HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-2008-001 Adoption StageORDINANCE NO.2()O8.OO1
ADOPTION STAGE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE DANIA BEACH COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
BY ADDING A PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT (PSFE),
AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE),
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT (ICE), AND THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (CIE) IN ORDER TO
INCORPORATE SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY
FLORIDA STATE STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 163.3184, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; FURTHER, PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I
WHEREAS, in 2005, the Florida Legislature adopted Senate Bill 360, which, in relevant
part, required all non-exempt local govemments and school boards to adopt the necessary
comprehensive plan amendments to establish public school concurrency; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statutes, the Department of Community Affairs created
a phased schedule for the adoption of public school concurrency, which provided that all non-
exempt local governments within Broward County must adopt the necessary comprehensive plan
amendments prior to February 1, 2008; and
WHEREAS, given that the City is not exempt from public school concurrency, City staff
recommends the adoption of the proposed amendments to the Future Land Use,
Intergovemmental Coordination, and Capital Improvemenls Elements, attached as Exhibits "A,"
"B", and "C" respectively, and the creation of the Public School Facilities Element, attached as
Exhibit "D," in the City of Dania Beach Comprehensive Plan (the "Comprehensive Plan") in
order to meet the state mandated requirements ofpublic school concurrency; and
WHEREAS, after an advertised public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Board, sitting
as the City's Local Planning Agency, reviewed the proposed amendments and recommended
approval to the City Commission; and
WHEREAS, after having received extensive input and participation by interested
members of the public and staff, and having considered the recommendation of the Planning and
Zoning Board, the City Commission transmitted the proposed amendments to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs, other units of local govemment and govemmental agencies
as required by law for their review after first reading ofthis Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs, other units of local
government and govemmental agencies as required by law have reviewed the proposed
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan attached to this Ordinance and submitted their
comments, if any, to the City Commission before second reading; and
WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance has been noticed in accordance with applicable law;
and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the proposed amendments are consistent
with Florida law and the Comprehensive Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That the preceding "Whereas" clauses are ratified and incorporated as a
record of the legislative intent ofthis Ordinance.
Section 2. That the City Commission amends and adopts Chapter 1 of the
Comprehensive Plan entitled "Future Land Use Element," as provided in Exhibit "A," in order to
meet the state mandated requirements of public school concurrency.
Section 3. That the City Commission amends and adopts Chapter 8 of the
Comprehensive Plan entitled "Intergovernmental Coordination Element," as provided in Exhibit
"B," in order to meet the state mandated requirements ofpublic school concurrency.
2 oRDINANCE #2008-001
Adoption Stage
ORDINANCE #2008-OO I
Adoption Stage
3
Section 4, That the City Commission amends and adopts Chapter 9 of the
Comprehensive Plan entitled "Capital Improvements Element," as provided in Exhibit "C," in
order to meet the state mandated requirements of public school concurrency.
Section 5. That the City Commission creates and adopts Chapter I I of the
Comprehensive Plan entitled "Public School Facilities Element," as provided in Exhibit "D," in
order to meet the state mandated requirements of public school concurrency.
Section 6. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances and all resolutions or parts of
resolutions in conflict with this Ordinance are repealed to the extent ofsuch conflict.
Section 7. That ifany section, clause, sentence or phrase of this Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions ofthis Ordinance.
Section 8. That this Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage by the
City Commission on second reading, except that the effective date of these plan amendments
approved by this Ordinance shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of
Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the plan amendments in compliance
in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. The
Department of Community Affairs' notice of intent to find the plan amendments in compliance
shall be deemed to be a final order if no timely petition challenging the plan amendments is filed.
PASSED on first reading on December 11,2007 (transmittal stage).
PASSED AND ADOPTED on second reading on April 8. 2008.
ALBERT C. JONES
MAYOR.COMMISSIO
ST:
LOUISE STILSON,
CITY CI,ERK
APPROVED AS TO F
BY:
TH
CITY A RNE
CORRECTNESS:
oB
Y
4 oRDINANCE #2008-001
Adoption Stage
Exhibit "A"
Ordinance #2008-001
City of Dania Beach
Chapter I
Future Land Use Element Text Amendment
Objective XV
Concurrencv management s,r-stems shall be established to effectively monitor and manage
new growth, in conformance with Florida's Comprehensive Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act, including Section 1633180 Florida Statutes (1999). (B.C.O.
#08.06.00)
Polic1 15.1
Dania Beach shall establish concurenc)' management s),stems to effectively manage nerv grou'th
and to ascertain u'hether necessarl' facilities identified u'ithin their local Capital Improvements
Elements are being constructed in accordance with the schedules in its local plan and to measue
the development capacit,"* of such facilities in a given area at a given time.
(8.C. #08.06.01)
Policy 15.2
Those facilities that are subject 1o the local concurency requirements include: traffic circulation.
recreational. drainage and flood protectiorL potable wateq solid waste and sanitary sewer
tacilities.auclpublic education.
(B.C.P. #08.06.02)
Objective XVI
f,ncourage the development and implementation of land use controls to increase the
protection and enhancement of beaches, rivers and marine resources identified on the
Natural Resources Map Series of the Dania Beach Land Use Plan Map Series. @.C.O.
#9.03.00)
Policy l6.l
Land development codes and regulations shall require the protection and,/or restoration of
beaches. particularly dunes and vegetation. through techniques such as conservation easemen6.
revegetation, elevated $alk-q a)'s, and clustering of developments. (B.C-P. #09.03.01)
Policy 16.2
Priority shall be given to water-dependent uses such as marinas and public access to waterways.
in decisions affecting waterfront property.
(B.C.P. #09.03.02)
H \Communitv Delelopmenr \\'ork Folder\School Etemenl and ILA\O-2008-0Ot Exhibit A - FI-U Texr Amendmenr (Schoot
Element) doc
Exhibit "A"
Ordinance #2008-001
Objective XXVIII
Coordinate future land uses uith the availabilitl of putrlic elementary and secondary
education facilities
Policy 28.1
The City shall determine the consistency of land use plan amendments with their Public
School Facilities Elements. The consistency finding shall address whether sufficient
capacitl, is available. or anticipated u,ithin the short or long-range planning horizon oitheir
Elements. to accommodate the projected student impact of proposed amendments. As
provided for u,ithin the Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facilities
Planning (ILA). the School Board of Broward County shall advise the City regarding the
projected student impact of amendments and the availability of capacity at inrpacted
schools.
Policy 28.2
The City shall not accept a building permit application, nor issue a building permit. for new
or additional residential units, unless the applicant presents evidence from Broward County
that the impact of the proposed development on public educational sites and facilities has
been mitigated by payment of school impact fees. based on the fee schedule and
accompan)'ing provisions of the Brou,ard County Land Development Code. Altemative
methods of mitigation for school impacts may only be approved via a recorded agreement
among the property ornner(s), Broward County, and/or the City and the School Board of
Bror.l'ard Countv.
Polic-v- 28.3
The City'. Broward County and the School Board ol Bro*-ard County shall coordinate
rhrough the processes and procedures identified in the ILA to ensure collaborative planning
and decision making on population projections and public school siting and to accornplish
coordination between the adopted local comprehensive plans and the School Board's
District Educational Facilities Plan.
Policl'28.4
The City, Bron'ard County and the School Board of Broward County shall explore and
evaluate opportunities for collocation and shared use of school lacilities and civic and
recreation facilities during their capital improvement plaruring processes and other
processes as provided for in the ILA.
Policy 28.5
The City, Broward County. and the School Board of Broward County will coordinate
through the procedures established in the ILA and the Broward County and local land use
planning process to ensure that proposed public school facility sites are consistent and
compatible with the land use categories and policies of their comprehensir.e plans and
enable a close integration bet*een existing and planned schools and surrounding land uses.
H \Communit-v Development work Folder\School Element and ILA\O-2008-001 Exnibir A - FLU 'fexl Amenalrnent fschootElemen, doc
Exhibit'oB"
Ordinance #2008-001
City of Dania Beach
Chapter 8
Intergovernmental Coordination Element Text Amendment
OBJECTIVE III
Continue current practices coordinating the provision of adequate consistent levels
of service as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan for public entities that have
operational and maintenance responsibilities for these facilities.
Poli 3.9
Pursuant to C anter 163.3177 &l F.S." the Cit ol Dania Beach. the Countv and the
School Board shall coordinate their planning and oemittinq Drocesses consistent $'ith the
procedure s cstablished within the Interlocal Asreement (ILA) as follows
Review- iurd update of the annual District Educational Facilities Plan
(DEFP) containir.rs the flnancialh' feasible schedule of capital
improvement lor school t'acilities needed to achieve and maintain the
adopted level of service stands in all Concunencv Service Areas.
3. Coordinate the Dreparation of the City and County projections lbr future
development with the School Board's school eruollment proiections to
ensure consistencv betrveen the Citv and Countv future land use olans and
the long term school plaqqinEMeqg!!
5. Coordinate rvith the School Board or.r the olandns. sitins. land acquisition.
permitting and development of new school facilities Io e4sutg lhe
availabilitv of public {acilitres.services and srounds. especiallv for
pur'poses of explorinq collocation opportunities
H:\Communiry f)evelopment work Folder\School Element ard ILA\O-2008-001 Exhibit B - ICE Text Amendment (School
2. Coordinate Citv and Count], land use pla:rning and L-erm,:illing_plqlq$qs
with the School Board's site selection and plarllag-Mqql!lLq-en$ug
future scl.rool facilities are consistent and cornpatible with land use
calegories and enable a close integration of betw-een existing and planr.red
school facilities and the sunoundine land uses.
,1. Coordinate with the School Board rhrough the Staff Workins Group and
Oversisht Committee regardins the preparation ol the Ci
aru-rual comprehensive plan updates and the Sc
ofthe I)EFP to ensure consistency betrveen the plans.
6. Revise City and County la:nd development codes and Scho
policies to establish a county-wide public school concurrency system.
Exhibit "C"
City of Dania Beach
Chapter 9
Capital Improvement Element
Text Amendment
The Cih of Dania Bcach. in collaboration $'ith the School Board and Brox,ard
futurg stu{94ts consistcnt with available financial rcsources and the adopted
Policl 6.2
The uniform. district-wide LOS shall be 1 I0%, of the Dermanent F ISH capacitv for
each oublic elementarv-middle and high school.
Policy 6.4
The School Board's DE,FP. as adopted and amended the School Board on Ausustb
l. 2007. is adonted elerence into the CIEtrvr
Ordinance #2008-001
Obiectir e VI
Countl, shall ensure that public school facilities are available for current and
Level of Sen'ice (LOS) standard.
Policy 6. I
Consistent with policies and procedures within tl.re Interlocal Asreement, the District
Educational Facilities Plan (DEF-P) shall contain a 5 vear financiall-r- feasible schedule
of capital improvements to address existing deilciencies and achieve and maintain the
adoplgd L,QS sllan{lard in all Concurrencl Service Areas. This financially feasible
schedule shall be updated on an annual basis and annually adopted into the Capital
Imprqyqlntnt ElqqaltlclE).
Policy 6.3
The adonted LOS shall be apnlied consistently bv the City of Dania Beach,Mi+a*aar.
Broward Countv and the School Board. district-wide to all schools of the same tvpe.
tl\:llllmunitv D€\,elopment Work Folder\School Elemenl and ILA\O,2008-00t Exhibjt C - CIE Te\r Amendnrenl (School
Elcnrentl.doc(;;\Sdige€*H,€nt6+€i++e6o*s\sg{egl..EtBM
EklB€rdgrePiJ€€
Exhibit ooD"
Ordinance #2008-00f
CHAPTER 11
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
OF THE
DANIA BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
N€v€ffib€r4007 April 2008
Community Development Department
City of Dania Beach
Public School Facilities Elemenl
SUPPORT DOCUMENT
Introduction ....
Concurrency Management System (CMS)
Collaborative Planning Process and Intergovernmental Coordination..
Level of Senice Standard Methodolog.v
Problems and Opporlunities for Existing and Future Schools..................
Need to Support Public Facilities for Existing and Future Schools..........
B. Data & Anall'sis..
l. Population and Housing Conditions ....
Population Gro*th in Broward County
School Age Population .....
Housing Characteristics. ...
Development Trends
2. Current Profile ofBrou'ard Countv Public Schools
Summary Profile of Public Schools in Bro*'ard County
Elementary Schools
Middle Schools .........
High Schools.............
1
1
-)
)
1
5
I
2
)
4
5
6
..........12
11
..t2
...........12
...13
...14
....16
15
16
27
3.+
.....17
Chaner Schools ......29
......32
3. Projected 5 Year (S/T) School Enrollment, Capacity, LOS & Improvements Costs........35
4. Projected 10 Year (L/T) School Enrollment, Capacity, LOS & Improvements Costs......29
5. Collocation of School Facilities.............39
Special Schools .........
Ancillary, Facilities....
6. Opportunities to Locate School to Sene as Community Focal Points...
7. Emergenc-v Shelters
8. Funding Sources for Capital Improvements ....
Goals. Objectives and Po Iicies....
..r+ I
..42
..43
C
City of Dania Beach Page l1-i Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
A. Overvie*'of School Facilities Planning ........ .. .. . . . . . . . . .. ... .. . . . . 1
Public School Facilities Element
A
B
C
D
E
F'
G
H
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
lnterlocal Agreement for Public School Facilities Planning (ILA)
Adopted 5 Year District Educational Facilities Plan (DEFP) (2007 -2012)
School Board of Broward County Educational Plant Survey (2001-2006)
2007 -2012 Level of Service (LOS) Plan
Existing Collocation Facilities
Potential Collocation Facilities
Table 1 1 : Current & Projected 5 Year (S/T) School Facilities (each school)
Florida Department of Education Letter
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Enrollment Projections........
Charter Schools Serving Elementary. Middle and High School Students
Population Broward County I 970-20 I 5 ...................
School Age Population Broward County 1970-2015
Housing Characteristics Broward County 1970-2005
Residential Building Permits Issued by Type 2005-2015
Summary Profile of School Capacity
Age of School Facility Buildin9s......................
Current Prolile - Broward County Elementary Schools 20061200712008
9A Current Profile - Broward Countv Middle Schools 3006/2007 /2008
9B Current Profile - Brou'ard County High Schools 2006/200112008 ....
I'-{GE
61
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
.13
10
14
..15
..15
..16
..17
...16
...25
..27
CitY ol' Dania []each Page l1 - ii Comprehensive Plan
Pu blic School Facilities Llement
NO
Public School I--acilities Elemcnt
10 Current Profile - Broward Count] Charter Schoots 20e6/2007/2008 ........................29
Current & Projected 5 Year (S/T) School Facilities (each school) ......... Attachment G
Current Profile - Broward County Special Schools 2€e6/200712008 ........................33
Ancillary Facility Inventory.3.1
11
l2
li
1.1
l5
Land Area Requirements
Estimated Revenue and Financing Sources.....
Estimated Appropriations
Estimated Expenditures - Debt Sen,ice / Capacity .........
LIST OF NIAPS
Existing Public Schools & Ancillarl Facilities - 2007 .......
Elementary, School LOS - 2007-2008
Middle School LOS - 2007-2008
Elemc-ntan School LOS - 201I-2012......
Middle School LOS - 201 l-2012...
High School LOS - 20I l-2012...........................
Existing Collocation and Shared Use Inventory
Potential Collocation and Shared Use Inventorv
Emergency Shelters
....37
Projected l0 Year (L/T) School Faciliries by Planning Area and District-Wide.......39
I 5A Anall sis of Planning Area / Seat Ar ailability' .41
List of Emergencl' Shelters -+3
.t-+
\o
..15
tt
tt
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
.....51
..19
52
53
5.1
10
...5 5
..56
City of Dania Beach Page lJ-iii Cornprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
16
17
18
19
Public School F-acilities Elemenl
A. Overview of School Facilities Planning
l. Introduction
Existing Interlocal Agreements bet*'een school boards and local govemments will
be updated and expanded to comply with the legislation.
Each local govemment is to adopt a Public School Facilities Element as part of its
comprehensive plan.
N,landates school concurrencl
Local govemments must update their lntergovemmental Coordinalion Element
and Capital Improvements Element to coordinate public school planning
o Procedures for comprehensive plan amendments
o Establish a process and uniform methodology for proportionate share mitigation.
Public School Facilities Element Requirements
The law requires that local governments adopt a public school facility element as a part
of their comprehensive plans to establish a framework for the planning of public schools.
(s. 163.3177(12), F.S.). Local governments were granted approximately three years to
adopt a public school facilities element. As directed by the legislation, the Florida
Department of Community Affairs has established a phased schedule for adoption of the
elements with each local govemment adopting no later than December 1, 2008. This
schedule established due dates which are staggered throughout the course of the 2008
calendar year. Broward County is required to adopt it no later than February 1, 2008. In
addition, the Legislature established enforcement mechanisms should a local govemment
and school district fail to adopt a public school concurency program.
The legislation prescribed the lollowing minimum content requiremenls for goals,
objectives. and policies:
o procedure of annual update process;o procedure for school site selectioni
a
Ciq, of Dania Beach Pagcll-l Comprehensive Plan
Public Sshool Facilities Element
ST:PPORT DOCUMENT
Over the past decade the Florida Legislature has progressively strengthened the ties
between school planning and general land use and comprehensive planning through
amendments to Chapters 163 and 1013. Florida Statutes. The 2005 Legislature mandated
that the availability ol public schools be nrade a prerequisite lor lhe approval of
residential construction and direcled a closer inlegration of planning lor school capacitl,
*ith comprehensive planning. Under the provisions adopted u'ith Senate Bill 360:
Public School Faciliries Element
o procedure for school permitting:
. provision of infrastructure necessary to support proposed schools;
. provision for collocalion ofother public facilities in proximity to public schoolsl
o pror,ision for location of schools proximate to residential areas and to complement
patlems of development;
. measures to ensure compatibility of school sites and surrounding land uses; and
o coordination u'ith adjacent local govemments and the school district on
emergenc-v preparedness issues.
In addition. the element is to include one or more future conditions maps which generally'
depictl
the anticipated location of educational and ancillary plants anticipated or,er the
fr.r'e-1ear and long-term planning period.
depict the anticipated location of educational and ancillary plants. including the
general location of improvements to existing schools or new schools anticipated
oYer the s-year or long-term planning period: and
out of necessit.v. the maps nill be general for the longterm planning period and
more specific tbr the 5-year period. Maps indicating general locations of future
schools or school improvements may not prescribe a land use on a pzrticular
parcel of land.
The data and anal-vsis portion of the Public School Facilities Element must address
. how level-of-service standards q'ill be achieved and rnaintained;o the interlocal agreement adopted pursuant to s. 163.31777 and the 5-year school
district facilities work program adopted pursuant to s. 1013.3 5:o the educational plant suney prepared pursuant to s. 1013.31 and an existing
educational and ancillary plant map or map series;
o projected future population and associated demographics. including development
pattems -vear by year for the upcoming 5-year and long-term planning periods:
andr Anticipated educational and ancillary plants with land area requirements.. information on existing development and development anticipated for the next 5
years and the long-term planning period;. an analysis of problems and opportunities for existing schools and schools
anticipated in the future;. an analysis of opportunities to collocate future schools rvith other public facilities
such as parks, Iibraries, and community centers;. an analysis of the need for supporting public facilities for existing and future
schoolsl. an analysis ofopportunities to locate schools to serve as community focal points
Citv of Dania Beach Pagell-2 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Public School Facilities Element
2. Concurrenc_v Manaqement Svstem (CMS)
The concunencl' management system for Broward Countl,'is an intergovemmental effort
that is grounded in the provisions of the Brou'ard County Charter. u'hich provide lor
countl-wide planning processes implemented through the County's Land Development
Code. The public school lacility Concurrency Management System operates according to
the state mandated requirements (Section 163.31777 F.S. and 163.3180 F.S.) for the
implementation of school concunency and the adopted School Board's lnterlocal
Agreenrent for Public School Facilitl' Planning (lnterlocal Agreement). These require
Brorvard Countl. the School Board and non-exempt municipalities to ensure that the
adopted Lelel of Ser','ice Standard (LOS) to be achie'r'ed and maintained for each school
tlpe and Concurrency Service Area (CSA).
Unlike existing concurency senices (roads, sanitary seu'er. solid u'aste. drainage.
potable \\ater, recreation and mass transit) w-hich are the responsibility of local
govemments. the School Board. by constitutional mandate, has the responsibility of
providing educational lacilities to meet the needs of current and future students as
represented in the School Board's adopted Five Year District Educational Facilities PIan
(DEFP). The local governments. therefore" do not have control ofthe funding sources or
rhe allocation of tunds for new or renovated schools which would add student capacity.
Horvever, since the School Board isn't emporvered to implement a Concurrency
Management System on its own, it must rely upon the local govemments to do so lhrough
their Land Developr.nent Regulations.
The Broward County Land Development Code contains the County's Concurrencl
Management S1'stem. The Code requires plat approval of all parcels of land prior to
receiving a Development Order. Plat approval applies to land u.ithin the municipal
boundaries as uell as that in the unincorporated areas. Per State requirements. the point
olrevierv fbr Pubtic School Concurrency is at plat or site plan (or functional equivalent).
When a development application is revieu,ed for school concurrency. it must be
determined if the development is exempted or vested (as per Section 8.11 of the
Interlocal Agreement) or has been issued a School Capacity Availability Determination
Lefter (SCAD) by the School Board indicating that adequate school capacity exists. Ifso.
it can be accepted bv the County for further processing.
If the development application is not exempted or vested. it is subject to school
concurrency and the applicant must submit a Public School Impact Application (PSIA) to
the applicable local govemment for revieq' by the School District according to the
provisions and processes outlined in Section 8.13 ofthe Interlocal Agreement.
The collaboralive planning process has greatly increased with the passage of the 2005
Infrastructure and Planning Act (SB 360) which mandated the adoption of a Broward
Comprehensive Plan
Pu hlic School Facilities Elernerrt
Ciq, of Dania Beach
3. Collaborative Plannine Process & Intereovernmental Coordination
Page l1 - 3
Public School Facilities Element
County Public School Facility Element and implementation ofpublic school concurrency
by February l, 2008.
Since the beginning of 2006. School Board staff has been w'orking collaboratively u'ith
the County and municipalities through the School Board's Staff Working Group and
Oversight Committee to form consensus on the amendments to the Interlocal Agreement
and the preparation of a model Public School Facilities Element. Several Staff Working
Group Subcommittees were also established to deal u'ith issues including collocation of
school facilities, land use changes and developing urban school standards. These
committees continue to meet on a regular basis in order to implement the state mandated
requirements to coordinate and collaborate on updates to the District Educational
Financialll Feasible Plan (DEFP). Concurrency Senice Areas (CSAs) and amendments
to the Comprehensive Plans ol the County and non-exempt municipalities for the
inrplementation of public school concurrenc-n".
4. Level of Senice Standard Methodologv
The level of service standard is based upon the capacity of the school facility. *,hich is
the number of pupils to be served by the facility. The level of service is expressed as the
percentage (ratio) of student effollment to the student capacity of the school. The level
of service is standard and is expressed in terms of Florida Inventory of School Houses
(FISH) capacity. FISH capacity is determined by Florida Departmenl of Education
guidelines and represents a measure of the physical capacity of the facility itselfl FISti
capacity includes satisfactory student stalions in permanent classrooms. The level of
service standard is uniformly set at 110 percent for each school type (elemen1ar1. middle.
high and special purpose schools) throughout Broward County's School District.
The relationship of enrollment to capacity, for individual schools and for concurrency
service areas, is derived directly from the five-year schedule of capital improvements that
incorporates the Five-Year District Educational Facilities Work Program adopted
annually by the School Board. The school capacity and level of senice analysis is
assigned in a capacity/enrollment and level of senice table. This table provides a lear-
by-year projection of capacily. enrollment, levels of sen'ice and available capacity,
illustrating surpluses and deficiencies. based on the financially feasible capital program
adopted b1 the school district.
Student enrollment is projected annually based on the specific function of the educational
facility and the characteristics of the school attendance areq historical trends. the current
and projected pace ofdevelopment and the potential of vacant lands.
Other f-actors such as students attending schools outside their assigned attendance areas
due to reassignments, magnet programs, charter schools and other educational choices are
factored into the methodology for enrollment projections and lbr allocating school
capacity.
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Eler.nent
City of Dania Beach Page l1-4
Public School Facilities Elen, ent
School enrollments exceeding the available capacity resulting in a level of service greater
than 110% in the first fiscal year achieve the level of service standard by the fifth year
due to planned capital improvements not yet available until the final year.
5. Problems and Opportunities for Existins and Future Schools
Land Availability A major issue facing the School Board is land availability. Existing
schools recovering from the last thirty 1'ears of rapid grorth have seen the school sites
become crowded n'ith classroom additions and relocatables. Additions/relocatables har,e
taken over plavfields. pla.vgrounds. green space, and parking areas. The demand for
larger u'ater retention areas and more parking facilities has also reduced the useable area
lbr the educational program. In addition. with current legislation den.randing more
accountability in the area of physical education schools face the dilemma of needing
playiield areas to meet neu' Sunshine Standards for Education.
Due to this land crisis. the School Board is developing strategies to reduce the site size
requirement to build new schools and expand an already aggressive collocation nrodel.
By designing a tighter building footprint. sharing parking and playfields, as well as
exploring the use of parking garages verse surface parking, this will be possible. In
addition. as a standard practice. the School District tries to purchase school sites adjacent
to parks and recreation areas.
Construction Costs & Revenue Sources Another major issue is the sbrinking of capital
revenue and the rising cost of construction. The School Board annually tackles the tough
task of balancing the needs for capacity additions versus capacity maintenance at the
existing schools. In a district that must maintain an estimated 34 million square feet of
space the need is great to fund the lit'e c1'cle replacement of major infrastructure systems
such as roofing, air conditioning, plumbing. and electrical distribution. The School
Board has the challenge to not only add capaoity but to maintain the existing capacity and
its infrastructure.
Declinine Emollment Proiections Declining enrollment has also offered some unique
challenges to the district. First and foremost the decline is not uniform in nature as looal
communities go though their aging cycle at different rates. The district is still
experiencing gro$th in certain areas of the county that has stressed the educational
t-acility capacities in that area. Planning based on sound enrollment projections has
proven to be a crucial component especially in times offinancial
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Ciry' of Dania Beach Page ll -5
Student enrollment projections are designated geographically' using local developnrent
trend data and the school district student enrollment data. School-b.v-school enrollmenl
projections bl concurrencl service areas are applied. General locations of future public
schools to be constructed ilithin the districl over fir'e vears are applied Io concurrencv
senice areas relatir,e to the location serving the anticipated capacity deficit. ln addition.
School Board Policy 5000 allows a variety ol options to reduce or avoid the need for
additional permanent student stations including. but not limited to: redistricting.
reassignment. expanded capacity utilization (e.g. year round schools). and other options.
Public School Facilities Element
Source: School Board ofBroward County,2007
The District is projected to decrease by 4*52l.l41 total pre-kindergarten through twelfth
grade students, including those in centers and charter schools, by the 2011-2012 school
year. Enrollment in charter schools is +4J4e17 .122 this year, with six additional charter
schools anticipated in 20O7-30081h9_4g1.Ly9sI Several hundred additional
public school students *,ill be enrolled in charter schools bv tlrc 2011-2012 school vear.
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
School l'r'pe
2006-200'7
20th Dav
Enrollment
2007-2008
-lDar
20$6-21Nt7
,am Du'
Enrollment
20tt-2012
Proiected
20lt-2012
Increase over
over 2007-
200t1 20'h Dar
Pre-
Kindergarten
3.876 166 3.878 (16.+)
(K-5)
( 1.960)106.7 56 (621 )
N{iddle 5 5.955 s 3.743 (2.212\54.362 619
Hieh 72.63 3 71.378 (1.255)70.665 (713)
Centers 4.71 5 5.213 +.785 (.+5 8 )
Charters 1 6.1 00 17.122 1.022 17.318 r96.fOTAL 262.6t6 258.e05 (3.71 I )257.764 ( 1.141 )
tjt$eo+++oe
2e06-2007
Seth--Day
E+rellmen{
2e0ffi
+reiee+ea
Seheelrlea+
200ffi
I+ere*se
eFer
:gtt-S&y
?A1+4+2l@
S€h€ot
Y€&r
20+1-30#t
I*erease-o+er
2e*+ay
Pr€-
Xjid€€a"en
3-876 3++8
4Q42
3+78 3
E+€fi€ntary
&-:f
+e9i3+]+7$60 @ l€gs6 €j8!
MiCdle 5#546r+s@ tH93)+@ 12#7L+rg €l{)7Q565 e968)(*.r5 q+5 €*s ?0 1.785
k€fs 1400 +106 s06 +H Hr*
1'O't,\t 262.514 2s9259 (#s?-\ <1 1/: 1 e$sa
Cit\ of Dania Beach Page ll -6
The updated five-year student enrollment projections provide a basis for determining
capital needs. Table I belou,. summarizes the p+qiee+e+actual enrollment. by lerel. for
the 2007-2008 and the ppjeqlqlprue,Umcnl-fot2O1 1-2012 school -vears. The enrollment
projections are compared to the 20'h day figures for the current (29062007-?0971008)
school 1'ear. As indicated in the table. a decrease of i.3573.711 students +s
prqiee+edoccurred between 2 006-2007 and f€F2007-200 8.
Table 1: Summan, of Enrollmcnt Proiections
I
Elementarv 109.337
I
I
I
14
Seuree: @
2007-2008
Increase over
Enrollment I
-L
-t0:12
I
107.377
528
Public School Facilities Elemenl
The increase in charter school enrollment uill reduce the number of potential students
that u,ill need to be housed in existing or neu' District facilities. lf the charter school
trend does not continue, then these projected students will impacl the capital needs of
other public schools in the District. Recent trends and current binh data indicate that
elementary (pre-kindergarten through grade 5) enrollment in District owned facilities will
decrease over the next five 1'ears by 2fl9135 students. Middle school enrollment in
District ouned facilities is projected to deerease b,vshow a slight increase ol !593619
students and high school enrollment u'ill decrease b1'!968713 students. 81- the end ol
the fir'e-1ear period, Broward Countl School District's p1qice1gd enrollment rvill total
sliehtl!' over 25 7,5e&700 students.
Class Size Reductior.r Requirements I Class size reduction is another major issue that the
district is focusing much of its financial and human resources on to achieve the
constitutional amendment goal. In November 2002, Florida voters approved the Class
Size Reduction Amendment. Class Size Average was set at l8 students for Grades Pk-3,
22 students for Grades 4-8, and 25 students for Grades 9-12 and uas designed to be
implemented in three phases. For fiscal lears:
o 2003-04 through 2005-06, class size average \vas set at lhe district level:
o 2006-07 and 2007-08, class size average \ ''as set at the school level; ando 2008-09 and thereafter, class size average will be calculated at the individual
classroom level.
Districts not in compliance u.ith class size targets during the October student membership
sun'e.v transfer undistributed funds proportionate to the amount ofclass size reduction not
accomplished from the district's class size reduction operating categorical to an approved
fixed capital outlay appropriation for class size reduction in the affected district. The
amount of tunds transferred would be the lesser of the amount verified or the
undistributed balance ofthe district's class size reduction operating categorical. Hou,ever,
if there was evidence indicating that a district had been unable to meet class size
reduction requirements, despite appropriate effort to do so, the Commissioner ol
Education could recommend that the Legislative Budget Commission approve an
altematir,e amount of funds to be transferred from the district's class size reduction
operating categorieal to its approved fixed capital outlay account lor class size reduction.
Stratesv 1br Class Size Reduction Impacts
To ensure that BCPS will accurately address the period-by-period Class Size Reduction
Comprehensive Plan
PLrblic School Facilities Element
City of Dania Beach Pagell-7
Consequences tbr not meeting Class Size 'fargets
Further. FDOE enforcement authority could develop a constitutional compliance plan for
non-compliant districts. The constitutional compliance plan included, but was not limited
to. the redrawing of school attendance zones to maximize use of facilities while
minimizing the additional use of transportation, unless the district came into compliance
based upon the February student membership sun,ey.
Public School Facilities Element
Amendment implementation in 2008-09. the Superintendent has directed that a Class Size
Reduction Action Committee (CSRAC) be established. The committee is comprised of
Principals and District Administrative staff from Facilities. Budget, Cuniculum, and
Instructional Staffing. The CSRAC has met to prepare the groundn'ork for period-b,v-
period implementation of Class Size Reduction legislation. The following tasks have
been undertaken:
Determine District resources (Budget, Personnel Staffing, Facilities, Boundaries.
ETS system modifications) negessary for the period-by-period implementation of
the 2008-2009 class size reduction requirements.
I\4odifu the monitoring tool to more accurately align District calculations to
FDOE average class size calculations.
Develop a new method ol forecasting leacher/classroom needs that takes into
account classroom scheduling and space utilization considerations. Additional
factors that have been integrated in this school-by-school analysis include: teacher
hiring, programs, scheduling, and classroom student-station utilization. This
analysis will:
o Take into consideration the curent plans for new classroom additions to
schools, and make recommendations to facilitate each school's
implementation ol the 2008-2009 period-by-period class size reduction
requirements.
o Consider the tlve-year projection lbr each school, and make personnel
staffing and facility recommendations.
o Determine additional lhnding required for period-by-period
implementation ofthe 2008-2009 class size reduction requirements.
o Five schools are scheduled for early full class size implementation and
will provide information on challenges the district may face in 2008-09
u,hen all schools will be mandated for period-by-period full class size.
The five schools scheduled for early full class size implementation
include: Mirror Lake Elementary, Westglades Middle, Falcon Cove
Middle, Monarch High, and Hallandale High Schools.
Broward County Schools has considered options to optimize the usage of educational
facilities rvithin the District. Each 1'ear the District undergoes an extensive boundary
process and considers the effectiveness of programs that are being utiiized as an
altematir e to addirg capacitl .
Boundary Process: Each year the District undergoes a borurdary process that considers
the demographic changes in student populations, available and future facility capacitl,
programming components, as well as the diversity at each school. As part of the amual
boundary process the District relies on input from the communities and stakeholders.
Through the boundary process, every efforl is made to maintain equal educational
opportunities.
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
a
a
City of Dania Beach Page1l-8
Options for Reducins Capacitv
Public School Facilities Element
Multi-track Scheduling: Broward Countl' Schools has utilized multi-track schedules fbr
an elementarv school successfully. In that school. this multi-track schedule
accommodated up to 150% of the school's FISH capacity in the 2005-06 school 1-'ear.
The community u,as content u,ith the multi-track scheduling and has shou'n increases in
studenl achievemenl. attendance and less discipline situations. The District has continued
to utilize this method to increase the utilization of schools.
Grade Level Organization: Various grade level configurations are examined to reduce
capacitl. Presently \\'e have one primary. school u'ith grade levels of
K-3. Some elementar.v schools are utilizing off campus annexes as temporary facilities
vvhile permanent capacitl is being built. At one high school an off campus ninth grade
center has been implemented.
Block Scheduling: Brou'ard County Schools have been in the forefront of implementing
and evaluating block scheduling. Brou'ard County Schools utilize block schedules at
seleral schools.
High School Options: Dual enrollment gives high school juniors and seniors the
opportunity to take college level courses and receive credits towards high school
graduation. If a student qualihes for this it can free up capacity u.hile benefiting student
achievement. The early admissions and 18 credit diploma option allows for high school
students to apply for early graduation. which u,ill also relieve enrollment at our high
schools.
Other Alternatives: Bro*,ard County Schools has also been using creative altemative
n.rethods to assist in distributing the student population by allowing parents and students
the choice ofschool assignment. Some examples are:
Magnet Schools: The District offers magnet programs in several locations largely
in schools where space is available. These programs offer a thematic educational
programi u,hich entices students/parents to choose a school and fill available
seats. They have been a popular choice altemative option.
.-Charler Schools: The District has led the state in the number of students attending
charter schools. During the 1999-00 school year 3,873 students attended charter
schools. Since that time charter school enrollment has increased an additional
W713.249 students, enrolling a total of 17,122 +6*eg-students during the
2ee62007-0+-08 school year.
Cirv- of Dania Beach Page 1l -9 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
?007 08 sehool year i€e-
Public School Facilities Element
Table 2: Charter Schools Sen ing Elementan., Nliddle and High School Students
Charters Sen'ing High School
Students:
Charters Sen'ing Elementary
School Students
Charters Sen'ing 1\'liddle
School Students;
Advantage Academy Broward
(New)
Ben Camla Charter (New)
Broward Community Charter
Broward Commurity Charter
West Central Charter School
Chancellor at North Lauderdale
Elementarl'
Chancellor at Weston
Charter Institute Training Center
Charter Institute Training Center
Annex
Charter School of Excellence
Dayspring Elementary Charter
(Neu ) Eagles Nest Excelsior
Charter of Broward Florida
Intercultural
Hollywood Academy
Kidz Choice Charter
North Brou,ard Academl' of
Excellence
Paragon Elementary
City of Pembroke Pines Charter
Elementary - Central Campus
City of Pembroke Pines Charter
Elementary - East Campus
City of Pembroke Pines - Forman
Campus
City of Pembroke Pines Charter
Elementary - West Campus
Somerset Academy
Somerset Academy Davie
Somerset at Miramar
Somerset Neighborhood
Sunrise Community Charter
Sunshine Academl. Davie West
Sunshine Elementary Charter
Susy Daniels
Ben Gamla Charter (New)
Broward Community Charter
Chancellor at North
Lauderdale Middle
City ol Coral Springs Charter
Discovery Middle Charter
(Neu)
Downto$rr Academy of
Technology & Arts
Eagle Academy
Eagles Nest
Florida Intercultural (New)
Hollyr,vood Academy
Intemational School of
Broward Q.{ew)
North Broward Academy of
Excellence
Paragon Academy
City of Pembroke Pines
Charter Middle - Central
Campus
City of Pembroke Pines -
Forman Campus
City of Pembroke Pines
Charter Middle - West Campus
Pompano Charter
Somerset Academy Middle
Somerset at Miramar
Smart School Middle
Sunshine Academy
Touchdorms4life
City of Coral Springs Charter
lntemational School of Broward
(New) Life Skills North
Lauderdale Academy
Parkway Academy
City of Pembroke Pines Charter
High
Smart School Institute
Somerset Academ,v High
Somerset Consen,atorv
Sourcc: School Board ofBroward Clounty,2007
Citl of Dania Beach Pase l l - l0 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
I
I
I
I
I
Public School Facilities Element
6. Need to Support Public Facilities tbr Existing and Future School!
Puhlic & Prir ate Pannerships The Brouard Coun* Public Schools District understands
horv essential community involvement is to the success of its students. Developing
partnerships nith private as rvell as public entities helps to insure that the entire
community becomes a pa( of and enlances the educational process for both K-l2 and
adult students. The school system has identified community involvement as one of the
key areas within the school system's strategic plan. The districl believes that community
involr,ement is vital to student achievement.
The District-s has more than 45.400 volunteers and 2.350 school level partners that
support Bron'ard Schools. @The District has launched the
Speakers Bureau offering businesses. community groups and organizations the
opportunit-v to have education experts speak about Bro'*'ard County Public Schools. The
Speaker's Bureau is a component of the District's Strategic Communications Plan. It is
designed to facilitate an understanding of the purpose. structures and effectiveness of
Brou'ard County Public Schools. This outreach project will increase the dissemination of
positive information about the District and enhance relations with the community. The
Speakers Bureau lakes the dissemination of information to a personal level that allows
discussion and encourages community input. The district also coordinates educational
programs vnith the Museum ol Discovery and Science, the Broward County Library
System, as rvell as Brou'ard County and local parks and recreation departments.
Student Enrichment in the Arts (SEAS) The Student Eruichment in the Arts (SEAS)
program rvas formed from collaboration bet*een Brouard Countl'Public Schools and the
Bro*'ard Center for the Perfbrming Arts in March 1990. According to the partnership. the
school s,vstem has a forty-year rent-free lease, uhich includes exclusive use of the
Brorvard Center Amaturo Theater during the day throughout the school year. The SEAS
program offers a different style of leaming by integrating theatrical perflormances. such
as music, dance and drama into the students' education. Since inception ol the program,
over '1.7 million students have attended. The Broward County Public School system and
the Broward Center for the Performing Arts continue to be on the cutting edge of
education. To complement SEAS, the Reading Residency program u.as designed to
improve reading and verbal understanding for economically disadvantaged students.
7. Analvsis of Infrastructure Needs for Exisling and Proposed School Facilities (Rule 9J-
5.025(2X f). F.-\.c).
Cir," of Dania Reach Page ll - ll Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Broward County currentlv has 283 public school facilities. includine elementarv. middle"
hieh. charter and special schools. There are 22 addilional school facilities which are
planned to open within the next five years. Due to the fact that Broward County is
predominatelv built out. the major infrastructure. including: roads. drainase. sanitarv
sewer and potable water facilities are available to suppofi existir.re and propqlqllqheq
lacilities.
Public School Facilities Element
One area which needs attention hou'ever, is pedestrian infrastructure The Countv has
some areas u'here sideu,alks and unobslructed access to schools can be imnroved. To
address this. Brou,ard Clountv promotes safe routes 10 schools through the Brorvard
Countv MPO 2030 Lons Ranse Transportation Plan A soal to "ensure and where
possible enhance safetv and securitv" in transoortation proiects near schools is intended
to reduce hazards bv providing the necessary infraslucture for pedestrians within a 2
mile radius ol schools deemed "hazardous" for school children. In furtherin fiis !,oall,
the 2030 Plan proposes sideu,alk infrastructure improvements in areas r.r'hich are deemed
hazardous and/or enhance the s and securitv of oedestrians.
In addition. during the development revierv and site selection orocess of anv orooosed
school all infrastructure needs are taken into consideration. These rocedures and
processes are outlined in Sections V and VI of the ILA The School Board also reouires
that all ma ans10 remodelir.i lacernents ects exceedor ex and/or
$1.000.000) so throush a N4aster Planning process. This process. n'hich involves public
input. must evaluate infrastructure issues such as site circulation- oarkins- retention areas
and ublic utili locations.
1. Population and Housins Conditions
Population Grov;th in Broward Coun6;
As displayed in Table 3 below, Bron'ard County has experienced significant population
grolrth since 1970. In 1970 Broward County had a population of620,100 and in 2005 the
population was 1,765,855. a gron-th of almost 285%. Though the County is approaching
"build-out", expectations are that gro\r1h will continue. The future pace of grou'th n'ill
be less than in past y,ears, both in terms of percentage and in absolute growth as Brou.ard
makes the transition from large tracts of "Greenfield" development to "redevelopment''.
At the same time the demographics of the population rvill continue to change. A larger
percentage of gronth will come as result of in-migration from abroad. Generally,
migrants are younger and less likely to have a family. The "Median Age" and "ok 65 or
over" columns are indicators of this change. Brou'ard's median age increased as it
became home to larger numbers oi retirees during the 1970's and early 1980's. Since
that time, the median age decreased and is expected to continue to do so. The population
ages 65 or greater peaked in the early 1980's vvith 22Yo; bttt, as intemational migration to
Broward increases that percentage drops significanlly to l4ok in 2005. At 13% of the
total in 2010, it approaches its lowest level since 1960, before the migration of the
relirees.
Cornprehensive PIan
Ptrblic School tacilities Llement
City of Dania Beach Page 1l - 12
B. Data and Analysis
Public School Facilities Element
Year Total Preceding
Average
Change
Years'
Annual
Median
Age
"h 18 or
Under
Percent Population
t 970 620.100 8.6%28.61 5 3 8.7 29%18%
198{)l .01 8.257 6.4o/o 39.81 6 3 8.7 ) l0l 27%
1990 I .255,531 23%)-t, 1) 7 3 7.8 21o/o
2000 1.623.018 2.9%36.719 i 7.8 24%t6%
2005 1.765,855 0.9%14,284 36.5 26%11%
20r 0 1.905.271 0.8%13.912 36.0 260h t3%
20r5 2.038"381 0.7%13,3 I I 3 5.8 26%t1%
Note: Populations for years 2005, 2010, and 201 5 are taken from the
Broward County Population Forecasting ]t4odel, 2005
Table 3: Population Brorr ard Coun$ 1970-2015
oh 65 or
over
As uith population grorth in general. Brouard's school age population has experienced
considerable gro\\th since 1970. In some \\'a)'s it reflects the overall demographics ofthe
population grouth. The influx of retirees through the early 1980's caused a drop in the
Kindergarten through 12th Grade population to decrease by more than 5% of the total.
The decline continued into 1990; but. by 2000 the K-12 population's percentage olthe
total increased. As the population grows larger the K-12 population is expected 1o
stabilize at around 19ok of the total population through 2015. By 2015, the school age
population (elementary through high school) will have groun by 30%. Most of the
growth rvill occur in the elementary and middle school age groups as the younger in-
mi grating population begins establishing famities.
The Higher Education-age group grows more rapidly in the short-term and by 2015 is
nearly 70Yo larger. More than anlthing, this large growth reflects a lower than average
2000 count ofpopulation for this age group in conjunction *'ith the younger, international
migration. According to the American Community Sune-v for 2005. this is happening in
Broward County (though to a lesser degree than displayed by the Broward County
Population Forecasting Model); a change that is consistent u'ith neighboring counties and
with the State of Florida as a whole.
Cornprehensil'e Plan
Public School Facilities Elernent
C itr o1' Dania Bcach Page I I - 13
I
Sc hool,4se P ooularion
Public School Facilities Element
Table .l: School Age Population Broward Countr 1970-2015
Ho us i np C hctr a ct e r i s I i c s
While Brouard's housing inventory once \,as dominated by the single-family. detached
homet that no longer is the case. The housing industry responded to the influx of retirees
during the 1970's and 1980's by building large numbers of multi-family condominiums
and apartments. Between 1970 and 1990. single family homes grerv by nearly 88.000.
During that same tiine period. multi-family homes grerv by 264,000 units (averaging
13,000 per year). Expansion in the southwest and northwest portions of Broward brought
about an increased emphasis on single-family honies. They increased by nearly as much
during the decade of the 1990's as they did for the twenty years prior. Still, there are
330% more multi-family units than single-family.
Despite the changes in housing unit t)?e, the percentage of owner-occupied units remains
relatively stable a! between 68% and 72.8%. As more multi-family homes are built, the
tendency has been for the percentage olrenter to increase; but, only slightly.
Reported vacancy rates are influenced primarily by the number of seasonally-occupied
units and magnitude of current residential construction. Because Broward has been a
destination for many seasonal residents and these units have been counted as vacant
regardless ofthe actual status, the vacancy rate is higher in Brou,ard than is traditionally
thought of as acceptable. Also keeping the vacancy rate high is the U.S. Bureau of the
Census practice of counting incomplete homes as vacant. At times of elevated building
activity with significant numbers of units nearing completion, the Bureau may count
them as vacant even though they are not ),et ready for occupation. Both these influences
on vacancy rates are expected decrease: costs of maintaining seasonal units are beyond
what many could previously afford and future residential construclion will seldom reach
the level ofactivity experienced during the previous decades.
Page 11- 1,1 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Elenrent
K-12 Ilieher Ed.Total K.12 Higher Ed.
t910 I 4l .289 43.859 22.8%7.1%29.9%
1980 17 5.546 86"963 262,509 17.2%8.5%25.8%
1990 r 90.563 89.584 280.147 15.1%7.1%223%
2000 298,243 99.026 tq7 ?6q 18.4o/o 6.1%24.5%
2005 329.696 139,243 468,939 18.7%'79%26.6%
2010 361,601 t58,241 519.851 19.0%8.3%27.3%
20r5 392,304 166.171 55R 775 19.2%8.2%
Citv of Dania Beach
Year rulation
Total
1 85. 1.+8 I
Source: U-S. Bureau ofthe Census, Decennial Ceflsus for years 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000
Broward Count) Population Forecasting Model 1br years 2005,2010 and 2015
Noter All populations are for Apiil 1.
K-12 is t}le population ages 5 through 18, Higher Educat,on population consists of l9 through 24
Public School Facilities Elenrent
Table 5: Housins Characteristics Brotard Counn' 1970-2005
Single
Family
0wner
Occupied
1970 25 3.3l5 9.861 l6l.e62 loo.oor I l].r",0 72.8o/o
1980 177.168 202.898 42.5% I ZSS.SSZ 15.583 299.730 117 .787 12.6%7 | .8o/o
1990 628,660 236.321 I 37.6%358.665 3 -1.67.+359.570 15.90h 68.0%
2000 741.043 101 15 7 40.9%.109.756 27,930 199.695 11 .70A 69.5%
2005 790,308 329.1,12 -+ 1 .69.',",13 6. i l3 2.+,853 481.r33 206, i 98 13.00 7 0.00h
Source: 2005 Americar Communit_v Survey, U.S. Bureau ofthe Census
All other years L'.S. Bureau ofthe Census, Decennial Census
Derelopnenl Trends
As Brorvard County approaches "build-out" while still feeling the pressure of population
growth; new residential construction will be predominantly multi-family. Table 6 on the
following page depicts forecasted Certificates of Occupancy, prepared by applying
housing unit gro\4th rates to municipally-provided data on unit type. shou,s that
approximatel1 90% of duelling unit growth will be multi-family. While the actual
numbers u'ill der,iate from this. the general trend w'ill apply. Most new units u,i1l be in
the form ol "redevelopment": attempting to maximize the number of households
accommodated and. at the same time. attempting to rninimize the costs of construction.
Table 6: Residential Building Permits Issued bv Type 2005-2015
429
Year,
Beginning
April lst
Residential Certificates of Occupancy
Single Family Multi-Family Total Change from
previous year
2005 1,137 3,568 4,705 N/A
2006 t,646 4,658 6.30.{1599
2001 685 s.865 6 550 246
2008 575 I s.stc 6.5,+9 (l)
2009 59.+I e ,ozt 6.621 72
5.91 8 6.31i (308)
201 1 256 6.046 6.302 (11)
2012 J+J 6.388 6.731
2013 -!l o 6,059 6.38s (346)
2014 335 6.226 6,561 176
201 5 321 6.298 (263 )
Total 6.61 3 62.706 69.3 l9
Source: Broward CounrY.. Planning Servicc Division, ?007
Citv of Dania Beach Page 11- 15 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Elernent
Year Total
Units
.o/o'.
Single
Family
Multi-
Family Other Renter
Occupied Vacant
"/o
Owner
0ccupied
149.447 59.0o/o I gq.Otl
168.872
,15.+.750
2010
I
395
5.977
Public School Facilities Element
Summarv Prolile of PubJic Schools in Broward (.ounty-
The numbers of school buildings. student stations and classrooms are reflected in Table
7. The majoritl' of buildings and student stations are utilized for elementary students,
44oh and 407o respectivelv as compared to the total for the School District. Middle
Schools have the highest level of relocatable stalions (10.468) and high schools have the
highest level of relocatabe classrooms (704). As noted in Table 8, most of the school
facility buildings were constructed in the last 10 years. Map 1 depicts the locations of all
Public Schools and ancillary locations in Broward County.
Table 7: Summan Profile of School CaDacitl'
School
Tvpe
Permanent
Buildings
Relocatable
Buildings
Permanent
Stations
Relocatable
Stations
Permanent
Classrooms
Relocatable
Classmoms
Permanent
Net Sq. Ft.
Relocatable
Net Sq. Ft.
Elernentan I ,182 -196 110,664 8,897 6.517 104 1 4,257 .07 4 430.090
s7 00s r 0.468 2.526 7 ,061,352 504,333High I tv 150 '7 5.614 7.900 2.964 5 3,1 9.196.602
t0l 3.703 1.65.1 t63 95 8 9.10 8
)18.799 0 801 l8 140,7562 15.900
1.578 266.715 28.91 9 13.07 r 1.830 32,632.197 1.333,5 85
S ial I '74
291_054
Charter 95
Total
Hi Schools
ecial Schools
I Source: School Board ofBroward Count), 2007
S
Elementary
Schools )2%
ears
40%4%
I
t5%8%1%
Middle Schools 32%33o/o 1%tlo
)-70 12%t7o
18%t5y,28%23%159/o lo/o
Charter Schools .110 /7%9%0%0%
Sou.ce: School lloard offlroward Coun\,2007
City of Dania Beach Page l1 - 16 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
l. Cunent Prollle of Brorvard Countr Public Scl.rools
Middle 381 625 419
I
70.960'7
I
Table 8: Aee of School Facilit! Buildines
School Type
ok of
sq.ft.
1-10
o/" of
sq.ft
tt-20
"/" of
sq.ft.
21-30
Y" of
sq.ft
31-40
23%t4% 17% 132%
Public School Facilities Element
Elementarv Schools
There are 138 public elementary schools in Brou'ard County as of 2Q862007 . The School
Board plans to open-fugl ten (10) elementary schools u,ithin the next five years. A
profile ofthe existing schools is depicted in Table 9.
Table 9: Current Profile- Broward Countv Elementan' Schools 20062007/2{0+2008
Permanent
Buildings
Current
Enrollment
(20 Day)
LOS
(1r0%
of
FISrr)
oh of
Capacity
8
1971-
2001 6 l-1 961
938 759 )127.80,6
123.58%
10 1980-
200.+
15
717
i 25.03 96
2 1958-
2000 4 0 5:f
512 500 I
+Q4-6
102.40%
Bennett
Elementary 8 1952-
2003 t1 0
,'t5 3
460 -5,12 1
8#
84.87%
t8 l96l -
2006 ll l9 +*
766 t.1l-1 I
6#
66.96%
10 l 961-
2003
1l 0 884
838 821 I
tot,7
102.07%
Broadvieu'
Elementary 10 r965-
2006 7 9 &1+
9t9 926 I
94,1
t01.400A
Broward
Estates
Elementarv
10 1957 -
2004
t7 7 693
638 691
+rl03
92.33%I
Castle
Annex
Hiil J 1965-
1965 I 0 0 398 n/aCastle Hill
Elementarv 9 1969-
2001 7 22 186
763 5jj 2
+q-5
143.15%
Central Park
Elementary
1990-
2001 10 10 H+
1 159 939 2
-r4#
123.43%
Challenger
Elementarv
2000-
2001 l li ++5
1231 I 00t).)
+++-5
123.400hChapel Trail
Elementar.v 10 1994-
2003 7 6 HJ3
1043 1.054 I
1{9++
98.96%
Coconut Creek
Elementary t0 t969-
2002 6 9-58 755 )+w
126.89%
Coconut Palm
Elementarv t2 2000-
2000 2 13 ++t+
109-5 810 2
ge5
133.54o/o
Allantic \l:esl
Elemen
Banyan
Elementarr'
Bayr.'ieu,
Elc'men
Bethune- Marr
Elemen
Boulevard
Heights
lllemen
0.0%
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Facility Name
Site
Size
(Acres)
Relocatable
Buildings
100"
. Perm.
F'ISH
(Student
Canacitv)
9s8
934
I
I
I
I
l3
8
I
J
Citl of Dania Beach Pagell-17
Public School Facilities Elenrent
Site
Size
(Acres)
Colbert
Elemenlary 10 1).18 6&
644 r.030 1
w
62.52%
Collins
Elementary 10 1957 -
2005
#
36s 371 1
W
98.38%
Cooper City
Elementary'10 1970-
2006
,+10 94s
909 701 1
]3,l-8
129.67Y.
Coral Cove
Elementarv 12 2004-
2004 2 0 8++
868 8i0 1
+e1+
104.58%Coral Park
Elementary l1 1989-
2004 1l 9 692
720 6l+705 21
]l+5
102.13%
Coral Springs
Elementary t0 1974-
2006 7 1 8€+
768 1
w
83.03%
Country FIills
Elementarv 1-5 1990-
2001 l0 15 988
961 8-+9 .)
l--l€++
113.19%
9 1987-
2004 l3 6 993
1000 980 1
l+H
102.01%
Cresthaven
EIementarv 10 t992-
2004 8 0 682
622 705 1
961
88.23%
Croissant Park
Elementarv I 8 ')642
667 802 I
8#
83.17%
Cypress
Elementary l3 r 969-
2006 10 1
763 873 1
Dania
Elementary 7 1962-
1992 10 7
g
503 569 I
1.1 1977 -
2003 7 6 896 711
l++
1.?.0.92%
1.1
1927-
2000 12 1
807
7s9 717
2
1
++24
105.86%
Deerfield Park
Elementary 1l 1978-
2002 I 0 655
652 787 1
84
82.85%
Dillard
Iilementary l0 1991-
1994 7 0 8e2
775 751 1
l4#
103.20%
t2 2005-
2005 -)0 s34
748 8i0 I
6W
90.12Yo
Drew
Elementary'l5 1990-
1990 9 0 609
s95 579 1
.l+53
102.76Yo
Driftr'ood
Elementarv 10 1960-
2002 l3 13 717
719 2
.#
128.85%Eagle Point
Elementary 1 l 1994-
2006 8 "+w
1307 1.216 1
]{r}5
1.01.90%Eagle Ridge t2 19S1-'/0 93+872 1 {16=8
Country Isles
Elemen
Davie
Element
Deerfield Beach
Elemenl
Dolphin Ba)
Elementarv
8#i
87.40%
933
88.40%
Citv of Dania Beach Page ll - 18 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
F acility Name
Permanent
Buildings
Relocatable
Buildings
Age
Range
Current Perm.
FISII
(Stud9nt
lOOYo tos
(ttoyo
of
msH)Capacity
o/o of
l9s2- |J zoot I
I 925
I
1992-
2003
I
558
I
13 I
I
I
2
I
I
I
Public School F-acilities Element
r 994F.lemenlarv
0 852
821 715 -)
]l4++
110.600
Embassy' Creek
Elementarv 1l l99l-
2002 7
2002-
2002
l 1 177
411 1
]+p
89.10%
Endeavour
Primary
Learning Center
1l
rc
I 021 1.060 1
-l€H
9632%
Everglades
Elementarv t0 1998-
2005 I 8
956
9s3 970 I
98=6
98.25%
Fairwal
Elementarr'l1 1968-
2005 11 0
Flamingo
EIementary l4 197 5-
1005 9 829
762 631 l
+3+4
120.76%
Floranada
Elementarv ll 1999-
1999 2 0 12+
753 8 1,+1
88=6
92.51o
Forest Hills
Elementarv 8 t975-
2004 I 2 69
656 795 I
8#
82.52%
Foster. Stephen
Elementary 9 t962-
1995 15 9 665
648 t 503 ')
w
128.83YoFox Trail
Elementarv l6 1997 -
2004 1 7 w
1233 1.178 I
+-q42
104.67Yo
r 998-
100-+
Gator Run
Elementarv
-)16
r l7')
1285 1.r40
]-H-6
112.72%
Gritln
Elementarv 10 1979-
I 991 1 I 60+
606 615 1
9H
98.s4%
Hallandale
Elementary 1l J I €€
l 182
8l:
1063
lsH
111.19%
Harbordale
Elementar.v +1959-
2006 15 2 359
375 380 I
945
98.68%
Hau'kes Bluff
Elementarv 12 1990-
2006 11 1l +s0
1961 852 2
-ll+-8
112.79%
Hoily*'ood
Central
Elementary
7 1991-
1995
9 1 68s
671 687 I
w
97 .670/o
Hollywood
Hills
Elementarv
l2 1959-
2006
9 l9 83+
809
9?]
786 I
89S
102.93Yo
Holli'wood
Park
Elementary
t)+0 59-
57t 593 1
93-9
96.29%
Horizon
Elementarv 8 t971-
2001 6 9 839
931 66i 2
ti,t+
t41.3304
Cin ol Dania Beach Page ll - 19 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
o/" of
Capacity
Permaaent
Buildings
Relocatable
Buildings
Curr.ent
Enrollment'(20 Day)
100o/o
Perm.
FISH.
(Student
Capacitv)
LOS
(rr0%
of
FISH)f,'acility Name
Site
Size
(Acres)
s11 101.47%
468
I
t2 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2
2003-
2003
1969-
t99l I
I
Public School Facilities Element
Hunt. .lames
Elementan'13 1973-
2004 6 0 943
905 811 1
+-t3=l
107.61%
Indian Trace
Elementan,1l 1990-
1990 9 10 14
730 669
2
l
]H
109.12YoKing, Martin
Luther
Elementarv
11 1968-
2005
8 -t 5€
518 809 l
69$
64.03%Lake Forest
Elementarv 11 1961-
2006 1t)9 9.{+
872 I t-2
.1 86
119.13%
Lakeside
Elementarv 12 1997-
2001 -1
958
885 )13€J
120.57Yo
Larkdale
Elernentarr 10 1961-
1993 14 6 482
472 623 I
77.1
75.76%
Lauderdale
N,lanors
Elementarv
1-l 1951-
2004
1l I 62e
594 754 I
w
78.78%
I-auderhill- Paul
Tumer
Elementar,v
11 1995-
1995
6 0 7]*
(r98 &72 I
H
80.05%
Libertl,
Elementarv t2 2001 -
2004 0 H
1147 1.260 I
8q
91.03%
Llo1'd Estates
Elementary 7 1968-
2001 1 9 #
485 593 I
ffi
81.79Yo
Bar'Manatee
Elementarv 7
2001-
2004 -)5 +g
1352 1,140 )
l-i9s
118.600
Mapleu,ood
Elementarv 11 1980-
2004 7 8 853
873 811 l
]+H
103.560/o
Margale
Elementarv 9 1962-
2006 17 I ++?8
1028 1.305 I
78*
7 8.7 70
C
Markham,
Robert
Elementary
9 1967 -
2004
l1 -+g
530 637 I
909
83.20o/o
Marshall.
Thurgood
Elementary
8 1 991-
2002
7 0
502 145 1
14+
67 .38Yo
McNab
Elementary 10 1993-
2002 8 t)711
136 713 I
]+t8
103.23%
Meadowbrook
Elementary 15 1958-
2006 l5 t5 #
626 I
&H
88.67%
Miramar
Elementary 10 1991-
2004 7 I 850
901 917 I
89+
95. 1 -l9ui;
Citl of Dania Beach Pagell-20 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
I
I
706
Sife
Size
(Acres)
Permanent
Buildings
Relocatable
Buildings
Perm.
FISII
(Student
LOS
(110%
of
rrsH)
3
I )+
I
Public School Facilities Element
Lapac[y,Mirror Lake
Elementan'13 1969-
2002 9 7 #
595 1
9g
95.20%
N{orrou'
Elementar!'l0 ts76-
2004 6 2 6l+
oJ 6 795 1
811+
80.25%
Nob Hill
EIementary 8 1975-
2004 I 7 82+
833 l-)2
l-13=6
115.21%
Norcrest
Elementan'l0 1958-
2000 13 0 t4]
727 1.(132 I
685
70.15%
North Andreu's
Gardens
Elementary
10 8 t)l8
8li 874 I
8#
95.31%North Fork
Elementary l0 1965-
2007 10 --)
53i+
513
14
713 1
199
80.36%
N orth
Lauderdale
Elementarv
li 197 4-
2006
7 0 9t+
883 988 I
9g
89.37%North Side
Elementary
t927 -
2001 8 0 5+6
500 6()8 I
865
82.24%
Nova. Blanche
Forman
Elementary
10 1965-
2003
6 6 8+9
195 774 I
1S#
102.71%
Nova.
Eisenhorver D
D Elementarv
l0 1969-
2003
8 0 846
813 777 I
le&g
104.63%
Oakland Park
Elementarv 7 1927-
2004 13 0 6:6
610 818 I
1*
73.67%
Oakridge
Elementan'8 1959-
1993 13 6 %+
686 605 2
,Be=+
113.39%
Orange Brook
Elementarv 9 2006-
2006 2 1 1#
148 830 1
9l-9
90.12%
Oriole
Elementary 9 1971-
2001 I 2 l1+
710 722 1
l€#
98.34%Palm Cove
Elementarv 1l 1992-
2005 10 9 96r
s++
889
2
I
]-rg
108.10%
Palmvieu,
Elementarv l0 1969-
2001 7 -)
g+
612
6g
665 1
t$+t
92.03%Panther Run
Elementarv 12 199'7 -
1991 2 1
19+
780 8 l.+1
W
95.82o/oPark Lakes
Elementary 15 2000-
2006 6 )H49
109 r
1 114
121.4 1
78-0
89.87%Park Ridge 10 1972-6 503 546 1 w
City o1'Danta Beach Page ll -21 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Elenrent
['acility Name
Site
Size
(Acres)
Age
Range
Permanent
Buildings
Relocatable
Buildings
Curfent
Enrollment
I (20 Day)
Y" of
Capacity
625
I
L,,u
2006
I
I
I
I
I
I
Public School Facilities Element
Park
Elemer.r
Park
Elemen
Springs
Trails
2001Elementarv 46e 85.e0%
t2 1990-
2001 10 0 9:l
926 I ,201 1
ls4
77.10%
l2 2000-
2005 -+0
g
1411 1..276
+
2
++H
110.58%
Parkside
I-.lementar\-l0 1999-
1999
869
lJ68 1
146
105.85.0%
Pasadena Lakes
Elemc'ntarr l0 1971-
200.+IJ 7 8-1€
725 739 I
+143
98.1 I %
Pembroke
Lakes
Elementarv
1976-
1990
I .+132
730 65-l ')
tl{+
111.79%
Pembroke Pines
Elementarv 9 1965-
1999 6 6 661
690 527 2
w
130.930h
Perry, Annabel
C Elementan'10 1969-
2005 10 9 141)
755 917 1
8g
82.33%
Peters
Elementarv 11
1958-
1992 l9 21 63+
'786 647
+
2
l+r+
121..+8%Pines Lakes
Elementarv l0 1979-
2002 6 .+8#
8s3 1
llg
120.99%
Pineu ood
Elementary 10 1979-
2001 7 9 95.1
10.+9 851 2
11].J
122.83%
Plantation
Elementary l2 1999-
1999
,)0 1#
711 81+I
9#
87 .35o/o
Plantation Park
Elementarv l0 1967 -
2002 )0 545
533 597 1
9lj
89.28%
Pompano Beach
Elementarv
1992-
t992 9 2 #
622 l/l
2
1
+w
108.93%
Quiet Waters
Elementary l8 12 ffi
1305 904 2
{35+
144.36%
Ramblelr-ood
Elementarl'l0 1977 -
2004 5 20 934
996 98s 1
98=9
101.12%
Riverglades
Elementary 10 1991-
1991 6 8 920
910 669 7
-l#
r40.510
Riverland
Elementan l0 7 6 #
576 63i 1
+e05
91.00%
Riverside
Elementary l0 1987-
2001 12 0 860
801 731 1
+114
109.58%Rock Island
Elementary l.+2001 -
2001 2 0 6e4
616 580 I
]++
106.21%Ro1'al Pahn 12 1971-10 8 89+892 I 140=6
Cit_v of Dania Beach Page 11 - 22 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Elenrent
Site
Size
(Acres)
Age
Range
Permanent
Buildings
Relocatable
Buildings
Current
Enrollment
(20 Day)
Perm.
rISH
(Student
LOS
(110%
of
FrsrD
l9
1990- |I zoo+ |
1.7
I
820
8
I
I
I
I
1991-
2006
I
705
I
I
Public School Facilities Element
Elementarr 2001 793 88.q0%
1
g
525 661 I
199
79.13%
Sanders Park
Elementarv
1965-
2004 I
Sandpiper
Elementarv f.i 1989-
2006 l2 7 ii95
8,+8 909 I
985
93 .29o/o
Sarvgrass
Elementarv ll 1993-
200,+8 0 992
983 1.184 I
83+
83.02%
12 1S90-
2004 ll I
1;0€
1016 1.091 I
9#
93.13Yo
Sea Castle
Elementary
65+
593 607 I
1IE-2
97.6e%
Sheridan Hills
Elementar)'7
1971-
2001 6 0
810 I
9l=5
92.35%
Sheridan Park
Elementarl 13 1966-
2004 6 8 14+
148
718 l
l l3:+
111.18%
Silver I-akes
Elementarv l2 199'7-
1997 )l sg
865
Silver Palms
Elementan l.+1995-
2001 3 6 #++
912 806 l
-ps
113.15%
1989-
1004 l3 I +r04e
1020 882 l
++15
115.65%
Silver Ridge
Elementarv
2002-
2003 -)(.)139
747 820 I
9H
91.10%
Silver Shores
Elementarv ll
676 701 I
rs2{
96A3%
Stirling
Elementary 9 6 ,)
l
94-0
83.75%
Sunland Park
Elementary -+
1991-
199:1 1
]{6
517
-l+8=9
1-12.44Yo
Sunset Lakes
Elementan'1).2002-
2002 -l 0 ++s
1086 820 l
Sunshine
Elementarv 9 1961-
2002 l5 J 942
907 803 2
++13
112.95%
Tamarac
Elementarr,8 l 0 w
1140 1.324 I
84,7
86.10%
Lt?I
54-8
57.87%
Tedder
Elementary 9 1964-
2001 t4 8
g5
713
Traderl inds
Elementarv 17 )t7 ffi
1113 746 1
+1#
149.20%
Tropical
Elenrentarv l0 1971-
2001 6 8-10
799 2
+]{5
112.690/0
Village
Elementarv t2 1968-
2005 13 g 9?8
931 816 1
++33
114.460/0
Walker
Elementary 10 1959-
2006 7 5 733
7il 4)26
996 I
?#
7 6.0001"
Citl of Dania Beach Page l1 - 23 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Site
Siie
(Acres)Range
Permanent
Buildings
Relocatable
Buildings
Current
Enrollment
(20 Day)
100v"
Perm.
FISH
(Student
Canacitv)['rsE)
LOS
of "/" of
Capacity
t2 I
I
I
I
I
13
l991-
2001
I
I 1974- |I zooq I
I
I
1995-
l9q5
709
Public School Facilities Element
Watkins
Elementarr 10 1995-
1995
,J 7$
712 811 1
923
91.15%
Welleby
Elenrentan t3 1991-
2004 7 8 865
862 809 1
{€g
106.55%
West
Holll'u'ood
Elementary
tl 1991-
1 991
5 5 ?la
707 591 2
w
118.43%
Urestchester
Elementary t0 1976-
2004 11 8 ]-{]3;
1101 1.074 1
10{}€
103.07Yo
West* ood
Heights
Elementarl
9 1958-
1997
11 I #a
715 773 I
+$1J-6
91.500,'.
Wilton Manors
Elementarl'IJ
1995-
1998 5 0 60+
607 615 1
97.1
98.70%
Winston Park
Elementarv 12 1990-
2004 t3 0
I 1',rl
1243 I .191 i
9U
1.04.37%
Young.
Virginia
Shunran
Elementan
fl 1993-
1993
7 0 143
750 669 2
-lll-+
112.1104
Total 1062 703 111 038
+1H+9 1++50+
ttt.407
Sourcc: School Board ofBroward Countv.2007
Elernentarl school locations and attendance zones/ concurrency sen'ice areas (CSAs) are
illustrated in Map 2. Elementary school enrollment for 2e06!QQ7l2007-2008 .+ariS
+lrJ8gl l LQl! students. There.are 47-41 elementary schools uith enrollment greater
than 110% of their permanent FISH capacity, which is the adopted LOS standard (LOS).
For lhe 2006!QQ7726,94-2pQ8 school year. this lranslates inro 34?9Yo of elementarv
schools in Broward County not meeting the LOS.
Middle Schools
There are {}{l public middle schools in Broward County as of 2f,86\p.
Board plans to open three (3) middle schools u,ithin the next five years.
these schools is shown by Table 9A.
The School
A profile of
City of Dania Beach Page ll -2;1 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
(Acres)
Age
Range
Permanent
Buildings
Relocatable
Buildings'Dav)
Current
Enrollment
l00o/"
Perm.
FISH
(Student
Capacity)
{ll0o/o
of
FISID
LOS
of
Capacity
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lus:l
Public School Facilities Element
Table 9A: Current Profile - Broward Countv Middle Schools 200612007
llo N4iddle
Dand1. William
I uiadte
ate Middle
Relocatable
Buildings
923
1210
2
1
+3+8
83.7|Yo151969-
1994 7 1=:5+
1038
21 200i -
2001 0 871
63'7 1.050 1
83+
60.6104
Attucks Middle 21 1960-
1997 8 0 99+
tt 16
g6
1283 I
l9:
6i 60%
4e4
1 104 I
94
9223%Bair \liddle
1975-
1993 164
1,957 1
#
7399%
Springs 19 1975-
2005 4
1342
2
1
l 1+:+
100.15%Crystal Lake Middle 14 1971-
2002 l5 4#
13,+4
19 19 8
1 325 1,131 2
Beacl.rDeerfield
Middle 32 11 12 w7
1300 1,412 1
22 1961-
2005 17 9 ffi
1516 1..669 1
942
92.63%Driftrvood Middle
39 #
2320 l
l1,343 2
+w
172.75%21Falcon Cor,e Middle
1999-
1999 2
2.0Forest Glen Middle
1990-
2004 19 9
1 t1l11
1430 1,6,+5 1
Glades Middle 20 2006-
2006 1 0 #++
1936 1.897 I
895
102.06%
Gullstream N,fiddle 1 1959-
2002 16 tl 29+
439 1
4*
69.24%
Indian Ridge Middle 26 1995-
2005 5 28 2240 1,727 2
w=9
129.10%
LakesLauderdale
Middle 14 1969-
1976 1 16 902
+s4.i
900
2
1
+159
100.22%
Lauderhill Middle 22 1969-
1995 7 9 839
591 983 1
84=.1
60.73%
Lyons Creek Middle 22 1999-
2006 J +J89
2000 1,858 1
1M
107.64%
23 1966-
r 990 9 6
g4
980 1,3 33 1
+w
7352%
McNicol Middle 12 1997 -
1997 2 0 ++s
1.314 I
849
61.72%
]+H
111 .lsYo
99J
90.15%
N4ar
Ciq of Dania Beach Pase l1-25 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
29
Arthur R. Ashe. Jr
Middle
#38
119710w
1448
Coral
Middle
I 0
I
1
199i-
1995I r960-I zoo:
I
I
8{=0
86.93%
o 1+
I
14
811
I
Public Sclrool Facilities Element
11 2001 -
2006Mitlennium Middle )0 H5+
1;199 1.618 I
8H
92.65%
RenaissanceNew
Middle l0 -+0 s09
1610 1.461
1
I
-l+3i
109.75Yo
Neu, River Middle 18 1995-
1995 .,)6 419
1340 1.383 I
t4g
96.89%
Nor,a Middle 11 1962-
1999 1l 2t
1 1nO
1260 ,)
]jg
144.00Yo
Olsen \liddle
195.+-
1991 2u 0 rieS
r l.+3 I 696 I
11+
6739%
Parkri'ar' \{iddle l5 25 t5 41?
I t57 1.667 1
8g
69.41%
20 1990-
1990 6 9 +++
t()17 I,175 I
]+t
89.11%
Pines Middle 21 1993-
2005 .,))9 +€
l46l 1.769 I
1g
82.59%
Pioneer N4iddle t6 1975-
I 991 l.++#4
1625 I .175
1425
138.30%
Plantation \,Iiddle ))1969-
2004 )9 +0+
1003 1.i85 I
195
72.42%
BeachPompano
Middle 12 1964-
1976 8 1i)+p?e
961
94
1 136
:I ++42
84.60%
Rambleq ood \{iddle t7 1976-
2004 -+20 w
1329 1.305 I
9p
101.81%
-l ar.nesfuckards.
14iddle 1i 1968-
2004 )li ]={s
960 1.068 I
9U
89.89%
SpringsSawgrass
Middle 20 1995-
1998 7 t.1 +*8+
1299 1,215
2
1
+14
106.91%
Seminole Middle 21 195 8-
2001 7 il i.286
1266 1.085 2
-ll€5
| 16.680/0
20 1983 -
2002 16 1l ++36
770 1.095 1
9+1
70.32%
Silver Trail Middle 22 1995-
1995 J 30 #
1745 1.430 )w
122.03o/o
Sunrise Middle
1991-
1999 l5 tt +?4
l2l 8 1,202 I
+4*
101.330h
TraceTequesta
Middle 23 1990-
2006 19 15 l.@
1727 1.382 2
-ll+5
124.960A
Westglades Middlc 24 2001-
2001 1 0 44s
l63s 1.458
+
2
9-H
112.14Yo
Perry-. Henrl
\,riddle
D
City of Dania Beach Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Site
Size
Aercs
Permanent
Buildings
Relocatable
Buildings
'Current
Enrollmept
(20 Day
1007" of
Perm-
FISH
(Student
Capacity)
LOS
{ll0V"
of
r$rD "/o of
Capacity
1999- |
tqee I
I
I
875
I
r 958-
1997
I
Silver Lakes Middle
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
Page ll-26
Public School Facilities Elemenl
Ag"
1007" of
Perm.
FISH
(Student
Capacity)
LOS
(ll0%
of
rlsrr)
+
"ll9aI,330
#+7
t4tt1
30 1987-
2006 16 30 +++4
1945 1 .121 a
131,9
136.88%
6+-9?-l
53.694
#{)
55,282
1w".,ine Middle
Young.
Middle
Total 78t
]{#
1 1 i.35%
Waller C
367 501
Sourcc: School Board of Broward Counr.v-,2007
Middle school locations and attendance zones/ concurrencl' serv'ice areas (CSAs) are
illustrated in Map 3. Middle school enrollment for 2O062007/30O7-20Q8 +as-is
6++2453.694 students. There are *5-11 middte schools rvith enrollment greater than
I l0% of their permanent FISH capacity. which is the adopted LOS standard (LOS). For
the ?0062007/2e07-2008 school .vear. this translates tnto 36!!%o of middle schools in
Bron'ard County not meeting the LOS.
There are 3l public high schools in Bro*'ard Counll, as o12eO62007.
plans to open two (2) new high schools within the next 5 years.
schools is shown by Table 98.
The School Board
A profile of these
Tablc 98: Current Profile - Brou ard Countv Hieh Schools 2006/2007
Facilitv Name Site Size
Acres
Age
Range
Permanent
Buildings
Relocatable
Buildings
Current
Enrollment
(20 Day
100Y"
Perm.
FISH
(Student
Capacity)
LOS,
(ll0%o
of
FISH)
32 1972-
2001 13 )2.;656
1,85 I I
N/A 200.1-
200.1 N/A .q*
588
546
584
Coconut Creek lligh ,10 1961-
2000 )2 31 2+€e
2425 2.186
College Acadenry @
BCC N/A N/A N/A N/A 145
Jll N/A N/A N/A
Cooper Ciry I-ligli l0 30 20 2-'i93
2.671
89r+
88.05%I
l5 I zoo:-I zoos .l 2-;455
2485
Anderson- Bo d lli
Atlantic Tech. (Bld
24)
Coral Glades Hi h 0
942
84.57%
]-$J
|0.93%
l$6_4
100.68Yo
1
2.723 | l
City of Dania Beach
943
91.260h
Page 1l -27 Comprehensive PIan
Puhlic School Fac ilir ies Elenrenr
Relocatable
Buitdings
Cuirent
Enrollment
(20 Day
I
l8 1990-
2006
High Schools
o/" of
Capacity
l
t97 t-
2006
l
Puhlic School Fac ilities Elemenl
Coral Springs High 31 1975-
2005 8 ll ?+88
2403 2.993 I
83-+
80.2q%
C,v.'press Bal High l5 2001-
200,1 9 131 #0
5501 J. -1vo )
l5.g
161 .98Yo
Deertleld Beach I Iigh 4l 446
2328 ),431 I
93-9
95.65%
Dillard t{ish 51 1959-
2001 l:1 0
) 1QO
201 7 2.822 1
l8J
'71 .41%
Ely. I3lanche High l.l 1952-
2002 t5 7 :-:.+o
2 014 1.8,12 I
l8=8
71 .51yo
Everglades High .15 4 22 #{}+
3635 1 ( tq )14#
r43.80%
.15 1995 -
1995 11 31 3461
3172 2.t 84
-l+85
r 33.05%
27 1958-
2001 16 16 #4
1751 2.711 I
w
63.88%
tJallandale High
1976-
1976 )I E4
r5l6 1 1))I
89+
88.04%
Hollr rr ood Hills llish 30 8 25 ?-+-14
?121 2.328 i
9+4
91.31o/o
McAnhur High .10 1958-
2002 30 )2:46
2421 , 1n)
2
1
.H{5
105.11Yo
McFatter Technical N/A 1997 -
1997 I N/A 561
541
584 I
l{g
96,06v"
Miramar High t8 1969-
2005 li 30 +s
32 l9 2.651 l
1l**r
121.43yo
Monarch Hish 55 2002-
2005 5 10
,13.]
2206 2.208 I
9#
99 .9lo/o
Nonheast High 52 1958-
2004 28 J 2+16
2098 I
83=8
85.91%
Nova Hish 5l t962-
2003 26 15
7_J)-1
2101 1.630 l
l3e5
129.26yo
Piper High
-10 t97 t-
2002 t7 ,15 2s2s
)'111 2,698 I
+44+
100.96Yo
Plantation Hish 35 1963-
2006 l5 l9 2;661
215 3 I ?1)l
9+5
86.13yo
Ponrpano Beach lnsl
Infl Studies l8 1952-
2002 t7 0 i.]99
t262
w
I 193 l
95:2
105.18yo
South Brorvard High 25 1947-
200r 27 0 2r4l€
2250 2.373 I
l+t5
94.820
South Plantation Iligh
1969-
2006 t5 9 2t'39
2659 2.482 l r 07.1 o
Stoneman Douglas
High .15 1990-
2001 12 11 3+s4
3111
2i60
2-360
w
131.82%
Flanagan. Charles W
Hi
Iron [-aLrderda]e lli
Citr ot Dania Beach Page ll -28 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
I
I
28
1968-
2007
I
I
I
I
I
Current
Enrollmert
(20 Day
lO0Y"
Perm.
FISH
(Student
Capacity)
LOs
(ttoy"
of
rrsH)
Site Size
Acres
Age
Range
Permanent
Buildirgs
Relocatable
Buildingq
Yo of
Capacity
I
I
te6e- |200J I
rs I 22
I
2002- I
2002 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l+B
I
Public School Facilities Element
Capacity
Vo ol
:1 9 I
r=935
r 802
1 <0<
2416 2.438 I
{19 57{
t++1+
71,182
7-l-:{i0
7 t .289
_18
3l
40
1060
1951-
2004
1980-
2005
1919-
2006
1t ,8
12.49o/oStranahan Hi
Taravella. J P Hi
Westenr I{i
h
294+
2869 3..188
849 I
82.2s% I+w
101.560/0h
Total
Source: School Board ofBrouard Counq,2007
High school locations and attendance zones/ concurrency sen.ice areas (CSAs) are
illustrated in Map 4. High school enrollment for ?9e6l_!7 l?3e-pL was 70pl+7i.182
students. There are 8-7 high schools with enrollment greater than ll0% of their
pernanent FISH capacity, which is the adopted LOS standard (LOS). For the
?$e6200112e$-2008 school tear, this lranslates into 2622Yo of high schools in Brou,ard
Countl' nol meeting the LOS.
Charter Schools
Table 10: Current Profile - Broward Counft Charter Schools 20061 2007
Brou,ard Communitv Charter West
I I 401 N W 56'h Drive, Coral S nn S
214
500
_oo
l+t
400
66
60t)
l))
-l+t
129
267
641
)71
3002620 Ho11 u,ood Blvd
Broward Community Charter Elementary
201 Universit Drive, Coral S t1
0
271
Broward Community Charter Middle
201 Universit , Drive. Coral S rrn
S
s
Chancellor Charter at North Lauderdale
Elementary. 1395 S SR 7, North 525
Capacity
Current
Enrollment
?0s620q2/0+08 , Deficit
Capacity
Surplus
or
Projected
Enrollment
20tut2
360
u
543 r98
g
630
559
522
20
108 570
City of Dania Beach Pagell-29
50.+
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Fac ilit ies Elemenr
Site Size
Acres
Permanent
Buildings
Relocatable
Buildings
Current'
f,nrollment
(20 Day
l0OYo
Perm.
FISH
(Student
Capacity)
:..186
I
There are 4+licharter schools operating in Broward County as of 2e062007/?0072008.
It is anticipated six (6) additional charter schools will open in the near future. The profiles
ofthese schools are shown in Table 10.
Ben Gamla Charter I
I 320
Central Charter School
4525 N SR 7. North Lauderdale
l0 t8
l1 i0
Facility Name & Location
a
57
ll 525
Public School Facilities Element
Lauderdale
Chancellor Charter at Nofth Lauderdale
Middle
1395 S SR 7. North Lauderdale
225 199 26 225
44
310
3-l+
290 20 311Charter School of Excellence
I 2l 7 SE 3 Ave. Fort Lauderdale
City ofCoral Springs Charter School
3205 N Unir,ersitl' Drive. Coral Springs
-L6e0
830
ffi
786
(6)
11
#
830
Do$ntoull Academy of Technology and
Arts
l0l SE 3 Ave. Fort Lauderdale
E
154
9:
1i2
*
22 261
500Dayspring Elementar\'
3550 Davie Blvd. Fort Lauderdale 500
I)iscoverv N4iddle Charter
ir,t.i\n's6rr D*"Fort Lauderdale 60t)')1 -578
Eagle Academy
3020 NW 33 Ave, Lauderdale Lakes
,+0e
280
g
293
15
Gl)400
Eaglesrl Nest Elementary
I 840 NE 41'1 St, Pompano Beach
3€e
40t)
-g
80
#
320 i00
Eagtes'_ Nest Middle
I 840 NE 4l't St. Pompano Beach
120g5 72
90
-r.+8
85 175
Early Beginnings West
3 I 17 SW I 3s Court. Fort Lauderdale 18 6 t2 36
Charter Institute Annex
5420 N SR 7, North Lauderdale
w
350
5e
81
2+4
ZOJ 1.200
Charter Institute Training Center
520 NW 5th Street. Hallandale 12 100
Excelsior Charter of Broward
10046 W McNab Rd, Tamarac
l€8
500
*
9l
1+
409 108
Florida Intercultural Academy
1704 Buchannan St. Holly-ivood 300 119
t7l
1+l
129 300
Elerrdalnlercqltural Academy Middle
1 704 Buchannan St. Holhu,ood 120 120
Holll.rvood Academy of Arts and
Science Elem
1720 Hanison St, Holly*ood
+fo 441
+
9 650
Hollywood Academy of Arts and
Science Middle 1720 Harrison St.
Hollywood
225 190
232
350 .{50
ffi
temational
Scliool of Broward
++oo
675
++00
41 1.000
Ciq of Dania Beach Pasell-30 Comprehensive PIan
Public School Facilities Element
Facility Name & Location Capacity
Current
Enrollment
?0062007s708
Surplus
or
Deficit
Capacity
Projected
Enrollment
20tut2
I
81 'll9
600
I
105
o
631
15
I
100 88
Public School Facilities Element
I 1 00 n-oth 7-5t1' Avenue
Kidz Choice Charter
9063 Taft Streetr Pembroke Pines 7-i0 i6 711 750
Life Skills
2360 W Oakland Park Blvd, Oakland
Park
.+00
600
s
101
85
-19-l
,+00
North Brou,ard Academy of Excellence
Middle
8200 SW 17s St. North l-auderdale
]5{)
800
s
187
20
613 ne\\ constr
North Broward Academy of Excellence
Elem
957 SW 71 Ave. North Lauderdale
ve
800
369
187 neu, constr
City of Pembroke Pines Cha(er Elem
East Campus 10801 Pembroke Road.
Pembroke Pines
600 600
City'of Pembroke Pines Charter Middle
West
I 8500 Pembroke Road. Pembroke Pines
6{X)
1200
600
1 199
0
1 600
City of Pembroke Pines Charter High
17189 Sheridan St. Pembroke Pines
s4
1600
ry
1703
l+t
(101)1,800
Paragon Academy of Technology
2210 Pierce St. Hollywood
Ig{a
450
*t
| -):3+
320 198
Paragon Elementarl
3i11 N Andrervs EXT. Pornpano Beach
w
450
g
130
-1{)3
320 t -1 -l
Parkway Academy
7451 Riviera Blvd. Miramar 365 525
City of Pembroke Pines Charter Elem
Central
12500 Sheridan St, Pembroke Pines
600 599 1 600
City of Pembroke Pines Charter Elem
West
1680 SW 184 Ave, Pembroke Pines
60t)600 0 600
City of Pembroke Pines Chaner Middle
Central
12350 Sheridan St. Pernbroke Pines
600 598 2
Pompano Charter Middle
331 I N Andrews EXT, Pompano Beach
E
600
35
52 132
Smart School Institute High
3020 NW 33 Ave. Lauderhill
500
1000
.105
147
95
)rJ 600
Smart School Middle - #5071
3698 NW 15 St" Lauderhill
,t&t
500
:€s
209
199
291 +8-+
Somerset Academy - Davie #521 I 156 €156
Citv of Dania Beach PageJl-31 Comprehensive Plan
Puhlic School Fac ilities Flement
Capacity
Current
5116llment
30M200z/o?g8
Surplus
or
Deficit
Canacitv
Projected
Enrollment
201il12
I
0 600
+
613
l
I
I
600 I
55e I6s0 |
185
wl548 |
I'ub lic School Facrlities Elenrent
Capacity
3788 SW Davie Road. Dalie 600 604 ru
Somerset Consen atory
20807 Johnson St. Pembroke Pines 200
:€
)l ll
Somerset Academy Elem
20803 Johnson St. Pembroke Pines
9ls
500
88;
82s
+7
/ -1, <\910
Somerset Academy High School
20801 Johnson St. Pembroke Pines
s68
ll0L)
*
593
11
607 5(r8
Somerset Academy Middle School
20803 Johnson St. Pembroke Pines
+rc
600
6:l
60.+(+l 710
tenlpSomerset Academy Miramar Elem
12425 Sw 53'd St. Miramar 1,+0 temp temp
Somerset Academv Miramar Middle
12425 SW 53'd St. Miramar
t€n1p
675
26
550
temP
l2s
+€n1p
675
Somersel Neighborhood School
12425 SW 53'd St. Miranrar
80
175
1+
/+101 77
Sunrise Community
71 00 Oakland Pp Blvd. Sunrise
35e
100
+09
130
r4+
(i0)350
Sunshine Acadenry
7130 Pembroke Rd. Miramar
450
500
?5
86
315
414 450
Sunshine Elementary
2210 Pierce St. Hollywood 116 60 56 ll6
Susie Daniel Charter Elementarv
2201 SW 42nd Ave.West Park "3€O
350
1€52tl 135
133 300
Touchdowns 4 Life
10044 W McNab Rd. Tamarac
]€e
175 105 55
70 150
Total +€J99
26.369
+#22
15.973 3,013 20.1-16
Source: School Board of Broward County, 2007
Charter school locations are illustrated in Map I. They have a district-*.ide attendance
zonelconcurrency service area, which means their LOS is measured on a county-wide
basis. Charter school enrollment for 20062007/2007-2QQ& was 15.973 +5922-students.
There +vas.-or+lyq9 ene-3 charter schoolg with enrollment greater than their_l_! 0l!
pe{?aanen+gj F[SH-capacity. For the ?00620077244q-2QQ8 school year, this translates
into just 2!7o of charter schools not meeting their LOS.
There are 20 special schools in Broward County as of 20462I!'l /2e0+2)!9. Special
schools are comprised of vocational and educational centers. There are no additional
special schools planned in the near future. A profile ofthese schools is shou,n by Table
12, below.
Corrprehensive PIan
Public School Facilities Element
Citv of Dania Beach Pagel1-32
20062092/0708
Curreut
Errollnient
Surplus
or
Deficit
Enrollment
20tln2
173
I
I
I
Special Schools
I
I
Public School Facilities Element
Facility Name
o/" of
Capacity
1€-g
101 .69%
38.538%
Atlantic Tech
Center*
Bright Horizons
Center
Broward Fire
Academv
Cross Creek
Center
C1'press Run Alt
Erc
9e
90.90%
N/A
Center N/A
Dave Thomas
Education
Center+ *
Dave Thomas
Education Center-
West
Drew. Charles
Resource Center
Hallandale Adult
Center+
Lanier-James
Education Center
McFatter, Witliam
Tech Center*
Old Dillard
Community
School (Museum)
Pine Rid e Center
Sea ll School
Sheridan Tech
Center
Sunset Learning
Center
The Quest Cenler
Whiddon Rogers
Ed Center
+sH
210.30%
10
1997
193 3
N/A
66
68
(]+)
(54)
#
109.82%
I l45JI st.ztv"
76.81
N/A N/A
5
]-99
122
++68
N/A
3g
42.68%l€#
69.51%
M%
N/A
9H
88.26%a4
59.730hg#1
N/A
Permanent
Buildings
Relocetable
Buildings
100%Surplus
or
(Deficit)
Capacity
30
1972-
2004 ,+5.+6
g-8
588
(3+
(42)
6
1.977 -
1995 5 0
32
325128
5I 0 N/A
6€
N/A N/A
200
t97
l5 1990 6 .l 131120 t)
1955
78
N8I .\029
69.1
(+91
364)3300
2003 N/A 629 N/AJ0
l0 12
1960-
1998 )1 N/A 409 N/A
l.+
t964-
2001 l9 l-+
694
9t7
H+
835
14+
(!!.)
)
1960-
1986 l0 lt
2+9
217 28s
l.+
1985-
2001 1l l
all
561
546
615
1 0 0
2005l 1 t)
89
108 253
t64
145
-)
1961-
2004 -+
568
374 538
(xr)
16-+)
l8
1961-
1987 18 -,,
s
45
srs
N/A
+Q4+
N/A
1996 2
+92
1ll8 213
2+
25
I 1977 -
1993 1 0
t91
l8l 303
1959-
2004 20 0
4i1
690
ffi
N/.{
Cin of Dania Beach Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Table l2: Current Profile - Brovr ard Countv Snecial Schools 2006/2007
N/A
N/A
I
I
I
IN/A
I
Current
Enro[ment
(20 Day)
I
1980-
2005
27
13 I 0
r9i
Page II -33
Public School Facilities Elenrcnt
t6 1990 7 2
]49
155 132
r:j7l
@l)
1974-
l 991 l 0
1+
78 i57
lt{{r
279l0
260 159 l-ll
+r81+
5,lll
8$83
8.819
Whispering Pines
Ex Ed Center
Wingate Oaks
Center
Total
'Adult ellrollment is not reflected
**lncludes Charles Drew Resource Center, Dave Thos-West
Source: School Board of Broward County,2007
1++$
7 t'7 .420/o
+95
21.81%
Special school locations are illustrated in Map 1. Similar to chafter schools. special
schools also have a district-r.l'ide attendance zonelconcurrencl sen'ice area. Current
enrollment for 2Q86200712Q{B-2008 for the Brou'ard Countl, special schools is
1$t+5.1 I l. Of the 20 special schools in Broq,ard County, 5 2 had enrollment greater
than their permanent FISH capacity. For the 2e062007/?0e7-2008 school year, this
translates into 510% of special schools not meeting their LOS.
Ancillarv Facilities
Ancillary facilities provide general support for the operation of the district. not related to
indilidual schools. There are 27 ancillary lacilities in Brou,ard Count)'. Locations of
these facilities are list in Table l3 and illustrated in Map 1.
Facility Address City
6600 SW Nova Dr Davie
Coral Springs Aquatic Ctr 12441 Roval Palm Blvd Cloral Springs
E.C.LA / Title 1 701 NW 31 Ale Oakland Park
HORTT Adnrin 1700 sw 14 ct Fort Lauderdale
ITV Relay Hammondville & Tumpike Coconut Creek
KC Wright 600 SE 3 Ave Fort Lauderdale
KC Wright / HRD 600 SE 3 Ave
Lockhart Stadium 5301 NW l2Ave Fort Lauderdale
M.E.T.R.I.C. - Multilingual/l44l S Federal Hr,',r,,Fort Lauderdale
North Area Bus Complex 2200 NW l8 St Pompano Beach
North Area Bus Garage 2600 NW 18 Terr Pompano Beach
North Area Maint-& Warehousc 6501 NW 15 Ave Fort Lauderdale
North Area Superintendent-Pomp 1400 NE 6 St Pompano Beach
North Central Super. Ollice 7770 W Oakland Park Blr,d Sunrise
City of Dania Beach Page l1-3,1 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Facilit;r Name
o/" of
Capacity
Table 13: Ancillan Facilitr- Inventon'
Current
Enrollment
(20 Day)
1009o of
Perm.
r.ISH
(Student
Site
Acres
Age
Range
Relocatable
Buildings
B.E.C.O.N.
I
Fort Lauderdale
Public School Facilities Elemenl
Facility Address City
Rock Island Annex (Prof Dev Ctr)2301 NW 26 Sr Oakland I'ark
South Area Bus Garage 900 S University Dr
1295 N 21 Ar,e Holll'*ood
Pioneer MS Annex 5400 SW 90 Ave Cooper Citl
South Area Portable Annex 201 SW 172 Ave Penrbrokc'Pines
South Central Area Super. Office l6l9NE4Are Fort Lauderdale
Southw,est Area Bus Complex 20251 Stirlins Rd Pembroke Pines
Tech & Supporr Srvs 7770 W Oakland Park Blvd Sunrise
Tu,in Lakes Admin 4200 NW 10 Ave Oakland Park
Trvin Lakes Annex 4l40 NW l0 Ave Oakland Park
'I'q,in Lakes Warehouse &
Transportation 3810 NW 10 Ale Oakland Park
West Central Bus Compound 2500 College Ave Dai ie
Edgex'ood Adrnin (\Lhiddon Rogers )1300 sw 32 cr Fort Lauderdale
Pembroke Pines
Source: School Board ofBroward Counq, 2007
3. Proiected 5 Year (S/T) School Enrollment . Capacitr,. LOS & Improvement Costs
The anall sis ofthe current and fir'e (5) 1,ear projected data of school facilities is compiled
in the Proposed Leyel of Service Plan (Attachment D) and Table 1l attached as
Attachment G. They both represent information for the years 2006/2007 through
201112012. except the table contains detail costs associated with capacity improvements.
The table shows the current & projected enrollmentl permanent Florida Inventory of
School Houses (FISH) capacity: Ler.el ol Sen,ice (LOS) percentage: surplus/deficit
capacity to attain the permanent FISH: improvement strategy; the cost; cost per student
stationl and the school district's funding source. The current and projected enrollment is
shoun for each school. Schools are sorted b1' administrative area Q.Jorth. North Central.
South Central. and South) and by grade level (elementary. middle. and high). The LOS
u,as calculated for each school and lbr each year of the five year period. The district's
major improvement strategy is to add new schools and additions to the existing schools.
Classroom additions are being added to 4446 of the district's 138 elementary schools; *9
19 of the district's 42 middle schools; and 9 of the district's 31 high schools. Using this
strategy of adding permanent additions, ngli/jchAqb. 3ry! along w.ith the School District's
Policy 5000. the data confirms that the all schools uill meet the LOS within the fir,e lear
planning period. It should be noted that school centers are not iisted that is because the
enrollment at the centers is relatively constant since the enrollment can be controlled b)
capping to insure they do not exceed their capacities.
As an improvement strategy to meet the LOS the school district will add a total of 99?
classrooms over the five year period (30e62007/O+08 - 2011-12) at a cost of an
estimated $22!@imillion dollars. averaging approximatel1, $]3;14019.000 per studenr
station to be funded from the School District's Capital Fund. The breakdou,n by grade
level is as lbllou's:
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Citv of Dania Reach Page l1-35
South Area Maintenance
Public School Facilities Element
School Ler,el Classrooms to be
AdCititlaAdded
s738
254431
214-j.16
$l++3517.700
$+l-g+15.500
$+s032s.900
All cost estimates are collected from the School Districl's Adopted Educational Facilities
Plan (DEFP) 2e062O07-2eU-2008 to 3e$2011401+2012. They r#i+++e-uedated-+a+e+
+r.:- ,,^^- r^ *-+:t^^r +L^ ^A^-f^.1 .nn? lnno +^ 1rl1 1 1n11 r\L.L-D __,1.;^Ll--- .,].--r1,,
Concurrencr, Costs Jffected Parties The costs associaled s'ith achieving and
maintaining the LOS during the fir,e (5) year period are paid for and shared by public and
private funding sources. Table l7 details the primary public and private entities rvhich
pay for the capacity improvements. These include; -llillage - funds collected through
property taxes which are the primary re\enue source. In addition. Certifrcates of
Porticipation /COPs) which are similar to tax exempt municipal bonds. These are
publicly offered bonds paid back rhough millage revenue. Public Educotion and Capital
Outlay (PECO) is another source u'hich is a fund allocation by the State. This is the third
largest rer.enue source for the School Board. These are funds based on bonding capacity
provided b), the Slate lrom gross receipts tar. Impact Feesiillitigation Funds is another
source collected from developers to address capacity improvement costs.
The cost associated nith the capacitl' additions fbr those school lacilities not currentl)
meeting the LOS are depicted in Table 11 u'hich is attached as Attachment G. The
improvement costs are derived from the financially feasible DEFP. There nray be
additional costs to meet concurrency uhich are addressed through Proportionate Share
Mitigation provisions. These pro" isions and requirements are outlined in the Interlocal
Agreement, specifically, Sections 8.14 and 8.15.
Land .{rea Requirenrents I he estinratc-d land area requirements necessary to support the
capacity improvements planned over the five year period 2006/2007 to 201112012 for the
school district are depicted in Table 14 belorv. The estimated acres needed are calculated
using an average acre amount: 11 acres per elementary. 2l acres per middle and .10 acres
per high schooi. Capacity improvements which only involve building additions to
existing school sites do not require additional land.
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Elemenr
Cirv- of Dania Beach Pagell-36
I Est.Averase Cost oer Studenli st^,i,r"
Elementar)-
Middle
High
Public School Facilities Element
Elemen
\.{iddle
Hi
ial
Total
New School
63
80h
S
Source: School Board ofBrorvard Coun 2007
The School Board is developing new "urban school" standards intended to reduce the
acreage amounts required to build schools given the diminishing availability of land in
Brou'ard Cor.rnt1,.
Student N,lembershio Proiection Methodolosv l'he School District's primary projection
tool lor enrollment projections is a geographicalll' based Cohort Sun'ival model. ivhich
projects future students by grade. The Cohort Sunival method is considered a very
reliable procedure and is utilized by the State of Florida in their projections and the U.S.
Census Bureau for their projections and reports. The model uses an "aging" concept that
moves a group or cohort of people into the ftture and increases or decreases their
numbers according to past experience through history. Years of historical student
enrollment data is used to create the sun,ival ra1io. That ratio is then used to project
future students. The survival projection of kindergarten is more speculative and requires a
different approach. Kindergarten is projected using a linear regression technique. Simply
put. the linear regression is based upon what the numbers have been for the kindergarten
population historically and this trend is continued into the futue.
The student projections by Traffic Analysis Zone (T AZ) or neighborhood lrom the model
are aggregated to individual schools based upon the neighborhoods (TAZs) that are
Iocated within school boundaries. This data is then carefully scrutinized. In some
instances. individual TAZs are hand conected to reflect changes in growrh *hich are not
picked up in the projection model's histories. These changes are checked and recorded.
The overall projections are compared and tested ior reasonableness *'ith other models
such as the Florida Department of Education (DOE) projections, the Broward County
Department of Urban Planning and Redevelopment population projections and the School
District Cohort (grade by grade) model which is based upon current and historical 20th
day enrollment counts. The Principals' projections are compared as well. Checks of
reasonableness are performed on the model output by utilizing other techniques such as a
cohort survival of one for a given population, attrition rates, and adding children which
are anticipated to be the result of new residential development.
District staff continues to gather all infonnation *'hich assists in making projections. For
example, each year the planning directors of municipalities in Brorvard County are
contacted to discuss grouth in their cities and provide current and lorecasted buitding
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Pagell-37
School Tlpe #of
Improvements I Estimated Acres
I Needed
Ner,school t0
\eu Sclrool
)
loNone lo
lI
City of Dania Beach
Table 14: Land Area Requirements
111
Improvement Type
2 5-+
Public School Facilities Element
permits and cerlificates of occupanc-v. Staff also talks regularly with developers in the
County and gro\\th is monilored through the Facility Management. Planning. and Site
Acquisition Department. All of this information is also used in determining the
adjustments to the cohort model and as a "check" ofthe model.
At any given time the follorving factors may have an eflect on the projections:
changes in the rate of neu' housing development within the county could lead
to "over" projections:
changes in the rate of neu' housing development *,ithin the county (i.e. high
interest rates or a recession may slow new }rousing starts and growh) could
lead to "over" projections;
economic condilions (i.e. the creation of jobs usually means families are
moving in) this can lead to "under" projections:
immigration: and
natural phenomena (i.e. Hurricane Andrew) which relocates people very
quickll'.
There are also decisions made u'ithin the district, u'hich may have a dramatic affect upon
projections. These include:
the Iocation and number ofbilingual clusters:
the location and number ofESE clusters:
the start ofmagnet programs (first year projections are difficult because of the
lack ofa "track record"); and
reassignments - beginning in 1996, the "open door" reassignment policy
transfers have had impact the district projections;
choice - in addition to reassignments, magnets. and Adequate Yearly Progress
(AYP), there are choice areas where students have a choice to attend more
than one school;
vouchers - these programs allow transfers between schools which can affect
projections;
Charter schools - opening/closing of charter school facilities throughout the
)ear.
In essence, the model derives a growth factor or ratio for student survival to the next
grade based upon previous survival numbers to the same grade of students in each Traffic
Anall'sis Zone (T AZ), the basic geographic area for the model. In most cases, TAZs
represent neighborhoods. There are over 900 TAZs in Bro*'ard Countl. The permanent
FISH capacity data \\,as extracted from the Florida Department ofEducation faciiities and
space inventory. The FISH capacity at each school indicates the current design capacity
of the school. The FISH data is updated every time a new addition or major remodeling
and renovation takes place at a school. The LOS ofeach school was determined b-v taking
ll09o of the school's pemranent capacitl.
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
1
2
)
4
5
6
7
PageII-38
1.
2.
J.
4.
5.
Cit-r' of Dania Beach
Public School Facilities Element
-1. Proiected l0 Year (L/T) School Enrollment. Capacit\'. LOS & Improvement Costs
The long-term planning period for school facilities is ten 1'ears. Table 15, belou.
represents capacitY needs information lor the end of the ten )'ear period through
2016i2017. The data compares the School District's LOS by grade level and Planning
Area to the 2016 - 2017 projected student enrollments and the needed permanenl
capacitl'. As mentioned earlier. the LOS is calculated at 110% of permanent FISH
capacity'. The cumulative infbrmation presents a total permanent capacity of 295,518
versus a projected enrollment of 259,770 or an excess of 35,748 seats. This gap is a result
ofthe projected declining enrollment that is occurring now and is projected to continue.
Tahle l5llrciletcd !0 Year School Facilities by Plannins Area and District-Wide
Elementary
School 16.321 1.1.3 l7 2.007 None N/A N/A
N4iddle School 8.919 8.1t2 701 None N/A N/A
High School 13.710 I 1.960 1.750 tr-one N/A ,r'/A
CIrafier N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Area A
Special School 0 0 0 None N/A N/A
Elementary
School 21 I 8,7 19 s srs None N/A N/A
Middle School 9,58r 9.380 :01 None N/A N/A
High School 12,624 10,024 2.600 None N/A N/A
Charter N/A N/A N/A N/A NiA N/A
.\rea ll
Special School 2,1 58 I ,341 8t7 None N/A N/A
Elementan,
School 19,106 16.485 t.6l I None N/A N/A
Middle School q 11'7 9,371 (97)
Classroom
Addition s 1 .5 00-000 99
Hrgh School 10.913 7,858 3.055 None N/A N/A
Charter N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Area C
Special School 0 0 0 None N/A N/A
Elernentary
School 18.117 16,890 I .227 None N/A N/A
Middle School 9,496 9,2 83 2tl None N/A N/A
High School r4.903 14.823 ti0 None N/A N/A
('ha rter N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Arca D
Special School 218 125 153 None N/A N/A
Elementary
School 1.1.143 l r.665 t.+7 8 None N/A r,\/AArea E
Middle School 7.5 59 5,907 1,652 None r.N/A r.,,"/A
Cin' of Dania Beach Page ll -39 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Elenrent
Surpiirs
(Deficit)
Planning
Area
'Etrollme
nt 20lG-77
Piojected
Added
Capacity
I
Public School Facilities Element
High School 9.799 5;772 4.027 None N/A N/A
Chaner N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Special School -1.986 1.657 l.tt9 None N/A N/A
Elementary
School 24.41 5 ?3.768 6.+6 None N1,A rr'1A
N{iddle School 10.635 12,250 ( 1.615)Neu,School
$50.000.00
0 1.151
High Sclrool l1.5 87 12.887 700 None N/A N/A
Charter N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Area F
Special School 1,15 12,1 2)None N/A N/A
Elenrentan
School 19.504 16.795 ) 70q None N/A N/A
Middle School 8.712 8.1 3,1 578 None N/A N1,A
Hich School 10.037 1,0,213 (206)
Classroom
Addition $2.'100.000 100
Chaner N1,A.N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Area G
Special School 3,316 1.717 1.569 None N/A N/A
Elementary
School l3 5,852 1 l8.6lS 17,213 None N/A N/A
Middle School 6,1.1 80 62.5.10 1.6.+0
New School
& Addition
$51.500.00
0 1.853
High School 85.572 73.567 r 2,005
Classroom
Addition $2.,+00.000 100
Charter N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
District-
Wide
Special School 9,9\4 5.021 ,1,890 None N/A N/A
Total 295.518 259,770
s53,900,00
0 2,0s3
Source: School Board ofBroward County,2007
There are slight seat deficiencies in Planning Area C in the middle school level capacity
and Planning Area G in the high school level. A rnajor deficiency of 1,615 middle school
seats is projected to occur in Planning Area F. The range of seat availability by grade
level is depicted in Table 15A below.
Comprehensive PIan
Public School Facilities Element
City of Dania Beach Page 1l - 40
I
I
I
I
I
LOS (rr0%
Perm.
Pmjected
Enrollme
nt.20lG
Pmjected
Added
I
I
35.7,18 I
Public School Facilities Element
Elementary B s.525 High
F 616 Lorl
\liddl!-E 1.652 High
F (1,61s)Lorv/Seat Deficit
IJigh E 4.027 IIigh
G (206)Lorv/Seat Deficit
Special 2.329 I Iigh
A&C 0 Lou'
Source: School Board ofBroward Countr, 2007
Long Tenn lmpact on Ancillan, Facilities. With an increase of student enrollment comes
the increase in operational costs to provide the needed support. School buses. custodial
support. utilily charges. and maintenance staff are all impacted as students and square
footages increase. The school district owns 26 administrative sites totaling 648,960
square footage ol permanent space. This space houses the district and area staffs. The
total includes six bus lots that house approximately 1.546 school buses.
5. Collocation of School Facilities
The collocation of public school t-acilities u'ith local government public/civic I'acilities.
and shared use is used in the context of this analysis as public facilities collocated or
located adjacent to each other, and used by both the School Board and local govemments.
Shared use facilities are facilities that are not located adjacent to each other, but ou,r:red
by either the School Board or the local govemment. but shared by both parties through
mutual agreement or understanding.
The School Board. Brorvard Countl and local governments currentl) have numerous
collocated facilities, and the 2004 Annual Report on the implementation olrhe Interlocal
Agreement indicated that further study might be needed to determine how the collocation
of such facilities can be enhanced in Brou,ard County. The Report further required an
inventory ofexisting collocated facilities to detennine ifsuch a study is needed.
The Collocation of Public School Facilities nith Local Govemment Public/Civic
facilities and Shared Use Repofi indicate that there are approximately two hundred and
tweli,e (212) existing instances where public school facilities are collocated with local
goyemment public/civic facilities. and include shared use. Of this number, the School
Board or local governments share use of one hundred and forty-six (146) public school
facilities or local government public/civic facilities. However. majority ol such facilities
are School Board o*'ned f-acilities. Also. sixtt.fir'e (65) of the 212 facilities are
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Elernent
City of Dania Beach Pagel1-41
E
Table 15A: Anah-sis of Plannins Area / Seat Availabilit\'
Existine Collocated Public School Facilities \eith Local Government Public/Civic
Facilities. and Shared Use Facilities
Puhlic School Facilities Element
collocatedi'shared use lacilities. and one
collocated u-ith Plantation High School).
is a collocated facilit,v (P.A-L. Stadium
Attachment E lists the existing collocation/shared use facilities. Map 8 depicts the
location of collocatior/shared use facilities
Government Public/Civic Facilities and Shared Use Facilities
Information provided by the local govemments did not identifl'anl potential sites that
rnight enable the collocation/shared use of public school facilities u'ith local government
public/civic facilities. Further. the information provided lists twenty (20) instances that
rnight potentially allow for the shared use ofpublic school facilities and local government
public/cilic facilities. Ten (10) of the facilities are County ou'ned. eight (8) are School
Board owned and tu'o (2) are municipal ou,ned.
Currently there are few existing public school facilities that are collocated lr'ith local
govemment pubic/civic l-acilities. Additional potential sites are needed to enable the
collocatiorVshared use of public school facilities with local govemment public/civic
facilities.
A study b,s a consultant to determine horv the collocation of public school facilities with
local govemment public/civic f'acilities can be enhanced in Bro*ard Count-v is currentl.v
being pursued. Such a study as it relates to these lacilities ma1'enable the most efficient
use of public in\.estment in the communit,v's public infrastructure.
Attachment F lists the potential collocation,'shared use facilities. Map 9 depicts the
location of potential collocation/shared use facilities
6. Onportunities to Locate Schools to Serve as Communit y F-ocal Points
Schools cal act as an anchor in the community. They are a symbol of a neighborhood's
stability and attract families to the community. They transmit knowledge to new,
generations, advance know,ledge, display the achievements of societl. plus bring
neighbors together for Parent Teacher Association meetings. school plays. and sporting
events. The.v offer their classrooms and media centers to residents for adult education
classes, and communitl, and club meetings. They are key determinants of the quality of
lit'e and are valued symbols of community identity and achievement. Moreor,er. the
communitv is often evaluated on the basis of the quality of its schools.
Historically, the School District and the County's municipalities have successfully
n'orked together to utilize school facilities for community purposes. A Reciprocal Use
Agreement (RUA) is the mechanism used to accomplisl.r shared use between the
municipalities and the School District. Several municipalities have RUAs n'ith the
School District. These municipalities include: Cooper City, Coral Springs, Fort
Lauderdale, Hallandale Beach. I-auderhill. Miramar, North Lauderdale. Oakland Park.
Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Pagell-42Cin of Dania Beach
Potential Sites for the CollocationtShared Use of Public School Facilities n'ith Local
Public School Facilities Element
Parkland. Pembroke Pines and Pompano Beach. The agreements enable the entities to
exchange use oftheir facilities "vithout entering into a lease for such use. The agreements
address each partl" s liabititl. operating and maintenance cos1s. scheduling of use. and
other issues that may arise. School facilities are often used as meeting places for
community associations and house several community programs such as summer youth
programs.
New educational facilities located outside a category 1,2 or 3 er,acuation zone are
required to have core facilitl, areas designed as Enhanced Hurricane Protection Areas
unless the facility is exempted based on a recommendation b1'the local emergency
management agency or the Department of Communitl' Affairs. Certain factors are
considered to quality for the exemption. such as low evacuation demand. size. location.
accessibility and storm surge. For example. schools w'ithin the county that have adequate
shelter capacity may be exempt. Table 16 is an inventory of schools within Broward
Count-v that serve as emergency shelters. Map l0 depicts the location of the emergency
shelter.
School llame ADDRESS
Arhl: ?obe:: isr! -. Lt6ll+1 :: 1 H?l 23d Avenu? Fl L,ruC--.:.!ie 333 I 1
aeEaft"l F:ta =lenr€l3rt l34li !l: !Jt'L:re! E:ed \, _:r.r 3,:1::::rr:l acve Elern€.:.ary :.':l :i\ 'r::. 1!E. . .:13,r:-:
a.r:l E 3des -.liqh :::: :.f,:+le(E{ . :nr :.!. _ql -jiL:
E!6_3rc:! El:m.?nr1 l:, s73'r:"t i!= ,'.'enr -rl::1
ElE 3 ic:s H,e.1r!, :,rt .::' C.0rr U-na. :i::i
Fil,:an Cove Miralie .+::r ar3f:n:J-e 5!: tletr, il?::
F.3raflaa Ekmen:6?a::.1 l.lE lal rl.ry. Fl jidelciie -i-.33,+
F.r -jaa Elem6r:ri)1::: l'l* -: Rc. lralr :3i:4
:it r R!. Ei:mEii3f^.1 i; 1 41ij. P..r6?r. !.lesic". 353:i
l.C€n f,,3g; MLolle 1 :5: r'kb -:r Rd.. tr3lle ?33:,4
-rl€si.ie E e.::nG.r !.r: tlil I 3alh ! € aernle P--Es 33::!
34:{l Ba*s Roid. Vao3t6 3!?3
!y. i! ;r€€k hlrdCle 4il3 Soi FJe:s 3L.d k_oBrl g!EE{ 330i1
t$cts€ ;ay Elen€ntar/1::!t sil 5-t. S!. ,,!:t..1 "]:33:
1a{? S :r$ A,re . l-lrlf,.!o! ?3!3
55:3 I$ !4th Are. TJnil3. ?3321
5-r:I r!!ile5 F.csd. a...nd :leel 31C73
lew Fe.ar!r:ro: Llcll;t:.-t r i,l,lna.6tec ll.a-!, ?3:,::
3::t iir!ir.: F. :r rr:E::F ?a:11
...i:r FL. EiEmEn_r1 3:' r.J.i l::1: trE :{i_:ii Pa4 :la:P
?n* bl:5 E]:m€n:a1 32:a h Stk Flsd I. L.r,5 rEal! L-.r.s 333:;
?i.t -..r,5 Eleme']lary 1ii* Trais :nd. Pallnni 3fr7?-3'lrec: EEm:nr.y 1::-I \* l!t\ S'- lyi !:n6r!':!:faPi:n:lttr. =jE-eltr.r 6€, l{?3iE A!! . Fa:rio. 33ili
?o{nprm 5E3ct -ir?f 6lC i{5 'r3i-t AlEnue i6m}},.o E}e.cn 33:t0
F..:i( r.i.l
= -"r<rt:.,:3.? tltl lSlh S:re€i F: Lr,:erd.r. :,_r-. ! 1
sireEr Lakes ilenEnt.irr :r:rl -qr'] 11:.d !.e lt{Err ?:A2S
Silv-:r Pel6€ :rc,":i.aEry l:'ll U$ 15:rhns Peeb.ote :..es 33:l;
5il!=. TrJrl Miolle 1$m er€ridin 5t . Pslbue Fires 33!: i
sr.]!€t :ersll C€n*:3Ia 5!t faihr.F: La---{da! 33:ll
5ur:€1 L.:kes :lE-en!i.r 1!4Cf :( i-iit 3t uiE-r L a:i
:ri6ern* EE al:.no,C.o:.ut C.eel 3,? lI3
1l:" tflj{ ;o,rr.t 5l . F: .Jucd.i.-' 3i: I 1
1::Cf:tci-ter! R.!d. Pr-l( 3i: it:tl
Citr of l)ania Beach Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
7. EnTersencv Shelters
Table 16: List of Emereencv Shelters
Page 1l -43
Public School Fac ilities Element
The School Board of Brouard Count-v has lotal projected revenue. and financing sources
ol $3.487.371.000 for public school capital improlements for the 5 .vear period ending
2011-2012 as depicted in Table 17. The major source of revenue is millage. u,hich is
collected from local property taxes and comprises 56%o of total revenue. The projected
appropriations for those funds are depicted in Table 18. The primarl' appropriation is for
debl sen'ice. u,hich comprises 3 1% of total appropriations.
Table 17: Estimated Rer cnue and Financinq Sourccs (stated in thousands)
Rt\ cru. & Finnlr.trs \ourrc\:o0r-08 :(r{18-09 :009,t 0 :0to.l I :1r ! t- !:
,.i\...iil \l I l_\s.l5t.nir
.lt,-l I I : 1,1 (ilI llrr.l{)i t -l il.,-tN r.t i.!
l'lpafl \l Li1:rri,r) li.!1)nij lnrcrc{l:_')r'(r [-inu rl.S(r0 t: irr)
\lri.cll r.du.l ,,t.rl tjj r i li!.,
f i (L,- (,,,.ir'rrrlLll 11..1().i L.t.i I I llrl :.rho : '. 1":t.6i:
lr.r:(.[.ei-]ts:r 1: !1..1 :lr.r_.1i
t 1 I .! I )\ .1. .....r {la,t,
r'.r:. :,^ I{(r,..ri,r1 ':.:1(1.i1ir(l ll.-<lrf
1l:\1,\I l.(i9:I {tul,:.1!!i):,tJt)ir :,1..91
!903,1-{r.Si,n,090 S6J8.0l$ y'2j.1!r S('5{.aJG sJ.iJ0.{21 l(xt 0Ir"i,
Table 18: Estimated ApproDriations (stated in thousands)
Il(rilnrt.d \oDronrirti.nr\t00:"08 :008,09 :f)09- t0 l0t0-tl tar l-t:
5:6,i.rE0 S:r,it.20:i Jlt{,.501 tl:l.j(,1 s?6.ttr'0
:1. .\ ir.. 1,lil.l t,.ltr..rf.l :!.i1)l .l.iti 8,r_[ I
ll ^:1:: lr.hil l.an^.r.1:l
Ir_81')l.r.:t.l t1.1,!1
l.:.1:i,'1,r.:iltl :1.9:().llr.:t)l'l,l-:51r
:t.;;l t:r.lit
I l. {t-ts.1i;7 t$.7qs 1iL).5:-l l5:!,
l.l.n I ;ti.lrl I r i.1,: ,
1i..1!il l.(,:.1
\ !|'(lr\lt.-i!t .t:. t5_l lt.tit 11.,1(,-.lt;.11,:..1r,,1n
ti.il,rt. '1]l l. tr)r r-l :,1r!
l.a(rl li. .. r r) itrr
ll.t5r)t1.75n ll 5N1):i.1t0 I12.rli1
Consr!(rir)n (i)\i ^di!{n.nr la.i,ii1i l1).tr00 14.|l)0 lLr:,{,(ril
1l.l{/r
l1-1,i,n
l : . ,,i
\908. t16 s._!n-090 \6la.fr1t :r,l-r.l:.{s6i0.:-1(i s-t.s-10..1:t tlro.tr011,
Source: I he Sclrool Board olBroward Countv 2007-2008 Adoptcd 5-Year DEFP. 2007
Ciry' of Dania Beach Page ll -4.1 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
8. Funding Sources for Capital Improvements
Public School Facilities Element
The projected capital outlal's, by school facilitl for the 5 1'ear period are depicted in
Appendix E. Schedule 5 of the Adopted S-Year DEFP. Attachment B. The projected
millage rate and debt capacity over the 5 1'ear period are included in Table t9 belo*.
Table 19: Estimated Expenditures - Debt Sen'ice/Capacitv
Tle School Bou rtl of Brou a nl ( ou n t1 , Fhrritla
l-srinraled lirptnditures - ( ()l's Dcht Scr\ ic('
I iscni Itr rs 20tl?-08 !o 201(r- I l
:. r l-r2
r.1:i _8r
l -t:
', 1{,
l l_i1
lr..'r:j tr,'r.!r, a'!r:': l'...1 .rrJ!
rnrr,,:'2.,1 i1.. ni,l ':..l'r.,
-- - - -r-!!l-r!:hrl']
Irtn \r' ( (tl\ l\r,.n..
t rr*.t91-rrr s 190.:6-l.rll ! l!t.ri:9-r:6 I :lt.6j:.r,5t ! l6J.3r(raJ8:
I, Li .till,r;,1r:'-,1, !1 ,.j
,l
J- .'!.ri..::r,r ir !i r, r'rrl\ilj.: -_:,1! r.'' rnrnL:1::ii(
i i1r,i.lr,!,r:i irlllr!
Source: '[he School Board ofBroward C]ounty 2007-2008 Adopted 5-Year DEFP. 2007
Operating Cost Considerations: Transportation costs to operate the 1.546 buses vrhich
transport more than 81.000 students to and from school every day are significant in the
operation ol school facilities. Over the next llve years it is estimated the district will
spend approximately $484.1 million dollars on transportation and $1.6 billion dollars on
maintenance. Utility costs are included as part of the maintenance estimate. Square
Page 1l - 45 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
:,.1
-',\,
,l 1,1 ': r't:
:\ i : \.:.l.rtll
:.) :
Cilv of Dania tseach
Public School Facilities Element
footage increases also impact the budget guidelines for calculating custodial staff at every'
school site. The administratir,e sites also include the housing for four area maintenance
departments. a district maintenance staff as u'ell as the 1'acilities and construction
management departments that totals over a thousand emploY'ees.
Cornprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Ciry of Dania Beach Page l1 - 46
Public School Facilities Element
\IAI' 1: Existing Public Schools & Ancillar.r Facilities - 2007
EXISTING PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES &
ANCILLARY PLANT LOCATIONS . 2OO7
Legend
f I Diskict Boundarv
-
Schools. Elementary
s Middle
r High
0 Special
o Charter
* Ancillary Plants
BR WARD Paorod ayalsstu
PLm6, S.M..! Ovir6L1*a n:milg .rd R.drwteBrn O@i.s?r
a
Er'
r.!::::it :r f.Irr-r a-q.t",
la
t l!'e i9 a!'
l
a
:.,,rl-".Gl,
a 1.:a
i .-.--.ior,i . i a rl
a
_"", {
a
a
a
st
""-,t,.-,1
:
ri^
i
1
r
a
i
*oirt*I
+l
i.
q:*39r'1f.,,1dn --8".lr.:gl!.
+
.l .ii'.. 'ir, a,-- |
a
,.,t
t'' . ,, !
I'.iu.-;7
t ' *'.'1,.:'
a 4...,
a
I t t r : ';l -?o t':, c_L'.4 4
s- 1?
:
iaf i 1-
..1
a
I 1F.t
n
o at a
1 ..,!,.
:, oi
d
a;:l
a
r
.a
ti r
_aE a L
aI
,,-;..-:.+?o
a5-a .*
1- _".,:q*.r-ir
I
'a
i-* --r"I{re
t?'- - a
I
I ,',-,r.!:at,.,, r
PageII-47 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
N
A
City of Dania Beach
Public School Facilities Element
\IAP 2: Elementan School LOS - 2007-200tt
2OO7 -20A8 ELEM ENTARY SCHOOL
LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
Leg€nd
I ureis Lei,e:- cr s:r'rce
f]l ooes rcr meer re.rL oF sERVrcE
-.,IS7RICT
BOUNOARY
-
C3NCUERENCY SERVI';E AREA (CSA] BOII'{BARY
. SCH$]i'OCATtrN
-l .:.. .
l
t
:.:;:
a,k,
:Jia,r
*,,*n"717!
.?i
BR \AARD Prap:€,J Bt
GIS 5..6.rPndftc SrvlB lltvalr.Urbd Pl.dvt -t R.d.{ro9Dr! Ce-tn}n
N
A
City of Dania Beach Page ll -48 Cornprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Elemer:t
.-tI
I
I
I
Public School Facilities Element
MAP 3: Middle School LOS - 2007- 2008
2007 -2008 t\4 I DDLE SCHOOL
LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
Legend
f] uerrs rrvel os srnuct
ffi ot,ss mr uerr rnc: oF sERVlcf
-
,lsmlcT BOUiIDAFII
-
CONCLIRRENCY SERiEE AREA {CS{] BOU NOARY
. scHoan i ocATloN
BR WARD Plerl3rea B/
Grs S€cic1
Pt nrfu Slr'c.3 DtfEeufix Pr.B')t ad Rrds,lkrt.El D.!€.tb!.d
N
A
L
Cilv of Dania Beach Page ll -49 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
r
I
(1
l
i
I j
-
I()
I
I *},
I
)
I
I
Public School Facilities Element
2OO7-2008 HIGH SCHOOL
LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
E]} oors ror uEr: ro,el sF sER\1a€
-
OrSTR(II BOU}|OAQY
-
ccNcuREENqr S:B\,1GE AFEi ICSA) ts(U:{r},R}
. s0.10cl tocgllrN
FCF
OEERFI:!!i:r€Artilr;it
ELY.
6Ln!air€Elri:l
rltS'l
Envl r
ttaF
ltSE
1tgH
ll61,
l-t!:t
lt39':R3L{DES
ller1
:9:Ra: 3:Lini3Caual: IPrgL€ scr]:nLa;
BRi::,r:U,A&D.,i}.ii:;;i
Freared F{
GIS S..1i4riAien.! 9d!{a5 Oiv'siel,t rn Flamtq ?rd ee4e!€Ll!a:3.g&:indn
N
A
City of Dania Beach Pasell-50 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Elernent
MAP 4: High School LOS - 2007- 2008
LegBnd
f]] urrs rrci cr s:nvrc:
Public School Fasilities Element
MAP 5: Elementary School LOS - 2011-2012
2011 -2A12 ELEM ENTARY SCHOOL
LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
Legend
',E'IS LEVE!CF SERIJCE
ll1]ES {Ol taEl LE!'EL OF SE*.'.CE
-
ols'iRlcT BcuiIOARY
-
CgNCIIERENCY 5:RVI:E AAEA ICSA] SOU,iiD'"9Y
. scrcl)l aoL(lrcN
tC-Fl:: Eit;-F?a, a.ir.ll, PtSlrt saHr'aLS
N
ER:1::l/\r BDETreI:GB
ftetrle36f6rssec16!*$a.9 Seli..s O,rkEn!.1x. Flrlsa d3 eeneE 3?aexl ler3rftst
A
$riti,
::,sa'
City of Dania Beach Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
Page 1l - 5l
i
?
Public School Facilities Element
MAP 6: \{iddle School LOS - 201 I - 2012
2011 -2012 Ml DDLE SCHOOL
LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
Legend
IIIEEIS LEi'E! CF S:F,'ICE
'gES
NCI I,4EET LE\iE! OT SERVICE
-
trrsl*lcT BOUIEIR!
-
CSTURRENCY SER.''CE AREA GSt) BCrJr,lOARy
. scrn)@'.ocArroN
lt
BR WARD ftooai! Br
3lS S&!onPlnn*lt S.$,kEs Oilisbntnba 6.bhd lni R6.v.lq!ian .)ar+fi*rr
A
I
I
City of Dania Beach Page ll - 52 Comprehensive PIan
Public School Facilities Element
I
)
r-1 I
.)
t_
-*v,-
s-
I 6r l,*r
L-+=- I
t-t \I
I
LJI
I
I
Public School Facilities Element
MAP 7: High School t-OS - 201l- 2012
2011-2012 HtGH SCHOOL
LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
Legend
MEETS IFIEL OF SERVICE
DOES NCI iIE€ TF.€L OF SERYICE
-
DISIRICT BOU{JOARY
-
C9NCURRENCY SERi'lCE AREq {CSAJ BC&NOAR}
' SCHOO!LOCATICN
BR..- WARD
iIEEITE
ftetrr+d 6rt
615 S.rterE.nnll! seoLe: oirisixloan Plrn'r., r:3 REderercpi6r Det.:1Bdri
N
A
,:! ": :-.
3a,1a'l
€!Y
ELr.r,rc-1Ettci.t
LiIJOERD4:E
i{IGH
iircnr1|EST:Rl
fir,3l-
titLLs
tiraF
E!:RGLA'ES
nr61-!Ftci
Citr of Dania Beach Pagell-53 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Fac ilities Element
Il
I
I
--7-
)
I
I
'l
I
I
I
I
Public School F acilities Element
MAP 8: Existing Collocation and Shared frse Inventon'
EXISTING COLLOCATION AND
SHARED USE INVENTORY MAP
LcAand
IJ
7
g
ir-Lr rw./F oel
-
a3r
?r 4491
12il
?9+
5i
AL
-_.1..'
9't1
t&
-;, N€S
-3731
-
Cin of Dania Beach Page 11 - 54 Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
@
3781
I
,,
i
ti\l li*
36;
.A
Public School Iracilities Element
MAP 9: Potential Collocation and Shared flse Inventon'
POTENTIAL COLLOCATION AND
SHARED USE INVENTORY MAP
Lcgend
E
ffiffi r,reerxI"..--*.,
I s;r-e .arr
TACILITY TYPE
->
-
--
a.I :
?-
i
c 3i I
z
t.
i
]J
1251
I
!
al sE i 7iH
a
> gtaus
:
1ILLLI
=
,a
Citr of Dania Beach Comprehensive Plan
Public School Facilities Element
F5 ES
Pagell-55
Public School Facilities Element
MAP l0: Emergency Shelters
EI\4ERGENCY SHELTERS
Legend
I I District Boundarv
-Emergency Shelters
a Primary
'''r Secondary
a Tertlary
N
!rqa?.ar 6r'ri:s seclbn
P6Minl Sernc-o5. E isiieLtis qrnni.! ,d qed.\*to$€nt DlpffineJ,
A
.a
'.:
Cit_v of Dania Beach Page 11 - 56 Comprehensive Plalr
Public School Facilities Element
I sri..Ei s].ioR1s i : : : 1.'LEuE\1rR/ /acox,- FA.,$ r€*',il:;.."j-i.'-,. . .E.F"(''r- .;*;jj.g",
:.sL\:Etr Lii(:s.-.lr::,4r.:.'a :",.1.. --.1 --. :..---'.'*-';- -' :
BRtiwARDi'iinriii}r