Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2021-012 BC ILA Transportation System Surtax Second Amendment to and Restatement of ILARESOLUTION NO.2021-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE PROPER CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE A SECOND AMENDMENT TO AND RESTATEMENT OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SURTAX INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH BROWARD COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; FURTHER, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 311/2-71, et seq., of the Broward County Code of Ordinances ("Transportation Surtax Ordinance"), a 30-year 1% transportation surtax was levied after approval by referendum of the general electorate at the General Election on November 6, 2018, to be expended for authorized transportation and transit projects in accordance with applicable law including, specifically, Section 212.055(1), Florida Statutes ("Transportation Surtax");and WHEREAS, the County has asked to clarify the history to the adopted interlocal agreement relating to the adopted plan for funding certain transportation surtax projects and has asked that the attached second amendment and restated transportation system surtax interlocal agreement; and WHEREAS, on September 12, 2019, the Transportation System Surtax Interlocal Agreement was amended to provide for the MPO's evaluation and ranking of municipal capital projects and the County's evaluation and ranking of municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects (the "First Amendment"); and WHEREAS, the County and the MPO entered into a separate agreement to establish, inter alia, the terms and conditions for the MPO to annually review, rank, and prioritize municipal projects based on the project's ability to alleviate traffic congestion and enhance connectivity; and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2020, the MPO completed its review and ranking of municipal capital projects for the first funding cycle and provided its recommendations to prioritize funding for 110 municipal capital projects for the County's fiscal year ("FY") 2020; and WHEREAS, the MPO did not evaluate the remaining 396 municipal capital projects for funding readiness and those projects will be evaluated for Transportation Surtax funding in future funding application cycles; and WHEREAS, the County also completed its evaluation, ranking, and approval of municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects for FY 2020; and WHEREAS, consistent with the Transportation Surtax Ordinance, all projects to be funded with Transportation Surtax proceeds are considered by the Independent Transportation Surtax Oversight Board for statutory eligibility under Section 212.055(1), Florida Statutes, before the Broward County Commission makes the final decisions regarding project approval and funding; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2020, the Oversight Board considered the proposed municipal capital projects ranked by the MPO and the municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects ranked by the County for FY 2020 and identified 97 municipal capital projects and 61 municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects as statutorily eligible. Of the 110 municipal capital projects ranked by the MPO, 13 projects were withdrawn from consideration by the applicable Municipality, deferred at the request of the applicable Municipality, or were deemed statutorily ineligible; and WHEREAS, on June 18, 2020, the County Commission approved Transportation Surtax funding for FY 2020 (which included funding carried forward from FY 2019) of (i) more than $60 million for the applicable phases of the 97 statutorily -eligible municipal capital projects recommended by the MPO, and (ii) up to $50 million for municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects; and WHEREAS, in July 2020, in connection with the County's annual budget process and the County's FY 2021 five-year capital improvement planning, the MPO provided its recommendations to fund additional phases of the 97 approved municipal capital projects (i.e., planning, design, and/or construction); and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2020, the County Commission approved more than $43 million in Transportation Surtax funding for community shuttle service and municipal capital projects for FY 2021 and approved the FY 2021 five-year capital plan; and WHEREAS, given the extent of the amendments outlined herein, Broward County requests that the interlocal be fully restate the Interlocal Agreement, as amended, including to (i) document the completion of the MPO's first cycle of evaluating and ranking municipal capital projects to be funded with Transportation Surtax proceeds, (ii) document the allocation of FY 2019, FY 2020, and FY 2021 Transportation Surtax proceeds for approved municipal capital 2 RESOLUTION #2021-012 projects, (iii) set forth the MPO's criteria going forward for evaluating, ranking, and recommending funding for municipal capital projects in future County annual five-year capital improvement plans, (iv) outline the County's general process for evaluation and ranking of municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects and document completion of that process for FY 2020, (v) document the allocation of FY 2019 and FY 2020 Transportation Surtax proceeds for approved municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects, and (vi) document an agreed upon process for funding municipal capital projects, including the timing of funding and the process for adjusting County annual five-year capital improvement plans; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to execute the Interlocal Agreement with Broward County in order to ensure the funding for the construction of the City's transportation surtax approved proj ects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the above "Whereas" clauses are ratified, made a part of, and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. Section 2. That the Second Amended and Restated Transportation System Surtax Interlocal Agreement with Broward County, which Agreement in substantial form is attached as Exhibit "A", is approved and the proper City officials are authorized to execute it. Section 3. That all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict with this Resolution are repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon execution of the agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED on January 26, 2021. ATTEST: t � y THOMAS SCHNEIDER, CMC CITY CLERK USHE0 APPROVED AS O F07,AND CO S THOMAS,J.�ANSB CITY ATTORNEY TAMARA JANtS MAYOR 3 RESOLUTION #2021-012 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AND RESTATEMENT OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SURTAX INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT This Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax Interlocal Agreement ("Second Amendment") is made and entered by and among Broward County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "County"), the Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization (the "MPO"), and the municipalities that formally approved and area party to the Transportation System Surtax Interlocal Agreement that was executed by the County on August 29, 2018 (collectively, the "Municipalities," and each a "Municipality"). The County, the MPO, and the Municipalities are each a "Party," and collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS A. Pursuant to Section 31Y-71, et seq., of the Broward County Code of Ordinances ("Transportation Surtax Ordinance"), a 30-year 1% transportation surtax was levied after approval by referendum of the general electorate at the General Election on November 6, 2018, to be expended for authorized transportation and transit projects in accordance with applicable law including, specifically, Section 212.055(1), Florida Statutes ("Transportation Surtax"). B. The County and the Municipalities recognized the importance of a collaborative and strategic transportation plan for Broward County and the need for a careful analysis of proposed projects to ensure the efficient expenditure of Transportation Surtax proceeds exclusively on eligible projects. Accordingly, the Parties entered the Transportation System Surtax Interlocal Agreement, which provided for, inter alia, a cooperative and organized process for the Municipalities to submit projects for evaluation and funding with Transportation Surtax proceeds. C. On September 12, 2019, the Transportation System Surtax Interlocal Agreement was amended to provide for the MPO's evaluation and ranking of municipal capital projects and the County's evaluation and ranking of municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects (the "First Amendment"). The Transportation System Surtax Interlocal Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, will be referred to herein as the "Interlocal Agreement." D. The Transportation Surtax Ordinance and the Interlocal Agreement provide for the MPO to annually review, rank, and prioritize municipal projects based on the project's ability to alleviate traffic congestion and enhance connectivity. Accordingly, the County and the MPO entered into a separate agreement to establish, inter alia, the terms and conditions for the MPO to provide those services. E. On February 28, 2020, the MPO completed its review and ranking of municipal capital projects for the first funding cycle and provided its recommendations to prioritize funding for 110 municipal capital projects for the County's fiscal year ("FY") 2020. The MPO did not evaluate the remaining 396 municipal capital projects for funding readiness and those projects will be evaluated for Transportation Surtax funding in future funding application cycles. The Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 1 of 28 County also completed its evaluation, ranking, and approval of municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects for FY2020. F. Consistent with the Transportation Surtax Ordinance, all projects to be funded with Transportation Surtax proceeds are considered by the Independent Transportation Surtax Oversight Board for statutory eligibility under Section 212.055(1), Florida Statutes, before the Broward County Commission makes the final decisions regarding project approval and funding. Accordingly, on June 4, 2020, the Oversight Board considered the proposed municipal capital projects ranked by the MPO and the municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects ranked by the County for FY2020 and identified 97 municipal capital projects and 61 municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects as statutorily eligible. Of the 110 municipal capital projects ranked by the MPO, 13 projects were withdrawn from consideration by the applicable Municipality, deferred at the request of the applicable Municipality, or were deemed statutorily ineligible. G. On June 18, 2020, the County Commission approved Transportation Surtax funding for FY2020 (which included funding carried forward from FY2019) of (i) more than $60 million for the applicable phases of the 97 statutorily -eligible municipal capital projects recommended by the MPO, and (ii) up to $50 million for municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects. H. In July 2020, in connection with the County's annual budget process and the County's FY2021 five-year capital improvement planning, the MPO provided its recommendations to fund additional phases of the 97 approved municipal capital projects (i.e., planning, design, and/or construction). I. On September 22, 2020, the County Commission approved more than $43 million in Transportation Surtax funding for community shuttle service and municipal capital projects for FY2021 and approved the FY2021 five-year capital plan. J. Given the extent of the amendments outlined herein, the Parties believe it would be beneficial to fully restate the Interlocal Agreement, as amended, including to (i) document the completion of the MPO's first cycle of evaluating and ranking municipal capital projects to be funded with Transportation Surtax proceeds, (ii) document the allocation of FY2019, FY2020, and FY2021 Transportation Surtax proceeds for approved municipal capital projects, (iii) set forth the MPO's criteria going forward for evaluating, ranking, and recommending funding for municipal capital projects in future County annual five-year capital improvement plans, (iv) outline the County's general process for evaluation and ranking of municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects and document completion of that process for FY2020, (v) document the allocation of FY2019 and FY2020 Transportation Surtax proceeds for approved municipal rehabilitation and maintenance projects, and (vi) document an agreed upon process for funding municipal capital projects, including the timing of funding and the process for adjusting County annual five-year capital improvement plans. Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 2 of 28 Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree to amend and restate the Interlocal Agreement, in its entirety, as follows: I. Recitals and Definitions. A. Recitals. The above -stated Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. B. Definitions. The following terms as used herein shall have the following meanings: 1. CBE means a County Business Enterprise, as defined in Section 1-81.1, Broward County Code of Ordinances. 2. Community Shuttle Service means the capital and operating expenses associated with existing, new, or expanded public transportation services, operated by participating Municipalities within their jurisdictions, that supplement fixed route mass transit service and are available to persons traveling within the Municipality. 3. County Commission means the Broward County Board of County Commissioners. 4. Cycle 1 Ranked Projects means the 110 Municipal Capital Projects listed in Exhibit A that were ranked and recommended by the MPO for funding in FY2020. 5. FDOT means the Florida Department of Transportation. 6. Fiscal Year means the County's fiscal year, which begins on October 1 of the year prior to the year referenced and ends on September 30 of the year referenced. For example, Fiscal Year 2020 began on October 1, 2019, and ended on September 30, 2020. Each specific Fiscal Year reference is abbreviated using "FY" preceding the year such that "FY2020" means Fiscal Year 2020, FY2021 means Fiscal Year 2021, and so forth. 7. Five -Year Plan means the schedule approved annually by the County Commission in connection with the County's annual five-year capital improvement planning, which provides for the timing of all Transportation Surtax funded capital improvement projects over a rolling period of the next five Fiscal Years, subject to the County Commission's decisions regarding budgeting and appropriation of Transportation Surtax Proceeds for each applicable Fiscal Year. A Fiscal Year reference to a Five -Year Plan means the plan for the five years commencing with the stated year, such that "FY2021 Five -Year Plan" means the Five -Year Plan that begins in Fiscal Year 2021. Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 3 of 28 8. FY2020 Approved Projects means the 97 Municipal Capital Projects that are a subset of the 110 Cycle 1 Ranked Projects listed in Exhibit A, and that were determined statutorily eligible for Transportation Surtax Proceeds. FY2020 Approved Projects do not include the 13 Municipal Capital Projects that were withdrawn, deferred, or deemed ineligible, which are listed in Charts 1 and 2 on Exhibit A-1. 9. MAP Administration means the County's Mobility Advancement Program Administration staff. 10. Minimum Annual Guarantee or MAG means the County's funding commitment to utilize at least ten percent (10%) of the Transportation Surtax Proceeds received by the County each Fiscal Year to fund, collectively, Community Shuttle Service, Municipal Capital Projects, Municipal R&M Projects, and Municipal Project Contingency, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Second Amendment. 11. MPO ILA means the Interlocal Agreement for Transportation Surtax Services entered into between the MPO and the County on April 25, 2019, to establish and implement an organized process for MPO Surtax Staff to evaluate and rank Municipal Capital Projects and make annual recommendations for Transportation Surtax funding in connection with the County's normal Fiscal Year budgeting process and five-year capital improvement planning. 12. MPO Surtax Staff means the staff or contractors hired by the MPO and funded by Transportation Surtax Proceeds. 13. Municipal Capital Projects or MCPs means municipal capital improvement projects involving primarily new or expanded roads, sidewalks, bike paths, bridges, and similar transportation elements. 14. Municipal Projects means collectively Community Shuttle Service, Municipal Capital Projects (including any Municipal Project Contingency), and Municipal R&M Projects. 15. Municipal Project Contingency means Transportation Surtax Proceeds allocated by the County Commission for the purpose of covering Municipal Capital Project costs associated with unforeseen conditions during construction. 16. Municipal R&M Projects or MR&MPs means municipal projects that involve restoring a facility to safe and functional condition and/or preventative maintenance of a currently -operating facility to preserve the facility from failure or decline. Such projects include primarily the maintenance or rehabilitation of roads, sidewalks, bike paths, bridges, or similar transportation elements. Municipal R&M Projects do not include, without limitation, mowing, tree trimming, pressure cleaning, Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 4 of 28 painting, irrigation repairs, landscaping repairs and maintenance, and cleaning and maintenance of catch basins, storm drains, and pipes. 17. New Municipal Capital Projects or New MCPs means all Municipal Capital Projects other than the Cycle 1 Ranked Projects. 18. Oversight Board means the Independent Transportation Surtax Oversight Board established in Section 31Y2-75 of the Broward County Code of Ordinances. 19. Projected Minimum Annual Guarantee or Projected MAG means the amount of MAG funding forecasted by the County to be available for the then -applicable Fiscal Year budget and/or for each of the applicable Fiscal Years in a Five -Year Plan. 20. Surtax Funding Agreement means the interlocal agreement executed by the County and the applicable Municipality, pursuant to Section 212.055(1), Florida Statutes, in the form acceptable to the County, and which provides for the remittance of Transportation Surtax funds to the Municipality for a specific Municipal Project. 21. Transportation Plan means the Regional Mobility & Transportation Enhancements Surtax Initiative considered and approved by the County Commission on September 13, 2018. The Transportation Plan included 709 Municipal Projects (506 MCPs and 203 MR&MPs) with an estimated total cost, inclusive of the Municipal Project Contingency and Community Shuttle Service, of $2.8 billion. 22. Transportation Surtax means the 30-year 1% transportation surtax levied pursuant to the Transportation Surtax Ordinance and approved by referendum of the general electorate at the November 6, 2018, General Election, the proceeds of which are to be expended in accordance with applicable law. 23. Transportation Surtax Ordinance means Section 31%-71, et seq., of the Broward County Code of Ordinances. 24. Transportation Surtax Proceeds, except where the context indicates otherwise, means the net amount of Transportation Surtax funds the County received for the applicable Fiscal Year from the Florida Department of Revenue after deduction of the five percent set -aside amount required by Section 129.01(2)(b), Florida Statutes. 25. Transportation Surtax Projects means all projects funded in whole or in part with Transportation Surtax Proceeds (including projects submitted by Municipalities, the County, or Tri-Rail). Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 5 of 28 II. Applications for Funding. A. Application Process for New Municipal Capital Projects. Unless otherwise expressly provided in this Second Amendment, Municipalities seeking Transportation Surtax funding for New Municipal Capital Projects shall submit applications to the MPO consistent with the MPO's prescribed application process. Such applications must include all supporting documents necessary to evaluate the New MCP, including all documents required by the MPO through its application process, any additional documents as may be requested by the MPO, and an independent cost estimate for each phase of the New MCP. The MPO's annual application period for New MCPs shall begin no later than April 1 of each year. New MCPs shall be evaluated and ranked by the MPO consistent with Section IV below. MCPs in the Transportation Plan that are numbered 111 through 510 in Exhibit A require additional evaluation and analysis by the MPO, are New MCPs as defined in this Second Amendment, and must be evaluated, ranked, and recommended for funding by the MPO pursuant to the process provided in Section IV.B. of this Second Amendment. Upon written notice to the County and the MPO, Municipalities may withdraw an MCP (i.e., cancel its application for Transportation Surtax funding for the applicable project) at any time prior to executing a Surtax Funding Agreement. The unincorporated area of the County shall be eligible to receive Transportation Surtax Proceeds for MCPs, and projects submitted by the County on behalf of the unincorporated area shall be included and reviewed by the MPO on the same basis as any other MCP. B. Application Process for Municipal R&M Projects. The County will accept applications for new Municipal R&M Projects periodically as Transportation Surtax Proceeds for MR&MPs become available, as determined by the County. New MR&MPs will be evaluated and ranked by the County consistent with Section IV below. III. Eligibility. To be eligible for funding with Transportation Surtax Proceeds, Municipal Projects must comply with Section 212.055(1), Florida Statutes, as well as the following eligibility criteria as applicable: A. Street lighting: Improvements to lighting systems along a public road that are ancillary to road improvements and illuminate the right-of-way for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists, are eligible projects. Such lighting improvements may be a component of the design for a road improvement project that included phases which were funded earlier with a different funding source. A lighting justification report consistent with Broward County and FDOT policies and the criteria outlined in the then -current version of the Florida Greenbook is required for these improvements to be eligible. Cuc".s Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 6 of 28 B. Drainage: Improvements to a public road stormwater system that address drainage deficiencies are eligible, provided the drainage improvements only address stormwater runoff from a public roadway. A drainage analysis is required for drainage projects and may include the width of the road right-of-way plus up to ten feet on each side of the right-of-way to calculate the eligible size of the stormwater system. Increases to the stormwater system to accommodate a drainage area greater than the eligible size are not eligible. Improvements to address runoff from private roads and/or developments are not eligible. C. Sound Walls: Improvements that are consistent with the then -applicable FDOT noise decibel level criteria and the Broward County criteria for noise abatement projects are only eligible if the improvements meet all of the following criteria: • Any requested sound wall is due to a road project that adds through lanes to an existing road, alters the road alignment significantly, or constructs a new road; • The traffic noise study indicates the projected exterior noise level approaches or exceeds 67 decibels (dBA) or increases the existing noise level by 15 dBA or more; and • FDOT compliant modeling shows the proposed wall will reduce the noise level at least five (5) dBA with a typical design goal of ten (10) dBA reduction. D. Fiber-optic: Fiber-optic improvements supporting only communications for the County's public transportation system are eligible, provided that the proposed improvements have received approval from the maintaining and operating agency(ies). A shared conduit that includes use for any purpose other than the County's public transportation system is not eligible for funding through Transportation Surtax Proceeds. E. Landscaping: Only landscaping improvements within the public road right-of-way that are ancillary to a road improvement project and meet the applicable design criteria are eligible. Such landscaping improvements may be a component of the design for a road improvement project that included phases ••� which were funded earlier with a different funding source. F. Parking: Improvements used for park -and -ride or other transit -oriented development parking that serve the public are eligible. Garages directly related to a public transportation project that serve the public are eligible, provided the parking fees do not exceed costs associated with operating and maintaining the facility. G. Road Improvements: New roads, widening, resurfacing, and repairs of existing roads, pavement markings, signage, guardrails, ADA accommodations, and traffic calming projects are eligible. High -end decorative lighting, decorative road signage, brick pavers, and similar items are not eligible. Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 7 of 28 IV. Evaluation and Ranking. A. The MPO's Cycle 1 Evaluation and Ranking of Municipal Capital Projects. The Parties acknowledge and stipulate that, having conducted all reasonable inquiry and performed all reasonable diligence, they are unaware of any facts that would render any of the following statements inaccurate or false: 1. The County's FY2020 and FY2021 funding of FY2020 Approved Projects and Municipal Capital Projects provided for in the County's FY2021 Five -Year Plan are consistent with all of the County's contractual obligations to the Municipalities and the MPO, and such funding was determined after prudent and proper consideration of the MPO's recommendations set forth in Exhibit A. The MPO's prioritization and ranking methodology and recommendations to the County were appropriately and validly informed by (a) each MCP's ability to alleviate traffic congestion and improve connectivity; (b) other factors such as shovel -readiness, level of service, incident delay, proximity to transit, population density, employment density, equity, and resiliency, as reflected in Exhibit B attached; and (c) the MPO's analysis and points distribution system illustrated in Exhibit B. 2. The MPO's evaluation and ranking process completed in February 2020 (a) properly considered all MCPs submitted by the Municipalities to date; (b) ranked the submitted MCPs in order from 1 to 110 in a fair and equitable manner in accordance with each of the Parties' contractual obligations; and (c) was not unfairly affected or tainted in any way, including, without limitation, by any existing or contemplated contractual obligations or entanglements of the MPO as consultant or service provider to one or more of the Municipalities. 3. The combined cost of funding all phases of each of the FY2020 Approved Projects far exceeds the projected aggregate Minimum Annual Guarantee for FY2019, FY2020, and all five Fiscal Years in the FY2021 Five -Year Plan. As a result, phases of FY2020 Approved Projects not scheduled for funding in FY2020 will be funded in one or more of the Fiscal Years in the FY2021 Five -Year Plan or subsequent Five -Year Plans, based on the MPO's FY2020 ranking and funding recommendations and the availability of MAG funds. In addition, statutorily -eligible Cycle 1 Ranked Projects deferred at the request of the Municipality will receive priority for MAG funding as outlined in Section IV.B.1(b) below based on the MPO's FY2020 rankings and funding recommendations. Therefore, it is anticipated that MAG funding for New MCPs may not be available before FY2027. B. MPO Evaluation and Ranking Process for New Municipal Capital Projects: The MPO will develop, establish, and utilize an evaluation and ranking process (the "New MPO E&R Process") to prioritize the order of funding Municipal Capital Projects within the Minimum Annual Guarantee, which process may not be implemented by the MPO prior to it being approved in writing by the County Administrator. Beginning in 2021, or as soon thereafter as such process has been developed by the MPO and approved by the County Administrator, the New MPO E&R Process shall be the process utilized for evaluation and Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 8 of 28 ranking of New MCPs, and shall include: (1) a preliminary assessment of the project's eligibility under Section 212.055, Florida Statutes, and Section III of this Second Amendment, which assessments shall be made in consultation with the Transportation Surtax General Counsel and counsel for the applicable Municipality; (2) an annual evaluation of any new applications from Municipalities for MAG funding of MCPs; (3) an evaluation of New MCPs for funding in the then -current fiscal year and the applicable Five -Year Plan, as applicable; (4) an evaluation of the cost estimate provided by the applicable Municipality for each expected phase of the applicable MCP; (5) individualized meetings with each Municipality to evaluate its funding applications, funding needs, funding sources, and project performance; (6) an evaluation and ranking of all MCPs for funding that utilizes the criteria listed in Section IV.13.2 below; and (7) a scoring distribution system for the evaluation and ranking of MCPs substantially the same as or similar to the system illustrated in Exhibit B. 1. MPO's Rankings and Funding Recommendation. Beginning in 2021, by June 1 of each year and consistent with the requirements of the New MPO E&R Process provided for herein, the MPO will annually develop and deliver to the MAP Administration: (i) a ranked list of MCPs the MPO recommends for funding in the upcoming Fiscal Year, subject to Section IV.A.3; (ii) recommended schedule for funding applicable phases of annually ranked MCPs; and (iii) recommended funding allocations for ranked MCPs within the MAG for each Fiscal Year of the applicable Five -Year Plan. The funding recommendations referenced in subsections (ii) and (iii) herein must be consistent with regard to the upcoming Fiscal Year with the ranked list of MCPs submitted pursuant to subsection (i) herein. (a) Annual MCP Rankings: Subject to Section 4.13.1(b) below, the MPO shall annually rank all MCPs, including New MCPs, and recommend funding within the MAG for the applicable phase of MCPs based on the criteria in Section IV.13.2. Each MCP (including their subsequent phases) shall be re-evaluated on an annual basis pursuant to the New MPO E&R Process and the criteria stated in Section IV.13.2. The Parties acknowledge and stipulate that the MPO's annual Fiscal Year ranking and funding recommendations for MCPs may vary each Fiscal Year, including based on the other MCPs being evaluated at the time and each MCP's progress and status at the time of each annual evaluation, such that a MCP or subsequent phases of any MCP may be ranked higher or lower in the ranked list in different Fiscal Years. (b) Cycle 1 Ranked Project Rankings. Notwithstanding Section IV.13.1(a), unless expressly provided for otherwise in this Second Amendment, Cycle 1 Ranked Projects shall retain their ranking as assigned by the MPO in FY2020 for all phases of the project, including for subsequent phases. In addition, the MPO's annual ranking and funding recommendations shall prioritize funding for Cycle 1 Ranked Projects, in the order of their original ranking, before New MCPs and lower -ranked Cycle 1 Ranked Projects. As a result, unless the Cycle 1 Ranked MCP is withdrawn or abandoned by the Municipality, subsequently deemed ineligible for Transportation Surtax Proceeds, or Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 9 of 28 deemed infeasible by the County pursuant to Section V.D., the MPO will assign Cycle 1 Ranked Projects the highest rankings in the annual ranking and funding recommendations, consistent with their originally assigned FY2020 ranking order, until all phases of Cycle 1 Ranked Projects are funded. (c) MPO's Funding Recommendations Not to Exceed MAG. The MPO's annual ranking and funding recommendations shall never exceed the Projected MAG for that Fiscal Year provided in writing to the MPO by the County Administrator. The MPO may provide a supplemental list of additional MCPs it recommends for funding in excess of the MAG only if and to the extent of a written request from the County Administrator. To avoid exceeding the MAG in any Fiscal Year, the MPO may recommend that the County distribute funding allocations for a single phase (e.g., construction) of a large MCP among several Fiscal Years, in which event the MPO shall include such recommended allocations in the proposed Five -Year Plan recommendations. The County, in its sole discretion, may time the funding of that phase of the MCP among multiple Fiscal Years within the MAG. 2. MPO Evaluation and Ranking Criteria. The MPO shall annually evaluate, rank, and recommend funding for timely submitted MCPs based exclusively on the criteria stated in subsections (a) and (b) below: (a) The project's ability to alleviate traffic congestion and enhance connectivity shall be the MPO's primary criteria for evaluating and ranking MCPs for funding and shall be weighted more than the factors in subsection (b) and any other factor in the MPO's scoring distribution and methodology. Factors relevant to the alleviation of congestion and enhancement of connectivity may include, without limitation, the following: L The project's ability to alleviate traffic congestion and enhance connectivity between and among densely populated and highly concentrated employment zones, existing transit services, and multimodal connections; ii. The level of service of the connected roadway network; iii. Connections to facilities like the proposed project, existing facilities, and existing public -school zones; and iv. The project's ability to reduce incident delays such as vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle accidents. (b) The following criteria are secondary to the criteria in subsection (a), and shall be weighted less than the factors in subsection (a) and in such order as the MPO deems appropriate: L The project's ability to improve or address an identified resiliency issue on a moderate to highly -vulnerable corridor including, without limitation, considerations of sea level rise and climate change, as set forth in generally accepted studies or reports such as the study titled "Extreme Weather and Climate Change Risk to the Transportation Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 10 of 28 System in Broward County," or the report titled "2019 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida." ii. Regional impact including, but not limited to, whether the project is a collaborative effort among municipalities and crosses municipal boundaries; iii. The economic impact in socioeconomically underserved areas as further defined by the MAP Administration; iv. Demonstrated outreach and public support for the project; v. Construction -readiness of the project; vi. Whether the proposed project (including any prior phase of the project) was included in the Transportation Plan, the Cycle 1 Ranked Projects, or a prior evaluation and ranking cycle; vii. Whether the Municipality has implemented Land Use Policy 2.16.4 by enacting specific regulations including those referenced in Land Use Policy 2.16.4 (applicable only after the Land Use Policy is 2.16.4 is effective); viii. Whether the Municipality deems the proposed project its highest - priority MCP; and ix. Project timing, cost, and performance (if any) to date, including but not limited to: • The proposed project schedule and estimated completion date; • The project budget and the estimated total cost of the project (inclusive of all phases); • Whether and the extent to which the project leverages state and/or federal funds; and/or • Project implementation performance to date (if any) (e.g., how well the project has met its proposed schedule, delivery goals, budget, and CBE goals). 3. Duration of the MPO Role. The MPO ILA is currently scheduled to expire on December 31, 2024. If the MPO ILA expires or is terminated, or if the MPO ILA is modified to remove the MPO from the process of evaluation and ranking of MCPs, the County and the Municipalities will negotiate and execute an amendment to this Second Amendment that identifies the individuals or entities to perform the role of evaluating and ranking MCPs at the conclusion of the MPO's service in that role. Notwithstanding Section VILD below, the MPO's execution of such an amendment will not be required for it to be effective. C. County Evaluation and Ranking of Municipal R&M Protects. 1. Cycle 1 Evaluation and Ranking of Municipal R&M Projects. The Parties acknowledge and stipulate that all Municipal R&M Projects contained in the Transportation Plan for which documentation was properly submitted in FY2020 were Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 11 of 28 properly and validly reviewed and ranked by the County based upon the factors listed in Section IV.C.2. below, which resulted in the list of 61 ranked MR&MPs. The Parties agree and stipulate that the total cost of the 61 MR&MPs alone exceeded the MAG for FY2019 and FY2020 combined (exclusive of Community Shuttle Service, all MCPs, and any Municipal Project Contingency). The Parties further agree and stipulate that MR&MPs on the ranked list of 61 MR&MPs that were not funded in FY2020 will be funded in future funding cycles, subject to the availability of MAG funds as determined by the County, until all 61 MR&MPs have been funded. The County may begin accepting applications for new MR&MPs after Surtax Funding Agreements have been fully executed for all 61 MR&MPs reviewed and ranked by the County in FY2020. 2. Evaluation and Ranking Criteria for Municipal R&M Projects. The County will evaluate and rank MR&MPs based on its assessment of the following criteria: (a) The age and condition of the facilities; (b) Multimodal components; (c) Sustainability components; (d) Socio-economic factors (including, without limitation, gas tax revenues distributed, household income, and miles of roadway under municipal jurisdiction); (e) Construction -readiness of the project; (f) Geographic and equitable distribution of Transportation Surtax Proceeds countywide; and (g) Other transportation -related projects occurring or scheduled to occur in the vicinity, including to avoid unnecessary disruption of traffic and inefficient or duplicative work. The County may re-evaluate and re -rank MR&MPs, in its sole discretion, including MR&MPs previously approved for funding, at any time based on additional information reasonably related to the criteria stated in this Section IV.C.2. and the availability of MAG funding after Community Shuttle Service and Municipal Capital Projects (including any Municipal Project Contingency) are funded in accordance with this Second Amendment. V. Surtax Proceeds for Municipal Capital Proiects. A. OPPAGA Performance Audit. In 2018, the amount of Transportation Surtax Proceeds estimated during the 30-year levy was approximately $15.6 billion. Section 212.055, Florida Statutes, which authorizes the levy of the Transportation Surtax, was amended to require, prior to the conducting of the referendum, completion of an independent "performance audit of the program associated with the surtax adoption proposed by the county." The audit was completed and posted on the County's website as required by the statute. Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 12 of 28 B. The County's Minimum Annual Guarantee and Protect Funding. 1. For each Fiscal Year, the annual amount of Transportation Surtax Proceeds allocated to Community Shuttle Service, MCPs, Municipal Project Contingency, and MR&MPs must be no less than the Minimum Annual Guarantee for the applicable Fiscal Year. Each Fiscal Year, the County will utilize the MAG for that Fiscal Year (after fully funding Community Shuttle Service) to fund MCPs, in the order as ranked and recommended by the MPO, except as stated in Section V.D below. If there are unallocated MAG funds after funding MCPs as ranked and recommended by the MPO for that Fiscal Year, the County, in its sole discretion, may roll over the unallocated MAG funds and increase the MAG for the next Fiscal Year by the amount of the rollover, or allocate the funds for MR&MPs. 2. Subject to Section V.13.1 and notwithstanding anything else stated in this Second Amendment, the Parties acknowledge and stipulate that the County has no obligation to fund Municipal Projects (inclusive of Community Shuttle Service, MCPs, MR&MPs, and Municipal Project Contingency) in any Fiscal Year in excess of the MAG. In addition, except for FY2019, FY2020, and FY2021 funding allocations for FY2020 Approved Projects, the Parties acknowledge and stipulate that the County may, without any further condition and in its sole discretion, utilize Transportation Surtax Proceeds in excess of the MAG to fund any Municipal Project, whether or not the project has ever been ranked by the MPO, and regardless of any ranking priority the MPO may have assigned to the project. Further, and except as provided for in Section V.13.1, the Parties agree that: (i) the MPO's ranking and funding recommendations do not apply to MCPs the County elects to fund in excess of the MAG; and (ii) the County has complete discretion to fund any such MCPs in excess of the MAG if, and on such terms and conditions, it chooses. 3. Upon the applicable Municipality's written request, the County in its sole discretion may apply funding for a designated phase of an MCP previously recommended by the MPO (e.g., planning or design) to another phase of the same MCP (e.g., construction) if the following conditions are met: (i) the previously recommended phase of the MCP is completed or other circumstances render funding of that phase futile (e.g., the phase was funded with other resources); and (ii) the substituted phase to be funded has been considered statutorily -eligible by the Oversight Board. The funding amount previously recommended by the MPO for the designated phase is the maximum amount that the County will apply to the substituted phase. Any MAG funding reallocated pursuant to this paragraph shall be counted in terms of calculating whether the County has met its MAG funding obligation. 4. The timing and process of funding any MCP shall be consistent with applicable law, including Section 129.01, Florida Statutes. Transportation Surtax Proceeds shall not be utilized to fund any Municipal Project unless the County, through the Transportation Surtax General Counsel, after consultation with counsel for the Municipality and after considering the recommendation of the Oversight Board, confirms Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 13 of 28 the project is legally eligible for funding with Transportation Surtax Proceeds. Notwithstanding anything in this Second Amendment to the contrary, Transportation Surtax Proceeds may not be used to fund: (i) a MCP submitted by a municipality not a party to this Second Amendment; or (ii) any project (or element of a project) legally ineligible for Transportation Surtax Proceeds. C. The County's Annual Budget and Five -Year Plan. 1. The County's FY2019, FY2020, and FY2021 Approved Budgets. The Parties agree and stipulate that: (a) funding allocated by the County for Municipal Projects through the effective date of this Second Amendment exceeds the total MAG for FY2019, FY2020, and FY2021 combined and fully satisfies the County's funding obligation for those Fiscal Years; (b) the County's FY2019, FY2020, and FY2021 funding allocations for the FY2020 Approved Projects were for only the stated phase of the respective FY2020 Approved Project; and (c) funding for phases of FY2020 Approved Projects not budgeted for in the FY2021 Five -Year Plan will be funded by the MAG in subsequent Fiscal Years consistent with the MPO's FY2020 rankings and funding recommendations. 2. Fiscal Year Budgets and Five -Year Plans After FY2021. For all Fiscal Years after FY2021, in the normal course of the County's annual budget and capital improvement planning process, the County will, through the County Commission, allocate funding for Transportation Surtax Projects for the then -current Fiscal Year and approve a Five -Year Plan for Transportation Surtax Projects. The County will use a team that will include transportation planning, legal, and other professionals to develop Five -Year Plans and Fiscal Year funding recommendations based on the following considerations: (a) The MPO's funding recommendations in FY2020 and for subsequent Fiscal Years up to the MAG; (b) The County Administrator's annual budget recommendations published by the County in approximately July of each year; (c) The Oversight Board's consideration as to statutory eligibility for funding with Transportation Surtax Proceeds pursuant to Section 212.055(1), Florida Statutes; (d) Available Transportation Surtax Proceeds; (e) Revenue and economic forecasts and analysis; (f) Corridor delivery modeling with an aim to achieve responsible and efficient use of Transportation Surtax Proceeds and the mitigation of potential or actual disruption to residents and businesses; (g) Requests from Municipalities to reschedule, modify, or combine projects; (h) Construction -readiness of each Transportation Surtax Project; (i) The ability to leverage state and/or federal funding; and (j) Other factors the MAP Administration or the County Commission deems relevant. Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 14 of 28 3. The County Commission's Approval and Allocation of Funding for Municipal Projects. Annually, the MAP Administration will provide to the County Commission for its consideration and approval: (a) a proposed Five -Year Plan which includes at least the Projected MAG funding allocations (after deducting the cost of Community Shuttle Service) for MCPs, by project and Fiscal Year, consistent with the MPO's rankings and MAG funding recommendations for the applicable Fiscal Years; (b) a Fiscal Year budget which includes at least the MAG allocations for Municipal Projects; and (c) its determination as to statutory eligibility of the proposed Transportation Surtax Projects based on the Oversight Board's evaluation. Prior to or simultaneously with its annual presentation to the County Commission, the MAP Administration will notify the Municipalities of the County's proposed Five -Year Plan and the Projected MAG for each Fiscal Year of the Five - Year Plan. The Five -Year Plan will provide for the timing of funding all capital Transportation Surtax Projects and include funding projections over a rolling five-year period. The County has no obligation to fund any MCP in an amount greater than the least of the following: the amount recommended by the MPO, determined statutorily - eligible by the Oversight Board, or the actual cost of the project. As used in this Second Amendment, a Municipal Project (including, as applicable, the designated phase of an MCP) is "funded" when the County Commission approves the allocation of funding for the Municipal Project (or the designated phase of the MCP as applicable) included in the County's then -current Fiscal Year budget. Municipalities will receive funds allocated for MCPs as outlined in Section V.F. 4. Adjustments to Five -Year Plans. In the event of a material change in one or more of the factors in Section V.C.2 above, the MAP Administration will (i) make periodic adjustments to the Five -Year Plan consistent with the factors outlined in Section V.D. and, if applicable, present such adjustments to the Oversight Board for its evaluation as to statutory eligibility for funding with Transportation Surtax Proceeds; (ii) present any proposed adjustments to the County Commission for its approval and appropriation of Transportation Surtax Proceeds as the County Commission deems necessary and appropriate; and (iii) in the event Transportation Surtax Proceeds actually received by County exceed the County's projections for that Fiscal Year, the MAP Administration will request additional rankings and recommendations from the MPO to fund additional MCPs and make any necessary proposed adjustments to the MAG funding allocations for that Fiscal Year for the County Commission's approval consistent with subsections (i) and (ii) of this section. 5. Reimbursements to Municipalities for Eligible Expenditures. Municipalities may request reimbursement from the County for eligible expenditures under Section 212.055(1), Florida Statutes, and Section of III of this Second Amendment for MCPs included in the then -current Five -Year Plan approved by the County Commission, provided that: 1) the Municipality obtains written approval from the County Administrator of the specific project; 2) the County Commission allocated Transportation Surtax Proceeds for that MCP for the then -current Fiscal Year; and 3) the Municipality Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 15 of 28 enters into and complies with all terms and conditions of the Surtax Funding Agreement for the applicable project. To the extent permissible under applicable law, the Surtax Funding Agreement may be executed after the expenditures by the Municipality, but must be executed prior to reimbursement, and the provisions of the Surtax Funding Agreement shall govern the eligibility of such expenditures for reimbursement. Funding shall be limited to the funds budgeted and allocated for that project in the then -current Fiscal Year, as approved by the County Commission. D. The County's Limited Discretion to Fund Municipal Capital Projects Other Than as Ranked by the MPO within the MAG Funding Recommendations. The Parties agree and stipulate that the County may deviate from the MPO's ranking to accelerate or subordinate funding of an MCP within the MAG for the applicable Fiscal Year only when necessary to ensure Transportation Surtax Proceeds are utilized legally, responsibly, efficiently, and with the least disruption to residents and businesses, in the circumstances set forth herein. The County's deviation from the MPO's ranking order in one Fiscal Year shall not modify the order of priority for funding MCPs in any subsequent Fiscal Year. If the County uses its limited discretion as defined in this section in any Fiscal Year, it shall provide written notice to the impacted Municipality(ies) of such deviation and the reason(s) for such deviation and commit to fund any subordinated MCP within a reasonably prompt time frame once the reason(s) for the deviation as stated in the County's written notice are resolved, subject to the availability of funds within the MAG. The circumstances under which the County may exercise its limited discretion pursuant to this section are limited to the following: 1. Demonstrated need, documented in writing, to coordinate the construction timeline of the applicable MCP(s) and the timing of other projects that affect the same or nearby transportation elements to avoid waste; 2. The MCP is scheduled for construction funding for that Fiscal Year but is not construction -ready for any of the following reasons: (a) The Municipality does not have 100% complete, signed, sealed, design plans and required construction documents for the project; (b) The Municipality has not obtained the written approval necessary to construct the project from the owner(s) of the impacted road(s); (c) Right-of-way required to construct the project has not been acquired; (d) The construction cost estimate is ten percent (10%) higher than the construction cost estimate proposed by the Municipality in its application for funding (after factoring in reasonable inflation); (e) The permits required to construct the project have not been obtained; Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 16 of 28 (f) The utility relocation required for the project to begin construction work has not been completed or a utility relocation plan has not yet been approved by all applicable entities; (g) The Municipality's governing body has not adopted a resolution of support confirming its approval for the project to proceed; or (h) The Municipality states in writing that it is unable or unwilling to move forward with the project because of opposition from an affected community or inadequate public support for the project. 3. The applicable Municipality(ies) fails to execute or materially breaches a Surtax Funding Agreement or this Second Amendment; and/or 4. When necessary to comply with the laws, rules, court decisions, orders, and regulations of applicable governmental authorities. In addition, the County may, in its sole discretion, deem a MCP infeasible if it fails to meet the construction -ready requirements listed in Section V.D.2 above within three Fiscal Years after the first day of the Fiscal Year for which the MCP was first scheduled for construction funding. If a project is deemed infeasible, as provided in this Section V.D., the project will be deemed canceled and withdrawn, will lose its ranking, and its allocated funding would then be available to fund other Municipal Projects. A Municipality may elect to submit a new application to the MPO for any MCP deemed infeasible by the County. E. The County's Discretion to Convert a Municipal Project to a County Project. The County may elect, at any time prior to executing a Surtax Funding Agreement, with the consent of the applicable Municipality(ies), to convert any MCP in the then -current Five - Year Plan to a County project. The County will provide written notice to the Municipality of its intent to convert the MCP to a County project. For any MCP converted to a County project, the funding for the project will not be counted toward the MAG, and the timing of funding the project in the applicable Five -Year Plan will be determined by the County in its sole discretion without regard to the MPO's ranking and funding recommendations. F. Surtax Funding Agreements. The Municipalities shall receive Transportation Surtax Proceeds from the County for a funded Municipal Project subject to and upon execution of, a Surtax Funding Agreement between the County and the Municipality for each such Municipal Project. Surtax Funding Agreements for MCPs and MR&MPs shall include at least a 30% CBE commitment for the project, unless such requirement is determined inapplicable by the Director of the County's Office of Economic and Small Business Development or is modified or waived by the County Commission. G. Community Shuttle Service. Subject to the availability of funds, the MAG will be used first to directly and fully fund the reasonable and necessary operating, maintenance, and capital costs of existing Community Shuttle Service and any improved or new Community Shuttle Service, before funding MCPs, Municipal Project Contingency, and Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 17 of 28 MR&MPs. Funding of Community Shuttle Service is not subject to evaluation or ranking by the MPO. Unless waived by the County, to be eligible for Transportation Surtax Proceeds, the Community Shuttle Service must meet or exceed the standard of 7.1 passengers per revenue service hour per route or such other standard as the County may impose. The County may, in its sole discretion, decrease or increase this standard based on future population and ridership growth. The County's Transportation Department administers the Community Shuttle Service program and allocated Community Shuttle Service funding is included in the Transportation Department's annual Fiscal Year budget. In the event of interruptions due to hurricane or other natural disasters causing Municipality to fail to meet the 7.1 passengers per revenue service hour requirement, County may suspend the ridership criteria. The Community Shuttle Service ridership requirement is suspended until the end of the current declared local state of emergency due to COVID-19. VI. Additional Requirements. Each Municipality shall: (a) fully comply and otherwise fully cooperate with the auditing, project review, and oversight requirements stated in Section 31%-71, et seq., Broward County Code of Ordinances, as same may be amended by the County; (b) ensure that all of its expenditures of Transportation Surtax Proceeds will be consistent with applicable law and with any conditions recommended by the Oversight Board when such recommendations are expressly and formally approved by the County Commission; and (c) comply with the reporting requirements stated in the applicable Surtax Funding Agreement, which may include requirements to report project performance data, metrics, measures, and deliverables as may be prescribed by the County. A. Reporting and Accounting. Each Municipality receiving Transportation Surtax Proceeds shall deposit and maintain all Transportation Surtax Proceeds in a segregated fund or account, which shall be subject to audit by the County and the Oversight Board. Any interest earned by a Municipality on any Transportation Surtax Proceeds shall constitute Transportation Surtax Proceeds and may be utilized by the Municipality only in accordance with the terms of the applicable Surtax Funding Agreement. Upon prior written approval by the Contract Administrator, a Municipality may utilize other methods of separate accounting for the Transportation Surtax Proceeds provided the accounting method permits a full and complete audit of the funds. B. Permitting. To decrease public inconvenience and to facilitate the expeditious and efficient completion of projects funded with Transportation Surtax Proceeds, for any project funded by Transportation Surtax Proceeds that is performed by the County and is in whole or in part within the geographical boundaries of a Municipality, each Municipality shall waive, unless prohibited by applicable state or federal law, all municipal permitting requirements, except to the extent of any portion of the work performed by the County that will be owned, operated, and maintained by the Municipality. The waiver shall include, without limitation, the requirements of permit application, permit issuance, inspections, and permitting fees. The County shall be responsible for ensuring adequate Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 18 of 28 plan review, inspections, and compliance with State and County standards for work performed by the County. The County shall waive, unless prohibited by applicable state or federal law, all County permitting fees for Municipal Capital Projects and Municipal R&M Projects. C. Road Closures. Each Municipality shall institute and comply with a cooperative notification program, in a format prescribed by the County, that ensures the County is promptly notified and promptly provided with data reasonably requested by the County regarding all municipal roads in the Municipality that are closed for any reason, including but not limited to construction of Transportation Surtax Projects, other construction, or flooding. D. Branding and Marketing. Each Municipality shall participate in reasonable branding and marketing in the form and content prescribed by the County, including, but not limited to, signage prominently acknowledging that the applicable projects are funded with Transportation Surtax Proceeds, utilizing County -approved wording, logos, or other imagery, which branding and marketing will acknowledge the project contributions of the County and the applicable Municipality(ies). The County will work cooperatively with the Municipality(ies) regarding the location of branding and marketing +signage. The costs for all branding and marketing requested by the County pursuant to this section shall be included in the Transportation Surtax Proceeds allocated for the applicable Municipal Project. E. Data Collection and Sharing. To the extent requested by the County, each Municipality shall ensure that each of its projects funded in whole or in part with Transportation Surtax Proceeds includes incorporation and placement of sensors or other devices on municipal roads, rights -of -way, properties, and assets for County -approved applications for mobility -related data collection purposes, provided such placement shall not unreasonably interfere with the aesthetics or the Municipality's use of such roads, rights -of -way, properties, or assets. The County shall fund the costs for any such incorporation and placement requested by the County. To the extent that the Municipality controls data collection, each Municipality shall ensure the collection of data includes and is consistent with the scope, type, frequency, quantity, and format requested by the County in order to facilitate countywide collection and utilization of transportation data. For the useful life of the applicable project, to the extent requested by the County, each Municipality shall provide the County any and all access to such data as may be requested by the County, including recurring or real-time access or periodic download. VII. General Provisions. A. Term of Agreement. This Second Amendment shall remain in full force and effect until all Transportation Surtax Proceeds allocated by the County to Municipal Projects Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 19 of 28 have been fully expended by all the Municipalities and thereafter until 90 days after the Oversight Board has completed its review of each applicable Party's final audit. B. No Impact to Future Levies. Nothing in this Second Amendment shall impact in any way, whatsoever, any future ballot question seeking to impose, extend, or increase any levy of any surtax, or impact in any way any distribution from any such new, extended, or increased levy. C. Funding Limited to Transportation Surtax Proceeds. The County's funding obligations under this Second Amendment shall be met solely through the use of Transportation Surtax Proceeds, and all funding provided by the County under this Second Amendment shall be consistent with applicable law including Section 129.01, Florida Statutes. D. Amendment. This Second Amendment may be amended by a written document formally approved by the County and by such Municipalities that both (i) constitute a majority of the Municipalities that are a party to this Second Amendment, and (ii) cumulatively represent more than 50% of the County's total population. The MPO's written approval of any amendment shall only be required if the amendment purports to modify any express obligation of the MPO hereunder. Any amendment approved in accordance with this section shall be binding on all Parties hereto. E. Governing Law, Venue, and Waiver of Jury Trial. This Second Amendment shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Florida. The Parties agree that the exclusive venue for any lawsuit arising from, related to, on in connection with this Second Amendment shall be in the state courts of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. BY ENTERING INTO THIS SECOND AMENDMENT, EACH PARTY HERETO HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHTS THAT PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CAUSE OF ACTION OR CLAIM ARISING FROM, RELATED TO, OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS SECOND AMENDMENT. F. Counterparts. This Second Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, taken together, shall constitute one and the same agreement. G. Further Actions. If an audit conducted in connection herewith or in connection with Chapter 31%, Broward County Code of Ordinances, documents any misspent funds or other violation of this Second Amendment, the Party in violation shall promptly take all reasonable and required actions to correct the violation. This provision shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Second Amendment. H. Notices. In order for a notice to a Party to be effective under this Second Amendment, notice must be sent via U.S. first-class mail, hand delivery, or commercial overnight delivery, each with contemporaneous copy via email, to the addresses listed Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 20 of 28 below and shall be effective upon mailing or hand delivery (provided the contemporaneous email is also sent). The addresses for notices shall remain as set forth in this section unless and until changed by providing notice of such change in accordance with the provisions of this section. As to the County: Broward County Administrator 115 S. Andrews Avenue, Room 409 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Current email: bhenry@broward.org With a copy to: Broward County Attorney 115 S. Andrews Avenue, Room 423 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Current email: ameyers@broward.org As to Municipality: Manager/Administrator Name, address, and current email provided on signature page With a copy to: Municipal Attorney Name, address, and current email provided on signature page MPO: MPO Executive Director 100 W. Cypress Creek Road, Suite 650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Current email: stuartg@browardmpo.org With a copy to: MPO General Counsel Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman 200 E. Broward Blvd., Suite 1900 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Current email: agabriel@wsh-law.com A Party's notice address may by changed at any time by that Party, provided that Party provides notice of such change consistent with the requirements of this section. I. Entire Agreement. This Second Amendment constitutes the final and complete understanding of the Parties regarding the subject matter of the items addressed herein, and supersedes all prior versions of the Interlocal Agreement, the First Amendment, and all prior and contemporaneous negotiations and discussions regarding that subject matter. There is no commitment, agreement, or understanding concerning the subject matter of this Second Amendment that is not expressly contained in this Second Amendment. To the extent of any conflict between or among this Second Amendment, the Interlocal Agreement, and the First Amendment (and, with regard to any obligation of the MPO or County under the MPO ILA, to the extent of any conflict between or among Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 21 of 28 this Second Amendment, the Interlocal Agreement, the First Amendment, and/or the MPO ILA), the provisions of this Second Amendment shall prevail. J. Headings. The section and subsection headings in this Second Amendment are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Second Amendment. K. Joint Preparation. The preparation of this Second Amendment has been a joint effort of the Parties hereto, and the resulting document shall not, solely as a matter of judicial construction, be construed more severely against any Party. L. Severability. If any portion of this Second Amendment is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue to be effective and the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to modify the invalidated portion of this Second Amendment in a manner designed to effectuate the original intent of the Parties. M. Advice of Counsel. Each Party acknowledges and agrees that it has had the opportunity to consult with and be represented by counsel of its choice in connection with the negotiation and preparation of this Second Amendment. N. Individual Liability. Except as provided in Section VILD., each Party agrees and commits to fully comply with the obligations of this Second Amendment for that Party, with each Party only being responsible for its own compliance; a default by any one Party of any obligation under this Second Amendment shall not constitute a default by any other Party. 0. Waiver and Release. Each Party agrees and stipulates that as of the Effective Date (as defined below) of this Second Amendment, each Party is in full compliance with all terms and conditions of this Second Amendment. To the extent any Party may have a claim for a breach or default of any provision of the Interlocal Agreement, the First Amendment, or this Second Amendment that accrued prior to the Effective Date, each Party fully waives and releases their individual claims. P. Effective Date. The effective date of this Second Amendment shall be the date of complete execution by the County, the MPO, and by such Municipalities that both (i) constitute a majority of the Municipalities that are a party to this Second Amendment, and (ii) cumulatively represent more than 50% of the County's total population (the "Effective Date"). [The remainder of this page is intentionally blank] Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 22 of 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have made and executed this Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation Surtax Interlocal Agreement on the respective dates under each signature: BROWARD COUNTY, through its Board of County Commissioners, signing by and through its County Administrator, authorized to execute same by Board action on the 10th day of September, 2020 (Agenda Item 61); the MPO, signing by and through its authorized officer or official, duly authorized to execute same by official action taken on the date identified on its signature page; and each Municipality signing by and through its authorized officer or official, duly authorized to execute same by official action taken on the date identified on its signature page. WITNESSES: Signature Print Name of Witness above Signature Print Name of Witness above COUNTY BROWARD COUNTY, by and through its County Administrator By: Bertha Henry, County Administrator day of , 20_ Approved as to form by Andrew J. Meyers Broward County Attorney Governmental Center, Suite 423 115 South Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 357-7600 By: Devona A. Reynolds Perez (Date) Assistant County Attorney By: Angela J. Wallace (Date) Transportation Surtax General Counsel AJW/DRP Second Amendment to and Restatement Transportation Surtax ILA.doc 12 i�01/08/2021 #20-114.00 Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 23 of 28 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AND RESTATEMENT OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SURTAX INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT By: Gregory Stuart, Executive Director This day of 2020. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY FOR THE USE OF AND RELIANCE BY THE MPO ONLY: By: Alan L. Gabriel, MPO General Counsel Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Biermann, P.L. MPO By: Chair This day of _ 2020. Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 24 of 28 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AND RESTATEMENT OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SURTAX INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CITY/TOWN/VILLAGE OF through its governing body, signing by and through its Mayor or Vice -Mayor, authorized to execute the same by Board action on the day of , 2020. MUNICIPALITY WITNESS: By: Signature of Witness Print or Type Name of Witness By: Signature of Witness Print or Type Name of Witness ATTEST: Municipal Clerk , Mayor day of , 2020 , Municipal Manager day of , 2020 Notices: Approved as to legal form by: With a copy to: Municipal Attorney Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 25 of 28 EXHIBIT A Cycle 1 Ranked Projects Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 26 of 28 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services 1 Wilton Manors WILT-006 Roadmy Median landscape improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction YEAR 1-Construction $6,000,000 $247,711 2 Sunrise SUNR-025.1 Various Drainage Improvements Resiliency Improvements Construction YEAR 1-Construction $10.000,000 $5,180,000 3 Pompano Beach POMP-004 Bay Drive Neighborhood Storrmvaler Improvements Project Resiliency Improvements Construction YEAR 1-Construction $4,290,485 $1,174,741 4 North Lauderdale NLAU-007.1 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Construction YEAR 1-Construction $1,998,187 $1,998,187 5 Weston WEST-224 Intersection Improvements Royal Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Construction YEAR 1-Construction $2,200,000 $1,612,082 6 West Park WPRK-0D4 SW 25 Street Complete Street Improvement Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction YEAR 1-Construction $2,000,000 $1,638,987 7 Coral Springs CORA-115.1 Emergency Traffic Signals Signal Enhancement Construction YEAR 1-Construction $900,000 $496,917 8 Dania Beach DANI-019 Stormmter Improvements Resiliency Improvements Construction YEAR 1-Construction $2,500,000 $2,191,740 9 Davie DAVI-003 Davie Rd Improvements Phase 3 Capacity Increase, Widening Construction YEAR 1-Construction $5,000,000 $4.859,167 10 Lauderdale Lakes LLAK-003 Citywide Community Gateway System Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Construction YEAR 1-Construction $1,500,000 $1,378,000 11 Tamarac TAMA-018 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Transit Construction YEAR 1-Construction $500,D00 $436,546 12 Cooper City COOP-036 Way Finding Signs Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Construction YEAR 1-Construction $75,000 $30,000 13 Hallandale Beach HALL-026 City -ride Bus Stops Digital Signage Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Construction YEAR i-Construction $520,000 $513,600 14 Deerfield Beach DEER-003 Citywide Pedestrian Street Lighting Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Construction YEAR 1-Construction $800,000 $800,000 15 Southwest Ranches SWRA-032 Drainage Project: SW 50 Street and SW 182 Avenue Drainage Resiliency Improvements Construction YEAR 1-Construction $124,000 $124,000 16 Oakland Park OAKL-099 Landscape Improvement Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Construction YEAR 1-Construction $330,000 $330,000 17 Hollywood HOLL-064 Industrial Park and Corridor Improvements Capacity Increase, Widening Construction YEAR 1-Construction $5,000,000 $5,000,000 18 Pembroke Park PPRK-002 S.W. 25th St. Stormvster Impr. (Ph II) Resiliency Improvements Construction YEAR 1-Construction $1,075,000 $1,075,115 19 West Park WPRK-007 SW 57 Ave & SW 20 Street Traffic Calming Improvement Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Construction YEAR 1-Construction $200,000 $163,519 20 Fort Lauderdale FORT-122 Safety Improvements: NW 15th Ave Mobility Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction YEAR 1-Construction $2,000,000 $2,000,000 21 Tamarac TAMA-003 Traffic Calming Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Construction YEAR 1-Construction $1,000,000 $528,902 22 Wilton Manors WILT-012 Complete Streets Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction YEAR 1-Construction $1,000,000 $629,804 23 Pompano Beach POMP-006 Kendall Lake Neighborhood Stormwater Improvements Resiliency Improvements Construction YEAR 1-Construction $3,772,201 $3,741,868 24 Hallandale Beach HALL-005 City -Wide Bus Shelter Improvements Transit Construction YEAR 1-Construction $3,000,000 $2,977,563 25 Davie DAVI-001 College Ave Phase 2 Widening Capacity Increase, Widening Construction YEAR 1-Construction $1,000,000 $1,0g0,000 26 Hollywood HOLL-035 Complete Streets - Hollywood Blvd Capacity Increase, Widening Construction YEAR 1-Construction $700,000 $700,000 27 Lauderdale Lakes LLAK-015 NW 36 Terrace Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction YEAR 1-Construction $750,000 $863,663 28 Weston WESTJ08 Indian Trace Elementary School Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction YEAR 1-Construction $150,000 $319,086 29 Wilton Manors WLT-007.1 Parking Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction YEAR 1-Construction $15,000,000 $849,475 30 Weston WEST-307 City-wide Wayfinding Signage Program Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Construction YEAR 1-Construction $1,056,000 $232,739 1 of 19 February 26, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services 31 Tamarac TAMA-014 Traffic Control Devices Signal Enhancement Construction YEAR 1-Construction $500,000 $445,817 32 Fort Lauderdale FORT-162 Street Lighting: NW 15Tth Avenue Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction YEAR 1-Construction $1,000,000 $996,668 33 Wilton Manors WILT-013 Electronic Message Boards I Wayfinding Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction YEAR 1-Construction $1,000,000 $639,650 34 Miramar MIRA-004 Miramar Parkway Extension to Pembroke Road Capacity Increase, Widening Design YEAR 1-Design Regional Network $25,000.000 $760,000 35 Miramar MIRA-002 Pembroke Road Expansion from SW 184th Avenue to 200th Avenue Capacity Increase, Widening Design YEAR 1-Design Regional Network $31,000,000 $1,510,DD0 36 Miramar MIRA-001 Pembroke Road Expansion from SW 160th Avenue to 184th Avenue Capacity Increase, Widening Design YEAR 1-Design Regional Network $28,900,000 $2,270,000 37 Miramar MIRA-003 Pembroke Road Expansion from SW 200th Avenue to US-27 Capacity Increase, Widening Design YEAR 1-Design Regional Network $8,000,000 $1,390,000 38 Fort Lauderdale FORT-108 Safety Improvements: Andrews Ave Capacity Increase, Widening Planning YEAR 1-Planning $5,000,000 $150,000 39 Oakland Park OAKL-023 City -Wide Mast Arm Conversion Signal Enhancement Design YEAR 1-Design $7,875,000 $945,000 40 Coral Springs CORA-097 New Sidewalk Construction Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $20,000,000 $600,000 41 Coconut Creek COCO-024 New Bus Shelters/Replacement Bus Shelters Transit Design YEAR 1-Design $3.600,000 $432,000 42 Pompano Beach POMP-002 Dixie Hwy/Atlantic Blvd Improvements Project Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $24,860,000 $2,983,200 43 Hollywood HOLL-036 Complete Streets - State Rd 7 Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $1,000,000 $120,000 44 Davie DAVI-016 Orange Dr Corridor Enhancements Capacity Increase, Widening Design YEAR 1-Design $3,000,000 $360,000 45 Miramar MIRA-021 Pembroke Road Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $3,000,000 $90,000 46 Pembroke Pines PPIN-039 City Wide Sidewalk Projects Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $4,431,250 $132,938 47 West Park WPRK-002 State Road 7 Pedestrian Lights Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design YEAR 1-Design $750,000 $90,000 48 Lauderdale Lakes LLAK-006 Comprehensive Traffic Calming Program Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Planning YEAR 1-Planning $850,000 $25,500 49 Wilton Manors WILT-009 Bus Benches And Shelters Transit Planning YEAR 1-Planning $6,000,000 $180,000 50 Sunrise SUNR-055 Pine Island Road Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $4,500,000 $540,000 51 Pembroke Park PPRK-010 Bike Lane And Sidewalk Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $250,000 $31),000 52 Lauderdale-0y-the-Sea LSEA-005 El Mar Drive Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $2,000,000 $240.000 53 Weston WEST-303 Weston Rd Corridor RRR Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $4,900,000 $588,000 54 Deerfield Beach DEER-007 FAU Research Blvd. Roadway Improvements Capacity Increase, Widening Design YEAR 1-Design $4,000,000 $480,000 55 Cooper City COOP-035 City Entry Signs And Features Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design YEAR 1-Design $175,000 $21,D00 56 Tamarac TAMA-008 Bike Paths Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $4,500,000 $135,000 57 Lighthouse Point LHP-010 Sidewalk/Bike Lane Construction Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $500,000 $15,000 58 North Lauderdale NLAU-007.2 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design YEAR 1-Design $3,001,813 $360.218 59 Parkland PARK-008 Construction Of Bike Lanes On Parkside Drive Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $1,500,000 $180,000 60 Dania Beach DANI-001 West Dania Beach Blvd Bridge Capacity Increase, Widening Design YEAR 1-Design $4,000,000 $480,000 2 o118 February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services 61 Margate MARG-002 Winfield Blvd. Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $174,000 $20,880 62 Southwest Ranches SWRA-021 Drainage Project: SW 61st Court Resiliency Improvements Design YEAR 1-Design $100,000 $12,000 63 Fort Lauderdale FORTH 04 Sidewalks: Sidewalk Program - New Construction Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $3,000,000 $360,000 64 Oakland Park OAKL-007 CSX And FEC Crossing Study Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $150,000 $150,000 65 Coral Springs CORA-098 New Sidewalk Construction Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $20,000,000 $600,000 66 Hollywood HOLL-038 Complete Streets - Johnson St Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $5,000,000 $150,000 67 Miramar MIRA-020 Bus Shelter Improvement Transit Design YEAR 1-Design $1,200,000 $144.000 68 Lauderdale Lakes LLAK-016 NW 50th Avenue Improvements Study & Design Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $500,000 $500,000 69 Sunrise SUNR-075 Oakland Park Blvd Multi -Use Path Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $3,250,000 $390,000 70 Pompano Beach POMP-011 PowerUne Road Improvements Project Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design YEAR 1-Design $2,734,862 $328,183 71 Davie DAVI-012 SW 30ti1 Street Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $2,000,000 $240,000 72 Coconut Creek COCO-020 Hillsboro Boulevard Sidewalk Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $563,305 $67,597 73 Wilton Manors WILT-003 Complete Streets Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $2,000,000 $240,000 74 West Park WPRK-003 SW 48 Avenue Complete Street Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $3,500,000 $420,000 75 Weston WEST-192 Indian Trace Road Roadway Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $280,000 $33,600 76 Pembroke Park WPRK-009 52 Ave Complete Streets Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $1,200,000 $144,000 77 Deerfield Beach DEER-005 Pioneer Grove Improvements -Pedestrian Lighting Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $2,000,000 $240,000 78 Lighthouse Point LHP-009 Traffic Calming Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $1,000,000 $30,000 79 Pembroke Pines PPIN-021 Privacy Wail - Sheridan Street Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design YEAR 1-Design $1,350,000 $162.000 so North Lauderdale NLAU-008 Sound Walls SW 64 Ter Sidewalks, Traffic Calming Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $3,000,000 $360,000 81 Cooper City COOP-024 Storm Water Drainage Improvement Resiliency Improvements Design YEAR 1-Design $2,400,000 $288,000 82 Parkland PARK-002 Lox Road Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $2,600,000 $312,000 83 Margate MARG-047 City Bicycle/Pedestrian Greenway System Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $1,000,000 $120,000 84 Southwest Ranches SWRA-022 Drainage Project: Green Meadows Resiliency Improvements Design YEAR 1-Design $43,000 $5,160 85 Tamarac TAMA-001 Multimodal Connectivity Plan Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $120,000 $120,000 86 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-035 Bike Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $3,000,000 $360,000 87 Dania Beach DANI-017 BE Stormwater Drainage System Resiliency Improvements Design YEAR 1-Design $7,212,000 $865,440 88 Fort Lauderdale FORT-113 Safety Improvements: SE 3rd Ave Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $1,500,000 $45,000 89 Coral Springs CORA-102 Bus Sheller Repair And Replacement Transit Design YEAR 1-Design $375,000 $45,000 90 Miramar MIRA-025 Pembroke Road Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $2,100,000 $252,000 3 of 18 February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Project Ranking Municipality Project Number Recanarnencled 91 Sunrise SUNR-061 Project No— Oakland Park Blvd Bicycle Lanes Work Mix Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Phase Design Fiscal Year 2020 Recommendation YEAR 1-13esign Surtax Plan Estimate $6,000,000 Phase Funding $720.000 92 Oakland Park OAKL-025 Oakland Park Blvd Gateway Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning YEAR 1-Planning $13,200,000 $396,000 93 Lauderdale Lakes LLAK-018 NW 36 St Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design YEAR 1-Design $1,000,001) $120,000 94 Hallandale Beach HALL-019 NW/SW 8th Ave Complete Street Project Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $1,500,000 $180.000 95 Davie DAVI-014 Nova Dr Improvements Capacity Increase, Widening Design YEAR 1-Design $2,800,000 $336,000 96 Coconut Creek COCO-016 Sample Road Multi -Purpose Path Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $2,755,000 $330,600 97 West Park WPRK-008 SW 21 St Street Complete Street Improvement Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design YEAR i-Design $2,000,D00 $240,000 98 Weston WEST-193 Indian Trace Road Roadway Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $2.800,000 $336,000 99 Pompano Beach POMP-013 Riverside Drive Improvements Project Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $5,928,768 $711,452 100 Wilton Manors WILT-015 Intersection Improvements (Gateway Design) Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage. Lighting Planning YEAR 1-Planning $13,200,000 $396,000 101 Deerfield Beach DEER-006 Pioneer Grove Improvements -Complete Streets Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $500,000 $60,000 102 Pembroke Park PPRK-008 County Line Road Storm Water Connection Resiliency Improvements Design YEAR 1-Design $750.000 $90,000 103 Cooper City COOP-042 Storm Water Improvements Resiliency Improvements Design YEAR 1-Design $1,600,000 $192,000 404 Pembroke Pines PPIN-038 Pines Blvd-Ingress/Egress-Holly Lake Capacity Increase, Widening Design YEAR 1-Design $2.300,000 $276,000 105 Lighthouse Point LHP-0I I Sidewalk Construction &cycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $750,000 $22,500 106 Parkland PARK-007 Traffic Light - Hillsboro Boulevard And University OR Signal Enhancement Design YEAR 1-Design $600.000 $72,000 107 Margate MARG-033 Firefighters Pk -Winfield Blvd. Bridge Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $200,000 $24.000 108 Southwest Ranches SWRA-037 Drainage Project: Dykes Road and SW 51st Manor Resiliency Improvements Design YEAR 1-Design $300,000 $36,000 109 Hollywood HOLL-056 Transportation/Traffic Calming- Dist. 5 Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design YEAR 1-Design $833,333 $100,000 110 Tamarac TAMA-021 Crosswalks Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning YEAR 1-Planning $3,000,000 $90,000 Projects ranked III through 510 below have been for funding Additional Fiscal Year 2020 Total $414,903,204 $72,016,813 111 Fort Lauderdale not evaluated FORT-110 readiness. evaluation and analysis will be required. Safety Improvements: Andrews Ave Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $3,500,000 112 Fort Lauderdale FORT-067 Bike Lanes: Flagler Greenway Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $12,000,000 113 Hollywood HOLL-037 Complete Streets - US 1 Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction RANK $6,000,000 114 Fort Lauderdale FORT-188 Roadway Improvements: US 1 Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $12,000,000 115 Fort Lauderdale FORT-107 Safety Improvements: NW 7th Ave Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $3,800,000 116 Fort Lauderdale FORT-139 Safety Improvements: Sistrunk Blvd Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $12,000,000 117 Fort Lauderdale FORT-152 Safety Improvements: Sunrise Blvd Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $15,000,000 118 Fort Lauderdale FORTA64 Street Lighting: Andrews Avenue Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $1,000,000 d of le February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Project Ranking Municipality Project Number Recommended 119 Fort Lauderdale FORT-189 Project Nam Roadway Improvements: US 1 Work Mix Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Phase Planning Fiscal Year 2020 R-caurniendation RANK Surtax Plan Estimate Phase Funding $25,000,000 120 Fort Lauderdale FORT-168 Street Lighting: Las Olas Boulevard Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $1,500,000 121 Fort Lauderdale FORT-065 Bike Lanes: Laudertrail Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $4,000,000 122 Fort Lauderdale FORT-169 Street Lighting: US 1/Federal Highway Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $1,000,000 123 Fort Lauderdale FORT-166 Street Lighting: SE/NE 3rd Avenue Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $1,000,000 124 Oakland Park OAKL-001 Prospect Road Corridor Enhancement Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $5,559,584 125 Fort Lauderdale FORT-187 Roadway Improvements: SE 17th St Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $15,00,000 126 Fort Lauderdale FORT-163 Street Lighting: NW 7th Avenue Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $1,000,000 127 Fort Lauderdale FORT-124 Safety Improvements: Las Olas Blvd Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $5,000.000 128 Miramar MIRA-015 Pembroke Road Expansion From Douglas Road To University Drive Capacity Increase, Widening NA SWAP $25,300,000 129 Lauderdale Lakes LLAK-017 Pedestrian Safety AssessmenUlmprovements, SR 7 And Oakland Park Blvd Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA HOLD $2,000,000 13D Hallandale Beach HALL-001 All Shores Blvd. Roadway Improvement Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure SWAP SWAP $335,000 131 Fort Lauderdale FORT-138 Safety Improvements: NE 62Nd St Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $4.000,000 132 Coconut Creek COCO-017 Sample Road Bike Lane Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $3,100,00 133 Fort Lauderdale FORT-182 Roadwy Improvements: Bayview Drive Traffic Calming Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction RANK $920,000 134 Fort Lauderdale FORT-148 Safety Improvements: NE 1 Sth Ave Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $6,500,000 135 Fort Lauderdale FORT-161 Street Lighting : PowerLine Road/NW 9th Avenue Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $2,000,000 136 Fort Lauderdale FORT-128 Safety Improvements: Downtown Walkability Project Phases 6-9 Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $5,000,ODO 137 Hallandale Beach HALL-006 South Old Dixie Highway Conversion Project Capacity Increase, Widening HOLD HOLD $5,000,000 138 Miramar MIRA-023 SW 68th Avenue Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,400,000 139 Oakland Park OAKL-008 PowerUne Road Complete Streets Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction HOLD $1,220,174 140 Fort Lauderdale FORT-155 Safety Improvements: 195 Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $25,000,000 141 Fort Lauderdale FORT-149 Safety Improvements: US 1 Tunnel Top Plaza Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Construction RANK $2,500,000 142 Fart Lauderdale FORT-134 Safety Improvements: SE/SW 17th St Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $3,500,000 143 Fort Lauderdale FORT-112 Safety Improvements: Andrews Ave Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA SWAP $799,000 144 Miramar MIRA-024 Douglas Road Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $2,400,000 145 Hollywood HOLL-153 Environmental Resiliency - Dist. 2 Resiliency Improvements Construction SWAP $1,666,667 146 Fort Lauderdale FORT-160 Street Lighting : Sistrunk Boulevard Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $1,500,000 147 Oakland Park OAKL-010 Oakland Park Blvd Corridor Improvement Signal Enhancement Planning RANK $9,112,600 148 Fort Lauderdale FORT-190 Roadway Improvements: At Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $12,000,000 5 of 1B February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Pwjecl Ranking Municipality Project Number Project Nam 149 Fort Lauderdale FORT-120 Safety Improvements: NW 9bt Avenue Mobility Improvements Work Mix Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Phase Design Fiscal Year 2020 Recommendation RANK Surtax Plan Estimate PReconannencled hase Funding $2,500,000 150 Miramar MIRA-037 Miramar Boulevard Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $3,000,000 151 Fort Lauderdale FORTA71 Street Lighting: SE 17th Street Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $2,000,000 152 Sunrise SUNR-057 Nob Hill Road Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $4,650,000 153 Sunrise SUNR-074 Nob Hill Road Muld-Use Path Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $2,500,000 154 Fort Lauderdale FORT-191 Roadway Improvements: 195 Capacity Increase, Widening Planning RANK $50,000,000 155 Fort Lauderdale FORT-115 Safety Improvements: SE 2Nd St Traffic Calm/Pedestrian Safety Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $270,000 156 Fort Lauderdale FORT-123 Safety Improvements: Las Olas Blvd &cycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,500,000 157 Sunrise SUNR-079 NW 136 Avenue Multi -Use Path Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,550,000 158 Sunrise SUNR-066 NW 136 Avenue Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $3,750,000 159 Oakland Park OAKL-020 Dixie Highway Complete Streets Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $4,687,500 160 Miramar MIRA-022 SW 64 Avenue Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $1,800,000 161 Fort Lauderdale FORT-147 Safety Improvements: NW 62Nd St Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction RANK $4,500,000 162 Oakland Park DAKL-026 Floranada Sidevalk Netmrk Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $368,365 163 Fort Lauderdale FORT-154 Safety Improvements: B—rd Blvd Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $500,000 164 Fort Lauderdale FORT-097 Sidewalks: NW 62nd St Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA HOLD $194,000 165 Coconut Creek COCO-022 Hillsboro Boulevard Bike Lane and Transit Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $4,034,384 166 Coconut Creek COCO-004 Pedestrian Lights On Lyons Rd Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Construction RANK $1,000.000 167 Sunrise SUNR-062 University Drive Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,000,000 168 Fort Lauderdale FORT-159 Street Lighting: Sunrise Boulevard Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $1,500,000 169 Fort Lauderdale FORT-192 Roadway Improvements: Las Olas Boulevard Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $37,000,000 170 Oakland Park DAKL-005 Oakland Park Elementary School Sidevarlk Nctmrk Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction HOLD $2,036,000 171 Hallandale Beach HALL-027 NE fat Ave Lane Ekminabon And Complete Street Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,700,000 172 Davie DAVI-004 Davie Rd Improvements Phase 4 Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $4,000,000 173 Hallandale Beach HALL-016 SE/SW 3rd Street Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $405,000 174 Fort Lauderdale FORT-106 Sidevalks: Andrews Ave North Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1.100,000 175 Fort Lauderdale FORT-117 Safety Improvements: NE 15th Ave Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,500,000 176 Sunrise SUNR-077 Flamingo Road Mulfi-Use Path Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,000,000 177 Sunrise SUNR-067 Flamingo Road &cycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $3,750,000 178 Fort Lauderdale FORT-057 Safe Routes To School: Shanahan High Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $300,000 sells Febrv.,ry za, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Pmject Ranking Recommended 179 Municipality Davie Project Number DAVI-020 Project Name SW 39 Street Improvements Work Mix Capacity Increase, Widening Phase Design Fiscal Year 2020 Recommendation RANK Surtax Plan Estimate Phase Funding $2,000,000 180 Miramar MIRA-006 SW 148th Avenue Expansion From Bass Creek Road To Miramar Parkway Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $27,300,000 181 Fort Lauderdale FORT-165 Street Lightng : Himmarshee Street Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $1,000,000 182 Sunrise SUNR-024 Sunrise Blvd/136 Ave -Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $3,000,000 183 Fort Lauderdale FORT-150 Safety Improvements: Sunrise Blvd Capacity Increase, Widening NA SWAP $12,000,000 184 Hallandale Beach HALL-021 Diplomat Parkway Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $395,000 185 Oakland Park OAKL-015 Lloyd Estates Elementary School Safe Routes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,485,217 186 Fort Lauderdale FORT-079 Bike Lanes: NE 13 St Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $4,500,000 187 Fort Lauderdale FORT-186 Roadway Improvements: 195 Interchange Capacity Increase, Widening Planning RANK $50.000,000 188 Miramar MIRA-029 SW 148 Avenue Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $1,800,000 189 Sunrise SUNR-076 Sunrise Blvd Multi -Use Path Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,500,000 190 Sunrise SUNR-065 Sunrise Blvd Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $3,000,000 191 Fort Lauderdale FORT-078 Bike Lanes: NE 13 St Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $4,000,000 192 Sunrise SUNR-056 Hiatus Road Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $4,800,000 193 Fort Lauderdale FORT-170 Street Lighting : NW 19th Street Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $2,000,000 194 Fort Lauderdale FORT-076 Bike Lanes: A1A Parallel Bike Facility Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $2,500,000 195 Oakland Park OAKL-011 Micro -Transit Circulator Transit Design RANK $2,500,000 196 Sunrise SUNR-070 SW 14th Street Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $1,500,000 197 North Lauderdale NLAU-010 Sound Walls Rock Island rd Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA SWAP $3,000.000 198 West Park WPRK-001 County Line Road Extension Capacity Increase, Widening NA SWAP $20,000,000 199 Fort Lauderdale FORT-114 Safety Improvements: NE 4th Street Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction RANK $219,300 200 Oakland Park OAKL-009 Dixie Highway Landscape Improvement Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $276,000 201 Coconut Creek COCO-019 Wiles Road Bike Lane And Transit Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,887,815 202 Miramar MIRA-030 SW 172 Avenue Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $3,000,000 203 Hallandale Beach HALL-020 Three Islands Boulevard Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA RANK $215,000 204 Coconut Creek COCO-015 Atlantic Boulevard Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $5,111,000 205 Pompano Beach POMP-007 NW 3rd Avenue Improvements Project Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $8,722,110 206 Fort Lauderdale FORT-109 Safety Improvements: Andrews Ave Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA SWAP $3,500,000 207 Parkland PARK-016 Street Lighting - Hillsboro Boulevard At Holmberg Road landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA HOLD $1,500,000 208 Davie DAA-019 SW 36 St Road Widening Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $5,000,000 7 of 18 February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Project Ranking Municipality Project Number Project Name, Recommended 209 Coconut Creek COCO-018 Wiles Road Sidewalk Improvements Work Mix Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Ph... Planning Fiscal Year 2020 Recommendation RANK Surtax Plan Estimate Phase Funding S480,l13 210 Miramar MIRA-014 Miramar Boulevard Expansion From Hiatus Road To Flamingo Road Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $25,000,000 211 Fort Lauderdale FORT-173 Street Lighting: East Las Dias Street Ughts Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $500,000 212 Miramar MIRA-036 SW 145 Avenue Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,500,000 213 Sunrise SUNR-072 Commercial Blvd Mulfi-Use Path Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,500,000 214 Sunrise SUNR-052 Commercial Blvd Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,000,000 215 Miramar MIRA-033 Miramar Parkway Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,700,000 216 Oakland Park OAKL-021 NE 12 Ave Corridor Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $4,096,000 217 Deerfield Beach DEER-004 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Complete Streets Lane Elimination Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA RANK $1,500,000 218 Fort Lauderdale FORT-167 Street Lighting: NE 15th Avenue Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $500,000 219 Sunrise SUNR-022 Oakland Park/Nob Hill Road -Intersection Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $5,000,000 220 Coral Springs CORA-112 Downtown DRI Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA RANK $4,000,000 221 Sunrise SUNR-O64 Sunrise Lakes Blvd Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $3,300,000 222 Sunrise SUNR-020 Oakland Park/University-Intersection Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $5,000,000 223 Miramar MIRA-009 Extension ES Right Turn lane on Miramar PKWY, Dykes Rd. to 1-75 SB Ramp Capacity Increase, Widening Construction RANK $600,000 224 Miramar MIRA-057 Additional North Bound Right Turn Lane -Dykes Road Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $305.000 225 Pompano Beach POMP-001 At Undergrounding Overhead And Streetscape Project Resiliency Improvements NA HOLD $16,940,366 226 Miramar MIRA-034 Pembroke Road Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,400,000 227 Miramar MIRA-026 Monarch Lakes Blvd. Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian infrastructure Design RANK $2,900,000 226 Davie DAVI-002 College Ave Phase 3 Wdening Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $4,000,000 229 Miramar MIRA-011 Bass Creek Road Expansion From SW 148th Avenue To SW 172nd Avenue Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $35,000,000 230 Miramar MIRA-005 Miramar Boulevard Expansion From Palm Avenue To Douglas Road Capacity Increase, Widening NA SWAP $25,000,000 231 Hallandale Beach HALL-007 SE 1st Ave Lane Elimination And Complete Street Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $395,000 232 Fort Lauderdale FORT-029 Intersection Improvements: Sunrise Blvd Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $1,400,000 233 Sunrise SUNR-078 NW thin Street Mufti -Use Path Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,500,000 234 Hallandale Beach HALL-018 SE 9th Street Fec Rail Crossing Realignment Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $1,700,000 235 West Park WPRK-010 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Improvement Area Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $2,500.000 236 Fort Lauderdale FORT-056 Safe Routes To School: Walker Elementary Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $500,000 237 Miramar MIRA-028 Bass Creek Road Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $3,300,000 238 Sundae SUNR-017 Panther Parkway Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Ughting Design RANK $3,000,000 8 of 18 February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Project Ranking Municipality Project Recommended 239 Weston Number WEST-304 Project N... Royal Palm Blvd RRR Work Mix Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Phase Design Fiscal Year 202D Recommendation RANK Surtax Plan Estimate Phase Funding $3,730,000 240 Sunrise SUNR-033 Commercial Blvd Median Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $500,000 241 Hallandale Beach HALL-015 Old Federal Highway & BE 3rd Street Safety Project Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $25,000 242 Fort Lauderdale FORT-059 Safe Routes To School: Fort Lauderdale High Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $400,000 243 Coconut Creek COCO-014 Johnson Road Greenway Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,700,000 2" Fort Lauderdale FORT-137 Safety Improvements: NE 56th St Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $4,000,000 245 Sunrise SUNR-018 136 Ave/New River Greenway Intersection Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $5,000,000 246 Hallandale Beach HALL-023 County Line Road/ SW 11th St Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $200,000 247 Pompano Beach POMP-009 Oceanside Garage Project Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $28.845,068 248 Fort Lauderdale FORT-153 Safety Improvements: Oakland Park Blvd Capacity Increase, Widening Planning RANK $1,000,000 249 Weston WEST-312 South Post Road - Bike Lane Buffer Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,200,000 250 Coconut Creek COCO-028 Fiber Optic On Wiles Road From Station 20 To Coral Springs Fire Station Fiber Design RANK $210,000 251 Pembroke Pines PPIN-032 Widening Pines Blvd (184th Ave - US 27) Capacity Increase, Widening NA SWAP $10,700,000 252 Weston WEST-187 Emerald Estates Dr. Roadway Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $249,700 253 Weston WEST-302 Indian Trace & 160th Ave Intersection Improvements Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $350,000 254 West Park WPRK-005 SW 36 Street Traffic Calming Improvements From SW 32 To SW 48 Avenue Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $1,500,000 255 Hallandale Beach HALL-017 BE 4th Street Facility Extension Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $260,000 256 Pompano Beach POMP-008 NW Roadways Improvements Project Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $1,822,842 257 Sunrise SUNR-014 Bus Stop & Bus Shelter Improvements Transit Design RANK $2,500,000 258 Fort Lauderdale FORT-177 Street Lighting: N Andrews Ave Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $177,000 259 Davie DAVI-008 SW 130 Avenue Roadway Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $500,000 260 Sunrise SUNR-073 C13 Greenway From Hiatus To City Limits Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $3,150,000 261 Fort Lauderdale FORT-151 Safety Improvements: Sunrise Blvd Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,000,000 262 Sunrise SUNR-059 Springtree Drive Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,400,000 263 Sunrise SUNR-023 Oakland Park/Hiatus Road -Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $5,000,000 264 Sunrise SUNR-019 136 Ave/Sunrise Boulevard -Intersection Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $5,000,000 265 Weston WEST-184 Bonaventure Blvd Roadway Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $31960,000 266 Coconut Creek COCO-021 NW 39th Avenue And Hillsboro Canal Greenery Trail Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $538,543 267 Lauderdale Lakes LLAK-002 NW 31st Avenue Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $2,500,000 268 Hallandale Beach HALL-022 Parkview Drive Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA RANK $75,000 9 of 18 February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services P miect Ranking Municipality Project Number Project Nam Recommended 269 Weston WEST-300 Weston Rd & Griffin Rd Intersection Improvements Work Mix Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Phase NA Fiscal Year 2020 Re—rn.crd.ti.n SWAP Sun.. Plan Estimate Phase Funding $400,000 270 Fort Lauderdale FORT-030 Intersection Improvements: Andrew Avenue Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $700,000 271 Fort Lauderdale FORT-127 Safety Improvements: Bayview Drive Traffic Circle At Yacht Club Blvd Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $775,000 272 Oakland Park OAKL-012 NE 11th Avenue Corridor Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1.366,789 273 Sunrise SUNR-063 Sunset Strip/Greenway Connector Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $5,000,000 274 Fort Lauderdale FORT-028 Intersection Improvements: Bayview Drive Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA HOLD $700,000 275 Davie DAVI-011 SW 136 Ave Widening Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $2,00D,000 276 Miramar MIRA-012 SW 184th Avenue Expansion From Miramar Parkway To Bass Creek Road Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $6,000,000 277 Miramar MIRA-017 Bass Creek Road Expansion From SW 148th Avenue To FL Turnpike Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $8,500,000 278 Miramar MIRA-013 SW 184th Avenue Expansion From Miramar Parkway To Pembroke Road Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $20,000,000 279 Sunrise SUNR-060 Josh Lee Blvd Complete Street Project Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,250,000 280 Fort Lauderdale FORT-066 Bike Lanes: Bonnet House Trail Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,500,000 281 Hallandale Beach HALL-014 NW 31d Street Expansion Complete Street Project Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $1,450,000 282 Davie DAVI-015 Oakes Rd Realignment Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $2,000,000 283 Weston VJEST-190 Indian Trace Road Roadway Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $110,000 284 Weston WEST-191 Indian Trace Road Roadway Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,100,000 285 Weston WEST-306 Bonaventure Blvd Bike Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2.194,000 286 Miramar MIRA-032 SW 184d1 Avenue Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $800,000 287 Deerfield Beach DEER-008 Crystal Lake Dr. Complete Streets Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $850,000 288 Sunrise SUNR-068 Weston Road Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA HOLD $2,000,000 289 Fort Lauderdale FORT-027 Intersection Improvements: SE 30 Street Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $700,000 290 Miramar MIRA-027 SW 136 Avenue Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,500,000 291 Sunrise SUNR-054 Spdngtree Lakes Drive Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,000,000 292 Oakland Park OAKL-016 NE 13th Avenue Sidewalk Network Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $4,590,000 293 Sunrise SUNR-021 Oakland Park/Pine Island -Intersection Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $5,000,000 294 Miramar MIRA-007 County Line Road Expansion From Flamingo Road To Red Road Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $15,000,000 295 Pembroke Park PPRK-011 Mast Arm HB Blvd/S.W. 48th Avenue Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $300,000 296 Lauderhill LHIL-013 Speed Humps Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA SWAP $1,000,000 297 Tamarac TAMA-006 Public Transportation Hub (2) Transit Planning HOLD $6,0D0,000 298 Weston WEST-305 Saddle Club Road Bike Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,700,000 10 of 18 February 26, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Project Ranking Municipality Project Number Recommended 299 Fort Lauderdale FORT-135 Project Nam Safety Improvements: SW 91h Ave Work Mix Traffic Circe, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Phase Planning Fiscal Year 2020 Recommendation RANK Surtax Plan Estimate Phase Funding $2,500,000 300 Fort Lauderdale FORT-136 Safety Improvements: SW 15th Ave Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $2,500,000 301 Parkland PARK-010 Construction Of Bike Lanes On Holmberg Road Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $600.000 302 Wilton Manors WILT -DOS Transit Connectivity Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $8,000,000 303 Lauderdale Lakes LLAK-007 The C13 Bridge Connecting The Northgate Community Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $1,000,000 304 Miramar MIRA-016 Bass Creek Road Expansion From SW 172nd Avenue To SW 184th Avenue Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $20,000,000 305 Fort Lauderdale FORT-132 Safety Improvements: Breakers Avenue Pedestrian Priority Street Phase 11 Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction RANK $3,000,000 306 Fort Lauderdale FORT-133 Safety Improvements: Breakers Avenue Pedestrian Priority Street Phase III Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction RANK $3,000,000 307 Fort Lauderdale FORT-131 Safety Improvements: Breakers Avenue Pedestrian Priority Street Phase I Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Construction RANK $3,000,000 308 Coconut Creek COCO-025 Traffic Calming Devices Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Planning RANK $1,500,000 309 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-009 Drainage Projects Resiliency Improvements NA HOLD $1,000,000 310 Pembroke Park PPRK-009 Dale Village Storm Water Connection Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $275,000 311 Pembroke Park PPRK-003 Park Road Paving Drainage Improvements Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $1,875,000 312 Davie DAVI-006 Oakes Rd Expansion Capacity Increase, Widening NA SWAP $1,000,000 313 Weston WEST-188 Glades Parkway Roadway Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $180,000 314 Davie DAM-009 SW 136 Ave I SW 14 Street Intersection Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $350,000 315 Miramar MIRA-031 Bass Creek Road Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $800,000 316 Fort Lauderdale FORT-058 Safe Routes To School: Our Lady Queen Of Martyrs Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $200,000 317 Sunrise SUNR-053 NE 50th Street Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,000,000 318 Sunrise SUNR-058 NW 94th Avenue Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,550,000 319 Deerfield Beach DEER-009 A1A Complete Streets Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA RANK $400,000 320 Oakland Park OAKL-024 NW 10 Ave Corridor Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $1,650,000 321 Hallandale Beach HALL-010 Church Drive Complete Street Project Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,100,000 322 Fort Lauderdale FORT-121 Safety Improvements: Birch Rd Mobility Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,200,000 323 Oakland Park OAKL-003 NE 34 Ct Complete Streets Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,605,200 324 Sunrise SUNR-016 Sunset Strip Entrance Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $3,000,000 325 Sunrise SUNR-071 Sawgrass Expressway Greenvray Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $5,000,000 326 Hallandale Beach HALL-009 Diana Drive Extension Project Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $900,000 327 Hallandale Beach HALL-008 Diana Drive Complete Street Project Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA RANK $2,500,000 328 Coconut Creek COCO-010 Pedestrian Lighting Throughout City Including Residential Areas Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $600,000 11 of 18 February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Project Ranking Municipality Project Number Project Nam Recommended 329 Coconut Creek COCO.009 Pedestrian Sidewalk Lighting For Trails And Greenways Throughout The City Work Mix Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting ph... Design Fiscal Year 2020 Recommendation RANK Surtax Plan Estimate Phase Funding $2,000,000 330 Pompano Beach POMP-012 Riverside Dr And NE 14th Street Causeway Stormwater Improvements Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $2,347,387 331 Oakland Park OAKL-019 Central Parking Structure For Downtown Coastal Link Station Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $6,500,000 332 Pembroke Pines PPIW037 Construction Of 208th Ave Road Capacity Increase, Widening Planning RANK $2,100,000 333 Lauderhill LHIL-017 Gateway Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA SWAP $5DD,DDD 334 Margate MARG-021 Traffic Calming Circle Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design SWAP $500,000 335 Weston WEST-311 Vista Park Blvd. RRR Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $800,000 336 Weston WEST-195 Saddle Club Road Roadway Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $99D,000 337 Weston WEST-196 Saddle Club Road Roadway Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,210,000 338 Coconut Creek COCO-012 Cullum Road Expansion Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $2,399,000 339 Coconut Creek COCOOil Banks Road Construction Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $3,400,000 340 Sunrise SUNR-031 East Sunrise Master Plan Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA RANK $10,000.000 341 Pembroke Pines PPIN-033 Widening Sheridan (196th To Us 27) Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $6,900,000 342 Weston WEST-222 Intersection Improvements Manatee Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $440,000 343 Davie DAVI-005 Hiatus Rd Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $500,000 344 Miramar MIRA-035 Pembroke Road Bike Lane Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $1,500.00 345 Sunrise SUNR-069 New River Circle Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $2,000,000 346 Pembroke Park PPRK-007 John P. Lyons Ln Stormwaler Improvements Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $700,000 347 Pembroke Pines PPIN-034 Widening Stirling rd. (196th to US 27) Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $6,900,000 348 Pembroke Pines PPIN-031 Pembroke Road Extension To US 27 Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $12,500,000 349 Margate MARG-022 Traffic Calming Circle Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design SWAP $500,000 350 Sunrise SUNR-013 NW 29th Manor Traffic Calming Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $500,000 351 Cooper City COOP-031 Traffic Calming And Streetscape Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $800,000 352 Sunrise SUNR-030 Pump Station No. 8Improvements Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $10,000,000 353 Weston WEST-290 Bonaventure Stormviater Improvement Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $440,000 354 Pompano Beach POMP-015 US 1 And NE 14th Street Causeway Slormviater Improvements Project Resiliency Improvements Construction RANK $2,344,555 355 Oakland Park OAKL-018 Mainstreet Drainage Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $300,000 356 Weston WEST-194 Manatee Isles Drive (36 St) Cul-De-Sac Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $275,000 357 Coconut Creek COCO-013 Cullum Road Signal Signal Enhancement Design RANK $600,000 358 Davie DAM-007 Orange Dr Corridor Enhancements Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $1,000,000 12 of 18 February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Project Ranking Municipality Project Number Project No.. Recommended 359 Parkland PARK-006 Traffic Light- Parkside Drive And Lox Road Work Mix Signal Enhancement. Phase NA Fiscal Year 2020 Recommendation SWAP Surtax Plan Estimate Phase Funding $500,000 360 Parkland PARK-004 Street Lighting - Pine Island Road Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA HOLD $500,000 361 Parkland PARK-003 Street Lighting - Hillsboro Boulevard Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA HOLD $1,500,000 362 Weston WEST-289 Sonaventure Stormvrater Improvement Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $440,000 363 Davie DAVI-013 Flamingo Rd I SW 26 St Intersection Signal Enhancement Design RANK $750,000 364 Weston WEST-301 Racquet Club Rd 8. Blatt Blvd Roundabout Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $400,000 365 Davie DAVI-010 SW 136 Ave / SW 26 Street Intersection Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $500,000 366 Southwest Ranches SWRA-024 Drainage Project: SW 62nd Street Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $70,000 367 Southwest Ranches SWRA-025 Drainage Project: SW 59M Court Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $70,000 368 Parkland PARK-005 Traffic Light - Hillsboro Boulevard And Nob Hill Road Signal Enhancement NA SWAP $600,000 369 Southwest Ranches SWRA-031 Drainage Project: SW 54th Street Interconnect Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $138,000 370 Southwest Ranches SWRA-036 Drainage Project: Frontier Trails Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $1,000,000 371 Southwest Ranches SWRA-033 Drainage Project: SW 49Th Court and 202 Avenue Resiliency Improvements Planning RANK $135,000 372 Pompano Beach POMP-010 Palm Aire Lakes Access Roadway Project Capacity Increase, Widening Planning RANK $485,244 373 Wilton Manors WILT-016 Parking Structure Capacity Increase, Widening NA SWAP $0 374 Pompano Beach POMP-005 Innovation District Infrastructure Improvements Project Capacity Increase, Widening NA RANK $76,272,192 375 Hallandale Beach HALL-004 Replacing Existing Damaged Sidewalk Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $400,000 376 Wilton Manors WILT-001 Sidewalk Connectivity Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Design RANK $1,200,000 377 Fort Lauderdale FORT-118 Safety Improvements: Sailboat Bend Traffic Mitigation Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $271,925 378 Fort Lauderdale FORT-144 Safety Project: Coral Ridge C.C. Estates Mobility Master Plan Implementation Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $500,000 379 Fort Lauderdale FORT-146 Safety Project: Palm Aire Village West Mobility Master Plan Implementation Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $500,000 380 Fort Lauderdale FORT-143 Safety Improvements: Shady Banks Mobility Master Plan Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $500,000 381 Fort Lauderdale FORT-145 Safety Improvements: Twin Lakes North Mobility Master Plan implementation Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $500,000 382 Fort Lauderdale FORT-140 Safety Improvements: Lake Ridge Mobility Master Plan Implementation .Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $500,000 383 Fort Lauderdale FORT-141 Safety Improvements: Tarpon River Mobility Master Plan Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $500,000 384 Oakland Park OAKL-006 Multi -Modal Mobility Plan Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $500,000 385 Hollywood HOLL-055 Transportahon/TrafSc Calming - Dist. 4 Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $833,333 386 Hollywood HOLL-057 Transportation/Traffic Calming - Dist. 6 Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $833,333 387 Hollywood HOLL-052 Transportation/Traffic Calming - Dist. 1 Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $833,333 388 Hollywood HOLL-053 Transportabon/Traffic Calming - Dist. 2 Bicycle Pedestrian infrastructure Planning RANK $833,333 13 of 18 February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Project Ranking Municipality Project Number Project Name Recommended 389 Hol"od HOLL-054 Transportabon/Traffic Calming - Dist. 3 Bicycle Pedestrian Work Mix Infrastructure Phase Planning Fiscal Year 2020 Recommendation RANK Surtax Plan Estimate Phase Funding $833,333 390 Lauderdale Lakes LLAK-019 Citywide Bike Lanes & Pedestrian Safety Improvements Project Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $1,500,000 391 Fort Lauderdale FORT-126 Safety Improvements: Beach Traffic Management Plan Execution Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $2,300,000 392 Fort Lauderdale FORT-125 Safety Improvements: SE 17th Street Mobility plan Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $2,691,000 393 Tamarac TAMA-004 Sidewalk Program Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $3,750,000 394 Fort Lauderdale FORT-103 Sidewalks: Ada Sidewalk Installation 8 Replacement Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $5,000,000 395 Fart Lauderdale FORT-102 Sidewalks: American Disability Act (ADA) Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $5,000,000 396 Oakland Park OAKL-022 North Andrews Gardens Corridor Improvements Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure Planning RANK $7,604,532 397 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-019 Neighborhood Sidewalks Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA HOLD $50,000 398 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-020 Neighborhood Sidewalks Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA HOLD $50,000 399 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSFA-021 Neighborhood Sidewalks Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA HOLD $50,000 400 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-022 Neighborhood Sidewalks Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA HOLD $50,000 401 Lauderdale -by -the -See LSEA-023 Neighborhood Sidewalks Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA HOLD $50,000 402 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-024 Neighborhood Sidewalks Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA HOLD $50,000 403 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-033 AIA Crosswalk Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA HOLD $400,000 404 Margate MARG-020 Sidewalk Additions (Various) Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $500,000 405 Miramar MIRA-059 Miramar Parkway Streetscape (SW 64 To SW 68) Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $1.526,870 406 Tamarac TAMA-020 School Zones Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA HOLD $4,000,000 407 Hallandale Beach HALL-025 Community Bus Fleet Trolley Modernization Transit Design RANK $600,000 408 Miramar MIRA-082 Bus Slop Improvements Transit Design RANK $1,150,400 409 Wilton Manors WILT-011 Community Bus Transit NA HOLD $0 410 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-031 Transportation Service Transit NA HOLD $200,000 411 Cooper City COOP-048 Bus Shatters Transit NA SWAP $400,000 412 Weston WEST-186 Bus Stop Improvements Transit NA SWAP $700,000 413 Hallandale Beach HALL-024 Community Bus Service Transit NA SWAP $2,200,000 414 Sunrise SUNR-015 Transit And Shuttle Bus Infrastructure Transit NA RANK $3.000,000 415 Tamarac TAMA-007 Bus Shelters/CrossvaiksfTraffic Lights Transit NA HOLD $5,000,000 416 Tamarac TAMA-022 Rapid Bus System On Sawgrass Transit NA HOLD $15,000,000 417 Fort Lauderdale FORT-142 Safety Improvements: Victoria Park Master Plan Improvements Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $500,000 418 Weston WEST-189 Glades Parkway Roadvay Improvements Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $1,800,000 14 of 18 February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Project Ranking Municipality Project Number Recommended 419 West Park WPRK-011 Project Name Neighborhood Traffic Calming Improvement Area Work Mix Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Phase Design Fiscal Year 2020 Recommendation RANK Surtax Plan Estimate Phase Funding $2,500,000 420 West Park WPRK-012 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Improvement Area Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $2,500,000 421 Weston WEST-183 Bonaventure Local Roadways Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $2,857,600 422 Fort Lauderdale FORT-116 Safety Improvements: Neighborhood Traffic Calming - Qalert Requests Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Planning RANK $3.000,000 423 Margate MARG-001 Colonial Drive Improvements Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA SWAP $40,000 424 Fort Lauderdale FORT-111 Safety Improvements: Andrews Ave Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA SWAP $525,000 425 Lauderhill LHIL-012 Roundabout Construction Program Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA SWAP $1,500,000 426 Tamarac TAMA-005 Corridor Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Construction RANK $15,000,000 427 Fort Lauderdale FORT-105 Sidewalks: Shade Trees Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $500,000 428 Hollywood HOLL-039 Neighborhood Improvements - Dist. 1 Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $2,500,000 429 Hollywood HOLL-040 Neighborhood Improvements - Dist. 2 Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $2,500,000 430 Hollywood HOLL-043 Neighborhood Improvements - Dist. 5 Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $2,500,000 431 Hollywood HOLL-044 Neighborhood Improvements - Dist. 6 Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $2,500,000 432 Hollywood HOLL-041 Neighborhood Improvements - Dist. 3 Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $2,500,000 433 Hollywood HOLL-042 Neighborhood Improvements - Dist. 4 Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $2,500,000 434 Fort Lauderdale FORT-156 Safety Improvements: Annual NCIP/BCIP Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $5,000,000 435 Lauderdale Lakes LLAK-014 Citywide Infrastructure Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA HOLD $3,000,000 436 Pembroke Pines PPIN-022 City Wide Streelscape Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA SWAP $4,720,000 437 Sunrise SUNR-034 Median Improvements (Citywide) Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $5,000,000 438 Miramar MIRA-041 Historic Miramar Drainage Improvements - Phase IV Resiliency Improvements Construction RANK $7,500,000 439 Hollywood HOLL-065 Industrial Park And Corridor Improvements Capacity Increase, Widening Design RANK $5,000,000 440 Miramar MIRA-042 Historic Miramar Drainage Improvements - Phase V Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $5,000,000 441 Miramar MIRA-043 Historic Miramar Drainage Improvements - Phase VI Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $28,500,000 442 Fort Lauderdale FORT-193 Roadway Improvements: US 1 Capacity Increase, Widening NA SWAP $4,000,000 443 Fort Lauderdale FORT-054 School Zone Safety Improvements: Pine Crest Private School Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $150,000 444 Coconut Creek COCO-023 Complete Streets Crosswalks on Lyons Rd Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $433,000 445 Miramar MIRA-056 Historic Downtown Revitalization Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure NA SWAP $500,000 446 West Park WPRK-013 Purchase of a Trolley For Community Bus Services Transit NA MOVED $100,000 447 Coconut Creek COCO-005 Mainstreet Circulator Transit NA HOLD $200,000 448 Lauderhill LHIL-003 Bus Transportation Vehicle Replacements Transit NA SWAP $330,000 15 of 18 February 26, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Project Ranking Municipality Project Number Project Recommended 449 Hollywood HOLL-062 Nam Community Shuttle Buses Work Mix Transit Phase NA Fiscal Year 2020 Recommendation MOVED Surtax Plan Estimate _Pha- Funding $5,000,000 450 Coral Springs CORA-116 Expand Community Bus Service Transit NA MOVED $9,000,000 451 Sunrise SUNR-027 Various Traffic Calming - Zone B Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Design RANK $500,000 452 Sunrise SUNR-026 Various Traffic Calming - Zone A Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Planning RANK $500,000 453 Sunrise SUNR-028 Various Traffic Calming - Zone C Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Planning RANK $500,000 454 Sunrise SUNR-029 Various Traffic Calming - Zone D Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Planning RANK $500,000 455 Fort Lauderdale FORT-119 Safety Improvements: Neighborhood Traffic Calming Traffic Cirde, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement Planning RANK $3,000,000 456 Fort Lauderdale FORT-157 Safety Improvements: SW 31 Ave Tragic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA SWAP $45,000 457 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-030 Traffic Calming Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA HOLD $125,000 458 Lauderdale-by-theSea LSEA-029 Traffic Calming Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA HOLD $125,000 459 Lauderdaleby-the-Sea LSEA-025 Traffic Calming Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA HOLD $125.000 460 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-026 Traffic Calming Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA HOLD $125,000 461 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-027 Traffic Calming Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA HOLD $125,000 462 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-028 Traffic Calming Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA HOLD $126,000 463 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-034 Traffic Safety Devices Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA HOLD $700,000 464 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-037 A1A Median Safety Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA HOLD $1,000,000 465 Fort Lauderdale FORT-129 Safety Project: BE 17th St - US 1 To SW 4th Ave Mobility Improvements Traffic Circle, Speed Tables, Intersection Improvement NA SWAP $2,500,000 466 Plantation PLAN-005 Adaptive Signal Coordination with Bromrd County Signal Enhancement NA SWAP $0 467 Hallandale Beach HALL-013 Hallandale Beach Blvd, US 1, Pembroke Rd & A1A Adaptive Signalimbon Signal Enhancement NA SWAP $780,000 468 Plantation PLAN-003 Adaptive Signal Coordination With Broward County Signal Enhancement NA SWAP $1,112.750 469 Tamarac TAMA-016 Adaptive Traffic Control Devices And Traffic Signahication Signal Enhancement NA RANK $15,000,000 470 Fort Lauderdale FORT-130 Safety Improvements: Downtown Wayfinding & Info Signage Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $280,411 471 Fort Lauderdale FORT-176 Street Lighting : Annual New Lighting Infrastructure Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Design RANK $10,000,000 472 Fort Lauderdale FORT-195 Roadway Improvements: Median Beautification - EntryMey Signs Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $145,349 473 Sunrise SUNR-007 Street & Pedestrian Lighting - Zone C Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $500,000 474 Sunrise SUNR-008 Street & Pedestrian Lighting - Zone D Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $500,000 475 Sunrise SUNR-005 Street & Pedestrian Lighting - Zone A Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $500,000 476 Sunrise SUNR-006 Street & Pedestrian Lighting - Zone 8 Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $500,000 477 Holtyvood HOLL-063 Industrial Park And Corridor Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $5,000,000 478 Tamarac TAMA-01I Median And Street Landscaping Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $12,000,000 16 of 18 February 28, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) 479 Fort Lauderdale FORT-175 480 Tamarac TAMA-023 481 Weston WEST-310 482 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-014 483 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-013 484 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-015 485 Lauderdals-bythe-Sea LSEA-016 486 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-017 487 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-018 488 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-036 489 Weston WEST-309 490 Lauderhill LHIL-006 491 Pembroke Pines PPIN-023 492 Weston WEST-260 493 Weston WEST-261 494 Wilton Manors WILT-010 495 Hollyvmod ROLL-152 496 Hollytwod HOLL-154 497 Hollyvood HOLL-155 498 Hol"od HOLL-156 499 Hollytwod HOLL-157 500 Fort Lauderdale FORT-174 501 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-008 502 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-010 503 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-011 504 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-012 505 Lauderdale -by -the -Sea LSEA-007 506 Pembroke Pines PPIN-036 507 Fort Lauderdale FORT-062 508 Tamarac TAMA-013 Broward MPO Surtax Services Street Lighting : Annual Lighting Retrofit Program Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $15,000,000 Corridor Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $15,000,000 Indian Trace Street Lighting Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting Planning RANK $15,000,000 Neighborhood Street Lighting Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA HOLD $60,000 Neighborhood Street Lighting Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA HOLD $60,000 Neighborhood Street Lighting Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA HOLD $60,000 Neighborhood Street Lighting Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA HOLD $60,000 Neighborhood Street Lighting Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA HOLD $60,000 Neighborhood Street Lighting Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA HOLD $60,000 Parking Guidance Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage. Lighting NA HOLD $1,000,000 Indian Trace Street Lighting Improvements Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA SWAP $1,500,000 Privacy Walls Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA SWAP $1,600,000 City Wide Landscaping - Medians 8 Smies Landscaping, Hardscape, Signage, Lighting NA SWAP $8.000,000 Culvert Improvements Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $2,000,000 Culvert Improvements Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $2,000,000 Storm Sewer Line Infrastructure Resiliency Improvements Design RANK $4,300,000 Environmental Resiliency - Dlst.t Resiliency Improvements Planning RANK $1,666,667 Environmental Resiliency- Dist. 3 Resiliency Improvements Planning RANK $1,666,667 Environmental Resiliency- Dist. 4 Resiliency Improvements Planning RANK $1,666,667 Environmental Resiliency - Dist. 5 Resiliency Improvements Planning RANK $1,666,667 Environmental Resiliency - Dist. 6 Resiliency Improvements Planning RANK $1,666,667 Street Lighting: High Mast Lighting System Resiliency Improvements NA RANK $150,000 Drainage Projects Resiliency Improvements NA HOLD $1,000,000 Drainage Projects Resiliency Improvements NA HOLD $1,000,000 Drainage Projects Resiliency Improvements NA HOLD $1,000,000 Drainage Projects Resiliency Improvements NA HOLD $1,000,000 Drainage Projects Resiliency Improvements NA HOLD $1,900,000 City Wide Signal Conversion To Mast Arms Resiliency Improvements NA SWAP $18,450,000 Fiber Optic Cables: North Shopper District Fiber NA SWAP $350,000 Fiber Optics Fiber NA RANK $3,000,000 17 o1 IS February 26, 2020 Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (Fiscal Year 2020) Broward MPO Surtax Services Project Ranking Municipality Project Number Recommended 509 Tamarac TAMA-017 Project Name Fiber Optics Work Mix Fiber Phase NA Fiscal Year 2020 Recommendation HOLD Surtax Plan Estimate Phase Funding • 000 •. Fiber Optic Installation Fiber NA RANK $18,000,000 Bro ward Mpa Metropolitan Planning Organization MOBILITY ADVANCEMENT .' Move Paople a Goods I Create coos I Strengthen Common:des PROGRAM RANK Projects requested by municipalities to be ranked for funding. HOLD Projects requested by municipalities to be put on hold from funding for various reasons. SWAP Projects requested by municipalities to be swapped out in February 2021. YEAR 1 Projects that are recommended for funding in Fiscal Year 2020, Notes: 1 The Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities (F iscal Year 2020 developed b the Broward MPO Surtax Services m partnership I) P P 1 Iershl with the municipalities IY P P P n Broward County. All project information was provided 6y the municipalities. (2) All projects were provided by Broward County and were contained in the Surtax Plan approved by the voters in November 2018. (3) The Municipal Surtax Capital Projects Priorities IFiscal Year 2020)consistent with the Surtax Ordinance, the Tri-Party Interlocal Agreement, and Bi-Party lnterlocal Agreement, is the output of the data -driven ranking tool utilizing the evaluation criteria, point distribution, and program readiness approach established in coordination with the municipalities. I4) Projects with numbers that include ".x" reflect multi -part projects. (5) As directed by Broward County, the following percentages are used to calculate the recommended phase funding since the projects in the Surtax Plan are a mphase(s) to be the total cost of the required phass) to complete the project: Planning: 3 % of the total cost of the project in the Surtax Plan. • Design: 12 % of the total cost of the project in the Surtax Plan. • Construction (includes CEI): 85 % of the total cost of the project in the Surtax Plan. • Rightof-way phase costs are project specific. (6) The Broward MPO Surtax Services selected the Cycle 1 (Fiscal Year 2020) funding goal of $71) - $80 million of the total $120 million available (30-Year Surtax Financial Plan) since the County did not provide specific guidance. This goal was selected to allow for adequate funds for Community Shuttle Bus and Rehabilitation and Maintenance projects to be funded by the County. 18 of 18 February 28, 2020 EXHIBIT A-1 Chart 1 and Chart 2 below list the Cycle 1 Ranked Projects that were withdrawn, deferred, or deemed ineligible and therefore not included in the FY2020 Approved Projects. Chart 1— Withdrawn or Deferred MCPs The Cycle 1 Ranked Projects in the table below were withdrawn or deferred at the request of the respective Municipalities. Ranking Project Number Municipality Comments #10 LLAK-003 Lauderdale Lakes Withdrawn/Deferred at City's request #18 PPRK-002 Pembroke Park Withdrawn/Deferred at City's request #70 POMP-011 Pompano Beach Withdrawn/Deferred at City's request #72 COCO-020 Coconut Creek Withdrawn/Deferred at City's request #79 PPIN-021 Pembroke Pines Withdrawn/Deferred at City's request #86 LSEA-035 Lauderdale by the Sea Withdrawn at City's request #92 OAKL- 025/WILT-015 Oakland Park/Wilton Manor Withdrawn/Deferred at City's request #100 WILT-015 Wilton Manors Removed/Combined with Oakland Park's project OAKL-025 #104 PPIN-038 Pembroke Pines Withdrawn/Deferred at City's request #110 TAMA-021 Tamarac Withdrawn/Deferred at City's request Chart 2 — Ineligible MCPs The Cycle 1 Ranked Projects in the table below were deemed ineligible. Ranking Project Number Municipality Comments #11 TAMA-018 Tamarac Ineligible #29 WILT-007.1 Wilton Manors Ineligible #55 COOP-035 Cooper City Ineligible Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 27 of 28 EXHIBIT B Municipal Surtax Project Ranking Evaluation Criteria & Points Distribution Second Amendment to and Restatement of the Transportation System Surtax ILA Page 28 of 28 Explanati Buffer Factor Scale Source MUNICIPAL SURTAX PROJECT RANKING EVALUATION CRITERIA & POINTS DISTRIBUTION 21/4/2020 EMPLOYMENT DENSITY Projects analyzed and awarded points based r connection to or adjacent to one Z more Traffic Analysis Zones >n b with employment density areas areas by percentage, ident fed by Broward County. POPULATION DENSITY Projects analyzed and awarded points based on connection to or adjacent to one or more Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) with population density areas by percentage, identified by Bmward County. TRANSIT Projects analyzed and awarded points based on total number of existing transit services and multimodal connections within the buffer, INCIDENT DELAY Projects analyzed and awarded points based on the total number of vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle crashes occurring within the butter during a five-year period. LEVEL OF SERVICE Projects analyzed and awarded points based on Level of Service (LOS) of connected roadway network CONNECTION TO EXISTING FACILITIES Projects analyzed and awarded points based on connections to an existing, like or supporting facility I 'Projects analyzed and awarded points based on the presence of a Public School(s) within the buffer. EQUITY Projects analyzed and awarded points based on the average equity indicator score within the buffer. RESILIENCY Projects analyzed and awarded points based on whether the project improves or addresses an identified resiliency issue on a vulnerable corridor. PROJECT PERFORMANCE Projects analyzed and awarded points based on their implementation performance. I%.mile] I%milal [%,mile] 120Dif] 1200ft1 200 ft. I'%mile] (9 mile] [200 ALLEVIATE CONGESTION B ENHANCE CONNECTIVITY ALLEVIATE CONGESTION ENHANCE CONNECTIVITY COMMUNITY EMPHASIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT Indicator Points ------------- Indicator Points ----------- Indicator Points ----------- Indicator Points ------------- Indicator Points ------------ Indicator Points ----------- Indicator Points ------------ Indicator Points ------------ Indicator Points Bptslper Sidewalk project provides Within a regionally P Top 5% Employment Top 5% Population BCT Bus Routes -Par Over 60 incidents within LOS F - Forced or new or enhanced identified moderate to 50 Density 50 Density Cap Route SOpls 1 W 200 ft 50 breakdown Clow connection to an existing Average score >3 20 20 high vulnerable corridor ------------- sidewalk (Tier 13) V a. ----------- ----------- Community ------------- ------------ --------- Bike lane project provides ------------ ------------ Not within a regionallyV Between 5%-10% 40 Between 5%-10% 40 ShuttlesMlicrotransif - 10 Between 4059 incidents BO LOSE -Unstable flow new or enhanced Average score of 2-315 identified moderate to 10 Employment Density Population Density Within 1/4 mile (Yes) within 200 ft connection to an existing bike lane 30 high vulnerable corridor — — — — — — — — — — — — — Between 10%-15% — — — — — — — — — — — Between 10%-15% — — — — — — — — — — — SFRTA Tri-Rail Shuffles- — — — — — — — — — — — — — Between Been 29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - Project provides new or — — — — — — — — — — — — .yCB'�E 3G 39 30 30 10 incidents 60 LOS D-Approaching 30 enhanced connection to Average score of 1-2 15 Employment Density Population Density Within 1l4 mile (Yes) within 200 ftunstable flow ------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- an existing bus stop --------- ------------ Between 15%-20% Between 15%-20% Between 11-19 incidents Project provides new or 2D Employment Density 20 Population Density 40 within 200 ft LOS C - Stable flow 20 enhanced connection to Average score of 0-1 10 TBD ------------- ----------- ---------------------------------------------------- an existing roadway Lew than 20% 10 Less than 20% Population Less than 10 incidents LOS B- Reasonably free Within 'A mile of an Employment Density 10 Density 20 within 20D ft 10 flow 20 existing public school Average score of 0 10 — — — — — — — — — — - LOS A 10 ----------- Not within % mile of an 10 existing public school No available LOS data 10 Sri MW -Mep Res hem the -Exaeme amwad County Phi upend Development Bmwem County Pennirq and Development Wowed County T—ft Routes SFRTA/Tn Sipnel FowCnah Dete (ore'I modes FDOTD4 LOS Assesement Repdf/FDOT EesedsnssopeeprgndIeewipbbnand S,eiec1MPOT spafAkii NenMrp Weel—W Umete Cher" Risk to Me amwad Cwnty Mobiny aaee—rd Management DA4i1on Menepr Division Red (Uniwsdyo/Florida) LOS Mp Package R—d County P.M.Schoch GIS lays, Equity Aseaesmanl melhorbkW Tmmportea'on Systemin Wowad County' Pnegrem Adrr hafa -fixty Capacity Increase, Widening, Bicycle Pedestrian Infrastructure y Transit provement Intersection Improvement Signal Enhancement Landscaping, Hardscape, Resiliency Improvements Fiber Work Mix Points: Bridge Signags, Lighting 50 Points 45 Points 40 Points 35 Points 30 Points 25 Points 20 Points 15 Points Broward MP&- -NA.".—�;`n Metropolitan Planning Organization Note: The Ranking Criteria and Points Distribution for municipal capital surtax projects was developed by the Broward MPO in partnership with the municipalities in Broward County. The MPO's data -driven ranking tool utilizes the evaluation criteria and point distribution in order to rank the municipal capital projects included in the Broward County Transportation Surtax Plan.