HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-07-01 Special City Commission Meeting Agenda PacketAGENDA
CITY OF DANIA
SPECIAL MEETING
JULY I, 1997
TO FOLLOW WORKSHOP MEETING
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY
COMMISSION WTH REGARD TO ANY MATTER CONSIOERED AT THIS MEETING
OR HEARING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDTNGS, AND FOR SUCH
PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS IS MAOE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
LOBBYIST REGISTRATION REQUIRED . REGISTRATION AS A LOBBYIST IN THE
CITY OF DANIA IS REQUIRED IF ANY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION IS BEING
PAID TO LOBBY THE COMMISSION ON ANY PETITION OR ISSUE PURSUANT TO
ORDINANCE NO. 01-93. REGISTRATION FORMS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE CITY
CLERK'S OFFICE IN THE ADMINISTRATION CENTER.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, PERSONS
NEEDING ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY OF THESE PROCEEDINGS
SHOULD CONTACT MARIE JABALEE, CITY CLERK, 1OO W. DANIA BEACH BLVD,
DANTA, FL 33004, (9s4) 921-8700 EXT. 202, AT LEAST 48 HOURS pRtOR TO
MEETING,
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
.A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA,
ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN &
ASSOCIATES, INC, TO CONDUCT A WATER AND
WASTEWATER UTILITIES RATE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF
DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.'
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA,
ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN &
ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND
WASTEWATER UTILITIES IMPACT FEE STUDY FOR THE CITY
OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.'
Discussion and possible action relating to City's position on
Purchase Assurance Program and other matters in connection
with expansion of Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood lnternational Airport.
1.
2.
RESOLUTTON NO._
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA,
ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN &
ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND
WASTEWATER UTILITIES IMPACT FEE STUDY FOR THE CITY
OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA:
Section 1 .That the certain Proposal dated June 18, 1997, submitted by Hartman &
Associates, lnc. to conduct a water and wastewater utilities impact fee study in the amount of
$9,500.00 for the City of Dania, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as
Exhibit'A", be and the same is hereby accepted and the appropriate city officials are hereby
authorized to execute same.
Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its
passage and adoption.
PASSED and ADOPTED on this 24 day of June '1997.
ROBERT MIKES
MAYOR - COMMISSIONER
MARIE JABALEE
CITY CLERK - AUDITOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS
By e^4 c. a/L-"-
FRANK C. ADLER, City Attomey
1
ATTEST:
Resolution No.
RESOLUTTON NO._
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That the certain Proposal dated June 18, 1997, submitted by Hartman &
Associates, lnc. to conduct a water and wastewater utilities rate study in the amount of
$20,000.00 for the City of Dania, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A', be and the same is hereby accepted and the appropriate city officials are hereby
authorized to execute same.
Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its
passage and adoption.
PASSED and ADOPTED on this 24 day of June '1997.
ATTEST:ROBERT MIKES
MAYOR - COMMISSIONER
MARIE JABALEE
CITY CLERK. AUDITOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS
ey: 4^-/ c C-A^-
FRANK C. ADLER, City Attorney
1
Resolution No
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA,
ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN &
ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND
WASTEWATER UTILITIES RATE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF
DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, tNC.
PlINCIEf,lli
l,B E Ori{ucrq.lE
uq8 c!ts l'&t:i
)t6nd E !(,YraL.r. l!F.
!ElUOr:l:llOC!$El:
Trqtva l&druh. PE
eagincers,hydrogtolo$sts,nrrtryors&mrnagemedtconsultarts ligltg51l
"*"-fi,Ii.itr;fl.Jrme 18, leeT HAI#97-237MK ffi,ffi,ii
1
Ms. Marie I. Jabalee
FrnLce Director
City ofDania
100 W. Danie Beaoh Blvd
P.O. Box 1708
Paniq, FL 33004
Subjectr Engineer's Quotation for:
1. Watcr and \{astew$er Utilities Rrte Study
2, Sarcr end Wasbwater Utilities Impect Fee Study
Dear lvls. Jabalee:
This leBer costhrtes our budget quotation to you and confiras our conversation of June 18,
1997.
Watcr aad WastecEtEr Utilities Rate Surdy - The hrmp sum aEount for ttre water aad
'wastewater rBte study is $20,000.
Water and 'Wastewaler Udities Irupact Fee Study - The lump fl]m ao.ount for fte wate:-
"''d w'asewater impact ft€ sardy is $9,500.
If the City desircs, the lump glm amoutt for a combined water aud wastelvater r8te study,
as well at a water arrd wastewaler impact fte study in one report is 529,500-
Our standard hourly rates are auached hereto,
EXHIBIT,A"
2.
)
2ol E\Sf P${[ STRIET . SUffE lnoo . ORI.AND(), Fl. ]?$01
TEI-F-FHONE r{071 afqfg5; . }-r\.r( a.ioi 8.-19-ll9o - E-I{AIL: lr.,no I *]o Lcnrn
Mg Marie I- Iabalee
June 18, 1997
Eage 2
GCIVoh
P?s/Jabalee. gch
Attachoeot
cc;IWke Rocca, C.M.C., IIAI
Very truly ycurs,
Eartman & Astocietcr' Ins
Our frE sta[ds co@itted to accomplish the above,refcralced work for'tbe lumP sm 8'@ouDts
delineatcd above. If aoy additioral serviccs arc raquirEd we are armilable to conduct tbc saue
utrlizing our houdy rate schedule.
/-*Ug-
llq,qzJd C. IIarmao, P.E.7 Presideat
JLJN-18-199? 14;1?447 B3-e 3?98 P .@2
EAWi{AN &ASSOCLXIE, INC
TOT]RLY RAIESCEEDALE
GeEld C. grtunt P.Ep tf'B./ P-G./ P.LS.) ' (S'htd4 ftistollrr, RIDrirg' Dnla' L,ob)
Scrre Mmagrr/Scoior Pn g"'cr
Division Mrargesthief ElgiDr.r (P5.1P'L S.1C'}1LC')
n rdlacc YItr (P.8.)
Seoior Project Mt! €Er
EDgiEEr Vtr (P.E.)
engirFer VI (P.8,) / Scieotid IV
Frlgh*qt Y (P.8.)
Engirar fV
ElgitrEcr Itr
Enginref Utr
Sede Scieotist
Sci.rrEt I/II
Elrgitrscl lryedor
h?cctG
Seuis Plaer
E$logEologist utr (P. G.)
HydrogeoloeiEt VI (?. G')
Hyd$g€oloEi$ vf e.G.)
Eydlofrologbt v
HydmgEologut lV
HydrDgEologist Itr
EydrogEologist UE
HyGo TeclriEieo II
IIy&o T.'tni.i'n J
hgincaiog DcsiSDE Itr
Erlgine€ri4g DEigE tr
Fnginerring Tecloirim IV
E'nErnacrinB T€chniciar Itr
Errgireedrs Tccenicim tr
Bnsincdng Techiciu I
LflsI sorYstor
Soncy Crr CLicf
SEv"y lbct idan III
SEvEy lEdlticisn tr
SEvsy Tccld,cirn I
Graphics Moagct
Gnpbict Tectoiciaa
S€lic R3te AElysr OiJ..{)
S(nio( Rrr. Aralyst
Rlt Aildyst
Seoctrial Suppcrt
BrylodtctionlCmria StPPort
Adndtrisffihc AssisErl
Scciu n Gd Prfre3so!
Storil Pmoessq
Roddart
s1r0.00
8115.00
$99.00
t90.00
s80.00
s?2.00
$72.00
$66-00
$@.00
$55.00
$50.00
$45.m
s60-00
$40.m
s50.m
$,m.00
$50.00
t83.00
$z-00
$66.40
$60.m
$5s-00
$50.m
$,15.0t]
$3s.00
025.00
$5o.oo
s45,0
s45.m
${0.00
$35-m
$50.00
s{5. m
${0.m
840.00
$35.00
i25.@
$4s.m
t35.00
s60.00
$55.m
$4s-m
uo.00
&5.q)
$ro'm
m7.m
$o.m
$20-00
Efftcriv. DiiE: AugEn 10, f995
(fl'Erly tEtG! ira rlt i! cd '"-"ny tud ory Do ediucd ro rlleot &ugcr ir rto vtio|]3 ek@EoE tfu( clrngrisB 6!0,.)
ztlMird/lEdrEASct
JL'l.l-l8-199? 14: r.B 4W A39 3?9q
Nt0t9s
P. 83
DRAFI +91
June 20, 1997 HAI #97-23?.MK
Ms- Marie Jabalee
Finanoe Dirwtor
City of Dania
100 lVest Daia Bor:Ievard
Dania Florida 33004
Subj ect: Wrter cnd Wastelr.ater Utilities Rrte Study
Dear Mg Jaba.lee:
Scope of Sqn r'ce s
The Consultant wiil perform the foilowing:
Gcua-al: Purruant to fre rcqucst for se*ices in rhe Citls RFP, it is the Consullrofs
understanding that ths City desires a review sf the water strd u,Esteqrater user rates and
misccllaneous scrvice cbarges, together with ttcommeodatione fo,r modificalions of the rare
surrcture rrd adjr.rsun€Dts to the ratcs as applicable.
Task I: Wder and TVastewater Utilities Study
l. Review Utility Customer Dda
The City wilt provide information as requescd by the Consuftart and t[e Consultad will
rsvieu/ aud evaluate historical and current records for the mlnber of sustomer accounls
currody oD Iitrc to $e waler systcm and urastewater systen. Data to be provided by de
City lvi[ irclud€, but not necessarily be ]irhited b, the nusrber of accouts belo'ging to
each customer class, the number of tnElEr accoutrts by metor size by clasq the numbe,l of
dwelling units associattd with cach ascollut and the breaftdown of accoruns betweea
inside ad outsidE service arcas and the number of exclusive irrigatio[ mstem by meter
siue.
JUl.l-?B-199? A9: 4E P. EE
Wc are pleased ro submit the following proposal for professional services in conaection with
watc! and wastewarer utilities rate strrdy. Ilarhan & Associates, Inc. (HAI), hereinafter refered
to as the 'Cnnsultat " proposes to furaish prof€ssioDal s€rvices for the City of Danie hereinafter
referred to as tle "City' for the sco,pe outlined bclow for the fecs stipulated hereia.
Ms. Marie Jabalee
Jme 20, 1997
Pagc 2 DRAFI
2. Rsview Water Use and Wastewafer Flow Drl:
The Clty will pmvidc and the Consultant wrlt compile historical flow data for the water
and wBst€water systems. The Consultant will review charact€ristics of utilif ctstomcrs
iu the CiY's seruice rcgs and itte'*l& any relationships to historical ard cu ent trEnds in
water dernand and consumption and wasrewder geaeration dara-
3. Forecast Customer Grrowth, Wate'r Cons:rnptioo and Wastewater G€oedation.
The number of accounts for each customer class of each utility will be forecast, inc'i6s
ard ourside the City's timfu, for the nort 5 years. These projections wiil bc rsviewed
wirh thE City sutr lo ensu€ tkk compauibility with City plaos. In addition,, water
consumption and wustewater generation will be projected for the same 5-year pcliod ond
pres€uted to the City for rcview.
4. Rcview Revenue RequiremefiE-
To estimate lhs rcvErue rcquireocnts, the City will provide and trre Consultaat rvill
review and Evaluats mch information as historioal aud currenr finanoial records,
operarion aad mair errince reports, aad schedules of rtisting debt sfivice as they pe$ain
to the water ad erastell,at€r sysEm^ Thc Consultant will require sssistance fiffil the
City's saff in estimating revetruc rEquircnreuts fot cach rrtility to ensure thd cach utility
urill opemte on a fiaaacially self-sufrciett basis.
5. Forecast Revenue Reguiremerts
Based upon suoh infoffialiotr as hislorical op*ating records. rystem dwelopmenr plano.
estimates of prevcfltstive maintenance costs a[d needs for rcgentzl End replaceorem and
contiageocics, ard relevsd ccoaomic conditions and bads, the Cotrsulturt will forecast
rcvenue requir€EEtrts fc &e rcxt 5 years for both the uacer and wssteurder systetrs.
Costs will be fqr€cast by mqior cost line item.
6. Allocate Costs to Each Utility
Cost allocations for both capital and O&M o<penses of the srater system will be rDade o
watcr sysleo flrnctions, custome,t classes, size of meter and volume of usage- Costs for
rhe uastcuatcr system wrll be alloeaf€d to wastewEt€r systEm fiDctioEs, the customer
classes rcflecting capital, and O&M and wholesale teatmef,t costs- Cost 8llocations will
be made to dctcrmine admioisEative charge back fr@ tht rtility syster::s to the City's
General Frmd. The Consultant's ralc study will also be condueted so as to Ecognize rhe
JUN-2EF199? 89:49
Ms. Marie Jabalee
June 20, 1997
Page 3
DRAFI
25% outside City surcharge on r:des to customcrs locatcd outside the City limib, as
allowed by Florida Statutc.
7- Evalu.ste Msceilaneorrs Service Charger
The lwel of vsious miscellaneow water and u/-cstewater senrice charges will be
rsevaluated fot gercral appropriateness and compa-ability with sirnilr cirarges for other
public utilities in rfiis area Fqr the waft utility, these cbarges inciude the followilg:
rleter hrm-ol, meter lum-olf, metcr oalibrarion, monthly {ire proteetion charges for
private fire liue and hydrant rates and security dcposits.
8. Allocate Reveflue Requiraueots for Each Utility-
Mainfainiag the basic integrity of e.ristng urater and nasteuater customer rate cdegories
and skuctre, tle Consultarrt wiI detffEdne eaclr crrstomet class' proPortioDate shae of
total syste revcnuf IequirerEeuts for cash utility.
9. Calculate Proposed Rares.
For the 5 yeer time horizotr ofthe snrdy, the Coruultant will forecast the annual rEveaues
eYlrected tO be coltected tluough rrtatEr syst€6 ratEs and charges and through wastewater
rates md cbarges. Proposed rates will be cmrpaed with the anrrcot ratcs for each utility
aad the differsrces wiil be identified.
10.Prcpare Report. @eliverable)
The Consultant will preparc a sin8lo vqlurg report of tlis [rojest' The report will
include:
An executive summary
A discussiou ofrate-making concepts focnsing on equity and cost of service
Assrmptions, policies and date sources
Methods and procedures
Conclusions and recommendations
Figurcs and tabulr displays ofihe analysis
A draft revised rate resolution
Eight copies of rhe drzff report will be providcd fm review by the City staff- The City
staff couments will be iacorporded as 4ppmpriatc.
Jufi-eE-lgg? 89:49 P.O4
a
|'
a
a
a
Ms. Marie Jabalee
Jurc70,1997
Page 4
DRAFI
Ten copies of the final roport wiit be provided to the City ofDania
1 l. Prcsentation to the City Commission.
The Consultant wiil present conelusions and reconmer:dations to the City of Dania
Commissimr at two public meetings on request.
Task II: hpact Fee Stud,v
Thc City may desire to engage the ConsEltant to perform a Water aud Wastewater IDtpact Fee
St[dy in additioa to tire Sy'ater and Waste' aer Utilities Rate Shrdy. This impacf fee study would
include an analysis of the City's existiog watcr atrd wsstcwater systEm fixed assets, fimditrg
sources rxed to scquire/cofftruct those a3sets and o<iSing water aad Wsstewater syste6 design
cqacities. In additioq a rcyiew of the City's futurE S-year Capital Improvemcnt PrograEt (CIP)
will also be conducted to deerminc the appropriate projecG to be firnded tkough the uater and
r*astewstff impact fees. The variOtrs assumptions, cOnclusioas and recommend*ions wili be
prwided to thc City in an executive rcport foaat or combined iD tXe Utility R te Study Rcporq
and prcsented to tle City Commission in ono public meeting. In additiOn, this proposal assumes
and relies on the avaii;ability of apgopriate data !o be provided by 6e City, in particular, data
regading the Cityt o<isting utility fixed assets and historical fi:nding mechanisms.
Tlsk II[: Additionsl Services
The Co$uitart will provide otbrr utiliry Managemeot Cons:Iting Serviccs on an as requested/as
needed basis. such sepices may includg but not be linited to, bond feasibiliqv rtports, bond
crcdit rati4 and i.usruaoce support, utility acquisition and valuation assisranae. arnual utility
Eports r.qufurd by bond coyenuts. capital fuiaing sssistsuc€; assesflne!,t programs, utility
strategic plarming, rtility linc o<tension policies, ordioalce/rcsolution preparation, litigation
suppo$ eryort witf,ess testimotry and assismce ragarding utility privatizdion issres.
Items To Re tr'umished AtNon4cmselo$e-Cons$d
Th+ City will assist fte Consultad by f:mishing, at no oost to thc Consultant, ail avaiiable
pertinelrt information iucluding Frevious rcports: fnaneial statcm€nts, budgse, oost cstirlatc J,
iu*omer dar,,- 8nd aay othEr dats relative to pcrformance of tlrc above services for the pmject It
is ugced and understood th* ltre accuracy md veracity of said informatioo and dara aay be
relicd upon by Consultant witltout indEpendent verification of the same.
JUr'{-28-199? E9:5A P. @5
Ms. Ivlarie Jabelee
June 20, 1997
Page 5
DRAFI
Designate in writing a person to act 8s the Citls represeotative witr rcspect to the services to be
performed uoder tiis Agreen€nt. Such person shalt have complete authority to tranqtrit
insbuctions, rcceivc informatioD. hterget and defiae the Citfs policies aod dccisions with
respect to materiats, eguipmeot, eleueuts and systems patincnr to thc Consultant's services-
Time of Performancc
Task t, items i through I0 ofthe Scopo of Services will be completed rvithin uinety (90) ca.leodar
days after receigt of Notice to Ptocccd et{c€,?t for delays beyond the reasonable coutol of the
Consultaot. Said rcpreseuaton is aot, however! a r aranry or guarautse that said sefvices wiu
be cornpleted within such time ftame-
Task I, itern I 1 of the Scope of Servir;es will bo complclrd as mutually agreed. Although the
e.xact timing ofprcseutations of the finat leport to the City Commission is unlmown d this time'
it is belicved thet this schedule will allow the City to implemcflt ttre adjusEd rate schedule, if
atry, as of Oclober 1, 1997.
fzst<s tt and III of ttre Scope of S*vices will be completed as muoally agreed to by both the
City Erd tlrc Coffultant
Fe€s to he Paid
For Task I of the Soope of Services (the Water and Wastevr,ater Utilities Rate Study), the
Couultad shall be paid a tump sum fee, includiog reimbursable E]qI€nses, of Tweffy Thousand
Dollars ($2Q000.00).
For Task II of the Scope of Services (WEtr ed Wastcwater Impact Fee Stdy), the Consultart
-sh:lt [6 pqid s 1um. s:m fce, inctuding reimbursable expeuses' of ]\rmE Thousand Five Huadred
Dollzrs (S9,500.00).
should the City desire thc consultaot to providc both the watrr ald wa3tswaler utilities REte
study as well as the warer ald wastcuacr hrpact Fec study, the consultant shall be paid a
htmp sum fee, inciuding reimbrnsable exPedsec of Twcnty'Nrne Thousad Five Hurr&ed
Dcllars (329,500.00).
For Task III of the Scope of Services (Additional Services), the Consultant shall bc paid a fee
based upon tle dtached Rate Schedule (See Exhibit A) plus reimbursable Expenscs-
ruN-2@-199? A9:50 P. 6b
Ms. Mrrie Jabalee
Jme 20, 1997
Paee 6
DRAFI
As specified for Task ltr, the Cousuitaut shall be reimbursed for direct nonsalary oSpcnses'
inoluding, but not liEited to, equipmeut reotal, auromobile travet at $0.30 pr nile, commersial
air tavciat cost, subsistEBce, prifiilrg atrd reproductio& plus Florida sales m:ces, if applicable.
Invoices for sewices rcnd€red arc prepaed laofithly aod the city agIEEs to Pay such invoice.s
within tte time frame cpecified in saction 218.70, "L seq., Florida statutes, tte'Florida Pmmpt
Paymeot Act. Howwer, se city shall retain 20 pcrccnl of lhe lump sum fees to be paid ro the
Colutant uatil tcn (10) days from final presentation to the City Cohmissioo
Paymcos which are not reDeived withio sixty (60) caiendar days ftom the date of invoicc will be
considard slfficieut cause for ConsulAat to discontinue pef,foming afld psoviding serviccs rmtil
paymeot in full is rcceived- If consulEt is requircd to take action to collect past due invoices,
lhe City will pay all legal fees and costs.
This oonAact sball be govemed by the laws of thc Sare of Florida atrd the apprcpriate venue for
zny aaions arisiag olll of thc agre€E€ot would be Odando, Floida'
Modifi cslion to thefenlsdlhisAsreEmsld.
In the cved tte city issues I Purbase otdsr or MeooranduE ot olher Imtument covcring thc
professional serr"ices described herei!, it is hereby specifically agreed and understood thar-such
ir*"tu* Order, Meooranilm or lasE1mos is for City intemal eoneol Purposes olly 9d ry
md atl tcrms and conditions contained therein" nihedrer printed fr' writ€o, shall be ofno force or
efEct. This cotrtact is tbe eotire cotrEact htween the parties and the(e is no modification or
waiver of rry ofrhe terms aad conditi6n3 fosrcin 'nlsss sigpod by both partiCI'
Termination
This Agrceoelft EEy be teminated by either party by giring thirty (3-0) aa.Vs fvarcE. Ytetr
noticc. -ThG cdlsuitsfi shall be paid for senrioes rendered to dre aerc af6spindion on the basis
of a rrasonahle Estimarc of tlrc Portioo of ser1,ices compteed prior to tErmirrtig] ald th'U b'
paid fm all reasuaable *pcoses rsutting fi,om such tecrniration aod for any r:opaid rcimbursable
expenses.
Acr4ance
Acceptaoce of this poposai may be indicared by the signature of a duly audrorized official of t]le
Ciry i" tnu tpoo" p*"iaua telow. one signed copy of this proposal retumed to *,g Consultant
JL0{-2A-199? 69:51 P. 0?
Ms. Marie Jabalee
June 20, 1997
Pw7 DRAFI
will scrve as an Agreeoent betwetn the two psrties and as Notice to koceed- This cotrtract will
be binding on the larties hereto and parties' successors and assigns. should this proposal oot be
accept d within a poioa or=i*ty (00) days from the above date, it shall become null snd void.
Very ruly yours,
Eertnau & Associatm, Inc.
WitEess
Wittrsss
Accepted bY:
Cif of Dania
Witness
Witrress
RC0vgs/PZJabalcc.rcc
c6: Aila Teuero, IIAI
Arthorized Signaturc
Date
JUN-26-199? E9:51 P. EB
EAMMN{ A ASSOCIATES, INC-
flOTJRLY BATE fiflEDUI.B
crseld C. llartra, P.E
P"-r.li,;rdD.k'(P.E / P.G.i P.L.s.) - (sdEidt Gdsbpt€r, BFrilg, Dirb' lxtr)
Scoior [,r"""fiScriu Elgils
nfviSon t*aragetlCtid F,,rgircer (PJ.IP-LS./C.M'C')
EIBiTrcrIIE(P.E-)
Scsior PtojEct }Irtra8lrp,8t""cr vII (P.E)
FrsinF.? YI c.B.) I scicslist Iv
F.!si'...tr V (PJ.)
E.gr".a IV
f.uginccr ttr
EEei!€€r Ytr
S€dor SciEorid
Scienti* IlT(
Etgillrt llspcEtr
Ilspscror
Seoicr Plaocr
HyrlngEologit VItr (P. C.)
Hydrogeloeist VII (P.G-)
Hy&otcologbt VI (P.G.)
Bydme€oloein V
Hfy&ogeotogisl IV
gydrogEologist 0I
Hydrogrologd YE
Hydlo Tectsid& tr
Eydm Tcchrhias I
t*iaecrine De{gH m
Eugiortring Dcsigrcr tr
ragiuccriry Tedriciaa Iv
Eueireetiug Tccbtrigia m
BqiDEEriDg TEchHa E
EnginE n ng Tldricitn I
lad Su[vqtoc
&rYcyClcoCtid
Srrwy Tcchrtcir Itr
Srru€y Tcdriciar tr
Survsf Tceiciaa I
Grsphics Mtrag€r
Orcphics ft.SoiEiar
Slsior R r! ArtlyE (M.B.A-)
Scrbr RtE Alrbd
R..tE Analys
Sacrtreriaf SWFort
frBmarcOuprcmicr sqpot
Adabistffivc.assistrd
SeDi I word PFccssor
Word PrscEssr
Rod-un
8150.00
$115.00
$99.m
090.00
$80.0n
372.00
t72.00
$6.m
560.00
$55.00
350.00
$4s.00
s6o.oo
t40.{x)
$50.00
s40.00
t50.00
I,E3.oo
$r2.00
$66.00
160 00
$5s.00
s50.00
M5.00
$35.00
s25-m
550-00
s45.00
$4J.00
510_00
s35.00
s30.00
s45.00
$().00
$'m.00
$35.00
$25-00
$45.O0
$35.00
$50.00
555.m
s45.00
$20.@
925.0t)
$s0.q)
t37.00
030.00
$20.( c
E$ccriv! Data A€4t tO, 1995
(Hdrdy trE qr lByidrlalr-![otUy .Ed Eey bc rdiu'cd (o i.OrEr ^rr1ngEs iA rbE vrric'ls ctcElrls tb.al qqtrPlkr (h!o.)
n,/}tir.d6EdtaraSd
JtB.l-28-199? @9:51
N/10/9J
P. 69
4?/CHAPTER2
Two important analyses are presented in this section. First, the input data from the 1992 and 1997
Noise Exposure Maps from the FAR Part 150 Study Program Update, dated December 1994, were
checked for accuracy and reasonability. Second, Young Environmental Sciences, lnc. (YES)
analyzed the 1995 estimated number ofoperations from FAA data and compared this most recent level
ofoperations with the FAR Part 150 forecast data. YES then developed a forecast ofoperations tbr
2005. ln Chapter 3, noise contour maps are plotted for 1985, 1992,1995,1997 and 2005, using actual
and forecast data. The YES noise contour maps display the Ldn 60 contour to highlight the areas
affected by a defined sound level less tban Ldn 65.
2.1 History and Local Market Share
As the second major airport in the Miami Hub, FLL is considered to be primarily a domestic airpon
as compared to MIA that serves a large intemational market. Intemational passenger enplanements ar
FLL are about l5 percent of the total, while at Miami intemational enplanements account for a little
over 40 percent of the passenger activiry.
Recent statisti,:s list Delta, USAir, Continental and American as the top four air carriers serving Ft.
Lauderdale. They accounted for about 77 percent ofthe enplaned passengers in 1994. Commuter and
air taxi passengers accounted for four percent of enplaned passengers, while about I 2 other airlines
carried the remaining l9 percent ofthe total.
Referring to the FAR Part 150 and Master Plan documents, the number of acrual and tbrecast
operations in a given year has changed as the various studies have evolved. Generally the greatest
difference between actual and forecast operations has been a decline in rotal operations, arribured
principally to a decline in general aviation (GA) operations. Another unanticipated occurrence is the
shift in commercial traffic from the predominance ofair carrierjets to the rapid increase in commuter
or air taxi operations.
The shortfall in GA activity at FLL is due to a general decline in numbers of operations tbr small
private aircraft nationwide. According to the 1995 FAA Aviation forecast, general aviation
operations decreased at a rate of 0.8 percent per year between 1985 and 199,4. Some leading
Page 2-1
HISTORY AND FORECAST OF OPERATIONS
AT FORT LAUDERDALE INTERNATIONAI, AIRPORT
1985 TO 2005
2.0 Introduction
In 1994 the Ft. Lauderdale/Ilollywood lntemational (FLL) airport ranked about 35th in the U.S. forair
carrier operations. This airport is considered a part of the Miami hub because of its proximity ro
Miami airport. In 1989, FLL handled about 32 percentofthe commercial operarions olthe Miami Hub
as compared to Miami lntemational (MIA) airpon that handled 68 percent ofthe commercial aircraft
operations. The FAA states that the FLL ailport is expected to increase its share of the Miami Hub
operations to 33 percent by 2005.
indicators of GA activity, such as business jet aircraft sales, were improved lor 1994. A slight
recovery of GA activiry, coupled with the 1994 General Aviation Revitalization Act, are expected to
encourage general aviation activity in the forecast years between 1995 and 2005, panicularly for
corporate jet activity.
An additional contributing factor to the decline in GA operations at Ft. Lauderdale airpon is en
increase in GA operations at the nearby Ft. Lauderdale Executive airport. For example, fiom 1985
through 1991, Executive airport increased its share ofGA operations in the Miami hub by about trvo
percent, while FLL decreased its share by more than three percent in the same time period.
The FLL air taxi operations increased in number at a very rapid rate between 1985 and 1990 as many
major airlines allowed their code-sharing airline partners to serve many intrastate Florida markets
with smaller capacity turboprop aircraft. That trend appears to have been a one-time shift ol
commercial traffic and the current traffic growth seems to be similar for both air carrier and air uxi
operations.
The number of night-period (10PM-7AM) operations is calculated to be l0 percent of air carrier
operations, based upon acrual flight schedules. Many night operations can be accounted for as cargo
flights and night period flights for tourists. The percent ofnight operations is not expected to change
significantly in the forecast period.
2.2 Annual Operations, Eistoric and Forecast
Figure 2-1 shows actual and forecast operations for Ft. Lauderdale Hollywood Intemational Airport
FORT LAUDERDALE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
ACTUAL AND FORECAST OPERATIONS
I
I
I
I
2
I
I
2
I
AVERACE
DAY
719
6r9
616
s73
645
68 r
757
718
878
YEAR
1980
1985
1990
1992
r 995
1997
2002
2 005
2012
TOTAL
273,20'7
22 5,8 00
224,703
209,065
23 5,5 04
60,800
68,400
64,73',1
81,100
7 5,000
75,000
78,289
7 5,000
2,000
2,000
891
2,000
248,5 00
27 6,400
272,938
3 20,400
Figure 2-I History and Forecast ofAircrafi Operations
Page2-2
SOURCE: l. FORT LAL'DERDAIE PARI 150 STIIDY 1994;
2. YOUNG ENVIRONMENIAI SCIENCES, INC.
SOURCE
AIR
CARRIER
9 I,808
7 5,3 00
99,362
82,920
106,7 t't
AIR GENERAL
TA)o AVIANON MILIARY4,020 176,630 '749
46,400 103,000 1,100
53.9'7 5 69,876 l,49046,052 78,613 l,480
57,698 70,151 938
l10,700
131,000
t29,021
162,300
for select years 1980 through 2012 from various sources, as indicated in dre Figure. The historical
data for 1980 through 1992 was taken from the FAR Pan 150 srudy and verified through other FA-A,
information sources.
For the 1995 actual (estimated) operations, Young Environmental Sciences f(ES) acquired rhe acrual
number ofoperations through June 1995 for this study. Using monthly data from the previous year, an
estimate of 1995 operations has been determined for this study. Note rhar the raffic increase tiom
1992 through 1995 represents an average annual increase offour percent.
YES developed a forecast ofannual operations for 2005 using the inlormation in rhe Part I 50 Srudy,
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Arurual and Hub Forecasts and Official Airline Guide
Schedules. Looking at Figure l-1, the YES forecast for2005 is lower than the Pan 150 forecast for
2002 that was completed in December 1994. This is the result of the continuation olconscnarive
forecasts for air transportation in the U.S. in general and for the Miami Hub in panicular.
Attention is focused on the 1997 forecast from the FAR Part 150 Study because thal contour is
expectedto represent the'\ orst case" in terms ofresidential noise exposure. Betu,een 1995 and 2000
the number of Stzge 2 aircraft operations is expected to be systematically reduced to almost zero.
Quieter Stage 3 aircraft are expected to replace the older Stage 2 aircraft. The Stage 3 aircraft will
tend to decrease the area ofcritical noise exposure, although the number ofnoise events will increese.
As calculated from Figure 1-1, acrual air carrier and air taxi operations increased at an average rate
of 3.5 percent per year between 1985 and 1995 (estimated). During this I 0 year time period, air taxi
operations increased at an average rate of approximately 2.2 percent. Although the average growrh
rate for commercial operations fiom 1985 through 1995 was relatively low, the more significant
factor is the unevenness ofthe change. Both air carrier and air taxi operations decreased in I 99 I and
1992 due to the residual effect ofslow economic conditions; and the termination ofEastem Airlines
service in January I 991, due to the airline's bankruptcy. From I 992 through I 995 air carrier and air
taxi operations increased at a hearty annual rate of 8.8 and 7.8 percent, respectively.
A trend of slower growth in commercial airline operations is apparent in U.S. rraffic statistics. This
is due to an economic slowdown in the early 1990's and to the general maturarion of the airline
industry in recent years. The FAA and other commercial forecasts project annual growth rares ol
between one to three percent over the next ten years.
General aviation operations include all civil aircraft operations not classified as air carrier or ai.'taxi
(commuter) operations. This category includes business jets and other smaller aircraft. Figure I - I
shows that GA operations increased only slightly from 1990 to 1995. The large increase in operarions
in 1992 was due to the temporary closing ofnearby Tamiami ai4port because ofHurricane Aldrerv in
August 1992. The Ft. Lauderdale Airport supponed those operations temporarily.
Page 2-3
General aviation operations are expected to increase at an overall rate ofapproximately l2 percent
by 2005. Within the GA category, business jet traffic is projected to increase at a lasrer rate while
smaller turbojet and reciprocal engine aircraft operations will increase only slightly in the next ten
years. As discussed previously, nearby Ft. Lauderdale Executive airport has experienced substantial
increases in GA operations directly related to decreases in GA activity at FLL. Fr. Lauderdale
Executive airport is expected to continue attracting GA acdviry because they are well suited ro sen e
this specialized market.
Military operations at Ft. Lauderdale have historically been less than two percent ofrotal operations.
Plarured reductions in military budgets will decrease those operations to an even lower level in furure
years.
Overall, moderate economic conditions coupled with an established rourism indusrry in the Ft.
Lauderdale Hollywood area are expected to contribute to a moderate I .7 percent annual growh rare
in air carrier operations over the next ten years. Air taxi operations are expected to ilcrease at a rate
ofapproximately L8 percent in the same time period. Although commercial operations are expecred
to increase at a relatively slow rate, passenger enplanements are expected to increase more rapidly.
In this ten yeartime frame, the average seating in commercial aircraft is expected to increase by more
than 14 percent. As an example, many older Boeing 727 and737 aircraft are expected to be replaced
by larger Boeing 757 and late model 737 aircraft. Another factor in the sluggish ourlook for
commercial airline traffic is the fact that many newer aircraft have increased space for belly cargo.
Therefore, commercial cargo operations are expected to increase at a slower rate than cargo traffic
because more cargo can be carried on fewer flights.
The 1997 - 2012 forecast as established in the FAR Part 150 Study seems reasonable in terms ol
number ofannual operadons. The Study considers recent changes in rates ofgrowrh for rhe major
classes ofaircraft operations. The selection ofaircraft fypes reflects the schedules in place at rhe time
of the Study. One noticeable change reflected in the YES forecast is the addirion of DC-9's to rhe
aircraft mix. The impact ofthis narrow body aircraft type is expected to have a minimal effect on the
final area of noise impact. The number and distribution of turboprop aircraft types are similar in rhe
FAR Part 150 and YES studies. Among general aviation aircraft the YES study conrains a slightly
higher percentage ofbusiness jet operations. The reason for this slighr shift in aircraft mix is the
tendency ofbusinessjet operators to choose the facilities ofa larger airpon. Operarors of smaller
aircraft such as single engine aircraft tend to prefer operating inan environment where rhey do nor have
to be sequenced with fasterjet aircraft.
The methodology used by the FAA in determining the average day operations selects the total
operations divided by 365. In realiry there are peaks in numbers of operarions that coincide with
weekly and seasonal variations. Lr the case ofFt. Lauderdale the climate andthriving tourism industry
cause seasonal peaks that are quite pronounced. The nature of the air transponation demand also
causes greater peak demand in correlation with weekend days. Therefore, the average day operations
as shown in Figure 2-1 represent a conservative forecast of operations that would as compared to
actual peak day activity.
Page24
To illustrate this point, if the established method of selecting a peak day as utilized in rhe Land Use
Plan were used, the peak day operations as a share ofthe total would be .00323 @eak monrh of9.7%
dividedby 30) as compared to the average day operations of.00274 (total operarions divided by 365).
For the 2005 forecast of272,938 operations the average day is 748 as compared to a peak day of882
operations.
In addition to peak mffic patterns, noise events during these periods tend to be more amoying ro
residents becausepleasant weather causes residents to keep windows open and panicipate in ourdoor
activities. Warmer weather also has a negative effect on aircraft performance. Therefore, aircraft
tend to take longerto climb to a given altitude. These factors mesh together to create a more negarive
noise environment lhan would be expected in an area that does not experience rhe exaggerated peak
traffic siruations as occur at Fort Lauderdale.
Figve 2-2 shows a detailed look at the aircraft mix for average day operations for the years 1985,
1995, and 2005. These numbers ofoperations are used as inputs for the noise conrours thar will be
generated forthis study. The aircraft mix is determined from the FAR Pan 150 Study and changed only
slightlyas discussed previously to reflect updated information taken from the currenr Official Airline
Guide schedules.
paaa )-<
Figure 2-2 History and Forecast ofAircraft Operations by Type
FORT LAUDERDALE INTERNATIONAI{RPORT
TIISTORYAI\D FORECAST OF OPERATIONS Bi TYPE
AIR CARRIER 1985 1995 2OO5 AIR TAXI 1985 1995 2005
8747400
MDIl
8767-200
8767-300
.A300
A310
L1011
DCIO
DC8-60x,
DC8-73
8757
A320
B737-300
8737400
8737-500
MDSO
MD88
Fl00
DC9-l0r
DC9-30
DC9-50f
8737-200*
8727 -t00*
8727-200
BACI-llr,
F281'
AC TOTAL
DHCT
DHC8
EMBI2O
DHC6
EMBIIO
c402
SD33O
SWM
AT TOTAL
5
l0
26
2
4
4
6
2
3
4
ll
)
l0
4
4
6
25
4
20
14
4
9
4
4
36
20
90
292
6
10
t2
22
4
J
6
8
6
45
1l
5
42
126
l8
28
46
6
6
l8
56
9.+
10
I /b
8 2
8
t58
l0
2
100
l4
82
24
6
6
8
6
8
6
48
52
58
192
T2
38
t2
32
5lu
214
GENERALAVIATION
LEAR25
CITATION
SABRE
LEAR35
G-III
LCTW
SMTW
SEP
GA TOTAI
MILITARY
cl30
C9
MIL TOTAL
t2
8
6
8
72
80
92
282
1
2
20
2
t7
5
26ll
78
8
2
208 354
6
1
,|
4
2
2I
2
2
4
* Stage 2 a./c
A}'ERAGE DAY TOTAL OPERATIONS
620
016
750
1985
r995
2005
Page 2-6
CHAPTER 3
NOISE CONTOUR NIODELLING
3,0 Introduction
ln Chapter 1 the concepts involved in noise ^"alysis and contour modelling were presented along
with a discussion of land use compatibility and noise related annoyance. Chapter 2 provided a
summary of aircraft traffic, historical and forecast for Fort Lauderdale Hollywood Intemational
Airport. This Chapter presents the results of the development of noise contour plots for 1985,
1992, 1995, 1997 and 2005, all plotted to the Ldn 60 level. Single event noise contour are also
shown for three representative Stage 3 aircraft rypes in order to shorv the relationship benveen the
annual average contours for the various years analyzed and the audible or single event noise con-
tour impacts. Both of these matters are central to decision making on land use compatibilirl'. Fur-
ther, statistical and summary information is presented to provide a further basis tbr understanding
and applying the results reported below.
3.1 Statistical Summary
Table 3-1 presents a summary of the total areas included within the contour sets by year. Table 3-
2 shows the total traffic by category in percentage distribution ofaircraft activity. Noise impacrs in
Table 3-l Comparison of Noise Contour Areas
COMPARISON OF TOTAL NOISE CONTOUR AREAS 1985-2005
YEAR
ALL AREAS IN SQUARE MILES
9.36
8.35
9.5 r
10.05
3.28
4.tl
3.6
4.t6
4.51
1.3 I
t.'79
1.52
1.78
2.M
0.62
Ldn 60
Area
r985
1992
I995
1997
2005
19.44
17.77
t9.67
22.03
7.95
Ldn 65 Ldn 70
Area Area
Ldn 75
Area
Page 3-l
The central purpose of showing this time series is to gain a better understanding of the changing
nature of source noise and the implications this has for community protection. Heavy jet aircraft
have undergone a major transforrnation over the last few decades as improvements in engine de-
sign have substantially reduced source noise emission levels. This improvement is masked to some
degree by the continuing presence ofnoisier aircraft in the fleet. Noise contours, by thr'ir nature,
tend to move in response to the noisiest components ol the fleet. Th.is will change dramatically
after the Year 2000 when, by federal law, all the noisiest (Stage 2) aircraft in the commercial flect
are grounded or converted to the quieter standards represented by Stage 3 emission levels. This
type of transition occurred once before, in 1985, when all Stage I aircraft were grounded or con-
verted. It is for this reason that the 1985 noise contours are presented.
ACTUAL AND FORECAST OPERATIONS PER DAY BY TYPE OF ACTIVITY
FORECAST
Mflitary TOTAL .OPS PERDAYAir
Taxi
General
Aviation
20.30yo
22.000/0
24.50yo
45.50Vo
37.600/0
29.70v,
0.700/o
0.70v.
0.60Yo
100.00%
700.000/.
100.00%
620
573
646
1997
2005
44.60yo
47.20yo
24.600/.
23.700h
30.100
28.50v.
0.7ovo
0.60v"
100.00%
100.00%
680
750
YTAR
HISTORICAL
1985
1992
1995
Air
Carrier
33.s0%
39.70o/o
45.20yo
Table 3-2 Distribution of Activity by Category in Percent
terms of the total area contained within the contours show a small reduction for 1992 in compari-
son to 198-5. 1985 and 1995 are almost precisely the same. The highwater mark in terms of total
area is expected to be reached by 1997 followed by a drastic reduction by the Year 2005. At that
time, total areas included within the contours are reduced to approximately one third the areas
covered in 1997 . Throughout this period, air carrier and air taxi traffic is increasing overall as can
be seen in Table 3-2. General aviation activity is gradually reduced while military activity remains
constant. Because of the expected drop in cumulative noise impacts that occurs with an all Stage
3 civil air carrier fleet, there is growing recognition that the land use compatibility standards his-
torically applied may need to be revised downward.
This circumstance is seen most clearly in Table 3-3 which analyzes activity on Runway 9R. This
runway is expected to be extended in the future to an air carrier capable 9,000 foot length. Activity
Tahle 3-3 Summary of Actit'i4, on Runw'a!, 9R
AIRCRAFT ARRTVALS ON RI.INWAY 9R 1985-2005
1'8,\R
1985
1992
1995
1997
2005
0.22 0.27
2.02 11 1 1.0
437 534
17 30.6
0
0 I
0
0 0 0.0
0.0000
0.05 21.75
0.97 59.72
50.1t9
11.75
30.4
10.03
39
TOTAL
CO}'NIUTERDAY NTGHT
TOTAL
AIR CARRIERD,\]' \IGtIT
GENERAL
AVTATIONDAY NIGHT
DAY PERTOD
AIRCRAFT
OPERATIONS
69.7
33.5
70.12
69.75
116.6
NIGHT PERIOD
AIRCRATT
OPERATIONS
0
0
0
0
0
Page 3-2
is restricted during the night period after the runway is lengthened. While this limits the size of rhe
noise contour, the volume of air carrier activiry goes from zero or nearly zero to 4? operations per
day' General aviation activity is reduced while commuter (air raxi) volumes increase. Thus, rvhile
it is clear from the summary ofareas enclosed that overall noise contour area decreases, the volume
ofoperations increases dramatically with the addition of47 large aircraft overflighrs by 2005, most
at comparatively low altitudes.
3.3 TechnicalProcedure
All noise contours in this report were prepared using the same program, the FAA Integrated Noise
Model Version 4.1 1. A newer version of the INM has been available since last September. This
program provides substantial changes and improvements over the earlier versions. These improve-
ments are primarily confined to semiautomated input modules instead of the text based inpur tile
characteristic ofall earlier versions. The calculation procedures for the noise contours lhemselves
are unchanged between the two differing versions. Early in the srudy program, the Irvo versions
were compared and produced identical results. However, conversion of the data input files from
INM 4.11 to INM 5.0 is not entirely straightforward due to the substantially revised merhod of
inpuning information and the expanded range of data required. More importanrly, the output from
INM 5.0 is not compatible with intemal electronic transfer of the conrours ar rhe degree of accuracy
desired. Thus, to retain consistency with other studies ofFort Lauderdale-Hollywood Intemational
Airport at the highest level of refinement, INM Version 4.1 I was used rhroughour.
A unique characteristic ofthe noise contours produced involves the display procedure. Generally,
the noise contours produced by the INM are transferred manually, i.e., traced onto a basemap rvirh
pen and ink. In this study, the contours are transferred elecuonically as an overlay ofthe basemap.
what is seen on the maps is the acrual ouput of the noise contour modelling program and not a
tracing ofthe original. All contours produced in this manner are runat the highest levels of accu-
racy the model is capable of rendering. The contours were produced on an Acer 586 deskrop
computer running at 133 megahertz. Typical run times in excess of three days rvere encountered
for each sequential contour set.
3.4 1985 Noise Contours
Figure 3-l shows the noise contours developed for 1985. Table 3-4 shows the aircraft assignmenrs
to runway. The boundaries of the city of Dania are shown with a heary black lines, the noise
contours themselves are in lighter black lines and labelled with the respective cumulalive rroise
levels. The base map itself is drawn from a steet map of the entire area around rhe Airport in order
to ease identification of specific locations within the Ciry.
Ldn 60 covers major areas of the City of Dania including most of Lakewood Village, substantial
portions of the Ravenswood section west of the general aviation Runway 9N27L,and major areas
in northeast Dania are effected. Ldn 65 effects much smaller areas but still include a major ponion
oflakewood Village. Small portions of Ravenswood and NE Dania were also effected. Ldn 70
and 75 are generaily confined to non residential areas in the Ciry of Dania rvith the exceprion ofrhe
Lakewood area and portions of Ravenswood.
Page 3-3
RIJIIWAY
9R
2TL
9L
27R
l3
3l
TOTAL
tt.t00/o
2.600
24.60yo
5.000/"
l.40Yo
0.90yo
4s.60yo
0.20yo
0.000/0
4.000
0.20yo
0.00v.
0.000h
4.40o/o
t3.30.
2.200/o
25.50%.
4.70(,/o
t.40yo
l.00vo
48.t0v.
1985 ACTIVITY BY RUNWAY
TO'trL
0.00%21.60'L
0.00%.r.80%
1.s00/"55.60%
0.20v.r 0.l0yo
3.1000.30yo
0.00yo t.90./"
2.00v.100.00%
ARRIVAIS
DAY
ARRIVALS
NIGHT
DEPARTUR-ES
DAY
DEPARTURES
NIGHT
Table 3-4 Distribution of Aircraft Activity by Runway for 1985
3.5 1992 Noise Contours
Figure 3-2 shows the noise contours for 1992. The noise contours for 1992 were developed direcrly
from information contained in the "Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airpon Pan 150 Up-
date of 1994" and are largely consistent with the contours produced in the Pan 150 Study. Details
on fleet mix, runway and flight track assignments can be lound there. The input dara rvas received
directly from the original analysts. There are some differences due to the differing plorting meth-
ods used.
The contours themselves are slightly smaller than those shown for 1985. Reducrions arc punicu-
larly apparent in NE Dania with the remaining areas effected remaining similarly impacred.
3.6 1995 Noise Contours
Figure 3-3 shows the noise contours calculated for 1995. They are a modest expansion ofrhe areas
calculated for 1992. The traffic volumes in percent split berween the runways are sho\\.n in Table
3-5. Here again major areas impacted by Ldn 65 and above levels are confined ro Lakeivood
Village, a small area in Ravenswood and a similar small area in NE Dania. Ldn 60, by conrrasr,
expands substantially and takes in the majoriry of the area west ofthe Airpon, all of the area ro rhe
east, and nearly reaches Dania Beach Boulevard in NE Dania.
Page 3-5
1995 ACTryITY BY RUNWAY
TOTAL
RUNWAY
2r.00v.9R
3.20"h0.00%t.40yo27Lt.60yo
59.50%9L 23.90v.4.60v.29.1|yo
11.7 0"27R 6.00./.0.30%5.20'
2.90yol.10Yo13t.10yo 0.00%
t.'7 0.Jh0.000 0.60v"3r t.tlv.
100.0 0 %o5.rtyo 48.20"/oTOTAL 44.900h
10.90%0.20yo 9.90'h
ARRIVALS
DAY
ARRJVALS
NIGIIT
DEPARTI,'RES
DAY
Table 3-5 Distribution of Airuafi Activity by Runway for 1995
3.7 1997 Noise Contours
Figure 3-4 presents the contours calculated for 1997, the year of highest overall impact. Ldn 65
levels and above involve major areas in Lakewood Village. The contour on Runrvay 9Rr27L
combines with the larger area around Runway 9Ll27R to envelope most ofRavens*ood. AII areas
to the east of the Airport are enclosed. Ldn 60 level impacts extend south of Grilfen Road to the
west of the Airport and nearly to Dania Beach Boulevard in NE Dania'
3.8 2005 Noise Contours
Figure 3-5 presents the Year 2005 forecast noise contours. Table 3-6 tallies rhe runway split dala.
The reduction in cumulative noise level is substantial. Total areas for all contours are approxi-
mately one third as large as are expected for 1997.
By that time, Ldn 65 and higher contours extend into small southem ponions ofLakervood Village
and encompass approximately one third of Ravenswood. Linle or no area south ol the Airport is
involved. Ldn 60 levels involve the southem one quaner oflakewood Village, the Avon Heights
area out to nearly 28th Terrace. To the south ofthe Airport, the contour extends beyond the Airpon
boundary but does not encroach on residential areas.
Page 3-8
DEPARTURES
NIGHT
0.00%
0.20y"
t.30yo
0.200
0.toyo
0.00v.
1.80%
15.500
3.70v"
t7.20yo
5.200h
t.7tyo
t.20yo
44.50yio
0.00v,
0.00%
4.80Yo
0.sqv.
0.t[yo
0.00yo
5.400h
19.llYo
2.100
2t.200h
4.0|Yo
0.90o/o
0.100
48.00v.
0.t00/"
0.00v"
t.50yo
0.30vo
0.r0yo
0.00yo
2.000
31.10yo
5.800/0
11.10Yo
10.00%
2.80v"
1.90v"
100.00%
2OO5 ACTIVITY BY RUNWAY
TOT.-\L
RUNWAY
9R
27L
9L
27R
13
3l
TOTAL
ARRIVALS
DAY
ARRJVALS
NIGHT
DEPARTUR"ES
DAY
DEPARTIJ'RES
NIGHT
3.9 Single Event Noise Contours
Figures 3-6, 3-7, and 3-8 present single event noise contours for three representalive aircraft rypes,
all Stage 3, i.e., quiet aircraft. This is shown as a single landing from the rvest follou'ed by a takeoff
to the east, all on Runway 9R. These aircraft include the Boeing 747, ore of the largest aircralt
manufactured and used chiefly in long range international service; the Boeing 757, a narrorv body
medium range airliner; and the Boeing?37400, a modern shon range airliner.
The Year2005 cumulative noise contours lead to the conclusion that the noise impact rvill, by then,
be reduced to such low cumulative levels that a significant problem with respect ro residential
areas no longer exists. However, Stage 3 aircraft are only comparatively quiet when measured
against earlier models. These single event contours are provided to balance the apparcnt improve-
ment against the reality that audible noise events will continue and remain objectionable in cenain
key community areas. Funher, land use compatibility straregies such as noise insulation are besr
keyed to audible noise levels than to average daily noise levels.
The lowest level ploued in these cases is 75 dBA. This is the generally accepted threshold lor rhe
onset of potential annoyance in outdoor areas. Long term observations of normal human reacrion
to aircraft sound tend to reinforce the conclusion that by the level of 85 dBA, serious objections
occur and noise is spontaneously characterized as deafening. Although exposure must conlinue at
this level for many hours before clinical effects, i.e., hearing loss can be documented, 85 dBA has
long be recognized as a key threshold perception level. Note that even in the case of the Boeing
757, one ofthe quietest healTjet aircraft in the fleet, levels at 95 dBA and above project wesnvard
into communiry areas.
Page 3- l I
Table 3-6 Distribution of Airuafi Activity by Runway for 2005
6V uHt|:aIii*l
I!7
Hull E
L
;i
II
st
llo 3T ir
30 PL ST
20 32t!Btx
lrrr
2t
EOE t
T t Ltt
/ City of Dania
8
I '- -- -l
++I
\
pont
LDN 75rohT F u D I 0At 0 tt EYERCLADLDN 70
I
,:: City ol Dania
LDN 7 I
ITRX
i.--- --i5LDN 65
ND I LDN 70
t-n COXTAINER
I /L'd,LEX
LDN 60 ,,o aan
t n
'15 FO
z I I o 4cr
a7 tr LDN 65
F 4' $r
I zIa LDN 60
I {
tRI IX,L 'i -l I]!3MuffiHffiffiIdli!:r!l?_r&E
3
ri
I
I
f
3 f !it1I3
95 -!l 732 tiartTIG
MI IP ,.i sc IA slvD
BL VO
N
C;lr i
r4l,
III
i---
I
I
rll
I
I
E
COLINTII Y
ct,l B
I
I
CITYOF DANIA
LONG TERIV] IJ\ND USE
COII PATI B I LIry P ROG RAIVI
I"E IILr-tI 1985 Noise Contours0 tr1@ N 0 Source: Young Environrnenlal Sciences
FIGURE 3 -1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
!t
I
,1 [,rk
I
D
I MItP a9 +2r FT I
tl
STI ,7j96 f 23?
I 23ts5lrrr
I liK I
62
l 7
G d
_-_--l
I
II
\/taax LDN 75 O PO
LDN 70 F UD RDAt 0tL EvERG
I BTIA ilA City of Dania L
l Rli
LDN 65 I
rbt 26 souToRl+
I
t,.J (?co t^i ,f
Y
t
43 co LF.Xlt'aa tr
oaLDN 60 a5 I a5
@ 95 LDN 75 ,r IBcl
F t,
LON 65
;P
I II
LDN?
i ]3lsr
62 II I 3 t
I R ti 3llf95l2 T.I
II 1
I
8r8
M}IT
sc
,P
I D
:
at igt .
l!
,l
/
+/FrdCr,
t
MABI t.
c o D na aty
^;(
RI tX;L
cot lirlt Y
( Ltttl
AIA
lll
3
:TrcdsrArr
I
'rl
stvD
'l|ril
6
M
I
9n,,iCITYOF DAT{IA
LONG TERIU LAND USE
COM PATI B I LIry P ROG RAIVI f,pI'I IILI
-__jl
'1992 Noise Contours FIGURF- 3 -2
Source: Parl 150Stud
0 t(m ffi
1t
CH Bt vo
r--_l
ii,
!:t cT
I
li
I t
ILDN 70
t
6t
T -I]
ffi,s'j
;l
IIHP
2l
ffi
cr
,
31 3r
o'o t,I tllntABI II t0 T
s5 I
Ettf
lrr 2!
;
5
I City ot Dania
75 7
I
+
LDN 75
T 5 /tAax F tIUDROAL
LDN 75
o
-'- - -l
LDN 65 LDN 70F
€t,coltT
City of Dania
t--?ARX
INE
IEvERCL.^
I ronf
,a!LDN 60 LDN 70a6
&t
a
o
a, tra? Dr
o
tF
R
LDN 65
B
Ra7
I
lr I
LDN 60
!
NT !7
Bt
F R
3
32 95
!ll
I
I
I
sc
I
rt
I
:4
it,
zE
ItOA
l
I
I
a
s,
*a,rlrr!It
t{locE
cotrliTfiY
c Ltr lr
AIA5
MIt
rl
I
I
TIG
CITYOF DANIA
LONG TERM I_,AND USE
CO IV1 PAT I B I L Iry P ROG RAl\4
1995 Noise Contours FIGURE 3 -3
Source: Young Environmental Sciences, lnc
O ffilm ?'TIJ
\
I
R'
!
I
r-
l
f-------.I
I rl
rnu
srI
3!t ST
IT3l n
6T
I l7
20 r-3?ii.-ci;r!r.l Pl.Drllt*ABI TI t3Ill !LII
70
€CTCityofDanra1
5
71.
GE
\
-l
I
I
I
I
I
I
-l
i +,iPoRT
,LDN 75 tl t UDEBDAI,H
I
LL City of DaniaPOR'T 95 ,?ARX
I
LDN 75 INDUI
ARXaoRT--- --1
E LDN 70 I 20 .,SO T
tl CONT INEB(''I '(}it---'6r-tr LDN 65 a5 noia595LDN 70H 3cl
LDN 60 a1
LDN 65
sr
.;LDN 60
E BH !,-tBI DCL
I
I
I
r!l
I
e lMfffiErEHFffilttrlltlllrll:.l
3 sr
I
rl
ts l 3COTN'RY
:r l'-n
3 ?5It{t 2.l ICLt]D I r,g 7 tl9532-31T I:i la-T rGl aTAl
i1
1 MHllttrt,sa I CH BI"VDIAIA
l E
CITYOF DANIA
LONG TERN/ LAND USE
CON/ PATI B I LITY PROG RAN4
1997 Noise Contours0 rylm N
Source: Part 150 Study
FIGURE 3 - 4
21
q e,hrJ B MHI
2l so SI lrST
r srot!MABII'I
IBt
- ir-.-c,i
g
I
ETLEB
a
B
,2
ir City of Dania
!
zZ
I
LDN 7LDN 7
/rAn.k LDN 75!eLDN
ea
LDN 60 I _t
-- -- -1
R'iA
o{I+
I a3 2t
aan
rl!
City of Dania
L1
\
RX
,r,so R',I'
ront
CONT
I r,r
TNER
LEX
LDN 70a5
I
a7 lr
LDN 65I
I Sr il
LDN 60f,
NT 3
:?
2
i
;
:!r
i
I fil,
.ar!
ie
?
I
I
I
it
I
i
I
I ,r ttx;!
couiTlr'I
CLUB
5C I ;
c
-rrG!srar!
SL VD
srM
j.#rffi6&t "v
B
3ll
-31
CITYOF DANIA
LONG TERIM LAND USE
COMPATIBILIryPROGRAM
2005 Noise Contours
Source: Young Environnrental Sciences
FIGURE 3 - 50 s1m 2@
7t,
I
!t
MHT 5T I'
Bo2l I5 dBA n3Tt30I3132 STo5 dBA !PLlfirht
80 dBA 2!s5 4t!
J -K I LEi
a
City of Dania 80 dBA 62 E I
GE ffi
85 dBA ----l
++
&
I,tq,o 90 dBA R
!IORT 5 PAAX t UDEB iE\TRC
City of DaniAA,L
I
95 dBAI l
85 dBA rqT lsou1?oBTOGEYrT
100 dBA
90 dBA 100 dBA
T
aa&Lt LOa
95
RO
I aF 33004Fcl
r Ert8
Sr I zE
IP,
Rt IX;ti !-
T
I
I
M !srCOL,\TltY t3tr t 15?t 2lIc Ll:8 u
95 l !v-J--s-2l2T ItT E
I'1 Ivil I .I SC A1A BtvDOA
CITYOF DANIA
LONG TERIM [-,AND USE I r-----r tL-I
--l
Single Event Noise Contours
Boeing747(-C)I\I1PATIRII ITV PRf..T:ctA I\,
0 fflm m
xilr
CH
FIGURE 3 - 6
I
\L
1
N:
t
t
HulltdltP
11 a ?
I
I
Sr.d Ar
I d
ll 20 a st
MARII{I ICT2!toE lrrr LI
i
I
3 I ELLEF
I
62 5Cily of Dania
GE ffi
I
I 1 '---'1 I+I I +4ha.Q,!rof,5 /'ARX F UD BDAI H
I
LL .Fl.ERCLA
City of Dania
I SOdBA I
-lI
'lo T n ARX
75dBA
tlla ct 26 so,,fo"T
85dBA coNT r1*E B4!a
aan 100dBAI 90 dBA
HT 95dBA oo4100 dBA90dBA 95 dBA1
85 dBA
SrE
P
lt I Lx;tl t aBI
.II
I
I,!
I
I
I 80 dBA33rcotNl lrY I
rl
l t 33'r
I c l.l:B E E;3ll I
Ic195!I32-!l
I
;Fl
GE N-T
i 75 dBA
-Tr
BLVOTI
ffi
t ffi T 8C I BTVD
I 3 oA IA
CITYOFDANIA
LONG TERTM LAND USE
COIM PATI B I LITY P ROG RAM
I-I IIir
--l
Single Event Noise Contours
Boeing757
Source: Young Environrnental Sciences
0 trlffi ry FIGURE 3 - 7
I
E
IT
E'
32
PAR}i
L
EI'ERCLA
26
f
COIiTA
'.-----t
souToR
COM
1 MH?ati ll2lgo a
2
5T
I sl 30 5TI!30 l"MASIH 7n
EOE rPLlrr
1 Jrrr 23
1tx I
cir oI Dan Ia ffiGE 75 dBA
I
++I.ttr,-l
I
IIORTRX
80 dBA F U D BD A
R?L'
I85 dBA
B a
I T 4t
I rl 90 dBA 2,
6r 100 dBAttI
.6 a6 95 dBAHT YLON
c
100 dBA 3004El8RI95 dBA
90 dBA
3rIp
R
!
MIIP
I
I
Ir!
I
,i IDOL !I I
co TIIY
t 85 dBAM3S!
ri
I .l t3 NtIcl.l 8 I i!t;t3r 7
32 3 ,l I 80 dBAI:i2rI
TIG 1
f{lt I 75 dBAI
z OA StvDonAtl
95
xHt
CHGITYOFDANIA
LONG TERIV LAND USE
COIV PATI B I LIry P ROG RAIM
E-=r:l Single Event Noise Contours
Boeinq 732- 4OO0 trlm m FIGURF ,q . N
CIty of Danla
IJIiV
l _-l
t ,
I
t;84t
[{lll';r'
?/ )r>l ;l
zl cr ol -l-1 i
2\
t!-r
l0
rlq ii
32.
601Fqt sl
29 ST
]O=S I
2
2
i
3
3
H
-1
rl
3
-2 451+.
<l
s
28
ril
E
TA sv{
29
SI
SI
SI rs!!
29 J!llllullI mrrT
-Li;-6
r-ft-
i
i 30
32Sl<
3t sI \
32 ST.
32C
SI
st
!l
22
20 *
3
&l
I
I
T
FE g=r,-,,r;lor
ll ST =I
' nD
Sho Te
P!rkini
G!
)
t-
I
F
t--i_| .-t
West
Terminrl
(3:tS
i
I.s,-
)Il--SW.-. - - --(:oruNs
q95 COM RC
F C-] s (\-l D)
LA,PARKf
RO
LAXE
H
3 t
North
Term in!l
4
t
_ti F
uJ
,
B
i
F
q!
I
f-
F
=
E
t--
n4Merinr44 Sr elTerm
hSou
T(l
U
45 45 ( I (--J L- --,-)S:_ r--:=r\ S =3c--:-:.r \,
I\,1U
=
3 t.
I
NEs
.l
I
I
.)1(s
F
F
z
39
,
zz s€dpfPro
F,'
ac
F 3
<rF
862
t, cT
3S Srl
40
al src
tr
Fill CT-sw
, RO
F
=
tt,R,d
s
42
NF
39
ST
I7
43
F
Sr =
F
sw
NEF AIVO
28
a3 ST
sr
47 St7Sr llarirr.r
tF
Cr
F
t-
=
=
ca
ST
>l
I
Sr8
i",l;ir., Id#,
IEF
3
T
I
CTA(E DA
1
58 ST58 CI
Iake
a
Nzs Stirling
I
I
I
-3
!o
Iahe
ol the
MHP
F
t
HACEBD
BLVD
C€ntea
Design
Bryrn Oa[s
Burirtr. Fart
Lahe
I
I
ki
I
I
I
Psr
FnEJ
ustri!l
3
LVD
tnd
Ari,
GERTAIL
€oRs
ST
MHP
i
TIIIP
3Ptsw
38
EXr
E XITtt
xl,IE
z
z
St Ptt
3$ST
I
2
lr
cI
(
21
Prrk
32
I
IO*lvoodI
I
I
,
I
,2
i'lw Oan=z
t--- -l
Commission Action:
Passed fl Failed I
Comment:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
CITY OF DANIA
Continued Othet
#>-
Date:06-17-97
Title:
DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION
Requested Action:
Report by Victor Lohmann, Chairman Airport Advisory Board
Summary Explanation & Background:
Update from the June 12, 1997 Regular meeting
Exhibits (List):
Purchasing Approval:
Prepared By:
LC
Source of Additional lnformation: (/Vama & Phonel
Recommended for Approval BY;
Agenda ltem #:
City Manager City Clerk
tr
Subject
Date:
From:
To;
Airport advisory board
Wed, l8 Jun 1997 l9:49:50 -0400 (EDT)
Iddesigns@aol.com
lulu@ci.dania.fl.us
Please see attached amended and approved statement ofposition. Please
Include this in the commission back up material for their next meeting.
Thanks Vic
Position Statement, Airport Advisory Board - June 12, 1997
Be it resolved the City of Dania, Airport Advisory Board hereby promulgates the position ofthe Board and
as representatives ofthe Community as a whole.
Whereas, The overwhelmingly most important issue in the proposed expansion of the Fort Lauderdale
Hollywood Intemational Airport is Community protectior. This being the stabilization and long term
health and safety of the residential communities surrounding the Air Field. There is significant concem
among many olthe Ciry's residents as to whether certain residential communities will remain viable and
tenabie as the airlield expands. The residents are also concerned about the lifetime economic invesinent in
their homes. These invesfinents must be plotected. These concems can be successfully addressed by
immediately seeking public input and further defining a Purchase Assumnce program as referred to in the
lnterlocal Agreement bemeen the City of Dania and Broward County. Furthermore, if BCAD is unable or
unwilling to furttrer define a program and the proPosed areas that would most likely be impacted and
participate, then this is indicative ofa runway expansion that is unnecessary'
Whereas, The protection of the residential communities surrounding the Affield benefits not only the local
community, but also the County as a whole. As tourism increases, it is cleady not in the best interests ofthe
County of blight this City. No one benefits from the conditions that have been created in the area
sunounding Miami Intl. Airport. Left unattended this will start to happen here.
Subordinate to the preservation ofthe Community and residents needs is preservation ofthe City's tax base
and road improvements.
MEMORANDUM
June 4, 1997
Lou Anne Cunningham
Victor Lohmann
agenda for d'l297
Please add item # 5.2 Repod fiom stafi on nctification
d county P&Z Board meeting and prcpos€d
Davdopmefit Order County Commission meeting.
(Your findings).
Under new hsin.ss please add the follo'/ing;
0.,it€m # e? Propo€€d position statom€nt
Ba it r6oh/€d that the City of thnh Alrport Advbory Board hereby promulgat€s
the posiuon d the Board and as r€pnsentativ€3 of the Community as a wtrole.
Whercas, Tlu orenalhalmingly mGt important issu€ in the proposed e:gansion of
Fod Lauderdale Hol[^ilood lnU. Airport is Community protoction. This b€ing tho
rtabilization and long tem helth and saftty of tlr6 rBidential dnmunities
arnounding the Air Field. Thero is significar concam among many of the Cihy's
rcidonts as to whother c8rtain reidedial communities will remain viable and
tsrable as the airfald e&ands. These concems can be successftrlly addressed
by immodidely s€eking public inpt and fuither defining a Purctme Assurance
program a! refsned to in tho lntralocal Agreomor b€tr,v€on the City of Danh and
&lrtErd County. Furlhormoro, if BCAD is umble or unrvilling to fuither dgfine a
prognm and the prcpced arcas that rvould moct likaly be impacled and
padlcipata, th€n thb b ildicatiw of a runway ergansion Urat b unneo.Bsary.
Whellas, ttu pr€senation of tha reidential communities sunounding the Airfeld,
bon6fib not only the local communig btjt the County as a whole. As tourism
increase it is clarly not in th. b€si intsr€Eis of tha Coutrty to bligtrt this City. No
one benefiB fom the condiUons that haw been cr€at€d in the ar€a sunounding
Mhmi lnU. Airyort. Lefr unattended thb will start to happon hsro.
Subordirde to the prasenration of the community arc other n€€ds, such asi
presenration of the City's tax base and road imprwements.
OATE:
TO:
FROIll1
RE:
cc:
L
.:il,:H1ru."n::iffi::liiffi Tlilnf ;H*'''iss'ionMe€uns'
ffi"ff"'ffi '****uri$ff
*"[i''l[f;"ffi l'.'""'
ffi ',f,ffi#ffisiHh#"ff H:rffif $$:ni#rr'"
il"** "" ^*nda
looks gr€st as usual'
thanlg,Mc
z
RESOLUTION NO. 67-97
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA,
RECOMMENDING THE SOUTH RUNWAY REMAIN A
GENERAL AVIATION RUNWAY AND ONE OF THE
NORTH RUNWAY ALTERNATIVES BE CONSTRUCTED,
WHICH WOULD MINIMIZE THE THREAT TO THE PUBLIC
HEALTH AND SAFETY OF DANIA RESIDENTS BY THE
PROPOSED PROJECT, AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DANIA, FLORIDA;
WHEREAS, an interlocal agreement was signed in September,
1995, between the City of Dania and Broward County regarding airport
expansion; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dania as the first local government of the
area known as Broward County has contributed more land proportionately
than any other city to airport expansion; and
WHEREAS, each airport expansion disrupts and removes prime
future tax base from the City and threatens both the economic stability as
well as the public health of the residents of Dania; and
WHEREAS, the protection of public health and safety is the primary
responsibility of the Dania City Commission; and
WHEREAS, the FAA has represented that it may not approve a
"one way" runway which is the basis of the remaining community
protections in the agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dania wishes to express its concern with
the status of the "Trail's End" parcel and the county's failure to proceed
with the buffer planning and construction; and
WHEREAS, the county has represented that the City is fully
supporting and not concerned regarding the proposed runway conversion
and expansion.
Section 1. A copy of this resolution will be supplied to Broward
County Commission and all relevant planning agencies.
Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect
immediately upon its passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED on the 13 day of May '1997.
,4//2.-/
ATTEST
CITY CLER AUDITOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
A.*,t e.d,4.*-
CITY ATTORNEY
ISSIONER{aevoa-co/M
2 RESOLUTION NO.67-97
NOW THEREFORE, let it be clearly known that the City of Dania
would prefer the south runway remain a general aviation runway and one
of the north runway alternatives be constructed, which would minimize the
threat to the public health and safety of Dania residents by the proposed
project which may require Dania to re-enter litigation.
)
CITY OF DANIA
,OO W. OANIA BEACH BLVD.
P.O. BOX'r70E
OAIUA, FL 33OO'
Phon.: (3051
Fer: (3061
g2t -8700
321-280a
October 20, 1995
The Honorable Suzanne N. Gunzburger
Chairperson
Broward County Commission
115 South Andrews Avenue, Room 421
Fort Lauderdale, Fl 33301
Re:lnterlocal Agreement between Broward County and City of Dania
pertaining to the Expansion and Jurisdiction of Fort Lauderdale -
Hollywood lnternational Airport
Dear Commissioner Gunzburger:
The City of Dania Commission adopted Resolution No. 144-95 approving the
lnterlocal Agreement regarding the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood lnternational Airport on
October 10, 1995. An original agreement has been enclosed with a copy of the
County's signatures on Page 12 and original signatures for Dania on Page 13.
As you know, this is an executory agreement which is conditioned on actions to
be taken by the Florida Legislature during the upcoming 1996 regular legislative
session with respect to annexation and deannexation.
Between now and the legislative session, City staff will be compiling the
necessary documents to finalize the financial transaction referenced in the ag reement.
Si
Mich ith
City M
MS/cs
Enclosures
cc: Jack Osterholt, County Administrator
RESOLUTION NO.144-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, APPROVING
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROWARD COUNry AND THE
CITY OF DANIA PERTAINING TO EXPANSION AND JURISDICTION OF
FORT l-AUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CIW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. That the city commission of the city of Dania, Florida, hereby
approves the lnterlocal Agreement between Broward County and the City of Dania
pertaining to expansion and jurisdiction of Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood lnternational
Airport, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit 'A', and the
appropriate city officials are hereby directed to execute same.
section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately
upon its passage and adoPtion.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 1Oth day of October, 1995'
ATTEST;
CITY CLERK -DITOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
Frank C. Adler, City AttorneY
MAYO MMISSIONER
Resolution No. 144-95
ay: d^-rJ e. 6il--
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Between
BROWARD COINiTY
and
CITY O IA
pertaining Eo
Expansion and Jurisdiction of
ForL Lauderdale-HollYvroodInternat
WITNESSETH:
operates the
(Ehe "Airport"),of the COITNTY,
Fort Lauderdale -
which is presenElythe CITY and the
T A1
This is an agreement between Broward County, a political
subdivision of the StaEe of Florida ('COUNTY') and the City of
Dania, a municj-pa1 corporation, organized and exist'ing under the
laws of the State of Florida ('CITY").
WHEREAS, COITNTY owns and
Hollywood International- Airport
located within t.he j urisdiction
City of ForE Lauderdale; and
WHEREAS, to ensure efficient operation and management of the
Airport, in 1971 the Legislature enacted certain k'cal bil-ls to
exciude' the Airport, as it was then configured,. from municipal
jurisdiction, but subseguenE land acquis.:-Eion for Airport expans.ion
in the early 1980's r6sulted in portions of the Airport again
f all-ing withln the iurisdiction of the CI'IY; and
WHEREAS, COIINTY and CITY have authority to enter into
Interlocal Agreements pursuant to S153.01-, Florida SLatutes; and
WHEREAS,COIINTYandC]TYdesirebythislnterlocalAgreementto proarid" for unified governmenta-f services and regulaEory control
of'the Fort L,auderdale -Hol- lywood International AirporE, and to
address the CITY's concernJ regarding future expansion of the
Airport; and
WHEREAS,CoLINTYhasapprovedthest'udyentitled"TechnicalReport: ForL Lauderdale -riollywood International Airport' Master
ei!"- upart"i dated l'tarch t9-g+, hereinafter referred to as the
,,Mastei p1an,,' which study recommends the widening of runway -9R/27L,attheAirporttol5OfeetanditslengEheningtso9,000feetto
oe/!2/e5 -1-
accommodate .he proiected capacity needs of the AirporE (the
" runway expansion" ) ; and
WHEREAS, previous Master Plans for Ehe Airport in 1978 and
1987 depicteci itre extension of runway 9R/ 2'7L to 6, 000 f eet,' and
WHEREAS,thelandsneededtocompletetherunwayexpansionare
Iocated within the CITY,' and
WHEREAS, COUNTY provides all necessary governmenta1 services
u"a ".r.i"ight Eo lhe'Airport, and, therefore, desires excfusive
jurisdiction within the Airport.; and
WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY recognize the benefit of the Airport
to the economy of Broward County and the City of Dania; and
WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY recognize the need for stsability and
commitment in Planning; and
WHEREAS, CITY desires the stabilization of i-Es Eax base in
light ;i-;;;h plinned acquisition of land for Airport purposes; and
WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY recognize and agree that any,interim
negative impacE on the tax base of Ehe CITY due to CoUNTY's
."d"i"iii"" tr lana within t.he crrY for the runway expansion will
fu-'iaar.="ud by the CrTY's annexatj"on of certain land' as more
fu11y described herein; and
WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY recognize and agree that
pot."ti"i impact of the runway expansion on the resj"dents in
iri"i.ri-ty of the Airport will be addressed by the runway use
noise mitigation programs addressed herein; and
NoW, TiilREFoRE, in consideration of Ehe mulual-
conditions, promises, and covenants set forth herein'
CITY hereby agree as follows:
1. AIRPORT EXPANS ION AND RIINWAY RESTRICTIONS
1. CO'TINTY and CITY agree that the Airport expansion proposed
in the Master PIan, and thJ mitigation of the impact of the runway
."p"""i"", as furtsher addressed 6y this Interlocal AgreemenE ' is in
ir-r'" f"=t l.rt.t"=t of the residents of Broward countsy '
2. CITY agrees to cooperate with couNTY in the preparation
and appro.ral of Jn amendment to the Airport DRI developmenE order'
i."a--"!.-pi"., "*e.rdm".rts re]ated to the Airport -DRr '- incl.uding the
amendment to " transportsat ion " of the land needed for Ehe runway
any
the
and
terms and
COIINTY and
0e/a2/es -2-
expansion, andMaster Plan for an Environmental Impact Statements based upon the
the Airport .
3 . COLINTY agrees to:
A. Amend the Broward County Land Use PIan and Compre-
hensive Plan to become consistent with the Airport Master P1an, to
the ext.ent the comprehensive and Broward county Land use -Plansaddress the matters addressed by the Airport Mast'er Plan Update;
B. Restrict Ehe use of proposed runway 9R/27L as
fol,lows:
(1) At all- times during phases 1, 2 and 3 of opera-
tlon, proposed runway 9F'/ 27f-, shalf be used only during- t'he hours of
7:00 i.m1o tO,OO p.m. and only by Stage III aircraft' However'
p."p"=.J runway 9Rf 2'7L may be used at. any tsime in the event of an-";;;;;;;y o, trr. .Io.rtu of ,,-,t,ay gL'/27R as hereinaf ter provi-ded '
(2) At the starE-up of operatlon of the proposed
runway gR/27L, aircraft exceeding 58,000 Ibs' wilI land only Eo the
;;;;-;", b-part only to the east. However, proposed-runwav 9R/27L
*uy f. used'unresErained at any time in the event of an emergency
or' thu closure of runway 9L/;7R as hereinafter provided' This
Ievel of use shall- be referred to herein as "Phase 1'"
(3) When the number of aircraft operaEions at' the
Airport require ic, !o avoid de1ay, aircraft exceeding 58'000 1bs'
miy'rana t6 trre easE or deparE to the west using proposed runway
9F''/ 27L only during IFR conditions during peak hours' However'
;;;;";"J;n*^y sx"J ztt' may be used unrestrained at any t j'me in the
event of an emergency or ihe closure of runway 9L/27R as hereinaf-
t.t ptt.riJ"a. fhis'le.'e1 of use shalI be referred to herein as
"Phase 2." COUNTY may proceed to Phase 2 use of the proposed
r;;;; ;R/27L only if iouiru has complied with Ehe requirements of
paragraph 4, bel-ow, "Noise Mitigation' "
(41 When the number of aircrafE operations at the
Airport require it, to avoid de1ay, aircraft exceeding 58'000 lbs'
miy- r""a t6 tne east or depart to the west using proposed run\^'ay
gi't zir only during peak houis. However, proposed -runway 9F./27L may
re' used unrestrained at any tsime in the event of an emergency or
the closure of runway gI-,/ 2iF' as hereinafter provided' T-his--1evel
of use shall- be referred to herein as "Phase 3'" CotlNTY may
proceed. to Phase 3 use of the proposed- runway 9F./271' onl-y if CoUNTY
;;;-;;pIl; witn trre requir6meits of paragraph 4' below' "Noise
Mitigation. "
(5) If COUNTY determines at any time that it is
necessary or advisabfe to move to Phase 2, Phase 3 or unrestrained
oe/1,2/e5 -3-
use of proposed runr^ray 9L/ 27R, COTINTY
in writlng and preparing a projected 5
map for ihe Airport and immediately
paiagraph 4, below, "Noise Mitigation'
(6) Unrestrained use of runway 9R/271- because
the closure of runway 9L/27F. or due Eo the existence of
;;;.g;;.t conditi-on a€ the Airport as declared bv a pilot-'
ii"iii" control personnel or the Airport operaEor shall
permitted at. al-l- times.
(7) COUNTY agrees to supply CITY monthly reports of
lhe Airport noise monitori-ng system' Such reporLs sh.all be
;;;"ia"Jl" the form iequested' bv. the crrY' Eo the extent the form
requested by the CrTY is' ,icfi" ihe standard existing capabilities
;iTh; noise moni tori.rt-"gt'i-pment and software' crTY has the right
to irra.p."aently verffi ii-,. '""uttt"y of the AirporE noise monitor-
ing system.
C. NoE proceed with the consEruction of the proposed
runwav expans j-on unless the restrictions descri-bed above are
:#ffii.J'i;^"r-rr.- rJl-rJ Aviarion Administration (,FAA" ) . and the
FAA has responded i"dittti"g that it did not object Eo the
restrictions -
may do so by notifYing CITY
year 55 Ldn noise exposure
,,Commencing to comPlY wj-th
of
A.Ir
be
4. Noise MiLigataon:
A. StarEing in the calendar year during which-construc-
tion of the proposed rtinway 9R/27L commences' CoUNTY shal l prepare
annually a proj ecteJ !-y-&r bs r'at' noise exposure map' -f or the
il;;;;;' "rra--pi".ria" tutr' map to . the crrY immediaLelv upon
;;;;t;".; by the ei"r"ia countv Aviation Department' - rhe. base
;;;;- j-;;;*iiion sr,atI be drawn f rom the best avail-able data on
actual aircraft op.r"iio.'= at the Airport' Data from the COUNTY's
noise monitori.,g .y.JJ*;h"il be utilized to verify the accuracy of
the compuEed base y.ut tot'to"t ' The projected 5-year noise
exposure map sharl "iiii" thu bt=t availible data to project the
;;il;;-;"d'tvp. "r ,li.iirJ ope-rations' rhe forecasts and aIl-'j"pi"iai"g dl't-a shall be provided to the crTY at CrTY's request '
At such time as a projected 5-year -55 Ldn noise
exposure map shows ii,.t -a p"'tion -Lt.lnv residential area within
the CITy wiLl be "*po=.a io 55 Ldn because of che operation of
i"irrr'v -i*Zrrr, *i- cr',:'t' s""r'' i- y""=, couNTY shal-I commence a noise
' where the term "Ldn* is used herein' it shafl -mean an
annual average i,dn contour' The term "55 Ldn' shall mean Ehe then-
current applicable F";;;;i A'viation Administration guideline for
noise mitigaE.ion of residentiaf areas'
oe/a2/e5 -4-
mitigatsion program, as described be1ow, in such area and shal]
="f.ia"tiafiy Jomplete such mitigation, as described in paragraph
a.c. n.f"r, -prioi to allowing the nexc phase of use of runway
9I./27L. ClTy-has the right to lndependenrly verify Ehe accuracy of
CoifNty's projected noj-se congours. However, CotlNTY may commence
;;;- ;t -tj"*"v 9R/ 27r-, or move to a higher phase without having
suU=ra.,tiafly completed the noise mitigation program if' because of
natural disjster or other force majeure, t.here is a drastic
i"a""ti"t in commercial airport capacity in the South Florida area'
such as the 1ong-term cloiure of a commercial aircraft runway ',rfri"t ."l-,s"= "n lrrc."ased commercial demand aE Ehe Airport beyond
;;;;;"Ji; projections. rn che event this occurs and is expected
io f".t tongei tLran six (5) months, couNTY shall immedi-aLe1y
DreDare a revised noise contour reffecting t.he increased -use of
i""ilv"g*Zzr" lnJi**eai"te1y commence noisE mitigation as defined
be fow .
B. The COUNTY sha11 prepare and implement' as requi-red
by paragraph 4.A. above, a noj-le - mit-igation program .based upon
then-current and applicable Federal Aviation Administration
ilia"ii;;", wrrich at'ihe present time may include one or more of
the following: purchase assurance or saI-es assistance programs2;
,.q"i=iJi"" -of - fee titfe to all property (and relocatj-on of
;;;;;;;;-;;.,"r=) ,itt,in a defined area; voruntarv acquisition and
rel-ocation; or, acquisition of avigation easemenEs ' -- Depending upon
tte aesires of the affected residents and the CITY' a variety of
miuigation measures may be offered r^'ithin the same area' The
;;i;;y- ";"cern in the prepar'ation of a noise miti-gation program
will be the desires "i ti" 'af fected residents' The exact terms of
any avigatior. "r""..rrts purchased wilt be subject to negotiation
beiween-the COLINTY and ihe propergy owner. Mit.igation p-rograms
;h;ii-;. developed 1., .oota'i''t"tion with Lhe crrY' and sha1l be
;;;;a ;p;" , "oniid"r.tiln or the consistency of such measures with
then-current and ,ppii.,ff" Federal aviation Administration
guidelines. ttowever,'ifre mitlgation programs se lected. shal- I- not be
dup"rra""t on the ,.r"it"Uj-:-ity "or f tau'"1- or state funding ' At this
;ril;-6; parties recog.,ize that a purchase assurance or sales
assistance program wiLL -Uest achieve the goals of the parties where
the affected resiaenJs desire to maintain the character of their
ne ighborhood .
C. Proposed noise mitigation programq frgpare-d pursuant
Eo this ,gi..*..rt -"fr":-f f" submitied to the Dania City Commission
for review "no "o...ni crrY shall review such programs and may
submit to couNTY a counter-proposal within fort.y-f ive (45) days'
2
value onaffected
Anv miEiqaEion program will- base the determination of
;;;;";Ji; piop.itiJs sefected from outside anv airport'
oe/L2/e5 -5-
Any counLer -proposal- s made by CITY -shal1 be based upon a
consideration of the desires or trre residents of the area and shall
be consistenE with then-current and applicable guidelines 'incluaing, at a minimum, f ederal- regulations regarding grant
et:-giliflty ana the expendit.ure- of -awiation funds' However'
mitigation programs proptsed by the C-ITY need not be dependent on
the Jvaifablfity ot iederal or state funding' The CrTY's counter-
;;;p;.;1; sha1l no! address the subseguent use or disposition of
any property acquired for noise mitigation purposes'
COUNTY shalI consider any such counter -proposals and
respond in writing regarding each e1ement of the counter-proposal '
if-I"iria the CorlNTY el&t to -pl]rsue a miEigation program dif f ering
iro. lfrrt proposed by the CITY, the parEies shal-I .attempt to
iesot.re tfr.it altf.r.ri"." and, if necessary, utiLize the services
;i-; 1";"i, publ ic _ orj-enEed organizario_n ro funcrion as a mediaror,
such as the "FAU & FIU Joint Center for Environmental and urban
ProbIems. " If the CoIINTY rejects the CITY's proposal because
coufliv contends tha! such pro-posa1 is not consist'ent with FAA
ouj-delrnes, or if Ehe CITY -coite.rds Ehat the mitigation is not
;;;;i;;;;a",oiJr, tr,. provisions of this asreement' the parties mav
.i."i t" utilize tlie services of an arbitrator to generate a
fin6ino on those i"",.r"". The arbitrator,s finding and all
""pp"iii"g documentation shalf be submitted for the FAA for a
rriirrg. The purpose of this approach is to ensure t'hat the
submittaf to Ehe raa is unbiased, complete and fu1ly- document ed '
The arbitrator wil-1 be selected as follows:
The COUNTY may requesE from the American Arbitration
Association ('AAA" ) a list oi sif (6) proposed arbitrators who have
a"."""lt"t"d knowledge and experti=e it' t t''" interpreEation and
"ppii"uii"" of then-c-urrent raA- laws and regulations pertaining to
gi'r.c-"f igj-bi!-ity and the expenditure of aviation funds by airport
!porr=o." -*t o t a.rl receivea iederal aviation grant f-unds ', within
iiifu." (15) days of receipt of the proposed lis.t. of arbitrators'
Ciiv ..,a COUNTf shalf attempt Eo agree on an arbitrator' If the
p"itr.= are unabfe to agree tt' "t'.aibitrator' they may request the-n.gi""ii Director of tirl AAA to designate the arbitraror, and the
parties agree to accept such.designacion' No individual- who is' or
t;=-;a-rti time been,'an officer,- emproyee or consultant of either
;;;a;"rlii L" "II "tr:-trator hereunder without the express written
consent of both parties. The arbitrator may' wit.h Ehe unanimous
consent of the parties, agree to such modifications to or
;;;;;;;"";- trom tG- artitr"ation Rufes as he or sLre deems
;;;;:;;i;.". - rhe arbitralor shafl interpret then-current
.iiii'""d" FAA l-aws
-a.,d regulations. regarding granE e-ligibility in
a reasonabLe manner. alf lrUitration -proceedings wi-1l be- held in
er.*;ia count.y, rloriJa. Each of th6 .parties wiIl .
pro-d-uce aJ-I
;;;;;a; ."q"."t"a bt ah; arbitrator' The agreement tso arbitrate
Ehe dispute as piovided in this agreemLnt is specifically
oe/L2/e5 -6-
oe /1,2 / e5 -'7 -
enforceabfe in any court having jurisdiction. The determination of
the arbitrator muit be in writing and will rnclude written findings
of fact to the extent the arbitration requirec the resofution of
factuaL disputes. The determinat.ion of the arblt.raEor musE also
rncfude conilusions of faw addressing Ehe basis of the arbitrator's
interpretation of the applicabl-e FAA l-aws and ru1es. The costs of
arbitiation sha11 be equiffy born by both parties. In the event. of
a dispute between the paraj-es as to whether the arbitrator has
jurisdiction over t.he subject.matt.gf of any dispute, - the decision
6f tfr. arbitrator as ro tshat jurisdiction wil] be followed by the
p"rii." in the first instancL, but wifl be subjecE to judiciaf'ieview afcer the deci-sion of the arbitrator on the merits of the
ai";;i.. The decision of ghe arbirragor as ro jurisdicrion witl be
ievErsiUle only if clearly erroneous. Each party submits Eo the
j"ri"ai.ti"n oi the arbj-crator appointed in accordance herewith'
CoIINTY will not proceed to Ehe next phase of runway
use unless there is a fu11y-funded noise mitigation program in
pi"." .nd COUNTY has subsEantlally completed such noise mitigation,
;;-;rt particularly described in +.e. above. NorwiEhsranding the
foregoin-g, the CouNiY may proceed with the next phase of runway use
;i;;;-; teriod of six iei months has elapsed from Ehe daEe t'he
COUf.ftV funds and offers to initlate its program of noise
mit igation.
5.CoLNTYagreesthatanyfeesimplecondemnationundertakenas a noise mitigaiion measure wifl be conducted pursuant to the
Federal Relocation Assistance Act '
1I. ANNEXAT I ON/DEANNEXATI ON
6. COUNTY shal-l- prepare al-l necessary documents for
annexation into Ehe CITi o-f the parcels of Iand more fu1ly
aLscrj-bea on Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, and sometimes referred to herein as the "Annexation
Parce-Ls. "
7. CITY and COUNTY agree Eo support by all reasonable and
lega1 means Che annexation b! cITy of the Annexation Parcels, which
shall incfude supporting blfore the Broward CounEy Legislative
o"i.g"tio" and th?- Legislature a local bitl in substantially the
form attached hereto u". r*r.iuit s. The modificaLion or elimination
of "oania AnnexaLion Area 3" as described in Exhibits 1 and in the
;ara;hments ro Exhitit 3 shall, not be considered a substantial
modification of Lhe local- bilf '
8. CouNTY shall prepare all necessary documents for the
deannexation from the Cfti of the parcels of land more fu11y
describea on Exhibit 2, atstached hereCo and incorporated herein by
reference, and someti-mes referred to here j-n as the "Deannexation
Parce Is . "
9. CITY and COIINTY agree to support by all reasonable and
1ega1 means the deannexation of the Deannexation Parcels, which
shi11 j.nclude supporting before the Broward County L,egislative
Delegatlon and the Legislature a Local bill in substantially the
form aEEached hereEo as Exhibit 3. If the COUNTY ever determines
that the area commonly known as "Trails End, " or any portion
thereof, is no J-onger needed or desired for airport purposes/
CoUNTY agrees thaE such land wifl be offered for safe or exchangTe
in accor-dance with the requirements of Fl-orida st.atutes and tshe
FAA, and that such lands may Ehereafter, at the discretion of the
CITY, be annexed i-n accordance wit.h 1aw lnto Ehe CITY-
l-0. The COT NTY and the CITY agree that the annexation and
deannexation of lands described herein, when considered together
with the other provisions of this agreement, provide comparable
benefits and obligations to each party. Therefore, if for any
reason the Legislature does not enact a local- bill in substantially
the form aEtached hereto as Exhibi! 3, this Interlocal Agreement
shaI1 be nul-f and void and of no further force and effect.
Similarly, if for any reason any clause or paragraph of this
tnterlocat Agreement 1s not agreed to and approved by each
commission, fhen both Ehe COUNTY and the CITY shal-1 wit.hdraw
support for a local bi1l.
II]. PLATTING; AIRPORT_COMPATTBLE USES
11.A. CITY agrees to supporE by all reasonabfe and 1ega1
means the pfatting, rezoning, and other such acEions necessary to
prepare cErtain l-ands in the vicinity of the Airpor-u for-devllopment or redevelopment for airport-related uses or airport
compati-bIe uses. The Iands to vrhich this paragraph applies are
inciuded in Ehe following plats or proposed plats: "Runway Lakes
FLLAirportP]-at3.,uTraiISEndFLLAirportPlat5
Avenue i'l,l airport Plat 7;" "Ravensvrood 32nd StreeE FLL Airport
Pfat 8;" and, "N.E. ?th Avenue FLL AlrporE Plat 9."
B. Regarding "Trails End FLL Airport Plat
agrees as soon as practicabl-e after plat recordation
within the area des j-gnated on the plaE as "openappropriate landscape buffer, similar to tshats proposed
nent-a-Car during CITY's review of the p1at.
C. CoIINTY agrees, following approval and recordation of
Plats 3, ? and 8, to of fLr Plats 3, 7 and I for sale or exchange in
accordance wit.h the requirements of Florida statuEes and the FAA.
so that such fands may be returned to the tax rol-es of the CITY'
5 , ' COT'NTYto instal-fSpace" anby Value -
0e/L2/es -8-
It is the parties' intent that such lands be offered for sal-e
soon as pract j-cable after pl-at recordatj-on, consideringprevailing market conditions.
IV. SETTLEMENT OE LITIGATION
the
When used in this agreement, " aj-rport - re Iated uses" or
" airport - compat ible uses" shaIl mean uses and facilities that arerelated to the Airport or aviaEion, or that provide support
services to the Airport, its tenants, users, concessionaires and
empl-oyees, and which may, by Ehe application of reasonable site-
p1ln, zoning or similar regulations, be conducted on a proposed
!ite in a manner that is compatible with exist.ing, non-airport uses
in the vicinity of the site. Without in any way f imj-ting the
generalit.y of the foregoing, " airport - related uses" and "airporc-compatible uses" include: rentaf car facilities and storagfe 1ots,
1on!-term passenger parking facil-ities, employee parki-ng facili-
tieE, airllne in-flight services, air cargo services, specialized
aircraft and. ground. t.ransporEation equipment repair and maintenance
excluding aircraft engine testing, and aviat ion - orient ed training
faciliEies.
1-2. IE is the intent and desire of the parties to resofve by
this agreement aff of their disputes regarding the proposed runway
expansion as described in the Airport Master Pl-an. Therefore,
baied upon the mutual benefits and obligations set forth herein and
the frimework for cooperation provided by this agreement, the
parties desire to resolve all pending fitigation, as follows:
A. CITY agrees to enter into a Stipulated Fina-
Judgment in the case styled City of Dania v- Broward County, case
No. 93 -:_8222 (05), pending in the 17th Judicial circuit. Broward
County, Florida, which Stipulated Final Judgment shalf incorporate
the tLrms of this agreement, and CITY agrees to dismiss Ehe non-
final appeal styled City of Dania v. Broward County, 4th DCA Case
No. 95-01238.
B. CITY agrees t.hat, by entering into and executing
this agreement, Resolution No. 26-95 of the City Commi.ssion of the
City o? Dania is hereby rescinded. COUNTY agrees, t'herefore, to
dismiss the case styled Broward County v. City of Dania, Ca-se No'
95-04f57 (05) , as soon as practicable after execution of this
agreement -
C. As soon as practicable after execution of this
agreement, CITY agrees that it will withdraw any and aII pending
*5tiorrs to intervene j-n eminenE domain actions filed by COUNTY to
acquire land for AirporE purposes, and voluntarily dismiss any and
ali appeals and proceedings currently pending regarding the CITY's
intserir-ention or participation in such eminents domain actions,
0e/L2/es -9-
includj-ng buL not fimited Eo the following cases: City of Danla v.
Broward. Count-v and Powef l-, et a7., 4th DCA Case No. 95-01223 [L.T-
Case No. 95-001848 (o?)l; City of Dania v- Broward County and
Poweff, et a1,., 4th DCA Case No. 95-01428 [L.T. Case No. 95'01847(fa)l; City of Dania v. Braward County and Lancaster SteeT Co-
Inc., et a7., 4th DCA case No. 95-01213 [L.T. case No- 95-
01555(O?)); City of Dania v. Broward County and Kurz AssociaEes,
L.P., et a7., 4th DCA Case No. 95-0r748 [L.T. Case No. 95-
01552 (13)l ; City of Dania v. Broward County and Peerless
Investment Co., et aL., 4t]n DCA Case No. 95-01747 [L'T' Case No'
95-01842(05)1. Thereafter, boch parties agree Eo withdraw or
dismiss any ancillary motions or proceedings, including any motions
for attorney' s fees .
V- OTHER PROVISIONS
13. COTINTY agrees to acquire from CITY certain infrastructure
improvements on the land being acquired for the runway expansion,
foi an amounE equal to the costs expended by the CITY, e-xcludj-ng
grants received or other amounts advanced or rej-mbursed by any
6ther entiEy, for the installation of such infrastructure
improvements, noE to exceed One Million, Six-Hundred Thousand
ooilars ( $ 1 , 5 0 o , o 0 0 . 0 0 ) , which cosEs the CITY shalf demonstrate and
document Eo the couNTY,s satisfaction. The CITY shal1 provide the
COIINTY with an itemized description of Ehe locations, t)'pes and
characteristics of the infrasEiucture for which cosEs are to be
paid by the Co-LTI{TY. simultaneous wiLh the pa)ment by the couNTY to-tfr. Cfty of Ehe costs of such infrastructure j-mprovements, Che CITY
sha]1 provide the COUNTY with: (1) a BiIl of Sale, in recordable
form, 'transferrj-ng all rights, titte and interest in said
improvements to tfie COUNTY; and 12) a quit c]-aim deed E-o al-1
prlperty righcs in the Deannexat.ion Parcefs. The Bil-1 of Sale'transf eiring al1 rights, title and interest in said j-mprovements to
the couNTY sir.rr r. in recordable form. colINTY shall bear any
expense of recording the Bill of SaIe, and CITY shafl be
ieiponsiffe for sales-gaxes, if any, thag are payable in connection
wiEh Ehis transaction.
L4. COUNTY agrees to protect the existing infrastructure' or
provide appropriati replacement infrastructure. needed to ensure
Lontinued-iafl and adJquate access and continuation of existing
utility services to areas currently served by the j-nfrastructure
defined in paragraPh 13 above -
15. COUIITY agrees to initiat'e amendments
CounLy Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Plan
Interiocal -AgreemenE, and diligently pursue such
to t.he Browardto reflect this
amendment s .
0e/L2/e5 -10-
76. The parEies agree, to the extenE permitEed by law, that 'as between crTY and the couNTY, coIrNTY sha1l be the focal
go.rur.r*"rrt wich exclusive jurisdiction over the Airport 'ie".i"=i-r" jurrsdiction" shal1 be construed to incfude, but shafl
noE be limiied to. power to issue any development order pursuant to
Section 380.06, r'lorida Statutes, or any Ioca1 program established
to repface the DRI program, for lands wj-thin the planned Airport
boundary .
77. Any notice required
writing by certified U. S. Mai1,
as follows:
FOR THE COIINTY:
hereunder shall- be Provided in
return receipt requested, addressed
Count.y Administrator
Broward CounEy Governmental Center
115 Souch Andrews Avenue, Suite 490
Fort. Lauderdale, FL 33301
FOR THE C]TY:CiEy ManagerCity of Dania
1Oo W. Dania Beach Blvd
Dania, FL 33004
18. Except as ot.herwise specifically provided in paragraph 7
reqardinq "pania Annexation Area 3: " t'his agreement .shall- be
";;=;;;;A ili;; entiretv and no portion thereof is severabl-e; each
.i..l=" i-s dependenE on the remiit'i'''g cfauses and common to the
;;ai;; contract; and, the parties agree tshat Ehe entire agreement
i"-r"ia should any clause 6r provisitn herein faj-I or be stricken.
Lg. COUNTY agrees to approve, or support the granting. by the
appropriate agency of, an uii.*tt't to. af 1bw the conEinuation and
*ui.rtlr,".r"" oi criy's entry sign on the traf f ic island at U's' I
and Griffin Road (S.R- 818), pr6vided CITY agree-s- to maintsain said
."irv =1g". The COUNTY furtlier agrees to instaLl' or provide for
the institlation of, ats no cost to the CITY' a landscaped gateway
to the CITY on U.S. 1, south of Griffin Road'
20. COUNTY agrees that at such E'ime as COUNTY no longer
.,.o.rid"= fire and/oi i.""rl. services from Fire Station #32 (located
:;-;.;.-iiJt;;;""), crrY sha1l be si-ven first consideration to
;;.;;;;"-;;.n tit. siation for the purpose of providins its fire
rescue servlces.
2:- . The Parties hereto
prerequisitses Pertaining to
been performed.
22. This Interlocal Agreement
construed in accordance with Florida
aqree thaE all legal
th-e execution of chis
requirements or
Agreement have
be governed bY and
supersedes alI Pri orsha11
0e/a2/e5 -11-
written or oral agreements between the parties, and may not be
modified or amende-d unless in writing following approval by both
the Board of County Commissioners of Broward County and the Dania
C j-ty Commission.
23. CoUNTY agrees, if necessary to faciliEate the relocation
of value -Rent -A- car from its present location at 1030 Taylor Road
within the area needed for the runway expansion to another site
within the CITY, to enter into one or more leases or other
agreements in COUNTY's standard form to al-Iow the use of a portion
of the runway protection zone for runway 13 for rental car storage,
subject to tie approval of the FAA and subject to any prior
exiiting contract rights of other renEal car companies '
IN WITNESS WHEREOE, Ehe ParInEerlocal Agreement on the respe
BROWARD COIINTY through its Board
ties have made and executed this
ctive daE.es under each signature:
of County Commissioners, s igning
Chaj-r, duly authorized to execute
, 1995, and the CITY OF
, duly authorized
by and through it
same by Board act
DANIA, signing bY
to execute same.
A11E>i :
nt
w;
s Chair o VlCE
l-on on
Ex-officio Cl-erk o
Board of County C
v AOm
d
to dstra
and t o its
the
omml ers
BROWARD COIINTY,
BOARD OF COUNTY
t.hrough j-t s
COMMISSIONERS
By
IA
/L
Cha
fo B nuoCl:aoT cNlo
,at
day of
Approved as to form bY Office of
the CountY Attorney, Broward
County, Fforida,
.JOHN J. COPELAN, JR., COUNTY
AEtorney, Governmentaf Center,
Suit.e 423. 115 South Andrews Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Telephone: (305) 357-7600
Telecopier: (305) 357-7641
Tracy Laut ens chl ager
31,
i,{\:)
,:i
$tt
t!
s
rv.
,l:(\
cr')
t,
/
oe/12/95 -)_2-
By
AssisLant County Attorne
COUNTY
1995.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROWARD COUNTY AND CITY OE DANIA
PERTAINTNG TO EXPANSION AND JURISDICTION OF FORT LAUDIRDALE -
HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
CTTY
CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA
WITNESSES:
By
Name :Tirle:
Approved as to form:
1995.
\,\
ATTEST:
C.l-C
EAL
a er
4**l e. Al!,*
City Attorney
C
ty
Tr!/ep
#93-890
09 /a2/9sdania.l3
-13-
/'1 au "r 0{fr14
Exhibit 1
Exhibits 2
Exhibit 3
EXI{TB IT LIST
-!4-
Annexation Parcefs
Deannexat.ion Parcel-s
Proposed Local Bil-1
iltl
ril,
ql il;l1t1l,
tW (/
1
r
t7 sl
0
fltjr!iJ
.n
!
(
\.= '
!,qEI _. ._..,.--tvEaoraots
[;t
I
Ii
I
rl
I
;A;.t
,
1
'?
tl
uls
I
I:
@
STAT oasrru |
I 4
\
I
Y
;a
IL
z
o
8
i
3
F
!
r/
: t;l 26
t.l
25
I
'(
()
.J!il
rI
," di
t
1
1l
ST
l'i'
i!
35
Iil
R
t-
RLING i RD
rrcl
I
:
DANIA
ARE 2
s
a
95
I
DE-AN
E t
T
\
I
a*
"0
r,. ?
EXATION AREAS
r-l-_lN
3
ANNEXATI
2
ANIA ANNEXATION '\Yorxt
28
ato
I
z
I-I
J
\
"q".
(11) x
{
34r-l!tl llti
a rStr-1tl
[1llP
I
3 3,!i!:i.iIg,i d,i
95 ;ltbi:rl!!
;li-
ii r
i.I
!tii
'DANIA ANNEXATION ABEAS]i
l'1
rI
-tr 25
HiI;tJ 0n)!!trL
a)
+t
LEGEND
1,
r1
Ir
I
)
I
ll
ft
t;7;
n11