HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2001-125 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-125
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH,
FLORIDA, AMENDING ITS GENERAL FUND
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001, BY
REDUCING CERTAIN REVENUE ESTIMATES AND
BY BORROWING $750,000 DOLLARS FROM THE
WATER FUND AND $750,000 FROM THE SEWER
FUND, PROVIDING THAT ALL RESOLUTIONS OR
PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT
HEREWITH BE REPEALED TO THE EXTENT OF
SUCH CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the budget of estimated revenues and appropriations for
expenditures for the fiscal year 2000-2001 has been approved by the City Commission
of the City of Dania Beach, Florida; and
WHEREAS, based upon actual receipts through the end of June, the City
desires to adjust certain revenue estimates to reflect more realistic revenue projections;
and
WHEREAS, in order to account for the reduction in those certain revenue
estimates, the it is necessary for the General Fund to borrow $750,000 from the Water
Fund and $750,000 from the Sewer Fund to be repaid with interest at 5% over a five
year period; and
WHEREAS, certain changes to said fiscal year budget of appropriations for
expenditures are now necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA:
is
1 RESOLUTION NO.2001-125
Section 1. That the General Fund Budget for the fiscal year 2000-2001 be
and the same is hereby amended, deleted and otherwise changed as set forth
in attachment "A" to this Resolution, which is hereby made a part of this
resolution:
Section 2. That all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith be
replealed to the extent of such conflict.
Section 3. That this resolution shall be in force and effect immediately upon its
passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 24T" day of July, 2001.
PATRICIA FLUKY
MAYOR — COMMISSIONER
ATT ST: ROLL CALL:
COMMISSIONER BERTINO - YES
COMMISSIONER MCELYEA - YES
CHARLENE JOqjSON COMMISSIONER MIKES - ABSENT
ACTING CITY CLERK VICE-MAYOR CHUNN - YES
MAYOR FLURY - YES
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
BY:
THOM YANSBRO
CITY ATTORNEY
•
2 RESOLUTION NO.2001-125
Attachment"A"
iBudget . Revised Budget
Account Revenue 2001 Reductions Estimates
001-30-3130-31-310 Franchise Fee Electricity 1,200,000 (200,000) 1,000,000
001-30-3130-31-350 Franchise Fee Cable TV 120,000 (50,000) 70,000
001-30-3140-31-410 Electricity 1,925,000 (350,000) 1,575,000
001-30-3210-32-100 Occupational Licenses 500,000 (100,000) 400,000
001-30-3290-32-909 Cost Recovery Fee 200,000 (75,000) 125,000
001-30-3420-34-240 Fire/EMS Non AV Assessmeni 1,711,700 (100,000) 1,611,700
001-30-3420-34-245 County Fire/EMS Services 350,000 (350,000) 0
001-30-3420-34-260 EMS Transport Fees 450,000 (50,000) 400,000
001-30-3430-34-340 Garbage& Penalty 930,000 (75,000) 855,000
001-30-3610-36-110 General Fund Interest 300,000 (150,000) 150,000
tbd by Finance Dept. Loan from Water Fund 0 750,000
tbd by Finance Dept. Loan from Sewer Fund 0 750,000
Total of Listed Revenue Estimates 7,686,700 7,686,700
•
W-S Loan Attachment A.xls 7/17/01
CITY OF DANIA BEACH
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jason Nunemaker Memo: DF-01-011
Acting City Manager
FROM: David E. Keller, CGFM ��/
Director of Finance
DATE: July 19, 2001
SUBJECT: Proposed Loan from Water and Sewer Funds to the General Fund
Issue
The issue is the proposed loan from the Water and Sewer Funds to the General
Fund.
• Explanation
During the preparation of the City Manager's Proposed FY 02 Operating Budget,
one of the steps the Finance Department has undertaken is the analysis of cashflow
in the City. Cashflow projections deal directly with the cash available to the City,
and the timing of actual receipt of revenues and expense of authorized
appropriation. Cashflow projections are a separate and distinct but necessary
analysis, and reveal the availability of cash for investment and use purposes. A
budget may be balanced between revenues and expenditures, but the timing of the
receipt of those revenues and the making of those expenditures also have significant
implications for financial management.
By way of an example, suppose that the City's budget had even expenditures of
$100,000 each month, for a total budget of $1.2 million (twelve months times
$100,000 per month). Let us also suppose that the budget is balanced by projected
revenues of $1 .2 million. However, a cashflow analysis might reveal that the City
gets only $200,000 in the first six months, and then the rest of the $1 million in the
last six months. Clearly, even though the budget is balanced, the City will run out
of available cash during the first six months, when expenditures will total $600
thousand, and revenues are only $200,000. This is a simple example, and assumes
that there are no previously existing reserves or fund balance, etc., but I am giving
the example to differentiate the balanced budget from cashflow requirements.
1ADKeller\My Documents\Memos\01-011.doc
The cashflow analysis for the General Fund of the City of Dania Beach indicates that
the majority of the City's revenue is received during the first six months of the fiscal
year. Expenditures, on the other hand, are more evenly spread out between the
twelve months. If the City received the revenues that were budgeted for, it should
be in a healthier cashflow position, and make it through the fiscal year without
cashflow problems. However, in both of the last full fiscal years (FY 99 and FY 00),
the City spent approximately significantly more than it received in revenues in the
General Fund: $2.185 million in FY 00 and $548 thousand in FY 99. This means
that the revenues coming in to the City were not sufficient to cover the operating
costs of the City. The City had a millage rate set at 6.1000 mills in each of those
years; however, taking the use of reserves into consideration, the real operating
experience of the City would have been 6.7652 in FY 98 and 8.5917 during last
fiscal year. The reason this was not a cashflow problem for the City in either of the
last two years is that the City had and used fund balance, or reserves, to account for
the annual $2 million structural deficit.
In the current fiscal year, however, the City is facing once again a shortfall of
revenues as compared with expenditures. The primary cause for this shortfall is an
over estimation of several budgeted revenue sources. The difference this year is that
there are no reserves in the General Fund left to be able to compensate for the
difference. At the present time, the City has approximately $1 million in an
® investment that is coming due at the beginning of September, and will be available
for the City to use. The cashflow analysis indicates that the City revenues during the
final three months of the fiscal year (July, August, and September) are approximately
$3 million. This, plus the $1 million the City had in its investment, gives the City
approximately $4 million available for operating purposes for the remainder of the
year. The City spends approximately $5.4 million during the last three months of
the fiscal year. There is a projected shortfall of approximately $1.4-$1 .5 million for
the remainder of the current fiscal year.
In order to have sufficient resources to make it through the end of this fiscal year
and also have sufficient resources to enter the beginning of the next fiscal year, I am
proposing that a loan to the General Fund be made of $750,000 from the Water
Fund and $750,000 from the Sewer Fund. Both of these funds have sufficient
reserves to be able to make such a loan. I am proposing that the loan should be
repaid at 5% interest over a five year period, which would result in annual
payments totaling approximately $382,000 from the General Fund over the next
five years. This amount has been appropriated in the City Manager's Proposed FY
02 Operating Budget.
I am also proposing that the transfer should be made effective upon approval by the
City Commission, which should allow the previously referenced investment, which
• is scheduled to come due on September 1", to come to maturity.
IADKe11er\My Documents\Memos\O1-011.doc
Recommendation
Please place the resolution for the loan of $1.5 million to the General Fund from the
Water and Sewer Funds on the agenda for the City Commission meeting of July 24,
2001.
1.\DKeller\My Documents\Memos\01-01 l.doc