HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2006-118 CDM Membranes RESOLUTION NO. 2006-118
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA
BEACH, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE AWARD OF AN AGREEMENT
FOR THE MEMBRANE WATER PLANT UPGRADE PROJECT; USING
WATER FUNDS; AUTHORIZING THE AWARD OF A WORK
AUTHORIZATION TO CAMP, DRESSER AND MCKEE FOR SERVICES
ASSOCIATED WITH THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND PILOT TESTING
FOR THE MEMBRANE WATER PLANT PROJECT FOR THE CITY WATER
SYSTEM IN THE AMOUNT OF $207,333.00; AUTHORIZING THE PROPER
CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; DESIGNATING
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS;
FURTHER, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission adopted Resolution 2002-120 approving the Water,
Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Plan; and
WHEREAS, construction of the Membrane Water Treatment Plant Upgrade project
figured prominently among the projects identified in the Water, Wastewater and Stormwater
Facilities Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission awarded a continuing engineering services contract to
Camp Dresser and McKee for design of water plant upgrade projects; and
WHEREAS, the City solicited a proposal from its design engineer Camp Dresser and
McKee for services associated with the preliminary design and pilot testing for the membrane
water plant project in the amount of$207,333.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That the foregoing findings are incorporated by this reference.
Section 2: That City Commission approves a Work Authorization to its design engineer
Camp Dresser and McKee for pilot testing and preliminary design completion in the amount of
$207,333.00, provided, however that no contract will become effective unless and until City
officials complete execution of it. Funding for the contract shall be derived from retained
earnings.
Section 3. That the City Manager is designated as the authorized representative to
provide the assurances and commitments required by the loan application.
Section 4. That the City Manager is authorized to delegate responsibility to appropriate
City staff to carry out technical, financial, and administrative activities associated with the loan
agreement.
Section 5. That all resolutions or part of Resolutions in conflict with any of the
provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.
Section 6. That if any Section or portion of a Section of this Resolution proves to be
invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity,
force or effect of any other Section or part of this Resolution.
Section 7. That this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and
adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED on June 27, 2006.
PATRICIA FLURY
MAYOR—COMMISSIONER
i AT<TEST:
LOLJISE STILSON, CMC
��- /ry CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO F AND CORRECTNESS:
BY:
THO AS A BRO
CITY AT ORNEY
2 RESOLUTION#2006-1 18
i
I
4
--- CITY OF DANIA BEACH
Agenda Item#
M
Agenda Request Database
Date of Commission Meeting: 6/27/2006
Adopt Resolution ❑X Adopt Ordinance (1st Reading) ❑ Adopt Ordinance (2nd Reading) ❑
Award Bid/RFP ❑ Presentation ❑ Continued from:
Re nested Action {Idenfity appropriate Action or Mo0.
tion)
Authorize agreement with Camp, Dresser and Mckee (CDM)for the Membrane Water Plant Upgrade Project
VKr 5 r r ,
�Ilhy Action �s,Rl6cessary X a
s.A 2r
To allow City to execute agreement with CDM for services associated with preliminary design and pilot testing for the
Membrane Water Plant.
}
Wh"ction Accomplishes
Continues Water Plant Upgrades as part of overall City infrastructure improvements
PurchasfingdRequests ONLY $ r �
Dept: 3303 Water Utility Water Plant Acct#: Amt:
Fund: General: ❑ Water: ❑ Sewer: ❑ Stormwater: ❑ Grants: ❑ Capital: ❑
Summary Explanat�oNBackground �� r
fiscaljr p' cd/Cost Summary;
None
ExhibitsAttached . �
,rr?,...>' _ ... .�..,x1fu., an
Resolution
Memo
Work Authorization
Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8
at Doc
Authorized Si natures=- a
Submitted by
Leo Williams Date 06/19/06
Department Director
Dominic Orlando Date 06/20/06
HR Director
Date
Finance Director
Patricia Varney Date 06/20/06
City Attorney
Thomas J. Ansbro Date 06/22/06
City Manager
Ivan Pato Date 06/22/06
City Clerk lJse � s a s ian w � I fix: 3
Commission Action:
Approved: ❑ Denied: ❑ Continued to: ❑
4
A� '"
City of Dania Beach
Department of Public Services
ro. .Y...........
100 West Dania Beach Blvd• Dania Beach,FL 33004 -(954)924-3741 (954) 923-1109(fax)
TO: Mayor Patricia Flury
Vice Mayor Robert Anton
Commissioner John Bertino
Commissioner Anne Castro
Commissioner C. K. McElyea
FROM: Ivan Pato, City Manager
Date: June 20, 2006
RE: Continuing Engineering Services - Recommendation to Award Work Order No. 5 to
Camp Dresser and McKee
4�nlroduction and Back ound
On October 22nd, 2002, the City Commission adopted Resolution 2002-120 approving the Water,
Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Plan. The Plan defines future capital infrastructure needs for
the water, sewer and stormwater systems in the City and recommends improvements to each system
based on current deficiencies, anticipated growth demands and compliance with federal and state
environmental mandates.
Thereafter, the City Commission awarded a continuing engineering services contract to Camp
Dresser and McKee. This continuing engineering contract was designed to have individual work
authorizations for design work submitted to the City Commission for approval. The first projects to
be designed were the 2 million gallon Ground Storage Tank, the construction for which is about to
commence and the pipeline from the water plant to downtown to reinforce the downtown
distribution system and fire flows which just bid. The next project is the membrane water plant
upgrade,
CDM was asked to provide this work authorization (WA-5) for engineering services for the
membrane pilot testing, concentrate volume minimization and design services as outlined in the
detailed Scope of Work as attached in Exhibit A hereto. The lump sum fee for the design,surveying,
permitting, bidding and award services, and miscellaneous services was negotiated to be $207,333. It
is recommended that the City Commission award this work authorization to Camp Dresser and
McKee.
Work Authorization No. 5 to CDM
5/8/2006 Page
WIRM'
IM,
City of Dania ]Beach
Department of Public Services
100 West Dania Beach Blvd - Dania Beach, FL 33004 - (954)924-3741 . (954)-923-1109(fax)
The preliminary engineering cost opinion for the construction of the aforementioned facilities was
estimated at approximately $4 million. A list of the billing rates is herein attached as Exhibit B -
Engineering rates are effective through January 1, 2007.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Commission award Work Authorization No. 5 (WA-5) to the
continuing engineering services contract to Camp Dresser and McKee in the amount of$207,333.
•
Work Authorization No. 5 to CDM
5/8/2006 Page 2
i
AGREEMENT
iTHIS IS AN AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") entered into orb . 2006,
between: the City of Dania Beach,Florida, a municipal corporation, (th "City";hand CpDresser
& McKee Inc. (the "Consultant").
In consideration of the mutual covenants,terms and conditions contained in this Agreement,
and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which are acknowledged, the
parties agree as follows:
1. Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform consultant services for the City
in accordance with the scope of services described in Exhibit "A" (Engineering Services to Study
Water Treatment Plant Improvements,Provide Conceptual Broward County Stormwater License and
Environmental Resource Permit Submittal, and Produce North Site Conceptual Buildout Master
Plan), a copy of which is attached and made a part of this Agreement by this reference. The Parties
acknowledge and agree that services are to commence o l% Cd �' ', Od' and that that date
is the effective date and commencement date of the se vices.
2. Subcontracts. Consultant may subcontract certain items of work. It is expressly
agreed by the parties, however, that the City shall approve in advance in writing any subcontractors
and the fees to be paid them by Consultant prior to any such subcontractor proceeding with any such
work.
3. Payment for Services.
A. City agrees to pay Consultant for services provided by Consultant, as
described in Section 1, an agreed upon lump sum amount of two hundred and seven thousand,three
hundred and thirty-three dollars($207,333.00)(the"Fee"). The Fee includes full payment,including
all labor,overhead and other costs. No travel and meal costs are reimbursable unless incurred outside
of Miami-Dade,Broward and Palm Beach Counties, and approved in writing in advance by the City.
Any such costs are payable at the City reimbursement rate.
B. Any necessary additional work, as determined by City, which is not covered
by the scope of services described in the attached Exhibit"A"(Engineering Services to Study Water
Treatment Plant Improvements, Provide Conceptual Broward County Stormwater License and
Environmental Resource Permit Submittal, and Produce North Site Conceptual Buildout Master
Plan), shall not be undertaken without a written amendment to this Agreement to that effect,
executed in advance by both parties.
C. Consultant shall submit its invoices in the format and with supporting
documentation as may be required by City.
D. City shall pay Consultant monthly for services rendered within thirty (30)
calendar days from date of approval of each of Consultant's invoices by the City Manager. If any
errors or omissions are discovered in any invoice, City will inform Consultant and request revised
copies of all such documents. If any disagreement arises as to payment of any portion of an invoice,
City agrees to pay all undisputed portions and the parties agree to cooperate by promptly conferring
to resolve the disputed portion.
E. Any invoice which is not timely paid as prescribed above will be subject to the
accrual of interest at the statutory rate prescribed by applicable Florida law.
4. Indemnification of City.
A. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its officers, employees and
agents (collectively, the"City"), from liabilities,damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to
reasonable attorney fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness or intentional wrongful
misconduct of Consultant and persons employed or utilized by Consultant in the performance of this
Agreement, including any Subconsultant and Subcontractor.
B. To the extent considered necessary by City any sums due Consultant under this
Agreement may be retained by City until all of City's claims for indemnification pursuant to this
Agreement have been settled or otherwise resolved, and any amount withheld shall not be subject to
payment of interest by City.
C. To the extent this indemnification clause does not comply with Florida law this
provision and all aspects of this Agreement shall be interpreted as the parties' intention for the
indemnification provisions and this Agreement to comply with Florida law applicable to indemnification.
5. Insurance. Consultant shall provide,pay for and maintain in force at all times during
the term of this Agreement, such insurance, including professional liability insurance, Workers'
compensation insurance and comprehensive general liability insurance as stated below:
A. Professional liability insurance with minimum limits of liability of One
Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) to assure the City of coverage of the
indemnification specified in this Agreement.
B. Workers' Compensation insurance to apply for all employees in compliance
with the "Workers' Compensation Law" of the State of Florida and all
applicable federal laws, for the benefit of the Consultant's employees.
C. Comprehensive general liability insurance, including contractual, with
minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence,
combined single limit for bodily injury liability and property damage liability.
The City is to be included as an "additional insured" with respect to any
claims arising out of this Agreement.
D. Automobile Liability with minimum limit of One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00) combined single limit.
Page 2 of 9
E. If Consultant hires a subcontractor for any portion of any work, then such
subcontractor shall provide general liability insurance with minimum limits
of liability of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00).
F. The Consultant shall provide the Risk Manager of the City Certificates of
Insurance for coverages and policies required by this Agreement. All
certificates shall state that the City shall be given thirty (30) days' advance
notice prior to expiration or cancellation of any policy. Such policies and
coverages shall not be affected by any other policy of insurance which the
City may carry in its own name.
6. Assignment of Agreement.
A. It is understood and agreed by both parties that this Agreement,in whole or in
part,cannot be assigned, sublet or transferred by the Consultant without the prior written consent of
City. The City is relying upon the apparent qualifications and expertise of John Goldman, one of
Consultant's associates,and such person's familiarity with the City's circumstances and desires. In
the event Consultant wishes to re-assign or replace such individual,the Consultant shall tender one
or more substitutes acceptable to City. In the event the City is not,for any reason or no reason at all,
satisfied with such substitute,Consultant shall be considered in breach of this Agreement. Violation
of the terms of this paragraph shall constitute a breach of Agreement by Consultant and City may,at
its discretion,terminate this Agreement for cause and all rights,title and interest of Consultant in this
Agreement shall then cease and terminate.
B. The Consultant acknowledges, understands and agrees that its performance
under this Agreement is or may be contingent upon the City receiving timely services from other
consultants whose subcontracts must be approved by City as specified in Paragraph 2, above (the
"Supporting Consultants"). The Consultant agrees to use its best efforts to coordinate its services
with the services of the Supporting Consultants and further agrees that in the event the rendition of
any services of any of the Supporting Consultants is delayed, such delay will not entitle the
Consultant to any additional compensation or payment of any kind. Furthermore, the Consultant
shall not be entitled to an increase in compensation, or be entitled to payment of any kind from the
City,for damages or expenses incurred which are direct,indirect or consequential or other costs and
lost profits of any kind including, but not limited to, costs of acceleration, inefficiency or extended
overhead,arising because of any other delay,disruption,interruption,interference or hindrance from
any cause whatsoever,whether such delay,disruption or interference be reasonable or unreasonable,
foreseeable or unforeseeable, or avoidable or unavoidable; provided, however, that this provision
shall not preclude recovery of damages by the Consultant for hindrances or delays caused solely by
fraud,bad faith or active malicious interference on the part of the City. The Consultant shall only be
entitled to extensions of time for performance as the exclusive and sole remedy for delay.
7. Examination of Records. Consultant shall maintain books, records, documents and
other evidence directly pertinent to performance of work under this Agreement in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and practices. The Consultant shall also maintain the
10 financial information and data used by the Consultant in the preparation of support of any claim for
Page 3 of 9
reimbursement for any out-of-pocket expense or cost. The City shall have access to such books,
records, documents and other evidence for inspection, audit and copying during normal business
hours. The Consultant will provide proper facilities for such access and inspection. Audits
conducted under this section shall observe generally accepted auditing standards and established
procedures and guidelines of the City. The Florida Public Records Act, Chapter 1l9 of the Florida
Statutes,may have application to records or documents pertaining to this Agreement and Consultant
acknowledges that such laws have possible application and agrees to comply with all such laws.
8. Termination.
A. Termination of Agreement for Convenience. It is expressly understood and
agreed that the City may terminate this Agreement at any time for any reason or no reason at all by
giving the Consultant written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, directed to the
principal office of the Consultant, thirty(30) days in advance of the termination date. In the event
that the Agreement is terminated pursuant to this provision, the Consultant shall be entitled to be
compensated for the services rendered from the effective date of execution of the Agreement up to
the date of receipt of Notice of termination. Such compensation shall be based on the percentage of
work completed, as fairly and reasonably determined by City after conferring with Consultant.
B. Termination of Agreement for Cause. If City elects to terminate the
Agreement for cause, City will provide Consultant five (5) days' advance written notice. If
Consultant promptly cures the matter giving rise to the cause within that time, this Agreement shall
continue. If not timely cured,the Agreement will stand terminated and the City will pay Consultant
for work completed less any costs, expenses and damages incurred by City as a result of such
termination. If a court of competent jurisdiction determines that the termination was not authorized
under the circumstances then the termination shall be deemed to be a termination for convenience
and the City will not be entitled to any additional costs, expenses and damages as a result of
termination.
9. Ownership of Documents. All correspondence, studies, data, analyses, documents,
instruments, applications, memorandums and the like, including drawings and specifications
prepared or furnished by Consultant (and Consultant's independent professional subcontractors or
subconsultants)pursuant to this Agreement shall become owned by and be the property of the City
and the City shall consequently obtain ownership of them by any statutory common law and other
reserved rights, including copyright; however, such documents are not intended or represented by
Consultant to be suitable for reuse by City on extensions of the work or on any other work or project.
Any such reuse, modification or adaptation of such document without written verification or
permission by Consultant for the specific purpose intended will be at City's sole risk and without
liability or legal exposure to Consultant or to Consultant's independent professional subconsultants.
If City alters any such documents, City will expressly acknowledge same so that no third party will
be in doubt as to the creation or origination of any such document.
Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained in this Agreement,
CONSULTANT shall retain sole ownership to its preexisting information including but not
limited to computer programs, software, standard details, figures, templates and specifications.
Page 4 of 9
When transferring data in electronic media format, CONSULTANT makes no
representation as to long term compatibility,usability,or readability of documents resultingfrom the
use of software application packages,operating systems,or computer hardware differing from those
used by CONSULTANT at the beginning of the Project.Because the data stored in electronic media
format can deteriorate or be modified inadvertently or otherwise without authorization of the data's
creator, the party receiving electronic files agrees that it will perform acceptance tests or procedures
within 60 days, after which the receiving party shall be deemed to have accepted the data thus
transferred. Any errors detected within the 60-day acceptance period will be corrected by the party
delivering the electronic files. CONSULTANT shall not be responsible to maintain documents
stored in electronic media format after acceptance by Owner. The original hard copy of the
documents containing the professional engineer's seal shall take precedence over the electronic
documents.
10. Notices. Except as provided above,whenever either party desires to give notice to the
other, it must be given by written notice, sent by certified U.S. mail, with return receipt requested,
addressed to the party for whom it is intended, at the place last specified and the place for giving of
notice in compliance with the provisions of this paragraph. For the present,the parties designate the
following as the respective persons and places for giving of notice:
City: Ivan Pato, City Manager
City of Dania Beach
100 West Dania Beach Boulevard
Dania Beach,Florida 33004
With a copy to: Thomas J. Ansbro, City Attorney
100 West Dania Beach Blvd.
Dania Beach, Florida 33004
Consultant: Jonathan Z. Goldman., P.E., DEE
Camp Dresser& McKee Inc.
6365 N.W. 6"'Way, Suite 320
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309
11. Consent to Jurisdiction. The parties agree that the jurisdiction for any legal action
arising out of or pertaining to this Agreement shall be the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial
Circuit in and for Broward County,Florida,or the federal District Court in the Southern District of
the United States. Each party further agrees that venue for any action to enforce this Agreement shall
be in Broward County, Florida.
12. Governing Law. The parties agree that this Agreement shall be construed in
accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida.
13. Attorneys' Fees and Costs. If City or Consultant incurs any expense in enforcing the
terms of this Agreement, whether suit is brought or not, each party shall bear its own costs and
expenses including, but not limited to, court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
Page 5 of 9
14. Headings. Headings in this document are for convenience of reference only and are
not to be considered in any interpretation of this Agreement.
15. Exhibits. Each exhibit referred to in this Agreement forms an essential part of this
Agreement. Each such exhibit is a part of this Agreement and each is incorporated by this reference.
16. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or the application of it to anyperson
or situation shall to any extent be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement,
and the application of such provisions to persons or situations other than those as to which it shall
have been held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, shall continue in full force and effect,
and shall be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.
17. All Prior Agreements Superseded. This document incorporates and includes all prior
negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements and understandings applicable to the
matters contained in this Agreement and the parties agree that there are no commitments,agreements
or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this
document. Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation from the terms of this Agreement shall be
predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written.
18. Consultant and its employees and agents shall be and remain independent contractors
and not employees of City with respect to all of the acts and services performed by and under the
terms of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not in any way be construed to create a partnership,
association or any other kind of joint undertaking, enterprise or venture between the parties to this
Agreement.
19. The Consultant understands and agrees that the City, during any fiscal year, is not
authorized to expend money, incur any liability, or enter into any contract which, by its terms,
involves the expenditure of money in excess of the amounts budgeted as available for expenditure
during such fiscal year and that any contract,verbal or written,made in violation of this subsection is
null and void and that consequently, no money may be paid on such contract beyond such limits.
Nothing contained in this Agreement shall prevent the making of contracts for periods exceeding one
(1) year,but any contract so made shall be executory only for the value of the services to be rendered
or agreed to be paid for in succeeding fiscal years. Consultant shall not proceed with services under
this Agreement without City's written verification that the funds necessary for Consultant
compensation and other necessary expenditures are budgeted as available within the appropriate
fiscal year budget.
20. Consultant warrants and represents that no elected official,officer, agent or employee
of the City has a financial interest,directly or indirectly,in this Agreement or the compensation to be
paid under it and, further, that no City employee who acts in the City of Dania Beach as a
"Purchasing agent" as defined in Chapter 112,Florida Statutes, nor any elected or appointed officer
of the City of Dania Beach,nor any spouse or child of such purchasing agent,employee or elected or-
appointed officer, is a partner, officer, director or proprietor of the Consultant and, further, that no
• such City employee,purchasing agent,City elected or appointed officer,or the spouse or child of any
of them, alone or in combination, has a material interest in the Consultant. Material interest means
Page 6 of 9
director indirect ownership of more than five percent (5%)of the total assets or capital stock of the
Consultant.
21. Consultant shall comply with all federal, state and City laws applicable to the
Consultant services and specifically those covering Equal Opportunity Employment,the Americans
With Disabilities Act ("ADA") eligibility to perform services as specified in the Florida Public
Entity Crime law and the Florida Building Code. The Consultant is expected to fully comply with all
provisions of all laws and the City reserves the right to verify the Consultant's compliance with
them. Failure to comply with any laws will be grounds for termination of the Agreement for cause.
22. In the event of any conflict between any provisions of this Agreement and any
provision in any attached Exhibit, the parties agree that the provisions of this Agreement are
controlling (including, but not limited to, all terms and provisions governing compensation).
IN WITNESS OF THE FOREGOING,the parties have set their hands and seals theday and
year fist above written.
Page 7of9
CITY:
• CITY OF DANIA BEACH,
a Florida Municipal Corporation
ATTEST:
,��;
zj
UISE STILSON PATRICIA FLURY
CITY CLERK MAYOR
IVA-PATo', cfry MANAGER
APPROVED FOR FORM APPROVED AS TO "SCOPE OF
AND CORRECTNESS: SERVICES"
';j
0 i
TH MAS . 'ANS RO DOMINIMORLA NDO, P.E.
CITY AT ORNEY PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTOR
Page 8 of 9
CONSULTANT:
Signed, sealed and delivered CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
in the presence of:
B -,
y�
the
JG per. - E. Lawrence Adams, Jr.. P.E., DEE
Witness Print Name
Vice President
Title
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF BROWARD
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on s� 2006, by
L'. and as
and , respectively, of (Consultant
Name) , a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Thev are persoilai
known to me or have produced as identification and did(did not)
tome oath.
" PHYLLIS M.THOMAS
-,•,'pv aus,'-
Notary Public-Stele of Florida
• 1'Commission Expires May 10,2009
F`d;:°o Commission#DID408190
OF
My commission expires:
Paae 9 of 9
k f
E
Work Authorization No. 5
CITY of Dania Beach
Engineering Services to
Study Water Treatment Plant Improvements,
Provide Conceptual Broward County Stormwater License and
Environmental Resource Permit Submittal, and
Produce North Site Conceptual Buildout Master Plan
May 5,2006
On November 23, 2004, the Dania Beach CITY Commission (CITY) adopted Resolution Nos.
2004-204 and 2004-205 approving an Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee Inc.
(CONSULTANT) in connection with the continuing professional engineering services contract
related to the CITY's water, wastewater and stormwater identified in the Waterworks Capital
Improvement Program.
I. Introduction
This authorization is for engineering services to study and design future improvements
at the CITY's Water Treatment Plant (WTP). The findings from this study will become
the basis of design for the next phase of the water treatment plant and stormwater
management improvements which will be authorized under a separate work
authorization.
II. Background
First, The CITY is interested in studying the feasibility of adding nanofiltration to its
water treatment process due to concerns about future regulatory issues. The CITY also
wants to study concentrate disposal options including reduction in vohune.
Second, the CITY's WTP site does not currently possess any stormwater pernlits or
licenses. A conceptual buildout plan for the Southern half of the site is being developed
by CONSULTANT and Calvin Giordano &Associates (CGA). The actions proposed
herein regarding the development of conceptual permitting applications will provide
compliance with all applicable Regulatory agencies while identifying the necessar�7
stormwater quality and quantity controls for future site improvements.
Thirdly, the CITY does not have a Buildout Site Plan for the Water Treatment Plant site
on Stirling Road. Calvin Giordano has been tasked to produce a plan for the Southern
half of the site. CONSULTANT has been requested to produce a plan for the Northern
half of the site.
The tasks presented in this proposal are:
cm VVA-I
Ph6653\7/5/06
■ Pilot testing to establish design criteria and confirm the feasibility of installing a
nanofiltration water plant at the existing plant site and pilot testing to study
reduction in the concentrate volume from the plant. The concentrate reduction
study can be addressed in parallel or after the base plant design concept is confirmed
and the detailed design is uriderw=ay.
■ Completion of a conceptual Broward County Stormwater License and
Environmental Resource Permit applications for the CITY's WTP site. The permit
applications will provide the engineering data,eater quantity and water quality
calculations, and infrastructure improvements alternatives for stormwater
management under future land use conditions. The conceptual permit applications
will be presented to the Broward County Environmental Protection Department
(EPD) for conceptual approval of both the Broward County Stormwater License and
the Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)which are required in order to proceed
with future construction activities at the WTP site.
■ Produce a Conceptual Buildout Site Plan for the North side of the WTP site.
III. Scope of Work
Task 1.0 Membrane Pilot Testing Program
The main objectives of this task are to evaluate and confirm important system design
criteria and project concepts,which are outlined in this task, and to develop a basis of
design for a nanofiltration membrane softening process consisting of two (2) 1.0 mgd
skids.
The pilot testing protocol will be developed to meet the following primary objectives:
■ Determine the appropriate pretreatment chemicals and dosing rates for the
nanofiltration membrane softenungsystem.
■ Confirm that the performance of up to five different membrane elements meet the
criteria for the base design concept.
■ Determine if membrane fouling is an issue at proposed base design recovery rates.
■ Characterize the composition of the concentrate stream to identify potential
treatment,permitting, and/or disposal issues.
■ Confirm there are no other unexpected problems in the base conceptual design.
The specific services which the CONSULTANT agrees to furnish the CITY for
completion of the above proposed objectives are described in the following subtasks.
The proposed pilot test program will consist of tests which address important design
decisions for the nanofiltration membrane softening.
cm W A-2
Ph6653\7/5/06
Task 1.1 - Literature and Background Review(by FALL)
Pur ose:The purpose of this task is to gather insight and lessons learned from previous
studies to determine the state of knowledge on the successful design and operation of
membrane systems, concentrate reuse, and viable disposal practices.
ALgproach: The research team will compile and review the pertinent existing literature
on membrane technology to obtain current teclunical data of existing systems,identify
viable and proposed approaches, issues, and challenges. A list of available and
experimental long-term alternatives will be assembled and ranked according to
selection criteria based on environmental sustainability, efficiency, and economic
factors that affect the City. Data will be gathered by graduate students at Florida
Atlantic University(FAU) Lander the supervision of Dr. Frederick Bloetscher,P.E.
Based on this literature review, a list of issues that affect the successful design and
operation of membrane systems, recycling and use of concentrate, and disposal
practices will be compiled. Effort will focus on gathering data on recovery
percentages, concentrate recycling considerations, and water quality for currently
operating facilities. The outcome of this review process will be a list of technical issues
identified in previous membrane projects that affect long-term performance with
regard to water quality,concentrate disposal,recovery of raw water, and performance.
• A list of references, an annotated bibliography and database of the findings, and a
draft surrunary report on the existing research and the issues described above will be
prepared. The draft report will be distributed to the City and CONSULTANT for
review.
Task 1.2 Desktop Evaluations
Provide a desktop evaluation of varying nanofiltration recovery rates (85%, 90%,
92.5%and 97%). Parameters to be considered include:
• System flows
■ Membrane fouling tendencies
■ Chemical consumption
• Capital cost (of the full size plant)
■ Operation and maintenance cost (fixed and variable)
■ Concentrate disposal
■ Perinitability
Note: Although recoveries higher than 85%twill be considered in these evaluations,
pilot testing in this phase will be limited to S5°/o recovery with an option for 90%
testing if it offers an economic benefit to the CITY.
cm WA
Ph6653\7/5/06
Task 1.3 Pilot Test Protocol
The CONSULTANT will develop a pilot test protocol for the test program which will
include the Pilot Test Unit setup and Testing Activities Matrix, including a data
collection table and a schedule for analytical sampling. The operation of the pilot plant
will be configured based on the raw water analyses, good engineering judgment,and
CDM experience in numerous similar plants in Florida. Innovative ideas discovered
in the Document Search will be considered but not necessarily implemented in the
base pilot test program. Testing will use available composite feed water from the
Dania Beach and Broward County 3A Nvellfield (Brian Piccolo Wells Nos. 5 and 6) to
evaluate permeate quality and fouling potential.
Task 1.4a Preliminary Testing
The following preliminary tests will be performed by the CONSULTANT:
■ Feed water analysis for parameters of interest to the membrane suppliers from
both wellfields (to be performed by FAU-also see 1.4b)
■ Biological Activity Reaction Tests (BART) on the composite feed water
® Silt Density Index (SDI) readings on the raw water composite taken on up to 10
different days
Task 1.4b - Characterize Raw Water Quality (by FALL)
Purpose: Water quality data is required in order to determine the appropriate
membrane system options that are available to the City. These water quality
parameters must be included in any bid document.
Approach: For purposes of this scope, raw water is defined as tuntreated grotuld water
pumped from the aquifer. For this project, both Dania and Brian Piccolo well water
will be characterized. The characterization will be a combination of existing water
analyses and new analyses performed by FAU. FAU will be responsible for
coordinating analytical services with the appropriate laboratories solicited to support
the project including collecting samples for analysis,preparing chain of custody forms,
and packaging collected samples for delivery to the appropriate lab. Much of the
work is expected to be completed by the Department of Civil Engineering's Laboratory
for Engineered Environmental Solutions tender the guidance of Dr. Daniel E. Meeroff.
The water quality parameters summarized in Table 1 will be measured to provide the
insight necessary to evaluate and design the proposed pilot and full-scale treatment
plants.
Deliverable: Table 1 is a list of water quality parameters that are related to water
treatmment process evaluations. The deliverable for this task shall be the completed Table
1 for Dania Beach. Both Dania Beach and Brian Piccolo well water will be included.
cm WA-4
Ph6653\7/5!)6
TABLE 1 PROCESS WATER QUALITY PARAMETER LIST
pH (at the source) Temperature (at the source) Conductivity and ORP
Calcium and Magnesium Arsenic (III and V) Sodiurn
Iron and Manganese Chromium(VI and total) PotassiLun
Chloride Barium and Boron Strontium
Fluoride Aluminum Bromide
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 Nitrate/Nitrite Bicarbonate
Total sulfide Ammonia Sulfate
Carbon Dioxide Silicon Dioxide THM Formation Potential
(46 hr SDS Procedure)
Total Hardness as CaCO3 N-nitrosodimethylamine Dissolved Oxygen
(NDMA)
Lead and Copper Silica Total Organic Carbon
Turbidity Color Phosphate
Bacteria Pathogens: Giardia and Solids
-iron bacteria Cryptosporidium -Total Suspended Solids
-sulfur bacteria -Total Dissolved Solids
-slime formers
-HPC
Task 1.5 Pilot Plant Set Up
The CONSULTANT will provide a self contained, membrane pilot Lout for testing
including nanofiltration membranes from one manufacturer. CONSULTANT will
coordinate the scheduling and delivery of the membrane pilot test unit. The
CONSULTANT will assist the CITY in selecting the location for the pilot unit and
assist with making arrangements for set up on site.
The CITY will install two 2-inch taps and two 2-inch diameter PVC pipes, as follows:
■ Composite feed water pipe to pilot plant from a two inch raw water tap with an
isolation valve.
® Combined permeate and concentrate pipe to discharge to softener. Note: Except
for some minor chemical addition,the combined discharge is the same as feed
water.
The CITY will provide temporary electrical power for the membrane test. The
electrical characteristics required are 3-phase,4S0 volt, 30 ampere service with a
ground.
The CONSULTANT will coordinate delivery and be present when pilot plant arrives
on site and assist with installation.
MA WA-5
Ph6653\7/5,'06
i
Task 1.6 Pilot Plait Start Up
The following services will be performed under this task:
1. The CONSULTANT will be present for startup, CITY operator training, and
troubleshooting services.
2. The CONSULTANT will conduct a bucket and stopwatch calibration of all
rotameters or flowmeters.
3. Tine CONSULTANT will calibrate all pressure gauges with a dead weight tester or
calibrated test gauges.
4. The CONSULTANT will chlorinate all feed water piping,and all piping and
pressure vessels on pilot plant (without membranes installed). The system will be
dechlorinated and flushed prior to membrane installation.
5. The CONSULTANT will procure carboys of sulfuric acid and antiscalant,prepare
antiscalant dilutions in a day tank, calibrate dosing pumps and pH controller,and
confirm pH alarm is functional.
Task 1.7 Pilot Plant Training
The CONSULTANT will train the designated CITY plant staff in basic pilot plant
operation and data collection for up to one full day. CONSULTANT will provide on
site operator training in up to two hands-on sessions with the pilot Lunt.
Task 1.8 Pilot Testing
A. The pilot-unit will be provided with low fouling nanofiltration membranes in good
condition and operated at 85% in a two stage configuration on Biscayne Aquifer
well water. The pilot will be operated for 30 days minimum to evaluate the
fouling potential and assess whether permeate water quality parameters match
preliminary design values. The concentrate from the pilot will also be analyzed
and characterized for disposal permitting parameters included in the Large User
Sevier Use Ordinance. At the completion of this phase of testing, a Preliminary
Testing Report will be issued. If results are acceptable, the Preliminary Design
Basis for the new plant can be established. The testing that follows will not affect
this design basis.
B. Optional three-stage testing: If the desktop analyses in 1.1 show there is a cost
benefit and the City authorizes the additional testing, the pilot plant shall be
configured for three stage operation and will be operated at 90% recovery for '00
days.
C. Membrane Comparison:Models from up to four additional membranes
manufacturers will be tested to compare with the results obtained in 1.7 A. Two
cm WA-6
Ph6653\7/5/06
manufacturer's membranes will be tested side by side for 30 days each. This
• testing phase will have a total duration of 60 days.
Task 1.9 Data Monitoring &Pilot Plaizt Operation
The CITY's staff will be responsible for monitoring the pilot plant operation. The CITY
shall notify the CONSULTANT promptly of any plant upset conditions.
CONSULTANT will be responsible for filling day tanks,making minor adjustments,
and making necessary repairs.
Data monitoring and collection will be performed by the CITY in accordance with the
protocol developed by the CONSULTANT.
Lab analyses will be provided by FAU as listed in the Pilot Test Protocol.
The following parameters will be checked periodically during the testing for the feed,
permeate and/or concentrate streams:
Alkalinity HAAFP Sulfides
Ammonia Iron THMFP
Barium Magnesium TOC
BART (misc) Manganese Total Dissolved Solids
Bromide Potassium Total Hardness
Calcium Silica Total Suspended Solids
Chloride Sodium
Color Strontium
Fluoride Sulfate
CONSULTANT (with assistance from FAU) will visit the site a minimum of once a
week to review pilot plant operation and collect performance data and grater quality
data. CONSULTANT will enter data into a data reduction spreadsheet and/or
manufacturer's data normalization program.
CONSULTANT will send a monthly report to the CITY with normalized graphs of the
following parameters:
• Salt passage based on total hardness and conductivity
■ Mass transfer coefficient of membranes
• Membrane differential pressure for each stage
Graphs of the following raw data will also be provided:
■ Permeate hardness and conductivity
■ Permeate flow
■ Membrane feed pressure
W A-7
Ph6653\7/5/06
t
Task 1.10—Nanofiltration Pilot Test Report
CONSULTANT will prepare a comprehensive report summarizing the results and
conclusions of the desktop evaluations,literature and backgrotmd review and pilot
testing(Task 1.813). If the CITY authorizes the optional testing, the results of this
testing will also be included in the report.
Task 1.11—Development of Concerrtrate Disposal Methods (by FALL)
Purpose: The purpose of this task is to conduct preliminary testing of recycling
concentrate at the City of Holl),vood's existing water treatment plant. The
nanofiltration (NF) process currently achieves a recovery of approximately 90%.
Pretreatment includes the use of a sequestering agent and raw eater acidification. If
implemented without appropriate process modifications, further concentration of the
NF concentrate could result in organic fouling of the reverse osmosis membranes due
to concentrated levels of sequestering agents. Inorganic fouling may also emerge to be
a challenge.
FAU will take the lead in this testing. They will provide all equipment, materials,
labor,water analyses, etc. to perform this work.
Successful implementation will likely require changes to the existing NF operating
scheme, including elimination of the sequestering agent and possibly reduction of the
recovery achieved by the nanofiltration process. Conceptually, an antiscalant would
be used to pre-treat the RO process feed, although there are several purported
methods to eliminate this need, including zeta rods. Thus anticipated recovery
reductions in the NF process would have to be offset by increased recovery in the RO
process. Projections will be required to establish potential limitations to any modified
operating scheme. This will serve as a basis for determining the operations and
process modifications required.
Approach: An overall reduction in concentrate volume due to proposed modified
process scheme will be estimated based on identified case studies of similar
applications. Potential performance risks and demonstration requirements to address
will be evaluated prior to implementation. Dr. Bloetscher has previously worked With
the City of Hollywood and retains an ongoing relationship with the City. He has
previously discussed access to for using the existing facility at the Hollywood WTP to
test concentrate reduction. The intent would be to transfer a self-contained pilot skid
to the Hollywood location for testing, which will focus on determining important
factors that affect maximum cycle length, maximum permeate flux, and maximum
allowable feed concentrations for total dissolved solids (TDS) and calciiun hardness. It
is intended to operate the system for prolonged performance testing (i.e. 6 months) to
determine pretreatmment needs (i.e. scale inhibitors), chemical addition schedules, and
information on membrane cleaning events and requirements as well as premature
fouling.
FAU will provide all required services including skid, chemicals, lab services,
manpower, etc.
cm WA-S
Ph665317/5/06
Hollywood Pilot Testing:
The first step in this process is to provide input and cooperate in the development of a
test plan and protocol for evaluating the process including operational test conditions,
operational monitoring, field data collection, sample event scheduling, and
coordination activities. An FAU graduate student will be available to perform all
needed field activities.
Dr. Bloetscher will supervise and visit the test site to verify the configuration of the
pilot test equipment, collect data and monitor the progress of testing.
Project management activities include: scheduling tasks that are necessary to observe
the monitoring and operation of the pilot-scale system; and coordination of laboratory
and vendor services. Coordination between FAU and the pilot equipment
suppliers/vendors may be required. It is anticipated that the reject (concentrate)
stream will be discharged to the sanitary sewer system. Dr. Bloetscher will asstune the
responsibility for this coordination.
FAU Deliverable: A summary of results of testing will be incorporated into a report on
Development of Concentrate Disposal Methods.
The project period for all FAU tasks is anticipated to be up to 1S months.
Task 2.0-Conceptual Broward County Stormwater License and Environmental
Resource Permit Applications
Task 2.1 -Phase I-Engineering Evaluations
A. Data Collection and Kickoff Meeting- CONSULTANT will coordinate data
collection between the CITY, CGA, and CONSULTANT in order to obtain the
necessary plans,data and information needed to develop the appropriate
stormivater permits based on the conceptual site plan currently tinder
development. CONSULTANT will identify the proper permit applications to
accommodate the proposed conceptual site improvements. These perinits will
keep the CITY in compliance with the applicable Regulatory agencies.
CONSULTANT will also coordinate a project kickoff meeting.
B. Model Development-CONSULTANT will develop a comprehensive stormwater
model by analyzing the existing and future hydrologic units,percent impervious,
overland flow data, stage-storage relationships, and other land use modifications
proposed in the conceptual site plan as provided by the CITY. This task will
include the following:
■ Model development utilizing Streamline Technologies Advanced
Interconnected Charmel and Pond Routing (1CPR) model version 3.02 for both
existing and proposed conditions with a maximtun of 10 sub-basins and 20
nodes for each simulation.
cm WA-9
Ph6653\7/5/06
CONSULTANT will identify up to two (2) conceptual alternatives to the
existing stormwater system to bring the Primary Stormwater Management
System (PSMS) at the WTP site into compliance with applicable Regulatory
agencies.
C. Alternative Evaluations-CONSULTANT will evaluate up to two alternatives for
the proposed future land use condition with the stormwater model including
water quantity and water quality components to meet Broward County criteria for
stormwater management to the extent practicable. CONSULTANT will simulate
the 10-year/24-hour, 25-year/72-hour, and 100-year/72-hour design storms. The
resulting flood stages,eater quality treatment, and peak floes will be summarized
in tabular format. The CITY shall provide critical elevation data,as-builts,and
conceptual plans of proposed site improvements as requested by CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT will meet with the CITY to discuss the evaluation of the first
Alternative prior to proceeding with a mutually-agreeable second Alternative, if
available.
Task 2.2 -Phase H—Conceptual ERP Support
A. Preparation of the Conceptual Stormwater Permit Applications - CONSULTANT
shall prepare a conceptual Environmental Resource Permit(ERP) application as
well as a conceptual Broward County Surface Water Management License
application for the WTP site. These permit applications will be developed
according to the Conceptual Site Master Plan being prepared by CONSULTANT in
conjunction with CGA under the new future land use concept.
CONSULTANT will submit to Broward County both the Broward Coimty Surface
Water Management License application and a Conceptual ERP application.
Sections of the permit submittal not related to the stormwater work shall be
provided by the CITY for inclusion in the application. This information shall be
provided to CONSULTANT in digital format to incorporate into the applications
for submittal to Broward Coimty as required. CONSULTANT will provide three
draft and three final copies of the stormwater applications to the CITY.
CONSULTANT will respond to one (1) Request For Additional Information(RAI)
from Regulatory agencies associated with each of the aforementioned permits.
B. Meetings-CONSULTANT will participate in up to 3 meetings during the duration
of the project in addition to one pre-application meeting with Broward County
Environmental Protection Department for a total of four meetings,including the
project kickoff meeting.
cm WA-10
Ph6653\7/5/06
Task 3.0 Conceptual Site Buildout Master Plan
Task 3.1 -Kickoff Meeting
CONSULTANT will participate in a kickoff meeting with the CITY to discuss the
scope of the task, collect existing information and discuss coordination with CGA.
Task 3.2 -Drawing Review and Site Walkthrough
CONSULTANT will review existing drawings and other documentation and conduct
a walkdown of all structures in the North plant area. This walkdown will also serve as
an as-built to verify the existing drawings are correct.
Task 3.3 -Interview with CITY Personnel
CONSULTANT will meet with the appropriate CITY personnel to discuss their future
plans for the site. Included in the discussion will be the existing water plant, future
nanofiltration plant, and all other structures to be included in the plan.
Task 3.4 -Interview and Coordination with South Site Planners (Calvin Giordano)
CONSULTANT will meet with the Calvin Giordano and the CITY, to discuss their
conceptual plan for the south site and possible interfaces between the two plans.
Task 3.5 -Draft Site Plan Drawing(s) and Technical Memorandum
Site drawing(s) and a technical memorandum briefly discussing the plans for the north
side of the plant site, and a schedule discussing the proposed implementation date of
applicable projects will be provided for CITY review and discussion.
Task 3.6-Finial Deliverable
Any comments on the draft deliverables will be incorporated and the Buildout Site
Master Plan will be finalized and delivered within 10 days of receipt of comments.
IV. Assumptions
1. Shipping of CDM's pilot unit to the Dania VVTP site is not being invoiced because
the plant is now local. Return of the unit to California when testing is complete has
been included in the estimate.
?. Testing at recoveries greater than 90%,if considered feasible in the desktop
studies,will be presented in a future proposal.
3. The CITY shall provide survey data for existing conditions as directed by
CONSULTANT (topographic information, finished floor elevations,roadway
crowns,land surface elevations, and other critical elevation data),and supply
cm WA-11
P h6653\7/5/06
existing geotechnical data. The CITY shall also provide all applicable information
compiled in the development of the conceptual site improvement plan, and
perform coordination of disciplines between this project and the other consultants.
The CITY shall provide all permit fees associated with this project. The CITY shall
respond to any regulatory Requests for Additional Information (RAI) comments
beyond the immediate scope of this project.
4. The CITY will be responsible for the timely review and execution of permit
documents.
5. CGA will provide timely information needed to complete the site drainage study
and the Conceptual Master Plan.
V. Deliverables
Task 1-Nanofiltration and Concentrate Disposal Studies
• Training materials for CITY Operators
® Summary of Literature and Background Search (by FAU)
■ Preliminary Nanofiltration Test Report (following completion of the initial testing)
■ Monthly Progress Reports
■ Pilot Test Report
■ Report on Development of Concentrate Disposal Methods (by FAU)
Task 2-Conceptual Stormwater Permitting
■ Three (3) draft copies of permit applications
■ Three (3) final copies of permit applications
Task 3-Conceptual Buildout Master Plan
■ Minutes of meetings with the CITY and CGA
■ Existing and future site plant drawings
■ Technical Memorandum detailing the Conceptual Plan including a schedule
VI. Schedule
The duration of the Nanofiltration Study will be six (6) months. The work will
commence upon notification to proceed by the Director of Public Services.
Transmittal of the Conceptual Site Permitting shall be completed within the estimated
time schedule below from issuance of the notice to proceed (NTP) for this phase of the
service order,assuming timely receipt of all required information pertaining to the
Conceptual Master Plan(s). Modifications to or delays in the development of the
conceptual land use plan or chosen alternative during the project shall extend the
completion date accordingly.
cm WA-12-
Ph6653\7/5/06
Time from NTP
Task 2.1A—Data Collection and Kickoff Meeting 30 days
Task 2.113—Stormwater Model Development 60 days
Task 2.1C—Alternative Evaluations 90 days
Task 2.2A—Permitting 120 days
Task 2.2B—Meetings as Required
The schedule for the issuance of permit approval by the Regulatory agencies is beyond
the control of the CONSULTANT and will depend on the timing of the agencies
involved. RAIs from Regulatory agencies will be addressed in a timely fashion to
expedite perinit approval.
The three tasks included in the Scope of Services are all closely interrelated. The
Conceptual Buildout Plan is based on the assumption of site improvements including
the possibility of a future nanofiltration water treatment system. The conceptual site
permitting and the degree of site development will dictate the amount of stormwater
controls required while the master plan needs to proactively locate stormwater
management facilities.
VII. Compensation and Invoicing
Compensation for services of CONSULTANT described in this Work Authorization will
be Lump Stun which includes labor,subconsultants, and other direct costs. The
CONSULTANT will submit monthly invoices based on percent complete.
Nanofiltration Studies (CDM and FAU): $89,010
Concentrate Testing (FAU): $55,787
Stormi,vater Permitting Services $42,201
Conceptual Buildout Plan-North Site $ 9,915
TOTAL BASE LUMP SUM COST $196,913
Optional: One month additional pilot testing at higher recovery $10,420
TOTAL WITH OPTIONAL SERVICES $207,333
VVA-13
Ph6653\7/5/06
IN WITNESS OF THE FOREGOING, the parties have executed this Work Authorization
effective on the date first appearing above.
APPROVED FOR FORM AND CITY OF DANIA BEACH
CORRECTNESS A Florida municipal corporation
ATTEST:
Ivan o TY Manager LouiseStitilson,n, TY Clerk
?
Thomas J. # s r &I vY A orney Patricia Flury, Mayor J [
Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence:
WITNESSES: CAMP DRESSER &McKEE INC.
v to By: �
. E. Lawrence Adams,Jr. .E.,DEE
Vice President
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF BROWARD
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on � 2006,by E.
Lawrence Adams,Jr., as Vice President of Camp Dresser &Acleee Inc.,a Massachusetts
corporation authorized to do business in Florida, on behalf of the corporation. He is
personally known to me or has produced as identification and did (did not) take an oath.
107
Not ry Public, State of Florida
(Signat-ure of Notary taking Acknowledgment)
Name of Notary Types,Printed or Stamped
My Commission Expires:
PHYLLIS M.
THpMq$
s Notary Pubk-Shft of Florida
sty COrr L lon Upi"May 10 M
CoI�#DO 408 t 90
8ondad by National Notary Assn,
CM WA-14
Ph6 6 5 317/5/0 6
N c co
In ^ O 5 Zo
F rf? �, to cfl yj tH ci-. to Esr to eH �»
ol
ra F F
^ O Ui O
v F
m m m
n n
t-rto N If] G In O N
r. Vr " --
C f'21
to di EA E9 Cf� � cF � Efi
C
_ f
F N O O m h aG O rr, K
Otc !h G O
v�
EA KJ H'-r iA ER kA EA 'A
t"
CL
vj
U
V
Ifn O
7 cD
OO In I1`, N O
1, N
url M
,'• �L � Ki K3 b., E ER fl EA EA Ki 'A
G
� L
o O v if O G tli O IC G
L M EH M, ffl K; h kA 9
Efl � EA
C to
v.
_ O Lrl _
cD
lo
� r
kA x
O
U G G c �r
v � C
R
ti- c
C
v ti
v to
tz
ti v X cJ O f'-' IO C
Tl
rc
i
c
x CD
^ lz
to '4 EA to ffr
E
JOl
C
O C
frl
Efi � Efi
_ � O
U
� L
,r 7
v G O O G O
O
:J
cn L
� KS txr ESi
G 7 N pp x o0 N o0
cH L
GO u O O cD O O O
L lo O N O .N.
M IG M
V L Efi fi3 fNP. EA Efl 'A
`+ O c
to �
G O O O
G o O^ O tOr, n
c �
N — oc) h' `S do
'D O O N N
t _
iJ M iA Ef. C^.
tF ER
V 3^i
L
it
v y
3 G
Ln
u
r1cl
f$ N fJ ry N N N
\ \ §
a \ e e = z 7 w
tZ
\ \ 3 ® Q ®
\ \ \ ® a
Cl
y \ _ cd
\ \ 3 ® $ = Q >
cc ° ° �
. / .
_ � \ \
�
-
\
•- % } _ 3
ƒ '2 \
\
\ -
j \ _ � -
G � r
Transmittal
cm
6365 NW 6th Way, Suite 320
Ft.Lauderdale, FI 33309
(954) 776- 1731
(954) 928- 1649
To: Mr.Tom Ansbro From: Jillian Carty
Organization/ City Attorney
Address: Date: July 5, 2006
City of Dania Beach
100 West Dania Beach Blvd.
Dania Beach, FI 33004
Re: Membrane Pilot Study and Site Masterplan Agreement
Job#:
• via: Mail: Overnight. Courier.- X
Enclosed please find:
For your information Approved
For your review X Approved as noted
For your signature Returned to you for correction
Message:
Tom,
Per Miriam's request enclosed are two(2) copies of our Agreement with the City for the Membrane Pilot Study and Plant
Improvements project. Please review and if there are no changes please forward to Miriam for the necessary signatures.
Sincerely,
i
Jillian Carty
h ;
Sig ed