Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-2002-189
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA APPROVING THE WATER, WASTEWATER AND STORMWATER FACILITIES PLAN; PROVIDING FOR AN ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING TO BE CONDUCTED ON SAID FACILITIES PLAN; FURTHER, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Dania Beach Public Works and Utilities Department has pursued an update to its utility systems and has developed a Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Plan as a way to help facilitate long-term decision-making on the water, sewer and stormwater systems as discussed previously with the City Commission; and WHEREAS, planning is a function which all enterprises . should participate in to anticipate needs, clarify organizational goals and provide direction to pursue; and WHEREAS, this need is particularly important with water and . wastewater utility systems, as many necessary improvements and changes in direction take many years to implement and complete; and WHEREAS, an adopted Facilities Plan is needed to enter the State Clearinghouse review procedure or to pursue State Revolving Fund loan monies for water, wastewater and stormwater projects; and WHEREAS, the proposed Facilities Plan has been created in contemplation of dealing with the expected improvements that may be required over the next 10 years on the water, wastewater and stormwater systems, including plant, pipeline and infiltration improvements; and WHEREAS, the Public Works and Utilities Director recommends that the City Commission approve the Facilities plan after the public hearing is conducted on October 22, 2002 as advertised and public input has been obtained. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA: Section 1: That the Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Plan, in substantial form as Exhibit "A", is approved. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-189 Section 2. That the City Manager and City Attorney are authorized to make minor revisions to the Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Plan as are deemed necessary and proper for the best interests of the City. Section 3. That this resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of October, 2002. IMAYROBRT H. CHUNN, JR. R ATT ST: ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONER BERTINO - YES �- COMMISSIONER MCELYEA -�r � C RAIR LENE JOH N§p N COMMISSIONER MIKES - YES • CITY CLERK VICE-MAYOR FLURY - YES MAYOR CHUNN - YES APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY For use and reliance of the City of Dania Beach, orida. THOM S J. AN `BRO CITY ATT RNEY 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-189 I AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY OF DANIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM NO. 1. DATE OF COMMISSION MEETING: 10/22/02 2. DESCRIPTION OF AGENDA ITEM: RESOLUTION & PUBLIC HEARING 3. COMMISSION ACTION BEING REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution or Ordinance X Expenditure ❑ Award Bid/RFP ❑ Presentation X General approval of item ❑ Continued from meeting ❑ Other(please explain) 0 4. SUMMARY EXPLANATION & BACKGROUND: Workshop with City Commission held in early July. Approval of consultant's work order in August. See attached memo for details. 5. ATTACHED EXHIBITS AND ADDITIONAL BACKUP MATERIALS (PLEASE LIST): Power point presentation Draft Facilities Plan (without appendices) 6. FOR PURCHASING REQUESTS ONLY: Dept: Amount: $ Fund: GENERAL: ❑ WATER: X SEWER: X STORMWATER: X Account name: Account#: Finance Director Approval: Date: 7. REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR ADDITION ON AGENDA: Submitted by: Michael J. Sheridan Date 10/10/02 SAME Department Director Date City Manager Date CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM • DATE: October 10, 2002 TO: Ivan Pato City Manager FROM: Michael J. Sheridan, P.E. Public Works and Utilities Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Plan ISSUE: The Public Works and Utilities Director requests that the City Commission conduct a public hearing the City's proposed draft Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Plan, and approve same after hearing any comments. This item has been advertised as a public hearing for October 22, 2002. EXPLANATION: The proposed draft Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Plan has been prepared to update the planning status for the City of Dania Beach's utility systems based on recent planning for major improvements, and to support the City's efforts to obtain SRF loans. The plan is the first such plan in the City's history. The City's immediate focus is on the improvements to the water treatment plant, water line looping and storage as per the Broward County Public Health Unit's directive from 2000. To support this plan, this document covers the current status of the utility, the water plant, distribution system, sewer collection system, stormwater needs and ancillary programs. The current capital plan, and the needs for the next 10 years are summarized in this document. The City desires to obtain SRF loans from the State of Florida to finance the planned utility improvements. To this end, the City's consultant has met with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection 's Water Facilities Funding staff in Tallahassee to clarify the most recent requirements for the facilities plan and obtaining funds. This document has been prepared to meet those requirements and supplement the City's requests for funding. FDEP staff advised that funding for FY 2004 is available. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Works and Utilities Director recommends that the City Commission approve the proposed, draft Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Plan after due public hearing. Ff� t SUN- SENTINEL PUBLISHED DAILY FORT LAUDERDALE, BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA BOCA RATON, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA MIAMI, MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF BROWARD/PALM BEACH/MIAMI DADE BEFO E THE UNDE SIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED HeaalNa Nortcle ~ CITY OF DANIA BEACH WHO, ON OATH,SAYS THAT 'WATER, wA FACER 'AND STORMWATER ER ACIL- E/SHE IS A DOXY AUTH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CLASSIFIED (TIES PLAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that..the DEPARTMENT OF THE SUN-SENTINEL, DAILY NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED City commission of the IN BROWARD/PALM BEACH/MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THAT THE city of Dania Beach;F� ri- da, on October 22;200202; ATTACHED COPY OF ADVERTISEMENT, BEING A: at 7:001 p.m., or soon (thereafter as the matter may be heard, will corl- WASTEWATER AND STORMWATER FACILITIES duct a public hearing.in the City Commisswn Chambers at City Hall;100 west Dania THE MATTER OF: vd, Dna Beach re- garding the city's water, Wastewater and Storm- Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities water Facilities Plan.It is anticipated that the City will seek loans from the, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT,WAS PUBLISHED IN SAID NEWSPAPER IN THE State n Florida's redoN- ing loan fund for a variety, ISSUES OF: of projects over the next s years.information will be given on the proposed; 09/22,1D 11088005 projects and •funding. sources.A copy of the Fa-. cilities Plan amendment is available in the .City! AFFIANT FURTHER SAYS THAT THE SAID SUN-SENTINEL IS A NEWSPAPER clerk's Office at City HalW.Danial,; PUBLISHED IN SAID BROWARD/PALM BEACH/MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DaOnia Beach,e FLh3300Blvd41 AND THAT THE SAID NEWSPAPER HAS HERETOFORE BEEN CONTINUOUSLY and may inspected du ing norr mal business PUBLISHED IN SAID BROWARD/PALM BEACH/MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, hours. Notice is given to all interested parties that EACH DAY,AND HAS BEEN ENTERED AS SECOND CLASS MATTER AT THE !if any person should de-� POST OFFICE IN FORT LAUDERDALE, IN SAID BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, side Sion to m appeal any deli-f made at the regular FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR NEXT PRECEDING THE FIRST PUBLICATION OF city commission meeting! such person will need.a! ATTACHED COPY OF ADVERTISEMENT;AND AFFIANT FURTHER SAYS THAT record of the proceedings: HE/SHE HAS NEITHER PAID, NOR PROMISED,ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR conducted at such regular meeting and for such pur- CORPORATION,ANY DISCOUNT, REBATE, COMMISSION, OR REFUND, FOR THE pose he or she may need to ensure that verbatim PURPOSE OF SECURING THIS ADVERTISEMENT FOR PUBLICATION IN SAID record of the proceedings NEWSPAPER. is made,which record in- cludes testimony and evi- dence upon which the ap- peal is to be based.In ac- cordance with the Ameri- (SIGNATURE AFFIANT cans with Disabilities Act, ) persons needing assis- tance to participate in SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME shouldgcontactoChadrlene: ON: 22-September-2002 , A.D. west Dania s achkBlvdDania Beach, FI 33004 01 V (954)924-3622,at least 481 hours prior to the meeting, mentioned above. Charlene JOhnson,CMC (SI(SNATURE OF NOTARY PUBLIC) city Clerk 1 (September 22,2002 ;`•'•PY':� Tara L Bezak *? * MY COMMISSION# DD024939 EXPIRES July 20,2005 BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE,INC „11 (NAME OF NOTARY,TYPED, PRINTED,•OR STAMPED) PERSONALLY KNOWN v OR PRODUCED IDENTIFICATION Dania Beach Water, Sewer and Stormwater Utility Strategic Facilities Plan Public Hearing Ivan Pato, City Manager Michael J. Sheridan; P.E. Director of Public Works & Utilities From Prior Discussion in July and August Planning is Needed to: Identify resources of the utilities Identify resource needs or deficiencies Identify solutions to problems — often capital projects Identify Policy Needs • Set Direction • Secure Funding 1 Summary of Service Area • Eastern 3 sq miles provided water and sewer by the City. Annexed area water and sewer by Broward County • Over 4600 water and sewer customers • 100% of eastern area has water and sewer • Nearly 6 sq. miles served with stormwater utility Service Area I I c�� --h I 1 I 2 Current System - Water • 3 MGD lime softening water treatment plant built in 1953, two wells • Raw water purchase from Broward County is poorer than City's • Interconnects with Hollywood, Broward County, Ft. Lauderdale • Problems: Water quality in the future, raw water supply degradation (County supply), age of plant, regulations Is CRY Damb ern a°""ftyMIP WTP 3 Rave Water Quality Issues )50 )00 ®DAN 250 BPP 7 tto i v too 50 d[ y9 AB.Ukky T-W C I i= M,gm,i�m Phrridr k.. C.Lr Udtr CM-id.. Bndn.� 13rdn.. Pmvrtrr Water Use 1999®Date ).50 MDP ).00 2.50 8 2.00 ADA t.5o 1.00 0.50 0.00 �� r '�fi d2`v � �r• 4#3 �fi �M r fir• �) ,fi' ~' , •;� D.te 4 • • v�. r.; ..................... ........ '>:r •- • r, r »Sce f ...: .f... i 9/ w t"ems 4e ,•�>ya Ap _ da- sm s tF '�.:&�v*'-��.n���n'�c•3,y'. .. �:.r 1'��^.�'"#F; � `z=+����, e •��� ��`t�gR � F� �^,''<.,•�g'� Finished Water 120 1180 I� .1 I� K 1 I 6 20 x fb 4 d Water Trotment Plant • Finished Water Quality - Color 25 m 15 ti 10 0 U 5 0 o Z w U > Wrier Tratmonr PIwA K\: r ry Fouling Concern 1.. XiJKf• h>o>!Ik wt { t• a�• �:; •.:�}•ivy j•��{:,.�is Y 6 • 5 Options • New or refurbished Lime plant • New membrane plant • Combination • Buy water from Hollywood • Do nothing Membrane Systems XI f wA�1 I Ji x • 7 • Cost Comparison ............. .............I.......... MGD MS+R0ha MGD WSJyfili': A w/repump ................................................................ .............................. .................Remove.......o-I.d-....W...T-P-...: ........... ................ .................................. ............... - ---- --------- s New Treatment Unit 3,500,600: ..........-............................... . ....... ....... ................................ Disposal ]":,$ 500,000 .............................................................................................................................................................. Remove old WTP ....... F:1..... ......�7 F............ 500,000: ff1pe Cost 50,000: $ 50,000: $ 750,000:: ....................................................................................... .................... ................................ 000 Bui4lin 10,g ' . I - ........ . ........ . ..... : ....... Added Power $ 250 000 250 000 'Refurbish Ex.WTP ............... ............................................................................. ......................................................... ............................... ........................................................... ..................... Repair Metal on Exisitng System250,000 .......... ........ .Replace aerators 100,000 ............................................................. .............................................................................................. .Replace Cat-walks on Existing Sptepj ..1001000 ... ........................p.............................. Refurbish Metal on Sludge System 666 $ ...............................J........................................................... *—Sub'Total--Constr.... **'........ $ 4,400,000 61400,000:: $ ......4,750,0001 .......... ................. ................................. .............................. .................. ............................. .............................. 2%) ' [.�A ............768,000� $ 570,000:: ................................. ............................................: :Contingency(10%) $ 440.000:$ 640.000, $ 475,000: .. .............*... .....*....... -... . ... ....................................................... ............ .......................................................................................... TOTAL.... ........... $ 5,368,000 7,808,000 .$.........5,795,000 .............................................. ....... ................. ...............I.................................. ............. ............... ..................................................... ... ... -----.............................................. • Discussion of Options • Do nothing and the lime treatment systems will not meet long term water quality standards — new parameters likely will not respond to lime softening • Hybrid system provides best of both options OLD STEEL TANK Heavy rust Functionally obsolete Storage Tanks • Existing tank in not salvagable and is too small — Recommend removal • Broward County Public Health Unit notified City in 2000 that a 2 million gallon tank was required for the system by 2003 — Options ground storage and pump station, or elevated storage • Recommend elevated storage - $1 .8 million at existing site 9 Current System - Water • Water distribution system contains 50 miles of pipe - generally cast iron, ductile iron or plastic • Condition seems pretty good - unaccounted for water is low • Small diameter pipe leak and need replacement • Problems: Fire flows, pressure limitations, small pipes and lack of storage limits commercial development on US 1 and Dania Beach Blvd. (i.e., building heights in CRA) Options • Do nothing • Replace old lines vs let them leak — present worth show cost to replace is lower than repairs in the long term • Solve looping problem — new lines or pumping. Pumping has much higher long term costs with electricity and maintenance than pipeline extensions 10 Replacements (see Map) ............................. .......... .................................................. ............................................: Pipeline From-To :'Amount:: nits nit Cost Cost ........................................................................................................................ .............................. ............... ............................ ............................................ $ :4th Street SW ::US 1 to 25 $ 35.625 ................................................. ................ ......................................................... SW ::US 1 to 4th Ave. SW 1500:�LF $ 25 $ 37,500 :: .............................................. ........ ....... Ave. SW 6th Street SW ::US 1 to40,000 ..............................:......... ...... . ........ .................... ....................... ............................ 7th Street SW :,US 1 to SW 1650 LF $ 41,250 . . .........I ........ ........... ................. .. .......................................... ::8th Street SW 2nd AV SW to 4th A 1100:LF 25 :: $ 27,500 ................................................... ................. :9th Street SW :3rd AV SW to 4th Avi 1000:LF $ 25 25,000 :: ::5th Street SE ::US 1 to 2nd Ave SE 560:::LF 25 $ 12,500 : ................ : $ 25 :: $ .6th Street S E US 1 to 2nd Ave. S E 500:LF .......... .... .....;......__:.. .............. ...... ....... ...... __�60:LF 25 $ ::8th Street SE ::US 1 to 2n8 A��. : t 12,500 : ............................................. ........................................................................................................ .............**............:.................................... ....... ... .$ 244,375 : 9775 ........................................................................................................................... ......................... ..........I................. ....................I................................................................................................. Engineering(15%)................ 36,656 ......................................................................... ....................... ............................. Continency(15%) 42,155 ....................................................... .......................... ........ .................... ......................... ...... ... ................... .......................... *........:TOTAL REPLACEMENT LINES $ 323,186 .......................................................................................................................................................... New Water Lines (See Mar%) F Amount Units:Unit Cost. Cost Apeline -To ............ .......-............................. ................ ............................................................. ................................i.��.......................................... ...Griffin Roa: 3200: $ 40 :$ 128,000 :16"C900 PVC-NW 4th Ave 1st St.SW to......................................................................................................... i Cqdo.PVC. ............... A\oeo Dixie Highway': 2800:LF 40 $ 112,000 ... ........ � 46 ....66 bc� : 2000: 1T C900 PVC Bryan Road Stirling o tige ail Blvd, 121 C900 PVC&J&B Dania Cut-off US 1 to 4th Ave.SW 800.LF LS $ 40,000 17'C900 PVC Dania Beach Blvd. 141:h Ave NW to 3rd Ave SE MOO I LF t 40 $ 80,000 :12'C960 PVC--Fed6rai Highway Ph 1 Old Grifin to Stirling Rd .........3.400:.L :$ 40 $.F................................136,000............... 12"C90..PVC-Federal Highway Ph 2 Rd to Sheridan St 5300,LF $ 40 212,000 ..........................................................................................................I................... ..... Hollywood Tie-in I.S.heridan Street ........................ ........I................................... Bryan .......... 80,000 C900 PVC-old Griffin Road 2000 LF $ .........................-.............. .......... .....................-.... : 21500: 918,000 ... ............ ......................__...... ............... ------ ....... ........ ............................ ......................................................................................I..................................... .................................. : .............I............ Engineering(15%) 137.700 ..........................................................................................................:...............I............. ............... ;Continency(15%) �$ 158,355 ............................................................ .............................................................. ........ ...................... ....... ........... ........''.. ..... TOTAL REPLACEMENT LINES $ 1,214,055 ................ ...... .............................. ....... .................-.......... ....................... 11 Sewer Collection System • Wastewater Treated by Hollywood via partnering agreement • Piping system is 40+ miles of submerged, clay pipe, gravity sewers which can leak as it- ages and 17 older lift stations • A lot has been done, but... ... • Problems: Infiltration/Inflow from service laterals (20-50%), telemetry/control of lift stations + 5 t 'GEAR Br► : �,�"c'"' +-+" Aws f 5 4PB • 12 Flows with Rainfall 10 9 8 20 --�—ADF(MGD) 7 i-MDF(MGD) p 6 —k—Ran in 15 f 5 e 4 10 3 2 5 1 Ran(in) 10,0 ,p le le Date Wastewater Flows 4.5 4 3.5 3 p 2.5 i 0 2 E 1.5 1 0.5 0 Jan-93 Jun•94 Oct-95 Mar-97 JUV98 Dx-99 Apr-01 Sep-02 Jan-04 Date 13 Confirmation of Infiltration aoo Sao BM aao Z s U laa laa a BC 1ml PPL PPM � �• WKL Va[! Recommendations • Restart Infiltration & inflow removal program — look like system is running 20%+ I/I • Telemeterize and rehabilitate lift stations to improve energy and operational efficiency and permit better monitoring of flows to improve 1/1 removal efforts - $750,000 14 Storm Water Program o Most flooding in southeastern area of City • Treatment a question • Discharge permits • Problems: Flooding in SE sector, discharge permits carer Daf .eech ftun&"ft 15 Solution Options • Pumping stations • Pipelines • Do nothing • Recommendation : The present worth of pipelines is less than the present worth of pumping due to operating costs of the pumps Stormwater Costs Item Amt................ UnitsCost ;Total ....................................................................................:.............:...........................:................................ PUmp Station $ 1 ea $ 125,000 $ 125,000 .........................................................:.......................................,............................ ............................ :Catch Basins $ 26 ea $ 2,000 $ 52,000 ..............................................................................................:...........................;................................. Tie-ins 3 ea $ 2,000 $ 6,000 ..............................................................:...................................................................................................: 18" Pipe $ 450 ?LF $ 70 $ 31,500 .......................................:......... ...... `24 Perforated Pipe $ 3,350 LF $ 85 $ 284 750 ::...............................................................;......................... >............:...................-..... Total Construction $ 499,250 ......................................................................................:.........................................................................: ..............................................................................................................................:................................: Engineering...................................'.......................... $ 74,888 ....................................... ............................: ;.Contingency $ 49,925 :.........................:.........................................,. ............................: ...............................................................;.........................--..........;......--............--.............................. ....; TOTAL Project $ 624,063 16 Strategies to Upgrade Operation and Efficiency of Utility Systems • Upgrade Infrastructure • Upgrade reliability of Wellfields • Improve reliability of piping systems • Improve data collection efforts • Improve information dissemination • Improve financial basis of all 3 utilities Strategy 1 - Capital Plan • Water System and Plant - $9.5 million • Sewer System - $1 .2 million • Storm Water System - $0.7 million 17 Strategy 2 - Rave Water Supply • Implement monitoring programs for water quality • Institute routine microbiological monitoring program • Institute historical data system • Improve remote security measures at wells Strategy 3 — Water Distribution • Remove 2 inc galvanized pipes • Complete looping of water lines • Model water system • Evaluate condition of pipe over 30 years old 18 Strategy 4 - Protect Water Quality • Provide monitoring capability at the water plant for security purposes • Enhance wellhead protection program and install monitoring wells • Pursue membrane treatment for plant expansion/reconstruction Strategy 5 - Sewer Collection System • Install telemetry and monitor pump run time and pumpage • Pursue program to encourage repairs to residential services • Institute dry season pipeline inspection program • Continue cleaning and lining program as an annual allocation in the operating budget 19 Strategy 6 — Public Outreach Efforts • Develop work order system to allow tracking and reporting of activities • Develop annual summary of water sales, water pumped, wastewater billed, lift station hours to improve knowledge of operations — some of this will require telemetry • Evaluate development of water conservation program • Consider PR efforts to customers — newletters, etc. • Strategy 7 - Finances • Insure new users pay their appropriate share of facilities • Improve financial stability of all three utility systems — all deficit spend • Adopt policy that utility systems will not rely on retained earnings as a revenue source • Review General Fund transfer amounts in light of fiscal condition of utility systems • Review policy to establish RRI contribution of at least $150,000 to rebuild system, including $50,000 for infiltration and inflow correction 20 Worst Case Rate Needs ..................................................................................................... I Year Water i Sewer ................................ ................ .............................................. .................2004 ..................................................... 10% 10% 10% 10%2005 .........................................................r-.............................. 2006 10% 10% ............................................................................................... 2007 1 6% 6% . ............................... .................................................................. 2008 3% 3% .. . ....... Comparative Rates Current Dania Beach Prop. 2008 Mo =CO SMOD moo U)M moo S 'OP UMV 21 Projected Membrane System Rates $70.00 "D.00 Y 3 E $W.00 'R sw.00 M.00 $20.00 d $10.00 ( RoposW DYno Dww' mw—.WYY1 C.W.City NiYhiY PUTP�+ 0 Nalh Miwni NdyYmd Booch(2008) UtilityA . Bosch UtRim in Omve Combuct d Mormb—FwAity Prior to 1907,BWY F.¢oYYd 2D034005 • Economy-of-Scale means small system have higher costs ' � t i 22 Recommendations • Approve Facilities Plan and Strategic planning goals with adopting resolution • Direct staff to pursue SRF funding option for capital programs — WTP and tank are top priority • Direct staff to pursue development of scoping documents and refining cost estimates for capital programs • Direct staff to further evaluate cost impacts to ratepayers • Direct staff to report ongoing results Questions? Public Comments 23 ITEM #9.1 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 22, 2002 DRAFT DRAFT WATER, WASTEWATER AND STORMVVATER FACILITIES PLAN 33,. Y % 1 CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA FY 2003 IMPROVEMENTS DEP project No. 0604010 (Drinking Water) Prepared by: Public Utility Management and Planning Services, Inc. P.O. Box 221890 Hollywood, FL 33022-1890 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 7 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Corporate Limits 77 1.2 Political Structure 7 1.3 Financial Basis of the City 8 1.4 Summary of the System 2.0 General Environment of Service Area 13 2.1 Topography and Soils 13 2.2 South Florida Climate/Ecosystem 13 2.3 Watershed/Surface Waters 14 2.4 Hydrogeological Considerations 14 2.5 Flora and Fauna 17 2.6 Wellhead Protection 18 22 3.0 Water System 3.1 Water Service Area 22 • 3.2 Water Treatment System 22 3.2.1 Raw Water Supply 22 3.2.2 Water Treatment Plant 24 3.2.3 Reclaimed Water System 27 3.2.4 Water Treatment Plant Laboratory 27 3.2.5 Regulatory Standing 27 3.3 Water Distribution System 28 3.4 Water Conservation Program 29 3.5 Current Water Agreements 29 3.5.1 Hollywood Water Agreement 29 3.5.2 Broward Raw Water Agreement 30 3.5.3 Ft. Lauderdale Water Agreement 31 3.6 Summary of the Water System 31 4.0 Wastewater and Stormwater Systems 62 4.1 Wastewater Service Area 62 4.2 Wastewater Treatment System 62 i 4.2.1 Wastewater Treatment 62 is 4.2.2 Pretreatment 64 4.2.3 Regulatory Standing 64 4.3 Wastewater Collections 65 4.4 Stormwater 68 85 5.0 Needs Assessment 5.1 Water System Improvements 85 5.1.1 Water Treatment Plant 85 5.1.1.1 Present Situation 85 5.1.1.2 Problems with Current Situation 86 5.1.1.3 Alternatives 86 5.1.1.3.1 Alternative 1 86 5.1.1.3.2 Alternative 2 87 5.1.1.3.3 Alternative 3 87 5.1.1.3.4 Alternative 4 88 5.1.1.3.5 Alternative 5 89 5.1.1.3.6 Alternative 6 90 5.1.1.4 Summary of Alternatives 90 5.1.1.5 Recommended Alternative 90 5.1.2 Takedown Elevated Tank 94 5.1.2.1 Present Situation 94 5.1.2.2 Problems with Current Situation 94 5.1.2.3 Alternatives 94 5.1.2.3.1 Alternative 1 95 5.1.2.3.2 Alternative 2 95 5.1.2.3.3 Alternative 3 95 5.1.2.4 Summary of Alternatives 96 5.1.2.5 Recommended Alternative 96 5.1.3 New Storage 96 5.1.3.1 Present Situation 96 5.1.3.2 Problems with Current Situation 96 5.1.3.3 Alternatives 96 ii 5.1.3.3.1 Alternative 1 96 5.1.3.3.2 Alternative 2 97 5.1.3.3.3 Alternative 3 97 5.1.3.4 Summary of Alternatives 9798 5.1.3.5 Recommended Alternative 5.1.4 Water Main Replacements 98 5.1.4.1 Present Situation 9898 5.1.4.2 Problems with Current Situation 98 5.1.4.3 Alternatives 5.1.4.3.1 Alternative 1 98 5.1.4.3.2 Alternative 2 99 5.1.4.3.3 Alternative 3 99 5.1.4.4 Summary of Alternatives 99 5.1.4.5 Recommended Alternative 99 5.1.5 Water Main Looping Upgrades 100 • 5.1.5.1 Present Situation 100 5.1.5.2 Problems with Current Situation 100 5.1.5.3 Alternatives 100 5.1.5.3.1 Alternative 1 100 5.1.5.3.2 Alternative 2 100 5.1.5.3.3 Alternative 3 101 5.1.5.4 Summary of Alternatives 101 5.1.5.5 Recommended Alternative 101 5.1.6 Chlorine System 108 5.1.6.1 Present Situation 108 5.1.6.2 Problems with Current Situation 108 5.1.6.3 Alternatives 108 5.1.6.3.1 Alternative 1 108 5.1.6.3.2 Alternative 2 108 5.1.6.3.3 Alternative 3 108 5.1.6.4 Summary of Alternatives 109 5.1.6.5 Recommended Alternative 109 iii 5.1.6 Recommended Project 109 5.2 Wastewater Improvements 110 5.2.1 Infiltration/inflow Reduction Program 110 5.2.2 Lift Station Rehabilitation and Telemetry Program 112 5.3 Stormwater Improvements 113 5.3.1 SE Stormwater District 113 5.3.1.1 Present Situation 113 5.3.1.2 Problems with Current Situation 113 5.3.1.3 Alternatives 113 5.3.1.3.1 Alternative 1 113 5.3.1.3.2 Alternative 2 113 5.3.1.3.3 Alternative 3 114 5.3.1.4 Summary of Alternatives 114 5.3.1.5 Recommended Alternative 114 V 5.3.2 Other Stormwater Projects 114 6 Environmental Assessment 120 6.1 Water System Improvements 120 6.1.1 Water Treatment Plant 121 6.1.2 Existing Elevated Tank 123 6.1.3 New Storage Tank 125 6.1.4 Water Main Replacements 127 6.1.5 Water Main Looping 1 6.1.6 Chlorine System 132 6.2 Wastewater Improvements 134 6.2.1 Infiltration/inflow Reduction Program 134 6.2.2 Lift Station Rehabilitation and Telemetry Program 136 6.3 Stormwater Improvements 138 141 7.0 Finances ® 8.0 Public Participation 161 iv 9.0 Recommendations and Action Steps 162 9.1 Recommendations—Capital Plan 162163 9.2 Strategies and Action Steps Appendices A—Bulk Water Agreement—Hollywood B —Bulk Raw Water Agreement—Broward County C—Water Use Permit D—Large User Sewer Agreement E—Emergency Interconnect Agreement—City of Ft. Lauderdale F—Public Participation Information G—Rate Ordinances H- SRF Rules-Water I— SRF Program Summary J—Infiltration and Inflow Data K—Consumer Confidence Report - 2001 L—Broward County 3A Water User Permit (Brian Piccolo Wells) M- SRF Rules—Wastewater/Stormwater N—Comparative Water Quality for S. Broward Utilities O—Comparative Raw Wastewater Quality— SCRWWTP Large Users P- Sanitary Survey Report Q—Partial List of Potential Sources of Contamination Found in Wellhead Protection Areas and in Watersheds R—FDOT Project S - 5 Basin Stormwater Master Plan T—FDEP Water Business Plan U—Health Department Letter v ® LIST OF TABLES 3.1 Raw Water Quality Parameters-Dania Beach and Regional County Wells 33 34 3.2 Bacteria Identified in Local Aquifers 35 3.3 Water Use Records 36 3.4 Demand Forecast 37 3.5 Water Quality Analysis 38 3.6 Inventory of Water Distribution Pipelines 39 3.7 Listing of remaining 2 inch pipelines 4.1 Regional Wastewater System Components/Populations 6266 4.2 Inventory of Sewer Collection System 69 4.3 Wastewater Flows 5.1 Comparison of Capital Costs-Water Treatment Plant 9192 5.2 Life Cycle Cost of Treatment Options 93 5.3 Present Worth Analysis-Water Plant 5.4 Recommended Water Plant Option 94 194 5.5 Water Main Replacement Program 103 02 5.6 Present Worth Analysis of Water Line Replacement Program 5.7 Present Worth Analysis Assumptions for Water Line Replacement 104 Program 105 ® 5.8 Budget Without Replacement 106 5.9 Budget With Replacement 107 5.10 New Water Main Costs 5.11 Present Worth Analysis of Water Line Looping Vs. Pumping Program 110 5.12 Recommended Water Program 110 5.13 EPA Infiltration Allowance 111 5.14 SESS Procedures and Associated Costs 115 5.15 Recommended Stormwater Improvements 7.1 Projected Budget for the Water Treatment Plant Through 2008 148 14 7.2 Projected Budget for Water Distribution Through 2008 150 7.3 Projected Budget for Water Accounting Through 2008 7.4 Projected Budget for Sewer Collections Through 2008 151 15 7.5 Projected Budget for Sewer Accounting Through 2008 7.6 Summary of Projected Budget for all Water and Sewer Operations 153 Through 2008 154 7.7 Projected Revenues for Water and Sewer Through 2008 7.8 Summary of Required Increases For Water and Sewer System 155 15 7.9 Impacts to User Classes 157 7.10 Comparison to Other Utilities 7.11 Projected Budget for Stormwater Through 2008 Assuming the Fee 160 Remains the Same ® 9.1 Recommended Capital Improvement Plan 167 vi LIST OF FIGURES 10 1.1 Corporate Limits Map 11 1.2 Organization Chart for the City 1.3 Organization Chart for the Public Works/Public Utilities Department 12 19 2.1 Location of Dania Beach 19 2.2 Evapotranspiration vs. Rainfall Curve 20 2.3 Hydrogeologic Conditions 21 2.4 Wellfield Protection Zones 3.1 Water and Sewer Service Area 4041 3.2 Well Locations 42 3.3 Well Diagram 3.4 Comparison of Dania Beach Raw Water Quality and County Raw Water 43 Supply 44 3.5 Water Plant Location 45 3.6 Aerators 45 3.7 Acceletors 46 3.8 Acceletor with calcium build-up 46 3.9 Lime Silo 47 3.10 Lime Slaker 47 3.11 Lime pumps 48 3.12 Gravity Filters 48 3.13 Sludge Pond 49 3.14 High Service Pumps 49 3.15 Chlorine system 50 3.16 Chemical Mixing system 50 3.17 FPL Transformers 51 3.18 Water Use Records 52 3.19 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Sodium 53 3.20 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Chlorides 54 3.21 Comparison of Water Quality Results for TDS 55 3.22 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Sulfates 56 3.23 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Color 57 3.24 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Trihalomethanes 58 3.25 Comparison of Water Quality Results for pH 59 3.26 Pipe Gallery 59 3.27 Laboratory 60 3.28 Elevated Tank 61 3.29 Elevated Tank Damage 4.1 Wastewater System Flows (with Rainfall) 1999-date 7071 • 4.2 Wastewater System Flows 1994-date 72 4.3 Wastewater Flows by Month and Fiscal Year vii • LIST OF FIGURES 10 1.1 Corporate Limits Map 11 1.2 Organization Chart for the City 1.3 Organization Chart for the Public Works/Public Utilities Department 12 2.1 Location of Dania Beach 1919 2.2 Evapotranspiration vs. Rainfall Curve 20 2.3 Hydrogeologic Conditions 21 2.4 Wellfield Protection Zones 3.1 Water and Sewer Service Area 4041 3.2 Well Locations 42 3.3 Well Diagram 3.4 Comparison of Dania Beach Raw Water Quality and County Raw Water 43 Supply 44 3.5 Water Plant Location 45 3.6 Aerators 45 3.7 Acceletors 46 3.8 Acceletor with calcium build-up 46 3.9 Lime Silo 47 3.10 Lime Slaker 47 3.11 Lime pumps 48 3.12 Gravity Filters 48 3.13 Sludge Pond 49 3.14 High Service Pumps 49 3.15 Chlorine system 50 3.16 Chemical Mixing system 50 3.17 FPL Transformers 51 3.18 Water Use Records 52 3.19 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Sodium 53 3.20 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Chlorides 54 3.21 Comparison of Water Quality Results for TDS 55 3.22 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Sulfates 56 3.23 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Color 57 3.24 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Trihalomethanes 58 3.25 Comparison of Water Quality Results for pH 59 3.26 Pipe Gallery 59 3.27 Laboratory 60 3.28 Elevated Tank 61 3.29 Elevated Tank Damage 4.1 Wastewater System Flows (with Rainfall) 1999-date 7071 • 4.2 Wastewater System Flows 1994-date 72 4.3 Wastewater Flows by Month and Fiscal Year vii • 4.4 Comparisons of BOD in Wastewater 7374 4.5 Comparisons of CBOD in Wastewater 4.6 Comparisons of TDS in Wastewater 75 7 4.7 Comparisons of Chlorides in Wastewater 77 4.8 Comparisons of Oil and Grease in Wastewater 78 4.9 Comparisons of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Wastewater 79 4.10 Comparisons of Total Phenols in Wastewater 80 4.11 Comparisons of Copper in Wastewater 81 4.12 Comparisons of TKN in Wastewater 82 4.13 Comparisons of Total Phosphorous in Wastewater 83 4.14 Comparisons of Chloroform in Wastewater 84 4.15 Stormwater Problem Areas 5.1 Recommended Membrane System Improvements 116 5.2 Water Lines to be Replaced 117 5.3 New Water Main Upgrades 118 5.4 Recommended Stormwater Improvements 119 6.1 Flood Plain Map 141 • • viii • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Dania Beach is located on the coast of southeastern Broward County. The City has recently annexed several large areas and doubled its area to nearly 6 square miles, and increased its population to nearly 30,000 people, from 13,700 persons in 1995. The community is primarily residential. With small concentrations of light industry, shopping, offices and some beachfront property exist within the corporate limits. A small industrial sector was added in the most recent annexation, but none of the industries would be considered "intensive." Much of the annexed area is served with water and sewer by Broward County. The City of Dania Beach was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida in 1904. It is the oldest incorporated City in Broward County. The Chief Administrative Officer of the City Government is the City Manager who is appointed by the City Commission. The Utilities and Public Works Department is one of six major departments within the City. The Utilities and Public Works Department operates the water and wastewater utility systems within the City. The initial water system has grown to where over 6000 connections exist within the City limits. The wastewater system has been served with central sewer since the 1940s, with treatment by the City of Hollywood at their current 42 MGD facility. The City of Dania Beach currently owns and operates two wells and one water treatment • plant. The current treatment facility provides water that meets all current drinking water standards. The current wells supply adequate water supply, but the South Florida Water Management District indicates that saltwater intrusion affects these wells and may cause them to become unusable in the near future. The City has an agreement with the County for raw water supplies,but the current treatment plan cannot adequately treat this water. The City also owns and operates a water distribution system and sewer collection system. There are some pressure deficiencies in the current water distribution piping system and some old lines that need replacement. Infiltration and inflow are ongoing issues on the sewer system. Infiltration and inflow are important because the City of Dania Beach is one of six surrounding municipalities send their wastewater to the City of Hollywood under a Large User partnership agreement that originated in the 1970's, and most recently updated in 1991 and 1997. The other municipalities are: • Pembroke Pines • Broward County • Miramar • Pembroke Park • Hallandale Beach These neighboring communities account for nearly 60% of the wastewater flows to the plant. Therefore increases in flow causes the cost to increase for the City. The City of 1 Dania Beach has recently annexed an unsewered area, but Broward County is in the process • of installing sewers (the customers will be County customers). This document has been prepared to initiate the planning status for the City of Dania Beach's water and sewer system based on recent planning for major improvements, and to support the City's efforts to obtain SRF loans and grants for the period 2002 to 2012. The City's immediate focus is on identifying water treatment needs, stormwater improvements and pipeline upgrades. The following summarize the major improvements contemplated: • Water Treatment Plant Upgrade: The current water treatment plant is 50 years old. While it adequately treats the City's current water supply, increased water from the County source is not treatable to meet drinking water standards. Therefore a 2 MGD nanofiltration water treatment plant is proposed to meet long terms needs of the City. © Storage is required per the Broward County Public Health Unit. Ten States Standards recommends that storage equals average daily flows. The City currently has only 380,000 gallons of storage on site and none in the distribution system. A 1.6 to 2.0 million gallon elevated storage tank is proposed to meet this need. o Gas chlorine is currently used on the site. The system is over 20 years old and given security and risk issues, the City desires to move to an on-site generator ® system. ® The existing water storage tank on Stirling Road is over 50 years old and has been unused since 1974. The tank has never been maintained and poses and potential nuisance to the City. Evaluation of the tank indicates repair is not possible at this point. The City proposes to remove this tank. The new tank would likely be built on the same site. o Water lines in several areas of the City need looping for pressure improvements and to replace small, galvanized pipelines that leak excessively. The City would reduce operating costs and improve system integrity with these improvements. ® The City proposes to install telemetry and to upgrade the 17 sewer lift stations. Currently the pumping stations are monitored through visits three days per week. Records of flows and pump activity cannot be monitored from any central point. The lift stations are over 20 years old so combining upgrades and telemetry improvements will improve system integrity and permit the City to identify areas where excessive infiltration and inflow may be occurring. o The City proposes to install stormwater piping on SE 2nd Avenue, SE 3Td Avenue and SE 4` Avenue to address flowing problems in the vicinity of SE 11`"Terrace. A pumping station is needed to improve flows in the interceptor that these piping systems will be tied into. Borrowing of funds for these projects can be accomplished at 3.11 percent interest from the Stare Revolving Fund loan program. The State of Florida's SRF program provides ® low interest loan monies to finance the cost of construction of publicly owned water, wastewater and stormwater facilities. Authority for the program is found in Rule Chapter 2 62-503 and 62-504 of the Florida Administrative Code. The Florida Department of • Environmental Protection (FDEP) is charged with implementing the program: Generally any local government entity, which has jurisdiction over the collection, transmission, treatment, storage or disposal of wastewater, is eligible to apply for SRF loans. The projects for wastewater must be associated with domestic wastewater on the public system, including treatment plants, collection systems, transmission lines, storage, disposal alternatives (or changes thereto), reclaimed water use or similar projects. The same applies for water and stormwater. As a part of the planning process, to continue to provide its customers with safe water supplies, sewer and stormwater service at an affordable price, the City has developed the following series of strategies and actions steps that the City should pursue in an effort to continue to improve its system aside from the capital program. Strategy: Improve Infrastructure Action Steps: 1. Pursue upgrades to water treatment system including membrane upgrade and rehabilitation of existing system 2. Pursue upgrades to chlorine system to convert from a gas system to on-site generation 3. Build 1.6 to 2 million gallon storage system in conjunction with water • plant upgrade 4. Rehabilitate and telemeterize lift stations to improve record-keeping and operations 5. Continue infiltration and inflow program, perhaps more aggressively 6. Continue replacement of 2 inch galvanized water mains with 6 inch and larger C900 PVC water mains 7. Pursue looping program to improve/correct pressure deficiencies in the water distribution system 8. Pursue piping and pump station improvements to address SE Dania Beach drainage issues 9. Pursue State Revolving Fund loan monies for major capital improvements 10. Adjust water, sewer and stormwater rates to meet capital needs Strategy: Improve Reliability of Raw Water Supply Action Steps: 1. Evaluate implementation of wellfield disinfection program on a routine basis 2. Develop record-keeping to monitor long term changes in raw water quality including record-keeping to monitor long-term bacteriological growth 3. Ensure that Brian Piccolo water meets minimum bacteriological, silt and sand parameters as set by City's design professional 3 4. Implement routine wellfield microbial sampling program 5. Provide monitoring capability to wells for security purposes Strategy: Improve reliability of Water Distribution System Action Steps: 1. Continue program to eliminate 2 inch galvanized water lines and their services 2. Initiate program to replace all cast iron lines over 30 years old along the beach and the east side of the service area • Perform analysis of the condition of these pipes • Prioritize the pipe replacement program • Coordinate efforts with repaving efforts of the City • Coordinate efforts with reclaimed water program and stormwater program in the event these pipeline can be used temporarily to accomplish goals of those programs 3. Develop a computer model of the water distribution system 4. Improve the mapping of the water distribution system Strategy: Protect Water Quality Action Steps: 1. Enhance wellhead protection program and install monitoring wells 2. Conduct routine microbial analyses of the distribution system 3. Pursue membrane treatment for plant expansion/reconstruction 4. Provide monitoring capability at the water plant for security purposes Strategy: Improve Collection System Reliability Action Steps: 1. Install telemetry and monitor pump run time and pumpage 2. Pursue program to encourage repairs to residential services 3. Monitor infiltration after rainstorms and during the dry season through pipeline inspection program 4. Read Hollywood meter daily and record readings — note any unusual readings — consider telemeterizing, perhaps as a joint project with Hollywood 5. Continue cleaning and lining program as an annual allocation in the operating budget 4 Strategy: Improve Stormwater System Reliability Action Steps: 1. Complete FDOT coordinated connections for US 1 drainage in SE basin 2. Install 2nd Ave SE and 3`d Ave SE connectors to 71h St. SE 3. Get aerial photographs after storm event of critical areas to monitor progress and improvement 4. Investigate location for additional pump station on 5ch Ave SE 5. Institute public relations effort to insure grate and catch basins are clear 6. Review current discharges in light of County NPDES permit requirements for compliance Strategy: Improve Data Collection and Dissemination Efforts Action Steps: 1. Revise the current work order system'to include not only the work order, but a database to track what work was accomplished, man-hours, where the work occurred, issues noted (condition of pipe), etc. so that trends can be developed. This is the long-term benefit of work order systems. 2. Develop an annual report of work order efforts, to include types of work, man-hours by function and equipment so that future budget consideration can be made 3. Develop an annual summary of needs identified from work order system 4. Develop annual summary of water sales, water pumped, wastewater billed, lift station hours to improve knowledge of operations — some of this will require telemetry Strategy: Establish Water Conservation Program Action Steps: 1. Initiate Drop-Saver program in schools 2. Establish routine public relations program for residents and homeowners groups 3. Establish department newsletter 4. Pursue low flow plumbing fixtures with the Building Department 5. Evaluate co-sponsorship of program with adjacent entities Strategy: Increase Public Interaction to Inform Public About Utility Action Steps: 1. Complete summary of programs and descriptions 5 ® 2. Implement periodic newsletter 3. Implement Periodic Construction Update on web-site 4. Instate Annual Report on Activities 5. Continue efforts to improve relationship with regulatory agencies Strategy: Update Utility Security via Telemetry and Remote Monitoring Action Steps: 1. Perform Vulnerability Assessment of Utility System 2. Install remote sensing devices at wells and lift stations as part of telemetry efforts 3. Evaluate interconnection of utility telemetry with City-wide monitoring system through Broward Sheriff's Office substation 4. Provide remote sensing contacts to Broward Sheriff's Office for response 5. Eliminate gas chlorine system 6. Improve security entrance to plant site 7. Move entrance from proximity to Stirling Road This is the first such facilities plan for the City, although ongoing improvements have occurred for many years to the water plant and piping systems. The program is fully consistent with the City's adopted comprehensive plan. • 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Corporate Limits The City of Dania Beach was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida in 1904. The City has recently annexed several large areas and doubled its area to nearly 6 square miles, and increased its population to nearly 30,000 people, from 13,700 persons in 1995 in large part due to annexation of nearly 3 square miles of unincorporated Broward County (known as the 3A service area). The community is primarily residential, with small concentrations of light industry, shopping, offices and some beachfront property within the corporate limits. A small industrial sector was added in the most recent annexation, but none of the industries would be considered "intensive." Much of the annexed area is served with water and sewer by Broward County. The City's water and sewer service area is bounded as follows: on the north by the City of Ft. Lauderdale, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean on the west by the Town of Davie and the recently annexed portion of Broward County (known as Service Area 3A), and the south by the City of Hollywood. Figure 1.1 shows the City's corporate limits. 1.2 Political Structure It is the oldest incorporated municipality in Broward County. The governing body consists of five at-large City Commissioners, one of who is chosen as the Mayor and one as the Vice Mayor. Elections are held every two years. The Chief Administrative Officer of the City Government is the City Manager who is appointed by the City Commission. The Public Works and Utilities Department is one of six major departments within the City. The others are Administrative Services, Fire/Rescue, Parks & Recreation, Growth Management and Finance (see Figure 1.2). The Public Works and Utilities Department operates the water, wastewater and stormwater utility systems within the City (see Figure 1.3). The water system has over 4500 connections exist within the City limits. The wastewater system has been served with central sewer since the 1940s, with treatment by the City of Hollywood at their current 42 MGD facility since the 1970s. The storm water utility is City- wide, with newly annexed areas to evaluate. 1.3 Financial Basis of the Utility System The City's water and sewer utility system were created to develop safe, reliable and financially self-supporting potable water and sanitary wastewater systems which will meet the water and sewage needs of the residents of the City of Dania Beach, and to ensure that existing and future systems are constructed, operated and managed at the least possible cost to the users with no direct or indirect financial aid from the general fund or taxpayers of the City. As a result, the Public Works and Utilities Department has been set up as an Enterprise Fund, operating as would a business whereby water and wastewater service ® revenues received are used for operations. The water and sewer system receives no taxpayer 7 funding for its operations. The revenues in the system are varied and include monthly water and wastewater bills, system connection charges and reserve capacity fees. The stormwater enterprise fund is set-up in the same manner. 1.4 Summary of the System The City of Dania Beach currently owns and operates two wells and one water treatment plant. The current treatment facility provides water that meets all current drinking water standards. The current wells supply adequate water supply, but the South Florida Water Management District indicates that saltwater intrusion affects these wells and may cause them to become unusable in the near future. The City has an agreement with the County for raw water supplies,but the current treatment plan cannot adequately treat this water. The City also owns and operates a water distribution system and sewer collection system. There are some pressure deficiencies in the current water distribution piping system and some old lines that need replacement. Infiltration and inflow are ongoing issues on the sewer system. Infiltration and inflow are important because the City of Dania Beach is one of six surrounding municipalities send their wastewater to the City of Hollywood under a Large User partnership agreement that originated in the 1970's, and most recently updated in 1991 and 1997. The other municipalities are: • Pembroke Pines • • Broward County • Miramar • Pembroke Park • Hallandale Beach These neighboring communities account for nearly 60% of the wastewater flows to the plant. Therefore increases in flow causes the cost to increase for the City. The City of Dania Beach has recently annexed an unsewered area, but Broward County is in the process of installing sewers (the customers will be County customers). This document has been prepared to initiate the planning status for the City of Dania Beach's water and sewer system based on recent planning for major improvements, and to support the City's efforts to obtain SRF loans and grants for the period 2002 to 2012. The City's immediate focus is on identifying water treatment needs, stormwater improvements and pipeline upgrades. The following summarize the major improvements contemplated: • Water Treatment Plant Upgrade: The current water treatment plant is 50 years old. While it adequately treats the City's current water supply, increased water from the County source is not treatable to meet drinking water standards. Therefore a 2 MGD nanofiltration water treatment plant is proposed to meet long terms needs of the City. • Storage is required per the Broward County Public Health Unit. Ten States Standards recommends that storage equals average daily flows. The City 8 currently has only 380,000 gallons of storage on site and none in the distribution system. A 1.6 to 2.0 million gallon elevated storage tank is proposed to meet this need. • Gas chlorine is currently used on the site. The system is over 20 years old and given security and risk issues, the City desires to move to an on-site generator system. • The existing water storage tank on Stirling Road is over 50 years old and has been unused since 1974. The tank has never been maintained and poses and potential nuisance to the City. Evaluation of the tank indicates repair is not possible at this point. The City proposes to remove this tank. The new tank would likely be built on the same site. • Water lines in several areas of the City need looping for pressure improvements and to replace small, galvanized pipelines that leak excessively. The City would reduce operating costs and improve system integrity with these improvements. • The City proposes to install telemetry and to upgrade the 17 sewer lift stations. Currently the pumping stations are monitored through visits three days per week. Records of flows and pump activity cannot be monitored from any central point. The lift stations are over 20 years old so combining upgrades and telemetry improvements will improve system integrity and permit the City to identify areas where excessive infiltration and inflow may be occurring. • The City proposes to install stormwater piping on SE 2nd Avenue, SE 3rd Avenue and SE 4` Avenue to address flowing problems in the vicinity of SE 11`h Terrace. A pumping station is needed to improve flows in the interceptor that these piping systems will be tied into. This is the first such facilities plan for the City, although ongoing improvements have occurred for many years to the water plant and piping systems. The program is fully consistent with the City's adopted comprehensive plan. 9 �a + f 1 A HJ • x nr ' � S � 0 0 4 _ 1 ' 1 1 I f I 1 1 _ _ f d � 1 h i 4 1y •�a f e 1 9 e yg Den1e BeecM1 P� w� � \ 3 » 2 \ � (73 (71 � / \ 0 0 \ \ m O N = B E / z \ � 2 U E = & %( — k ° \ . \ _ ° c \ } / / \ » 2 cok 7 § e o E I = \ CD @ \ § / \ \ < � § \ \ k \ / \ k to k 2 = 8 < m CLI E Em � a� v_ (73 m � o 03 e 12 � o N � N GA � 3 � m � m w . 2.0 GENERAL ENVIRONMENT OF SERVICE AREA 2.1 Topography and Soils The topography of South Florida is virtually flat: the land slopes south-southwest at 5 to 10 inches per mile or less in southwest Florida. In the Everglades, the slope can be as little as 1 inch per mile to the south. The coastal ridge of the east coast is the exception, as it slopes more quickly toward the sea. The City of Dania Beach lies on the east side of the coastal ridge. Since virtually all of south Florida is less than 15 feet above sea level, with the majority ranging between 0 and 12 feet, the flat topography causes a significant amount of percolation of rainfall downward into the soil, and eventually recharging the surficial aquifer system. The predominant surface soil type is sand, which is highly permeable. Therefore the influence of soil, though not as noticeable in South Florida as in other areas of the United States, is reflected in plant cover. The soil types present in the area reflect both the past and present environmental characteristics of the sites where they are found. However, the improvements made by man over the past 70 years have significantly altered this natural system. Muck, from remnant mangroves and sloughs, has far less permeability. 2.2 South Florida Climate/Ecology ® The City of Dania Beach is located on the coastal portion of southeastern Florida (see Figure 2.1), where the climate is subtropical, having average annual temperatures between 71 and 75 degrees Fahrenheit. Temperatures below freezing are not unknown, although they are rare occurrences. Cooler temperatures are associated with shorter winter days less direct sun, which in turn reduces evapotranspiration, and maintains generally lower humidity. The ocean buffers the coast from both warmer summer and cooler winter temperatures as well. Water is the resource that determines the entire ecology of all of south Florida, with average annual rainfall supplies between 50 and 60 inches. However, the rainfall fluctuates over a 6 to 10 year wet-dry cycle. Florida also has one of the highest evapotranspiration rates in the southeastern United States. Approximately 70 percent of the annual precipitation falls in the wet,season (which is defined as June 1 through October 31), resulting in extreme wet and dry seasonal variations (see Figure 2.2). Throughout the wet season, the Atlantic Ocean and adjacent estuarine areas have large amounts of water vapor (produced through evaporation by the sun), that condense to form puffy, white, cumulus clouds. As these clouds move over land, additional water vapor accumulates due to evaporation from freshwater streams, rivers, lakes and ponds, and evapotranspiration from vegetation. As the amount of water vapor increases, the clouds combine and form anvil-topped thunderheads. At some point, the condensed vapor exceeds the holding capacity of the atmosphere and the moisture is released as rain in lightning-packed, localized thunderstorms that complete the hydrologic cycle. During the • average rainy season, the elevation of groundwater in the water table aquifer may be at or 13 • above the surface of the ground, where its movement becomes a terrestrial (flooding) matter. Evapotranspiration, particularly in environments such as those found in south Florida, can be significant. For growth, plants must continually absorb water through their roots and circulate it up through the plant. Water leaves the plant through its leaves by transpiration into the atmosphere. For aquatic plants that grow in swampy environments, the quantity of water lost is significant. As shown in Figure 2.2, these evapotranspiration effects during the summer months offset a good portion of the rainfall. Open water has the highest evaporation rate. Although a large amount of rain falls in southeast Florida during the wet season in average years, the rainfall is still not sufficient to compensate for water lost during the dry season. The average rainfall exceeds the evaporation rate during the wet months but there is a large deficit during the dry months. The result is dry-season water shortages that are a recurrent phenomenon affecting a variety of systems, including groundwater levels and supplies, and vegetation patterns. Compounding the variation is that much of the excess summer rainfall is discharged to tide by the extensive canal system that makes South Florida developable. 2.3 Watershed/Surface Waters In trying to review the ecological health of Southeast Florida, one must look at the entire • southern portion of the peninsula of Florida, including the Everglades system, as all are one interconnected watershed. The historical character of the south Florida has been shaped in part by how much freshwater is delivered, how fast this water enters the wetlands and estuaries, and the quality of that water. The key elements of the watershed include Lake Okeechobee, the Everglades, the Big Cypress swamp, the canal system and the rainfall over the area. Within the City of Dania Beach, the only major surface water bodies are the C-10 Canal, and the Intracoastal Waterway. While the native soil and topography create an environment that is highly permeable and capable of absorbing significant percolation of the water into the soil, the change in the land use has resulted in water falling on impermeable land where the water collects in pools or runs off rapidly where development has taken place, in direct contrast to the natural condition. The result of run-off flowing over impermeable regions often results in large-scale flooding because the storm intensity (rate of rainfall) cannot be used to design facilities due to economics. Stormwater planning is an issue for the City. 2.4 Hydrogeological Considerations The entire south Florida plain is underlain by beds of porous limestone that absorb water standing on the land during the wet season (mostly in the Everglades). These limestone formations contain large volumes of fresh water - perhaps more than in any other limestone formations in the eastern United States. A geologic profile of southeastern ® Broward County has been developed based on drilling data from the Broward County, the 14 ® United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the City of Hollywood (see Figure 2.3). Southeast Florida is underlain by a series of interspersed rock formations with varying permeability. The uppermost formation generally encountered along the southeast coast is the Pamlico Sand formation of the Biscayne Aquifer. This surficial, Pleistocene Age deposit occurs throughout most of South Florida and consists predominantly of fine to medium-grained quartz sand, with varying amounts of shell, detrital clays and organic constituents. Thickness of the sand is variable in the area, but averages approximately 40 feet. Under the surficial sand lies a series of fossiliferous, sandy limestones, which are part of the Anastasia or Fort Thompson formation. These also date to the Pleistocene Age and often occur interwoven with each other and the Key Largo Limestone, making distinction difficult. Together with the Pamlico Sand layer these formations compose the wedge- shaped Biscayne Aquifer, which gains thickness as it approaches the coast, where it can be as much as 400 feet deep (but generally less than 200 feet). The Biscayne Aquifer is one of the most productive aquifers in the world, since its components are all very permeable and full of water. Beneath the City of Dania Beach, the Biscayne Aquifer often contains two distinct sandy, limestone beds that are generally separated by 40 to 50 feet of sand. The upper bed occurs between 40 and 100 feet below land surface (bls) and the lower bed between 110 and 200 feet bls. The Tamiami Formation of the Pleistocene Age lies beneath the Anastasia/Ft Thompson Formations. The Tanvami Formation in the City of Dania Beach area consists primarily of fossiliferous, sandy, limestones that have well-developed secondary porosity and are highly • permeable. The lower limestone units tapped by some of the City's production wells are likely members of the Tamianu Formation of the Biscayne Aquifer. The water levels in the Biscayne Aquifer fluctuate in response to rainfall, drainage and withdrawal for irrigation and potable use. Since the Biscayne Aquifer is exposed to the surface with little in the way of confinement, the only major recharge in the area is rainfall, most of which occurs between June and October. During the winter months the aquifer's water level continues to decline without some form of supplemental recharge. The canals operated by the South Florida Water Management District are designed provide flood protection, but also serve to limit drawdown induced by the canals by delivering water stored in Lake Okeechobee during the dry season. Western Broward wellfields benefit due to their proximity to the water conservation areas operated by the South Florida Water Management District, but little help is available for eastern wellfields such as the City of Dania Beach's. As a result, the aquifer levels in eastern wellfields steadily decline during the winter months, which subjects the Biscayne Aquifer to contamination from saltwater intrusion, as well as surficial activities. Several areas of the Biscayne Aquifer already have saltwater intrusion problems, the most extensive occurring along the coast and the canals connected directly to the coast without salinity barrier/control structures. Generally, the water level in the Biscayne Aquifer averages 1 to 2 feet ngvd, except during extremely wet and dry periods. Beneath the Biscayne Aquifer, is a thick, confining layer known as the Hawthorn Group. • The Hawthorn Group dates back to the Miocene Age and contains two formations - the 15 Peace River Formation and the Arcadia Formation. The Hawthorn Group Aquifers are used for water supply in some areas of south Florida, but have low permeability. The Hawthorn Group beneath Broward County appears to act as a barrier between the saline water of the underlying Floridan Aquifer and the fresh Biscayne Aquifer. The Peace River Formation consists mostly of sparsely fossiliferous, light olive gray, silty limestones that are relatively well inundated. The transition from the Peace River Formation to the Arcadia Formation is marked by a decrease in hardness and in grain size, detrital quartz concentration and fossil abundance. The Arcadia Formation consists mostly of very soft, poorly lithified marls. This formation can be informally subdivided into two members, the upper unit (480-545 feet) that consists of poorly lithified sand marls that are highly friable and a lower unit (545-926 feet) that consists of finer grained marls that are cohesive (due to a high clay content) rather than friable. The upper Arcadia Formation marls are light olive gray to yellowish gray, contain abundant fine grained quartz sand, and have a fauna dominated by small benthonic foraminifera. The lower formation marls are light olive gray, sparsely fossiliferous and appear to have very low porosities. The boundary between the upper and lower Arcadia Formations is located at approximately 545 feet. Phosphate grains and shell fragments are common in both the upper and lower Arcadia Formation. The lower Arcadia Formation marls are the principal barrier to vertical flow between the Upper Floridan and the Biscayne Aquifer. The geology of the Floridan Aquifer beneath the City of Hollywood was investigated by drilling two test wells at the site of the City of Hollywood's water treatment plant. The section of the Upper Floridan Aquifer penetrated during the City of Hollywood's investigation consisted predominantly of fossiliferous limestones that belong, in descending order, to the Suwannee Limestone (Oligocene), Ocala Limestone (Late Eocene), and Avon Park Formations (Middle Eocene). These limestones consist mostly of fossiliferous grainstones, and fossil peloid packstones and grainstones. The transition from the clay and phosphate-rich marls and limestones of the Hawthorn Group to the comparatively clean limestones of the Suwannee Limestone, Ocala Limestone, and upper Avon Park Formations is marked by a decrease in gamma ray emissions. The boundary between the Hawthorn Group and Suwannee Limestone is placed at 926 feet, the shallowest depth at which relatively clean fossiliferous limestones was recorded in the cuttings. The Suwannee Limestone can be informally subdivided into two units based on fauna and lithology. The upper 55 feet of Suwannee Limestone (926-982 feet) consists of light gray to yellowish gray fossiliferous limestones that contain a diverse marine fauna (gastropods, echinoderms,bivalves, foraminifera, etc.). The lower Suwannee Limestone (982-1123 feet), as well as the Ocala Limestone and part of the Avon Park formation, consist predominantly of fossil peloid grainstones and packstones with low diversity faunas dominated by the distinctive.large cone-shaped foraminifera of the genus Dictyoconus. The upper Suwannee Limestone consists of interbedded limestones with variable, but usually low visual porosity, whereas the Lower Suwannee Limestone usually has medium to high intergranular porosity. 16 • The Ocala Limestone is lighter-colored (white to very pale orange) and less fossiliferous than either the lower Suwannee Limestone or the upper Avon Park Formation below it. The upper and lower boundaries of the Ocala Limestone are placed, respectively, at 1123 and 1139 feet, based on the decrease in gamma log ray log response. The Ocala Limestone has a low gamma ray emission because of its relative purity. The Upper Avon Park Formation is darker colored (yellowish gray) than the overlying upper Floridan Aquifer limestones. The Avon Park is harder than the overlying Formations. The Floridan Aquifer within these formations is an artesian system where the potentiometric surface of the water is about 25 feet above the land surface, providing an expected surface between 35-36 feet ngvd. The water level elevation may vary seasonally since it depends on recharge from other areas. Analysis of the water of the Floridan System indicates that it contains some chlorides, with salinity increasing with depth and proximity to the coastline. Dissolved chlorides, determined during the City of Hollywood's testing, ranged from 1900- 2200 mg/l. This water is suitable for low pressure, reverse osmosis feed water and is productive enough to provide approximately 1.5 MGD wells at relatively close spacing. The primary production zones lie between 925-1,050 feet and between 1415 and 1700 feet below land surface. The dissolved chloride concentrations remain relatively stable throughout the production zones. Below 1700 feet, the dissolved chloride concentrations rapidly increase beyond 10,000 mg/l as they approach the Oldsmar Formation. The lower Oldsmar Formation, commonly referred to as the "Boulder Zone," is a highly cavernous, limestone, dolomitic formation of highly mineralized water with little artesian pressure. The basic "Boulder Zone" terminology was first utilized by oil well drillers to describe the apparent difficulty of drilling through a highly fractured formation, akin to drilling through boulders. The formation is characterized by frequent loss of drilling fluid, which goes into these large, cavernous areas. The formation is actually a rather intricate network of vugs and caverns that exist in the lower portion of the Floridan system. The Boulder Zone is generally limestone that is highly fractured and interspersed with dolomite. Beneath Broward County, the hydraulic gradient is basically flat although water temperature readings indicate that flow in the Boulder Zone is from the sea toward the west. The zone is several hundred feet thick, and is most generally used for the injection of concentrate reject water from membrane plants and excess treated wastewater effluent. A comparison of videotapes indicates that the Boulder Zone on the east coast appears to be thinner and less fractured than it is on the'west coast (which has larger vugs) and a hydraulic gradient, which provides limited movement of water within the formation. 2.5 Flora and Fauna The elevation and path of water moving across the land dictates the type of ecology that will develop. Because vegetative types differ in their nutrient requirements and in ability to live in water-saturated or saline areas, soil type also plays a role in determining plant distribution. Because virtually all areas within the City have been developed at some point, there is little native soil remaining in unaltered form. The significant alterations in the course of the past 60 years that has caused it to become intensively drained, diked and 17 developed to allow for man's use. The result is that the paradise of flora and fauna that once existed in south Florida has been totally changed by artificial manipulation to control flooding. Today, visitors to South Florida often see water in abundance in the canals, swamps and lakes that exist throughout south Florida. 2.6 Wellhead Protection Watershed protection can be broadly defined as a program to reduce the threat to water supplies from contaminants. Having such a program is a requirement of the Safe Drinking Water Act amendments of 1986 (Section 1428). States are required to submit a plan to implement source protection. However, in Florida, the State has delegated this responsibility to counties to do on county-wide basis. Utilities should be aware of the impact of surface activities on their water supply, and make additional efforts where needed. This issue remains important to the City as long as it operates its current wells. The City's water use permit outlines details of the wells, including the drawdown zones, wellfield protection and identification of potential contamination sites (see Figure 2.4 and Appendix Q. The City has one site across the street from Well G that is currently monitored for contamination as a result of its location in the 500 ft. wellhead protection zone. No contamination source is known to affect the other well. The County's wells are located at Brian Piccolo Park. No known contamination sources exist on this site. Appendix Q outlines the EPA Partial List of Potential Sources of Contamination Found oin Wellhead Protection Areas and in Watersheds worksheet. The City has a series of wells on the plant site that have not been used in many years. Improperly abandoned wells are in contrast to proper watershed protection strategies, especially since the slabs are in poor condition. These wells will be properly abandoned in the near future. 0 18 �I -:, City of Dania Beach Everglades System Low point Figure 2.1 —Location of Dania Beach 12 12 ® N 10 EXCES 10 Z W MEAN 0 _ -------- ------- AWFAt -- ---- ----- ---------- 8 Q Z 8 J — ----- — -- -- a ---- --- N Q Z LL EV POTRA 4SPIRAI ION � Q q O Z — . ate"? °� Q S ORTFA � W 2 oa,� - 2 W 0 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTH Figure 2.2—Evapotranspiration vs. Rainfall i 19 GULF STRAITS OF BIG CYPRESS OF MEXICO� SWAMP EVERGLADES S FLORIDA FEET S FEET z UNDIFFERENTIATED PLEISTOCENE DEPOSITS SEA SEA ::•:::..:...............:..:..:.....:_.... ......:,..,-.•:.::::5:. LEVEL LEVEL ............:..::...:.:•.:....... ...........-.:.._:...-::.�: ::.:. i� .�:::::::.:::::::. TAMIAMI FORMATION NLffSLONE AND gwp L, i NAWRLOIUI FOiL/MT10N 3 - (CLAY MA 70 500 'NMESi01&1 Y .ICUYSTONE),x„.a " 500 <'TAMPA UME so (LIMESTONE) MUM TERRACE SUWANNEE LIMESTONE 1.000 1.000 it i 1 E .o wr $0 OCAA LIMESTON $ 1 I.n.r o h 1,500 AVON PARK s S� '-;r xm I 1,500 Q FORMATION 1 '�. - m I I 1 2,000 W NPPER DOIDSTOLET m 40 z•500 2,5W LL w mKxIE DOLnBTorq m OLDSMAR FORMATION 1 3ODO _a 1 I m 1 11 1 m 3.000 ADMER DOLOSIONE) 1 \ BOULDER ZOM 1 1 3,500 (7, 14 1 \ 0.500 J CEDAR KEYS MATION \ 1 m 4,000 4 000 E7><PL.ANATON SURFICIAL AQUIFER 0 10 20 30 MILES I I I CONFINING UNITS 0 10 20 30 IOLOMETERS ��--�' LOP OF SEAWATER•LROE SAUNITY —80— UN OF EOUAL SCALE APPROXIMATE TEMPERATU E Werval 10 degrees FahIwtm B Figure 2.3 Hydrogeological Profile (Meyer, 1989) • 20 a Aldi 1 CL Oil CD A C? o• � � wm. 0- 1 1 H eC,-r € 0 4� � ..w... 1 , a i 1 a..P P` N i � nr d 4{ 1 i •�a I 3 A i Denle Beecn v7 , w� • 3.0 WATER SYSTEM 3.1 Water Service Area The City has a land area of approximately 6 square miles, but serves water to only half that area, as the newly annexed areas remain service areas for Broward County (District 3A). Figure 3.1 shows the area served by the City's water treatment plant. There are two agreements for bulk water service: an emergencylbulk agreement with the City of Hollywood and an interconnect agreement with the City of Ft. Lauderdale on an emergency basis. These agreements are included in the appendices. Interconnects with Broward County also exist, but there are no known agreements for these interconnects. These agreements are discussed in Section 3.5. 3.2 Water Treatment System 3.2.1 Raw Water Supply The City of Dania Beach Water Treatment Plant is designed to make water safe and attractive to the consumer. The current source of raw water is a pair of wells, located on the west side of the City on Ravenswood Drive. These wells are restricted due to saltwater intrusion although it appears that the chloride content of the raw water is diminishing slightly with time and responds to rainfall. The capacity of the 65-foot deep wells is 1500 gpm each. Figure 3.2 shows a typical well graphic and Figure 3.3 shows the location of wells the City uses for water supplies. Additional supplies are available from Broward County's Brian Piccolo Park wellfield and from Wells 5 and 6 in the old Broward County 3A wellfield. The City's wells provide relatively good quality raw water, although high in iron. During drier parts of the year, the wells are influenced by saltwater exfiltration from the C-10 canal system. The County's Brian Piccolo Park wells have higher color (60 c.u.) and high iron. The iron from both wellfields causes staining and is indicative of water with high concentrations of naturally occurring groundwater bacteria. Table 3.1 shows a comparison of the City's raw water quality and that of the County's Brian Piccolo Park wells — the regional system referenced in the agreement in Appendix B. The water quality analysis shown is for those constituents most commonly treated for. Figure 3.4 shows a graphical representation of Table 3.1. The County water supply is higher for all constituents except chlorides, indicating that the County water supply is lower quality raw water than the City of Dania Beach's. The most important constituent in the wellfield from a treatment perspective is high in iron. The County's raw water has periodic spikes of high iron that would be detrimental to some membrane processes. Decisions with regard to treatment of water need to factor in this water quality information. The chlorides are expected to be higher in Dania Beach because the location of the City's wells is far closer to saltwater sources than the County's. However, the difference is only 10 to 15 mg/L, which is not significant unless the quantity is increasing. It should be noted that all of the values are the highest concentrations reported for two randomly selected months (one winter and one summer). A second raw water parameter affecting treatment is microbiological 22 • populations in the aquifer. Microbial parameters are not routinely monitored by either system,but should be. In stark contrast to public perception that aquifers are "pristine" environments, bacteria naturally exist in most aquifer systems; almost any aquifer with an organic content will have some degree of bacteriological activity. Table 3.2 is a series of bacteria found in nearby wellfields. The typical agents for microbiological fouling include iron, sulfur- reducing and slime producing organisms, although many others exist. Iron bacteria, like Galhonella, are common in aerobic environments where iron and oxygen is present in the groundwater, and where ferrous materials exist in the formation (such as steel or cast iron wells). These bacteria attach themselves to the steel and create differentially charged points on the surface, which in turn create cathodic corrosion problems. The iron bacteria then metabolize the iron that is solubilized in the process. Iron bacteria tend to be rust colored, or cause rust colored colonies on the pipe surfaces. Sulfur reducing bacteria are often responsible for the hydrogen sulfide smell release when raw water is aerated. These bacteria are common where sulfur naturally exists in the formation, and will tend to form black colonies on pipe surfaces. While anaerobic, they will exist in environments where aerobic conditions that can lead to symbiotic relationships with aerobic organisms exist. Limited amounts of sulfur-reducing bacteria appear to exist because hydrogen sulfide levels are minimal in the City's wells. Slime producing bacteria are found in surface waters and in soil. Members of this genre • are often used to protect farm crops from fungal growth, and as a result are to be expected in groundwater that has organics. However, these bacteria are highly adaptive; research several years ago indicated that the bacteria would grow in any environment into which they were introduced. The Pseudomonas genera are facultative anaerobes that can persist in oxygen-depleted environments by breaking-down complex hydrocarbons for the oxygen. In some circumstances, they will use nitrogen in the absence of oxygen. Pseudomonas bacteria can permanently affix themselves to laser-polished 316L stainless steel in a matter of hours, so attaching to steel or lower grades of stainless steel is easily accomplished. Given that the Pseudomonas sp. are adhering bacteria, they are capable of producing a polysaccharide matrix (biofihn) that can act as a barrier protecting the bacteria incorporated in the films from harmful substances such as disinfectants and, in some cases, oxygen. Biofihns also act to protect the bacteria from the shearing effect of turbulent flow, and can provide an environment for other species. Periodic sloughing occurs when the biofilm gets too thick. These are problematic organisms, but are found in every well in South Florida. The microbiological accumulations/biofilms pose several significant concerns. First, the accumulations on the metallic surfaces create anodes and, in conjunction with reactions caused by dissimilar metals, can leading to a steady cathodic deterioration over time (with or without iron bacteria). Because the Pseudomonads are acid formers, ferrous materials are particularly vulnerable to deterioration, especially in the presence of iron bacteria. Iron staining often indicates their presence. Fortunately, analysis of treatment processes • indicates that the lime softening processes do a relatively good job at removing the bacteria 23 because of the mixing of lime and raw water that occurs and the "sticky" constituency of the • bacteria. However, the sloughing events pose a significant fouling concern for membrane systems, so must be considered if membranes are proposed. The corrosion of the steel pipe at lime softening plants could also be partially attributed to the bacteria being brought in with the raw water. 3.2.2 Water Treatment Plant The City's plant is a 3.0 MGD steel, lime softening reactor facility located on Stirling Road, just west of the ACL railroad at the intersection of J.A. Ely Avenue (Figure 3.5). The plant is an older, ring steel facility. The eastern accelator was constructed in the 1952 and the western accelator in 1963. Piping for a third reactor appears to exist west of accelator #2. Both accelators were furbished in 1992 to extend their useful He. The condition of the plant is better than one would expect for its age. The raw water is conveyed to the cascading aluminum aerators for removal of hydrogen sulfide and other gases (Figure 3.6). Mmimal odor comes form these units indicating that hydrogen sulfide concentrations are minimal. The aluminum aerators are stained from the iron and iron bacteria in the water, and the steel pipe in the interior needs replacement. They are not original equipment and can be replaced fairly easily. Replacement with aluminum aerators is recommended as opposed to fiberglass or poly-vinyl chloride that may deteriorate in the sun. • The water is then conveyed to the lime reactor units (or accelators), which are steel, conical shaped, open reactor vessels (Figure 3.7). The water is mixed with slaked lime. The lime reaction occurs as the water moves to the top of the reactor units, removing calcium, magnesium and carbonate hardness, which are precipitated as lime sludge. These units are maintained periodically to remove excess calcium build-up (Figure 3.8). The units were taken out of service for cleaning in the winter of 2002 to remove this build-up. The downside to taking units out of service is the need to purchase water from Hollywood, Broward County or Ft. Lauderdale, as the plant has no redundancy. However, the condition of the steel is fairly good, despite the age. Lime comes from a lime silo on the site (Figure 3.9). A new lime slaker was installed in 2002 after 50 years of use on the old one (Figure 3.10), after which the lime is mixed with water and then mixed with raw water to the center of the accelators (Figures 3.11 and 3.7). The softened water flows out of the top of the reactor units to gravity filters for removal of suspended materials by filtration. Lime sludge is withdrawn at the bottom and drained to a settling pond built in 1982 to replace the existing pond that is not just a ditch across the center of the property (see Figure 3.12). Sludge is disposed of by hauling to the County landfill after dewatering. The gravity filters contain a filter media consisting of graded gravel, silica sand and anthracite coal (Figure 3.13). The filters were rehabilitated and new media installed in the within past 5 years. The filters are in good condition, albeit stained from the iron in the • water. The finished water is pumped directly into the distribution system or stored in one of 24 • two clear wells located on the plant site, with a capacity of 380,000. The clear wells are the only storage capacity available on the system. Emergency connections to, the Broward County 3A, Hollywood and Ft. Lauderdale systems can supply potable water if needed to supplement the system demands. The Broward County Health Department wants a new storage tank installed at the plant site to supply adequate storage for the system. A 2 million gallon tank has been suggested and will be required as a part of any permit to make major upgrades to the treatment process. The Health Department believes there is a commitment form the City to construct the tank by the end of 2003. Four high service pumps are used to keep the water in the distribution system at a desirable pressure of 60 psi (Figure 3.14). The high service pumping capacity is currently rated at 6 MGD. The pumps have been upgraded and replaced in the last 5 years. New drive systems were added in 1998, but they are not variable speed drives. Still, much of the pressure fluctuations of the past were corrected when the new system was installed. Disinfection is via gas chlorine (Figure 3.15). This system is being considered for replacement with sodium hypochlorite. Stabilizing chemicals, including fluoride are added before the clearwell. The mix area is small but efficient (Figure 3.16). A back-up emergency generator is housed in the plant building. However the FPL transformers have seen better days. FPL should be contacted about the condition of these units (Figure 3.17). They are FPL's responsibility. Any additional improvement to the site will require a review of the power transformer capacity brought in by FPL. Average daily flows are 1.85 MGD. Table 3.3 outlines the water usage records, and purchased water records for the past three years. The City's water usage is expected to be constant over the foreseeable future as other providers bound the water service area on all sides, and unless major commercial development occurs in place of existing structure in the downtown CRA area, there is little potential for growth within the service area. These results are graphically depicted in Figure 3.18. Table 3.4 outlines the demand forecast. There is one lead operator and three shift operators. Two operators are on during weekdays. Table 3.5 shows the results posted for water quality in the City's most recent Consumer Confidence Report (full report in Appendix K). This water supply meets all requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Additional analysis was performed on potable water for the major utilities in Broward County (see Appendix N). The flowing summarizes the findings with regard to the City's current potable water supply: ® The City's concentration for sodium (see Figure 3.19), a measure related to saltwater, was well within the drinking water standards and was similar to neighboring utilities in the south County • Chlorides in Dania Beach were well within the drinking water standards, but were generally higher than most of the surrounding utilities (see Figure 3.20). The South Florida Water Management District has identified chlorides as a saltwater intrusion tools, and indicates that continued rise in chlorides will cause them to eliminate the City's current water sue permit for the City's wells. 25 • ® Total dissolved solids factor in salinity and hardness issues. For this parameter, the membrane facilities — Miramar Central, Plantation, and Hollywood, were well below others (see Figure 3.21). Dania Beach can expect similar water quality if membranes are pursued. ® Sulfates were well below the drinking water standard, but sulfates can indicate upconing or saltwater. The City was generally higher than its more inland neighbors (see Figure 3.22). ® Color on the City's system approaches the secondary standard as a result of limitations in the treatment process (see Figure 3.23). Lesser quality County water supplies will likely cause the City to exceed the secondary standard for color as Margate and the North county systems currently do while using lime softening to treat western water supplies ® Trihalomethane (Thm) data is limited — the zeros on Figure 3.24 are non-reports, not zeros. The City meets the current and near term proposed standard. Thms are caused by chlorinating water with organics. The City is one of the few communities in Broward County that does not chloraminate, which would significantly reduce Thms. Use of membranes will also reduce Thms (see Hollywood). e Most of the communities in Broward County exceed the suggested secondary standard for pH as a result of the lime softening processes employed. The pH should be above 7.0 in water systems, preferably about 8. The pH change in lime softening processes tends to push the pH past the' suggested upper limit of 8.5. • There is no health risk with a higher pH. There may be with a low pH like Plantation has given that acidic water may tend to dissolve metals in the piping system (See Figure 3.25). In summary, the City's water quality meets the standards and the quality is what would be expected given current limitations in the treatment process and meets all drinking water standards. Execution of programs to maintain or improve the treatment system assures the quality and/or quantity of water available to the public as a finished product. These programs are also intended to foster observation of safe practices in the execution of the programs. Routine maintenance of the water plant is designed to ensure the availability of operable equipment necessary for the production and treatment of potable water to meet demands continuously. This is achieved through the execution of corrective and preventive maintenance programs. In addition, maintenance responsibilities include keeping the structures clean, safe and presentable. The City's latest Sanitary Survey indicates no deficiencies and that all systems are in appropriate condition except the abandoned elevated storage tank (see Section 3.3). The latest Sanitary Survey is included as Appendix P. The major maintenance issue at the water plant is the catwalks. Figure 3.26 shows the pipe gallery under the catwalk between the accelators and the filters. The piping and valves appear to be in fair shape. The catwalk and electrical service tray are in need of refurbishing. Replacement with fiberglass and aluminum is recommended. 26 The staff has pursued an appropriate maintenance and operations program for the facility. The water plant has a work order system to insure work takes place. However, this program is in form only — there is no tracking of the work performed or connection to an inventory system. 3.2.3 Reclaimed Water System Effluent reuse is of substantial benefit to the area for a number of reasons, the most important of which is the reduction of competing water withdrawals from the surficial aquifer system by the application of the reclaimed water. The drainage system has lowered the water table, causing saltwater intrusion to occur. Carefully designed applications of effluent to critical areas of the surficial aquifer could protect and maintain freshwater sources. However, the City must rely on the City of Hollywood for reclaimed water, as the City has no treatment plant of its own. To date, the City of Hollywood has not had facilities or water quantity to extend reclaimed water to the City of Dania Beach. This situation could change if the City of Hollywood extends reclaimed water to Port Everglades. 3.2.4 Treatment Plant Laboratory The City currently conducts only routine monitoring in its lab at the water pant site (Figure 3.27). All other laboratory samples, including all compliance samples, are sent to contract labs. Documentation of pumps and equipment is filed in the water plant operations office. 3.2.4 Regulatory Standing Because people in urbanized South Florida use groundwater supplies that are replenished directly by summer rainfall, the quantity of water available is finite and the quality must be protected for the end users - the public and the ecosystem. Water supplies in the State of Florida are regulated by five water management districts established by the Florida Legislature, via consumptive water use permits issued based upon water demands and availability of the resource. Since ground water is the principal source of raw water for treatment in south Florida, the South Florida Water Management District regulates withdrawals by issuing water use permits, which limit both annual average and maximum day withdrawals from the aquifer. Periodic renewal (typically five years) of the consumptive use permits allows the water systems to adjust the quantities for withdrawal based on growth and/or prior experience. The City has recently received a water use permit for the coming 5 years (see Appendix Q. The permit allows for limited withdrawal from the City's two wells, and further reliance on the Brain Piccolo wellfield owned by the County. The City has an agreement to purchase water from this source (See Appendix B). However, the water quality of the Brian Piccolo source creates difficulty in meeting color requirements for the City's existing water treatment plant. This is an ongoing issue with the City and County. 27 3.3 Water Distribution Water Distribution is responsible for the maintenance and repair of the potable water distribution and sewer collection systems throughout the City. Currently there are over 50 miles of water lines ranging from 2 inches to 14 inches in diameter, as shown in Table 3.6. Materials on the water distribution system vary from galvanized iron to asbestos concrete to PVC and ductile iron, depending on the age of the system. The oldest water lines exceed sixty years, which is beyond their useful life. Most of these water lines are located in the eastern half of the City and some are made of cast iron. For much of the year they are partially submerged, sometimes in salt water. An investigation of the condition of these pipelines should be undertaken (or comments recorded during repairs) to evaluate the state of deterioration of older pipelines and the priority for replacement. Those pipelines submerged in saltwater are likely to have especially acute problems. Failures of these pipelines, especially large ones, will cause road and potentially property damage, so a proactive approach by the City is needed. Fortunately City staff advises that many of the 12 miles 2 inch galvanized iron pipelines that existed in 1995 have been replaced with 6-inch PVC pipelines. Table 3.7 shows the location of remaining 2-inch lines. Experience throughout Florida indicates that the acidic soil conditions do not promote long life of galvanized pipelines. Those that have not been replaced tend to be in rear yard alleys that are not easily accessible. These pipelines are a priority, although they may need to be moved to the front yards. Asbestos concrete (or transite) pipes are inert, and unless disturbed, pose little risk. A long-term plan is should be implemented to evaluate the eventual need for replacement of these pipelines. In addition a plan for dealing with asbestos pipe repairs, and disposal of asbestos pipe needs to be developed. Most of the City's service lines, including all of those on replaced water mains, are non- metallic, thereby eliminating corrosion potential. The services attached to the cast iron lines may be constructed with galvanized fittings. These service lines are subject to severe corrosion and may also be a source of leaks and lead leaching into the water supplies. They should be replaced at the same time as the rest of the pipes. The same is true for the few remaining lead goosenecks on service lines. Standard materials for water lines are PVC C900 for the pipe, polyethylene tubing for service lines and brass fittings to connect the PVC and polyethylene tubing. All are appropriate materials. Storage on the system is limited to the clear wells. The Broward'County Health Department has identified storage as a deficiency on the system. The current elevated tank (Figure 3.28) has not been used in many years and is likely beyond the point of repair. If repairable, the cost will be extensive given the condition of the tank bowl (see Figure 3.29). At present the tank is an attractive nuisance. Fortunately the ladders have been cut off making_access more difficult. Lead paint, and containment of sanding materials are among the problems to be incurred in repair of the tank and may be issues with takedown. Daily maintenance includes large user meter readings and repairs to pumps, valves and piping. The City has recently replaced or overhauled the large meters. This should occur no less than every two years. City crews repair most breaks, valves and leaks. An annual • 28 contract exists for fire hydrant testing and repair that includes maintenance, painting and reporting fire flows to the City. Maintenance and upgrades to the water meter inventory to maintain these assets in good condition is required. The present meter base is approximately 4500 active accounts. Since the average life for accurate registration is from seven to ten years, City crews change out many of the oldest meters each year. All large meters appear to have been repaired or replaced in the past two years. Unaccounted-for water is 3 percent according to City staff. This is surprisingly low for the age of the system. There are several identified areas of low, or potentially low pressure. The most serious would appeal' to be the hotels at the intersection of I-95 and Griffin road. The hotels are apparently fed by 12-inch pipeline, but in reality, smaller lines feed those pipelines. These deficiencies need to be corrected. Likewise, Federal Highway contains a 6-inch be for its entire length. It is doubtful that adequate flows exist in this pipeline at the present time (commercial use normally requires at least an 8 inch line). Given that the City has set up a CRA for the US 1 corridor to redevelop commercial activity, if the intensity of commercial activity is desired to increase, the pipeline will need to be replaced to improve adequate commercial flows. A single 6-inch pipeline feeds Melaleuca Gardens. Looping with the 12-inch lines feeding the hotels is desirable. A southern loop along le St SW is also desirable. The needs assessment section of this report indicated where pipelines would reinforce the distribution system and improve fire flow capability. Updated mapping is required, but maps do exist. Mapping has not been updated since 1997. 3.4 Water Conservation Program The City of Dania Beach has no formal water conservation program. A typical water conservation program is composed of five elements: develop/maintain an accurate database of water consumption to reduce municipal water waste; a retrofit program; the modification of relevant City Codes (plumbing, irrigation, landscaping, the promotion of xeriscaping; and public information and education programs. The City of Hollywood has an award-winning program that could be modeled. 3.5 Current Water Agreements 3.5.1 Hollywood Water Agreement (Appendix A) The agreement between the City of Dania Beach and the City of Hollywood was executed in May, 1968. The concept in the agreement was to allow the City of Dania Beach to draw potable water from the City of Hollywood's system when required to provide service to Dania Beach residents from a meter located at Sheridan and 20th. In reality it is an emergency service agreement but is not labeled as such. The agreement is • extremely one-sided in most respects: 29 • • Dania Beach can take water when it desires and Hollywood is required to have sufficient water available for the City to draw • Hollywood must deliver the water at pressures similar to its customers • The meter is Dania Beach's, but it is maintained by Hollywood • There are no limits to extensions form the meter on the Dania Beach side • The agreement is renewable at the option of Dania Beach While the hydraulic limitations of the agreement are debatable from a realistic perspective, the one-sided renewal and lack of termination clause may raise doubts on the legality of the agreement. Also the rate section has been debated — the current rate Hollywood indicates should be charged is $1.80 per 1000 gallons, a number determined by David M. Griffiths and Associates/Maximus several years ago based on increases to Hollywood residential customers. This rate is well in excess of that for other bulk users. Dania Beach has previously thought the rate would be under $1.00 per thousand gallons. Hollywood would like to renegotiate this agreement but to date it has adequately served the purposes of both municipalities. 3.5.2 Broward Raw Water Agreement (Appendix B) The Broward County raw water agreement was executed in June 1990 between the City of Dania Beach and the County. An addendum was issued in 1994 because no water had been delivered to that date., The concept was to permit several eastern communities, Dania Beach, Hallandale and Hollywood among them, to draw raw water from a new western wellfield to replace lost capacity in the eastern wellfields. The agreement has the following provisions: • Defined the service area—limiting Dania Beach to the then-City limits. • Created a Large User Advisory Board that was to meet regularly • Determined that the County would construct the wellfield and all appurtenances • Defined a rate methodology for the raw water • Defined meter locations, readings, meter inaccuracies and a dispute resolution • Requires a 10% renewal surcharge for wellfield maintenance • Reserves certain flows for each user The agreement has a provision on raw water quality. This section has been the subject of much debate between the County and the Cities of Hollywood and Hallandale. First, the contractor left debris and sand in the pipeline that fouled membranes in Hollywood. The iron content is higher than anticipated, bacteriological issues arose and the color makes the water untreatable by the existing treatment regimes — Hollywood built their membrane facility to treat this water, and then found the sand and fouling problems prevented its use. Most of these issues have been resolved, but the cost to the municipal users is $0.17/1000 gallons, about 50 percent more than anticipated. To date, Dania Beach has not drawn the Regional well supply— instead relying on the County's 3A wells that are not longer used by the County's 3A facility since that facility is now a bulk • customer of the City of Hollywood. 30 3.5.3 Ft. Lauderdale Water Agreement (Appendix E) The agreement between the City of Dania Beach and the City of Ft. Lauderdale was executed in October of 1973. Like the Hollywood bulk water agreement, the concept in the agreement was to allow the City of Dania Beach to draw potable water from the City of Ft. Lauderdale's system when required to provide service to Dania Beach residents. The important provisions: ® Do not specify the location of the meter • Specify that the agreement is for emergency and/or pressure purposes only ® Notes that the water can be used for Dania Beach residents only • Denotes a 30-year life of the agreement for the date of execution ® Sets the rate as the City of Ft. Lauderdale's bulk rate, whatever that amount might be. • Requires the City of Dania Beach to be responsible for all.water once delivered to the meter. ® Dania Beach to hold Ft Lauderdale harmless from suits. The agreement appears to work for both entities and clearly provides more fairness than the Hollywood agreement. The agreement expires in October of 2003, so City of Dania Beach should pursue an extension of the agreement immediately. 3.6 Summary of the Water System The water system is old, but has been maintained over the years. Staff operates the facilities to meet all regulatory requirements. Staff and management of the utility are appropriate. Current raw water supplies are adequate and enough capacity for average days are present. However, deficiencies in the system do exist. The following summarize the major improvements contemplated: o Water Treatment Plant Upgrade: The current water treatment plant is 50 years old. While it adequately treats the City's current water supply, increased water from the County source is not treatable to meet drinking water standards. A 2 MGD nanofiltration water treatment plant is proposed to meet long terms needs of the City. This will also allow the water plant capacity to be increased to meet future peak demands. ® Storage is required per the Broward County Public Health Unit. Ten States Standards recommends that storage equals average daily flows. The City currently has only 380,000 gallons of storage on site and none in the distribution system. A 1.6 to 2.0 million gallon elevated storage tank is proposed to meet this need. o Gas chlorine is currently used on the site. The system is over 20 years old and given security and risk issues, the City desires to move to an on-site generator system. 31 The existing water storage tank on Stirling Road is over 50 years old and has been unused since 1974. Evaluation of the tank indicates repair is not possible at this point. The City proposes to remove this tank. ® Water lines in several areas of the City need looping for pressure improvements and to replace small, galvanized pipelines that leak excessively. The City would reduce operating costs and improve system integrity with these improvements. The FDEP business plan document summarizes the City's current management and operations capacity. This document is included in Appendix U. • 32 Table 3.1 Raw Water Quality Parameters Dania Beach Wells and Regional County Wells Dania Dania Average BPP 1 BPP 2 Average Beach 1 Beach 2 Dania BPP mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L Parameter DAN BPP pH 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.6 7.5 Alkallinity 244 228 236 294 288 291 Total Hardness 244 252 248 293 300 296.5 Calcium Hardness 236 236 236 261 292 276.5 Magnesium 30 16 23 53 58 55.5 Fluoride 0.22 0.16 0.19 1.43 0.28 0.855 Iron 0.72 0.44 0.58 2.09 1.88 1.985 Color Units 53 46 49.5 65 60 62.5 Chlorides 70 70 70 59 46 52.5 • 33 Table 3.2 Bacteria Identified in the Local Aquifers Isolated Isolated From Isolated from South from Bacteria Biscayne County Floridan Wellfield Regional Wellfield Wellfield inetobacter anitratus J FA-6netobacler baumannii inetobacter calcoaceticus inetobacter haemolyticus J J inetobacter Iwoffii Actinomyces/Streptomyces romonas hydrophila tali enes faecalis tali enes x losoxidans Bacillussp. Burkholderia Pseudomonas ce da J hryseornonas luteola itrobacter diversus itrobacter freundii lostridium bifemientans J lostridium Perfrinuens J lostridium se ticum Clostridium sordellii lostridium sporogenes nebaderium s . Crenothrix polyspora Desulfovibrio sp.. Enterobacter ae genes Enterobacter a lomerans Enterobacter cloacae Escherichia coli Fiavobacterium odoratum Flavobaderium s . allionella ferru inea Klebsiella oxNdoca Klebsiella pneumoniae J Kiuyveras . J Microceccus luteus Micrococcus s . Plesiomonas shi lloides Proteus mirabilis Pseudomonas aeruginosa J J J Pseudomonas alcali enes Pseudomonas fluorescens Pseudomonas pickettii Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes J Pseudomonas utida J J Pseudomonas stutzeri Rhodococcus a ui Runyon Group IV Mycobacterium almonella s . Serratia marcescens hev✓anella Pseudomonas utrefaciens haerotilus natans hin omonas aucimoblis J to iococcus aureus J J to -coa ulase ne ative tenotro homonas Xardhomonas maltoDhilia J J J 34 Table 3.3 Water Plant Production and Purchases July 1999-June 2002 Date ADF MDF Purch Purch Purch Rainfall MGD MGD Hwd Ft L Broward (in) July, 1999 2.14 2.56 6.98 August, 1999 2.07 2.28 10.89 September, 1999 1.96 2.14 8.42 October, 1999 1.98 2.20 0.12 0.02 17.31 November, 1999 2.08 2.24 0.46 0.15 2.21 December, 1999 2.00 2.16 0.36 0.18 2.86 January, 2000 2.16 2.38 0.01 0.13 0.46 February, 2000 2.34 2.45 0.07 0.03 2.19 March, 2000 2.49 2.71 6.46 April, 2000 2.47 2.74 4.16 May, 2000 2.59 2.87 0.02 0.01 4.53 June, 2000 2.34 2.72 7.92 July, 2000 2.13 2.36 0.02 0.18 10.60 August, 2000 2.15 2.40 0.08 0.10 9.54 September, 2000 2.15 2.35 0.01 0.01 4.66 ® October, 2000 2.07 2.33 0.04 0.01 10.60 November, 2000 2.06 2.50 0.69 December, 2000 1.94 2.20 0.19 0.20 0.00 5.78 January, 2001 1.92 2.30 0.22 0.15 1.10 February, 2001 1.99 2.23 0.18 0.09 1.25 March, 2001 1.95 2.22 6.55 April, 2001 1.95 2.14 0.02 3.02 May, 2001 1.95 2.16 6.42 June, 2001 1.86 2.09 5.25 July, 2001 1.91 2.12 6.92 August, 2001 2.05 2.29 6.59 September, 2001 1.93 2.30 19.60 October, 2001 2.16 2.47 7.47 November, 2001 2.45 2.80 2.54 December, 2001 2.42 2.73 1.81 January, 2002 2.35 2.51 0.66 February, 2002 2.29 2.46 3.60 March, 2002 2.43 2.72 0.92 April, 2002 1.88 3.14 0.40 0.17 0.15 2.30 May, 2002 2.66 3.14 0.05 9.41 June, 2002 2.32 2.63 0.01 0.01 16.82 35 Table 3.4 Projected Demands Year ADF MDF MDF/ADF 1999* 2.04 2.26 1.11 2000 2.24 2.50 1.12 2001 2.05 2.32 1.13 2002* 2.32 2.77 1.19 2003 2.2 2.6 1.17 2004 2.2 2.6 1.17 2005 2.3 2.6 1.17 2006 2.3 2.6 1.17 2007 2.3 2.7 1.17 2008 2.3 2.7 1.17 2009 2.4 2.7 1.17 2010 2.4 2.7 1.17 2011 2.4 2.7 1.17 2012 2.4 2.7 1.17 Partial Year 36 • Table 3.5 Water Quality from Information Collection Rule Data Source, 2001 Consumer Confidence Report Parameter MGCL MCL City Range for City Health Impact Erosion of natural deposits;water Fluoride (ppm) 4 4 additive that promotes strong teeth. (ppm) Naturally occurring in groundwater > �1 ' Barium m 1 2 due to mineral erosion;Discharge of drilling wastes;discharge of metal :. refineries t.';z:.>.3•: Runoff from fertihzeruse:leaching Nitrate (ppm) 10 10 `<# fin septic tanks,sewage:erosion of natural deposits. Erosion ofnatural deposits Gross Alpha 0, 15 ::::: from(ppm)) Saltwater intrusion;leaching frm o Sodium m 160 160 soil. TTI IM's (ppb) 0 100.0 15.2-49.24 Byproduct of drinking water chlorination. Chloroform € '< Bromodichor. Dibromochor. `< r 0-1% Naturally present in the environment Total Coliform 0 5% Lead (ppb) 0 AL=1 ND Corrosion of plumbing systems; € >r:<`» erosion of natural deposits. (At entry point) 5 (PPb) Lead 0 AL* =1 ND Corrosion of plumbing systems; => > `# erosion of natural deposits. (At tap) (ppb) 5 * ND —0.14 Corrosion of household plumbing Copper 1.3 AL=1. systems;erosion of natural deposits. (At tap) (ppm) 3 37 • Table 3.6 Water System Components WATER SYSTEM Amount Units 2"and under Water Main 10270 LF 4"Water Main 6690 LF 6"Water Main 164120 LF 8"Water Main 61200 LF 10"Water Main 2100 LF 12"Water Main 27720 LF 14"Water Main 900 LF Elevated Water Tank 1 ea WTp 3 MGD Land 10 ac Wells-Biscayne 2 ea 12"Raw Water Line 2500 LF 5/8 or 3/4" Services 4114 ea 1" Services 142 ea 1-1/2" Services 80 ea 2" Services 77 ea 3" Services 4 ea ® 4" Services 8 ea 6" Services 1 ea Fire Hydrants 396 ea 38 Table 3.7 List of Remaining 2-inch Lines Location From-To Length Units 4th Street SW US 1 to 4th Ave. SW 1425 LF 5th Street SW US 1 to 4th Ave. SW 1500 LF 6th Street SW US 1 to 4th Ave. SW 1600 LF 7th Street SW US 1 to 4th Ave. SW 1650 LF 8th Street SW 2nd AV SW to 4th Ave. SW 1100 LF 9th Street SW 3rd AV SW to 4th Ave. SW 1000 LF 39 asmm a 1 C ou �-t CD 1 �a CD CL CD CD � 9 cn CD CD CD a) .v CD CD 1 i ' N a 1 , 1 , � 1 / i n cD d P� 0 �a o u CD CD MW i i r�a W .n ►r. O y � 3 w (D r O ._ y ' O O i i m } •�e 1 1 'tee i oem.e.acn "aP s� y.:y1 \8 h ng tirm11 g t 3x• > , G t: } ........:.... rx XX moo h..... .i .........:....... .J•.n �k 4'l „1. ,i.�,y.y.>x , nf... S: .aE...\• \•Y+C cxn-.KYn`W.>.;;;�•::.,-i;3x..... .;> fi<�`.��q,Y.'•'?:ua,.:c>a a<st }: Sv ..s.•.r�...�>Fy'o,)iai�a;( Y% oa'�..o,?03.:>..•: `• � >ReY�r�} <.*. ..�y>F>.{ `i>�>ova ad;�s X1 Z)ta�L a s t y F�(y�SF rs �A..✓k? ,��., �>"< < � ,. edoo ! dam' x `r d:eev r ,. h7. .N3Yc r ot-wq..rry S y7c'� 5S:: < ♦r��,'++rWt�•{».•�.a r �'�' na rr+� Tt.vev.�ryrK+v�+,•1 •4 .•Ld,.<Aa:,t•> .. �F. 3.v1 -:. X i, : :}a! hv. r .. F1 < �,f�,6 ki� k►s�,tw�'Lar t:� «a#;�. �x a ,'Q->3 eR�x24f xF*?,�'*� s°�.�� y,Y,s < �>`S �,�i•� s .Y<a �; � 3• E't.�'wY"g."„"""t"�.h Sr) 3:�-1 ,:: + Ft,;a c,� y x>'� « �^x<,<+y.� '....} a h s � ��X Y.t S A k r x i x'y. z Y_:Y..,.�`- ,.",r.,.•,N a Figure 3.3 - Well Diagram > >: 42 350 300 ®DAN 250 BPP E 200 c 0 150 c 0 u 100 50 0 PH Nkallinity Total Calcium Magnesium Fluoride Iron Color Units Chlorides Hardness Hardness Parameter Figure 3.4 Comparison of Dania Beach Raw Water Quality and the County • Water Supply 43 CD —40 CD CD --------------------- o 9 � 9 � a 1 i 1 � 1 N � Q � 1 1 0 1 0 k � zs S " 3 ,�a " 9 1 r d Denle Beech 3. P3 x� k � .......... . .;'.;:.}:i;>:•::._:.:::.ii:is i'::;:: .. MIS A'ry� wavy' q 4 �jppC. loo J:r ��:C:•+r :........................ ... ri:::::.;:;+,y.F.,.:..+.....:::.iii:: r.::....f.}i}>:'':.:.�:r• F r fa YM .....::::..::.:.............. ,,,,,�� 'iij;i:{:y}•:;{:•i'•i:L<i:i:^:v.}:::+:}i"i:">�''�'i: F frS •»::•iii•.i:•is�::•i:�ii:;•ii:;•:'�:;•>:�i:c•:.:>:�>:�ii:�i::•i �; .. :::.ii:^i});•}':�}::.}i}}i:�ii}i•.}'::•.i:i::v<.vv:.}i}}iiiii'.:::: - 3� ::rr`>""it.+if'r'kur<<!�r�`fnfL,:y}s3..:e:;:;:; _,:•...:.c�_k :.;L - k v •"'%/�i%/.firs., r a ,�"'Y.fY" ��f �r ��� �r /f���� �� �� �axr. b -'>%� .• � � r/`fit yr i rt� r f f t lif. r � r ice/ } F 4 : :✓' �1{ {r�i F ,�•''fESs�,`Tm �t }AONEW �! a F,ti.•t:/� i + t#e.,gym @. `a'S >m r AMA S� R F ',,�''° •k��"," :: � �w$, °� Win"++.' '""•"`}r ��2 � .somas �F ram........... 4 M' .ea { i:`?? � a:;ij�':' iiy:�5;�:;:: ::::>::;:;,•' .:::iii :;::ii:;;.i;::;;:;i:: -- ti:......::.:::: X. ai a;< r s .Cl rff,"'1•,..as>A�rr'Yy fa f/:�frr� a F .......... f d � A4. i ?4 e�<`d d �e ............:::.:: g, �. _ 9 f pfi? i:Ci;•:::i.:::.::J::::.�:':.....?.,,......�;:.:iii;;...:.'.i::'. iY.!•::::•:iii::.;n...:.........:.....:.n::ii:i::::^i:..::..:::.:::::..:.: 1 f.C•Yiii:•iYi.:•i�<:YiiF:;:;�: '.•S a 4 ....'::.:.:::::is i...::::...•::: iv::::•iivii?ii'%rri .y::.., y - ...:: .:.�F:::.:.�v:vv: ... r...:r+,:::v:::::,iirrr:/iii!?.;!rx!!•Y:?::::.}{?;:?: :. ....:::...:.:.'::.iir'f.Y:•: iaY::?:S:•YiiYi:•'r.::?:cvc:cii:;:;::?:::::r::••::::+ ,n..r..:i:S:';%:::?>:;::�:- �.. • h. :i:'::.•iii:Liiii:�iii::i�::i::?iiiiiii;�.::•iii;:is iiiiiY::•iii?:::.........:......::::iii':.:::i::'�. ...:::::�:'i:i:::::::j:_::%:: f•: U :•iYff1Y: v:.v ....:..:44:;•}::::i•ii`:i?•i•::vi}^i•Y}4:vi:i?:::•:.%:'riiiiii:: ..F. .........::.... ,.. ::??^ii:i:9::4:iii}:{•Y:::•::. .. • f f Y: ! g l b ayA,i l NO.iF .>r'fy rfr Js<' av:d_ ,��,��Wl�f �f ?i3` F. ...^^"^• `�""':.�xw.. • "RLP • • ............ .::.::<�:: ::f%rr4}Y}:::ii:?•Y:?•}:4iYi}isi:..::::::.....::.....:.......::::.......:...:.�...::::::::::::::::::::is::: ryFrr "fi. 4rl+bY%f':il%%1 xf.•r, rj�:���::>��:v�::�iil��Y!�ii:� fr. .4� :;:'Sa•!`a?:v is rii {Ij'r+„rrf?rF fF:.r;jrSyrxt� f {ir+Y xl{•r ??f.tft. � r.r f i 11A {{f/ r x� fi r f f /f. Ys. r .rf. ! n:•� F S Ff f� f '•Y}} f f:r 4i'!. ••t4ii:/:i'4:: { f+: IFf.IX+f F }f Y 4 rf r� .. F IX. 'f�ff`lf`/fiJffC .. "°vy. IX ::5 J• J }::•fir F f : i 6Eoa'w �U .,y tl 3. 9 � 1 :<:r ,.:?t;•Y:.;:•:•}:?•}:.Y::;?•isS•Y:.}:;?.}:.:»>s»:}:><>::»>::><:::s::::»>::>::»>i>::»:»:>::»::»>s::>:z:»>::>:::r::;.. ern j '•, ii':y':^:�:{:Cjjyj?;:;i;.;{:C}:i:{$iJii;isY:>:is�'isr:v�:}�i:::::::)::y::Fii>''i:i+iiii'iii`:�:v:'?%'i:'T':::' rS.?S� �?• ` a <:�j'/,,.}ems:_ ir'::n•::: �SrkY� .,H..y ^F ...:.....:.... .. 4::r._:}x.}.:::fr..rn-..,.:•f;[�?iii}ifiFi Ji}iiii;iiii:•iii:i�?i�i?ii: -. Y .n� .•:f,.?v...:..':::?":i::::::: _ +.......4 w::... ....:}Y:n;nnf,.!!YV':':'[iiti:}}ii}Y:?4}:ti!:•i}};::�' ............ .... ..µ.:4:YYY:<::y;i:};:<:.:::::::.::,•:n.:n�:::.:•: � _< ,,. . .r.au+r:;:;}:;:tvf}:.;S;:;xi::.ty....:•.an,;. �:.•:,::::::::n:•,...:.:.::F, .......:.... .. ;SS:f?:,•:i?'+y;}}}.:�>o-n•::o-}::4YY%:;:?cx!S:Y:oi;:a .::;i}};}}:;- " :�� rf::ii?•S S� 1.,...w $ .r r r: ,i..:.::::::}a}>:•�:}}::•>'}Ys}:r�i:}:SSSSS: ;F. ..ern :: 'F.•:4i:?.n}•iY:rt'?:j}iiiiiii; +,/ff' J.' .. f .tl;;:ty?y{Y+�ii,•. ,��' flay/! � :.✓!:?-;.> ; / rh � �t .'/?tt••}}}} !fF.+4f:%;f/rff Ff , %�•i:r::r;::•:S?4a r' �'?. ..w`i rr`sxrrfSr'•:r `` 'f" . ';.:,.::::::• � :. :4}?�'xn•fs ! fir. .af rfr` Nr 4a.......?ter. ,-,. „�°. ........ ..:::....... ..................::::�:::: _..a:?:,.. .:.::...:/;2`';.:isiY::isC::•)�:;:tii?i;i.1%:iiii:ii:Y•iG::o.. ON ............. c .. t R r f. gg �}r yy J a^ :,,per 's'4gftr,,aJ f• fri f3 r rf9 ,� a ....:............. - - ?::..:::::.?.>:::�:;??•isii::;ir:'ii>i�!i;:�i:5i<i::^.ri.'�iidiic:i:o:>:;;iii;;.:.:..:.::.:..:.. ............. .:::.�:>;:?•:a:»>:?o}::::i::4i::iiii;i°` sisisii:i`ii: i:i:':r $[ii:ii:. ;:::.isiii%%:::i::i::Yii ':'; :•i:?�:::::•:J:::.�:::::°:: ........... .::;::;;. � _......::::::::::::.:+o-iii}i:a:a::•}:;i:?;•:oi:::•::::::.iii>}ii>ii:•:i>i>:i:ii;i;i:?;??'!ii;::::=:::._:::G:i':�. i!Aij:%....:,..::i� e ".ti'p,">i'�iiiifiiiiiii�'Si;iii�fiii:%iii:[:[::;:.:;i:�iir:�i:�:�i:�ii:>iiiiiiii;iiiiii�:i>ii:?•>wi:?;°:iiii:;oi:•;iiii:::•:::;:} ....}ii:�:•i:•>:?ii}::... ..�:.:: i;iii isi`i�7:�iiiiiiii�i Gi ? :':;+. ii:%ii;;".. ..:..E.;. :::�:is�:�:i.�::�:%�:�::i:;::i:;:;::}':i:�i:�iiii:Y�i:i:�i iii�:�i:�ii:•i:�:�:%�ii:�ii:?°i:°i:°i}: W. a soft v fr. +.f ff + ....................................... r rr� •:v'fr r J' .i:t::i fF::/f »Nr+ "lvv•Ciiiit'rii•v rJ wf f� k' s:+f ••f •:J•..J r h:%:i�:•`::ii:i: :::i':�:::::i:S Jiiiii::iii:•iiiiii:4iil%vv:iii i::i}ii:i+:ii'r�:iiii ii'ri:i::i'::ii%!!:C�:3:%:i:::C::i ii:�i:'. v'+rl:•iii:CtC•: N:::C•Y..v J/ rrG;G ./ J............ •irn N 'i +r r. :a} ior•.+. 1r fr•.N+ k? :::•::::::•.:?:t::v :.•: :•r 'lr.!�'r r�?4>:�i::•}:.:i:>i::::,i:?.i:•i;>r i:•:;�ii:::.:3i:::3::.: :::.y:•:::.i:'�:::.: r > ' ..rf .:tY.tram .rl r +F + N r ..:.�:::::: � ++.rFr. :. /.' 'i: ;;,�'ittii iiiii:i?:i iii�:::ii:•:`i"iii iii�ii'i:;i:i ii�'i<'i:;:;::iii'%ii'iir.:'%.`;!:;:;%i'iii�+i i.i i':,'i:i :: :.......+..r Jr. ..f... ;1..,...r:r� .:-sa.:.:::�•::>:°i:::;i::or:°:::no-i:>ii::ii:?;G';h:.>iiiii>i.ai:C isci:-asi''i:J:'i:i�r:�:>:::i°;ii�::::::i.,::::::::..:.....::.. .>i.4 K+ i r?ta' / w >}..., ,:,:: •:• "w ,!ai tc:iii::ii:i°°:Sii....- .:ai;;?;:{:.;;:•::::::•°:.:.:::..:isi:'ai:;iii i:• Loilm.:::. +: $ r 1rr , r• '' .. /.:i:•:•}:3:}:�i:;.i:::•:::::::::C�:i}:':ii:C•:i}}i}}}'fi}}:?:�:��::'•�:'�:�}::3:}'i'�::::�i:::::� :. r.f.. ,/r: f'�i.•' .rf :+v v` fffJ:4:::. rrr .rrr iii'/.• .+ rJ ...?!f : rr � •r r rt./ :JJ r:}:}}::.}}i:3:.:iF.:i}}:t::::.};:::..}.iii:iii:?:::�.:.��. C•' .� : } C ., ,.•:!:::}:Ci}}:::i}:}}i::}}i:::}}:}}'•:.�:�:'::�v�::.�i:..'.::�::..•:i:<v'''ii.,v.;:;..Sv j...:�.... . J .'rJ• ./• ..:�:::;:�:G:h:?:::i:.::.ii:�ii��i:??�i:;•>:°i:°:i:i:°::::;.;,..:::iii':4ii:•:::.}':::::....................}:..::.........:...................... :i`:+fi%N..fN::f��rr/':.•JJ/.�r f •rr .>���//-�r........... ...: •rr..+::.�:::::..�::.::.�::..::......::...::::•.::::::.�:::::::::::•:::::..:::::..�:.�::::::::::::::::•::::::::: ..........................................ii::........n......iii• ufir::++:::v:::::•rr.•::•::.}}ii;3}}}}>:4}::•}}}ii:a:•i}}i:?t4;:.:•::.�::...�.,....:°:r.�i:::..�i�::-::::i::.: ::�:•:::::•:::::..•:::::::•:?+???:•}iii:•}:, •r:::.;i•+•}v}}:t....:fl/�/. ..+rrr::r:::,v:.::.::�.:.�::::.:........ .. . ................. ......... y?Yf Jrr n..r.....rr. ..::..- .., .. Yff/ /J"J is::i.•.�:::.::::::::::::::::::::v::::::. .n•v.'.:�.::.. N:i++r:rv:r.. .i/x:'. Yr}!} '"i} J :.:S:�J�tr r:{{?r..::r.r.....:.�.:..:}}i}}:?•:}}'f:a:4i}}}:•:}}}}::•}}i::. •}<�ii'>:•ss:?Jrsi.•+:r r f�l«J rr,:^r;dlv�.•��." .;r...::r:::::::. ../{.+:::rrf+`J,Y.r+f.�ny/!! +J.n.•.�/: rf :r..r;,..:rr::•::.:••i}. .l r.N�. / :}i•:: :i:l;'{'.:is•::r}Y.:{i:Siii:>iv�}ji:::i�:iii}}i}iii:�:>:ii:�:�: ?•i:.•r.•:r::::f.:rr .:1„J/j}'J,FJ. /'f{+:�::4::::::•r,.?:•:r+.....?.r+.r:r....;;.°..,. •}iF?�:::::+: .../:.r.:::/r,/..v:+:.:.:rn•Nv xJf.i�rr:'l¢:. :.J.vr::>. vnw:r:3.3•::???3'??rC; ::•::•::•::.�::•.�::::.::.:: +:i f.•.•::�t r n�r.......:........:.:.....:..........r::•:?ry:::::::rrxrxWfi:?????!.}:{?{ry,3}i:{ti•i:f... ::.......:.:: :::::::..::ii:.•::::::::::.:,:::.:::..... .::::...:..:::.. fi f. 5 l f{ '1Jv� f f y. f _frf . � n � t �}/fin�,�f '�'`�.. � �y�� .�•r�lw. .: f n 4 f•tip '� f _ ,�� I ..t ' WIN.. f f ,,� �$ '� 1 '°�c � �" � •,� '�rf f tip :': ..... - •:is"6:'Ciiii:•: --:'- �' ' v� X. 1 { ' ZH`i'i;�;:Fic :� isi` •`:%? 2; �% ;c;i i%'SiSi�SiSSi4i%�[ii.^:.. :: >.i'';'%;<it`;:y:�: a a+ ' ��ypE S j .. T J' < - - J r re'°"„gam, ..:.rr• rr r f �: .. Y 7 :.:.:..:........ Wa ti Ono b p ¢ f.4 rFgt'T'. "a8 r +• J rr. wlrmrs t6' h } » e n.... liA` OF ............ iO WN w p t ash s u3 n f{ Aso r _ rrff MrM; Y r { :...::::::.:..... � ....:.........:::. 4y ............:. low.. . ................. ............. y � re ,fir �: � � rC;it:'• rrr{�r ``;c5``irf{. } d°.� .xr. tL fr r/r:4:`•�,::::}:}r..: `:�K:HN.. �/.f .:%±:::•.f'U.ii:J/l.fi::t•:tri:}vtitt:,lri'fii:n�tr{r.+f, / �:•%::R:Y•::::::;::::ryi:iii:it/.U,,C.'r.f fii+` ff� f.{ ii'�fG:4ii:4}ffr ^;ff '•'.:�'.:: fff/ f f is f ..................:.... .............................. ..............................:....::::... •,f! f f� f 'r f /f f .J. :fU. 3.50 MDF 3.00 2.50 0 2.00 ADF D 1.50 LL 1.00 0.50 0.00 t z r m r to E E E m z r ` _ _ S E E E E W e $ g gyt � OZ Figure 3.18 —Water Use 1999-2002 51 180 160 140 120 J c 100 O a 80 u c 0 u 60 40 20 0 STD DAN BC 1 BC 2 MIR MIR TAM PPM HAL DAV SUN FTL DFB PB MAR PLN PLN LHL HWD NSID CSID SUN NL CC E C S E W Water Treatment Plant ® Figure 3.19 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Sodium 52 aoo 250 _ 200 0 � ,5a a u e 0 U 100 50 0 �' S�0 �� Q 4p oV+ IZF' 4,ti fie- OFa dt� ts' oP�J� c� e d? �� 41, ? � 4. Water Treatment Plant Figure 3.20 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Chlorides 53 600 500 400 300 u u 200 too Water Treatment Plant Figure 3.21 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Total Dissolved Solids 54 • 300 250 200 a 0 150 E 0 0 c 0 U 100 50 0 Water Treatment Plant Figure 3.22 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Sulfates • 55 • 25 20 15 c 0 E u 10 c O u 5 r 0 Water Treatment Plant Figure 3.23 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Color 56 • 120 100 _ 80 w c 0 60 c 0 u 0 0 U 40 20 0 STD DAN BC 1 BC 2 MIR MIR TAM PPM HAL DAV SUN FTL DFB PB MAR PLN PLN LHL HWD NSID CSID SUN NL CC E C S E W Water Treatment Plant Figure 3.24 Comparison of Water Quality Results for Trihalomethanes t • 57 • 12 10 a e 6 c • u c 0 u a 2 0 STD DAN BC 1 BC 2 MIR MIR TAM PPM HAL DAV SUN FTL DFB PB MAR PLN PLN LHL HWD NSID CSID SUN NL CC E C S E W Water Treatment Plant Figure 3.25 Comparison of Water Quality Results for pH 58 xt � r {p �-i.w,y�a •.., :t'm. •m e�,•r .a � `;:Mir:;::::; ,f •f F':l ':j;Y.11iar,.`;;G;•:r:::'r`'fJ::::::{ .:.! 'r,f.. NY%girl..,.ui 'I•xix;�v�:r. l••i f%fr• �� r..hrr../frN.y fxnn{vr•nv � rr w• ':!iirlff"/f':h�?rh'•xcm•::l�yf , {y: r./11.ar�'/h:{r.•rf.,..{rfjY:�UiSPY': ii f i%fr Jl/f�'i%fff`{:i}•%%`�Y•wrYSN� yS:�,..:} '� lfi y :• iF�f.{+��ff''!'rriiS•}}ikLU•f.Y.rR y,;.: i+:. i f. .%Fi. �/11/Y%:v'•%�f�'lf�pf i::i•:v�:rr Fr:::yy:: • F. ryh. Y'l.`/:��?h�3';i� f;.�i'w9r :S:ii�}i+ ...y.. N s f 3 —y Y r fr {hlYf t r ,,ff' ✓N it i. f:/�{x f�'. .. f• { . .. :�rfb,'vyb:`y'r'}::`•} ^� �fri +'''::::�3..y r:'rr•ri:.. ::rr{u r.r:ry.r /f. "'::5:';,` i2a.,..h S•:::;:5:�:'3i;:ii.: t. +Y:rJi K.:Yrfi:<.r'n .ff'.rx5.•r:'., fr �;;.....":';•::.• •xva f.xy>:;yi:>i;i:{or'Y ..:r.•i}r11:Y.hi: +{ufflrh ,¢+ .;.<r+:•Yr: S%/.xlrl.::?YY:;::?YYii::•i:' .:, 5'r f Y+�++.-•S:x flrl ...�Y`r:i i}};xrr.•„ :::.{ii?{.if:irF r}} f•'ri:i%,;iiiY.. ..f.,;f.,.;y%ii.� rl/sfl�Sfi:h' f+f {irz•i}rx{,{•{y,{{lf,.f{•%f�`'VI % f +:rl?Y''$..lrllf,cc.F¢F,.{ 1 4:,c•::::::..f{•.!{•,;ffi+': :..?i;!{;,,:;:'.s.i..'. ors . _:, ....:.... ...... ...:. r .....::::. .................................::.i:::;::;.}:.:.. ........... :, �'° N �iii}iri:�•Yri 1/ ff f.} � f/ :::.'::�':�::: 1. 3 tors:.'9R, ".SA COXX ... i}:} •:.....:: e4 t� :::......y......: :ij;::: ..:.; ':..� :..:.:5:f'$. ::}:�:�?"vi:hi,;•:;isjii:jJ;:;::;:;:;5'::i"�'ii:i'i:.., .. � .: .. ...'. rra da' a�Fx 9� tg ::...:+ iw No NOR NEW imp,t ':vi:h::•iiv'i i�iiii::�i: - 'iii.:'^i.::ii: �':::. ...::::•::ice::::�i •i:• �:':.N:::::::.....ii:.':i�i:':':ii.+...... �:::.:ii::•.;v:is ii:i,:i f i .. Y :::::.�.i:.Y F' t iii`ii;:..!{ii:,`%::�: v q:: r � s r rfr:2•: . 4.0 WASTEWATER AND STORMWATER SYSTEMS 4.1 Sewer Service Area The City of Dania Beach is but one of seven service areas served by the Southern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, operated by the City of Hollywood, the wastewater treatment plant for the bulk of southern Broward County - the facility is truly a regional facility. Table 4.1 indicates the sewered area and population as defined in the 1992 Infiltration and Inflow Analysis report by Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. (based upon 1990 Census data). Table 4.1 Hollywood Southern Regional WWTP Sewered Area and Population, 1990 Total Sewered Large User Area (Sq. MI) Population Area (Sq. MI.) Population Hollywood 29.30 121,697 11.11 86,550 Pembroke Pines 32.46 65,452 12.43 48,021 Miramar 31.04 40,663 9.90 40,663 Hallandale 4.51 30,996 3.72 30,998 Dania Beach 4.92 13,204 3.14 13,204 Broward County 6.88 11,850 5.04 11,850 • O.E.S District 3A Pembroke Park 1.70 4.933 1.32 4 933 Total 110.85 288,615 46.66 236,037 4.2 Wastewater Treatment System 4.2.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant The City of Dania Beach has no wastewater treatment plant, and no plans to construct one, having abandoned the their plant in the early 1970s as a result of impacts of the.discharge to the C-10 canal. Since that time, the City has relied on a large user partnership agreement with the City of Hollywood and five other municipalities to treat wastewater and dispose of the residuals one a regional basis(see Appendix D). The City of Dania Beach has sent its wastewater to the Southern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant since it abandoned its wastewater plant in 1974. The 1973 Broward County 201 Plan designated the Southern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant as the lead facility for its regionalization efforts. The plant is owned and operated by the City of Hollywood. However, as a part of the regionalization effort, seven partnering agreements were signed with neighboring communities. Dania Bach was one. In the late 1980s some controversy arose over the City of Hollywood's use of certain reserve funds. The City of Hallandale sued with the result being a revision to the Large User agreements in 1990, and the methods of cost allocation for operating the facility being delineated in 62 the attachments to the agreement. There have been periodic amendments to the agreement—the most recent being for pre-treatment efforts. The revised agreement makes the City of Hollywood responsible for the operations, maintenance, regulatory compliance and improvements to the treatment facility, although the costs are allocated to the Large Users. They are also responsible for obtaining permits for the facility and complying with regulations. The result is that the risks are Hollywood's for any issue arising on any Large User's system, for which Hollywood is responsible. A prior Hollywood City Manager attempted to revise the agreement to address the risk issue, but at this time it is unlikely to be addressed. The agreement has the following basic provisions: • Defines the service area of each Large User • Requires the Large Users to maintain their system (i.e., infiltration and inflow removal) • Requires monitoring by the Large Users of their system to insure wastes detrimental to the treatment process are not introduced • Defines anticipated demands to 2000 • Defines that the plant capacity is to be 50 MGD • Defines that demands in excess of the year 2000 projected demands or in excess of 50 MGD are to be paid for by the requesting Large User • o Allocates costs by flow volume and requires an annual true-up • Defined connection points and meter locations for each Large User, readings, meter inaccuracies and a dispute resolution • Defines how the agreement can be terminated (requires the Large User to pay all costs for service and for capacity they are no longer using) • Denotes a renewal, debt and depreciation cost are to be included in the rates charged to the Large Users The original agreement (mid-1970s) and this replacement agreement are intended to secure a regional facility so pull-out of the regional system is not cost effective. This is good, because a pull-out of any of the Large Users would financially disadvantage all of the other Large Users. The unique aspect of this agreement, and what separates it from a bulk agreement, is that the Large Users and Hollywood share the costs based on their flows, and the agreements makes Hollywood responsible to the Large Users for the ongoing operations, maintenance and financial stability of the facility. Hollywood cannot make a profit on the service, but is compensated to operate the facility at optimal conditions. A Large User group meets periodically to discuss issues with the plant. Unfortunately most of these issue focus on cost implications, rates, etc. and not facility. A benefit to the Large Users is that while the agreement required the plant to be expanded to 50 MGD by the year 2000, in the mid-1990s Hollywood noted that the flows were not growing as anticipated. At that time there was buy-in from the Large Users to delay certain construction. All parties have benefited from this delay by deferring debt service for 10 years. 63 The central wastewater treatment plant has existed in the City of Hollywood since the 1940s and has expanded to the current 42 MGD facility (50 MGD is pending). The current wastewater treatment plant is a Category II, Class A activated sludge plant that has the capacity to treat and, dispose of 42 million gallons per day of industrial, commercial and domestic sewage in an environmentally acceptable manner. The City of Hollywood also has a 4 MGD reclaimed water system for effluent reuse via golf course and public area irrigation. They run at a deficit for customers, so reclaimed water may be available on an ongoing basis if new pipelines are installed. Existing treatment units include mechanically cleaned bar screens, grit tanks, influent pumps, oxygenation tanks, clarifiers, chlorination, effluent pumps, an ocean outfall, an effluent reuse system, return and waste sludge systems, and post lime sludge stabilization facilities. The majority of the existing equipment is expected to provide service until 2008 or after. Equipment with earlier projected replacement dates will be replaced as part of the City of Hollywood's Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Recent WWTP performance has been generally in compliance with regulatory permit requirements, with the exception of brief periods of process shutdowns caused by improvement program construction tie-ins and high rainfall events. Disposal of the bulk of the wastewater effluent continues to be via an ocean outfall, although the Florida Department of Environmental Protection has mandated that two injection wells be installed for additional wastewater disposal capability. The effluent is disinfected by a gaseous chlorination system consisting of two (2) chlorinators and two (2) stand-by generators that provide continuous disinfection and effluent pumping. Maintenance crews address all equipment, structures, and grounds maintenance needs of the wastewater treatment plant on a routine basis, and as necessary. The work performed encompasses mechanical repair and installation, plumbing, carpentry, painting, masonry work, machining of parts, electric and electronic installation and repairs. A comprehensive stock of spare parts and equipment is maintained to respond to emergencies. 4.2.2 Pretreatment Program The City of Dania Beach allows the City of Hollywood's pre-treatment staff to conduct its pretreatment program, which reduces staff time by the City of Dania Beach. South Florida is generally a residential and resort community with little industry so few industrial customers exist in the service area. The City of Hollywood's pretreatment program only regulates 27 significant "industrial" users that have been identified in the entire wastewater service area of 240,000 people after several years of intensive efforts. Most of these are food-processing industries. Only 1 SIU class user is in Dania Beach. The City of Hollywood's pretreatment program won FDEP's program of the year award in 1998. 4.2.3 Regulatory Standing The City of Dania Beach is in full compliance with FDEP on its wastewater system. However, the wastewater system, as a part of the City of Hollywood's treatment service 64 ® area, is subject to the Clean Water Act as delegated to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), the Broward County Department of Planning and Environmental Protection (BCDPEP), and the Broward County Health Department(BCHD). The wastewater plant is generally in regulatory compliance with the exception of the upgrade and expansion work defined as required by the regulatory consent orders and Large User agreements. It is reasonable to expect that construction permits can be obtained for improvement projects included in this program. Construction permits have already been obtained the 1999 WWTP Upgrade project (and the work is nearly complete). Work on the injection wells is underway using SRF loan funds. Bids for the remaining components to expand the plant to 50 MGD are expected to be received in the late Fall, 2003, with completion in 2005. While these expansions are several years after what was contemplated in the Large User partnering agreements, no moratorium has developed based on slower than anticipated demands. Several consent orders are outstanding. Most of these issues are underway and the consent orders are a mechanism to allow the City to uprate the facility while providing FDEP with a tool to demonstrate how effluent disposal will occur while awaiting final issuance of the Wastewater Facility Permit which includes addressing uprate of the WWTP in two steps from 42 MGD to 45 MGD and from 45 to 50 MGD. Consent orders include Solids Removal and Reliability, metals removal and pretreatment (which is complete except for a chlorine decay study which FDEP as yet to approve), and related requirements for the installation of deep injection wells that are currently underway. All consent order items should be completed by 2005. 4.3 Wastewater Collection The City is responsible for maintenance of its own lift stations and collection systems, and since keeping excess flows down benefits the City financially, correction of leaks and infiltration should be priority projects. Ongoing testing of the influent by the City of Dania Beach, and monitoring of the City's lift stations provides a measure to determine whether inappropriate amounts of infiltration are going to the City of Hollywood. Maintenance and repair of the sewer force main piping and gravity collection system includes excavation and repair to manholes, gravity piping, service connections and force mains. City crews are responsible for insuring the reliable service of sewage lift stations and accompanying force mains and gravity lines throughout the City of Dania. Wastewater from the City is transmitted through 750 manholes and over 40 miles of gravity and force main piping to the Hollywood Wastewater Treatment Plant. These pipelines range from 4 to 20 inches in diameter. Table 4.2 summarizes the collection system inventory for the City of Dania Beach. 65 ® Table 4.2 Collection System Inventory Services 3720 LF 8" Gravity Sewer 164630 LF 10" Gravity Sewer 13320 LF 12" Gravity Sewer 160 LF 15" Gravity Sewer 780 LF 18" Gravity Sewer 8740 LF 24" Gravity Sewer 330 LF Manholes 754 ea Small LS 17 ea Land 10 ac 12"Force Main 6900 LF 14"Force Main 7725 LF 16"Force Main 4370 LF 20"Force Main 6500 LF In 1991 it was anticipated that 50% of the flow going to the Southern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant was infiltration and inflow as the CBODS dropped below 100 milligrams per liter. In the ensuing five years, considerable effort was placed into defining and correcting infiltration of inflow problems. All Large Users made repairs to the main sanitary sewer collection system components, but no force mains or pump stations. The City of Dania Beach has one of the more intensive infiltration and inflow correction programs because, as a coastal community, and an older community, the City of Dania Beach has'a significant amount of vitrified clay pipe that has a tendency to have broken joints,joints that leak, or cracks in the pipe that allow infiltration into the system. Based on a report by Hazen and Sawyer, P.C., the City of Dania Beach has spent over $1.1 million to remove infiltration and inflow in the system. In the past 10 years, most of the piping in northeast, northwest and southeast Dania Beach has been lined. Indications are that the southeast section had the most problems, in part because the land is low and the system remains under the ground water table throughout the year. Current measurements continue to indicate that the majority of infiltration to the system comes into the southeast section of the City. Staff believes this is due to damaged service laterals. This finding concurs with findings by Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. in the Lakes section of Hollywood and in Hallandale, both of which are similarly situated. The investment in infiltration and inflow reduction has provided the City with measurable decreases in raw wastewater to the City of Hollywood in the past 10 years when flows dropped significantly from prior levels. Figure 4.1 shows the flows for the past three years. The average daily flows are about 3 MGD, which relates to water use as shown on Table 4.3, which shows the wastewater flows versus rainfall. They are nearly equal throughout the year appearing to indicate only minor amounts of infiltration and inflow. However, from Figure 4.1 the following can be discerned: ® Average daily flows are 3 MGD as noted 9 Flows increase with Rainfall 66 ® 1.5-inches of rainfall will adjust flows by 2 MGD Figure 4.2 shows the flows over the past eight years. More recently the wastewater flows to Hollywood have begun to climb again (0.75 MGD in the past 7 years) which is pause for concern as there does not appear to be enough development for this kind of increases (although a new meter was installed in 1998 that may account for some change). Figure 4.3 shows the flows by year, which also shows and increasing trend with time. The highest average year appears to be 2000. This graph does show flows to be highest in September and October, which coincides with a high groundwater table at the end of the rainy season. To gain a better understanding of potential infiltration amounts, the raw wastewater quality for the Large Users of the SCRWWTP were compiled from Hollywood files. The biological oxygen demand for the City's wastewater was about 175 mg/L which is slightly less than expected but well within range of the other Large Users (See Figure 4.4). Chemical oxygen demand was less helpful as there is an error in the City's results— CBOD cannot be less than BOD. Total dissolved solids and Chlorides (Figures 4.5 and 4.6) show that the City has ongoing saltwater coming into the system — most likely in Melalueca Gardens and the east side of Dania Beach near West Lake and the Dania Cut- off Canal. Since much of the piping has been relined, this finding lends credence to the idea that laterals on private property may be at fault. The reaming analyses were not enlightening as to possible sources of inflow although the following were noted: ® High oil and grease content (Figure 4.7), which indicates that oil and grease traps . are either not installed, or not cleaned regularly at restaurants and commercial establishments • High Petroleum Hydrocarbons as compared to the other Large Users, which could also be a source for the oil and grease— garages and boat yards should be checked —Hollywood may do this as a part of its pre-treatment effort (See Figure 4.8) ® High Phenols, which lends credence to the above comments (Figure 4.9) For most metals (Figure 4.10 shows copper) the City was in the middle or lower end o f the results. The same was true for nutrients (Figures 4.11 and 4-12). The only other constituent of interest was a higher level of chloroform than the other Large Users. Chloroform, which is a disinfection by-product, which may be related to the formation of ammonia in the collection system mixing with the chlorinated drinking water in the system. Most of the other Large Users use chloramines for disinfection so would be expected to have lower quantities. Ongoing infiltration and inflow efforts are required to minimize infiltration and inflow into the system since it directly translates to billings from the regional system. Some additional efforts may be required in light of the above findings. 67 . In addition to continued infiltration and inflow removal, ongoing maintenance includes reading the large user meter and inspection of all lift stations to ensure that pumps and alarms are operating properly. Two lift station technicians check all the lift stations three ties per week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday). Painting, servicing of equipment and test running of generators are performed as regular scheduled maintenance. The lift station technicians make repairs to controls and alarms and the mechanical staff repairs pumps, valves and piping. The lift stations are not telemeterized. Maintenance and repair of the force main piping and gravity collection system includes the cleaning and televised inspection of the gravity lines and manholes, and the cleaning and adjustments to the force main air release valves. Repairs include excavation and repair to manholes, gravity piping, service connections and force mains. In addition, new connections, gravity mains and force main piping are installed. The sewer-cleaning program involves the cleaning and televised inspection of the gravity lines and manholes, the cleaning and adjustments to the force main air release valves, and response to complaints about stoppages. Parts of this work are contracted to contractors with large-scale equipment to correct problems. 4.4 Stormwater The sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems in Dania Beach are not interconnected. However, the stormwater system affects the sewer system as standing water and periodic flooding contribute to infiltration and inflow into the sanitary sewer system. As noted previously, approximately 70 percent of the annual precipitation falls in the wet season (which is defined as June 1 through October 31), resulting in extreme wet and dry seasonal variations. The summer rains are generally intense and short-lived, so standing water can exist immediately after the storms. The intense rains average up to several inches of rain in an hour— the more rain, the higher the likelihood of standing water. The City has ongoing problems in the southeast quadrant of the City. In part the cause was the building of 56 Avenue SE, which acts as a dike to the West Lake ecosystem on the east side of the road. Until that road was build, the drainage from the southeast part of the City naturally drained to West Lake. The road prevents this. The City has ongoing efforts to correct concerns. The City recently upgraded the pump station at Meadowbrook Apartments (north) and has an interim system at 3' St. SE and 5 Avenue SE. The staff indicates a new generator is shortly to be installed. However, flooding continues in the areas of 2"d and P Avenues SE and around Olsen Middle School. The solution appears to be tie-ins with the 36-inch pipeline on 7 h Street SE that drains to West Lake. In addition, the improvements on Federal Highway drain to the City's system on 2' Avenue SE, which decreases the system capacity. The City and FDOT are working toward a solution to this problem. Figure 4.1 shows the major problem areas of the City. 68 • Table 4.3 Wastewater Flows to Hollywood FY99- date Date WW Flows WW Flows ADF (MGD) MDF (MGD) Rainfall (in) July, 1999 3.11 3.95 6.98 August, 1999 2.73 5.51 10.89 September, 1999 3.14 3.93 8.42 October, 1999 3.78 6.38 17.31 November, 1999 3.16 5.82 2.21 December, 1999 2.81 2.89 2.86 January, 2000 2.77 2.88 0.46 February, 2000 2.84 2.93 2.19 March, 2000 2.90 3.59 6.46 April, 2000 2.97 3.44 4.16 May, 2000 2.75 3.37 4.53 June, 2000 2.51 3.63 7.92 July, 2000 2.90 4.16 10.60 August, 2000 2.72 3.26 9.54 September, 2000 2.65 2.97 4.66 October,2000 3.86 9.37 10.60 . November, 2000 3.00 5.46 0.69 December, 2000 2.97 3.58 5.78 January, 2001 2.70 2.92 1.10 February, 2001 2.67 2.75 1.25 March, 2001 2.69 2.99 6.55 April, 2001 2.66 2.84 3.02 May, 2001 2.74 3.47 6.42 June, 2001 2.57 2.81 5.25 July, 2001 2.62 2.96 6.92 August, 2001 2.97 5.43 6.59 September, 2001 3.10 4.96 19.60 October, 2001 3.40 5.04 7.47 November, 2001 3.23 3.77 2.54 December, 2001 2.77 3.61 1.81 January, 2002 2.77 2.96 0.66 February, 2002 2.81 3:39 3.60 March, 2002 2.88 3.11 0.92 April, 2002 2.76 3.33 2.30 May, 2002 2.79 3.43 9.41 June, 2002 3.61 4.95 16.82 • 69 • 10 9 8 20 --O,---ADF(MGD) 7 -M MDF(MGD) 0 6 -fir-Rain in 15 C9 � 5 Y! c 10 LL 4 3 2 5 1 Rain(in) 0 ^�9Id? .4p lee ti� ti� ti� ti� � tititi � � lee If �61 � �J,�,��, -,4k' G �,A Date • Figure 4.1 -Wastewater System Flows (with Rainfall) 1999-date 70 • 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 3 0 2 LL 1.5 1 0.5 0 • Jan-93 Jun-94 Oct-95 Mar-97 Jul-98 Dec-99 Apr-01 Sep-02 Jan-04 Date Figure 4.2 - Wastewater System Flows 1994-date 71 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 --0—FY 1994 0 2 —N FY 1995 —A FY 1996 1.5 —H FY 1997 IN FY 1998 1 --0 FY 1999 —�—FY 2000 0.5 FY 2001 FY 2002 0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Month Figure 4.3 - Wastewater Flows by Month and Fiscal Year 72 250 200 150 E 100 50 0 BC MIR PPK PPN DB HAL LARGE USER Figure 4.4 - Comparisons of BOD in Wastewater 73 • Boo 700 eoo 2 eoo d 400 EE 300 zoo 1 FAA goo I rm ffff&— mum 0 BC MIR PPK PPN De HAL LARGEUSER Figure 4.5 - Comparisons of CBOD in Wastewater 74 1200 1000 800 600. E 400 200 0 BC MIR PPK PPN OB HAL LARGE USER Figure 4.6 - Comparisons of TDS in Wastewater 75 i 600 500 400 300 2DD 100 D FIAL gC MIR PPK PPN DB LARGE USER Figure 4.7 - Comparisons of Chlorides in Wastewater 76 300 250 200 a 150 E 100 50 0 pB FIHL BC MIR PPK PPN LARGE USER Figure 4.8 - Comparisons of Oil and Grease in Wastewater 77 s 8 ,F7 6 5 d a E 4 3 2 1 0 1. DB HAL MIR PPK PPN LARGE USER Figure 4.9 - Comparisons of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Wastewater 78 50 45 40 35 30 25 E 20 15 10 5 0 P BC MIR PPK PN DB HAL LARGE USER Figure 4.10 - Comparisons of Total Phenols in Wastewater 79 0.06 0.05 0.04 E 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 BC MIR PPK PPN DB HAL LARGE USER Figure 4.11 - Comparisons of Copper in Wastewater 80 80 70 60 50 30 20 10 0 BC MIR PPK PPN DB HAL LARGE USER Figure 4.12 - Comparisons of TKN in Wastewater 81 6 5 4 00 3 E 2 0 BC MIR PPK PPN DB HAL LARGE USER Figure 4.13 - Comparisons of Total Phosphorous in Wastewater 82 20 18 16 14 12 10 CC 8 6 4 2 0 BC MIR PPK PPN DB HAL LARGE USER Figure 4.14 - Comparisons of Chloroform in Wastewater 83 low _SW-23RD AVE_ - AdM Hlbf N m -d7� ._..... � ~- - !cn cr+ -- N Z Z N�11St Z�I1S dHW Al jV dN Z HJIH all HlO£N did _ kbM1SLZMS ri. _ FNI 3AV Hlb£N - lD aH d00MSNA`di� N �+ AVM HIOZ-MS F+• T CD 41 V, m GULF_STREAM..WAY �. CD ►� -i ,' r 1 ti.... v 96\" a CL d � ST-IRLING RD RAMP _ -+ Yn CD dW 581 dO " ' z N`iN2i08HOiH CD cCA i � n ��-i � Qp Z D O0 cn Z w ' NW 14TH WAY- � if .#!��_:MN 10 H11 MN 3��y1 1ndN to Hl£l MNcn __...... 3AV Hl£l MN 110 H1Z 6 MN Ind cn —1 MN - - --- - 4__...... -- --- — - end H Lz _ 3nt1jH1ZL MS 1 A , i i NW OTH VE � �I .mi _- I w w 1DH l MN and FIl6 MN —- -- Nlp S.W BTII ►p lO - ---- A cn Sw _._ p � � 'W �b 1SlZ N T Rp - 7Tf/.AV z_ 3nV Hlfi 3AV-H1B MN z S W S z _ v __ I H-AV 4T i� v W 6TH:AVE �._....:NW NTH E oo in ant/HL MN o V\/4T N S I — I u, 0 10"H1S MS; - A V c 2 Cr w H10Z-N u, 4n cn ,a, N v cn -i __:NW g 1 -I m S �'TI�AV w -and Hlg MN—'Z cn _ Z \ S►iy 3 W 4T Al%E IVW 5TH E o o T � w . ;v v RD AV cn — i� v _ :� _ ;�r 3nb'C1NZ MS:� NAVE TH AVER -� -� _- Fy ..:� mto h _ NVy 3Rp-AV i lO IS 4 1U1S cn D --- Y! - �- m 3-nd!1S 3nH 1S 6 MN - --... v cn cn h -i -cn z �` c y_cnL _r AMH�t�3C13�S AMHTda3a3�Nm -- - T - m m - -- 1 3nd 1S6N a� `m m m " I S 2 r= !N u) lm m lO1SC3N m 101S13N and 4NZ 35--m a r N I w �. m : Icn 3X z co ---3 - BN -- - - m � I -� ' cn !m �. m cn ao m m NOlNOL4 Aj 0• 'W n rig � v J _ ICU _I 3n,H,lb 3SCA � - v N -AVE- aIz nti H15`3S i-- _ m D '-1 --- 10 H19 3S -N-- c z TAYLOR_RD;O m cn v z Ipo ~ SSN 1Sd`If1J _v E < dH WV3Z1 m - d`j3 �d M SE�TN Cr r" dHW SU3N13M'; O D soCD cn s� CD � _ 0' � sf 0 Z � i � 5.0 NEEDS ASSESSMENT This section outlines the needs for the water, sewer and stormwater systems along with options explored to resolve the needs. The recommended projects are outlined with cost estimates. 5.1 Water System Needs There are six distinct areas of.need with the water system. The first is the need to address deteriorating water quality from the City's raw water supplies — especially in light of increased dependency on Broward County's Brian Piccolo Park well system. The current system cannot adequately treat the County's raw water. The existing elevated storage tank has not been used in 28 years, and is in dilapidated condition. However, the Broward County Public Health Unit has notified the City that they want a 2 million gallon storage tank installed in the system. Small, galvanized water lines need to be replaced and several looping lines need to be installed. Finally disinfection is a concern, as the City desires to move away from gas chlorine. The following sections outline each of the items: 5.1.1 Water Treatment Plant ® 5.1.2 Existing Elevated Storage Tank ® 5.1.3 Storage Tank a 5.1.4 Water Main Replacements © 5.1.5 Water Main Upgrades ® 5.1.6 Disinfection System a 5.1.7 Recommended Water Project Within each of these section, the current situation, the potential problems with the current situation, the alternatives to solve the problem (at least three are presented with cost impacts for each), and a recommended solution are presented. 5.1.1 Water Treatment Plant 5.1.1.1 Current Situation The City currently operates a 3.0 MGD lime softening package plant on Stirling Road. Current average daily demands are just over 2.2 MGD. The peak day recorded is 3.1 MGD. Growth is expected to be limited, but may put some pressure on the peak demands. Current treated water quality meets the standards, but future conversion to the County raw water supply will cause difficulty in the current plant's ability to treat the water. 85 5.1.1.2 Problems with the present situation The plant is over 40 years old and has lived its useful life. Its operation is familiar to the operations staff and it treats the City's current water supply wells adequately. However, the plant cannot treat the County's Brian Piccolo Park (BPP) water supplies adequately and the South Florida Water Management Districts latest permit indicates more water must be taken from the BPP supply. District staff also believes the City's wells will be eliminated in the next 10 ten years. Between the life of the current facility and the water quality impacts, some decisions must be made. 5.1.1.3 Alternatives There are six alternatives to resolve the problem: build a new lime softening water treatment plant, build. a membrane water treatment plant, refurbish the old water treatment plant, some combination of the above, buy bulk water, or do nothing. The do nothing alternative does not comply with the City's comprehensive planning effort to provide adequate service to its residents so this option will be discarded. Refurbishing the current water treatment plant is an option, but despite substantial investments, the current facility cannot be made to treat the County water supply. 5.1.1.3.1 Alternative 1 Description: A new lime softening facility could be built. Feasibility: A new lime softening plant will bring the same technology and operations as the current system. It will also suffer the same treatment limitations as the current facility, meaning it likely will not treat the County water source adequately. Cost Analysis: The cost of a new facility is $4.5 million, based on estimates given to the past Director. This option would require removal of the existing treatment system, which would not only cost about $500,000 to accomplish, but would require the City to purchase water from Hollywood for at least a year. Once complete, the new treatment plant operating costs will increase due to increases in lime for treatment and additional sludge generated from that treatment. Other operations and maintenance costs will be similar to the current facility. It is assumed that salvage will be negligible. Discussion: A totally new facility would require demolition of the current plant and construction of a building for housing the plant. Lime softening will be familiar to the operations staff. However, it will suffer the same issue as the current water plant — the County water supply will be difficult to treat, although with a larger reactor and added lime addition (enhanced coagulation), the color may bleach out. Enhanced coagulation is inherently less stable than the current operations, which may challenge the operations staff. Bleaching with chlorine is an option, but that would require the addition of ammonia to stop trihalomethane formation, an added cost. While technically feasible, the option has limited potential so will not be evaluated further. 86 5.1.1.3.2 Alternative 2 Description: To treat the County water supply, a nanofiltration water treatment facility could be constructed to meet the City's demands. Feasibility: Nanofiltration will resolve the treatment concerns and provide high quality water that will meet all existing and contemplated water quality standards. Cost Analysis: The cost for a new 3 MGD facility is $5 million. Disposal of concentrate from the facility will be a challenge — sewers or the C-10 canal are the only options that are reasonable. Said costs could add up to $1 million to the cost; an assumed cost of $500,000 is included in the cost estimate (if the C-10 is an option FDEP and the Broward County DPEP would consider, the cost would decrease). Operations costs would increase from current costs due to electrical increases albeit they would partially be offset by a decrease in chemical costs for treatment. Post-chemical costs are a potentially large cost - $50,000 per year or more. This option would require removal of the existing treatment system, which would not only cost about $500,000 to accomplish, but would require the City to purchase water from Hollywood for at least a year. Piping is located on site to facilitate the project, but a new building would need to be constructed to house the membrane system — estimated cost for a steel structure to house two or more skids is $100,000. Piping, given the existing site configuration, would likely be about $50,000 for the connections to the raw water line, finished water lines and a concentrate connection. A new generator would be required as the current generator is not adequate to handle the electrical load from the membrane system. This cost is assumed to be $250,000, which covers the generator and minor switchgear modifications. The power issue will need to be reviewed in more detail. Discussion: While this option would solve the treatment issues, its flexibility with regard to operations and demands is limited. Problems with this scenario are that the fluctuation in flows may create operational difficulties and peak demands likely would require an even larger system. However, because this alternative offers the best option to resolve the water quality issue, can be accomplished quickly and is the course being pursued by other southeast Florida utilities, it will be evaluated further. 5.1.1.3.3 Alternative 3 Description: A hybrid system — keeping the current water plant, but reducing the flow volumes, and supplementing with a 2 MGD nanofiltration skid with recirculation of the concentrate and reduced disposal costs, is a third option. Feasibility: This option would permit treatment of the County water source while limiting post-treatment chemical costs. This option has been successfully employed in Hollywood. Cost Analysis: Between refurbishment of the current plant, and the new skid, the cost would be $4.4 million. The skid is estimated to cost $3 million. Disposal is estimated at 87 $500,000 as noted in section 5.1.1.3.2. This estimate assumes that the lime softening system can be used to deal with the concentrate or the City can pursue one of two other cost effective solutions: ® Discharge to the sewer system (at reduced flows), which would require and industrial use permit under the City of Hollywood's pre-treatment program • Discharge directly to the C-10 Canal, which has a remote potential if proposed concentrate disposal rules are modified (this is by far the least costly alternative). To accomplish this option, some refurbishment of the existing system is required. Figure 3.6 shows the staining of the aluminum aerators. They have been in service for some time and wear is present in the aerator trays. The cost to complete the replacement of both aerators and fix the aerator tray problems is $100,000. In Figure 3.26, it was pointed out that the cat-walks are in poor condition. The cost to replace the cat-walks with aluminum and fiberglass is $100,000. The sludge collection system shows metal deterioration that must be repaired in-situ. Based on engineering judgment from other projects, the cost to make these repairs is $150,000. Miscellaneous repairs throughout the plant may be needed. These costs will be based on field inspection, but may include base work, weir repairs and cone repairs in the accelators. While in fair shape, the corrosive environment of the accelators and the presence of groundwater bacteria, encourages deterioration. The filters have neither situation, which is why repairs to the filters will be minimal. Based on similar projects, the engineer's estimate for metal repairs is $250,000. The estimates are liberal based on unknown conditions. Despite the modifications ongoing in the rehabilitation of the existing facility, this alternative would not require the City to purchase water from Hollywood for any extended periods. The skid could be located in an existing bay in the water plant building. Piping is located on site to facilitate the project. Given the existing site configuration, would likely be about $50,000 for the connections to the raw water line, finished water lines and a concentrate connection (see Figure 5.1). A new generator would be required if the City wanted to have full back-up power, as the current generator is not adequate to handle the electrical load from the membrane system. This cost is assumed to be $250,000, which covers the generator and minor switchgear modifications. The power issue will need to be reviewed in more detail, but would not be a required improvement as the lime system is fully operational under the current generator system. Discussion: The benefit is reduced operating costs from the membrane option since post chemical stabilization would not be required. The piping for this option is available and the skid could be constructed using performance specifications and installed in the current building. The option meets both flexibility and treatment needs. Mixed operations may challenge operators initially but this can be resolved with time. The hybrid system would require that some facets of the current system be refurbished, but the amount of refurbishment would be lessened because dependence on the system is less because redundancy is created. The hybrid operation has the benefit of simple tie-ins to the raw and finished water lines, an existing site for placement of the skid indoors, and 0 88 ease of site access. Limited site impact would be expected with this option as it is not disruptive. 5.1.1.3.4 Alternative 4 Description: Refurbishing the existing water plant could be pursued. Feasibility: A major refurbishment would be in order if the plant were to continue with the current operations for the next 30 years, and redundancy should be created. However after 50 years, the plant is beyond its useful life, has been refurbished once (early1990s) and cannot treat the County water supply adequately. As a result this option is not feasible and will not be considered further. 5.1.1.3.5 Alternative S Description: The City currently has an agreement for bulk service with Hollywood. The agreement could be used for the City to purchase water from Hollywood and abandon its current treatment facilities. Feasibility: Hollywood has expressed an interest in providing this service. Pipelines are needed, as is storage. Cost Analysis: The agreement is one-sided toward the City of Dania Beach with one exception — the cost, which is much higher than the City of Hollywood's other bulk customers based on a cost allocation developed based on the contract by the City of Hollywood's rate consultant. The City of Hollywood has indicated revising the agreement would permit them to lower the cost to $1.29/1000 gallons(current cost). The major improvements required for this option include a storage tank — most likely a ground storage tank with a pumping system (see section 5.1.3) and a pipeline from Hollywood's system to that storage tank in order to properly serve the City of Dania Beach. The pipeline cost is $750,000 based on recent construction estimates. Post- chemical costs of$20,000 or more may be required. If Hollywood wants the City to pay for a new 2 MGD skid, that cost is $3 million. This issue has been discussed. This option would require removal of the existing treatment system, which would cost about $500,000 to accomplish. New high service pumps may be required. The cost to supply a new high service pumping system and variable speed drives is $500,000. The existing generator appears to be adequate to handle the electrical load from the high service center proposed. The power issue will need to be reviewed in more detail. Discussion: Buying bulk water form Hollywood would solve the treatment and capacity issues for the City of Dania Beach. The City of Hollywood would then have their pumps and storage facilities providing same to Dania Beach, although in-City storage and re- pumping would still be required. A loss of direct control over the treatment of the water supply is a concern with this option, but the City of Hollywood's record with water quality, as a result of their membrane treatment system, surpasses the other surrounding 89 communities. As a larger facility, adequate capacity may.be available from the City of Hollywood. One unknown is the cost Hollywood might want for construction of an additional skid. IF this cost is factored in ($3 million), this project becomes less viable. 5.1.1.3.6 Alternative 6 Description: A joint Davie-Dania Beach - County regional water plant is an option. Feasibility: The City of Hollywood and the County continue to wrangle over the 3A service area and the Brian Piccolo water source. The conclusion of this issue is unclear and there may be an opportunity to work a joint solution with the Town of Davie, Broward County and the City of Dania Beach to construct a regional facility to serve all parties. The City of Dania Beach should strive to be the contracted operator of this facility as the County has indicated an interest in pulling staff from the south County area, and the Town of Davie would use the source as a supplement. Ownership of the facility would have to be an entity created by the parties to oversee operations. A loss of direct control is a concern with this option, but less so if the City is the operating entity. An 8 MGD water treatment facility and storage tanks would be anticipated. However, because it appears that Davie and Broward County are pursuing their own paths, and this option cannot be fully developed at this time, so will not be pursued further. 5.1.1.4 Summary of Alternatives In reviewing water treatment alternatives, three real options exist, albeit with major differences: a new membrane softening system, a hybrid membrane system with the existing plant refurbished and the purchase of bulk purchase from Hollywood. Table 5.1 summarizes the costs of each option. Tables 5.2 and 5.3 outline the 20-year cost cycle comparison between the City of Dania Beach building a new membrane water plant, a hybrid system and purchasing water from the City of Hollywood. It is assumed that no salvage value will remain in any of the facilities. Operations costs have been estimated from existing budgets, modified to factor in increases in power and/or chemical versus the bulk purchase. From this table is clear that the hybrid option is the least costly. 5.1.1.5 Recommended Alternative The recommended course of action is to construct the hybrid system, including the components outlined in Table 5.4. The City could delay or delete the generator modifications since back-up power to supply the redundancy in the lime system would remain available. Sequencing on construction to minimize disruptions will be a consideration. However, the membrane system could be constructed relatively quickly. A performance specification for a design-build system may be appropriate. The membrane system is sketched in Figure 5.1. 90 Table 5.1 Comparison of Capital Costs—Water Treatment Plant Component 2 MGD MS+Reha 3 MGD MS Plant Bulk w/repump Remove old WTP New Treatment Units $ 3,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 3,500,000 Disposal $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Remove old WTP $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Pipe Cost $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 750,000 Buidling $ 100,000 Added Power $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Refurbish Ex.WTP Repair Metal on Exisitng System $ 250,000 Replace aerators $ 100,000 Replace Cat-walks on Existing System $ 100,000 Refurbish Metal on Sludge System $ 150,000 Sub Total-Constr. $ 4,400,000 $ 6,400,000 $ 4,750,000 Engineering (12%) $ 528,000 $ 768,000 $ 570,000 Contingency (10%) $ 440,000 $ 640,000 $ 475,000 TOTAL $ 5,368,000 $ 7,808,000 $ 5,795,000 91 Table 5.2 Life Cycle Cost of Treatment Options Year 2 MGD MS + Reha Bulk w/repump MS WTP 1 $ 1,035,468 $ 1,193,950 $ 1,055,468 2 $ 1,066,532 $ 1,228,575 $ 1,092,410 3 $ 1,098,528 $ 1,264,203 $ 1,130,644 4 $ 1,131,484 $ 1,300,865 $ 1,170,216 5 $ 1,165,429 $ 1,338,590 $ 1,211,174 6 $ 1,200,391 $ 1,377,409 $ 1,253,565 7 $ 1,236,403 $ 1,417,354 $ 1,297,440 8 $ 1,273,495 $ 1,458,457 $ 1,342,850 9 $ 1,311,700 $ 1,500,753 $ 1,389,850 10 $ 1,351,051 $ 1,544,275 $ 1,438,495 11 $ 1,391,583 $ 1,589,059 $ 1,488,842 12 $ 1,433,330 $ 1,635,141 $ 1,540,952 13 $ 1,476,330 $ 1,682,560 $ 1,594,885 14 $ 1,520,620 $ 1,731,355 $ 11650,706 15 $ 1,566,239 $ 1,781,564 $ 1,708,481 16 $ 1,613,226 $ 1,833,229 $ 1,768,277 17 $ 1,661,623 $ 1,886,393 $ 1,830,167 18 $ 1,711,471 $ 1,941,098 $ 1,894,223 19 $ 1,762,815 $ 1,997,390 $ 1,960,521 20 $ 1,815,700 $ 2,055,314 $ 2,029,139 TOTAL Ann Cost $ 27,823,419 $ 31,757,534 $ 29,848,306 Assume 6.125% Infl $ 8,675,342 $ 9,901,999 $ 9,306,702 TOTAL Life Cycle $ 14,043,342 $ 15,696,999 $ 17,114,702 92 Table 5.3 Present Worth Analysis—Water Plant Options 2 MGD MS+Rehab Bulk w/repump MS WTP Item Operations $ 1,035,468 $ 1,193,950 $ 1,055,468 Growth Rate 1.030 1.029 1.035 Present Worth $ 8,675,342 $ 9,901,999 $ 9,306,702 Assume 3% Infl Debt $ 364,493 $ 393,486 $ 530,171 Annual Cost $ 1,399,961 $ 1,587,436 $ 1,585,639 Present Worth $ 5,368,000 $ 5,795,000 $ 7,808,000 Assume 6.125% Infl TOTAL PW $ 14,043,342 $ 15,696,999 $ 17,114,702 93 Table 5.4 Recommended Plant Construction Component Cost 2 MGD Membrane Skid $ 3,000,000 Disposal $ 500,000 Piping $ 50,000 Additional On-site Power $ 250,000 Refurbish Existing WTP Repair Metal on Existing System $ 250,000 Replace Cat-walks on Existing Plant $ 100,000 Replace Aerators $ 100,000 Refurbish Metal on Sludge Collection System $ 150,000 Construction Cost $ 4,400,000 Engineering $ 528,000 Contingency $ 440,000 Worst Case Cost $ 5,368,000 5.1.2 Existing Elevated Storage Tank 5.1.2.1 Current Situation The City has one, old, elevated storage tank that it has not used or maintained in years. 5.1.2.2 Problems with Current Situation The tank has been unused for nearly 30 years. It has not been maintained and poses an attractive nuisance to the City. For safety reasons, problems with the tank need to be addressed. Taking the tank down is in the public interest and could save the City from potential lawsuits. 5.1.2.3 Alternatives There are three options for dealing with the old tank: take it down, repair it or do nothing. 94 5.1.2.3.1 Alternative 1 Description: Repairing the old tank to serviceable condition is one option. Feasibility: A tank inspector looked at the tank. He declined to climb it. From his visual inspection, his conclusion is that tank is not repairable for any reasonable cost. Issues with lead paint, containment of sanding and paint chips, and extensive metal replacement are potential issues. Cost: The costs of repair exceed the cost of a new tank. The current tank is not adequately sized (it is only 0.25 MG). The Broward County Public Health Unit has informed the City that a 2 million gallon tank is required, which means repairing this tank, with such a small portion of the required storage, is not useful. Dealing with a new tank would eliminate the need for this option. Discussion: This is not a viable option and will not be considered further. 5.1.2.3.2 Alternative 2 Description: Taking down the existing tank and disposing of it. Feasibility: Taking down the tank is feasible. Lead paint concerns would be the responsibility of the contractor. This could be accomplished quickly. Cost Analysis: Taking the tank down would cost $250,000 for takedown and disposal. Discussion: Taking the tank down eliminates the public nuisance and hazard issues and relieves the City of potential liabilities. This option also frees up the site for the replacement tank to be erected. This alternative appears to be the only viable option, and the most prudent option to pursue. 5.1.2.3.3 Alternative 3 Description: This alternative involves leaving the tank as is. Feasibility: Leaving the tank in place is feasible but resolves none of the risk issues associated with the liability for the structure as an attractive nuisance. Cost Analysis: There are no current costs for this option, but the potential liability is a financial liability for the City. One lawsuit over the tank would dwarf the takedown costs. Discussion: Doing nothing will delay the takedown costs, but the logical, and fiscally responsible thing to do is remove the existing tank. This is not a viable option and will not be considered further. 95 5.1.2.4 Summary of Alternatives There is only one viable option identified — taking down the existing tank at a cost of $250,000, since on-site storage is being required by the Broward County Public Health Unit as an ongoing operations issue(see next section). 5.1.2.5 Recommended Alternative Remove the existing, dilapidated 0.25 million gallon storage tank. 5.1.3 Additional Water Storage 5.1.3.1 Current Situation The City currently has only 380,000 gallons of storage in two wet wells on the plant site. The City has an abandoned 0.25 million gallon elevated storage tank that is recommended to be torn down. The City relies on interconnects for additional peak needs. 5.1.3.2 Problems with Current Situation The Broward County Public Health Unit informed the City that they were going to require that 2 million gallons of storage be installed on the City's water system to meet the storage requirements for water systems based on 10 States Standards (see Appendix S). Regardless of the treatment scenario pursued, including the purchase of water from Hollywood, a storage system must be added. 5.1.3.3 Alternatives There are three options for dealing with the old tank: elevated tankage, ground storage and do nothing. 5.1.3.3.1 Alternative I Description: Install a 2 million gallon elevated storage tank. Feasibility: It appears to be feasible to construct a 2 million gallon elevated storage tank at the site of the current elevated storage tank based on pricing from a vendor. Cost: The capital cost for the elevated provided by a design-build vendor is $1.8 million. An annual contract of$30,000 will maintain the tank. Aerial space could be leased —the total receipts of which could be $120,000 per year. 96 Discussion: This is a viable option. The only disincentive is the location near the cost during storm events. Elevated tanks have the advantage of being able to stabilize pressure less expensively than ground storage systems. The City staff prefers this option. 5.1.3.3.2 Alternative 2 Description: Install a 2 million gallon ground storage tank. Feasibility: Ground storage would best be located at the water plant site as opposed to the elevated tank site. A ground storage tank requires a high service pumping center. Cost Analysis: The ground storage option would cost $1.3 million for the tank, but requires a high service-pumping center, which adds $0.5 million to the cost, plus annual operations (electricity). Therefore, the cost of the ground storage system will be similar to that of the elevate tank, without the potential for revenues. Discussion: Taking the tank down eliminates the public nuisance and hazard issues and relieves the City of potential liabilities. This option also frees up the site for the replacement tank to be erected. This alternative appears to be the only viable option, and the most prudent option to pursue. 5.1.3.3.3 Alternative 3 Description: This alternative is ignoring the Broward County Public Health Unit requirement for additional storage. Feasibility: Ignoring a regulatory directive will subject the City to regulatory action and fines. Cost Analysis: There are no current costs for this option, but the potential liability is a financial liability for the City. Discussion: Doing nothing is not a viable option and will not be considered further. 5.1.3.4 Summary of Alternatives The Broward County Public Health Unit has informed the City that a 2 million gallon tank is required. An elevated storage tank could be located at the existing tank site. It would be constructed as a design-build system. A ground storage tank would be constructed at the water plant site. Some site limitations are present. Added pumping and electrical costs would be required. The two options are nearly equal. The elevated tank option has the attractive feature of stabilizing pressure without power cost. 97 5.1.3.5 Recommended Alternative Construct a 2 million gallon elevated storage tank at the existing tank site, constructed as a design-build system. 5.1.4 Water Main Replacements This program, as envisioned by the City, replaces current pipelines. A few of the old pipelines are galvanized and generally 2 inches in diameter. The City will replace all of these pipelines with pipelines made of PVC C900,fire generally tionnches in Leaky pipeter andless salt there are reasons for larger pipes to provide prote immersed pipes are the priority. 5.1.4.1 Current Situation The City needs to replace the old pipelines are galvanized and generally 2 inches in diameter. These provide insufficient service and are prone to significant leakage. 5.1.4.2 Problems with Current Situation The old pipelines are galvanized and leak continually. Replacement will reduce the amount of leakage and protect service to the customers in these areas. 5.1.4.3 Alternatives There are three options for dealing with the old lines: replace the lines with PVC, replace the pipeline with ductile iron piping, or do nothing, which will require continued repair. 5.1.4.3.1 Alternative I Description: Replace the 2-inch pipeline with larger pipelines made of C900 PVC. Feasibility: For years the City of Dania Beach, as well as other cities throughout the nation, has replaced these older lines. Therefore the option is feasible. Cost: PVC C900 pipelines generally cost under $25 per foot in these situations. While ductile iron pipes are an alternative, the salt conditions make this option less attractive. The cost of this program is $323,000. Discussion: This is the recommended alternative as continued leaks are not acceptable from a public health or regulatory viewpoint, and early replacement or increased leakage in the future are not desirable. 98 5.1.4.3.2 Alternative 2 Description: Replace the 2-inch pipeline with larger pipelines made of ductile iron. Feasibility: For years the City of Dania Beach, as well as other cities throughout the nation, has replaced these older lines. Therefore the option is feasible and ductile iron is a material permitted in the system under certain conditions. Cost: The cost for using ductile iron is similar to PVC, generally costing under $25 per foot. The cost of this program is $323,000, the same as PVC. The City permits no other material. Discussion: While ductile iron pipes are an alternative, the salt conditions make this option less attractive — parts of the City may experience periodic saltwater intrusion, which would shorten the life of the pipe. Early replacement and increased maintenance are problems. This is no the preferred alternative as continued leaks are not acceptable from a public health or regulatory viewpoint. 5.1.4.3.3 Alternative 3 Description: This option is to do nothing. Feasibility: For years the City of Dania Beach has replaced these older lines. Leaks are an ongoing problem as consume staff maintenance time. At some point, pipelines cannot be repaired. These old lines are nearing this point. As a result, the do nothing alternative is not viable. Cost: Added staff costs consumed on repairing leaks detract form other priorities of the City. The costs cannot be directly determined at this time, but are zero upfront. Discussion: This is not a viable alternative. 5.1.4.4 Summary of Alternatives Table 5.5 and Figure 5.2 show the replacement program needs and cost estimates. These are ongoing by the City. Table 5.6 and 5.7 show the 20 year cost cycle comparison between the do nothing and the replacement program. The lowest long-term cost is to keep up with the replacements. Tables 5.8 and 5.9 show the difference made in the budget with the ongoing improvements. Therefore the option to pursue is to replace these pipelines. The do nothing alternative also does not meet the City's fiscal or comprehensive planning needs. 5.1.4.5 Recommended Alternative Because there is a cost to maintaining older, leaky pipelines, the best option to pursue is 0 to replace these pipelines with PVC pipe. 99 5.1.5 Water Main Upgrades This program, as envisioned by the City, is intended to address low flow or low-pressure problems in the City and to deal with the looping problems by completing a series of loops and reinforcements. 5.1.5.1 Current Situation Several areas of the City have low pressure as a result of undersized water mains or development not contemplated in the past. Most are on the fringes of the system. In addition, there are problems with looping in the system. 5.1.5.2 Problems with Current Situation Pressure problems beget low flows and limit availability during demand periods. These need to be corrected to maintain the integrity of the system. 5.1.5.3 Alternatives There are three options for dealing with the looping problem: complete the loops, add pumping or do nothing. 5.1.5.3.1 Alternative 1 Description: There are a series of loops and reinforcements that need to be completed. These are outlined on Table 5.3. Feasibility: Low pressure and flow limitations may contribute to public health impacts in times of stress on the water system. Installation of the pipelines in the public right-of- way or canal easements is feasible. This is the only feasible alternative. Cost: PVC C900 pipelines generally cost under $25 per foot in these situations. While ductile iron pipes are an alternative, the salt conditions make this option less attractive. The costs are similar. The City permits no other material. The cost to complete the looping and reinforcement involved in this program is $1.1 million. Discussion: Continued low pressure and flow limitations are not acceptable in the City's growth management plan or from a regulatory perspective. Therefore the situation needs to be corrected. 5.1.5.3.2 Alternative 2 Description: This option is to add pumping and/or storage. 100 Feasibility: Permitting pressure and flow problems is not acceptable. New storage sites are limited in a system that is built out. The current storage site is to be replaced, but adding height will not solve pipeline problems at the extremities. Adding pumping capacity would. Limited site availability is present. Cost: There are three main areas with 000 in valuing forquire eacht�Theee ttotalscostas estimated cost of $250,000 each, plus $50 $900,000. The operations and maintenance costs would be over 0,000 per year added at a cost or of of these stations, mostly in electrical cost Telemetry would need to be $25,000. Discussion: While a viable option, the upstream piping must be able to deliver water in accordance with the demands of the system. Restriction in the small piping can partially be overcome with pumping, but the friction losses create significant wasted energy. While a viable option the City does not desire to have multiple pumping stations that complicate the water system operation, especially when the long term costs have a negative affect on the budget. This is not a recommended alternative. 5.1.5.3.3 Alternative 3 Description: This option is to do nothing. Feasibility: Permitting pressure and flow problems is not acceptable. As a result, the do nothing alternative is not viable and will not be pursued further. Cost: None. Discussion: This is not a viable alternative given the flow and pressure issues. 5.1.5.4 Summary of Alternatives The do nothing alternative was rejected. Adding pumping complicates the system operation and adds operational costs that would not otherwise be incurred. This is not a viable option from the City's perspective. 5.1.5.5 Recommended Alternative Serving existing developed areas are the first priority. Figure 5.3 outlines the priority systems. The first is a 12-inch pipeline from Stirling Road, north on Bryan Road to NW I" Ave. This will complete part of the 12-inch loop that serves the hotels. The next priority would be completion of the second part of the loop — on Old Griffin road — less than 500 feet of 12-inch pipe appears to be needed to complete the loop. Federal Highway is a priority in light of CRA and beautification efforts. FDOT is supposed to pave the road in the near future, so design and construction of a 12-inch pipeline would address future needs for commercial redevelopment on Federal Highway. 101 Coordination with FDOT is required, including the potential to enter into an agreement with FDOT to have line designed and constructed in conjunction with their program. Other priorities are focused on completing loops that will address pressure issues, such as a loop across to Melaleuca Gardens (which should be done in conjunction with the Old Griffin Road project), a southeast/southwest connector and improved connections on Sheridan Street to the City of Hollywood system. Table 5.10 and Figure 5.3 show the upgrade program needs and costs. Table 5.11 shows the present worth cost comparison. The do nothing alternative does not meet the City's fiscal or comprehensive planning needs. The cost of this program is $1.2 million. Table 5.5 Water Main Replacement Program Pipeline From - To Amount Units Unit Cost Cost 4th Street SW US 1 to 4th Ave. SW 1425 LF $ 25 $ 35,625 5th Street SW US 1 to 4th Ave. SW 1500 LF $ 25 $ 37,500 6th Street SW US 1 to 4th Ave. SW 1600 LF $ 25 $ 40,000 7th Street SW US 1 to 4th Ave. SW 1650 LF $ 25 $ 41,250 8th Street SW 2nd AV SW to 4th Av 1100 LF $ 25 $ 27,500 9th Street SW 3rd AV SW to 4th Av 1000 LF $ 25 $ 25,000 5th Street SE US 1 to 2nd Ave. SE 500 LF $ 25 $ 12,500 6th Street SE US 1 to 2nd Ave. SE 500 LF $ 25 $ 12,500 8th Street SE US 1 to 2nd Ave. SE 500 LF $ 25 $ 12,500 9775 $ 244,375 Engineering (15%) 36,656 Continency (15%) $ 42,155 TOTAL REPLACEMENT LINES $ 323,186 102 Table 5.6 Present Worth Analysis of Water Line Replacement Program Options Repair Only Replace Item Maintenance $ 616,629 $ 604,379 Growth Rate 1.045 Var from 1.018 Present Worth $ 7,806,941 $ 6,353,116 Assume 6.125% Infl Debt Variable Variable Present Worth $ - $ 323,186 Assume 6.125% Infl TOTAL PW $ 7,806,941 $ 6,676,302 103 Table 5.7 Present Worth Analysis Assumptions for Water Line Replacement Program Rate Repair Only Rate Replacement Year $ 684,929 $ 684,929 $ 672,679 $ 672,679 1 1.045 $ 715,7.50 1.019 $ 685,460 2 1.046045 $ 748,707 1.028 $ 704,310 3 1.047091045 $ 783,965 1.029 $ 724,594 4 1.048138136 $ 821,703 1.030 $ 746,404 5 1.049186274 $ 862,120 1.031 $ 769,841 6 1.05023546 $ 905,429 1.033 $ 795,015 7 1.051285696 $ 951,864 1.034 $ 822,045 8 1.052336982 $ 1,001,682 1.035 $ 851,064 9 1.053389319 $ 1,055,161 1.037 $ 882,213 10 1.054442708 $ 1,112,607 1.038 $ 915,648 11 1.055497151 $ 1,174,353 1.039 $ 951,542 12 1.056552648 $ 1,240,766 1.041 $ 990,079 13 1.0576092 $ 1,312,246 1.042 $ 1,031,465 14 1.05866681 $ 1,389,231 1.043 $ 1,075,921 15 1.059725476 $ 1,472,203 1.044 $ 1,123,692 • 16 1.060785202 $ 1,561,692 1.046 $ 1,175,044 17 1.061845987 .$ 1,658,276 1.047 $ 1,230,271 18 1.062907833 $ 1,762,595 1.048 $ 1,289,694 19 1.063970741 $ 1,875,349 1.050 $ 1,353,662 20 $ 23,090,627 $ 18,790,642 PV $ 7,806,941 $ 6,353,116 Assume PW 6.125% TOTAL PW $ 7,806,941 $ 6,627,116 104 N N N GwNO 00 00 pw w w w In Ngg , `cS CO NONo N C6co 0� pj OD N 000 N N n n O w w w w w w w N^G go� m ww 09.Lfk o N O M 00 iD N N n n O w w w w w w w w N.J. 0Q��d� V) OD N N N cis w w w w w w w w w On �j�,��ij IP P �p O O O N N N (O w w w w w w w w w 3 we N q 1 y o ce N 00 N 1 w w w OF w M w w w w cad O . vs O i ao rNNi of 8 v N N N 00 N � >Cow VP w V., w tollw toil w w 128120 8 S �3 A N �noQg �' m Ir N O N (00 N Ifj . � O I(1 ON R �m w w to VI. w w w w w w N N pp� N O N cvj lrj p � � N n � V O O 000 0 16 0 n n m OD Q Q O N} alL m w w 0 fq w w w w w w w w w w w "Ql N i O N Q 0 c O 07 Imo r LL w w w w w w w w w w w w w O l7 lq L C O O 1 0 $O n 0 N VVV w w w w w U- w w w N C y O_ L? d w F- c s w is Z c V W N U) ° `° p c as m m a v A O c 0 c m 0 LL '& t CS O w .2 0J d CD g ozmMm 0 0 ; o o a o m m a �W m O F Z a f710 r (1OD�� NN > r L � w too. 88ww w (Gwppww w �n C 7 1(I r Gp ' N YSy did f0 C N N N r A w w w w w w w w w w 8 N Go pp Qp {ap R N O O ' O O OI $ O N N O m Ti mC C�L6 v NNn�p t� Gwpw QQw w www w w� Q W Q in �i 5Zj f,)O8 n , NRO V) � ' N OIN� 0p�L6 (6 GD N rl N ww ww w w1Aw w w n� N in N N O N N 2 3 ww ww w w w w w r C id Vl � ww ww w w w w w pqp 8 p G` .� In 0 O O O w CD O P> N GD Gn [—' N N N 1D •'N m ww ww w w w w w w � o A &n00� L g P" Npp 8 N O N CD N N m w w w w w w w w w w w w Qw w 110 � M m p pp o �S L U N R O GO GO N n �•" �m w w vl wV). w w w w w w a m N N? GCL act O G7 O r ww b9w wwww w w w w w O N pp @ CIL � O ' ���� o i N ww w w w w w w N O N U WQ`1 o O QQ W m O "' w z a ~ to F m m mIUL o o O HO Z p a maa c ~O a O O vim a►-womb i- �nc� z Table 5.10 Water Main Looping Costs Pipeline From-To Amount Units Unit Cost Cost 16"C900 PVC-NW 4th Ave 1st St.SW to Old Griffin Roa 3200 LF $ 40 $ 128,000 12"C900 PVC-SW 14th St SE 2nd Ave to Dixie Highway 2800 LF $ 40 $ 112,000 12"C900 PVC Bryan Road Stirling Rd to Tigertail Blvd. 2060 LF $ 46 $ 96,666 12"C900 PVC 8 J&B Dania Cut-off US 1 to 4th Ave:.SW 800 LF LS $ 40,000 12"C900 PVC Dania Beach Blvd. 4th Ave NW to 3rd Ave SE 2000 LF $ 40 $ 80,000 12"C900 PVC-Federal Highway Ph 1 Old Griffin to Stirling Rd 3400 LF $ 40 $ 136,000 12"C900 PVC-Federal Highway Ph 2 Stirling Rd to Sheridan St 5300 LF $ 40 $ 212,000 Hollywood Tie-in Sheridan Street LF LS $ 50,000 12"C900 PVC-Old Griffin Road Bryan Road to 1-95 2000 LF $ 40 $ 80,000 21500 $ 918,000 Engineering(15%) 137,700 Continency(15%) $ 158,355 TOTAL REPLACEMENT LINES $ 1,214,055 Table 5.11 Present Worth Analysis of Water Line Looping Vs. Pumping Program Options Pipelines Pump Stations Item Operations Increase $ - 50,000/yr Growth Rate 1.030 Present Worth $ 454,244 Assume 6A25% Infi Construction $ 1,214,055 $ 925,000 TOTAL PW $ 1,214,055 $ 1,379,244 107 5.1.6 Disinfection System Improvements 5.1.6.1 Current Situation Chlorine gas is currently utilized at the water plant for disinfection purposes. Recent regulatory requirements and public safety issues have caused the City to re-evaluate the use and storage of gaseous chlorine on-site. 5.1.6.2 Problems with Current Situation Regulatory requirements and public safety issues have caused the City to re-evaluate the use and storage of gaseous chlorine on-site or liquid hypo-chlorite. 5.1.6.3 Alternatives There are three options for dealing with the chlorine problem: do nothing, on-site generation and ultraviolet disinfection. 5.1.6.3.1 Alternative I Description: The do nothing alternative is to continue with gas chlorine Feasibility: The problem with this is that while easy and well understood, given security issues involving water plants, the gas chlorine is a potential source of danger. In addition, the current system is about at its useful life. Rather than replace it with a gas system later and perform a risk management plan, it is more logical to pursue a less risky disinfection system. Cost: None at the present time for installation. Discussion: A risk management plan should be performed. The cost for this plan is $50,000. Later rehabilitation of the site will be required. The option does not address the problems identified with birds and termites. Therefore this option is not deemed to be viable. 5.1.6.3.2 Alternative 2 Description: Ultraviolet light is an option for water treatment. Feasibility: Ultraviolet is an option for disinfection. However a chlorine residual is still required so the problem is not resolved. In addition, the staff has no experience with ultraviolet disinfection and reconfiguration of the site may be significant. Cost: The cost for excavation of the project is $100,000. Re-piping and purchase of an ultraviolet system is $150,000. Operations costs will increase $45,000 per year over the 108 current operations costs. The new building and telemetry will cost $100,000 while an ongoing disinfection system will remain. Discussion: While the costs may appear to be similar to the on-site system, the operations costs make it a less attractive alternative. In addition, since chlorine is still required, then the on-site system is still existing building reasonablwill e or required as well. A move to this method of disinfection does not seem feasible at this site, so will not be considered further. 5.1.6.3.3 Alternative 3 Description: On-site generated chlorine gas will be a 250 lb/day 0.8% sodium-hypo- chlorite generation system to include solution generators, brine tank/makers, hypo- chlorite storage tanks, transfer and metering pumps, modifications to the existing chlorine distribution system, and associated appurtenance and controls. The existing chlorine cylinder building and chlorinator room, along with part of the existing chemical mixing room, will be utilized for the installation of the system. Feasibility: This is a feasible system that could retrofit the existing site with limited problem. Cost: The total estimated cost is $350,000. These costs include the repair of the termite- infested roof and areas of bird perching that has drawn the attention of the public health unit in Broward County as well and the on-site generator. Discussion: others are pursuing this system throughout Florida. The systems have a short track record, but seem to work adequately. This is the recommended alternative. 5.1.6.4 Summary of Alternatives Gas is the alternative with the most risk and greatest liabTheility. In use of ultraviolet oft light concerns about security, removing the gas system is recommended. olves many issues,but still requires the injection of a chlorine disinfectant. Therefore the conversion to the on-site system has merit. 5.1.6.5 Recommended Alternative Since many other cities are pursuing on-site systems throughout Florida, is would appear this is the best option to pursue. The City's engineer-of-record is reviewing this option. 5.1.7 Recommended Water Project Based on the prior sections 5.1.1 to 5.1.6, it is recommended that the City pursue a program that involves the construction of a 2 million gallon elevated storage tank to meet the storage required by the Broward County Public Health Unit, and a 2 MGD nanofiltration upgrade with existing plant refurbishment. This will ensure continued high 109 water quality despite use of the Broward County wells, while solving post-treatment chemical concerns. Ongoing upgrades to the water distribution should include replacing the remaining 2-inch galvanized water lines and looping the large lines that are currently dead-ended or are tied to smaller lines. Gas chlorine should be replaced with an on-site system and security measures should be pursued. Table 5.12 outlines the proposed water program. Table 5.12 Recommended Water Program Component Cost 2 MGD Membrane Skid, Disposal, Piping, $ 5,386,000 and Plant Refurbishment Exisitng Tank Removal $ 250,000 Elevated Tank $ 1,800,000 Replacement Water Pines $ 323,186 Water Pipeline Looping $ 1,214,055 Chlorine System $ 350,000 TOTAL $ 9,323,241 5.2 Sanitary Sewer Improvements 5.2.1 Infiltration/Inflow Reduction EPA has established infiltration criteria depending on the footage of collection sewer in the area as follows: Table 5.13 EPA Infiltration Allowance Allowance Range Sewage Footage (gpd/in-mile) 2,000-3,000 > 100,000 3,000-5,000 50,000-100,000 5,000-8,000 1,000-50,000 110 The criteria in the table are used as a primary indicator for the assessment and classification of collection system infiltration. In 1993, the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and Miami-Dade County entered into a Settlement Agreement. The Agreement required that a Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES) be conducted on any collection basin with a night flow in excess of 10 gpm per mile of gravity sewer. This newly developed criterion is used as a secondary requirement in prioritization. Areas of the City of Dania Beach's sewer systemwere-flow rankedmn descending order by the completion of the 1993 rehabilitation program. The areas were measured infiltration in gallon per day per inch-mile of collection sewers and the results were compared against the EPA criteria for classification of an area as having "excessive" infiltration. The City has limited current infiltration and inflow,needs except in the southeast section of the City. At the same time, to protect the current investments, the City needs to.monitor, televise and line areas of the City that develop leaks. As recommended in the City's "Sewer System Rehabilitation" report, an ongoing SSES should be performed in these collection systems. The recommended program for the collection areas that have been identified in the initial I/I reduction program is a modified SSES. The following are the procedures to be conducted and their typical costs: Table 5.14 SSES Procedures and Associated Typical Costs Procedures Standard SSES Modified SSES 1. Manhole Inspection $55.00 each ($0.22/LF)' 2. Smoke Testing $0.30 LF $0.30/LF 3. Dye Water Testing $700/each ($0.10/LF)2 - 4. TV Inspection $1.25/LF $1.25/LF 5. Evaluation $1.65/LF $1.60/LF TOTAL $3.52/LF $3.15/LF 1. Assume average line segment is 250 feet. 2. Assume test performed on every 7,000 feet. The rehabilitation costs can be significantly different at each pump-station collection area, depending upon its conditions. Experience based on past projects indicates that repair costs of construction and program management vary from $12.00/LF to $20.00/LF, and could be as high as $40.00/LF, if no previous repair work has been done in the system. For those collection systems that have been through the initial rehabilitation programs, a repair cost of $12.00 per foot of sewer was assumed. If $12.00/LF is the assumed construction cost for the additional repair work in these collection systems, the 111 total 1/1 reduction program costs, including program management, SSES, and rehabilitation could be $15.15/LF ($12.00 + $3.15). For collection systems that are not included in the Initial 1/I Reduction Program, a cost of$16.00/LF is assumed, resulting in the total cost of$19.52/LF ($16.00 + $3.52). An ongoing appropriation for infiltration and inflow repair should be included in each annual budget. No borrowing appears to be needed since the wastewater flows balance the water flows indicating that infiltration and inflow control is under control and no specific projects can be identified. However, southeastern Dania Beach has service lateral issues that may be tackled from a different perspective. A grant option may be available to explore methods to correct lateral damage in the system. 5.2.2 Lift Station Rehabilitation and Telemetry There are 17 lift stations serving the City. There are limited controls and the stations are older. Some rehabilitation and telemetry for tracking data is important. It is especially of concern since the City purchases bulk wastewater service from the City of Hollywood, so reducing infiltration and preventing excess inflow is important. Identifying and tracking problem areas is best accomplished with telemetry. The cost per station is $20,000. Two options exist — do nothing and provide some degree of oversight. Doing nothing means the City is blind to the collection system. This is not in keeping with the goals of the City and likely causes the City to incur, periodic large inflow occurrences in the system. An engineer who designs telemetry systems should perform a needs assessment of each lift station. The cost of the study will be under $50,000. The cost to retrofit and telemeterize the system is under $400,000, but the costs are highly dependent on the findings of the control boxes at the lift stations. Most of the stations use bubblers for control. Sonic systems should be reviewed if the bubblers are not functioning well. An inventory of pump needs and concrete, rail and pipe repairs for each station needs to be undertaken. Since many of the lift stations are older, and do not have liners or protected metal, they will require refurbishing. The cost for this program is estimated at $300,000. However, replacing lift stations will cost over $100,000 each, and use of more efficient pumps may reduce power consumption. FPL may have an interest in reviewing the City's power cost for lift stations. 5.3 Stormwater Stormwater needs are currently being addressed in three areas of the City: SW 40th Ave in the recently annexed area (by Broward County), on 32°d Ave where the City is raising the road to reduce flooding, and recently upgraded pump station improvements at Meadowbrook Apartments (north) at SE P St and SE 5 Ave. However, the southeast basin remains a concern as identified on Figure 4.1. Flooding continues in the areas of SE 2°d and 3'd Avenues and around Olsen Middle School. 112 5.3.1.1 Current Situation The southeast basin remains a concern as identified on Figure 4.1. Flooding continues in the area of SE 2"a and P Avenues and around Olsen Middle School. 5.3.1.2 Problems with Current Situation Flooding during rainstorms can have health effects. Also since this is around the school, it can be hazardous to children trying to leave school (typically the rains come about when school lets out). 5.3.1.3 Alternatives There are three options for dealing with the flooding: a piping and pumping system, a series of pumps or do nothing. 5.3.1.3.1 Alternative 1 Description: The solution appears to be tie-ins with the 36-inch pipeline on SE 7 h Street that drains to West Lake. Figure 5.4 shows the improvements anticipated. These would be pipes and catch basins in the existing swales. It would be noted that curb and gutters would require complete rebuilding of the road and likely added property acquisition. Connection of piping should be pursued on SE 2"d, SE 3rd and SE 4a' Avenue between SE 11'h Terrace and SE 7a' Street to convey water to the large interceptor line that is currently in place on SE 7 h Street. Modifications from the stormwater plan have been made because Meadowbrook Apartments will not permit the City to use their lakes. Feasibility: The pump station is required to make this feasible so as not to overflow the interceptor on SE 7'}' Street. Cost: The estimated cost is $624,000 as outlined in Table 5.15 Discussion: This solution resolves the problem in the area with the most critical need in the City. No land would need to be acquired and all work would a in the right-of-way of the City. Some inconvenience to homeowners will occur during construction. 5.3.1.3.2 Alternative 2 Description: Installation of pumping systems on SE 2'a, 3`d and 4a' Avenues near SE I I' Terrace and pumping to SE 7 treet. Feasibility: This option is feasible if .the property to locate the pumping system is available. Since this is residential developed property, it would need to be acquired. This may prove problematic. 113 Cost Analysis: The costs for the pumping system sis $150,000 each. Four would be required, plus piping. Land costs would approach $100,000. Discussion: This is a problematic option given the land acquisition needs. Given this cost exceeds the gravity option of Alternative 1, it will not be considered further. 5.3.1.3.3 Alternative 3 Description: This alternative involves leaving drainage as is. Feasibility: Leaving the tank in place is feasible but resolves none of the flooding issues or the associated liability for the flooding. Cost Analysis: There are no current costs for this option, but the potential liability is a financial liability for the City. Discussion: While the situation has existed for years, given the City is aware of the problem, this is not a viable option and will not be considered further. 5.3.1.4 Summary of Alternatives There is only one viable option, Alternative 1. 5.3.1.5 Recommended Alternative The solution appears to be tie-ins with the 36-inch pipeline on SE 7h Street that drains to West Lake. Figure 5.4 shows the improvements anticipated. These would be pipes and catch basins in the existing swales. It would be noted that curb and gutters would require complete rebuilding of the road and likely added property acquisition. Connection of piping should be pursued on SE 2nd, SE 3' and SE 4 h Avenue between SE l la' Terrace and SE 7 h Street to convey water to the large interceptor line that is currently in place on SE 7d' Street. Table 5.15 outlines the stormwater costs. 5.3.2 Other Stormwater Projects In addition to the SE Drainage project, improvements constructed by MOT on Federal Highway drain to the City's system on 2`ld Avenue SE, which decreases the system capacity. The City and MOT are working toward a solution to this problem. FDOT has recently agreed to fund these improvements, which involve the installation of up to 11 drainage wells, 40 feet deep to increase infiltration, but allow the City to oversee their installation through a Local Agency Program (LAP) agreement. The estimated cost $150,000, to be paid for by FDOT. The program is outlined in Appendix R. At some point, an update of the City's 5 Basin stormwater master plan (1996) should be undertaken to insure that the current discharges to the West Lake basin does not create NPDES problems for the County. 114 IV, Table 5.15 Recommended Stormwater Improvements Item Amt Units Cost Total Pump Station $ 1 ea $ 125,000. $ 125,000 Catch Basins $ 26 ea $ 2,000 $ 52,000 Tie-ins $ 3 ea $ 2,000 $ 6,000 18" Pipe $ 450 LF $ 70 $ 31,500 24" Perforated Pipe. $ 3,350 LF $ 85 $ 284,750 Total Construction $ 499,250 Engineering $ 74,888 Contingency $ 49,925 TOTAL Project $ 624,063 5.4 Permits )Required The majority of the projects planned for the next 10 years (and longer) will involve rehabilitation or replacement of existing infrastructure. All water line installations, including replacement lines,. will require Broward County Health Department permits that will be secured at the time of design (prior to construction). This will be done on a project-by-project basis. Permits will be required for the water plant improvements, storage tank, chlorine system and new water lines. None are expected to pose a significant problem. No permits will be required for any wastewater improvements. Depending on the stormwater projects selected, certain permits for piping or treatment may be required, but are as yet unknown. Since this program included herein is a ten-year program, and given that rules or rule requirements can change, the exact nature of permits will be derived at the time of design, and prior to request for any funds from the SRF program. 115 _y t" o cD CD O CD Existing pipeline i w CD ITI cD co CD C CD a r CD CD �l1 FO....II O l+i CD CD o � � � a \ Cl. CD � C � CD O A�CD O OT—__j I 1to CD i5: 0 CD I CD CD CD CL CD O CD CD CD I C CD CD o � " crIN CD d I I I i _____S.W 23RD AVE m AVM HlOE N m cn a2j H10£N ad 3Xdl 3 --- 2i31-aNZZ-MS W 1S l Z MS '' !N dHW-�1Nt/d-aNtf1H�JIH 'a, P.B. 1 '77 3AV H1 N 0£ .k.v 1SlZ MS Iz r CD -- -- - --; --- ob aoonnsN3A t� CD N .IFIM HlOZ MS CL m GULF-SrREAM..WAY CDCD 00 CD r 1 CL 10 CD "' STIRLING RD RAMP- N\��1b`J�:'h o � m qy a- dW did 561 y CD ! �j �o co z z CD o l D co N7N108H�,(H -iCD 03 � z :� v (D D ; _ 0 !� NW 14TH_WAYJ 10 Hl I H Cb L_/NN b L MNI lcn 3 lo-Hlu MN cn cn 3ntf.H1Z6 MS 3nb H�Zl�H1Z;l MN T and HlE 6 M -.._ - 3AV Q ZZ1N - ------ -- r— - - --� ------- i l N1N _..__ m 22 NW 1Q_T AVE o IN - -- i IM �\. ._..S 4T _i �1'H/P w Ir c�—-i Sw H.qV 15R1O1 MN G) m ntl is 6 N W N`CT ,PEN R n�i w 8TN AV z� ! - and HIB MN!IT_ o J S. 4THAVE„_Sw;4TH C)`-�w z "- -� -r `` j� W3/\ MZ ZJ z cn <n _z_._-- N W 6 KA V N ,� o cn 5AV H1L MN 1 0 H16ZN ' min _cn -r �!p 1�0 H C5 M _ � `� �` m - cn N.IN r_ r. - j w w 6 � SW_4T _._� TM E Io � � and Hl9 N\N iz cn -� ;� ;o jZ \� _.spy H AV€ NV_y�T AV �, -- p --- - RD AV N__A_VF m n cn p z _. NW m o _ _ _ TH.AVE;� n 'cn - - +�c�` ---� - ;r _m_w-u_3ntl aNZ�1n5`� _ -_4THAV t -I *- cn = y�� - - p - -� NW 3RpA E p Cn; ,, cn l 1S MS iiF —I cn I t Io -i ant/1Sl MSm cn3 S l MN _ ntl 1 MHj"I`dZ1303 M m m m m IM !� m w 3nt/1S13N I m m m m m cn r m J.MN 1t218 S - w fcn �- -3ntT0NZ 3S m—o__� 1S6 3N m ,_ --i -� m l 1S 6 3 N m 10, cn cn cn cn m _ -- . � � i -� � - ant/ONZ 3N--- _ ' cn ' z -m n Ix rm _m-�--- __ 10 CENZ 3N m h m v ;cn i - -a- ��-- --� '2 vi in _1 .—ice and 42i£3S-.. —ID r--_3Ad_ Intl a8E-3S m -� ;cn sIM '� m cn m nl - a8£-3N. i !1x i--i 'w a 9 N01N083' -i -- 2 V1 m p m w z �� z z �� o 'er �n m cn o p _ m - -- -lb 3---S i- -+- i-- --m-- mr j --3%t/HI r p !m ---.---;' -- - - -- 5 3S � z LAVE . -- 3ntl Hl N 3 m. co v z TAYLOR.RD� m r' m rn r m o _ tSF sTH _ o z �R _CT_.,;D - ll9 3N - .: SF, m -- 42i Wb32�IS3`If1J --- m - - dHW S2:GNOM { 0 'D -I �A� m cn a 3$ CD i� o� CAD Im z S SW 23RD AVE_ - cn, --2i4 3JIdl 3 � 31-aNZZ M$ INl 15LZ tMS N �' dHV018Vd aNb'IHJIH -ab`HioE N' - � 19 19 3AV H10£N kvm 1SLZ MS o � S QOOMSN3/�d2i- (n � U) � ® �, AtfM-HlOz Ms --- ST_ 0 ® X GU F- -.REAM_WAY (D K) D (D CD o ` 96 W -: I i STIRLING_RD RAMP —aW o� < � d� n 19 v So i ,v -- -9 (D w z z � Nil 3N2iO,9HJ1 p tD CL rn z ® > p D � _ cn D fA cn i, Z ® I a Z '� — 0 o NW 14TH WAY -- , i ._Lv j 1�7 Hl4l MN lO H1tilN M Icn io-Hl£l MN 3At1 H3nV H1Z10 H1Z;6 MN ��� m cn - - ,-- a-ON _ IMN - - ---, ---- t/ 3Ad;H1U MS 3A j NW 10TH"AVE o cn -- -- --- _s _, --- - - - -- N � _ v P cn__ SW gTH f 10 H101 MN z 3Ad Hl6 MN 0 4T _HIP p r- 1A_VE n AV 1S l Z N y CT E'EN (n cn - H18 M lcnSw H AI/ W 4 I�o-N -----SW T H aV _ I�`� 3A d Hl6 N1N_ J = 3/��/ N I Z v \ in 4T 1 S`�N C w ,� Iz r TNAVE NNW ZTH E lz_ o j 3n�1 H1L MN1 0 S " l cn -� - in1 -NW I� r v lO HlS)V1 G� 3/� Ff19 MN �m s i �TII w = -- i Iw w I �7� W _A VE ice ' 2 H10Z Icn a a w cn N S AV NvV S v- v n _ _ _ r mT-o W R4 THAV � z -�- 10 h h h w 3 ._q.V z E�Vel � o TH AVER - �'i ---cni n' O+6` _ -��AdTaNz MSS ` cn �' ilk 1S MS b P -W- - --3AV LSl MS —I> - - 3AViSl MN jI IIIIII -_ - =3 --- -r m =vi�cn m m Jl C7lN~I`dF18a33 S'� -.� JCMFI� \ ! 43 Nm N m m m m m t_-� L-- ---3nV 1S6 3N �. i jcn -- - - NZ-3S- m = -m lm cn z lO 1S6 3N v ,z z � m _� -;cn---�m 1�-1S1-3N m � v, , -� M r m v ;� h D t \ Cl) _,cn -� �_.._-�-- oo and a m icn --3nd aNZ 3N fA V7 ;cn _ �N - - I m m_ -- t sn Imo, h i cn o -� z o m - t lO aNZ 3N m mI m : cn end a�£3s o m _ -i__ _..:�_ -and a8E 3N-- ,cn ifn cn _ m = cmn ,m w Im W I m - m - ;� nl9 NO1NO2i _ s I� .s n a m cn cn m-- cn : 3/W � Hlb 3S! r II i II m cn _ N 1 AVE 3AV-Hl9 3S _.__ � m r I- izn .. D lO H19S o ',cn - -Z TAYLOR.RDi� m m -� m ir-z �_ Hl9 3N _!o. -- - An - i-i SF C m rd2i WV31IlS3'1f1J m dHIN S2l3NFR. _ _ O �D c --I Z �p� m a Out r 3,7 N D CD I iyB g X N iD N �Z D S Discharge to West Lake SE 7' St. Proposed Pump-Station Existing Interceptor 24" Pipe SE 9 h St. N W Q Q N M d' W SE 110 Terrace 18" Pipe 18" pipe Catch Basins �� Figure 5.4 Recommended Stormwater Improvements r 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The City of Dania Beach is embarking upon a major capital program to upgrade its existing facilities. The majority of the improvements are driven by regulatory requirements, new demands and facility age. The proposed water, sewer and stormwater expenditures over the next 10 years are over $10 million and much of this money may be requested from SRF loans. Implementation of all of the proposed expenditures and loans from the SRF Program is not mandatory. The actual expenditures and loan amounts will depend upon financial needs. The program is intended to ensure that the City meets its contractual obligations to its existing customers over the planning period, and should permit the City to meet all regulatory requirements currently in effect or reasonable anticipated in the future as well. This section outlines the environmental review of the major components of the program where SRF loans are proposed. To summarize the findings herein, the following should be noted: • All of the projects proposed to be in sites currently developed, such as the water plant site, road right-of-ways or City owned, cleared property (storage tank site). • All proposed areas for construction have been previously disturbed • There are no known archaeological or historical sites in any of the project areas and no undisturbed areas that might uncover currently unknown archaeological or historical sites • There are no known wetland, terrestrial, endangered species, environmentally sensitive or biological impacts in any of the project areas. All the sites planned for improvements have previously been disturbed, and exist in an urban setting where wetland, terrestrial, biological or environmentally sensitive impacts would not occur as a result of prior disturbance. With regard to socio-economic interests, the following summarize the impact of the projects: • There is limited surface water in Dania Beach. For the water system, no surface water impacts are expected unless the DEP permits a discharge of concentrate to the C-10 Canal. This would require a permit and monitoring to insure no adverse impacts occur. On the sewer side, pursuit of infiltration and inflow programs will limit the potential for sewer overflows to impact surface waters • Groundwater impacts are minimal. Small diameter water lines are old and undersized. They leak because they are under pressure, but groundwater impacts are not an issue. Groundwater will tend to flow into the sanitary sewer system, not out of the system. • Air quality will not be affected by any project contemplated herein. • Noise impacts will not occur as a result of any. project contemplated herein, although some limited noise may occur during construction. 120 Aesthetics — failure to repair leaks in a timely manner provides the appearance of failure to maintain the system adequately. Pursuit of the program anticipated herein would maintain integrity of the system and have no aesthetic impact. o Economic - Construction would maintain the current economy. Rates and fees are, or will be in place to cover the facility costs. Leaks and subsequent repairs will hamper normal traffic patterns, which may be a disincentive to do work in Dania Beach. Limitations on commercial property eliminated with upgrades to the water system. Addressing infiltration and inflow will help prevent undue increases in sewer bills and reduce any potential for fines to be levied against the City. o Public Health - Improved water quality would result from the improvements to the water plant contemplated herein. New water lines will improve service and reduce the likelihood of service interruptions and will provide storage. On the sewer side, pursuing and ongoing infiltration and inflow and lift station maintenance program will treat and monitor the system for excessive infiltration and inflow which may adversely affect public health due to higher risk of untreated sewage spills without rehabilitation of existing facilities and increase sewer charges to residents. ® Cultural—no impacts are expected o Transportation - Minor inconvenience during construction on-site and a temporary increase in traffic on road into sites is expected, but these would likely be less in the long-term than impacts from repeated repairs of old lines. Potential for damage to pavements and alleys, which may damage private property as a result of excessive leakage of old, small pipes that flood streets and gutters, will be eliminated with the planned program. ® Energy — Some increase in energy consumption will occur as a result of the membrane plant. However this will partially be offset by a reduction in extra pumping of water that leaks out of the system is wastes energy. Details for each element of the proposed plan is found in the following sections. One aspect remains — flood plains. Much of Dania Beach is located in storm surge areas. The building codes will require that structures constructed to be located above the flood stage. The only project where this applies is at the water plant if new buildings are constructed. Figure 6.1 shows the flood plain system in Dania Beach. 6.1 Water System 6.1.1 Environmental Assessment—Water Treatment Plant Improvements What Happens if the Program is Not Constructed (No Action)? Physical Surface Water: No impact 121 Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No impact Wetlands: No impact Aquatic: No impact. Terrestrial: No impact Socio-economic Economy: Water quality will deteriorate. Land Use: No impact Public Health: Water quality will deteriorate. Transportation: No impact Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact. Cultural Aesthetics: No impact Arch./Historical: No impact What Happens if the Program is Constructed (Action)? Physical Surface Water: No impact. Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact 122 Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No Impact Wetlands: No impact. BioWical Aquatic: No impact Terrestrial: No impact. Socio-economic Economy: No impact—barriers removed. Land Use: No change in impact Public Health: Improved water quality. Transportation: No impact Community Facilities: No impact Energy: Will increase with a membrane facility Cultural Aesthetics: No impact. Arch./Historical: No impact 6.1.2 Environmental Assessment—Elevated Storage Tank What Happens if the Program is Not Constructed (No Action)? Physical Surface Water: No impact Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact 123 Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No impact Wetlands: No impact Biological Aquatic: No impact. Terrestrial: No impact Socio-economic Economy: No impact. Land Use: No impact Public Health: Attractive nuisance. Transportation: No impact Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact. Cultural Aesthetics: No impact Arch.A istorical: No impact What Happens if the Program is Constructed (Action)? Physical Surface Water: No impact. Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact 124 Flood Plains: No Impact Wetlands: No impact. Biological Aquatic: No impact Terrestrial: No impact. Socio-economic Economy: A site would be freed up that the City might be able to utilize for other purposes. Land Use: No change in impact Public Health: No impact. Transportation: Minor inconvenience during construction on-site and temporary increase in traffic on road into sites Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact Cultural Aesthetics: No impact. Arch./Historical: No impact 6.1.3 Environmental Assessment—New Storage Tank What Happens if the Program is Not Constructed (No Action)? Physical Surface Water: No impact Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact 125 Flood Plains: No impact Wetlands: No impact Biological Aquatic: No impact. Terrestrial: No impact Socio-economic Economy: No impact Land Use: No impact Public Health: Insufficient storage identified as problem in system Transportation: No impact Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact. Cultural Aesthetics: No impact Arch./Historical: No impact What Happens if the Program is Constructed (Action)? Physical Surface Water: No impact—project will be constructed at existing site Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No Impact 126 Wetlands: No impact. Biological Aquatic: No impact Terrestrial: No impact. Socio-economic Economy: Change in commercial development may occur since peak loading would be available in storage Land Use: Change in commercial development may occur since peak loading would be available in storage Public Health: Storage would serve City in case of water plant failure for short period of time without pressure drop. Transportation: No impact Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact Cultural Aesthetics: No impact. Arch./Historical: No impact 6.1.4 Environmental Assessment—Water Main Replacements What Happens if the Program is Not Constructed (No Action)? Physical Surface Water: Most of the pipes are old and undersized. They leak. Potential for damage to pavements and alleys, which may damage private property as a result of excessive leakage of old, small pipes that flood streets and gutters. Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact 127 Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No impact Wetlands: No impact Biolorical Aquatic: No impact. Terrestrial: No impact Socio-economic Economy: No impact. Land Use: No impact Public Health: May adversely affect public health due lower water pressure and potential for contamination of pipes if pressure drops. Transportation: Leaks and subsequent repairs will hamper normal traffic patterns, which may be a disincentive to do work in Dania Beach. Community Facilities: No impact Energy: Extra pumping of water that leaks out of the system is wasted energy that the City must pay for. Cultural Aesthetics: No impact Arch./Historical: No impact What Happens if the Program is Constructed (Action)? Physical Surface Water: No impact Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact 128 Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No Impact Wetlands: No impact Biological Aquatic: No impact Terrestrial: Minor, short-term impacts to the streets are expected. Minimal impact to wildlife as very little wildlife frequents the site. Socio-economic Economy: Construction would maintain the current economy. Rates and fees are, or will be in place to cover the facility costs. Land Use: No change in impact Public Health: Additional fire protection will protect the public health. Transportation: Minor inconvenience during construction, but less incidents for repairs in the long term. Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact Cultural Aesthetics: No impact Arch./Historical: No impact 6.1.5 Environmental Assessment—Water System Looping What Happens if the Program is Not Constructed (No Action)? Physical Surface Water: No impact. Groundwater: No impact 129 Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No impact Wetlands: No impact Biological Aquatic: No impact. Terrestrial: No impact Socio-economic Economy: Limits commercial development. Land Use: No impact Public Health: May adversely affect public health due lower water pressure and potential for contamination of pipes if pressure drops. Transportation: Leaks and subsequent repairs will hamper normal traffic patterns, which may be a disincentive to do work in Dania Beach. Community Facilities: No impact Energy: Extra pumping of water that leaks out of the system is wasted energy that the City will pay for. Cultural Aesthetics: No impact Arch./Historical: No impact What Happens if the Program is Constructed (Action)? Physical Surface Water: No impact Groundwater: No impact 130 Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No Impact Wetlands: No impact Biolo_�ical Aquatic: No impact Terrestrial: Minor, short-term impacts to the streets are expected. Minimal impact to wildlife as very little wildlife frequents the site. Socio-economic Economy: Construction would maintain the current economy. Rates and fees are, or will be in place to cover the facility costs. Limitations on commercial property eliminated Land Use: No change in impact except commercial redevelopment on US 1 can occur Public Health: Additional fire protection will protect the public health. Transportation: Minor inconvenience during construction, but less incidents for repairs in the long term. Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact Cultural Aesthetics: No impact Arch./Historical: No impact 131 6.1.6 Environmental Assessment—Chlorine System Upgrade What Happens if the Program is Not Constructed (No Action)? Physical Surface Water: No impact Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No impact Wetlands: No impact Biological Aquatic: No impact. Terrestrial: No impact Socio-economic Economy: No impact Land Use: No impact Public Health: Potential for gas leaks. Transportation: No impact Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact. Cultural Aesthetics: No impact Arch./Historical: No impact 132 What Happens if the Program is Constructed (Action)? PhZical Surface Water: No impact. Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No Impact Wetlands: No impact. Biological Aquatic: No impact Terrestrial: No impact. Socio-economic Economy: No impact Land Use: No impact Public Health: Reduced risk of exposure to chlorine gas leaks. Transportation: No impact Community Facilities: No impact Energy: Will increase with a membrane facility Cultural Aesthetics: No impact. Arch./Historical: No impact 133 6.2 Sanitary Sewer System 6.2.1 Environmental Assessment—Infiltration/Inflow Reduction Program What Happens if the Program is Not Constructed (No Action)? Physical Surface Water: May adversely affect the effluent receiving water, the Atlantic Ocean, and other bodies through more frequent spills, since the reliability and capacity of the facilities in questions during storm and high flow events as a result of excessive infiltration. The no action option is inconsistent with the existing Facilities Plan Amendments and would therefore be unacceptable. Groundwater: Minimal impact. Groundwater will tend to flow into the sanitary sewer system, not out of the system. Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No impact Wetlands: No impact Biological Aquatic: May adversely affect the effluent receiving water, the Atlantic Ocean, and other bodies through more frequent spills, since the reliability and capacity of the facilities in questions during storm and high flow events as a result of excessive infiltration. The Facility Plan Amendments lists the impact of no action on aquatic life as unacceptable. Terrestrial: Roads may settle and sink as a result of infiltration or silt and soil into the sewer pipes. Socio-economic Economy: Will adversely impact the City as a result of regulatory fines, penalties and legal costs for sanitary sewer overflows. Higher costs to City residents if Hollywood must construct new plant capacity to treat excessive infiltration and inflow. 134 Land Use: No change in impact Public Health: May adversely affect public health due to higher risk of untreated sewage spills without rehabilitation of existing facilities Transportation: No impact Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact Cultural Aesthetics: The impact of sewage spills and odors as aesthetic impacts is unacceptable. Arch./Historical: No impact What Happens if the Program is Constructed (Action)? Physical Surface Water: Less potential for spills, since the reliability and capacity of the facilities would be appropriate for the wastewater generated in the service area. Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No impact Wetlands: No impact Biological Aquatic: Less impact to aquatic species should be created with improved pipe capacity. Terrestrial: No impact. 135 Socio-economic Economy: Failure to improve flow conditions by eliminating infiltration and inflow could place the large users in a building moratorium. Construction would maintain the current economy. Rates and fees are, or will be in place to cover the facility costs. Land Use: No impact Public Health: Reduction in potential spills and overflows will improve public health. Transportation: Minor inconvenience during construction on plant site and temporary increase in traffic on road into plant site. Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact Cultural Aesthetics: No impact Arch./Historical: No impact 6.2.2 Environmental Assessment—Lift Station Rehab and Telemetry Program What Happens if the Program is Not Constructed (No Action)? Physical Surface Water: The lack of control and monitoring ability leaves the City blind to incidents in the system. Infiltration and inflow are but a few of the parameters that could be monitored. Groundwater: Minimal impact. Groundwater will tend to flow into the sanitary sewer system, not out of the system. Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No impact 136 Wetlands: No impact Biological Aquatic: May adversely affect the effluent receiving water, the Atlantic Ocean, and other bodies. The Facility Plan Amendments lists the impact of no action on aquatic life as unacceptable. Terrestrial: No impact. Socio-economic Economy: No Impact unless inflow overwhelms certain portions of the City. Land Use: No change in impact Public Health: May adversely affect public health due to higher risk of untreated sewage spills without rehabilitation of existing facilities Transportation: No impact Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact Cultural Aesthetics: The impact of sewage spills and odors as aesthetic impacts is unacceptable. Arch./Historical: No impact What Happens if the Program is Constructed (Action)? Physical Surface Water: Less potential for spills, since the reliability and capacity of the facilities would be appropriate for the wastewater generated in the service area. Groundwater: No impact Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact 137 Flood Plains: No impact Wetlands: No impact Biolozical Aquatic: Less impact due to more control of wastewater system. Terrestrial: No impact. Socio-economic Economy: No adverse impact. Land Use: No impact Public Health: Reduction in potential spills and overflows will improve public health. Transportation: No impact. Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact Cultural Aesthetics: No impact Arch./Historical: No impact 6.3 Stormwater Improvements 6.3.1 7a' Street SE Interceptor Connections What Happens if the Pro ram-is Not Constructed (No Action)? Physical Surface Water: None. Flooding will continue around Olsen Middle School Groundwater: Minimal impact. Storm water will tend to flow into the sanitary sewer system, not out of the system. 138 Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact Flood Plains: No impact Wetlands: No impact Biological Aquatic: The Facility Plan Amendments lists the impact of no action on drainage problems as unacceptable. Terrestrial: No impact. Socio-economic Economy: No impact. Land Use: No impact Public Health: May adversely affect public health due to higher risk of surcharging the sewer collection system around Olsen Middle School Transportation: No impact. Flooding will continue to impact,transportation around Olsen Middle School Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact Cultural Aesthetics: Flooding is not aesthetically positive. Arch./Historical: No impart What Happens if the Program. is Constructed (Action)? Physical Surface Water: Limitd impact. Current surface waters that stand over roads would be directed to a piping system. Potential contamination from sewer system will be eliminated. 139 Groundwater: Limited impact. Current surface waters that stand over roads would be directed to a piping system. Potential contamination from sewer system will be eliminated. Air Quality: No impact Noise: No impact Flood Plains: Less flooding in the area around Olsen Middle school Wetlands: No impact Biological Aquatic: No impact. Terrestrial: No impact. Socio-economic Economy: No adverse impact. Land Use: No impact Public Health: Reduction in flooding and the potential from sewer overflows will improve public health. Transportation: Improved ability to travel on existing roads after rainfall Community Facilities: No impact Energy: No impact Cultural Aesthetics: No impact Arch./Historical: 'No impact 140 CD m S v I t O »»— a - 7-1 � tt t w . a� t , t a , �£P,,ffr Wr ' .+•� ,ram � ae��� 1� '� f! � Ye�r�' t t� a a tl i Denle Bsech P� / 7.0 FINANCIAL.ASSESSMENT Historically, the utility industry has shown dedication to building and maintaining drainage systems to provide high quality drainage service to its customers. The rapidly changing regulatory framework has forced utilities to investigate new water management strategies that pursue demand mitigation alternatives, and include treatment capability to meet ecosystem demands as well as urban runoff demands. The City of Dania Beach has begun a comprehensive evaluation of its water, sewer and stormwater system, to determining where needs exist so that improvements to the citizenry can be made. The City has identified the State Revolving Fund loan program as a source of funding for necessary improvements. Determining how these new projects will be integrated into the finances of the utility system is important. Traditionally, utilities have used water volumes and pricing as a means to recover costs by charging users of a specific type in accordance with the cost of serving that type of user, which is both effective and equitable. But pricing can also work to reduce demand by providing an incentive for customers to manage water use more carefully. Utilities consider a number of pricing objectives when an appropriate rate structure is being selected. These objectives include: I. Financial sufficiency - generating sufficient revenues to recover operating and capital costs; 2. Conservation - encouraging customers to make efficient use of scarce water resources through costs; 3. Equity - charging customers or customer classes in proportion to the costs of providing service to customer groups; 4. Implementation - having the capability to implement the rate stricture efficiently without incurring unreasonable costs associated with reprogramming, procedures modification, and redesigning of forms; 5. Compliance with appropriate legal authorities — being consistent with existing local, state, and federal ordinances, laws, and regulations; 6. Effect on customer classes - minimizing negative financial effects on utility customers; and 7. Long-term rate stability - producing rates that are reasonably constant from year to year. The public can best be served by a utility that is a self-sustaining enterprise adequately financed with rates based on sound, established engineering and economic principles. Water rates typically consist of operating and capital costs. Examples of operating costs include salaries, electricity, chemicals, and other recurring expenses. The capital portion typically includes contributions from current revenues, new borrowed funds and contributions for repairs and replacements. Debt service includes payments on any outstanding borrowing. Repayment of SRF loans are included here. 142 All of the financing starts with the utility's "cash registers" — the meters. This program requires that the utility install a meter to record water consumption for each customer and bill for water use based on metered consumption. The alternative is to bill customers on a flat rate regardless of water consumption. Metering provides an incentive for customers to use water wisely. User charges are then based on these meter readings to meet certain objectives. A number of different rate structures are available. These include the following: Declining Block Rates For many years, a single schedule of declining block rates applicable to all customer classes was the predominant water rate form in the United States. The declining block rate provides a means of recovering costs from the customer classes under a single rate schedule, recognizing the different water demands and costs associated with each customer class. Uniform Volume Rates A uniform-volume water rate is one in which all water use is charged at the same rate to all metered units, regardless of consumption. Sewer consumption is often based directly on water usage up to a specified level (usually the average household indoor use calculated for the utility). Inverted Block Rates Inverted block rates are the opposite of the declining block rate structure. Under this alternative, rates increase for progressively larger volumes of water use. As a result, larger-volume customers pay a progressively higher average rate for increased water use. The usual reason for using an inverted block rate structure is to offer financial incentives for reducing water use. Note that the South Florida Water Management District has rules requiring utilities to utilize this rate structure to reduce water use during restrictions. Off-Peak Rates Off-peak rates are charged for water service provided during periods when the utility is not providing water service at its daily or hourly peak rates of flow. This measure works for electrical service because the meter already tracks this information system, but is impossible to hard to utilize in a cost-effective manner for residential water customers. Seasonal Rates A variation of off-peak rates is to institute seasonal rates. Seasonal pricing to affect peak use is probably the most effective and equitable method of demand management. Seasonal rates establish a higher rate for water use during the 143 utility's peak season, reflecting the higher cost of providing the facilities for water during those peak periods. Seasonal rate structures indicate to the consumer the importance of efficient use of resources. Such rates are becoming a popular and effective rate structure in areas where seasonal peak uses are high. Rate schedules can be complied by customer class to establish a separate rate structure or schedule of charges for each group (or class) of customer served by the utility. A rate structure applicable to all classes of customers cannot reflect the cost of service for any particular customer group. By establishing rates by class, however, there is a more direct recovery of cost from each customer group. Since the rates can better reflect cost differences among the various classes, customers in each class are made aware of the cost of each unit of water consumed. The major difficulty in establishing a rate schedule is the identification of the various classes and the assignment of each customer appropriately. 7.1 Water and Sewer System As the City of Dania Beach begins its planning process for the water and sewer utility, this section of the plan as a planning tool to make relative funding decisions. This study is a "table-top" or planning level rate analysis to derive information for inclusion in the Capital Financing Plan and as back-up for the SRF applications, and to provide staff and the City Commission with information on the magnitude of rate impacts for decision- making purposes. Such an analysis is not intended as a legal defense of rate-making by the City, but will suffice to indicate the revenues, expenditures and modifications that may be required to rates to provide adequate coverage for financing objectives, and will indicate the impacts of fee increases that may be required (if any). Operating expenses for the utility in 2002, including chemicals and electricity use accounts for 36 percent on the water-side, and 47 percent on the wastewater side of the total $4.6 million budget. Chemicals and electricity are 13% of the total operations, which is typical for water systems. Salaries and benefits account for only 25% of operations. Renewal and replacement funding does not comprise a significant part of the total. Debt service is minimal — mostly equipment. Debt has not been utilized in the recent past to fund water and wastewater system improvements, plant upgrades, line replacements or major repairs. Methodology Multi-year financial forecasts and financial plans are common tools in business. Most of the major private enterprises project sales and expenditure levels at least five years, and many times 10 to 20 years, in advance. However, this tool is seldom used in a public sector due to the nature of public enterprises - most do not "sell' a tangible product; they provide services such as police protection, fire protection and recreational services. However, as tax revenue sources are exhausted, local governing bodies have begun to set up many municipal departments as enterprise funds to accommodate the establishment of fees for the service. Municipal water and sewer utilities have extensive experience using financial forecasts and plans like private sector businesses for their enterprises as many 144 governments separated their water and sewer utilities years ago as a part of the federal grant process. Governmental expenditures are subject to changes in the statutes, case law, sound financial practice, competitiveness between public entities, the political process and group decision-making. Many public entities rely on determining revenues, and afterward planning expenditures to remain within the revenue projections, including capital items, which "fit in." This practice can lead to the deferral of needed capital expenditures or insufficiency in maintenance obligations, since many capital expenditures must be planned years in advance. The consequences of these capital items not coming on-line at the appropriate time may subject the utility to excessive maintenance costs, lawsuits or failures in providing service. More progressive utilities today project expenditures, including long-term capital allocations, a practice that causes the revenue needs become clearer from year to year. Projected shortfalls can be planned for ahead of time, and capital expenditures can be scheduled and completed at the necessary time. Projecting capital expenditures promotes efficient operations, as well as being politically expedient, since projects are budgeted and built on schedule - when promised and when necessary to continue operations and meet community needs and growth patterns. This philosophy is in part responsible for portions of the Florida Growth Management Act of 1985, which states that infrastructure must be in place at the time growth demands it. This analysis follows a similar, albeit limited, protocol as the City's water and sewer rate study conducted by other rate professionals. Information on operations from 1998 to date was collected for use in making projections about expenditures and debt availability. Expenses in years through 2002 tie directly to the budget documents (budgeted or actual expenditures), except that the depreciation line item was deleted. The next task was to project expected operational expenditures. The following assumptions were used to this end: o Salaries grow at 7% per year. ® Benefits remain fixed at 50% of salaries, based on the average over the preceding 5 year period ® General fund administrative costs increase at 4% per year. This appears to result from a cost allocation study ® Chemicals and electricity grow at 1.8% per year. ® All other operations function grow at 4% per year These assumptions appear reasonable and have used for other jurisdictions. Projections were made for the period ending in FY 2008, although the out-year projections should be viewed with some skepticism due to uncertainty in projecting out so many years. Tables 7.1 to 7.5 summarize the actual expenses and current budgets, while projecting the current base period from FY 1998 to FY 2008, broken down by 145 budget division. Table 7.6 summarizes the totals for the budget divisions. An assumption of debt requirements for all projects contemplated herein as a worst-case scenario is included for rate estimating purposes. The City's currently identified projects amounting to $9.975 million, although the costs are very preliminary. The projects were identified in Chapter 5. SRF debt amounts to under $715,000 per year under this scenario. The next task was to evaluate revenues. The current revenues are shown in the rate ordinance). This is projected to raise about $4.62 million in FY 2003. No growth was assumed. Table 7.7 shows the revenue needs over the coming 5 years. While ongoing operations costs are expected to increase, the debt increase will require a rate increase as discussed previously with the City Commission. Fortunately the debt that will be, incurred will not exist before 2005 assuming the projects start in 2004. Alternatives The next task was to evaluate options for additional funding which would require additional revenues. For the average single-family user, 5,000 gallons per month, the combined water and sewer bill is $37.02 per month, which garners $4.62 million. Because the City is unsure of the storm water needs that will be identified, some idea of the impact to rates for large projects was required. One option to create added monies is to reduce the General Fund transfers. Likewise, the General Fund could dedicate capital funds to the storm water program. Both options were considered highly unlikely, so there is no money available for capital improvements. Therefore the only option was to increase the monthly user fees. The 1998 rate study recommended a 12 percent increase that was not enacted. While the City has recently increased its rates by 4 percent in 2002 and 5 percent in 2003 in anticipation to address the use of substantial amounts of retained earnings, the result has been that the utility, over the past several years, has limited ability to self-fund major capital improvements. This issue is not viewed favorable when borrowing money. Therefore, in calculating rates, it was assumed no fund balance would be used, which is a proper assumption. The use of fund balance accounts for 7 percent of revenues, so by itself, requires a 7 percent rate increase. The new debt requires a 16 percent increase. Ongoing operations issues would require an additional increase. The following schedule is the generalized rates required to meet the expenditure plan: These rates would increase monthly water fees for the average 5,000 gallon-per-month single-family user to $17.15 (from $11.80) and $30.04 (from $20.67), for a combined increase of$14.72 (or 53 percent) over a five-year period. The total of$47.19 is within the contemplated realm of neighboring municipalities undergoing similar water plant improvement programs (Hallandale, North Miami Beach, Hollywood, and Davie). Table 7.8 shows the rate adjustments anticipated for the scenario described. Each year the issue should be reviewed for adjustments (up or down), but consistent increases are desirable. Table 7.9 shows the rate impacts for three classes of user: small, single family users, average users and high users. The City's current rate structure penalizes the high end 146 users. Tinkering with the rates could shift additional burden to the high end users. Table 7.10 and Figure 7.1 show rates for average users in nearby municipalities. The Town of Davie has rates set by an agreement with the City of Sunrise, so do not reflect actual costs of service (they were reduced 20% as a result of this settlement). In 2006 these rates are expected to rise again to beyond their former levels. Figure 7.2 shows projected rates for membrane utilities. Dania Beach, as the smallest of these utilities, has a lower than expected projected rate. Since most of the work is for rehabilitation and replacement programs, the use of impact fees is restricted by law. Therefore, current ratepayers are the only source for repayment of any debt as they are the benefactors of the improvements. Appendix I includes the City's rate ordinances. 7.2 Stormwater Enterprise Fund Methodology This analysis follows a similar, albeit limited, protocol as the City's water and sewer rate study conducted by other rate professionals. Information on operations from 1998 to date was collected for use in making projections about expenditures and debt availability. Projections were made for the period ending in FY 2008, although the out-year projections should be viewed with some skepticism due to uncertainty in projecting out so many years. Table 7.11 summarizes the actual expenses, current budgets and projects the current base period from FY 1998 to FY 2008, including the debt as derived herein. The years through 2002 tie directly to the budget documents. The next task was to project expected operational expenditures. The following assumptions were used to this end: ® Salaries grow at 7% per year. ® Benefits remain fixed at 50% of salaries, based on the average over the preceding 5 year period • All other operations function grow at 4% per year These assumptions appear reasonable and have used for other jurisdictions. The next task was to evaluate revenues. The current revenues are $20/year for typical single-family lots (see rate ordinance — Appendix I). This is projected to raise $363,000 in FY 2002, which includes the new annexation areas. This amount is insufficient to cover the current expenses. As a result to meet current deficits, the stormwater fee needs to be increased. Over the period 2002 to 2008, the fee needs to rise to $32 per year, which places the City among the lowest (Hollywood is $6 per month). Table 7.11 shows this increase. If modifications to the SE Drainage system can be reduced, the need for the full increase will be mitigated. 147 con pQ8n " 88 � - m � 000CppO pOpN 8 � OnfvOlrNaOO Villi � n O O N R N " V/Vl V/Vl Vi N di t9 vl vl ° � §LQ § m QQ CClp pp "I po Q O C% A) N N LL• V!19 pM 8M V!Nl pM 19 M V3, V! V) mv W V O O O O N O N T I ' �(Qpp (� p 1� O n N CO In IN N N N N " IQN Vl vl V! n9 Vl W%vi V1�! V! 13 N § O8O(OOO � ONp� O - OovN v if) H' V" ON )CD IT N " N LL of Vs e9 Vs 6%r/ds ul 69 v/ 60 ul o v co 0 CO n CO O � C'. N " N •O di Vl QM 69 Vl 50 �VQl V! to), 19 V! V) a' no25 § 2525 " " Iq Le y Sm III On OHO Nnf'� 1A � n N g i+ � f7 " N r-1 V/of ds di Vl 69 Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl Vl 09, I.r NNr pp pp pQ p n l'7 <D CO '" O O O O O N N n ' 0) IT m �O O N n - 0 � N M N N Cl) R O V/ V) V) V) O rno'^ n c� nrnv rn m cNom o o 4r N n NOO � " p N N Y N .N- n0 � 0 V CD CD IL f9 Vl 1A M 69 Vl bl V/ 19 V! Vl V/ f9 CA 8 OIn OOp pOp pppp pOppp O � 1 1 Q � O NN�00008 , On `� P' 'T O NCOO GOI � ^ QNf N O } N v 00 lL V!Vl tl9 V!iA V/V)CVp! !9 V! IA Vl /A Vl r--1 INAO '•S (OO_IO- NIn M �R • QOO10 1 Off C ��{ O O N 4 O °D [L V),Vl N V/M!V/Vl V/ IA Vl NMnp� � Cpp 1� C.4 10 9 c0 c+01 1 n lL M M Vl Vl Vl V!Vl vl M 19 V! M yr to a 8 Lt o N H z gc w Z ci CD A m '-T° XaX c OI c m CDa t1 W W C N M i+ N O O O J Uc m w � YVIL E Q H O Q !9 Q N CI C U m Y L ~ O C 0 ~ d ~ 0 O � � � Hw0A 8 i U m ��(Ni ' cli N 04 G HHHH HHH H H o � � r, CD to O m N N N n n N O H H H H H H H H H �p ym NN ' O y O O N C O N N N O C7 N N N N a` H H o H H H H H H H CN7 CD O O in Q1 sN{ 00 O 0 N � N N 13 O N r Q (L N H H H H H H H H H 0 of of of � Ly O N w N eq �^ N O � H H ppH H pH ppH W. H H O N O'" O ' S O N N O � O ^� a1 p(p O N 10 {O N t.- m N N N N to O a` N 1 N nH H 8H H 86.3, apH H H H H H Orz� n � 0 ' O O so H CM N M r 3 A pp Epp N lh N (D H H H H V! H H H H H Ln C14 co Ln O N p� 10 } N 1L H H H H H H H H H H H H H H (7 ON inO r r r r r Cl ��+pj p r r 1f01 IfO� N C; COO CO N c V lTL H H H H H H H H H H H H .-y O N pp Cp 1 1 a Go O r r r r r ro fC00 Go H H H H H H H H H H H H H cq N (OO � N in O IOA } N R lL HH H H H H H H Le Z y� [A O o ?b U Q U x w N Z C w NN( V o 0 c co W c 1O r0 ° w 5 c txo O LL. Z ❑ O O J O J J yi d m e -6 { m m Y t o O U z ❑ F- U F- _ ~# /§ - ©-r4 C - . � gq R k $ 4 � d n CD - $~ @ a -- ----- - ® _ _ - �kk kgK10 k 0) ' f d / (n ;;~ § ) 2 IL -- ----® - - ® - § � § # k§ # w 7U §2 ° ° e \$� § t § � -- ---®- - ® - - o cmw 7 § # kg#ot ( ' eu R$§ ° © esN b b a ° � - - M -- --®-- ® + - � 0) oo e 7 KV: kgq#R � 0 § Z 0) ° - enk� § § § H ---- - - ® - - k{k k� Ak § k K \ K ] § In 7 J & q k -- ----- ® ® - ® - W o A w o § Go ° K & $CZ } I§ § � N N w N 2 � 2 � � � n �R IT g S 2 -- - --- - ® - - - - § § § C4 cn ' in K k K K ' A Q - R m § § 7 -- ------ - - - ® - - co k 8 /k , . , , . § § co § . 2 2 @ � ° $ $ Cl) 7 0 7 -- -®--®- - - - - - _ iqk . . , . , 0) 7 $ , . $ aLd te ° - § v -- ------ - - - - § %� 9 2 , ; Gm ° IV v \ k � � -- - - ® - - § § ® 00 � CD w 2 f § _ § g v ° | . . r k CL o b k N 0 , b / ) \ ƒ g o 2 � } / G f 2 k k 0 0 2 ■ v _ % § S z 3 L a N C §k~k 0 v n m v o- $ o 7f (n �� tn 2 n -- --- -- - - ® - ® 88 . § ƒ § �° m v /§ f Q / � -- --- - 0 0 13 � iz A , K 84 w§° m m - 3 8 n # - \ - § � � -® to-- -- - - - - - CD to in t � o n § \ § 8 § A , & e\ # R 8 & A§ ° m m � a - cli ? -- --- -- - - - to - q to R ° a 2 R © 2 ° w C' « . - 5 0 aA) A7C0 k ° � - ° in § / I� � P ® w -- --- -- - - - - - k0) °� Cl M § k ° m /k / cri N 0 -W. --- -- W. ® - - - - § m o& \& t Clt © § 76g . g k o CN oa ¥ # 2 -to). --® �- - 2 - - � s� (n ©G / 46 F§ -: � 2 ° � R Rm [ m t \~ § w 2 -- --®--- - - q §Aa§ . . , Ak It) 7 m/ §@ m _ ® \ � f ®- ®®--�- - ® - - - - - / § § RR § o 0 � §� § § � -- ------ - ® - - - m k m of � G . §§ \ -- ® -- - - - - B ® . 2 . ' § . co 0 2 - a ' R i 3 / / ■ / \ 0 / k § IL k § a5 }2f CO � CE d w o C3§ ° S z 3 ° v ° 0 8 G n m � . f $/ § ■ - In $ B 2 -- -®--- - W. - - N $ m R - - . �A @ � � � . R §ƒ a$ »§eq / 2 § CL -- -®-®- - - - - a §w K k § \ #■ ■ "W; $ § G � -- ---®- - - - - n� nn co r1l k§G , e § k f& q 7\ � ( ■ $e� S § ( -- ----- - - - - V) ° a a 8 ~ q Rk s' ��gA R q ' F4 Q a � 2« § E b H -- ---®- - W. - - kKk kKkkg k k k k k §� mR ° ° aCl) § § § 2 � -- ----- - ® - ° n ° ° § § § CIS o § 6 KAa #KN # 8 3 u r- ■ © ¥§ - § § CD § R 2 � � -- --- - - - - - - ROB k§$ ' � A k m § ' ( b'T - om a IC., r4R n § - -- ®---- - - - ® - ® s OD 2 2 N §° . , , , / 7 ( ' . , / q e -- ----- - - - - - - s Kkk \ , . . � � § . . 4 . 9C4 e e § -- ----® - - - - ® 7 gSCi R . q° 2 2 R R to f § ) 2 . -- - B � § _ r 8 .1 $ § # w . . FA § { 0 % 0 b ( } 0 ; E / b / o § (s o 2 f 3§ ° § z v ° � A m W p m m� n Y p W W O W W o n op n ry op O W A N 0 N m m m M A m N O N Y M O m O A A% m p 0 m p� pj �p O •- N A O O Y O •f Y N m M M M M M N N N N N M M N N M M NNN M M M M N N m M N ry 0 m Y O W M N m N O n O ry O N O ry O N W O 0 M p M m YI n Y m M N IV O ' O " ' O O O A O A W N NNM 0 0 ♦m O N m M m N N O N O N O N N O fOV A N In•1 UI n Ny »»» »» N »N »» » NN N»» N N » �•1 'n m m O m M W W Y W M M m O ' ' r Y O Y N O N `hM11/ O f m O O m O O Y N m W O A O n m O m O H W A N N A ry N N m m N _ M ' O O O n m N n r + W m o v o ri o n O r O N N N M M .1 f Y r 1° IM•1 m ry 0 N N M N N N M N M M M M » M M N MMN N N N M M M Y m m m M m n o W o o Y Y O p o m o N N o n ry ry m m N M W ry m o o p m m N m Y m W M fV N Y m N O O O O m m M O 0 0 0 m M N O Y N O O O pm m O O O m m P .1 A m M Y M Y O 0 •� ry N Y N N ry N MNM M M N N N N N N M N N M N M N N N M M A Y W O W m O O W 0 m m m n N m O O n N 0 N N Y O m M m m m M O O W O W M ry N N W N N M M O N Nmm A O N N O 01 M N O Y M Y Y^ 0 0 b m O m OOP M O A ImrIM Y rn•1 N N m 'N O Y � O O N N M M N N N » M N N N M N N M M NNN N M N M pm N A N m N M m A Y W O Y n 0 0 W 0 Y p n O O N N m a. N n m m N N N N M M VI ry A m M A N m M A m m m m Y N OI P? O O N N N` a O N 0 M M M m � ry N M N ry ry N NNN M N M M N M M M N N » N M »N N N M M M a. N A O Y n 0 n m m 0 m a O m m N M W O � M M m � Y Nm O O (O�yy NAN NN N M Nm m m N ry m f� N �N A m MN' lm•1 NM IN'1 AO m 'l1 � M M NNM N N M M M NNN N N M N M N O N M m m m m Y O ONO N O O N co O ry N W O $ pMry m ^� Y W rv�o M o�g oo mmm n omi r + ry O O n n N W N Y O O N m N M pYp M mv mmm m 1•1 A N N M O N m O N N N m M M A A Y� m Y N M b m N M' IM•1 N M M M A O A V •Nf WJ NNM M M N N M M N N M N M M N M N MMN N M M M O W A Y N m a N N m O MM 0 m Y N F+i co'i a cR a o ui pri m r vi o m of m o r m of ro ro m m ••r� Ilk m 1 In•1 m O UNMM N N N M M MNM N MMM M M M NMM M M N N 1M G) m m m ry m m n N A O Sao •O W m N N n m m m G O O N A O m m m M M ry ry N O 0 O N O c m A ' M ' m m N N M M Nmm N O A m ONO m O' N m m m m O O O W N N O M O N N N N NNN N N N N O NNN N N» » N NNN N NNN N r� Z C(JYr O f 3m O LL C Z i6 x o ap •• c$ Y ° O U o m W lu n a wo OR n a C m Ea'3 ins w � 3; r o� o 1u o ° o LLco o 0 o OEM Ln lo i O-� Z UU K oo°� tS ° O 6 o 0 N 33< 3 am N f- z w z �- z � � �� Cam CO C— N e-N �oi Oo 0c 9 nsg N 1n V O LQ - C7 (7 l7( N M C'7 M Cl) f9 69 CA/9 69 FA w CA 19 CA(a C9 CA/A Cto fA Vi ((Qa ppppcn 8S N WM tv) O cO aac 0 0 Co-N co I-O aD N t0 OO O O O OOO t-- OO r- 1�InN C� O O NN O V mNv S 11'1 fV ��N C� N. N N N(n ri (+I C7 M 69 M 69 69 69 (A 69 to w 4i M w di 69 fA di w M �S S S N7 LL7 V W t� S� r CO N 'N s Iz t`1C'/ (A f� V N V O O O V V O CO �- O � P-o ppo pip r-MLi � po r Moi 00 r- � S C j N (()V S S(O S lC1 N O O m N N N N N v F) M M N E9 fA w Vi C9 69 C9 69 w 699 19 69 69 C9 CA CA 69 CA 00 �S SS �(oT cnCC��ppo CV(��7 pgpS pn �(coo� ov v C N (OnC Oat M O l`� tnN CO aOD�� C�,7 C0.1 Ny N N N N N N N N N • 6969 69 fA H 69 CA♦A 6% /9 49 C9 C9♦A to FA C9 69 v�+l LOBO opr� CA CO O� r�-P� VA in 0000 (DO O COO NN ((+A OCl8ND N0nS �S iVi L�� � V N �SNBppppr� � pQ p S CA � Vi O �lh N N N N N N N N C7 MM ♦A f9 FA♦A FA faCpA to C9 FA FA M f9 w V)in U9 fA 19 wfA<A FA to H N LQ 9 C m 8 V O/N CD (O R CO� anD b NN CO N ONI IOn�ON N r Cl) N (O N N N N N N N N ~ LL CA H(9 (9 69 to C9 69 fA 69 69 (A CA w w(A w p d �g§§§ § §§ N@ § § §(n m cd Voe a V- eo mco(� (� V Ld ON co N N ` —r- N S 1� In 1� N V '�T CO V CO (A C-` N N N Cl cV (D v .N.. i..� N N N N N N C'1 �F•1 LL (9 CA CA w wCA t9 w (9 CA(A M CA fA (A CA (A IA sA CO pp pp 8oQ (fDy ym� 80-0 In O �r-_ CO7 S C N O N � V V ' C 0 �Cl)Q Cl) O Cl) N O t r` C7 S m N N N W N O r-- v V N N 1-7 CN N N N N LL 69 699(9 69 CA (.9 69 69 W 69 69p (A CA H M w w 69 pM r coi 9 CO SNIn N NOV1 r`OO V V N CD C7r r r- COO N U mC75J1S mCD Nv t� OtO ry 00 N01 O p UN O Cl)Q Of CA Crl Vl Cc"77 V ry •O �� N N CV N� aLL (A 6940GF)61� 69 6969w 0% V)V) w U)V�in 2�cn 0, N Cn V V NCV�tOO �W)r - N )mo 'S" rn to C7 Co V - N Co co ap VVC7 r Co N N ON O co ( to rn - m rn V (o- th m N N m rn CD P O N N N— LL (9 t9 u9 rA CA t9 (» f9 CA 69 Hi CA 69 CA 69 69 u)CA W M ar 3 yy � N~ O1 d(n � 1g$ d (D �Z U w yQj1 G! W to y O/ Lo (fl LL > W W lL Cl)� d C Z J J LL yam-_.U N Z a 0 E 00r a o o Ey 00V F� O Table 7.8 Summary of Required Increases For Water and Sewer System (assuming the worst case scenario) Year Water Sewer 2003 5% 5% 2004 10% 10% 2005 10% 10% 2006 10% 10% 2007 6% 6% 2008 3% 3% 155 Table 7.9 Impacts to User Classes Avg Bill 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Rates Base Water $ 4.89 $ 5.13 $ 5.65 $ 6.21 $ 6.83 $ 7.24 $ 7.46 1000 gal water $ 1.27 $ 1.33 $ 1.47 $ 1.61 $ 1.77 $ 1.88 $ 1.94 Base Sewer $ 7.49 $ 7.86 $ 8.65 $ 9.52 $ 10.47 $ 11.10 $ 11.43 per 1000 gal sewer $ 2.44 $ 2.56 $ 2.82 $ 3.10 $ 3.41 $ 3.61 $ 3.72 Proposed 2000 gal Customer Base Water $ 4.89 $ 5.13 $ 5.65 $ 6.21 $ 6.83 $ 7.24 $ 7.46 1000 gal water $ 2.54 $ 2.67 $ 2.93 $ 3.23 $ 3.55 $ 3.76 $ 3.88 Base Sewer $ 7.49 $ 7.86 $ 8.65 $ 9.52 $ 10.47 $ 11.10 $ 11.43 per 1000 gal sewer $ 4.88 $ 5.12 $ 5.64 $ 6.20 $ 6.82 $ 7.23 $ 7.45 TOTAL $ 19.80 $ 20.79 $ 22.87 $ 25.16 $ 27.67 $ 29.33 $ 30.21 Net Change($) $ - $ 0.99 $ 3.07 $ 5.36 $ 7.87 $ 9.53 $ 10.41 Net Change(%) 5% 16% 27% 40% 48% 53% Proposed 5000 gal Customer Base Water $ 4.89 $ 5.13 $ 5.65 $ 6.21 $ 6.83 $ 7.24 $ 7.46 1000 gal water $ 6.35 $ 6.67 $ 7.33 $ 8.07 $ 8.87 $ 9.41 $ 9.69 Base Sewer $ 7.49 $ 7.86 $ 8.65 $ 9.52 $ 10.47 $ 11.10 $ 11.43 per 1000 gal sewer $ 12.20 $ 12.81 $ 14.09 $ 15.50 $ 17.05 $ 18.07 $ 18.62 TOTAL $ 30.93 $ 32.48 $ 35.72 $ 39.30 $ 43.23 . $ 45.82 $ 47.19 Net Change($) $ - $ 1.55 $ 4.79 $ 8.37 $ 12.30 $ 14.89 $ 16.26 Net Change (°r6) 5% 16% 27% 40% 48% 53% Proposed 10,000 gal Customer Base Water $ 4.89 $ 5.13 $ 5.65 $ 6.21 $ 6.83 $ 7.24 $ 7.46 1000 gal water $ 15.95 $ 16.75 $ 18.42 $ 20.26 $ 22.29 $ 23.63 $ 24.34 Base Sewer $ 7.49 $ 7.86 $ 8.65 $ 9.52 $ 10.47 $ 11.10 $ 11.43 per 1000 gal sewer $ 24.40 $ 25.62 $ 28.18 $ 31.00 $ 34.10 $ 36.15 $ 37.23 TOTAL $ 52.73 $ 55.37 $ 60.90 $ 66.99 $ 73.69 $ 78.11 $ 80.46 156 a0 O CO (O O M O to Q) O to 0 0 O) L (n v O M CD M (O '11� .- N to O O O M (O O Q1 (O 0) 00 M -- I-CY) LO M I O - to m O o.U � 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 64 to fA FA EA 69 69 69 F» t» m co v 00 (D 0n rn Co co O v (o to � (A o ,n LO�n co ornLnor- (oMr- Mo 0 0 Z) O CD CD N 0 m ('7 (O O O y N M O (D U � Y 69 69 69 EA E9 69 69 E<i 69 69 E9 fA 69 69 69 CN m m r- w 0 vC) 19T w gTMtnN m O_ OI C M - N (V N M (V r N � � m N rn O O co 69 69 fA 69 69 69 69 69 69) 69 69 69 69 69 co 0) O1- MOONCDOO (OO (O M 00 CD 0) N '-T LO CV - 0 0 IT to m I� Co O t Co CV IT 00 CV CO M m m m LL y 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 E9 69 (A 649 (fl E9 69 to .- CO CON N M f- LO 4. NCO N (O to r CN N N Co O CO N CO O Mtri - ti (M (•i _: vO .TuiOOO [� O o I U O Lf) N9 fA 69 69 69 69 fig 69 69 69 69 69 69 fA 69 Cd F coon (o � coMr� OOp- 0Mrn �. Cr) COMQ) ONNtttoto tn (3) d' m n. cm - O - - - .- N 5 O O > f V 69 69 69 69 69 69 to fA (fl N9 69 fA 69 69 61) M - O r- M O O V N to CD 0 (3) N to V CO I- 0 O O M CO to N (3) to 0) � m (D to0) 00 (ONCOI- (Y) M r to y to m LL •-- fA 69 69 69 fA 69 fR 69 69 fA 69 69 69 fA (A u) y m c c c c m m t U U E o ; ? o U aEi N ID d U c o m m C v m ` L m 7 U O L m > m V y v C m N CIn o j. m �' oU le U U 10° moo m > m mUU - (p aa E E Eo C � NON mOa m m m O O 0 0 0 m m m ` (A ❑ 2 ❑ = U � � a- Z .Jdm00 0000 d r Jy 4 MM 01-50,10M am �y0 h+l �G a 0 IS, o r. o �o � o �, w �4 a a ly� ll� i�� 2 m L � U � XX Z m CL L 0 0 E a a vCD NEEs = mLL cu 3 c a., O a 4-� 8 d E o Gn Qn � o � fn LD O E 'v� p p„ O V1 ap 0 = N O N � m _ m °D 00 w N L � u a10i 2 m a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 C4 jasn owd6 0009-apil A143UoW'6nt/ N MNNN NN M N N N N N N N M M O , INp � 1Np ONI O ONI o ry� v a in Ra a` wwww gww w w w 5w� w ,w w w w N N tQ�ppp u m a $ S m m c ry O 00 wwww ww N w N ga w w w w w N a mpg o m � 25 to m c ry o m � N N N N w N f Np �♦Ny N M ♦N N M �p (wy N i"1 9 m f O O O O n �"� NgNN wN N M M N N N N N N V rN OO IOmMN '� ♦ O N N ' N Y ��' • M LL �pNp�N NS�♦Np N 1p(N� w w q N 8 w w tNp m N�1pp(pNp N p♦N� pq N pC LL w M N w w N g w q N N M N N N M N N N N 00f MOI W h f �1A1p0p 1~O f~O N r A fm0 m N N m m N N m 0 LL N N w w qNN N N N w w M NNN M .-, Rio n� . m ~ m ry �r I N c m m o1� to m N m pp rp ..In � • m m N 17 R Y N N p N N n CCo Q� LL w T ,O NNq NN N N N N NMp NN N N � �O/� ci Qi m pa 1�1�y1 1mm1.. � Imo, m An n mmNp n m Imp ♦ ry ry >o � LL i+ www w w w w w w w w ww w w w `o C>C 8 dj r i1 3i` m mm oLL w� m it 2 0 S m �y O v1 '8 r o e rii ❑o oa mm " t r O Co O z z L u z z 11 8.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Public participation in the City's planning efforts began in 2002 when a new City Manager and the City Commission began discussing a comprehensive look at the utility system. The City Manager requested a workshop with the Commission on July 8, 2002, which summarized work accomplished to date in this evaluation and recommended moving forth with the facilities planning process. The City Commission agreed with this recommendation. This investigation resulted in the City's first water facilities plan and proposal to seek SRF funds. For this plan, a public hearing was advertised in the Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel on September 22, 2002 and a public hearing was held on October 22, 2002 at City Commission Chambers 7:00 p.m. A copy of the notice and the presentation slides are included as Appendix A. The issues covered included the proposed improvements and costs, the proposed use of SRF funds to fund the improvements, the comparative options and the impact of doing or not doing the improvements. Minutes of the meeting are not yet available. The City Commission approved the plan after the public hearing where there was no commentary from the public. 161 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACTION STEPS The final section of this report is broken into two sections—recommendations and action steps. The recommendations section summarizes the capital needs and operational recommendations. The action steps are defined tasks that City staff can pursue to improve the system operations in the long term. 9.1 Recommendations The City of Dania Beach is well situated for upgrade of its water, sewer and stormwater utility systems. To meet the continuing regulatory needs and demands of the residents for improved service, the projects identified on Table 9.1 should be pursed as the capital improvement program for the utility systems. The major improvements are: ® Water Plant upgrades ® New water storage facilities ® Water main replacement and pipe looping ® Chlorine system replacement a Telemetry and pump station rehabilitation ® Drainage Improvements in SE Dania Beach The amount that needs to be borrowed is just over $10.5 million if all of these projects are constructed at one time. The cost estimates may be less depending on findings during design. Annual debt is $715,000. Borrowing of funds can be accomplished at 3.11 percent interest from the State Revolving Fund loan program. The State of Florida's SRF program provides low interest loan monies to finance the cost of construction of publicly owned water, wastewater and stormwater facilities. Authority for the program is found in Rule Chapter 62-503 and 62- 504 of the Florida Administrative Code. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) is charged with implementing the program. Generally any local government entity, which-has jurisdiction over the collection, transmission, treatment, storage or disposal of wastewater, is eligible to apply for SRF loans. The projects for wastewater must be associated with domestic wastewater on the public system, including treatment plants, collection systems, transmission lines, storage, disposal alternatives (or changes thereto), reclaimed water use or similar projects. The same applies for water and stormwater. Rate increases will be required to meet current operations needs as well as new debt. Each year FDEP has developed an annual priority list of projects to be funded, based on need, health hazards, readiness to proceed, costs and State objectives (SWIM program, etc.). Each year the Florida Legislature and the United States Congress must appropriate funds for capitalization of the SRF program. The Legislature provides a 20 percent match to the proposed federal funds. 162 From a strategic standpoint, the City can pursue a number of strategies and action steps to upgrade the utility systems in both the short and long term in addition to the capital projects. Approval of these strategies and action steps by the City Commission provides staff with an agenda to pursue to improve the overall quality of the three systems. These strategies and action steps are described in the next section. 9.2 Proposed Strategic Plan To continue to provide its customers with safe water supplies, sewer and stormwater service at an affordable price, the City has developed the following series of strategies and actions steps that the City should pursue in an effort to continue to improve its system aside from the capital program. Strategy: Improve Infrastructure Action Steps: 1. Pursue upgrades to water treatment system including membrane upgrade and rehabilitation of existing system 2. Pursue upgrades to chlorine system to convert from a gas system to on-site generation 3. Build 1.6 to 2 million gallon storage system in conjunction with water plant upgrade 4. Rehabilitate and telemeterize lift stations to improve record-keeping and operations 5. Continue infiltration and inflow program, perhaps more aggressively 6. Continue replacement of 2 inch galvanized water mains with 6 inch and larger C900 PVC water mains 7. Pursue looping program to improve/correct pressure deficiencies in the water distribution system 8. Pursue piping and pump station improvements to address SE Dania Beach drainage issues 9. Pursue State Revolving Fund loan monies for major capital improvements as defined in Table 9.1 10. Adjust water, sewer and stormwater rates to meet capital needs Strategy: Improve Reliability of Raw Water Supply Action Steps: 1. Evaluate implementation of wellfield disinfection program on a routine basis 2. Develop record-keeping to monitor long term changes in raw.water quality including record-keeping to monitor long-term bacteriological growth 3. Ensure that Brian Piccolo water meets minimum bacteriological, silt and sand parameters as set by City's design professional 163 4. Implement routine wellfield microbial sampling program 5. Provide monitoring capability to wells for security purposes Strategy: Improve reliability of Water Distribution System Action Steps: 1. Continue program to eliminate 2 inch galvanized water lines and their services 2. Initiate program to replace all cast iron lines over 30 years old along the beach and the east side of the service area o Perform analysis of the condition of these pipes o Prioritize the pipe replacement program ® Coordinate efforts with repaving efforts of the City ® Coordinate efforts with reclaimed water program and stormwater program in the event these pipeline can be used temporarily to accomplish goals of those programs 3. Develop a computer model of the water distribution system 4. Improve the mapping of the water distribution system Strategy: Protect Water Quality Action Steps: 1. Enhance wellhead protection program and install monitoring wells 2. Conduct routine microbial analyses of the distribution system 3. Pursue membrane treatment for plant expansion/reconstruction 4. Provide monitoring capability at the water plant for security purposes Strategy: Improve Collection System Reliability Action Steps: 1. Install telemetry and monitor pump run time and pumpage 2. Pursue program to encourage repairs to residential services 3. Monitor infiltration after rainstorms and during the dry season through pipeline inspection program 4. Read Hollywood meter daily and record readings — note any unusual readings — consider telemeterizing, perhaps as a joint project with Hollywood ' 5. Continue cleaning and lining program as an annual allocation in the operating budget 164 Strategy: Improve Stormwater System Reliability Action Steps: 1. Complete FDOT coordinated connections for US 1 drainage in SE basin 2. Install 2nd Ave SE and 3rd Ave SE connectors to 7 h St. SE 3. Get aerial photographs after storm event of critical areas to monitor progress and improvement 4. Investigate location for additional pump station on 5'Ave SE 5. Institute public relations effort to insure grate and catch basins are clear 6. Review current discharges in light of County NPDES permit requirements for compliance Strategy: Improve Data Collection and Dissemination Efforts Action Steps: 1. Revise the current work order system to include not only the work order, but a database to track what work was accomplished, man-hours, where the work occurred, issues noted (condition of pipe), etc. so that trends can be developed. This is the long-term benefit of work order systems. 2. Develop an annual report of work order efforts, to include types of work, man-hours by function and equipment so that future budget consideration can be made. 3. Develop an annual summary of needs identified from work order system 4. Develop annual summary of water sales, water pumped, wastewater billed, lift station hours to improve knowledge of operations — some of this will require telemetry Strategy: Establish Water Conservation Program Action Steps: 1. Initiate Drop-Saver program in schools 2. Establish routine public relations program for residents and homeowners groups 3. Establish department newsletter 4. Pursue low flow plumbing fixtures with the Building Department 5. Evaluate co-sponsorship of program with adjacent entities Strategy: Increase Public Interaction to Inform Public About Utility Action Steps: 1. Complete summary of programs and descriptions 165 O 2. Implement periodic newsletter 3. Implement Periodic Construction Update on web-site 4. Instate Annual Report on Activities 5. Continue efforts to improve relationship with regulatory agencies Strategy: Update Utility Security via Telemetry and Remote Monitoring Action Steps: 1. Perform Vulnerability Assessment of Utility System 2. Install remote sensing devices at wells and lift stations as part of telemetry efforts 3. Evaluate interconnection of utility telemetry with City-wide monitoring system through Broward Sheriffs Office substation 4. Provide remote sensing contacts to Broward Sheriff s Office for response 5. Eliminate gas chlorine system 6. Improve security entrance to plant site 7. Move entrance from proximity to Stirling Road Strategy: Increase total revenues of the System Action Steps: 1. Improve financial stability of all three utility systems 2. Adopt policy that utility systems will not rely on retained earnings as a revenue source 3. Review General Fund transfer amounts in light of fiscal condition of utility systems 4. Review policy to establish RRI contribution of at least $250,000 in construction improvements each year to rebuild system, including $50,000 per year at minimum for infiltration and inflow correction 5. Modify, collection of impact fee revenues to ensure new users pay their appropriate share of facilities 6. Secure routine rate modifications that ensure adequate revenues to fund debt, RRI and operating costs will be available 166 Table 9.1 Capital Improvement Program Project 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 TOTAL Water Water Plant Upgrade $450 $3,000 $3,450 2 MG Ground Storage Tank $225 $1,500 - $1,725 High Service Pumps $75 $500 $575 Repair Metal Tanks $250 $250 Replace Cat Walks $100 $100 Refurbish Sludge Metal $150 $150 Add On-site Power $38 $250 $288 Replace Aerators $15 $100 $115 Remove Elevated Tank $38 $250 $288 Water Main Replacement $48 $323 30 30 30 30 $371 Water Main Looping Upgrades $182 $1,214 $1,396 Chlorine System $53 $350 $403 Security $60 Water Total S $803 $5,971 $2,387 $- $- $- $30 $30 $30 $30 $9,160 Sewer Infittation/inflow $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $300 Lift Station Rehab $113 $750 $863 Security $25 SewerTotal S $50 $188 $800 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $1,188 Revenues SRF $803 $6,108 $2,864 $- $- S $9,775 Operating Revenues $50 $50 $323 $50 $50 $50 $80 $80 $80 $80 $573 Total Revenues S $853 $6,158 $3,187 $50 $50 $50 $80 $80 $80 $80 $10.348 Stonnwater Federal highway $100 $100 SE Basin Piping $624 $624 StormwaterTotal S S $724 $- S S S S S i i $724 Revenues SRF $- $624 $624 Operating Revenues S $100 $- rr S S S S $- S $100 FDOT $100 Total Revenues S S $724 $- S S $- $- $- S $- $724 167 APPENDIX A Bulk Water Agreement—Hollywood AGREEMENT . ::� ` .THIS.AGREEMENT made and entered into this ;'•� day 1968,'by and between the 6ITY OF HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA* of a Municipal corporation Qiereinafter referred to as "Hollywood", party of the DANIA, -FLORIDA, a municipal corporation first part),and the CITY OF Qlerefnafter referred-to as "Dania", party of the second part); WI TNE•SSETH: WHEREAS, Hollywood owns, maintains and operates a water-production and distribution plant, and. :WHEREAS, Dania requires'the'use of Hollywoo&s,water for consumption by if's resident's, and 'WHEREAS, engineers representing both parties have determined that it is�feasible for Hollywood to furnish water to Dania, NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants . and undertakings of each party for and'withthe other, and the Agreement herein contained, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1� .Hollywood shall sell and deliver to Dania all water that Dania may need from time to time and at all times during the effective period of this Agreement for services by Dania to the residents within its corporate limits. Hollywood shall have such water available for delivery to Dania.as Dania may need at all times subject only to its inability.from doing so due to events-over which it has no control, including but not limited to fire, storm, flood, explosion, civil commotion or riot, acts of the public enemy, sabota gq strikes, walk outs, labor disputes, or acts of God.. 2. All water delivered by Hollywood hereunder shall be of good and potable quality satisfactory for domestic use and shall have received the same treatment and be of the same quality as that furnished by Hollywood to the individual customers from Hollywood's Water Department'.';..Hollywood shall maintain adequate water pressure, similar to the water pressure being • maintained throughout Hollywood's water system. • 3. The water furnished hereunder will be delivered by Hollywood and will be accepted and received by Dania from Hollywood's meter at 20th Avenue and Sheridan Street, which is hereby declared to be the point of delivery. Additional points of delivery may be established at such times and places as shall be mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto. Dania shall bear the entire cost and expense of extending at least an eight inch water line to each point of delivery and connecting same to the connecting piping which shall be provided for this purpose at each point of delivery. Hollywood shall install at Dania's expense at each point of delivery such water meters', valves or meter structures as may be necessary to comply -ion iO with the terms hereof. , The water meter will become the property of the City of y Dania however the maintenance of said water meter will be undertaken b the Cit //f.L-of Hollywood• aria shall install whatever water distribution system extensions may be necessary and required on its side.of the meter to connect to its existing water distribution system at its own cost and.expense.. -.5: It shall be the sole.duty and obligation of Hollywood ® to read, maintain and test the water meter or meters to be installed. However, Dania shall, from time to time, and at reasonable times, have the.privilege o f reading said meter or meters, inspecting same and causing same to be tested by its employees or appointees; but under the supervision and con— trol of Hollywood. 6. . In order to remain current under the terms hereof, Dania agrees to pay to Hollywood a minimum sum of $1.50 per month, as and when Dania is billed by Hollywood for same. Dania shall pay to Hollywood and Hollywood shall accept from Dania, as compensation for all water delivered to Dania hereunder, during each month of the effective period hereof, such amounts as shall be determined in accordance.with the following rates: c Y1oC The minimum charge, as set forth above, in the ,j'. f amount of $1.50 shall cover all water used up to 3,000 gallons.. Any water used in excess of 3,000 gallons and not • more than 100,000 gallons shall be at the rate of $0.40 per each 1,000 gallons. All water used In excess of 100,000 gallons shall be at the rate of $0.2250 per 1,000 gallons. ^2^ a N f T ® `3 The rates may be increased by Hollyw ood and Dania agrees ? .: or times as the rates charged such increased rates, at such time ood to Pay rtment is increased by Hollyw to tho consumers of Hollyw ood's Water DePa ,. n regulatory agency that has Jurisdiction at such time, rate maki . • ercentag0 of increase or by any ' such increase in Dania rates shall not exceed the P 11 °od's water ;,';.`.:'•+ and as is made in the rates of the individual consumers of No ent. delinquent paymentse Departm ment of bills, de q 7. Mallets of billing Pay the following provisions maintenance and the like shall be governed by Dania agrees meter which provisions Da of the City Code of the City of Hollywood, by reference: to abide and which are incorporated herein b/ 63.31; 63.34; 63.27, 63.28; 63.18 (7) and (8);. 63.38; 63.39 and 63.41' 37; 63.35; 63.36; 36. 1968 8. Agreement shal This l become effective on TutX 1�. and sh all continue until June'301 1998. be renewable reement shall+ at the option of Dania, 1�7 This Ag Dania to Holly nods, provided notice 1n writing is given by fo ton year Pe expiration Certified Mail not later than six (6) months prior to the wood.by date of the original term or any extension thereof. , covenants and agrees that in 9 1ollywood recognizes above, anticipation of the use by Dania of Ho outlined llywood's facilities as large sums of money in conse4uenco of which Hollywood _Dania•is "Pending _ non-payment cannot.cancel this Agreement on any condition save and except non-P Y of the sums as above outlined. ent ll bind the Parties hereto and their 10. This Agreem sha successors and assigns SS WHECF, the Parties hereto have caused IN WITNE • duly executod these presents to be by their duly officers for;and -3 on behalf of the said parties the day.and year"first above written.' CITY OF HOLLY`NOOD, a municipal Signed sealed and delivered in the presence Of� corporation '. BY• ��"` YOR t ATTEST: �u�'r✓ \CLERK C TX CLE u As to City of Hot YWood orpaation CITY OF DANIA, a municipal Pl BY: y r . �tAXOR 01 ATTEST* CI " CITX CLERK; As to City of Daa APP OVED TO FOR ell City AttorneYr City of Hollywoo City AttorneY. City of Dania APPENDIX B Bulk Raw Water Agreement—Broward County ;.' Office of Environmental Services Waier Supply Division 2401 N. Powerline Road o Pompano Beach, FL 33069 o� Phone: (305) 960-3051 '%Po COUNI*' [Fax (305) 960-3052] January 22 , 1991 r t. r Mr . Robert Flatley , City Manager City of Dania 100 West Dania Beach Boulevard Dania , Florida 33004 RE : REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PROJECT RAW WATER SUPPLY TO CITY OF DANIA BCOES PROJECT NO . 1134 Dear Mr. Flatley : ® District 3A Wells 5 & 6 are complete , with a total construction cost of $647 ,843 .70 . Under the terms of the "Addendum to Large User Raw Water Agreement between Broward County and City of Dania " , the City of Dania is to reimburse the County for one- third of the costs for the wells plus the cost for oversizing the transmission line , which is $94 ,071 .20 . However , the County will not expect payment until the raw water line to Dania is complete and connected to your water system . The easement across the Oakridge Country Club has not yet been obtained ; none of the three possible solutions described in my letter dated July 24 , 1990 were successful . The County Commission approved the filing of a Request for Declaratory Judgement , which will take this issue to court for a resolution . If the decision is in the County ' s favor, the easement question should be resolved and construction of the transmission main could be started . If the decision is in the property owners ' favor we will either have to condemn the easement or change the route . It is impossible to predict the outcome of this court suit , so we cannot give you an estimate as to when water will be available . At best , completion of the transmission main is at least six months away . BROWARD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS—An Equal Opportunity Employer Scott I.Cowan Nicki Englander Grossman John P.Hart Ed Kennedy Lori Nance Parrish Sylvia Poitier Gerald F.Thompson We're Building A Future For Your Family.And Your Business. This document is printed on recycled paper BCOES Project 1134 January 22 , 1991 Page 2 of 2 ® The County is still committed to provide the City of Dania with raw water and is working to resolve the problems delaying this project . You may contact Gary Smith , Chief of the Water Supply, Project , at 968-3817 for additional information and/or future updates . Sincerely , Michael Scottie , Director Water Supply Division MJS : GLS/mm (4 ) cc : N . T h a b i t E . Goscicki , P . E . E . Kerwin S . Uhrick , P . E . G . Smith , P .E . J . Tanacredi File 1134 : IV • RESOLUTION NO. 102-89 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, t _ _• � APPROVING THE LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROWARD COUNTY AND CITY OF DANIA; AND AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA: Section 1. That that certain Large User Raw Water Agreement between Broward County and the City of Dania, a copy of which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", be and the same is hereby approved and the appropriate city officials are directed to execute same. Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption.- PASSED and ADOPTED this 2r}h day of Spntemhpr 1989. 1 1. ATTEST: 44A'YOR - COMM SSION `CITY CLERK - AUDITOR J , APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS " B s.v FRANK C. ADLER, City Attorney _ _ Resolution No. 102-89 LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROWA�R ) COUNTY A2ND CITY OF DA.YIA DATE: January 31, 1990 LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROWARD COUNTY AND CITY OF DANIA KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: This Agreement is made and entered into in Broward County, Florida, between BROWARD COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, through its Board of County Commissioners, which term shall include its successors and assigns, AND CITY OF DANIA, hereinafter referred to as CUSTOMER which term shall include its successors and assigns. WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions, promises, covenants and payments hereinafter set forth, COUNTY and CUSTOMER hereby agree as follows: -1- ARTICLE I PREAMBLE In order to establish the background, context, and frame of reference for this Agreement and to generally express the objectives and intentions of the respective parties herein, the following statements, representations, and explanations shall be accepted as predicates for the undertakings and commitments included within the provisions which follow and may be relied upon by the parties as essential elements of the mutual considerations upon which this Agreement is based. 1.1 The Board of County Commissioners through the enactment of Broward County Ordinance Number B440, have created a Water Supply Advisory Board, hereinafter referred to as WSAB, in November 1984. The purpose of WSAB is to assist in the development of a county-wide Water Supply Plan to assure future water supply needs. 1.2 COUNTY engaged the firm of James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. (JMM) as the consultant to prepare the Water Supply Plan known as the Study of Water Supply and the Selection of Future Wellfield Sites in Broward County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the STUDY, which was intended to satisfy the goals established by the COUNTY and WSAB. 1.3 The recommendations of the consulting engineer, JMM, were establishment of raa water delivery systems by the COUNTY to deliver raw water from centralized wellfield! to the LARGE USERS, and related actions necessary for protection of the wellfields. The capital funding, as approved and defined by the Board of County Commissioners, for the Water Supply Program will be by the COUNTY. The OPERATION ANI MAINTENANCE CHARGES and other necessary non-capital charges (renewal ant replacement and administrative costs) associated with the system will be borne by th, LARGE USERS. 1.4 The recommendations of the consulting engineer, JMM, were adopted by the Browar( County Board of County Commissioners on December 9, 1986. ® 1.5 To the best of its ability, the COUNTY will have sufficient raw water transmission ant -2- well capacity from the PROGRAM to furnish the projected raw water needs of CUSTOMER during the entire term of this Agreement, based upon the projected raw water flow schedules as provided by CUSTOMER. 1.6 CUSTOMER agrees to purchase raw water from COUNTY in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. 1.7 The authority of this Agreement is by action of the Broward County Board of County Commissioners. 1.8 Broward County's Water Supply Program, hereinafter referred to as the PROGRAM, is the future water supply plan for Broward County as defined in The Study of Water Supply and The Selection of Future Wellfield Sites in Broward County,June 1986, as approved by the County Commission, including any and all approved amendments. Amendments must be approved by the WSAB and the County Commission in the same manner as initial approval of the Program. w1.9 It is recognized that any existing public water utility, by showing a demonstrated need to join the raw water supply system, may make application to the Water Supply Advisory Board (WSAB) for inclusion in the system. 1.10 Based on expected needs the PROGRAM has been phased. Phase I includes anticipated Customers as follows: City of Dania, City of Hallandale, Broward County System 3A, City of Deerfield Beach (East) and Broward County System 2A and possibly a portion of the City of Hollywood. Phase II includes anticipated Customers as follows: City of Hollywood, City of Hillsboro"Beach, and additional wells and/or pipelines to meet any additional needs of Phase I Customers. -3- ARTICLE 2 DEFINITIONS Unless the context specifically indicates otherwise, the following words and phrases used in this Agreement shall have the following meanings: 2.1 Words and terms related to water and wastewater shall have the definitions listed in the "Glossary - Water and Wastewater Control Engineering, 1981", published by AWWA. e, "COUNTY" When used herein shall mean Broward County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida as represented by the Broward County Board of County Commissioners. b. "COUNTY FACILITIES" This term shall mean those facilities owned or operated, or both, by COUNTY and approved by Water Supply Advisory Board as a part of the PROGRAM and ratified by COUNTY for the purpose of providing for raw water from the Biscayne Aquifer (wells) and transmitting raw water from these wells through the POINT OF CONNECTION to CUSTOMER as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. C. "CUSTOMER'S SERVICE AR .A" This term shall mean the geographic boundaries for which the COUNTY'S RAW WATER is ultimately supplied by CUSTOMER as potable water as shown on Exhibit "B". d. "CUSTOMER'S SYSTEM" This term shall mean the entire water supply system of CUSTOMER including wells, raw water mains, treatment facilities, storage, transmission and distribution mains, services, and all appurtenances thereto downstream of the POINT OF CONNECTION to the COUNTY FACILITIES. e. "LARGE USER" This term shall include all users including Broward County's Office of Environmental Services, any municipality or other public entity which operates -4- ® water treatment and distribution facilities which connect into COUNTY FACILITIES for the purpose of receiving RAW WATER and who have entered into a LARGE USER AGREEMENT (LUA) with the COUNTY and for the purposes of each LARGE USER AGREEMENT an individual LARGE USER shall be designated as CUSTOMER, f, - "LARGEUSER'S ADVISORY BOARD" (LijA]3) The term Large User Advisory Board shall mean the Board that is established and composed of representatives of LARGE USERS receiving raw water from COUNTY FACILITIES, and whose function is to serve in any advisory capacity to the Office of Environmental Services regarding rates, modification to the COUNTY FACILITIES and to perform other advisory tasks related to the use of COUNTY FACILITIES. Each LARGE USER shall be entitled to one representative on said Board. g. „ , This term shall mean the Broward County Office of Environmental Services located at 2401 North Powerline Road, Pompano Beach,Florida 33069. h. "OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES" Operation and Maintenance charges shall mean the COUNTY'S reasonable and necessary expenses of maintenance, repair, and operation of the COUNTY FACILITIES, and shall include, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all ordinary and usual expenses of maintenance and repair, which may include expenses not annually recurring, COUNTY administrative expenses properly charged to the raw water system, and any reasonable charges for pension or retirement funds properly chargeable to the raw water systems, insurance premiums; engineering expenses relating to maintenance, repair and operation; raw water sampling cost; legal expenses, any taxes which may be lawfully imposed on the income or operations and reserves for such taxes, and any other expenses required to be paid by the COUNTY, all in accordance with the accrual method of accounting, but shall not include any deposits or transfers to renewal or replacement funds, except as provided for herein, or any deposits or transfers to ® the credit of the Sinking Fund, Loan Repayment Fund, and the General Reserve .g. ® Fund. Each CUSTOMER shall pay a percentage of the expenses proportional to the consumption divided by the total consumption of the COUNTY FACILITIES as defined herein. i. "POINT OF CONNECTION" This term shall mean the point where the CUSTOMER'S system connects to the COUNTY FACILITIES for the purpose of receiving raw water from the COUNTY FACILITIES; said POINT OF CONNECTION is described and set forth in Article 3.1 below and shown in Exhibit "A". j. "PROGRAM" This term shall mean the implemented recommendations for supply of raw water from COUNTY to LARGE USERS in the STUDY including amendments approved by the Water Supply Advisory Board and approved by the COUNTY. lc. "PROGRAM CUSTOMER CAPACITY" This term shall refer to the Maximum Daily Raw Water Demand in million of gallons per day (MGD) in the year 2020 as shown in Table 3-9 of the STUDY or the modification thereof or such other flow demand substantiated by records from the CUSTOMER'S water treatment plant and operations or substantiated by growth pattern projections approved by the WSAB and approved by the COUNTY; less the permitted or desired maximum daily raw water demand supplied by the CUSTOMER'S own existing wells and shown in the year 2020 of the CUSTOMER'S initial raw water flow projections provided in Section 3.5 hereof. Said year 2020 projection should indicate CUSTOMER'S expected ultimate raw water flow needs from the PROGRAM at build-out of CUSTOMER'S SERVICE AREA. 1. "RAW WATER" This term shall mean the untreated water extracted from the Biscayne Aquifer. m. "RENEWAL. AND REPLACEMENT FUND" The Renewal and Replacement Fund shall be used, when necessary, for the purpose of paying the cost of upgrading or improvements to, or the significant -6. ® replacement or renewal of capital assets of the COUNTY FACILITIES, or the extraordinary repairs of said COUNTY FACILITIES. Except as provided below any amounts collected by COUNTY shall be used only for upgrading, repair, renewal, and replacements to COUNTY FACILITIES. In the event that the amount of the Renewal-and Replacement Fund exceeds the amount necessary for the purposes of the Renewal and Replacement Fund as certified by a Consulting Engineer, or as provided in Section 5.1.2. such amount in excess thereof shall be used to offset OPERATION ARID MAINTENANCE CHARGES. n. "RESERVED CAPACITY" This term shall refer to the Annual Maximum Daily Flow projection of Raw Water in MGD of the CUSTOMER'S Raw Water Flow Projections provided in Section 3.5 hereof. Such flow projection shall be as identified for year 1 of the then current CUSTOMER'S PROGRAM RAW WATER FLOW PROJECTIONS table in Section 3.5; provided,however, that flow projection must be (with the exception of the first three (3) years of projections)less than or equal to the volume shown in the fourth year projection three (3) years prior to the current table. This shall ® provide COUNTY a period of three (3) years to supply any increase in demand projections submitted by CUSTOMER as a revision in the raw water flow projections. o. "STUDY- -The Study of Water Supply and the Selection of Future Wellfield Sites it Broward County, Florida", and approved amendments thereto. P. ;TECHNICAL. ADVISORY COMMITTEE" The Water Supply Advisory Board (WSAB) may establish a "Technica Advisory Committee" consisting of members with technical and operatio expertise. Each LARGE USER would have one person to serve on the Technics Advisory Committee (TAC). Such TAC member would typically be a Cit. Engineer, Utilities Director, Public Works Director, or of similar level an background. The WSAB may also add other public agency representatives to th TAC as may be prudent and beneficial. Such members could be from Sout ® Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), United States Geologic Servic , (USGS), Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) or of similar regulatory or public agency. q. TER SUPPLY ADVISORY BOARD" (WSkB) As defined in Broward County's Ordinance 84-40. r. "WATER SUPPLY PROGRA_W See PROGRAM .g. ARTICLE 3 TO THE COUNTY RAW WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM 3.1 "POINT OF CONNECTION" Both parties agree that the POINT OF CONNECTION and meter location shall be as indicated in the attached Exhibit "A". 3.2 'TRANSFER OF LAND AT POINT OF CONK QTION" COUNTY may locate the POINT OF CONNECTION and meter location and necessary transmission facilities on property now being used by CUSTOMER for raw water transmission or treatment facilities. CUSTOMER will convey at no cost to COUNTY either the fee simple title or appropriate easement to the property needed by COUNTY for the POINT OF CONNECTION, meter location, pump stations, transmission facilities, and such interest in property as is necessary to provide ingress and egress to COUNTY to said POINT OF CONNECTION. Such property shall be of sufficient magnitude to allow for future projected expansion. Such POINT OF CONNECTION location shall be ® mutually acceptable and be provided by acceptable legal instrument in a form approved by both COUNTY and CUSTOMER. 3.3 ''MAINTENANCE OF CUSTOMER'S SYSTEM" Except as provided elsewhere herein, CUSTOMER agrees to construct where necessary, and to operate and properly maintain at its own cost and expense, all water mains, treatment facilities and other required appurtenances related and directly attributable to the acceptance of COUNTY-delivered RAW WATER downstream of the POINT OF CONNECTION that are necessary to properly accept raw water from the POINT OF CONNECTION to the CUSTOMER'S SYSTEM at such elevation, pressure, and not-to- exceed flow rates as described in Sections 3.5, 3.6, and 3.7 herein. 3.4 "CUSTOMER'S SERVICE AREA" CUSTOMER agrees that it will not provide potable water outside its CUSTOMER SERVICE AREA, (Exhibit "B"), except in the case of public health, safety, welfare or emergency, (and as provided in interlocal Agreements) unless CUSTOMER receives ® prior approval by the COUNTY, with such approval being the subject of a written .9. supplemental agreement attached hereto and made a part hereof. It is agreed that such approval will not be unreasonably withheld and it is further agreed that disclosure of all contract obligations has been made by the CUSTOMER. 3.5 "CUSTOMER'S FUTURE FLOW PROJECTION" CUSTOMER agrees that it shall annually review its needs for raw water supply and transmission service, and, with the advice and counsel of a professional engineer, project its future needs to the best of its knowledge and ability,in the format shown below. PROGRAM RAW WAIER FLOW PR TPC ONS***® Annual May.Month Annual Avg. Daily Avg. Daily Max.Day Peak Flow Flow Daily Flow Houriy Flow Year (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) 1* 1.0 1.2 1.4** 1.7 2 1.0 1.2 14 1.7 3 1.0 1.2 L4 1.7 4 2.8 3.2 3.9** 4.7 5 2.9 3.3 4.1 4.9 10 3.5 4.0 49 5.9 15 4.3 4.9 5.8 7.0 20 4.3 4.9 5.8 7.0 2020 4.3 4.9 5.8*** 7.0 ° October 1, 1990 through September 30, 1991 80 RESERVED CAPACITY PROGRAM CUSTOMER CAPACITY SEE ATTACHMENT 1 These projections shall serve as a reasonable estimate of the future needs of CUSTOME: and shall be used by COUNTY for the purpose of planning expansion, construction modification, or alteration of said COUNTY FACILITIES and shall be so used b ® COUNTY in determining transmission and well capacity requirements attributable 1 CUSTOMER in COUNTY FACILITIES. In determining when to expand or modify i- -10. ® facilities, COUNTY will consider recommendations of the individual CUSTOMERS, the LARGE USER'S ADVISORY BOARD, and the TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. COUNTY is obligated to furnish service to CUSTOMER under this Agreement which shall be limited to a PROGRAM CUSTOMER CAPACITY as established in Table 3-9 of the STUDYor the modification thereof, as substantiated either by records from the CUSTOMER'S water treatment plant operations or substantiated by growth pattern projections approved by the WSAB and approved by the COUNTY;less the permitted or desired maximum daily raw water demand supplied by CUSTOMER'S.own existing wells. Said PROGRAM CUSTOMER CAPACITY shall be that shown on the CUSTOMER'S initial "Raw Water Flow Projections" as provided in Section 3.5 With the single exception of the capital funding referenced in Section 1.3, all obligations referred to as COUNTY obligations shall mean obligations fulfilled by COUNTY with the cost borne by the LARGE USERS through charges accrued by the PROGRAM. COUNTY shall have all right and power by suit or other such proceedings at law or ir, equity to enforce the limitation of its obligations hereunder and to prohibit CUSTOMER or its officers, agents or employees from extracting RAW WATER from COUNTY FACILITIES which exceeds the amount of demand projections indicated in the above ® table. CUSTOMER agrees to furnish this projection to BCOES at the time of contract execution and thereafter no later than the first day of January of each year. 3.6 "RESERVED CAPACITY" COUNTY'$ annual obligation to furnish service to CUSTOMER under this Agreemen shall be limited to the RESERVED CAPACITY as established in the table in Section 3..' hereof. COUNTY is obligated to implement PROGRAM to provide CUSTOMER wit] approved RESERVED CAPACITY. This term shall refer to the Annual Maximum Dail; Flow Projection of RAW WATER in MGD of the CUSTOMER'S Raw Water Floi Projections provided in Section 3.5 hereof. Such flow projection shall be as identified fo year I of the then current CUSTOMER'S RAW WATER FLOW PROJECTIONS table ii Section 3.5; provided, however, that flow projection must be (with the exception of the firs three (3) years of projections) less than or equal to the volume shown in the fourth yea projection three (3)years prior to the current table. This shall provide COUNTY a peroo, of three years to supply any increase in demand projection submitted by CUSTOMER a a revision in the raw water flow projections in accordance with Section 3.5 -11- 3.7 "PRESSURES AT POINT OF CONNECTIQN" COUNTY agrees that, under all operating conditions, except as provided in Article 7.6 of this Agreement, the minimum pressure in COUNTY transmission main at the POINT OF CONNECTION shall be adequate to provide the RESERVED CAPACITY to the CUSTOMER'S POINT OF CONNECTION; however, such pressure shall not exceed 30 pounds per square inch. The pressure shall be agreed to by CUSTOMER and COUNTY to fit the technical situation that exists at and downstream of the POINT OF CONNECTION. 3.8 "EQUALIZATION OF DEMAND" CUSTOMER agrees, through the use of generally acceptable utility methods, to receive a raw water flow from the COUNTY FACILITIES through the POINT OF CONNECTION, not to exceed the RESERVED CAPACITY. In the event the CUSTOMER exceeds the RESERVED CAPACITY or Peak Hourly Flow set forth in Section 3.5, then COUNTY may impose a compensatory charge to the monthly billing to CUSTOMER as provided in Section 5.2. 3.9 "COUNTY TO INSTALL METERS" COUNTY agrees to furnish and install a raw water metering device, housing, accessories and appurtenances of a type and design selected by COUNTY sufficient to meet the CUSTOMER'S needs and to be located at the site or sites as defined in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. COUNTY shall retain ownership of the metering device, together with the housing, accessories and appurtenances thereto. In the event the capacity of the metering device becomes inadequate for the amount of flow delivered, COUNTY shall replace the meter or install such additional metering device or devices as may be necessary. 3.9.1. "COUNTY TOMAINTAIN METER" COUNTY agrees to have an annual inspection and report prepared regarding the condition and accuracy of the metering device performed by a representative of the manufacturer or other competent entity. A copy of the annual report on meter inspection shall be furnished to CUSTOMER. CUSTOMER shall have the right to make its own meter inspection, or to have an independent meter manufacturer authorized company check the metering equipment at any time during normal business hours provided, -12- ® however, no such inspection shall be made unless CUSTOMER shall first give COUNTY written notice of its intent to have the inspection made nor shall any such inspection be made prior to forty-eight (48) hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, subsequent to the receipt of said notice by COUNTY. All cost and expense of CUSTOMER'S interim inspection shall be borne by CUSTOMER unless the meter is found to be inaccurate beyond the manufacturer's guaranteed range of accuracy, in which case the cost and expense of such interim inspection shall be borne out of OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES. Normal maintenance of the metering device shall be performed by COUNTY. All results of interim meter inspections shall be provided to the COUNTY. 3.9.2 � EhT N C SF OF METER INACCURACY" Both parties agree that, should the metering equipment be found to be inaccurate beyond the manufacturer's range of accuracy, the meter will be assumed to be inaccurate since midway between the previous meter check and the discovered inaccuracy or for a period of three months, whichever time should be less, and that the following month's billing will be adjusted to show a credit or additional charge to CUSTOMER for that period based on the average daily flow of the thirty (30) day period prior to the previous meter check. An additional adjustment shall be made after the meter inaccuracy has been corrected. Said additional adjustment shall show a credit or additional charge to CUSTOMER for that period based on the average daily flow of the thirty (30) day periods prior to the previous meter check and immediately alter the period of inaccurate operation. 3.9.3 "PAYMENT IN CASE OF METER FAILURE" Both parties agree that, if at any time the metering system shall be inoperative or in an. way fails to provide information with respect to the quantity of flow from the COUN7TT " FACILITIES, CUSTOMER shall pay to COUNTY a per day amount using the averag+ flow of the thirty (30) day period immediately prior to the period the meter wa inoperative. .13. ® ARTICLE 4 p�OVI�OhS �TING TO RAW WATER, QUALITY 4.1 '$AW WATF,R Qt1A .It TY" The COUNTY does not guarantee the quality of RAW WATER supplies, but agrees to supply RAW WATER of reasonable treatable quality. If through changing finished water quality standards, decreasing RAW WATER quality, or other causes, the RAW WATER is no longer or may no longer be reasonably treatable, an engineering study may be commissioned by the WSAB, and approved by the COUNTY, as a cost to the system, to determine the most economical method of achieving finished water quality standards. The CUSTOMER shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, at no penalty to the CUSTOMER, if the quality of the raw water supplied to the CUSTOMER by the COUNTY is such that either of the following conditions are met and "confirmed". "Confirmed" shall mean an independent evaluation of the situations (a) and/or (b) below by a ® consulting engineer or public agency acceptable to COUNTY and CUSTOMER, approved by the WSAB and approved by the COUNTY. All confirmation costs to be borne b) CUSTOMER. a. The CUSTOMER can purchase treated potable water meeting all standard: imposed by local, state and federal authorities at 30 percent less cost than the tots cost to the CUSTOMER to purchase raw water from the COUNTY under thi Agreement and to treat said raw water in the CUSTOMER'S water treatmen plant to meet the current standards of water quality required by local, state an federal authorities. b. The CUSTOMER can supply or have supplied raw water from another permitte source and can treat said raw water at such cost that the combined cost of ra water supply and treatment to meet all then current required water qualil standards of local, state and federal authorities is 30 percent less than tl combined cost of raw water purchase and treatment of COUNTY supplied ral is -14- water to meet all current required water quality standards of local, state and ® federal authorities. 4.2 "RAW WAIER SAMPLING" The COUNTY shall be entirely responsible for having all raw water sampling tests required by statutory authorities performed at the well sites and in the transmission mains up to the POINT OF CONNECTION. CUSTOMER and COUNTY shall establish a sampling point at a mutually agreeable location at or near the POINT OF CONNECTION so that both parties may obtain samples of the RAW WATER delivered by the COUNTY to the CUSTOMER. COUNTY agrees to provide for such right-of-way or privilege upon properties within its control as may be necessary to allow CUSTOMER access to the sampling point. CUSTOMER shall have the right to obtain raw water samples during normal business hours provided, however, no such inspection shall be made until CUSTOMER shall first give COUNTY written notice of its intent to obtain samples and type of analysis or test • proposed, nor shall any such samples be obtained within forty eight (48)hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, subsequent to the receipt of said notice by COUNTY. All costs of collecting and testing CUSTOMER requested samples shall be borne by the CUSTOMER. The COUNTY reserves the right to collect duplicate samples with the CUSTOMER. The costs of said duplicate samples shall be part of the OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES. -15- ® ARTICLE 5 CHARGES PROYISI 5.1 "PSIS OF CHAR .S" Both parties agree that COUNTY shall provide raw water supply services to CUSTOMER at fees, rates and charges constituting the full cost, not to include capital cost, of such services, which shall include OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES. Such fees, rates and charges shall be just and equitable, and COUNTY shall set the same fees, rates and charges for all LARGE USERS that are within the PROGRAM. Such fees, rates and charges shall be adopted by the COUNTY, and it shall consider recommendations of the individual CUSTOMERS and the LARGE USER ADVISORY BOARD. The COUNTY shall hold public hearings on adjustments to the rates and charges in the manner proNided by law and after thirty (30) days written notice to CUSTOMER of such public hearing. The CUSTOMER shall pay a monthly charge to COUNTY for raw water supply services provided by the COUNTY. Such charges shall include the items provided in Section 5.1.1 ® and 5.1.2. 5.1.1 Sri;RATION A_TvTD MAINTENANCE CHARGES" OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES are applicable to the raw water transmission mains and well operations and facilities and appurtenances thereto. The portion of the CUSTOMER'S monthly charge attributable to such OPERATION ANC MAINTENANCE CHARGE shall be based upon the actual flow used by the CUSTOMEF during the billing period. Such monthly charge shall be computed as a charge per 1004 gallons passing through the meter or metrrs serving CUSTOMER. The rate for such pe: 1000 gallons charge shall be computed by dividing the budgeted annual Iota OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES for each of the COUNTY'S ensuini fiscal years ending September 30 by the number of thousands of gallons of raw orate which is estimated to be delivered to all the LARGE USERS of the system for that year After the close of the fiscal year, an annual adjustment will be computed which will b based upon the actual OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES recorded for th COUNTY FACILITIES for that fiscal year divided by the actual number of thousands c -1& gallons of RAW WATER provided through the system for that fiscal year. Such ® adjustment will be made subject to final verification of OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES by annual audit performed by a Certified Public Accountant. If the annual adjustment shows that an underpayment was made by CUSTOMER, the amount due and owing shall be paid by CUSTOMER in twelve (12) equal monthly payments and shown as a separate item on the monthly bills during the next twelve (12) months after the adjustment has been made. If the annual adjustment shows that an overpayment was made by CUSTOMER, the amount due and owing; CUSTOMER shall be credited to CUSTOMER in twelve (12) equal monthly installments and shown separately on the monthly bills during the next twelve (12) months after the adjustment has been determined. 5.1.2 "RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT FUND" (R&R FUND) A charge representing a contribution to the RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT FUND (R&R FUND) maintained by the COUNTY shall be a surcharge of up to ten percent (10%, on each monthly bill, with such sum being deposited in the R&R Fund, with the ® surcharge such that the R&R Fund will be maintained at a level not to exceed five percen (5%) of the replacement cost of the COUNTY FACILITIES based upon the annua' engineering report. Any amounts collected by COUNTY shall be used only foi upgrading, repair, renewal and replacements to the COUNTY'S FACILITIES (a! defined in Section 2.1.m). Interest accruing and any gains realized from investment o R&R FUND shall be credited to the R&R FUND. 5.2 "CHARGE FOR EXCESSIVE FLOW' In the event that a CUSTOMER'S peak daily flow for any month exceeds th CUSTOMER'S RESERVED CAPACITY as shown in year 1 in the table in Section 3.5 fo two (2) successive days then the monthly charge to the CUSTOMER shall be increased b; twice (2X) the percentage that the CUSTOMER exceeds its commitment for each da; thereafter that its flow exceeds RESERVED CAPACITY as shown in the table in Sectioi 3.5. Nothing in this section shall be construed to waive or rescind any rights tha COUNTY shall have pursuant to Section 3.6 relating to the limitation of COUNTY: -17- ® obligation to provide RESERVED CAPACITY to CUSTOMER only up to the amount CUSTOMER has reserved. In the event that CUSTOMER'S peak hourly flow for any day of the month exceeds the CUSTOMER'S projected Peak Hourly Flow as shown in year. I in the table in Section 3.5 for two (2) successive days then the monthly charge to the CUSTOMER shall be increased by twice (2X) the percentage that the CUSTOMER exceeds its peals hourly flow commitment for each day thereafter that its flow exceeds CUSTOMERS projected Peak Hourly Flow as shown in the table in Section 3.5. If both peak hourly flow and maximum daily flow are violated within the same month only the higher penalty of the two shall apply. Nothing in this section shall be construed to waive or rescind any rights that COUNTY shall have pursuant to Sections 3.5 and 3.6 relating to the limitation of COUNTY'S obligation to provide raw water RESERVED CAPACITY to CUSTOMER only up to the amount CUSTOMER has reserved. 5.3 �SVIEWS" COUNTY agrees that reviews of the cost of providing raw water supply services shall be made annually, based on the COUNTY'S fiscal year. The fees, rates, and charges which will be effective during the succeeding fiscal year for all LARGE USERS will be developed by the COUNTY following such annual review. In developing such fees, rates, and charges for the succeeding fiscal year, the cost of providing raw water supply services during the current fiscal year, the audited costs for the preceding fiscal year, and the anticipated changes in costs in the succeeding fiscal year, will be the preliminary basis for establishing the fees, rates and charges for the succeeding fisca year. 5.4 "PAYMENT AND PENALTIES FOR NONPAYMENT" Both parties agree that COUNTY shall bill CUSTOMER for raw water supply services or a monthly basis in accordance with its standard billing procedures, CUSTOMER steal pay such billings within forty-five (45) days of the date of mailing the monthly bill Should CUSTOMER not pay within the forty-five (45) day period, CUSTOMER shall pa; an interest penalty on the unpaid balance at the maximum rate allowed by State statute Should a billing or a portion of a billing be outstanding for a period of more than sixt., (60) days from the date of the original billing, then the CUSTOMER shall be considere+ -18- ® in default and the COUNTY, in addition to all other rights and remedies, shall have the right and power, by suit, action, mandamus or other such proceedings at law or in equity, to protect, enforce, and compel performance by the CUSTOMER and any of the offices, officials, agents, or employees of said CUSTOMER to perform and carry out its and their duties and obligations under this Agreement or applicable law. 5.5 "CUSTQM R AC ESS TO COUNTY RECQRDS" COUNTY agrees to maintain accounting records for COUNTY FACILITIES, and tc have said records audited annually. COUNTY will furnish to CUSTOMER a copy of tha COUNTY'S annual audit, and the most recently adopted annual budget for review COUNTY agrees to maintain information in sufficient detail to permit CUSTOMER L ascertain the cost, as defined in Section 5.7 of raw water supply services, separate an( apart from the cost of other services of COUNTY. Upon reasonable notice given b, CUSTOMER, COUNTY will make available to CUSTOMER, at COUNTY'S offices, it books and records regarding operation of the raw water facilities. 5.6 "COUNTY TO HAVE JU ISDICTIQN" Both parties agree that COUNTY has sole and exclusive authority and jurisdiction as administration, operation, and maintenance of COUNTY FACILITIES; establishing t] annual budget, establishing and amending service fees, rates, and other charges i provided in the Broward County Code; for efficient operation and maintenance COUNTY FACILITIES. However, with the exception of challenges to charges, COUNT agrees to evaluate and consider implementation of the recommendations that it receiv from the LUAB and TAC before making decisions in areas in which the LARGE USE] and the LUAB have an interest. Both CUSTOMER and COUNTY agree that any LARGE USER or the LUAB m challenge the propriety of expenses charged to the operation and maintenance oft COUNTY FACILITIES through normal COUNTY budget process. However, unsatisfied with results via the normal budget process, the LUAB may present th challenge to the Water Supply Advisory Board for their action at a public meeting a their (WSAB) recommendation to the COUNTY. -19- 5.7 "ANNUAL AUDIT AND ENGINEERING ESTIMATES" COUNTY shall provide raw water service to CUSTOMER at fees, rates and charges constituting the full cost, set forth herein, direct or indirect, of such services. Such cost shall include, but not be limited to, labor, material, equipment, fuel, utilities, chemicals, transportation and travel expenses, administrative expenses (including interdepart- mental service costa, such as amounts attributable to services of the Finance Division. Purchasing Division, County Attorney, etc.), billing expenses, supplies, rent, insurance, employee benefits, liability and workers compensation, outside services, and any other costs of operation, maintenance, and repair to said COUNTY FACILITIES. Such fees, rates and charges shall be adopted or amended by the COUNTY only after public hearing in the manner provided by law. It is intended that fees, rates and charges to the CUSTOMER shall be based on the most recent actual or anticipated costs;however, from time to time as costs change, and as actual costs replace estimated costs, the COUNTY intends to annually review the basis upon which the prevailing fees, rates and charges have been detennined. Subsequent reviews of the cost of providing raw water supply services shall be made annually, not later than ninety (90) days prior to the end of the current fiscal year. The fees, rates and charges which will be effective during the succeeding fiscal year to the CUSTOMER; and LARGE USERS will be developed by the COUNTY following sucl annual review. In developing such fees, rates and charges for the succeeding fisca year, the costs, as defined herein, during the current fiscal year, and the anticipate( changes in costs in the succeeding fiscal year, will be the preliminary basis fo establishing the fees, rates and charges for the succeeding fiscal year. The COUNT. shall give the CUSTOMER at least thirty (30) days notice prior to the effective date of an changes in such fees, rates or other charges. COUNTY agrees to provide the CUSTOME with a copy of the annual audit, the annual engineering report and estimates, and th most recently approved annual budget for the COL"N'TY FACILITIES for review as Soo as possible after completion. Upon reasonable notice given by CUSTOMER, COUNT, will make available to CUSTOMER at COUNTY'S offices, its books and record regarding operation of the COUNTY FACILITIES. -20- ARTICLE 6 PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO ADDITIONAL_. OBLIGATI QF BOTH PARIES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT 6.1 "COUNTY TO EXPAND RAW WATER CAPACITY" COUNTY agrees to provide whatever expansion to COUNTY'S FACILITIES as may be reasonably necessary to provide for CUSTOMER'S future projected demand, as established herein in Section 3.5 and 3.6, provided that upon the COUNTY'S review, e facilities expansion is determined to be appropriate. Toward this objective COUNT will make application where feasible for appropriate financial assistance from federal, state, and local programs under which said facilities and the project may be eligible. Further, COUNTY agrees to apply applicable portions of any such assistance which ma3 be received to offset capital costs of the COUNTY system. 6.2 "CUSTOMER TO RECEIVE RAW WATER RESERVED" CUSTOMER agrees, during the term of this Agreement, to receive up to the raw wat.e ® demand projected in Section 3.5 first, prior to utilizing any other sources, with thi exception of the regulatory permitted withdrawal volume from the CUSTOMER'S own wellfield(s) existing at the effective date of this Agreement. Raw water flow demand: shall not exceed amounts set forth herein in Section 3.5 and 3.6, as existing or a hereafter amended, for the length of this Agreement; and COUNTY agrees to delive such raw water demand not exceeding amounts set forth herein in Section 3.5 and 3.6, a existing or as hereafter amended, for the length of this Agreement in accordance wit] PROGRAM and subsequent amendments thereto, approved by the WSAB and approve, by the COUNTY. It shall be incumbent upon CUSTOMER to utilize the COUNT` FACILITIES to accept raw water. CUSTOMER shall accept a minimum flow on & annual average basis of twenty (20) percent of the PROGRAM CUSTOMER CA.PACIT! however such minimum flow requirement shall not exceed 2.0 MGD nor be less than 0: MGD on an annual average basis. Should CUSTOMER'S annual usage be less tb& twenty (20) percent of PROGRAM CUSTOMER CAPACITY or 0.5 MGD, whichever i greater, CUSTOMER shall be obligated to pay charges and fees as though the RAN WATER was actually provided; however, such payment shall be limited to a maximur ® of 2.0 MGD on an annual basis. Said payment for minimum flow be considered as s -21- underpayment and shall be paid by CUSTOMER as provided in Section 5.1.1. 6.3 "CHANGES IN RESERVED CAPACITY AND PROGRAM CUSTQMER CAPACITY" If proposed flows in the table in Section 3.5 exceed the Maximum Daily Raw Water Demand as depicted in Table 3-9 of the Study said increases in RESERVED CAPACITY and PROGRAM CUSTOMER CAPACITY must have prior approval of the WATER SUPPLY ADVISORY BOARD and of the COUNTY-. 6.3.1 "CHANGES BY OUTSIDE AGENCIES" COUNTY may revise the PROGRAM RAW WATER FLOW PROJECTIONS shown in Section 3.5 if any federal, state, or local agency promulgates regulations that require a change in scheduling or flows as defined in 3.5. if there is a determination by either party that regulations requiring change in scheduling or flows are unreasonable, either party reserves the right to challenge said regulations in court. 6.3.2 "CHANGES BEYOND COUNTY'S CONTROL" COUNTY may revise the flow schedule for such periods as are reasonable and necessary if anticipated construction is delayed for any reason beyond the control of COUNTY. The reasons for delay may be,but are not limited to, contractor delays beyond completion date or lack of acceptance or approval by regulatory agencies. 6.4 "CUSTOMER AGREES TO PAY" CUSTOMER agrees to establish and maintain service charges or other means of obtaining funds within its CUSTOMER'S SERVICE AREA sufficient to provide monthly payments to COUNTY for raw water supply services, and that such means shall be revised as may be required from time to time to provide sufficient funds to pay any sums due COUNTY under the terms of this Agreement. 6.5 "GRANT INFORMATION" CUSTOMER and COUNTY agree to provide each other with all necessary information pertinent to CUSTOMER'S SYSTEM and CUSTOMER'S SERVICE AREA or COUNTY'S FACILITIES which any federal, state, or local agencies shall require in an application for financial assistance in the construction of COUNTY'S FACILITIES or ® CUSTOMER'S SYSTEM. Further, CUSTOMER and COUNTY agree to adopt such -22- ® regulations, execute such Agreements and do such work as said federal, state, or local agencies may require as part of COUNTY'S or CUSTOMER'S application for funds. -23. ® ARTICLE 7 PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO VIOLATIONS AND FXCEPTIQNS TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT 7.1 "AGREEMENT NOT TO BE CANCELLED" Both parties agree that each is undertaking a major obligation in that the COUNTY in providing a portion of CUSTOMER'S existing and future raw water flow requirements, and therefore each agrees with the other that this Agreement will not be cancelled on any conditions except as provided for herein in Section 4.1 or by a mutual cancellation agreement between the parties hereto, which will be a written document executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. 7.2 "NOTICE OF VIOLATION" COUNTY shall serve CUSTOMER with written notice stating the nature of any violation of this Agreement by CUSTOMER. Except as otherwise provided, said notice steal ® provide a reasonable time for the satisfactory correction thereof. CUSTOMER shall within the period of time stated in such notice, permanently cease or correct al violations. CUSTOMER shall take necessary corrective action in accordance with th provisions of this Agreement and standard operating and administrative procedure! CUSTOMER shall serve COUNTY with written notice of any violation of this Agreemer by COUNTY. Except as otherwise provided, said notice shall provide a reasonable tim for the satisfactory correction thereof. COUNTY shall, within the period of time stated i such notice, permanently cease or correct all violations. COUNTY shall take necessai corrective action in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and standar operating procedures. If at any time CUSTOMER shall create any condition which COUNTY should determii destructive or damaging to any part of the COUNTY'S FACILITIES, COUNTY sh: give ten (10) days written notice to CUSTOMER to discontinue such harmful operation practice, within which period CUSTOMER agrees to comply. If any damages result COUNTY FACILITIES the entire cost of such damages, judgments or both, resultii -24- ® therefrom shall be paid by CUSTOMER. In any event, proper, thorough, demonstrable proof of condition and damage must be provided by COUNTY to CUSTOMER in said written notice. If at any time COUNTY shall create any condition which CUSTOMER should determine destructive or damaging to any part of CUSTOMER SYSTEM, CUSTOMER shall give ten (10) days written notice to COUNTY to discontinue such harmful operation or practice, within which period COUNTY agrees to comply. If any damages result to CUSTOMER SYSTEM, the entire cost of such damages, judgments or both, resulting therefrom shall be paid by COUNTY. In any event: proper, thorough, demonstrable proof of condition and damage must be provided by CUSTOMER to COUNTY in said written notice. Both parties agree that no provisions contained herein shall be construed as preventing any agreement or arrangement between COUNTY and CUSTOMER whereby an unusual or uncharacteristic situation may be addressed by CUSTOMER and COUNTY. 7.3 "DISPUTE OVER CH R , .S" CUSTOMER agrees that, in the event of any continuing violations or disputes, or if the parties do not agree within thirty (30) days from the billing date upon the amount invoiced, or if the matter ur a dispute continues unresolved for thirty (30) days from the billing date, the CUSTOMER shall automatically deliver to the COUNTY the amount billed. However, the amount of the bill that is legitimately in dispute shall be deposited for the payment of the invoice or invoices in escrow in an interest-bearing bank account in a banking institution designated by the COUNTY during such continuing claimed violation or dispute. 7.4 "FORCE MAJEURE" Both parties agree that any restriction of raw water supply services, including COUNTY ability to supply and the ability of CUSTOMER to accept, resulting from an Act of God, fire, strikes, accidents, casualty, breakdown of or injury to machinery, pumps or pipe ® lines, insurrection or riot, or civil or military authority, shall not constitute a breach of -25- this Agreement on the part of the COUNTY or CUSTOMER and neither COUNTY nor CUSTOMER shall be liable to the other for any damages resulting from such restriction. COUNTY agrees to provide maintenance such that the COUNTY FACILITIES are kept in reasonable operating condition. Until a written notice to the contrary may be received from federal, state, or local agencies, both parties agree to keep this Agreement in effect to the degree physically possible for the COUNTY to supply and the CUSTOMER to accept necessary quantities of RAW WATER regardless of pressure or quality. Both parties agree that any increase in CUSTOMER demand for raw water supply services resulting from an Act of God, fire, strikes, casualty, breakdown of or injury to machinery, pumps or pipe lines, insurrection or riot, or civil or military authority, shall not constitute a breach of this Agreement on the part of the COUNTY or CUSTOMER and neither COUNTY nor CUSTOMER shall be liable to the other for any penalties or damage resulting from such demand increase until a written notice to the contrary may be received from federal, state, or local agencies. 7.5 "JURISDICTION OF OTHER AGENCIES" Both parties agree that certain federal, state, and local agencies have some jurisdiction and control over water supply matters and should any such agency, excluding the Board of County Commissioners of Broward County, Florida, issue legally enforceable laws, regulations, mandates, or orders that may alter any of the terms and conditions of thi! Agreement, there shall be no liability on either party because of such action, provided thal COUNTY shall-not be precluded-from making-a necessary adjustment to the fees, rate! and charges. It is further agreed that if any such .agency shall request a change in thl provisions of this Agreement that both parties will, by mutual agreement, make ever effort to comply with such request. However, the terms of this section shall not preclude administrative or judicial challenge, or both, of such order by either or both pantie: hereto. This provision shall not be construed so as to permit CUSTOMER to terminate this Agreement. 0 -26- ® 7.6 _CUSTOMER WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM; CUSTOMER agrees to participate in any regulation by the Water Supply Advisory Board and approved by the COUNTY or any governmental agency including but not limited to South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) as deemed necessary for the conservation of water. Should COUNTY be requested or mandated to reduce volume and/or pressure of raw water supply in response to official regulatory requests or mandates, COUNTY may do so without constituting a violation of this Agreement. Also, no surcharging of fees as provided in Section 5.2 nor payment of fees for failure to accept minimum flows shall apply to CUSTOMER as a result of said regulatory requests or mandates. Each CUSTOMER shall respond to said official regulatory requests and mandates in proportion to the flow volumes prevailing at the time of said request or mandate. Should CUSTOMER not respond to mandated reduction in flows per official regulatory requirements, COUNTY shall charge said CUSTOMER a surcharge to the entire flow ® volume. Said flow volume will be evaluated on a weekly basis and said charges shall be applied on a weekly basis. Said surcharge shall be triple (3) the degree to which CUSTOMER fails to adhere to the mandated cutback. For example, if a 15 percent cutback is mandated by the SFWMD and CUSTOMER'S demand is reduced by only 5 percent, a surcharge of(15%-5%X3) = 30 percent would be applied to the entire flow volume taken by the CUSTOMER. The:-disposition,of_ such>_surcha.rge revenue,_shall,_be:.___first, _to_. offset operation.-and maintenance charges to those CUSTOMERS who have met said mandated reduction in flows; second, only in the case where no LARGE USER meets said mandated reduction in flows, said surcharge funds shall go to offset operation and maintenance costs of BCOES. •27- ® ARTICLE 8 FRQVISIONS PERTAINING TO THE AnM1N1STRATIQN QF THIS AGREEMENT 8.1 "DATE OF BEGINNING" Both parties agree to be bound by this Agreement as of the date of its execution. COUNTY agrees that the COUNTY FACILITIES from which CUSTOMER will receive raw water pursuant to this Agreement shall be operational within a reasonable period of time. Should CUSTOMER, through no fault of COUNTY, not avail itself of the COUNTY facilities when such facilities are available, it shall pay the applicable standby charges, as defined and described in Article 8.1.2 below. 8.1.1 "DATE QF CUSTOMER CONNECTING TO COUNTY FACILITIES" COUNTY will keep CUSTOMER informed as to the construction schedules of those facilities necessary to serve CUSTOMER. The COUNTY shall give CUSTOMER notice ® of the completion date as certified by its Engineer of the construction of all COUNTN FACILITIES necessary to serve CUSTOMER and CUSTOMER shall be prepared tc connect CUSTOMER system to the POINT OF CONNECTION on this completion date of within sixty (60) days of the date of this notice, whichever date is later. If construction is completed at the time of execution of this Agreement, COUNTY shall given written notiu thereof to CUSTOMER who shall connect to the system within thirty(30) days of receipt o written notice. Notwithstanding whether.CUSTOMER accepts its allotment of RAW __WATER, it:sha]1 pay standby charges which-shall commence no later than 60 days fron the date of notice that RAW WATER is available to the CUSTOMER 8.1.2 "BASIS OF STANDBY CHARGES" Should CUSTOMER fail to accept its allotment of RAW WATER on the date above agree, upon, then COUNTY will bill and CUSTOMER will pay the monthly charges set forth is Article 5 hereof as if CUSTOMER was receiving 75 percent of its Annual Average Dail Flow as projected in Article 3.5. These revenues will remain in the appropriate Fund. •28. 8.2 TERMINATION AND EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT" Both parties agree that this Agreement shall begin and bind the parties as set forth in Article 8.1 hereof and shall terminate and extend as provided for in Article 7.1. 8.3 tNVAi.iniTX OF AGREEMENT" Both parties agree that the invalidity of any section, clause, sentence, or provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity of any other part of this Agreement which can be given effect without such invalid part or parts. 8.4 "BINDING ON SUCCESSORS" Both parties agree that this Agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto and may be enforced by appropriate action in court, or courts, of competent jurisdiction. 8.5 -LEGAL REQUIREMENTS" ® Both parties agree that all legal requirements for execution of this Agreement have been performed, and each party hereto agrees to exchange with the other certified copies of the official records of its governing body which authorize the execution of this Agreement. 8.6 "QIVING OF NOTICE" Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be considered to have been. properly given if the same has been set in writing by certified or registered mail to the following: COUNTY: Board of County Commissioners C/O County Administrator 4th Floor,Broward County Governmental Center 115 South Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 BCOES: Office of Environmental Services 2401 North Powerline Road Pompano Beach, Florida 33069 CUSTOMER: -29- 8.7 "ALL PRIOR ACRE M -NTS SUPERSEDED' This document supersedes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agreed that there are no commitments, agreements, or understanding concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment, or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a written document executed with the same formality and of equal dignity. 8.8 "EXECUTION" ION" This Agreement shall be executed in five (5) copies, each of which shall be deemed an original. CUSTOMER shall provide COUNTY with a copy of CUSTOMER'S Resolution or evidence of other action authorizing CUSTOMER to execute this Agreement, which ® Resolution or other document shall be attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement on the respective dates under each signature: BROWARD COUNTY through its BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, signing by and through its Chairman, authorized to execute same by Board action on the day of 19 and signing by and through duly_.;authorized_.to execute same, -30- COUNTY BROWARD COUNTY, through its ATTE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Cou dmi trator and Ex- By: Officio Clerk of the Board Sc9'tt I.' Cowan, Chairman of County Commissioners of ,r Broward County, Florida 1 day of 1990 Approved as to form by Office of County Attorney Broward County, Florida a Governmental Center, Suite 423. . 4 '�. ° °°°°'°°Ole0 115 South Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale , Florida 33301 p e CR.E„TED o Telephone: (305) 357-7600 ? V : OCT. 1ST s �' 1915 ago By: ••.;?, � .� 0�.` Assi taut Cou} ttorney ►®'�o CITY OF DANIA, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida By:/J//-L '� ATTEST: arles K. yea, Mayor mmissi er V, �/��7 /�v� ZL n«/ By _ `Wanda Mullikin Robert F. Flatley City Clerk-Auditor City Manager 30th day of April , 1990 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS By: c. a&.0 Frank C. Adler, City Attorney a 1 1 / , 1 --------------- I s � 1 { --._ pg I '•,, ',; a� Q w.J / I I 41 1 _ r 1 1 1 :a1yeZ / n: d + If w Ix tji 1 1 { { � 1 1 { t 8 1 • ,g 1 � II I � { . 1 i 1{, J { '3Ati'SS1£'A's { � � .. u 1• 1 U eoncr ' I{ b , ao a I a i - a3 1 1 >o , DANIA POINT OF CONNECTION EXHIBIT A 1 MINE _ � 1 i sue; �Qfl• lt!!!'J� ��1� il21m we NP4 -- ME �E EVNEEN WERE�� G�!l�L�l1 E�� � • : SDIi SEW loin EMIT eW sue_ RESOLUTION NO. 102-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT "'a.. BETWEEN BROWARD COUNTY AND CITY OF DANIA; AND AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS TO - - EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN -:ice%'•' ' EFFECTIVE DATE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA: Section 1. That that certain Large User Raw Water Agreement h S_ ";i, - — between Broward County and the City of Dania, a copy of which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", be and the •= same is hereby approved and the appropriate city officials are directed to execute same. Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED this �)g+h_ day of SPnt_mhFr 1989. tr . 1 COMMISSION S O - ION Y R X -r. iT ATTEST: �> ' CITY CLERK .- AUDITOR -++.+_,✓ •..s�.r�• `L r��'^`.1':- fir _ _ _ .- .. : ,� - - ^.-._-ass s'+y� :::may+?-'�T?-a. `�.rx•.r �.. _.:. _ .. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS x n ¢=�;_ '`;`'J'-"�' FRANK C. ADLER, City Attorney a ~ t t, r �r1'.•, }:17i T ice .-..��.-" �'.?'.'�•.5,- ilcyy •ait7 .w.' EXHIBIT ADDENDUM TO LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROWARD COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DANIA WHEREAS the City of Dania is in immediate need of raw water to supplement its own . resources ; and WHEREAS the addition of water wells 5 and 6 to the Broward County 3-A wellfield will enable Broward County to satisfy this need until such time that the Centralized Wellfield is , in place ; WHEREAS the Broward County Water Supply Board and the Broward County Board of County Commissioners have approved the concept of an interim arrangement to supply the City of Dania with raw water , which includes the construction of a pipeline that will become a part of the raw water supply pipeline from the southern wellfield to the City of Dania , but in the , interim will convey raw water from the County ' s 3A wellfield to the City of Dania . NOW, THEREFORE , in consideration of mutual terms and conditions , and until such time as raw water from the Centralized Wellfield is available to the City of Dania , each ® party agrees as follows : ADDENDUM PROVISIONS 1 . 1 It shall be the obligation of the COUNTY to design , construct , and install raw water service lines and metered connection at the COUNTY ' s expense , in accordance with plans , specifications , and engineering data as submitted by a Florida registered engineer , said plans and specifications to be approved by all applicable regulatory agencies . Said raw water service lines shall be connected with said meter connection by COUNTY to COUNTY ' s existing raw water service lines . 1 . 2 CITY will convey at no cost to the COUNTY the fee simple title or appropriate easement to the property needed by COUNTY for POINT OF CONNECTION, meter location , pump stations , transmission facilities , and such interest in property as is necessary to provide ingress or egress by COUNTY to said POINT OF CONNECTION. 1 . 3 CITY shall reimburse COUNTY 1/3 ( one- third ) of the cost of construction of wells S and 6 , payable upon completion, of said construction , to cover the expense of oversizing the ® welds to meet the city ' s needs. COUNTY shall be responsible for the remaining 2/3 ( two- thirds ) of the cost . 1 . 4 . Upon completion of the necessary raw water service line: and metered connection , the COUNTY shall commence to provide a quantity of raw water to supply CITY , said quantity not to cxceed one million gallons per day . 1 . 5 COUNTY shall provide raw water transmission service to CITY at fees , rates , and charges constituting the full cost of such service , per EXHIBIT 1 . 1 . 6 In the event that water wells designated for the purpose of providing water to the CITY do not , for any reason , provide adequate raw water to supply CITY with its one- million-gallon-per -day allocation in addition to providing COUNTY ' s two-million-gallon-per -day allocation , the available raw water will be divided proportionately , 1/3 ( one- third ) to CITY and 2/3 ( two- thirds ) to COUNTY . 1 . 7 COUNTY shall give 60 ( sixty ) days ' notice of date of completion of transmission lines and metered connection . CITY shall connect its system to the point of connection , and begin accepting raw water within 90 ( ninety ) days of the postmarked date of said notice . 1 . 8 This Addendum is an interim measure and shall not be construed to conflict with any provision in the Large User Raw Water Agreement to which it is attached . 1 . 9 This Addendum is valid only until raw water from the Centralized Wellfield is available to the CITY under the - conditions specified in this Agreement , at which time this Addendum becomes null and void . 1 . 9 This Addendum is valid only if executed in conjunction with the LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROWARD COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DANIA . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have made and executed this Addendum on the respective dates under each signature : BROWARD COUNTY through its BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , signing by and through its Chairman , authorized to execute same by Board Action on the ---------- day of _ ____ _ _ 19 and the City of Dania , signing by and through the Commission of the City of Dania , duly authorized to execute same . COUNTY BROWARD COUNTY, through its AT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS County Admi ra or and Ex- Officio Clerk of the Board eSco'tt I.' Cowan, Chairman of County Commissioners of Broward County, Florida day of 1990 Approved as t form by Office of County Attorney Broward County, Florida ®� ••®• Governmental Center, Suite 423• 00o y COM,4.41` ®® 115 South Andrews Avenue o�,,J� ,.• °•.e°�+/�® Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 • o Telephone: (305) 357-7600 CP $ 'FATED •� 791 v :0 5 �: By: _ •04 0: `: Assi taut oun ttorney pe ••tea....• 0 11 ••�•� ^r ,r r CITY OF DANIA, a municipal •a e r� corporation of the State of Florida By: ATTEST: ar es Mc yea, Mayor - o mil`bsi ✓ er Y ` Wanda Mullikin Robe et F. Flatley City Clerk-Auditor City Manager 30th day of April , 1990 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS By: A_�a e 4610.10 Frank C. Adler, City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 81 -94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO ADDENDUM TO LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROWARD COUNTY AND CITY OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA: Section . That the City Commission of the City of Dania, Florida, hereby approves First Amendment to Addendum to Large User Raw Water Agreement Between Broward County and City of Dania, copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED this 1 o t h day of Ma y , 1994. ATTEST: AYOR - "MISSIONER CITY CLERK - AUDITOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Frank C. Adler, City Attorney Resolution No. 81 -9 4 FIRST AMENDMENT TO ADDENDUM TO LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT Between BROWARD COUNTY and CITY OF DANIA FIRST AMENDMENT TO ADDENDUM TO LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT Between BROWARD COUNTY and CITY OF DANIA This is a First Amendment to Addendum to Large User Raw Water Agreement made and entered into by and between: BROWARD COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY, " AND CITY OF DANIA, hereinafter referred to as "CITY. " WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY previously entered into a Large User Raw Water Agreement ("Agreement") and an Addendum to Large User Raw Water Agreement ("Addendum") ; and WHEREAS, Section 1. 3 of the Addendum included a provision that obligated CITY to reimburse COUNTY for 1/3 (one-third) of the cost of construction of wells 5 and 6, payable upon completion of said construction, to cover the expense of oversizing the wells to meet CITY's needs; and WHEREAS, the completion of the pipeline connecting wells 5 and 6 to CITY's water treatment plant was not completed as originally scheduled due to factors beyond both parties' control; and WHEREAS, CITY is now receiving raw water from wells 5 and 6; and WHEREAS, CITY did not have access to water from wells 5 and 6 for the length of time anticipated when the Agreement and Addendum were executed; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions, promises, covenants and payments hereinafter set forth, COUNTY and CITY agree as follows: 1. Section 1.3 of the Addendum is hereby stricken in its entirety, and replaced with the following language: ® 1. 3 G�ITY shall reimburse GGUNTY !-« (ene-third) oft the sew e -ee ns t r u et i ent ewes-5-ai}d--6, -- of said--e-enstruetien, te expense of eve-sizing the wells te meet the eity's needs. GGT-4iTY shall be r espe nsi le €er the remaining--2/3 (twe-thir-ds) ef the eest. CITY shall reimburse COUNTY FORTY-FOUR THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY-SIX DOLLARS AND TEN CENTS ($44 , 686. 10) representing 1/6 (one-sixth) of the cost of construction of wells 5 and 6. CITY shall make payment within thirty (30) days after approval and execution of this Amendment. 2 . Except as modified herein, the Agreement and the Addendum shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have made and executed this First Amendment to Addendum to Large User Raw Water Agreement on the respective dates under each signature: BROWARD COUNTY through its BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, signing by and through its Chair j�or ice Cha ' uthorized to execute same by Board action on the day of 19`�, and CITY OF DANIA, signing by and through its duly authorized to execute same. COUNTY ® ATTE BROWARD COUNTY, through its C® ��5+• BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS S1 r ® A,� 000000® � ' Coup Adm' nistra- d 04, By Ex-Officio Clerk , C���TCU o+�� Chair the Board of Cou!4 t e (P 2 C; .T. iST Commissioners of!Brgwar � _ day of - Le- 19 County, Florida t$` Approved a z o f orm by Office of ounty Attorney aroward County, Florida �lp ",3CPHN J. COPELAN, JR. , County Attorney governmental Center, Suite 423 115 South Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (305) 357-7600 Telecopier: (305) 357-7641 By MI HAE . KERR Assist a t County Attorney -2- FIRST AMENDMENT TO ADDENDUM TO LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROWARD COUNTY AND CITY OF DANIA CITY WITNESSES: CITY OF DANIA a By May-or-g,6mmissioner 1 day of 19 ATTEST: By City Mana r ' City Clerk day of 19 . (CORPORATE SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: By City Attorney MJK/eb DANIA.A01 04/08/94 #90-170. 03 -3- CITY OF DARIA INTER-OFFICE MEMORAN D TO: Mayor,Vice-Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Robert (Bud) palm, Utilities Director RE: Addendum to raw water agreement DATE: May 05, 1994 - --------------------- ------------------------------------------- On September 26, 1989 a resolution No. 102-89 approving the large user raw water agreement between Broward County and City of Dania was adopted. On June 5, 1990 a addendum to large user raw water agreement between Broward County and the City of Dania was entered into. This was for the City' s immediate need of one million gallons of raw water to supplement its own resources. The City was to reimburse ' County 1/3 (one-third) of the cost of construction of wells 5 and 6, payable upon completion of said construction, to ® cover the expense of oversizing the wells to meet the city' s needs. Cost to be paid by City was to be $89, 372.20. The raw water line to Dania was complete and connected to our water system on July of 1993 but we were unable to use any water from the 3A system due to permitting problems with the South Florida Water Management. This was worked out in March of 1994 and we are presently using water from the 3A system. Attached you will find a letter that I sent to Michael J. Scottie, Director of -the County Water Supply Division requesting a reduction in the cost to the City. This was presented to the County Commission and excepted. I recommend that you sign the addendum from the County Commission to pay $44, 686. 10 . Commission Auditor's Office =� 115 S.Andrews Avenue.Room 426 Fat Loudesdme,FL 33301 6ROWARD COUNTY (305)357-7590 * FAX(309)357-7592 PSEKOR3�NDIIM January 18, 1994 To: B. Jack Osterholt, County Administrar,Or (Attn: oMs) From: N. W. Thabit, Commission Auditor "ter Subject: Raw Water Agreement with the City ,of Dania The County entered into a large user raw water agreement with the city of Dania on June 5, 1990 (Agenda Item 10) . The agreement contains an addendum to supply raw water pending the completion of the centralized wellfield. The addendum states the city of Dania will reimburse the County 1/3 of the cost for over-sizing wells 5 and 6. The payment was due upon completion of the construction. The construction was completed as of January 1991. The payment, however, remains due as of this date. The County Attorney, in paragraph 1 of attachment, gives the opinion the "reimbursement from the city of Dania is due and owing". The County Attorney further states, in paragraph 3 of attachment, "steps should be taken immediately to require performance of any ® obligations under the addendum". This office has followed the lack of progress regarding this matter for two years. It appears the administration is reluctant to pursue collection and the city is equally reluctant to pay because the South Florida water Management District refuses to give a waiter allocation for the city_ However, the addendum is clear on the obligation of the City of Dania to pay. The administration should resolve the issue of reimbursement for construction of the wells. If the city of Dania is unwilling or unable to pay, city officials may seek a waiver of payment from the Board of County Commissioners. z will suspense this memorandum until February 1, 1994 for a resolution of this matter. NWT:MOR Attachment l �� ry CC: Board of County Commissioners County Attorney BROWARD COLVI Y BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS-An fi a rot oopa+hridy Employer Ono Provider of Services Sc-OTT 1.Cowc.'•n 5:ucnne IN Giry-1-noer John P nor Lon blcnce Pcrosr. SYnne Finn ionn E.6'o= Om .;r. Gaerof r inornesso We're Building A Future For Your Fnrniry.AAV Your Business. ® TOTPL P.01 JAN-16-1994 19:-6 3053-15 7044 P.01 - �4► 0� 13.4,2STI-A, Phone:921-8700 4 > P.O. BOX 1708 ` DANIA, FLORIDA 33004 i LoR19�' February 8, 1994 Mr. Michael J. Scottie, Director Water Supply Division 2401 Powerline Road Pompano Beach, FI 33069 Re: ADDENDUM TO LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT BCOES PROJECT NO. 1134 Dear Mr. Scottie: As a follow up to our discussion on February 4, 1994 regarding the City of Dania's share for the cost of installation of the wells at the 3A Plant. You stated that the city's share, which was 1/3 of the cost, would be $89,372.20. Due to the fact that the agreement provided that the city would be able to draw .' _. 1,000,000 gallons of raw water per day and in fact will only be able to,draw one.half of . that amount,the city will, with the City Commission's approval, be willing to pay one half of the cost ($44,686.10). The agreement was to cover the immediate need of raw water to supplement the city's resources. Beginning on October 1, 1990 to the time that water was to be - supplied from the regional well field on or before October 1, 1993. As you know we have not been able to draw any water from the 3A well field as of this date, nor has the -regional well-field come on line. It appears that we may be paying for something that we will never utilize. If the County Commission is agreeable to our paying the $44,686.10, please present us with an addendum to the original agreement along with a request for payment which includes proof of costs for our auditing purposes. Sincerely, ® Robert "Bud" Palm Utilities Director APPENDIX C Water Use Permit SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT • 3301 Gun Club Road,West Palm Beach,Florida 33406 (561)686-8800 • FL WATS 1-800-432-2045 TDD(561) 697-2574 Mailing Address: P.O.Box 24680,West Palm Beach,FL 33416-4680 • www.sfwmd.gov CON 24 Permit No . 06-00187-W Application No . 001107-11 March 20, 2001 DANIA BEACH CITY OF (CITY OF DANIA BEACH) 100 WEST DANIA BEACH BLVD DANIA, FL 33004 Dear Permittee: Enclosed is your Permit as authorized by the Governing Board of the . South Florida Water Management District at its meeting on March 15 , 2001 . Special Conditions to your Permit require reports to be filed with this District. Please read these Conditions and use the enclosed ® form(s) , as applicable, for your submittal of these required reports . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, ?_"AA� Jennifer Krumlauf Deputy Clerk Environmental Resource Regulation Division Enclosures 0 GOVERNING BOARD EXECUTIVE OFFICE .Michael Collins,Chairman Vera M.Carter Nicolas J.Gutierrez,Jr. Frank R.Finch,P.E.,Executive Director Michael D.Minton, Vice Chairman Gerardo B.Fernandez Harklev R.Thornton James E.Blount,Chief of Staff \44,-1o11 1A! R-- Pa i'lr 1 (;1-- T,—ii K Willi— s SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATER USE PERMIT NO. RE—ISSUE 06-00187—W NON - ASSIGNABLE ) FORM 902" Rev.5/93 Date Issued: MARCH 15, 2001 Expiration Date: March 15, 2006 Authorizing: THE CONTINUATION OF AN EXISTING USE OF GROUNDWATER FROM THE BISCAYNE AQUIFER FOR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY USE WITH AN ANNUAL ALLOCATION OF 730.01 MILLION GALLONS. Located In: Broward County, S23, 26-36/T50S/R42E S2, 3/T51S/R42E Issued To: DANIA BEACH CITY OF (CITY OF DANIA BEACH) 100 WEST DANIA BEACH BLVD DANIA , FL 33004 This Permit is issued pursuant to Application No. 001107-11 , dated November 1, 2000,for the Use of Water as specified above and subject to the Special Conditions set forth below. Permittee agrees to hold and save the South Florida Water Management District and its successors harmless from any and all damages, claims or liabilities which may arise by reason of the construction, maintenance or use of activities authorized by this permit. Said application, including all plan and specifications attached thereto, is by reference made a part hereof. Upon written notice to the permittee, this permit may be temporarily modified,or restricted under a Declaration of Water Shortage or a Declaration of Emergency due to Water Shortage in accordance with provisions of Chapter 373, Fla. Statutes,and applicable rules and regulations of the South Florida Water Management District. es Permit may be permanently or temporarily revoked, in whole or in part, for the violation of the conditions of the permit or for the violation of any provision of the Water Resources Act and regulations thereunder. This Permit does not convey to the permittee any property rights nor any privileges other than those.specified herein, nor relieve the permittee from complying with any law, regulation, or requirement affecting the rights of other bodies or agencies. Limiting Conditions are as follows: SEE PAGES 2 - 4 OF 4 ( 24 LIMITING CONDITIONS) . Filed with the Clerk of the South South Florida Water Management Florida Water Management District District, by its Governing Board On 2 Z By By Dk4uty Clerk Assis ant Secretary PAGE 1 OF 4 PERMIT NO: 06-00187-W PAGE 2 OF 4 LIMITING CONDITIONS 1 This permit shall expire on March 15, 2006. 2 Application for a permit modification may be made at any time. 3 Water use classification: Public water supply 4 Source classification: Ground Water from: Biscayne Aquifer 5 Annual allocation shall not exceed 730 MG. Maximum daily allocation shall not exceed 2 MG. 6 In the event of a declared water shortage, water withdrawal reductions will be ordered by the District in accordance with the Water Shortage Plan, Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C. The Permittee is advised that during a water shortage, pumpage reports shall be submitted as required by Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C. 7 Withdrawal Facilities: Ground Water - Existing: ® 1 - 18" X 65' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 58 Feet 1 - 18" X 69' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 58 Feet 8 Permittee shall mitigate any adverse impacts to existing legal uses as a consequence of withdrawals permitted herein. When adverse impacts occur, or is imminent, the District reserves the right to curtail withdrawal rates. Adverse impacts are: A) reduction in well water levels that impairs the ability of an adjacent well, including a domestic well, lawn irrigation well, or public water supply well, .to produce water by 10% or greater, B) significant reduction in levels in an adjacent water body, such as a lake, pond, or a canal system, that impairs the ability to produce water by 10% or greater, C) saline water intrusion or induced movement of pollutants into the water supply of an adjacent water use, resulting in a significant reduction in water quality, and D) change in water quality caused by the permittee that results in significant impairment or loss of use of a well or water body. 9 Permittee shall mitigate any adverse impact to existing off-site land use as a consequence of withdrawals permitted herein. If increased withdrawals cause an adverse impact on existing land use, the District reserves the right to curtail future withdrawal rates. Adverse impacts are: A) significant reduction in water levels in an adjacent surface water body, including impoundments, to the extent that the designed function of the • water body is impaired, B) land collapse or subsidence caused by reduction in water levels; and C) damage to crops and other types of vegetation. 10 If adverse impacts occur to natural resources as a result of the PERMIT NO: 06-00187-W PAGE 3 OF 4 . Permittee's water withdrawals, the Permittee shall mitigate for such ® impacts. When adverse impacts occur, or are imminent, District reserves the right to curtail withdrawal rates. Examples of adverse impacts are: A) reduction in ground water levels that results in significant lateral movement of the fresh water/salt water interface, B) reduction in water levels that adversely impact the hydroperiod of protected wetland environments, C) significant reduction in water levels or hydroperiod in a naturally occuring water body such as a lake or pond, D) induced movement or induction of pollutants into the water supply resulting in a significant reduction in water quality, and E) significant damage to the natural system including damage to habitat for rare or endangered species. 11. If any condition of the permit is violated, the permit shall be subject to review and possible modification, enforcement action, or revocation. 12 . Authorized representatives of the District shall be permitted to enter, inspect, and observe the permitted system to determine compliance with special conditions. 13 . The Permittee is advised that this permit does not relieve any person from the requirement to obtain all necessary federal, state, local and special district authorizations. 14 . The permit does not convey any property right to the Permittee, nor any rights and privileges other than those specified in the Permit and Chapter 40E-2, Florida Administrative Code. 15 . Permittee shall submit all data as required by the implementation schedule for each of the limiting conditions to: S.F.W.M.D. , Supervising Hydrogeologist - Post-Permit Compliance, Water Use Regulation Dept. (4320) , P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680. 16 . Prior to withdrawing water as authorized by this Permit, the Permittee shall provide the results of the calibration testing of the identified water accounting method(s) and equip all existing and proposed withdrawal facilities with approved water use accounting method(s) pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications. 17 . Every two years from the date of Permit issuance, the Permittee shall submit re-calibration data on each water pumping accounting facility, for those Permittees whose accounting method(s) require re-calibration. 18 . Monthly withdrawals for each withdrawal facility shall be submitted to the District quarterly. The water accounting method and means of calibration shall be stated on each report. 19 . The Permittee shall notify the District within 30 days of any change in service area boundary. If the Permittee will not serve a new demand within the service area for which the annual allocation was calculated, the annual allocation may then be subject to modification and reduction. 20 . Permittee shall implement the wellfield operating plan described in ® District staff report prepared in support of recommendation for permit issuance. 21 . Permittee shall determine unaccounted-for distribution system losses. Losses shall be determined for the entire distribution system on a monthly PERMIT NO: 06-00187-W PAGE 4 OF 4 basis. Permittee shall define the manner in which unaccounted-for losses are calculated. Data collection shall begin within six months of Permit ® issuance. Loss reporting shall be submitted to the District on a yearly basis from the date of Permit issuance. 22 . Permittee shall maintain an accurate flow meter at the intake of the water treatment plant for the purpose of measuring daily inflow of water. 23 . The Water Conservation Plan required by Section 2.6.1 of the Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District, must be implemented in accordance with the approved implementation schedule. 24 . Permittee shall implement the following wellfield operating plan: A) In the event of, a declared Water Shortage, the permittee must reduce withdrawals from its wellfield to 1.5 MGD on a maximum daily basis. Further reductions in pumpage may be required by the District, if the chloride concentrations indicate that salt front is unstable in the vicinity of the wellfield. B) If chloride concentrations measured in production wells or in monitoring wells screened within the production zone exceed 150 mg/L or indicate that the salt front is unstable in the vicinity of the wellfield, the permittee shall immediately reduce pumpage and notify the District within 5 days of obtaining the chloride concentration results. s . u - Last Date for Governing Board Action: March 15, 2001 Subjecty' � )3 Water Use Staff Review Summary Board Approval Application Number: 001 1 07-1 1 Permit Number: 06-00187-W Project Name: CITY OF DANIA BEACH Water Use Permit Status: RENEWAL Environmental Resource Permit Status NOT APPLICABLE. Right Of Way Permit Status: NOT APPLICABLE Location: BROWARD COUNTY, S23, 26-36/T50S/R42E S2, 3/T51 S/R42E Applicant's Name and Address: DANIA BEACH CITY OF 100 WEST DANIA BEACH BLVD DANIA, FL 33004 Purpose: The purpose of this application is to renew Water Use Permit Number 06-00187-W for public water supply for the City of Dania Beach (City). The City's service area encompasses approximately 4,300 acres in southeastern Broward County, as depicted in Exhibits 1-3. Page 1/10 06-001 s7-W 001107-11 March 15,2001 d ® Staff Recommendations Date Of issuance: March 15, 2001 Permit Duration: 5.00 Years Expiration Date: March 15, 2006 Water Use Classification: Public Water Supply Sources: Ground Water from: Biscayne Aquifer Recommended Allocation: Annual Allocation: 730 Million Gallons (MG) Maximum Daily Allocation: 2 Million Gallons (MG) Existing Withdrawal Facilities- Ground Water Source: Biscayne Aquifer 1 - 18" X 65' X 2100 GPM Well Cased to 58 Feet 1 18" X 69' X 2100 GPM Well Cased to 58 Feet Rated Capacity Source Status Code GPM MGD MGM MGY Biscayne Aquifer E 4,200 6.05 183.9 2,208 Totals: 4,200 6.05 183.9 2,208 Page 2/10 06-00187-W 001107-11 CITY OF DANIA BEACH March 15,2001 ® Project Description RESOURCE SAFE YIELD The City withdraws groundwater from 2 wells completed within the Biscayne Aquifer portion of the Surficial Aquifer System. Exhibit 4 describes well construction details. The base of the Surficial Aquifer System in the project area is estimated to be -300 feet NGVD (SFWMD Technical Publication 92-05). Historical water level data indicate that minimum end-of-dry season water level in the wellfield area is approximately 1 foot NGVD. Average data for the past three years measured at the City's wellfield is approximately 2.8 feet NGVD. These water levels reflect, in part, historical pumpage from the wellfield. The total available drawdown is approximately 300 feet. Withdrawals from the City's two active groundwater wells have been limited to 2 million gallons per day (MGD) due to the potential for saline water intrusion. Staff used the Theis equation to evaluate cumulative withdrawals of the recommended maximum daily allocation of 2 MGD for 90 continuous days with no recharge (Exhibit 5). The drawdown at the well sites is estimated to be 1.8 feet (Exhibit 6), indicating close to 300 feet of available drawdown. The sustained yield of the aquifer is not expected to be exceeded as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation. EXISTING LEGAL USERS The nearest existing legal user (ELU) to the project is Business Park/Hotel Irrigation, located approximately 3200 feet to the east (Figure 6). This nearest ELU possesses General Water Use Permit No. 06-02857-W for landscape irrigation of approximately 2.7 acres of turf. Cumulative drawdown at the location of this ELU is predicted to be approximately 0.5 feet, and land surface elevation is approximately 10 feet NGVD. Minimum dry season water level elevation in the area is approximately 1 ifoot NGVD. These data indicate that the dry season water level will be approximately 10 feet below land surface (BLS), which is within the lifting capability of 20 feet BLS for a centrifugal pump. Staff considers the potential for adverse impacts to occur to existing legal users as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. LEGAL DOMESTIC USERS The location of the nearest domestic user is unknown. The applicant states that there is no known domestic potable use within the City limits. Broward County supplies water to the majority of the area to the west of Dania's wellfield. The drawdown at the closest domestic users influenced by City withdrawals should be no more than 2 feet, the approximate predicted maximum amount of drawdown at the wellsites. Available water level data indicate that minimum water levels in the vicinity of the wells are approximately 1 foot NGVD, or approximately 9 feet BLS. Water levels should remain within the withdrawal capability of a centrifugal well pump of 20 feet BLS. Staff considers the potential for adverse impacts to occur to existing legal domestic users as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation to be minimal. SALINE WATER INTRUSION The City of Dania's wellfield is located approximately 4000 feet to the south of the Dania Cut-Off canal, approximately 2600 feet to the north of the C-10 "spur" and approximately 4500 feet to the west of C-10, all sources of saline water. The City has discontinued the use of previously permitted eastern wells due ® to saline water intrusion problems. Page 3/10 06-001 s7-W 001 1 07-1 1 March 15,2001 r:)TV nF nANIA REACH Project Description The City is currently monitoring chloride concentrations from the production wells (Exhibits 3 and 4), and from three monitoring wells at the two monitoring well locations identified in Exhibit 3. Two monitoring wells, MW-A and MW-B, are located at the monitor (SALT) Well G location in Exhibit 3. MW-A is screened between 63 and 68 feet BLS, and MW-B is screened between 94 and 99 feet BLS. The third monitoring well, identified as Emerald Hills Well in Exhibit 3 is completed to a total depth of 117 feet. Exhibits 7A and 7B present results of chloride monitoring for production wells and monitoring wells. Data presented in these Exhibits indicate that chloride concentrations within the production wells have shown overall decreases during the last several years, but were elevated during the 1989-1990 drought event and during the early 1990's when the City withdrew more than 2 MGD . At greater depths, however, it is apparent that chloride concentrations have increased, particularly within the Emerald Hills monitoring well. Based -on examination of the water quality data presented in Exhibit 7, Staff recommends continuation of limiting withdrawals to 2.0 INGD. Limiting Condition No. 24 stipulates that in the event of a declared Water Shortage, the permittee must reduce withdrawals from its wellfield to 1.5 MGD on a maximum daily basis. Further reductions in pumpage may be required by the District, if the chloride concentrations indicate that salt front is unstable in the vicinity of the wellfield. Limiting Condition No. 24 also requires the permittee to immediately reduce pumpage and notify the District within 5 days of obtaining the chloride concentration results, if chloride concentrations measured in production wells or in monitoring wells screened within the production zone exceed 150 mg/L or indicate that the salt front is unstable in the vicinity of the wellfield,. WETLANDS The closest protected wetlands in the vicinity of the City's wellfield are located at "West Lake Park" approximately 3 miles to the east. The drawdown at the edge of the nearest wetland is estimated to be approximately 0.1 feet. The potential for adverse impacts to occur to protected wetland environments as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. SOURCE OF POLLUTION The applicant indicated that contaminated groundwater has been associated with the Lindsey Lumber Superfund site, which is located approximately 4000 feet to the northeast of the City's wellfield (Exhibit 3). Evaluation of data indicates that the groundwater gradient at the Lindsley site is to the southeast, The recommended allocation represents historical use and is not expected to change the existing gradient. The potential for induced movement of contaminants to occur as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Additional Information EXISTING FACILITIES There are two production wells, G and H, with total depths of approximately 70 feet (Exhibits 3 and 4). Existing storage capacity includes the following: 15,000 gallon hydropneumatc tank; 185,000 gallon (east) clear well; 195,000 gallon (west) clear well; and 250,000 gallon elevated storage tank. ® The original water treatment plant (WTP) was constructed in the 1950s and upgraded to a design capacity of 3 MGD in 1992. Water treatement includes preliminary treatment with cascading aspirating Page 4/10 06-00187-W 001107-11 March 15,2001 rrry nc nANIA RFA(^H ® Additionallnformation aerators followed by coagulation, softening, sedimentation and then filtering through a mulit-media filtration system. WATER SERVICE CONTRACT The City has a signed Large User Raw Water Agreement with Broward County for water to be delivered from the 3A system and the South Broward County Regional Wellfield (Permit No. 06-01474-W). The City utilizes raw water from the County to meet service area demands, which are greater than the allocation for the City's wellfield. INTERCONNECTS The City maintains interconnections with the following public water suppliers (Exhibit 8): two 8-inch interconnects with the City of Hollywood; one 12-inch interconnect with the City of Fort Lauderdale; and one interconnect with Broward County. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN Pursuant to Section 2.6.1 of the BOR, Water Conservation Plans - All public water supply utilities are required to develop and implement a water conservation plan. Each of the mandatory water conservation elements must exist or have a proposed time frame for implementation. The applicant has provided the following water conservation plan elements. A. Permanent Irrigation Ordinance - City Ordinance No. 04-94 restricts landscape irrigation to the hours of 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. B. Xeriscape Ordinance - City Ordinance No. 08-94 requires the use of xeriscape landscape principles. volume C. Ultra-low Volume Plumbing Fixture Ordinance adoption of the South Florted the ida Buildingrrent CodeoWBroward plumbing fixture standard through mandatory p Edition. _. D. Water Conservation Rate Structure The City has`an increasing'-block rate structure' o encourage water conservation. Rates increase between approximately 51% and 88% for each increase in usage above certain threshold categories. E. Leak Detection- The City indicated that recent unaccounted-for water loss is approximately 5.8%. It also indicated that it has initiated an agressive program to replace old, 2-inch galvanized water mains and services with new 6-inch lines. All 2-inch and larger water meters were replaced in 2000. F. Rain Sensor Device Ordinance - City Ordinance 08-94 requires that new installation of automatic irrigation systems shall be equipped with a water sensing device which will automatically discontinue irrigation during periods of adequate rainfall. G. Water Conservation Education Program - The City distributes literature and promotional items ® describing the importance of water conservation. H. Reclaimed Water- Effluent from the City is transmitted to the South County Regional WWTP where it Page 5/10 06-00187-W 001107-11 March 15,2001 ® Additional Information is used by the City of Hollywood to irrigate golf courses, parks, median strips, and other areas. I.Water Conservation Plan Updates-Conservation Plans are updated as required. WELLFIELD PROTECTION ORDINANCE The applicant indicated that the City's wellfield is protected under the Broward County Wellfield Protection Ordinance. Chapter 27 of the County Environmental Regulations, i.e. Pollution Control, contains the wellfield protection requirements. WATER USE ACCOUNTING METHOD Water use is accounted for via flow meters, including one located on each of the production wells, two influent meters at the WTP, and a distribution meter located on the discharge line from the plant. Monthly withdrawals for each well and the maximum daily withdrawals for each month for the entire wellfield shall be submitted to the District quarterly. Pursuant to Limiting Condition No. 18, every two years from date of permit issuance, the permittee shall submit re-calibration data on each water use accounting facility. RECOMMENDED ALLOCATION Exhibits 9 through 11 present information submitted by the applicant pertaining to historical and anticipated future population and water use. Per capita use rate for the past three years averaged 168 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The applicant requests continuation of its allocation of 2 MGD from its wellfield with the remaining quantity of their demand to be provided by Broward County. Staff recommends approval of their requested allocation. Page 6/10 001107 11 06-00187-W CITY OF DANIA BEACH March 15,2001 Recommendations a , dub-ect to Go Board Approval Application Number: 001107-11 Permit Number: 06-00187-W Date Of Issuance: March 15, 2001 Recommendations: Staff recommends renewal of Water Use Permit No. 06-00187-W for public water supply serving 14743 persons in the year 2006 with an average per capita use rate of 168 gallons per day and a maximum to average daily ratio of 1.12. Withdrawals are from Biscayne Aquifer via two existing withdrawal facilities. The use is reasonable-beneficial, will not adversely impact presently existing legal users and is consistent with the public interest. The use is further subject to 24 limiting conditions. J f'� Application Reviewer: Date-,--' Paul M. Stout, P.G. Date: 2 14 �o t Su pervisor: Jeffrey Rosenfeld, P.G. Date: 21 Water Use Department: Wm. Scott Burns, P.G. Page 7/10 06-001 s7-W 001107-11 March 15,2001 r:ITv r1F nANIA BEACH Limiting Conditions 1.This permit shall expire on March 15, 2006. 2.Application for a permit modification may be made at any time. 3.Water use classification: Public water supply 4.Source classification: Ground Water from: Biscayne Aquifer 5.Annual allocation shall not exceed 730 MG. Maximum daily allocation shall not exceed 2 MG. 6.In the event of a declared water shortage, water withdrawal reductions will be ordered by the District in accordance with the Water Shortage Plan, Chapter 4OE-21, F.A.C. The Permittee is advised that during a water shortage, pumpage reports shall be submitted as required by Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C. 7.Withdrawal Facilities: Ground Water- Existing: 1 - 18" X 65' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 58 Feet 1 - 18" X 69' X 2100 GPM Well Cased To 58 Feet • 8. Permittee shall mitigate any adverse impacts to existing legal uses as a consequence of withdrawals permitted herein. When adverse impacts occur, or is imminent, the District reserves the right to curtail withdrawal rates. Adverse impacts are: A) reduction in well water levels that impairs the ability of an adjacent well, including a domestic well, lawn irrigation well, or public water supply well, to produce water by 10%or greater, B) significant reduction in levels in an adjacent water body, such as a lake, pond, or a canal system, that impairs the ability to produce water by 10%or greater, C) saline water intrusion or induced movement of pollutants into the water supply of an adjacent water use, resulting in a significant reduction in water quality, and D) change in water quality caused by the permittee that results in significant impairment or loss of use of a well or water body. 9.Permittee shall mitigate any adverse impact to existing off-site land use as a consequence of withdrawals permitted herein. If increased withdrawals cause an adverse impact on existing land use, the District reserves the right to curtail future withdrawal rates. Adverse impacts are: A) significant reduction in water levels in an adjacent surface water body, including impoundments, to the extent that the designed function of the water body is impaired, B) land collapse or subsidence caused by reduction in water levels; and C) damage to crops and other types of vegetation. 10.If adverse impacts occur to natural resources as a result of the Permittee's water withdrawals, the Permittee shall mitigate for such impacts. When adverse impacts occur, or are imminent, District reserves the right to curtail withdrawal rates. Examples of adverse impacts are: A) reduction in ground water levels that results in significant lateral movement of the fresh water/salt water interface, B) reduction in water levels that adversely impact the hydroperiod of protected wetland Page 8/10 06-00187-W 001107-11 March 15,2001 CITY OF DANIA BEACH ® Limiting Conditions environments, C) significant reduction in water levels or hydroperiod in a naturally occuring water body such as a lake or pond, D) induced movement or induction of pollutants into the water supply resulting in a significant reduction in water quality, and E) significant damage to the natural system including damage to habitat for rare or endangered species. 11.If any condition of the permit is violated, the permit shall be subject to review and possible modification, enforcement action, or revocation. 12.Authorized representatives of the District shall be permitted to enter, inspect, and observe the permitted system to determine compliance with special conditions. 13.The Permittee is advised that this permit does not relieve any person from the requirement to obtain all necessary federal, state, local and special district authorizations. 14.The permit does not convey any property right to the Permittee, nor any rights and privileges other than those specified in the Permit and Chapter 40E-2, Florida Administrative Code. 15.Permittee shall submit all data as required by the implementation schedule for each of the limiting conditions to: S.F.W.M.D., Supervising Hydrogeologist - Post-Permit Compliance, Water Use Regulation Dept. (4320), P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680. 16.Prior to withdrawing water as authorized by this Permit, the Permittee shall provide the results of the calibration testing of the identified water accounting method(s) and equip all existing and proposed withdrawal facilities with approved water use accounting method(s) pursuant to Section 4.1 of the . Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications. 17.Every two years from the date of Permit issuance, the Permittee shall submit re-calibration data on each water pumping accounting facility,for those Permittees whose accounting method(s) require re- calibration. 18.Monthly withdrawals for each withdrawal facility shall be submitted to the District quarterly. The water accounting method and means of calibration shall be stated on each report. 19.The Permittee shall notify the District within 30 days of any change in service area boundary. If the Permittee will not serve a new demand within the service area for which the annual allocation was calculated, the annual allocation may then be subject to modification and reduction. 20. Permittee shall implement the wellfield operating plan described in District staff report prepared in support of recommendation for permit issuance. 21.Permittee shall determine unaccounted-for distribution system losses. Losses shall be determined for the entire distribution system on a monthly basis. Permittee shall define the manner in which unaccounted-for losses are calculated. Data collection shall begin within six months of Permit issuance. Loss reporting shall be submitted to the District on a yearly basis from the date of Permit issuance. 22.Permittee shall maintain an accurate flow meter at the intake of the water treatment plant for the purpose of measuring daily inflow of water. 23.The Water Conservation Plan required by Section 2.6.1 of the Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District, must be implemented in accordance with the approved implementation schedule. 24.Permittee shall implement the following wellfield operating plan: A) In the event of a declared Water Shortage, the permittee must reduce withdrawals from its wellfield to 1.5 MGD on a maximum daily basis. Further reductions in pumpage may be required by Page 9/10 06-00187-W 001107-11 March 15,2001 CITY OF DANIA BEACH ® Limiting Conditions the District, if the chloride concentrations indicate that salt front is unstable in the vicinity of the wellfield. B) if chloride concentrations measured in production wells or in monitoring wells screened within the production zone exceed 150 mg/L or indicate that the salt front is unstable in the vicinity of the wellfield, the permittee shall immediately reduce pumpage and notify the District within 5 days of obtaining the chloride concentration results. Page 10/10 06-00187-w 0011 07-1 1 March 15,2001 BASIN MAP • Exhibit 1 E, s , s .i s 3a r3 _ � f KIS IMM E s UPPER EAST COAST ® PALM BEACH LOWER WEST BROWARD COAST CONSE ATIO DADE/MONROE PROJEC SITE j UW ® O � o z Q 0 w CL LL Go d CL G. co to N O �y /cny ct L LL L� Exhibit 2 OLT& i FORT LUMERDALE l � i FT. LAlXXXW E / H0LLY*V= hTOMTIONAL ARPM I i {� I o o i I H=YW= _w s WM BEACH MU ATIAW C OCEAN CnY LWM v _Q4 � 107 11 4�"•1p JR rL091pp Calvin,Gordan Associates,Inc ;I DANIA LOCATION SKETCH GROJEdT � &glneen Surveyors Planners � � ® EXHIBIT 3 1900 Ells Drive,suite 600 i Fort Laududal$Florida 33316--- - �� to B T v o n u o u n®M V uo sti E r� ALTA i� i 1 UNDSLEY WLMM I SUPERFUND WE 41 tt, WELL H 1 WELL c i I I MONITOR (SALT) WELL G j MONITOR (SALT) WELL WATER TREATMENT PLANT EMERALD HILLS _ I® TIP 4 Op THR wry O,e 0. T r ® g o P fLOS1Op ,r Calvin,Gor6m 6 Associates,Inc. ;� vRaecr rb L ,i i � ®. �oEU=DdM alanners WATER TREATMENT PLANT � �`� 30 Fort Lauler(W,,Flanda 33316 I I __ + Fhwc;954.921.7781 F=954921.8807 i & WELLS N d Q W � � J m � 0) r CL •N d 0 a a a C cr c mca w � m N Q S' c In co 0 cc m N d Q m CL— + 7 N a1 cy r w c6 Q o `n < a) a) `n ca caco to CD c a T j coco CD co LO N E .? cn T W co Un d F- N N a') rn cD d a. m 0 4) p G a L C a O Z 07 Z O a a; �. L �' 01 G C C j O` N t p m C m W > (! O. m Co « r C N N y z a ° E a m w a T c7 J = o w 0) la d W 'C F. C z m c) -J V W Z C .O. i V j IL C m ) 4)) 0 p. a s •' n• O 7 N CI O N �d, O. m p 7 h :a v01i cl ° ° E E E, 00)) 1 E ca o d a) u y Q Ech Q3 z * LL w 3 F°— ci LL N LL F- a. a' a' )` " a' > a a U. Q = 3 a Exhibit NO: 4 • o c a� Cl) 0 N U) C o E N E (1 G > C.) N C E 3 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 'O O O N N N N O) O) O M O) O n O CO r t- 0 t0 CO W O a Oov 'IT 'IT v r0 m0C) m0cot000cc p) O O N N N N N -'d- C° O) O O co O tD CO w O O U) to In In r r r co -t -,t w O O Lo (n In In r r r r r r OO O 00 OD OD 00 O N (n Cn M M N N N N y A .^. y I N j d cc 1 ` N N M I` 0 O N M r- CO M .4t O t Lo to Kr h M O CO ON O M W C° CO w O w N N O °) (n y 0 y y O O N N N N r M M M M M M M N M M M M M M M T C 5IL cc E E N N y Z CO CD CO CO CO CO CO CD O CD CO CO tD CD (° CO (O O CO tD CO CO CO 0 0 z z LL LL u. LL C O 0 ++ O T U L W L) O O w N O cz N N d c n' O N O) O CO N r Ln CO M M CA t` In Cn t` h N r ti v r r O cm n CO CO r CO N I,- In M CO I\ O Cn M O N 't N (n L Q ++ r N N M CO t`') 00 CO (n O r (n N 00 'It 'IT I- N CO O to CO d i N co OD f- 00 00 OD n I- I, 00 CO M "t 00 CO Cl) Cn I- f- I- I- n C yCO N N N N N N CM Cl) M co co C•M N M Cl) Cl) co N N M Cl) Cl) M W rn (M O) O O) O O) O) m O) O M O M O m O) O) m °) 0) O O) z' ~ as a� _ cn o 3� 3: 3: i>> � � � � � � � � � � � w ev � .O O O o a r d3 00 v m) c» o00o r (c) nco a) vr; c) c� c%) c� ca a CO M M M M M M m M M M r- M M O r W W N N N N Cl- - r et �t It It 'ct -It Cn O M O N N N N O !4 (M) O d O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N > qt N p) O O O O O O O O O 0.0 O O O O O O O O O,O (a w CO 0 CO CO CO 0 (O CO 66 CO CO 6 CO 6 6 6 6 CO CO > z = 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O _ CO f- _-' - - 7 C) U rn rn W E r- IL N tV •0 T CL Q 0 o � p (D � C7 C7 LL c > ° c in O c c 3 =o (n X c o 0 (D 5 N m y } U (°� cL E y U) X >. Es to .> d U oC : 0 0 Q Q Z Z d cLc Z (yn U ° ° ° U ® v d a y U) rn •° n 06 � 'o i m Cho O O O O ° � o Ca o o = o N .N a g V C ❑ f- cn0zzc2 -j -1 � v1mm Exhibit No: 5 T O V N O N fn c c d O c L G O O 7 U c 3 R .� 'a .O O O O M 00 CD N M M t Q OD 00 O Cl) O O O r M tT O O O O r' O CD u� m D) O O O O O O O CD O) co O0 O O 00 N ?� .. -crN N N O O — co000 LO 00 � M Ori N O Tr Ni N N N N N +- r r n � d � O / t MLn O 4I) 00 cD �t O) N O cD O h O O O ao O O O O O O) r Cn to 0 C7) c 'C N m 00 m M M to m N M M cD c0 W w 00 c0 O O M M N CV M N N N N N N N N N N r � Z (p (D O O O O CD CO CD UJ tD CD cD CO CD (D CD GO r O J r- U f- V O cz aI 00 c IL d N t\ N r N O d' I`r n r n 0 ..i M r n M .M ..N M M r-O N N M M M M M i. Q r+ 00 r N V I` I- V* CO M It co fl- 00 N r- M r y u) L O 0 0 I- ) O) 0) fn NV 7( U) to cD In O r r M C'7 N N N N N N N N M M N M M M M M E N V W mmmmmmrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrna) O .C. 0 N cz M M M C>1 CA N CV M M r 00 M 6 M r h 00 d p N N M M M co M N w 0 � I` co CO M O m N N N N N N In m CD O CD to 00 O CD I,- O O y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M E O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O > Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ca c0 0 _ QO Q w U .100 co � LL Q T a Q CT '0 ~ 0 � � LL c > 0 � O � cn U � ci d N iQ r 76 c0 Z Z d E w 7 o U can Exhibit No: 5 co cz 0 g . C16 -------------- ------------------------------- ..........-4 O 1 m � V � 0o -� I LiJ d I m L �® °` 0 .cz= ► ON i e O I� M o� CY\ I v 0 mI ti ao ► ,_, I ,o 1 LO Q` f S O Q � I Q Q Q o LO o LO N EXHIBIT 7 i 0 O Ib 0 co F7 - ® Cl% COco 0 LO u L — L OL co I lf) $- Ln .® cal L C .00 u i o o n o n o o 0 EXHIBIT 7 -••� -- , a■��.�"�—,.,""fir.ii � �;._�!z .- � —_r=•. tII�I ilr'{t��/± —:r— � Now— Ila;�'q�It' II�I�w Sm ire � .+ ��I:�l 'i�lll�f��ii t�.��r►:.:. �� ' — I • - I •k 1 i y .5 TABLE E ® WATER USE FOR 12 MONTH PERIOD FROM Oct 1999 to Sept 2000 MONTH RAW WATER PUMPAGE` TOTAL RAW WATER TOTAL WATER PUMPAGE MGM 121 TREATED MGM)") AVG. DAY MAX DAY Oct 99 1.84 1.89 55.2 61.5 Nov 99 1.66 1.79 49.7 62.3 Dec 99 1.68 1.83 50.3 62.2 Jan 00 1.65 1.95 49.5 67.2 Feb 00 1.73 1.96 50.3 68.0 Mar 00 1.80 1.88 54.2 77.1 Apr 00 1.76 1.91 52.9 74.4 May 00 1.86 1.90 55.9 80.2 Jun 00 1.78 1.96 53.5 70.2 Jul 00 1.77 1.90 53.3 66.1 Aug 00 1.79 1.82 53.6 66.8 Sep 00 1.70 1.93 51.1 64.5 TOTAL 21.02 N/A 629.5 820.5 AVG. L75 N/A 52.4 68.37 RATIO OF WATER PUMPED TO WATER TREATED .77 MAXIMUM DAY PUMPAGE WAS 1.96 MGD AND OCCURRED ON 2/20/2000 RATIO OF MAXIMUM DAY PUMPAGE TO AVERAGE DAY PUMPAGE WAS 1.12 (1) For service area only. (2) Water from Dania Beach's two wells only. (3) Includes raw water from Dania Beach and that received from Broward County as make up ® water to handle the City's peak demands. November 2000 4-2 CUP TABLE F ® PAST WATER USE YEAR PAST NUMBER OF PER CAPITA TOTAL AVG. MAX. POPULATION UNITS* USAGE ANNUAL DAY DAY (MG) (MG) (MG) 1990 13,163 144 679.76 1.90 2.45 1991 13,179 141 679.76 1.86 2.54 1992 13,194 166 802.91 2.19 2.33 1993 13,209 184 887.25 2.43 3.11 1994 13,468 186 897.90 2.46 2.95 1995 13,726 177 884.99 2.43 3.08 1996 13,850 176 891.16 2.44 2.89 1997 13,872 171 865.46 2.37 2.91 1998 13,923 158 803.78 2.20 2.84 1999 13,978 168 T--8-57.5-0 2.35 2.74 * CUMULATIVE ** These figures include withdrawals from City wells plus raw water supplied from Broward County. �. XAITo 1 November'_000 4-3 CUP TABLE G ® PROJECTED WATER USE YEAR PROJECTED . NUMBER PER CAPITA TOTAL AVG. MAX. POPULATION Off'NITS* USAGE ANNUAL DAY DAY (MG) (MG) (MG) 2000 14,073 168 863.00 2.36 2.65 2001 14,184 168 870.00 2.38 2.67 2002 14,295 168 877.00 2.40 2.69 2003 14,407 168 883.00 2.42 2.71 2004 14,519 168 890.00 2.44 2.73 2005 14,631 168 897.00 2.46 2.75 2006 14,743 168 904.00 2.48 2.77 2007 14,856 168 911.00 2.50 2.80 2008 14,968. 168 918.00 2.51 2.82 2009 15,081 168 925.00 2.53 2.84 2010 15,195 168 932.00 2.55 2.86 * CUMULATIVE PER CAPITA USAGE - AVG. LAST 4 YEARS = 168 November 2000 4-4 CUP STAFF REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST PROJECT: CITY OF DANIA BEACH APPLICATION NO. 001107-11 ® APPLICANT: DANIA BEACH CITY OF PERMIT NO. 06-00187-W INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION Reviewer: X Paul M. Stout,_P.G. X Engineer, County of: Broward X J. Giddings- LDP Engineer, City of: X J. Karas- Broward Sery Ctr P. Kochan - REG X Dura Loving - REG Local Drainage District: X R Mireau J. Morgan - GPA A.Waterhouse - REG Building Dept., County of: Well Construction Permitting X Enforcement X Field Engineering Building Dept., City of: X Office of Counsel COUNTY X Well Permitting X Broward -Dir., Water Mgmt. Div. GOVERNING BOARD MEMBERS BUILDING AND ZONING Ms. Valerie Boyd Mr. William Graham OTHER Mr.William Hammond X Broward County DNRP Ms. Betsy Krant X Broward County Office of Env. Services Mr. Richard Machek City of Sunrise Mr. Eugene K. Pettis X David Pritchard Mr. Nathaniel P. Reed X David Sinclair Ms. Miriam Singer X F.G.F.W.F.C. Mr. Frank Williamson, Jr. X FDEP X Michael Scottie DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Montgomery Watson, Inc. X West Palm Beach X Witt Van Cott Exhibit No:12 APPENDIX D Large User Sewer Agreement 1 a ® RESOLUTION NO. 80-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE LARGE USER WASTEWATER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HOLLYWOOD AND THE CITY OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA: Section 1 . That that certain Large User Wastewater Agreement between the City of Hollywood and the City of Dania , a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" , be and the same is hereby approved, and the appropriate city officials are hereby directed to execute same . Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take ® effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED this 28th day of August , 1990 . ATTEST: 'CITY CLERK - AUDITOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS : FRANK C. ADLER, City Attorney Resolution No. 80-90 ,lye. LARGE USER WASTEWATER AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into in Broward County, Florida, as of this �J day of 1990 , by and between the CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "HOLLYWOOD" )-, and the DANIA, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "DANIA" ) W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, HOLLYWOOD and DANIA entered into that certain Large User Wastewater Agreement dated the day of 19 as amended, to provide for utilization of ® a common area wide wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facility ( collectively the "Prior Agreement" ) ; and WHEREAS, the parties deem it mutually beneficial to continue to utilize the Hollywood Regional Wastewater , Treatment and Disposal Facilities and the HOLLYWOOD Transmission Facilities, as such terms are defined herein; and WHEREAS , the parties hereto have therefore determined to replace the Prior Agreement with this Agreement in order to provide for the technological advances, more stringent environmental regulations and governmental requirements which have occurred and which have caused the Prior Agreement to be inadequate to address current issues . NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual ® terms and conditions, promises, and covenants hereinafter set forth, HOLLYWOOD and DANIA agree as follows : EXH1131T «A» ® ARTI'CLE I . DEFINITIONS Unless otherwise specifically set forth elsewhere herein, the following words and phrases used in this Agreement shall have the following meanings : Any word or term related to "water" or "wastewater" shall have the definitions listed in the "Glossary - Water and Wastewater Control Engineering" 1981 , Third Edition, published by the American Public Health Association, American Society of Civil Engineers, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation. 1 . "Annual Average Daily Flow" or "ADF" shall mean the flow determined by the total flow in gallons for a one year period divided by 365 days ( or 366 days in the event of a leap ® year ) . The one year period shall be a Fiscal Year as defined herein. 2 . "Consulting Engineer" shall mean that professional engineer or engineering firm selected and retained from time to time by HOLLYWOOD to perform engineering services pursuant to this Agreement. 3 . "Debt Service Charges" (Treatment Disposal and/or Transmission) shall include DANIA' s applicable share of principal , interest, and coverage requirements on presently outstanding or new issues of revenue bonds , refunding bonds , bank financings or other obligations and including, but not limited to, bond agent fees , credit enhancement fees or service charges , heretofore or hereafter issued by HOLLYWOOD for the benefit of the Large Users and the HOLLYWOOD System. Each Large User ' s -2- mean those facilities owned or operated, or both, by HOLLYWOOD for the purpose of wastewater treatment and disposal , including any future additions , ' improvements or modifications to or extensions of these facilities that may occur from time to time , whether said facilities are within the municipal jurisdiction of HOLLYWOOD or not. 10 . "Hollywood System" shall mean collectively the HOLLYWOOD Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities and the HOLLYWOOD Transmission Facilities , which System is hereby deemed to be a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) under 40 CFR 403 . This term shall not include any physical facility that relates solely to the retail collection system of HOLLYWOOD. A map depicting the HOLLYWOOD System Service Area is attached , hereto as Exhibit "A" . 11 . "DANIA System" shall mean the entire wastewater system including manholes , laterals , gravity sewers , lift stations , pumping stations , force mains , and the appurtenances thereto, and belonging ' to DANIA, whether within the corporate limits of DANIA or not. 12 . "DANIA Service Area" shall mean the geographic boundaries in , which: ( i ) DANIA is responsible for providing wastewater collection and transmission services to the HOLLYWOOD System, and ( ii ) HOLLYWOOD is responsible for providing treatment services to DANIA, both as more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. The parties agree ® that DANIA Service Area, as defined herein, shall also include any modifications to such Service Area as a result of -4- ® annexations , deannexations , or by mutual written agreement of the parties . Any change in DANIA' s Service Area shall be deemed to automatically amend Exhibit B hereto, as necessary to correct the DANIA Service Area map. 13 . -"Industrial User" shall mean a user as defined in 40 CFR, as amended. 14 . "Industrial Wastes" shall mean liquid wastes from any industrial process, cooling water discharge, or wastes exclusive of those which are Domestic Wastewater as defined in paragraph 5 of this Article . 15. "Infiltration and Inflow" shall mean water entering the sewer system and service connections from the ground ® ( Infiltration) or water discharged into a sewer system or service connections from a roof, yard or street drains , cooling water discharges , manhole covers removed for storm drainage ( Inflow) . Infiltration and Inflow are mutually exclusive terms.. 16 . "Large User" shall mean any county, municipality, special district and any other entity which operates wastewater collection or transmission facilities which connect into the Hollywood System. The term "Large User" shall refer only to those counties , municipalities , special districts and other entities which have executed this form of agreement containing substantially the same terms and conditions . HOLLYWOOD shall be included within the defined term "Large User" when said term is used in conjunction with the obligations of the Large User for Debt Service Charges ; Renewal , Replacement and Improvement Account Charges ; Depreciation Charges ; and Operation, Maintenance -5- and Administrative Costs ; the flow projections contained in Article II hereof; the pretreatment requirements contained in Article III hereof; any penalty or compensatory charges set forth herein; and the non-monetary default provisions contained in Article VII hereof. When Hollywood is included as a Large User as set forth above , then Hollywood shall be bound by all terms , conditions, liabilities and obligations. of all Large Users as set forth herein. 17 . "Large Users ' Advisory Committee" shall mean an advisory committee comprised of the appropriate and technically qualified representative of each of the Large Users , including HOLLYWOOD, and which shall have the rights and responsibilities ® set forth in Article VIII hereof. 18 . "MGD" as used herein is an abbreviation for the term "million gallons per day. " 19 . "Operation Maintenance and Administrative Costs" shall mean any reasonable and necessary expenses of operation, maintenance and administration of the HOLLYWOOD System, including but not limited to all HOLLYWOOD Treatment Facilities expenses , ( including all costs attributable to the General Pretreatment Regulations , 40 CFR 403 ) , allocable transmission expenses , allocable utility administration expenses , allocable _utility accounting expenses , allocable general fund administration expenses , all as set forth more completely in composite Exhibit "D" attached hereto and made a part hereof . ® 20 . "Points of Connection" shall mean those points where DANIA' s system connects to the HOLLYWOOD System for the -6- ® purpose of delivering DANIA' s wastewater into the HOLLYWOOD System from DANIA' s System, which points of connection are more particularly described ad set forth in Article II below. 21 . . "Renewal Replacement and Improvement Account Contribution" shall mean a monthly contribution, as more particularly described in Article IV 2 (d) below, which contribution shall be in addition to all other charges due to HOLLYWOOD from DANIA, and shall be deposited into an account ( "Renewal , Replacement and Improvement Account" ) to be established and utilized by HOLLYWOOD for renewal , replacement and improvement of the HOLLYWOOD System, as more particularly described in Article IV 2( d) below. The account established for DANIA shall be , through standard accounting techniques , segregated from any Renewal , Replacement and Improvement Account established by HOLLYWOOD for any other Large User . —7— ARTICLE II . CONNECTION TO THE HOLLYWOOD SYSTEM 1 . Points of Connection. The parties hereto agree that the points of connection of DANIA' s System to the HOLLYWOOD System and meter locations shall be as set forth in Exhibit "C" , attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2 . Easement Points of Connection. HOLLYWOOD may locate the points of connection as per Exhibit "C" and provide for meter locations , and may locate meters on property currently being used by DANIA for wastewater transmission facilities . DANIA shall convey at no cost to HOLLYWOOD, an appropriate easement to the property as needed by HOLLYWOOD for the point of connection, meter locations , as necessary to provide ingress and egress to said facilities. 3 . Maintenance of DANIA' s Facilities , a. DANIA agrees to keep facilities located within its Service Area or under control of DANIA through any agreement with the State , a county, or municipal government or authority or private party, in such condition so as to reasonably prevent any Infiltration or Inflow which would result in extraordinary levels of groundwater or storm water into DANIA' s System, and thereby Into the HOLLYWOOD System. - b. DANIA agrees to adopt, enact and enforce such rules , regulations or ordinances as may be required from time to time to ensure that DANIA, or users of DANIA' s system are not discharging or causing to be discharged waters or waste which would cause DANIA' s wastewater to be unacceptable under the provisions of Article III of this Agreement. -8- C . DANIA agrees to be responsible for prompt implementation in its system of all actions required by any federal , state or local regulations imposed on HOLLYWOOD or the HOLLYWOOD System, or DANIA, either now or in the future with regard to the collection, treatment , transportation and disposal of wastewater, including, but not limited to, EPA general pretreatment requirements as contained in 40 CFR 403 , and as same may be amended from time to time . 4 . Service Area . DANIA agrees that it shall not accept wastewater from outside its Service Area for transmission to the HOLLYWOOD System unless DANIA receives approval from HOLLYWOOD and any regulatory agencies that have jurisdiction over the matter for said connection prior to its being made , with such approval being the subject of a written supplement or agreement which shall be attached hereto and made a part hereof . The parties hereto acknowledge that all contractual. obligations regarding connection to and transmission to the HOLLYWOOD System existing as of the date of this Agreement, have been disclosed by each party to the other . Any agreement( s ) between Large Users to exchange , trade , sell , assign or otherwise agree with respect to the use of each others flows within their respective Service Areas must be approved, in writing, by HOLLYWOOD. _ Unless otherwise expressly agreed to in writing, HOLLYWOOD has no obligation to accept or provide service for any wastewater which originates outside of DANIA' s Service Area . Subject to Article II , Section 6 .B . hereof, DANIA agrees that it shall cause all wastewater flow generated within its present Service Area as -9- defined in Exhibit "B" ; to be transmitted to the HOLLYWOOD System. 5 . Future Flow Projections . DANIA agrees that it shall annually review its needs for wastewater transmission, treatment and disposal service , and shall , with advice and counsel of a professional engineer project its future ADF needs to the best of its knowledge and ability, for both the next ensuing Fiscal Year and the tenth year . projection to HOLLYWOOD, by written notice , on or before March 1st of each year . Said projections shall be in such a format as may be requested by HOLLYWOOD from time to time and shall provide the following information: ( 1 ) Average Daily Flow (MGD) for the next ensuing Fiscal Year ; and ( 2 ) Average . Daily Flow (MGD) anticipated during the three months of greatest flow. 6 .A. HOLLYWOOD' s Obligation to Provide Wastewater Treatment Services . HOLLYWOOD acknowledges and agrees that in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the other Large User Agreements , it has an affirmative , continuing obligation to provide wastewater treatment services to 'DANIA and the other Large Users with respect to wastewater flows within the Hollywood Service Area as shown on Exhibit A. HOLLYWOOD' s obligation to provide wastewater services to DANIA shall continue until such time as this Agreement is terminated in accordance with Article VI hereof, or until such time , if any, as HOLLYWOOD is ordered to stop treating DANIA' s flows by injunction -10- ® or final order of a court of competent jurisdiction or by a regulatory agency with the jurisdiction to issue such an order or injunction. 6 .B . Projected Flows (ADF ) . DANIA acknowledges that HOLLYWOOD will rely on DANIA' s future flow projections for ADF for the Fiscal Year 1999-2000 , as set forth herein, in calculating and planning for the initial HOLLYWOOD System capacity expansion and the financing for same , and that any material increase or decrease in the amount of actual ADF from that disclosed or projected could seriously impact on HOLLYWOOD and the other Large Users with regard to their obligations concerning plant expansion and financing of same . Accordingly, except for those "Excess Flows" as defined herein, which DANIA elects to flow to an alternate system, DANIA agrees that it shall cause all wastewater collected within its Service Area as defined in Exhibit "B" hereto to be transmitted to the HOLLYWOOD System throughout the term of this Agreement. In addition, DANIA agrees that it shall not cause any wastewater collected within its Service Area, as defined in Exhibit "B" hereto, to be transmitted to the HOLLYWOOD System in excess of its projected flows set forth herein for the Fiscal Year 1999-2000 throughout the term of this Agreement, unless DANIA acquires or leases additional flow capacity from another Large user as set forth in Article II , Section 4 , herein or unless HOLLYWOOD makes a further plant capacity expansion to accommodate DANIA' s additional flow needs . Debt Service Charges relating to any additional plant capacity expansions shall be borne by those Large Users who require said expansions in proportion to their respective needs. -11- DANIA hereby makes the following ADF Flow projections for the Fiscal Years indicated. FISCAL YEAR 10/1-9/30 ADF ( RESERVE CAPACITY MGD) 1988-1989 2 . 90 1999-2000* 4 . 70 * Fiscal Year 1999-2000 projections to be used by HOLLYWOOD for purposes of planning HOLLYWOOD System capacity expansion to the year 2000 . HOLLYWOOD shall have the right and power to enforce the limitation of its obligations hereunder either by suit or other proceedings at law or in equity and to take such action as necessary to prohibit DANIA from transmitting wastewater into HOLLYWOOD' s Transmission and Treatment Facilities which exceeds 110% of the amount of DANIA' s - Annual Average Daily Flow as projected for a given Fiscal Year . Subject to obtaining HOLLYWOOD' s and any regulatory agency' s prior written consents, which consent from HOLLYWOOD shall not be unreasonably withheld, DANIA may transmit only those flows from within its Service Area which exceeds the ADF projected for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 ( the "Excess Flows" ) as set forth above to available alternate -systems for wastewater treatment . HOLLYWOOD shall have no obligations or liabilities with respect to any Excess Flows which DANIA elects to transmit to any alternate system. 7 . Meters . To the extent that HOLLYWOOD has not already done so, HOLLYWOOD shall furnish and install wastewater -12- metering, recording and transmitting devices to be located at the sites as set forth in Exhibit "C" . HOLLYWOOD shall retain ownership of the metering, recording and transmitting devices , together with any appurtenances thereto . DANIA shall reimburse HOLLYWOOD for * the design, construction, calibration, and financing costs of such devices , to the extent that DANIA has not already done so, within thirty ( 30 ) days of receiving the invoice for said costs . The type of equipment selected shall be at the discretion of HOLLYWOOD; however , HOLLYWOOD shall require the manufacturer of the equipment to submit certified calibration tests to DANIA and HOLLYWOOD. 8 . Meter Maintenance . HOLLYWOOD shall have a semi- annual inspection report prepared regarding the condition and accuracy of the metering device by a representative of the meter manufacturer . The expense for the annual inspection shall be an operating charge of the HOLLYWOOD facilities. A ,copy of this semi-annual report shall be furnished to DANIA. 9 . Meter Accuracy. The parties hereto agree that should. the metering equipment installed by HOLLYWOOD be found to be inaccurate beyond the manufacturer ' s range of accuracy, the meter will be assumed to be inaccurate since the last meter check -or for a period of three ( 3 ) months , which ever time is less , and the following month' s billing will be adjusted to show a credit or additional charge to DANIA for metered flow for that period. If DANIA, for whatever reason, requests a meter report in Saddition to the semiannual reports, HOLLYWOOD will comply. If the meter was malfunctioning or required calibration, the expense -13- associated with DANIA' s request will be an operating expense to the HOLLYWOOD System. If the meter report indicates the meter was operating properly within the manufacturer ' s guaranteed range of accuracy, DANIA will be charged in the subsequent monthly bill for the expenses associated with the inspection. 10 . Meter Failure . The parties agree that if at any time during this Agreement a metering device shall in any way fail to tabulate the flow into the HOLLYWOOD collection and treatment facilities , each successive monthly charge shall be based on the last available meter reading and adjusted to equal the same percent of total plant flow each month until the meter is once again fully operational . ® 11 . Registration of Meter , Registration of a meter , when maintained as above , shall be binding on both parties for all wastewater flow charges . Access to the meters shall be available to DANIA upon request and in the presence of a representative of HOLLYWOOD. 12 . Meter Reading , Meter reading for billing purposes shall occur as nearly as possible on the 25th day of each month. -14- ARTICLE III . LIMITATION ON DISCHARGE OF CERTAIN WASTES 1 . Type of Waste to be Discharged. a . Except as hereinafter provided, DANIA shall not discharge nor cause to be discharged any of the waters or wastes described in paragraph b. below, into the HOLLYWOOD System. All of the quality limitations enumerated below apply to concentrations or other physical characteristics obtained from analysis by HOLLYWOOD of representative samples of the waste collected, which samples upon request of DANIA in writing will be divided between HOLLYWOOD and DANIA. Such analysis as set forth herein shall be made in accordance with the latest edition of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" prepared and published jointly by the American Public Health Association, the American Waterworks Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation for so long as same is continued to be published. In the event these standards are no longer published, the parties shall agree on the standard for such analysis . b. No person shall discharge or , cause to be discharged any of the following described waters or wastes into the HOLLYWOOD System. ( 1 ) Any inflow and that infiltration which can be deemed cost effective to correct . ( 2 ) Any wastewater or vapor having a temperature higher than one hundred fifty ( 150 0 ) degrees Fahrenheit ( 650C) . ® ( 3 ) Any gasoline , benzene , naphtha, fuel oil or other flammable or explosive liquid, solid or gas . -15- ( 4 ) Any waters or wastes having a pH lower than 5 . 5 or higher than 9 . 5 , or having any other corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to structures , equipment, or personnel of HOLLYWOOD. '( 5 ) Any wastewater containing constituents in concentrations which are in excess of the concentrations set forth for normal wastewater : BOD5 400 ppm TSS 400 ppm TKN 30 ppm Phosphorus ( P) 15 ppm COD 800 ppm TDS 2000 ppm ( 6 ) Any waters containing toxic or poisonous solids, liquids or gases in sufficient quantities , which either singly or by interaction with other wastes, may injure or interfere with any waste treatment process , constitute a hazard to humans or animals , create a public nuisance , or create any hazard in the wastewater treatment plant, as sampled at or in the immediate vicinity of the point of discharge to the HOLLYWOOD System. The maximum limits for the below listed substances are : Antimony 0 . 200 ppm Arsenic 0 . 100 ppm Barium 5 . 000 ppm Beryllium 0 . 010 ppm Bismuth 0 . 045 ppm Boron 1 . 000 ppm - Cadmium 0 . 500 ppm Chlorides 600 . 000 ppm Chromium, Hexavalent 0 . 500 ppm Chromium, Total 1 . 000 ppm Cobalt 1 . 000 ppm Copper, ( Total ) 2 . 000 ppm ® Cyanides 0 . 250 ppm Hydrogen Sulfide 3 . 000 ppm Iron 10 . 000 ppm Lead 0 . 400 ppm Manganese 1 . 000 ppm —16— Mercury 0 . 100 ppm Molybdenum 0 . 500 ppm Nickel 1 . 800 ppm Phenols 0 . 005 ppm Selenium 0 . 100 ppm Silver 0 . 240 ppm Strontium 0 . 200 ppm Tellurium 0 . 001 ppm Tin • 0 . 800 ppm Toxic Radioactive Isotopes without a special permit 0 . 000 ppm Zinc , (Total ) 1. 000 ppm Pesticides 0 . 010 ppm Herbicides 0 . 010 ppm Fungicides 0 . 010 ppm The maximum allowable values of the substances listed above may from time to time be revised by federal , state , local regulatory agencies , or HOLLYWOOD, if determined by the Consulting Engineer to be in the best interest of the Hollywood System, in which case DANIA agrees not to exceed such revised maximum limits . HOLLYWOOD shall provide DANIA, written notice , of any amendment or change to said schedule . ( 7 ) Any solid or viscous substance in quantities or of such size capable of causing obstruction to the flow in the 'sewers or an interference with the proper operation of the wastewater facilities , such as , but not limited to, ashes , cans , sand, straw, shavings , metal , glass , tar , wax , lime slurry, lime residues , chemical residues and paint residues . ( 8 ) Any wastewater containing more than twenty- five ( 25 ) milligrams per liter of petroleum oil , non- biodegradable cutting oils , or products of mineral oil origin. ® ( 9 ) Any water or waste containing more than one hundred ( 100 ) milligrams per liter of biodegradable oils , fat, -17- ® grease or any oily substances , whether singularly or in a combination. ( 10 ) Any water or wastes containing suspended solids or color or other such characteristics in quantity that unusual attention or expense is required to handle such material at the HOLLYWOOD facility, without a special permit. ( 11 ) Any noxious or malodorous gas or substance which either singularly or by interaction with other wastes , is capable of creating a public nuisance or hazard to life , or which prevents or makes unduly hazardous the entry into sewers for maintenance and repair. ( 12 ) Any water or wastes containing substances ® which are not amenable to treatment or reduction by the wastewater treatment processes employed, or are amenable to treatment only to such degree that the wastewater treatment plant effluent cannot meet the requirements of other agencies having jurisdiction over discharge to the receiving waters . ( 13 ) Any waters or wastes which constitute a hazard to any structure or appurtenances of the HOLLYWOOD System. ( 14 ) Any water or waste which singularly or in combination with other waters or wastes that inhibit or interfere with the treatment process or may render the treatment plant effluent toxic as determined by regulatory permit requirements . ( 15 ) Any waters or wastes that render the sludge produced by the treatment plant to be other than a Class-I sludge as defined by Florida' s Department of Environmental Regulation . -18- ( 16 ) Any substance or constituent in violation of " Federal ( National ) Categorical Pretreatment Standards" as issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, including any amendments or successor enactments thereto, or which exceeds , ' or would exceed, federal , state or local quality requirement, unless the discharge is allowable by a duly issued operating permit from the Broward County Environmental Quality Control Board. 2 . Compliance . ( a) If at any time DANIA shall not comply with the restrictions imposed upon it in the preceding portion of this Article , or if DANIA shall create any condition which HOLLYWOOD should determine destructive to any part of HOLLYWOOD' s System, HOLLYWOOD shall give thirty ( 30 ) days written notice to DANIA to discontinue such operation or practice, within which period DANIA agrees to comply. If DANIA does not initiate and/o.r establish a compliance program within ninety ( 90 ) days of notification, and/or if any damages result from the discharge of improper wastes by DANIA, HOLLYWOOD reserves the right to provide such preliminary treatment facilities or establish such programs as required to bring DANIA' s discharge into compliance . DANIA will 'be responsible to HOLLYWOOD for all charges , both capital and operational for the establishment of these programs or facilities as described herein. Additionally, failure to comply with the conditions stipulated in Section 1 hereof , shall place DANIA in default of this Agreement . -19- (b) DANIA recognizes and agrees that HOLLYWOOD has the obligation and authority to perform the below as well as any future activities required by Environmental Protection Agency General Pretreatment Regulations , 40 CFR 403 , Section 403 . 8 , as set forth below: HOLLYWOOD agrees to notify DANIA, in writing, and will. give DANIA the opportunity to take the appropriate action, prior to HOLLYWOOD taking any of the following actions . ( 1 ) deny or condition new or increased contributions or pollutants , or changes in the nature of pollutants , to the HOLLYWOOD System by industrial user; ( 2 ) require compliance with applicable pretreatment standards and requirements by industrial users ; ® ( 3 ) control , through permit, contract, order , or similar means , the contribution to the HOLLYWOOD System by each industrial user to ensure compliance with applicable pretreatment standards and requirements; ( 4) require (a ) the development of a compliance schedule by each industrial user for the installation of technology required to meet applicable pretreatment standards and requirements and (b) the submission of all notices and self- monitoring reports from industrial users as are necessary to assess and assure compliance by industrial users with pretreatment standards and requirements , including, but not limited to, the reports required in Paragraph 403 . 12 ; ( 5 ) carry out all inspection, surveillance ® and monitoring procedures necessary to determine , independent of information supplied by industrial users , compliance or non- -20- compliance with applicable pretreatment standards and requirements by industrial users ; ( 6 ) obtain remedies for non-compliance by an industrial user with any pretreatment standard and requirement. ( c ) The parties mutually agree that no statement contained herein shall be construed as preventing any special agreement or arrangement between HOLLYWOOD and DANIA or any user within DANIA' s Service Area, whereby an industrial waste of unusual strength or charter may be accepted by HOLLYWOOD for treatment, subject to additional payment by DANIA, or said user . (d) HOLLYWOOD agrees to provide DANIA with written notification of changes to the Regulations and a copy of ® the EPA required Pretreatment Annual Report. (e ) Nothing contained herein shall obligate DANIA to pay any costs incurred by HOLLYWOOD for pretreatment facilities required as a direct result of discharge of improper wastes into the HOLLYWOOD System by other Large Users . 3 . Sampling. a. DANIA agrees to include in the design of its wastewater delivery system a sampling station so that HOLLYWOOD can take representative samples of the wastewater as a means of monitoring the characteristics of the wastewater received from DANIA, and DANIA shall further provide to HOLLYWOOD such right- of-way or easements as may be necessary to assure HOLLYWOOD of access to the sampling station site . HOLLYWOOD shall , upon notification to DANIA, have the right at any time to collect samples of sewage and industrial wastes at selected locations -21- i within DANIA' s facilities for the purpose of making laboratory analysis of these wastes . The cost of collecting and then testing such samples shall be considered a HOLLYWOOD facility treatment and effluent disposal operating expense . 'b. DANIA shall , upon written request, submit annually to HOLLYWOOD, no later than April 1 of each year, a laboratory analysis conducted by a State certified laboratory of composite samples of the combined Industrial and Domestic Wastes leaving DANIA' s facilities at each point of connection. The costs for said submission shall be borne by DANIA. DANIA shall give HOLLYWOOD five ( 5 ) days written notice exclusive of Saturday, Sunday and holidays , of its intent to take the required ® samples, in order that HOLLYWOOD may be present at the time the sample is taken. The analysis made pursuant to this paragraph shall be made on twenty-four ( 24 ) hour representative samples and may include temperature , pH, and those substances listed in paragraph lb( 3 ) , ( 5) , ( 6 ) , ( 8 ) and ( 9 ) above . HOLLYWOOD shall direct DANIA as to the particular samples , including pesticides , herbicides and/or fungicides for which analysis is required. 4 . Regulatory Action . a . DANIA agrees to adopt, enact and enforce such necessary rules , regulations and/or ordinances as may be required so as to ensure that the users of DANIA' s system do not discharge or cause to be discharged waters or wastes which would cause DANIA' s wastewater to be unacceptable under the provisions of this Article , and to furnish to HOLLYWOOD certified copies of said regulations , rules and/or ordinances within one hundred -22- eighty ( 180 ) days from -the date of enactment of same or one hundred eighty ( 180 ) days from the date of this Agreement , whichever shall first occur . b. DANIA shall be responsible for implementation in its system of federal , state or local regulations imposed on HOLLYWOOD or DANIA, either now or in the future . 5 . Additional Charge for Wastes of Unusual Strength . In lieu of the remedies set forth in paragraph 2 of the Article above , in the event of a violation or default by DANIA pursuant to this Article , DANIA shall be subject to an additional charge which shall , upon imposition, be included in DANIA' s monthly billing( s ) subsequent to said determination by HOLLYWOOD. ® Designation of waste as being of unusual strength or character shall occur when the contributed wastewater parameters exceed those set forth in paragraph 1 of this Article . The additional charge shall be based upon HOLLYWOOD' s total cost. incurred in providing treatment, additional treatment programs , or additional facilities for the treatment of such wastes of unusual strengths . Any monies received from this Section shall be applied by HOLLYWOOD first to pay for the cost of correcting the problem caused by DANIA and then to reduce the relevant operating expense bf the HOLLYWOOD System. - 6 . Emergency Action . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained above , if at any time during the term of this Agreement, HOLLYWOOD determines , in its sole and absolute ® discretion, that DANIA' s failure to comply with the restrictions imposed upon it by this Agreement constitutes such an immediate -23- threat to the HOLLYWOOD System and/or the public health or safety so as to constitute an emergency situation requiring immediate remedial action, then, in that event, HOLLYWOOD may declare an emergency situation to exist and upon written notice to DANIA, may proceed to take whatever corrective action it deems necessary as to said emergency to prevent further nuisance or damage to HOLLYWOOD' s System without the necessity of giving notice ( other than notice of the emergency situation) to DANIA or affording DANIA an opportunity to remedy the situation. Any costs incurred by HOLLYWOOD . in response to an emergency situation shall be charged to DANIA, and shall be the sole responsibility of DANIA to pay. -29- ARTICLE IV. CHARGES AND BILLING 1 . Annual Estimate . HOLLYWOOD shall estimate all costs ( on a Fiscal Year basis ) of providing wastewater transmission, treatment, and disposal services to DANIA beginning with Fiscal Year 88-89 . This annual estimate shall be the basis for DANIA' s monthly billings during the next succeeding Fiscal Year . Adjustments will be made annually as described below based upon actual flows and actual costs when known. 2 . Billings Procedure . The parties hereto agree that HOLLYWOOD shall provide wastewater transmission, treatment and disposal services to DANIA, at rates and charges constituting the full and actual costs of such service , including but not limited ® to Operation, Maintenance and Administrative costs , Renewal , Replacement and Improvement Account Contributions , Debt Service Charges , Depreciation Charges , and compensatory charges , and HOLLYWOOD shall set the same proportionate rates and charges for all Large Users of the HOLLYWOOD System. DANIA shall pay a monthly charge to HOLLYWOOD, as calculated pursuant to Section IV-1 . above , for wastewater transmission, treatment and disposal services provided by HOLLYWOOD, commencing on the date of execution of this Agreement. Such charges shall be paid to HOLLYWOOD by DANIA monthly, and shall include the following components : a . Operation Maintenance and Administrative Costs ., Operation, Maintenance and Administrative Costs are ® defined in Article I , paragraph 19 hereof , and will be estimated for each Fiscal Year . The portion of the monthly charge to DANIA -25- • for Operation, Maintenance and Administrative Costs shall be based on the estimated rate per thousand gallons and shall be applied on actual flow used by DANIA during the billing period. ( 1 ) Adjustment to Operation , Maintenance and Administrative Costs . At the end of each Fiscal Year , an annual adjustment shall be computed to determine DANIA' s share of the actual Operation, Maintenance and Administrative Costs . This computation will be based upon the actual operation, maintenance and administrative expenses recorded for the HOLLYWOOD System for that Fiscal Year, multiplied by DANIA' s percentage of the actual number of gallons of wastewater treated and disposed of through the HOLLYWOOD System for that Fiscal Year . Each adjustment in • the operation, maintenance and administrative monthly charges shall be made subsequent to, and subject to final verification of the operation, maintenance and administrative expenses incurred which verification shall be included in the annual review of said charges . The above-referenced annual review shall be performed by an independent Financial Consultant selected by HOLLYWOOD and shall be distributed to DANIA on or before March 31 of the year following the end of each Fiscal Year . In the event the annual adjustment reflects that an underpayment has been made by DANIA with regard to Operation, Maintenance and Administrative- Costs , then the amount due and owing for said underpayment shall be shown as a separate line item on the next monthly bill sent to DANIA after the adjustment has been made . In the event the annual adjustment reflects that an overpayment has been made by DANIA, with regard to Operation, Maintenance and Administrative -26- Costs , then in that event the amount of said overpayment shall be credited to DANIA as a separate line item on the next monthly bill after the adjustment has been made . b. Debt Service Charges . , Debt Service Charges , as defined in Article I , paragraph 3 , for the HOLLYWOOD System shall be computed annually as follows : ( i ) with respect to projects relating to improvement and upgrading of the HOLLYWOOD System, DANIA' s Debt Service Charges shall be computed annually by taking the ratio of the amount of DANIA' s actual flow to the total flow of the HOLLYWOOD System fot each Fiscal Year , multiplied annually by the total debt service due in that Fiscal Year for such upgrading project( s ) ; ( ii ) with respect to projects relating to • the initial plant capacity expansion of the HOLLYWOOD System, DANIA' s Debt Service Charges shall be computed annually by taking the difference between DANIA' s actual ADF Flows for Fiscal Year 1988-89 and DANIA' s projected ADF Flow for the Fiscal Year 1999- 2000 and then dividing that difference by the projected increase in capacity in the HOLLYWOOD System over and above the total System capacity for the Fiscal Year 1988-1989 as a result of such planned capacity expansion; and then multiplying that fraction by the total debt service due in that Fiscal Year for such expansion project( s ) ; provided however , DANIA' s Debt Service Charges with respect to this initial capacity expansion financing will be adjusted pursuant to Article II , Section 6 .B . in the event that DANIA' s actual flows exceed its projected flows for Fiscal Year • 1999-2000 ; and ( iii ) with respect to projects relating to transmission pipes and related transmission facilities within the -27- HOLLYWOOD System, DANIA' s Debt Service Charges shall be computed annually by multiplying the proportional cost , based on design, of the new transmission facilities which are required by DANIA by the total debt service due in that Fiscal Year for such transmission project. In addition, except as otherwise set forth in Exhibit "D" hereto, any Debt Service Charges which may be due HOLLYWOOD from DANIA by reason of any financings relating to the HOLLYWOOD System under the Prior Agreement ( other than financings for transmission) shall be recalculated in accordance with the applicable formulae set forth above . The above described formulae are illustrated in Exhibit "D" attached hereto. In determining which projects are related to upgrading or expansion of the Hollywood System, prudent engineering judgment shall be used. The Debt Service Charges relating to any additional plant capacity expansions of the HOLLYWOOD System shall be borne by the Large Users who require said expansion in proportion to their respective needs . C. Depreciation Charges , Depreciation Charges as defined in Article I , paragraph 4 above , shall be computed based on DANIA' s proportionate share ( as established in the Prior .Agreement ) of the three ( 3% ) percent per year depreciation on the existing facilities constructed from revenues of HOLLYWOOD other than the HOLLYWOOD Sewer System Bond proceeds and federal grants ; the cost of said facilities being One Million Ninety-Six Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty and 74/100 ( $1 , 096 , 860 .74 ) Dollars . d. Renewal Replacement and Improvement Account Contribution . -28- ( 1 ) Funds- from the Renewal , Replacement and Improvement Account, shall be used for the improvement, repair and replacement of the HOLLYWOOD System. Said Account shall be funded through contributions made monthly by DANIA to said account. As of October 1 , 1988 , the balance in DANIA' s Account is deemed to be zero, and all other amounts on deposit in said account shall be carried forward. HOLLYWOOD shall maintain a separate Renewal , Replacement and Improvement Account for each Large User . Any amounts collected by HOLLYWOOD for DANIA' s Account shall be utilized by HOLLYWOOD only for renewals , replacements and improvements to the HOLLYWOOD System. HOLLYWOOD shall use prudent engineering judgment in determining the need ® for renewal , replacement and improvement projects . Expenditure of funds on deposit in each Large User ' s RR&I Account shall be made based on their respective percentage of the total System flows . The contributions made by DANIA to the Account shall be in addition to all other charges collected by HOLLYWOOD set forth herein. Except as otherwise provided herein, DANIA' s monthly contribution to this Account shall be ten percent ( 10% ) of DANIA' s monthly total bill for wastewater transmission and treatment, including, but not limited to, Debt Service Charges , Depreciation Charges , and Operation, Maintenance and Administrative Costs. Payments to said Account shall continue to be made monthly at the aforestated rate until such time as DANIA' s Account contains funds equal to DANIA' s share of a maximum amount of five ( 5% ) percent of the actual cost of the HOLLYWOOD System, and as said System may be expanded from time .to -29- ® time . During any period* in which DANIA' s Account is maintained at a level equaling its pro rata share of five percent ('5% ) of the actual cost of the HOLLYWOOD System, as expanded, no monthly payments shall be due from DANIA to this Account; provided, however , that pursuant to this Article , the maximum level may be modified from time to time , in which event DANIA shall resume making monthly payments to this Account until its required contribution level is reached. In the ' event the balance in DANIA' s Account shall at any time fall below the maximum prescribed level set forth herein, then at that time DANIA shall resume making monthly payments in accordance with this paragraph so as to bring the balance in said Account to the maximum prescribed level . Said Account shall include any unexpended monies deposited since October 1 , 1988 , remaining on deposit in the special renewal or replacement and improvement fund established under the Prior Agreement between the parties . Contributions to the Renewal , Replacement and Improvement Account shall earn interest at HOLLYWOOD' s pooled fund interest rate , which interest shall be credited annually based on the average monthly balance in DANIA' s Account . ( 2 ) In the event it is necessary to renew, replace or improve an element of the HOLLYWOOD System for which sufficient funds are not available in the Renewal , Replacement and Improvement Account established for DANIA, HOLLYWOOD shall notify DANIA of the deficiency in said Account . DANIA shall have a period of sixty ( 60 ) days from the date of said notification to contribute any said deficiency to the Renewal , Replacement and -30- ® Improvement Account. In the event DANIA has not made said deficiency contribution within sixty ( 60 ) days of the date of notification of the deficiency by HOLLYWOOD, HOLLYWOOD, at its option may: ( i ) obtain financing necessary to fund the deficiency, in which event DANIA shall pay the cost of said financing as additional Debt Service Charges ; or ( ii ) HOLLYWOOD may fund the deficiency internally, in which event DANIA shall repay HOLLYWOOD the amount of the deficiency, plus interest at HOLLYWOOD' s earned interest rate as an- additional monthly charge to DANIA, over a period of not less than sixty ( 60 ) months and not greater than one hundred twenty ( 120 ) months . 3 . Additional Capacity. At such time as financing ® is secured for construction of additional facilities as contemplated in Article V below, so as to service the various Large Users , or it becomes necessary for DANIA to secure additional transmission or treatment capacity, DANIA shall pay all additional Debt Service Charges based on the formulae set forth in Article IV, 2 (b) hereof . 4 . Payment and Penalties for Nonpayment . The parties agree that HOLLYWOOD shall bill DANIA for providing the services necessary for wastewater treatment, transmission and disposal , on a monthly basis in accordance with HOLLYWOOD' s standard billing procedures . DANIA shall pay such billings within forty-five ( 45 ) days of the receipt of the monthly bill . Should a billing or a portion of the billing be outstanding for a period of more ® than forty-five ( 45 ) days from the date of receipt of the original billing, then DANIA shall be considered in default of -31- this Agreement . Should DANIA not pay within the forty-five ( 45 ) day period set forth herein, DANIA shall pay interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of twelve percent ( 12% ) per. annum. 5 . Dispute Over Amounts Billed ._ DANIA agrees that in the event of a dispute as to a billing invoice or the amount DANIA owes on a monthly bill , and which dispute the parties cannot resolve within forty-five ( 45 ) days from the date of receipt of the original invoice , then DANIA shall automatically deliver to HOLLYWOOD the total amount billed and an adjustment of the billing invoice amount, if any, shall be made subject to subsequent agreement or adjudication. The amount of such charge that is in dispute shall be held in escrow by HOLLYWOOD until the ® dispute is resolved, provided however , that in the event the disputed amount relates to Debt Service Charges , then HOLLYWOOD shall be entitled to apply such disputed amount to make debt service payments when due . 6 . Access to Records . HOLLYWOOD agrees that it shall maintain accurate accounting records for the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities , and that HOLLYWOOD will make available to DANIA for inspection or review said records upon reasonable advance notice ( at least fifteen 15 days ) and specific written request as to the records requested. Any questions or explanations necessary as to the information contained in such records shall be addressed at the Large Users ' Advisory Committee meetings . -32- ® ARTICLE V. ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES 1 . Expansion of the Hollywood Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities . HOLLYWOOD and DANIA acknowledge that the present rated capacity of the HOLLYWOOD Regional Wastewater Treatment . Facilities is 38 MGD, and that subsequent to the execution of this Agreement and similar agreements between HOLLYWOOD and the other Large Users , that the HOLLYWOOD System is planned to be initially expanded to treat the total projected flow requirements for the year 1999-2000 of all Large Users , including HOLLYWOOD. In the event that any further plant expansion( s ) become necessary, then the costs , including the Debt Service Charges , relating to such additional expansion( s ) shall be borne by those Large Users who require said expansion( s ) in proportion to their respective needs . In the event that the HOLLYWOOD System is rerated without any capital expenditure to an MGD in excess of its then current capacity by an agency with regulatory authority to rerate the capacity of the plant , then each of the Large Users , including HOLLYWOOD, shall be given credit for such increased capacity on a pro rata basis in proportion to their maximum projected reserved flows set forth in Article II , Section 6 .B . hereof as adjusted or amended, as a percentage of total projected reserved flows for all Large Users into the HOLLYWOOD System at the time of rerating. 2 . Cost of Expansion of the Hollywood Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities . At such time as HOLLYWOOD, ® determines it is necessary, in order to respond to the needs of the Large Users utilizing the HOLLYWOOD System, to expand the -33- HOLLYWOOD System, HOLLYWOOD shall charge DANIA monthly one— twelfth ( 1/12 ) of DANIA' s annual Debt Service Charges then due attributable to said expansion which shall be computed in accordance with the formulae set forth in Article IV, 2 (b) hereof. Said Debt Service Charges will be imposed at the time that HOLLYWOOD incurs the debt. Nothing contained herein shall obligate HOLLYWOOD to undertake financing, either by issuing wastewater system revenue bonds , or any other financial mechanism, without the cooperation of DANIA, and the other Large Users and DANIA agrees to cooperate and execute any reasonably necessary document that may be required by the credit enhancement provider, bond insurer or rating agencies in order for HOLLYWOOD to obtain the financing for the expansion contemplated herein , including, documents , representations and consents , if any, required by bond rating agencies and municipal bond insurers or credit enhancement providers in connection with obtaining a credit rating or bond insurance on the bonded obligations ; provided however, that DANIA shall not be required to execute any document or note that creates a bonded indebtedness directly to DANIA. 3 . DANIA' s Obligation to Deliver Wastewater . Except as otherwise provided in Article II hereof, DANIA agrees that during the term of this Agreement, it shall deliver all existing, and future wastewater flows collected by it, from within its Service Area as set forth in Exhibit "B" , to the HOLLYWOOD ® System, and HOLLYWOOD agrees to accept such wastewater flows from DANIA' s Service Area on the terms and conditions set forth herein. —34— ® 4 . DANIA' s Cooperation . DANIA agrees to cooperate and execute any necessary documents to effect the agreements contained herein, and to cooperate with HOLLYWOOD under the terms of the Florida Intergovernmental Cooperation Act as may be required from time to time in furtherance of this Agreement, and DANIA further agrees that it shall take no action which would jeopardize the tax exempt status , pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code , as amended from time to time , of the interest on any debt now or hereafter issued to finance the HOLLYWOOD System. 5 . Changes Reauired by Outside Agencies . Notwithstanding HOLLYWOOD' s obligations with respect to treating and disposing DANIA' s flows as provided herein, HOLLYWOOD may revise the schedule of flows set forth herein in the event any federal , state or local agency having jurisdiction promulgates rules and regulations that would affect the amount or quality of flow HOLLYWOOD can treat or dispose . In that event, the parties agree to comply with any such rule or regulation and make such amendments to this Agreement as may be necessary, provided, however, that should there be a determination by either party that the rules or regulations so promulgated are unreasonable or not binding, the parties hereto reserve the right to challenge said regulations . HOLLYWOOD and DANIA acknowledge that -certain federal , state and local agencies have jurisdiction or control over pollution matters and, should such agency issue legal and enforceable orders or rules that may alter any of the terms and ® conditions of this Agreement, there shall be no liability on either party by reason of such action, provided that HOLLYWOOD —35— ® shall not be precluded from making an necessary adjustments to P g Y Y the sewage collection and treatment rates; provided further , that any increased costs incurred by HOLLYWOOD from any such action shall be assessed pro rata to DANIA based on DANIA' s actual flows ; unless said adjustments are occasioned solely by the acts of Large Users other than DANIA, in which case DANIA shall not be liable for said adjustments . 6 .. Adequate Rate Schedule . DANIA agrees that it shall establish and maintain rates and service charges or other means of obtaining funds within its Service Area which shall be sufficient to provide the monthly payments to HOLLYWOOD for the wastewater collection and treatment service contemplated herein, ® and such rates and charges shall be revised as may be required from time to time to provide sufficient funds to pay any sums due HOLLYWOOD under the terms of this Agreement . —36— ARTICLE VI . PROVISIONS RELATING TO TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT OF HOLLYWOOD' S RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS 1 . Termination Clause . Except as otherwise provided in Section 2 of this Article VI , this Contract may be terminated at any time by either participating party on one ( 1 ) years notice ( or such shorter time as the parties shall mutually agree ) to the other in writing by certified mail , only under the following conditions : a. Termination by DANIA. ( 1 ) Subject to subsection ( 3 ) below, DANIA shall pay to HOLLYWOOD in advance of termination all Debt Service Charges which would otherwise have been chargeable to DANIA under the terms of this Agreement (based upon a weighted average for future years using projected flows ) . If such Debt Service Charges can be reduced by calling bonds for redemption or otherwise providing for their payment prior to maturity under the terms of their issuance and if DANIA provides HOLLYWOOD with sufficient money to cover its Debt Service Charges and all expenses in connection with such call for redemption, including premiums , legal fees and costs , publication costs , and trustees and paying agents fees and mailing costs , then HOLLYWOOD shall call for redemption as many of such bonds as may be called under their terms with the money paid by DANIA to HOLLYWOOD. HOLLYWOOD reserves the right to determine which bonds to call . ( 2 ) Subject to subsection ( 3 ) below, DANIA shall , in addition to Debt Service Charges , pay to HOLLYWOOD a sum equal to the then present value of all other payments which, in the absence of such termination, would be made by DANIA to -37- HOLLYWOOD hereunder during the period when HOLLYWOOD would receive and treat wastewater from DANIA, through and including five ( 5 ) years from the date of termination using DANIA' s annual payment in the year of termination . The "then present value" as used above means the value on the termination date of the various sums payable thereafter , discounted at the then prevailing Prime interest rate plus all payments due and past due with interest at the then prevailing Prime interest rate from the date due to the termination date . In making such determination, DANIA shall be given full credit for all actual reductions , if any, in HOLLYWOOD' s expenses of operation and maintenance , and administration which reductions are attributable to the termination of this Agreement. Hollywood shall also have an affirmative obligation to take such actions as are available in order to mitigate its expenses . ( 3 ) There shall be deducted from the sums of the amounts payable by DANIA under subparagraphs ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) above any amount of liability (not in excess of said sum) assumed in writing by any other municipality, political subdivision or other entity, simultaneous with or prior to such termination if ( a ) capability of municipality, the political subdivision or other entity assuming such liability to satisfy the same shall be found satisfactory by HOLLYWOOD, ( b) such municipality, political subdivision or other entity shall execute an agreement with HOLLYWOOD substantially the same as this Agreement, ( c ) whenever any revenue bonds of the CITY OF HOLLYWOOD payable in whole or in part from sewer revenues are then outstanding which are secured —38— • b ordinance resolution empowering y or indenture empo e ing a trustee or other agent on behalf of the holders of such bonds to consent to said assumption of liability, if such trustee or other agent' s consent shall have been obtained in writing, and (d) DANIA shall execute and deliver to HOLLYWOOD, in a form acceptable to HOLLYWOOD, an agreement releasing and holding HOLLYWOOD harmless and indemnifying HOLLYWOOD from any responsibility, liability or claim for or relating to collecting and/or treating DANIA' s wastewater from and after the date of termination of this Agreement. b. Termination by HOLLYWOOD. ( 1 ) There shall be a readily available • alternative means of treating and disposing of the wastewater of DANIA which HOLLYWOOD would otherwise be required to treat and dispose of under this Agreement and such alternative means must meet all state, federal and local requirements pertaining to the public health, the pollution of public water and the protection of the environment generally. ( 2 ) Any revenue bonds of the CITY OF HOLLYWOOD payable in whole or in part from wastewater revenues are secured by ordinance , resolution or indenture which requires a trustee or other agent for the holders of such bonds to consent _to such termination on their behalf , such trustee or agent shall so consent in writing. ( 3 ) HOLLYWOOD shall pay to DANIA an amount equal • to the sum of ( a ) the actual expenses incurred by DANIA in changing from the use of the HOLLYWOOD System to the use of the -39- alternative facilities plus ( b) additional charges , if any, which DANIA pays above the charges it would otherwise have to pay during the five ( 5 ) year period after the termination date when HOLLYWOOD would receive wastewater from DANIA, less ( c ) any Debt Service Charges and all other amounts due or past due to HOLLYWOOD from DANIA hereunder as of the date of such termination, with interest at the then prevailing Prime interest rate from due date to the termination date . The net payment, if any to be made by HOLLYWOOD, for expenses under this subsection shall be determined by a Financial Consultant in consultation with an independent licensed engineer acceptable to both parties and the payments for increased continuing expenses shall be made , ® at HOLLYWOOD' s option either ( i ) in one sum based on the then present value of the amount of such payments , discounted at the then prevailing Prime interest rate or ( ii ) an amount payable annually for five ( 5 ) years on October 1 , of each year from the excess revenues of the HOLLYWOOD System. The fee for the Financial Consultant and independent engineer referenced herein, shall be paid one-half by each party and who shall be permitted at all reasonable times to inspect all pertinent books and records of each party. In the event DANIA and HOLLYWOOD fail to agree on any such amount due by HOLLYWOOD, the amount -of such payment shall be determined by binding arbitration. 2 . Sale Lease or Transfer of the HOLLYWOOD System. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1B above , HOLLYWOOD has ® the right in its sole discretion, to sell , lease or transfer all or a portion of the HOLLYWOOD System to Broward County, another -40- governmental entity or an inter-governmental or regional authority. In the event HOLLYWOOD sells , leases or transfers the HOLLYWOOD System to Broward County, another governmental entity or an inter-governmental or regional authority, HOLLYWOOD shall , upon such sale , lease or transfer assign all or some of its rights and obligations hereunder to said purchaser , lessee or transferee . Upon the assumption of such assignment by said purchaser, lessee , or transferee , HOLLYWOOD shall cease to be liable for further performance of any obligations or responsibilities so assigned. HOLLYWOOD shall give DANIA at least 60 days advance written notice of its intention to sell , lease or transfer the HOLLYWOOD System under this Section. • In the event that Hollywood sells , leases or transfers the HOLLYWOOD System to any such entity and such entity agrees to pay HOLLYWOOD an amount of money for the HOLLYWOOD System which is in excess of the then combined total outstanding .long-term and short-term debt (principal , interest and premium, if any, ) of the HOLLYWOOD System, then this "excess amount" , when actually paid, shall be divided among all of the Large Users , including Hollywood, based upon their respective percentages of actual flows to the total System flows for the Fiscal Year in which the HOLLYWOOD System is transferred; provided further that HOLLYWOOD shall not be obligated to pay DANIA or any other Large User any amount that may otherwise be owed by HOLLYWOOD under Section 3 (b) hereof to the extent that such increased payments are due to the ® "excess amount" paid by the new owner or transferee of the HOLLYWOOD System. -41- ARTICLE VII . PROVISIONS RELATING TO DEFAULT 1 . Default . a . The parties agree that in the event either party commits an act of default under any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, the party so defaulting shall be liable to the other party for any expenses , loss or damage occasioned by reason of such default. b. The parties acknowledge that in order to construct the planned expansion of the HOLLYWOOD System, it is necessary for revenue bonds to be issued from time to time to provide the funding source for said expansion program and, by reason of such obligations incurred by HOLLYWOOD with regard to ® said bond financing, it is imperative that HOLLYWOOD be paid in a timely fashion the sums due from DANIA pursuant to this Agreement. In light of the obligations to the bondholders, and the acknowledgments that HOLLYWOOD has relied . on DANIA' s representation that payment of all sums due HOLLYWOOD under the terms of this Agreement shall be prompt in their remittal , the parties hereby agree to resolve disputes over monthly billings in accordance with Section 2 hereof. In the event that DANIA shall have committed an act of monetary default by failing to pay a monthly service bill within forty-five ( 45 ) days of receipt of said bill , then DANIA shall pay an interest penalty on the unpaid balance at the rate of 12% per annum and HOLLYWOOD shall have , in addition to any other rights and remedies provided for herein, • the right and power, by suit, action, mandamus or . other such proceedings at law or in equity, to protect, enforce and compel -42- performance and payment by DANIA or any of the officers , agents or employees of DANIA to perform and carry out its and their duties and obligations under this Agreement or applicable law. C . DANIA covenants and warrants that it shall maintain a rate structure sufficient to pay all obligations hereunder . Failure of the governing body of DANIA to so maintain an adequate rate structure shall be considered a monetary default of this Agreement . 2 . Dispute Over Monthly Billings .. As provided in Art. IV, Secs . 4&5 herein, HOLLYWOOD shall submit to DANIA a monthly billing invoice for the amounts then due , and if DANIA does not agree upon the amount invoiced, then DANIA shall notify HOLLYWOOD in writing of the disputed amount; provided, however , within forty-five ( 45 ) days of receipt of the original billing invoice DANIA shall automatically deliver to HOLLYWOOD the original amount billed in full and DANIA and HOLLYWOOD shall continue to work out an agreement as to the amount in dispute . The adjustment of the 'billing invoice amount, or actual cost, expense or damage shall be subject to subsequent agreement or court adjudication. HOLLYWOOD shall hold the amount of such charge that is in dispute in escrow until an agreement is reached; provided, however , that to the extent that the amount in dispute relates to Debt Service Charges, then Hollywood shall have the right to use such disputed funds to make debt service payments when due . 3 . Non-Monetary Default . Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, with respect to non-monetary defaults -43- only, committed by DANIA, the default, if not otherwise resolved after due and diligent effort by both parties , shall be submitted to binding arbitration a:� set forth in paragraph 4 below. 4 . Arbitration . Any non-monetary dispute between HOLLYWOOD and DANIA arising from this Agreement which cannot otherwise be resolved after due and diligent effort by both parties , shall be the subject of binding arbitration. said arbitration shall be conducted by a board of three arbitrators , each of whom shall be qualified as a licensed engineer or a certified public accountant, or otherwise qualified person, and who shall not be employed by either party on a regular salaried basis . Each party to this Agreement shall choose one arbitrator , and the two so chosen shall choose a third who shall act as chairperson. The fees , charges and expenses of such arbitrators shall be borne equally by the parties hereto. DANIA agrees that during any such period of arbitration, it will . continue to promptly make all payments due HOLLYWOOD, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and Hollywood shall continue to provide wastewater treatment services to DANIA in accordance with the terms hereof. -44- 5 . Litigation and Arbitration Costs ._ a . DANIA agrees that, to the extent legally permitted , it shall indemnify and hold HOLLYWOOD harmless from and against any and all costs or expenses incurred by HOLLYWOOD in the event of any litigation in which DANIA or HOLLYWOOD is or may become a party as either Plaintiff or Defendant, which results from and is determined to be caused in whole or in part from the effects of the improper introduction of materials by DANIA or any users of DANIA' s System into the HOLLYWOOD System, or any portion thereof which may cause damage within or without the HOLLYWOOD System. b. In the event of litigation between the ® parties to enforce the terms of this Agreement, then in that event the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs and fees incurred, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys ' fees . 6 . Fines . In the event any fines , penalties or damages are incurred or imposed by or on HOLLYWOOD by reason of DANIA' s violation or default of its obligations under this Agreement, then, in that event, DANIA shall be solely responsible for the payment of same . 7 . Force Majeure . The parties agree that _ in the event of a temporary cessation of wastewater transmission which results from an act of God, hurricane , lightning, fire , strike , casualty, necessary maintenance work, breakdown of machinery, ® insurrection or riot, that said temporary cessation shall not constitute a default in this Agreement on the part of either of -45- e the parties , and neither. party shall be liable to the other for any damage resulting from such cessation, and unless written notice to the contrary is received from any federal , state or local agency, or any court having jurisdiction over the subject matter , HOLLYWOOD shall. continue to accept and dispose the wastewater transmitted to it by DANIA if possible , regardless of the degree of treatment available and DANIA, during any such period of interruption or reduced treatment shall continue to pay its share of Debt Service Charges due and the actual costs incurred by HOLLYWOOD. In the event the amount of the Debt Service Charges and actual costs incurred during any period of temporary cessation cannot be determined by reason of no flow, or insufficient flow of wastewater , then the Debt Service Charges and actual costs incurred paid by DANIA shall be based on the twelve ( 12 ) month period prior to said interruption of service or reduced treatment. • -46- ® ARTICLE VIII . ADMINISTRATION 1 . Execution and Agreement . The parties hereto agree that upon execution of this Agreement by the appropriate officials of HOLLYWOOD and DANIA, that said Agreement shall be in full force and effect as of the date of said execution, provided that the effective date for billing purposes and calculations of amounts owed shall be as of October 1 , 1988 . Upon execution, this Agreement shall be filed with the official records of the Broward County Clerk' s Office . 2 . Large Users Advisory Committee (LUAC) . The parties agree that HOLLYWOOD shall , subject to the terms contained herein, have sole and exclusive authority as to the ® administration, operation and maintenance of the HOLLYWOOD System, including establishment of the annual budget, establishment and amendment of service fees, rates and other charges necessary for the efficient operation and maintenance of the HOLLYWOOD System;. provided however , that commencing with the charges to be paid by DANIA during the 1991-92 Fiscal Year and each Fiscal Year thereafter, Hollywood will consult with DANIA and each of the other members of the Large User ' s Advisory Committee on or before May 15 of each Fiscal Year with respect to establishing the proposed respective fees , rates , RR&I contributions and other charges to be paid by the Large Users in the next ensuing Fiscal Year . In addition, HOLLYWOOD shall have the obligation to meet with the Large Users Advisory Committee at least quarterly to review rate and budgeting matters and the Committee shall have the right to make recommendations to -47- HOLLYWOOD concerning these matters . HOLLYWOOD also agrees to meet with the Large User ' s Advisory Committee and discuss any plans relating to relocation of System facilities prior to any definitive action. 3 . Invalidity of Provision . In the event it is determined that any section, clause , sentence , or provision of this Agreement shall be invalid, then same shall not affect the validity of any other part of this Agreement which can be given effect without such invalid part or parts . The parties agree that this Agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto and may be enforced by appropriate action of court, or courts of competent jurisdiction. 4 . Legal Reauirements . The parties agree that each has complied with all necessary legal requirements for execution of this Agreement, including but not limited to due consideration of the terms and conditions hereof by the appropriate governing body of each municipality and its city attorney, and public hearing on this matter; and each party hereto agrees to exchange with the other, certified copies of any official records of its governing body authorizing the execution of this Agreement on its behalf. 5 . Notice - Any notice required to be given hereunder in writing shall be considered to be properly given if the same has been sent in writing by certified or registered mail to the following: —48- HOLLYWOOD: City of Hollywood 2600 Hollywood Boulevard Hollywood, FL 33021 Attention: City Utilities Director Copy to: City Attorney DANIA: 6 . Prior Agreements . This document , upon its execution by both parties shall supersede any and all prior negotiations , correspondence , conversations , Large User agreements , including the Prior Agreement and any amendments thereto, or understandings applicable to the matters contained ® herein and the parties agree that there are no commitments , agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, it is agreed by the parties that there shall be no deviation from the terms hereof which shall be predicated upon any prior representation or agreements whether oral or written, unless said are specifically provided for herein. 7 . Modification Amendment or Alteration . Except as otherwise expressly provided herein as to certain matters which only require written notice , no modification or amendment to the terms or conditions of this Agreement shall be effective unless contained in a supplemental document executed with the same formality of this Agreement and attached hereto. 8 . Findings . All of the recitations contained in the preamble of this Agreement are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference . -49- . t r9 . Co nter r-t Execution This Agreement may be executed in counterpart originals , each of which shall be deemed an original . DANIA shall provide HOLLYWOOD with a certified copy of DANIA' s resolution or evidence of other such action authorizing DANIA to execute this Agreement . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement on the respective dates under each signature . Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: HOLLYWOOD: CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Florida d?a�� A0 By: Mayor Dated: 2-e G707 �� Attest: M 4rhr-f S . Lam s , Ci y Clerk P epared and approved as to orm and legality by: kl�n oslow City A orney -50- • ( See prior page for additional signatures) (Additional signatures to the Large User Wastewater Agreement between HOLLYWOOD and DANIA) Appro Paul E. Wimberly Fina ire for Robert A. Cr ghton Utilities Dir for DANIA: a municipal corporation of the State of Florida MAYOR ` Dated: • I , Attest: / G% City Clerk-Wanda Mulilkin Approved as to Form and Legality: Robert Flatley-Cit anager Frank Adler , City Attorney By: • z � a € ow ryl Sco CIA m � 0 • 4 CAKAL G�17 I � 1 � 9 �r MAMMO =4 S .� n m r• � �. .Qa U. • 244'Fd Goal ; a ffiff SI A 6 o � P a can A , c� $XHIBIT "CC' WUY= SOUTHERN REGION DTP LARGE USER RUER AMD INTE11CMECT LOCATIMS 1 . HALLANDALE METER AT LIFT STATION E-8. 800 THREE ISLAND BLVD. INTER-CONNECTION AT 13TH AVENUE MASHINGTON STREET MANHOLE OB334N 2. HALLANDALE DETER AT LIFT STATION E-6. 1350 FUNSTON STREET INTER-CONNECTION AT 14TH. & JACKSON STREET. VANBUREN ALLEY MANHOLE B27 3. HALLANDALE METER AT U.S. 1 & PEMBROKE ROAD INTER-CONNECTION AT 19TH AVENUE & PLUNKETT STREET MANHOLE 401A 4. HALLANDALE • METER AT FLETCHER STREET & 22ND AVENUE INTER-CONNECTION AT 23RD TAFT STREET 5. PEMBROKE PARK COCA COLA PLANT. PEBMBROKE ROAD INTER-CONNECTION AT 620 S. RAINBOW! MANHOLE 353 6. MIRAMAR SEWER PLANT INTER-CONNECTION AT JOHNSON STREET & 62ND AVENUE 7. PEMBROKE PINES METER AT N.N. 77 KAY. 13TH STREET ' INTER-CONNECTIN AT TAFT STREET AND 56TH S. DANIA METER AT SHERIDAN & S.E. 5TH AVENUE INTER-CONNECTIN AT 14TH & HARDING STREET MANHOLE 1002 9; . COOPER CITY. DAVIE (TREATED) METER AT COOPER CITY AHD DAVIE SEWER PLANTS INTER-CONNECTION AT HOLLYWOOD SEWER PLANT APPENDIX E Emergency Interconnect Agreement—City of Ft. Lauderdale RECEIVED UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ' A G R E I T '74 JAY-JIF AM 1U:5'6 T71IS AGREE:KENT, made and entered into this, day of �.-• .i.",rr , 1973, by and between: �f3e��y �4- CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a municipal cor- poration of Florida, herein called the "seller". and p CITY OF DANIA, c'lorida, a municipal cor- poration of Florida, herein called the "Consumer". L•1TNESSETH: THAT ;'rdE_EAS the Seller in its proprietary c p ity, owns and operates a ',eater producing and distribution facility and is in a position to service the Consumer; and the Consumer in its proprietary capacity, owns and operates a water rroducing and distribution systera, and t:e Consumer desires to purchase from the Seller water to be uscd in the Consume-'s distribution system in servicing the Consumner's customers, upon terms mutually agreeable; and 1r1:,FiEAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to allo',% she COnsuL-,ar UO obtain water in varying amounts and at vwr�'i:� vir fro;: tl:e Seller t12 meet emergency needs and/or r?�ess� e and _n such quantity as :nay oC C c ex as providec -.. �.2c ion: hereof; it being the intent of the Seller and the Co:isu-:::_r ghat ® tl:c Consumer will continue- to f,]mash '_ts customers wet%_ f r0::: i o:vn p.Lant and system. insofar as pc-sib�e and will only c: �i.: from tine Seiler such additional quant_ti.:s of water as are necessary ;,o meet the Consumer's needs to Supply its customers; :'10:'7 THER? FORii, Or a1id in considcr�.-_On )f a:' 'he sari, of One Doi-e': (`y-.00) cash in fie:::: !)aid by �:-e- O-'-e-^ e'r _-O the Seller, receipt where Of is heresy acknc:.le;- ed, -. i OL:^.e . cod and valuable consideratiO :o IT !S HE-E my CvVEW .NTZ ,X J A:iRZED by and between the parties hereto as follows: (1) 3e�,inning October lo, 1973, and continuic. -317 a period of thirty (30) years zhe"reaftel , the Sel�c."_^ a :2c sell to the Corsurier and she Consur:.er agrees to buy fro:r, the Se--r;r water for resale to the cit_zens and customers of she Cor.sur:cr, under the terms and conditions set forth herein. (2� During the ter:-- of the 1gr2em2r,t, the Sa:_el ;ions :ct b--'-u itself during a period of water shortaEe 17rc.:: an condition or an inadequacy Of mains or other G :..r. c than deliver water to said metering as are available for allocation by the rs outside of the city limits of ire Seiler, of water consumers and demands for fire crotectio.: r _ir,.its of the Seller have been satisfied. I:, 3,� u become necessary for the Seller to adopt regul� i L.�iOn of water in case of emergency, the COriyl:u� t wi�1 adopt and enforce similar regulations for during such time of emergency or, in the alter.". Fr will cease to obtain water from the Seller durinG Lwc Vic:;cy, the decision to remain with the Consumer. /,�� The areas to be serviced by the Consumer r.re _ wr a i:,B,roward County, Florida and described as followa: The present Corporate Limits of the Cit., of : ania. ® if such areas are increased or enlarged, the wr<i.tei. consent t1ne Seller to the servicing of such increased areas raust first ae obtained, as evidenced by an amendment to this Agreement. (4) There shall be one or more master meters instc:*-.cd at points mutually agreeable, through which all water to be _,ur- r,_shed hereunder by the Seller to the Consumer shall JC Sup: .and metered. The Seiler shall, at the expense of the Consu:.e=, aonrove, procure and install all master meters. After instal_r- tion the Seller will, at its own expense, maintain the r,eters, aria title to sa,e shall remain in the-Seller. (5) The Consumer shall be bound by the provisions of Cnaptc'r 1;5 of the "Code of Ordinances of the City of Fort Lauuc.r- <:1e", noa OX Sting or as amended from time to time, insofar a are applicable and not varied by this Agreement, as well as all ordinances of tho City of Fort Lauderdale now existing or i:eieafter adopted pertaining to water service and water -regula- tions, not in conflict herewith. (6) The water rates to be charged by the Seller to the Consumer herein shall be the rates set forth in Section 45-17, :oa:agraph. � d) of the Seller's Code of Ordinances, now currently :ocin� "0.3o for each thousand gallons used, or the late hereafter charged under said Section to municipalities, political subdivisions, and privately owned utilities' in the County which connect to the Seller's water mains through a master meter or master mete-r's arrangement of the Seller. (7) The Seller shall -render monthly state-ments for water is'r.ed through all -meters. Water furnished through additional :•aters will be included in the monthly statement and not billed separately. The rate for water furnished will be based on the total sum of the meter readings. The Consumer shall pay pror:ptiy all statements furnished. Should the Consumer fail or refuse to ay the amount of such statement within the forty-five (45) days after same has been submitted, .the Seller shall have the right: (a) To apply to the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida, for appointment of a receiver or r_anda„mus to compel levy or any other relief deemed advisable by the Seller. (b) To enforce the provisions of Ordinance of the Seder providing for discontinuance of service until past due indebtedness is paid. (8) The Consumer shall be responsible for comply_i:� with a11 L'-ederal, State, and local regulations regarding ware_ quality Consumer's side of the meters including, but not 1_:::ited to, rr�per programs covering cross connection control, line flush n Ir and bacteriological sampling and testing. (9` The Consumer agrees to hold the Seller har mess from any sMs, liability or legal action which may be bro;a�::t by ir: Which the Consumer may be made a defendant or bacorce _--i c on account of the execution of this Agreement, except case. a isin, out of a violation of any part of this Agree.me t b - -.e Seller. 101 ;later sold to the Consumer hereunder will be supp'_' c el er's water producing facilities and will beo� subs;,a.:- v tre same quality as the water furnished by the Se_,. tc _ts cor.sw.ers within the city limits of the Seller. 2 _ (11) This A.-reement may be amended, changed, voi(:c; 0-_ annulled at any ti:;ie by joint consent of the parties, in wr�U-1". '. (12) This Agreement shall not become effective until a ,,esolution has been adopted by each of the parties hereto ap roving this Agreement and authorizing its execution. 1N G)ITN-ESS IrHE3EOF, the Seller has caused this Agree-:.c.�t O t�i S1�:1C d by lus Mtlyor-Co;lra _ issioner and City v:ana %er and ate:;Zcd by i s City Clc-r-c an ; its corporate seal to be affixed, approved by its City Attorney, and the Consumer has causeu s A-reerr,ent to be signed by its mayor and attested by its City cior;; --nd its corporate sea! to be affixed, and approved by its ;,ity Attorney, IN DUPLICATE, the day and year above written. ;1ITNESSES: CITY OF FORT LA,.DERDAL, 62 iiayq�l Ori By City i 4anager \ / 1 'CORPORATE SEAL) > Ci 'I1eric ® A prgvecl�,as to f orr..,,: Ci-tyAt orney i ?ITNESSES: CITY OF DANIA By Mayor ATTEST: % ATTEST: i ty Ter.c Approved rao to forIII: (i:�/i:i'OIC/1'1'i: ;.;LAL) , r ' 'b7-'!/' `� 1''`.y,J �---• 1 y tU'fn0y - 3 - 2ESOLUj'ICN NO. 73-3&_; ING E2Y OFFICIALS TO EXECIU= AN THE CITY OF DANIA TO PROVIDE FOR --:E S,,',LE CF -i-!ATER FROM THE C= OF FORT LAUDERDALE TO THE CITY OF DANIA. ,,IHEREAS, the City of Dania has requested the City y Of Lauderdale to enter into an agreement to provide for the ale of wa-,;er from the City of'Fort Lauderdale to the City of Dan-;*.a to meet emergency needs and/or pressure needs in the servicing of its custoi,,-,ers within its corporate lirri-ILts; NOW, Thu REF ORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY 0:,, 1_71�� CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA: ® C 1. the That proper City officials of the City of For, U I - Lauderdale, be and they are hereby authorize"� ana , prov_�_a -i- dirccted to execute an agreement with the City of Dar-; for the sale of v,,a,;c-r from the water-producing and d1stributlof. facility of the City of Fort Lauderdale to be used in the wazer distribution syster,-, of the City of Dania to meet eme—ency naed� and/or pressure needs in the servicing of its customers . th_,-. corporate limits, for a period of thirty years, said agreeme-n-;Z, be approved by the City Attorney. ,ADOPTED t'.-,is 1'.-Ihe loth day of October, 1973. i CERTTF'CT,;'LOt: I, WANDA XULLILIN, do hereby certify as follows: (1) That I am City Clerk-Auditor of the City of Dania, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation, and that I have custody of all ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission of the City of Dania. (2) That the foregoing is a true and exact copy of a resolution formally and finally adopted by the City Commission of City of Dania at its meeting on November 5, 1973. (3) That the resolution has not been amended or repealed since the date of its adoption and is still in full force and effect. DATED this day of November, 1973. f � I WANDA MUL IKINN,`City Clerk-AUTItor (seal) RESOLUTION NO. 41 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF FORT LAUDERDP.LE, AS SELLER, AND CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, AS CONSUiiF.R, REGARDING THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF POTABLE WATER BY C_TY OF DANIA FROM CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE; AND PROVIDING THAT ALL RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF P.ESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH ARE HEREBY REPEALED TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING THAT THIS RESOLUTION SH ;?,:, BE IN FORCE AND TARE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY UPON ITS PASSAGE AND ADOPTION. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA: Section 1 That the r,ayor and City Clerk of City of Dania, Florida, bo and they are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a agreement with City of Fort Lauderdale concerning the bulk sale by City of Fort Lauderdale to City of Dania of potable water. Section 2. That a photocopy of the form of agreement is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. Section 3. That all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 4. That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED this Sth day of November, 1973. i Mayor-COmIIlissioner r:..:.e L t. ® City,"Clerk-Audi for APPENDIX F Public Participation Information APPENDIX G ® Rate Ordinances ® RESOLUTION NO. 2002-162 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA, SETTING MONTHLY CHARGES FOR SEWER SERVICES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USERS; PROVIDING THAT ALL RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH BE REPEALED TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; FURTHER, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Manager and the Director of Finance have recommended to the City Commission an increase of 5% in the sewer rates to offset the increases in the cost of providing sewer services; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined the level of rates necessary to .meet the expenditure requirements of the utility system and equitably allocate the cost of services to all customers necessitates an adjustment of the monthly charges for sewer services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA: Section 1. That for residential users a base charge of seven dollars and eighty-six cents ($7.86) monthly shall be applied to all single-family residences, each living unit in cooperative and condominium usages, multi-family structures, and each unit in mobile home parks for sewer service supplied to each of such units for said monthly period. In addition, a charge of two dollars and fifty-six cents ($2.56) will be charged for each thousand (1,000) gallons of water used to a maximum of twelve thousand (12,000) gallons by each of such units for said monthly period. Section 2. That for commercial, business and industrial users a monthly base charge per meter according to the size thereof for sewer service to a commercial, industrial, business, institutional or similar unit, building or complex, and each separate ® municipal or other governmental agency, building or special type unit shall be levied according to the following schedule: 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-162 5/8" meter..........................$ 7.86 1" meter........................... 19.66 1-1/2" meter.......................... 39.31 2" meter.......................... 62.90 3" meter.......................... 125.80 4" meter.......................... 196.56 6" meter.......................... 393.12 In addition, there will be a charge of two dollars and fifty-six cents ($2.56) for each thousand (1,000) gallons of water used by each of such units for said monthly period. Section 5. That all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 6. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect the 1st day of October, 2002. PASSED AND ADOPTED THI AY F SEPTEMBER, 2 ® RO ERT H. CHUNN, JR. MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ATTEST: ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONER BERTINO-YES COMMISSIONER MCELYEA- NO CHARLENE JO ON COMMISSIONER MIKES-YES CITY CLERK VICE-MAYOR FLURY-YES MAYOR CHUNN-YES APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS BY: - � THOMAS J. A NSEAO CITY ATTORNEY 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-162 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA, SETTING MONTHLY CHARGES FOR WATER SERVICES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USERS; PROVIDING THAT ALL RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH BE REPEALED TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Manager and the Director of Finance have recommended to the City Commission an increase of 5% in the water rates to offset the increases in the cost of providing water services; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined the level of rates necessary to meet the expenditure requirements of the utility system and equitably allocate the cost of services to all customers necessitates an adjustment of the monthly charges for water services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA: Section 1. As provided for in Section 27-24 (a) of Chapter 27 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dania Beach entitled "Rates and Charges.for Consumption of Water', the following rates for the consumption of water, and the same are hereby approved and adopted for residential users. A base charge of five dollars and thirteen cents ($5.13) monthly shall be applied to all single-family residences, each living unit in cooperative and condominium usages, multi-family structures, and each unit in mobile home parks for water supplied to each of such units for said monthly period. In addition, a charge for each thousand (1,000) gallons of water used by each of such units for said monthly period will be made according to the following schedule: $1.33 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 5,000 gallons. $2.02 for each 1,000 gallons used from 5,001 to 14,000 gallons. $2.51 for each 1,000 gallons used over 14,000 gallons. Section 2. As provided for in Section 27-24 (a) of Chapter 27 of the Code of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-161 ® Ordinances of the City of Dania Beach entitled "Rates and Charges for Consumption of Water", the following rates for the consumption of water be and the same are hereby approved and adopted for commercial, business, sprinkler meters and industrial users. A monthly base charge per meter according to the size thereof for service to a commercial, industrial, business, sprinkler meter, institutional or similar unit, building or complex, and each separate municipal or other governmental agency, building or special type unit shall be levied according to the following schedule: 5/8" meter..........................$ 5.13 1" meter........................... 12.83 1-1/2" meter.......................... 25.66 2" meter.......................... 41.06 3" meter.......................... 82.12 4" meter........................... 128.31 6" meter.......................... 256.62 ® In addition, a charge for each thousand (1,000) gallons of water used for said monthly period will be made according to the following schedule: 5/8" meter $1.33 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 5,000 gallons. $2.02 for each 1,000 gallons used from 5,001 to 14,000 gallons. $2.51 for each 1,000 gallons used over 14,000 gallons. 1" meter $1.33 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 12,000 gallons. $2.02 for each 1,000 gallons used from 12,000 to 35,000 gallons. $2.51 for each 1,000 gallons used over 35,000 gallons. 1-1/2" meter $1.33 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 25,000 gallons. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-161 $2.02 for each 1,000 gallons used from 25,001 to 70,000 ® gallons. $2.51 for each 1,000 gallons used over 70,000 gallons. 2" meter $1.33 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 40,000 gallons. $2.02 for each 1,000 gallons used from 40,001 to 112,000 gallons. $2.51 for each 1,000 gallons used over 112,000 gallons. 3" meter $1.33 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 80,000 gallons. $2.02 for each 1,000 gallons used from 80,001 to 224,000 gallons. $2.51 for each 1,000 gallons used over 224,000 gallons. 4" meter $1.33 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 125,000 gallons. $2.02 for each 1,000 gallons used from 125,001 to 350,000 ® gallons. $2.51 for each 1,000 gallons used over 350,000 gallons. 6" meter $1.33 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 250,000 gallons. $2.02 for each 1,000 gallons used from 250,001 to 700,000 gallons. $2.51 for each 1,000 gallons used over 700,000 gallons. Section 3. The charges listed in Sections 1 and 2 of this resolution shall remain in force as long as the service is connected to the water main, whether turned on or off. However, when the owner of property requests that a meter be removed from the premises, billing will be discontinued until such time as the owner requests that the meter be reinstalled and service continued. A charge of one hundred dollars ($100.00) will be assessed for the reinstallation. Section 4. Bills are due when rendered and are delinquent 20 days after the initial rendition of the bill. If bills are not paid within the 20 day period, with 5:00 p.m. being the cut off time on the last day, a 10% penalty will be assessed. If bills are not paid within 30 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-161 1' days after the initial rendition of the bill, watd, will be turned off until such time the bill is paid. A reconnection fee will be charged. Any yunpaid charges will be added to the next month's bill. Section 5. That all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 6. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect on October 1, 2002. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THIS 23`d DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2002. ROBERT H. CHUNN, JR. MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ATTEST: ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONER BERTINO-YES COMMISSIONER MCELYEA- NO CHARLENE J NSON COMMISSIONER MIKES-YES CITY CLERK VICE-MAYOR FLURY-YES MAYOR CHUNN-YES APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS BY: 'A THO ASJ. ANSBR CITY ATTORNEY 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-161 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA, SETTING MONTHLY CHARGES FOR WATER SERVICES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USERS; PROVIDING THAT ALL RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH BE REPEALED TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Dania Beach retained Hartman and Associates, Inc., a firm of engineers, hydrogeologists, and management consultants, to evaluate the City of Dania Beach's water and wastewater rates, miscellaneous service charges and impact fees; and WHEREAS, Hartman and Associates, Inc. completed its water and wastewater rate and impact fee study for the five fiscal year period from 1998 through 2002 and submitted the report to the Dania Beach City Commission in January, 1998; and WHEREAS, the referenced report recommended a series of annual increases in order to develop sufficient resources to finance a series of capital improvements to the infrastructure of the water system in the City of Dania Beach; and WHEREAS, the CPI for All Urban Consumers, South Region has increased by approximately 9% during the period between the last rate adjustment and the current fiscal year, while no adjustments have been made to water rates; and WHEREAS, the Interim City Manager and the Director of Finance have recommended to the City Commission an increase of 4% in the water rates to address both the concerns expressed in the Hartman & Associates, Inc. report, and to offset the increases in the cost of providing water services; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined the level of rates necessary to meet 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-173 Y ' . the expenditure requirements of the utility system and equitably allocate the cost of services to all customers necessitates an adjustment of the monthly charges for water services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA: Section 1. As provided for in Section 27-24 (a) of Chapter 27 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dania Beach entitled "Rates and Charges for Consumption of Water", the following rates for the consumption of water be, and the same are hereby approved and adopted for residential users. A base charge of four dollars and eighty-nine cents ($4.89) monthly shall be applied to all single-family residences, each living unit in cooperative and condominium usages, multi-family structures, and each unit in mobile home parks for water supplied to each of such units for said monthly period. In addition, a charge for each thousand (1,000) gallons of water used by each of such units for said monthly period will be made according to the following schedule: $1 .27 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 5,000 gallons. $1 .92 for each 1,000 gallons used from 5,001 to 14,000 gallons. $2.39 for each 1,000 gallons used over 14,000 gallons. Section 2. As provided for in Section 27-24 (a) of Chapter 27 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dania Beach entitled "Rates and Charges for Consumption of Water", the following rates for the consumption of water be and the same are hereby approved and adopted for commercial, business, sprinkler meters and industrial users. A monthly base charge per meter according to the size thereof for service to a commercial, industrial, business, sprinkler meter, institutional or similar unit, building or complex, and each separate municipal 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-173 or other governmental agency, building or special type unit shall be levied according to the following schedule: 5/8" meter..........................$ 4.89 1 it meter........................... 12.22 1-1/2" meter.......................... 24.44 2" meter.......................... 39.10 3" meter.......................... 78.21 4" meter.......................... 122.20 6" meter.......................... 244.40 In addition, a charge for each thousand (1,000) gallons of water used for said monthly period will be made according to the following schedule: 5/8" meter $1 .27 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 5,000 gallons. ® $1 .92 for each 1,000 gallons used from 5,001 to 14,000 gallons. $2.39 for each 1,000 gallons used over 14,000 gallons. III meter $1 .27 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 12,000 gallons. $1 .92 for each 1,000 gallons used from 12,000 to 35,000 gallons. $2.39 for each 1,000 gallons used over 35,000 gallons. 1-1/2" meter $1 .27 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 25,000 gallons. $1 .92 for each 1,000 gallons used from 25,001 to 70,000 gallons. $2.39 for each 1,000 gallons used over 70,000 gallons. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-173 2" meter $1 .27 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 40,000 gallons. $1 .92 for each 1,000 gallons used from 40,001 to 112,000 gallons. $2.39 for each 1,000 gallons used over 112,000 gallons. 3" meter $1 .27 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 80,000 gallons. $1 .92 for each 1,000 gallons used from 80,001 to 224,000 gallons. $2.39 for each 1,000 gallons used over 224,000 gallons. 4" meter $1 .27 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 125,000 gallons. $1 .92 for each 1,000 gallons used from 125,001 to 350,000 gallons. $2.39 for each 1,000 gallons used over 350,000 gallons. 6" meter $1 .27 for each 1,000 gallons used from 0 to 250,000 gallons. $1 .92 for each 1,000 gallons used from 250,001 to 700,000 gallons. $2.39 for each 1,000 gallons used over 700,000 gallons. Section 3. That all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 4. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect on October 1, 2001 . PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THIS 24T" DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2001 . PATRICIA A. FLURY MAYOR-COMMISSIONER 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-173 ATTEST: ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONER BERTINO-YES COMMISSIONER MCELYEA-NO R ENE*JNSON COMMISSIONER MIKES-NO ACTING CITRK VICE-MAYOY CHUNN-YES MAYOR FLURY-YES APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS BY: 48S THOMA J. ANO CITY ATTORNEY 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-173 a RESOLUTION NO. 2001-174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA, SETTING MONTHLY CHARGES FOR SEWER SERVICES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USERS; PROVIDING FOR METER REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION CHARGE; PROVIDING FOR LATE FEES AND DISCONTINUING WATER SERVICE FOR DELINQUENCY; PROVIDING A DISCOUNT FOR LOW INCOME RESIDENTS; PROVIDING THAT ALL RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH BE REPEALED TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; FURTHER, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Dania Beach retained Hartman and Associates, Inc., a firm of engineers, hydro geologists, and management consultants, to evaluate the City of Dania Beach's water and wastewater rates, miscellaneous service charges and impact fees; and ® WHEREAS, Hartman and Associates, Inc. completed its water and wastewater rate and impact fee study for the five fiscal year period from 1998 through 2002 and submitted the report to the Dania Beach City Commission in January, 1998; and WHEREAS, the referenced report recommended a series of annual increases in order to develop sufficient resources to finance a series of capital improvements to the infrastructure of the sewer system in the City of Dania Beach; and WHEREAS, the CPI for All Urban Consumers, South Region has increased by approximately 8% during the period between the last rate adjustment and the current fiscal year, while no adjustments have been made to sewer rates, and WHEREAS, the Interim City Manager and the Director of Finance have recommended to the City Commission an increase of 4% in the sewer rates to address both the concerns expressed in the Hartman & Associates, Inc. report, and to offset the increases in the cost of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-174 ® providing sewer services; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined the level of rates necessary to meet the expenditure requirements of the utility system and equitably allocate the cost of services to all customers necessitates an adjustment of the monthly charges for sewer services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA: Section 1 . That for residential users a base charge of seven dollars and forty-nine cents ($7.49) monthly shall be applied to all single-family residences, each living unit in cooperative and condominium usages, multi-family structures, and each unit in mobile home parks for sewer service supplied to each of such units for said monthly period. In addition, a charge of two dollars and forty-four ($2.44) will be charged for each thousand (1,000) gallons of water ® used to a maximum of twelve thousand (12,000) gallons by each of such units for said monthly period. Section 2. That for commercial, business and industrial users a monthly base charge per meter according to the size thereof for sewer service to a commercial, industrial, business, institutional or similar unit, building or complex, and each separate municipal or other governmental agency, building or special type unit shall be levied according to the following schedule: 5/8" meter..........................$ 7.49 1" meter........................... 18.72 1-1/2" meter.......................... 37.44 ® 2" meter.......................... 59.90 3" meter.......................... 119.81 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-174 ® 411 meter.......................... 187.20 6" meter.......................... 374.40 In addition, there will be a charge of two dollars and forty-four cents ($2.44) for each thousand (1,000) gallons of water used by-each of such units for said monthly period. Section 3. The charges listed in Sections 1 and 2 of this resolution shall remain in force as long as the service is connected to the water main, whether turned on or off. However, when the owner of property requests that a meter be removed from the premises, billing will be discontinued until such time as the owner requests that the meter be reinstalled and service continued. A charge of one hundred dollars ($100.00) will be assessed for the reinstallation. Section 4. Bills are due when rendered and are delinquent 20 days after the initial rendition of the bill. If bills are not paid within the 20 day period, with 5:00 p.m. being the ® cut off time on the last day, a 10% penalty will be assessed. If bills are not paid within 30 days after the initial rendition of the bill, water will be turned off until such time the bill is paid. A $25.00 charge will be added to the next bill for turning the water back on. Any unpaid charges will be added to the next month's bill. Section 5. A discount of twenty percent on the monthly sewer rate shall be extended to certain low income, single-family residential or multi-family customers who are individually metered only. The lifeline rates shall not apply to multi-family residential customers who receive service through a master meter. The eligibility for the lifeline rate discount is contingent on the customer meeting the conditions of Chapter 27, Section 27-29 (c) of the City of Dania Beach Code of Ordinances. Section 6. That all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith be and the • 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-174 ® same are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 7. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect the 1"day of October, 2001 . PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2001. PATRICIA A. FLURY MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ATT ST: ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONER BERTINO-YES C. COMMISSIONER MCELYEA-NO CHARLENE J SON COMMISSIONER MIKES-NO ACTING CITY CLERK VICE-MAYOY CHUNN-YES MAYOR FLURY-YES APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS BY: l � THOMAS J. A SB O CITY ATTORNEY 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-174 Consumption in Thousand Gallons Water Sewer Total Plus Cap Total Sanitation With 10% Tax 12,000 Sanitation Gal. Base Charge 5.38 7.49 12.869 19.45 32.32 1 6.78 9.93 16.71 19.45 36.16 2 8.17 12.37 20.54 19.45 39.99 3 9.57 14.81 24.38 19.45 43.83 4 10.97 17.25 28.22 19.45 47.67 5 12.36 19.69 32.05 19.45 51.50 6 14.48 22.13 36.61 19.45 56.06 7 16.59 24.57 41.16 19.45 60.61 8 18.70 27.01 45.71 19.45 65.16 9 20.81 29.45 50.26 19.45 69.71 10 22.92 31.89 54.81 19.45 74.26 11 25.04 34.33 59.37 19.45 78.82 12 27.15 36.77 63.92 19.45 83.37 13 29.26 36.77 66.03 19.45 85.48 14 31.37 36.77 68.14 19.45 87.59 15 34.00 36.77 70.77 19.45 90.22 ® 16 36.63 36.77 73.40 19.45 92.85 17 39.26 36.77 76.03 19.45 95.48 18 41.89 36.77 78.66 19.45 98.11 19 44.52 36.77 81.29 19.45 100.74 20 47.15 36.77 83.92 19.45 103.37 21 49.78 36.77 86.55 19.45 106.00 22 52.40 36.77 89.17 19.45 108.62 23 55.03 36.77 91.80 19.45 111.25 24 57.66 36.77 94.43 19.45 113.88 25 60.29 36.77 97.06 19.45 116.51 26 62.92 36.77 99.69 19.45 119.14 27 65.55 36.77 102.32 19.45 121.77 28 68.18 36.77 104.95 19.45 124.40 29 70.81 36.77 107.581 19.45 127.03 30 73.44 36.77 110.21 19.45 129.66 31 76.07 36.77 112.84 19.45 132.29 32 78.69 36.77 115.46 19.45 134.91 33 81.32 36.77 118.09 19.45 137.54 34 83.95 36.77 1120.72 19.45 140.17 35 86.58 36.77 123.35 19.45 142.80 APPENDIX H SRF Program Rules DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 ® WATER FACILITIES CHAPTER 62-552 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING WATER FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 62-662.200 Definitions. 3 62-552.300 General Program Information. 6 62-652.350 Pre-construction Loans for Rate-Based Community 10 Water Systems. 62-662.360 Pre-construction Grants for Financially Disadvantaged 11 Communities. 62-562.370 Construction Grants for Financially Disadvantaged 12 Communities. ® 62-652.400 Program Administration Costs. 14 62-662.420 Project Allowances. 15 62-552.430 Construction Loans for Rate-Based Community Water 19 Systems. 62-662.500 Funds Reserved for Specific Purposes. 23 62-552.600 Project List Information. 24 . 62-652.650 Priority Determination. 26 62-662.665 Ranking Projects for Project List Development. 30 62-562.680 Project List Management. 33 Effective 7-20-99 1 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES 62-552.700 Planning, Design, Construction, and Post-Construction 36 Requirements. 62-552.800 Audits Required. 44 62-562.900 Forms for the State Revolving Fund Program for Drinking Water Facilities. 45 Effective 7-20-99 2 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-662 WATER FACILITIES 62-662.200 Definitions. For purposes of this rule chapter: (1) "Act" means the Federal Safe.Drinking Water Act, as amended. (2) Additional completion loan" means a loan, subsequent to execution of a pre-construction loan agreement and the Department's authorization to incur post- allowance project costs, which may be made to the project sponsor by the Department for the purpose of furnishing additional funds to finance post-allowance project costs. The interest rate for any additional completion loan shall be established under rule 62- 552.300(9), F.A.C. (3) "Adjusted post-allowance project costs" means the costs associated with post-allowance project activities for a project that will qualify for construction loan or construction grant funding. Capitalized interest and loan repayment reserve pertain to loans only, and such costs for loan funded projects are excluded from adjusted post- allowance project costs. (4) Capitalized interest" means interest accruing at the interest rate set for the loan and compounding annually from the time when disbursements are made until six (6) months before the first semiannual loan repayment is due. (5) "Community water system" means a public water system which serves at least 15 service connections used by year-round residents or regularly serves at least 25 year-round residents. (6) "Complete grant application" means completed form 62-552.900(3), Grant Application. (7) "Complete loan application" means completed form 62-552.900(2), Loan Application. (8) "Contingency portion" means the portion of a project list consisting of projects qualified to be on the fundable portion upon list adoption but for which there are insufficient funds. (9) "Cost-effective" means the lowest present worth (or equivalent annual value) of the implementable and environmentally acceptable alternatives to achieve the project sponsor's objectives considering capital costs as well as operation and maintenance costs. (10) "Department" means the Department of Environmental Protection. (11) "EPA" means the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (12) Equivalency project" means a project for which the project sponsor shall document compliance with specific federal requirements under rule 62-552.700(1), F.A.C., in addition to the general requirements under rules 62-552.700(2) through (11), F.A.C. (13) "ERC" means the Environmental Regulation Commission. (14) "Financially disadvantaged community" means a municipality, county or agency (such as a county-wide department)thereof, franchised area, or other entity with a defined public water system service jurisdiction meeting the following requirements: (a) It must be served by a community water system; ® Effective 7-20-99 3 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES (b) It has a median household income of less than the statewide average as reported in the most recently available decennial census or as of a more recent verifiable determination and, for the purpose of qualifying for a grant to fund post- allowance project activities, it would have a debt service component, reflecting both existing indebtedness and that which would be required to implement the proposed project without financial assistance under this rule chapter, of the annual average residential drinking water user charge (or the equivalent thereof) to median household income financial burden ratio exceeding the following criterion: 1. When the median household income is at least 80% but less than the 100% of the statewide average, the financial burden ratio criterion shall be 1.0%; 2. When the median household income is below 80% of the statewide average, the financial burden ratio criterion shall be 0.5%. (15) "Fiscal year' means the 12-month period between July 1 and June 30. (16) "Fundable portion" means the portion of a project list consisting of the projects scheduled to receive approval for funding during the fiscal year for which a list is prepared. (17) Funds allocated each year by the Department" means funds that are credited to the Drinking Water Revolving Loan Trust Fund in any fiscal year and are available, or expected to be available, for project grants and loans (including those for financially disadvantaged communities and small communities) during the fiscal year for which a project list is being developed as follows: (a) As a direct result of federal capitalization grants and state appropriations less the amount of any funds appropriated, or similarly designated, for specific purposes or projects; (b) As a direct result of loan repayments from project sponsors; and (c) As a direct result of investment earnings, project list management actions under rules 62-552.680(4) and (5), F.A.C., project cost underruns, and previous allocations by the Department that leave funds unassigned to projects on the fundable portion. (18) "Loan" means financing provided by the Department under this rule chapter and which has been, or will be, secured using a formal agreement executed by the project sponsor's authorized representative and the Secretary. (19) "Non-community water system" means a public water system which provides piped water for human consumption to at least 15 service connections or which serves at least 25 individuals at least 60 days out of the year but which is not a community water system. NOTE: The difference between a community water system and a non-community water system is that the former serves inhabitants whereas the latter serves transients or non-residents who otherwise do not inhabit the building served by the system. Private and limited use public water systems are addressed in chapter 64E-8, F.A.C., and are regulated by the Department of Health. (20) "Non-profit water system" means a public water system that is owned by a non-profit Florida corporation qualifying for such status under chapter 617, F.S., the Florida Not For Profit Corporation Act. ® Effective 7-20-99 4 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES (21) "Non-transient non-community water system" means a public water system that is not a community water system and that regularly serves at least 25 of the same persons over six (6) months per year. (22) "Planning portion" means the portion of the project list consisting of alphabetically ordered projects for which planning and design related activities are incomplete and, as a result, may receive funding in a future fiscal year. (23) Pledged revenue" means project sponsor revenue specifically approved by the Department and pledged for the repayment of the loan. (24) Post-allowance activities" shall mean the construction, procurement of equipment and materials, land acquisition, demolition, and technical services after construction bid opening. (25) "Post-allowance project costs" means allowable costs for post-allowance activities and contingency and, for projects to be funded with loans, capitalized interest and loan repayment reserve. (26) "Project" means any cost-effective devices and systems associated with the supply, storage, transmission, treatment, disinfection, and distribution of drinking water, including rehabilitation of existing facilities. Project construction need not, in and of itself, result in an operable system. The principal purpose of the project shall be to provide safe drinking water for the population projected to require such service during the design life of the project. The scope of a project includes only those facilities which qualify for funding under this rule chapter. ® (27) "Project list" means the yearly listing of fundable, contingency, and planning portion projects for financial assistance. (28) "Project sponsor' means an entity, as defined in any of the following, that seeks or obtains financial assistance under this rule chapter: (a) A municipality, county, district, or authority or any agency thereof or a combination of two or more of the foregoing acting jointly in connection with a project, having jurisdiction over a public water system; or (b) A legally responsible entity representing a privately owned, investor- owned, or cooperatively held public water system. (29) "Public water system" means all facilities, including land, necessary for the treatment and distribution of water for human consumption and includes a community, non-transient non-community, or non-community system for the provision to the public of piped water for human consumption, provided that such system has at least 15 service connections or regularly serves at least 25 individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year. The term includes: (a) Any collection, treatment, storage and distribution facility or facilities under control of the operator of such system and used primarily in connection with such system. (b) Any collection or pretreatment storage facility or facilities not under control of the operator of such system but used primarily in connection with such system. (30) "Rate-based community water system" means a community water system providing water to its customers in exchange for revenues based, at least in part, on the ® Effective 7-20-99 5 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING�FUNRD PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-652 FACILIES quantity of water that may be provided. One characteristic of a rate-based community water system is that operating revenues may be generated in excess of the operating expenses. (31) "Refinancing loan" means a loan under this rule chapter to finance any portion of project construction and related services that has been completed or partially completed before the execution of the loan agreement if the project sponsor incurred debt to enable construction. (32) Request for inclusion" means form 62-552.900(1), Request for Inclusion on the Priority List for Drinking Water Facilities. (33) "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Protection. (34) "Segmented project" means a project for which the allowable costs in a given fiscal year exceed the amount that the Department commits to provide under rule 62-552.500(1)(d), F.A.C., or 62-552.600(1)(b), F.A.C. (35) "Small community means a municipality or unincorporated community or other identifiable entity with a total population of 10,0 00 or less as of the most recent decennial census or as of a more recent verifiable determination. (36) "Target date" means the anticipated effective date for a financial assistance agreement for any part of the amount listed on the fundable portion of the project list. (37) "Water facilities plan" means plans and studies formally adopted by the ® project sponsor that directly relate to selecting facilities for a public water system. The requirements for a water facilities plan are set forth in rule 62-552.700(4), F.A.C. Specific Authority 403.8532, 403.852, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History- New 4-7-98, Amended 8-10-98, 7-20-99. 62-652.300 General Program Information. (1) Only project sponsors owning community water systems, non-profit non- community water systems, and non-profit non-transient non-community water systems meeting the provisions of section 403.8532(3), F.S., shall be eligible to receive financial assistance under this chapter. (2) The categories of allowable project costs are: (a) Land, including easements and rights-of-way, that will be acquired from a willing seller and is necessary for the location of the facilities to be funded. Funding of an acquisition shall be limited to the fair market value of the property necessary to locate the project facilities thereon including mandatory set-backs and buffer areas. However, the cost of acquisition shall not be included in the adjusted post-allowance project cost for the purpose of establishing allowances under rule 62-552.420, F.A.C.; (b) Public water system construction and related equipment procurement and land acquisition when contracts are executed either after the effective date of a financial assistance agreement with the Department or, if an authorization to incur costs for such ® Effective 7-20-99 6 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING TER FUN TIES FOR DRINKING 62-652 WA activities has been given by the Departmen , t Written authorizationtote of incur a financial costs shall be assistance agreement with the Department mailed to the project sponsor within 14 days of receipt of a request for such authorization provided that the environmental review under rule 62-552.700(3), F.A.C., has been completed. Requests for such authorization shall be made in writing and shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400; (c) Demolition and removal of existing structures; (d) Contingency for unforeseen project costs; (e) Technical services after bid opening; (f) Loan repayment reserve; (g) Interest accruing during construction on payments under binding agreements between a project sponsor and contractors, manufacturers, or suppliers; (h) Unretired debt principal, excluding any reserves such as for debt service, under a refinancing loan; (i) Capitalized interest for the loan; 0) Multiple purpose facilities, such as those to treat or convey wastewater and drinking water residuals. The proportion of the total cost allowable shall be established using engineering estimates of the total cost and the least cost facilities that could resolve the public water system problem; ' (k) Allowances under rules 62-552.420, F.A.C.; (1) Acquiring all or part of an existing public water system from a willing seller as part of a consolidation or regionalization project. Funding of an acquisition shall be limited to the fair market value. However, the cost of acquisition shall not be included in the adjusted post-allowance project cost for the purpose of establishing allowances under rule 62-552.420, F.A.C.; and (m) Capacity purchase in an existing public water system. However, the cost of capacity purchase shall not be included in the adjusted post-allowance project cost for the purpose of establishing allowances under rule 62-552.420, F.A.C. (3) Unallowable project costs include the following: (a) Facilities not in conformance with an approved water facilities plan; (b) Facilities not included within the approved project scope; (c) Construction using personnel employed by the project sponsor; (d) Costs yet to be incurred at the time of the on-site administrative action taken by the Department to document project completion, such as for pending construction claims; (e) Facilities or services for which the requirements of rule 62-552.700, F.A.C., are not met; (f) Any project for which the post-allowance project costs are less than $75,000; (g) Any project sponsored by a for-profit private owner or investor-owner entity of a community water system that regularly serves 1,500 service connections or more within the certified or franchised area in which the project will be located unless Effective 7-20=99 7 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUNR FARPROGRAM RA FOR DRINKING 62-552 • !h! such project will result in the consolidation of the project sponsor's public water system and at least one additional public water system; (h) That part of any project primarily intended to serve future growth not justified by public water system service demand projections in the water facilities plan; (i) That part of any project to be given financial assistance by another agency; and 0) Any other cost not listed as allowable under subsection (2) above. (4) In order to receive consideration for financial assistance, a complete grant or loan application shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400. The project sponsor may incorporate into a grant or loan application by reference any information previously submitted to the Department that meets the applicable requirements of this rule chapter in lieu of resubmitting such information. (5) The amount of the allowable project contingency shall not exceed 10% of the estimated sum of the costs for allowable land (when the actual costs are unknown), equipment contracts, materials contracts, and construction contracts prior to completion of procurement activities under rule 62-552.700(5), F.A.C. The contingency shall be adjusted by the Department to not more than 5% of construction, equipment, and materials contract amounts after procurement contracts have been executed. The contingency remaining after accounting for contract change orders shall be eliminated • by the Department at the time of the on-site administrative action taken by the Department to document project completion. Contingency funds shall not be used to pay for work not described in the financial assistance agreement. (6) The repayment period for loans under this rule chapter and the Act shall be limited as follows: (a) Construction loans shall be repaid in no more than 20 years except for loans to project sponsors qualifying as financially disadvantaged communities. The 30-year limitation established under section 403.8532, F.S., shall be available only for construction loans for projects to serve financially disadvantaged communities. (b) Pre-construction loans shall be repaid in no more than 10 years. However, when construction loans are executed to finance the facilities planned and designed under a pre-construction loan, the project sponsor shall have the option to convert the repayment period to the repayment period negotiated for the construction loan. (7) Only project sponsors qualifying for funding under rule 62-552.200(28)(a), F.A.C., are eligible for a refinancing loan in accordance with the Act. However, a project, or any portion thereof, that is financed with a loan from the Department shall not be refinanced, at a lower interest rate, by the Department. (8) The lesser of 15% of the funds allocated each year by the Department or 30% of the amount determined by adding the federal grant and state matching funds and subtracting the set-asides authorized by the Act shall be used to fund projects for financially disadvantaged communities. Financial assistance may be in the form of grants or grants and loans for the non-grant funded share under subsection (6) above. ® Effective 7-20-99 8 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING ATER FARO TIES FOR DRINKING 62-652 However, funds available for such grants and loans are not reserved. There is no special preferential consideration given to financially disadvantaged communities in identifying projects for funding under rules 62-552.655 or 62-552.680, F.A.C. Funds that are not committed to projects on the fundable portion of the list at the time of the annual list adoption immediately also become available for loan commitments to other than financially disadvantaged communities on a priority score basis. (9) The interest rate available for an additional completion loan shall be as follows: (a) The lesser of the interest rate established in the pre-construction loan agreement provided that the conditions under rule 62-552.350(3), F.A.C., have been met or, (b) The subsidized rate based on market conditions as described in rule 62- 552.430(3), F.A.C., provided the project becomes listed on the fundable portion of the priority list under the procedures described in rule 62-552.655 or 62-552.680, F.A.C. (10) Each loan and grant agreement shall have terms necessary to meet the requirements of section 403.8532, F.S., the Act, and this rule chapter. (11) The ERC shall establish priorities and have final state approval on grant funding. Only the ERC shall place projects to be funded with grants for financially disadvantaged communities on the fundable or contingency portion of the project list under rule 62-552.600 or 62-552.680(1), F.A.C. Only the ERC shall remove projects involving grants from the list under rule 62-552.680(4), F.A.C. ® (12) The Secretary or designee shall establish priorities and have final state approval on loan funding. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.804, 403.8532, FS. History - New 4-7-98, Amended 8-10-98, 7-20-99 . 62-552.360 Pre-construction Loans for Rate-Based Community!plater Systems. Funding of pre-construction loans for planning, engineering, and administrative allowances shall be made only to project sponsors having rate-based community water systems for projects which have a public health risk priority component under rules 62- 552.650(4)(a)through (d), F.A.C. A pre-construction loan shall not be available as a supplement to a pre-construction grant. A pre-construction loan project sponsor must qualify as a small community unless the project priority is based, in part, on consolidation or regionalization under rule 62-552.650(5)(c), F.A.C. Pre-construction loans shall be available only after a listing on the fundable portion of the priority list has been obtained, a complete loan application has been submitted to the Department, and execution of a loan agreement for which the Department shall have the primary responsibility for drafting and settling of terms. Pre-construction loans shall be available before the completion of project planning. (1) . The maximum estimated adjusted post-allowance project costs, for the purpose of establishing allowances, shall be limited to $2,000,000. ® Effective 7-20-99 9 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING TER PRO TIES FOR DRINKING 62,-`62 lAl (2) The planning activities under a pre-construction loan shall address, at a minimum, all of the small community's public health and compliance related rule 62-drinking water facilities needs throughout the Planning period required 552.700(4)(b), F.A.C. (3) Loan recipients shall prepare and submit to the Department, no later than the time set forth in the loan agreement: (a) Water facilities plan. (b) Affirmation of availability of all project sites for the purposes of construction, operation, and maintenance over the useful life of the facilities; (c) Biddable plans and specifications consistent with the selected alternative described in the water facilities plan. (d) Value engineering report for operationally related project facilities for which the adjusted post-allowance project costs are valued at more than $5,000,000. (4) Loan agreements shall provide for the continuation of the pre-construction interest rate for post-allowance activities to be covered under an additional completion loan when the cond not tions stated in beenmet,the Depart subsection ent s comm tment to c continue When a conditions haveinterest rate shall be terminated. (5) Loan agreements shall provide for the following: (a) The loan repayment reserve, semiannual loan repayment, interest rate determination, loan service fee, loan security features, escrow account, pledged revenue coverage, legal affirmation, assurances of compliance with SRF program requirements, disbursement, and annual certification requirements of rule 62-552.430, F.A.C. (b) The late repayment remedies under rule 62-552.430, F.A.C. (c) A project sponsor shall be entitled to the special interest rate consideration given in rule 62-552.300(9), F.A.C., when a project to be funded with an additional completion loan has been planned and designed according to the schedule incorporated into a pre-construction loan agreement, and the project has been included on the fundable portion of the priority list, (d) The Department shall have no lien on or security interest in or claim on any moneys of the project sponsor except as expressly provided in the loan agreement. (e) The project sponsor shall begin repaying a loan no later than the date originally scheduled under the loan agreement. The scheduled date shall be six months after completion of planning, engineering, and administrative activities. Pre-construction administrative activities include the Department's written notification of completion of all documentation. required under rule 62-552.350(3), F.A.C. (f) A project sponsor shall be entitled to roll over the pre-construction loan principal into a construction loan when a project to be funded with such an additional completion loan has been planned and designed according to the schedule incorporated into a pre-construction loan agreement and the project has been included on the fundable portion of the priority list for a construction loan. However, the loan service fee, if included in the principal of the pre-construction loan, shall not be rolled ® Effective 7-20-99 10 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-562 WATER FACILITIES over into the principal of the construction loan. The loan service fee for both the pre- construction and construction portions of the total loan principal shall be applied as described under rule 62-552.400(1), F.A.C. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History - New 8-10-98, Amended 7-20-99. 62-562.360 Pre-construction Grants for Financially Disadvantaged Communities. Grants shall be available only after a listing on the fundable portion of the priority list has been obtained, a complete grant application has been submitted to the Department, and a grant agreement has been executed. Pre-construction grants shall be available before the completion of project planning. (1) A project sponsor must qualify as a financially disadvantaged community in order to receive a pre-construction grant for planning, engineering, and administrative allowances. (2) A project sponsor must qualify as a small community unless the project priority is based, in part, on consolidation or regionalization under rule 62-552.650(5)(c), F.A.C. (3) Pre-construction grants for financially disadvantaged communities shall be for 85% of the allowances under rule 62-552.420, F.A.C., unless a lesser amount is ® requested by the project sponsor. (4) Pre-construction grants shall be awarded only for projects which have a public health risk priority component under rules 62-552.650(4)(a) through (d), F.A.C. (5) No project sponsor shall be eligible to receive more than one pre- construction grant unless the project priority is based, in part, on consolidation or regionalization under rule 62-552.650(5)(c), F.A.C. (6) Pre-construction grants shall be subject to the requirements and limitations of rules 62-552.350(1) through (3), F.A.C., except that "loans" shall mean "grants." (7) Pre-construction grants shall be subject to the requirements and limitations of rules 62-552.370(1)(j), (2) and (3), F.A.C. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History - New 8-10-98, Amended 7-20-99. 62-652.370 Construction Grants for Financially Disadvantaged Communities. Grants shall be available only to project sponsors that qualify as financially disadvantaged communities. Additionally, projects must meet the financial burden, benefit limitation, and priority criteria under this rule section. Grants shall be available only after a listing on the fundable portion of the priority list has been obtained, a Effective 7-20-99 11 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVINGWATER FACIOL TIES FOR DRINKING 62-562 complete grant application has been submitted to the Department, and a grant agreement has been executed. (1) Construction grants shall be subject to the following limitations: (a) The grant amount plus the loan amount, when the non-grant funded share is funded under this rule chapter, for a project in any one year shall not exceed the lesser of$750,000 or 25% of the funds available under rule 62-552.300(8), F.A.C. The total financial assistance shall be less than the foregoing not-to-exceed amount when there are insufficient funds to enable funding of all projects qualifying for such assistance on the fundable portion of the priority list. When deferred funding occurs under paragraph (f) below, the minimum segmented grant and loan amount available in any one year shall be the lesser of the estimated adjusted post-allowance project costs or$375,000 subject to the 25% limitation referenced above. (b) The grant funding shall not exceed 85% of any allowance under rule 62- 552.420, F.A.C., and the estimated post-allowance project costs when the median household income is below 80% of the statewide average and the financial burden ratio is at least 0.5% as established under rule 62-552.200(14)(b), F.A.C. (c) The grant funding shall not exceed 65% of any allowance under rule 62- 552.420, F.A.C., and the estimated post-allowance project costs when the following conditions have been met: 1. The median household income is at least 80% of the statewide average but less than the statewide average and the financial burden ratio is at least 1.0% as established under rule 62-552.200(14)(b), F.A.C., or 2. The median household income is below 80% of the statewide average and the financial burden ratio is less than 0.5% as established under rule 62-552.200(14)(b), F.A.C. (e) No project sponsor shall be eligible to receive more than one construction grant unless the project priority is based, in part, on consolidation or regionalization under rule 62-552.650(5)(c), F.A.C. However, a grant that is segmented for deferred funding as described under paragraph (a) above or paragraph (f) below shall not be construed to be multiple grants. (fl A project sponsor shall document as part of the requirements under rule 62-552.700(4)(i), F.A.C., that the debt service component of the user charge (or equivalent thereof) to median household income ratio requirement of rule 62- 552.200(14)(b), F.A.C., has been met. (g) A project sponsor, owning or operating more than one public water system, shall document under rule 62-552.700(4)(i)5., F.A.C., that the exclusive benefit requirement has been met. (h) Grants shall be awarded only for projects and for project components to which a public health risk has been assigned under rules 62-552.650(4)(a) through (d), F.A.C. When a multiple component project has both public health risk and compliance priority components, project components to which compliance priorities have been assigned under rule 62-552.650(4)(e), F.A.C., may be grant funded subject to the following considerations: 0 Effective 7-20-99 12 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-662 WATER FACILITIES 1. Project components having public health risk priorities under rules 62- 552.650(4)(a) through (d), F.A.C., shall be funded before any consideration is given to funding project components having compliance priorities. 2. In the event grant funds remain available after all public health risk priority project components are funded, project components having compliance priorities shall be funded in order of priority rank established under rule 62-552.655 or 62-552.680, F.A.C. 3. No project component to which an "other' priority has been assigned under rule 62-552.650(4)(f), F.A.C., shall be eligible for grant funding. (i) The funding of projects qualifying for grants in excess of the amount available from the Department in a single fiscal year shall be segmented for deferred funding under paragraph (a) above and rules 62-552.600(1)(b) and 62-552.655(4)(a)1., F.A.C. (j) A project sponsor shall obtain, within 180 days of grant agreement execution, a binding commitment for the non-grant share of the project costs described in, and to be incurred under, the grant agreement if such funds are not available at the time of grant application. No grant disbursements shall be made before the non-grant share has been secured. (2) Compliance with the requirements of this rule chapter shall be necessary to qualify for a construction grant. (3) Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the grant agreement ® shall result in one or more of the following actions: (a) Grant disbursement withholding. (b) Suspension, termination, or annulment of the grant agreement. (c) Legal proceedings to recover the grant amount. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History - New 8-10-98, Amended 7-20-99. 62-552.400 Program Administration Costs. (1) A loan service fee based on a percentage of the total loan amount less the portion of the loan for capitalized interest and loan repayment reserve shall be paid by the loan recipient. The service fee percentage shall be established at the beginning of each fiscal year by the Department for all loans to be executed during that year. Each loan agreement shall identify the loan service fee percentage and the loan service fee amount. The loan service fee shall be assessed at the time of loan agreement execution. The loan recipient may elect to pay the entire loan service fee at the time of loan agreement execution or pay it plus capitalized interest thereon no later than by the time that the second semiannual loan repayment is due. Projections of loan program administration costs over a period of five (5) years shall be made by the Department to establish the service fee percentage for each year. These projections shall take into account the balance of the administrative funds available under rule 62-552.500(2), F.A.C., at the beginning of each fiscal year and the estimated investment earnings Effective 7-20-99 13 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES thereon, funds resulting from scheduled loan repayments, federal and state appropriations for the fiscal year under consideration and that are available at the time the fee is being established, and projected expenses to administer the program. The earnings on investments shall be estimated using an interest rate 1% below the Thomson Publishing Corporations Bond Buyer 20-Bond GO Index average weekly yield for the full weeks during the January 1 to March 31 calendar year quarter immediately preceding the fiscal year for which the loan service fee is being established. The fee percentage authorized shall be not more than that required to ensure that the balance of administrative funds available at the beginning of the first year is not less than the sum of the administrative expenses for the succeeding two (2) fiscal years and the projected balance at the end of the fifth year is not less than zero. The fee percentage shall be rounded to the nearest 0.1%. However, the loan service fee shall not be less than 2% nor greater than 4%. Loan service fees shall be adjusted downward if procurement contracts result in a loan decrease. (2) The service fee for a loan agreement executed after June 30 of the fiscal year in which a project, or segment of a project, is first listed on the fundable portion shall be the greater of the fee percentage for the fiscal year during which the project was first listed on the fundable portion and the fee percentage for the fiscal year in which the loan agreement is executed. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History- New 4-7-98, Amended 7-20-99. 62-562.420 Project Allowances. Certain allowances shall be included in the allowable project cost at the request of the project sponsor. However, the costs of acquiring land, including easements and rights- of-way; acquiring existing public water systems; and purchasing capacity in an existing public water system shall be excluded from the adjusted post-allowance project costs for the purpose of establishing allowances. Allowances shall be used in lieu of reimbursement for incurred costs. When administrative and engineering allowances are disbursed under a pre-construction loan or pre-construction grant, the project sponsor shall be ineligible to receive the same allowance disbursements under a construction loan or construction grant for the same project. The amount of the disbursements under a construction assistance agreement shall be established by subtracting the amount previously disbursed under a pre-construction agreement from that allowable under the construction assistance agreement. When a construction project is funded with a combination of a grant and a loan, the financial assistance shall have both grant and loan components. The grant percentage established under rule 62-552.370(1)(b) or(c), F.A.C., shall be applied to each allowance to determine the grant portion under such combined grant and loan assistance. The loan portion of administrative and engineering allowances shall be for the remainder after subtracting the grant portion from the total of each allowance. There shall be no loan portion for a planning allowance since no pre- construction loans shall be made in conjunction with pre-construction grants. Effective 7-20-99 14 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES (1) The allowance for administrative expenses shall not exceed the following: (a) For pre-construction loans and pre-construction grants, the maximum allowance that may be requested shall be $12,000 regardless of the adjusted post- allowance project costs. (b) For construction loans and construction grants, the allowance shall not exceed 0.6% of the adjusted post-allowance project costs. However, the maximum allowance that may be requested for projects with adjusted post-allowance project costs not exceeding $2,000,000 shall be $12,000. (2) The allowance for engineering work performed before construction bid opening shall not exceed the following: (a) For pre-construction loans and pre-construction grants, the allowance shall not exceed the larger of the allowance listed under"Engineering Amount"for the range in costs or the amount calculated using the percentage listed under"Engineering Amount" multiplied by the estimated adjusted post-allowance project costs as given in the table below. The amount of the allowance shall be subject to the adjusted post- allowance project costs limitation of$2,000,000 under rule 62-552.350(1) or 62- 552.360(6), F.A.C., respectively. Adjusted Post-allowance Project Costs Engineering Amount Less than $500,000 10.3% or$ 21,000 At least $500,000 but less than $1,000,000 8.5% or$ 52,000 At least$1,000,000 but less than $2,000,000 7.5% or$ 85,000 At least$2,000,000 but less than $5,000,000 6.8% or$ 150,000 At least$5,000,000 but less than $10,000,000 6.4% or$ 375,000 At least $10,000,000 but less than $50,000,000 6.0% or$ 640,000 At least $50,000,000 5.7% or$3,000,000 (b) For construction loans and construction grants, the allowance shall not exceed the larger of the allowance listed under"Engineering Amount' for the range in costs or the amount calculated using the percentage listed under"Engineering Amount' multiplied by the estimated adjusted post-allowance project as given in the table under paragraph (a) above. (3) The allowance for planning work under a pre-construction loan or a pre- construction grant shall be independent of other allowances for engineering work and administrative expenses under this rule section. The amount of the allowance shall be subject to the adjusted post-allowance project costs limitation of$2,000,000 under rule 62-552.350(1)-or 62-552.360(6), F.A.C., respectively. The planning allowance shall not exceed the larger of the allowance listed under"Planning Amount"for the range in costs or the amount calculated using the percentage listed under"Planning Amount" multiplied by the estimated adjusted post-allowance project costs as given in the table below: Effective 7-20-99 16 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES Adjusted Post-allowance Project Costs Planning Amount Less than $1,000,000 4.4% or$15,000 At least $1,000,000 but not more than $2,000,000 3.9% or$44,000 (4) Disbursement of allowances shall be as follows: (a) For pre-construction grants and pre-construction loans, one-half of each of the administrative and the planning allowances shall be disbursed on request of the project sponsor after a financial assistance agreement is signed. The remaining one- half of each of the administrative and the planning allowances shall be disbursed on request of the project sponsor and after the environmental review under rule 62- 552.700(3), F.A.C., has been completed. One-half of the engineering allowance under a pre-construction loan or pre-construction grant agreement shall be disbursed upon request of the project sponsor after the environmental review under rule 62-552.700(3), F.A.C., has been completed. The remaining one-half of the engineering allowance shall be disbursed upon request of the project sponsor after completion of the plans and specifications. (b) For construction grants and construction loans, administrative and engineering allowances shall be disbursed on request of the project sponsor after a financial assistance agreement is signed. Planning allowances shall not be included in construction loans or construction grants. (5) Increases to allowances shall be subject to the procedures for obtaining a ® priority for funding under either rule 62-552.655 or 62-552.680(1), F.A.C., and to the following: (a) There shall be no increase in the amount of a planning allowance. (b) An increase, if requested, to the administrative or engineering allowance shall be according to the following: 1. An increase in an allowance initially included in a pre-construction loan or pre-construction grant shall be available only when a project has been planned and designed according to the schedule incorporated into a pre-construction assistance _°°. agreement and only in conjunction with a construction loan or construction grant that provides funding for facilities designed under the pre-construction loan or pre- construction grant. The amount of an allowance increase shall be established by subtracting the allowance based upon the originally estimated costs for post-allowance activities documented in the pre-construction assistance agreement from the allowance based upon the adjusted post-allowance project costs established upon execution of the final procurement contract for which the design was funded under the pre-construction assistance agreement. The costs included in such final adjusted post-allowance project costs shall be in the award amount(s) for the construction related contract(s) included in the project scope as described in the construction assistance agreement, regardless of whether project funding has been segmented under rule 62-552.500(1)(d) or 62- 552.600(1)(b), F.A.C. a. When an increase in post-allowance project costs occurs for a project funded first with a pre-construction grant that has not been limited by the $2,000,000 ® Effective 7-20-99 16 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES maximum adjusted post-allowance project costs imposed by rule 62-552.360(6), F.A.C., and then funded with a construction grant for any part of the project, an increase to grant participation in engineering and administrative allowances shall be made at the 85% grant participation level for that part of the project being funded with the construction grant. b. When an increase in post-allowance project costs occurs for a project funded first with a pre-construction grant that has been limited by the $2,000,000 maximum adjusted post-allowance project costs imposed by rule 62-552.360(6), F.A.C., and then funded with a construction grant for any part of the project, an increase to grant participation in engineering and administrative allowances shall be made at the construction grant participation level for that part of the project being funded with the construction grant. C. When a project funded first with a pre-construction grant that has been limited by the $2,000,000 maximum adjusted post-allowance project costs imposed by rule 62-552.360(6), F.A.C., and then is funded with a construction grant for any part of the project, grant participation in that part of the engineering and administrative allowances previously disallowed by the $2,000,000 maximum shall be available on request. Such grant funding shall be made at the construction grant participation level for that part of the project being funded with the construction grant. 2. An increase in an allowance initially included in a construction loan or construction grant shall be available when the amount of all construction related contract awards exceeds the estimate documented in the construction assistance agreement. The amount of an allowance increase shall be established by subtracting the allowance based upon the originally estimated costs for post-allowance activities documented in the construction assistance agreement from the allowance based upon the adjusted post-allowance project costs established upon execution of the final procurement contract. The costs included in such final adjusted post-allowance project costs shall be in the award amount for the construction related contracts included in the project scope as described in the construction assistance agreement, regardless of whether project funding has been segmented under rule 62-552.500(1)(d) or 62- 552.600(1)(b), F.A.C. (6) Decreases to allowances shall be made by amendment to the financing agreement which the Department shall prepare and provide to the project sponsor for execution subject to the following: (a) The amount of any decrease under pre-construction grants or pre- construction loans shall be established as follows: 1. When planning is not completed as required by a financing agreement, the amount of the decrease shall.be established by eliminating all remaining undisbursed allowances from the pre-construction grant or pre-construction loan amount. 2. When planning is completed but facilities are not designed as required by a financing agreement, the amount of the decrease shall be established as the engineering allowance for the incomplete design work based on the estimated adjusted post-allowance costs documented in the completed facilities plan. The decrease shall ® Effective 7-20-99 117 �. DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-652 WATER FACILITIES be applied to all remaining undisbursed allowances under the pre-construction loan or pre-construction grant. If necessary, the decrease shall be recovered in conjunction with a construction loan or construction grant that provides funding for any part of the designed facilities. Allowances are subject to further adjustment under paragraph (b) below. (b) The amount of any decrease to allowances under construction grants or construction loans shall be established by subtracting the allowance based upon the adjusted post-allowance project costs established upon execution of the final procurement contract from the allowance based upon the originally estimated costs for post-allowance activities documented in the construction assistance agreement. The costs included in such final adjusted post-allowance project costs shall be in the award amount for construction related contracts included in the project scope as described in the construction assistance agreement, regardless of whether project funding has been segmented under rule 62-552.500(1)(d) or 62-552.600(1)(b), F.A.C. 1. When a decrease in post-allowance project costs occurs for a project funded first with a pre-construction grant that has not been limited by the $2,000,000 maximum adjusted post-allowance project costs imposed by rule 62-552.360(6), F.A.C., and then funded with a construction grant for any part of the project, a decrease to grant participation in engineering and administrative allowances shall be made at the 85% grant participation level for that part of the project being funded with the construction ® grant. 2. When a decrease in post-allowance project costs occurs for a project funded first with a pre-construction grant that has been limited by the $2,000,000 maximum adjusted post-allowance project costs imposed by rule 62-552.360(6), F.A.C., and then funded with a construction grant for any part of the project, a decrease to grant participation in engineering and administrative allowances shall be made only if the costs drop below the maximum and then the grant decrease shall be made at the 85% grant participation level for that part of the project being funded with the construction grant. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History- New 4-7-98,.Amended 8-10-98, Amended 7-20-99. 62-552.430 Construction Loans for Rate-Based Community Water Systems. To receive a loan, a project sponsor must enter into a negotiated written agreement with the Department. The Department shall have the primary responsibility for drafting the agreement and settling its terms. Loan agreements shall provide for the following: (1) The project sponsor shall establish a loan repayment reserve account. When pledged revenues result from the operation of water systems or water and sewer systems entirely owned by a single project sponsor responsible for systems operation and for loan repayment, the reserve shall be 0.03 times the total loan amount less the portion of the loan for capitalized interest and loan repayment reserve. When pledged revenues result from other revenues, the project sponsor responsible for loan ® Effective 7-20-99. 18 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-652 WATER FACILITIES repayment is other than as previously described in this subsection, the project sponsor has not demonstrated the ability to service long term debt, or all default remedies under subsection (15) below are not available to the Department, the repayment security in the form of coverage in addition to the 1.15 amount and other security features described in subsection (4) below shall be negotiated. However, any loan repayment reserve in excess of that based on the 0.03 factor specified above shall be established using local funds unless the project sponsor qualifies as a financially disadvantaged community. (2) , Uniform loan repayments shall be made semiannually. The loan recipient shall make monthly deposits of pledged revenues to an escrowed debt service account and shall be responsible for the maintenance of that account. (3) The interest rate shall be 60% of the market rate as established using the Thomson Publishing Corporation's "Bond Buyer"20-Bond GO Index and shall not exceed that paid on the last bonds sold pursuant to s. 14, Art. VII, State Constitution. The market rate (20-Bond GO Index) shall be established by the Department as of January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 of each year and shall be the average weekly yield for the full weeks occurring during the three months immediately preceding the date of determination. Once established in the loan agreement, the interest rate shall be fixed for the principal amount of the loan. Interest rates for additional funds, if any, lent to the project sponsor via a loan agreement amendment shall be established in the same manner as for the initial loan. The procedures for establishing the market rate for ® any funds lent shall be subject to the following considerations: (a) When the loan agreement, as provided to the project sponsor by the Department for execution, is signed and returned to the Department in the same fiscal quarter as it is offered, the market rate shall be the average weekly yield during the preceding fiscal quarter. (b) When the loan agreement, as provided to the project sponsor by the Department for execution, is signed and returned to the Department in the fiscal quarter after that in which it is offered, the market rate shall be the�gEr, r of the average weekly yield for the fiscal quarter preceding that in which the I"ban agreement is offered and the fiscal quarter preceding that in which the signed loan agreement is returned to the Department. (4) Pledged revenues resulting from the operation of water systems or water and sewer systems entirely owned by a single project sponsor responsible for systems operation and for loan repayment shall be as follows: (a) When the project sponsor has demonstrated the ability to service long term debt and all default remedies under subsection (15) below are available to the Department, pledged revenue shall be not less than 1.15 times the amount required to make each semiannual loan repayment unless the project sponsor establishes an escrowed reserve using local funds in an amount not less than one semiannual loan repayment. (b) When the project sponsor has demonstrated the ability to service long term debt but all default remedies under subsection (15) below are not available to the ® Effective 7-20-99 19 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES Department, pledged revenues shall be not less than 1.15 times the amount required to make each semiannual loan repayment. (c) When the project sponsor has not demonstrated the ability to service long term debt and all default remedies under subsection (15) below are not available to the Department, pledged revenues shall be not less than 1.15 times the amount required to make each semiannual loan repayment. In addition, special loan security provisions shall be negotiated that provide assurance that debt service requirements will be fulfilled. The additional security provisions shall be as follows: 1. Additional escrowed reserve funds equivalent to not less than five semiannual loan repayments. Upon request from a financially disadvantaged community, the Department shall include the equivalent of one of the five additional semiannual loan repayments in the loan repayment reserve funds to be included in the loan principal under subsection (1) above. Escrowed funds shall be accompanied by a lien on the assets of the project sponsor in the amount of the total loan principal less the amount of security of principal provided by the additional escrowed funds. 2. A letter of credit from a bank or trust company, having a combined capital and unimpaired surplus of not less than $50 million, authorized to transact commercial banking or savings and loan business in the State of Florida and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assuring that no less than five semiannual loan repayments will be made. The letter of credit shall be accompanied by a lien on the assets of the project sponsor in the amount of the total loan principal less the amount of security of principal provided by the letter of credit. 3. A personal or corporate, as applicable, obligation ensuring that all semiannual repayments can be made. 4. Other security features equivalent to those described in subparagraphs 1. through 3. above. (d) When the project sponsor has not demonstrated the ability to service long term debt and all default remedies under subsection (15) below are available to the Department, pledged revenues shall be not less than 1.15 times the amount required to make each semiannual loan repayment. (5) Pledged revenues resulting from the operation of water systems or water and sewer systems that are not entirely owned by a single project sponsor responsible for systems operation and for loan repayment shall be subject to the negotiated loan security provisions under paragraph (c) above. (6) Pledged revenue coverage for the loan from the Department shall not result from or be transferred from or be derived from coverage required by senior lien debt documents. (7) When submitting a loan to the Department for execution, the project (a) The loan agreement constitutes a valid and legal obligation of the project sponsor; (b) The loan agreement specifies the revenues pledged to the repayment of the loan; and (c) The pledge is valid and enforceable. Effective 7-20-99 20 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES (8) The Department shall have no lien on or security interest in or claim on any moneys of the project sponsor except as expressly provided in the loan agreement. (9) The project sponsor shall provide assurance that: (a) Written records will be kept and organized. The Department, the State of Florida, and their agents shall have access to all records pertaining to the loan. (b) Accounting and financial reporting related to a project sponsored by a governmental entity will be in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Accounting Principles established by the Government Accounting Standards Board. Accounting and financial reporting related to a project sponsored by other than a governmental entity will be in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The address at which documents may be obtained from either Board is 401 Merritt 7, P.O. Box 5116, Norwalk, CT 06856-5116. (c) Facilities will be properly operated and maintained. (d) Loan funds will not be used for the purpose of lobbying any governmental entity. (10) The project sponsor shall begin repaying a loan no later than the date originally scheduled under the loan agreement. (11) Disbursements to the project sponsor shall be for costs paid or incurred, certain allowances, or establishment of a loan repayment reserve. However, capitalized interest is not disbursed to the project sponsor. Disbursements shall be subject to the ® following requirements: (a) Requests for disbursements (other than those relating to allowances) shall be accompanied by certifications and itemized summaries of the materials, labor, or services to identify the nature of the work performed. Certifications shall state that the construction or other service for which payment or reimbursement is sought has been satisfactorily performed. (b) The materials,-labor, and services being invoiced shall be part of the approved project. : r (c) The disbursement shall be due under the terms of the loan agreement. (d) Requests for disbursements for allowances shall be subject to the limitations imposed by rule 62-552.420, F.A.C. (12) No later than three (3) months before the project sponsor's first loan repayment and annually thereafter until the final loan repayment is made, the project sponsor's authorized representative or its chief financial officer shall submit a certification that: (a) Pledged revenue collections, currently deposited under subsection (2) above plus those projected to be collected at current collection rates before the due date for a semiannual loan repayment will satisfy the rate coverage requirement; (b) The monthly escrow account contains the funds required under subsection (2) above. (c) The loan repayment reserve account under subsection (1) and, if appropriate, subsection (4) above contains the funds required; and Effective 7-20-99 21 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-562 WATER FACILITIES (d) Insurance in effect for the facilities generating the pledged revenues adequately covers the customary risks to the extent that such insurance is available. (13) Events of default shall include noncompliance with any of the terms of a loan agreement. (14) No delay or omission by the Department to exercise any right or power accruing upon an event of default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver of any such default or acquiescence therein, and every such right and power may be exercised as often as may be deemed expedient. (15) Remedies for default, including delinquent repayments, include the following: (a) Imposition of 6% penalty interest, accruing on any amount due and payable on the 30th day following the repayment due date, in addition to charging the cost to,handle and process the debt. (b) Interception of local governmental agencies' revenue sharing or tax sharing, except as otherwise provided by the State Constitution. The Department shall certify any local governmental agency repayment delinquency to the Auditor General and the Comptroller. The certification of delinquency shall not limit the Department from pursuing other remedies for default. (c) Imposition of any remedy available to the Department under Florida law. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. ® History- New 4-7-98, Amended 8-10-98, 7-20-99. 62-662.500 Funds Reserved for Specific Purposes. A portion of the funds allocated each year by the Department, including the financially disadvantaged community funds established under rule 62-552.300(8), F.A.C., is reserved for the benefit of small communities. Funds are also reserved to reimburse the Department for its administrative costs in managing the program. (1) Fifteen percent of the funds allocated each year by the Department shall be reserved for projects that will serve small communities. The Department shall administer the small-community reserve funds as follows: (a) Projects that will serve small communities that have sufficient priority ranking, after the assignment of a priority score under rule 62-552.650, F.A.C., shall be listed on the fundable portion list using the procedures under rule 62-552.655 or 62-552.680, F.A.C. (b) A project that will serve a small community shall be eligible for construction Ioan funding from the small-community reserve even if the project sponsor does not qualify as a small community subject to the conditions listed below. This provision shall not apply to pre-construction grants or construction grants. This provision shall not apply to pre-construction loans unless the project priority is based, in part, on regionalization or consolidation under rule 62-552.650(5)(c), F.A.C. 1. A county government or agency thereof is the project sponsor, or Effective 7-20-99 22 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES 2. The existing population of the small community is at least one-half of the' total existing population to be served by the project; and 3. The design year population growth projected for the small community represents at least one-half of the total design year population growth to be served by the project. (c) When the project list is adopted, any part of the reserved amount not needed to place small-community projects on the fundable portion shall no longer be reserved exclusively for small-community projects. (d) The amount of funds that may be lent for any construction project in any one year to serve a small community shall be limited to 25% of the funds reserved under this subsection. Projects qualifying for additional assistance shall be subject to the same limitations and entitlements as those segmented under rule 62-552.600(1)(b), F.A.C. (e) The amount of funds that may be lent for any pre-construction project shall be subject to the limitations under rule 62-552.350(1), F.A.C. (f) The amount of grant funds that shall be reserved for a pre-construction project shall be subject to the limitations under rules 62-552.360 and 62-552.300(8), F.A.C. (g) The amount of grant funds that shall be reserved for all construction grant projects shall be subject to the limitations under rule 62-552.300(8), F.A.C. (2) Service fees under rule 62-552.400, F.A.C., shall be deposited in the ® Department's Grants and Donations Trust Fund. Fee proceeds, including investment earnings, shall be reserved to pay for the administration of the financial assistance programs of the Bureau of Water Facilities Funding. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History- New 4-7-98, Amended 8-10-98, 7-20-99. 62-562.600 Project List Information. Each year, a project list shall be adopted at a public hearing. The ERC establishes project priorities and approves the placement of projects on the list before projects can be funded with grants for financially disadvantaged communities. The Secretary or designee establishes project priorities and approves the placement of projects on the list before projects can be funded with loans. The list becomes effective after adoption, but not before July 1 of the fiscal year for which it is developed. The following are the procedures to be used to establish project list information for Fiscal Year 1999 and subsequent years: (1) The Department shall accept-requests for inclusion on the next year's project list when they are postmarked or delivered between December 1 and February 15. Resubmittal shall not be necessary if the requested project was included on the preceding year's list. However, current target date and estimated cost information shall be provided by the February 15 deadline for any project previously listed on the planning portion or contingency portion to qualify for listing on the fundable portion. A ® Effective 7-20-99 23 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-562 WATER FACILITIES request for inclusion shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400. Procedures for the review of requests for inclusion shall be: (a) Additional information shall be requested by the Department when the data provided by the project sponsor are incomplete or unclear. Data remaining incomplete or unclear after 30 days from receipt of the Department's written request for additional information shall result in a lower funding priority, reflecting a substitution of assumed data for the incomplete or unclear data. The assumed data shall generate the minimum priority score attributed to the incomplete or unclear data. (b) The amount of funds available to a project sponsor for projects to be listed on the fundable portion for construction loans shall be limited to no more than 25% of the funds allocated each year by the Department in any one fiscal year. The amount of funds available to a project sponsor in any one fiscal year for projects to be listed on the fundable portion for construction grants shall be limited under rule 62-552.370(1)(a), F.A.C. There shall be no limitation imposed on the amount of funding assigned to contingency portion projects. A project shall be segmented for deferred funding when a project sponsor achieves a fundable portion listing and qualifies for funding in excess of that available to it in any one fiscal year. (c) A target date shall be assigned to each project, including those partially funded during the preceding fiscal year. Projects to be scheduled for funding in the fiscal year for which the list is being developed shall have target dates no later than March 31 of that fiscal year. (d) A priority determination under rule 62-552.650, F.A.C., shall be made for each project. (2) A schedule for completing all remaining requirements before the target date deadline, referenced in paragraph (1)(c) above, shall be furnished by the project sponsor to obtain a project listing on the fundable or contingency portion. The schedule shall be compatible with deadlines required by administrative or judicial actions or by permit conditions. (3) The scope of a fundable or contingency portion project described on the project list shall not be expanded to encompass additional work unless it has been subject to the prioritization procedures of rule 62-552.650, F.A.C., and either the list development procedures of rule 62-552.655, F.A.C., or the list management procedures of rule 62-552.680, F.A.C., as appropriate. (4) After the ranking of projects under rule 62-552.655, F.A.C., and before June 1 preceding the fiscal year for which the list will be in effect, a proposed list shall be established. The proposed list shall be mailed by the Department, not later than 14 days prior to the list adoption hearing to be held under this rule section, to all project sponsors that have submitted a request for inclusion on the proposed list and to anyone who submits a written request, at least 14 days before the scheduled list adoption, to the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Effective 7-20-99 24 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-652 ® WATER FACILITIES Law Implemented 403.804, 403.8532, FS. History- New 4-7-98, Amended 8-10-98. 62-552.650 Priority Determination. (1) The priority system for financial assistance is based on public health considerations, compliance with the Act or other enforceable requirements relating to drinking water systems, and affordability. Affordability includes the evaluation of median household income, population affected, and consolidation of very small public water systems which serve a population of 500 people or fewer. The baseline priority score shall be determined as set forth in subsections (2), (3), and (4) below. The affordability score shall be determined as set forth in subsection (5) below and shall be added to the baseline score. Special consideration shall be given, in the form of the cost-effectiveness preference under rule 62-552.700(2), F.A.C., to projects in areas where salt water intrusion jeopardizes adequate supplies of safe drinking water. (2) Each project, or component of a project when a project has components qualifying for different baseline priority scores, shall be assigned a baseline priority score to indicate protection of public health, compliance with the Act or other enforceable requirements, or another lower priority need. (a) When a construction loan project has components qualifying for different baseline priority scores, the score for the entire project shall be the highest number of points for which at least 50% of the estimated project costs qualify. When no single project component generates at least 50% of the estimated project costs, the cost of the highest priority component shall be combined with one or more lower priority component costs, at the lowest number of points associated with any of the combined components, to achieve the 50% threshold and thereby establish the overall project baseline priority score. (b) When a construction grant project has components qualifying for different baseline priority scores, each component shall be assigned its own priority score. A project must have a public health risk assigned to it or to one of its components to qualify for a construction grant under rule 62-552.370(1)(h), F.A.C. The priority of any project component, regardless of the ratios of component costs to total project cost, shall not establish overall project baseline priority score. (c) When a pre-construction project has components qualifying for different baseline priority scores, one of the project components must have a public health risk assigned to it to qualify for a loan under rule 62-552.350, F.A.C., or a grant under rule 62-552.360, F.A.C. Such a public health risk priority establishes the overall project baseline priority score. However, an overall pre-construction project baseline priority score shall not be carried over to any subsequent construction grant or construction loan project. Any prioritization of a construction project shall be subject to the applicable paragraph (a) or(b) above. (3) Compliance monitoring results for public water systems or County Health Department sampling results for other supply, treatment, or distribution systems during the 48-month period immediately preceding the date upon which a request for inclusion Effective 7-20-99 26 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES is submitted under rule 62-552.600(1) or rule 62-552.680(1)(a)2., F.A.C., shall be used to justify public health and compliance baseline priority scores involving a comparison to a maximum contaminant level (MCL) or other numerical standard relating to drinking water quality. A certification by the State Health Officer of the existence of a public health risk during the referenced 48-month period also shall justify a public health baseline priority score. (4) Baseline priority scores shall be assigned to projects that will eliminate any of the following conditions or satisfy the Florida Administrative Code requirements cited below: (a) Acute public health risk sub-category projects shall be assigned a baseline priority score of 800 points when the following is documented. 1. Exceedance of the fecal coliform or E. Coli MCL value as set forth in rule 62-550.310(3)(b), F.A.C.; 2. Failure to meet the surface water treatment or disinfection requirements of rules 62-550.560 and 62-555.600 through 62-555.630, F.A.C., commonly known as the Surface Water Treatment Rule; 3. Exceedance of a lead or copper action level as set forth in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 141, sections 80 through 91 (1995)for two (2) successive monitoring periods; or 4. Exceedance of a nitrate, nitrite or total nitrogen MCL value as set forth in rule 62-550.310(1), F.A.C. For public water systems, an exceedance shall be established according to the monitoring requirements of rule 62-550.512, F.A.C. (b) Potential acute public health risk sub-category projects shall be assigned a baseline priority score of 700 points when the following is documented. 1. Exceedance of the total coliform MCL value as set forth in rule 62- 550.310(3)(a), F.A.C.; 2. Violation of the disinfection requirements under rule 62-555.320(4), F.A.C.; 3. Exceedance of 50% of a nitrate, nitrite or total nitrogen MCL value as set forth in rule 62-550.310(1), F.A.C; 4. Treatment or disinfection facilities are needed to enhance compliance with the Surface Water Treatment Rule; or 5. A certification is made by the State Health Officer that an acute public health risk exists as a result of contaminants for which the Department has no established standards for water supplies and the proposed project will eliminate the risk. (c) Chronic public health risk sub-category projects shall be assigned a baseline priority score of 600 points when an exceedance of an MCL value for the following is documented. 1. Primary chemical contaminants (except nitrate, nitrite, and total nitrogen) identified in Tables 1, 2, and 3 of chapter 62-550, F.A.C.; 2. Trihalomethanes identified in rule 62-550.310(2)(a), F.A.C.; or 3. Radionuclides identified in rule 62-550.310(4), F.A.C. Effective 7-20-99 26 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-652 WATER FACILITIES (d) The potential chronic public health risk sub-category projects shall be assigned a baseline priority score of 500 points when the following is documented. 1. Exceedance of 50% of an MCL value for primary chemical contaminants (except nitrate, nitrite, and total nitrogen) identified in Tables 1, 2, and 3 of chapter 62- 550, F.A.C.; or 2. Exceedance of 80% of an MCL value for trihalomethanes identified in rule 62-550.310(2)(a), F.A.C.; or 3. A certification is made by the State Health Officer that a chronic public health risk exists as a result of contaminants for which the Department has no established standards for water supplies and the proposed project will eliminate the risk. (e) The compliance with the Act and other enforceable requirements category projects shall be assigned a baseline priority score of 300 points when any of the following is documented. 1. Violation of any secondary contaminant standard found in Table 4 of chapter 62-550, F.A.C. 2. Required facilities do not currently exist or must be provided to enable compliance with rules of the Department. The situations requiring compliance are listed below: a. Requirements for the minimum number of wells in rule 62-555.315(1), F.A.C.; b. Well set-back and construction requirements of rules 62-555.312 and 62- 555.315, F.A.C., respectively; C. Treatment, storage, power, and distribution requirements of rule 62- 555.320, F.A.C.; and d. Cross connections and backflow control requirements of rule 62-555.360, F.A.C. (f) A separate category having a baseline priority score of 100 points shall be assigned to all other projects that cannot be categorized under paragraphs (a) through (e) above. Examples of such projects are water softening treatment and computer or laboratory facilities. (5) In addition to the assignment of a baseline score, each project shall be awarded points based upon the three affordability criteria outlined below. These points shall be added to the baseline category score to determine the total priority score for the project. (a) A median household income (MHI) score shall be derived based on the extent to which a community's MHI falls below the statewide average. Data used to determine the score shall be from the most recent decennial census or from verifiable estimates provided by the project sponsor. Household income data shall be representative of all areas to be served by the proposed project. The score is based on the following formula: MHI score = 200 x (1.00 - MHI fraction) Effective 7-20-99 27 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES Where the MHI fraction is the MHI estimate for the project service area divided by the statewide average MHI. This score shall not exceed a maximum of 100.0 points and shall be rounded to the nearest tenth of a point. (b) Projects for small systems are generally less affordable than those for larger systems because of the limited rate base from which to recover costs. These systems also often have difficulty complying with the Act. Thus, special consideration will be given to such projects based on population. The population score is based on the following formula: Population score = 50.0- (P/1,000) Where P is the population of the project's service area. The minimum score shall be 0.0 points and shall be rounded to the nearest 0.1 point. (c) Because very small public water systems often experience difficulty complying with the regulatory requirements, a consolidation score will be used to reflect a project's consolidation or regionalization of such systems. For each project which consolidates or regionalizes public water systems serving 500 or fewer persons, an additional 15 points for each such system will be awarded. However, the consolidation score shall not exceed 45 points regardless of the number or consolidated or regionalized systems. Specific Authority 403,8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History- New - 4-7-98, Amended 7-20-99. 62-552.655 Ranking Projects for Project List Development. Projects shall be assigned to the fundable, contingency, and planning portions of the project list each year, thus establishing project rankings. Each project shall be listed on the fundable, contingency, or planning portion. Priority score of the project, the amount of funds allocated each year by the Department, and, for construction grants and loans, readiness of the project sponsor to proceed with construction procurement shall determine the appropriate portion for project listing. The small-community reserve funds under rule 62-552.500(1), F.A.C., shall be administered so that the ranking of qualifying projects is independent of rankings of other projects on the project list. When a segmented project is included on the fundable portion, the unfunded remainder shall be deferred to the contingency portion. Projects with equal priority scores shall be subranked in order of the date of postmark or receipt by the Department of the request for inclusion, whichever is earlier. Similar subranking of projects shall take place when updated project information is submitted under rule 62-552.600, F.A.C. (1) Projects shall be listed on the fundable portion of the project list if sufficient funds are expected to be available, the conditions of this section are met, and a schedule for completing all remaining program requirements before the target date has been submitted under rule 62-552.600(2), F.A.C. (2) The procedures for identifying the projects to be funded from the small- community reserve funds require the identification of the lowest ranked project, regardless of size of the community to be served, on the fundable portion based on the Effective 7-20-99 28 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES availability of unreserved funds only. Subsequent procedures are described below, and they may result in the assignment of small-community projects with relatively low priority scores to the fundable portion of the project list. (a) When there are more qualifying small-community project needs than reserved funds available, reserved funds shall be made available in descending order of relative priority score for projects having lower priority scores than the lowest ranked fundable portion project established under subsection (2) above. Any remaining reserved funds then shall be assigned to projects in ascending order of relative priority score for projects having higher priority scores than the lowest ranked fundable portion project establish under subsection (2) above. (b) When there are more reserved funds available than there are qualifying small-community project needs, reserved funds shall be made available for all qualifying projects regardless of priority score. After assignment of the reserved funds to all qualifying projects, the remaining funds no longer shall be reserved to fund small- community projects. (c) The lowest ranked project not qualifying for reserve funds on the fundable portion shall be reestablished as a result of assigning reserved funds to small-community projects as described in paragraphs (a) and (b) above. (3) When the reserved or unreserved funds expected to be available will not fully finance the lowest-ranked project being considered for the fundable portion and the project sponsor seeking funding will not commit to building the entire project without an assurance of additional funding from the Department, the entire project shall be deferred to the contingency portion and listed immediately below incompletely funded projects. (4) Projects shall be placed on the fundable portion as described below during the annual updating under rule 62-552.600, F.A.C. Only qualifying projects may be placed on the project list. The rules of the Department in effect when a project was placed on the contingency portion of the list shall be used to establish whether the project qualifies for a fundable portion listing. However, projects that are to serve the needs of small communities shall receive preferential consideration as described in subsection (2) above for placement on the fundable portion when there are available funds reserved for small communities. (a) Projects, if any, included on the fundable portion of the previous fiscal year's project list and requiring additional funds to cant' out the approved scope of work shall be ranked above all other projects on the fundable portion of the project list being developed if current target date and estimated cost information are provided by February 15 under rule 62-552.600(1), F.A.C. The incompletely funded projects shall appear on the fundable portion as follows: 1. Segmented projects limited to the maximum funding under rule 62-552.500(1)(d) or 62-552.600(1)(b), F.A.C., and having an unfunded remainder listed on the contingency portion in the immediately preceding fiscal year shall be advanced to the fundable portion in priority score order. Effective 7-20-99 29 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-652 WATER FACILITIES 2. Other incompletely funded projects shall be listed in priority score order immediately after the segmented projects that advance from the contingency portion. Incompletely funded projects shall be listed ahead of other projects advancing from the contingency portion. (b) Other qualifying projects shall be placed on the fundable portion in the order described below. 1. Projects receiving a priority score based on a public health risk sub- category and which were included on the preceding year's contingency portion shall advance in priority score order. These projects shall be ranked immediately behind the incompletely funded projects. 2. All other qualifying projects shall be placed on the fundable portion in priority score order immediately behind those advancing from the contingency portion pursuant to subparagraph 1. above. (5) The following documentation shall be postmarked or delivered to the Department by April 15 preceding list adoption under rule 62-552.600, F.A.C., to qualify a construction loan or construction grant project for listing on the fundable portion: (a) The water facilities plan. (b) Evidence that the results of the Department's environmental review have been published under rule 62-552.700(3), F.A.C., and environmental concerns, if any, identified during the 30-day comment period have been resolved. (c) Biddable plans and specifications and evidence that the Department has established conformance with the water facilities plan. (d) Evidence that any of the following permitting related conditions exist for the project: 1. The use of a general permit under rule 62-555.410, F.A.C., has been authorized; 2. An intent to issue a permit under rules 62-555.520 and 62-555.530, F.A.C., has been established; 3. The Department has issued other authorization for project construction; or 4. The Department has determined that its authorization is not required prior to construction. (e) Certification of availability of all project sites necessary for the purposes of construction, operation, and maintenance over the useful life of the facilities. (f) Reasonable financial assurance that project construction will be completed. Such assurance may be in the form of a commitment to maintain adequate reserve funds dedicated throughout the construction period to ensuring project completion. Other forms of such reasonable assurance include requirements for contractors to provide performance and payment bonds under section 255.05, F.S., and insurance covering workers' compensation, comprehensive general liability, vehicle liability, and property damage to the extent that coverage is available for construction activities. (g) A value engineering report for operationally related project facilities for which the adjusted post-allowance project costs are valued at more than $5,000,000. Effective- 7-20-99 30 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-652 WATER FACILITIES (6) The requirements for a pre-construction loan or pre-construction grant project to qualify for a fundable portion listing are such that the project sponsor shall have postmarked or delivered documentation as required under rules 62-552.600(1) and (2), F.A.C. (7) Projects or portions of projects shall be placed or retained on the contingency portion during the annual updating under rule 62-552.600, F.A.C., when the funds expected to be available are insufficient for placement on the fundable portion. The procedures for listing qualifying projects on the contingency portion are described below. (a) Incompletely funded projects being retained on the contingency portion from the previous fiscal year's project list shall be ranked according to priority score above all other projects. The incompletely funded projects shall be subranked as follows: 1. The unfunded segments of projects limited to the maximum funding under rule 62-552.500(1)(d) or 62-552.600(1)(b), F.A.C., shall have the highest ranking on the contingency portion. Such projects shall be subranked according to priority score. 2. The unfunded portion of other projects requiring additional funds to carry out the approved scope of work shall be subranked according to priority score and listed immediately after the segmented projects. (b) Projects receiving a priority score based on a public health risk sub- category and which were included on the preceding year's contingency portion shall ® advance up the contingency portion in priority score order as higher ranked projects advance to the fundable portion. The advancing projects shall be listed immediately after the unfunded projects described in subparagraph (a)2. above. (c) Other qualifying projects shall be included, in priority score order, on the contingency portion behind the advancing projects described in paragraph (b) above. (8) All projects that cannot be listed on the fundable or the contingency portion shall be listed on the planning portion in alphabetical order. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History- New 4-7-98, Amended 8-10-98. 62-552.680 Project List Management. (1) The fundable portion of the project list shall be modified as the result of a public hearing held by the ERC when grant assistance for a financially disadvantaged community is involved or as the result of a public hearing held by the Secretary or designee when loan assistance is involved as described in paragraph (a) below or as a result of an administrative action as described in paragraph (b) below. The fiscal year's small community set-aside and financially disadvantaged community grant set-aside shall be available to add projects to the fundable portion of the project list. Such additions shall be made on a priority score basis, regardless of the characteristics of the community to be served. However, the total funding under each set-aside provided to all qualifying projects that have been listed on the fundable portion of the current fiscal year's project list shall not exceed the original amount of each set-aside at the time of • Effective 7-20-99 31 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES project list adoption. The.amount of the set-aside for small communities and for financially disadvantaged communities is addressed in rules 62-552.500(1) and 62- 552.300(8), F.A.C., respectively. When the funds expected to be available will not fully finance the lowest-ranked project being considered for addition or advancement to the fundable portion and the project sponsor seeking funding will not commit to building the entire project without an assurance of additional funding from the Department, the project shall be listed on the contingency portion immediately below incompletely funded projects. The amount of funds assigned to any project sponsor which has already received the maximum funding assignment allowed for the fiscal year shall not be increased unless additional state or federal appropriations have been made available which increase the estimate of the funds allocated each year by the Department. (a) Upon receipt of a written request to conduct a public hearing for the purpose of modifying the project list, the Department shall schedule a public hearing to be held within 90 days for the purpose of assigning additional funds to projects on the fundable portion and adding projects to the bottom of the fundable portion if unassigned funds are available and the requirements of this paragraph are met. Requests shall include the information identified below and shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, MS 3505, 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400. Projects categorized in subparagraphs 1. or 2. below and that have equal priority scores shall be subranked in order of the date of postmark or receipt by the Department, whichever is earlier, of the request for additional funds or for the addition of a project to the fundable portion. 1. Additional money first shall be assigned to a project included on the fundable portion of the previous or current fiscal year's project list which requires additional funds to cant' out the approved scope of work if an itemized cost breakdown and explanation are submitted that justify the requested increase. The request for inclusion previously submitted to the Department shall be used to re-establish priority scores for such previously funded projects. The previously funded projects shall have funding preference over projects currently on the fundable portion. 2. Other projects shall be added to the bottom of the fundable portion in priority score order only after assignments under subparagraph 1. above have been accomplished and all non-segmented projects receiving a priority score based on a public health risk sub-category that are on the contingency portion have advanced to the fundable portion. Additions to the bottom of the fundable portion shall be made provided that a request for inclusion has been submitted and: a. All of the conditions under rule 62-552.655(5), F.A.C., have been met; and b. The project sponsor has submitted its project schedule establishing a deadline for filing a complete loan application no later than the date below corresponding to the three-month period in which the notification to the project sponsor by the Department of the listing on the fundable portion occurs. Notification Period Deadline January 1 to March 31 May 15 Effective 7-20-99 32 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES April 1 to June 30 August 15 July 1 to September 30 November 15 October 1 to December 31 February 15 3. No requests for addition to the fundable portion of the project list shall be considered unless the request has been received by the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, MS 3505, 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 before the date on which the public notice for the hearing appears in the Florida Administrative Weekly. (b) Projects receiving a priority score based on a public health risk sub- category and which are not segmented projects currently listed on the contingency portion of a project list shall be administratively advanced in order of listing on the contingency portion to the fundable portion without a public hearing when unassigned funds become available. When such an advancement occurs, the deadline for filing a complete loan application shall be no later than the date given in sub-subparagraph (1)(a)2.b. above corresponding to the three-month period in which the notification to the project sponsor by the Department of the advancement occurs. (2) The contingency portion of the project list shall be modified by assigning additional funds to projects or adding projects only as the result of a public hearing. Additional money shall be assigned to a project currently on the contingency portion if an itemized cost breakdown and explanation are submitted justifying the requested ® increase. Projects shall be added to the contingency portion in priority score order if a request for inclusion has been submitted, and all of the conditions under rule 62-552.655(5), F.A.C., have been met. However, no project shall be placed above an incompletely funded project or a project receiving a priority score based on a public health risk sub-category already on the contingency portion. The timeframe for requesting an addition to the contingency portion shall be limited as set forth for the fundable portion under subparagraph (1)(a)3. above. , (3) A project shall be added to the planning portion of the project list if a request for inclusion on the planning portion is received. Additions to the planning portion shall not require a public hearing. (4) A project shall be assigned to the planning portion of a project list when the assignment of the project to the fundable portion has been withdrawn. If a target date deadline or a deadline for submitting a complete financial assistance application is not met, the project status shall be scheduled for review at a public hearing to be held by the ERC when a grant for a financially disadvantaged community is involved or by the Secretary or designee when a loan is involved no sooner than 30 days after the deadline. If, as a result of the hearing, it is determined that the activity at issue has not been completed, the project shall be removed from the fundable portion. (5) Projects shall be rescheduled for implementation in a future fiscal year or removed from a project list at the request of the project sponsor without a public hearing. Rescheduled projects shall be listed on the planning portion. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. ® Effective 7-20-99 33 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES Law Implemented 403.804, 403.8532, FS. History- New 4-7-98, Amended 8-10-98. 62-552.700 Planning, Design, Construction, and Post-Construction Requirements. Special federal requirements under subsection (1) below shall be met for equivalency projects. When projects cease to be equivalency projects, the special federal requirements shall not be mandatory. However, the requirements of subsections (2) through (11) below shall be met for all projects. Federal regulations incorporated by reference shall be read so that the terms "United States," "federal," "EPA," and "officials of EPA" mean "the state" unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. These federal regulations also shall be read so that"grants" also means "loans." (1) Equivalency projects shall be subject to the requirements of federal cross- cutting authorities identified in "Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program Guidelines," EPA 816-R-97-005, February 1997. (2) A project that develops an alternative drinking water supply and management technique in an area where existing source water is limited or threatened by saltwater intrusion, excessive drawdown, contamination, or other problems shall be given a 10% present worth or uniform annual cost preference. To be given such a preference, a project shall provide for a safe, dependable supply of drinking water throughout the proposed service area and the project shall contribute to the ® sustainability of regional water sources. (3) The Department shall perform an environmental review for each project to be funded. The environmental review shall establish the environmental significance of a proposed project and whether the planning of the project meets the requirements of this rule chapter. The environmental review also shall establish the Department's intention to make funding available for a project after the project sponsor has met the appropriate requirements of this rule chapter. A notice of availability to announce the results of the Department's environmental review shall be published in the Florida Administrative Weekly. The notice of availability shall include instructions about the procedures for accessing project information and the Department's findings. The Department shall provide a 30-day period, commencing as of the date of the notice of availability, for public comment about the environmental impacts of proposed projects. Written comments from the public shall be postmarked or delivered, within the 30-day comment period, to the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400. (a) When an environmental review is performed for a component or portion of the planned public water system in advance of completing the review for the entire system of facilities, the environmental review process is partitioned. Partitioning shall not imply further approvals for the remainder of the public water system, and the environmental review for the remainder of the facilities shall conform to the applicable requirements of this subsection. A partitioned environmental review, if requested by the project sponsor, shall be performed only if all the following conditions are met: Effective 7-20-99 34 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES 1. The component will immediately remedy a public health, drinking water standards violation, or environmental problem or advance completion will achieve a demonstrable cost savings; 2. All environmentally sound, implementable alternatives for the overall public water system of which the component is a part have been identified, and the component does not foreclose any of the alternatives; and 3. The component will not cause adverse environmental impacts, including impacts that will be minimized or eliminated only by completing the entire system. (b) The Department shall consult with project sponsors during the preparation of water facilities plans to assist in the preparation of environmental information. The project sponsor shall document cultural, historical, archaeological, and biological aspects of a project during the planning process. Conditions shall be placed on a financial assistance agreement to enhance the compatibility of the project with the existing environment when such conditions will satisfy environmentally based objections to the project. The Department shall document the results of its environmental reviews as described in paragraphs (c) through (f) below. When an environmental review document is amended in lieu of issuing a new document to reflect proposed project changes that potentially have environmental impacts, the same basic procedures as were used to produce the original document shall be used. (c) A Florida Categorical Exclusion Notice (FCEN) shall be used for certain projects that are not expected to generate controversy over potential environmental ® effects. An FCEN shall not be used where there are environmental objections to a project at the public hearing held, under subsection (4) below, before the project sponsor adopted the water facilities plan provided that such objections have a basis in statute, rule, or ordinance. An FCEN shall not be used where a project will result in the inability of existing facilities to meet permit conditions or drinking water standards or where the project would provide capacity to service previously undisturbed areas such that more than 30% of the total design population for the project is attributed to the undisturbed areas. 1. In issuing an FCEN, the Department shall: a. Briefly describe the project, the justification for the categorical exclusion, and the proposed loan funding. b. Conclude the environmental review only after the 30-day public comment period, under subsection (3) above, has expired and: no information is received about adverse environmental impacts; information is received about adverse environmental impacts and the objections either are without a basis in statute, regulation, or ordinance or are resolved; or information is received about adverse environmental impacts and the FCEN is rescinded. 2. Projects categorically excluded from further environmental review are: a. Rehabilitation of existing facilities or replacement of structures, wells, waterlines, or equipment; b. Facilities that will not result in more than a 50% increase of existing public water system capacity and there is no acquisition of land other than easements and Effective 7-20-99 36 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES rights-of-way where streets have been established, underground utilities installed, building sites excavated, or where such lands have otherwise been disturbed from a natural condition; C. Facilities for the disinfection of public water supplies; d. Back-up supply wells where, after disinfection, existing water quality meets drinking water standards and there is no acquisition of land; and e. Facilities that will result solely in the provision of adequate public water system pressure. (d) A Florida Finding of No Significant Impact (FFONSI) shall be used when a project sponsor proposes a project not categorically excluded from a detailed environmental review and not requiring a Florida Environmental Impact Statement. In issuing a FFONSI, the Department shall: 1. Record the basis for the decision to provide financial assistance for the project, addressing: a. The existing and future environmental conditions without the project and the environmental consequences of the project; b. The purpose of, and the need for, the project; C. The alternatives to, and the cost-effectiveness of, the project; d. Environmental enhancement measures to be implemented; e. The public participation process; ® f. The interdisciplinary review of the project; and g. Compliance with rules of the Department. 2. Consider public comments about environmental impacts of a project if the comments are received within 30 days after the publication date of the notice of availability under subsection (3) above. 3. Conclude the environmental review for the project only after the 30-day comment period has expired and: a. No information is received about previously unconsidered adverse environmental impacts; b. Information is received about previously unconsidered adverse environmental impacts and the objections are resolved; or C. A re-evaluation of the project is made as a result of the comments and the Department takes action to confirm the original decision, require additional analysis and environmental enhancement measures before implementing the project, or rescind the original decision. (e) A Florida Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and a Florida Record of Decision (FROD) shall be used for a project for which there is an adverse direct, or indirect, impact on land use and population patterns, the quality of the environment, cultural or environmental resource areas, or the habitats of endangered or threatened species. An FEIS and FROD also shall be used when there is unresolved public controversy over the environmental impacts of a project provided that the objections to the project have a basis in statute, rule, or ordinance. An FEIS shall be prepared by the Department or, at the direction of the Department and in accordance with the ® Effective 7-20-99 36 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-562 WATER FACILITIES Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act, section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes, by others with no conflicting interest in the outcome. In completing the environmental review, the Department shall: 1. Issue a notice of intent to prepare an FEIS for the project; 2. Develop a plan of study and convene a meeting of government, including EPA, and other interested parties to determine the scope of the FEIS; 3. Identify and evaluate project alternatives; 4. Provide for public participation and review by federal and state environmental regulatory agencies; 5. Ensure that adverse impacts of the project are minimized or eliminated; 6. Document the findings of the environmental review using both the FROD and FEIS; 7. Announce the funding eligibilities using a FROD and consider public comments about environmental impacts if received during the 30-day period beginning on the date of publication of the notice of availability under subsection (3) above; and 8. Conclude the environmental review only after a 30-day public comment period has expired without receipt of comments about adverse environmental impacts or if, after receipt of such comments, the Secretary takes action to: a. Confirm the original decision; b. Require additional analysis and environmental enhancement as a condition of confirmation of the original decision; or C. Rescind the original decision. (f) A Florida Reaffirmation Notice (FRAN) shall be used to establish the Department's continuing intention to make funds available for unimplemented projects, the planning for which was previously documented by the Department in an FCEN, FFONSI, FROD, or analogous documents issued by EPA, or amendments to any of the foregoing. In issuing a FRAN, the Department shall: 1. State the findings being reaffirmed. 2. Consider public comments about changed conditions altering the environmental impacts since the previous FCEN, FFONSI, FROD, or analogous documents issued by EPA, or amendments to any of the foregoing. Comments shall be considered if received during the 30-day period beginning on the date of publication of the notice of availability of the FRAN under subsection (3) above. . 3. Conclude the environmental review only after the public comment period has expired and: a. No information is received about changed conditions resulting in adverse environmental impacts; b. Information is received about previously unconsidered adverse environmental impacts or about changed conditions altering the environmental impacts and the objections are resolved; or C. Information is received about adverse environmental impacts and the FRAN is rescinded. (4) A water facilities plan shall include documentation of the following: Effective 7-20-99 37 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES (a) Identification of the planning area and the existing and future project service areas; (b) Cost-effectiveness of feasible alternatives, including consolidation and regionalization of facilities, over a planning period of at least five years based on a discount rate projected to be in effect during that planning period; (c) Implementability of the selected facilities from legal, institutional, financial, technical, and management perspectives; (d) Environmental effects and other non-monetary considerations, if any, associated with the selected facilities; (e) Identification of the water quality, treatment, storage, distribution, or supply problems associated with the public water system and the local physical conditions associated with those problems; (f) Identification of the facilities needed to comply with federal and Florida rules and identification of the facilities needed to provide adequate quantities of safe drinking water throughout the future project service area over the planning period; (g) Public participation process carried out by the project sponsor; (h) Capital improvements financing information addressing the following for projects to be funded with loans: 1. The source of funds or revenues to be dedicated to repaying the loan and the expenses, charges, and liens against such dedicated funds or revenues; 2. All capital improvements, including those to be financed using any type of debt instrument, that will be implemented over a period of five (5) years beginning with the projected year of the first annual loan repayment and that will be financed from the same funds or revenues dedicated to repaying the loan; 3: Proposed system of charges, rates, fees, and other collections that will the generate revenues to be dedicated to loan repayment demonstrating that the public water system is to be financially self-sufficient; . 4. Proposed rate ordinance or other enforceable schedule for charges, rates, fees, and other collections associated with loan repayment; 5. Public water system operating and non-operating expenses and revenues for the most recent audited operating year and projected to be in effect for the first full year after the project has been constructed and is in operation; (i) Capital improvements financing information addressing the following for projects to be funded with grants: 1. All capital improvements to the public water system, including those to be financed using any type of debt instrument, that will be implemented over a period of five (5) years beginning with the year after the project has been constructed and is in operation; 2. Proposed system of charges, rates, fees, and other collections that will generate the revenues that will be dedicated to making the public water system financially self-sufficient; ® Effective 7-20-99 38 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES 3. Proposed rate ordinance or other enforceable schedule for charges, rates, fees, and other collections associated with the revenues that will be dedicated to making the public water system financially self-sufficient; 4. Public water system operating and non-operating expenses and revenues for the most recent audited operating year and projected to be in effect for the first full year after the project has been constructed and is in operation; and 5. When the project sponsor owns or operates more than one public water system, a demonstration that the benefits of the grant will exclusively accrue to the defined service jurisdiction for the financially disadvantaged community. 0) Affirmation that the selected facilities are consistent with local comprehensive plans; (k) Responses generated by a multi-disciplined intergovernmental review, if appropriate; (1) Executed and fully implementable contractual agreements whenever facilities or services beyond the project sponsor's jurisdiction are involved; (m) Identification of the technical, financial, and managerial resources needed to ensure compliance with the Act when a project sponsor owns a public water system in significant noncompliance with any federal or Florida drinking water rule or variance; (n) Identification of local wellhead protection and source water protection programs or activities in the planning area; and (o) Identification of the source water protection area and the characterization • of pollution sources potentially affecting sources of drinking water in the project planning area as follows: 1. The source water protection area for a public water system that uses ground water as its source of drinking water shall be established as the composite area having a 500 foot radius around each of the project sponsor's drinking water wells. At the project sponsor's option, the source water protection area may be established under the programs and activities described in paragraph (n) above if such area provides for, at a minimum, a 500 foot radius around each of the project sponsor's drinking water wells; 2. The source water protection area for a public water system that uses surface water as its source of drinking water shall be established as the watershed upstream of the intake structure. The watershed in which the intake is located shall be as delineated on the U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Unit Map-1974, State of Florida; and 3. Characterization of pollution sources shall be accomplished using the guidance provided in Appendix E of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's "State Source Water Assessment and Protection Programs Guidance," EPA 816-R-97-009, August 1997. (5) The project sponsor shall hold a public hearing, consistent with the requirements contained in "Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program Guidelines," EPA 816-R-97-005, February 1997, before formal adoption of its water facilities plan. The purpose of the hearing shall be to enable public participation in the final evaluation Effective 7-20-99 39 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES of project alternatives and costs. The project sponsor shall publish a notice of the hearing. The notice requirement may be met by publication in a local newspaper of general circulation before the date of the hearing or in other documented communications to the public such as mass mailing of the hearing notice throughout the planning area. The project sponsor shall mail copies of the notice, prior to the intended date of publication, to persons having made a previous written request for information about the project. The water facilities plan shall be made available to the public before the hearing. The project sponsor shall have a complete record of the hearing and shall make the record available to interested parties on request. (6) Biddable plans and specifications shall be complete to the point where they can be distributed for competitive bidding. Plans and specifications shall be in conformance with the water facilities plan. (7) A value engineering report shall be submitted for operationally related project facilities for which the adjusted post-allowance project costs are valued at more than $5,000,000. (8) One or more of the following permitting related conditions shall be demonstrated to exist for the project: (a) The use of a general permit under rule 62-555.410, F.A.C., has been authorized; (b) An intent to issue a permit under rules 62-555.520 and 62-555.530, F.A.C., has been established; ® (c) The Department has issued other authorization for project construction; or (d) The Department has determined that its authorization is not required prior to construction. (9) A certification of availability of all project sites necessary for the purposes of construction, operation, and maintenance over the useful life of the facilities shall be made. (10) Reasonable financial assurance shall be made that project construction will be completed. Such assurance may be in the form of a commitment to maintain adequate reserve funds dedicated throughout the construction period to ensuring project completion. Other forms of such reasonable assurance include requirements for contractors to provide performance and payment bonds under section 255.05, F.S., and insurance covering workers' compensation, comprehensive general liability, vehicle liability, and property damage to the extent that coverage is available for construction activities. (11) Procurement of construction contractors, equipment and materials, and service providers shall be conducted according to the competitive or noncompetitive negotiation procurement methods or the formal advertised competitive bidding method. Procurement requirements shall be as set forth in the following sections of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 33, Procurement Under Assistance Agreements (1995), incorporated herein by reference: 33.230(c) and (d) (except that the references to architects and engineers shall be interpreted to mean the.offerors of technical services, the procurement of which is not subject to chapter 287.055, F.S.), 33.255(c) Effective 7-20-99 40 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-652 WATER FACILITIES (except that the salient requirements of the named brand need not be stated and the reference to 40 C.F.R. Part 35 is deleted), 33.305, 33.310, 33.315, 33.405, 33.410, 33.415, 33.420(a) through (d) and (f) (except for references to section 33.295 and form 5720-4), 33.425, 33.430 (except that bid rejection shall be based solely on sound documented business reasons), 33.505, 33.510 (except for references to section 33.295 and form 5720-4), 33.515, 33.520, and 33.605(a) through (c) as supplemented by the provision that noncompetitive negotiated procurement also shall be deemed justified when a material, product, or service provides for necessary interchangeability of parts and equipment or promotes innovative technologies. (12) Project changes after advertising for bids and before bid opening shall be made by addendum to plans and specifications. Changes after bid opening shall be made by change order. The project sponsor shall submit all addenda and change orders to the Department. (a) The Department shall perform an eligibility determination to establish the justification for all change orders to construction contracts funded with grants. (b) The Department shall not perform an eligibility determination to establish the justification for change orders to construction contracts funded with loans unless change orders involve one or more of the following: 1. Additional cost of the changes covered by a single change order exceeds $100,000; ® 2. Change in project scope or work outside the approved project scope; 3. Procurement methods involved would not be consistent with those approved by the Department before contract award; or 4. Deletion or substantive modification of any requirement of chapter 62-552, F.A.C. Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History- New 4-7-98, Amended 8-10-98. 62-662.800 Audits Required. (1) Beginning with the fiscal year in which the loan agreement is executed and continuing for each year thereafter until the loan is retired, the loan recipient shall submit annual audit reports to the Department. Audits shall address the loan recipient's financial condition; accounts of water and sewer systems or other sources generating the pledged revenues; loan disbursements received, if any; project expenditures, if any; and compliance with loan agreement covenants. The loan recipient shall cause its auditor to notify the Department immediately if anything comes to the auditor's attention during the annual examination of the loan recipient's records that would constitute a default under the loan agreement. Reports shall be submitted within one (1) year after the end of each audited fiscal year. (2) Beginning with the fiscal year in which the grant agreement is executed and continuing for each year thereafter the final grant disbursement is received, the grant recipient shall submit annual audit reports to the Department. Audits shall address Effective 7-20-99 41 DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES the grant recipient's financial condition; accounts of the water system; grant disbursements received, if any; project expenditures, if any; and compliance with grant agreement covenants. Reports shall be submitted within one (1) year after the end of each audited fiscal year. (3) Within 12 months after the effective date of a financial assistance agreement amendment establishing final project costs, the project sponsor shall submit to the Department a separate audit report for the project,revenues, including receipt of disbursements under all financial assistance agreements with governmental entities, and expenditures. The audit report also shall address compliance with financial assistance agreement covenants under this rule chapter. The audit findings shall set aside or question any cost for which a financial assistance agreement disbursement under this rule chapter was made and is unallowable. A final determination of the allowability of such costs shall be made by the Department. (4) The Department may conduct an audit at any time within three (3) years after the effective date of the financial assistance agreement amendment establishing final project costs. Situations that could result in such an audit include financial assistance agreement covenant compliance problems; record keeping deficiencies; and unusual, questioned, or apparently irregular costs. The Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding and the Inspector General jointly shall be responsible for determining whether an audit is to be performed. (a) The Department shall mail a notice that an audit will be performed to the project sponsor no later than 30 days prior to the audit. (b) The Department, the State of Florida, or their authorized representatives shall have access to records for audit purposes. The project sponsor shall similarly require its contractors and lower tier subcontractors to maintain and allow access to such records for audit purposes. (c) The Department shall prepare a written report on its audit and shall provide a copy of the report to the project sponsor. The project sponsor shall respond, in writing, to the findings and recommendations within 30 days after receipt of a written request from the Department. Specific Authority 403.8532,,FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History New 4-7-98, Amended 8-10-98. 62-552.900 Forms for the State Revolving Fund Program for Drinking Water Facilities. Each form is listed below by rule number, which is also the form number, and with the title and effective date. Copies of the following forms, which are hereby incorporated by reference and identified by this rule number, may be obtained by writing to the Bureau Chief, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400: (1) Request for Inclusion on the Priority List for Drinking Water Facilities, dated (Effective 7-20-99). • Effective 7-20-99 42 ® DEP 1999 STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM FOR DRINKING 62-552 WATER FACILITIES (2) Loan Application, dated (Effective 7-20-99). (3) Grant Application, dated (Effective 7-20-99). Specific Authority 403.8532, FS. Law Implemented 403.8532, FS. History- New 4-7-98, Amended 8-10-98, 7-20-99. Effective 7-20-99 43 APPENDIX I SRF Program Summary PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS General Program Information General information on the SRF program can be found in Rule 62-503 F.A.C. Those activities that may be funded include: • Land, including easements and rights-of-way, that will be used for the ultimate disposal of wastewater treatment plant sludge (or other residues) or will be an integral part of the wastewater treatment process; • Construction and related procurement, the contracts for which are executed after a loan is made or, if an authorization to incur construction costs has been given by FDEP, which are executed before a loan is made. The authorization to incur costs shall be given on request of a local government only after the environmental review has been completed by FDEP; • Demolition and removal of existing structures; • Contingency for project cost overruns; • Legal and technical services after bid opening; • Project start-up services; • Loan repayment reserve; • Interest accruing during construction for payments under binding agreements between a local government and contractors, manufacturers, or suppliers; • Un-retired debt principal, excluding any reserves such as for debt service when refinancing an existing loan; • Capitalized interest; and • Multiple purpose facilities, such as those for sludge and solid waste handling resulting in co-generation of power. Unallowable project costs include the following: • Acquiring all or part of existing wastewater treatment works; • Facilities not in conformance with an approved facilities plan; • Facilities not included within the approved project scope; • Construction using local government personnel except in emergencies; • Costs yet to be incurred at the time of the on-site administrative action taken by FDEP to document project completion, such as for pending construction claims; • Facilities or services for which the requirements of the Facilities Plan are not met In order to receive consideration for a loan, the local government shall submit a complete loan application to the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair .Stone Road, MS 3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400. The entity applying may incorporate into a loan application by reference any information ® previously submitted that meets the applicable requirements in lieu of resubmitting such information. ® Loans for project contingencies, at the time of loan approval, cannot exceed 10% of the estimated sum of the costs for allowable land (when the actual costs are unknown), equipment contracts, materials contracts, and construction contracts. The contingency is adjusted by FDEP to not more than 5% of construction, equipment, and materials contract amounts after contracts have been executed. The contingency remaining after accounting for contract change orders is eliminated when project closeout occurs. Contingency funds cannot be used to purchase equipment or pay for construction work not described in the loan agreement. Increases in the amount of the planning allowance initially included in a pre-construction loan are also not permitted. The loan repayment period for construction loans are limited to 20 years under the Clean Water Act. Pre-construction loan repayment periods are limited to 10 years. However, when a construction loan is executed to finance projects that have been included on the fundable portion of the. priority list for a construction loan after facilities have been planned and designed under a pre-construction loan, the local government has the option to convert the repayment period to that negotiated for the construction loan. Increases, if requested, to the design and administrative allowances initially included in a pre- construction loan are made only in conjunction with a construction loan that provides funding for facilities planned and designed under the pre-construction loan. The amount the increase is established by subtracting the allowances based upon the originally estimated post-allowance project costs documented in the pre-construction loan ® application from the allowances based upon the estimated post-allowance project costs documented in the completed facilities plan. A project, or any portion thereof, that is financed with a State Revolving Fund loan cannot be refinanced, at a lower interest rate via a subsequent State Revolving Fund loan. Facilities Plan Rule 62-503.700(2) requires the local government to prepare and adopt a wastewater facilities plan (previously referred to as the 201 Plan), which includes documentation of the following: • The boundaries -of the planning area as well as the existing and future project service areas. o The demographic, geologic, topographic, hydrogeologic, and institutional characteristics of the study area impacting the evaluation of alternatives to the selected facilities. o The cost-effectiveness of feasible alternatives to the selected facilities, including regionalization of facilities, considering capital costs and operation and maintenance costs over the useful life of the facilities based on a discount rate projected to be in effect during a year planning period of not less than five (5) years. ® s conserved as a result of reclaimed water The value of potable water resource ® reuse alternatives (such as agricultural or landscape irrigation). ® The implementability of the selected facilities from legal, institutional, financial, technical, and management perspectives. ® The environmental effects and other non-monetary considerations, if any, associated with the selected facilities. © The collection, transmission, treatment, reuse, and disposal problems associated with the wastewater system and the local physical conditions associated with those problems. ® The facilities needed to comply with wastewater treatment plant discharge permits issued by FDEP and the facilities needed to maintain compliance throughout the project service area over a planning period of not less than five (5)years. o The public participation process, including the project sponsor's public hearing held before formal adoption of the facilities plan for the purpose of enabling public participation in the final evaluation of project alternatives. • Capital improvements financing information addressing the following: ® The source of funds or revenues to be dedicated to repaying the loan and the expenses, charges, and liens against such dedicated funds or revenues. ® All capital improvements, including those to be financed using any type of debt instrument, that will be implemented over a period of five (5) years beginning with the projected year of the first annual loan repayment and that will be financed from the same funds or revenues dedicated to repaying the ® loan. The proposed system of charges, rates, fees, and other collections that will generate the revenues to be dedicated to loan repayment demonstrating that the wastewater management system is to be financially self-sufficient. ® The proposed rate ordinance or other enforceable schedule for charges, rates, fees, and other collections associated with loan repayment. ® The applicable actual and projected wastewater management system operating and non-operating expenses and revenues for the following years: o The most recent audited operating year. © The first full year after the project has been constructed and is in operation. ® An affirmation that the selected facilities are consistent with other locally adopted plans. ® The responses generated by a multi-disciplined intergovernmental review, if applicable. ® The executed and fully implementable contractual agreements whenever facilities or services beyond the local government's jurisdiction are involved. • The following additional information shall be provided if the cost-effectiveness of the recommended facilities is determined by wastewater flow. ® o Flow reduction methods shall be documented unless the estimated average per capita discharge to the sewer system is less than 70 gallons per day. ® ® Infiltration and inflow reduction shall be documented if the rainfall- induced inflow results in chronic operational problems, rainfall-induced inflow exceeds 275 gallons per capita per day during storm events, or the wastewater flow rate exceeds 120 gallons per capita per day during periods of high groundwater. ® The benefits of improving operation and maintenance of existing facilities if the cost-effectiveness of recommended facilities is determined by the level to which wastewater or residuals is treated. o A description of the recommended facilities, preliminary design parameters, estimated capital costs, and estimated operation and maintenance costs. v The schedule for constructing the recommended facilities. Recent recommendations for revisions to the current rule have been proposed by FDEP- SRF — Wastewater staff that would relax some of the rigid requirements of the current rule, although they have yet to be formally changed. Staff s perspective is that the main issue that utility's must demonstrate is that some degree of planning and forethought has taken place, and that there is a means to pay back the loan promptly. To this end, the City can expect that the requirements for the Facilities Plan amendment will be lessened. Readiness to Proceed Requirements 41 The following outline the requirements for submittal to FDEP for the determination for readiness to proceed. All are required by rule to be complete and submitted by April 15, although FDEP staff has relaxed this requirement and will accept applications for new projects at any point during the fiscal year, assuming all the requirements are met: ® Complete wastewater facilities plan adopted by the local government. Evidence that the 30-day public comment period has expired following publication of the results of FDEP's environmental review, and environmental concerns, if any, identified during. the 30-day comment period have been resolved. NOTE: FDEP's environmental review process normally takes 90 days. ® Biddable plans and specifications that include evidence that FDEP has established conformance with the facilities plan. ® Value engineering report for operationally related project facilities, the construction of which is valued at more than $10,000,000. ® Notice of intent to issue the construction permit. ® Certification of availability of all project sites necessary for the purpose of construction, operation, and maintenance over the useful life of the facilities. Priority List Information Each year, revised construction and pre-construction loan priority lists have been adopted at a public hearing held by FDEP. The lists become effective after adoption. These lists ® are now updated throughout the year at the request of the proposing entity.. A project may consist of various facilities, all of which qualify for the fundable or contingency portion. Other projects may be those consisting of facilities that qualify for the planning portion as a result of differences between the projects in readiness to proceed. The scope of a fundable or contingency portion project described on the construction loan priority list is not increased to encompass additional work except where such increases have been subject to the prioritization procedures. Additional information may be requested by FDEP when the data provided by the local government are incomplete or unclear. Data remaining incomplete or unclear after 30 days from receipt of FDEP's written request for additional information shall result in a lower funding priority, reflecting a substitution of assumed data for the incomplete or unclear data. The amount of funds available to a local government for all its projects to be listed on the fundable portion of the construction loan list is limited to no more than 25% of the funds allocated each year. There is no limitation imposed on the amount of funding assigned to contingency portion projects. A project shall be segmented for deferred funding of the unavailable funds when a local government qualifies for funding in excess of that available to it in any one fiscal year. Priority Determination. The project priority score is determined based upon public health considerations and the potential for surface and ground water pollution control. The quantity of existing flow that will be collected, treated, or which otherwise generates the need for the project is used as a further determinant of priority. Special consideration shall be given to projects, which will assist in the restoration or protection of a water body with an adopted Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Plan. Each project is categorized by the highest single base score justified by any one of its components or facilities, and it shall be assigned to one of the categories indicated below: Project Category Base Score Projects to eliminate public health hazards 140 Projects to achieve compliance with laws requiring discharge elimination from specific water bodies 120 Projects to achieve compliance with other pollution control requirements: Toxics control 100 Sludge management 80 Reclaimed water (excluding discharge to surface water) 80 Treatment to reduce nutrients before discharge to surface water 60 Other facilities 40 Projects not required to achieve compliance with pollution control requirements: ® Reuse of reclaimed water or sludge 30 Rehabilitation of existing wastewater transmission systems necessary for the ® hydraulic or structural integrity of the sewer system 30 Elimination of infiltration/inflow 30 Projects not otherwise categorized 20 The project's base score shall be adjusted by multiplying it by the flow factor for the highest existing average daily flow for a one-month period generating the need for the associated facility. However, flow factors shall be limited by a minimum of 5.000 and a maximum of 20.000. Flow factors shall be established to the nearest 0.001 value. Flow factors for any flow not listed below may be determined by interpolating between the data tabulated below or by using the formula: Flow factor= 5.000 + [0.75 X(flow in gallons per day divided by 1,000,000)] Flow (gallons per day) Flow Factor 20,000,000 and greater 20.000 12,000,000 14.000 6,000,000 9.500 2,000,000 6.500 100,000 5.075 10,000 5.008 1,000 5.001 The adjusted base score shall be further increased by multiplying it by 1.2 if the associated facility will assist in the restoration or protection of a water body with an adopted SWIM Plan. Upon completion, FDEP assigns each project to the fundable, contingency, and planning portions of the priority lists, thus establishing project rankings. The extent to which segmented projects qualify for deferred construction loan funding are evaluated each year. Projects with equal priority scores shall be subranked and may be listed on the fundable or contingency portions. Projects are listed on the fundable portion ' of the construction loan priority list if sufficient funds are expected to be available. When a project is segmented and included on the fundable portion, the unfunded remainder is placed in the contingency portion to be financed with funds allocated in the next and, if appropriate, successive fiscal year(s). Projects included on the preceding year's contingency portion shall advance, maintaining the same relative order with respect to each other, to the fundable portion when the annual updating occurs. However, only projects qualifying for fundable portion listing may advance. The requirements for a project to qualify for a fundable construction loan listing are such that the local government must deliver the following documentation to FDEP by April 15 preceding the fiscal year for which a list is being developed: o The facilities plan under Rule 62-503.700(2), F.A.C. • Biddable plans and specifications and evidence that FDEP has established conformance of the project with the facilities plan. ® Value engineering report for operationally related project facilities, the construction of which is valued at more than $10,000,000. ® Evidence that any of the following permitting related conditions exist for the project: ® The use of a general permit has been authorized; ® An intent to issue a permit has been established; FDEP has issued other authorization for project construction; or o FDEP has determined that its authorization is not required prior to construction. • Certification of availability of all project sites necessary for the purposes of construction, operation, and maintenance over the useful life of the facilities. Evidence that the results of FDEP's environmental review have been published and environmental concerns, if any, identified during the 30-day comment period have been resolved. ® Reasonable financial assurance that project construction will be completed. The requirements to add or retain any project or segment of a project on the contingency portion of the construction loan list are the same as for adding a project to the fundable ® portion. Pre-construction Loan Funding Funding of pre-construction loans for planning, engineering, and administrative allowances and the construction of projects are made only to small communities from the 15 percent reserve established under Rule 62-503.500(1), F.A.C. The maximum estimated total project cost, including construction upon which the allowances are based is $10,000,000. Pre-construction loans shall be available prior to the completion of project planning. Disbursements by FDEP for planning and administrative allowances are available after loan execution. General Requirements for the Construction Loan While the nature of a project will determine specific requirements, the general requirements for a construction loan are: • Plan cost-effective, environmentally and financially sound facilities consistent with local comprehensive plans; ® Provide for public participation in the planning process; © Establish how the loan will be repaid; ® ® Acquire the necessary project sites; Design facilities consistent with the planning recommendations; and • Obtain the necessary permit(s) to enable construction. The repayment period for loans is 20 years except for loans to entities qualifying as financially disadvantaged communities, in which case the term is 30 years. The interest rate is 60% of the market rate as established using the 'Bond Buyer 20 - Bond General Obligation Bond Index. The rate does not change over the life of the loan. Repayment begins six months after project work is scheduled to be completed. Payback consists of equal semi-annual repayments. The revenue source to be used to repay the loan must be identified. Generally, pledged revenues resulting from the operation of water systems or water and sewer systems are as follows: 0 Pledged revenue shall be not less than 1.15 times the amount required to make each semi-annual loan repayment. o In addition, for project sponsors who have not demonstrated the ability to service long-term debt, special loan security provisions shall be negotiated that provides assurance that debt service requirements will be fulfilled. These additional security provisions must be negotiated to provide: © Additional escrowed reserve funds (equivalent to not less than five semiannual loan repayments) and a lien on the assets of the entity. 0 A letter of credit from a bank or trust company and a lien on the assets of the entity. ® e A personal or corporate, as applicable, obligation ensuring that all semiannual repayments can be made. 0 Other security features equivalent to those described above. Standard loan agreements are set up for a pledge of water and sewer utility revenues. These are commonly used but other types of revenues can be considered. Exceptions to Program Requirements FDEP may consider requests for exceptions to the requirements of this rule if the exception does not conflict with state or federal law or federal regulations. A request for exceptions must contain the following information: The name of the local government; project number; award date, application date, or target date; and the assistance amount involved. 0 The specific rule to which an exception is requested. o A complete description of what the exception would accomplish and justification for the exception. ® A statement of whether the same or a similar exception previously has been sought; and, if so, an explanation of the reason for that request and the outcome. 0 Proof that compliance with the specified rules is unnecessary for abatement of pollution and protection of public health. 0 Proof that the economic, social, and environmental costs of compliance exceed the economic, social, and environmental benefits of compliance. TIMELINES FOR THE STATE PRIORITY LIST The rule-based notices are as follows: ® Requests for inclusion must be submitted for all projects contemplated for placement on the pre-construction list (old target date was February 15, but these are now accepted throughout the year) ® Readiness to proceed requirements must-be complete and submitted for all projects contemplated for placement on the Construction loan list (old target date was April 15, but these are now accepted throughout the year) ® Approval of Construction Fundable Priority List (from which construction loans are made) occurs 45-60 days after the readiness to proceed documents are submitted ® Loans must be executed or project goes back into the priority listing process within 9 months of approval (old date was March 31 of the current fiscal year) The State's timeline for reviewing the Facilities Plan is likely the longest requirement (about 90 days). The plan must first be approved by the local government body after due public hearings. It is transmitted to the State, where it is dispersed to 20 or so other agencies. Each agency has 30 days to comment. All comments are collated and retuned to the local government at the conclusion of the 30 days. The local government responded. Assuming all comments are satisfactorily addressed, FDEP will authorize a 30-day comment period. Certification that this is complete must be accomplished prior to consideration for placement on the Construction loan list. APPENDIX J Infiltration and Inflow Data i SEWER SYSTEM REHABILITATION �1 City of Dania 1. June 1995 Hazen and Sawyer Environmental Engineers and Scientists in association with ADS Environmental Services, Inc. i, �� SAWYER Hazen and Sawyer,P.C. AND4000 Hollywood Boulevard Sevenlh Environmental Engineers & Scientists Hollywood, , 3021orih Tower Hollywood,FL 33021 305 66 Fax Fax 305 05 96 987-2949 June 5, 1995 Mr. Robert J. Palm y Public Works / Utilities Director CITY OF DANIA 100 West Dania Beach Boulevard Dania, Florida 33004 City of Dania Sewer System Rehabilitation _ Dear Mr. Palm: -;1 The attached report documents full compliance by the City of Dania, a Large User of the Hollywood Southern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, with EPA Administrative Order Number 90-083 and, with the infiltration / inflow (1/1) reduction requirements of the December 1991 i, Settlement Agreement with Broward County Office of Natural Resources Protection (ONRP). The City of Dania Infiltration / Inflow Reduction Program was designed to meet all regulatory 'I. } requirements. Since it was initiated in 1991, the City of Dania has undertaken all three-phases of the program including 1/1 Analysis, Sewer System Evaluation Survey, and Sewer System Rehabilitation. Upon the completion of the program, the 1/1 reduction achieved in the City of ,:..' Dania was 0.971 mgd at a construction cost of $720,000, according to the short-term flow monitoring results in individual collection basins. Based on this estimate, it can be assumed that the City of Dania has eliminated approximately 58 percent of the total 1/1 flows. Regional 1/1 reduction was estimated by a mass balance analysis of the treatment plant influent strength. According to the analysis, a total of 6.36 mgd of extraneous flow has been eliminated F fE from the regional wastewater collection system. Approximately 651,000 gallons per day 1/1 still remain in the system. It is believed that a significant portion of this 1/1 enters through service lines or laterals and, during rainfall events, through manhole covers. Many sewer repairs were completed during the 1/1 reduction program, which reduced flows to the treatment plant. It can be assumed that these sources have been i. N eliminated. However, continuous deterioration over time of other portions of collection areas may create new leak problems and, therefore, result in excessive infiltration and inflow. It is recommended that the City implement a continuous program to keep 1/1 under control, and to further reduce the system 1/1. Page 1 of 2 Hwd.4921L001 New York,NY • Armonk,NY Upper Saddle River,NJ Raleigh,NC Charlotte,NC Richmond,VA Hollywood,FL Boca Raton.FL Fort Pierce,FL •Jupiter,FL Miami,FL Bogota,D.E.Colombia I14ZEN AND SAWYER Mr. Robert J. Palm June 5, 1995 We remain available to meet with you, at your convenience, to review the results of the sewer system rehabilitation program. Once again, we thank both you and the Utilities Department employees for your cooperation on this important project, and we look forward to providing you 1 services in the future. Very Y trul yours, HAZEN AND SAWYER P.C. J. Peter Larsen, P.E. Principal Engineer J c. File No. 4921-000 ,I i T i Page 2 of 2 i a Hwd:4921 L001 I. Executive Summary The City of Dania Infiltration / Inflow Reduction Program was designed to correct the excessive infiltration and inflow in the City's Wastewater Collection System. The program has met all regulatory requirements. Since the program was initiated in 1991, the City has undertaken three phases of the program including I/I Analysis, Sewer System Evaluation Survey, and Sewer System Rehabilitation. .Upon the completion of the program, the I/I reduction achieved was 0.971 mgd according to the short term flow =' monitoring results. Flow reduction of 1.31 mgd was also observed in the Large User's meter record. Based on these estimations, it can be assumed that the City has eliminated approximately 58 percent of the total I/I flows, which represents a saving of $5.62 millions over the next 20 years. ES.1 Background The City of Dania maintains approximately 200,100 linear feet of collection system. Excessive infiltration and inflow was identified in the collection system by abnormally high chloride concentrations and low organic and solid concentrations. j� EPA issued Administrative Order Number 90-083 requiring that an I/I flow reduction program be undertaken within a stipulated time frame. The program was thus initiated ('? in July of 1991, by following the three traditional steps in implementing an I/I reduction program as follows: Conduct an Infiltration / Inflow Analysis to identify those drainage areas within is - ' a regional wastewater collection system that have excessive I/I flow which is cost- effective to reduce. M Undertake a Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES) to physically identify specific defects in each drainage area with excessive I/I flow and outline a cost- effective rehabilitation program to correct the sewer system defects. 13 Commence a rehabilitation program to make necessary sewer repairs to eliminate `1 system defects and reduce the I/I flow contribution. The City of Dania, as a Large User, complied with these regulatory requirements and. performed all three phases of the program. City of Dania Hwd:4921R008 ES-1 Sewer System Rehabilitation Executive Summary ES.2 I/I Analysis The infiltration / inflow analysis was performed to demonstrate the possible existence of excessive infiltration and inflow in each sewer collection system tributary to the treatment works. Through a systematic investigation of the sewer system, the analysis identified the presence, flow rate, and type of infiltration and inflow conditions which existed in the sewer system. A total I/I flow component of 1,622,000 gpd was identified, of which 350,000 gpd was cost effective to remove at an estimated cost of $709,200. These four collection areas >a' included D3, D4, D5, and D6. ES.3 Sewer System Evaluation Survey Following the I/I. Analysis, the City of Dania undertook a Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES) program for each collection area that was identified as having excessive infiltration and inflow. A total of four basins were surveyed during May 1992 through May 1993. Based on the survey results, the I/I sources identified for each collection area were as i ® follows: Table ES-1 Total Recommended Repair and Estimated Cost No. of I/I Removal Estimated Description Locations (gpd) Cost ,l 1. Manhole Repairs 48 16,074 $ 22,393.00 2. Sewer Line Repairs 109 819,342 637,013.00 3. Service Lateral Repairs 155 40,798 50,900.00 TOTAL 312 876,214 $ 710,306.00 I/I reduction was estimated based on more specific cost effective analysis. It was observed that a total of 876,000 gallons per day could be cost effectively removed at a cost of $710,306: qJ Hwd:4921R008 ES-2 Sewer System Rehabilitation Executive Summary ESA Sewer System Rehabilitation Based on results of the sewer system evaluations survey, sewer defects were identified and a repair program was implemented. The following repairs were completed in the City's collection system: 2 A total of 20,121 feet of sewer lines were cleaned, tested, and sealed with chemical grout. 13 A total of 27,979 linear feet of fold and formed pipe liner was installed. N Manhole inserts were installed in twenty-one manholes ® Six manhole line connections were plugged and abandoned in place. E3 Seven manhole castings were realigned and grouted. a 117 cleanouts were repaired. ® Three mainline taps were repaired. Two disconnected service lines and one stubout line were plugged. r P gg One yard drain was removed. El Sectional liner was installed at one location. 4=� Point repair of service line was performed at three locations. ES.5 I/I Reduction Upon completion of the sewer :rehabilitation program, flow measurements were performed on the rehabilitated collection areas during the months of December 1994 and January 1995. Rainfall was also monitored to demonstrate the correlation between rainfall and infiltration / inflow. Hydrographs were prepared and compared with the hydrographs developed during infiltration and inflow analysis. I City of Dania Hwd:4921R008 ES-3 Sewer System Rehabilitation Executive Summary The I/I reduction in the City's collection system is as follows: Percent of Removal Dry Weather Infiltration 0.902 mgd 63% Wet Weather I/I 0.069 mgd 28% TOTAL I/I 0.971 mgd 58% ES.6 Continuous I/I Reduction and Control Program I/1 reduction is an ongoing program which all municipalities should make a high priority in their collection system operation and maintenance program. All municipalities contributing flows to the Hollywood Southern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant should plan or implement further steps in their efforts to reduce I/I. Among those steps are: Address the collection areas that were not surveyed and/or repaired; install permanent flow and rainfall monitors; implement a 100 percent television inspection program; address the service laterals by televising all suspect laterals; implement policies for lateral repairs in private property and, procuring annual contracts with specialty contractors. i { Hwd:4921R008 City of Dania ES-4 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 1 - Introduction The Broward County Southern Regional Wastewater Collection System serves the cities _ of Hollywood , Dania, Hallandale, Miramar, Pembroke Pines, the Town of Pembroke j Park, and a portion of unincorporated Broward County, District 3A. It consists of 2,830,100 lineal feet of collection sewers that covers approximately 106.58 square miles. The collection system provides sanitary services for a population of 288,615 inhabitants. ! Wastewater collected via the gravity sewer system is conveyed by pumping stations and "-' force mains to the trunk interceptors and discharged to the Hollywood Southern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. The sewage is treated by secondary biological treatment and disposed of to the Atlantic Ocean through an ocean outfall. ,E. The City of Hollywood is the lead agency representing the Broward County Southern Region. The City of Hollywood maintains and operates the regional treatment plant while each of the municipalities, known as Large Users, is responsible for maintaining and operating their own wastewater collection and transmission systems. The City of Dania maintains approximately 200,100 linear feet of collection system. Excessive infiltration and inflow was identified in the collection system by abnormally 1 high chloride concentrations and low organic and solid concentrations. Infiltration and inflow studies have been conducted to quantify the I/I contribution in each collection j system. Consequently, a sewer system rehabilitation program was implemented. This �., report describes the results of the previous infiltration / inflow analysis and sewer system evaluation survey and documents the I/I reduction by rehabilitation program in the City's collection system. Citywide flow reduction is observed by comparing the flow measurements prior to and after sewer rehabilitation. It was estimated that approximately 971,000 gpd, based on short term flow monitoring, was eliminated from '. the city's collection system. 1.1 Background The Broward County Southern Region Wastewater Collection System is situated in the -T southeast corner of Broward County. The City of Dania is located in the northeast section of the region as shown in Figure 1-1. It is bordered on the east and south by the City of Hollywood, on the north by the City of Fort Lauderdale and Fort Lauderdale- ( Hollywood International Airport, and on the west by unincorporated Broward County. The City covers approximately 4.92 square miles and has an estimated population of 13,000 citizens. The sewered area covers approximately 3.14 square miles and serves the A entire population. The City operates and maintains the wastewater collection system. City of Dania Hwd:4921R001 1-1 Sewer System Rehabilitation - rn rn C T 03 Q _ 3 it Q � I LL \\\\ \ \\N \\ \\\ of n \ \� \\J\ \\ •' \ •� w Z \ \ \ saw�cranu w \\ \` >\\\\\\ >\ O O t <n w \ , \ \Lu J.LU cn Lli uj V) Of COS ���'.u� kiO��ZOX6S84 Chapter 1 Introduction The sewered area was divided into seven drainage areas, as shown on Figure 1-2. Each drainage area consisted_of a gravity collection system and one or more pumping stations. An 18-inch force main on Southwest 4th Avenue collects the various pumped flows and discharges them into a 36-inch gravity sewer in the City of Hollywood service area at the intersection of North 14th Avenue and Harding Street. Wastewater flows are then transported to the Hollywood Southern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SRWWTP) for treatment and disposal. Table 1-1 lists each drainage area, its service area acreage, the population served, and sewer line configurations. Figure 1-3 is a schematic of the Dania collection and transmission system indicating the wastewater flows route to the City of Hollywood. r:•� r - City of Dania Hwd:4921R001 1-4 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 1 Introduction 1.2 Regulatory Requirements Due to the observation of excessive infiltration and inflow in the regional collection system, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cited the city of Hollywood for violating the NPDES permit requirements by failing, on occasion, to meet its eighty-five percent TSS removal requirement. Excessive I/I diluted the influent wastewater and made the EPA "percentage removal" requirements difficult to consistently meet. EPA issued Administrative Order Number 90-083 requiring that an I/I flow reduction program be undertaken within a stipulated time frame. The program was thus initiated in July of 1991, by following the three traditional steps in implementing an I/I reduction program as follows: 12 Conduct an Infiltration / Inflow Analysis to identify those drainage areas within a regional wastewater collection system that have excessive I/I flow which is cost- effective to reduce. Undertake a Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES) to physically identify specific defects in each drainage area with excessive I/I flow and outline a cost- effective rehabilitation program to correct the sewer system defects. Commence a rehabilitation program to make necessary sewer repairs to eliminate system defects and reduce the I/I flow contribution. In December 1991, the City of Hollywood, as the lead agency for the Broward County Li Southern Region, entered into a settlement agreement with Broward County Office of Natural Resources Protection (ONRP) to rescind an area-wide sewer moratorium. As part of the settlement agreement, an I/I flow reduction by 1.0 mgd. over an initial ki twelve-month period and 1.5 MGD reduction in the following twelve months was required. -J' The Broward County Southern Region was obligated to implement a regional I/1 flow reduction program to meet these commitments: EPA Administrative Order No. 90-083 Broward County ONRP Settlement Agreement The City of Dania, as a Large User, complied with these regulatory requirements and performed all three phases of the program: I/I Analysis, SSES and Sewer Rehabilitation. City of Dania Hwd:4921R001 1-7 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 1 Introduction 1.3 Authorization In June 1991, Hazen and Sawyer was retained by the City of Hollywood and representatives from each Large User to perform the professional services in responding to the EPA Administrative Order No. 90-083. In July 1991, a report entitled "Preliminary Infiltration / Inflow Analysis of the Regional Collection System" was submitted to EPA. In August 1991, Hazen and Sawyer was authorized to commence the Infiltration/Inflow Analysis. In April 1992, the City of Dania authorized Hazen and Sawyer to conduct a sewer system evaluation survey. Based on the findings and quantification of system infiltration and inflow, a sewer system rehabilitation program was implemented. Hazen and Sawyer, as the program administrator, directed and coordinated the SSES Program and provided overview, partial field inspection and advice on the Rehabilitation Program, which was performed by the City. Hazen and Sawyer retained the services of ADS Environmental Services, Inc., to perform field work related to the study phase of these programs. 1.4 Report Organization This report is divided into several chapters. The contents of each chapter is briefly ® summarized as follows: Chapter 1 Introduction Presents brief description of the overall project including the background, regulatory requirements, and the scope of work. Chapter 2 Infiltration /Inflow Analysis and Sewer System Evaluation Survey Summarizes the results of previous infiltration and inflow studies. Infiltration and inflow rates are presented for each collection area. Presents the estimated costs for cost- effective repairs. :i Chapter 3 Sewer System Rehabilitation Technologies Describes the repair technologies undertaken in the collection system rehabilitation program including manhole repairs, line repairs, and service lateral repairs. Chapter 4 Sewer System Rehabilitation Details the quantities of repair items completed in the City's collection system. City of Dania Hwd:4921R001 1-8 Sewer System Rehabilitation r O d � di O ON 00 O 0 1 a O O O O O O O y O• C\ CO O m ^ co (n co U) N N O O N cm cn O O ` n n 00 00 ;`. r + _ o 0 00 n q o m 0 m o00 � In ... e-� N Cf) r-+ Cf) N O O O LU - 000 ��-+ O � C\ m > _ O O O o 0 0 0 0 _ r--i cV O M r--4 �,D M 00 r-+ ui d� N C� dt r-+ \-p '-- Lf) O N N [� Lr ed En 00 to v CO c CD � N N � .�-� m O N . �r •O N � � � � O n N N 07 d O CI\ m O N M N N M L � e••r O _ o �+ O O O O O O O LO -71 LL rn z LL I (V O � QQ Q J r C O N co l I r-i N W Q � z WQ Q = I O C9 z w 1 Ln i Q Q w 0 ,o `O N p 10 O Ua g Ua J w , ` Q� I cr) I W z Z V C - -__0_-� --_ -___ O N 0 Q I Q Q r ' I z to W rn z .1__ LL p z ' , :o LU J C9 O � I LL z Q z w W W W N C z C I cc LU 5 O = I � 0 t co C ..I 1 ILL: _ .. L C G) V co 2 WN ® W C p p I h J = U) 3 O N 7 C i CL) to L (v -C+ Ln LU co Q W, J i Q U ; N Ocn a � I C C c O co cc LL- 0 cc 1 1 LL I CN @J ' 1 I �O , 1 I L1J cn ILL G cry ' I N C 'I G Id LL r 1 i r^„ r O O O - d G �W ,4 i HOO'COxeseo Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 5 Infiltration and Inflow Reduction Analyzes the flow measurements and determines I/I reductions in each collection area. Chapter 6 Conclusions and Recommendations Lists the recommended elements for continued sewer rehabilitation and I/I control program. 1 { r . j ' 1 City of Dania Hwd:4921R001 1-9 Sewer System Rehabilitation ® Chapter 2 Infiltration / Inflow Analysis and Sewer System Evaluation Survey In accordance with the EPA mandate, the City of Hollywood and the Large Users undertook an I/I study for the entire regional collection system. The I/1 study consisted of two phases of work; an I/I Analysis and a SSES Program, which were funded by a regional bond program administered by the City of Hollywood. The I/I Analysis was conducted during the months of August through December of 1991. The SSES was conducted during the months of May of 1992 through May of 1993. 2.1 Infiltration / Inflow Analysis The infiltration / inflow analysis was performed to demonstrate the possible existence of excessive infiltration and inflow in each sewer collection system tributary to the 1 treatment works. Through a systematic investigation of the sewer system, the analysis identified the presence, flow rate, and type of infiltration and inflow conditions which existed in the sewer system. {`� The major work of the I/I analysis was to measure wastewater flow in each collection area during dry and wet weather conditions, to quantify the extraneous flows, and to ' determine which collection areas with excessive 1/1 were cost-effective to repair. The entire collection system was evaluated to determine appropriate locations for the placement of flow measuring equipment. Available sewer maps and as-built drawings t were also reviewed. Collection system maps were developed after discussions with utility department personnel. The City's sewer system was divided into smaller sub- systems. Seven collection areas were developed in Dania. Flow meter locations were established at system terminal manholes so that the total flow could be measured. Sites were inspected before the final metering locations were selected. (:J In order to determine the rainfall impacts on infiltration and inflow measurements, one rain gauge was installed to record rainfall in Dania. Since most of the gravity sewers are below the groundwater table, groundwater fluctuation will influence the amount of infiltration into the collection system. Three groundwater gauges were installed to estimate the effects of groundwater levels on flow r measurements. City of Dania Hwd:4921R002 2-1 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 2 Infiltration / Inflow Analysis and SSES During the monitoring period a 100 year storm event occurred on October 8-9, 1991. During a 24-hour period, approximately fourteen inches of rainfall were recorded at the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Wastewater and groundwater samples were collected from seven sampling locations throughout the study area and analyzed for chloride concentration. The results were used to assist in revealing the evidence of saline groundwater infiltration. The entire collection system was monitored between August 29 and October 10, 1991. 2.2 Quantification of Infiltration and Inflow Groundwater infiltration was determined during dry weather conditions. It was. measured as the difference of total dry weather flow subtracted by the wastewater component (or baseline flow). Wastewater contribution by collection areas was calculated by using monthly water use records and sewered population. An average of eighty percent of the water consumed was estimated to return to the wastewater collection system. Wet weather infiltration and inflow is defined as an extraneous flow that enters a sewer system during and/or after a storm. It is the difference between the wet weather flow less.the dry weather flow. The total collection system infiltration and inflow is the sum of dry weather infiltration and the wet weather infiltration / inflow. Summarized infiltration / inflow rates for each collection area are given in Table 2-1. Hydrographs are shown in Figures 2-1 through 2-4, for the cost-effective areas D1, D3, D5 and D6. Area D4 flows were accounted for in area D5 flows. City of Dania Hwd:4922R002 2-2 Sewer System Rehabilitation m Nt 't m N d' O TS c V) Q M � 00 Om0 N N Ln O m .y �i •cII � O m � p m ) r4 U) � N cn t0 00 O co O o '0 w W Q O O O O O O O 4 � O p ... O N N N r•1 CT N, m ... v cn N � `' R > 3 v i O C �r o LO o 00 m o CO ti c 0-4 a Lf O N 0�0I 00 G r+ o to t.::..1 O •4 C m TJ 41 6, N aj � . O �r .r TS F a mm CU \0 � L v � 0N v C � � � . cu fa 0 O rl� N t-i v a W m i.. 3 .ct w+ m rn o rn It+ o a E N r+ f� O� N N L a •- m G vpi N [,, n w .� -0 L6 L6 [< r-4 m O O CVw 00 G y CD CA 0 a vas 3 ° N 00 00 m >, 0 3 a cz N O r-+ CV N N `" m o ra o m O o m '� v a, o v m v m w to > 3 � H > � � � � � p ¢ ¢ w� H o O O o 0 CD O O "� N o Q Q Q Q Q Q Q --1 N Cl) rM lr) \0 n R' 'i m t WrN 0 _ a ® o c o 0 o c o 0 o Cl ui CE o 0 0 o c m 00 �O Q N O I6/171/0I I6/ZI/0T z i I6/0I/OT T6/8/0T T6/9/0T T6/ti/OT I6/Z/OT I6/0£/6 T6/8Z/6 ,^ T6/9Z/6 h s T6/bZ/6 Q T6/ZZ/6 A4 I6/OZ/6 Q ^O' 16BT/6 C � C T6/9 T/6 - i tF o=D A I6/DT/6 Lz T6/ZT/6 i T6/0T/6 j 3 T6/8/6 0 c c 0 o y I6/9/6 0 T6/h/6 e o 16/Z/6 '. U Ca i6/IEN A •c 16/6Z/B 3 0 3 a ® ® Cl ® 16/LZ/8 T 0 T6/SZ/8 m B Ei T6/IZ/8 0 O � 1n m (Q✓W)MOIJ cm .. a Q (U!) llujuTE� 0 0 0 • o 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 o rn I6191/01 tO i6/t'T/OT 16/ZI/01 i I6/01/01 i 6/8/0I I - I6/9/01 16/D/01 j I6/Z/OI i` 16/0£/6 i6/SZ/6 i6f9Z/6 i6/t2/6 RC 16/ZZ/6 0 o A 3 16/OZ/6 Q w C a� I6/8T/6 a o 'o Ca 16/91/6 LW j b=D A 16/171/6 L I6/ZI/6 C i 6/0I/6 c c i6/8/6 =o i6/9/6 o I6/b/6 rs � m m m 161Z/6 33�� 16/I£/8 03� ®®a® 16/6Z/8 1 T 6/LZ/8 i6/SZ/8 ` T6/£Z/8 i6/TZ/8 N (Qqw)M0u 0 Q i (u!)IIEPM l Lri ® o 0 0 0 0 0 r4 O (D T6/rl/OT T6/Z T/01 16/01/01 T 6/8/01 1 a I6/9/01 T6/b/OT T6/Z/OT T6/0£/6 T T6/8Z/6 T6/9Z/6 16/17Z/6 s � - C' Q 16/ZZ/6 oa c ,eap 3. .0 ea o" 16/OZ/6 m ® ocp PCCZ . N =" o 16/91/6 L � °D p 16/61/6 aim WZY/6 T6/0T/6 I6/8/6 3 . T6/9/6 o .o 16/11/6 5 L �' 5 =5 o I6/Z/6 U a 6 16/1£/8 u 3� - °' .a T6/6Z/8 i 3030:Boom rn rn I6/LZ/8 0 _ O T6/SZ/8 A c T6/EZ/8 0 Ei T6/TZ/8 3 N OD �D ^ N yr OD 1C Q N O 0 co Ql a (QJW),MOB a Q LO (U!) Hu.uIEH ry O ^, P 00 Vi R h N C (O I6/8/0I I6/9/OT I6/h/0 i I6/Z/OI I6/0£J6 T6/8Z/6 I6/9Z/6 T6/bZ/6 I6/ZZ/6 I6/OZ/6 16/8T/6 i c Q cn i T6/91/6 O Co 16/171/6 a I6/ZT/6 L ;^ bD A L I6/01/6 C 16/916 r-� 1 o I6/9/6 c c c c c I6/17/6 0 0.2 cz ` I6/Z/6 55 0 U i6/I£/8 L� a� � L N R7 cJ I6/6Z/8 c _ c ®®p® 16/LZ/8 111 co I6/SZ/8 g -{ I6/£Z/8 c o E I6/IZ/8 3� ...� In Ln 'R 1n P'i tn fV .fir .r h p 0 j O .O LO co a Chapter 2 Infiltration / Inflow Analysis and SSES 2.3 Cost Effective Analysis A cost-effective analysis was performed to compare the costs of transportation, and treatment of the I/I flows, with the, costs of implementation of a sewer system rehabilitation program. The analysis etermined the amount of I/I that can be cost- effectively removed from the City's wastewater collection system. The collection basins which were cost effective to repair were recommended for sewer system evaluation survey and rehabilitation. The remaining basins needed no further action at the time. Four out of seven collection basins were cost-effective to reduce I/I flows; therefore, they were subjected to SSES and repair program. A total I/I flow component of 1,622,000 gpd was identified, of which 350,000 gpd was cost effective to remove at an estimated cost of $709,200. These four collection areas included D3, D4, D5, and D6. 2.4 Sewer System Evaluation Survey The SSES field work included a visual inspection of each located system manhole, smoke testing the system for inflow sources, isolating areas of the system to measure infiltration sources, dye water testing to confirm findings, cleaning and television inspection of line segments and monitoring the flows from the collection system to establish a flow data ® base to confirm I/I flow quantities and document future I/I flow reductions. Following the I/I Analysis, the City of Dania undertook a Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES) program for each collection area that was identified having excessive infiltration and inflow. Four basins were surveyed during May 1992 through May 1993. Manhole inspection: Four hundred eighteen of the 476 manholes within the collection -" basins of D03, D04, D05, and D06 were inspected. Of the remaining fifty-eight manholes, eleven could not be located; nine were buried, ten were surcharged, and twenty-eight were not sanitary manholes. The following manhole defects were found during the inspection: i E Seven manholes were subject to ponding and water-tight covers or inserts needed to be installed Fifteen manholes had poor casting fits Six manholes showed evidence of roots E One hundred seventy manholes had debris accumulation Eleven manholes were in poor condition City of Dania Hwd:492IR002 2-8 Sewer System Rehabilitation ' Chapter 2 Infiltration / Inflow Analysis and SSES 0 Incoming and outgoing manhole- pipelines were also inspected and the findings are as follows: U Root intrusion was present in eight line segments a One segment had a collapsed pipe ® Fifty-eight segment had cracked pipes IN Twenty-six segments had broken pipes 0 Eighty-seven segments had indications of joint infiltration ® Twenty-three segments had offset pipe joints �' � P P J dSmoke Testing: Smoke tests were performed in 110,950 linear feet of sewers. The results are as follows: 0 Eighty-five manholes were confirmed for repair 1 Seventy-three cleanouts had missing caps, or broken risers 0 Forty laterals were broken ® Two storm sewer cross-connections were identified Dye water testing was performed by the City. U- Night Flow Isolation: During the SSES program, a total of one-hundred flow isolation measurements were conducted. The purpose of this task was to screen and identify these line segments within each collection area that had excessive groundwater infiltration. Flow measurements were taken during early morning for the isolated segments. - The sewer lines were then recommended for television inspection if the '-� measured flow was greater than 3,000 gpd/in/mi. As a result of flow isolation, a total of 19,435 linear feet of sewer was recommended for television inspection. Television:Inspection / Cleaning: Based on the results of the smoke testing, visual inspection, and flow isolation, a total of 19,435 feet of sewer lines were televised. Video :J tapes were recorded and reviewed. Structural defects, specific location of I/I sources,' abnormal conditions and other pertinent observations were documented. Based on these { observations sewer repair alternatives were recommended . r>} City of Dania Hwd:4921R002 2-9 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 2 Infiltration / Inflow Analysis and SSES Flow Monitoring: The wastewater flows from collection basins D03, D04, D05, and D06 were monitored from October 22 to November 8, 1992, in order to confirm I/I flow quantities determined during the I/I Analysis. The measured flow data together with the flow data determined from the 1/1 analysis were compared to the flow data obtained after the completion of the sewer repair program to determine the amount of I/I reduction. Hydrographs are shown in Figures 2-5 through 2-8. It was observed that the infiltration measured during dry weather condition is fairly close to that predicted in the 1/I Analysis. However, due to the rainfall influence, inflow measurements were not as significant as those measured in the I/I Analysis. 2.5 Summary of SSES Findings and Recommended Repair Quantities Based on the survey results, the I/I sources were identified for each collection area. Table 2-2 summarizes the number of defects identified and estimated cost of repair. All these recommended repairs are shown on the sewer maps attached in Appendix B. TABLE 2-2 Total Recommended Repair and Estimated Cost ® No. of I/I Removal Estimated Description Locations (gpd) Cost City of Dania 1. Manhole Repairs 48 16/074 $ 22,393.00 2. Sewer Line Repairs 109 819,342 637,013.00 3. Service Lateral Repairs 155 40,798 _ 50,900.00 TOTAL 312 876,214 $ 710,306.00 i I/I reduction was estimated based on the more specific cost effective analysis. It was observed that a total of 876,000 gallons per day could be cost effectively removed at a cost of $710,306. City of Dania Hwd:4921R002 2-10 Sewer System Rehabilitation a v ui _ o 0 0 Q N O O O O O C Z6/S/Ti Z6/LIT I Z6/9/ii Z6/S/T I Z6/0/T I Z6/£ITT Z61Z/TI 00 Z6/T/TT L � i pp O Z6/I£/OT to • ea o Z6/0£/01 L Z6/6Z/OT (ar` Z6/SZ/0T 3 c c o. Z6/LZ/OI 0 0 c c Z6/9Z/01 ` U Z6/SZ/0I y W fn C 3o3c� . .� ES 6 ❑ ® Z6/bZ/OT l Z6/£Z/0T Z6lZZ/0T Ln o W eV .•r o (n U) (a9w)mou o a (Q!)IIgN�2I o c ® tn o to v� o ei Clo V !'i fV N O O L6 O O O Z6/S/TT `D Z6/UIT Z6/9/T i Z6/S/Ti Z6/b/TT Z6/£/T T Z6/Z/IT CL Z6/I/I T L C s. caGi v� .�. Z6/I£10T cc L • N w_ ewo '_ Z6/0£/01 CP c O, Z6/6Z/01 Z6/SZ/OT c Z6/LZ/OT ti �_.. N, Z6/9Z/0I CU d_U L C N 33 Z6/SZi0I 3o3a 0 ® O Z6/bZ/OT r Z6/£Z/OT Z6lZZ/OT p CO O O O O C p O CO O W rn rn O 0 a (M) HVJUTUH o .. Q 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O N .N.•i ^ O O O O O � 00 O C N O Z6/8/T I `D Z6/Ul I Z6/9/T T Z6/9/TT Z6/D/T T J. Z6/Vl I Z6/Z/I T a . . GIn Z6/I/11 ca ® v) r iA Q o_D Z6/I£/01 !• Cc c � N U •Lo C? Ca tom. C Z6/0£/01 Z6/6Z/0I }-j L3 Z6/8Z/OT 3 c Z6/LZ/OT 0 0 .2 0 c p - Z6/9Z/OT ] : i 3 3 2 Z6/SZ/01 10 ® ❑ ® .� Z6/17Z/0I i Z6/£Z/0I W j (([f)W)n+013 N 0 LO (u!) [is3u!Lu m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 00 t� V VI Q N1 fV •r C. . Z6/891 MUTT Z6/9/T T Z6/S/TT WWI T Z6/£/T I .0 CL Z6/Z/I I bD � Z6/I/TT A � v] Q � Z6/T£/OT a NU = p Ca L Q C7 CL Z610£/OI Z6/6Z/OI 3 Z6/8Z/OT o i c c o Z6/LZ/OI cz c . U Z6/9Z/OI 3 " 3 .E Z6/sZ/0I cc 3o3x 1'® 13 ® Z6/K/OI Z6/EZ/0T O� OD h �O Ifi N ti Cl w O O O C O C O O O (n T ((IDW)M0IJ o 0 Chapter 3 Sewer System Rehabilitation Technologies The SSES field investigation identified and quantified I/I sources. The system defects were then analyzed and sewer system repair programs were developed. The cost of each proposed sewer repair was then determined. The following sections describe the repairs undertaken in the South Broward Regional Collection System. Rehabilitation recommendations were based on several factors which should be considered when selecting a particular sewer repair method. These are: Excavation versus "no dig" or "trenchless" technologies, traffic disruption, desire to maintain wastewater flow versus bypassing, location (street or backyard), long-term effectiveness of the rehabilitation method, etc. Forty-three types of repair were developed. The most common manhole repairs were: cementitious manhole liner, spray on polyurethane manhole liner, realign "and grout castings and replace manhole frame and covers. Mainline sewer repair recommendations consisted mainly of cured-in-place linings, fold- - , and-formed linings, robotic repairs utilizing epoxy, sectional liners, excavated point repairs and, total line replacements. Service laterals were addressed as follows: Repair cleanouts, cured-in-place lateral liner and excavated point repairs which included total lateral replacement up to the property line in some cases. .do 3.1 Manhole Repairs jSewer manholes often require rehabilitation to prevent surface water inflow and groundwater infiltration, to repair structural damage and/or to protect surfaces from damage by corrosive substances. The selection of a particular rehabilitation method t> should consider the cost of repair, type of defect, the overall physical condition of the structure, its location and use, its previous repair history and the type of construction. 3.1.1 Frame and Cover Repairs Surface water from storm runoff can often flow into the manholes through holes in the } lid or cover, through the annular space around the lid, the frame cover and/or under the frame if it is improperly sealed. During the rehabilitation program manhole frames and covers were repaired by the following techniques: Installing a prefabricated lid insert between the frame and the cover. The plastic lids are resistant to corrosion and damage by sulfuric acid or road oils. The lids i come with gas relief and vacuum relief valves to allow the escape of sewer gases. They prevent water, sand, and grit from entering the manhole and are easy to install. 0 City of Daria Hwd:4921R007 3-1 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 3 Sewer System Rehabilitation Technologies Raising buried manhole frames and covers to minimize flows through the frame covers. 0 Realigning the manhole cover and frame on the manhole. 0 Replace manhole frame and cover with watertight frame and cover. In Dania, the frame and cover repair alternatives were performed by city forces. 3.1.2 Manhole Structure Repairs Manhole wall and base rehabilitations were required to prevent groundwater infiltration. Fiberglass manhole inserts were used for severely deteriorated manholes and bases. Manhole wall and base rehabilitation was carried out with the following procedures: Chemical grout was injected through walls to stop infiltration through cracks and holes. `Structural liners restored the structural integrity of the manhole, provided corrosion resistance, and stopped infiltration. Hydraulic grouting was applied ® first as a preliminary measure to stop high volume infiltration followed by c m ntiti u waterproofing provide waterproofing, then e e o s grouting to ro i e hydrophilic , �' g P rP g rP g with crystallization and calcium aluminate cement lining was applied. The surface was finished with an epoxy coating. Fiberglass structural liners were inserted in the manholes and concrete poured between the liner and walls. 3.2 Line Repairs i Several sewer line repair alternatives are available from chemical grout repairs to line replacement. The repair alternative selected depended on the type and quantity of sewer defects and the relative cost of the repair alternative. 3.2.1 Chemical Grouting Alternatives Chemical grout was used to seal leaking joints and circumferential cracks in sewer lines. Small holes and radial cracks were also sealed by grouting. The grout material was applied to pipeline joints, by injecting it under pressure using special tools and techniques. 3 City of Dania Hwd:4921R007 3-2 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 3 Sewer System Rehabilitation Technologies Although the chemical grout technology has been used for many years, new materials and technologies continue to be developed. 3.2.2 Point Repairs Point repairs were specified where there was an isolated major structural pipe defect, j such as a broken, severely cracked or corroded sewer pipe or a misaligned joint and other repair alternatives were less cost effective. Point repairs utilize standard repair technologies which require the excavation and repair of the defect. 3.2.3 Robotic Repairs This technology was used to perform point repairs from inside the sewer where a remotely controlled machine was used to repair isolated cracks, defective joints, and protruding and recessed laterals. The robotic system removes protruding service laterals and patches the defect with an epoxy material to restore the service connection. Cracks in pipes are drilled out, and filled with epoxy to restore the pipe to its original condition and stop leaks. This repair was used where deep or wet conditions were present and open cut construction would be extremely costly. 3.2.4 Sectional Liners Sectional liners are cured-in-place liners that are used to reline three to fifteen-foot sections of pipe which were cracked or leaking. The liners are installed in a similar manner as the cured-in-place liners. They are used where the depth or the location of the sewer made an excavation difficult and expensive. 4. 3.2.5 Cured-in-place Pipe Lining P P g Inversion lining is successful in dealing with a number of structural problems, particularly in sewers needing minor structural reinforcement. Caution must be used, however, in the application of this method to any structural problems involving major loss of pipe wall. Inversion lining can be accomplished relatively quickly and without excavation and thus, this method of pipeline rehabilitation is particularly well suited for repairing pipelines located under existing structures, large trees, or busy streets and highways where traffic disruption must be minimized. Inversion lining produces minor reductions in pipe cross-sections. It is applicable to non-circular pipes and pipes with irregular cross-sections. This method is also effective in correcting corrosion problems and can be used for misaligned pipelines or in pipelines with bends where realignment or additional access is not required. i City of Dania Hwd:4921R007 3-3 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 3 Sewer System Rehabilitation Technologies There are currently several processes that have been introduced in the United States, that use the cured-in-place technology. Insituform was selected for this project. Inversion lining is formed by inserting a resin-impregnated felt tube into a pipe, which is inverted against the inner wall of the pipe and allowing it to cure. After the lining system had been installed and cured, a special cutting device is used with a closed- circuit TV camera to reopen service connections, which are located with the camera before the liner is installed. The pliable nature of the resin-saturated felt prior to curing allows its installation around curves, filling of cracks, bridging of gaps, and maneuvering through pipe defects. After installation, the fabric is cured to form a new pipe of slightly smaller diameter, but of the same shape as the original pipe. The new pipe has no joints or seams and has a very smooth interior surface which may actually improve flow capacity despite the slight decrease in diameter. Polyester resin was used in this method of pipe rehabilitation. It is a liquid thermosetting resin, and has excellent resistance to domestic wastewater corrosion. 3.2.6 Fold and Formed Liners I The fold and formed method of rehabilitation does not require a long curing process in terms of speed of installation. This process of rehabilitation has been carried out in the United States for the last five years. Fold and formed method of pipeline rehabilitation are suitable for pipe diameters of 4 to 15-inches with typical lengths of installation of 300 to 600 feet. This process uses a folded thermoplastic high density polyethylene pipe that is pulled into place and was then rounded and cured with high temperature steam to conform to the internal diameter of the existing pipe. Excavation is not required for installation since there are existing manhole access points. Lateral reinstatement is accomplished internally, similar to the inversion liner technique. The finished pipe has no joints and produces a moderately-tight fit to the existing pipe wall. This method of pipe rehabilitation is less versatile than cured-in-place methods:in terms of diameter range and installation length. Only slight offsets and bends can be negotiated. U-liner was selected for this project. 3.2.7 Excavation and Replacement Excavation and replacement of defective pipe. segments was undertaken under the following conditions: - City of Dania Hwd:4921R007 3-4 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 3 Sewer System Rehabilitation Technologies a When the structural integrity of the pipe had deteriorated severely; for example, when pieces of pipe were missing, pipe was crushed or collapsed, or the pipe had large cracks, especially longitudinal cracks. i 11 When the pipe was significantly misaligned. Es When additional pipeline capacity was needed. Is When trenchless rehabilitation methods that would be adequate to restore pipeline structural integrity would produce an unacceptable reduction in service capacity. J For point repair where short lengths of pipeline were too seriously damaged to be effectively rehabilitated by any other means. a When entire reaches of pipeline were too seriously damaged to be rehabilitated through point repairs. `I 0 Where removal and replacement was less costly than other rehabilitation methods. 3.3 Service Lateral Repair Service laterals are the`pipes that connect building sewers to the public sewer main. The service laterals usually range in size form 3 to 6 inches and are often laid on a uniform slope from the building to the immediate vicinity of the main sewer. They can enter the sewer at angles of 0-90 degrees from horizontal. For many years the effect of leaking service connections were considered insignificant because it was assumed that most service connections were above the water table and therefore subject to leakage only during periods of excessive rainfall or high groundwater levels. Recent studies indicate that a significant percent of infiltration in any collection system is the result of service connection defects such as cracked, broken or open-jointed pipes. Service connections may also transport water from inflow sources such as roof drains, and storm water flows from commercial and industrial properties. In a national survey carried out b state and P P Y Y local agencies, it was found that the estimated percentage of total system infiltration from service laterals ranges from 30- to as high as high as 95-percent in some cases. Repair procedures and equipment used for rehabilitating service laterals in this rehabilitation program included: Inversion LininZ: This technique is similar to the sewer main installation in that it involves the insertion of a resin-impregnated flexible polyester felt liner into the service r City of Dania Hwd:4921R007. 3-5 Sewer System Rehabilitation I Chapter 3 Sewer System Rehabilitation Technologies line. No significant annular space is created between the liner and the pipe that might result in infiltration migration. No prior excavations are required to correct slight offsets. An access point is always needed on the upstream side of the service connection line. A variation from the sewer main installation is the use of a special pressure chamber to provide the needed pressure to invert the fabric materials through the service pipeline. Replacement: In some cases it was more cost effective to replace all or a portion of the service to restore operation. The installation and repair of cleanouts also require an open cut method. I' ; { City of Dania Hwd:4921R007 3-6 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 4 - Sewer System Rehabilitation Based on results of the sewer system evaluation survey, sewer defects were identified and a repair program was implemented. Cost effective analysis indicated that basins D-3, 4, 5, and 6 were cost-effective to repair. The City, utilizing their own forces, elected to expand the program and perform a survey and rehabilitation program in Area D-l. The detailed repair work is described in the following sections. i 4.1 Drainage Area D-1 Drainage Area D-1 is located in the south portion of the City. It is bound on the south by the City of Hollywood, on the east by Southeast 4th Avenue, on the north by r � Southeast 10th Street and 7th Street, and on the west by the F.E.C. Railroad tracks. Wastewater is collected by the gravity sewer system and then pumped by Lift Station No. 1 via a force main that manifolded to the 16-inch force main at the Southeast 11th Street. Total length of sewer is estimated at 30,229 linear feet. Although this area was not included in the original cost-effective repair program, the I City implemented repairs in this area to further reduce citywide 1/1 flows. The j® following items of repair were completed: j E 11,663 linear feet of sewer lines were grouted. M U-liner was installed on a total of 16,533 linear feet of sewer lines. 4.2 Drainage Area D-3 i Drainage Area D-3 is located in the north central portion of the City and contains Frost Park and City Hall. It is bordered on the north by the Dania Cut-off Canal, on the south by Stirling Road, on the east by Southeast 3rd Avenue, Fronton Boulevard and Northeast 3rd Avenue, and on the west by the F.E.C. Railroad tracks. All sewer flows drain by gravity.to Pump Station No. 3 at the intersection of Southeast Park Street and Southeast 2nd Avenue. A 14-inch force main then transports the flows south along Southeast 2nd Avenue to a 16-inch force main on Southeast llth Terrace. The 16-inch force main -� transports the flows to the 20-inch force main on Southeast 4th Avenue which goes to the City of Hollywood's collection system. A sewer repair program was implemented in this area and the following items of repair were completed: "+ City of Dania Hwd:4921R004. 4-1 Sewer System Rehabilitation i Chapter 4 Sewer System Rehabilitation 0 6,579 feet of sewer lines were cleaned, tested, and sealed with chemical grout. ® 10,217 linear feet of fold and formed pipe liner were installed. o Manhole inserts were installed in sixteen manholes. o Six manhole line connections were plugged and abandoned in place. One manhole casting was realigned and grouted. 42 cleanouts were repaired. Three mainline taps were repaired. 4.3 Drainage Area D-4 Drainage Area D-4 is a very small area located in southwest Dania, near the Dania Beach Boulevard and Northwest 14th Court intersection. The area is bordered on the north by Northwest 1st Street, on the south by Dania Beach Boulevard, on the east by Northwest 14th Avenue, and.on,the west by Northwest 14th Way. All sewer flows drain north, by ® gravity, to a 12-inch sewer on Northwest 2nd Street andthen pumped to the 12-inch force main on Northwest loth Court. Four items of repair have been completed in this basin, which included three cleanout repairs and the installation of one cementitious manhole liner. 4.4 Drainage Area D-5 Drainage Area D-5 is a large area encompassing the western portion of the City of Dania. It is bordered on the north by Northwest 4th Street, on the south by Sheridan Street,'on the east by the F.E.C. Railroad tracks, and on the west by Interstate 95 and North 22nd Avenue. All sewer flows drain to Pump Station No. 7 on .Northwest 10th Court. A 12-inch force main then transports the flows to the 14-inch force main on Dania Beach Boulevard, and then to the 20-inch force main on Southeast 4th Avenue. i A sewer repair program was implemented in this area and the following repair items were completed: 0 1,124 feet of sewer line were cleaned, tested, and sealed. i M Two disconnected service lines and one stubout line was plugged. City of Dania Hwd:4921R004 4-2 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 4 Sewer System Rehabilitation 63 Four manhole castings were realigned and grouted. 0 One yard drain was removed. 0 Fifty-three cleanouts were repaired. Ea One service line was repaired. i En Sectional liner was installed at one location. j 4.5 Drainage Area D-6 Drainage Area D-6 is located in the northeast corner of Dania and is centered at the intersection of Gulfstream Road and Northeast 2nd Street. The area is bordered on the north by the Dania Cut-off Canal, on the south by Dania Beach Boulevard, on the east by an undeveloped area, and on the west by Fronton Boulevard. All sewer flows drain to Pump Station No. 6 on Northeast 2nd.Street between Gulfstream Road and Northeast 6th Avenue. Sewer flows are then transported via a 16-inch force main, which runs south along Gulfstream Road and then west along Dania Beach Boulevard, to the twenty-inch force main on Southeast 4th Avenue. ,® A sewer rehabilitation program was implemented in this area, and the following repair items were completed: i.:) 0 755 feet of sewer line were cleaned, tested, and sealed. 1,229 feet of fold-and-formed pipe liner were installed. 0 Five manhole inserts were installed. 13 Point repair of service line was performed at two locations. a One manhole casting was realigned. o One manhole casting.was raised. i..1 El Nineteen cleanouts were repaired. i All cost-effective I/I defects identified in the SSES have been repaired. A complete listing of repairs is provided in Appendix A. The next chapter will discuss the flow reductions in each collection area. Citywide I/I reduction is also presented. City of Dania Hwd:4921R004 4-3 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 5 - Infiltration and Inflow Reduction Upon completion of the sewer rehabilitation program, flow measurements were performed on the rehabilitated collection areas during the months of December 1994 and January 1995. Rainfall was also monitored to demonstrate the correlation between rainfall and infiltration/inflow. Hydrographs were prepared and compared with the hydrographs developed during the infiltration and inflow,analysis. This chapter will analyze the flow measurement and determine I/I reduction in each collection area. Citywide I/I reduction was also evaluated at the Large User sewage flow meter. 5.1 Post Rehabilitation Flow Measurement 5.1.1 Drainage Area D-1 Flow measurement was performed during the I/I analysis for the period between August 21, 1991 and October 15, 1991. The average daily flow was 0.468 mgd. Dry weather infiltration was 0.152 mgd and total I/I was 0.29 mgd. A post rehabilitation flow measurement was taken between December 15 of 1994 to January 10 of 1995. Figure 5-1 shows the hydrograph and rainfall recorded. Peak I/1 of 0.98 mgd occurred in December 21, 1994 corresponding to the 6.34 inches of rainfall. An average I/I of 0.071 mgd was removed. E',.j 5.1.2 Drainage Area D-3 In the 1991 1/I analysis, Basin D-3 experienced a total infiltration and inflow of 0.940 mgd. Due to the 25-year storm in October 1991, wet weather peak infiltration and inflow was measured at 1.4 mgd. A post rehabilitation flow measurement was taken from December 15, 1994 to January 10, 1995. It was observed that the average daily flow was reduced from 1.355 mgd to J 0.693 mgd. Dry weather infiltration was identified as 0.166 mgd. Total I/I was 0.228 mgd, which is twenty-seven percent of that occurred in 1991. An average I/I reduction of 0.624 mgd was achieved. 5.1.3 Drainage Area D-5 I Flow measurement in Drainage Area D-5 prior to, and after rehabilitation indicated that a fifty percent infiltration has been removed from the collection system. Peak I/I prior to rehabilitation, which occurred during the 25-year storm, was 1.68 mgd. Wet weather City of Dania Hwd:4921R003 5-1 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 5 Infiltration and Inflow Reduction peak I/I measured during the post metering period was 0.58 mgd. An annual I/I reduction of 0.257 mgd was achieved. The hydrograph for this area is shown on Figure 5-3. 5.1.4 Drainage Area D-6 A post rehabilitation flow measurement was taken from December 15, 1994 to January 10, 1995 and compared with flows measured in the 1991 I/1 analysis. It was observed that twenty-eight percent of yearly I/I was removed from the collection system. A total of 0.018 million gallons was eliminated from the collection system. Figure 5-4 shows the hydrograph for basin D-6. The following Table 5-1 summarizes the results of short term flow monitoring before and after rehabilitation. The total I/I reduction was estimated at 0.971 mgd. Table 5-1 Infiltration / Inflow Reduction Before After Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Area Type (October 1991) (January 1995) Reduction ® mgd mgy mgd mgy mgd orgy Percent D-1 Dry.Weather Infiltration 0.152 55.590 0.103 37.657 0.049 17.933 32% Wet Weather I/I 0.071 25.953 0.049 17.787 0.022 8.166 31% TOTAL I/I 0.223 81.543 0.150 55.444 0.071 26.099 32% D-3 Dry Weather Infiltration 0.759 277.114 0.166 60.547 0.593 216.567 78% Wet Weather 1/1 0.094 34.198 0.062 22.802 0.031 11.397 33% TOTAL 1/1 0.853 311.312 0.228 83.349 0.624 227.964 73% D-5 Dry Weather Infiltration 0.500 182.353 0.250 91.245 0.250 91.108 50% Wet Weather I/1 0.046 16.846 0.038 13.984 0.008 2.862 17% TOTAL 1/I 0.546 199.199 0.288 105.229 0.258 93.970 47% i D-6 Dry Weather Infiltration 0.028 10.190 0.018 6.497 0.010 3.693 36% Wet Weather I/1 0.037 13.420 0.029 10.592 0.008 2.827 21% TOTAL I/1 0.065 23.610 0.047 17.089 0.018 6.520 28% TOTAL Dry Weather Infiltration 1.439 525.247 . 0.537 19.5.946 0.902 329.300 63% TOTAL Wet Weather 1/I 0.248 90.417 0.178 65.165 0.069 25.252 28% • TOTAL M 1.687 615.664 0.715 261.111 0.971 354.552 58% City of Dania Hwd:4921R003 5-2 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 5 Infiltration and Inflow Reduction 5.2 Citywide I/I Reduction As a result of the sewer rehabilitation program, total wastewater flow to the treatment ai plant has been reduced. Figure 5-5 shows the metered average monthly flow from the City. It was observed that a flow reduction occurred during 1993 and 1994. The 12- month average daily flow in 1992, prior to repairs, was 3.47 mgd. The most recent 5- month average flow after completion of the repairs is 2.16 mgd, indicating an overall flow reduction of 1.31 mgd in the City of Dania. City of Dania �i ; I i Hwd:4921R003 5-3 Sewer System Rehabilitation a (Eq) nEJUiEu N 0 Cl 0 o 0 0 0 0 '•� '••� 00 NO S6/0T/T D S6/6/I S6/9/I 3 c S6/L/T r c r ° ° •° 56/9/1 5 •c u � U — d cEM S6/£/I 303 � 0 ® ❑ ® SUM S6/T/T 3 b6/I£/LT a c t. O b6/0£/LI "C MUM ys b6BZ/ZTQ ee a b6/LZ/ZT c. b=D C b6/9Z/LT b6/SZ/ZI b6/b T b6/£ZRI b6/LZ/LI b6/IZ/ZT Y •, b6/OZ/LI 176/6I/ZI b6/SI/LI i b6/LT/LT b6/9T/LT E m b6/ST/ZT N p m O C. O 2 0 0 (m) I uju!E I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q .N.•i ^ C O O p p U7 S6/0 i/1 j * S6/6/I _ ' I 56/8/I S6/L/i S6/9/I S6/S/i S6/b/i 56/£/I i S6/I/T � b6/I£RI � 3 GL O 176/0£RT b6/6ZRI� d N O 116/8ZRIQ J• N y i U •� b6/LZRI L ,i b6/9ZRI b6/SZRI g b6/bZRI c c � b6/£ZRI m ;D b6RZRI C c O U 66/IZRI cc L.L ... b6/OZRi y � . 3 a 3 b6/6IRI - b6/BIRT � b6/LIRi _3 b6/9i/LI 176/5IRI w N O (n o (n (QJL1I)t+013 cn _ O I a (Q!) !IE.N!LH 0 0 0 o c c o vi S6/0T/i fD S6/6/T S6/8/i S6/!JT S6/9/T S6/S/T S6/b/T S6/£/i S6/Z/i � y RM 0 S6/i/T O Ca A e4 p "L7 m .y gigcli b6/If/ZT vA a� U •O a a b6/6Z/ZT d0 A v� Laa O a' b6/8Z/Zi b6/LZ/ZT o _ b6/9Z/ZI c c o • • b6/SZ/ZT c U b6/bZ/ZT L t d 3 " 3 � � b6/£Z/ZT 3 a C2 El ® ❑ ® 176/ZZ/LT b6/TZ/ZT b6/OZ/Zi 176/61/Li Cl) 00 O O N O O O O O w co (Q`JW)M0JALO rn 0 O , Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 R R R R R R 0 0 o c o m a ri Cl 96/0I/I S6/6/T S6/8/T JI 3 S6/L/I o t3 c S6/9/T o 2.2 S6/5/T o S6/b/T td co i° 56/£/T S6/ZlT N®rl® S6/I/I s v b6/I£RI �. p F. 176/OMI o ea A c 2, b6/6Z/tT D6BZ2IQ kn _ - b6/LZ/ZI LV •� � " A p 176/9Z/ZT :` ' b6/5Z/ZI 3 D6/hZ/Zl b6/£Z/ZT b6/ZZ/ZI h6/IZ/ZT b6/OZ/LI h6/6T/ZT < V6/8I/LT b6/LI/ZT 06/9T/ZT c CD E b6/SI/Zi 2 to Ln v in en In N tn .. t o cc C 0 ri a N Q� sayaul`pejuley O Lf) N _ N co CO -T V N . . Ss/JeW i s6/uer fOm N 46/AON co m Q E . • 46/daS 46Anr VORN v6New C bsNer E Li 3 L £6/AON d' LL 3 m £6/daS 3 rn € £6Anr m i i MANY L ° o . - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - £s/yew £6Ner c Z6/AON � m C1 Z6/daS Z6Anr a E Z6/AeW m � m o:m Z6/JeVV m CJ Z6Ner i t 6/AON t 6/daS i t6Anr o S S o 0 0 0 t0 LO Cl) N C t p6w'Molj z O a 0 m i m s a a Chapter 6 - Conclusions and Recommendations i The overall effort of reducing I/I in the City of Dania has been very successful and the results have met regulatory requirements. The interest and active participation by the City staff in the implementation of the program has assured project success. 6.1 Conclusions ;.j Throughout the program, initiated in 1991, two I/I reduction targets, along with the cost 1 of repairs, were estimated: M Infiltration / Inflow Analysis - 0.350 mgd at $709,200 0 Sewer System Evaluation Survey - 0.876 mgd at $710,300 The final results exceeded the SSES estimate. According to the flow monitoring results, the I/I reduction achieved was: 0 Short term flow monitoring - 0.971 mgd (By Basin) j Permanent flow monitoring - 1.310 mgd (Citywide) °j The total estimated rehabilitation cost of $720,000 was slightly higher than planned since A, the City decided to include repairs in Area D-1. Table 5-1 indicates an I/I'reduction of 58 percent. However Figure 5-5 indicates that, considering the more accurate long term flow monitoring, Dania has eliminated 80 percent of their total infiltration / inflow. Using a conservative 0.971 mgd of I/I removal, savings of $5.62 million over the next twenty years have been realized by the City through this program. I'I' 6.2 Recommendations The control and reduction of extraneous flows should be an ongoing effort. Although the City has completed all three phases of sewer evaluations and rehabilitation program in the selected areas, it is anticipated that progress will be made continuously and improve future efforts. A leak-free or "tight" system, in which extraneous flows are either excluded or held to a minimum, is beneficial to the maintenance of the City's wastewater collection systems. These benefits include: City of Dania Hwd:4921R006 6-1 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 6 Conclusions and Recommendations (1) Reduction of overloaded or surcharged sewers and the associated problems of wastewater backups and overflows; (2) More efficient operation of the regional wastewater treatment plant; and (3) Increase in sewer hydraulic capacity for future flows. Such a tight system can lower overall capital and operating costs as a result of: (1) Extended life of existing system components; (2) Delay in future expansions of hydraulically sized components, such as sewers, pumping stations, etc.; and (3) Lower operating costs realized by a decrease in energy requirements (pumping and certain chemicals). Many sewer repairs were completed during the I/I reduction program, which reduced flows to the treatment plant. It can be assumed that the sources have been eliminated. However, continuous deterioration over time of other portions of collection areas may create new leaking problems and, therefore, result in excessive infiltration and.inflow. j 6.2.1 Collection Area D-2, D-7 These two collection areas were classified as non-cost effective for repair during the I/I Analysis in 1991. SSES was not conducted. However, these two areas-impose an excessive I/I of 13,674 gpd per inch and per mile of sewer for D-2 and 8,580 gpd per inch per mile of sewer for D-7 respectively, which contributes approximately 0.22 MGD of extraneous flows to the regional treatment works. As time passes the collection system keeps on deteriorating and I/I may have increased since 1991. Approximately thirty percent of these I/I flows can be removed by selected repair technologies at a cost of $422,900. It is recommended that the City develop a financial and engineering plan to address this remaining I/I within a timetable. Detailed I/I sources and repair program should be prepared during SSES and such a repair program should be implemented. 6.2.2 Design Standards.for I/I Prevention and Control The best method for controlling infiltration / inflow into sewer systems is to take measures initially during the design of new collection systems to prevent its entry. These measures should include: • City of Dania Hwd:4921R006 6-2 Sewer System Rehabilitation Chapter 6 Conclusions and Recommendations 1. Specifying low allowable leakage limits for pipe acceptance tests and carefully inspecting the quality of the construction work done. 2. Requiring appropriate field acceptance testing. 3. Specifying pipe products, jointing systems, and appurtenances proved for water tightness. 4. Ensuring proper connection practices. 'i -j In summary, I/I reduction is an ongoing program which all municipalities should make a high priority in their collection system operation and maintenance program. All ,f municipalities contributing flows to the Hollywood Southern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant should plan or implement further steps in their efforts to reduce I/I. Among those steps are: Install permanent flow and rainfall monitors; address remaining areas which were not surveyed (SSES); implement a 100 percent television inspection program; address the service laterals by televising all suspect laterals; implement policies for lateral repairs in private property and, procuring annual contracts with specialty contractors. r ;1 a _ 1 ;j 3 City of Dania Hwd:4921R006 6-3 Sewer System Rehabilitation APPENDIX A Recommended Repairs ' i : i 9 l m 300 0 a • o N to x O U U m � W J v � o J O \ Q F 1 Y Y Y a 2 0 0 0 ll w w w 1 = U c c J J Z N oe ww ccc Z Z Z a .- a a aQ O O w w w ter- - � � � r— - � � F- rr `- � - �- r � �- � '- � �- r- �- r �- � Y Y Y C0000 W 0 0 00000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 00 w w w �Q'/rt� ''c^^ 'c'nn ''cnn ''c^^ ''c^^ 'c'nn ''Q^ ,c,^^ 'c'nn ''cnn 'c^ 'c'^^ Z Z Z `/U V l"J V V V V V V V V V V V V1>— m ' Q S = W d LIS cn NW o P O ['� N O uJ c`7 to Q N c0 O c7 _O N O c7 r� O O u2 O h O L ^ ,O n u) O cV ^ O cc) cn O O Z O lj ^ N N n N to p N 00 V c� � QQ m N c7 ^ N N L Q c') N N R N u, N O O K 1� V) UJ h O Z P N N c`7 c'J co ^ N �O N c7 fV N N V 10 �O N n Cl) V 1, n N N M N N ^ in c'� m ^ m N N N N . W W N Q m '..�Z co G .. .� Q c0 co c0 c0 c0 N c0 67 OD cD W c0 c0 c0 co c0 c0 co aD co N m - of m m N O coO O N O m m co O O 0 O Z :.1 Y W J L.j ZLo pO 11 3 N ^ C fJ N aD t0 O ^ c7 cD c7 uJ Q () Lo M pOco mC O V M V m th N N ^ Q cA c7 ^ N N N N N cA O cD ^ N N N N M M m N c) c7 co ) � N � co M d .: P COV c"ODJ N m M m 'O O ^ M d O N c7 OQ c. �o a cD N P C U ^ ^ ^ Q Q m cV N N cV V 'O w O O Q U N .p Cl) c J N CO N A M cl) V co 0 � Q � co V O Lr) 1..� Z O N cc cc cc m W r i r r cc Ix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 O D D D D D O D D O D D D O D D D D D O D D D D D D D D D D D p p D p 00 p 0p O H O ' cc 3r _ ^ N c+) Q m P O ^ N M C cD P O N crj v N n c0 P O ^ N t+i c cc) �O r� m P 3 .� ^ N N N N N N N N N N cry c7 c! c7 c7 c•) c7 c7 M c7 ^ N i.- cc .::I W 0 (L` 3 O d • O N � m W O U � U s O ix U W_ G J U 0 J yW� G O \ Q W W � a a � O V N cc. Z a O W °C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c w c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w. w w w w w w w w w Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z J J J J J J J J J m a S W N � G I H lA = SSE p LA th op � 0 0 0 O LA _O P m Q O O_ Q p. O O 1\ N N O O o O m c0 O P O N Q N Z S S E P H .9 H of O Q v ^ Q ^ r\ 2 c') ^ S g n Q LcJ Q ^ Q � u� O� S O aD ^ �O O 0 N N O Z M N ^ N t'J th C7 N t") N N N t7 N N t! N [+) th c J c7 c') r) Q to V) m N N .O n m m Q N t`� O O N M w 3 w N a z c Qao to m to to m co m ao ao co co m m to to to co co co co m w to ao ao m co m to ao co m co m m m w 0 O Z Y I W J p p O. ^ Cl) O S 0 0 ^ � N N m m N N N m M � Q Q � c7 � O N N no N ^ N t7 N N N d O U) O ti7 P 8 O !-0 O 1 7 CN N N t\ N ,_ c7 t!J O P Q Q [O pp N N Cl) n co co P P ^ N N N N N N N [7 th ^ Q Q t") .- N O P P O 0 0 to c7 i\ t� p P .- ^ ^ N tq N N N Z ., N Q c c c l m S S. S S S Z = S = S S S S S S S S S S S LL LL LL LL V _ p' , 0 0 0 O ' O O O O O O O p, O O O q, O O p' O ' ' 1 , , ' 1 , 1 , 1 S S O S O S O D p p p p p ❑ p p p p S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S p O a ® _ co o O U') O t` to P O ^ N eh Q to O c0 P O N coQ O �o � m P O N m Q O �o n to P O ^ N m V O O \ 3 Z N N N N N N N N N t7 t7 Cl) m e7 M M M co t•) Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 2 C7 a 99 W to 3O d ® _o N < m = O U U < 0 Ix V � C J U < i O J O _ W Q d Q c O i V cn < Z W °C cccc Q z z z z I m Q 2 � w W cn } W to P O N N Z O P O a0 G7 N LccO J � N r 0 : 3 w N _ . Q - a z co < co co O N O Z J 3 �2n ? 0 �\ O N N N N G N IL v O N N N �I Z N co < 00 � U` v x W _ S Q 00 0 < f3 Q N O m W a is=i�� i i j i :7 ® APPENDIX B Location Maps f .3 i.a 1 I z z 0 0 `< < GC c c c c c c c c C ¢ Q Q < Q Q Q Q Q ¢ IX Y > > yd! yd� yd� tau �dy Wd d µdi Wd Wdµ� < N N c c c C c c C C C C C oc U c c U O c c O O O c c c c <d c O O O c c c < < U ¢ ¢ U U V U Q U ¢ < < .c < U U U U ¢ < < o d d p < d d < < ¢ < d ¢ d d d d < .( ¢ ¢ d d d - o o c c w c c c r c c z z z z z z z z z` z z W W O O o O o 0 3 0 0 0 0 a U U d U U U U U U U U U U U U O D U U U U U U U yI O cc KW p c ? c c c ? c c c c c Occ z_ z z z c= z s 5 5 5 9 z d z z 4 Z Z O d d d 0 d Z Z O Z O d d d d z z O N < < < Z < < < < < < < < z U U c0 U U H O O O < co u U u U u 0 0 0 0 U u u O � W O LL U LL O O - 0 - w w I.— W < O C c ? aS c c Z as as as c aC < c c c < as ep e6 ds c c a a a s j O 0 < O < < < < < O C� Q Q Q _-,� ►Q- oc C w w O w O O O w O w w wc d d 0 0 0 Q w d d j 0 c c C9 c c U LL c It c c c c c c Ca W rT Q z cc W 0 G W W W W W C C W W Q W LL z z z z z Z Z J z < < O o J J J J J J J WW W O CL a a a a d > > > > a a a a j p `� z a 0 0 O O a d a d o o o ►- U ¢ z U ¢ g z z z z z z z z Z Z m < z m c c a c < c < < < < c c c c < < < Go � Q u � Z o 0 0 o u ° em u uu0000uuu Z' a < J c Q < ^� of df -b C as c c c c z cG m c c c O < < a < < D 0 O a m <d a m - - 6 8 W F 3 c J 3 U O O O c c c c c 0 0 0 0 c c c .J U W - LL Y CO O p. < W ..d O O O O O N PN N N O (aV N N t^1 N faV fav G 25 Z- p w c d o c o- c ^ c v v v N v v v U Q oc c m a a r Q W a v c p p p = o v o 0 0 W Vf.. N LU 3 LL d v c v fV CV `0 O �n u� O n O O O N C> v c c a m m to m m m Q In .. LL a C i C� � � N ' � W he W Z O N O O O O O O O O O CC,) O O O O O O O O O O O O O i J Z W 3 p N M n c �n v� �n a r. m a v� v> v> u, v� a < m m .� o o W 8 8 8 8 8 88 8 8 8 8 8 � � 88888 � � 0000 < IL m v v� a < V' 8 8 8 8 8 88 8 8 8 aa � � < C 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z . - Z OC N In Q N N N N� C C �� w h ' i c� z H e C < J c c c a a a < < = a W h a s n C O < C w Wp W O o a u C C z a < cQ UO a < haa p azp O o C<Q ? CCy Z p z C C Y C t Cyy � tpy W Lc¢ O O z z � p W V ul O O 3 0 U 0 U U o U o U z 9 U z U U OU OU U zz p o U U C O W 0 z W Z U Ix O O Z Z = Z O ix W O -� > > > > 7 O ? O .. LIJd nW Wa j aW �Q a d a a 0 0 a .�+ z n a a z Oz z z zz c a c O a a z z < z Q Q Q Q C9 < Q Q Q U c c < c U U U U 0 < � ? c c U Z. c O x V o O O U o 0 0 0 z Uo p 0 0 O O o 0 d Q -6 c as c c c c > S C_zg c as aA c as eti c c 1- W '- < 0 d G C a a p Q C a O D < 0 < < Q oe C O C 0 C C C C g C9 C ? C 2 0 0 O O n a .J J d C C W �y m � � LL LL W Q _ _z c < S Z O W W W W W < O C C Ly C a < z z z 3 .m<.. Q J z leJ z J O J J J z 4{1 {yJ C 0 W W W W W %4] N Z C W W- O a .a_: a 0 0 d a C W O p a a j Q a a O O W O a a O a 0 0 n O a 0 c O z 0 a' a p C a a p p - ►- z 2 .2 z g z z z 2 z z c -z z z z w O O O J O "� O `�' O "! c O OU O as c c C Q, C z0 c c < < Vn uUi U ,n aS U " U U U " U O U = u z du z O O U O U p O D U O a o o n 0 a a o d o a < Q z a <Q o o Q Ur C p o ¢ Q a a a Q O C O O C O C C C C Ja e C �" U C Uc' z U OLL OW C a p O O C C U W N OpZ r OCC O d W W . 3 2 ui -0-Q LL a c aco v W m O '- .. ^ N ^ H I.- N N ei h W HW v t7 O P m m u] 10 4O M m ^ R C co Q Q ' N fV 10 z O m co m m m CO m m m m n 1 o m cc m m m COI m m m m m m - Q � U O VI m e7 � Y7 oV Qp oQ N N N h pp. Z Z v � O N N R c� e� Nj O I N 7 v O P P O C m O CV e'� nJ N e7 N ..1 Y 1 O n N N � N N N N N N J Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z m < W O O .'O m' m. m m O R N �tj v h O N O m N N m m N e7 00 c e o 0 o S g g o 0 8 N N o 0 0 0 0 0 cl c 0 0 z d ^_ m'- P_ O O O ((pp�� 'N N n O v O ^ m O N n n P N 0 D O O O O O O 0 0 0 N N O O O O O $ $ a 0 0 0 0 O .p ^ m P O — N V •p yX . C C W �P a O o 3 3 W 3 3 3 3 z W r c c c c Sz C C 8 = Cg < < < oYc U U U U U a a a a a Q o a Q > a a N c a N N N N c C `g c c N L c z Z z z z O O C a C O 0 c < C CO c' Q� <� <QQ r 'E � R Oc c., c � Oc 2 c c LL Z z z z z Z z Z z Z J O z Z U a O a 0 a 0 aw 0 aL O p O O O O 0 0 = U O 0 0 = a O U O c4 z C CL C W W W W Z W Z O yCj Z J C Z Ix W AL o a a a a J a a J a J c ? O y w O W w w = W a z p 0. 0 d H a N. Q � CL< Q < < _ `tj < = Z f Ow OQ Y V O W W W O O 0 O Q C C O Z O N W (�nj 2t W C w Z Q Of < & w w < w O d o a w O as �++ = O w O a w w c � < O c U U U U U c N c U c H o v^ IL m. Q 0: d a Z S Z 0 vS v5 Z Z Z z z c u, � Z = C J J J J C W < C O C W � J J W W W J J J J J ? c a a U U U a yak wa ya/ ay z Q ? z o a 00'5 w a Z `li a W v~i Z < �LIV t c Q <' ¢ < a C za ¢ C Z u m N g .. U U U �U c y�. ( w W W. a < z C U C V O LL v N O = ? Z O z O t0 C — x x z z z z z °� c w c c+ z b C " a as z as Z a m Q m Q m F- W -.W- a W w O Q c Q Q a O a n J O O c" Q' O O c ° �° �& 5& g& 3 u u ° CZc (D u ° cZ� 3 ° o ? ° W I V c� U W m LU �' = S. c I 'o FQ- O N p .( .� m a . N V Q z 0 oc ° n " cq 'io I= a W ltl QW G m j p o o O 3 Q ^ ^ ^ N HWui V Ot N Q LA. 1L - 3 Z H O =' = o O m w m m m � Q o La. O 0 2 - Z Z cV cQi R tQi �i �i �i m o o - °° ^ N N �t7 C Q N e7 t7 .- J N J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 J Z 3 .. ,o O c 0 0O e7 O n cOp n Ln snO n n w P cPp pO pp Q O O N O O .0 O O O O O O O O B O O O O O O Og S z - ....� QQ QQ c o co 0 coo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r5 25 g g g g Q P O N t7 Q N d n t0 P 'O ^ N cc w m m a0 mRe m m X a C a' a � c Y OI I C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C < < < < < < < Q < < < Q Q < Q IL a a a a a a w a U a 0- a O a a a a Lt! Le U I U U I U I U U I ul 10, U1 a I ol 01 U a I U 1 U U U � 0 S W p W W W D of U LJ O c > g 0 c J e 5 > > > > W O 0 0 O O z 0 z c` O O O O O O O AL Q Q Q Q Q �{Qyy ca 0 `�' Q {<{y �< Q yy<J Q Q J J J '" Z J < N Z z- J J J w J J J Z d'. U U U U U O U 2 U U U U U U U Q y < 0 O O O C O O C O 0 p O a < cw Ccw Cw Cgw 0w Q ¢c Qc ks Q C Sc cQ <ca GI.- W aaaaOa O e d C. w w z wa C aCc C z a a of G a C0: E. c ZC CZ CZ J J d co Q cx z c z Z O O O O o w ® U O LU Q U U > m p > LL W w W O O O O ` O O Ow wOJ w cwO7 ?¢zz Q ZJcwyy JwcO z z � z z z O Oz JJ w Bcca>- U U U U U O UCU U UZ0 U Uv oC U C N coIx O � cZ o aa U ai ¢ ap I U cUc wOJyy c w -i U W (�. J co J Q j N O N O O O N N N N m N N N O N O U Q m a r' 1L W G ` Q W CO > O = cw 3 LL -. W C Q c v I.- U N ry Q LL 3 " W a iri o n n c U) 'i c N . Q y Q ai c v ac v v v �O ui r: r� Q v e� v vi z p Q U _< Z_ m m m m m m co m m m m m m m m m m. m Q p i , O x N a G` p n - m e7 F� n Q o .O pP pp oP N JJ H J Y N N N O O O ^-i L J In w N In N N .O h .gyp n .Pp Pp ^ v1 d m m N O O O O O c O O 'O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z .I d N � ¢ C41 Np Np In h .p .p n P O cOpp O O n0 O O O O O O O co -' Z _ N h N InN �fi h h In L z O C O Lo off_ C � z Q 3 z z z 4 4 �n Z C c c c c c c r c < a4 t L t `. L w t Le cO a O c O U c c c V c c O U? Q Q d w < w Q Q U Q a a a C9 a Ow a Q < z z zz z zz z zz z z O O O OO O OO U U U a U U Z C 0 0. Z C ..i cW W .Q. U4 � � ? c c c xc z z � c g g c OLL Z W W C J J W (D 0 W Z Z J J J i � 6 C J � Q Q G •� � � � � J Q 0 k' ix k i a O O O O O Wa d Q ZZ0 Z 2 a ¢ Q Q Q Q d 0 - < C C W Q Q Q C C < U) < Z f M J Z R S O Q U N N to O U U U U _ U O � � � W O O 0 O c 0 j O_ a < c as as L [�� z n� z z [�� °� c c c c as Z ►•- LijOC oc a w � � W � � & � � � 0 n a a g c = a < c o c U' U 0 U U 0 c c c 0 c Z c U Q 0 = Z O W c c z J z z ? c Z W W J J J W O O ` O /Op i a < Z J J Q Q Q Q < W J v v O J v Q Z - a Z W w W W o 0 0 0 0 a S > > o d o a a a Z a y Z C C ?L < Q ¢ G ¢ a c < ? ? Z ? c ? Q W O Q O O J � rW- W ti < O W j W W N C W ,y 'i `i U .� Z W U U U Z U O U W ' �j C C W . 0' Z Z Z Z Z O ib C W 0: W c Q Q Z W 4� Lr Z O m ¢ c 0 0 < Q Q Q ¢ < 0 0- 0 J- 0 `�' wN JO J a w J �w.l U aCaC a QQac Q c ? -0 c U U U U U to J Ix W = g 8 S £Z N J 0 W d O Q Q N h Q •C O O N O O �0 Z p� O W tV V ^ Q P - V Q V N n � a LU � c IL o I.- V N LU Q LL £: LL x 3 w o P c v P o r O O o v n e, o c v ,O ,O aCR GQ y IL m n •O •O ^- P m m n V C LO C •O V V n m Q O i < Z o m m ,o m co m m m m m m m co m m m m co m < C V � O Qc Q C pn vp� •p ^. n N m O O N n O m co O P [.'.�� —1 � � e�J e7 N t7 O N to O e7 e7 m •O •O N N eJ 6• �' �'J N N e') e7 t7 N N N e7 t•] N N S F W Y N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O .3 Z O O g g $ g c g g g o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 x o. Z P P P P P P P O P P 8 O O O O O O O O S X SS Q C � N W Q h p W W Z a CL < Q a a a c c O O C i g c O c a O -3 C c c C c c U U WCZ O ¢ U < c p U U ¢ ¢ ¢ Q < ¢ ¢ ¢ a 0 a < O a w < ¢ m d a a a LL Z Z w w ¢ Z O Ztb LL Z Z O O U >o c U OU a U O OU OU U U U U U U 0 0 cWz Ix �y c � w dS df dS a6 OC O O QJ ][ U J W c a ac (9 CJ zW ? W LLpjpaQW � 0 O O a <W¢ c�dc0 0w CL d a ¢ < < < << < < CA < < LLp tt pLLpLLp Z ZpzZ H z O < a ;pS0S;S0p p < 0 0 OQ? Q Q? Q aQQ = c c< U .. c - J J d m Q ¢ Q � Z ? c w c c c w S Z O w W O U w w g Z Z d' Q ca < w < Z > Z Z w > w w w < QQ"rJ- a. JO LL cOW C9 WRW aC > CcO cv p 8d � CSU N8U >v0U 0. c0 ccc0 I.- < < < < 5 ¢ <C c gZ g O O } O O O NN U Z w U U cz � p gZ Q - p _ pQQ O U OO O O O U U U> U> U Lu U us Co LU IX 0 5. CN 0. v O � p m U Q ca �N , < CL LAJ Im OS Q W r = m 5 a Ncq 3 Lu pm I-- o<c O v S 'N V - . .. Q Lu 3 LL W = m c v v v m N N N N v e m O o O O Q H W m O N 'n h N v v v v O m m O Q O O N G Q O m m co m m m m m m m m m m m m m O D Q G LL O = ~• P n P N �% PJ t7 e'J e7 17 v Q v N N N CV N Z Z N e7 In) n 7 M N J Y 1 y<j Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O J .J 'O N R O m N N N N N CPV N C .� Or c 'd - f� I� �. N N a O O W N < Lo ® N C C � N n C N C CO Z O a O a c c c c N Y a a a a i Le Le t Le W C _C 6 C § ¢ U < C_< < ¢ < < U (.) U < < ¢ < a ¢ a a_ a s O a U O O a < < < U a a a a F- Q F F i- F W W W W O O O Z it L it U U U U U U a U a a a U U U U a U U U U f I 0 W LU W w Z z V1 Z 2 Z Z Z u O w ¢ < Z > > > > U y,� O O O O LU a O ¢ 0 0 0 0 j J Gi `uS O O O O CL z 2 z z z z Q p p z z z z y �_ U O U U U U N N U U U U LO Q y < p W p 0 p p Z WO Z rW. p p p p 1j C C 0 Q Z Z { Q w w w w w w w O U a a w w & 1� J a C U C C ix C C G 1 U U C C C C C7 m < sx W z W 2 Z O !: z p O < O O < c _< J Z w< <W U _ W _ W < 0 W W O W W C N N W LU O 0 0 O O O Z O Z U O z O z O p p LL Q Z O O O � 0 Z .rn z z z Z c —c -U c -c - z z �n Z ¢ 0 a ¢ < ¢ c� xc� xwx� x� x 0 s < ¢ O3< < < ¢ } W _Q t, � `!! � . "J' uj .6 � z2Z dS 2.G � m Q Q --, t� t, u9 y W C Z C U C c ZZZZ� z0z (9 N Z aCa �UW U U U Z cc oc w (D LO9- L LDZ O z z c xcp c c 1 C ¢ < ¢ ¢ < J UaWcU c U W <OO VWQ <� Q ¢ C W¢ ¢ ¢W J J ¢ < aWU a U c c W . J no W W C. (9 JO 2 Z OC Q WIL � U Q a _3 W W { Q LU W W m > dLu In c m N c y LU a LL 3 W - ALN O O N O O -n v P n m — m — — 'I— W P P .p v '� '_� `=-3 Q U l p a z N m m m m m m m m m w m m m m m Q s - J U. - O T0 1:._.i j Y Q ' O N N N N O O O O In O H H H H p H H H O H H H O O O O O O - '� _. 0 < O O O N Q W pO C S i_-��• H H S O (� S S S H S O O N v < P O_ P_ N N ¢ S O O O O 0 O p 0 0 Z 2 N m i C X c a O o N W C z Y 0 z O 0 c c c c c c c c c " c c C c c c c c c < ¢ < < a < a < < � < < ¢ < < < a < -a a a a a a a 0 a a a a o. O o. o. a a z ;*_ z Z z z it a it Z it it - U U U U U U U U Z U U U U U a U U U U S S 2 W C 0 p� O zz� yz irz� O J U U U V) X G J yJ �J ' OZ JO WZ WZ WZ z Z z zd Z z z U Z z z a ¢ aWJWa Z U U U U U U U U U U U O Q h Q c O z 0 0 0 O O z zcr IL D O D O D O Q H W r a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ ¢ a ¢ ,��{ Q ¢ ¢ a ¢ a ..Q INC 0. 0. w w w w w w w w w a ¢ a w w w a a H J aCL O C C C C C w C C C C C C w C w C C C C C C mQ z z z Z O O O O z z Z U 2 U U U w 2 ULU U Q . o O O O ' O O c c W W S SU � z0 U U U o ; W O .O w ' 0 w w w 0 O z 0 0 0 0 0 O O Z 0 z 0 0 O O O p '� r- z z J ' z VZ Z J c _ c _ v� Z a s a�yzm� _c z z z z z z z zc z Z zc (9 x a a ¢ a a a t9 x C�J = a ¢ ¢ a ¢ 'I W 0 �j .t H U U U U Z z a Z C zc9U U U U U U Z0zQU U U U U CD � c g C c c G ¢c c c _0 Z g c c c c c z z_ c c c c c c c C Q a ¢ w < < w< w<.w Z O a ¢ < a < < --i < < ¢ O m < < z Q Q O - - a a a a ¢ a a a- a c Q ` a a a a a a ¢ `a Q `a a s a a a c- W W. Z W W z W Z W Z O a W W W W W W W W W Z O W W W O Q - O t= c c c c `J 3 c c c o >c U c c c c c c c U c U c c U c c c a > W V Lu Q J N ►- d N .O 8 O N 8 O' N n S n O 8 H O et Z VLU Q a W Q W 3 < = m Q o LL W ►- U N P N a L1 P a h m n O �o Q N In vi o o C o ,p vi d o m ed d d vi o d d Q O co m m m m m m col m m m m ? m ao m ao LL 0 - _ V m o). ^ O m o p. pO pO a0 .Pp N N N m Z Z v- tV tN'7 fdV m _ �'�'J ec'J'� �N,� fV N N N l'1 n N N � _ he Cj J v tv m Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z �Q 0 0 0 25 -0 o -0c o -0o 0 o g 0 Z O N42g e7ma PO N a h a U P O h n O Q 'n `" o' o0000000 e h O n m O O — N n v u]' ,p 0 0 — ..Z N N N N N N N e7 M �'] t'J 17 th t7 t7 Q Q yX . C $S • N �S n C N C W �U h a O o N Y OC ¢ W c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c < < < < < < < < < < < < < a < < a < < ¢ a ¢ ¢ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a O O a O U a a a a a s Le t t t t kt t t t Le Le Le � Z z Le Z Z t Le t � � 4 Z � � � � � � Z Z Z Z Z Z: Z U U 10 C51 U U C51 U I U I U I U U U U U U t a U a a U U U U U U i W C � w > ! Ixd > > > > >S > > O O > > > > > > O > O > O O _I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O zW O O z -z Z z z z z Z z Z z Z z z z Z z Z z Z p z Z ¢. ¢ a ¢ a a a ¢ a a ¢ ¢ ¢ a a a ¢ a ¢ a to < !y uJ !�l �j �H !� -L� !N `J !�f !� !� t� tH !!j !� tj t� �9 Q z `J` Za' u uuUUuuuuUU U UUUU. U UUU O - UU Y U O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O OW n 2- 0 0 U) c 0 Q < W W W W w W W W W W W W W W V W C d < g c c g g c g g c g c g a c c ~Q W ► ¢ ¢ < a a ¢ a ¢ ¢ z a < a a ¢ ¢ ¢ < ¢ 0 < C " WC a. a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a J O a s J < c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c a s c c J J d m Q oWc z z in z :.} W Z O U U av m W O UZ 0:W > > > O O O O O O O O O O O � > p O. O O O �++O z O U O O O uS O O F- c Z z z Z z z z Z Z z Z z Z z Z A Z Z Z Z z z N Z ¢ ¢ a a ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ c ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Qa0 x ¢ ¢ E� x ¢ ¢ ¢ p z ¢ a t } W O ¢a `...i' uJ J `� `J. �' -U `�` ,' a 'y `�, `�' `�' 3 d-b 'J` 3 4 .�. uj LLJ � Ng u' w UUUUUUUuuu UUUU = Z (DUx o " UUu SOc UU c g c z z c c c c c c c g C (� Z c , c c c O c c Z z o a a < ¢ < < < < < < z o < < a ¢ x a U < < < U < < a a a a a a a a a a C a a a a Q a `� a ¢ a a Q D a a o O a s a0 i s 0: c c c c IX c Oa i -a a- a- a, "n 3 c U c �i 3 h a c c c a s c c0. t- _ I ¢ W V W ...� N Lu .� d S 7 0 S V V N V V V V O O Q Q V O O O p p 6 n V n n n n n O n n n O O O O O o• Z p W O v v v ^ N - V ^ V ° v v v v U Q � t: a W Q W r \ mo 7 N O V w O c- U N LLS Q LL 3 "W N O m m O O O N N P O ,O C O O N N Q P.- - O ^ V Q Q V V C Q Pi vi e7 m n ,O O ,O to 0 ,O .O n Q Q tf) Z 0 Q J < Z m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m o 0 0 o m m m Q o c LL 0 _ 0 m.. •O ,O ,O P P P m 0- 0. InP n m m O m m m O m N h p ,O P QQ .[p] pp e") N N N N N O O Q Q O p Z Z N �'J N N t7 t7 �'J N N t7 a7 th e7 t'J t'J e'] !7 AJ c5 N 1") t7 Q N e7 N N N N N = O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z W V - ,O ,O n n n h 0 n. m V V O v] m m V V N d n ^ N O 0 P ^ V V V O n O O N n V O O O O O O - R R N N N N N N N N e7 cJ t7 e7 17 C c R V V Q C c N h h N � ��f) 1n YJ, N h O � � O V d d •O G x Z a Y C N N a O 'a C w N R m W C c c c c c < ¢a c ¢ c< c< c< < < < < ¢ c < < a ¢ a a m m m m < c< c< c¢ c< c¢ CL � ca ac¢ ac O U U U U U m U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U G 0 WIx � w OC O C z 9x w L� a s 5 s c W } z O o 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z .z z a us < z a Q � UUUU > UUUUUUUUUUU U UUUUU U U U Z X U O Q O QO O O O Q O O O O Q O Q O O O O O O O O O Oy C W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W d < (� c c c c c c c C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c � to ►- Co < ¢ < a o ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ < < < a a ¢ < < < < < < < < a < Q a a a a � C w w w w w w w w w u+ w W w H a C C at C C C C C C C 0: C C C C C J d m Q sm z = ZZ O U O O O W P w j m m m Q G U Q C v ¢ a �{ LU LU o 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O cn Z o < < < < < < a < < < a a a < < a < a < < a a < _ U) U Go C UUUU UUUUUUUUUUU UU z UUUU U c9 Z W O c c c g 0 c c c c g c c c c g c c c g c c c W c W c (9 Z - 3 O aaaa a a a a a a a a aad 0 < < < a � < < < < ¢ < < < <. < < 2 Q < < ¢ < < 4 < O < Q - O Qw w wwww <ww <C ¢ O a 0. c c "� c c c c c c c c Le `L c t a > c c c c c c CD 0, 9 c c9 c U Lu LU _ } Co Z O pm, o c p p Pm Pm PN d . h O O U - oc a W W OC _ Q W m m w n. m w P IX .O N N V - 4 � - 3 LA_ _ - W m m h P N N N N N 0: m - m I.- N o N to m o m o O V V V t`i m n V V V V C .- O Q O QZ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m '0 0 ~ - C n m P P m N uO N Lo In Lo O n V 4 �-i e� N 4 a �n N N m m m m n ,o m 1 Z Z N t7 - (V N N N FJ cr N N �'J (V V1 W Z O 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O J , W 3 V O n vJ m t7 t7 M O N m P m N V V N O rI V V V V V V V V V - V v7 m 'COO n C O O P P P NO Q CL Z op p Op p Op CN co n n a c v c h C CZ'0 m P P Le) P p Q O O -� N 19 V ^ C n m P O N M V V) n m P O N e7 V vn v� _ O n n n n n n n n n m m m m m m m m m m P P O P P x 55 • h Le S n c W d O o N w� C Z C C O a ¢d ¢ Z D Le W O �v C C C C C C C C C w VT` C C C d C C d { U a a a a a a a p < a a a Q c a n c U z t Le Llv Le t � -w 2 � Le Le t � C Le c z z it a- Z p p Z Z zp 3 3 z d U U U U U U U Z U U U U U O U U O a 2 p x x U, x 0 W G W Z V�z C c W J J Z Q J K O.' O 00 z z zo z W U U c o Z 0 0 d x O c O c U U U U d U ` p C _� � p LU `cciC y" w O�SO O c x o a < zUZUo 0 0 0 Do o G Q c c c c OQN � a o� < a O O Z O C C O cz Q Ix a z Z c W W d - w J a C C -j J a ro / lu cx c=Q o Z C f z z In LU Z O yQ Qy > > ¢ Q u a Q ` N N O o 0 0 w 3 O W �" N O O df w p z � � ococ < < ¢ a Q a 3> c � 30 0 z z � g W u x �� � `J` `J Oc c0 aSx CU z uJ � d � p o z z C O c 0 U U U U c a c U z w ¢ U U Q U"� U c c N Z - Ux ¢ z z S ¢ Y O O C9O O2 � S 30 } W O .62 � a. d Z W x 0 co y W z z c a Q c c c c o c `d < c c 3 Z Z -' U w ¢ Q O 0 < U _ c U c d c c J U w LU ix cq O25 Z K o W _ V h Q N (FiV N O .p O O cp N N p�j N O N OC CV u CL LL, W W \ m � a mm n N j 3Lu ? o o I.-,U af r 3 U. W AL - P n n n n P n n C n e7 n Q Q l� '� Z 0 0 m' m C m m m11 m m co m com m m m m m m m I Q O 1_..� U- 0 cc +) Z Z 4 N N V V C N N N N NInIn �3 J Y j Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr Z m c < < 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d V m Q V_ OO ¢ O a Q ■ ` S S S S O O O O .,vs CDO CD J Z aa F-oz v� o n m P sr S N n C N a o a i C C C C C C N C a a a a a a Z < c c c' to c, �' m C C C C 0 c c c c c c c c c c 0 0 O c c O O c c c ¢ < a < < < < < < -< U U u u u < < u a a a a a < < < < ¢ a s C Z Z Z W< <a� � R c Z Z O O O O O p z z z Zit U U U U U U U u U U U U U U U U U U a a O U U U O cW W W a C wz Z C = O Z O 7 > > O O C O J > > > O O ar C O C `c O U O O O O O O < 0 0 <- 0 0 0 O Z ks � Z Z Z Z Z. Z W < Z Z < > < < < < < a dS d y a < Q h a W < W O Ix 0:IX U p p U cU OOW J__ JCQ V< Uc U Qa O O O c a cUO DcU U w O c¢ < ¢ < < ¢ d � a a a a2 < < < U c c 0 c <b.- W Oc H oc O` J a J W Z W Z m Q Q K Z - ul Z w O w Z w J c= C = Z O Q Q Q = J W J J z c W Q Z WN►O-C Q. - , J..Z JC Q< JCaaQ . O O Z ` O O pO COp c0c c0c c0Z< Z Z Z Z Z 0 a Z Z Z c =O ¢ < < O (�W w5 wW U QO , ¢ < Qc U U UQ < UUW w Z U U UZ QnU O - o � C ¢ Le < < < a C>- lL O a a a a a << ¢ <N Z a Q < pp ffi c c W Q Z O wc - J < Uc Q 0 0 Z Z a O w O W C W U Lu J W \ O 0 Q Nd i Q J iN ~ > a c� m m N n cv N io v 15 m - m H O e Z C O W N N N YI ._ `�i N ri N N N N N f�V U Q °` N = IL Lu W ►- W wm S m m 3 oac p w (9 � I.. U N Q � 3 _ n _ W � v- F P P P — n n V m m O e� n P P P m m 0: p c Q N C v h n n m n v n n O V C. O O m m O O N Q v z p m m m m m to m m m m m m m m O N N N O O O O m m m Q C � W O _. V � - L" O m O .p .D m O e� O P P C> m c Q v N N O �o - - O I Ci O �O O O �"i �J n e�1 N N N — h u') N c�V Z Z' n N N N N N N N N .... N � J J< Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z m N N N N 0 Z cO o 8 S S S 8 s S o bn 8 8 S S o 8 8 8 0 0 8 o c c o ca P O N Cnv n n ^ N m m P O N N N t7 e7 Q p c O O (OV O O O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O O Q Q N O m P Z — CCVV N N N N N N N N N �^! �7 <J e7 t7 t7 e7 ry e7 e7 Q Q p X • a � c a 2 n C N W QN � v } \/ $OU ( k § } §/ § I \ 2 §: z§ 3 a ;Fc£ a u $ 2 \ v § § * § LU } \ \ j . § ■ t u ® . IL _ = b cq # ƒ ƒ 2 2 § . § y R . § CL cc \ z k u § z§ § . \] I J ( z = \ § i2 §§ §& }K I 2 % £ « b »§ ■2oc= o \ � u 2 ) a � oozo =Oz O § CLCl $ »§ ± k \\ / u 2 § 2 » §( }\ /§ (/ f � I ± e 0: k f / ± ) + \ \ ) § u a mLU gx3 2 E R § } \ \ Z § § $ - g m ƒ§ \} � 7 LLI LU cm & E ; §w /\ Lu I-- of o R IL ° e $ 2 ƒ/ . G U Ij « � ? b 7 - 7 § � < U Eo � . : - { p <= 2 z [ ) A . 7 ® K /\ \} � k // \ z CD 0 00 E - CD (} }\ §/ . - K = g « §{ o c § e ) ) A \ z Q z z = \ \ > ■ % < ` I § \ R k 2 § z F--� , K E � } (< _ � ! S ;Nit 14 I all n Lr- ® ® - mcx CXo ao _ W < z� b ao O crU a M LJ rm r�r — etL eu R � � R KL xd m o � ,ts ad ar. � C R 2Pd A. An / NL ad!L I / - u R ILL id M o a - G N Ir ma $4 G a m w OZ� ZW <W � I b - R d a � tu.,•x sr. : g IN I.DAMA MWM can 8 W st r / ya 3R IL lot n. + g J < b d •�1 � Y rao laws MUM I a W Q ter-- — — — twu muo+aw. is � , Illg �I �I o 6Fa _ Y o 0 ® v $ ; u Cy-w a 'o Qw Z� = Q ivwr�ao-w VWM n / mrsra ROID � I A Ka ad PL. R / c w g Q R KQ]nl Wa IR I / OWl m � LO I Z I @ s a b aarBy. / a' II$�1II D Q r¢11 rz pi Ic • Q ' g / s Y 8 s II F g o a s Y s Ka bd e a i D Iall I Q u s W � K6 to WR�y W I IR B / q o a� I _ _ I • D R wra VVM IL 8 6 i k • R u r1 Ws I 50 so po R 0s e / t E steaxo Rao > 3i > > R + of a a 10 I ' � 1= b - L L—YV 9Ma 33S — 0 3Nn HO1bYV I i i i i i � is $I vl _ 9_H 9M0 33S_ 0 3Nn HOiVrl j L!.ati n. 3§E b s LQ.ara PL L Z 18 / 6p� z ck: ® � 22 � ono k > o0 B Ls sa IM / $ $ ; u Q W I Q / cm o Ls.D < N_ Ih R Z Q cr 8 - La 0!h sT. / - Z< Q ff o L � O La 7V+sT. b A B �x I ' �' L1L 7U1 7t70G / P x a LC.MST. 1 A Lw.M ST. / .. .. u `u � b 3 Lt.101h IT. 7. Be F-I F� I � � uW 1 H R I 0 a: o I � 1 � c C L 1 a -1 ¢ ap a o is E � W I J � I II Ommftmum\ is w-s-�+aergr�y . • i Q � ISO. y W N $ Y ® ® w ocr-w _ W _Q 0 ww M LM vMMO ' P rT 910 O I a�• N E t RN I I u u u 0 w o I d � W TXO c gW Kt xr sr. b Z • a I � a b • b '� b �@y Q b KE it P— R iG b b R b MZ s a zt. I W W M i R I 0 R I � W A A I � I R I I � R herma�v%-"mmvw+aa a 3 I I , �r Is 14 a w w�-orooswrr\■-.-w.auypiy � r APPENDIX K Consumer Confidence Report - 2001 ts lu ts o� C� City of Dania Beach PrsrtStd 100 W. Dania Beach Blvd. U S Postage Dania Beach, FL 33004 PAID S Florida Facility Permit No 855 U by vi y ui5b no - ° o > W W x O y ' N °� w b 3 � c6 > d U y V aO+ G w R v O A, U. a id b n v v O u u �j °' a •v u p o CIO a y ° lV v, c> p +� L'. " 1 3 •� 3 O O p O p ^cTi � IV, °v ,o oy ? 0 0C > B "I Cod �0 Iu y a ite� ag a 3 „°° o Y> 0 En ° o b a G o • o ° U C1 p o ° p .r o o iO.••i .O��' Oi ro 'pb y . C ZI d49 y W y p y pN > o Rp �O o u .J Yi y b 3 •� > d Lz O 67 G T. Fy D 'C N ... cd c� •� .O '� ed o �� a� O o v o 2 3 a Q ° b 3 3 tb ° I U 11 5 .° .� a > a � 0 o m 40. rn 10 per. ac G C7 c �' 3 o � W) p y •� .O 6y .� rd b U O F O ' r .3 may, ° 4Ci m en to 3 a� q O H � wd .., r C p .i•"�' "0 1 . v� t� p FS t � u � O � ,c" b I; o vj C s to 0 z go d F I ^ O ° b � •0 ' d � . p�� C O.• .5 � A U A, doo o U c o U co 006 � S5' o a� iy a > 3 U r 0� w O O P. a•� at : fii' >, U m z ° O a x a.m a o N k_; e a a H •.. o e e 000 rA `�" O O b it m o 114 U.° " �; � •� � .� .� ;� "n., — J a� Fri' v' � � '� � c� .• d � � •c � 'fig.{„ 6t A ao H ao •o `� 3 d ao °�'i. ou �i. ?: � ., o A♦ ^ U ,O �"" V1 is VJ Q 4• T.5 tO O•° p C Fi .r, ,T C C Q C �i Vd a� o ^� o c? H ,y� d G � .d .-•��+, by �w � •g • � °' C= w o o � 6 �.-: �;� m o Q" o o �, ►. CC W O �"•, '3 r� i� U ,�:. ,. W �z v'C .O.GYi akJ C W v] .°n C1 UAL U Si U �i U m O .,• O a- rz vj A O O U 3 U b L>a o R: A U ~ z cdtux O O d) 5 � >.A G W .O F�1 O y�y :i'•}::fi:j'4i�i v:.4p:•i:•::•i:Li a Vl �: TT L a� }i tit N• ^O F. U a 3 4 x � a�i W 3 CO "' J." _ c 0 ` O U ti w °p cd cd OC 3 -- O O O O O M� U °. 00 o rA 8 'I~ • APPENDIX L Broward County Water Use Permit—Brian Piccolo Wells Jun 11 02 11 : 52a water Regulation Depart (bal / aue-uuab h��My��v� ' �°m� A°6w" �pv^wovo/mw�VW0Ul� ewn/un*umC °�O�] iv�/�0xv+/ 00� 71 Water Use Staff Review Summary k,��� Application Number: 001108-10 Permit Number: 06'01474-v Project Name: BROVVARO COUNTY SOUTH REGIONAL VVELLF|ELO Water Use Permit Status: MODIFICATION/RENEWAL Environmental Resource Permit Status: NOT APPLICABLE. Right Of Way Permit Status: NOT APPLICABLE Location: 8ROVVARDCQUNTY. S25.88/T50S/R41E S17.19.20'23.26'30T50O/R42E S1'G10 15 2'25/T51S/R41E S1'30/T51S/R42E Applicant's Name and Address: BROVVARD COUNTY OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 2SSS WEST COPANSROAD POMPANO BEACH, FL 33069 � Purpose: The purpose of this application is to modify and renew o Water Use Permit for public water supply. 8/oward County has applied for a modification to existing Water Use Permit 0G-01474'YV for anallocation to supply raw water to moat the purlia| demands of the cities of Hollywood, Hallandale Beach and Dania Beach as well as Florida Power & Light. Withdrawals are from an existing Biscayne aquiforwnUUo|d (Shan Piccolo Pork). in addition tn existing wells at the Broward County 3A and 3BwoUUa|do. The service areas of the large users, who will be utilizing water as allocated in this staff report, are located in southeastern Bmwund County as depicted in Exhibit 3. Staff recommend a dauroaxo in the annual allocation from e444mG(17.7MGD)to5183 (142MGO)and a decrease m the maximum daily allocation from 23.1 MQOm22.4kxGO. post-ir Fax Note 7671 Oa a pages To phone phone Fax Fax$1 Page1/13 ~ ou�mo�n 08-01*74^w Jun 11 02 11 : 53a Water Regulation Depart (561 ) 682-OU65 p- 2 Staff Recommendations Date Of Issuance: June 13, 2002 Permit Duration: 4.50 Years Expiration Date: December 13,2006 Water Use Classification: Public Water Supply Sources: Ground Water from: Biscayne Ag0er Recommended Allocation: Annual Allocation: 5,183 Million Gallons(MG) Maximum Daily Allocation: 22.4 Million Gallons(MG) Specific Source Limitations: Annual(MG) Monthly(MG) Daily(MG) Freeze(MG) Biscayne Aquifer-3A Welifield 730 4 Biscayne Aquifer-313 Weilfield 730 3.8 Existing Withdrawal Facilities-Ground Water Source:Biscayne Aquifer 1 -10"X 130'X 0 GPM Well Cased to 110 Feet 1 - 10"X 65'X 0 GPM Well Cased to 55 Feet 1 - 14"X 180'X 0 GPM Well Cased to 116 Feet 1 - 18" X 108'X 0 GPM Well Cased to 88 Feet 1 - 18"X 115'X 2800 GPM Well Cased to 81 Feet 1 -20"X 101'X 2800 GPM Well Cased to 63 Feet 1 -20"X 103'X 2800 GPM Well Cased to 82 Feet 1 -20"X 105'X 2800 GPM Well Cased to 81 Feet 1 -20"X 105'X 2800 GPM Well Cased to 82 Feet 1 -20"X 105'X 2800 GPM Well Cased to 88 Feet 1 -20"X 106'X 2800 GPM Well Cased to 81 Feet 1 -20"X 115'X 2800 GPM Well Cased to 90 Feet 1 -8"X 100'X 0 GPM Well Cased to 80 Feet 2-12"X 65'X 0 GPM Wells Cased to 55 Feet 2-20"X 1 10'X 1400 GPM Wells Cased to 75 Feet Rated Capacity Source Status Code GPM MGD MGM MGY Biscayne Aquifer E 25,200 36.29 1,103.2 13,245 Totals: 25,200 36.29 1,103.2 13,245 i Page 2/12 06-01474.W 001108.10 June 13,2002 BROWARD COUNTY SOUTH REGIONAL WELLFIELD Jun 11 02 11 : 53a Water Regulation Depart (561 ) 682-0065 p. 3 • Project Description BACKGROUND Broward County was Issued Water Use Permit 06-01474-W on December 20, 1990 for use of groundwater from the Biscayne aquifer for public water supply with an annual allocation of 6132.05 MG (16.8 MGD) and a maximum daily allocation of 22.7 MG. The permit was most recently renewed on November 9, 1995 for an increase in allocation to 6444 MGY and a maximum daily allocation of 23.13 MG. FACILITIES The applicant has three existing wellfields, 3A, 3B and Brian Piccolo Park. The applicant requests the full allocation from Brian Piccolo Park wellfield, with wells 5 &6 at the 3A wellfield and wells B, C, & D at the 38 wellfield as additional facilities for water supply to blend with water from Brian Piccolo Park. The wells at 3A and 3B will be utilized only during non-drought conditions at an average rate of 2 MGD from each wellfield and on a maximum daily basis of 4.0 MGD and 3.8 MGD, respectively. The Brian Piccolo Park wellfield consists of 8 active Biscayne aquifer wells with a total withdrawal capacity of 32.3 MGD. There will be no treatment plant and no storage facilities asscociated with this wellfield. The raw water is supplied to each large user for their treatment, storage and distribution. System 3A wellfield will have a capacity of 4.0 MGD from wells 5 and 6. System 36 wellfield will have a capacity of 4.8 MGD vs. a 3.8 MGD maximum day allocation from wells B, C and D. Broward County has stated that they plan to abandon wells 1-4 at 3A and wells A& 1-3 at 38. Any use of these wells is not authorized in this permit. The existing water treatment facilities for System 3A and 3B wellfields have been dismantled and the service areas are currently provided potable water by the City of Hollywood. DEMAND PROJECTIONS Broward County requests an allocation to provide raw water to four large users as stipulated in the Large User Agreements. The County has provided the executed large user agreements for the cities of Hollywood, Hallandale Beach and Dania Beach as well as Florida Power& Light. The applicant requests an annual allocation of 5,183 MG (14.2 MGD) and a maximum day allocation of 22.4 MG for the year 2006. which is based upon the quantities in each Large User Agreement. The demands for each Large User is shown in Exhibit 8. RECOMMENDED ALLOCATIONS The recommended allocations are based on the quantities in the Large User Agreements. Staff recommend an annual allocation of 5183 MG (14.2 MGD) and a maximum daily allocation of 22.4 MG (Exhibit 8). Pursuant to Limiting Condition Number 5,withdrawals from the wellfields shall not exceed: Wellfield Annual (MG) Maximum Day(MG) Brian Piccolo 5183(14.2 MGD) 22.4 System 3A 730 (2.0 MGD) 4.0 System 3B 730 (2.0 MGD) 3.8 GROUNDWATER MODEL SIMULATIONS During the last permit renewal, the applicant provided reasonable assurances that the operation of the wellfields would not cause adverse impacts through the development of a three-dimensional groundwater flow model to estimate impacts to existing legal users and the resource. The simulations were developed' using the USGS finite-difference code MODFLOW. The model included packages to account for recharge, the interaction of river and drainage networks with the groundwater resources, variable aquifer parameters, ET and cumulative impacts from existing legal users. In 1995, Staff reviewed the model data Page 3/12 a 001108-10 06-01474-W BROWARO COUNTY SOUTH REGIONAL WELLFlELD June 13,2002 Jun 11 02 11 : 53a Water Regulation Depart (561 ) 682-0065 p. 4 Project Description flies and was in general agreement with the assumptions and parameters used in the model. Further details of the inputs and assumptions used in the model simulations are provided in the November, 1995 staff report. The maximum drawdown predicted at the Brian Piccolo Park Wellfield is approximately 0.9 of a foot as a result of pumping 26.8 MGD for 90 days with no recharge. Impact Assessments Water Resource Availability Biscayne Aquifer-3A Wellfield As shown in Exhibits 6A-6F, the monitoring wells at the wellfield indicate a dry season water level of between 1 and 1.5 feet NGVD. The base of the Biscayne Aquifer is approximately -120 feet NGVD which results in a total available drawdown of 121 feet. The maximum drawdown predicted at the 3A Wellfield is approximately 0.3 of a foot. The water resource availability of the aquifer is not expected to be exceeded as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation. Biscayne Aquifer-3B Wellfield The maximum drawdown predicted at the 38 Wellfield is approximately 0.3 of a foot. The water resource availability of the aquifer is not expected to be exceeded as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation. Biscayne Aquifer-Brian Piccolo Park Wellfield The maximum drawdown predicted at the Brian Piccolo Park Wellfield is approximately 0.9 of a foot. The water resource availability of the aquifer is not expected to be exceeded as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation. Existing Legal Users Biscayne Aquifer-3A Wellfield The applicant requests continued use of a wellfield that has been in operation since the 1950's. Staff is recommending no change to the existing allocation. The potential for harm to occur to existing legal users as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered to be minimal. Biscayne Aquifer-38 Wellfield The applicant requests continued use of a wellfield that has been in operation since the 1950's. .Staff is recommending no change to the existing allocation. The potential for harm to occur to existing legal users as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered to be minimal. Biscayne Aquifer-Brian Piccolo Park Wellfield The closest existing legal user located in the vicinity of Brian Piccolo Park wellfield is Davis Nevils' Landmark Church (General Permit 87-128-W). This existing legal user is permitted to withdraw from one well in the Biscayne aquifer for public water supply. The existing legal user's well is approximately 900 feet north of production well 22 and may have a centrifugal pump that is assumed to have a lifting capability of 20 feet below land surface. The dry season water level of the Biscayne aquifer is approximately 2 feet below land surface. Modeling indicates an approximate drawdown of 0.8 of a foot in the area of the existing legal user's project which would result in a water level of 2.8 feet below land surface. The potential for adverse impacts to occur to existing legal users as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Legal Domestic Users Biscayne Aquifer-3A Wellfield The applicant requests continued use of a wellfield that has been in operation since the 1950's. Staff is recommending no change to the existing allocation.The water level in a domestic well will remain within Page 4/12 001108.10 • 06.01474-W BROWARD COUNTY SOUTH REGIONAL WELLFIELD June 13,2002 Jun 11 02 11 : 53a Water Regulation Depart (561 ) 682-0065 p. 5 20 feet of land surface,WhlCh is assumed to be the lifting capability of a centrifugal pump. The potential for harm to occur to legal domestic users as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered to be minimal. Biscayne Aquifer-3B Wellfield The applicant requests continued use of a wellfield that has been in operation since the 1950's. Staff is recommending no change to the existing allocation.The water level in a domestic well will remain within 20 feet of land surface,which is assumed to be the lifting capability of a centrifugal pump. The potential for harm to occur to legal domestic users as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered to be minimal. Biscayne Aquifer-Brian Piccolo Park Wellfield The wellfield is located in Cooper City, which supplies potable water to domestic users. However, private domestic wells may exist in the area as close as 100 feet from the nearest well at Brian Piccolo Park. The modeling results indicate that a drawdown of approximately 0.8 of a foot may result at the nearest potential domestic well. The water level in a domestic well will remain within 20 feet of land surface, which is assumed to be the lifting capability of a centrifugal pump. The potential for adverse impacts to occur to legal domestic users as a result of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Saline Water Intrusion Biscayne Aquifer-3A Wellfield The historical water quality monitoring data (Exhibits 6A-61F) show an increasing trend of chloride concentration, which indicate the saline water interface is unstable in the area. The water quality in production wells 5 & 6 is fresh. The applicant has performed a wellfield drawdown test and measured the drawdown at the saline water interface to be less than 0.1 of a foot. Based on the proximity to saline water, Staff is recommending no change to the current maximum daily allocation of 4.0 MGD. The increasing trend in chloride levels shown on Exhibits 6C, 6E and 6F are not unique in Southeast Broward County. Several coastal saline water monitor wells located outside the direct influence of weilfields, have shown long-term trends of inland saline water movement. Modeling studies conducted by Anderson (1986) and later by the USGS, suggest these trends are attributable to the historical lowering of the water table on a regional basis associated with drainage in western urbanized Broward County. Staff agrees with the County's contention that the chloride level rise near the 3A wellfield is not the result of wellfield pumpage. However, should the saltwater front move into the weilfield's area of influence, the allocation will need to be reduced to protect the wellfield and water resources. The applicant indicates that water from the wellfield will be used to blend with water from Brian Piccolo Park wellfield, when adequate groundwater is available during non-drought conditions. During a District declared water shortage emergency, withdrawals from the 3A wellfield shall cease pursuant to Limiting Condition Number 22. Pursuant to Limiting Condition Number 5, the System 3A wellfield is limited to a total of 730 MGY(2.0 MGD)and 4.0 MGD on a maximum daily basis. As required by Limiting Condition Number 21,the permittee shall continue to submit monitoring data for the SALT plan for the System 3A wellfield. Biscavne Acuifer-313 Wellfield The applicant requests the continued use of existing wells B, C & D at the system 3B wellfield. The historical water quality data indicate no increasing trend of chloride concentration within adjacent monitoring wells and production wells B; C & D. Water Use Permit 06-00147-W allowed the use of the wellfield at a maximum daily allocation of 3.8 MGD. As previously evaluated,withdrawals at this rate are • considered to not cause significant saline water intrusion. Staff is recommending no change to the previously permitted amount. Pursuant to Limiting Condition Number 5, the System 3B wellfield is limited to a total of 730 MGY (2.0 MGD) and 3.8 MGD on a maximum daily basis. As required by Limiting Condition Number 21,the permittee shall continue to submit monitoring data for the SALT plan Page 5/12 001108-10 • 06-01474-W eROWARD COUNTY SOUTH REGIONAL WELLFIELD June 13.2002 Jun 11 02 11 : 55a Water Regulation Depart (5611 682-0065 p. 6 • for the System 3B wellfield. The recommended allocations represent no change to the existing maximum daily allocation of System 38 wellfield. The potential for significant saline intrusion or upconing to occur as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Biscayne Aquifer-Brian Piccolo Park Wellfield The results of the model indicate that the drawdown will be less than 0.1 of a foot at the S-13 salinity structure on the South New River Canal. The upstream stage of the structure is 1.6 feet NGVD. Therefore, a mound of fresh water with an elevation greater than 1 foot NGVD will exist between the saline water front and the wellfield which is consistent with criteria 3.4 of the Water Use Basis of Review. Water quality data from monitoring and production wells, as shown in Exhibits 6G-6L, indicate that the production zone contains fresh water. However, initial drilling tests indicate there is connate water(250- 520 mg/L) beneath the wellfield at depths greater than 125 feet below land surface, below the production horizon in a lower permeability zone. Water quality in monitoring wells MW-17, MW-18,MW- 22 and MW-24 indicate an Increasing trend of chloride concentrations. Monitoring well 17 had the highest value of 270 mg/L while no withdrawals were occuring from the adjacent production well 17. Broward County staff indicate that the monitoring wells may have poor construction that results in inaccurate data and additional monitoring wells are currently being drilled to allow collection of reliable data. The source of chlorides exist in a less permeable zone of the aquifer below the production interval. The low permeability combined with the vertical displacement between the source of chlorides ® and the bottom the the production wells suggests vertical migration of saline water will be very slow and will represent a minor portion of the total radial flow into each production well. Eventually,the connate water will be purged from the deeper formation. In order to monitor water quality at the wellfield, Limiting Condition Number 21 requires continued data submittal. Based on the considerations discussed here, Staff conclude that reasonable assurances have been provided that significant saline water intrusion will not occur as a result of this permit. Wetlands Biscayne Aquifer-3A Wellfield There are no known wetland areas in the vicinity of the existing wellfield. Staff consider that a drawdown of less than one foot beneath wetland areas after pumping the maximum daily allocation for 90 days with no rainfall will result in no adverse impact. The results of the previous modeling indicated a maximum drawdown of approximately 0.3 of a foot at the wellfield. Therefore, the potential for adverse impacts to occur to protected wetland environments as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Biscayne Aquifer-3B Wellfield There are no known wetland areas in the vicinity of the existing wellfield. Staff consider that a drawdown of less than one foot beneath wetland areas after pumping the maximum daily allocation for 90 days with no rainfall will result in no adverse impact. The results of the previous modeling indicated a maximum drawdown of approximately 0.3 of a foot at the wellfield. Therefore, the potential for adverse impacts to occur to protected wetland environments as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Biscayne Aquifer-Brian Piccolo Park Wellfield The applicant utilized a 90 day transient modeling scenario with no rainfall as recharge while pumping the requested maximum daily allocation of 26.8 MG. This scenario is used to address potential impacts to wetland areas. Staff considers that a drawdown of less than one foot beneath wetland areas after pumping the maximum daily allocation for 90 days with no rainfall will result in no adverse impact. The • results of the modeling indicate a maximum drawdown of 0.9 of a foot at the Brian Piccolo Park wellfield. Therefore, the potential for adverse impacts to occur to protected wetland environments as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal- Page 6/12 • 001108.10 06-01474-W • SROWARD COUNTY SOUTH REGIONAL WELLFIELD June 13,2002 Jun 11 02 11 : 56a Water Regulation Depart (5611 6ti2-000b p. 7 • Source Of Pollution Biscayne Aquifer-3A Wellfield The closest known potential contamination sites are shown in Exhibit 7. Results of the previous modeling effort indicated a drawdown of less than 0.1 of a foot at the closest potential contamination. The production wells are protected from the adverse effects of bacterial and chemical contamination by the Broward County Wellfield Protection Ordinance, The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Environmental Protection and Broward County DPEP have provided no adverse comments on this application. The wells at System 3A and 3B have historically been and are presently contamination free. The potential for movement of contaminants, if present, from known pollution sources as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered to be minimal. Biscayne Aquifer-38 Wellfield The closest.known potential contamination sites are(shown in Exhibit 7. Results of the previous modeling effort indicated a drawdown of less than 0.1 of a foot at the closest potential contamination. The production wells are protected from the adverse effects of bacterial and chemical contamination by the Broward County Wellfield Protection Ordinance. The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Environmental Protection and Broward County DPEP have • provided no adverse .comments on this application. The wells at System 3A and 3B have historically been and are presently contamination free. The potential for movement of contaminants, if present, from known pollution sources as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered to be minimal. Biscayne Aquifer-Brian Piccolo Park Wellfield The closest known potential contamination sites are shown in Exhibit 7. Results of the previous modeling effort indicated a drawdown of approximately 0.2 of a foot at the closest potential contamination. The groundwater flow gradient and direction at the potential contamination sites should not be significantly altered. The production wells are protected from the adverse effects of bacterial and chemical contamination by the Broward County Wellfield Protection Ordinance. The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Environmental Protection and Broward County DPEP have provided no adverse comments on this application. The wells have historically been and are presently contamination free. The potential for the induced movement of contaminants from known sources of pollution to occur as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Additional Information WATER USE ACCOUNTING The applicant indicates that flow meters have been installed on all pumping facilities to measure the withdrawals. Pursuant to Limiting Condition Number 17. the applicant is required to submit recalibration data for each water pumping facility at least every two years. Records of daily withdrawals for each pump shall be maintained, with monthly withdrawals for each well and maximum daily withdrawals for the entire system to be submitted to the District on a quarterly basis pursuant to Limiting Condition Number 18. INTERCONNECTS The County has 6 emergency interconnects in the 3A service area and 4 large user interconnects shown in Exhibit 4. Page 7/12 a ' 001108-10 06-01474-W BROWARD COUNTY SOUTH REGIONAL WELLFIELD June 13,2002 Jun 11 02 11 : 56a Water Regulation Depart (561 ) 682-0065 p. 8 - Additional Information LARGE USER RAW WATER AGREEMENT Broward County signed an agreement with the City of Hollywood in March 1994 to provide an average of 6 MGD and a maximum of 8 MGD of raw water from the County South Regional System(Brian Piccolo Park Wellfield). According to the agreement, the City must take a minimum of 1.2 MGD of raw water on an annual average basis (Article 6.1). The South Regional System became operational in December 1995. The City began utilizing the County's raw water in December 1998 at the rate of 1.2 MGD on a test basis. The City has attempted to increase the use of the County's raw water to a rate of 4.5 MGD and reported treatment problems with a high sand content reaching the membrane treatment plant. The County implemented a line flushing plan and successfully removed the sand from the distribution line. Staff consider that raw water is available from the County's South Regional System. The City of Hallandale Beach currently has a membrane treatment plant under design and anticipates completion in 2005,which accounts for the increase in demand shown in Exhibit 8. Also, the City of Dania Beach may potentially construct a membrane treatment plant during the same timeframe in anticipation of similar treatment issues. Florida Power and Light uses the water that is purchased from the County for make-up water. LONG TERM WATER SUPPLY PLAN • The applicant has indicated that the long term water supply plan is to continue to withdraw water from the Biscayne aquifer using the existing wells to meet the demands of the large users. Should saline water intrusion make the wells (5 & 6) at the 3A wellfield unusable, these wells will be decommisioned and pumpage will shift to the Brian Piccolo Park wellfield. If Broward County executes additional large user agreements,the permit shall be modified to include the additional demands. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN Pursuant to the Water Use Basis of Review, Section 2.6.1, Water Conservation Plans - All public water supply utilities are required to develop and implement a water conservation plan. Each of the mandatory water conservation elements must exist or have a proposed time frame for implementation. The applicant has previously provided the water conservation plan elements. RECLAIMED WATER Broward County is currently providing an average of 2 MGD of raw water to Florida Power and Light(FPL) from the Brian Piccolo Park wellfield. The City of Hollywood plans to provide reclaimed water to FPL. Should the City and FPL enter into an agreement for delivery and the City makes reclaimed water available to FPL pursuant to 373.250 Florida Statutes, the District shall require Broward County to cease deliveries(Limiting Condition Number 23)of water to FPL from the South Regional Wellfield,except under emergency back-up conditions or as a supplemental supply if the full demands can not otherwise be provided by reclaimed water. Page 8/12 001108.10 06-01474•W RRr1WARn rN INTY R01ITH RFAI0NA1 WFI i FIR n June 13,2002 Jun 11 02 11 : 57a Water Regulation Depart (561 ) 682-0065 p. 9 • Recommendations Project Name: BROWARD COUNTY SOUTH REGIONAL WELLFIELD Application Number: 001108-10 4�'71 - Permit Number: 06-01474-W Date Of Issuance; June 13, 2002 JUL� Recommendations: Staff recommend modification and renewal of the Water Use Permit for public water supply for the 8roward County South Regional Welifield. The annual allocation of 5183 MG and a maximum daily allocation of 22.4 MG is to be withdrawn from the sources as shown in Limiting Condition Number 5. Withdrawals are from Biscayne Aquifer via 13 existing withdrawal facilities. The use is reasonable- beneficial,will not adversely impact presently existing legal users and is consistent with the public interest. The use is further subject to 23 Limiting Conditions. • Application Reviewer: l�ems- (tea Date: a 4J-- Thomas Colios Supervisor: � r.,� �+-es� Date: �o Thomas Colios Water Use Division: �� W Date: (0 0 2 m.Scott Burns, P.G. Page 9/12 a 001108-10 06-01474-W eonureon rnutiTv cell iTu aGra,nnie, wr,i MM n June 13,2002 Jun 11 02 11 : 57a Water Regulation Depart (561 ) 682-0065 p. 10 • Limiting Conditions 1.This permit shall expire on December 13,2006. 2.Application for a permit modification may be made at any time. 3.Water use classification: Public water supply 4.Source classification: Ground Water from: Biscayne Aquifer 5.Annual allocation shall not exceed 5183 MG. Maximum daily allocation shall not exceed 22.4 MG. The following limitations to annual withdrawals from specific sources are stipulated: Biscayne Aquifer-3A Wellfield:730 MG. Biscayne Aquifer-38 Wellfield:730 MG. The following limitations to maximum daily withdrawals from specific sources are stipulated: Biscayne Aquifer-3A Wellfield:4.00 MG. Biscayne Aquifer-36 Wellfield:3.80 MG. 6.In the event of a declared water shortage,water withdrawal reductions will be ordered by the District in accordance with the Water Shortage Plan, Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C. The Permittee is advised that during a water shortage,pumpage reports shall be submitted as required by Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C. 7.Withdrawal facilities: 8.Permittee shall mitigate any adverse impacts to existing legal uses as a consequence of withdrawals permitted herein. When adverse impacts occur,or is imminent,the District reserves the right to curtail withdrawal rates.Adverse impacts are: A) reduction in well water levels that impairs the ability of an adjacent well, including a domestic well, lawn irrigation well,or public water supply well,to produce water by 10%or greater, B) significant reduction in levels in an adjacent water body, such as a take, pond, or a canal system, that impairs the ability to produce water by 10%or greater, C)saline water intrusion or induced movement of pollutants into the water supply of an adjacent water use,resulting in a significant reduction in water quality,and D)change in water quality caused by the permittee that results in significant impairment or loss of use of a well or water body. 9.Permittee shall mitigate any adverse Impact to existing off-site land use as a consequence of withdrawals permitted herein. If increased withdrawals cause an adverse impact on existing land use, the District reserves the right to curtail future withdrawal rates. Adverse impacts are: A) significant reduction in water levels in an adjacent surface water body, including impoundments, to the extent that the designed function of the water body is impaired, B)land collapse or subsidence caused by reduction in water levels;and C)damage to crops and other types of vegetation. 10.If adverse impacts occur to natural resources as a result of the Permittee's water withdrawals, the Permittee shall mitigate for such Impacts. When adverse impacts occur, or are imminent, District reserves the right to curtail withdrawal rates. Examples of adverse impacts are: A)reduction in ground water levels that results in significant lateral movement of the fresh water/salt Page 10/12 • 0"1474-W 001108-10 June 13,2002 ---Ann Ann!`n111,1TV cn11TH PPr1nNA1 WFI I FIFLD Jun 11 02 11 : 58a Water Regulation Depart (561I 682-0065 p- 11 Limiting Conditions water interface, B)reduction in water levels that adversely impact the hydroperiod of protected wetland environments, C) significant reduction in water levels or hydroperiod in a naturally bccuring water body such as a lake or pond, D) induced movement or induction of pollutants into the water supply resulting in a significant reduction in water quality,and E) significant damage to the natural system including damage to habitat for rare or endangered species. 11.If any condition of the permit is violated, the permit shall be subject to review and possible modification,enforcement action,or revocation. 12.Authorized representatives of the District shall be permitted to enter, inspect, and observe the permitted system to determine compliance with special conditions. 13.The Permittee is advised that this permit does not relieve any person from the requirement to obtain all necessary federal,state, local and special district authorizations. 14.The permit does not convey any property right to the Permittee, nor any rights and privileges other • than those specified in the Permit and Chapter 40E-2, Florida Administrative Code. 15.Permittee shall submit all data as required by the implementation schedule for each of the limiting conditions to: S.F.W.M.D., Supervising Hydrogeologist - Post-Permit Compliance, Water Use Regulation Dept.(4320),P.O. Box 24680,West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680. 16.Within six months of permit issuance, the Permittee shall provide the results of the calibration testing of the identified water accounting method(s)and equip all existing and proposed withdrawal facilities with approved water use accounting method(s) pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications. 17.Every two years from the date of Permit issuance, the Permittee shall submit re-calibration data on each water pumping accounting facility,for those Permittees whose accounting method(s) require re- calibration. 18_The permittee shall maintain records of the calibrated daily withdrawals from each pump. These records shall be available for review upon request by District staff. Monthly withdrawals for each pump shall be submitted to the District quarterly. Maximum daily withdrawals for each month for the entire system shall be submitted to the District quarterly. The water accounting method and means of calibration shall be stated on each report. 19.The Permittee shall notify the District within 30 days of any change in service area boundary. If the Permittee will not serve a new demand within the service area for which the annual allocation was calculated,the annual allocation may then be subject to modification and reduction. 20.Permittee shall determine unaccounted-for distribution system losses. Losses shall be determined for the entire distribution system on a monthly basis. Permittee shall define the manner in which unaccounted-for losses are calculated. Data collection shall begin within six months of Permit issuance. Loss reporting shall be submitted to the District on a yearly basis from the date of Permit issuance. 21.The Pormittee shall continue to submit monitoring data in accordance with the approved saline water intrusion monitoring program for this project. 22.Permittee shall implement the following wellfield operating plan: Wells 5 and 6 at the 3A wellfield shall not exceed the limitations shown in Limiting Condition Number ® 5. Should the chloride concentrations in monitoring wells for the 3A wellfield indicate movement of the saline water interface,Park weUf withdrawals eld. During a Dit shall b District declared shortage wellfieldnued from this rtage emergency,withdrawals from the 3A welllfield shall cease. Page 11l12 • 06-01474-W 001108-10 June 13,2002 o onwA on rnl wTv gn(ITH nF:ni]NAL WELL FIELD Jun 11 02 11 : 58a Water Regulation Depart (561 ) 682-0065 p. 12 Limiting Conditions 23.it reclaimed water becomes available prior to the expiration date of this permit, the Permittee shall apply for a modificatlon of the water use permit to reflect that portion of the allocation which is to be provided for by reclaimed water. Reclaimed water is considered available when an agreement has been executed between both parties, the transmission lines are constructed to the project site, and the necessary on-site modifications and authorizations are obtained. r Page 12/12 06-01 a7a-W 001106.10 June 13,2002 oonulean not UJTV Cnl TTH RFMnNAL WELLFIELD J11-1-12-2002 09:57 SFUID LEGAL 561 682 62?6 P.01 ;rmkNr J)j5,jT..TCT ........... -14 FLO W , ' ' I III)(;,;1) 6117-2574 ISOUI JZ I t)A VVINJ L R MIAN A C FL -JIM Bc,%J), al;P1,00 'Zi,V 3:�M -'E IMME P1,A TEL 1 PL S Y FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Fox Number for SFINMD office of Cotinsel (561) 662-6276 suncom Sub.sr-ribers. Dial Su"IcOr": 229-62/6 12, 2002 NLji'nhpr Called: 954.967.4450 DATE: June pages to Transmit including this tO(M: 17 -TkME-. DELIVER TO: Whit vancott, Director Of Utilities FROM: ElIzabe.th D. Ross, Esq- MESSAGE: Please see Soction 172espp�eciall ------------ - ------------ -6,261 or (861) 6s2--6273. For confirmation, questions or problern� call (561) 362 T,udi t4uo M 1*11,glish U.rv,zrt F. GerorJu 1; rbmc10 APPENDIX M SRF Rules - Wastewater CHAPTER 62-503 STATE REVOLVING LOAN PROGRAM FOR WATER POLLUTION CONTROL TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 62-503.200 Definitions. 62-503.300 General Program Information. 62-503.350 Preconstruction Loan Funding. 62-503.400 Program Administration Costs. 62-503.420 Project Allowances. 62-603.430 Loan Agreements. 62-503.600 Funds Reserved for Specific Purposes. 62-603.600 Priority List Information. 62-503.650 Priority Determination. 62-503.655 Ranking Projects for Priority List Development. 62-503.680 Priority List Management. 62-503.700 Planning, Design, Construction, and Post-construction Requirements. 62-503.800 Audits Required. 62-603.850 Exceptions to Program Requirements. 33 Effective 02/06/02 GFS 62-503, FAC 62-503.200 Definitions. For purposes of this rule chapter. (1) "Act" means the federal Water Pollution Control Act, Pub. L. 92-500, as amended also known as the amended Clean Water Act. (2) "Adjusted post-allowance project costs" means the post-allowance project costs less capitalized interest and loan repayment reserve if any. (3) "Best management practice" means a control technique that is used for a given set of conditions to achieve water quality and water quantity enhancement at a feasible cost. (4) Capitalization grant project means a project for which the project sponsor shall document compliance with specific federal requirements under Rule 62- 503.700(1), F.A.C., in addition to the general requirements under Rules 62-503.700(2) through (11), F.A.C., to qualify for a loan. The aggregate funds used for the annual loans to be made for capitalization grant projects represents the amount of the corresponding annual capitalization grant received by the Department from the EPA. (5) "Capitalized interest" means interest accruing at the rate of 60% of either the market rate (20-Bond GO Index)for loans to local governments or the indexed prime rate for loans to other project sponsors and compounding annually from the time when disbursements are made until six months before the first semiannual loan repayment is due. The procedures for establishing the market rate (20-Bond GO Index) and indexed prime rate are as described under subsection (22) below. • (6) "Complete loan application" means completed Form 62-503.900(2), Loan Application, effective 02/06/02, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Copies of this form may be obtained by writing to the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400. (7) "Complete request for inclusion" means completed Form 62-503.900(1), Request for Inclusion, effective 02/06/02, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Copies of this form may be obtained by writing to the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400. (8) "Construction manager at risk" means a firm or other single entity that contracts with the project sponsor for a guaranteed maximum price for the work. The construction manager is responsible for performance under individual construction contracts. (9) "Contingency portion" means the portion of a priority list consisting of projects that are qualified to be on the fundable portion but cannot be placed on the fundable portion until there are sufficient funds. (10) "Department" means the Department of Environmental Protection. (11) "Design/build" means a contracting procedure whereby a firm or other single entity contracts with the project sponsor for a fixed price for the work and is responsible for both design and construction. (12) "Direct loan" means a loan from other than the proceeds of bonds issued by the Florida Water Pollution Control Financing Corporation. (13) "EPA" means the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Effective 02/06/02 2 GFS 62-503,FAC • (14) "Financial hardship" means a situation where the median household income of a small community to be served by the project is less than the statewide average as of the most recent decennial census. Data may be obtained from the State Data Center, 200 Hartman Building, 2012 Capital Circle Southeast, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2151. (15) "Financing rate" means the semiannual compounding rate at which charges are imposed on the principal, including capitalized interest, of a State Revolving Fund loan. The financing rate has a loan interest rate component and, for loans made after June 30, 1997, a grant allocation assessment rate. The financing rate is adjusted for a projects that will serve a small community having a financial hardship. (16) "Fiscal year" means the 12-month period between July 1 and the following June 30. (17) "Florida Water Pollution Control Financing Corporation" means the nonprofit public-benefit corporation created for the purpose of financing or refinancing the costs of water pollution control projects and activities authorized under section 403.1835, F.S. The activities of the corporation are specifically limited to assisting the department in implementing financing activities to provide funding for the programs authorized under section 403.1835, F.S. (18) "Fundable portion" means the portion of a priority list consisting of the projects to which funds allocated each year by the Department have been assigned. (19) "Funds allocated each year by the Department".means funds that are available or expected to be available for loans during both the fiscal year for which a priority list is being developed and the succeeding fiscal year as a result of the following: (a) Federal capitalization grants and state appropriations less the amount of any funds appropriated or statutorily designated for specific projects or purposes; (b) Loan repayments; (c) Investment earnings; and (d) Net proceeds of bonds issued by the Florida Water Pollution Control Financing Corporation. (20) "Grant allocation assessment' means that portion of each repayment of each loan made after June 30, 1997, used solely for the purpose of making wastewater grants to financially disadvantaged small communities under Rule Chapter 62-505, F.A.C. The grant allocation assessment is in addition to the principal and interest portions of each loan repayment. The grant allocation assessment is established using a rate that compounds semiannually from a point in time six months before the first semiannual loan repayment is due until the loan is repaid. (a) For loans to project sponsors that are local governments, the grant allocation assessment rate is 30% of the market rate for interest as established using the Thomson Publishing Corporation's "Bond Buyer"20-Bond GO Index. The market rate (20-Bond GO Index) is established by the Department as of January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 of each year and it is the average weekly yield during the three months immediately preceding the date of determination. The average weekly yield is derived from the yields reported in the "Bond Buyer'for the full weeks occurring during the three-month period. (b) For loans to project sponsors that are not local governments, the grant allocation assessment rate is 30% of the indexed prime rate for interest. The indexed prime rate is established by the Department as of January 1, April 1, July 1, and Effective 02/06/02 3 GFS 62-503,FAC October 1 of each year and it is the average rate during the three months immediately preceding the date of determination. The indexed prime rate is derived from data for the top 25 insured U.S. chartered commercial banks as reported weekly in the Federal Reserve Statistical Release available through the Federal Reserve internet address www.federaIreserve.gov. (21) "Leveraged loan" means a loan from the proceeds of bonds issued by the Florida Water Pollution Control Financing Corporation. (22) "Loan interest rate" means 30% of either the market rate (20-Bond GO Index) for loans to local governments or the indexed prime rate for loans to other project sponsors. Interest compounds semiannually from a point in time six months before the first semiannual loan repayment is due until the loan is repaid. (a) For loans to project sponsors that are local governments, the loan interest rate is 30% of the market rate as established using the Thomson Publishing Corporation's "Bond Buyer" 20-Bond GO Index. The market rate (20-Bond GO Index) is established by the Department as of January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 of each year and it is the average weekly yield during the three months immediately preceding the date of determination. The average weekly yield is derived from the yields reported in the "Bond Buyer"for the full weeks occurring during the three-month period. (b) For loans to project sponsors that are not local governments, the loan interest rate is 30% of the indexed prime rate. The indexed prime rate is established by the Department as of January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 of each year and it is the average rate during the three months immediately preceding the date of determination. The indexed prime rate is derived from data for the top 25 insured U.S. chartered commercial banks as reported weekly in the Federal Reserve Statistical Release available through the Federal Reserve internet address www.federalreserve.gov. (23) "Local government" means a municipality, county, district, or authority, or any agency thereof, or a combination of two or more of the foregoing acting jointly in connection with a project and having jurisdiction over collection, transmission, treatment, or disposal of wastewater, industrial wastes, or other wastes. It includes a district or authority, the principal responsibility of which is to provide airport, industrial or research park, or port facilities to the public. (24) "Planning portion" means the portion of the priority list consisting of projects that may receive funding in a future fiscal year. Projects identified on the planning portion shall be listed in alphabetical order. Projects not qualifying for the fundable or the contingency portion shall be included on the planning portion. (25) "Pledged revenue" means revenue specifically approved by the Department and pledged or dedicated to the repayment of the loan. (26) "Post-allowance project costs" means costs, subject to the limitations imposed by Rule 62-503.300(1), F.A.C., for allowable construction, equipment, materials, demolition, land acquisition, contingency, capitalized interest, legal and technical service costs and, for direct loans, the portion of the loan repayment reserve disbursement associated with the foregoing costs. (27) "Priority list" means the yearly listing of fundable, contingency, and planning portion projects. (28) "Project" means as follows: Effective 02/06/02 4 GFS 62-503,FAC • (a) For funding as a result of section 212 of the Act, devices and systems associated with wastewater or stormwater collection, transmission, treatment, or disposal facilities. This includes facilities to produce, store, convey, and distribute reclaimed water. Project construction need not, in and of itself, result in an operable water pollution control system; and (b) For funding as a result of either section 319 or section 320 of the Act, devices and systems or implementation of best management practices associated with nonpoint source water pollution control. (29) "Project sponsor" means a local government eligible under the Act or other entity eligible as a result of sections 319 and 320 of the Act to receive a loan and that meets the following requirements: (a) Has the current capability to repay the loan from established and predictable revenues; and (b) Has audited financial statements for the two years preceding the loan application date demonstrating the availability of established and predictable revenues or has not defaulted on loans, from a commercial bank or government agency, the aggregate amount of which is at least as large as that requested from the Department. (30) "Refinancing loan" means a loan from the State Revolving Fund for any portion of a project originally financed with bond proceeds or a previous loan from the State Revolving Fund. (31) "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Protection. (32) "Segmented project" means a project for which the allowable costs in a given fiscal year exceed the amount that the Department commits to provide under Rule 62-503.600(2)(b), F.A.C. (33) "Small community" means a municipality or unincorporated community with a total population of 20,000 or less as of the most recent decennial census. Data may be obtained from the State Data Center, 200 Hartman Building, 2012 Capital Circle Southeast, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2151. (34) "Spending authority" means the amount of budget and proceeds of bonds issued by the Florida Water Pollution Control Financing Corporation available to the Department to execute loans during the fiscal year. (35) "Target date" means the anticipated date for a negotiated loan agreement for any part of the amount listed on the fundable portion of the project list to be ready for execution by the individual authorized to commit State Revolving Fund monies to finance the project. (36) "Value engineering" means a review of existing engineering work related to the design of project facilities by a professional engineer that has relevant expertise and that has a license to practice in the State of Florida. Value engineering is intended to result in savings in capital costs and operation and maintenance costs without detracting from project function over the design life of the project facilities. Specific Authority 403.1835(10) FS. Law Implemented 403.1822(3), 403.1835 FS. History - New 4-17-89, Amended 12-4-91, 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.200, Amended 1- 4-98, 7-1-99, 2-6-02 Effective 02/06/02 5 GFS 62-503,FAC 62-603.300 General Program Information. (1) The categories of allowable project costs include the following subject to such limitations for leveraged loans as are necessary to maintain the tax-exempt status of bonds issued by the Florida Water Pollution Control Financing Corporation: (a) Land, including easements and rights-of-way, that will be used for the ultimate disposal of wastewater or stormwater residues or will be an integral part of the treatment process; (b) Construction and related procurement and other arrangements used to implement planned activities (such as a best management practice) under the following conditions: 1. A contract is executed after a loan is made; 2. A contract is executed before a loan is made and after authorization to incur costs has been given by the Department; 3. A contract is executed but costs are not incurred before a loan is made and there is no authorization to incur costs from the Department, all provided that procurement is consistent with the procedures required under Rule 62-503.700, F.A.C.; or 4. An equipment or materials contract is executed, costs are incurred before a loan is made, there is no authorization to incur costs from the.Department, and the equipment or materials furnished are to be installed under a separate contract described in subparagraphs 1. or 2. above, all provided that procurement is consistent with the procedures required under Rule 62-503.700, F.A.C. (c) Demolition and removal of existing structures; (d) Contingency for project cost overruns; (e) Legal and technical services after bid opening or receipt of proposals; (f) Loan repayment reserve under a direct loan; (g) Unretired debt principal, excluding any reserves such as for debt service when refinancing a project; (h) Capitalized interest; (i) Allowances for costs under Rule 62-503.420, F.A.C.; Q) Technical services for specialized field studies and tests such as soil and hydrogeological tests for potential reuse sites, geotechnical evaluations for subsurface conditions, sewer system evaluations for infiltration/inflow elimination, property surveys for new sewer collection systems, and"appraisals for eligible land; (k) Costs for design when incorporated into a fixed price contract for providing complete and operable water pollution control system and when the contract price is based on incomplete plans and specifications prepared by the project sponsor such as under design/build procurement. Such design costs are considered an integral part of the construction cost; and (1) Costs to implement best management practices for agricultural nonpoint source water pollution control. (2) Unallowable project costs include the following: (a) Acquiring all or part of existing stormwater, wastewater, or water pollution control management systems; (b) Project facilities or activities not included within the approved project scope; Effective 02/06/02 6 GFS 62-503,FAC (c) Costs for the project sponsors personnel in constructing project facilities or implementing of agricultural best management or conservation practices; (d) Costs, such as for pending construction claims, yet to be incurred at the time of the on-site administrative action taken by the Department to document project completion; (e) Project facilities or services for which the requirements of Rule 62-503.700, F.A.C., are not met; (f) Water pollution control systems or components thereof, under a leveraged loan, that serve a private use to the extent that the tax status of bonds issued by the Florida Water Pollution Control Financing Corporation is jeopardized; and (g) Any other cost not listed as allowable under subsection (1) above. (3) The amount of the project contingency, at the time of loan approval and when actual costs are unknown, shall not exceed 10% of the estimated sum of the costs for allowable land, equipment contracts, service contracts, materials contracts, and construction contracts. The contingency shall be adjusted by the Department to not more than 5% of construction, equipment, services, and materials contract amounts after procurement contracts have been executed. The contingency remaining after accounting for contract change orders shall be eliminated by the Department when project closeout occurs. Contingency funds shall not be used to purchase equipment or pay for construction work or other activities not described in the loan agreement. (4) Loan repayment periods shall be limited as follows: (a) Construction loan and preconstruction loan repayment periods for projects sponsored by a local government shall be limited to 20 years under the Act or the useful life of the project, whichever is less. (b) Repayment periods for loans sponsored by other than a local government shall be limited to 10 years or the useful life of the project, whichever is less. (5) A preconstruction loan shall be available under Rule 62-503.350(1), F.A.C., only to a project sponsor qualifying as local government. (6) The construction loan financing rate available for a_project, planned and designed in accordance with the schedule incorporated into a preconstruction loan agreement, shall be subject to special consideration under Rule 62-503.430(3)(a)5., F.A.C. (7) A project, or any portion thereof, that is financed with a State Revolving Fund loan shall not be refinanced, at a lower loan interest rate or a lower grant allocation assessment rate, by the Department via a subsequent direct loan. (8) The scope of a fundable or contingency portion project described on the priority list shall not be increased to encompass additional work except where such increases have been subject to the prioritization procedures of Rule 62-503.650, F.A.C., and either the list development procedures of Rule 62-503.655, F.A.C., or the list management procedures of Rule 62-503.680, F.A.C., as appropriate. (9) In order to receive consideration for a loan, the project sponsor shall achieve a fundable portion listing for the project, satisfy the appropriate requirements under Rule 62-503.430(2), F.A.C., and submit a complete loan application to the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400. The project sponsor may incorporate into a loan application by reference any information previously submitted to Effective 02/06/02 7 GFS 62-503,FAC • the Department that meets the applicable requirements of this rule in lieu of resubmitting such information. (10) Projects shall be placed on the fundable portion of the priority list being developed under Rule 62-503.655, F.A.C., or shall be added to the list under Rule 62- 503.680, F.A.C. (11) Loans shall be offered to project sponsors for projects listed on the fundable portion on a first-come, first-served basis under Rule 62-503.430(1), F.A.C., while spending authority remains. Spending authority assigned to the Department for loans in any year may be less that the amount of funds allocated each year by the Department. (12) A portion of the funds allocated each year by the Department shall be reserved, under Rule 62-503.500(1), F.A.C., to place small-community projects on the priority list. When the priority list is adopted, any part of the reserved amount not needed for small-community projects shall become available for any project. However, all uncommitted funds allocated each year by the Department shall remain available to place small-community projects on the priority list according to priority established under Rule 62-503.650, F.A.C., and the procedures under Rule 62-503.680, F.A.C. (13) Projects that remain on the fundable portion at the close of the fiscal year due to the failure of the project sponsor to complete all funding requirements shall be subject to reranking on the succeeding year's priority list as planning portion projects under Rule 62-503.680(6), F.A.C. Projects that remain on the fundable portion at the close of the fiscal year solely as a result of the Department's inability to execute loan agreements shall be placed on the succeeding year's fundable portion under Rule 62- • 503.655(6)(b), F.A.C. (14) Direct loans shall be available to project sponsors for projects to serve small communities qualifying for financial hardship assistance under Rule 62-503.430(3)(a)4., F.A.C. To_qualify, the project must be listed on the fundable portion and its sponsor must be a local government. Both preconstruction and construction loans shall be available for financial hardship assistance situations as long as spending authority is available for direct loans. (15) Projects that qualify for funding as a result of section 212 of the Act shall be eligible for direct loans or leveraged loans. However, a project sponsor that has previously financed any stormwater project or wastewater project using tax-exempt bond proceeds shall not qualify for a direct loan for construction as long as the net proceeds of bonds issued by the Florida Water Pollution Control Financing Corporation are available. (16) Projects that qualify for funding as a result of section 319 or 320 of the Act shall be eligible for direct loans only. Specific Authority 403.1835(10), 403.1837(9) FS. Law Implemented 403.1835 FS. History - New 4-17-89, Amended 12-4-91, 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.300, Amended 1- 4-98, 7-1-99, 2-6-02 62-603.350 Preconstruction Loan Funding. (1) Preconstruction loans shall be available only to local governments. Preconstruction loans shall be available to finance administrative, planning, and design activities for projects to be constructed. Preconstruction loans shall be available for the initial design/build project work described under Rules 62-503.420(4) and (5), F.A.C. Effective 02/06/02 8 GFS 62-503,FAC • The scope of a preconstruction loan project need not include all of the local government's water pollution control needs. (2) Loan recipients shall prepare and submit to the Department, no later than the time set forth in the loan agreement, documentation of completion of the planning and design related requirements associated with Rule 62-503.700, F.A.C. (3) A preconstruction loan agreement shall provide for the continuation of the preconstruction financing rate to finance the post-allowance project costs regardless of whether the post-allowance project costs are financed with a direct or a leveraged construction loan. However, when the entire project is not included on the fundable portion and subsequently funded, continuation of the preconstruction financing rate shall be limited to only the first such portion or segment of the project for which a loan agreement or amendment is executed. When the preconstruction activities are not completed as required under the loan agreement, the Department's commitment to provide funds at the financing rate provided under the preconstruction loan agreement for post-allowance project costs shall be terminated. (4) A preconstruction loan agreement shall provide for the roll over of loan principal into a construction loan for the-post-allowance project costs only when such costs are financed with a direct loan and only when preconstruction activities are completed according to the schedule in the loan agreement. Construction loan prerequisites include placement of the project or a segment thereof on the fundable portion. When the preconstruction activities are not completed as required under the loan agreement, the Department's commitment to roll over the_preconstruction loan principal into a construction loan shall be terminated. Specific Authority 403.1835(10) FS. Law Implemented 403.1835 FS. History- New 02- 23-94, Formerly 17-503.350, Amended 1-4-98, 7-1-99, 2-6-02 62-503.400 Program Administration Costs. A loan service fee shall be paid by the project sponsor in the amount of two percent of the total loan amount less the portion of the loan for capitalized interest and the loan repayment reserve (if any). The loan service fee shall not be included in the principal of the loan. The loan service fee shall be assessed at the time of loan agreement execution. The loan recipient may elect to pay the entire loan service fee at the time of loan agreement execution or pay it plus interest accruing at the loan interest rate thereon no later than by the time that the second semiannual loan repayment is due. Specific Authority 403.1835(10) FS. Law Implemented 403.1835 FS. History - New 12- 4-91, 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.400, Amended 1-4-98, 7-1-99, 2-6-02 62-503.420 Project Allowances. (1) Certain allowances for costs shall be included in the approved project cost under a direct loan at the request of the project sponsor. Allowances shall be adjusted to reflect revised project costs after procurement contracts are executed under direct loans. The maximum allowances available upon request of the project sponsor shall be based on adjusted post allowance project costs. Project sponsors shall not be eligible to receive engineering allowances under both subsections (3) and (4) below for the same project. When allowances are disbursed under a_preconstruction loan, the recipient shall be ineligible to receive the same allowance disbursements under a construction Effective 02/06/02 9 GFS 62-503,FAC loan for the same project. Planning and engineering allowances are not available unless the project involves construction. Allowances for project administration, planning, conceptual engineering, and design engineering shall be used in lieu of reimbursement for incurred costs. (2) The allowance for administrative expenses shall not exceed 0.6% of the adjusted post-allowance project costs when that amount exceeds $2,000,000. The maximum allowance that may be requested for projects with lower total eligible amounts shall be $12,000. (3) The allowance for engineering work when the procurement method is as described in Rule 62-503.700(9), F.A.C., including design, performed before construction bid opening or otherwise when construction plans and specifications are completed prior to executing a contract to complete all the work shall not exceed either the amount determined by multiplying the percentage listed below for the range encompassing the adjusted post-allowance project costs by the actual adjusted post- allowance project costs or the allowance listed below for that range, whichever is greater. Allowance Adiusted Post-Allowance Proiect Costs ($1,000 Units) Less than $500 10.3% or$21,000 At least $500 but less than $1,000 8.5% or$52,000 At least $1,000 but less than $5,000 7.5% or$85,000 At least $5,000 but less than $10,000 6.4% or$375,000 At least $10,000 but less than $50,000 6.0% or$640,000 At least $50,000 5.7% or $3,000,000 (4) The allowance for engineering work performed in preparation of a request for proposals when only conceptual or-partial design documents are completed prior to executing a contract to complete all the work shall not exceed 20% of the amount determined under subsection (3) above. The work for which the allowance is available is that performed prior to the date established for receipt of proposals by the project sponsor. (5) The allowance for planning work shall be independent of the allowance for engineering work available under subsection (3) or(4) above. Planning allowances shall be available only for_projects funded with a preconstruction loan. The planning allowance shall not exceed either the amount determined by multiplying the percentage listed below for the range encompassing the adjusted post-allowance project costs by the actual adjusted post-allowance project costs or the allowance listed below for that range, whichever is greater: Adjusted Post-Allowance Proiect Allowance Costs ($1,000 Units) Less than $500 5.2% or$10,000 At least $500 but less than $1,000 4.4% or$26,000 At least$1,000 but less than $5,000 3.9% or$44,000 At least $5,000 but less than $10,000 2.9% or$195,000 At least $10,000 less than $50,000 2.5% or$290,000 At least $50,000 1.8% or$1,250,000 (6) Disbursement of allowances under direct loans shall be as follows: Effective 02/06/02 10 GFS 62-503,FAC • (a) For preconstruction loans, one-half of each'of the administrative and the planning allowances shall be disbursed on request of the project sponsor after a loan agreement is signed. The remaining one-half of each of the administrative and the planning allowances shall be disbursed on request of the project sponsor and after the environmental review under Rule 62-503.700(3), F.A.C., has been completed. One-half of the engineering allowance under a preconstruction loan agreement shall be disbursed upon request of the project sponsor after completion of the environmental review under Rule 62-503.700(3),_F.A.C. The remaining one-half of the engineering allowance shall be disbursed upon request of the project sponsor after completion of the plans and specifications or completion of the request for proposals, as appropriate. (b) For construction loans, administrative and engineering allowances shall be disbursed upon request of the project sponsor after a loan agreement is signed. Planning allowances shall not be included in construction loans. (c) For nonpoint source water pollution control loans to implement best management practices as opposed to construction, administrative allowances shall be disbursed upon request of the project sponsor after a loan agreement is signed. Specific Authority 403.1835(10), 403.1837(9) FS. Law Implemented 403.1835 FS. History - New 4-17-89, Amended 12-4-91, 6-21-93, 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.420, Amended 1-4-98, 7-1-99, 2-6-02 62-503.430 Loan agreements. (1) To receive a loan, a project sponsor must enter into a negotiated written agreement. Loan agreements shall be offered to project sponsors for projects listed on the fundable portion on a first-come, first-served basis irrespective of priority score, project rank, or qualification for the small-community reserve funds while spending authority remains. Available spending authority for direct loans is expected to be different than for leveraged loans. A complete loan application shall be submitted to the Department. (2) Project sponsors shall meet the following requirements prior to being offered a loan: (a) For loans to construct projects qualifying for funding as a result of section 212 of the Act, the following shall be submitted to the Department: 1. Plans and specifications as described in Rule 62-503.700(4), F.A.C. 2. Value engineering report as necessary and as described in Rule 62- 503.700(5), F.A.C. 3. Permitting related documentation as described in Rule 62-503.700(8), F.A.C. 4. Certification of availability of project sites as described in Rule 62-503.700(6), F.A.C. 5. Reasonable financial assurance documentation as described in Rule 62- 503.700(7), F.A.C. (b) For loans to implement projects qualifying for funding as a result of section 319 or 320 of the Act, the following shall be submitted to the Department: 1. For projects that involve construction, the requirements of paragraph (a) above shall be met. 2. For projects that do not involve construction, the following requirements shall be met: Effective 02/06/02 11 GFS 62-503,FAC • a. All project sites necessary to carry out the project activity over the useful life of the project shall be available. b. Procurement of equipment, materials, and services shall provide for price consideration. c. Reasonable financial assurance that project activities will be completed. Such assurance may be in the form of a commitment to maintain adequate reserve funds dedicated throughout the project period to ensuring project completion. Other forms of such reasonable assurance include requirements for service providers and equipment suppliers or manufacturers to_provide performance guarantees; and insurance covering workers' compensation, comprehensive general liability, vehicle liability, and property damage to the extent that coverage is available for project activities. (c) For loans to implement preconstruction projects, all loan agreement prerequisites shall be met upon submittal of a complete loan application. (3) The Department or its designee shall have the primary responsibility for drafting the agreement and settling its terms. Loan agreement covenants shall vary for direct and leveraged loans. Projects being funded as a result of different sections of the Act or as a result of different sources of pledged revenues shall have different loan agreement covenants. (a) Agreements for direct loans shall provide for the following: 1. For a project sponsored by a local government, a loan repayment reserve account shall be established in the amount of 0.03 times the total loan amount less the portion of the loan for capitalized interest and loan repayment reserve. Any additional loan repayment reserve established as a result of subparagraph 6. below shall be established using local funds. 2. For a project sponsored by other than a local government, a loan repayment reserve account shall be established in the amount of 0.12 times the total loan amount less the portion of the loan for capitalized interest and loan repayment reserve. Any additional loan repayment reserve established as a result of subparagraph 6. below shall be established using local funds. 3. Loan repayments shall be made semiannually. The loan recipient shall make deposits of pledged revenues to an escrowed debt service account and shall be responsible for the maintenance of that account. 4. The financing rate that shall be fixed for the principal amount of the loan, once an agreement is fully executed, and for the duration of the loan repayment period shall be established. For loans to benefit financial hardship communities, the financing rate shall be adjusted downward using the percent that the median household income is of the statewide average. 5. The financing rate available for construction of a project or a portion of a project planned and designed in accordance with the schedule incorporated into a preconstruction loan agreement shall be as described in Rule 62-503.350(3), F.A.C. When a financing rate is retained for a preconstruction loan agreement executed on or before June 30, 1997, it shall be converted such as to have equal loan interest rate and grant allocation assessment rate components. 6. Pledged revenues shall be 1.15 times the amount required to make each semiannual loan repayment unless the project sponsor establishes an escrowed • reserve in an amount not less than the equivalent of two semiannual loan repayments. Effective 02/06/02 12 GFS 62-503,FAC • The pledged revenue coverage for the loan from the Department shall not be transferred or derived from coverage required by senior lien debt instruments. (b) Agreements for leveraged loans shall provide for the following: 1. A loan repayment reserve shall not be included in the loan amount. However, a special loan repayment reserve may be required to be established by the project sponsor using its own funds when pledged revenues are not at least 1.15 times the amount required to make each semiannual loan repayment as described under subparagraph (3)(a)6. above. 2. The provisions for loan repayment, financing rate, and pledged revenues addressed in subparagraphs (3)(a)3., 4. (except that hardship loans shall not be available), 5., and 6. above shall be applicable to leveraged loan agreements. 3. Acknowledgement that the tax-exempt status of bonds issued by the Florida Water Pollution Control Financing Corporation shall be maintained. (4) The loan agreement shall have reasonable and necessary terms to meet program requirements. (5) When a loan agreement executed by the project sponsor is submitted to the Department for execution, it shall include an affirmation by the project sponsors legal counsel that: 1. The loan agreement constitutes a valid and legal obligation of the borrower; 2. The loan agreement specifies the revenues pledged to the repayment of the loan; and 3. The pledge is valid and enforceable. (6) The Department shall have no lien on or security interest in or claim on any moneys except as expressly provided in the loan agreement. (7) The project sponsor shall provide assurance that: a. Records will be kept using generally accepted accounting_practices. The Department, the Auditor General, and their agents shall have access to all records pertaining to the loan. b. Project facilities will be properly operated and maintained and best management practices shall be continued, as appropriate. c. Loan funds will not be used for the purpose of lobbying the Legislature, the judicial branch, or a state agency. (8) The financing rate specified in a loan agreement offered to a project sponsor may be revised upward prior to the Department's execution of the loan agreement when the loan agreement is not signed and returned to the Department in the same three-month calendar year quarter in which it is offered. The financing rate shall be the greater of that established in the originally offered loan agreement and the financing rate available when the signed loan agreement is returned to the Department. (9) The project sponsor shall begin repaying a loan no later than the date originally scheduled under the loan agreement. The scheduled date shall be six months after construction or other activity completion or, for refinancing loans, six months after the date estimated for the final disbursement by the Department. (10) Disbursements to the project sponsor shall be for allowable costs. However, capitalized interest is not disbursed. For direct loans, disbursements shall be for costs paid or incurred, certain allowances, and establishing a loan repayment reserve. For • Effective 02/06/02 13 GFS 62-503,FAC • leveraged loans, disbursements shall be only for costs paid or incurred. Disbursements shall be subject to the following requirements: (a) Requests for disbursements (other than those relating to allowances) shall be accompanied by certifications and itemized summaries of the materials, labor, or services to identify the nature of the work performed. Certifications shall state that the construction or other service for which payment or reimbursement is sought has been satisfactorily performed. (b) The materials, labor, and services shall be part of the approved project scope. (c) The disbursement shall be due under the terms of the loan agreement, and there shall be money available under the loan agreement for the payment of it. (d) Disbursements for allowances shall be subject to the limitations imposed by Rule 62-503.420, F.A.C. (11) No later than three months prior to the first loan repayment and annually thereafter until the final loan repayment is made, the project sponsor's authorized representative or its chief financial officer shall submit a certification that: (a) Current pledged revenue collections plus those projected to be collected (at current collection rates) prior to the due date for a semiannual loan repayment satisfy the rate coverage requirement; (b) The pledged revenue escrow account contains the funds required; (c) The loan repayment reserve account required for a direct loan contains the funds required; and (d) Insurance, including that issued through the National Flood Insurance Program authorized under 42 U.S.C. secs. 4001-4128, when applicable, in effect for the facilities generating the pledged revenues, adequately covers the customary risks to the extent that such insurance is available. (12) Remedies for delinquent loan repayment and other events of default shall be limited to those set forth in loan agreements. Events of default shall include noncompliance with any of the terms of a loan agreement. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon an event of default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver of any such default or acquiescence therein, and every-such right and power may be exercised as often as may be deemed expedient. Specific Authority 403.1835(10), 216.349, 403.1837(9) FS. Law Implemented 403.1835 FS. History - New 4-17-89, Amended 12-4-91, 6-21-93, 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.430, Amended 1-4-98, 7-1-99, 2-6-02 62-503.600 Funds Reserved for Specific Purposes. (1) Fifteen percent of the funds allocated each year by the Department less the amount of any bonds issued or to be issued by the Florida Water Pollution Control Financing Corporation shall be reserved to fund projects that will serve small communities. The Department shall administer the small-community reserve funds as follows: (a) A project serving a small community shall retain eligibility for funding from the small-community reserve regardless of the population of the project sponsor . seeking funding for the project. However, a project shall not be eligible for funding from Effective 02/06/02 14 GFS 62-503,FAC the small-community reserve if more than half of the population of the community to be served by the project is located within an incorporated jurisdiction that is not a small community. (b) When the priority list is adopted, any part of the reserved amount not needed for small-community projects shall become available for all projects. (c) The execution of a loan agreement shall be subject to the first-come, first- served provision of Rule 62-503.430(1), F.A.C. (2) Service fees collected for loan program administration under Rule 62- 503.400, F.A.C., shall be deposited in the Department's Grants and Donations Trust Fund. Fee proceeds, including investment earnings, shall be reserved to pay for the administration of the financial assistance programs of the Bureau of Water Facilities Funding. (3) Grant allocation assessments shall be deposited in the Grants and Donations Trust Fund. Grant allocation assessments and earnings thereon shall be used solely for making wastewater management project grants to financially disadvantaged small communities under Rule Chapter 62-505, F.A.C. Specific Authority 403.1835(10) FS. Law Implemented 403.1835 FS. History - New 4- 17-89, Amended 12-4-91, 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.500, Amended 1-4-98, 7-1-99, 2- 6-02 62-503.600 Priority List Information. (1) Each year, a priority list shall be adopted at a public hearing held by the • Department. The list becomes effective after adoption, but not before July 1 of the fiscal year for which it is developed. A project sponsor may describe a project as consisting of various facilities or activities. Other projects may be separately described as a result of differences in readiness-to-proceed. (2) The Department shall accept a complete request for inclusion for the next year's priority list when it is postmarked or delivered between October 15 and December 1. Acceptance of a complete request for inclusion shall be prerequisite to placement of a project on any portion of the priority list. Procedures for the review of a complete request for inclusion shall be: (a) A priority determination under Rule 62-503.650, F.A.C., shall be made for each project. Additional information may be requested by the Department when the data provided are incomplete or unclear. Data remaining incomplete or unclear after 30 days from receipt of the Department's written request for additional information shall result in a funding priority reflecting a substitution of assumed data for the incomplete or unclear data. The assumed data shall be such as to generate the minimum priority score component or consideration attributed to the incomplete or unclear data. (b) The amount of funds available to a project sponsor in any one fiscal year for projects to be listed on the fundable portion of the priority list shall be limited to no more than 25% of the spending authority when the total cost of the projects qualifying for the fundable portion exceeds the spending authority. There shall be no limitation imposed on the amount of funding assigned to contingency portion projects. A project shall be segmented for deferred funding of the unavailable funds when a project sponsor qualifies for funding in excess of that available to it in any one fiscal year. The 25% • Effective 02/06/02 15 GFS 62-503,FAC • limitation applies independently to a project sponsor for each category of its projects identified below. 1. Wastewater management projects eligible for funding as a result of section 212 of the Act. 2. Stormwater management projects eligible for funding as a result of section 212 of the Act. 3. Nonpoint source water pollution control projects eligible for funding as a result of section 319 of the Act. 4. Any projects eligible for funding as a result of section 320 of the Act. (c) A target date shall be assigned to each project, including those partially funded during the preceding fiscal year. Projects to be scheduled for funding in the fiscal year for which the list is being developed shall have target dates no later than June 30 of that fiscal year. (3) After the ranking of projects under Rule 62-503.655, F.A.C., the proposed list shall be made available to interested parties at least 30 days before adoption. Specific Authority 403.1835(10) FS. Law Implemented 403.1835 FS. History - New 4- 17-89, Amended 12-4-91, 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.600, Amended 12-26-96, 1-4-98, 7-1-99, 2-6-02 62-503.650 Priority Determination. (1) Eligible projects shall be given priority according to the extent each project is intended to remove, mitigate, or prevent adverse effects on surface or ground water quality and public health. The final priority score, calculated to the nearest 0.01 point, for each project shall be the adjusted score established under subsections (2) and (3) below multiplied by the cost-to-benefit index under subsection (4) below and then increased for multiple funding source priority coordination and economic hardship, if appropriate, under subsections (5) and (6) below. (2) Each project shall be categorized by the highest single base score justified by any one of its components or facilities. A project shall be assigned a base priority score according to one of the categories as follows: (a) Reduce documented public health hazards (800 points); (b) Protect ground water that is under the direct influence of surface water when such ground water is used for public drinking water supply (400 points); (c) Reduce potential public health hazards (200 points); (d) Eliminate failing on-site sewage treatment and disposal systems or those that are causing environmental damage (140 points); (e) Eliminate direct discharge of untreated stormwater to Class F-I, G-1, or G-II ground water or Class I or II surface water(130 points); (f) Promote reclaimed water reuse, such as agricultural or landscape irrigation, cooling water, and waste conveyance, the purpose of which is to provide an alternative to consumptive use of public drinking water supply (120 points); (g) Reduce saltwater intrusion into ground water under a management program to retard such intrusion (110 points); (h) Assist in the implementation of total maximum daily loads adopted by the Secretary or pollutant load reduction goals established under Rule Chapter 62-40, F.A.C. (100 points); • Effective 02/06/02 16 GFS 62-503,FAC • (i) Contribute to compliance with laws, such as Chapter 90-262, Laws of Florida, requiring the elimination of discharges to specific water bodies (90 points); Q) Enhance, create, preserve, or restore wetlands (80 points); (k) Contribute to compliance with other enforceable water pollution control requirements or water quality standards, such as those included in a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit, toxics control, wastewater residuals management, or reduction of nutrients, sediment, or bacteria (70 points); or (1) Achieve other water pollution control objectives, rehabilitation of deteriorating infrastructure, implementation of best management practices, or otherwise promote the protection or restoration of Florida's surface and ground waters (30 points). (3) A project base score assigned under subsection (1) above shall be multiplied by 1.2 if the project will assist in the restoration or protection of special surface waters. The special water bodies justifying the multiplier are as follows: (a) A priority water body identified in an adopted Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan; (b) Outstanding Florida Waters; (c) Water bodies identified under the National Estuary Program; (d) Wild and Scenic Rivers; or (e) A water body in a priority watershed established under the Unified Watershed Assessment Program. (4) The relative costs of achieving environmental and public health benefits shall be taken into consideration. The ratio of the total cost for each project to the score (benefit) for that project as established after adjustment, if appropriate, of the_base score under subsection (2) above for restoration and protection of special surface waters under subsection (3) shall be computed. The cost data used shall be expressed in units of one-thousand dollars (e.g., $1,000,000 shall become $1,000 for purposes of determining the cost-to-benefit index). The least desirable (highest) cost divided by benefit ratio shall be indexed at not less than 1.00. The most desirable (lowest) cost divided by benefit ratio shall be indexed at not more than 1.20. The cost-to-benefit index (multiplier) for a specific project shall be established to the nearest 0.01 value as follows: 1.20— 0.021 x Natural Logarithm of(Project Cost to Benefit Ratio) (5) The importance placed on a project by another governmental entity shall be taken into consideration. Ten points shall be added to the priority score, after adjustment under subsections (3) and (4) above, when another governmental entity is providing funding for the project. (6) The extent of the economic hardship existing in a small community to be served by the project shall be taken into consideration. Five points will be added to the priority score,_after adjustment under subsections (3) and (4) above, when the ratio of a community's median household income to the statewide average is not more than 0.80. Median household income data shall be established as of the most recent decennial census. Data may_be obtained from the State Data Center, 200 Hartman Building, 2012 Capital Circle Southeast, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2151. Specific Authority 403.1'835(10), 403.1835(7) FS. Law Implemented 403.1835 FS. History - New 4-17-89, Amended 8-1-90, 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.650, Amended 1- • 4-98, 7-1-99, 2-6-02 Effective 02/06/02 17 GFS 62-503,FAC • 62-503.655 Ranking Projects for Priority List Development. (1) The Department shall assign projects to the fundable, contingency, and planning portions of the priority list each year, thus establishing project rankings. Project ranking information shall be made available to interested parties under Rule 62- 503.600(3), F.A.C. Each project shall be listed on the fundable, contingency, or planning portion, depending on the readiness of the project to proceed, the amount of funds allocated each year by the Department, and the priority score of the project. The small- community reserve funds under Rule 62-503.500(2)(a), F.A.C., shall be administered so that the ranking of small-community projects to be funded from the reserve may be independent of rankings of other projects on the priority list at the time of list development. The extent to which segmented projects qualify for deferred funding shall be evaluated each year. Projects with equal priority scores shall be subranked and may be listed on the fundable or contingency portions. Such subranking shall follow the order of the date of postmark or delivery to the Department of the complete request for inclusion, whichever is earlier. Similar subranking of projects shall take place when updated project information is submitted under Rule 62-503.600, F.A.C. (2) Projects qualify for ranking on the fundable portion if sufficient funds are expected to be available from funds allocated each year by the Department, priority list information is submitted as described under Rule 62-503.600(2), F.A.C., and the appropriate requirements listed below are met: (a) Construction projects to be funded as a result of section 212 of the Act ® qualify for placement on the fundable portion after the following conditions have been met: 1. The planning requirements of Rule 62-503.700(1), F.A.C., have been met for capitalization grant projects; 2. The planning requirements of Rule 62-503.700(2), F.A.C., have been met for all projects; 3. The results of the Department's environmental review have been published under Rule 62-503.700(3), F.A.C.; and 4. The environmental concerns, if any, identified during the 30-day comment period have been resolved. (b) Nonpoint source water pollution control projects or other projects to be funded as a result of section 319 or 320 of the Act qualify for placement on the fundable portion after the planning requirements of Rule 62-503.700(2), F.A.C., have been met. (c) Preconstruction projects qualify for placement on the fundable portion regardless of the status of any planning documentation. (3) When a project is segmented and included on the fundable portion, the unfunded remainder shall be deferred to the contingency portion to be financed with future spending authority. (4) Projects to serve small communities included on the fundable portion may have lower priority scores than other projects that cannot be so included as a result of the administration of the small-community reserve funds under Rule 62-503.500(1), F.A.C. When there are more small-community project needs qualifying for the reserved funds than money available, reserved funds shall be made available in descending order of relative priority score for projects having lower priority scores than the lowest Effective 02/06/02 18 GFS 62-503,FAC ranked fundable portion project initially established by assigning only unreserved funds to fundable portion projects. Any remaining reserved funds then shall be assigned to small-community projects with priority scores higher than the lowest ranked fundable portion project initially established by assigning only unreserved funds to fundable portion projects. This procedure may result in the re-establishment of the lowest ranked fundable portion project, and it may result in the assignment of small-community projects with relatively low priority scores to the fundable portion of the_priority list. When there are fewer small-community project needs qualifying for the reserved funds than money available, reserved funds shall be allocated to place all qualifying small- community loan projects on the fundable portion of the initial priority list. (5) When the reserved or unreserved funds expected to be available will not fully finance the lowest-ranked project being considered for the fundable portion, and the project sponsor seeking funding will not commit to completing the entire project without an assurance of additional funding from the Department, the project shall be deferred to the contingency portion and listed immediately below the segmented projects. (6) Projects shall be ranked on the fundable portion according to the following: (a) Projects included on the fundable portion of the previous fiscal year's list and continuing to require funds to cant' out the approved scope of work shall be placed on the fundable portion if current target date and estimated cost information are provided by December 1 under Rule 62-503.600(2), F.A.C. Projects shall appear on the fundable portion as follows: 1. Segmented projects limited to the maximum funding under Rule 62- 503.600(2)(b), F.A.C., and having an unfunded remainder listed on the contingency portion in the immediately preceding fiscal year shall be subranked according to priority score and advanced to the top of the fundable portion. 2. Other incompletely funded projects shall be subranked according to priority score and listed immediately after the segmented projects that advance from the contingency portion. (b) Projects included on the preceding year's fundable portion and for which all funding requirements were met, including receipt by the Department of signed loan agreements, but for which the Department was unable to execute loan agreements shall be placed on the fundable portion and ranked according to priority score below the incompletely funded projects referenced in subparagraph (a)2. above. (c) Projects included on the preceding year's contingency portion shall advance,,maintaining the same relative order with respect to each other, to the fundable portion. However, projects not continuing to qualify shall be assigned to the planning portion. (d) Projects on the planning portion of the preceding fiscal year's priority list and those potentially to be assigned to the planning portion under Rule 62-503.680(6), F.A.C., that qualify for the fundable portion shall be subranked according to priority score and included on the list below all projects advancing from the contingency portion under paragraph (c) above. (e) Projects not identified on the preceding year's priority list but that qualify for the fundable portion shall be subranked according to priority score and have the lowest ranking for funding of any projects listed on the fundable portion. • Effective 02/06/02 19 GFS 62-503,FAC (7) The requirements to add or retain any project or segment of a project on the contingency portion are the same as for adding a project to the fundable portion under subsection (2) above except that funds availability shall not be considered. When a project has a segment listed on the fundable portion, the unfunded remainder shall be ranked with the unfunded remainders of other such projects in priority score order on the top of the contingency portion. (a) Projects shall be retained on the contingency portion when the funds allocated each year by the Department are insufficient for advancement to the fundable portion. Projects shall advance up the contingency portion maintaining the same relative order with respect to each other and be listed after the continuing segmented projects and ahead of those added to the contingency portion under paragraph (b) below. (b) Qualifying projects listed on the previous years planning portion shall be added to the contingency portion in order of priority score below projects that are retained on the contingency portion. (c) Qualifying projects not listed on the previous years planning portion shall be added to the contingency portion in order of priority score after projects are added to the contingency portion under paragraph (b) above. (8) All other projects that cannot be listed on either the fundable or the contingency portion shall be listed on the planning portion in alphabetical order. Specific Authority 403.1835(10) FS. Law Implemented 403.1835 FS. History - New 12- 4-91, Amended 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.655, Amended 1-4-98, 7-1-99, 2-6-02 62-503.680 Priority List Management. ® (1) The fundable portion of the current years project list may be modified as the result of a public hearing as described in subsection (2) below or as a result of an administrative action as described in subsection (3) below. The Department shall modify the contingency portion as described in subsection (4) below. Modifications to the planning portion shall be pursuant to subsections (5) and (6) below. At the request of a project sponsor, a project shall be rescheduled or withdrawn from the priority list as described in subsection (7) below. (2) The Department shall modify the priority list as a result of a public hearing by assigning additional funds to projects on the fundable portion and adding projects to the bottom of the fundable portion if unassigned funds allocated each year by the Department are available and the requirements of this subsection are met. Previously funded projects, projects currently on the fundable portion, projects advancing from the contingency portion, and other projects not previously described represent different preference groupings listed in descending order of funding preference. Projects shall be subranked according to priority score within each preference grouping. Projects that have equal priority scores within a preference grouping shall be further subranked in order of the date of postmark or delivery to the Department, whichever is earlier, of the request for additional funds assignment or for the addition of a project to the fundable portion. However, additional funds shall not be assigned to any segmented project nor shall funds be assigned to any additional project sponsored by an entity that has already received the maximum funding assignment allowed for the fiscal year unless additional funds allocated each year by the Department become available that increase • Effective 02/06/02 20 GFS 62-503,FAC • the estimate, made at the time of list adoption, of the funds allocated each year by the Department. (a) Additional money shall be assigned to a previously funded project or to a project currently on the fundable portion if additional funds are available and if an itemized cost breakdown and explanation are submitted that justify the requested increase. The complete request for inclusion previously submitted to the Department shall be used to re-establish priority scores for previously funded projects. (b) A project shall be added to the bottom of the fundable portion behind projects advancing from the contingency portion if additional funds are available; a complete request for inclusion has been submitted; the requirements of Rule 62- 503.655(2), F.A.C., as appropriate, are met; and the project sponsor has established a target date deadline. (3) Projects, other than those designated as segmented, that are currently listed on the contingency portion shall be advanced in order of listing on the contingency portion to the fundable portion without a public hearing when unassigned funds allocated each year by the Department become available. (4) The Department shall modify the contingency portion only as a result of a public hearing by assigning additional funds to projects on the contingency portion and adding projects to the bottom of the contingency portion. Additional funds shall be assigned to a project currently on the contingency portion if an itemized cost breakdown and explanation are submitted justifying the requested increase. A project shall be added to the bottom of the contingency if a complete request for inclusion has been submitted, and the appropriate provisions of Rules 62-503.655(2), F.A.C., are met. The availability of funds shall not be a consideration in modifying the contingency portion. (5) A project shall be added to the planning portion if a complete request for inclusion is received by the Department. Additions to the planning portion shall not require a public hearing. (6) A project shall be subject to reassignment to the planning portion when the assignment of the project to the fundable portion has been withdrawn. If the target date deadline is not met, the project status shall be scheduled for review at a public hearing to be held by the Department no sooner than 30 days after the deadline. If, as a result of the hearing, the Department determines that the deficiencies in the project work at issue have not been addressed and there are inadequate funds allocated each year by the Department to modify the fundable portion as provided under subsections (2) and (3) above, the Department shall withdraw the project from the fundable portion. Target date considerations notwithstanding, a project that achieved fundable portion status and for which a loan agreement has not been executed prior to the close of the fiscal year because of the failure of the project sponsor to meet appropriate funding requirements under Rule 62-503.430(2), F.A.C., submit a complete loan application, or sign a loan agreement as offered by the Department shall be subject to reranking on the succeeding year's priority list as a planning portion project. Once subjected to reranking, such a project qualifies for subsequent placement on the fundable portion according to Rule 62-503.655(6)(d), F.A.C. (7) Projects shall be rescheduled for implementation in a future fiscal year or removed from a priority list on request of the project sponsor without a public hearing. Rescheduled projects shall be listed on the planning portion. Effective 02/06/02 21 GFS 62-503,FAC Specific Authority 403.1835(10) FS. Law implemented 403.1835 FS. History - New 4- 17-89, Amended 12-4-91, 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.680, Amended 1-4-98, 7-1-99, 2- 6-02 62-603.700 Planning, Design, Construction, and Post-construction Requirements. (1) The requirements of subsections (2) through (11) below, where applicable, shall be met for all projects. Federal regulations incorporated by reference shall be read so that the terms "United States," "federal," "EPA," and "officials of EPA" mean "the state unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. These federal regulations also shall be read so that"grants" means "loans." Capitalization grant projects shall be subject to the requirements of specific federal cross-cutting authorities identified in the loan application Form 62-503.900(2), F.A.C. (2) Evidence of planning shall include documentation of the following: (a) Sufficient illustrative detail of the local area to identify where the project or activity would be located. Landmarks and other readily identifiable features shall be noted. (b) The need or justification for the projector activity. (c) A cost comparison of at least two alternatives. Alternatives may include no action. When an agricultural practice, identified in subparagraphs 1. through 3. below, is selected for implementation during planning for nonpoint source water pollution control projects qualifying for funding as a result of section 319 or section 320 of the Act, the cost comparison requirement shall be deemed to have been met. 1. Conservation practices listed in Natural Resource Conservation Service's "Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV." 2. Best management practices established in statute or rule. 3. Best management practices and related activities addressed in the Department's "Florida Nonpoint Source Management Program Update." (d) The adverse environmental effects, if any, associated with the selected facilities. Adverse effects, if any, must be offset by environmental benefits in order to demonstrate environmental soundness. (e) The public participation process used to explain the project and the financial impacts to affected parties. 1. When a project is eligible for funding as a result of section 212 of the Act, the public participation process shall include the project sponsoes public meeting held before the project sponsor's acceptance of the planning recommendations. The public meeting shall provide for public participation in the evaluation of project altematives. 2. When an agricultural practice identified in subparagraphs (c)1. through 3. above is selected for implementation during planning for nonpoint source water pollution control and it is eligible for funding as a result of section 319 or section 320 of the Act, the public participation requirement shall be deemed to have been met. (f) Financial feasibility information addressing the following: 1. The revenues to be dedicated to repaying the loan and the expenses, charges, and liens against such dedicated funds or revenues. The information shall demonstrate the ability to repay the loan. Effective 02/06/02 22 GFS 62-503,FAC 2. Capital improvements that will be financed from the same funds or revenues dedicated to repaying the loan. Information must include capital improvements that will, be implemented over a_period of that includes a two-year period commencing with the first semiannual loan repayment. 3. The proposed system of charges, rates, fees, and other collections that will generate the revenues to be dedicated to loan repayment. (g) The responses generated by a multi-disciplined intergovernmental review for projects eligible for funding as a result of section 212 of the Act. (h) A description of the recommended facilities, estimated capital costs, and estimated operation and maintenance costs, if applicable. (i) The schedule for implementing the recommended facilities or activities. 0) Adopting resolution for planning documentation or other specific authorization to implement the planning recommendations; (3) The Department shall perform an environmental review for each project to be funded as a result of section 212 of the Act. An environmental review shall not be required for projects to be funded as a result of section 319 or section 320 of the Act. The environmental review shall establish the environmental significance of a proposed project and whether the planning of the project meets the requirements of this rule. The environmental review also shall establish the Department's intention to make funding available for a project after the project sponsor has met the applicable requirements of this rule. The results of the Department's environmental review for each project shall be issued as an environmental information document. The different environmental information documents are described in paragraphs (c) through (f) below. A notice of availability of an environmental information document shall be published in the Florida Administrative Weekly to announce the results of the Department's environmental review. The notice of availability shall include instructions about the procedures for accessing the project information and the Departments findings. The Department shall provide a 30-day period, commencing as of the date of the notice of availability, for public comment about the environmental impacts of proposed projects. Written comments from the public shall be considered by the Department before approving a project for funding if postmarked or delivered within the 30-day comment period to the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Facilities Funding, 2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 3505, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400. (a) When an environmental review is performed fora component or portion of the project in advance of completing the review for the entire pollution control system, the environmental review process is partitioned. A partitioned environmental review shall be performed only if all the conditions listed below are met. However, partitioning shall not imply further approvals for the remainder of the water pollution control system, and the environmental review for such remainder shall conform to the applicable requirements of this subsection. 1. The component will immediately remedy a public health, water quality, or other environmental problem, or advance completion will achieve a demonstrable cost savings; 2. Environmentally sound, implementable alternatives for the overall water pollution control system of which the component is a part have been identified, and the component does not foreclose any of the alternatives; and Effective 02/06/02 23 GFS 62-503,FAC 3. The component will not cause adverse environmental impacts, including impacts that will be minimized or eliminated only by completing the entire system. (b) Review procedures, identical to those described in this subsection, shall be used when the Department amends an environmental information document to announce project changes that have potentially significant environmental impacts. (c) A Florida Categorical Exclusion Notice (FCEN) shall be used for certain projects that are not expected to generate controversy over potential environmental effects. A FCEN shall not be used when there are documented environmental objections to a project before the local government adopted the planning recommendations provided that such objections have a basis in statute, regulation, or ordinance. A FCEN shall not be used where a project will result in the inability of the existing water pollution control system to meet permit criteria. 1. In issuing a FCEN, the Department shall: a. Briefly describe the project, the justification for the categorical exclusion, and the proposed loan funding. b. Conclude the environmental review only after the 30-day_public comment period, under subsection (3) above, has expired and: I. No information is received about adverse environmental impacts; II. Information is received about adverse environmental impacts and the objections either are without a basis in statute, regulation, or ordinance or the objections are resolved; or III. Information is received about adverse environmental impacts, the FCEN is ® rescinded, and an environmental review is undertaken according to paragraph (d) or(e) below. 2. Projects categorically excluded from further environmental review are: a. Rehabilitation of existing water pollution control system components or replacement of structures, materials or equipment; b. Water pollution control systems that do not change the existing discharge point or permitted pollutant concentration limits and that do not involve acquisition of undisturbed land; c. Water pollution control systems that serve less than 10,000 people in unsewered communities that involve self-contained individual or duster systems providing both treatment and disposal of wastewater that will take place near the buildings from which the wastewater is to be discharged; d. Water pollution control systems in areas where streets have been established, underground utilities installed, or building sites excavated; e. Treatment plant upgrades that are solely to enable reclaimed water reuse if the treatment level enables unrestricted public access. (d) A Florida Finding of No Significant Impact (FFONSI) shall be used when a project sponsor proposes a project not categorically excluded from a detailed environmental review and not requiring a Florida Environmental Impact Statement. In issuing a FFONSI, the Department shall: 1. Record the basis for the decision to provide financial assistance for the project, addressing: a. The existing and future environmental conditions without the project and the environmental consequences of the project; Effective 02/06/02 24 GF5 62-503,FAC b. The purpose and the need for the project; c. The alternatives, including no action, to and the cost considerations for the project; d. Any environmental enhancement measures to be implemented; e. The public participation process; f. The interdisciplinary review of the project; and g. Compliance with rules of the Department. 2. Consider public comments about environmental impacts of a project if the comments are received within 30 days after the publication date of the notice of availability under subsection_(3) above. 3. Conclude the environmental review for the project only after the 30-day comment period has expired and: a. No information is received about previously unconsidered adverse environmental impacts; b. Information is received about previously unconsidered adverse environmental impacts and one of the following occurs: I. The objections are either without a basis in statute, regulation, or ordinance or the objections are resolved; II. A re-evaluation of the project is made as a result of the comments and the Department confirms the original decision or requires environmental enhancement measures before implementing the project; or III. The FFONSI is rescinded. (e) A Florida Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and a Florida Record of Decision (FROD) shall be used for a project for which there is an adverse direct or indirect impact on land use and population patterns, the quality of the environment, cultural or environmental resource areas, or the habitats of endangered or threatened species. A FEIS and FROD also shall be used when there is unresolved public controversy over the environmental impacts of a project provided that the objections to the project have a basis in statute, regulation, or ordinance. A FEIS shall be_prepared by the Department or, at the direction of the Department and in accordance with the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act, section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes, by others with no conflicting interest in the outcome. In completing the environmental review, the Department shall: 1. Issue a notice of intent to prepare a FEIS for the project; 2. Develop a plan of study and convene a meeting of government, including EPA, and other interested parties to determine the scope of the FEIS; 3. Identify and evaluate project alternatives; 4. Provide for public participation and review by federal and state environmental regulatory agencies; 5. Ensure that adverse impacts of the project are minimized or eliminated; 6. Document the findings of the environmental review using both the FROD and FEIS; 7. Announce the funding eligibilities using a FROD and consider public comments about environmental impacts if received during the 30-day period beginning on the date of publication of the notice of availability under subsection (3) above; and Effective 02/06/02 25 GFS 62-503,FAC 8. Conclude the environmental review only after a 30-day public comment period has expired without receipt of comments about adverse environmental impacts or if, after receipt of such comments, the Department takes action to: a. Confirm the original decision; b. Require additional analysis and environmental enhancement as a condition of confirmation of the original decision; or c. Rescind the original decision. (f) A Florida Reaffirmation Notice (FRAN) shall be used to establish the Department's continuing intention to make funds available for unimplemented projects, the planning for which was previously documented as accepted by the Department in a FCEN, FFONSI, FROD, or analogous documents issued by EPA, or amendments to any of the foregoing. In issuing a FRAN, the Department shall: 1. State the findings being reaffirmed. 2. Consider public comments about changed conditions altering the environmental impacts since the previous FCEN, FFONSI, FROD, or analogous documents issued by EPA, or amendments to any of the foregoing. Comments shall be considered if received during the 30-day period beginning on the date of publication of the notice of availability of the FRAN under subsection (3) above. 3. Conclude the environmental review only after the public comment period has expired and: a. No information is received about changed conditions resulting in adverse environmental impacts; b. Information is received about changed conditions resulting in adverse environmental impacts and one of the following occurs: I. The objections are resolved; H. A re-evaluation of the project is made as a result of the comments and the Department confirms the original decision or requires environmental enhancement measures before implementing the project; or lll. The FRAN is rescinded. (4) The project sponsor shall submit plans and specifications conforming to the planning documentation for projects involving construction. (5) The project sponsor shall submit a value engineering report for operationally related project facilities for which the adjusted post-allowance project costs exceed $10,000,000 unless the project is to be implemented under a design/build fixed price contract. (6) The project sponsor shall certify that all sites necessary for the purposes of construction, operation, and maintenance or affirm that project sites to otherwise cant' out the project activity over the useful life of the project are available. (7) The project sponsor shall provide reasonable financial assurance that project construction, if appropriate, will be completed. Such assurance may be in the form of a commitment to maintain adequate reserve funds dedicated throughout the construction period to ensure project completion. Other forms of such reasonable assurance include requirements for contractors to provide performance and payment bonds under section 255.05, F.S., and insurance covering workers' compensation, comprehensive general liability, vehicle liability, and property damage to the extent that ® coverage is available for construction activities. Effective 02/06/02 26 GFS 62-503,FAC (8) The project sponsor shall submit evidence that any of the following permitting related conditions exist for the project: (a) The use of a general permit under Rule 62-620.705, F.A.C., has been authorized; (b) An intent to issue a permit under Rule 62-620.510, F.A.C., has been established; (c) The Department has issued other authorization for project construction; or (d) The Department has determined that its authorization is not required prior to construction. (e) An intent to issue a permit for construction under Part IV, Chapter 373, F.S., has been established. (9) Construction contractors shall be selected according to a recognized procurement method such as competitive or noncompetitive negotiation procurement or formal advertised competitive bidding. Procurement requirements for the competitive or noncompetitive negotiation procurement methods or the formal advertised competitive bidding method shall be as set forth in the following sections of 40 C.F.R. Part 33, Procurement Under Assistance Agreements (1995) incorporated herein by reference: 33.230(c) and (d) (except that the references to architects and engineers shall be interpreted to mean the offerors of technical services, the procurement of which is not subject to Chapter 287.055, F.S.), 33.255(c) (except that the salient requirements of the named brand which must be met by offerors need not be stated and the reference to 40 C.F.R. Part 35 is deleted), 33.305, 33.310, 33.315, 33.405, 33.410 (provided that public notice includes announcement in a publication having general circulation on a statewide ® basis), 33.415, 33.420(a) through (d) and (f) (except for references to section 33.295 and Form 5720-4), 33.425, 33.430 (except that bid rejection shall be based solely on sound documented business reasons), 33.505, 33.510_(except for references to section 33.295 and Form 5720-4), 33.515, 33.520, and 33.605(a) through (c) as supplemented by the provision that noncompetitive negotiated procurement also shall be deemed justified when a material, product, or service provides for necessary interchangeability of parts and equipment or promotes innovative technologies. (10) Project changes after advertising for bids or other project proposals and before bid or proposal opening shall be made by addendum. Changes to executed contracts involving construction shall be made by change order. The project sponsor shall submit all addenda and change orders to the Department. Unless a change order involves one or more of the following, the Department shall not perform an eligibility determination for it except as necessitated by an audit under Rule 62-503.800(2), F.A.C.: (a) The additional cost of the changes covered by a single change order exceeds $100,000; (b) The change would affect the project scope or include work outside the approved project scope; (c) Procurement methods involved would not be consistent with those approved by the Department prior to contract award; or (d) The change would conflict with any requirement of Chapter 62-503, F.A.C. (11) Design/build and construction manager at risk procurement are allowable alternatives to the procurement methods described in subsection (9) above. Effective 02/06/02 27 GFS 62-503,FAC i Procurement for contractors that will provide both professional and construction services shall be according to a recognized procurement method such as described in the following: (a) Requests for proposals shall be used in the selection process. (b) The request for proposals shall describe the work eligible for a loan, the requirements with which the successful respondent shall comply, and the evaluation process to be used in selecting the successful respondent. (c) Advertising shall include announcement in a publication having general circulation on a statewide basis and either in a construction trade journal or a professional journal. (d) The time allowed for development of proposals shall be commensurate with the complexity and extent of the work and with the extent of the conceptual documents provided with the request for proposals. (e) Both the qualifications of the respondents and the price for completing the advertised work shall be considered in the selection process. (f) The project sponsor shall demonstrate that the competition solicited is sufficient for the complexity and extent of the work. (g) Requests for proposals shall be submitted to the Department prior to advertising for a determination of compliance with loan program requirements. Specific Authority 403.1835(10) FS. Law Implemented 403.1835 FS. History- New 4- 17-89, Amended 8-1-90, 12-4-91. 6-21-93, 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.700, Amended 1- 4-98, 7-1-99, 2-6-02 ® 62-603.800 Audits Required. (1) Beginning with the fiscal year in which an agreement for a leveraged loan is executed and continuing for each year thereafter until the loan is retired, the local government shall submit annual audit reports to the Department. Audits shall address the local government's financial condition; accounts of water and sewer systems or other sources generating the pledged revenues; loan disbursements received, if any; project expenditures, if any; and compliance with loan agreement covenants. The local government shall cause its auditor to notify the Department immediately if anything comes to the auditor's attention during the annual examination of the local government's records that would constitute a default under the loan agreement. Reports shall be submitted within one year after the end of each audited fiscal year. (2) Within the later of 12 months after the effective date of a loan agreement amendment establishing final project costs or the date upon which deposits of pledged revenues under Rule 62-503.430(3), F.A.C., are first required, the project sponsor shall submit to the Department a report for a state project-specific audit of the loan related revenues and expenditures. Audits of both direct loans and leveraged loans shall address the project sponsor's financial condition; accounts of the sources generating the pledged revenues; loan disbursements received, and project expenditures; and compliance with loan agreement covenants. The project sponsor shall cause its auditor to notify the Department immediately if anything comes to the auditor's attention during the examination of the records that would constitute a default under the loan agreement. The audit findings shall set aside or question any costs that are unallowable under this rule chapter.-A final determination of whether such costs are allowed shall be made by Effective 02/06/02 28 GFS 62-503,FAC the Department. The above-described state project-specific audit shall be required unless the only disbursements under the loan agreement are for allowances, loan service fee, and loan repayment reserve under a preconstruction loan. The definition of a state project-specific audit may be found in section 215.97 of the Florida Statutes. (3) The Department may conduct an audit within three years following project close-out if loan covenant compliance problems have been noted; record keeping deficiencies are noted during close-out; the project involves unusual or questioned costs; or other justification for conducting the audit becomes apparent. (a) The Department shall give the project sponsor advance notice of any audit. (b) The Department shall prepare a written report on each audit and shall provide a copy of the report to the project sponsor. The project sponsor must respond, in writing, to the findings and recommendations within 30 days after receipt of a written request from the Department. Specific Authority 403.1835(10), 403.1837(9) FS. Law Implemented 403.1835 FS. History - New 4-17-89, Amended 12-4-91, 02-23-94, Formerly 17-503.800, Amended 1- 4-98, 2-6-02 62-503.850 Exceptions to Program Requirements. (1) The Department shall consider requests for exceptions to the requirements of this rule if the exception does not conflict with state or federal law or federal regulations. (2) A request for exceptions must contain the following information: (a) The name of the local government; project number, award date, application date, or target date; and the assistance amount involved. (b) The specific rule to which an exception is requested. (c) A complete description of what the exception would accomplish and justification for the exception. (d) A statement of whether the same or a similar exception previously has been sought; and, if so, an explanation of the reason for that request and the outcome. (e) Proof that compliance with the specified rules is unnecessary for abatement of pollution and protection of public health. (fl Proof that the economic, social, and environmental costs of compliance exceed the economic, social, and environmental benefits of compliance. Specific Authority 403.1835(5)(a), FS. Law Implemented 403.1835, FS. History — New 4-17-89, Formerly 17-503.850. Effective 02/06/02 29 GFS 62-503,FAC APPENDIX N Comparative Potable Water Quality for South Broward Utilities l.UlJ2- N 0H� n� O Y �o U❑ ❑O O❑❑o O❑O O❑❑❑❑O❑❑❑O❑o ❑ ❑❑U U U Z ZZZZ Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z z 2zZ Z Z Z A N N f V O N O O + O Y O s o fV N N AAM, J O 000000 ❑O❑❑❑❑❑❑O❑❑❑❑❑❑ O❑ ❑ ❑0 J Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z r� Y£l�z000000 O O N m vT z z zzz z z z z z z Z z z z z Z z z z z z z z z z WY NOoE ❑ 0000❑o o❑00000000❑ ❑J,10 zz o ❑ ❑❑ U_Uzzzzzzzzzzzzz zz z z zz 8 O m D C3 0 ck Q O❑01000 0000❑ 000000000 ❑❑ ❑ O ❑❑ Z E Z z Z Z 2 2 2 2 Z 2 Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z 2 Z zz Q M m �nmN c no o o moo o cc o LL ❑ $ ❑❑❑JOU O❑❑o❑ ❑❑❑❑❑o❑❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ OZZZZ 2 Z 2 2 Z Z 2 Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z—Z Z Z Z n C o m J o o J Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 00000Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z m O O O O C l V 3 0 Z n 3o 000000 ❑ ❑❑o❑ 1-Z m ❑azzzz z zzZz zzz zzzz z zz z fMNT.ZM nCO w Ts r O❑❑❑❑o ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑O ❑❑ ❑U a az z zzz 2 z Z ZZ22Z2 2 2 2 2 z z 2 z pp atN m N AN' YONO E §Z z z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 2 Z Z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 z Z Z Z Z Q m m m N m n f 7 N 1 m m N m 0 m m 0 o c� p oao p0o m0 Y L O cD C O 00, 8 .86 O O $O G^ Y O O p O O O Y u m❑ Z zz d m a 2 z zzzz z z z z z a! � a � N m rn v c ry o 0 0 m LL❑ 000000 0000000❑0❑00❑0❑ o❑ o +o 00 'y oz zzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zz z 2z zz LL m n m n N o O Mory c o 0o R mry oA c J FF O❑❑❑❑O O ❑❑o❑ 0❑❑❑❑0❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑0 li LL Z Z Z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z 2 z Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 (p fA f�l m a �NO� ® M V/^�� N Y�m5 a D j . C G a VJ m y�Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ZZZ 2 Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z 000 z z Z z m m0 J m m o m c e n IVV Y m a O QT Q❑o ❑❑0❑❑❑ ❑❑❑0❑❑❑o❑ ❑❑o❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ Z p ❑Zz ZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZ2Z 2ZZZZ 2 Z Z ZZ Y Y N ♦ m A m N 'O A N Q O' O 0 0 ry gL o Q ❑o❑❑❑❑ ❑❑O❑O❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑O❑ ❑ o O O O m S Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ZZZ 2 Z 2 Z Z 2 Z 2 Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z W O 0 d Y m m B O G m Y� J n Q ❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑0❑❑❑0❑❑❑❑O ❑ ❑❑ ❑O as smz zzzzzz zzzzzzz2ZZZZZZZ z zz ZZ m ry O m N m m Y m A � r a 0 Y m �.- ❑❑O o O❑ o❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ N❑ ❑ IW z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z z Z Z z Z Z Z Z 2 ri Z Z m W 0 m 0 0 $ N 9 m o tU o Q � uT-0❑ 000❑00 ❑❑❑00❑00❑0❑❑ 0❑ ❑❑ ❑ 00 �U m Z Z 2 2 2 Z 2 Z z Z z 2 Z Z 2 Z ZZZ z Z Z Z z Z Z 2 n N Y N m m Y o o m ^ 5 -N+ Imo a o N w o 0 r^ L° mo ❑ ❑❑o❑oo ❑ ❑❑00 00000 zz 00 0 0❑ V �w2z z zzzzzz z zzzz ZZZZz zz zz z zz Z m r m p Y ry o 0 0 'Uo ❑00000 0 ❑000 oo❑00❑00 0❑ ❑ ❑o Z mumz zzzzzz z zzzz zzzzzzzz zz z zz nM r m0 rvo Q 'u❑ oo❑❑o❑ o ❑❑oo canon o❑ ❑ 0 0❑ mumz zzzzzz zzzz ZZZzz zz z z zz nnm Y N m� IV atN �� 1 N O N p O O C fV InN t V O CLZZ 00 o O Y Q❑❑ ❑❑o❑❑❑ ❑0❑0❑0 0❑❑0❑❑❑O ❑ ❑ ❑ O❑ a m❑Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N O N N N N N Y N M N N N Z. N m Y O O ry O N 1'1 O O O o O N 0 0 0 O 00 0 0 0 190, 0 0 O O m S N' N YI FF 0 0 G O ci 'O 0j N Z Z ZZZ Z Z CJ J J J J J J J '^� 73 E E B E E E E E > >> >> > E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E > > E V/ ® c rg Y O a E E E E N N Z;N_ .� poYCa icy E �, Xaag � Q$N ❑c��` =WM na�a�a mmu �u�urq �d Z3�i�a❑8 Y m m m m m m au E � • APPENDIX O • Comparative Raw Wastewater Quality— SCRWWTP Large Users • UNITS Broward Miramar Pembroke Pembroke Dania Hallandale Type Constituent ® County Park Pines Beach Avg BC MIR PPK PPN 0.01 OB 0.02 HAL 0.001325 Cyanide Total mg/L NO NO NO 1 mg/L 5 1.4 2 4 Gross Alpha 0.087 NO ND NO Hex.Chromium mg/L 4.175 mg/L 5.13 4.5 3.86 Surfactants WAS14 29.2 255 13.2 Oil&Grease mglL 14.9 15 .075 pH mg/L 7.5 7.7 0 7.4 70 2.12 70 1.14 7 0.2 Radium 226 mg/L Radium 228 mg/L 0.5 0 2 0.5 Hydrogen Sulfide mg/L 21.9 0.19 0.11 2.2 0.4 0.688 25 Temperature mg/L 312 25 28.6 31 27.3 0 0.02 2 0.22 NO 5 m /L 0.07 Total Phenolics g 6.5 NO 4.75 8 4.25 Petroleum Hydrocarbons(TPH) mg/L NO Detergents mg/L 3.8 Total VOC mg/L 0.15 Total SVOCs mg/L 0.09 4.38 MBAS mg/L 5.13 ug/L ND NO NO ND 0 OP Aldrin 0 alpha BHC ug/L 0.081 NO NO NO ND beta BHC 0 ug/L NO NO NO 0.02 NO delta BHC ug/L ND NO NO NO NO 00 Lindane(gamma BHC) ug/L NO NO NO NO ND 0 Chlordane ug/L NO NO NO NO NO 0 4 4 DOD ug/L ND NO NO NO NO 0 4 4 DOE ug/L NO NO NO NO NO 0 4 4 DDT ug/L NO ND 0.45 NO ND DielDDdrin ug/L NO ND NO NO NO 0 uglL ND ND NO NO ND 0 Endosulfan I 0 Endosulfan II ug/L NO ND NO NO ND 0 Endosulfan sulfate ug/L ND NO NO NO ND 0 Endrin ug/L ND NO NO NO ND 0 Endrin aldehyde ug/L ND ND NO NO NO 0 Heptachlor ug/L ND NO NO NO NO 0 Heptachlor epoxide ug/L NO NO NO p p 0 Toxaphene ug/L NO NO NO NO NO PC61 PCB-1016 ug/L NO ND NO ND 00 PCB2 PCB-1221 ug/L NO ND NO NO O NO O 0 PC63 PCB-1232 ug/L NO 0 PCB4 PCB-1248 ug/L NO ND NO NO NO NO ND 0 ug/L NO PCBS PCB-1254 PCB6 PCB-1260 ug/L NO NO NO NO 0 VOC Acrolein ug/L NO NO 0 NO ND 0 ac lonitrile ug/L Benzene ug/L ND ND ND NO 0 ND 3.9 ND NO 0 Bromodichloromethane ug/L NO NO NO NO 0 Bromoform ug/L 0 Bromomethane ug/L N N NO ND NDO NDO NO NO 0 Carbon Tetrachloride ug/L NO NO NO 0 Chloroethane ug/L NO ND 0 2 Chloroethylvinyl ether ug/L 18.4 0.625 Chloroform ug/L 8.74 12 15 NO Chloromethane ug/L NO ND NO 63.1 0 3,1 NO NO 0 Dibromochloromethane ug/L NO 12 Dichlorobenzene ug/L NO NO NO NO ND 00 1 3 Dichlorobenzene ug/L NO NO ND ND NO 15.2 NO ND 7.46 2.5 3.25 1 4 Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND NO NO 0 1 1 Dicloroethane ug/L 0 1 2 Dichloroethane ug/L NO ND NO ND 1 1 Dichloroethene ug/L NO ND ND NO 0ND NO 0 trans 1 2 Dichloroethene ug/L NO NO NO NO ND 0 ® 1 2 D3 Dicopropaneroprop ug/L NO NO 0 cis 1 3 Dichloropropene ug/L NO trans 1 3 Dichloropropene ug/L 40 ND 0ND NO ND NO 0 ethylbenzene ug/L • Methylene chloride ug/L 133 ND ND NO ND 0 1 1 2 2 Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND ND ND ND 11 ND 1.24 ND 0 Tetrachloroethylene ug/L 9 7 NO 3.03 1.5 0.275 Toluene ug/L 0 1 1 1 Trichloroethane ug/L ND N ND ND ND NDO ND ND 0 1 1 2 Trichloroethane ug/L NO ND ND 0 Trichloroethylene ug/L 0 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L NO NO ND ND NO NO ND ND 0 Vinyl Chlroide ug/L NO NO 3.17 ND 0 Xylene Total ug/L NO NO 0 Metals Tellurium nag/L ND 0 Arsenic mg/L ND NO ND NO NO Barium mg/L 0.001 NO 0.047 NO 0.0224 0.015255 Beryllium mg/L NO 0.051 NO NO NO Bismuth mg/L NO ND 0.1 0 0.14 0.23 0.265 0.24 Boron mg/L NO Cadmium mg/L ND 0.01 NO ND 0 0 Chromium mg/L ND 0.0056 ND NO 0.003 0 Cobalt mg/L NO NO NO NO NO 15 0.012 0.03 0.0242 0.02 Copper mg/L 0.055 0.0 Iron mg/L 0.18 2.4 0.55 27 0.8 0.53755 Lead mg/L 0.003 0.738 ND 0.082 ND Manganese mg/L 0.019 NO 0.017 0.05 0.019 0.01225 Molybdenum mg/L NO ND NO ND 0.011 0 Nickel mg/L 0.0026 2E = ND 0.009 00 Selenium mg/L NO 3 ND NO, ND Silver mg/L 0.007 NO ND NO NO 0 Strontium mg/L 0.42 0.35 0.405 0.6925 mg/L Tin NO NO NO 0 Zinc mg/L 0.13 0.39 0.071 4.6 0.6 0.1005 Mercury mg/L 0.00002 NO ND ND 0.0004 Antimony mg/L 0.0004 NO ND ND 0.7 0 mg/L 135 120 230 202 174.8 135.25 Oth BOD mg/L Chlorides mg/L 90 57 44 54.9 450 476.5 COD mg/L 395 230 350 730 100 245 TDS mg/L 405 210 280 280 1060 950 TKN mg/L 41 70 21 40.3 26.5 27.75 Total Phosphorous mg/L 5.4 4.2 3.2 5.44 3.3 2.245 TSS mg/L 49 190 150 300 160 90 NO NO 0 Extr Acenaphtene ug/L NO 0 Acenaphthylene ug/L ND NO NO Aldrin ug/L NO ND NO 0 Anthracene ug/L NO NO ND NO NO 0 Benzidine ug/L NO ND NO ND 0 Benzo a anthracene ug/L ND ND NO ND ND 0 Benzo b fluoranthene ug/L ND ND NO ND ND 0 Benzo k fluoranthene ug/L ND ND NO ND ND 0 Benzo g h I perylene ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0 Benzo a pyrene ug/L NO ND ND NO NO 0 alpha BHC ug/L ND ND NO 0 beta BHC ug/L ND ND NO 0 delta BHC ug/L ND ND NO 0 Lindane(gamma BHC) ug/L NO ND 0 Bis 2 chloroethyl ether ug/L NO NO ND ND 0 Bis 2 chloroethoxy methane ug/L NO NO NO ND 0 Bis 2 ethylhexyl phthalate ug/L 15.7 ND 20.3 135 7.425 Bis 2 chloroisopropyl ether ug/L ND ND ND 0 4 Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L ND ND ND ND ND 0 Chlordane ug/L NO ND 0 4 Chloro 3 methylphenol ug/L ND ND ND ND 0 2 Chloronaphthalene ug/L NO ND NO 0 2 Chlorophenol ug/L NO ND ND 0 4 Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L NO ND ND ND ND 0 ® Chrysene ug/L NO NO ND ND ND 0 4 4 DOD ug/L NO ND ND 0 4 4 DOE ug/L NO ND NO 0 4 4 DDT ug/L NO NO NO 0 Dibenzo a h anthracene ug/L ND ND NO NO ND 0 Di n butyl phthalate ug/L NO NO ND NO NO 0.35 1 2 Dichlorobenzene ug/L NO NO NO 0 1 3 Dichlorobenzene ug/L NO NO ND 0 1 4 Dichlorobenzene ug/L 4.2 ND ND NO 0 0 3 3 Dichlorobenzidine ug/L NO NO NO ND NO 0 2 4 Dichlorophenol ug/L 0.46 NO NO ND 0 Dieldrin ug/L NO 6 Diethyl phthalate ug/L 2.34 NO NO NO NO 0 2 4 Dimethylphenol ug/L ND NO ND NO 2 4 DinRrophenol ug/L ND ND ND ND 0 2 4 Dinitrotoluene ug/L NO ND NO NO ND 0 2 6 Dinitrotoluene ug/L ND NO NO NO 0 Di n octyl phthalate ug/L NO NO ND 5.07 ND 0 Endosulfan I ug/L NO NO ND 0 Endosulfan Il ug/L ND ND ND 0 Endosulfan sulfate ug/L NO NO NO 0 Endrin ug/L NO ND ND 0 Endrin aldehyde ug/L ND ND NO 0 Fluoranthene ug/L NO NO NO NO NO 0 Fluorene ug/L ND ND ND NO ND 0 Heptachlor ug/L ND NO NO 0 Heptachlor epoxide ug/L NO NO ND 0 Hexachlorobenzene ug/L NO ND ND NO NO 0 Hexachlorobutadiene ug/L NO NO NO NO 0 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/L NO NO ND NO 0 Hexachloroethane ug/L NO ND NO NO 0 Indeno 1 2 3 c d pyrene ug/L NO NO NO NO NO 0 2 Methyl 4 6 dinitrophenol ug/L NO NO ND 0 1 Methyl naphthalene ug/L NO ND NO NO 0 2 Methylnaphthalene ug/L ND NO NO ND 0 Naphthalene ug/L NO NO NO NO 0 • Nitrobenzene ug/L NO ND NO 0 2 Nitrophenol ug/L ND NO NO ND 0 4 Nitrophenol ug/L ND NO NO NO NO 0 n NRrosodimethylamine ug/L NO NO NO NO NO 0 n Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ug/L NO NO NO NO PCB-1016 ug/L NO NO ND 0 PCB-1221 ug/L NO NO NO 0 PCB-1232 ug/L ND NO NO 0 PCB-1248 ug/L ND NO ND 0 PCB-1254 ug/L NO NO ND 0 PCB-1260 ug/L NO ND ND 0 Pentachlorophenol ug/L NO NO NO ND NO 0 Phenanthrene ug/L NO NO NO NO NO 0 Phenol ug/L 43.8 7.4 2.89 15 1.15 Pyrene ug/L NO NO NO ND NO 0 Toxaphene ug/L NO 0 1 2 4 Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND ND ND NO 0 2 4 6 Trichlorophenol ug/L NO NO NO ND 0 Misc Hexane Extractables ug/L 16 NO NO 2 Methyi Phenol o cresol ug/L 22 14.9 3 Methyl Phenol m cresol ug/L 14.9 46 4 Methyl Phenol p cresol ug/L NO 2 3 6 Trichlorophenol ug/L NO NO 2 4 5 Trichlorophenol ug/L NO 2 4 6 Trichlorophenol ug/L NO Mirex ug/L NO Tetachloroethene ug/L NO Diazinon ug/L NO Malthion ug/L NO Parathion Methyl ug/L` NO Parathion Ethyl ug/L NO Ethion ug/L NO Azinphos Methyl ug/L NO Fethion ug/L NO Chlropyrifos(dursban) ug/L NO Simazine ug/L NO Atrazine ug/L NO Acetone ug/L 290 NO Methyl Ethyl Ketone ug/L NO NO Dichlorofluoromethane ug/L NO NO NO NO MTBE ug/L NO NO 2 2 Dichloropropane ug/L NO NO NO cis 1 2 Dichloroethene ug/L NO NO Bromochloromethane ug/L NO NO 1 1 Dichloropropane ug/L NO NO 1 1 Dichloropropene ug/L NO 1 2 Dichloropropane ug/L NO NO 1 3 Dichloropropane ug/L NO Dibromomethane ug/L NO NO Bromobenzene ug/L NO NO Chlorobenzene ug/L NO NO NO • 1 1 1 2 Tetrachlorothane ug/L NO NO NO Isopropylbenzene ug/L NO NO NO 1 1 1 2 Tetrachloroethene ug/L NO NO NO NO 1 2 3 Trichloropropane ug/L 1 2 4 Trichloropropane ug/L NO NO 1 3 5 Trimethylbenzene ug/L NO NO NO 2 Chlorotoluene ug/L NO NO NO 4 Chlorotoluene ug/L NO NO NO Sec Butylbenzene ug/L NO NO Tert Butylbenzene ug/L NO NO NO 1 2 4 Trimethylbenzene ug/L NO NO p Isopropyltoluene ug/L 7.1 NO NO n butylbenzene ug/L NO NO NO n propylbenzene ug/L NO NO NO 1 2 Dibromo 3 chloropropane ug/L NO NO NO 1 2 4 Trichlorobenzene ug/L NO NO NO NO 1 2 3 Trichlorobenzene ug/L NO NO NO Benzyl Alcohol ug/L NO NO Isophorone ug/L NO NO Dimethylphthalate ug/L NO NO 4 6 Dinitro 2 Methylphenol ug/L NO NO N Nitrosodiphenylamine ug/L NO NO 4 Bromophenyl Phenyl ether ug/L NO Bis 2 ethylhexyl adipate ug/L NO Dioxin ug/L NO Azobenzene ug/L NO Theoxychlor ug/L NO Benzoic Acid ug/L 120 Aniline ug/L NO NO 4 Chloroaniline ug/L NO Dibenzofuran ug/L NO NO 2 Nitroaniline ug/L NO NO 3 Nitroaniline ug/L NO NO • 4 Nitroaniline ug/L NO NO NO Carbazole ug/L NO 2 6 Dichlorophenol ug/L NO NO Pyridine ug/L ND ND ND ND 2 3 4 6 Tetrachlorophenol u9/L ND 2 3 5 6 Tetrachlorophenol ug/L ND ND Butyl Benzyl Phthalate ug/L 32 ND Bis 2 Ethylhexyl Phthalate ug/L ND ND 1 2 Dibromomethane ug/L ND ND Styrene ug/L ND Trichloroethene ug/L ND cis 1 2 Dichloropropene ug/L ND trans 1 2 Dichloropropene ug/L ND cis 1 3 Dichloropropene ug/L ND trans 1 3 Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1 Chloronaphthalate ug/L ND 2 Chloronaphthalate ug/L ND Diphenylamine ug/L ND 1 2 Diphenylhydrazine ug/L ND Benzyl Chloride ug/L ND Carbon Disulfide ug/L ND trans 14 Dichloro 2 Butane ug/L ND Diethyl ether ug/L ND Hexachlorobutadiene ug/L ND Hexachloroethane ug/L ND lodomethane ug/L Methyl Butyl Ketone ug/L 12 2 Propanol ug/L ND n Propylbenzene ug/L ND ND • APPENDIX P Sanitary Survey Report t State of Florida Department of Health Broward County Health Department Community Water Treatment Plant SANITARY SURVEY REPORT Plant Name CITY OF DANIA BEACH PWS ID: 4060253 Plant Location 1201 STIRLING RD,DANIA BEACH,FL 33004 Phone 954-924-3747 Owner Name CITY OF DANIA BEACH Phone 954-924-3747 Owner Address 100 W Dania Beach Blvd. Dania Beach, FL 33004 Contact Person JAMES M. BAKER This Survey Date: 04/10/2002 Last Survey Date: 07/12/1999 Population Served 10,335 RAW WATER SOURCE Service Connections 4,533 X Ground(How many wells? 2 ) SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS Surface(source ) Mobil Homes; Business: Family homes; Hotels; Condos X Purchased from(PWS ID Broward County ) Comments TREATMENT PROCESSES IN USE •Aeration,Chlorination,filtration,lime soft.,setiling, AUXILIARY POWER SOURCE Blended phosp and 8% silica Total Power Load of Plant: 350 KW (Attach power analysis report) Certified Operators&Certification Class-Number Identify Standby Source(s): Jim Baker-B-0027873 Dan Cherial-B-006808 Generator Kerry Roman-C-007873 Bob Maxon-C-002810 Nunzio Nevola-C-007869 Capacity of Standby Generator(s)(kw): 350 KW Switchover: FX—1 Auto F]Manual Hrs. Operated Under Load/mo.(wk.)? 4 Hrs./Mo. O&M Log: Yes No What equipment can be operated by the generator(s)? Well Pump(s): GPM Average Daily Flow: 2.4 MGD X High Service Pump(s): 3,000 GPM Maximum Daily Flow: 2.7MGD X Treatment Equipment: All treatment equipment Design Capacity: 3.0 MGD Storage Capacity: 627,000 Diesel Fuel Storage 4,000 Comments: Elevated tank 250,000 Containment Yes Clearwells 376,000 Does it satisfy'/2 max-demand? Yes Hydropneumatic tank 10,000 INTERCONNECTIONS (SYSTEMS &SIZES) 3-6"Hollywood------1-10"Ft.Lauderdale • 1-12"Broward County Comments: 303-EE/3 BCHD(11/96) Page 1 of 6 i PWS ID 4060253 Date 04/11/2002 • GROUND WATER SOURCES WELL:NUMBER' :, G H s.Year Drilled! 1976 1976 Depth'Drilled 65' 69' "Drilling Method Cable Cable Type"of Grout N/S N/S Static>Wateit6vel 1.8' 1.8' Pumping:W"ater Level Design, Well',Yteld 2500GPM 1500GPM Actual Yield' 1300GPM 1200GPM .Screen(Type%.Material); Galv. Cone Galv. Cone Length:of Outside4Casing; 58' 58' Diameter of Out side'Casing 18" 18" Material'of_Qutsidetaasm' Steel Steel Well.Contamination History N/A N/A Is Inundation of Well'Possible? NO NO 6' x 6' x4"Concrete"Pad? = ' YES YES WELL Septic Tanks NO NO ET Surface Water NO NO ACKS Other SanitaryHazard(s) NO NO PUMP Type Vertical Turbine Vertical Turbine Rated-Capacity 2300GPM 2100GPM Motor HP 60HP 20HP Well Casing'12"above grade? YES YES W611 Casing,Sanitary Seal'. YES YES Raw Water Sampling tap,' YES YES Pressure Gauge YES YES Check Valu Value I Shut,Off e ~' YES YES Flow Meter;;r r " YES YES Fence:/Housing YES YES Well"Vent Protection " YES YES Maintenance Schedule YES YES *Attach additional copies of this page as needed Comments: • 303-EE/3 BCHD(11/96) Page 2 of 6 r PWS ID 4060253 Date 04/11/2002 PLANT EQUIPMENT RATION: FILTRATION ype Cascade Capacity 2100 GPM Type of Unit : Gravity Aerator Condition Good Size D-18.6'-H9' No. of Units 4 Hydraulic Overload NO Length of Filter Runs 72 Hrs Bloodworm Pressure NO Type of Filter Media Multi-media Algae/Slime/Plant Growth NO Media Visible Yes Clean After BW Yes Protective Screen Yes IX No Filter Rate 1050 GPM Each BW Rate 4500 GPM Comments Filter Capacity 18,000 Gals Surface Wash Operable Yes Cracks/Cementation/Channeling No Corrosion Minimal Algae Growth No LIME SOFTENING/COAGULATION: Turbidity in Clearwell .08NTY Chemicals Used: Slaked Lime,Polymer(Nalcuvear 8173 Head Loss Gauge Yes Pulz Sampling Taps: Yes Unit Capacity 2100GPM Comments Sludge Blanket Appearance Good Excessive Carry-Over No Corrosion Minimal MEMBRANE SOFTENING/REVERSE OSMOSIS: Algae Growth No Make N/A Pressure Recarbonation Yes X No No. of Modules Permeate Capacity(MGD) Sludge Recirculation Used Yes X❑No Blend Ratio&Type *Recycle of Decanted Backwash Water X❑Yes No Chemicals Used Comments: Containment Waste-to-Product Ratio Pre-Treatment Post-Treatment ION EXCHANGE: Waste Disposal Site/Method Make N/A Model IW Permit#/Expiration Date Capacity Comments: Grade of Salt for Regeneration Backwash Effluent Destination Comments: FLUORIDATION: Chemical Used HFS Strength 20-25% Containment Yes Corrosion No Feeder Type LMI Pumps Scale/Recorder Yes STABILIZATION: Ventilation: High Level X Cross Effluent S.I. +.8 pH Control Yes Bulk Storage Tank/Day Tank Vented Outside Yes Chemical Used SlaKd Lime Analytical Testing Equipment(Type) Orion model 720A Injection Point At head of plant Anti-siphon Valves Yes Comments: Residual Range .08 To 1.0 Point of Application Ahead of filters Emergency Eyewash Yes Deluge Shower Yes Protective Clothing Yes Comments: ADDITIVES: Meet NSF 60&61 YES 303-EE/3 BCHD(11/96) Page 3 of 6 t PWS ID 4060253 Date 04/11/2002 PLANT EQUIPMENT WHLORINATION: AMMONINATIONS: N/A Type: X❑ Gas Xa Hypochlorite Make Capacity Make W&T Capacity 500 GPD Injection Points C 12 Feed Rate 11 PPM Sprinkler Points Average amount of C 12 gas used/day 60lb-200GPD Hypo Comments: C12 Residuals: Plant .5/3 Remote .2/2.5 Remote Tap Location Argonaut Isle DPD Test Kit on Site: Yes Injection Points: Pre-Interim-Clear Wells OTHER TASTE/ODOR CONTROL PROCESSES Comments: Explain: N/A CHLORINE GAS USE s REQUIREMENTS :` YES COMMENTS Dual System X Auto-Switchover X Loss of Chlorination Alarm X qF Scale X Chained Cylinders X Adding 2- 150 lb cylinders by June 2002 Reserve Supply X Adequate Air-Pak X Sign of Leaks X Leak Alarm Fresh Ammonia X Corrosion X Low Level&Cross Ventilation X Room Lighting X Warning Signs X Repair Kits/Spare Parts X Fitted Wrench X Housing/Protection X Chlorine Scrubbers X Additional Comments: • 303-EE/3 BCHD(11/96) Page 4 of 6 i PWS ID 4060253 Date 04/11/2002 HIGH SERVICE PUMPS Pump`,Number ype.' Capacity.(GPM)' Motor HP ' Date.Installed Maintenance #1 US Motors 500 30 1997 Monthly #2 US Motors 1000 60 1998 Monthly #3 US Motors 1000 60 1998 Monthly #4 US Motors 500 30 1998 Monthly Comments: i STORAGE FACILITIES (C) Clearwell (E) Elevated (G) Ground Hydropneumatic Tank Type'Number C E H Capacity(MG) , .377 MG 250,000 MG .010 MG Material Concrete Steel Steel Gravity Drain k, None Yes Yes By-'pass Piping Yes Yes Yes Physical Condihori „ Good Poor Good Pressure Gauge ,,, ; Yes Yes Yes Sight G1asslLevei'Indtcatar Yes No No Covered/Screened Openings , Yes NO NO Datejof Lasf;Cleanng !992 Unknown 1992 Safety Rail &Ladder N/A Yes No Height to Bgttorn of Elev"Tank ,a 2' 98, N/A Height to'Ivaxunuin Water Level 14' 140 N/A Access PadlockedF Yes Yes N/A 303-EE13 BCHD(11/96) Page 5 of 6 PWS ID 4060253 Date 04/11/2002 Written STRIBUTION.SYSTEM COMPLIANCE MONITORING Cross-Connection Program X❑Yes No System is in full compliance with: Material of Mains Cast Iron----C900 PVC Yes No Operation Pressure 52Psi to 70 Psi Bacteriological X Maximum Pipe Diameter 16" Inorganic Chemicals X Minimum Pipe Diameter 2" VOC's X How Often Flushed Twice per year Pesticides/PCB's X Number of Fire Hydrants 262 THM's X Schedule for Super-chlorination Twice per year Radiological X PLANT LABORATORY Turbidity X CAPABILITY Yes No Secondaries X Bacteriological X Other Inorganies X Organics X Radiological X Turbidity X Violation of Sampling Requirements: pH X NONE Iron X Color X Hardness X Alkalinity X Chlorides X Chlorine Type( ) X Fluorides X Violation of Maximum Contaminant Levels: Stability X NONE Marble Tests X Jar Tests X Other: Person in charge of Laboratory and his/her credentials No certified chemist on-site The following deficiencies are noted,with recommended corrective action: (If none,write "none" in this space). DEFICIENCY REGULATION PERTAINING RECOMMENDED ACTION Inspector's Signature Date Title Approved by Date 303-EE/3 BCHD(11/96) Page 6 of 6 APPENDIX Q Partial List of Potential Sources of Contamination Found in Wellhead Protection Areas and in Watersheds Office of EPA Ground Water and Office of Witter Drinking Water Appendix E: Partial List of Potential Sources of Contamination Found in Wellhead Protection Areas and in Watersheds Introduction Appendix E gives specific examples of potential sources of contamination.Under section 1453 states may,but are not required to, inventory all of these potential sources of contamination. Depending on the local situation,the following potential sources may or may not be significant potential sources. Appendix E should be used in conjunction with Appendix F. The stars(*)indicate sources of microbial contaminants. Agriculture not applicable Crop-related sources Irrigated crop production ® Non-irrigated crop production Specialty crop production(e.g.,horticulture,citrus, nuts,fruits) Grazing-related sources* Pasture grazing-riparian and/or upland* Pasture grazing-riparian* Pasture grazing-upland* Range grazing-riparian and/or upland* Range grazing-riparian* Range grazing-upland* Intensive animal feeding operations* Concentrated animal feeding operations(CAFOs;permitted;PS)* Confined animal feeding operations(NPS)* Aquaculture* Atmospheric deposition data unavailable Collection system failure no current overflow scenarios applicable Combined sewer overflow*not applicable Construction Highway/road/bridge construction not applicable in vicinity of wells Land development not applicable in vicinity of wells Contaminated sediments not applicable in vicinity of wells (Debris and bottom deposits not applicable in vicinity of wells Domestic wastewater lagoon* not applicable in vicinity of wells Erosion from derelict land not applicable in vicinity of wells Groundwater loadings not applicable in vicinity of wells Groundwater withdrawal Cuity's wells are only known or permitted groundwater withdrawal—See App. C Habitat modification(other than hydromodification)not applicable in vicinity of wells Removal of riparian vegetation Bank or shoreline modification/destabilization Drainage/filling of wetlands Highway maintenance and runoff not applicable in vicinity of wells Hydromodification not applicable in vicinity of wells Channelization Dredging Dam construction Upstream impoundment Flow regulations/modification Industrial Point Sources Major industrial point sources not applicable in vicinity of wells Minor industrial point sources one business monitored in vicinity of wells Internal nutrient cycling(primarily lakes)not applicable in vicinity of wells Land disposal not applicable in vicinity of wells Sludge* Wastewater* Landfills* Inappropriate waste disposal/wildcat dumping* Industrial land treatment Onsite wastewater systems(septic tanks)* Hazardous waste Septage disposal* Leaking underground storage tanks not applicable in vicinity of wells Marinas and recreational boating not applicable in vicinity of wells In-water releases* On-land releases* Municipal point sources*not applicable in vicinity of wells Major Municipal Point Sources-dry and/or wet weather discharges* Major Municipal Point Sources-dry weather discharges* Major Municipal Point Sources-wet weather discharges* Minor Municipal Point Sources-dry and/or wet weather discharges* Minor Municipal Point Sources-dry weather discharges* Minor Municipal Point Sources-wet weather discharges* Package plants(small flows)* Natural sources(e.g.,arsenic,radon,wildlife)* no data to support any impacts from these sources Other n/a Recreation and tourism activities(other than boating)not applicable in vicinity of wells Golf courses Resource extraction not applicable in vicinity of wells Surface mining Subsurface mining Placer mining Dredge mining Petroleum activities Mill tailings Mine tailings Acid mine drainage Abandoned mining ® Inactive mining Salt storage sites not applicable in vicinity of wells Sediment resuspension not applicable in vicinity of wells Sewer lines(leaking)*not data to indicate concern in vicinity of wells—pipelines tend to infiltrate,not exfiltrate Silviculture not applicable in vicinity of wells Harvesting, restoration,residue management Forest management(e.g.,pumped drainage,fertilization,pesticide application) Logging road construction/maintenance Silvicultural point sources Sources outside state jurisdiction or borders*not applicable Spills(accidental)*none known in vicinity of wells Unknown source*none known in vicinity of wells Urban runoff/storm sewers* Nonindustrial permitted*not applicable in vicinity of wells Industrial permitted*not applicable in vicinity of wells Other urban runoff*limited roadway runoff in ditches on side of road in vicinity of wells ® Illicit connections/illegal hookups/dry weather flows*not known in vicinity of wells Highway/road/bridge runoff not applicable in vicinity of wells Erosion and sedimentation not applicable in vicinity of wells Waste storage/storage tank leaks(above ground)*not applicable in vicinity of wells NOTE: EPA's 305(b)guidance also asks states to identify major sources of contamination of waters designated for drinking water supply use. States are urged to coordinate their source water and 305(b)information and programs. APPENDIX R MOT Project FEDERAL HIGHWAY (US-1) DRAINAGE STUDY FOR CITY OF DANIA BEACH BROWARD COUNTY, FLO DA REPORT `k -1 13 --------------- m- f5 ' Y w _4oy. Prepared by: Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc. �y Engineers Surveyors Planners 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 Phone: 954.921.7781 Fax: 954921.8807 CGA Project No. 99-0183 October 2001 y ,c • . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A study was conducted for the City of Dania Beach to identify the impact of Federal Highway stormwater runoff on the low-lying residential areas east of Federal Highway, from Sheridan Street north to East Dania Beach Boulevard. The study area was divided into the drainage basins contributing runoff to the low-laying residential areas between Federal Highway and Southeast 5th Avenue. Each of the drainage basins outfalls was analyzed to determine its hydraulic performance and the impact on the City's existing drainage system. �v8 The study indicated that nine of the existing drainage outfalls from Federal Highway east contribute to the internal drainage infrastructure in the eastern portion of the City. ,Y Based on the hydraulic evaluation of the existing drainage system it is recommended that the Federal Highway drainage system outfalls and the City drainage system be separated. 0111 The discharge from the Federal Highway system is proposed to be diverted into drainage wells at the following locations: o SE 3rd Terrace o SE 4t' Street o SE 5 h Street S SE 6`h Street o SE 110' Street v SE 13''Terrace To comply with the stormwater quality requirements it is proposed to provide the pollution retardant structures designed for the 90 seconds detention time. In addition, the design of the proposed drainage wells will provide the 1" of specific capacity for each well. Each of the proposed improvements was evaluated separately to provide the City of A Dania Beach and the Florida Department of Transportation the flexibility to implement the improvements depending on the availability of funds in a fiscal year. } The engineer's opinion of probable construction cost of the proposed improvements is $940,000.00. ;.. i Federal Highway Drainage Study e October 2001 v Cabin.Giordano€Associates.Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engineers Surveyors Planners TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Appendixes List of Tables all List of Figures l. Introduction 2. Methodology 2.1 General Approach 2.1.1 Data Collection 2.1.2 Engineering Analysis 2.1.3 Proposed Improvements 2.2 Assumptions a 3.0 Study Results 3.1 Drainage Basin £z 3.2 Proposed Improvements 3.3 Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost ist rc v Federal Highway Drainage Study e ©' 11 October 2001 ® Caivn.Giordano 6 Associates.Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 .e EnBoetrs Surveyan Platmers LIST OF APPENDIXES Appendix 1 Ground Water Test Data Appendix 2 Existing Drainage Wells Data Appendix 3 Drainage Areas 5 Appendix 4 Drainage Well Design Appendix 5 Routing Data for Proposed Drainage Improvements Appendix 6 Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost v 4 Y� ® X Federal Highway Drainage Study © ill October 2001 o Calvin.Giordano$Associates.Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 ;` F., Engineers Surveyors Planners LIST OF 'TABLES r Table 1 Federal Highway Drainage Area South Table 2 Federal Highway Drainage Area North Table 3 Drainage Well Design -SE 3`d Terrace Table 4 Drainage Well Design-SE 4`h Street It Table 5 Drainage Well Design-SE 5th Street Table 6 Drainage Well Design-SE 6th Street Table 7 Drainage Well Design-SE 11`h Street *h Table 8 Drainage Well Design-SE 13`h Terrace Table 9 Routing Data- SE Yd Terrace Table 10 Routing Data- SE 4th Street Table 11 Routing Data- SE 5th Street Table 12 Routing Data- SE 6th Street r` Table 13 Routing Data- SE 1 lth Street Table 14 Routing Data- SE 13th Terrace Table 15 Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost- SE 3rd Terrace Table 16 Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost- SE 4th Street Table 17 Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost - SE 51h Street Table 18 Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost- SE 6th Street Table 19 Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost- SE 1 lth Street Table 20 Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost- 5E 13th Terrace r�3 1V Federal Highway Drainage Study October 2001 CGA Project No.99-0183 C".Giordano S Associates.Inc. =r` '�' � �-� Eng�an Surveyors Planners LIST OF FIGURES Figure I Location Maps Figure 2 Proposed Drainage Well Locations Figure 3 Pollution Retardant Structure Figure 4 Drainage Well Section Federal Highway Drainage Study v October 2001 , Calvin.Giordano S Associates,Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engin ts Surveyors Planners 1. INTRODUCTION y; City of Dania Beach is located on the Intracoastal Waterway, and encompasses approximately eight and half square miles. The City extends from the Dania Cut-off- Canal south to Sheridan Street east of Federal Highway and Stirling Road, SW 33`d Court and Griffin Road west of Federal Highway. The City also extends west from West Lake to SW 12d'Avenue south of Stirling Road and as far as SW 351h Avenue north of Stirling Road. Several major highways and arterial roads as well as F.E.C. and S.C.L. railroad tracks and two primary South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD)canals traverse the City. Figure 1 presents the City limits, major communication arterials, drainage basins and the study area. The study area is located in the drainage Basin 5 which is most impacted by storm events due to its very low elevations. There is a great deal of drainage facilities within this basin, however, limited discharge impacts the study area during the more severe storm events. w o identify the impact of Federal Highway on the low-lying The purpose of this study as t d fY p � Y Y g residential areas east of Federal Highway and The study included data collected from the Florida Department of Transportation and the extensive field survey of the existing drainage structures. Federal Highway Drainage Study c' S 1 October 2001 Calvin.Giordano b Associates.Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 yy "- Engkwrs Surveyors Planners 94„ 7-- ------------------ LL t EAST DANIA BEACH BLVD. ��LMT OF J --------------------------------- DRAINAGE STUDY Ld > L) z a. ai Lu 0- a. 6 - 3 :i z 3 L'i LLI LLI 0 Z) D w w w< < K z II M 0 z UA 0.< a, Lu w a 9 If -K Z ----------- q: 0-. 0 uj C) o D 0 0- w x 0. LLJ 0-ir L'a 0- L) .......-------- 0 lu .-.IERR. 0 S.E 3rp.L. .... ........ > I W> x z -- --------------- ----------- u. L s E-.-- 15 6 6 t 0 L "R" W Li L'i o xw( -w < ST- xz W cr z z Z V)P V)P uj 0 D D c D :5 Ln 0 1 0 M 4 0 n CE u-)of (D W 7x R ........_ w F- w Z z w z Lj Lj Lj Z u) WI0 0 .0 .0 0 a (f)U L) V)0 V)L) 6 vi L) W dn Lu LLJ 30- 36' ------------- ----------- T, 61 �z 4 L'i v v 4 Li J loth., ---------------- If fill S.E,jlth. -- -------- ---------- --------- .............. ............................ -------------- ............ LIANT OF SHERIDAN STREET DRAINAGE STUDY j I V,IV W:WLt 100Z/90/Lk '6mp-�'-01j\s6uimoj(]\ApnjS abouioj(] o!uo(] y�M66\sPPfOid\:d 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1. GENERAL APPROACH The procedure to develop this study consisted of three phases: Phase 1. Data Collection • Define the study area and identify drainage basins. • Identify and locate the existing drainage facilities. a Outline characteristics of at the drainage basins. Phase 2. Engineering Analysis o Compile drainage basins data. ® Identify problem areas. Phase 3. Proposed Improvements ® Define the required improvements. ® Schedule of the proposed improvements ® Prepare engineers opinion of probable construction cost 2.1.1 DATA COLLECTION The data collection phase involved a number of tasks, which were required to gather and compile information for the existing drainage analysis and preliminary hydraulic evaluation. ® Define the study area and identify drainage basins. The study area was defined as the right-of-way of Federal Highway from Sheridan Street north to Dania Beach Boulevard. The study area was broken down to identify the existing drainage basins corresponding to the existing drainage patterns and the outfall locations. The study area is limited to 12.66 acres within Federal Highway right-of-way. ® Identify and locate the existing drainage facilities. Information regarding the existing drainage facilities for the City of Dania Beach was identified through field survey and as-built plans obtained from Florida Department of Transportation,District 4. • Characteristics of the study area. The City of Dania Beach along Federal Highways corridor consists of mainly commercial, industrial and office sites. a; 3 Federal Highway Drainage Study October 2001 © 4 Calvin.Giordano S Associates,Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engineers Surveyors Planners I The north portion of Federal Highway storm sewer system consists of mostly 15" to 24" diameter gravity systems. These systems discharging to the east contributing to the ponding of the low laying areas throughout eastern portion of the City. The south portion of Federal Highway storm sewer system consists of the interconnected gravity system and exfiltration trenches. This system also has the outfalls discharging to the east, contributing to the ponding in the eastern portion of the City. 2.1.2 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS phase consists of assembling the collected data, performing The engineering analysisp g P g evaluation of the existing drainage flow patterns, hydraulic evaluation of the existing drainage outflows from Federal Highway to the east, and evaluation of the flooding record of the study area. o Compile drainage basins data. The information collected from field survey and as-built are transform into a data base including drainage areas, runoff coefficients and time of concentration. This information together with the drainage basins characteristics and hydrologic data is then used in the routing calculation to analyze the existing discharge rates at the Federal Highway outfalls. ® Identify problem areas. The problem areas are identified based on the evaluation of the drainage area characteristics, the analysis of the existing Federal Highway drainage system and the flooding record of the study area. The study area ground elevation varies from 10.0' NGVD at Federal Highway to about 4.50' NGVD at SE 2nd Avenue. The area east of SE 2nd Avenue is most impacted by storm events due to its low elevations. Any flow reduction from the Federal Highway drainage system presently discharging into the City drainage system will provide flood relief for this area. 2.1.3 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT'S • Define the required improvements. The proposed drainage improvements shall decrease the rate of the stormwater discharge from the Federal Highway into the existing City of Dania Beach drainage system. The proposed drainage improvements must provide the required level of service for Federal Highway and increase the existing local drainage system efficiency. 4 Federal Highway Drainage Study ® October 2001 Calvin,Giadaw€Associates,Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 f`„Engmeers Surveyors Planners ® Schedule of the proposed improvements. To allow the City of Dania Beach and the Florida Department of Transportation a -= flexible schedule to implement the proposed improvements, each of the proposed improvements is evaluated as a separate component. The City and the Florida Department of Transportation can choose to complete a part or all of the proposed drainage improvements. ® Engineers opinion of probable construction cost. Similar to the proposed improvements schedule, the engineers opinion of probable construction cost for each of the proposed improvement is presented as a separate component. Depending on the availability of funds in a fiscal year the City and the Florida Department of Transportation can choose to complete a part or all of the proposed drainage improvements. i .k a 5 Federal Highway Drainage Study October 2001 ®® Calvin.Giordano b Associates.Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engineers Surveyors Planners ins. 2.2 ASSUMPTION r The following assumption and data were used to prepare this report: • Ground water elevation: Wet season water table elevation of 2.40 feet NGVD (based on the FDOT Project No. 86010-3539, dated 1976, for Federal Highway). v Rainfall data: FDOT Zone 10 • Storm event: Frequency—3 year Duration— 1 hour Time of concentration - 10 min Intensity—6.81"/hr • Ground water test: The salinity and T.D.S. tests were performed by Severn Trent Services. Location of the test—NE corner of the intersection of SE 5`h Street and SE 2°d Avenue. Tested Chloride content— 10,750 mg/L Tested Total dissolved solid (DTS) content—23,180 mg/L For the ground water test results please refer to Appendix 1 ` • Drainage well design: The available drainage well specific capacity for the project site is obtained from the as-built data for the FDOT Federal Highway Project No. 86010-3539 (1987). The preliminary specific drainage well capacities for the study are calculated to be in the range of the well tested specific capacities for the above referenced project. This project included ten drainage wells with the tested specific capacity ranging from 570 GPM to 1,100 GPM per foot of head. For details please refer to Appendix 2. ` 6 Federal Highway Drainage Study October 1001 n Cahan.Giordano$Associates,hw. CGA Project No.99-0I83 Engineers Surveyors Planners 3. STUDY RESULTS 3.1 DRAINAGE BASIN The Federal Highway drainage areas have been delineated to reflect the existing roadway drainage patterns and the existing outfall locations. The existing drainage outfall locations and corresponding drainage areas are presented in Appendix 3, Tables 1 and 2. ® Federal Highway drainage system- south. The existing gravity drainage system for this portion of Federal Highway extends from Arthur Street south of Sheridan Street to SE 7`h Street. The roadway high point at SW 10 Street separates the drainage areas to the south and north. The Federal Highway drainage area to the north contributes 3.67 acres to the City of Dania Beach drainage system. This portion of Federal Highway has two outfalls discharging to the east: -SE 13`h Terrace, -SE 1 lth Street(the actual discharge is into the existing section of the exfiltration trench). Table 1 represents drainage area data for the portion of Federal Highway located south of SE 7`h Street. ® Federal Highway drainage system-north. The portion of Federal Highway north of SE 7`h Street consists of the seven separate contributing areas and outfalls discharging to the eastern portion of the City. Four of the existing outfalls impact the area between Federal Highway and SE 5�' Avenue in the City of Dania Beach: -SE 6th Street -SE 5`h Street -SE 4th Street -SE P Terrace For Federal Highway north of SE 7�h Street drainage area data,please refer to Table 2. 7#r << � 7 Federal Highway Drainage Study October 2001 d CGA Project No.99-0183 ry Cahiin.Giordano 5 Associates.Inc. � ' Engineers Surveyors PlanrKrs i• 3.2 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The study has revealed that the existing Federal Highway drainage system impacts the local storm sewer system in the eastern portion of the City, between SE 2nd and SE 5`h Avenues. To provide flood relief for this section of the City it is proposed to separate the existing Federal Highway outfalls from the City's drainage system. After analyzing topography of the area, the existing drainage systems hydraulic performance and the boundary condition of the drainage basin, it is proposed to utilize drainage wells to intercept the discharge from the Federal Highway outfalls to the east. The locations of the proposed drainage wells intercepting the stormwater runoff from the Federal Highway are as follows: p' ® SE 13d' Terrace -2 wells • SE 1 Ith Street -2 wells • SE 6 h Street - 1 well ® SE 5 h Street - 1 well e SE 4 h Street - 2 wells ® SE 3rd Terrace - 1 well Locations of the proposed drainage wells are presented in Figure 2. The existing local drainage system will be separated from the Federal Highway and will operate independently. The stormwater runoff from Federal Highway will be intercepted by the existing catch basins and convey through the existing pipe system to a proposed pollution retardant structure with a baffle. The proposed structure must comply with required stormwater quality (providing 90-seconds detention time for the design runoff) and also serve as a grease and silt interceptor. The stormwater runoff from the proposed pollution retardant structure will be conveyed into the proposed 24-inch diameter i. drainage well(s). The proposed drainage wells must provide 1" minimum specific capacities. 8 Federal Highway Drainage Study October 2001 Calves.Giordano 5 Associates.Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engineers Surveyors Planners a r ® a o o -iOL o v) �i 0mQ Zm zz_I z _j I I I � I z hJ• �, 3Ad 41L 3 N 41L ,a 1 4 3 N1 I -- LO � I- 'tll 111U11 , �I l _ _3Ad 419 `i I �fIF;7 i.. J I2 a� I � l < W w <G m Ali Ii [lt �t =IJu VIP �n�p�y��p ' �lf. <i 0 v, , mlt �..PA18 X �GA1 Ala Y'fL3�d '41Z1 'M's u. z V'' IIII���^' oa Npiae� ; I � ell 5). all � !r odoalroa 1 o s i l y- Ulll�il it oa aoomsN3nva .. I w i IL �!i rj I' f Il t, lh� i41 I` L �i fil5 [ —J�� "-� :1— ...I � ❑1 iff �aai Ms vi LIIJ�IIII �(�_ asiavd .3Ad.416Z 'MS FIT- 0 m 41noS - I� L-41 r I 0 Wd 4'S:lb 11 100Z/SO/ll '6mp t_ojj\sbulmoj0\ApnjS a6ouloJ0 oluoa M066\S1*OJd\:d The preliminary design of the proposed drainage wells is based on the result of the = salinity and Total Dissolved Solids tests performed on the project site by Severn Trent Service, and the available well specific capacity depicted from the as-built record data. Based on the salinity test data, the required head allowance for the project is estimated to be 1.43 ft—corresponding to the chloride content of 10,750 mg/L. The design capacity of the drainage well depends on the available hydraulic head. The field survey data has revealed that the Federal Highway elevations range from 9.50' to 10.50' NGVD. At SE 2"d Avenue, the roadway grade elevations drop to 4.50' NGVD. The design ground water elevation for the project site is estimated to be 2.40' NGVD. The grade elevation at the SE 2"d Avenue creates a condition of marginal head for the drainage wells. At this location, the effective head would be 0.67 ft, based on the assumption that the rim elevation is set at 4.50' NGVD and there is no a free board. wells articular) the drainage well specific capacity is based on The design of drainage , particularly g P the local drilling experience. Appendix 2 provides drainage well design data depicted from the previous FDOT project. Presented data refer to the drainage wells constructed in the City of Hollywood section of Federal Highway. The project has consisted of ten drainage wells with the tested specific capacities ranging from 570 to 1,100 G.P.M per feet of head. The location of the proposed drainage wells is the key factor concerning wells hydraulic performance and the design capacities. The grade elevation variance between Federal Highway and SE 2"d Avenue have the major impact on the wells design effective head and the design capacities. Based on the design ground water elevation of 2.40' NGVD, the design effective head at the Federal Highway would be 6.17 ft, but at SE 2"d Avenue, the design effective head would be only 0.67 ft (assuming that the wells are designed with no free board). The proposed drainage wells located near Federal Highway would have the design capacities greater that at the location of SE 2"d Avenue (based on the gravity head). Taking this fact into consideration it is recommended to locate the proposed drainage wells as close as possible to Federal Highway. 1 The design data for the proposed drainage wells is presented in the summary table. Appendix 4 (Tables 3 through 8)provides the design data for each of the proposed wells. Figure 3 presents a pollution retardant structure and Figure 4 presents a drainage well typical section. Appendix 5 (Tables 9 through 14) presents the routing data for the proposed drainage systems. 10 Federal Highway Drainage Study ® T October 2001 Cakin.Giordano 8 Associates.Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engin s Surveyors Planners ----- -------------------------i a i i ----- -------------------------� 94- PLAN 1- M.H. RIM FREE BOARD WEIR P.R.B. TO DRAINAGE— —� DMW=2.40 WELL 00 — FROM FEDERAL HIGHWAY � N L1 L SECTION POLUTION RETARDANT STRUCTURE FEDERAL HIGHWAY (US-1) s� �`ph �` LN. T. S. 99-0183am� Sam ow DRAINAGE STUDY FOR FIG.3 n�m same CITY OF DANIA BEACH �'m oaE wD osa�¢.rrm �cn�ax� 01—DRN OF USF 310-A RING AND BOLTED COVER W/ POLYTHELENE WATER TITE INSERT. 4" DRAIN SEAL OPENING WITH HOLE 2.40 N.G.V.D. 2 IA. EPDXY GROUT (TYP.) NC > •� FROM POLLUTION oU2 2 0 RETARDANT STRUCTURE 0 0 c ou-i 2, 0" OO uu- Z "v W SEAL OPENING WITH 00 p EPDXY GROUT (TYP.) ui V U o 0 a- L-j w BOTTOM OF SLAB c<i Z 24" STEEL PIPE w w z o oz END OF PIPE � w - QU o OPEN HOLE _ o N i Il� BOTTOM OF WELL DRAINAGE WELL SECTION !i ammo S die. FEDERAL I'IIGH�lAY SUS-11 " ►w F e N. T. S. 99-0183 law in"on" DaftNo DRAINAGE STUDY I FIG.4 '@""°aw4 "norms m18 CITY O� DA�IA BEACH oxass r eoa►ra 02—DRN ► j U U N cccc, v M oMQ Cq Q Z Z r r T r T z F- ('� V N O to tD N N N LL r 00 CD w d U Co 0) CD Co T oQ v r z F- IL) Q a N � � cMD ti. w w n, a. (� m Ln r` M f` r`. o u) U w > o V Q LL ti � ct N w w '� �t ch d d m ti L1. LL w LLI } U w > U. Mv, T Mv, Co � v O T cn J Z Q U) I_ ^ O O O O O O w Z a1 ti ti N' QEcn J pf J W J W O T N N C r r V w � Z U a J .-. Z w 0 s�V N N N N Itt N 0 � v w 0 N w ('} O Qi t` Cn C Cq WZ T O O c0 00 cc LL LL O cnCDU. w to N N z U CO to tD C: r r. z r r a w Q � LO r- to Co Co QT T T O r T w w (� v F- F- F- w a cc M w ccw V Fw-- l% N N s OV +. .., I J C7 � Ln tD T r w w._ w w w LLJ c u) c u) cn N 13 Federal Highway Drainage Study October 2001 m t_ahin,Giordano S Associates,Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engkmm Surveyors Planners s #I: 3.3 ENGINEERS OPINION ON PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST The engineers opinion of probable construction cost of the proposed drainage improvements is presented in the summary table, and a line item estimate for each of the separate drainage outfall improvement cost are presented in Appendix 6 (Table 15 through 20). I� �5[ F' i*h ys Federal Highway Drainage Study 14 October 2001 ' m CGA Project No.99-0183 Cahn.Giordano S Associates.Inc. * ' Engineers %rveyas Planners ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY 3� Drainage Location Improvement Cost SE 3rd Terrace $141,111 SE 4th Street $190,374 SE 5th Street $141,111 SE 6th Street $128,547 SE 11th Street $142,367 "$ SE 13th Terrace $194,341 Total Cost $937,851 15 Federal Higlnvay Drainage Study October 2001 - „ Cabin,Giordano 3 Assoaates,loe. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engaseers Surveyors Plantxrs— APPENDIX I GROUND WATER TEST DATA Federal Highway Drainage Study October 2001 Cahin.Giordano 9 Associates.Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engineers Surveyors Planners STL Miami CITYOF000156 Page 1 September 4 2001 Mr. James Baker City of Dania c/o Water Plant Submission /i 108001612Order#212675 100 West Dania Beach Boulevard FDEP C 212675 #/990102 Dania, FL 33004 FL-DOH Certification## E86349, 86413, 86565 Site Location/Project Sample I.D.: #I-105Ft S.E. 5th. St. & 2nd. Ave. Collected: 08/31/01 10:00 Chlorides + TDS Received: 08/31/01 15:00- Collected by: J. Baker ARAMETER RESULT UNITS METHOD DETECTION DATE DATE ANALYST LIMIT-RQL EXT. ANALY, Residue,Total Filterable(TDS) 23180 mg/L SM2540C(160.1) 1.0 09/04/2001 09/04/2001 SMF hloride 10750 mg/L 300.0 1.0 09/02/2001 09/02/2001 1L ***BDL: Indicates Analyte is Below Detection Limit***MEDF: Matrix Effected Dilution Factor*** ***Work Subcontracted to Outside Labs Denoted by HRS Cert ID in Analyst Field*** ***Qualifier following result conforms to FAC 62-160 Table 7******Unless otherwise noted, mg/Kg denotes wet weight*** ***62-770: If the MDL using the most sensitive and currently available technology is higher than a specific criterion, PQL shall be used. Hoe s:Al.=#/41180, Ct.=01-10217, Ks.=1/E270 + E1245, Ky.=#f90087, La.=##9601, Md.=#/271, Ma.=##M-FL535 ND.=##R 163, OK.=##9523, SC.=1#96023, Tn.=##TN02826 Author oratory Management Y; 3" �i •r R! a r"' K= 10200 11SA Today Way• Miramar.FL 33025 • Tel:954 4314550 •800 LAB 8550 • Fax 954 431 1959 • www.sti4nc.com APPENDIX 2 EXISTING DRAINAGE WELLS DATA Federal Highway Drainage Study October 2001 CGA Project No.99-0183 Calvin.Giordano$Associates,Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners PROJECT N0. 86010-3539 U.S. 11 North of Dade-Broward County Line WELIS Structure Plans Plans Plans Salinity Head Effective Correct No. DERM Head Sp. Cap. Corrections Read Sp, Cap ofs fr. GPM ppm Ft. Ft. Gpm 62 4.06 0.95 1918 9100 +0.79 1 .74 1047 63 4.06 1.73 1053 9600 +0.72 2.45 744 68 3.00 0.87 1548 8500 +0.87 1.74 774 69 0.93 1.01 843 9000 +0.80 1.81 231 74 3.25 1.35 1080 8800 +0.83 2.18 669 79 2.63 1.39 849 8700 +0.85 2.24 527 82 3.23 1.30 1115 8500 +0.87 2.17 668 86 3.17 1.68 847 8500 +0.87 2.55 558 90 3.22 0.98 1475 8600 +0.85 1.83 790 91 3.22 0.98 1475 8600 +0.85 1.83 790 tructure Correct Tested TestedAverage Short of Excess of Overall No. Sp-Cap- Sp.Cap. Inch Inch 1" by 1" by Excess ® 22�! Gpin 62 1047 775 0.74 0.88 0. 12 63 744 760 1.02 68 774 1100 1.4" 0.42 69 231 860 3.72 2.39 1.39 74 669 710 1.06� 79 527 670 1.27 0.27 82 668 570 0.85 0.15 86 558 . 670 1.20 0.20 90J 790 930 1.171 1.04 0.04 91 790 710 0.90 0.27 2.32 2.05 APPENDIX 3 DRAINAGE AREAS q. Federal Highway Drainage Study ® October 1001 4 Calvin,Giordano b Associates.Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engineers Surveyors Planners TABLE 1 City of Dania Beach Federal Highway South Interconnected Drainage System Areas Intersection Station US-1 Distance R/W Area Exlfiltration HP LP (Sf) (Ac) Trench (Sta) (Sta.) (ft) (ft) (ft) Arthur Street 154+28.38 15428.0 100 Cleveland Street 157+60.81 15760.8 997.0 80 79760 1.83 1000 McKinley Street 160+93.22 0 Roosevelt Street 164+25.62 16425.0 0 Taft Street 167+59.09 16759.1 998.0 80 79840 1.83 500 Wilson Street 170+90.20 50 Harding Street 174+23.67 17423.0 500 Coolidge Street 177+28.25 17728.25 547.0 80 43760 1.00 500 Scott Street 180+87.50 17970 50 Shenandoah St. 182+59.13 18259.13 520 80 41600 0.96 0 W. Lee Street 184+20.08 500 E. Lee Street 185+81.69 18490 500 W.Thomas St. 187+52.57 18709 510 80 40800 0.94 50 E.Thomas St. 189+20.95 19000 0 Sherman Street 190+85.03 50 Sheridan Street 194+17.28 19417 930 80 74400 1.71 260 SE 15 Street 196+04.83 0 SW 15 Street 197+54.17 0 SE 14 Street 199+29.72 19930 0 SW 14 Street 200+90.96 0 SE;;1:3 Terrace 202+02.90 0 SE 13 Street 204+27.50 20427 722 80 57760 0 SW 13 Street 204+27.93 0 SE 12 Street 206+52.12 20652 0 SW 12 Street 207+64.94 500 SE 11 Street 209+33.15 20933 618 80 49440 1 13. ": 500 SW 11 Street 211+01.71 0 SE 10 Terrace 212+69.89 21270 0 SW 10 Street 214+25.55 0 21520 660 80 52800 21930 Drainage Wells 3.67 1000 Proposed Drainage Well Location ® U to r Q O O � •- r- •- r t0 w to N to N to In M N N M m O w Q (n N tD to Y. !t ICT ICT TT -T M O M O O O 11* M wO M O co CD w a1 U C M O O O O O O N N M O n ONO Cr0 r- O Z C > O o v O o O O O to to ir co of cc o tri o c"+a Q 3: Cl) N N N N CD N N N = O = N E Z O O O o 0 0 ® Wm �. Ch 0LOtri000CD m I- LL a) = d fn 04 N N N � co N C W = Q m •i cc O 00 OO N O O O -a LL !a to h N tO N LOO O N •� -� (n v v tM tO w co r- Oo Q. c N N N N N N N O c a n o o v o 0 0 p� � CV) c tri U � v co aoi co n v o O x N N N N N qT LO to N N co (n r ' O O O O O O J to m d N N LO N N O � co = N N N 00 C O OOp N lOO O tO O tOO n N LOO N t~O O tO + + + + + + + + N N N N N N N co N c c m > a°i a CO aa) 4) m C J !0 � 6 ld N N In N N LU APPENDIX 4 DRAINAGE WELLS DESIGN Gl Federal Highway Drainage Study October 2001 o Calvin,Giordano Associates,Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engineers Surveyors Planners TABLES 3 THROUGH 8 PRESENT THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE WELLS DESIGN DATA 0 Federal High-way Drainage Study October 2001 Cahin,Giordano S Associates,Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engineers Surveyors Planners TABLE 3 LOCATION �� �` SE f 3 xd TERRACE _ ' A = 1.42 Ac - CW = 0.90 WELL DESIGN WELLv DA',PA..d_-�_��'�*"�„;;Ns WSLL�°HYDRA,�IILICS SPECIFIC CAPACITY= 824 GPM/FT-H Q3 = . 8.70 CPS WELL DIA. = 24 is ®®® Qw = 3.34*L*H^3/2 CFS/FT HEAD WELL DEPTH = LF WELL L= 6.28 LF HEAD ALLOWANCE = 1.43 LF HEADQ3= 0.58 LF REFERENCE ELEV = 10.32 NVGD EP TDS LEVEL = 23180 ppm Q = 8.70 CFS SALINITY = 10750 ppam W = 9.0 LF L = 15.0 LF DHW = 2.4 NVGD A = 55.53 SF V = 0.16 FPS Tc = 10 min FDOT 13 = 6.81 "/hr FDOT Q3 = 3903 GPM WELI�.PROFILE: AVAILAElLE HEAD = 6.17 LF REF ELEV.----- 10.32 NGVD 1-75 l"SPEC. CAPACITY = 637 GPM FREE EIRD --- 8.57 NGVD SPECIFIC CAPACITY ---------------------- = 1.29 inch 1" SPECIFIC CAPACITY TOP WELL -------- TOTAL EPF LF _CTIYE HEAD 4 74 ` LFr`j Y x AVL HEAD 6 I.7 WE:LL�,CAPRCTTY�� :-�- �. ��8 '70;,.CFS -�=`"� �K --------DHW 2.4 NGVD ® TABLE 4 A/2= 0.75 AC -- .. Cw - 0.90 WELL DESIGN WELL"��tDAT7�� ���',N� SWELL HYDRAULICS.`, SPECIFIC CAPACITY= 555 GPM/FT-H Q3 = 4.60 CPS WELL DIA. = 24 in Qw = 3.34*L*H"3/2 CFS/FT HEAD WELL DEPTH = LF WELL L= 6.28 LF HEAD ALLOWANCE = 1.43 LF HEADQ3= 0.38 LF REFERENCE ELEV = 9.30 NVGD OVIDERAI11G8 TRIIGTOi , TDS LEVEL = 23180 ppm - Q 9.19 CPS SALINITY = 10750 ppm W 10.0 LF L = 16.0 LF DHW _ 2.4 NVGD A = 51.5 SF V 0.18 FPS Tc = 10 min _ aFDOT I3 = 6.81 "/hr PDOT Q3 = 2061 GPM AVAILABLE HEAD m 5.15 LF REF ELEV.-------- 9.30 NGVD 1.75 1"SPEC. CAPACITY = 336 GPM FREE BRD -------- 7.55 NGVD SPECIFIC CAPACITY " ---------------------- = 1.65 inch 1"SPECIFIC CAPACITY TOP WELL -------- TOTAL HEAD � �9 LE', LF WELL CAPACITY ^°"`�"�4 6a�M�CFS�.1�o.,A.,., g.s.ax..-.-.mari c:..v .- ..v.a F s$ ..d` •*�tw n"ca s ^ ;; DHW -------- 2.4 NGVD TABLE 5 LOCATION. _��;_� � � ,SE 5th STREET y A = 1.12 AC WELL DESIGN WELL_ DATA � _`,_;�""� xWELL�HYDR'AULICS SPECIFIC CAPACITY= 746 GPM/FT-H Q3 = 6.86 CPS WELL DIA. = 24 in Qw = 3.34*L*HA3/2 CFS/FT HEAD WELL DEPTH = LF WELL L= 6.28 LF HEAD ALLOWANCE = 1.43 LF HEADQ3= 0.49 LF REFERENCE ELEV = 9.71 NVGD ItIDEIDRAINAG ScTRII~ DS LEVEL = 23180 ppm - Q 6.86 CPS SALINITY - 10750 ppm W - 8.0 LF L = 15.0 LF DHW = 2.4 NVGD A = 44.48 SF V = 0.15 FPS Tc = 10 min FDOT I3 = 6.81 "/hr FDOT Q3 = 3078 GPM ',FELL PRORILE °' 3� " AVAILABLE HEAD = 5.56 LF REF ELEV.-------- 9.71 NGVD --75 1"SPEC.CAPACITY = 503 GPM FREE BRD --- - 7.96 NGVD SPECIFIC CAPACITY ---------------------- = 1.48 inch 1"SPECIFIC CAPACITY TOP WELL -------- h TOTAL HEAD "� s7_ 3 LFrri EFFECTIVE HEAD �4 13 LF ]4ULD f5,'.,5.6 LF caEzv CAp,AC=?�� ���� � �6 �86�w..cFs� .;3 4 DHW -------- 2.4 NGVD TABLE 6 LOCATION' .,, � ,.�F s6t � STREET _.... _ A = 0.5 9 Ac Cw = 0.90 WELL DESIGN SPECIFIC CAPACITYs 368 GPM/FT-H Q3 = 3.62 CPS WELL DIA. = 24 in Qw = 3.34*L*H43/2 CFS/FT HEAD WELL DEPTH = LF WELL L= 6.28 LF HEAD ALLOWANCE= 1.43 LF HSADQ3= 0.32 LF REFERENCE ELEV = 9.99 NVGD PR xQYIDED D 8 TRtiT 'L'QRS DS ....� " TDS LEVEL = 23180 ppm - Q 3.62 CPS SALINITY = 10750 ppm W - 5.0 LF L 12.0 LF DHW = 2.4 NVGD A = 29.2 SF V 0.12 FPS Tc = 10 min x FDOT I3 = 6.81 "/hr FDOT Q3 = 1622 GPM AVAILABLE HEAD= 5.84 LF REF ELEV.-------- 9.99 NGVD 17 111SPEC.CAPACITY = 265 GPM FREE BRD ---- - 8.24 NGVD SPECIFIC CAPACITY ---------- --------- --- = 1.39 inch 1"SPECIFIC CAPACITY TOP WELL -------- LF TOTAL HEADa'= x7 6 LF 7» v t " Q WSLL, CAPACITY 63 62 CFS -------- DHW 2.4 NGVD TABLE 7 A/4 = 0.92 Ac WELL DESIGN a SPECIFIC CAPACITY= 772 GPM/FT-H Q3 = 5.62 CPS WELL DIA. = 24 in Qw = 3.34*L*H^3/2 CFS/FT HEAD WELL DEPTH = LF WELL L= 6.28 LF HEAD ALLOWANCE = 1.43 LF HEADQ3= 0.43 LF REFERENCE ELEV = 8.85 NVGDRODEDDRAG S'1RIIC ��# TDS LEVEL 23180 ppm - Q SALINITY = 10750 ppm W = L = DHW = 2.4 NVGD A = V Tc = 10 min d _ MOT I3 = 6.81 "/hr � FD NOTE: EXISTING EXFILTRATION TRENCH MOT Q3 = 2522 GPM SWELL s�,PROEILF ,.�7 AVAILABLE HEAD = 4.70 LF REF ELEV.-------- 8.85 NGVD 1.75 1"SPEC.CAPACITY = 411 GPM FREE BRD -------- 7.10 NGVD SPECIFIC CAPACITY - ----- _ 1.88 inch 111SPECIFIC CAPACITY TOP WELL -------- TOTAL HEAD K ; 6 5 LFn - .tag-� EFFEGTIUE HEAD 63 3 27 LF x'+ AVI, HEAD,., 4 70 LF _._ . mow.... DHW ------ 2.4 NGVD TABLE 8 I,oCATI011T ,, `� a' wSE �13rd TERRACES ' A/4 = 0.92 Ac Cw = 0.90 WELL DESIGIN SPECIFIC CAPACITY= 767 GPM/FT-H Q3 _ 5.62 CFS WELL DIA. = 24 in Qw = 3.34*L*H"3/2 CFS/FT HEAD WELL DEPTH = LF WELL L= 6.28 LF HEAD ALLOWANCE = 1.43 LF HEADQ3= 0.43 LF REFERENCE ELEV = 8.87 NVGD �P$OVIDEDDRAINA� STRHCTURS ; ., TDS LEVEL = 23180 ppm Q = 11.25 CFS SALINITY = 10750 ppm W = 12.0 LF L = 19.0 LF DHW = 2.4 NVGD A = 56.64 SF V = 0.20 FPS Tc = 10 min FDOT I3 = 6.81 "/hr FDOT Q3 = 2522 GPM _ WELL�PItOFILE `��, AVAILABLE HEAD 4.72 LF REF ELEV.-------- 8..87 NGVD 1-75_ 1"SPEC.CAPACITY = 411 GPM FREE BRD --- 7.12 NGVD SPECIFIC CAPACITY ---------------------- = 1.86 inch 1"SPECIFIC CAPACITY TOP WELL -------- T �y^ �� .,^' � „� EFFECTIVE HEAD = � 3 29 ELF AVL HEAD 4 7 LF ram. a -------- WELL DHW 2.4 NGVD r,. 1 APPENDIX 5 .ss6t ROUTING DATA FOR PROPOSED DRAINAGE PAM Federal Highway Drainage Study October 2001 o CaWm,Giordano Associates,Inc. CGA Project No.99-0183 Engineers Surveyors Planners Advanced Interconnected Channel 6 Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) (31 Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. ® CITY OF DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY SE 13th TERRACE .......... Input Report ................................I....................... --------Class: Pipe______________________________________________________________ C:` Name: S2 From Node: N2 Length(ft): 325 Group: EASE To Node: N3 Count: 1 UPSTREAti DOWNSTREAM Equation: Average K Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 36 36 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5 Rise(in): 36 36 Exit Loss Coef: 1 Invert(ft): 0 0 Bend Loss Coef: 0 Manning's N: 0.012 0.012 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0 0 Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use do Bottom Clip(in): 0 0 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall 1 1 BF Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall 1 1 0 --------Class: Rating Curve----------------------------------------------------- Name: R1 Count: 1 From Node: N3 Group: BASE Flow: Positive To Node: N4 TABLE ELEV ON(ft) ELEV OFF(ft) #I: T1 3.83 2.4 #2: 0 0 #3: 0 0 #4: 0 0 i® Advanced Interconnected Channel 6 Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) I11 Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc- CITY OF DAIJIA DRAINAGE STUDY IDE 13th TERRACE EAD LOSS CALCULATION .......... Node Maximum Conditions - RUN1 ............................................................I............ (Time units - hours) Node Group Max Time Max Stage warning Max Delta Max Surface Max Time Max Inflow Max Time Max Outflow Name Name Conditions (ft) Stage (ft) Stage (ft) Area (sf) Inflow (cfs) Outflow (cfs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N1 BASE 0.59 7.36 10.00 0.0020 135.50 0.58 11.63 0.58 11.55 N2 BASE 0.59 7.24 10.00 0.0020 159.88 0.58 ll.55 0.59 11.47 N3 BASE 0.60 7.10 10.00 0.002C 137.38 0.59 11.47 0.60 11.44 N4 BASE 0,00 2,40 10,00 0.0001 0.00 0,10 11.44 1,00 0.00 g- 9AMM- APPENDIX 6 ^T '' ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST Federal Highway Drainage Study A ' October 2001 m CGA Project No.99-0183 Calvrtr.Giordano:Associates,Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners M= TABLE 15 THROUGH 20 Am kr- ENGINEES OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST FOR THE INDIVIDUAL OUTFALL IMPROVEMENT f-7Ah Federal Highway Drainage Study October 2001 CGA Project No.99-0183 Calvin.Giordano 5 Associates.Inc. TABLE 15 ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST OUTFALL LOCATION: SE 3rd TERRACE UNIT COST COST ITEM UNIT QUANTITY ($) ($) Pavement restoration SY 850 $35.00 $29,750 Manhole, Water Tite, 4' dia. EA a 1 $2,000.00 $2,000 24" RCP LF 0 $30.00 $0 30" RCP LF 300 $40.00 $12,000 36" RCP LF 325 $50.00 $16,250 Pollution Retardant Structure EA 1 $10,000.00 $10,000 24" Drainage Well EA 1 $36,000.00 $36,000 PRB EA 1 $700.00 $700 Sub-Total $106,700 Mobilization 5% $5,335 MOT 10% $10,670 15%Contingency $18,406 Total ,. $141;111 d:- TABLE 16 ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST OUTFALL LOCATION: SE 4th STREET UNIT COST COST ITEM UNIT QUANTITY, ($) ($) Pavement restoration SY 850 $35.00 $29,750 Manhole, Water Tite, 4' dia. EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000 24" RCP LF 0 $30.00 $0 30" RCP LF 300 $40.00 $12,000 36" RCP LF 350 $50.00 $17,500 Pollution Retardant Structure EA 1 $10,000.00 $10,000 24" Drainage Well EA 2 $36,000.00 $72,000 PRB EA 1 $700.00 $700 Sub-Total $143,950 Mobilization 5%, $7,198 MOT 10% $14,395 15%Contingency $24,831 Total ..'$190�374 TABLE 17 ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST OUTFALL LOCATION: SE 5th STREET UNIT COST . COST ITEM 'UNIT- QUANTITY, Pavement restoration SY 850 $35.00 $29,750 Manhole, Water Tite, 4' dia. EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000 24" RCP LF 0 $30.00 $0 30" RCP LF 300 $40.00 $12,000 36" RCP LF 325 $50.00 $16,250 Pollution Retardant Structure EA 1 $10,000.00 $10,000 24" Drainage Well EA 1 $36,000.00 $36,000 PR13 EA 1 $700.00 $700 Sub-Total $106,700 ` • Mobilization 5% $5,335 MOT 10% $10,670 15%Contingency $18,406 Total "`4 TABLE 18 ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST OUTFALL LOCATION: SE 6th STREET a UNIT COST COST ITEM UNIT QUANTITY ($) ($) Pavement restoration SY 850 $35.00 $29,750 Manhole, Water Tite, 4'dia. EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000 24" RCP LF 625 $30.00 $18,750 30" RCP LF 0 $40.00 $0 36" RCP LF 0 $50.00 $0 Pollution Retardant Structure EA 1 $10,000.00 $10,000 24" Drainage Well EA 1 $36,000.00 $36,000 aPRB EA 1 $700.00 $700 Sub-Total $97,200 Mobilization 5% $4,860 MOT 10% $9,720 15% Contingency $16,767 Total $128,547 y,M1 fl TABLE 19 ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST OUTFALL LOCATION: SE 11th STREET UNIT COST COST ITEM UNIT QUANTITY. ($) ($} Pavement restoration SY 640 $35.00 $22,400 Manhole, Water Tite,4' dia. EA 0 $2,000.00 $0 24" RCP LF 0 $30.00 $0 30" RCP LF 0 $40.00 $0 36" RCP LF 265 $50.00 $13,250 Pollution Retardant Structure EA 0 $10,000.00 $0 24" Drainage Well EA 2 $36,000.00 $72,000 PRB EA 0 $700.00 $0 Sub-Total $107,650 Mobilization 5% $5,383 MOT 10% $10,765 15% Contingency $18,570 Total,: i. 142, < TABLE 20 ENGINEERS OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST OUTFALL LOCATION: SE 13th TERRACE UNIT.COST COST ITEM UNIT (QUANTITY Pavement restoration SY 850 $35.00 $29,750 Manhole, Water Tite, 4' dia. EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000 24" RCP LF 0 $30.00 $0 30" RCP LF 0 $40.00 $0 36" RCP LF 650 $50.00 $32,500 Pollution Retardant Structure EA 1 $10,000.00 $10,000 24" Drainage Well EA 2 $36,000.00 $72,000 PRB - EA 1 $700.00 $700 Sub-Total $146,950 Mobilization 5% $7,348 rT, OT 10% $14,695 5% Contingency $25,349 otal,,. $194341 APPENDIX S 5 Basin Stormwater Master Plan COMPREHENSIVE DRAINAGE L FOR CITY OF DANIA a i 1 1 R J� �� C " , JT� CpNC'iTATA E� Q 1904 �9 d � � 0 a Prepared by: r, ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS 2 Oakwood Boulevard, Suite 120 Hollywood, Florida 33020 B&C Project No. 96-1507 Date Submitted July 16, 1996 City of Dania Drainage Study i A study of the City of Dania Drainage system was conducted to address some of the flooding problems which the city is currently experiencing. The city was divided into drainage basins and each was analyzed to determine the level of service. The study indicated that all basins except one meet the 10 year - 1 day and 100 year - 3 day level of service. An operation and maintenance plan was suggested for Basins One, Two, Three and Four which meet the 10 year 1 day and 100 year - 3 day level of service. The one basin which did not meet this level of service was Basin Five. Basin Five extends east from the F.E.C. railroad track to West Lake and from Sheridan Street north to the Dania Cut-off Canal. Basin Five was analyzed as three sub-basins. Sub- Basin a, b and c make up Basin Five. Several individual Capital Improvement options are presented for Sub-Basin 5b which allow the city the flexibility to implement all or part of the improvements depending on the availability of funds in a fiscal year. The fundamental concept of the proposed improvements is Is to create trunk Imes of sufficient size to rapidly convey stormwater from the residential and commercial zones to lake l systems and ultimately pump the water to a swale which will allow the water to overflow to the West Lake area. The proposed improvements were developed based on the premise of dividing Sub-Basin 5b into a northern and southern drainage area as well as removing the drainage surcharge to the existing system contributed by Federal aHighway. The city has the option of implementing all the proposed Capital Improvements and ensure that Sub-Basin 5b meets the 10 year - 1 day and 100 year - 3 day level of service or implement individual improvements and provide drainage relief for individual sections of Sub-Basin 5b. The cost of the proposed capital improvement options range from $160,000.00 to $660,000.00. a 6errV/ �Ctllvinlnc. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS/SURJEVORS PLANNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLEOF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................ii LIST OF APPENDIXES ........................................................................................................ill LISTOF TABLES .................................................................................................................iv :y. _R LIST OF FIGURES.................... 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2. METHODOLOGY .............................................................. 2.1. GENERAL APPROACH............................................................................................. 4 2.1.1. Data Collection ................................................................................ 4 BID 2.1.2. Engineering Analysis........................................................................................... 6 2.1.3. Capital Improvements ......................................................................................... 7 2.2. ASSUMPTIONS......................................................................................................... 7 3. BASIN RESULTS .......................................................................................................... 14 3.1 BASIN ONE 3.2 BAS IN TWO............................................................................................................. 14 3.3 BASIN THREE 3.4 BASIN FOUR........................................................................................................... 16 -' 3.5 BASIN FIVE ......................................... ;A 4. BASIN IMPROVEMENTS.............................................................................................. 19 4.1. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION PLAN.............................................................. 19 4.2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS.................................................................................... 20 a a6efr QCalvininc. July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS�SURJEYORS - PLANNERE B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study �y a_ APPENDIX A : AREA BREAK DOWN................................................................................ 35 APPENDIX B : ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE ............................................................40 APPENDIX C : STORM SEWER DESIGN ......................................................................... 52 APPENDIX D : 10 YEAR - 1 DAY SFWMD ROUTING....................................................... 74 APPENDIX E : 25 YEAR - 3 DAY SFWMD ROUTING....................................................... 83 APPENDIX F : 100 YEAR - 3 DAY SFWMD ROUTING..................................................... 94 APPENDIX G : BROWARD COUNTY DRAINAGE MAPS............................................... 106 UZI s : berry ga1vinI,.. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS sumiEvorn Pl NER; B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study iv a TABLE 1 : PERVIOUS - IMPERVIOUS RATIO 8 K; TABLE 2 : BASIN MAXIMUM STAGE................................................................................ 15 TABLE 3 : BASIN 5b CAPITAL IMPROVEMNT COST ...................................................... 21 TABLE 4 : PUMP'FLOW vs. OPERATING TIME ............................................................... 23 a TABLE 5 : BASIN 5b MAXIMUM STAGES......................................................................... 24 TABLE 6 : BASIN 1, AREA BREAK DOWN ....................................................................... 36 TABLE 7 : BASIN 2 AR EA BREAK DOWN ....................................................................... 37 TABLE 8 : BASIN 3, AREA BREAK DOWN ....................................................................... 37 TABLE 9 : BASIN 4, AREA BREAK DOWN ....................................................................... 38 TABLE 10 : BASIN 5a, AREA BREAK DOWN TABLE 11 : BASIN 5b, AREA BREAK DOWN ................................................................... 39 TABLE 12 : BASIN 5c, AREA BREAK DOWN TABLE 13 : BASIN 5b-1, FEDERAL HIGHWAY TRUNK LINE .......................................... 41 a�> TABLE 14 : BASIN 5b-3, SE 2"d AVENUE TRUNK LINE ................................................... 42 TABLE 15 : BASIN 5b-4, SE 3rd AVENUE TRUNK LINE.................................................... 43 a.,� TABLE 16 : BASIN 5b-5, SE 41h AVENUE TRUNK LINE.................................................... 44 TABLE 17 : BASIN 5b-6, SE 2"d AVENUE TRUNK LINE ADDITION ................................. 45 TABLE 18 : BASIN 5b-7, SE 2"d AVENUE TRUNK LINE ................................................... 46 TABLE 19 : BASIN 5b-8, SE 3rd AVENUE TRUNK LINE.................................................... 47 TABLE 20 : BASIN 5b-9, SE 3rd AVENUE TRUNK LINE.................................................... 48 TABLE 21 : BASIN 5b-10, SE 2"d AVENUE TRUNK LINE ADDITION ............................... 49 TABLE 22 : BASIN 5b-1 1, OUTFALL IMPROVEMENTS ................................................... 50 TABLE 23 : BASIN 5b-12, SW 5`h AVENUE RELOCATION............................................... 51 a6errcesvininc July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PAWNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study �r e a- °> FIGURE 1 : CITY LIMITS & BASIN BOUNDARY................................................................. 3 r:. FIGURE 2 : BASIN ONE BOUNDARY ................................................................................. 9 FIGURE 3 : BASIN TWO BOUNDARY................................. FIGURE 4 : BASINS THREE & FOUR BOUNDARIES....................................................... 11 FIGURE 5 : BASIN FIVE BOUNDARY............................................................................... 12 FIGURE 6 : BASIN SIX BOUNDARY................................................................................. 13 FIGURE 7 : BASIN 5b, PROPOSED FEDERAL HIGHWAY TRUNK LINE........................ 25 FIGURE 8 : BASIN 5b, PROPOSED 5b-3 TRUNK LINE .................................................. 26 FIGURE 9 : BASIN 5b, PROPOSED 5b-4 TRUNK LINE ....................................... 4� FIGURE 10 : BASIN 5b, PROPOSED 5b-5 TRUNK LINE ................................................. 28 FIGURE 11 : BASIN 5b, PROPOSED 5b-6 TRUNK LINE ................................................. 29 aFIGURE 12 : BASIN 5b, PROPOSED 5b-7 TRUNK LINE ................................................. 30 FIGURE 13 : BASIN 5b, PROPOSED 5b-8 TRUNK LINE ................................................. 31 FIGURE 14 : BASIN 5b, PROPOSED 5b-9 TRUNK LINE ................................................. 32 a FIGURE 15 : BASIN 5b, PROPOSED 5b-10 TRUNK LINE ............................................... 33 FIGURE 16 : BASIN 5b, PROPOSED OUTFALL IMPROVEMENTS................................. 34 a. FIGURE 17 : 1 - DAY RAINFALL 10 YEAR RETURN PERIOD....................................... 107 FIGURE 18 : 1 - DAY RAINFALL 25 YEAR RETURN PERIOD....................................... 108 ^rt FIGURE 19 : 1 - DAY RAINFALL 100 YEAR RETURN PERIOD..................................... 109 FIGURE 20 : AVERAGE DRY SEASON WATER LEVELS.............................................. 110 FIGURE 21 : AVERAGE WET SEASON WATER LEVELS ............................................. 111 a FIGURE 22 : 10 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION MAP.......................................................... 112 FIGURE 23 : REVISED 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION MAP ....................................... 113 a6err O►C`Olvim, July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS)sua�Evone PLAN M B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 1 a City of Dania is one of the oldest municipalities in Broward County. As indicated in Figure 1, the city is located on the Intracostal Waterway, and encompasses approximately six (6) square miles. The city extends from the Dania Cut-off Canal south to Sheridan Street east of Federal Highway and Stirling Road, SW 33' Court and Griffin Road west of Federal Highway. The city also stretches west from West lake to SW 121h Avenue south of Stirling Road and as far as SW 35`h Avenue north of Stirling Road. The City also owns approximately one half square mile north of SW 36th Street to State Road 84 and ninety-five (95) acres north of Dania Cut-off Canal to Griffin Road. w The City of Dania is a noncontiguous city consisting of a mixture of old neighborhoods and new developments. Several major highways and arterial roads as well as F.E.C. and S.C.L. railroad tracks and two Primary South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) canals traverse the city as reflected in Figure 1. Due to the existing topography, the city is divided into six major basins as shown in Figure 1: L? 1. Basin One is the most northern area discontinuous from to the rest of the city. 2. Basin Two consist of all areas west of Interstate 95. 3. Basin Three is the area between the Dania Cut-off Canal and Griffin Road except for the Mobil Home Park. 4. Basin Four extends west from the FEC railroad track to interstate 95. 5. Basin Five extends east from the FEC railroad track to West Lake and from Sheridan Street north to the Dania Cut-off Canal. 6. Basin Six is located north of the Dania Cut-off Canal and west of the Hollywood-Ft. Lauderdale International Airport. l6erryQCalvininc. July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS wm�tvoM • PW NEZ B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 2 The City of Dania has an undersized drainage system and lacks retention' areas to store excess stormwater. The areas closest to the Dania Cut-off Canal and SFWMD C- 10 tend to have minimal flooding due to available discharge capacity. Basins One and Three, shown in Figures 2 and 4, are relatively flood free and with regular maintenance of the drainage system should continue to drain adequately. Basins Two and Four, shown in Figures 3 and 4, have some areas of flooding but can be corrected by upgrading the existing systems and adding new systems in areas with no drainage facilities. Basin Five, shown in Figure 5, is most impacted by storm events due to its very low elevations. There are a great deal of drainage facilities within this basin but the system can not discharge fast enough to meet the 10 year or 100 year flood stages. The improvements in this basin must concentrate on additional storage and faster discharge to minimize flooding. Basin Six, shown in Figure 6, consists of some industrial sites along the Dania Cut-off Canal. The remainder of the basin is undeveloped and therefore will not be dealt with in this report. de a l6err RCCIlviininc. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS Jsum�Evor7s PLANNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 fltlfi f� S a t^ U LEGEND: -� CITY BOUNDARY BASIN BOUNDARY i1 --: _.• ._ _._ =- + RAIL ROAD 5 ,, 48th` ` BASIN BREAKDOWN y BASIN No. AREA AC. 339.31 ' 2 1,155.16 -- 3 110.04 L 4 739.81 S.W. 5 1,281.18 6 710.76 �4 J �T�Y (8 PROJECT N. J.T.S. 96-1507 inc. 11 FIGURE-9 ? ENGINEERSberr SURVEYORS • PLANNERS I CAD FILE 2 OAKWOOD BLVD_ SUITE 120 HOLLYWOOD. FL. 33020 BRObYARD (305) 921-77St / PAX (305) 921-880715/96 1507-F1 City of Dania Drainage Study 4 y ' i� 2.1. GENERAL APPROACH N The procedure used to develop this study consisted of three phases. Each phase identified three tasks which must be completed prior to addressing the next phase. The study was divided into the following phases: Phase I: Data Collection Define the study area and identify the basin limits. Identify and locate the existing facilities. Outline characteristics of the study area. lie Phase II: Engineering Analysis Compile drainage basin data. Identify problem areas. Define level of service. Phase III: Capital Improvements Define required improvements. Create schedule of improvements. Prepare engineering cost estimate. 2.1.1. Data Collection The data collection phase involved a number of tasks which were required to commence the study, to gather and prepare information for the drainage analysis and to propose improvements. 996 6CFFYL► .alVininc July 15, 1507 ENGINEERS sum�EvoRs PLANNERS B&C P�OJ2Ct NO 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 5 ti 6 Define the study area and identify the basin limits The study area was defined as the area encompassed by the limits for the City of Dania shown in Figure 1. The study area was further broken down to identify drainage basins that are bermed by existing roads, railroad tracks, canals and any other natural or manmade barriers. The topography of the city creates six major drainage basins, Figures 2 through 6. Basin One: Located north of the main body of the City of Dania, it saddles Interstate 595 and is bounded to the north by State Road 84, to the south by Collins Road (SW 36th Street), to the east by the S.C.L. railroad track and to the west by SW 291h Avenue. Basin Two: Consists of all areas of the city located west on Interstate 95. Basin Three: Consists of the area north and east of the Dania Cut-off Canal, south of Griffin Road and west of the F.E.C. railroad road track, except the a Mobil Home Park. Basin Four: Extends south from the Dania Cut-off Canal to Stirling Road and Sheridan Street. It is Bounded to the west by Interstate 95 and to the east by the F.E.C. railroad track. aBasin Five: Located east of the F.E.C. railroad tracks extending to West lake. It is also bounded to the north by the Dania Cut-off Canal and to the south by Sheridan Street. Basin Six: Located north of the Dania Cut-off Canal and west of the Hollywood- Ft. Lauderdale Airport. Identify and Locate the existing facilities a Preliminary information regarding the facilities for the City of Dania was identified through investigation of aerial surveys, permits, as-builts from local and state agencies and detailed survey information available in-house. Some field investigation and verification was also performed to obtain additional information. a° 0 Characteristics of the study area The City of Dania consist of mainly residential neighborhoods with pockets of industrial and office park sites along the Dania Cut-off Canal and Interstates 95 and 595. All the 6er 6 �Ct1AVin!nc July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PL"NERS B&C Project No 96-1507 sad City of Dania Drainage Study g commercial sites are located along the corridor of the main roads, such as Federal Highway and Griffin Road. The city has little undeveloped land available. The drainage facilities for the city are in general undersized, there are some lakes within the city limits but not enough to provide storage for excess stormwater. The storm sewer system consist of mostly 12" to 24" pipes which can not provide enough conveyance to avoid flooding. As a result of very low grades throughout the eastern region of the city, even smaller storms contribute to the ponding of rain water on streets and yards. 2.1.2. Engineering Analysis The engineering analysis phase consists of assembling the gathered information from the previous phase and performing calculations to obtain flood stages and conveyance capacities for the existing system, as well as propose improvements. O Compile drainage basin data The information gathered from as-builts, permits and surveys are translated into data such as total pervious area, impervious area, roof area, water management area, runoff coefficient, time of concentration and friction factors. This information is then used in computer models for routing and hydraulic calculations and for analyzing the performance of the drainage system in each basin. ® Identify problem areas The problem areas are identified using the results obtained from hydraulic calculations and routing. Information such as flood stages, allowable discharge and capacity of the existing storm sewer is compared to minimum standards set by local and state agencies. O Define level of service Based on the results of the calculations, a level of service is assigned to each basin. All areas within a basin must achieve the same level of service. Generally, the basins within the City of Dania can meet the 10 year - 1 day stage for the minimum road crown elevation and the 100 year - 3 day stage for the minimum finished floor elevation. Basins which can not meet the above standards, even with proposed capital M!g improvements, will have a lower level of service. al6err �Salvininc. July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS/SUF�EYORS • aWJNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 i City of Dania Drainage Study 7 a 2.1.3. Capital Improvements The Capital Improvements proposed for each basin are designed to maximize the existing system and to interact efficiently with the improvements. • Define required improvements Once a level of service is assigned to a basin, a number of scenarios are designed to allow that level of service to be met. Each scenario is then scrutinized for feasibility and constructability. The best options for each basin are then chosen to create a comprehensive drainage plan for the City of Dania. Create schedule of improvements To allow the City of Dania a flexible schedule to implement the proposed Capital Improvements, the recommended options in each basin have been broken down into individual components. The city can choose to complete part or all of the drainage improvements in a particular basin depending on the availability of funds in a fiscal year. zit • Prepare engineering cost estimate An engineering cost estimate is prepared for each component, addressing the Capital Improvements only. Some of the work required to complete each component connects the existing system to the proposed trunk lines. These connections are not included in the cost estimates. 2.2. ASSUMPTIONS The following assumptions were used to prepare this report for the City of Dania: ® Water Level Elevations (NGVD) 1. Wet Season Water Table 2.0 feet 2. Receiving Tailwater Elevation 2.0 feet udNEERS �l1IV�1*R B&C JulyProje t No 96-1507 ENGINEERS City of Dania Drainage Study g • Rainfall Amounts 1. 10 Year - 1 Day (Road Design) 9.5 inches/day 2. 25 Year - 3 Day (Design Storm) 11.0 inches/day 3. 100 Year - 3 Day (Minimum Floor) 15.0 inches/day ® Pervious - Impervious ratio Table 1 list all pervious - impervious assumptions TABLE 1 : PERVIOUS - IMPERVIOUS RATIO Residential 1 DU/AC 20 10 10 80 Residential 2 DU/AC 25 10 15 75 Residential 3 DU/AC 30 10 20 70 rim Residential 4 DU/AC 38 13 25 62 Residential 8 DU/AC 65 25 40 35 Residential condo. 70 50 20 30 Commercial 85 35 50 15 Industrial 72 57 15 28 School 60 30 30 40 Road 85 0 85 15 Park 15 10 5 85 Open (not developed) 0 0 0 100 Lake 100 0 100 0 Total Impervious = Building Pad + Other Impervious Other Impervious includes Driveways, porches, ... 6Crr`y,�SCJVin1nc July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS/SURJEYORS • PLANNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 N w LLJ � M < o � z � o U Q o m o W ! CY) m z Q ,� � U)w ® Q Q x U m Q_l W cv Q z o 0 LU V � _r Cn - m . S u a I i 96-1 } 0 96 31ViS83iN1_ ad QOOMSNIAVd �_0_S-_ uj - Z Z •O � /y M ! ! 1 O LL -- coI LL Cl) O __. (-ad VIVd1) dd31 u19Z ,r 41 41 I ' ' inN30 U46Z M'S z �o Hype H111pS you U �cvo WI�iW 1 p 6 SO 8V • �yv� Q \ y�o � r N�! �h Y1 �m0 W Ov LLloq tz�7 i �o0 4J cJ¢i CV) LLJ CC LL o � N m r (D cD to = rn 95) -- - - — o � RSZ FEE CY GOOM I I i SN3ndd -- 2� - �_.. 1. LL � j 1 11�, ! �•I cr- ........... .......... t - ! -. II f I `: J 1 O �'I cr- _ —_ _ L -- - -_ -- '— - _._ 1 II II I 1 ..---— ---'-------_-- Q - _ � Q II i i - cc W----- I Imo.._.__i l_.__i l__.__ ---.._—___. -- - -'-—- Z LL co LL cc O+ _ I , ,, f' _ _. I �1 L_._-. � I � w I I _ I m Q �' I -------- U o o O it m m � O O _ Lv ® - r • � o J to a z N F ,� r Cc Q WOE m 6 U,Y �00 h a: d' uj _. . LL. 1tr,qY Q a_ W o M J o rn ro i = m ad08Lj N1��12�J ' I t` I .... f Y i j j j ' In j i I � r ! , �j0 1f1� ldNdO In . r a`d02� N13312�0 a-10 W o - N Y 1 � r r , , i I -- '---- - _. 1 �� Y/ LU I - - - an�8d38INb�GJ _ _ ... N p c ' (D m ` J 4i Q i - LL ------------- - - _ _..__. - I (IV 8 �N1�811S Q l 1 LL----------- = i C/) r •rt' i m W cl� W --- i >_ LU r W' Q ® ............ i a a Z O pQ O = Q �r z p oo p m p C/) - i O i ® Q Q X (^ ® 1 i uj LL 0 J v o� NO Wnm O V) OP KIM= wJY CD w I X I J� �_.__ i W o v 1332�1S NVOld3HS zY� Z�!?�p0 W rytD Ld Ln w LU 00 0° o o Q o :2 M 00 Lri co O z w `y V-) (.0 C4 zo m ao � m z m Q . . J 0 ® Q Q x U Q 1 1 1 u� w V oLr) z z z zrn 0 z LO a Q Q W m m m _ � m GO I a 3 , aJ bo it It I I I , I r ; III I I ; I t - -_-__..__• ' . ._ c • J =- __ _ - , II --a I _.._._._� C .. -- - -- I j if 11 ! i 1O <I, ' -j Ir' �j i ! it i II a Jm Q!. IQ Lil l f I I I ! 1' `i I fI I Wz �! 'w icn 3 — cn LJ j zl !� may,, 'a��9 H�d38 INda 1Sd3 � ---' --- -- -_—__- I V • LU li _ LLJ Q I , — i f^ I _ I, I � 1 LO , LL U _I� i i --, �� uj j U — — ! I -- — — —----- i `I r 1. _ — _-- _ _r r U — — — l LL wp `L I Ld I i rl 1 iI (�L_ --- -- / — Iy� ( ---Y i j 1 En — h i - - - -- --- -- } -- ;T ci ._ _ - i111 -I(_.._ - t i - I� llop ___.._ ! 11-- _ t ao� i r I ---- I --- -•{I_.... ..____.. I II I!!� � �1I� ,; }iII1^•Pir,I � �n cn '� -. ............. , it i I{ -- , z ._ LUQ I WOuj L. - q 133diS NV(11d3HS wnm �LLJ lei cc Q cfl o `n 0 Q :2 0 0 o LL Wr 0O m U) CY m Q z V) Q x c) m w z O o m I r z o z W Z uo ujI W V I CL 1 1 LL LLJ iLLJ �7i a i% Q - C � I i� IIQ � y]Ol 'TN � � X -- '15 Q u. , r I ' _ Qom -- o oNe o OIL, " m NN 4) WUv ��3 z a: wNm Q City of Dania Drainage Study 14 Most of the basins meet the current 10 year and 100 year flood elevation requirements.Y q lrements. Many of the existing roads and buildings were built prior to the implementation of the current SFWMD drainage requirements. If the minimum crown elevations or the minimum floor elevations of these older roads and buildings are below the 10 year or 100 year flood elevations, flooding will be experienced during these storm events. 3.1 BASIN ONE The total drainage area of Basin One is 326.57 acres. Basin One consists of approximately 15% building pads, 17% roads and parking, 23% miscellaneous impervious, 7% lakes and 38% pervious land. The best available information indicates an average ground elevation of 5.8 feet NGVD and an average wet season water table elevation of 2.0 feet NGVD. Since Basin One is discontinuous from the rest of the City of Dania, the hydrology results presented in Table 2 are based on complete on-site stormwater retention. The 10 year and the 100 year flood elevations for Basin One are 5.0 feet NGVD and 7.5 feet NGVD, respectively. As indicated in Table 1, Basin One meets the current 10 year - 1 day and the 100 year - 3 day storm level of service. Routing Calculations for Basin One can be referenced in Appendix A, B and C. 3.2 BASIN TWO Basin Two, is the largest of all five basins. In total, the basin encompasses 1,105.93 acres. The basin makeup consists of approximately 21% building pads, 5% roads and parking, 21% miscellaneous impervious, 6% lakes and 47% pervious land. Available information indicates an average ground elevation of 5.0 feet NGVD and average wet season water table elevation of 2.0 feet NGVD. The results reflected in Table 1 are based on the basin discharging excess stormwater via an equivalent 60 inch culvert to �x berry�calvin,n.. July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS SI,RVEVORS PLANNERS BBC Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 15 • the Dania Cut-Off Canal. The equivalent culvert is representative of all outfalls to the Dania Cut-off Canal. The 10 year and the 100 year flood elevations for Basin Two are 5.5 feet NGVD and 7.0 feet NGVD, respectively. As indicated in Table 2, Basin Two meets the current 10 year - 1 day and the 100 year - 3 day storm level of service. Routing Calculations for Basin Two can be referenced in Appendix A, B and C. TABLE 2 : BASIN MAXIMUM STAGE • - ® , ® 1 -- 0.00 5.66 2 60" Culvert 92.86 5.27 10 YEAR 3 24" Culvert 24.25 5.35 4 48" Culvert 79.60 5.43 1 DAY 5a 48"Culvert 69.85 5.14 5b 1-31.2 cfs Pump 31.20 5.23 5c -- 0.00 5.81 1 -- 0.00 6.44 2 60" Culvert 121.99 5.93 25 YEAR 3 24" Culvert 25.61 5.73 4 48" Culvert 99.91 5.99 3 DAY 5a 48" Culvert 84.30 5.56 5b 1-31.2 cfs Pump 31.20 5.94 5c - 0.00 6.65 1 -- 0.00 7.07 2 60" Culvert 149.88 6.51 100 YEAR 3 24" Culvert 27.29 6.24 4 48" Culvert 121.29 6.54 3 DAY 5a 48" Culvert 103.55 6.09 5b 1-31.2 cfs Pump 31.20 6.55 5c -- 0.00 7.34 �crr�/8►c�lvininc. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS SURJEVpR$ PLANNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 1 City of Dania Drainage Study 16 • 3.3 BASIN THREE Of all the basins analyzed, the smallest is Basin Three. The acreage enveloped by the basin is 92.04 acres. Basin Three is composed of 25% building pads, 8% roads and parking, 14% miscellaneous impervious and 53% pervious land. Table 2 mirrors results which are based on discharging excess stormwater via an equivalent 24 inch culvert to the Dania Cut-Off Canal. The 10 year and the 100 year flood elevations for Basin Three are 5.0 feet NGVD and 7.0 feet NGVD, respectively. As indicated in Table 2, Basin Three slightly exceeds the current 10 year - 1 day storm level of service. Basin Three meets the 100 year - 3 day storm level of service. Routing Calculations for Basin Three can be referenced in Appendix A, B and C. 3.4 BASIN FOUR DAM Basin Four is 694.69 acres in size. The basin can be described as having 22% building pads, 11% roads and parking, 17% miscellaneous impervious, 3% lakes and 47% pervious land. Available information indicates an average ground elevation of 5.0 feet NGVD and average wet season water table elevation of 2.0 feet NGVD. Results presented in Table 2 are based on discharging excess stormwater via an equivalent 48 inch culvert to the Dania Cut-Off Canal. The 10 year and the 100 year flood elevations for Basin Four are 5.5 feet NGVD and 7.0 feet NGVD, respectively. As indicated in Table 2, Basin Four meets the current 10 year - 1 day and the 100 year - 3 day storm level of service. Routing Calculations for Basin Four can be referenced in Appendix A, B and C. 3.5 BASIN FIVE Basin Five consists of 977.38 acres. Because of the many state roads and arterial roads which traverse this basin, it was analyzed as three separate Sub-basins. The boundaries of Sub-basin 5a, 5b and 5c were selected based on existing topography, as indicated in Figure 5. • berrYBcnlvininc. July 15, 1996 ENGINEER$/SUfNEVORS PLMWK B&C Project No 96-1507 1 City of Dania Drainage Study 17 • Sub-Basin 5a encompasses 261.99 acres. The sub-basin make up is 286/o building pads, 4% roads and parking, 25% miscellaneous impervious, 0.6% lakes and 42% pervious land. Available information indicates an average ground elevation of 4.75 feet NGVD and average wet season water table elevation of 2.0 feet NGVD. The stages presented in Table 2 are based on discharging excess stormwater to the Dania Cut-Off Canal via an equivalent 48 inch culvert. The 10 year and the 100 year flood elevations, for Sub-Basin 5a are 5.0 feet NGVD and 6.0 feet NGVD, respectively. As indicated in Table 2, Sub-Basin 5a does not meet the current 10 year 1 day and 100 year 3 day storm level of service. Routing Calculations for Sub-basin 5a can be referenced in Appendix A, B and C. Sub-Basin 5b contains 425.39 acres. This sub-basin is composed of 26% building pads, 3% roads and parking, 23% miscellaneous impervious, 4% lakes and 44% pervious land. Available information indicates an average ground elevation of 4.75 feet NGVD and average wet season water table elevation of 2.0 feet NGVD. Stages in Table 2 were computed by allowing excess stormwater to be discharged to the West Lake area via an existing 31.2 cfs drainage pump. The 10 year and the 100 year flood elevations for Sub-Basin 5b are 5.0 feet NGVD and 6.0 feet NGVD, respectively. As indicated in Table 2, Sub-Basin 5b does not meet the current 10 year - 1 day and 100 year - 3 day storm level of service. Routing Calculations for Sub-basin 5b can be referenced in Appendix A, B and C. Sub-Basin 5c is composed of 290 acres. The composition of this sub-basin is 31% building pads, 7% roads and parking, 20% miscellaneous impervious and 42% impervious land. Available information indicates an average ground elevation of 4.75 feet NGVD and average wet season water table elevation of 2.0 feet NGVD. Basin 5c is bounded on the west side by the FEC Rail Road tracks and on the east by Federal Highway. These two topographic features act as natural dikes hindering drainage in this portion of Basin 5. In order to reflect this condition, the results in Table 2 are based on complete on-site stormwater retention. The 10 year and the 100 year flood elevations for Sub-Basin 5c are 5.0 feet NGVD and 6.0 feet NGVD, respectively. As indicated in Table 2, Sub-Basin 5c does not meet the current 10 year - 1 day and 100 berry1,S .alvinir,. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS Jwrr�EvoRS • PLANNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 18 year - 3 day storm level of service. Routing Calculations for Sub-basin 5c can be referenced in Appendix A, B and C. • 6erryA,4 alviniN.. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS/SURJEYORS PLPNNE{E B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 19 4.1. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION PLAN The engineering analysis indicates that Basins One, Two; Three and Four meet the 10 year 1 - day and the 100 year - 3 day level of service. As a result, no capital improvements are recommended. It is important to understand that although these basins meet the 10 year - 1 day and the 100 year - 3 day level of service, some localized flooding will occur. Localized flooding among other reasons is the result of isolated areas having lower site elevations than the average ground elevation in the basin. It is recommended that the existing operation and maintenance program adopted by the City of Dania be implemented to address localized problem areas. In addition, it is also recommended that the City in conjunction with Berry & Calvin develop a Facilities Upgrade Plan (FUP). The FUP will be used to identify and target isolated problem areas in order to implement tailor made cost effective solutions and ensure that areas with critical problems are addressed first. In addition, the FUP will ensure that any upgrade to the existing system is carried out in a logical fashion and is properly recorded on engineering plans for future record. Sub-basin 5a in Basin Five does not m _ meet the 10 year 1 day and the 100 year - 3 day level of service. However, the stages calculated for this sub-basin by simulating 10 year and 100 year storms are marginally greater than the 10 y year and 100 year ar flood stages required by Broward County. As a result, through proper maintenance and the FUP, Sub-basin 5a can be made to cope with the 10 year - 1 day and the 100 year - 3 day storm events. • Gorr C►4ira1vin[rc. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS YSURJEVORS PLANNERSB&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 20 • 4.2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS As stated in the results section, Sub-basin 5b and 5c do not meet the 10 year - 1 day and 100 year - 3 day level of service. In order to bring these Sub-basins in Basin Five up to the 10 year - 1 day and 100 year - 3 day level of service, several individual capital improvement options are recommended. The recommendations proposed are stand alone components which allow the city the flexibility to implement all or part of the improvements depending on the availability of funds in a fiscal year. In addition, the city has the option of implementing all of the proposed Capital Improvements or implement individual improvements only. The Sub-basin 5c drainage system conveys water to the West Lake area through the Federal Highway system and the Sub-basin 5b system. Any improvements to the Sub- basin 5b drainage system will also improve the performance of the drainage system in Sub-basin 5c, because the conveyance of stormwater out of Sub-basin 5c will be greatly improved. As a result, the proposed Capital Improvements are focused on Sub- Basin 5b. The proposed Capital Improvement options are based on the premise of dividing Sub- basin 5b into a northern and a southern drainage area as well as removing the surcharge on the 5b drainage system produced by stormwater collected from Federal Highway and Sub-basin 5c. The following are the recommended capital improvement options: Trunk Line 5b-1: The purpose of this trunk line is to convey stormwater collected from Federal Highway and Sub-basin 5c directly to West Lake as indicated in Figure 7. This line will bypass the existing Sub-basin 5b drainage system and improve the drainage system of both Sub-basin 5b and 5c. The estimated cost of this option is presented in Table 3 and a line item estimate is contained in Appendix B. The Storm Sewer Calculations can be referenced in Appendix C. berrYlcelvininc July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS/SUAJkYORS PLANNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 21 TABLE 3 : BASIN 5b CAPITAL IMPROVEMNT COST Basin 5b-1, Federal Highway Trunk Line $ 354,315.00 Basin 5b-2, Existing Federal Highway Trunk Line $ 0.00 Basin 5b-3, SE 2"d Avenue Trunk Line (North) $ 339,399.50 Basin 5b-4, SE 3rd Avenue Trunk Line (North) $ 177,491 TO Basin 5b-5, SE 41'Avenue Trunk Line (North) $216,700.25 Basin 5b-6, SE 2"d Avenue Trunk Line Addition North) $221,449.75 Basin 5b-7, SE 2"d Avenue Trunk Line (south) $240,677.75 Basin 5b-8, SE 3rd Avenue Trunk Line (south) $203,366.00 Basin 5b-9, SE 411 Avenue Trunk Line (south) $215.435.25 Basin 5b-10, SE 2"d Avenue Trunk Line Addition (south) $ 158,751.75 Basin 5b-11, Outfall Improvements $ 656,616.30 Basin 5b-12, SW 5`h Street Relocation $ 326,995.60 TOTAL $2,895,978.59 Trunk Line 5b-2: This is an existing trunk line which currently conveys stormwater from Federal Highway to the existing lake system as indicated in figure 7. There is no associated cost with trunk line 5b-2. Trunk Line 5b-3, 4 , 5 and 6: These trunk lines indicated in Figures 8, 9, 10 and 11 drain the northern drainage area of Sub-basin 5b. The trunk lines convey stormwater from residential and commercial zones to the existing lake system located on SE 2nd Street and 3rd Avenue. Each trunk line represents an individual option which the city may choose to implement. The estimated cost of these options is presented in Table 3 and a line item estimate is contained in Appendix B. The Storm Sewer Calculations can be referenced in Appendix C. 6crry8celvinI July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS SURJEYORS PLANNER: B&C Project No 96-1507 1 City of Dania Drainage Study 22 • Trunk Line 5b-7, 8, 9 and 10: These trunk lines drain the southern drainage area of Sub-basin 5b as indicated in Figures 12, 13, 14 and 15. Stormwater from residential and commercial zones is conveyed by way of these trunk lines to the existing lake system located between SE 11' Terrace and 10t' Terrace. Each trunk line represents an individual option which the city may choose to implement. The estimated cost of these options is presented in Table 3 and a line item estimate is contained in Appendix B. The Storm Sewer Calculations can be referenced in Appendix C. Proposed Outfall Improvements: As indicated in Figure 16 this option consists of upgrading the existing lake interconnects as well as providing 50 cfs pumps in each lake system. The proposed pumps will rapidly convey stormwater from the lakes to the West lake area. Increasing the volume of water which is presently discharged to the West Lake area will require a permit from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). It is anticipated that the SFWMD will not permit a point source aw discharge and as a result, a spreader swale is proposed. To construct the spreader swale, SE 5th Avenue will have to be relocated to the west side of the existing right of way. The estimated cost of these options are presented in Table 3 and a line item estimate is contained in Appendix B. Since the funds to relocate SE 5tt' Avenue may be obtained from sources of revenue other than the proposed special assessment, the cost is provided separately. It is important to understand derstand that increasing the volume of water to the West Lake area will force the City of Dania to construct the spreader swale and relocate SE 51t' Avenue in order to comply with the SFWMD. It is also important to understand that if any of options 5b-3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 are implemented, the 50 cfs pumps at each of the existing lake systems must also be implemented to convey the water out of the lake systems to the West Lake area. Table 4 indicates the time which the existing 31.2 cfs pump must operate to convey stormwater out of Sub-basin 5b to West Lake. Table 4 also compares the operation time of various pumps at each of the existing lake systems. If one 50 cfs pump is implemented in each lake system, the operation time is ® reduced by 60.25 hours. This implies less time of flooding and ensures Sub-basin 5b berryAcelvininc Jul 151996 ENGNEERS SURJEVORS PLANNER Y B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 23 meets the 10 year - 1 day and 100 year -3 day level of service if all the other components are implemented as indicated in Table 5. While pumps require regular maintenance, which the city is currently providing for the existing 31.2 cfs pump, implementing the pumps at each lake system indicated in Figure 16 will allow the city to properly drain during high tides which is impossible to accomplish using gravity drainage. TABLE 4 : PUMP FLOW vs. OPERATING TIME 4 , 1 31.20* 5.13 4.00 2.00 87.75 2 62.40 4.96 3.56 2.00 44.00 10 YEAR 2 100.00** 4.85 3.56 2.00 27.50 • 1 DAY 2 124.80 4.80 3.56 2.00 22.00 2 249.60 4.64 3.56 2.00 12.50 2 374.40 4.54 3.56 2.00 4.50 1 31.20* 5.84 4.00 2.00 149.75 2 62.40 5.43 3.56 2.00 82.75 25 YEAR 2 100.00** 5.22 3.56 2.00 58.50 3 DAY 2 124.80 5.06 3.56 2.00 49.75 2 249.60 4.81 3.56 2.00 36.25 2 374.40 4.71 3.56 2.00 32.00 1 31.20* 6.43 4.00 2.00 210.00 2 62.40 6.01 3.56 2.00 110.00 100 YEAR 2 100.00** 5.62 3.56 2.00 72.75 3 DAY 2 124.80 5.67 3.56 2.00 65.75 2 249.60 5.30 3.56 2.00 25.25 2 374.40 5.15 3.56 2.00 16.00 * Flow capacity for the existing pump. ** Flow capacity for proposed pumps. berry8cnlvininc. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS � °5 PLA""EW B&C Project No 96-1507 1 City of Dania Drainage Study 24 • TABLE 5 : BASIN 5b MAXIMUM STAGES AXIMUMASIN 10 YEAR 5b Existing 1 - 31.2 cfs Pump 31.20 5.23x 5b Excluding Fed. Hwy. 1 -31.2 cfs Pump 31.20 5.13 1 DAY 5b Excluding Fed. Hwy. 2 -50.0 cfs Pump 100.00 4.85 25 YEAR 5b Existing 1 -31.2 cfs Pump 31.20 5.94 5b Excluding Fed. Hwy. 1 -31.2 cfs Pump 31.20 5.84 3 DAY 5b Excluding Fed. Hwy. 2 -50.0 cfs Pump 100.00 5.22 100 YEAR 5b Existing 1 - 31.2 cfs Pump 31.20 6.55 5b Excluding Fed. Hwy. 1 - 31.2 cfs Pump 31.20 6.43 3 DAY 5b Excluding Fed. Hwy--J. -2 - 50.0 cfs Pump 100.00 5.62 • r berryis Ivm July 15, 1996c. B&C Project No 96-1507 n w oc C7 1 — LL - _... . OA�B H�V38 NVO 1SV3 r �� �w �Nw :". r 0 Z O X Z O z O� r� Sz _j w n cr Y Y Y v rrrrlirr ,n vi �r _z=pQ z_=1- z_=F- QS mQ L m='D d'to Q N q rw rw r� 1II� ! o�X 0Lw Dow oq x l t Y-W5 Z U w w U LL to Q) 13 T w_.-- ��Z , , J Li �.� ..... d _ — rrr.rrr rr,rrr. W_. :.` w Z - r`i`rT Z J Y G Z LLI `r -_ - --- -- -- 1T, '15 41S 3 S I Z a 1S;S --- - - - Q�x c cq Q W 1 W `T 1 -._ O U. W } — T cc H __Yla - 5 - d ...... \� 0 1� took C 4 1 011+ -E•i b ' 1 ..._._.. �. eta T ..,l _ 15_.: glbl .. 35::.:r kt� NN_ • 1S.:. 4SS 1 3 S - --- -- ------ m" 13381S NV0183HS Wpm 00 w oc LL c� w 1 �oz n '3S �� m \ C S Z Q O ° Pk O O It ui UJ .. 1 4ltl,� � { 1S 3-S - <� — . 3_s c.: . PJC � ! w 1 Y ..:: ? z _ _3S l 0 ...._.. N1 .M ! is 47s 3 S ( z d cc — _ ; Q Ix M fl) Q Q U) 133 Q W ... p CD N O a O N wl _ - LL cc 0. _: ._ .__dd31_- _ -.... _.4}O.l. _................ :Is - q p, .J ....-- , - .. —3 ad • 1S 41S! .: 35 _ ��n-�. .... ..__. .. . -........ ._.. d ° g 13381S NV4183HS W O Wnm rn w D C7 LL • - ._ i ..::�i O W Q J w Y IN ! I Z .p < it m I 15 Isl '3S I I ~W I D Q i ! m'o L u O o m () � r u' I w qq P- I I _ I - t a 1S M� 3 S N --- .--I LO w wl I I �LO Z _ - Y C7 - - VIS 3 S 15 I Z �OC ---_ - _. a - I In 3 Q _ ! Z m 0 _.. W -- LL a w w! O O m I I I vi i -: - } cc I � � a IN if Ili, ;V Fj{aReililAsj I V I I Iy , aa3i_._ J_ I IN : 3 S— am t �r aka C Is.- ..... o \ I I 133a1S NVOI83HS Wnm O w oc -- - _. Li___. _ °Z _ — _Oa Naga _3 s_-_ lil Y I N x Z o n Q rn m 15 Is BS U� Lj ,a 0] 2 LU W - a .. 1S Fif 3._s N ..... .___ _ - w - - Lu • N J W Y C7 15 43S 3 S -: zacc -- _. - __.._.. .- ; : Q to to �yUD LLJ LL Cr Uil U W } 15 �t78 t!tni a : ...410.1 , 'tt q , - 7 �{ S W r 1 101 fi i t1l ��ggff� i fit :} I gv yNl 13381S NVOI83HS j Z � Zoo w.+m W ix c7 r- t is wY i i'J : �Q G Z $ 7 1 t ~N I (I{ , m z Lj I 0 o vi N N � a w _.. .. ..._._ TS ._. ..._.._..__ _.-_ Z Z w >I __._ ._._. _.._ ._._ -... � > I............ W. p. N 7s el (n J W Y 1S 41S 3-Scr Q .... w r to W _ LL O O a avvxm lg :::'15 vte -3's ice ' �• i -- O is 916 _3S r I t�7 l� : i E-Wn ero GdNjI — 133a1s M/ala3Hs W$o zap Wnm N W C7 • -- -- .. - - _ - F LL - 0'Z vl __ 7s7 3 S _.. _: w Z � $ !, D Q I i my I U N Z N _ 4 1 W II uj F 1S. .__ :::. -- n 1 : ...._...� In 3:S --r- H 2 .. 479 _ rn, 3 5 I `,1 Y Z r _ Z I I Q k� I �l I i Q 47Z � fq I"C f. l4ii I O I cr Lli _ yT '212J31 -4101 3 S..-. r ��U* �� pY � ll. J �tt Y I' l; C VJ^m I ryry - i 4 yN- _ S .': • _... ._ .- -- ._ ........ Po _.._-......... _..._..._._..- �Nan 1332115 NVOR13H5 4u � ®P W rm M W OC O w -- - (if zamD i Q N � I is ..._ lsl _... _-. .3 S - —w I $ --- - ---- -I° ~ Zw0 u l Z U vi I� pu — - W g eta L - - 15 Pit D -- w: . . .__ .,_ ._ 3 ._... oD Lu ' 0 - w m: 3 S � Z _ IS ------------ cc ............ 3 uj __..... _ ! ii O -- cn iLL cc a U 3..5.._ t , I i r .. _ .- fl n I U¢Om I I i I - � • R N= m� — 13381S NVOI83HS WOO Q�ig5 ..�w- a w cc C7 LL O i oa �iavd -3'S-- w Y x CYz ; CY y Z LjID Q m w F- 2 Z O W 0 I N rn Z (1 vi u .... W �..._._ ...._. Piz_.. A - I � n LLI ----------- D � W w a < I .1 92 ;'L W Lu _. D Z _... o aa3r . .. ❑ f II 1 � J • - _ - - "> _ 3 S_ � uj Y LL a - � is .3 S N N } T 1 }S - 83i_ ... 3 S. s .........._. � I i 4141 '3'S - 1S 4151 =3S a 133a1S — Mdala3HSOno= a mob W..o W oc CL °z J _aa ravel 3 s w Y x ly -..- a m uj m v 99 U vi W 1 ------ LU Li _ - _.._ P�£._.. 3,S -- 1S -- - - I i t - - W 9... • .. -._ C _ M1 _ ._ ._.. I -... N ... .... -. W,- 1S 47S t^I 3�5 W Y _ (� Z I I' I Z�H OCZO Q Q Q in u' a Iw; O O 'iS 41fi:=3s . I 3 S 4r 1 11�tlll I � 6 I LLJ 41 I fa I I • _. J.. - - 13381S NVQI83HS V ¢¢ Wpm co w c7 ._,G8 '....Navel -. ._..,3.5 _. zo N N o .___.._._.__....____...____.. N .._.__..___._..._......._.__..,_.. Q n M rn m _. _ ..... " L Li,Lil ._. 15 . ....... '3 S _... �q Q wN W�z w z z > x N G .. [ o WJw It \ i of W ?N Q < 5Y1 'i uj P,[ - L I a 3 a < zCL N I w CL CL _ o r! Z _... -.. _.. = W O N F- W n t N ... ... .,... .. ... .._ ..- Q .... 1S 43S 3 S � __. J r .. ._.. Q 3 ' Q LL Z � x 41Z:: z LL -. N ... _ 1 O LLI i .I �Q 15 ... 478 wj wl w fn w 3S ._._ m, ;. pi w � O N N 1._ _. ..... ------------ I _0- n H a Li _..- 1 � r ; o, -_.- _ S 'I a�'� _ Js 919 L 4^ .._ 13381s — Nva183r+s Wo¢W z°i W+gym City of Dania Drainage Study 35 APPENDIX A : AREA BREAK DOWN berryAcelvini... July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS SURJEYORS PLAMEM B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 36 The following Tables list the total area for each Basin as well as the pervious - impervious -. ratios. TABLE 6 : BASIN 1, AREA BREAK DOWN ,x Residential 1 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 10 0.00 80{ 0.00 Residential 2 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 15 0.00 75 0.00 Residential 3 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 20 0.00 70 0.00 Residential 4 DU/AC 2.39 13 0.31 25 0.60 62 1.48 Residential 8 DU/AC 0.00 25 0.00 40 0.00 35 0.00 Residential condo. 4.21 50 2.11 20 0.84 30 1.26 Commercial 67.00 35 23.45 50 33.50 15 10.05 Industrial 88.32 57 50.34 15 13.25 28 24.73 School 0.00 30 0.00 30 0.00 40 0.00 Road 64.94 85 55.20 0 0.00 15 9.74 Park 0.00 10 0.00 5 0.00 85 0.00 Open (not developed) 77.63 0 0.00 0 0.00 100 77.63 Lake 22.08 100 22.08 0 0.00 0 0.00 TOTAL 326.57 153.49 48.19 124.89 Q 6ePfy CCllbininc. July 15, 1996 ENGNEEPS sumiEvazs PI NER' BBC Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 37 TABLE 7 : BASIN 2, AREA BREAK DOWN Residential 1 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 10 0.00 80 0.00 Residential 2 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 15 0.00 75 0.00 Residential 3 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 20 0.00 70 0.00 Residential 4 DU/AC 263.47 13 34.25 25 65.87 62 163.35 Residential 8 DU/AC 152.62 25 38.16 40 61.05 35 53.42 Residential condo. 51.69 50 25.85 20 10.34 30 15.51 Commercial 153.88 35 53.86 50 76.94 15 23.08 Industrial 137.45 1 57 78.35 15 20.62 28 38.49 School 0.00 30 0.00 30 0.00 40 0.00 Road 58.05 85 49.34 0 0.00 15 8.71 Park 53.71 10 5.37 5 2.69 85 45.65 Open (not developed) 166.38 0 0.00 0 0.00 100 166.38 Lake 68.68 100 68.68 0 0.00 0 0.00 TOTAL 1,105.93 353.86 237.51 514.59 TABLE 8 : BASIN 3, AREA BREAK DOWN Residential 1 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 10 0.00 80 0.00 Residential 2 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 15 0.00 75 0.00 Residential 3 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 20 0.00 70 0.00 Residential 4 DU/AC 74.81 13 9.73 25 18.70 62 46.38 Residential 8 DU/AC 0.00 25 0.00 40 0.00 35 0.00 Residential condo. 0.00 50 0.00 20 0.00 30 0.00 Commercial 8.73 35 3.06 50 4.37 15 1.31 Industrial 0.00 57 0.00 15 0.00 28 0.00 School 0.00 30 0.00 30 0.00 40 0.00 Road 8.50 85 7.23 0 0.00 15 1.28 Park 0.00 10 0.00 5 0.00 85 0.00 Open (not developed) 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 100 0.00 Lake 0.00 100 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 TOTAL 92.04 20.02 23.07 48.97 berry8►ca1Vi inc. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS SURJEVORs • PLANNER' B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 38 i TABLE 9 : BASIN 4, AREA BREAK DOWN e P dential 1 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 10 0.00 80 0.00 dential 2 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 15 0.00 75 0.00 Residential 3 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 20 0.00 70 0.00 Residential 4 DU/AC 49.94 13 6.49 25 1 12.49 62 30.96 Residential 8 DU/AC 170.55 25 42.64 40 68.22 35 59.69 Residential condo. 5.38 50 2.69 20 1.08 30 1.61 Commercial 127.59 35 44.66 50 63.80 15 19.14 Industrial 33.02 57 18.82 15 4.95 28 9.25 School 10.79 30 3.24 30 3.24 40 4.32 Road 86.14 85 73.22 0 0.00 15 12.92 Park 12.62 10 1.26 5 0.63 85 10.73 Open (not developed) 175.45 0 0.00 0 0.00 100 175.45 Lake 23.21 100 23.21 0 0.00 0 0.00 TOTAL 694.69 216.23 154.41 324.07 TABLE 10 : BASIN 5a, AREA BREAK DOWN Fesidential ential 1 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 10 0.00 80 2 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 15 0.00 75 0.00 Residential 3 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 20 0.00 70 0.00 Residential 4 DU/AC 50.50 13 6.57 25 12.63 62 31.31 Residential 8 DU/AC 16.00 25 4.00 40 6.40 35 5.60 Residential condo. 4.96 50 2.48 20 0.99 30 1.49 Commercial 99.05 35 34.67 50 49.53 15 14.86 Industrial 29.25 57 16.67 15 4.39 28 8.19 School 0.00 30 0.00 30 0.00 40 0.00 Road 12.95 85 11.01 0 0.00 15 1.94 Park 8.99 10 0.90 5 0.45 85 7.64 Open (not developed) 38.83 0 0.00 0 0.00 100 38.83 Lake 1.46 100 1.46 0 0.00 0 0.00 TOTAL 261.99 77.76 74.39 109.86 berry ,4c lvinl July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 39 TABLE 11 : BASIN 5b, AREA BREAK DOWN ® 0 - - Residential 1 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 10 0.00 80 0.00 , Residential 2 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 15 0.00 75 0.00 Residential 3 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 20 0.00 70 0.00 Residential 4 DU/AC 139.19 13 18.09 25 34.80 62 86.30 Residential 8 DU/AC 63.75 25 15.94 40 25.50 35 22.31 Residential condo. 83.87 50 41.94 20 16.77 30 25.16 Commercial 50.28 35 17.60 50 25.14 15 7.54 Industrial 0.00 57 0.00 15 0.00 28 0.00 School 23.09 30 6.93 30 6.93 40 9.24 Road 16.45 85 13.98 0 0.00 15 2.47 Park 0.00 10 0.00 5 0.00 85 0.00 Open (not developed) 34.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 100 34.00 Lake 14.76 100 14.76 0 0.00 0 0.00 TOTAL 425.39 129.24 109.14 187.02 TABLE 12 : BASIN 5c, AREA BREAK DOWN pRedential 1 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 10 0.00 80 0.00 dential 2 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 15 0.00 75 0.00 Residential 3 DU/AC 0.00 10 0.00 20 0.00 70 0.00 Residential 4 DU/AC 140.75 13 18.30 25 35.19 62 87.27 Residential 8 DU/AC 14.50 25 3.63 40 5.80 35 5.08 Residential condo. 3.01 50 1.51 20 0.60 30 0.90 Commercial 94.96 35 33.24 50 47.48 15 14.24 Industrial 0.00 57 0.00 15 0.00 28 0.00 School 0.00 30 0.00 30 0.00 40 0.00 Road 24.29 85 20.65 0 0.00 15 3.64 Park 5.95 10 0.60 5 0.30 85 5.06 Open (not developed) 6.54 0 0.00 0 0.00 100 6.54 Lake 0.00 100 0.00 0 0.0b---1 0 1 0.00 TOTAL 290.00 77.93 89.37 122.73 • berry�celvinlnc. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PIA4WRE B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 40 APPENDIX B : ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE .0 berry g:La1vin,,.. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS wReEvoRs Pl NWZ 8&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 41 Tables 13 through 23 are cost estimates for the individual components of the Capital Improvements proposed in Sub-Basin 5b. Table 3 (page 21) summarize the total cost of each component. TABLE 13 : BASIN 5b-1, FEDERAL HIGHWAY TRUNK LINE A Manholes EA 9 $ 1400.00 $12,600.00 Inlets EA 0 $ 1250.00 $ 0.00 Pollution Retardant Baffle EA 1 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Pavement Restoration LF 2700 $ 25.00 $67,500.00 Rip-Rap headwall CY 10 $ 330.00 $3,300.00 15" RCP LF 0 $24.00 $ 0.00 t" 18" RCP LF 0 $ 28.00 $ 0.00 24" RCP LF 0 $ 32.00 $ 0.00 30" RCP LF 0 $ 38.00 $ 0.00 36" RCP LF 0 $ 53.00 $ 0.00 42" RCP LF 600 $65.00 $39,000.00 48" RCP LF 300 $ 78.00 $23,400.00 54" RCP LF 1800 $ 90.00 $162,000.00 60" RCP LF 0 $ 110.00 $ 0.00 Sub-Total $308,100.00 15% Contingency $46,215.00 TOTAL $354,315.00 a 0 a • berry galvininc. July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS SURJEYOfES PLANNER_' B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 42 TABLE 14 : BASIN 5b-3, SE 2"d AVENUE TRUNK LINE yy Manholes EA 9 $ 1400.00 $12,600.00 Inlets EA 0 $ 1250.00 $ 0.00 Pollution Retardant Baffle EA 1 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Pavement Restoration LF 2600 $ 25.00 $65,000.00 Rip-Rap headwall CY 11 $ 330.00 $3,630.00 15" RCP LF 0 $ 24.00 $ 0.00 18" RCP LF 0 $ 28.00 $ 0.00 24" RCP LF 0 $ 32.00 $ 0.00 30" RCP LF 0 $ 38.00 $ 0.00 36" RCP LF 600 $ 53.00 $31,800.00 42" RCP LF 0 $65.00 $ 0.00 48" RCP LF 600 $ 78.00 $46,800.00 54" RCP LF 950 $ 90.00 $85,500.00 60" RCP LF 450 $ 110.00 $49,500.00 Sub-Total $295,130.00 15% Contingency $44,269.50 TOTAL $339,399.50 Fz. 6err`gtii.lvin,nc July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS PLANNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 a� } City of Dania Drainage Study 43 TABLE 15 : BASIN 5b-4, SE 3rd AVENUE TRUNK LINE Manholes EA 7 $ 1400.00 $9,800.00 Inlets EA 0 $ 1250.00 $ 0.00 Pollution Retardant Baffle EA 1 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Pavement Restoration LF 1700 $ 25.00 $42,500.00 Rip-Rap headwall CY 8 $ 330.00 $2,640.00 15" RCP LF 0 $24.00 $ 0.00 18" RCP LF 0 $28.00 $ 0.00 24" RCP LF 0 $ 32.00 $ 0.00 30" RCP LF 300 $ 38.00 $11,400.00 36" RCP LF 600 $ 53.00 $31,800.00 42" RCP LF 500 $ 65.00 $32,500.00 48" RCP LF 300 $ 78.00 $23,400.00 54" RCP LF 0 $ 90.00 $ 0.00 60" RCP LF 0 $ 110.00 $ 0.00 Sub-Total $154,340.00 15% Contingency $23,151.00 TOTAL $177,491.00 berryV ,4:iaMninc. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS/YJfNEVORS . PIANKRE B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 44 TABLE 16 : BASIN 5b-5, SE 4th AVENUE TRUNK LINE Nit duk" ® s: Manholes EA 7 $ 1400.00 $9,800.00 Inlets EA 0 $ 1250.00 $ 0.00 Pollution Retardant Baffle EA 1 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Pavement Restoration LF 1800 $ 25.00 $45,000.00 Rip-Rap headwall CY 9.5 $ 330.00 $3,135.00 15" RCP LF 0 $ 24.00 $ 0.00 18" RCP LF 0 $ 28.00 $ 0.00 24" RCP LF 0 $ 32.00 $ 0.00 30" RCP LF 0 $ 38.00 $ 0.00 36" RCP LF 600 $ 53.00 $31,800.00 42" RCP LF 0 $ 65.00 $ 0.00 48" RCP LF 800 $ 78.00 $62,400.00 54" RCP LF 400 $ 90.00 $36,000.00 60" RCP LF 0 $ 110.00 $ 0.00 Sub-Total $188,435.00 15% Contingency $28,265.25 TOTAL $216,700.25 berry8celvini July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS SUfNEYORS PLANNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 45 TABLE 17 : BASIN 5b-6, SE 2"d AVENUE TRUNK LINE ADDITION AANT o. Manholes EA 9 $ 1400.00 $12,600 00 Inlets EA 0 $ 1250.00 $ 0.00 Pollution Retardant Baffle EA 1 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Pavement Restoration LF 2040 $ 25.00 $51,000.00 Rip-Rap headwall CY 9.5 $ 330.00 $3,135.00 15" RCP LF 0 $ 24.00 $ 0.00 18" RCP LF 0 $ 28.00 $ 0.00 24" RCP LF 130 $ 32.00 $4,160.00 30" RCP LF 680 $ 38.00 $25,840.00 36" RCP LF 0 $ 53.00 $ 0.00 42" RCP LF 530 $ 65.00 $34,450.00' 48" RCP LF 160 $ 78.00 $12,480.00 54" RCP LF 540 $ 90.00 $48,600.00 60" RCP LF 0 $ 110.00 $ 0.00 Sub-Total $192,565.00 15% Contingency $28,884.75 TOTAL $221,449.75 berry g1vini.c. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS wmlEr«:s PVJJ4Z B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 46 TABLE 18 : BASIN 5b-7, SE 2"d AVENUE TRUNK LINE A Manholes EA 7 $ 1400.00 $9,800.00 Inlets EA 0 $ 1250.00 $ 0.00 Pollution Retardant Baffle EA 1 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Pavement Restoration LF 1950 $25.00 $48,750.00 VE Rip-Rap headwall CY 9.5 $ 330.00 $3,135.00 15" RCP LF 0 $24.00 $ 0.00 18" RCP LF 0 $ 28.00 $ 0.00 24" RCP LF 0 $ 32.00 $ 0.00 30" RCP LF 0 $ 38.00 $ 0.00 36" RCP LF 600 $ 53.00 $31,800.00 42" RCP LF 0 $ 65.00 $ 0.00 48" RCP LF 500 $ 78.00 $39,000.00 54" RCP LF 850 $ 90.00 $76,500.00 60" RCP LF 0 $ 110.00 $ 0.00 Sub-Total $209,285.00 15% Contingency $31,392.75 TOTAL $240,677.75 6err`y,Wgalvinina July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS/wa�Evan PIMWW B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 47 • TABLE 19 : BASIN 5b-8, SE 3rd AVENUE TRUNK LINE x Manholes EA 7 $ 1400.00 $9,800.00 Inlets EA 0 $ 1250.00 $ 0.00 Pollution Retardant Baffle EA 1 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Pavement Restoration LF 1950 $ 25.00 $48,750.00 Rip-Rap headwall CY 8 $ 330.00 $2,640.00 15" RCP LF 0 $ 24.00 $ 0.00 18" RCP LF 0 $ 28.00 $ 0.00 24" RCP LF 0 $ 32.00 $ 0.00 30" RCP LF 300 $ 38.00 $11,400.00 36" RCP LF 600 $ 53.00 $31,800.00 42" RCP LF 750 $ 65.00 $48,750.00 48" RCP LF 300 $ 78.00 $23,400.00 54" RCP LF 0 $ 90.00 $ 0.00 60" RCP LF 0 $ 110.00 $ 0.00 Sub-Total $176,840.00 15% Contingency $26,526.00 TOTAL $203,366.00 July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS sumiEvoRs R< 6&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study Ile 48 TABLE 20 : BASIN 5b-9, SE 3rd AVENUE TRUNK LINE °. . T� Manholes EA 7 $ 1400.00 J $9,800.00 Inlets EA 0 $ 1250.00 $ 0.00 Pollution Retardant Baffle EA 1 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Pavement Restoration LF 1900 $ 25.00 $47,500.00 Rip-Rap headwall CY 9.5 $ 330.00 $3,135.00 15" RCP LF 0 $ 24.00 $ 0.00 18" RCP LF 0 $28.00 $ 0.00 24" RCP LF 300 $ 32.00 $9,600.00 30" RCP LF 0 $ 38.00 $ 0.00 36" RCP LF 600 $ 53.00 $31,800.00 42" RCP LF 0 $ 65.00 $ 0.00 48" RCP LF 400 $ 78.00 $31,200.00 54" RCP LF 600 $ 90.00 $54,000.00 60" RCP LF 0 $ 110.00 $ 0.00 Sub-Total $187,335.00 15% Contingency $28,100.25 TOTAL $215,435.25 6erry`y/,8celvininc. July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS/SUiNEYpRS PIPNN As B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 49 TABLE 21 : BASIN 5b-10, SE 2"d AVENUE TRUNK LINE ADDITION 3 M Manholes EA 6 $ 1400.00 $8,400.00 Inlets EA 0 $ 1250.00 $ 0.00 Pollution Retardant Baffle EA 1 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Pavement Restoration LF 1700 $ 25.00 $42,500.00 Rip-Rap headwall CY 6.5 $ 330.00 $2,145.00 15" RCP LF 0 $ 24.00 $ 0.00 18" RCP LF 0 $ 28.00 $ 0.00 " RCP LF 30 300 $ 32.00 $9,600.00 30" RCP LF 500 $ 38.00 $19,000.00 42" RCP LF 200 42 $ 53.00 $10,600.00 " RCP LF 700 $ 65.00 $45,500.00 48" RCP LF 0 $ 78.00 $ 0.00 54" RCP LF 0 $ 90.00 $ 0.00 60" RCP LF 0 $ 110.00 $ 0.00 Sub-Total $138,045.00 TOTAL 15% Contingency $20,706.75 $158,751.75 10 berry Splvino.. July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS EURJEVORS FIANWR' B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 50 TABLE 22 : BASIN 5b-11, OUTFALL IMPROVEMENTS Manholes EA 6 $ 1400.00 $8,400.00 Lq Inlets EA 0 $ 1250.00 $ 0.00 Pollution Retardant Baffle EA 0 $ 300.00 $ 0.00 Pavement Restoration LF 4360 $ 25.00 $109,000.00 Rip-Rap headwall CY 62 $ 330.00 $20,460.00 15" RCP LF 0 $ 24.00 $ 0.00 18" RCP LF 0 $ 28.00 $ 0.00 24" RCP LF 2200 $ 32.00 $70,400.00 30" RCP LF 0 $ 38.00 $ 0.00 36" RCP LF 0 $ 53.00 $ 0.00 42" RCP LF 0 $ 65.00 $ 0.00 " RCP 54 LF 2160 $ 78. 00 $168,480.00 54" RCP LF 0 $ 90.00 $ 0.00 60" RCP LF 0 $ 110.00 $ 0.00 New Pump EA 2 $ 50,000.00 $100,000.00 Pump Station Shed LS 1 $ 75,000.00 $75,000.00 Revetment SF 10800 $4.00 $43,200.00 Excavate Spreader Swale CY 652 $ 3.50 $2,282.00 Sub-Total $597,222.00 15% Contingency $89,583.30 TOTAL $686,805.30 us 6erFy ,iiLa1Vin1nc. July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS SUINEVORS PLAWZ B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study y 51 TABLE 23 : BASIN 5b-12, SW 5th AVENUE REL OCATION UANT Manholes Inlets EA =" 0 $ 1400 00 $ 0.00 Pollution Retardant Baffle EA g $ 1250.00 $10,000.00 EA 4 $ 300.00 $1,200.00 Pavement Restoration LF 0 Rip-Rap headwall $25.00 $ 0.00 CY 5 $ 330.00 15" RCP LF $1,650.00 18" RCP 0 $ 24.00 $ 0.00 LF 240 24" RCP $ 28.00 $6,720.00 30" RCP LF 0 $ 32.00 $ 0.00 LF 0 36" RCP $ 38.00 $ 0.00 42" RCP LF 0 $ 53.00 $ 0.00 LF 0 48" RCP $ 65.00 LF 0 $ 78.00 54" RCP $ 0.00 60" RCP LF 0 $ 90.00 LF $ 0.00 0 $ 110.00 $ 0.00 Filter Fabric SF 61600 Stabilized Subgrade $ 2.50 $154,000.00 CY 2280 $ 7.00 $15,960.00 8" Limerock Base SY 8312 1 %"Asphalt $ 6.50 $54,028.00 SY 7334 $4.00 $2,282.00 4' Sidewalk LF 2200 $ 6.50 $14,300.00 Sub-Total 15% Contingency $$39,140.00 TOTAL 39,021.00 $299,161.00 6errREy8calvininc July 15, 1996 ENGERS AIRJEVpR$ • RIANNER: B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 52 APPENDIX C : STORM SEWER DESIGN 6erryA,4:�.alvinin.. July 15, 1996 ENGNEEPS PLANNEZ B&C Project No 96-1507 1 w y C C CID CD O — (N M V U') tD t` M O . t' C ® C O� n n n Lo N O O 1� ' O f` N N N N N N N O N W Q C N N N N N N CV Z C 0 O.�' v Zm In Lo In L V V V 0 m W Lo CD Lo to In Z 7- N O ,. � ON O O O In � uo V V V (D Oi w uJ Z U C J 0 3 w (m (o r-- w m O V In (D LL > 0i3- v v v v v )ri 6 0 cd 0 w � m O w d 1, CO O O 'ItUn (O D V to w w CO Z J d O C Oa O O O O O O N O L ~ } C C O O O O O O CDO O J d� O O O O O O O O O in M M M M M M M M M 11 C O C N x IT a J'y C In tVA In u In OV NV C N U O Q 1da,�w o O 0 0 0 0 CR 0 UU`w o 0 0 0 0 o h r: ip m co M )n N N CO )n P c0 )n N F0 3w o r~ n n r.- m w m CC) LL — O � voO w o 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 C)0 Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OF CO N )n(O 1- 0 In co CN �n7 F- 7 U t` I` 1` h I\ m O w m 6i + U L LL (O C•'C (O CO O V V V v V to to 0 In Go m C O O O O N CR O O ~ Cl) N N N N N N N N N 11 3Q n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Y •� N c ♦� N uQ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cU o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a .� '0 0 0 0 0 o Coo II � 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ud (i cc:)) 0 0 0 0 0 0 o tO a _ o e m co _ _ ® j w J �- J U LL II N M V )o (D I-- c0 Q) H U L U O m w c //\ a Z ~ o � o co � N O i m c � N O V � O C N O O^ _U) to CL O O CN co a N N N C,N J fn O O N N C_ 00 n O C.N O O J fq N O O tp t!7 C,N J!) O O (D LO C LO O N � V lC d O _ O N 7 LO y N C,N J(n O O O CAI O C O J co O _ O Nr to N tr) C,N ® O V I LM C, O ^+ J N W O E $ O O O O O O L N r O O O d ^ri� W c/ C y C Q C O .-- N M V to CO n N cm c„ (L C O O O C) O (D O > O C.0... O O tq O O o ch nj C w m a^ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f- > > to to o o to to 0 0 0 OQ M N N Z D C Q' 030^•� O O O LO Z'O LO M M N M O v M M V to tf) to V f{, O O 00 ll) tt) to V LOO Z M V m N O CDN W U. 0 3 N N n N fD O O O J 'D 'o V' ui 'I, CM V ri cM N cr r" W C1 m O H N n N f0 M O O a D 7� V M V M M fV Z J # N C Oo O CDO O n O O O O O J H v O O O O O O O O O C C O O O O O O O O O } M M M M M M M M LO C O II U U U U U U U U U � d C N K O O V V 0 O(0 q- a (O to N 0V �' M M ' C 7 aw w O O O O M tD (O O O U O O O aD -to tt) O O co O ate+ 3,o n N N CO O CO CO m r-= rn oo n (D to M C O U- 0 < O O O O O O O O O O Q .U.• O O O O O O O O O 0 O O c t0 .0+ p ry n N N M. O M - M F- 7 M OMO r- t0 LO M N .�- L1J U LL t C WE �"' m n N to 0) ` C C C M M V to f0 n N a0 O lL (D to 0 too n C V O O n — Q7 V t7p to O ~ •� M M N N N N N N N M LO m II 0CDM n v f0 ao O C) t0 N e® coU N N 0p to tV C UQ N N N O W pp w m O C C U Un to U� co to to o tm (0 CV N N (V N N N N N O W O LOto t0 to to to to to to O 41(� � O t0 tC) tl) tl) to to to 11 -0 O 0 O O O O O O O may^ rn rn rn n n n n n n to to CR o cq CR cq to 0 N II tf m LO J r J U C) II N M V to (D n m m U ® CI w _C � W O � a z J N M V «) tp n ao O CY) 9 0 ® m LO (D C14 dj (3)C') C) N O C) N C14 (C70 CV C) C) C) co r- 0 Q) N CD C) O OD O O O to CD tT LO W) C) C) O V Lo C) O Cl C) OD ce)ko u -J )_ C) C) pf C) 0 c NCO C.N IL C) C) 04 CD N -j U) O $ � c C) C� co co � d c� m O N M V' ta7 UJ O) O @ � C a c D� o o ton ton ® M M M M N " O y Q^ O O O O O > 7 tf) to O O U) O U) Q C (`? M M M N N O C, Z C 0 O O ((p LO a CO M Z O"' Cl) ai C- v ri v V r` Z IV: M in v co v v v W Z U G J 0 3 N I- CO CD M C) N LL >'C v '7 to V N N O W m U H O Q 1� CO O M t?) N > > '� (n Z J O O O O I- M C_ Oo O O O O O c7 ~ J Nv O O O O O O O ui G C O O O O O O p } J N O N N M M M m to 11 C U U U U U U U O N = N G N J V �V NV VN' M M c07 Q.N,C G u— d aw WNW V � CD O O O O N N cn Cl) 0 m 3� M N v N ao o N (pD 'mV LL � 0 < O o O O O O O Q O Q rr� O O O O O O O O NON (� ('� N V N CO 00 m CDM to m C M Mp N + � LJJ U J � w O L h N 00 CO CO M (O � N O N LLUJ C ZEE V V V' t1i LO Q CC) G 1 CD O � .-- O M O � ~ •E N N N N N N N Cl)® EQ o C) 0; LO 0) c) co Y� 7 ^ � O N p ■o cn V CO CO N C -0d C cU o n o 0 0 0 0 �q O N N N N `0 t: O (n LO LO (n (CI (n D sew y V CD to (n U7 LO (n (n 11 wuo v o 6 6 6 6 6 o m ~ ': '°^ O U` U rn LO LO LO n LO a 6 vi Ci M C6 _ 3 It � o °) •- coc m j vi (' . J E LL II L O °_' -I w it z cr LO (D I- O H 1 o I— 0 CO O �-T N c o .O co O Q_ C _N (D J(o O O tF C tD co C,N J(n O O N c to to co o 0 u)ci o C N J(n V O R O d co a/ .0 st V N d C,N J fn O O (o •C N M,-t C,N O O V c _ co N co ® CN L - o o e� N W co 3 r� C,N J(n O O CDO co��/�� W N d � C C# 4) 3= O N M CD � Q) � � C a c o- o o LO LO Ln LO o 0 v V 4 C? M M N CV p W M ci N Z C 30 O O O M IN (D O Z�" M M M M M CD n Z7- r0 � to n CD O rl M M M M W Z U C J 3 H P- rn 7 rn Co co v LL -6 0 V V tD M V N O w W u _ m O O n � CJ) O CD V• D a Z J !V O _C Oo O O O O C) ~ J(/)v O O O O O O O 1 _ Q) C } CF O O O O O O O J 2` N N M M M M II V N C U U U U U U U O J Nv LO C � M IM co C 7 U— y U� O O O O O N N O O O O O N N Cl) CO In O O w N r O CO CA Cl) 0 F- N n CND v rNi LL CD pw CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 ao OC N V O CD V O M M n � CO V M 111 + U CC) m O N LL C "Y v V IT v CC) CIA 0 co O U Lq N O K ~ •E N N N N O N N N im M M M M II O EQ o 0 0 o N U CD CD CD � CD V N C ■® O CD M �J N U Q O C) C C U O O N N N N N O O M M M M M 0 ^ O ..i.i C a)U o o 0LO � U� U .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a U U U O O O CO CO O CR O. C Q m O O N CC) Ln <n Cn 3 LO II ON CO •CID LO /wp O 5 C_ J � J U LL I I L N M � to CD f` �, U Oa) III F- CO 9 CDLO I�M � N a C.N J(n O O (D C_ (D tD(h CD O N N � C N J(n O O N C �tf N N C,N J fn O co O Z V c � •- d �t O CD C N Go J fn O - O O (O M� C N J fn O O N Ln C,N •� J fn O L O A o N LO L V J f� O iv O O O O M ui v/ Nd c A CD 0) — O — N M 7 LO fD M O O O) t>) a C c o- ton toO Uo o ton ton o Uo 0 (h M th ('7 N N t i 7 O W H toO toO toO o toO o n 0 0 Oa M c? N N 7 i Z D Q LO 0 LO C (� LO p� N N O m 7 OO O I� Z'O" V V M V V V M rn ZLn; N o rn °T oo m n U v v v ri v a cD ri v W Z U C J N 03 h V M O N O V M m LL 'O- to to to N M L V Cl) .-- 0 W _ m O to � p, '7 M O N O V' M CT 7..., to to to LO tD LO V M .-- Z J C7 ao^ O (DO O O L2 O O O � co p o O O o to 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N m^ } C Cam O O O O O O O O O J d t2 N (D O M to M �2 LO N N M M M 11 C O U U U U U U U U U 'r) Cl. J'yl C U 0 LO V' V v M M N ` E Oak CLZ U o 0 0 0 0 aa) 0) o 0 O O O O O CO N O O fD M OD M 3 N fD N p OO M N 00 O O 00 00 00 CO LO of N to LL '- < F- i::, '0 pw O o O O O O O O O O 00 Q�� O O O O O O O O O O _ O (D v to N to OR O M Cl) wC-i O + H 7 U CO CO CO <D to IT N — to W U J C _ LL _ L LL C ate+C N N CC? vt IV: to (D o0 tD OR tp to to to 10 to to to to to co _ m V C (D N tO O V M O N O F- E O O) W a0 fD tD O M 11 00 t2 M fD fD r ® E Q V v to GoO U cD cD Lo o v r� Oo o Z •® O M N C C U Q O tD O O N O) to ao O ® c U o o Oo M cD I� ao 0 O .i.i o y^ o toO toO LO LOton toO LO LO ton It � uU o 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 6 L) l4 U C N O O to (�D Cl) to LOO Q. Q O 3 CD II O (D m m (� tv LO `J J_ U LL It N M a to (D I� CO O U L U C to C 0 O /�1 -� N M v LO CO � M M a Z U cD o o O • m LO ai w .o 0 ai ui C,N J fn 00 tt O O N C to V C,N J to O O O C N to V C,N O Eva O co ,C V R d c co ui ci C,N J(n O O t0 S CAI tI') C_N J to O O R C_ N U7 (U N • J<n 4� O40 L p N C L T°' Q� C,N W O p O O O O O i W Cl)4 CO (6 9 ® O ai LO C:) C) LO C) C) m C) LO CN ea C) C) CN C:) 00 m S�a).Naj . -j cn C:) C) C) C) LO O C) C? C6 0 04 C:) -1=0 LU C C# V O (O n Q) L t' C N CEO O O O in in ® M (6 M N (V O W o 0 0 U� . C C7 c? M N N Z C (7 O�` v v 00 N CO O Z1� O O V O O w O _ n Z7- ll� CO N O O V n N O 1q, O O 0 O 'cf W Z U G J 0 03 N M M O w 0 Cl) N LL �•O O O V V (M 'i N O W U m p, N M O (O f0 M N Q 7... O U') J d QC__Oo O O O O O O O O O O O O O O J N v O O O O O O O C CE O O O O O O O .J N.... O O O O O O O O M M N N M M M II C U U U U U U U 'O x CD �5 a J N.C-_. LO LO to 7 U— N 07 V1 m O O O O O O O IIJJ O O O O O O O �p CO a0 M w 3 w O r- O N OJ O O N H� u to co coU.n O V M .O- O Q � O O O O O O O Q n O Qr= O O O O O O O Q O O Q CR F- `— O O n O R M WLL U J F O Z M � C+r G (O (O n O C O O N Q t0 WE.% V V O O CO n _ Q) U C M N O CO N O .a H E O N N N N N N N (") II ® EQ 00 (n M N V ai ao r o 0 o c .® ai to c i ke � m C c U C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 pe O M M M M M M X O O(D O O O O O O (O I�1 U a($ co�- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 cc u O.. U U` U O U) to U') (LO U) ( •�. LCQm O O O O O O O ' I� N // �/� m � co _O O O C ` J J U E N tL II ® d w W �d G d Z F- U? o 0 o O N LO To c co ' ui ai a - o 0 0 (� 6ai C,N J fn O O C_ co N O O N .0 O _ v IT O y d C N t J<n V 10 C M t O O a) N_ Go J(n O c coo a N N7 N N C,N J(n O O W ■v L LvO O k.1. O C,N N L -cn 3 a� O O n (h O CD ui r� W v/ N d y O N M V to (D O) cn O) d C N C p- to O O O to LO00 ri ® N N N N p W o o O O O O O Q j jto O O O to to O C N N N N Z C O Z-' � tU V (00 W � Z v" ui to to ui 0 LOCD v Z tarp . V (oo CR � (q to LO ui to to ui v It W Z 0c 0 U- 3 in o v to I� o r` o � 0 V to V M M N N 0 W m U N o a o v to o r` o 7 R Ln V M M N N Z -1 FQ- G) C_ Oo O O O O O O O J 0` O O O O O O Ci (`1 } J d O to O O O O O to M M N N M co co II V O C U U U U U U U d � .x tb N N N (D (D O C- J N U� � IQ�V O O O O O O a U�v o 0 0 0 0 0 o io Cl) 0 w 3 w n tD fD V N h N t0 p H r=.� LO to V M N O LL '0 p4 O O O O O O O O CD p Qw� O O O O O O O p _ tD cli h (D (D V N I- M M 0 O N O C V to M M fN 0 Llj + F- M— to to V M NM J U C ` LL ~ t (D h VN O N co O C V CM lD 1� V to O O ~ N LO v Cl) N N N N N N II ® E N N In O (D V I- w 7 Q M V I� O ■ U 0 n LO M c °> t_ c c U o m a^o, a^o o r o a y^ o to to tUn ULO ` U` t`nn II Mcc CQ.m.- O N o in cc cn c w J J U }a U- N II i� M V to (p f� E... U � U O O H � C � O) _J N CO V to (D f� a Z H U) w m o LO Cl) a O LO N O O N 00 d' N N O LO � v ee d O O C) .® IL L 3 O E $ O O O O O O ® a�i LO �— ~ M �— LO v� N y �C# O •-- N M V � (O O d CA m � a �o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl W > M- 0 0 0 0 0 o p C N N N N O o j c_ LO (7 G- O 7 M OV C*? Z'C v N Cl! O to LO 7 LO to LO to n Z7 F N 0) M R M N (/1 tO a to to to to to W Z J 0 3 N W co n co N to .- LL ".0 Ix 4 V V 4 ri Lri ri et W m U N O O. O 00 n O N LO Z M to M at J FQ- d 0 C Oo O O O O O O O J ro O O O O O O O J y O C) O O O O O to (M Cl) N N Cl) Cq CM II _ 13 O C U U U U U U U N J N C LO LO V v M M N C off U 7 N C) C) O CD U Cl) CD Cl) n o rn U� o o CN c w I0-C n u0� v M N O < F- C:)V p.N O o 0 o O o 0 O QC , o 0 0 0 0 0 o Q o CD N n OR n to O OO M Cl) F- 7 V n n LO I�r M N - W + LL \ L N 0 tO to to (O C'� V � V' cr-O _ O C M N tO (D l0 N O M ~ E N to N N N N N N M II ie o O Q O � N COD tt N . N U co `n Oi r- v N y c cU cD no CO CO v v v ® O M N N N N N L LO to 0 tO LO tO LO II O y V to to to tt? to to to a (�V 0- 0V O O O O O O O ,Y v U •- -. O N N N N N N 'Q v v v In II O � CDo m m d LO 75 J J U E II LU ® W c^ -1 N M v to co n a Z o �- O U) N cyi LO f�N 00 N N 40 � C N a J(n O O (O C fD (p M N N C,N J(n O O c_ LO M 00 N N N C,N _J!n O O Oo t J(n d Li. O O O co M R C N_ J(n O O �O N LO N N C N N O 0 v o LO IL O C N N O E $ O o O M O' O '0 Y 1 N y N Q_ O •-- N M sr O (D QOj tT O O C a V > O 0 0 0 o O p o® o r; �N N CV CV p O W M Q oD C) o 0 0 a CD CD 0 o Q C N N N N Z D Lo 7 C�7 V M Z O" in in v Ln Ln (n in n Z 7- O O M C M N LC) to t0 n to W Z O 3 N a0 ao r` a0 N O cr _ m U O N O a0 n au N to a Z > > v v v c�i ui (� v J d 0 c_oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J Nv O O O C) O O O C C O O O O O CD Lo J Nam.. M N N N M M M II d ' C U U U U U U U O C N C LD � OV Va0 M C07 N a J N,` E 7 _ N U � 3 N U V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O iD M co ::3 y .- a0 n Cl)to O aD N OOP n r- coLo V M N U Q � 'DO pw O O O O O O O Q O O O O .O+OF n C0 U? O aD Cl) CM U V M N U C L C r L (OO n cq C Lo N Q LL� 1 a0 sT Itst IT 017 n O C M ~ •� N N N N N N N M C II ® EQ v m r N O (O M r (O CN N a0 V: .N y V O n � N C■® N cU ca t v Cl) v v q O M N N N N N d X O II cog o 0 6 6 0 0 6 m n U U � U 3 Un II O N m L r w J U- U ll II � U ® d 11 °0 o i/) N M v Ln cD n a Z 1 O N O Oilm .c o a J fn O O (O O (p co C,N J fn O O V C_ M O to M O N C N J fn co O O Z O O O 00 M IT N N C N J fn O O (D C V N LO C N J U) O O W //��0 L i 6 p C _N N J fn 3 O O O O O p O n M ui L. > t2 7 d ",aW co c O) p O .- N M v tO O) Q) � � C a C O 7 O' O o v O N O _ W o o LO W) o o O C OoCO M ;Wo, M Z'O rt._-ot._-o L (D 1l- _ (O Z o (P n M CO M O 'O Ln (O w r- 0p W z U C J U 3 H1 (0 .-- M 'O e- IL of W ci m O M 'n D > (D 'ci Lo r� ui c Z J Oc_ o o r` � (n 'n _ N N J 'Av O O O O O O ui J d� a CD CD M V N N M M 'n If 'O C U O C.) J Nv V' � M M M N C E u_ � A y �-- (O O 10 1,- Q' N U� v M M N Q) CO c0 M O O"A � O 'o Il O) OR CV Em O F'-=- N M M N r• O < vow o 0 0 0 0 0 o0 Qr� o 0 0 0 0 o p 0 0 0 y v O 'O h O OO M Cl) F-• 7 'O M M N t � W U J � L C ('� V M 'OO fnO ONO Q t0 IY C' 'o tO L(l) LO 'o (D a0 _ O C (D M h N N O U •E Oi OO � � (O L O ~ M N II ® E N N N O O O ..�'. 7 Q O 00 (O ■0 N V (3) (O (O v N C ♦� m may@ c N N N N N N N N O N N N o V LOLOnLOLOn a O d ' ' If Vic- 0 0 0 0 0 omm cc a u19— o 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 v 0 0 0 n < v v o v v v g 3 v~i n o a� p m _C U J � J U lL II N M V, 'O O � U � U ® o �.+ c/� J# N M IT 'O (D O �!r a z 1 o H I ' ® m ci LO � c O N I CO a N fn O O R .0 U)Cl) C,N J(n O O N C O �Cl) UI N C,N O _ O O c cD MCI) t C_22 V O R c c O _ O 04 C,N J(n O Cl V W e� C ® N L �a o0 (L^ N N N C N J(n L CD cn o � O o 0 o O ui co o L > � 'ri O co'�A� W City of Dania Drainage Study 74 APPENDIX D : 10 YEAR - 1 DAY SFWMD ROUTING berry�ccl Iminc. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS SURJEVpitS PUWNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 i City of Dania Drainage Study 75 Zompany Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers 3xecution Date............ 07-03-1996 Program Name.............. SCS4 -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 1 3ngineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 326.57 acres ;round Storage............: 2.88' inches rermination Discharge.....: 50 cfe )ietribution Type.........: SFWMD leturn Frequency..........: 10 years 2ainfall Duration.........: 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 9.7 inches leporting Sequence........: Standardized Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1............. LAKE V 22.08 2 Entry No. 2............. MAJOR ROADS L 55.20 4 10 Entry No. 3............. PERVIOUS L 124.90 4 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 76.21 4 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 11.04 0.00 3 3.00 22.08 0.00 4 3.50 33.12 0.00 5 4.00 44.16 0.00 6 4.50 64.73 0.00 7 5.00 104.36 0.00 8 5.50 163.05 0.00 9 6.00 240.79 0.00 10 6.50 337.60 0.00 11 7.00 453.47 0.00 12 7.50 580.01 0.00 13 8.00 708.85 0.00 14 8.50 840.00 0.00 15 9.00 973.45 0.00 16 9.50 1109.19 0.00 17 10.00 1247.24 0.00 R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Diechge Inflow Volume Outflow Diachge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.44 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 1.33 0.16 34.4 4.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.18 10.00 2.07 0.51 78.0 13.8 13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.59 11.00 2.61 0.84 131.9 22.9 22.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.98 11.50 3.09 1.17 224.2 32.0 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.34 11.75 4.73 2.45 1682.5 66.7 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.13 12.00 6.36 3.86 1859.9 105.2 105.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.77 12.50 7.07 4.50 420.6 122.5 122.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.12 13.00 7.44 4.84 221.1 131.6 131.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.21 14.00 7.93 5.29 135.2 143.9 143.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.33 16.00 8.54 5.85 89.0 159.1 159.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.46 20.00 9.23 6.50 53.9 176.8 176.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.58 24.00 9.70 6.93 36.1 188.7 188.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.66 Maximum Stage - 5.66 feet Maximum Discharge a 0.00 cfe 6erry&calVininc. July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS %A?VEYORs . PWR.FlE B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 76 Company Name..............: Berry 6 Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name............... SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 2 Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 1105.93 acres Ground Storage............. 2.3 inches Trmination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........s SFWND Return Frequency..........: 10 years Rainfall Duration.........: 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 9.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Weir Information..........: Length-Ft Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 5 2 3.13 Culvert Information.......: Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 50 5 .044 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............: LAKE V 68.68 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 49.34 5 9 Entry No. 3.............s PERVIOUS L 514.58 3.5 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 235.83 3.5 7 Point Stage storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 34.34 5.53 3 3.00 68.68 15.65 4 3.50 103.02 28.75 5 4.00 164.16 44.26 6 4.50 278.90 61.86 7 5.00 447.24 81.32 8 5.50 670.73 102.47 9 6.00 950.90 125.20 10 6.50 1287.75 149.39 11 7.00 1681.29 174.97 12 7.50 2104.71 201.86 13 8.00 2531.22 230.01 14 8.50 2960.80 259.35 15 9.00 3393.48 286.16 16 9.50 382769 29620 17 10.00 4261:91 305..92 R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume out Diechge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfs) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.43 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 1.30 0.23 143.5 20.8 20.5 0.3 3.1 0.9 2.28 10.00 2.02 0.63 296.3 58.3 57.0 1.3 11.3 6.1 2.79 11.00 2.56 1.00 485.7 92.1 89.5 2.6 21.7 15.7 3.23 11.50 3.03 1.36 811.0 125.0 121.3 3.7 31.3 26.5 3.58 11.75 4.63 2.69 5941.9 247.8 243.3 4.5 47.0 39.1 4.08 12.00 6.23 4.13 6417.2 380.4 374.7 5.7 65.3 56.1 4.59 12.50 6.93 4.77 1435.8 439.5 430.8 8.7 77.7 73.0 4.91 13.00 7.29 5.11 753.0 470.6 458.6 12.0 81.7 79.9 5.01 14.00 7.77 5.56 459.1 512.5 493.7 18.9 85.3 83.6 5.09 16.00 8.36 6.12 301.5 563.9 530.6 33.3 88.9 87.2 5.18 20.00 9.04 6.77 182.1 623.9 560.7 63.2 91.9 90.5 5.25 24.00 9.50 7.21 121.9 664.2 570.4 93.8 92.9 92.4 5.27 30.00 9.so 7.21 0.0 664.2 525.4 138.8 88.7 90.a 5.17 36.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 664.2 482.4 181.8 84.6 86.7 5.08 42.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 664.2 441.4 222.8 80.6 82.7 4.98 48.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 664.2 402.5 261.6 76.2 78.4 4.87 54.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 664.2 365.8 298.3 71.9 74.0 4.76 60.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 664.2 331.2 333.0 67.9 69.9 4.66 66.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 664.2 298.4 365.7 64.1 66.0 4.56 72.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 664.2 267.6 396.6 60.1 62.2 4.45 78.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 664.2 238.9 425.3 55.7 57.9 4.33 84.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 664.2 212.3 451.9 51.6 53.7 4.21 86.75 9.50 7.21 0.0 664.2 200.7 463.4 49.9 50.8 4.16 Maximum Stage = 5.27 feet Maximum Discharge = 92.86 cfe bcrry&celvininc. July 15, 1996 ENGMEERS WRAY= • PLAMEM B&C Project.No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study .tsv 77 Company Name..............: Berry 6 Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name..............: SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 3 Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area............... 92.04 acres round Storage............: 2.63 inches termination Discharge.....: 50 cfs Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 10 years Rainfall Duration.........: 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 9.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized heir Information..........: Length-Ft 9't Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 2 2 3.13 Culvert Information.......: Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 50 2 0.024 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. I.............: MAJOR ROADS L 7.23 5 9 Entry No. 2.............: PERVIOUS L 48.97 3.5 7 Entry No. 3.............: IMPERVIOUS L 12.78 3.5 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfs) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 0.00 2.21 3 3.00 0.00 6.26 4 3.50 0.00 11.50 5 4.00 2.21 17.71 6 4.50 8.82 20.97 `4 7 5.00 19.85 22.98 8 5.50 35.51 24.82 9 6.00 56.04 26.53 10 6.50 81.43 28.14 11 7.00 111.68 29.66 12 7.50 144.59 3111 13 8.00 177.95 32..49 14 8.50 211.76 33.82 15 9.00 246.02 35.10 16 9.50 280.51 36.33 17 10.00 315.00 37.52 - R E S E R V O I R - - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfs) (af) (af) (af) (Cfs) (cfs) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.43 0.00 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 1.30 0.18 10.3 1.4 0.1 1.2 10.3 3.8 3.39 10.00 2.02 0.54 22.6 4.2 0,9 3.2 13.5 12,0 3,66 11.00 2.56 0.88 37.8 6.8 2.3 4.5 16.9 14.9 3.94 11.50 3.03 1.22 63.9 9.4 4.2 5.2 18.4 17.8 4.10 11.75 4.63 2.50 475.4 19.2 13.6 5.6 20.9 19.6 4.49 12.00 6.23 3.91 521.0 30.0 23.9 6.1 22.7 21.8 4.94 12.50 6.93 4.54 117.4 34.8 27.8 7.0 23.8 23.4 5.21 13.00 7.29 4.87 61.6 37.3 29.3 8.0 24.0 23.9 5.28 14.00 7.77 5.32 37.6 40.8 30.8 10.0 24.2 24.1 5.34 16,00 8.36 5.87 24.8 45.0 31.0 14.0 24.3 24.2 5.35 20.00 9.04 6.51 15.0 49.9 27.9 22.0 23.9 24.1 5.25 24.00 9.50 6.94 10.0 53.2 23.4 29.8 23.4 23.6 5.11 Maximum Stage = 5.35 feet Maximum Discharge = 24.25 cfe a �F berry&celv1ninc. July 15, 1996 ENGWEERS wrNEvons B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 78 Company Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name..............: SCSY -- (05/06/86) i Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 4 Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area............... 694.69 acres Ground Storage............: 2.3 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 10 years Rainfall Duration.........: 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 9.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Weir Information..........: Length-Ft Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 4 2 3.13 Culvert Information.......: Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 50 4 .024 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............: LAKE V 23.20 2 Entry No. 2........... MAJOR ROADS L 73.22 4 9 Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS L 324.07 3.5 7 Entry No. 4.............. IMPERVIOUS L 119.80 3.5 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge tk- No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 000 2 2.50 11.60 4..43 3 3.00 23.20 12.52 4 3.50 34.80 23.00 5 4.00 62.25 35.41 6 4.50 123.24 49.49 7 5.00 219.59 65.06 8 5.50 351.31 81.98 9 6.00 518.40 100.16 10 6.50 720.85 119.52 11 7.00 958.67 139.98 12 7.50 121600 154.67 13 8.00 1476:99 161.55 14 8.50 1741.65 168.14 15 9.00 2009.96 174.49 16 9.50 228011 18061 17 10.00 2550:25 186..54 R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Out Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfs) (ft) -_ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.43 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 1.30 0.23 90.1 13.0 12.6 0.4 4.5 1.3 2.50 10.00 2.02 0.63 186.1 36.6 34.3 2.3 20.9 11.3 3.40 11.00 2.56 1.00 305.1 57.8 53.5 4.4 30.0 25.4 3.78 a;< 11.50 3.03 1.36 509.4 78.5 72.8 5.8 36.6 33.4 4.04 11.75 4.63 2.69 3732.4 155.7 149.0 6.6 46.5 41.6 4.40 12.00 6.23 4.13 4030.9 238.9 231.2 7.7 60.2 53.4 4.84 12.50 6.93 4.77 901.9 276.1 265.6 10.5 69.8 66.3 5.14 13.00 7.29 5.11 473.0 295.6 282.2 13.4 72.5 71.3 5.22 14.00 7.77 5.56 288.4 322.0 302.4 19.5 75.3 74.0 5.30 ?' 16.00 8.36 6.12 189.4 354.2 322.0 32.2 78.0 76.7 5.38 20.00 9.04 6.77 114.4 391.9 333.7 58.3 79.6 78.8 5.43 24.00 9.50 7.21 76.6 417.2 332.6 84.6 79.5 79.5 5.43 30.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 417.2 294.4 122.8 74.7 77.1 5.28 36.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 417.2 258.5 158.7 70.1 72.3 5.15 42.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 417.2 224.9 192.3 65.7 67.9 5.02 48.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 417.2 193.5 223.7 60.8 63.3 4.86 54.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 417.2 164.5 252.7 56.2 58.5 4.71 60.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 417.2 137.7 279.5 51.8 54.0 4.58 a 62.75 9.50 7.21 0.0 417.2 126.2 291.0 50.0 50.9 4.52 Maximum Stage a 5.43 feet Maximum Discharge . 79.60 cfe berry&ea Ivl July 15, 1996 ENG.�EERSANNSZE BBC Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 79 Company Name............ Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name.............. SCSY -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............s DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN Sa Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 261.99 acres Ground Storage............. 2.3 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........; 10 years Rainfall Duration.........: 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 9.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Weir Information..........: Length-Ft Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 4 2 3.13 Culvert Information.......: Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 50 4 0.024 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev ' Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............: LAKE V 1.46 2 Entry No. 2.............• MAJOR ROADS L 11.01 8 12 Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS L 109.86 3 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 65.28 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 0.73 4.43 3 3.00 1.46 12.52 4 3.So 6.17 23.00 5 4.00 21.55 35.41 6 4.50 48.15 49.49 's 7 5.00 85.97 65.06 8 5.50 135.00 81.98 9 6.00 195.26 100.16 10 6.50 266.73 119.52 11 7.00 349.42 139.98 12 7.50 437.72 154.67 13 8.00 526.02 161.55 14 8.50 614.66 168.14 15 9.00 704.00 174.49 16 9.50 794.02 180.61 17 10.00 884.73 186.54 18 10.50 976.12 192.28 19 11.00 1068.21 197.85 20 11.50 1160.98 203.28 21 12.00 1254.44 208.56 - - - - - R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow volume out Diechge Dischge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.43 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 1.30 0.23 34.0 4.9 3.0 1.9 15.2 5.8 3.13 10.00 2.02 0.63 70.2 13.8 , 8.6 5.2 24.4 19.9 3.56 11.00 2.56 1.00 115.1 21.8 14.4 7.4 28.7 26.3 3.73 11.50 3.03 1.36 192.1 29.6 21.0 8.6 33.3 30.9 3.92 11.75 4.63 2.69 1407.6 58.7 49.3 9.4 42.4 37.9 4.25 +` 12.00 6.23 4.13 1520.2 90.1 79.7 10.4 56.0 49.2 4.71 12.50 6.93 4.77 340.1 104.1 91.1 13.0 65.6 62.1 5.02 13.00 7.29 5.11 178.4 111.5 95.7 15.8 67.8 66.8 5.08 14.00 7.77 5.56 108.8 121.4 100.0 21.5 69.5 68.8 5.13 16.00 8.36 6.12 71.4 133.E 100.6 33.0 69.8 69.8 5.14 20.00 9.04 6.77 43.1 147.8 92.2 55.6 67.0 68.5 5.06 24.00 9.50 7.21 28.9 157.3 80.3 77.1 62.6 64.9 4.92 30.00 9.50 7.21 0.0 157.3 52.1 105.2 51.1 56.7 4.55 30.75 9.50 7.21 0.0 157.3 49.0 108.3 49.8 50.5 4.51 Maximum Stage - 5.14 feet Maximum Discharge - 69.85 cfe 'd' 0 pp�erfy&calvininc. July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS SNAYOM • PLAKNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 80 Ile Company Name..............: Berry 6 Calvin Engineers Execution Date............ 07-03-1996 Program Name.............. SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 5b Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 425.39 acres Ground Storage............: 2.45 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type......... SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 10 years Rainfall Duration.........: 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall............ 9.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Pump Pump On Pump Off Pump Rate No. Elevation Elevation Discharge (ft) (ft) (cfe) 1 4.00 2.00 31.20 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. I............. LAKE V 14.76 2 Entry No. 2............. MAJOR ROADS L 13.98 8 12 Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS L 187.02 3 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 100.49 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage NO. (ft) (af) 1 2.00 0.00 2 2.50 7.38 3 3.00 14.76 4 3.50 28.82 5 4.00 60.43 6 4.50 110.43 7 5.00 178.82 8 5.50 265.60 9 6.00 370.76 10 6.50 494.32 11 7.00 636.26 12 7.50 787.39 13 8.00 938.53 14 8.50 109010 15 9.00 1242:55 16 9.50 1395.87 17 10.00 1550.06 18 10.50 1705.13 19 11.00 1861.07 20 11.50 2017.88 21 12.00 2175.57 R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Diechge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.43 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.00 8.00 1.30 0.20 51.7 7.2 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.45 10.00 2.02 0.59 109.6 20.9 20.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.18 11.00 2.56 0.94 181.3 33.5 33.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.54 11.50 3.03 1.29 304.4 45.8 45.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.72 11.75 4.63 2.60 2245.3 92.2 92.2 0.0 31.2 15.6 4.09 12.00 6.23 4.02 2441.2 142.7 142.0 0.6 31.2 31.2 4.55 12.50 6.93 4.66 547.9 165.2 163.3 1.9 31.2 31.2 4.85 13.00 7.29 5.00 287.5 177.1 173.9 3.2 31.2 31.2 4.94 14.00 7.77 5.45 175.4 193.1 187.3 5.8 31.2 31.2 5.04 16.00 8.36 6.00 115.3 212.8 201.8 11.0 31.2 31.2 5.13 20.00 9.04 6.65 69.7 235.7 214.4 21.3 31.2 31.2 5.20 24.00 9.50 7.08 46.7 251.1 219.5 31.6 31.2 31.2 5.23 Maximum Stage - 5.23 feet Maximum Discharge - 31.20 cfe r 6erry&ca1vin,, . July 15, 1996 UCGW"S SURVEYORS - B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 81 Company Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date............ 07-08-1996 Program Name.............. SCSI -- (05/06/86) y.. Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN Sb EXCLUDING 19.63 ACRES OF FEDERAL HWY Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area.. 389.24 acres Ground Storage............. 2.6 inches Termination Discharge.....: 30 cfe Distribution Type.........; SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 10 years Rainfall Duration.........: 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 9.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Pump Pump On Pump Off Pump Rate No. Elevation Elevation Discharge (ft) (ft) (cfe) 1 4.00 2.00 31.20 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Entry No. 1......... LAKE Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) V 14.76 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 9.21 8 12 Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS 0 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 98.63 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage No. (ft) (af) 1 2.00 0.00 2 2. . 3 3.00 00 14.7676 4 3.50 28.58 5 4.00 59.09 6 4.50 107.06 7 5.00 172.50 8 5.50 255.39 9 6.00 355.73 10 6.50 473.54 11 7.00 608.81 12 7.50 752.80 13 8.00 896.80 14 8.50 1041.08 15 9.00 1185.94 16 9.50 1331.37 17 10.00 1477.38 18 10.50 1623.97 19 11.00 1771.13 20 11.50 1918.86 21 12.00 2067.18 Rain Accum. Basin Accum. - R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfs) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.43 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 1.30 0.18 44.3 5.9 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.37 10.00 2.02 0.55 96.5 17.9 17.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.08 11.00 2.56 0.89 161.0 29.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.45 21.50 3.03 1.23 271.6 40.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.64 11.75 4.63 2.52 2017.8 81.7 81.7 0.0 31.2 15.6 4.02 12.00 6.23 3.93 2208.5 127.3 126.7 0.6 31.2 31.2 4.47 12.50 6.93 4.56 497.2 147.8 145.9 1.9 31.2 31.2 4.76 13.00 7.29 4.89 261.1 158.6 155.3 3.2 31.2 31.2 4.85 14.00 7.77 5.34 159.4 173.1 167.3 5.8 31.2 31.2 4.95 16.00 8.36 5.89 104.9 191.0 180.0 11.0 31.2 31.2 5.04 20.00 9.04 6.53 63.4 211.9 190.6 21.3 31.2 31.2 5.11 24.00 9.50 6.96 42.5 225.9 194.3 31.6 31.2 31.2 5.13 36.00 9.50 6.96 0.0 225.9 163.4 62.5 31.2 31.2 4.93 42.00 9.50 6.96 0.0 225.9 147.9 78.0 31.2 31.2 4.81 48.00 9.50 6.96 0.0 225.9 132.4 93.5 31.2 31.2 4.69 54.00 9.50 6.96 0.0 225.9 126.9 108.9 31.2 31.2 4.58 60.00 9.50 6.96 0.0 225.9 101.5 124.4 31.2 31.2 4.44 66.00 9.50 .6.96 0.0 225.9 86.0 139.9 31.2 31.2 4.28 72.00 9.50 6.96 0.0 225.9 70.5 155.4 31.2 31.2 4.12 78.00 9.50 6.96 0.0 225.9 55.1 170.8 31.2 31.2 3.93 84.00 9.50 6.96 0.0 225.9 39.6 186.3 31.2 31.2 3.68 90.00 9.50 6.96 0.0 225.9 24.1 201.8 31.2 31.2 3.34 96.00 9.50 6.96 0.0 225.9 8.6 217.2 31.2 31.2 2.59 99.50 9.50 6.96 0.0 225.9 -0.3 226.2 0.0 30.1 1.98 Maximum Stage - 5.13 feet Maximum Discharge - 31.20 cfs beery8►celvinIn. July 15, 1996 E?GCN ERS mx:vEvons . PL"WJE'' B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 82 Ile a Company Name.......... . : Berry S Calvin Engineers Execution Date......... ..: 07-03-1996 Program Name..............: SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name.............:: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 5c Engineer's Name.......... LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 290 acres Ground Storage............. 2.36 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfs Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 10 years Rainfall Duration.........: 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 9.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............: MAJOR ROADS L 20.65 8 12 Entry No. 2.............: PERVIOUS L 122.72 3 7 Entry No. 3.............: IMPERVIOUS L 57.26 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfs) <s 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 0.00 0.00 3 3.00 . 0.00 0.00 4 3.50 4.31 0.00 5 4.00 19.63 0.00 6 4.50 46.44 0.00 7 5.00 84.74 0.00 8 5.50 134.53 0.00 9 6.00 195.60 0.00 10 6.50 268.56 0.00 11 7.00 352.80 0.00 12 7.50 442.79 0.00 13 8.00 532.78 0.00 14 8.50 623.42 0.00 15 9.00 715.34 0.00 16 9.50 808.56 0.00 go 17 10.00 903.07 0.00 18 10.50 998.87 0.00 19 11.00 1095.95 0.00 20 11.50 1194.33 0.00 21 12.00 1294.00 0.00 - - - - - R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Diechge Inflow volume out Diechge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfs) (cfs) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 `f 4.00 0.43 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.00 8.00 1.30 0.22 36.7 5.2 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.52 10.00 2.02 0.62 76.5 14.9 14.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.82 11.00 2.56 0.98 125.9 23.6 23.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.05 11.50 3.03 1.33 210.6 32.2 32.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.19 11.75 4.63 2.65 1547.1 64.1 64.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.52 12.00 6.23 4.09 1675.3 98.7 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.96 12.50 6.93 4.73 375.3 114.2 114.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.26 13.00 7.29 5.06 196.9 122.3 122.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.36 14.00 7.77 5.52 120.1 133.3 133.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.46 16.00 8.36 6.07 78.9 146.7 146.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.59 _ 20.00 9.04 6.72 47.7 162.4 162.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.72 24.00 9.50 7.16 31.9 173.0 173.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.81 Maximum Stage- 5.81 feet Maximum Discharge - 0.00 cfe ((� JU1 15, 1996 �E ERS SUR► OM - KAMM BBC Project No 96-1507 ENGNEER$ SUfNEYORS PV�NrkA' City of Dania Drainage Study 83 APPENDIX E : 25 YEAR - 3 DAY SFWMD ROUTING berry8►celvinirc July 15, 1996 ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLMNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 84 Company Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date............s 07-03-1996 Program Name..............: SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 1 Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 326.57 acres Ground Storage............: 2.88 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 25 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 11 inches; Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. I.............s LAKE V 22.08 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 55.20 4 10 Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS L 124.90 4 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 76.21 4 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 11.04 0.00 3 3.00 22.08 0.00 4 3.50 33.12 0.00 5 4.00 44.16 0.00 6 4.50 64.73 0.00 7 5.00 104.36 0.00 8 5.50 163.05 000 9 6.00 240.79 0..00 10 6.50 337.60 0.00 11 7.00 453.47 0.00 12 7.50 580.01 0.00 13 8.00 708.85 0.00 14 8.50 840.00 000 15 9.00 973.45 0..00 16 9.50 1109.19 0.00 17 10.00 1247.24 0.00 R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Diechge Inflow Volume out Diechge Dischge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.27 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 0.54 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 12.00 0.80 0.02 3.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.02 16.00 1.07 0.07 5.9 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.09 20.00 1.34 0.16 8.2 4.3 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.19 24.00 1.61 0.27 10.0 7.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.33 28.00 2.00 0.47 17.6 12.8 12.8 0.0 0.0 00 2.57 32.00 2.39 0.70 20.0 19.0 19.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 2.85 36.00 2.78 0.95 21.8 26.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.17 40.00 3.17 1.23 23.2 33.4 33.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.50 44.00 3.56 1.52 24.4 41.3 41.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.86 48.00 3.95 1.82 25.3 49.5 49.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.12 52.00 4.44 2.22 41.4 60.3 60.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.38 56.00 5.46 3.07 93.5 83.5 83.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.72 58.00 6.29 3.80 141.2 103.4 103.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.97 59.00 6.91 4.35 208.7 118.4 118.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.10 59.50 7.46 4.85 329.8 132.0 132.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.21 59.75 9.31 6.57 2262.8 178.8 178.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.43 60.00 11.17 8.32 2311.9 226.6 226.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.75 60.50 11.97 9.09 506.7 247.5 247.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.01 61.00 12.39 9.49 264.6 258.4 258.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.08 62.00 12.95 10.03 160.6 273.1 273.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.16 64.00 13.63 10.69 105.1 291.0 291.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.25 68.00 14.42 11.46 63.3 311.9 311.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.36 72.00 14.95 11.97 42.3 325.9 325.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.44 Maximum Stage - 6.44 feet Maximum Discharge 0.00 cfe berry&cnlvin,:x. July 15, 1996 ENGMEEPS WRVErosa . s BBC Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 85 Company Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name..............: SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 2 Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 1105.93 acres Ground Storage............: 2.3 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 25 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 10.8 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Weir Information..........: Length-Ft Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 5 2 3.13 Culvert Information.......: Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 50 5 .024 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev . Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1........... LASE V 68.68 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 49.34 5 9 Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS L 514.58 3.5 7 Entry No. 4.............s IMPERVIOUS L 235.83 3.5 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 34.34 5.53 3 3.00 68.68 15.65 4 3.50 103.02 28.75 5 4.00 164.16 44.26 6 4.50 278.90 61.86 7 5.00 447.24 81.32 8 5.50 670.73 102.47 9 6.00 950.90 125.20 10 6.50 128775 149.39 11 7.00 1681:29 174.97 12 7.50 2104.71 201.86 13 8.00 2531.22 230.01 14 8.50 2960.60 259.35 15 9.00 3393.48 286.16 16 9.50 3827.69 296.20 17 10.00 4261.91 305.92 R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Diechge Inflow Volume out Dischge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.26 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 0.53 0.00 3.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 12.00 0.79 0.04 16.8 3.8 3.7 0.1 0.6 0.2 2.05 16.00 1.05 0.12 26.6 11.1 10.7 0.4 1.7 1.1 2.15 20.00 1.31 0.23 34.1 21.3 20.1 1.2 3.2 2.4 2.29 24.00 1.58 0.37 39.9 33.6 32.1 2.6 4.9 4.0 2.45 28.00 1.96 0.59 67.5 54.6 49.7 4.9 9.8 7.1 2.71 32.00 2.34 0.85 74.4 78.2 69.0 9.1 15.5 12.7 2.99 36.00 2.73 1.13 79.6 103.7 88.3 15.5 22.8 19.2 3.27 berry&calvin,n�. July 15, 1996 ENGINEEM �«n . B&C Project No 96-1507 lie City of Dania Drainage Study 86 40.00 3.11 1.42 83.7 130.8 106.6 24.2 29.4 26.3 3.52 44.00 3.49 1.73 86.9 159.0 124.4 34.6 33.9 31.7 3.67 48.00 3.88 2.04 89.5 188.2 141.7 46.6 38.3 36.1 3.81 52.00 4.36 2.46 145.3 226.3 166.2 60.2 44.3 41.1 4.00 56.00 5.36 3.33 324.0 307.1 230.9 76.2 54.0 48.5 4.28 58.00 6.18 4.08 485.7 375.8 2900 85.8 62.6 580 4.52 59.00 6.78 4.64 714.8 427.3 336..1 91.1 67.6 64..9 4.65 69.50 7.32 5.14 1126.2 473.7 379.7 94.0 72.2 69.8 4.76 59.75 9.14 6.86 7690.6 632.6 537.0 95.6 82.3 77.2 5.02 60.00 10.96 8.62 7811.9 794.0 696.5 97.5 97.3 89.8 5.38 60.50 11.75 9.38 1706.5 864.4 762.7 101.8 108.5 104.4 5.63 61.00 12.16 9.78 890.2 901.2 794.9 106.3 111.8 110.3 5.71 62.00 12.71 10.32 540.0 950.7 834.9 115.7 115.3 113.7 5.78 64.00 13.38 10.97 353.0 1010.9 875.8 135.1 118.8 117.2 5.86 68.00 14.16 11.73 212.3 1081.0 906.2 1748 121.4 120.2 5.92 72.00 14.68 12.24 141.7 1127.8 912.7 215..1 122.0 121.7 5.93 80.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 1127.8 834.1 293.7 115.7 118.9 5.79 88.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 1127.8 759.6 368.2 109.7 112.7 5.66 96.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 1127.8 689.0 438.6 104.0 106.8 5.53 104.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 1127.8 622.3 505.5 97.9 101.0 5.39 112.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 1127.8 559.5 5683 919 94.9 5.25 120.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 1127.8 500.6 627..2 86..4 89.1 5.12 132.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 1127.8 416.9 708.9 78.0 82.3 4.92 144.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 1127.8 345.8 782.0 69.6 73.7 4.70 156.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 1127.8 280.6 847.2 62.1 65.8 4.51 168.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 1127.8 223.5 904.4 53.4 57.6 4.26 173.25 14.68 12.24 0.0 1127.8 201.1 926.8 49.9 51.6 4.16 Maximum Stage - 5.93 feet Maximum Discharge a 121.99 cfs �eelvini�o.b�rr July 15, 1996 y B&C Project No 96-1507 ENGMlEEHS AIHJEVORS RAIYER' f City of Dania Drainage Study 87 ' Company Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name..............s SCSY -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 3 Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 92.04 acres Ground Storage............: 2.63 inches Termination Discharge.....: SO cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 25 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............. 10.8 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Weir Information..........: Length-Ft Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 2 2 3.13 Culvert Information.......: Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 5o 2 0.024 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............: MAJOR ROADS L 7.23 5 9 Entry No. 2.............: PERVIOUS L 48.97 3.5 7 Entry No. 3.............: IMPERVIOUS L 12.78 3.5 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 0.00 2.21 3 3.00 0.00 6.26 4 3.50 0.00 11.50 5 4.00 2.21 17.71 6 4.50 8.82 20.97 7 5.00 19.85 22.98 8 5.50 35.51 24.82 9 6.00 56.04 26.53 • 10 6.50 1.43 28.14 11 7.00 111.68 29.66 12 7.50 144.59 31.11 13 8.00 177.95 32.49 14 8.50 211.76 33.82 15 9.00 246.02 35.10 16 9.50 280.51 36.33 17 10.00 315.00 37.52 - - - - - R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 2.00 4.00 0.26 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 2.00 8.00 0.53 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 12.00 0.79 0.02 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.5 2.23 16.00 1.05 0.09 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.8 1.5 242 20.00 1.31 0.18 2.5 1.4 0.0 1.4 2.5 2.2 2..53 24.00 1.58 0.30 3.0 2.3 0.0 2.3 3.0 2.7 2.59 28.00 1.96 0.51 5.1 3.9 0.1 3.8 5.1 4.7 2.86 32.00 2.34 0.74 5.8 5.7 0.1 5.6 5.8 5.5 2.94 36.00 2.73 1.00 6.2 7.7 0.1 7.6 6.2 6.0 3.00 44.00 3.49 1.57 6.9 12.1 0.1 12.0 6.9 6.a 3.06 48.00 3.88 1.88 7.2 14.4 0.1 14.3 7.2 7.1 3.09 52.00 4.36 2.28 11.7 17.5 0.1 17.3 11.5 9.1 3.50 56.00 5.36 3.13 26.3 24.0 2.2 21.8 16.9 13.5 3.94 56.00 6.18 3.86 39.6 29.6 4.8 24.8 18.8 18.0 4.17 59.00 6.78 4.40 58.4 33.8 7.4 26.4 20.0 19.3 4.35 59.50 7.32 4.90 92.2 37.6 10.4 27.2 21.1 20.5 4.53 59.75 9.14 6.60 631.5 50.6 23.0 27.7 22.4 21.7 4.85 60.00 10.96 8.34 643.8 63.9 35.8 28.2 24.1 23.2 5.30 60.50 11.75 9.09 140.9 69.7 40.6 29.2 25.1 24.8 5.59 61.00 12.16 9.49 73.5 72.8 42.6 30.2 25.3 25.2 5.65 62.00 12.71 10.02 44.6 76.9 44.6 32.3 25.5 25.5 5.71 64.00 13.38 10.67 29.2 81.9 45.3 36.6 25.6 25.6 S.73 68.00 14.16 11.43 17.6 87.7 42.7 45.0 25.4 25.5 5.67 72.00 14.68 11.93 11.7 91.5 38.2 53.3 25.0 25.2 5.56 Maximum Stage - 5.73 feet Maximum Discharge - 25.61 cfe lie berry&celvin,nt. July 15, 1996 ENCMEES M • aAtOrM BBC Project No 96-1507 i City of Dania Drainage Study $$ Company Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name..............s SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 4 Engineer's Name...........= LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 694.69 acres Ground Storage............: 2.3 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........I SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 25 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 10.8 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Weir Information..........: Lenqth-Ft Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 4 2 3.13 Culvert Information.......: Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 50 4 .024 Storage Information....... Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.......... LAKE V 23.20 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 73.22 4 9 Entry No. 3.............s PERVIOUS L 324.07 3.5 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 119.80 3.5 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 11.60 4.43 3 3.00 23.20 12.52 4 3.50 34.80 23.00 5 4.00 62.25 35.41 6 4.50 123.24 49.49 7 5.00 219.59 65.06 8 5.50 351.31 81.98 9 6.00 518.40 100.16 10 6.50 720.85 119.52 11 7.00 958.67 139.98 12 7.50 1216.00 154.67 13 8.00 1476.99 161.55 14 8.50 1741.65 168.14 15 9.00 2009.96 174.49 16 9.50 2280.11 180.61 17 10.00 2550.25 186.54 - - - - - R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume outflow Diechge Dischge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 .0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.26 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 0.53 0.00 2.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 12.00 0.79 0.04 10.6 2.4 2.3 0.1 0.8 0.3 2.09 16.00 1.05 0.12 16.7 7.0 6.4 0.6 2.4 1.5 2.27 20.00 1.31 0.23 21.4 13.4 11.7 1.7 4.4 3.3 2.49 24.00 1.58 0.37 25.1 21.1 17.3 3.8 8.2 6.3 2.74 28.00 1.96 0.59 42.4 34.3 26.7 7.6 15.3 11.5 3.13 32.00 2.34 0.85 46.7 49.1 35.1 13.9 22.9 19.2 3.49 36.00 2.73 1.13 50.0 65.1 43.0 22.1 26.5 24.7 3.64 40.00 3.11 1.42 52.6 82.1 50.7 31.4 29.9 28.2 3.78 44.00 3.49 1.73 54.6 99.9 58.0 41.9 33.2 31.6 3.91 48.00 3.88 2.04 56.2 118.2 64.9 53.4 35.9 34.7 4.02 52.00 4.36 2.46 91.3 142.2 76.6 65.6 38.5 37.0 4.11 56.00 5.36 3.33 203.5 192.9 113.4 79.5 46.7 42.0 4.40 58.00 6.18 4.08 305.1 236.0 148.3 87.7 53.0 49.9 4.61 59.00 6.78 4.64 449.0 268.4 176.1 92.3 57.3 55.0 4.75 59.50 7.32 5.14 707.4 297.5 202.8 94.7 61.2 59.1 4.88 59.75 9.14 6.86 4830.9 397.4 301.3 96.1 69.1 65.2 5.12 60.00 10.96 8.62 4907.1 498.7 401.1 97.6 81.9 75.5 5.50 60.50 11.75 9.38 1071.9 543.0 441.8 101.2 90.6 87.3 5.74 61.00 12.16 9.78 559.2 566.1 461.1 105.0 93.3 92.1 5.81 62.00 12.71 10.32 339.2 597.2 484.3 112.9 96.1 94.8 5.89 .64.00 13.38 10.97 221.7 635.0 506.0 129.0 98.6 97.4 5.96 68.00 14.16 11.73 133.3 679.0 517.2 161.8 99.9 99.3 5.99 72.00 14.68 12.24 89.0 708.4 513.7 194.8 99.5 99.7 5.98 80.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 708.4 450.1 258.3 92.7 96.1 5.80 88.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 708.4 391.0 317.5 86.3 89.5 5.62 96.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 708.4 335.9 372.5 80.0 83.2 5.44 104.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 708.4 285.2 423.2 73.5 76.7 5.25 112.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 708.4 238.6 469.8 67.5 70.5 5.07 220.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 708.4 196.0 512.4 61.2 64.5 4.88 132.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 708.4 139.9 568.6 52.2 56.6 4.59 • 135.25 14.68 12.24 0.0 708.4 126.2 582.3 50.0 51.1 4.52 Maximum Stage - 5.99 feet Maximum Discharge - 99.91 cfs beery&eelvin,na July 15, 1996 E � o:S • PLANNEM B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 89 Company Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name..............: SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 5a Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 261.99 acres Ground Storage............: 2.3 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 25 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 10.8 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Weir Information..........: Length-Ft Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 4 2 3.13 Culvert Information......... Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 50 4 0.024 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............: LAKE V 1.46 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 11.01 8 12 Entry No. 3.............s PERVIOUS L 109.86 3 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 65.28 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 0.73 4.43 3 3.00 1.46 12.52 4 3.50 6.17 23.00 5 4.00 21.55 35.41 6 4.50 48.is 49.49 7 5.00 85.97 65.06 8 5.50 135.00 81.98 9 6.00 195.26 100.16 10 6.50 266.73 11952 11 7.00 349.42 139..98 12 7.50 437.72 154.67 13 8.00 526.02 161.55 14 8.50 614.66 168.24 15 9.00 704.00 174.49 16 9.50 794.02 180.61 17 10.00 884.73 186.54 18 10.50 976.12 192.28 19 11.00 1068.21 197.85 20 11.50 1160.98 203.28 21 12.00 1254.44 208.56 R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfa) (cfs) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.26 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 0.53 0.00 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.02 12.00 0.79 0.04 4.0 0.9 0.5 0.4 2.6 13 2.29 16.00 1.05 0.12 6.3 2.6 0.9 1.7 5.5 4..0 2.57 20.00 1.31 0.23 8.1 5.0 1.1 3.9 7.6 6.7 2.70 24.00 1.58 0.37 9.5 8.0 1.2 6.7 9.1 8.4 2.79 28.00 1.96 0.59 16.0 12.9 2.1 10.8 13.6 12.4 3.05 32.00 2.34 0.85 17.6 18.5 2.9 15.6 15.4 14.5 3.14 36.00 2.73 1.13 18.9 24.6 3.6 20.9 16.9 16.2 3.21 40.00 3.11 1.42 19.8 31.0 4.2 26.8 18.2 17.6 3.27 44.00 3.49 1.73 20.6 37.7 4.7 33.0 19.3 18.8 3.32 48.00 3.88 2.04 21.2 44.6 5.1 39.5 20.2 19.7 3.36 52.00 4.36 2.46 34.4 53.6 7.0 46.6 23.4 21.6 3.52 56.00 5.36 3.33 76.8 72.7 17.3 55.4 31.4 26.6 3.84 58.00 6.18 4.08 115.0 89.0 27.9 61.2 38.1 34.8 4.10 59.00 6.78 4.64 169.3 101.2 36.7 64.5 42.5 40.1 4.25 59.50 7.32 5.14 266.8 112.2 45.9 66.3 46.8 44.6 4.41 59.75 9.14 6.86 1821.9 149.9 82.5 67.4 55.9 51.4 4.70 60.00 10.96 8.62 1850.6 188.1 119.4 68.7 70.0 62.9 5.15 03 60.50 11.75 9.38 404.3 204.8 132.9 71.8 79.8 76.2 5.44 61.00 12.16 9.78 210.9 213.5 138.3 75.2 82.3 81.3 5.51 62.00 12.71 10.32 127.9 225.2 143.1 82.1 84.0 83.3 5.56 64.00 13.38 10.97 83.6 239.5 143.5 96.0 84.3 84.3 5.56 68.00 14.16 11.73 50.3 256.1 132.7 123.3 81.0 82.7 5.47 72.00 14.68 12.24 33.6 267.2 117.9 149.3 76.0 78.5 5.32 80.00 14.68 12.24 0.0 267.2 73.0 194.2 59.7 67.9 4.83 85.25 14.66 12.24 0.0 267.2 49.3 217.9 50.0 54.7 4.51 Maximum Stage - 5.56 feet Maximum Discharge - 84.30 cfe berry&celvin,na July 15, 1996 ENGMEEM R)WEYORS . a B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 90 ® Company Name..............: Berry 6 Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name............... SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 5b Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 425.39 acres Ground Storage............: 2.45 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 25 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 10.8 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Pump Pump On Pump Off Pump Rate No. Elevation Elevation Discharge (ft) (ft) (cfe) 1 4.00 2.00 31.20 storage Information.......: Component storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............: LAKE V 14.76 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 13.98 8 12 Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS L 187.02 3 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 100.49 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage No. (ft) (af) 1 2.00 0.00 2 2.50 7.38 3 3.00 14.76 4 3.50 28.82 5 4.00 60.43 6 4.50 110.43 7 5.00 178.82 8 5.50 265.60 9 6.00 370.76 10 6.50 494.32 11 7.00 636.26 12 7.50 787.39 13 8.00 938.53 14 8.50 109010 15 9.00 1242:55 16 9.50 1395.87 17 10.00 1550.06 18 10.50 1705.13 19 11.00 1861.07 20 11.50 2017.88 21 12.00 2175.57 R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Diechge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfs) (af) (af) (af) (cfs) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 ma 4.00 0.26 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.00 8.00 0.53 0.00 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 200 12.00 0.79 0.03 5.7 1.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2..07 16.00 1.05 0.10 9.4 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.24 20.00 1.31 0.21 12.3 7.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.49 24.00 1.58 0.33 14.6 11.8 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.79 28.00 1.96 0.55 25.0 19..5 19.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.16 32.00 2.34 0.80 27.7 28.3 28.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.47 36.00 2.73 1.07 29.8 37.8 37.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.64 40.00 3.11 1.35 31.5 48.0 48.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.80 44.00 3.49 1.65 32.8 58.6 58.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.97 48.00 3.88 1.97 33.8 69.7 61.9 7.7 31.2 24.4 4.01 52.00 4.36 2.37 55.1 84.1 66.1 18.0 31.2 31.2 4.05 56.00 5.36 3.24 123.2 114.8 86.4 28.4 31.2 31.2 4.25 58.00 6.18 3.98 185.1 140.9 107.4 33.5 31.2 31.2 4.45 59.00 6.78 4.53 272.7 160.5 124.4 36.1 31.2 31.2 4.58 59.50 7.32 5.03 430.0 178.3 140.9 37.4 31.2 31.2 4.69 59.75 9.14 6.74 2940.4 239.0 201.0 38.0 31.2 31.2 4.94 60.00 10.96 8.49 2991.7 300.8 262.2 38.7 31.2 31.2 5.30 60.50 11.75 9.25 654.1 327.8 287.9 40.0 31.2 31.2 5.57 61.00 12.16 9.65 341.3 341.9 300.7 41.3 31.2 31.2 5.65 62.00 12.71 10.18 207.1 360.9 317.1 43.8 31.2 31.2 5.73 64.00 13.38 10.83 135.4 384.0 335.0 49.0 31.2 31.2 5.82 68.00 14.16 11.59 81.5 410.9 351.6 59.3 31.2 31.2 5.90 72.00 14.68 12.10 54.4 428.9 359.2 69.6 31.2 31.2 5.94 • Maximum Stage - 5.94 feet Maximum Discharge a 31.20 cfe 6errV&cal /ininc. July 15, 1996 a ENGWEERS/S MOQS • AWRE B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 91 Company Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-08-1996 Program Name..............: SCSI[ -- (05/06/86) Project Name............... DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 5b EXCLUDING 19.63 ACRES OF FEDERAL HWY Engineer's Name........... LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area.. 389.24 acres Ground Storage.... 2.6 inches Termination Discharge.....: 10 cfe Distribution Type.......... SFWHD Return Frequency n......... 25 years Rainfall Duration.. 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall.. 10.8 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Pump Pump On Pump Off Pump Rate No. Elevation Elevation Discharge (ft) (ft) (cfe) 1 4.00 2.00 31.20 Storage Information......_.: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............. LAKE V 14.76 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 9.21 8 12 Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS L 181.60 3 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 91.63 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage No. (ft) (af) 1 2.00 0.00 2 2.50 7.38 3 3.00 14.76 4 3.50 28.58 5 4.00 59.09 6 4.50 107.06 7 5.00 172.50 8 5.50 255.39 9 6.00 355.73 10 6.50 473.54 11 7.00 608.81 12 7.50 752.80 13 8.00 896.80 14 8.50 1041.08 15 9.00 1185.94 16 9.50 1331.37 17 10.00 147738 18 10.50 1623:97 19 11.00 1771.13 20 11.50 1918.86 21 12.00 2067.18 R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow volume Outflow Dischge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.26 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 0.53 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 12.00 0.79 0.03 4.5 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.05 16.00 1.05 0.09 7.9 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.19 20.00 1.31 0.19 10.6 6.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.40 24.00 1.58 0.31 12:7 9.9 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.66 28.00 1.96 0.51 21.9 16.7 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.06 32.00 2.34 0.75 24.6 24.4 24.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.34 36.00 2.73 1.01 26.6 32.9 32.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.57 40.00 3.11 1.29 28.1 41.9 41.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.71 e44.00 3.49 1.59 29.4 51.5 51.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.87 July 15, 1996 berry�►e - KWE B&C Project No 96-1507 EN(.NEEE6 SUAJEYOM RS PIAMJER' City of Dania Drainage Study 92 48.00 3.88 1.89 30.4 61.4 59.4 1.9 31.2 6.8 4.00 52.00 4.36 2.29. 49.6 74.4 62.1 12.2 31.2 31.2 4.03 56.00 5.36 3.15 111.5 102.0 79.5 22.6 31.2 31.2 4.20 58.00 6.18 3.88 167.7 125.7 98.0 27.7 31.2 31.2 4.39 S9.00 6.78 4.43 247.5 143.5 113.2 30.3 31.2 31.2 453 59.50 7.32 4.92 390.5 159.6 128.0 31.6 31.2 31.2 4,.63 59.75 9.14 6.62 2673.9 214.9 182.6 32.2 31.2 31.2 4.87 60.00 10.96 8.36 2725.0 271.2 238.3 32.9 31.2 31.2 5.23 60.50 11.75 9.12 596.4 295.8 261.6 34.2 31.2 31.2 5.50 61.00 12.16 9.52 311.3 308.7 273.2 35.5 312 312 5.57 62.00 12.71 10.05 188.9 325.9 287.9 38.0 31..2 31..2 5.65 64.00 13.38 10.70 123.6 347.0 303.8 43.2 31.2 31.2 5.74 68.00 14.16 11.46 74.3 371.6 328.1 53.5 31.2 31.2 5.81 72.00 14.68 11.96 49.6 388.0 324.1 63.8 31.2 31.2 5.84 80.00 14.68 11.96 0.0 388.0 303.5 84.4 31.2 312 574 88.00 14.68 11.96 0.0 368.0 282.9 105.1 31.2 31..2 5..64 96.00 14.68 11.96 0.0 368.0 262.3 125.7 31.2 31.2 5.53 104.00 14.68 11.96 0.0 388.0 241.6 146.3 31.2 31.2 5.42 112.00 14.68 11.96 0.0 388.0 221.0 167.0 31.2 31.2 5.29 120.00 14.68 11.96 0.0 388.0 200.4 187.6 31.2 31.2 5.17 132.00 14.68 11.96 0.0 388.0 169.4 218.5 31.2 31.2 4.98 144.00 14.68 11.96 0,0 388.0 138.5 249,5 31.2 31.2 4.74 156.00 14.68 11.96 0.0 388.0 107.6 280.4 31.2 31.2 4.50 168.00 14.68 11.96 0.0 388.0 76.6 311.3 31.2 31.2 4.18 180.00 14.68 11.96 0.0 388.0 45.7 342.3 31.2 31.2 3.78 192.00 14.68 12.96 0.0 388.0 14,7 373.2 31.2 312 3.00 197.75 14.68 11.96 0.0 388.0 -0.1 388.1 0.0 30.,5 1.99 Haximum Stage - 5.84 feet Haximum Discharge - 31.20 cfs a berr`p,&calvininc. July 15, 1996 ENCAWER5/SIMJEYOBS • PLQ* RS B&C Project No 96-1507 a City of Dania Drainage Study 93 Company Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name..............: SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name....... ..: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 5c Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area............... 290 acres Ground Storage............: 2.36 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfs Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 25 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 10.8 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............: MAJOR ROADS L 20.65 8 12 Entry No. 2.............: PERVIOUS L 122.72 3 7 O Entry No. 3.............: IMPERVIOUS L 57.26 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge NO. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 0.00 0.00 3 3.00 0.00 0.00 4 3.50 4.31 0.00 5 4.00 19.63 0.00 6 4.50 46.44 0.00 7 5.00 84.74 0.00 8 5.50 134.53 0.00 9 6.00 195.80 0.00 10 6.50 268.56 0.00 11 7.00 352.80 0.00 12 7.50 442.79 0.00 13 8.00 532.78 0.00 ® 14 8.50 623.42 0.00 15 9.00 715.34 0.00 16 9.50 808.56 0.00 17 10.00 903.07 0.00 18 10.50 998.87 0.00 19 11.00 1095.95 0.00 20 11.50 194: 0.00 - - - - - - 21 12.00 129400 00 0.00 Rain Accum.Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Diechge Inflow Volume Outflow Diechge Dischge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0(.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.26 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.00 8.00 0.53 0.00 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.00 12.00 0.79 0.04 4.2 0.9 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.10 16.00 1.05 0.11 6.8 2.8 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.31 20.00 1.31 0.22 8.7 5.4 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.53 24.00 1.58 0.35 10.3 8.5 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.63 28.00 1.96 0.58 17.4 13.9 13.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.81 32.00 2.34 0.83 19.3 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.00 36.00 2.73 1.10 20.7 26.6 26.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.13 40.00 3.11 1.39 21.7 33.7 33.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.26 44.00 3.49 1.70 22.6 41.0 41.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.39 48.00 3.88 2.01 23.3 48.6 48.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.53 52.00 4.36 2.42 37.9 58.5 58.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.65 56.00 5.36 3.29 84.6 79.6 79.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.92 58.00 6.18 4.04 126.9 97.5 97.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.12 59.00 6.78 4.59 186.8 111.0 111.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.24 59.50 7.32 5.10 294.4 123.1 123.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.36 59.75 9.24 6.82 2011.9 164.7 164.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.58 60.00 10.96 8.56 2044.9 206.9 206.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.92 60.50 11.75 9.33 446.9 225.4 225.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.17 61.00 12.16 9.73 233.1 235.0 235.0 0.0 0.0 00 625 62.00 12.71 10.26 141.4 248.0 248.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 6..35 64.00 13.38 10.91 92.5 263.8 263.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.46 68.00 14.16 11.67 55.6 282.1 282.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.58 72.00 14.68 12.18 37.1 294.4 294.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.65 Maximum Stage - 6.65 feet Maximum Discharge - 0.00 cfe bcrry&calvininc. July 15, 1996 ENGNEERS SJWE`'ORS • PLANNM B&C Project No 96-1507 1 City of Dania Drainage Study 94 Im in APPENDIX F : 100 YEAR - 3 DAY SFWMD ROUTING 6err 8►galvim,� July 15, 1996 ENGNEERSYwmiEvoas PLANNERS B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 95 1 0 �ompany Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers dxecution Date............: 07-03-1996 ?rogram Name..............s SCSI -- (05/06/86) ?roject Name.......... .: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 1 ingineer'e Name...........s LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ ?roject Area..............: 326.57 acres :round Storage............s 2.88 inches Germination Discharge.....: 50 cfe :ietribution Type.........s SFWMD return Frequency..........: 100 years tainfal1 Duration.........: 3 -day 14-hr Rainfall............. 15 inches reporting Sequence........: Standardized Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............. LAKE V 22.08 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 55.20 4 10 WE Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS L 124.90 4 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 76.21 4 7 ?oint Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 am 2 2.50 11.04 0.00 3 3.00 22.08 0.00 4 3.50 33.12 0.00 5 4.00 44.16 0.00 6 4.50 64.73 0.00 7 5.00 104.36 0.00 8 5.50 163.05 0.00 9 6.00 240.79 0.00 10 6.50 337.60 0.00 11 7.00 453.47 0.00 12 7.50 580.01 0.00 13 8.00 708.85 0.00 14 8.50 840.00 0.00 15 9.00 973.45 0.00 16 9.50 1109.19 0.00 17 10.00 1247.24 0.00 - - - - - R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Diechge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfs) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.36 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 0.73 0.01 2.8 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.01 12.00 1.10 0.08 8.3 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.09 16.00 1.46 0.21 12.3 5.7 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.25 20.00 1.83 0.38 15.3 10.3 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.46 24.00 2.19 0.58 17.6 15.8 15.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.71 28.00 2.72 0.92 29.4 24.9 24.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.12 32.00 3.26 1.29 32.0 35.1 35.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.58 36.00 3.79 1.69 34.0 46.1 46.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.04 40.00 4.32 2.12 35.5 57.6 57.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.32 44.00 4.85 2.56 36.7 69.5 .69.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.56 48.00 5.38 3.01 37.7 81.9 81.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.71 52.00 6.06 3.60 60.9 97.9 97.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.91 56.00 7.44 4.84 135.1 131.6 131.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.22 56.00 8.58 5.89 201.9 160.2 160.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.46 59.00 9.42 6.67 296.6 181.6 181.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.60 59.50 10.17 7.38 466.8 200.8 200.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.71 59.75 12.70 9.79 3181.6 266.5 266.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.95 60.00 15.22 12.24 3224.1 333.2 333.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.31 60.50 16.32 13.31 703.4 362.2 362.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.57 61.00 16.89 13.87 366.8 377.4 377.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.66 62.00 17.66 14.61 222.4 397.7 397.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.75 64.00 18.58 15.53 145.4 422.5 422.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.86 68.00 19.66 16.59 87.4 451.4 451.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.99 72.00 20.39 17.29 58.3 470.7 470.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.07 Maximum Stage = 7.07 feet Maximum Discharge = 0.00 cfe 6err &ca1vin,nc. July 15, 1996 ENGNEENS)SuRVEY«RS • :KLWC'd B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 96 Company Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name.............:: SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name............. DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 2 Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 1105.93 acres Ground Storage............: 2.3 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWND Return Frequency..........: 100 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 14.5 inches Reporting Sequence........s Standardized Weir Information........ Length-Ft Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 5 2 3.13 Culvert Information.......: Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 50 5 .024 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............: LAKE V 68.68 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 49.34 5 9 Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS L 514.58 3.5 7 Entry No. 4.............s INPERVIOUS L 235.83 .3.5 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 34.34 5.53 3 3.00 68.68 15.65 4 3.50 103.02 28.75 5 4.00 164.16 44.26 6 4.50 278.90 61.86 7 5.00 447.24 81.32 8 5.50 670.73 102.47 9 6.00 950.90 125.20 10 6.50 1287.75 149.39 11 7.00 1681.29 174.97 12 7.50 2104.71 201.86 13 8.00 2531.22 230.01 14 8.50 2960.80 259.35 15 9.00 339348 286.16 16 9.50 3827:69 296.20 17 10.00 4261.91 305.92 - - - - - R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Diechge Inflow Volume Outflow Diechge Diachge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (Cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.35 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 0.71 0.02 17.4 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 2.03 12.00 1.06 0.12 36.0 11.4 11.1 0.3 1.7 0.9 2.16 16.00 1.41 0.28 48.8 25.7 24.4 1.2 3.9 2.7 2.35 20.00 1.76 0.47 58.1 43.5 40.5 3.0 7.2 5.2 2.58 24.00 2.12 0.69 64.9 63.9 57.8 6.2 12.2 9.7 2.83 28.00 2.63 1.05 105.3 97.2 85.5 11.7 21.7 16.6 3.23 1121 32.00 3.15 1.45 112.8 133.4 112.9 20.5 31.0 26.7 3.57 3600 3.66 1.86 118.3 171.7 139.8 31.9 37.8 34.4 3.79 40..00 4.18 2.30 122.4 211.5 166.1 45.5 44.4 41.1 4.00 44.00 4.69 2.74 125.6 252.6 191.8 60.8 48.3 46.3 4.11 48.00 5.21 3.20 128.1 294.6 217.2 77.4 52.2 50.3 4.23 52.00 5.86 3.79 206.0 348.8 253.4 95.5 57.6 54.7 4.38 5600 7.19 5.02 453.2 462.4 346.2 116.3 69.1 62.9 4.69 58..00 8.29 6.06 674.2 558.1 429.7 128.4 78.5 73.4 4.93 59.00 9.11 6.83 988.2 629.4 494.3 135.1 84.8 81.5 5.08 59.50 9.83 7.52 1552.1 693.4 554.7 138.7 90.0 87.3 5.20 59.75 12.27 9.89 20548.3 911.4 770.7 140.7 101.6 95.8 5.48 bcrry&celvin,nc. July 15, 1996 ENGMEERSY •OR'S • M BBC Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 97 60.00 14.72 12.28 10651.6 1131.5 968.5 143.0 119.3 110.5 5.87 60.50 15.78 13.32 2319.3 1227.2 1079.0 148.3 132.7 127.7 6.15 61.00 16.33 13.86 1208.9 1277.2 1123.3 153.8 136.7 134.9 6.24 62.00 17.07 14.59 732.7 1344.3 11789 165.3 141.0 139.1 6.33 64.00 17.97 15.47 478.5 1426.0 1236..9 189.0 145.4 143.4 6.42 68.00 19.01 16.50 287.5 1521.0 1283.3 237.7 148.9 147.2 6.49 72.00 19.71 17.19 191.8 1584.3 1297.3 287.1 149.9 149.4 6.51 80.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 1564.3 1200.4 384.0 143.1 146.6 6.37 IM 88.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 1584.3 1107.9 476.4 136.5 139.8 6.23 El 96.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 1584.3 1019.8 564.5 130.1 133.3 6.10 104.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 1584.3 935.8 648.6 124.0 127.1 5.97 112.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 1584.3 856.0 728.4 117.5 120.7 5.83 120.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 1584.3 780.3 804.0 111.4 114.4 5.70 132.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 1584.3 674.2 910.1 102.8 107.0 5.51 144.00 1971 1719 0.0 1584.3 576.9 1007.4 93.6 98.1 5.29 156.00 19..71 17..19 0.0 1584.3 488.3 1096.0 85.2 89.3 5.09 168.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 1584.3 - 407.9 1176.5 76.8 81.1 4.88 180.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 1584.3 335.9 1248.4 68.5 72.5 4.67 192.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 1584.3 271.8 1312.5 60.8 64.7 4.47 204.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 1584.3 215.9 1368.5 52.2 56.4 4.23 207.50 19.71 17.19 0.0 1584.3 201.1 1383.2 49.9 51.1 4.16 Maximum Stage = 6.51 feet Maximum Discharge = 149.88 cfe IM berr &calvini.. July 15, 1 996 ENC MER5�91RMCQS . Purr B&C Project No 96-1507 07 City of Dania Drainage Study gg Company Name..............: Berry 4 Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 Program Name..............: SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 3 Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 92.04 acres Ground Storage............: 2.63 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 100 years Rainfall Duration.......... 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 14.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Weir Information..........: Length-Ft Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 2 2 3.13 Culvert Information.......: Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 50 2 0.024 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. I.............: MAJOR ROADS L 7.23 5 9 Entry No. 2.............: PERVIOUS L 48.97 3.5 7 Entry No. 3.............: IMPERVIOUS L 12.78 3.5 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 0.00 2.21 3 3.00 0.00 6.26 4 3.50 0.00 11.50 go 5 4.00 2.21 17.71 6 4.50 8.82 20.97 7 5.00 19.85 22.98 8 5.50 35.51 24.82 9 6.00 56.04 26.53 10 6.50 81.43 28.14 11 7.00 111.68 29.66 12 7.50 144.59 31.11 13 8.00 177.95 32.49 14 8.50 211.76 33.82 15 9.00 246.02 35.10 16 9.50 280.51 36.33 17 10.00 315.00 37.52 R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Diechge Inflow Volume Outflow Diechge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.35 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 0.71 0.01 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.2 2.22 12.00 1.06 0.09 2.5 0.7 0.0 0.7 2.5 1.8 2.53 16.00 1.41 0.22 3.6 1.7 0.0 1.7 3.6 3.1 2.67 20.00 1.76 0.40 4.4 3.0 0.0 3.0 4.4 4.0 2.77 24.00 2.12 0.60 5.0 4.6 0.1 4.5 5.0 4.7 2.84 28.00 2.63 0.94 8.2 7.2 0.1 7.1 8.2 7.7 3.19 32.00 3.15 1.31 8.9 10.0 0.1 9.9 8.9 8.6 3.25 36.00 3.66 1.71 9.4 13.1 0.1 13.0 9.4 9.2 3.30 40.00 4.18 2.12 9.8 16.3 0.1 16.2 9.8 9.6 3.34 44.00 4.69 2.55 10.1 19.6 0.1 19.5 10.1 10.0 3.37 48.00 5.21 '3.00 10.4 23.0 0.1 22.9 10.4 10.3 3.39 52.00 5.86 3.57 16.8 27.4 0.6 26.8 12.8 11.8 3.60 56.00 7.19 4.78 37.1 36.7 4.6 32.1 18.7 16.1 4.15 58.00 8.29 5.80 55.4 44.5 9.2 35.4 20.9 19.7 4.48 59.00 9.11 6.57 81.3 50.4 13.3 37.1 21.6 21.2 4.66 59.50 9.63 7.25 127.8 55.6 17.6 38.0 22.3 22.0 4.84 59.75 12.27 9.60 870.4 73.6 35.1 38.5 23.7 23.0 5.20 60.00 14.72 11.97 881.1 91.8 52.8 39.0 25.5 24.6 5.70 60.50 15.78 13.01 192.1 99.8 59.7 40.1 26.6 26.2 6.03 61.00 16.33 13.55 100.2 103.9 62.7 41.2 26.9 26.8 6.11 62.00 17.07 14.27 60.7 109.5 66.0 43.4 27.1 27.0 6.18 64.00 17.97 15.15 39.7 116.2 68.3 47.9 27.3 27.2 6.23 68.00 19.01 16.18 23.8 124.1 67.2 56.9 27.2 27.3 6.21 72.00 19.71 16.87 15.9 129.4 63.5 65.9 27.0 27.1 6.14 Maximum Stage - 6.24 feet Maximum Discharge - 27.29 cfe 6erf &calVininc. July 15, 1 996 ENGNJEERS)s�«� • 68�C Project No 96-1507 07 City of Dania Drainage Study 99 Company Name..............: Berry 6 Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-03-1996 fla Program Name..............: SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 4 Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 694.69 acres Ground Storage............: 2.3 inches Trmination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........s SFWHD Return Frequency..........: 100 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 14.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Weir Information..........: Length-Ft Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 4 2 3.13 Culvert Information.......: Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 50 4 .024 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............. LAM V 23.20 2 Entry No. 2.............s MAJOR ROADS L 73.22 4 9 Entry No. 3.............s PERVIOUS L 324.07 3.5 7 Entry No. 4.............s IMPERVIOUS L 119.80 3.5 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 11.60 4.43 3 3.00 23.20 12.52 4 3.50 34.80 23.00 5 4.00 62.25 35.41 6 4.50 123.24 49.49 7 5.00 219.59 65.06 8 5.50 351.31 81.98 9 6.00 518.40 100.16 10 6.50 720.85 119.52 11 7.00 958.67 139.98 12 7.50 1216.00 154.67 13 8.00 1476.99 161.55 14 8.50 174165 168.14 15 9.00 2009:96 174.49 16 9.50 2280.11 180.61 17 10.00 2550.25 186.54 - - - - - R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Diechge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 400 0.35 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8..00 0.71 0.02 10.9 1.4 1.3 0.0 0.5 0.1 2.05 12.00 1.06 0.12 22.6 7.2 6.7 0.5 2.5 1.4 2.28 16.00 1.41 0.28 30.7 16.1 14.3 1.8 6.1 4.0 2.60 20.00 1.76 0.47 36.5 27.3 22.6 4.8 11.8 9.0 2.96 24.00 2.12 0.69 40.8 40.2 30.4 9.8 18.6 15.2 3.29 28.00 2.63 1.05 66.1 61.1 43.6 17.5 26.7 23.3 3.65 32.00 3.15 1.45 70.8 83.8 56.5 27.3 32.5 29.6 3.88 36.00 3.66 1.86 74.3 107.8 69.0 38.8 36.8 35.0 4.05 40.00 4.18 2.30 76.9 132.9 81.4 51.5 39.7 38.2 4.15 44.00 4.69 2.74 78.9 158.7 93.6 65.0 42.5 41.1 4.25 48.00 5.21 3.20 80.5 185.0 105.5 79.5 45.2 43.8 4.35 52.00 5.86 3.79 129.4 219.1 124.0 95.1 49.4 47.1 4.50 56.00 7.19 5.02 284.7 290.5 177.9 112.6 57.8 53.0 4.77 58.00 8.29 6.06 423.5 350.6 227.8 122.8 65.6 61.4 5.01 59.00 9.11 6.83 620.7 395.4 267.0 128.4 70.3 67.7 5.16 59.50 9.83 7.52 975.0 435.6 304.2 131.3 74.6 72.4 5.28 59.75 12.27 9.89 6625.9 572.5 439.5 133.0 84.1 79.4 5.56 �/&calvin,.c. July 15, 1996 ENC, EEPS w�m„«rs . M B&C Project No 96-1507 1 City of Dania Drainage Study 100 is 60.00 14.72 12.28 6690.8 710.7 575.9 134.9 98.9 91.5 5.97 60.50 15.78 13.32 1456.9 770.9 631.7 139.2 109.5 105.6 6.24 61.00 16.33 13.86 759.4 802.3 658.4 143.8 112.8 111.3 6.33 62.00 17.07 14.59 460.3 844.4 691.1 153.3 116.2 114.7 641 64.00 17.97 15.47 300.6 895.7 722.9 172.8 119.4 117.9 6..50 68.00 19.01 16.50 180.6 955.4 742.8 212.6 121.2 120.4 6.54 72.00 19.71 17.19 120.5 995.2 742.5 252.7 121.3 121.3 6.54 80.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 995.2 664.6 330.6 114.1 117.8 6.36 88.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 995.2 591.5 403.7 107.1 110.6 6.18 96.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 995.2 522.8 472.4 100.6 103.8 6.01 104.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 995.2 458.6 536.6 93.7 97.1 5.82 112.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 995.2 398.9 596.3 87.2 90.4 5.64 120.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 995.2 343.3 651.9 80.9 84.1 5.47 132.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 995.2 267.9 727.3 71.3 76.0 5.18 144.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 995.2 201.6 793.6 62.2 66.8 4.91 156.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 995.2 144.7 850.5 53.0 57.4 4.61 160.50 19.71 17.19 0.0 995.2 125.6 869.6 49.9 51.4 4.51 maximum Stage - 6.54 feet maximum Discharge - 121.29 cfs a 0 6CPPY RCOIVIflo-,c. July 15, 1996 ENSWEERS/RANVORS • M B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 101 • Company Name..............: Berry 6 Calvin Engineers Execution Date......... ..: 07-03-1996 Program Name..............: SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............s DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 5a Engineer's Name...........s LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 261.99 acres Ground Storage............: 2.3 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........s 100 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............s 14.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Weir Information..........: Length-Ft Elev.NGVD-Ft Coefficient 4 2 3.13 Culvert Information.......: Length-Ft Diameter-Ft N-Value 50 4 0.024 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............. LAKE V 1.46 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 11.01 8 12 Entry No. 3.............s PERVIOUS L 109.86 3 7 Entry No. 4.............s IMPERVIOUS L 65.28 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 .0.00 2 2.50 0.73 4.43 3 3.00 1.46 12.52 4 3.50 6.17 23.00 5 4.00 21.55 35.41 6 4.50 48.15 49.49 7 5.00 85.97 65.06 8 5.50 135.00 81.98 9 6.00 195.26 100.16 10 6.50 266.73 119.52 11 7.00 349.42 139.98 12 7.50 437.72 154.67 13 8.00 526.02 161.55 14 8.50 614.66 168.14 15 9.00 704.00 174.49 16 9.50 794.02 180.61 17 10.00 884.73 186.54 18 10.50 976.12 192.28 19 11.00 1068.21 197.85 20 11.50 1160.98 203.28 21 12.00 1254.44 208.56 - - R E S E R V O I R - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Diechge Inflow Volume outflow Diechge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.35 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 0.71 0.02 4.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 1.9 0.5 2.22 12.00 1.06 0.12 8.5 2.7 1.1 1.6 7.2 4.4 2.67 16.00 141 0.28 11.6 6.1 1.4 4.7 10.8 9.2 2.89 20.00 1..76 0.47 13.8 10.3 1.7 8.6 12.7 12.0 3.01 24.00 2.12 0.69 15.4 15.1 2.2 13.0 13.8 13.2 3.06 28.00 2.63 1.05 24.9 23.0 4.6 18.4 19.0 16.5 3.31 32.00 3.15 1.45 26.7 31.6 6.3 25.3 22.6 20.9 3.48 36.00 3.66 1.86 28.0 40.7 7.6 33.1 23.9 23.4 354 40.00 4.18 2.30 29.0 50.1 9.0 41.1 25.0 24.5 3..58 44.00 4.69 2.74 29.8 59.8 10.2 49.6 26.0 25.5 3.62 48.00 5.21 3.20 30.4 69.8 11.4 58.4 27.0 26.5 3.66 52.00 5.86 3.79 48.8 82.6 15.0 67.6 29.7 28.1 3.77 56.00 7.19 5.02 107.4 109.5 30.6 79.0 39.6 34.3 4.15 58.00 8.29 6.06 159.7 132.2 46.1 86.1 47.5 43.2 4.43 59.00 9.21 6.83 234.1 149.1 58.8 90.3 52.9 50.1 4.61 59.50 9.83 7.52 367.7 164.3 71.7 92.5 57.6 55.1 4.76 59.75 12.27 9.89 2498.9 215.9 122.1 93.8 68.6 63.1 5.10 60.00 14.72 12.28 2523.3 268.0 172.6 95.4 85.5 77.0 5.60 60.50 15.78 13.32 549.4 290.7 191.5 99.3 97.3 92.9 5.92 61.00 16.33 13.86 286.4 302.6 199.2 103.4 100.4 99.1 6.01 62.00 17.07 14.59 173.6 318.5 206.7 111.8 102.8 101.8 6.07 64.00 17.97 15.47 113.4 337.8 209.0 128.8 103.6 103.3 6.09 68.00 19.01 16.50 68.1 360.3 197.7 162.6 100.6 102.1 6.01 72.00 19.71 17.19 45.4 375.3 180.3 195.0 95.5 98.1 5.87 80.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 375.3 123.0 252.3 77.8 86.6 5.38 88.00 19.71 17.19 0.0 375.3 77.0 298.3 61.4 69.5 4.88 94.25 19.71 17.19 0.0 375.3 48.5 326.9 49.6 55.3 4.50 Maximum Stage m 6.09 feet Maximum Discharge - 103.55 cfe ii� op July 15, 1996 t7tl��/RC��- P B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 102 Company Name..............: Berry & Calvin Engineers Execution Date........... • 07-03-1996 Program Name..............: SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 5b Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 425.39 acres Ground Storage............: 2.45 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWND Return Frequency..........: 100 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 14.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Pump Pump On Pump Off Pump Rate No. Elevation Elevation Discharge (ft) (ft) (cfe) 1 4.00 2.00 31.20 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............: LARE V 14.76 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 13.98 8 12 Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS L 167.02 3 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 100.49 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage No. (ft) (af) 1 2.00 0.00 2 2.50 7.38 3 3.00 14.76 4 3.50 28.82 5 4.00 60.43 6 4.50 110.43 7 5.00 178.82 8 5.50 265.60 9 6.00 370.76 10 6.50 494.32 11 7.00 636.26 12 7.50 787.39 13 8.00 938.53 14 8.50 1090.10 15 9.00 1242.55 16 9.50 1395.87 17 10.00 1550.06 18 10.50 1705.13 19 11.00 186107 20 11.50 2017:88 21 12.00 2175.57 - - - - - R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfs) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 400 0.35 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.00 8..00 0.71 0.02 5.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.04 12.00 1.06 0.11 12.7 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.25 16.00 1.41 0.25 17.7 8.9 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.59 20.00 1.76 0.44 21.4 15.5 15.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.02 24.00 2.12 0.65 24.1 23.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.28 28.00 2.63 1.00 39.4 35.4 35.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.60 32.00 3.15 1.38 42.4 49.0 49.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.81 36.00 3.66 1.79 44.7 63.4 62.1 1.3 31.2 4.9 4.01 40.00 4.18 2.21 46.4 78.5 66.9 11.6 31.2 31.2 4.06 44.00 4.69 2.65 47.7 94.1 72.1 21.9 31.2 31.2 4.11 48.00 5.21 3.10 48.7 110.0 77.8 32.2 31.2 31.2 4.17 52.00 5.86 3.69 78.5 130.7 88.1 42.5 31.2 31.2 4.27 56.00 7.19 4.91 173.1 174.0 121.1 52.9 31.2 31.2 4.57 58.00 8.29 5.94 257.8 210.5 152.5 58.0 31.2 31.2 4.79 59.00 9.11 6.71 378.1 237.8 177.2 60.6 31.2 31.2 4.96 59.50 9.83 7.40 594.2 262.3 200.4 61.9 31.2 31.2 5.09 5975 12.27 9.76 4042.1 345.8 283.3 62.5 31.2 31.2 5.36 60..00 14.72 12.14 4086.0 430.3 367.1 63.2 31.2 31.2 5.78 60.50 15.78 13.17 890.2 467.0 402.6 64.5 31.2 31.2 6.09 61.00 16.33 13.72 464.1 486.2 420.4 65.8 31.2 31.2 6.18 62.00 17.07 14.44 281.3 512.0 443.6 68.3 31.2 31.2 6.28 64.00 17.97 15.33 183.8 543.3 469.8 73.5 31.2 31.2 6.39 68.00 19.01 16.36 110.4 579.8 496.0 83.8 31.2 31.2 6.50 In Im 72.00 19.71 17.04 73.7 604.1 510.0 94.1 31.2 31.2 6.55 Maximum Stage - 6.55 feet Maximum Discharge - 31.20 cfe berr RCAIVIn,c. July 15, 1996 EWMEFSYSJRMOIS ' B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 103 company Name..............: Berry 6 Calvin Engineers Execution Date............: 07-08-1996 Program Name..............: SCSI[ -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 5b EXCLUDING 19.63 ACRES OF FEDERAL HWY Engineer's Name...........: LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area..............: 389.24 acres Ground Storage............s 2.6 inches Termination Discharge.....: 10 cfe Distribution Type.........: SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 100 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 14.5 inches _ Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Pump Pump On Pump Off Pump Rate No. Elevation Elevation Discharge (ft) (ft) (cfe) 1 4.00 2.00 31.20 Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. I.............. LAKE V 14.76 2 Entry No. 2.............: MAJOR ROADS L 9.21 8 12 Entry No. 3.............: PERVIOUS L 181.60 3 7 Entry No. 4.............: IMPERVIOUS L 91.63 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage No. (ft) (af) 1 2.00 0.00 2 2.50 7.38 3 3.00 14.76 4 3.50 28.58 5 4.00 59.09 6 4.50 107.06 7 5.00 172.50 8 5.50 255.39 9 6.00 355.73 10 6.50 473.54 11 7.00 608.81 12 7.50 752.80 13 8.00 896.80 14 8.50 1041.08 15 9.00 1185.94 16 9.50 1331.37 17 10.00 1477.38 18 10.50 1623.97 19 11.00 1771.13 20 11.50 191886 21 12.00 2067:18 R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Diechge Inflow Volume Outflow Diechge Diechge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.35 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 8.00 0.71 0.01 4.2 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.02 1200 1.06 0.09 10.7 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.20 16..00 1.41 0.23 15.3 7.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.49 20.00 1.76 0.40 18.7 13.1 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.87 24.00 2.12 0.61 21.3 19.7 19.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.17 28.00 2.63 0.95 35.0 30.7 30.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.53 32.00 3.15 1.32 37.9 42.8 42.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.73 36.00 3.66 1.72 40.1 55.7 55.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.94 40.00 4.18 2.14 41.7 69.3 62.2 7.1 31.2 22.4 4.03 44.00 4.69 2.57 43.0 83.3 65.9 17.4 31.2 31.2 4.07 48.00 5.21 3.01 44.0 97.7 70.0 27.7 31.2 31.2 4.11 52.00 5.86 3.59 71.1 116.4 78.4 38.0 31.2 31.2 4.19 56.00 7.19 4.80 157.1 155.7 107.4 48.3 31.2 31.2 4.49 58.00 8.29 5.83 234.4 189.0 135.5 53.5 31.2 31.2 4.70 59.00 9.11 6.59 344.1 213.8 157.7 56.1 31.2 31.2 4.86 59.50 9.83 7.28 541.1 236.1 178.7 57.4 31.2 31.2 5.00 59.75 12.27 9.63 3684.1 312.2 254.2 58.0 31.2 31.2 5.26 here &calving.. July 15, 1996 ENGME:a��«a . BBC Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 104 • 60.00 14.72 12.00 3728.2 389.2 330.6 58.7 31.2 31.2 5.68 60.50 15.78 13.03 812.7 422.8 362.8 60.0 31.2 31.2 5.99 61.00 16.33 13.57 423.8 440.3 379.1 61.2 31.2 31.2 6.08 62.00 17.07 14.30 256.9 463.8 400.0 63.8 31.2 31.2 6.18 64.00 17.97 15.18 167.8 492.5 423.5 69.0 31.2 31.2 6.28 68.00 19.01 16.21 100.9 525.8 446.5 79.3 31.2 31.2 6.38 72.00 19.71 16.90 67.3 548.0 458.4 89.6 31.2 31.2 6.43 80.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 437.8 110.2 31.2 31.2 6.35 88.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 417.2 130.9 31.2 31.2 6.26 96.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 396.6 151.5 31.2 31.2 6.17 104.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 375.9 172.1 31.2 31.2 6.09 112.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 355.3 192.7 31.2 31.2 6.00 120.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 334.7 213.4 31.2 31.2 5.90 132.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 303.7 244.3 31.2 31.2 5.74 144.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 272.8 275.3 31.2 31.2 5.59 156.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 241.9 306.2 31.2 31.2 5.42 168.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 210.9 337.1 31.2 31.2 5.23 180.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 180.0 368.1 31.2 31.2 5.05 192.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 149.0 399.0 31.2 31.2 4.82 204.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 118.1 430.0 31.2 31.2 4.58 216.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 87.1 460.9 31.2 31.2 4.29 228.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 56.2 491.8 31.2 31.2 3.95 240.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 25.3 522.8 31.2 31.2 3.38 250.00 19.71 16.90 0.0 548.0 -0.3 548.4 0.0 30.8 1.98 Maximum Stage a 6.43 feet Maximum Discharge - 31.20 cfe hcrry&calvini.. July 15, 1996 ENCMEERS oa5 • BBC Project No 96-1507 1 City of Dania Drainage Study 105 Company Name..............: Berry 6 Calvin Engineers Execution Date............3 07-03-1996 Program Name..............s SCSI -- (05/06/86) Project Name..............: DANIA DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN 5c Engineer's Name...........s LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ Project Area............... 290 acres Ground Storage............: 2.36 inches Termination Discharge.....: 50 cfe Distribution Type.........s SFWMD Return Frequency..........: 100 years Rainfall Duration.........: 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall............: 14.5 inches Reporting Sequence........: Standardized Storage Information.......: Component Storage Area Start Elev Ending Elev Name Type (acres) (NGVD-ft) (NGVD-ft) Entry No. 1.............: MAJOR ROADS L 20.65 8 12 Entry No. 2.............: PERVIOUS L 122.72 3 7 Entry No. 3.............: IMPERVIOUS L 57.26 3.25 7 Point Stage Storage Discharge No. (ft) (af) (cfe) 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.50 0.00 0.00 3 3.00 0.00 0.00 4 3.50 4.31 0.00 5 4.00 19.63 0.00 6 4.50 46.44 0.00 7 5.00 84.74 0.00 8 5.50 134.53 0.00 9 6.00 195.80 0.00 10 6.50 268.56 0.00 11 7.00 352.80 0.00 12 7.50 442.79 0.00 13 8.00 532.78 0.00 14 8.50 623.42 0.00 15 9.00 715.34 0.00 16 9.50 808.56 0.00 17 10.00 903.07 0.00 18 10.50 998.87 0.00 19 11.00 1095.95 0.00 20 11.50 119433 0.00 21 12.00 1294:00 0.00 R E S E R V O I R - - - - - Rain Accum. Basin Accum. Accum. Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) (in) (in) (cfe) (af) (af) (af) (cfe) (cfe) (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.00 4.00 0.35 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.00 8.00 0.71 0.02 4.3 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.05 12.00 1.06 0.12 9.1 2.8 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.32 1600 1.41 0.27 12.5 6.5 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.57 20..00 1.76 0.46 15.0 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.71 24.00 2.12 0.68 16.8 16.3 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.89 28.00 2.63 1.03 27.3 24.9 24.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.09 32.00 3.15 1.42 29.3 34.3 34.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.27 36.00 3.66 1.83 30.8 44.3 44.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.45 40.00 4.18 2.26 31.9 54.7 54.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.60 44.00 4.69 2.71 32.8 65.4 65.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.74 48.00 5.21 3.16 33.4 76.3 76.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.89 52.00 5.86 3.75 53.8 90.5 90.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.05 56.00 7.19 4.97 118.5 120.2 120.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.34 58.00 8.29 6.01 176.4 145.2 145.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.57 59.00 9.11 6.78 258.6 163.9 163.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.72 59.50 9.83 7.47 406.3 180.6 180.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.84 59.75 12.27 9.84 2761.9 237.7 237.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.09 60.00 14.72 12.22 2790.1 295.3 295.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.49 60.50 1578 13.26 607.7 320.4 320.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.77 61.00 16..33 13.80 316.8 333.5 333.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.87 62.00 17.07 14.53 192.0 351.1 351.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.98 64.00 17.97 15.41 125.4 372.5 372.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.10 68.00 19.01 16.44 75.3 397.4 397.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.24 72.00 19.71 17.13 50.3 414.0 414.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.34 Maximum Stage - 7.34 feet Maximum Discharge - 0.00 cfe berry&celvin,nc July 15, 1996 OC-NEERS � • PLaa4EM B&C Project No 96-1507 Ile City of Dania Drainage Study 106 APPENDIX G : BROWARD COUNTY DRAINAGE MAPS 16 July 15, 1996 6erryA,"1vinI,,.. B&C Project No 96-1507 ENGINEERS PLANNEW City of Dania Drainage Study 107 • FIGURE 17 : 1 - DAY RAINFALL 10 YEAR RETURN PERIOD CONTOURS = ;E INCHES OF i_IN / EAf RWILES JC�C.V CJUAll - I 70AO , \� SAMPLE R0.70`. � �1 CONS[ Poll AREA CONSCRVA�'ON AREA e � 2 S C-iJLQ I k S-34 L Ir 1 Tq ao S-124 1 ( 10 XA-e of I( SaJd' C eS.91�. OI '�. mac:• Q { v 2I 4 � 1 a tL1 �; aottsraoa x w555 dcvv _ M a I t. r. NOTE: TO OBTAIN 3-OAY RAINFALL.MULTIF_Y AMOUNT SHOWN TIMES 1.359. QQ � 6cerY N►4.plvimnc. July 15,1996 ENGPi896 St /EYORS qwrc"L B&C Project No 96-1507 City of Dania Drainage Study 108 FIGURE 18 : 1 - DAY RAINFALL 25 YEAR RETURN PERIOD I I 113 � I �\ RSARE I2 E� "o INCHES OFRAIN 14 0 If I I PALM B CH COUNTY - BROWARO COUNTY ICANAC 14 £ERnEL D BEACN ,. WILES ROAD �- SAMPLE ROAD � I M CONS£ Ar/0N AREA V S-3B r C-/1 IONPI BEACH S-3TB f L EE 33 B C- -37A M 8 ` CONSERVAJr/ AREA � „Q� ( 2 B % S-36 C-/ 12Q S-34 64',."� S-/25 Chi C-/z S-33 o I / ► t Eiy FORT LAUDERDAL[ 2 C44, N U J v I SR 64 I , C-/I DAM/A �7 C-/I c�!O cANA h Sa3A -/3 11Q S-9 C O` I U. r SOL L M000 I Ct � •.nxcrwom BLvO M o „I is n� BROWARO CQ DADE CouvrY y. �I S� 9 10 O 8 S4 NOTE: TO OBTAIN 3-DAY RAINFALL,MULTIPLY AMOUNT V�r SHOWN TIMES 1.359. V a{ 996 berry c, ,alvin,.. July 15, 1507 E 68C Project No 96-107 Ole City of Dania Drainage Study 109 FIGURE 19 : 1 - DAY RAINFALL 100 YEAR RETURN PERIOD �$= I 14 I I I .o CONTOURS ARE 61 £SEE INCHES OF RAIN 39 18 H/ --PAL 1W TSFAcoumry _ _ _ BROWARO UNrr CANAL I O I [RA(L 0 IlJOI WILES ROAD 12 SAMPLE ROAD � � CONSERVA r/ON ARE 18� 1A y S-38 C-a PONAAAC MACN S-37B Liver tss C. -JTA CONSERVATION AREA 2 B S-36 ro b� V -34 O Z € C_(2 S 33 0 y, S,q S-/24 BI NFW row r LAUOCROALL k. x C+~+/ j O V s1f 6t 1 OANIA O .0 CANA ~ S_fJ! S-9 Q C C, w TQ O J �* I NOLLrVOQO N 2 O u ^ - OAOE C - -- ----J C 14 G-! 5-30 10 12 ° S NOTE: TO OBTAIN 3-DAY RAINFALL,MULTIPLY AMOUNT SHOWN TIMES 1.359. l7P.�Py`9'QCfIIVlr9lnc July 15, 1996 507 ENGWEERS/AIINEYOHS PIQ*M B&C Project No 96-1507 e City of Dania Drainage Study 110 FIGURE 20 : AVERAGE DRY SEASON WATER LEVELS LE GENO PRIMARY CANALS PALM IV/44 0'OO BEA 'H COUi TY WATER LEVEL CONTOURS e° I CANALJFIGURES IN PARENTHESIS (Z.al �fj ARE METERS ><o (sea EEAFI ELO ® AVERAGE WATER LEVELS IN BEACH THIS AREA ARE EXP£C TED TO (Las fu) OECLINE AS OEVELOPNENT cONr+NU ES AND FARMING-IS (Lll •.° _+ DISPLACED. fs.tl e.o tiN fizzlAREAS APF£cr£o or WELL to PIELO PUNPAGE. +1'117.0 lac t—I• 1241 7 PONPaMO L.-.13 BEACH 7,o Laf L° 4-0 sVTA a.o f r.Il CONSERVATION AREA s-sa e-Is +Lsf 2 � Q rw -sa N[-11 W OQT3.0 U W t-�2 (f.11 (I.11 0.11 i q -vew FORT xo q+yE.q O _ 4.. LAUDERDALE a ao CANAL 9 C 11.�1 4.0 7.0 20 x taal t°.a 0 v t-n t-ft V ad F. 2 t. (l.al 4.0 2.0 Q C 1L21 f0i1 2.0HOLLYWOOD C i_..-'• �1 q HOLLYWOOD BLVD. q* q ec BROWA_RO COUNT-- . e > OAOE COUM t-a 0 e I If J A 'wive f� July 15, 1996 berry&celvmir,o B&C Project No 96-1507 ENGINEERS SURJEVORS • RLkWERE City of Dania Drainage Study ill FIGURE 21 : AVERAGE WET SEASON WATER LEVELS NOTE: Tli-.,; -.--.o c_n sucersecea i-1 :.. r! ce !ocz i i zea (j a to exists an a can _e �w s zan ct a cea. PRIMARY CANALS PAL4 OEACH COUNTY I)— $YATER LEVEL CONTOURS FIGURES IN PARENTHESIS CA N A L ARE #4C—,ZRS AVERAGE WATER LEVELS I N' LA THIS AREA ARE EXPECTED DEE TO DECL:NE AS DEVELOPMENT 14 p- BEACH CONTINUES AND FARMING 4.31 IS DISPLACED. "3,0. tic 13—�;l AREAS AFFECTED BY WELL I� HELD PUMPAGE 01 C 0 IL POMPANO -33 8EACN 4.0 I49J 3-2T 4.0 00NSERVATION 0,1 0 OHSERVArION AREA IL61 4. 1 O.T1 ., 3.0 z a L C-43 I i z -3. w AlOp'. Q .Ac, SA 0.231 Air ((Lot all FORT LAUDERDALE 4.0 5.0 pa, 4. > " ,�� / cI tot 4.0 1.21 ILI (0.93.01 r •„"I ! HOLLYWOOD SLV IICLLYWOOD ml Q': 01 -La a 201 0 (4.0 931 COUNTY BROWARD I �\ I,1/ DADE DUN Ty NOTE:This map available an 24"x36-sheet at Waver Resources Management Division.Phone 357-6318.' July 15, 1996 6erryL4�alviqnc. B&C Project No 96-1507 ENGNEERS P~km i City of Dania Drainage Study 112 FIGURE 22 : 10 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION MAP INCTE: finis..ac avaiiacie::.� 2=1-x:5"sheet a.'Nazer Aesaurc_: 7ivisicn. 7.7 i 1 tI J C Z.i.S.L. 0.:-J.v � I 6f,lC.Y C�NS£.4VAT7ON .:RE.7 ` 110 2 .4 / 12.7 1 Urate:C ��,-J/�:I.OJ I<Lo CO NSERVAr/ON.:RC.J 1 i o Lo to� I ,.o , f / 4j5 I I_,wc—tom a.o \ ea r �. c.sS za ° I co _J—,Tle • IJ J za�1J•; Z �:`Sltll La Sites � T I!wpl 11 V+.I W'1 2. I r a� T•, I /�1 M So\� _ FORT cot • L.JuoERCALE 0 N� to I.a I a.a �J u1yl a CA is i 1.0 -10 �Illti I. 4.0 J 1 V .aJ; e o r !I I'� _. 1 Ei is 1 MOL:1'W000 Ict ..t „I to I" YIM.so.•T.a II n � GO gRO:vARC �a _ �... III �^ C.o ° -named on 10-- annual probability of return. day star= duration. 24 hour sustained flood elevation. elevation. r July 15, 1996 berry ► alvininc. B&C Project No 96-1507 ENGMEERS SURJEYORS P Awf d City of Dania Drainage Study 113 FIGURE 23 : REVISED 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION MAP NC77— avaiiaoic cn s,-neet --iesourc2s.1iIanzca:--.:!-:r Division. Phone F4A. "IMAWAI lo RAL.11 S A a W-1 17C 9 Z 2 9fz 3 0 E-v;-CIE,0 C. ��C » C�� \ 11 ° L_ 1-a =:i1 J7, )".014 C-NSZ*RV,J,-;O,V ARC III Ix�' :7.• � � . // POMPANO L. SEACH CO3VSCIMMOR AREA 7 C-IJ Cc 0.4 7.0 0.4 SJ3 1A FORT -a.3 To in a0`-a ;pal e0�/ L t/ 01 C-1 (" 10 ------------- 4-1 i0 061 -ZLI10. OLLYWOOO 4OLL'W000 0.0 t-.7.0 to Cs411.0 'A couvrr . �. ° •snood an 1_ annual probabilitj of return 3 day storm duration July 15, 1996 6erfy1,4:Lp1vin,r,.. B&C Project No 96-1507 PW*ri�s APPENDIX T FDEP Water Business Plan DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND BUSINESS PLAN Sponsor Name: City of Dania Beach System Population: Est 13,000 DWSRF Project#: DW0604010 PWS ID#: Contact Person and Title: Ivan Pato, City Manager Telephone: 954-924-3610 Mailing Address: 100 W. Dania Beach Blvd. City: Dania Beach State: FL Zip: 33004 Contact for Finance Plan(if different): Telephone: 954-924-3620 Mailing Address: 100 W. Dania Beach Blvd City: Dania Beach State: FL Zip: 33004 e-mail: ipato@,ci.dania-beach.fl.us Fax: 954-921-3937 Source Type: x Ground Water x Purchase Water ❑ Surface Water ❑ Surface/Ground Combined The Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program(DWSRF),authorized by the 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act,provides financial assistance to public water systems(PWS). To obtain this assistance, project sponsors must demonstrate Capacity Development or demonstrate how the assistance will ensure these requirements are met. The term Capacity Development takes into consideration three vital areas of a public water system: Technical,Managerial,and Financial capabilities. FINANCIAL A financial capability demonstration(and certification)is required well before the evaluation of the actual loan or grant application. This demonstration is necessary to ensure that the system has the financial capability to repay the loan,if applicable, and to adequately operate and maintain the system. Financial capability also includes funding future capital improvements that may be required. Please see Rule 62-552.700(4)in Chapter 62-552,F.A.C. for further details. It is expected that the revenues to be dedicated to repaying a loan will be generated either from water and sewer utility operations or from water utility operations alone. If the source of revenues will not be from such enterprises,this set of worksheets alone will not satisfy the Department's needs. (Please contact the Department for further guidance if dedicated revenues will be generated externally to such utilities.) The following worksheets have been developed to identify the minimum information needed. The completed worksheets should be used in disclosing DWSRF project financing to the public during the required dedicated revenue hearing. The worksheets can serve to identify the impacts of the SRF project on residential users and how the project fits into the project sponsor's overall capital improvement program for the water and sewer utility(or water utility,as appropriate). Supplemental capital financing documentation may be submitted with these worksheets and may be presented at the required dedicated revenue hearing. The revenues being dedicated to repayme (�r r< System revenues What is the frequency of water system bi . 7 1✓ Monthly How often are system rates reviewed for A" Every 2 to 3 years When was the last time rates were reviev �-` 2000 What resources and guidance does the *. water Consultant is hired user rates,fees or charges? C� To independently review rates and recommend Changes that are adopted by the City Commission What is your water system bond rating? j Not rated Is a rate increase necessary as a result of:}.__ :., Not the initial stages, rate increase in 2004 What is the Median Household Income( ? Est$32,740 Which, if any,of the following activities must be undertaken to implement the DWSRF project? Acquire privately held land? Yes ❑ No X Acquire land held by another public water system entity? Yes ❑ No X Enter into inter-local or inter-project sponsoring agency's agreements? Yes ❑ No X Does the system have an annual budget with a separate reserve account for equipment Yes X No ❑ replacement and/or capital improvement? Does the system have a capital improvement plan? How many years does it cover? 10 Yes x No ❑ Does the system have a governing board of directors? City Commission Yes x No ❑ Does the water system employ the services of a professional engineer? Yes x No ❑ Are there procedures for billing and collection? Yes x No ❑ Does the system have audited financial statements? Yes x No ❑ Are there standard purchasing procedures that provide controls over expenditures? Yes x No ❑ What year will construction be completed and repayments begin(for the first project)? 2005 Please attach a copy of the user charge ordinance. Table 1 Water Rate Revenue Summary Actual Adopted 2001 2002 200] 2004 2005 2006 Description W (9 For Residential: 1 Number of Customers 4,020 4,023 4,043 4,063 4,094 4,104 2 Number of New Customers 3 20 20 20 20 3 Annual Water Usage(h801on Gallons) 651 652 6S8 665 671 679 4 Average Annual Usage(Million Gallons) 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 5 Average Annual Revenue Generated per B01 S 888.00 S 892.44 S 94S.99 S 1,050.04 S 1,155.05 S 1,247.45 6 Total Amount of Bills S 3,569,760 S 3,590,286 S 3,824,732 S 4,266,680 S 4,716,814 S 5,119,630 7 Annual Amount Uncolkted - - - 8 Total Rates Collected S 3,569,760 S 3,590,296 S 3,924,732 S 4,266,680 S 4,716,314 S 5,119,630 9 Impact and Connection Fees per SerAce $ 82 S 47 S 117 $ 44 $ 44 $ 10 Total Impact B:Connection Fees $ 329.000 S 188,801 $ 471,291 $ 180,000 $ 180,000 S 180,000 For CommerclaI: 11 Number of Customers 605 609 621 634 646 659 12 Number of Now Customers - 4 12 12 13 13 13 Annual Water Saks(M60on Gallons) 145 1" 148 149 151 152 14 Annual Amount Uncolleted 15 Total Comm/Ind BillsCollected $ 655,740 S 658,708 S 790,SM S 810,168 S 967,718 S 1,023,354 Average Annual B10 S 1,080.00 S 1,123.20 S 1,190.59 S 1,321.56 S 1,4S3.71 S 1,570.01 16 Impact and Connection Fees per Comm Service 17 Total Impact d Connection Fees $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18 Bulk Sales $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 18 Total Rates Collected $ 4,554,500 $ 4,434,795 $ 5,086,607 S 5,256,848 $ 5,764,532 S 6,322.985 Total fees includes User Fees,Impact fees,penalties,Connection Charges But not surplus used * Large meters should be checked annually for accuracy. OInstructions for Completing Table I Line 1 Include the actual number of customers for last year and year 1 (current year). The numbers in years 2 through 5 should reflect your estimated number of residential customers. Line 2 This line is a subset of line 1. It should reflect the number of new customers that will be charged an impact or connection fee. Line 3 This line is your total volume (million gallons) of water used by your residential customers. Line 4 This is the average annual usage(million gallons)by a single residential customer. To get this number divide line 3 by line 1. Line 5 To obtain the average annual residential bill use the rates that will be in place for that particular year. Line 6 Multiply line 1 by line 5. Line 7 This is the amount of the uncollected residential bills outstanding for the year. Line 8 Line 6 minus line 7. Line 9 This line is the impact and connection fee for new residential service. Line 10 Multiply line 2 by line 9. Line 11 This line is your total volume (million gallons) of water used by your commercial accounts. Line 12 Total revenue collected for commercial accounts. Line 13 This is the number of new commercial/industrial service accounts in a given year. Line 14 This line is the impact and connection fee for new commercial/industrial accounts. Line 15 Multiply line 13 by line 14. Line 16 Total revenue for bulk water sales to consecutive systems. Line 17 Total of line 8+10+12+15+16. 10 TABLE 2 INCOME, EXPENSES, AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT COMBINED WATER& SEWER Table 2 Income,Expenses,and Cash Flaw Statement Combined Water 8 Sewer mr2y02 2 Description m I I 2o�)m I 2(2))e I 2� 1 OPERATING REVENUES: 2 Rats S 4434,795 S 5,086,607 S 3,236,846 S 4764,572 S 6,322,995 3 Aire Protecttoa - - - 4 Fee&Services 5 Interest Income f 161,301 S 1106447 f 100,000 S ]00,000 f 7040on 6 Graots&Lwns 7 Other S 27 500 S 360,844 S 80,000 S 80,000 S 00,000 8 TOTAL(Unes 2-7) S 4,623,596 S 5,557,898 S A436,848 S 5,9. 2 S 6,SM,985 9 NON-OPERATING REVENUES: 10 Interest Income I InterIncome Transfer 210,362 12 Proceeds from the Sale of Assets - 13 Leases and Extraction Fees - - 14 Other 296'9 1S TOTAL(Unes 10-14) S S 509,359 S 16 17 OPERATING EXPENSES:- is OPERATIONS&MAINTENANCE: 19 Selades(Operators) f 759,541 S Mn,517 S 943,213 S 1,009,249 S 1,079,996 20 Benefits S 347,792 S 48%572 S 471,612 5 _AA624 S 539,948 21 Utilities 38,00o 36,000 55,000 55,000 SS,tt00 22 ChemicalsB Treatment 26,000 25,� u'� n000 25.E 23 Monitoring f 11%000 S 117,750 S 116.50 S 119,467 S 122,450 24 Materials,Supplies,6 Parts 11%000 138,000 140,494 143,013 145,587 25 TfansportatlQl 1,763,000 1,763,000 1,795,260 1,826,165 1,861,729 26 Purchased Water Casts 491,100 S 442,500 S 460.200 S 478.608 S 497,752 27 Outside Services 2,576,100 2,563230 2,592,92 2,649,252 2,707,96 28 OTHER 29 TOTAL(tines 19-28) S 3,643,433 S 3,873,339 S 4007,346 S 063,126 S 4,727,362 30 ADMINISTRATIVE: 31 Selades S 154794 S 167,523 f 174970 S 187,217 S 200,3 IOA521 32 Benefits 89,594 94,195 92,166 98,616 f05,52 33 Building Overhead 34 Office Supplies S Postage 0 0 0 0 0 35 Insurance S 11,957 S 111957 S 5,421 $ 5.421 S 5,421 36 Customer Billing 6 Collection 74,734 74,734 77,723 80,932 K066 37 Accounting 38 Legal 39 A/E S Professional Services 732 40 Other 40,550 37,100 38,584 40,127 ,0 41 TOTAL(Ones 31-40) S 371,629 f 301,509 S 368,864 S 412,216 $ 437,63 0 42 Depredation Expense(If money Is set aside) S 133,498 f 133,488 S 300,000 S 2-%000 S 250,0M 47 Other(Contingency) - 9953 20000 20,000 20,000 44 TOTAL(Unes 29+41+43) S 4146,550 f 4,398" $ %716,211 f '%W'm S 5,034,425 45 NET OPERATING INCOME(Use 8-Use 44) S 475,046 S 1,159,609 S 720,637 S 1,099,191 S 1,466,560 46 47 NON-OPERATING EXPE "r' 48 Imerest Expense�. 49 Irderfund Transfers - 50 To General Fund S 684,356 S 739,106 S 760,670 S 79%417 f 831,394 51 To Replacement Fund 153,369 M To Emergency Fund S - $ 9,953 f 20,000 S 20,000 $ 20,000 53 TOTAL(Unes 48-52) 684356 M428 714670 819,417 851,394 54 Other - - - - 55 TOTAL(Ones 53+Line 54) $ 664356 f 902,426 S 766,670 f M9,417 S 851,394 56 NET NON-OPERATING INCOME(Use 15-Une 55) (604356) (393,069) (788,670) (819,417) (01,394) 4 TABLE 2 INCOME, EXPENSES, AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT Actual Adopted :::'.�.'?].' 20M 200J 2004 2005 2006 neaea tiou I m (m 1 m 1 m M 56 NET NON-0PERATING INCOME(Une 15-1Jne 55) OW56) (393,069) (788,670) (819,417) (11151,294) 57 NET INCOME BEFORE TAXES S (209,310) $ 766,540 S (68,672) S 279,774 $ 617,166 58 TAXES: 59 Income Taxes $ - S - $ - $ - f 60 Other Than Income Taxes - - -_ 61 TOTAL(Uses 59+Une 60) S - S f - S S 62 NET INCOME AFTER TAXES(Une 57-Line 60) S (209,310) S 766,540 $ (68,077) S 279,774 S 617,166 63 64 EXTRAORDINARY REVENUES: 65 Construction Grants $ - S - $ f - 66 Proceeds from Bonowfng(SRF) - - f 9,975,000 - 67 Equity Contribution 60 Dow 69 TOTAL(Ones 65-68) S - S - S 9,975,000 S - S - 70 71 EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSES: _ _ 71 Debt Repayment-Principal S - S - S _ S S 75 Capital Improvements - - - $ 757,500 $ 715,000 74 Other - 75 TOTAL(Uses 72-74) f - S - S - S 357,500 S 71-NOW 76 CASH FLOW(Unes 62+Une 69-Une 75) S (209,710) S 766,540 S 9,906,967 S (77,726) S (97," NOTES: 1. The City of Dania Beach accounts for both water and sewer within one enterprise fund. Therefore there is not difference in water and wastewater revenues according to their accounting system. Therefore, the combined fund total have been shown in Table 2 2. A rate hike is expected in FY 2004 3. Debt for the proposed SRF program for both water and wastewater are included in the projections in Table 2 5 Instructions for Completing Table 2 REVENUES- Revenues include all sources of income to the system. They are separated on this form as: O "Operating", lines 2-7, "Non-Operating", lines 10-14, and"Extraordinary", lines 65-68. When using the subcategory"other" under any item, please write a descriptive term . EXPENSES- Expenses include all those activities or purchases which incur cost for the system. Expenses can be estimated in various ways. One method bases the projections on historical expense. This can be accomplished by using historical costs and escalating them from known and projected changes. An example of a known change would be an increase in labor costs for the budget period due to known or anticipated salary increases. An example of a projected increase or escalation in costs would be a 5% annual inflation rate. Materials and Supplies expense, for instance, would be expected to increase with the projected inflation rate. Expenses are separated on this form in the same fashion as Revenues with further subtopics to more clearly define expenses. When using the subcategory"other" under any item please write a descriptive term and cross out the word "other". Expenses are separated on this form as "Operating", lines 19-28, "Administrative", lines 31-44, "Non-Operating", lines 48-54, "Taxes" lines 59 and 60, and "Extraordinary", lines 72-74. Lines 2-3 These lines include all money received for supplying water service. Information should come from a completed Attachment 1. Line 4 Include all miscellaneous fees and charges generated by providing water service other than for the actual water service (for example, connection fees, bad check fees, reconnect fees, meter testing fees, etc.). Line 5 Interest earned from cash on hand or on fees financed by the utility. Line 6 Include any funds to be received for capital improvements. These funds should be reflected as expenses on line 73 and repayments on loans should be reflected on line 72. Line 7 If used, please describe. Line 9 Non-operating revenues are fur, 'generated outside the water system and used by the water system to cover expenses. Lines 10-15 Items should be clear, modify topics if needed. Lines 19-20 Salaries and Benefits (Operators), include all compensation to employees of your system when the work is related to the system's O&M. This account should not include compensation of officers, directors, or general and administrative staff. Volunteer labor cannot be applied. Line 21 Utilities, includes the cost of all electric power, gas, telephone, water(at least account for what is being used at the plant), and any other system-related expenses incurred in rproducing and delivering water. Line 22 Chemicals and treatment is intended to cover the cost of all chemicals used in the treatment of your water. 6 Line 23 Monitoring, includes all water monitoring costs incurred by the system. This should include both in-house monitoring and analysis costs as well as outside laboratory costs. Line 24 Materials, supplies, and parts means all materials and supplies used in the O&M of the water system and in providing and delivering the water to the customer. Include any repairs or parts needed in producing and delivering water. This would include grease, oil, and minor repairs to equipment. This should not include materials for administrative purposes such as postage, copying or copy machine supplies, billing forms, or letterhead. Line 25 Transportation is intended to include all expenses related to trucks, automobiles, construction equipment, and other vehicle expense used in producing and delivering water to the customer. Line 26 Include the cost of purchasing water. Use only if a consecutive system. Line 27 Administration expense are considered overhead but not those directly related to O&M of the daily production and delivery of water to the customer. This category includes billing and administrative costs incurred by the system. For example, all meter reading costs, secretarial costs, postage, publications, reference materials, uncollectible debts insurance accounting services, and all other overhead items belong in this subsection. Lines 31-32 Salaries and Benefits include all compensation to employees of your system in which the work is related to the administration of the system, such as officers, directors, secretarial, and meter reading salaries and benefits. This account should not include compensation of operators. If an employee performs both operation and meter reading a percentage of their salary should appear under the appropriate topic. For example, if an operator reads meters 25% of the time, 3/4 of their salary should be shown on line 11 and '/a of their salary on line 23. Line 33 Overhead associated with the building itself such as, mortgage payment, insurance, taxes, maintenance, etc. Line 34 Office supplies and postage includes all materials and supplies in administration of the water system. This includes office supplies, postage, copier charges, and paper. Line 35 Insurance (Vehicles, Liability, Workers' Compensation) includes all insurance costs associated with the coverage for the vehicles, general liability, workers' compensation insurance, and other insurance costs related to the operation and administration of the system. Line 36 Customer billing and collection should include all expenses specific to this function such as, special billing forms or software. Lines 37-38 Accounting and legal expenses includes all salaries and wages with legal and accounting functions for the system even if they are outside services. Line 39 A/E and professional services means all engineering and other professional'services expenses associated with water system planning and design requirements. 7 Line 40 Other means expenses such as employee training and water certification requirements (classes, registration fees, travel, etc.), public relations campaigns and public notifications, etc. Line 42 Depreciation expense only applies to systems which are currently depreciating investments made in the past (recovery of previously invested funds). Line 43 Other, should include the type and amount of recurring expenses that did not fit into any of the above line items. Line 47 Non-operating expenses are ones that are necessary and paid by the water system, but are not part of daily O&M or Administration of the system. Lines 48-55 These lines represent some possible categories, modify if needed. Lines 59-60 Taxes can be incurred in a variety of ways such as a state utility tax, business and occupation tax, property tax or federal income tax. Each of these taxes can be accounted for separately within the operating budget, modify if necessary. Lines 65-68 Revenues that come from sources not considered in the totals on lines 7 or 44 should be listed in these items, modify if necessary. Lines 72-74 Expenses that are involved in operating or administering the water system that were not considered in the totals appearing on lines 27 and 54 should be shown in these items, modify if necessary. Debt Repayment and Capital Improvements are typical items that may appear on this type of analysis. Capital improvements include facility and non-facility costs related to: 1)Meeting growth requirements or improving your system's infrastructure to provide better service and reliability to existing customers, 2) replacing or renovating existing facilities, or 3) to ensure compliance with drinking water regulations. Non-water rate revenues from loans, grants, and special charges may act as direct offsets to these capital expenditures. The unfunded difference is the net capital costs which should come from water rate. fTto 8 Table 3 SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AND PARITY LIENS • List annual debt service.beginning two years before the anticipated loan agreement date and continuing at least fifteen fiscal years. Use additional pages as necessary. #1 #2 #3 Identify Each Misc. Vehicle Fund #4 Identify Each Coverage % % % Insured? Yes No Yes No Yes No Fiscal Annual Debt Service Total Debt Total Debt Year 1 2 3 4 Service Incl Coverage 2003 $ 161 ,201 $ 161 ,201 $ 161 ,201 2004 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 2005 $ - $ _ 2006 $ $ _ 2007 $ - $ _ 2008 $ - $ _ 2009 $ - $ _ 2010 $ - $ ® 2011 $ _ $ _ 2012 $ $ _ 2013 $ $ _ 2014 $ - $ _ 2015 $ - $ _ 2016 $ - $ 2017 $ - $ 2018 $ - $ _ 2019 $ - $ _ 2020 $ - $ 2021 $ - $ 2022 $ - $ 2023 $ - $ 2024 $ - $ 2025 $ - $ 9 SCHEDULE OF ACTUAL REVENUES AND DEBT COVERAGE FOR RATE-BASED SYSTEM PLEDGED REVENUE (Provide information for the two fiscal years preceding the anticipated date of the SRF loan agreement.) FY2002 FY2003 (a) Net Revenues (Table 2 line 62) $ (209,310) $ $ 766,540 (b) Debt Service (including required coverage; should reflect last column of r able 3) $$ 12,644 $ 161,201 (c) Attach audited annual financial report(s), or pages thereof, and any other documentation necessary to support the above information. Include any notes or comments from the audit reports regarding compliance with covenants of debt obligations having a prior or parity lien on the revenues pledged for repayment of the SRF loan. (Attachment# (d) Attach worksheets reconciling this page with the appropriate financial statements (for example, backing out depreciation and interest payments from operating expenses). (Attachment# n/a (e) If the net revenues were not suffix ient to satisfy the debt service and coverage requirement, please explain what corrective action was taken. (Attachment#2) SCHEDULE OF PRO. IECTED REVENUES AND DEBT COVERAGE FOR RATE-BASED SYSTEM PLEDGED REVENUE (Begin with the fiscal year preceding first anticipated semiannual loan payment.) FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 (g) Net Revenues y294;390 $21,967 $319,773 $657,166 $792,823 (h) Revenue (including coverage) pledged to debt service, excluding $1 1,201 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 SRF loans _ (i) Revenue (including coverage) pledged to outstanding SRF loans Sr'_ _ �0 $0 $0 $0 Q) Revenue Available for this SRF Loan (i = g- h- i) _$133,489 _$(98,033) $319,773 $657,166 $792,623 (k) Identify the source of the above information and explain methods used to develop the projections (Attachment#2). Include an explanation of any revenue and expense growth or other adjustments; for ex�rnple, ;ny rats increases, service growth, inflation adjustments, expense adjustments reflecting the cost of operating additional facilities, or other considerations. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS (use additional sheets if necessary) Attachment Number Audited Statements 1 ® Rate Ordinance 2 Capital Financing Plan 3 CH 7 — Facilities Plan 4 10 TECHNICAL: Accurate answers to the following questions will help identify the technical strengths as well as areas that may need improving within your system. If a question or section does not apply to your system, please write N/A for not applicable. For questions that ask you to rate your system from 1 to 5, answer 1 for worst case scenario and answer 5 for the best case scenario. • System has current and accurate data showing average and peak gpd used Yes x No ❑ • System's capacity exceeds peak demand by a comfortable margin Yes ❑ No x • System can meet peak demand without pumping at peak capacity for extended periods. Yes x No ❑ • System has an emergency plan in place to meet system demand during a shortage(natural disaster or largest pump/well out, etc.) Yes x No ❑ • System has accurate records indicating types and percentage of customers use: Yes x No ❑ Residential 86.7%Commercial 13.3 %Industrial n/a%Dedicated Irrigation Meter % • System has comprehensive water loss program that compares amount of water produced(plant meter)with total delivered through metered and unmetered service connections (system's unaccounted for water is 3.1%) Yes x No ❑ Purchase Water Systems System has a written agreement with the supplier that: • ensures adequate supply of water during shortage conditions, Yes x No ❑ • does not require the purchase of a minimum amount of water(water is • supplied through a meter), Yes x No ❑ • assures supplying water system will remain in compliance with the appropriate State or federal regulations, and Yes x No ❑ • assures purchasing system will be notified of any water quality issues. Yes x No ❑ Surface Water Systems and Systems Using Ground Water Under the Influence of Surface Water NA X • System has redundancy for all critical treatment components 1 2 3 4 5 • System monitors raw, settled, and individual filtered water turbidity 1 2 3 4 5 • System consistently(95%of the time)has a filtered water turbidity of %, which is within the current standard of.3 NTU 1 2 3 4 5 • System has the capability to add coagulant before the filter and disinfect at various points in the treatment process 1 2 3 4 5 • System is evaluating (or has evaluated)changes necessary to meet the Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule 1 2 3 4 5 Some needed changes are: • System is evaluating(or has evaluated)changes needed to meet requirements in the Disinfection By Products Rule 1 2 3 4 5 Some planned modifications are: Ground Water System NA ❑ • A minimum of two sources of groundwater are provided Yes x No❑ • Source water protection area provides a minimum 500 foot radius around each 11 drinking water well Yes ❑ No x • Groundwater source capacity equals or exceeds the design maximum day demand and equals or exceeds the design average day demand with the largest producing well out of service Yes x No El • System monitors raw water quality to determine appropriate treatment 103 4 5 • System's well(s)have; air/vacuum relief valve, check valve, blow-off,by-pass,meter, working sanitary seal, construction/maintenance records and are properly vented 1285 • System routinely monitors drawdown 1 25 Disinfection • System has adequate contact time of minutes following disinfection and before the first user in the distribution system Yes x No El • Disinfection equipment is regularly inspected and maintained Yes x No ❑ • A chlorine residual is maintained throughout the distribution system 1 2 305 5 Distribution System • System has accurate information, including age, for pipe materials that currently make up the distribution system 103 4 5 • Water mains providing fire protection are a minimum of 6-inches in diameter Yes ❑ • System is free of severe"water hammer"problems 1 3 5 • System tracks ranges of operating pressure, especially during peak demand 1 2 4 5 • System maintains a minimum operating pressure of 20 psi Yes x No • Normal operating pressure is kept between 40 and 100 psi 1 2 3 4 • System has a routine leak detection program that uses(type of equipment)no, repairs identified leaks quickly, and keeps water loss in the distribution system below 5%. Average number of leak repairs per year is not tracked 1®3 4 5 • System has a cross connection control program in place that addresses: evaluation of each service connection, installation of specified backflow preventer,training, record keeping, annual testing, and education 1 3 4 • System is working to eliminate dead ends in the mains 2 3 4 • System has a flushing program that operates one times a year 1 2 3 4 • System has a map showing the bacteriological, lead and copper, and TTHM (if applicable) sampling points 02 3 4 5 • System has accurate"as-built"maps of the distribution system posted that show: location of sources (or intakes), size of mains, dead end mains,valves,curb stops on service lines, and proximity of mains to other utilities (gas, electric, etc.) 2 3 4 5 • System has a routine valve exercise program 6 2 3 4 5 • All customers are metered and all meters are routinely calibrated 1 2 IM5 • Customer complaints are relatively infrequent 1 2 5 List number of complaints in the past year: not tracked. Pumping • System has a pump maintenance program that includes annual inspection, scheduling of repair, and routine maintenance that is conducted by a qualified contractor 3 4 5 12 • • System has standby or emergency power equipment that is routinely tested under load and can provide 100%of the average daily demand for n/a days 1 2 3®4 5 Installation of emergency power generators currently ongoing Storage • System is able to meet peak demand without the high service pumps running at peak capacity for extended period 1 2 5 • System has adequate reserve capacity for fire protection. 1 3 Total storage capacity of the system is 380,000 gals with interconnects to Hwd&Ft L • System's 2 storage tanks receive routine inspection(every 3-5 years)to AOAL 2 3 4 5 determine and schedule any needed maintenance • All storage tanks are equipped with an altitude valve to prevent overflowing and are sized appropriately to ensure adequate turnover and no loss of water quality N/A 1 2 3 4 5 • Storage tanks are covered and the surrounding areas are fenced N/A 1 2 3 4 5 • Storage tanks have a drain valve and an entry hatch to allow access for cleaning and painting of the interior of the tank N/A 1 2 3 4 5 13 MANAGERIAL: Answering the next set of question will help the system clearly define responsible parties, • staffing needs, operational needs, policies, and internal standard that guide system performance. For questions that ask you to rate your system from 1 to 5,answer 1 for worst case scenario and answer 5 for the best case scenario. • System has a current organizational chart and accompanying position descriptions that clearly define responsibilities of staff members 1 2 5 • The plant is a category II plant operating 24 hours per day. List names, class, and license numbers for all operators fulfilling staffing requirements: See attached • System is satisfied with service provided by contract operator(s) NA 1 2 3 4 5 • The operator's authority and responsibilities are clearly defined 1 5 Policies and Plans: Please indicate with a check mark the items for which the water system has written policies or plans. x standard specifications ❑ connection policies [I main extension policies x bacteriological sampling plan x emergency operation plan x Lead&Copper sample plan ❑ cross connection control plan ❑ record management plan El TTHM ❑general rules x disconnection policy ❑ public education &outreach x Safety/Risk Management Policy x disaster response plan x personnel policy • • Based on the answers above the system has: clear organizational structure, defined staffing requirements, and appropriate rules/policies 1 3 5 Operations and Maintenance: The items that follow are elements that may be contained in a thorough Operations and Maintenance(O&M)manual. A complete 0&M manual is useful as a quick reference for anything from troubleshooting to emergency procedures. Please indicate with a check mark those items contained in the system's O&M manual. Introduction and Overview x System name x System ID# 4060642 x location x design flow capacity x type of treatment x water source x available training x publications available x Statement of the purpose of the manual and relay to the operator how to best obtain pertinent information x organizational chart(note which activities require qualified and licensed/certified personnel) General System Description x a flow schematic (source to distribution) x pumping capabilities (source,chemicals, and high service) x storage (raw, finished water, and chemicals) x system map showing location of all wells, intake structures,pumping stations, storage tanks, and the defined service area • System Operation and Control ❑ identification of major system components including a description of the normal operation of each component—only mechanical components installed over the oast 20 vears are available. 14 • ❑ possible alternative operation modes and circumstances under which they would be used x schematic diagrams of each treatment process ❑ preventative maintenance program(include inspections performed when the facility is off-line ❑ common operating problems with methods of bypassing while being repaired ❑ importance of and how to use laboratory tests for process control ❑ routine system operation for each major system component this should include startup and shut-down procedures, safety procedures, meter reading x evaluation of overall system performance— Quarterly Health Dept Inspections Laboratory Testing x identification of samples and tests needed for compliance as well as for process control. x sampling locations,time, and methods ❑ how to interpret laboratory results and the use of these results to improve the process ❑ what should be in laboratory supply and chemicals inventory ❑ list of laboratory references; ❑ instructions for filling out worksheets for a sample(include completed example) x for tests to be performed by outside laboratories,the name of the laboratory, contact person,telephone number, and method of requesting sample pick-up or schedule for sample pick-up Not written format Records and Reports Section ❑ a general explanation of the purpose and importance of accurate records and reports (Not specifically) x a log of complaints and responses x daily logs, maintenance records, laboratory records, monthly reports, monitoring reports, sanitary surveys, • annual reports, operating cost reports,and accident reports. x historical records (permits, standards,pumping capacity, consumption, and drawdown) ❑ list of equipment warranties and provisions x specific area for filing records x procedures for reporting to appropriate agencies (specify how long records should be kept) Maintenance ❑ general information including purpose and value of scheduled and preventative maintenance ❑ preventative maintenance schedule and sample worksheets with instructions x specifications for fuels, lubricants, filters, etc. for equipment x troubleshooting charts or guides which reference pages in manufacturers' O&M manual or system's O&M manual as appropriate ❑ a record of data plate information on each piece of equipment maintained,this should include manufacturers'maintenance schedule for routine adjustments ❑ a work order system for maintenance of equipment with sample forms to accurately track O&M costs for each piece of equipment ❑ brief operation instructions for each piece of equipment with reference to the manufacturers' technical specifications for major system components ❑ a mechanism for storage and check out of specialized equipment used infrequently x list of outside contract maintenance tasks x contact person and phone numbers for equipment manufacturers, major suppliers, and all utilities serving the system Not in written form ❑ list of special tools used and how to replace x stocks of spare parts, supplies, chemicals and other items vital to system operation x a system of requisitions and/or work orders used to distribute parts, supplies, chemicals, etc. for reorder purposes 15 • Emergency Response Program x pre-response activity such as;personnel assignments, emergency equipment inventory, filling a storage tank before a storm hits, copies of all emergency numbers. Laminated copy of phone numbers to keep readily accessible should include water system personnel responsible for making decisions in specific situations; including name,job title, home and work phone number(pager/cell phone number if available),police, fire departments, and for chemical spills or exposure CHEMTECH 800424-9300. ❑ safety procedures for all personnel involved in the response El contingency plan to ensure proper treatment of water even in adverse conditions which may include agreements with nearby water systems for equipment or personnel ❑ procedures for putting standby and emergency sources into active service x procedures for notifying customers, the local health jurisdiction, and EPA of water quality problems ❑ systematic procedure for returning to normal operation Appendix The appendix can contain documents and other information that cannot be easily incorporated into the body of the manual. Large documents such as copies of plans and specifications may be stored separately from the main manual. The following list has examples of items that might be included in appendices. Please check all that apply to your O&M Manual. ❑ Detailed design criteria ❑ x User Charge System ❑ Approved shop drawings ❑ Schematics ❑ Piping color codes ❑ Valve indices or schedule ❑ As-built drawings ❑ Drinking water rules/Ordinance ❑ Manufacturers'manuals • Based on the answers above please rate the system's current O&M Manual. 02 3 4 5 • The last set of questions is designed to help you evaluate the systems' source(s). Please read the item then circle the number from 1 (needs improving)to 5 (top notch)that you feel best describes your systems' current status relative to that item or check boxes as appropriate. • System has an active Source Water Assessment Program 1 5 For Ground Water Systems: • System has accurate historical information(like well driller's log and construction records)for each well 1 2 3 • Well(s)have the"zone of contribution"identified on a map 2 3 4 5 • No storage of potential contaminants in close proximity of well(s) 2 3 4 5 • Well(s)are housed and fenced and have an appropriate concrete pad 1 5 • Well casing(s) extend at least 12" above floor or ground 1 2 Name of aquifer is known: x Yes ❑ No Aquifer is: Biscayne Confined x Unconfined For Surface Water Systems: N/A • Commercial, industrial, or agricultural operations up stream are identified 1 2 3 4 5 • System has provided a contact to these facilities in case of an accidental release 1 2 3 4 5 • System performs up stream monitoring 1 2 3 4 5 • System has a raw water reservoir of gallons that acts as a buffer 1 2 3 4 5 Overall: • System has adequate knowledge and program activity to protect and ensure an adequate supply of drinking water 10 years into the future 1 4 5 16 CERTIFICATION: I,the undersigned authorized representative of the applicant,hereby certify that all information contained in this form and attachments is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also certify that I have been duly authorized to file the business plan and to provide these assurances. Signature Of Authorized Representative Name(Please Print) Michael J. Sheridan, P.E. Title Director of Public Works and Utilities Address 100 W. Dania Beach Blvd. City Dania Beach State FL Zip 33004 Phone 954-924-3740 Fax 954-923-1109 17 APPENDIX U Broward County Public Health Unit Letter LOR DEPARTMENT OF J $lT Jeb Bush Robert G. Brooks,M.D. Governor Secretary Broward County—MW City of Dania Beach May 22, 2000 Robert I Palm,Public Works/Utilities Director City of Dania.Beach 100 W. Dania Beach Blvd. Dania Beach, FL 33004 Re: Storage Capacity Requirements for a Public Water Svstem Dear Mr. Palm-, The Broward County Health Department (BCHD) has received the engineering plans and application documents for the Generator Replacement project. A thorough review of these documents reveals that your water treatment plant has been operated for many years with a woefully inadequate storage capacity of only 250,000 gallons in the two clearwells, a deficiency that must be corrected as soon as possible! • The Ten State Standards call for the minimum storage capacity for systems not providing fire protection to be equal to the average daily consumption, of which the last 6-month average for your system is 2.26 MGD. For modest-sized fires, the fire flow is calculated based on the guideline of Chapter 10 of the A)NWA Water Distribution Systems Handbook by Larry W. Mays as follows: 3,500 gpm (60.min/hr) (3 hours) 1106 = 0.63 MG. Therefore, the required storage capacity of your water system should be: 2.26 + 0.63 = 2.89 MG. Subtracting the clearwells' capacity from the total required storage capacity,the additional storage capacity required is: 2.89—0.25 =2.64 MG. Using the functional sizing approach in Chapter 10 of the AWWA Water Distribution Systems Handbook, the required storage capacity can be, calculated as the sum of: equalization flow, fire flow, and flow for emergencies other than Sizes. The equalization flow can range from 5% to 50% of the maximum daily flow (MDF) and BCHD recommends using the maximum value of 50% of the MDF because it corresponds with the recommendation in the Enviroru-rental Engineering and Sanitation by Joseph A. Salvato, p. 412, that "in general it is recommended that water storage equal not less than one-half the total daily consumption," Using the fire flow calculated above and the total design capacity of the plant (3.0 MGD) as the value for MDF, and ignoring the flow for emergencies other than fires, the storage capacity required is: '/2 (3)+ 0.63=2.13 MG,which calls for an additional storage capacity of: 2.13 —0.25 = 1.88 MG. Broward Counry Health De.paranent 2421-A S.W.6`b Avenue,Ft.Lauderdale, FL 33315 Robert J. Palm -2- May 22, 2000 all The additional storage capacity is an urgent matter now because nobody can predict the future, especially future emergencies; therefore, BCHD requires that the City make plans to instal', an additional 2.0 MG storage capacity within 3 years of the permit date, and will so state on the construction permit for the Generator Replacement project, If you have any questions regarding the above, please call the writer at 467-4846 or Thomas K. Mueller, P.E. at 467-4829. Sincerely, Phong D. Nguyen, P.E., Assistant Director Envirorimental Engineering Section Cc: Thomas K.Mueller, P.E., Director Karl Kennedy,P.E., Calvin&Giordano Associates, Inc. • TOTHL 03