Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2007-132 DJP Site Plan and Waiver RESOLUTION NO. 2007-132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA,APPROVING THE SITE PLAN REQUEST AND SETBACK WAIVER SUBMITTED BY MILLER LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC. ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNER MARINA MILE PARK OF COMMERCE, LLC, FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SW 30T" AVENUE AND SOUTH OF STATE ROAD 84, IN THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS;FURTHER,PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 8.4 of Article 1 of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dania Beach, Florida, states that a site plan is required as a condition to the issuance of a building permit; and WHEREAS, Section 18.60, "Area Requirements" of Article 18 of Chapter 28 of the City Code of Ordinances of the City of Dania Beach, Florida, sets the area requirements for uses within the IROM zoning district; and WHEREAS, Miller Legg& Associates, Inc., on behalf of the property owner Marina Mile Park of Commerce, LLC., is requesting site plan approval for the proposed construction of 62,176 square feet of warehouse/condo and 117,137 square feet of office use to be generally located on the east side of SW 301h Avenue and south of State Road 84, in the City of Dania Beach; and WHEREAS, Miller Legg& Associates, Inc., on behalf of the property owner Marina Mile Park of Commerce,LLC., is requesting a waiver(WA-32-07)to provide a front setback of 37 feet. (Chapter 28, Article 18, IROM, Section 18.60 requires a setback of 40.5 feet.) WHEREAS,the Planning and Zoning Board on June 20, 2007, recommended that the City Commission grant the site plan request (SP-12-07), subject to certain conditions, based upon the criteria set forth in Section 8.4 of Article I of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dania Beach; and WHEREAS,the Planning and Zoning Board on June 20, 2007,recommended that the City Commission grant the request for waiver(WA-32-07), subject to certain conditions,based upon the criteria set forth in Section 18.60 of Article 18 of Chapter 28 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dania Beach; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA: Section 1. That that certain application(SP-12-07) for site plan approval and (WA-32- 07)request for waiver,a copy of which is attached and made a part of this Resolution as Exhibit"A" is approved with the following conditions to be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Must provide recorded access easement for use of ingress/egress at NW corner of property prior to issuance of building permit (Planning Division). 2. Must provide a recorded copy of the plat prior to issuance of the building permit (Planning Division). 3. Directory sign area cannot exceed 24 square feet. Must be revised prior to issuance of a building permit; additional review will be needed (Planning Division). 4. 8 directory signs proposed; 6 permitted. Must be revised prior to issuance of a building permit; additional review will be needed (Planning Division). 5. Sheet SPO-1 shows 9 monument signs and no directory signs. Must be revised prior to issuance of a building permit; additional review will be needed (Planning Division). 6. If applicant wishes to phase the project (i.e., construct the office buildings first), an amendment to the site plan with staff review and possible City Commission approval will be necessary showing how each phase can stand on its own(Planning Division). 7. Water supply to be provided prior to issuance of a building permit after Broward County has installed 16" mains (Fire Marshal). 8. Additional information will be provided prior to issuance of building permits,as stated in their response. We reserve the right to provide additional comments. (Public Services). 2 RESOLUTION#2007-132 It is further noted that the original site plan is maintained in the office of the Community Development Department of the City of Dania Beach. Section 2. That based upon the criteria set forth in Section 8-4(p)of Article 1 of Chapter 8, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dania Beach,all site plan approvals shall automatically expire and become null and void unless building permits are obtained on or before 12 months from the date of this Resolution. Section 3. That all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict with this Resolution are repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED on July 24, 2007. v OB ANT MAYOR— OMMISSIONER AT EST: LOUISE STILSON, CMC CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO E M AND CORRECTNESS: BY: TlfOM APS1f3RO CITY ATTORNEY 3 RESOLUTION #2007-132 City of Dania Beach, Florida Department of Community Development Planning and Zoning Division (954)924-3645 General Development Application ❑ Assignment of Flex/Reserve Units ❑ Land Use Amendment ❑ Plat ❑ Plat Delegation Request (f� '}v �� ❑ Rezoning �c� ll Date Rec'd: (o y ❑ Site Plan ❑ Special Exception JUN 0 4 Y007 Petition No.: wA_ Ja-o"] ❑ Special Request ❑ Trafflcway Waiver Planning❑ Variance ❑ Vacation Request Department A Other: [AjO6lJ2 (?— THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNTIL IT IS COMPLETE AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL NECESARRY DOCUMENTS. Refer to the application type at the top of this form and "Required Documentation"checklist to determine the supplemental documents required with each application. For after the fact applications, the responsible contractor of record shall be present at the board hearing. Their failure to attend may impact upon the disposition of your application. As always, the applicant or their authorized legal agent must be present at all meetings. All projects must also obtain a building permit from the City's Building Department. Location Address: South of SR 84, between SW 30 Avenue and SW 26 Terrace(Tram Road) Lot(s): N/A Block: N/A Subdivision: N/A Recorded Plat Name: DJP Airport West(proposed); Isgette's Runway BCR B 158, PG 18 Folio Number(s): 5042.20.50.0010(portion only) Legal Description: 5042.20.00,0320 5042 20 00 0330 504220 00 0340 Applicant/Consultant/Legal Representative(circle one) Miller Legg 8 Associates, Inc. Address of Applicant: 1800 N. Douglas Road, Suite 200, Pembroke Pines, FL 33024 Business Telephone: 954.436,7000 (o)/ Home: N/A Fax: 954-436-8664 Name of Property owner: Marina Mile Park of Commerce, LLC Address of Property Owner: 814 S. Military Trail, Deerfield Beach, FL 33442 Business Telephone: 954-596-2411 Home: N/A Fax: 954-480-6250 Explanation of Request: Administrative Variance. See attached correspondence for ff " ;.istification. Prop. Net Acreage: +/- 16.27 Gross Acreage: Prop. Square Footage: 7 sf Existing Use:vacant Proposed Use:63,200 sf warehous- f office Is property owned individually, by a corporation, or a joint venture? LL __ I un rsta that site plan and variance approval automatically expires within 12 m the of City omm ssion approval, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2005716 iful CoIIfN _ Applicant/Own r ignature Print Name Date APPLICANT,CONSULTANT, OR LEGAL REPRES NTATIVE N RIZED IGPIATURE Sworn to and subscribed before me Appli nt/Consultant/Represe to This day of T LL&k-- 20L.� Signature: /I Date: y Jill Cohen, RLA, AICP Sign a e of Nota blic (Print Name) Stat (Ft or-� P ) � - 1600 N. Douglas Road, Suite 200 v\^ Pembroke Pines, FL 33024 Print Name of Notary Street Address, City, State and Zip Code Commission E `Osy'(*�' MA Y MFDE 954.436.7000(p)/954.436.8664 (f) Seal: '�* EXPIRE 10 Telephone No. &Fax No. J'„��p�e.°� BaidaC iMU BuEpMNOWYBwkM INDIVIDUAL OWNER NOTARIZED SIGNATURE: N/A This is to certify that I am the fee simple owner of subject lands described above and that I have authorized (Applicant/Consultant/Representative) to make and file the aforesaid application. Sworn to and subscribed before me Owner: This day of 20_ Signature: Date: Sign Name of Notary Public (Print Name) State of( ) Print Name of Notary Street Address, City, State and Zip Code Commission Expires: Seal: Telephone No. & Fax No. I CORPORATION NOTARIZED SIGNATURE: This is to certify that the below referenced corporation is the owner of subject lands described above and that I, as a duly authorized officer, have authorized (Applicant/Consultant/Representative) Robert Miller to make and file the aforesaid application. Sworn to and subscribed before me Corporation Name: Madna Mi r6 o merce,LLC This�day of-„�P 20� Signature: Date: 04 • 0 4 • D0 Robert Millar \ _ (Print Name) v� �.�\. \... Chief Operating Officer Sign Name of Notary blic (Print Title) State of( Ftor,2,a._. ) 814 S.Military Trail,Building 6 naarflaid Reath.FL 31442 Print Name of Notary Stree Address, City, State and Zip Code Y�,vH MICHELEUREYTEDRIC 54. 6.2411(py 954.480.6250 Commission Ex 'r • • tateofF Seal: `WCommssanExpveaNatQ¢Agp one No. &Fax No. at, Commission a DO 452326 Bonded By National Notary Assn. 30INT VENTURE/PARTNERSHIP NOTARIZED SIGNATURE: This is to certify that the below referenced that the duly authorized persons are the owners of subject lands described above and that all partners have authorized (Applicant/Consultant/Representative) to make and file the aforesaid application. Sworn to and subscribed before me This_day of 20_ Signature: Date: (Print Name)** Sign Name of Notary Public State of( ) Print Name of Notary Street Address, City, State and Zip Code Commission Expires: Seal: Telephone No. & Fax No. **Each partner must sign. Attach duplicate sheets as required. i N MILLER LEGG June 4, 2007 0:Pianning Laurence Leeds, AICPGrowth Management City of Dania Beach 100 West Dania Beach Boulevard Dania Beach, FL 33004 RE: DJP Airport West Site Plan (f.k.a.) Marina Mile Park of Commerce MLA Project No: 06-00329 Dear Mr. Leeds: Per our Site Plan Review Committee comments, dated April 27, 2007, please accept this administrative variance request for the above referenced project. The applicant is requesting an administrative variance request, per "Chapter 28, Land Development Code Section (LDC) 10.13, Variances" for the front building setback along Southwest 301h Avenue. The justification request per §10.13 of the Code, is attached. Specifically, we are requesting a variance to LDC Chapter 28, Section 18.60 (c) (1) "Yard Requirements," which requires a front yard setback abutting any street or public thoroughfare to be one (1) times the building height, measured to the property line. According to this code, a 43'-6" (the building height to the highest peak) setback is required from the abutting Southwest 30th Avenue roadway. Technically, however, the west property line is adjacent to an existing landscape and retention area, (per Plat Book 144, Page 2, which lies between the proposed DIP Airport West Site Plan and Southwest 30 Avenue) and not to the roadway. The closest condition is on the southwest building comer which measures 37 feet from the building to the westem property line. The `retention area' is an additional 46 feet at this closest condition, which combined with the 37 feet for the building, provides for an overall setback adjacent to the street of 83-feet. Please accept this letter and attached justification, along with the application and check for $ 290.00 as our administrative variance, request. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at ( 4) 436`7.000, Ext. 255. Regards, 4 Jill Coe'/ RZA, AK PP Associate/Planning JC/rm/ Attachments cc: Robert B. Miller, DIP Dcvclopmcm Anitra Lanczi, Shutts and Bowen Gordon Lunt, GLDC, Inc. Jose Jaramillo, The Architectual Group V Projects'-Otl60b-un329 - Marina .Mik Park U( t'omnmQl:%LucuntentY M,MLL( %dill it strati,a vanauce Recst doc IMPROVING eOMMUNITIES. CREATING ENVIR 'JMENTS. South Florida Office: 1800 N Douglas Road • Suite 200 • Pembroke Pines,Florida • 0 (954)43646age F"QSA4)436-8664 www.millerlegg.com i Marina Mile Administrative Variance Justification ATTACHMENT 1 Justification of Administrative Variance Request for Marina Mile Front Setback: §10.13. VARIANCES. Authorize upon appeal such variance from the terms of the chapter as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this chapter will result in unnecessary and undue hardship. In order to authorize any variance from the terms of this chapter, the city commission must and shall find: (a) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands,structures or buildings in the same zoning district; Response: This request is unique to this parcel of land is not applicable to surrounding lands within this zone. The portion of the site "adjacent" to Southwest 31P Avenue, which requires this variance, is separated by a "triangular" piece of land which is, at its widest, 46 feet from back of curb to said property line of DJP Airport West Site Plan, (See Attachment 2). We note, that this "triangular" piece of land is not owned by the applicant and is a landscape and retention area, per the "Port 95 Commerce Plat, " as recorded in Plat Book 146, Page 2, B.C.R. and the proposed office building is 37 feet from the DJP Airport West prOferty line and an additional 47 feet from the adjacent roadway, Southwest V Avenue. (b) That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; Response: This condition is not a result of actions Jrom the Applicant. As noted in the response above, the adjacent lands are a landscape and retention area per recorded plat. (c) That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to other lands, buildings or structures in this same zoning district; Response: This variance request would not grant any special privilege, as this site has an additional landscape and retention buffer, per Plat Book 144, Page 2, B.C.R., which at its widest measures 46 feet from the back of curb (Southwest 30 Avenue) to the DJP Airport West Site Plan property line. This strip of land lying between Southwest 30"' Avenue and the west property line of this site plan is not buildable and per the recording document is specified as use for retention and therefore neither revokes any special privilege on the adjacent parcel. (d) That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning Page 2 of 3 Marina Mile Administrative Variance Justification district under the terms of this chapter and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant; Response: The interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would be a hardship to the subject property to the development rights enjoyed by similar properties with the same zoning designation. Due to the irregularity of parcelization in area and the triangular shape of the adjacent property to the west, the literal meaning and definition of the standard setback requirement is not applicable in this scenario. A length of 83 feet is provided for this setback, measured from the building corner closest to the property line, to the roadway (37feet from the DJP Airport West property line and an additional 46 feet from the adjacent roadway, Southwest 30'h Avenue). With the inclusion of the width of the adjacent property, the combined setback far exceeds the standard interpretation of the minimum code setback requirement. (e) That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure; Response: The granting of this variance will provide for a reasonable accommodation for the building adjacent to the roadway considering the circumstances of the recorded drainage retention area and the requirements governing the front setback for this zone. (f) That the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter, and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Response: The granting of this variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. This variance request is for the setback to be from the property line, as opposed to the adjacent roadway, as this site is separated 46 feet adjacent to the roadway, in addition to the provided 37 foot setback to the property line. The combined 83 foot setback to the roadway will provide for an aesthetically appealing corridor frontage in keeping with the design intent of the code in effect. Pa,ae 3 of 3