HomeMy WebLinkAbout36643 - AGENDAS - City Commission m
Y
4
4
owe% � n ()1n
ul Y e,
r �
FFz� j
�r urks�,v
�a
1 t1J"! R
C: Uyf !
5
.rf I�j{{r{rlk i
t t
4 u
a `4
n
d v r
F S}�"relit' ,! �� J ,. r < �•.�
R `eta r: 1.c �
tdr;�blra»l4YY��J,•u
�,vl) �pax wiyYYtSi'43j
4 er �i'NAf.4R'�T�AS"
^RY
—. aJ
1
1
lu
s;
Ms. Gianatasio explained that the data received from the Property Appraisers Office is
;• not 100% accurate and that additional efforts are made to compare data from the State
Fire Marshall Office to obtain the best possible property information. Ms. Gianatasio
advised that residential properties seem to generate 72% of the rescue calls in the City
and that different property categories are being considered to develop the rates. She
then presented a schedule of the upcoming resolutions and ordinances being adopted
up through the final public hearing on August 13, 1996.
It was noted that the City is providing residents a reduction in ad valorem taxes with the
Y implementation of the Fire Rescue Assessment Program.
t4�
2. Capital Improvement Program - Fire Department
City Manager Smith mentioned that the Capital Improvement Program for the Fire
Department includes the renovation of the existing fire station, construction of a fire !
r station in the Griffin area and the purchase of more equipment and vehicles. ;:
Tom Grammer, Fire Chief, presented a review of the costs for the Capital
G :
- Improvements needed in the Fire Department due to the increase in personnel and r
deterioration in buildings and equipment over the past years.
The Commission expressed their desire to cancel the lease for the present fire station t
property that is costing $1500 per month in the Griffin Road area. Discussion followed
on the possibility of purchasing property from Broward County or obtaining grant funds
` to purchase marina property that may be available to build a fire station in the Griffin
Road area.
ITEM 3 WAS HEARD FIRST ON THE AGENDA
T �'t
� 3. Stormwater Assessment Program (Presentation by Duncan Rose, GSG
r i (Government Systems Group, L.C) *�
+ City Manager Smith mentioned that drainage has been an issue in the City for
is sometime and that legislation from the State will allow establishment of a Stormwater
»„ Assessment Program to fund the improvements.
a Duncan Rose, GSG, explained that direction is needed from the Commission on the
' engineering alternatives and aspects as well as funding strategies for establishing the
' program.
' Berry & Calvin Engineering presented the Scope of Services to be provided for the s
drainage system.
4 ,
'S
WORKSHOP MEETING 2 JUNE 18, 1996
'
!���rw•�
a
t NIP.
r�iHa! C�� ♦ Y+ :
r yy, i
�� �S,
$�k<.
a
'- .' .•_, e�� _ ;r _�,.. .:: .! .<a:, ,_,. ....::,, «.'ter
t•
rr
a. Mr. Rose presented information on the limitations and capabilities of an assessment r
approach to the Stormwater problem. He clarified the following fees:
• A tax can be extracted from anyone as long as it has a legitimate public purpose
and can be remitted in the form of benefit of services. :J•
A user fee must be a reasonable relationship between the benefit delivered and the
amount charged.
An assessment fee can only be applied to property and parcels and must show
special benefit to the property. The fee must be fair and reasonably apportioned.
1
In responding to questions from the Commission, George Nickerson, Nabors, Giblin &
Nickerson, P.A., agreed that schools could possibly be charged but cautioned the City
that it may cost more to prove the right to charge opposed to what is collected on
schools. City Clerk Jabalee advised that the City of Oakland Park is one of the first
' cities to implement this fee and that they are collecting a fee from the school board on iv
their properties. ? t r
Bud Palm, Public Works/Utilities Director, explained the work that has been
t accomplished on the drainage system in the past year and additional maintenance work
needed in the City. `
;•try, s:'
tf The Commission decided to have Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson come back with the cost f+
per homeowner to implement the Stormwater Assessment Program. µ
4 n roi} Lyle' , ,
ITEM 1 WAS HEARD AFTER ITEM 3 '
This meeting was adjourned after Ite L
1 A OR-COMMISSIONER
w �
IIIII .� CITY CLE -AUDITOR
t 4 �
r,
}} sy
�l t
4t
� o
t
(I tf h
3 JUNE 18, 1996
5r
WORKSHOP MEETING "
Olt,i
y `1p�4
. d yikCs�"ryi
!
x7
. f
1
4
4,. !�
•® a f` WWI
o0 >-� �b
4-4
.ti i7
IZ! r
s WA�
,
f 7 � e 111
f
� ` f
� o
!
ee�n w,;1Y � Lz
9�3 )ICY f t'Yix
}'IVXvxrY, n
i
r y
tit
a
M; v
6 >-�
cu
+4
lA
� s �
Y
a 4 f
J �
Y1 q l;
dYl j
Its Y{{}}
h ......i
y�f"
v r�yrtL47 N'�xr M�"\' Yv
I
A a 9�pfl
• ® rs x
4-J
o00 0�0 0®0 oso
I
tl
� '
i E3
t
Y
,
s
6 •
Y
1 � t
1 � w
U
u �
t�
t
yry 4 ,
cu
Wn 3
v�
5 7R .�r
- j
a
i
U
` M1
e 5 rI�1
i tt a Y
J' L ti
1 f
f
1
t V
{ IF
yl{rly;l i7 Y`�It ���f�
T� l
t J ) !
t
i
its
. i
cu
N
�/� 1
rw
Lo
(r5 ' � T `V � •�
O
J . ,
I '
Y ,
} � I
T A S
� ty
1� a,ye rni rig !r >i�tr�
yf�4d4
4 z
ykr
r
i
i
M
C
d
H
W V!
W ^ C C
a+ O
d � �
C C CL E A m
CL
CL
4 O U CL
m w H x
W
Jiff v J M
t . O
O O N i
NCO r
(D '
f �
1 1.
�` 111
W O O
s P
r _ V c
i- N
` M `
60
1
M
i
I
iz
1
i
i
r
N
t N
uu l�
3
.L M
47 12 to) C Z C
� i t
® ® ■ ® ® ❑
1
0
iy Op
Pot Ld
t t 6
LO
zz
i o
7� z
St
fj
L 7ii
t BPS 3
)Ij X
J (�
ri^}J
t✓X �a L t
4r t 7
t F
31 �
F
n
d Sid x n
r �
~ 1
I
ti
•
bi
1 M O (9 MLr)
lOr� r� W" en eq do N rraq
-1 Lf) M
in fan
Q 01 ias fj}
s F
f
r.a .
a�a �
Lo O L �® (U 0
Ln % GJ,.�
enO Oaf O ��
[� O
•N � � II H II � �� �°�
W o 0 0 0
CDo arm,rA ® Ln N ,
t
7 �
l�
f
5 ��-
1 YI
��r r
/ I
I
I
,
( I
r
CU
cu
cuIT
t ,;v
CU ® ,
4- J
t
u �, u u
j
i
ti � 4y
v �
c
� r
a t4 C !
s ` 1
S� c
r!
1
O
,;. CU
Y}
O
, r P
a O O z >
°d^ f
r r �
cu W
t
X X
r ?tl
N
'y{rFw
ka
Trk
iv
Sfi{ r
h yzMzv
G
ON
ON
110
CT � .a
y,
c m
�—+ cu
cv � m m
N N ri
�vH
4=
i 1 y UO
m V) m
< iCA
u M 4-J v cu
tj p x
U aj (n �
u � w
i
V A{ K
a l
� r lJ r 4 e
SQ pf,R F x rR"r 1 r 1 A—a9r`
+•
�.1'ni�yxM-�-•r'I
1
• f
l
LO
Y4 L
�{ LO
co
cm
, z
r 1+
y
p
�i YSby F
d4
,
i •.
i,
i
4 '
�, 1 t Os:µ d fire`"t�nyw
N O
T 3 '
`k .
�ER�J�JSp-a�,rp�✓S.Jis'k��f'p r: , _._. --•-m.-. ,�v t t ��-i
i A l
'^
CD
cc
CO
Lo
cz
L
W
l.k
h
L k
f
] ta. C)
t ) f{�
T ;
.1 M i cz aF"1 1
k .. x. �r V � VV VH i '
�. co
o- k,
CO
2 f ��
t(
co
— _
r.
I � r
:to
NCD
-s
co
4
N O 00
k5, fi1it P P P :r
I(�{ rr r
�I�t,fiS�A 1 �V jjii
yy
l 1 )( � _... F • .yam. I ��( 1
k
I,
1
f
i
i
LO
0)
G
MM V!
iy
b
/c��)
VJ
3v�
cz
f I ,
Y$ � CN
Y f
{
f t
t4
Cd
�
M
W
LO
co
a. ,4 N
a I
} ( E e�
` ti71, 00
00
Tom
N
co
w r'
t CD
co
o
i
ss
LO M N
I
�+,yc'�iN,(kJTr{,Y+}fiK Ja,.,�e � t 't�a�i,�x,�•=vi��`'`�VC
'y1E✓ i ,n�yl?f r,.. ^A ! \xS tjW�,r�,}..t,.^'�"r.
VA
J. '
r aid I e ♦N ��o �k�i ,,,.v.i r ,-:' '�;; ..' .. �_ , x '
i
r
J TTL
co CD
CM
r
� I
�
ce). r
LO
TooO P
yn F ti TF`
M i
cu
(D%
4 'A ! 1 ,} /... Q •�
} ® Cd Uct Cot
+thy
i
r Q
! .-+ 0 f V/
/ C N ! iN
Ir 0 I f � >•.
�! R ,� � � I ��� o /ti•xf
Cc
aA, W
co
I f Z} a 9
N ® c�W w V N
Jhr + ±
,
a�'
a
i a 1 hyF C Flti'y34-ia 4
^M
2 N er 1
7r ✓ / t, - V e �nY 1 EY ,tM, _
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP L.C.
a
OVA
Providing Management Systems 8 Services to Local Government
i
June 10, 1996
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Marie J. Jabalee
cll
City Clerk
City of Dania
100 W. Dania Beach Boulevard
J, Dania, Florida 33004 ;
II
k !
r 1 M
w Re: City of Dania (the "City") Final Fire Rescue Assessment Report `("Assessment Report") t
i Dear Marie:
Enclosed please find ten bound copies and one loose copy of the City's final ,
Assessment Report. If you have an p Y y questions, please contact me or Mark Lawson of
r; h Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A. 4 *,
1 Sincerely,
CaO
Camille S. Gianatasio �
CSG/ilm
! Y;
Enclosures
� , .
t� cc: Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A.
i David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd.
x'
rm
r t
t
t
Y
�^ � v
V. I
Fr,ryrtrj
a 4�
F
i�1ra+ {Yi SUITE 860•DARNETT BANK BUILDING•315 SOUTH CALHOUN 5TREET TALLAHA55EE,FLORIDA 32301 t + r
(904)651.3717•FAX(904)224-7206
",+T lu�i s ,5 iv #Er: '^'"k 7 <•`V Fib
1����sr��tJ�Gvv I �� rn'�rirS v1
b 417. �k`a.�'1dif. 3jJ dry �' Pl i
� i � try rLf
iAK i i
A,
t'
l
l
t
}
I'.i.
J
i r
DANIA
FIRE RESCUE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Executive Summary
Introduction i
Objectives i
h , Apportionment Methodology ii
C Preliminary Assessment Rates and Classifications
Remaining Issues vi
5' Assessment Report ,{+
Introduction 1 � `
Objectives
r 2 � ,ra
Study Methodology 3ti
Service Description 35
v " Assessable Cost Calculations
Incident Data 12 ��
tx, A Property Data 14 k ,!
+ p Special Benefit Assumptions 18 F� a
Apportionment Methodology 19
k r? Residential Parcel Apportionment Assumptions 20 ,w<
Non-Residential Parcel Apportionment Assumptions 21 yr
. Preliminary Assessment Rates and Classifications 24 kY
x i Legal Sufficiency Conclusion
Preface 31 �
Special Benefit Requirement 31
Fair and Reasonable Apportionment Requirement 34
Legal Sufficiency Conclusion 34 r �,
ix Implementation Schedule
' '' Statutory Time Frame And Home Rule Authorization 38 k
` $ F Critical Events Schedule 39 n
( f
l J�il�! tr � r,1 hYY� gym$
t` 1✓' sry it "*'c.:�4
}u t GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP' L.C. &DAVID M. GRIFFITH 8 ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Y I,
aj,,Zt ISb3� ' '�"Cy,'vrt
ti 5
k �' My�LhP F�'�'� x r' S a ° � 1 , ,:. as.•s«:h l+� � ^Li �, rr�a�ji� �}'��C��h
Fr
rC
" J
r Appendices
Appendix A User Fee Study
Appendix B Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
Appendix C Categories and Associated Department
Of Revenue Codes
Appendix D Categories and Associated Improvement Codes
h
r x�
h,Y
r W
r
r Y r a 1'�) tKri✓� � i
•/ ��,T�r rP I
S rSt�
J 1Z
ryr, t
v:.
x
tr
pY � 4 0 _ t F •�i;
r�
r ,,ryry i/F+SWt
>
'� h 5cktj ulx iR�y% fr 1Yri+k r)�ra 5��47,�.;
y" rp, GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. & DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD.
`�'rt?�f'��YY�(Y' 'rt�,��r'Zy'7"�•Y-e Y(�x�i"� ,��
J�
h r�t4(t .rpi, rx+
} P�
M
N t( YJ 1 la
E t
h t�ww
ro'S y r t d 4 q '�`'. e t w• `7yy44
G
w
INDEX OF TABLES
page
Table 1 Cost Apportionment iv
Table 2 Preliminary Rates - Residential Category iv
Table 3 Preliminary Rates - Commercial Category v
Table 4 Preliminary Rates - Industrial Category v
. Table 5 Fire Rescue Department Organizational Chart 4
s Table 6 Response Protocol 5
Table 7 Dania Fire Rescue Five-Year
,k Assessment Budget 5 '
Table 8 Capital Projects 8 `
Table 9 User Fee Summary
Table 10 Fire Rescue Incidents and Proportion
' of Calls by Category 14
r; Table 11 Department of Revenue Property Use Codes 15 #k, 7
Table 12 Improvement Codes 16e',
,L Yummy ,F^t
�• Table 13 Cost Apportionment 19 t }
Table 14 Parcel Apportionment Within Property Use Categories 20
Table15 Parcel Apportionment - Commercial Propertya',a,
Use Category 23 z`
E fr� Table 16 Parcel Apportionment - IndustrialNVarehouse
Property Use Category 23 f
v, s Table 17 Preliminary Rates -All Categories (excluding Institutional) '
Fiscal Years 1996-97 Through 2000-01
yF 100% of Assessable Costs 25 �
t t Table 18 Preliminary Rates - All Categories (excluding Institutional) u/'
Fiscal Years 1996-97 Through 2000-01 ti"w
75/o of Assessable Costs 26
/
Table 19 Preliminary Rates -All Categories (excluding Institutional) ,
4 Fiscal Years 1996-97 Through 2000-01
50% of Assessable Costs 27
Table 20 Preliminary Rates -All Categories (excluding Institutional)
Fiscal Years 1996-97 Through 2000-01
x 25/o of Assessable Costs 28 ; P,
Table 21 Preliminary Rates -All Categories (excluding Institutional)
Fiscal Years 1996-97 Through 2000-01
Minnet, Capital, Implementation & Annual Costs 29 >:ti
Table 22 Preliminary Rates -All Categories (excluding Institutional)
Fiscal Years 1996-97 Through 2000-01
s w l i
f Minnet Plus Implementation and Annual Costs 30
�JyK�i�t•` j> sr f t 4afAfi(
4f GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES LTD.
{kirj'.ytl' r�� K
,�4✓� `ip� x� l` /
� er d�}��•{fYN�,iM1�^.y:�"�4r �'n,7�"wu rh v.Ka'�"�4i.:�
Ftnw'Ira
'w.. ".�rt� "SSStllll�� de111;'.j
t
Sy fv��4i3�'4vw2yk ��
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Government Systems Group, L.C. ("GSG") is a firm that
INTRODUCTION provides management consulting services to local governments
utilizing computer based technology and process oriented
analysis. GSG is an affiliated company created and partially
owned by Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A. ("NG&N"), a law firm dedicated to the
representation of local governments on issues of finance and taxation. David M.
Griffith &Associates, Ltd. ("DMG") is a national consulting firm that works with public
sector agencies in the fields of cost accounting, budgeting, revenue enhancement
and service delivery analysis.
4
The City of Dania (the "City") has entered into an agreement with GSG and DMG to
provide specialized services in the development and implementation of a non-ad ir1
valorem assessment program to fund fire rescue services within the City. NG&N has
been engaged by GSG to review the proposed assessment apportionment
< �
methodology and deliverables and provide an analysis relative to the legal tests ( :{
required in Florida for a valid special assessment consistent with the legal
r requirements of the tax bill method of collection. f1 i i
y i t r
This document constitutes the Assessment Report which is one of the project
deliverables specified in the scope of services incorporated in the existing agreement
(� with the City. y
The work effort included in this Assessment Report required the calculation of
` preliminary assessment rates and classifications required to fully fund the identified
' assessable costs to provide fire rescue services within the City. This work effort
f requires the identification of the full costs of fire rescue services (minus all revenues)
and the allocation of these costs to properties which benefit from the provision of
such fire rescue services. ,r
Prr.n
YMS
The City has retained GSG and DMG to develop a special t
OBJECTIVES assessment program capable of funding all of the assessable
costs associated with providing fire rescue services utilizing the
ad valorem collection powers provided in section 197.3632,
Florida Statutes (the "Uniform Method"). The Uniform Method necessarily requires
the use of data available on the ad valorem tax roll. Accordingly, the challenge for
local government is to develop a non-ad valorem assessment program which
employs property information that is or reasonably should be included and
consistently updated on the ad valorem tax roll. To this end, GSG and DMG have
been charged to fully cost the services to be provided by the City, develop a fair and
reasonable apportionment methodology for such assessable costs and determine
assessment rates and parcel classifications that are accurate, fair and equitable.
S'
�r
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. & DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD.
% Z
v
7
i�♦ i� ''-t, I c3
i
..v.
iF <
j
The fire rescue non-ad valorem assessments are required to meet the Florida case
law requirements for a valid special assessment, which are:
• The service provided must provide a special benefit to the property
' being assessed; and
• The costs assessed must be fairly and reasonably apportioned among
the properties that receive the special benefit.
The objectives of this work effort to evaluate the City of Dania's Fire Rescue
Department were to:
Provide an inventory of the fire rescue services that the City is { x
proposing to provide. j
• Determine the anticipated full costs of providing fire rescue services
within the City.
• Review such final cost determination with the City to confirm that all '
I
f elements provide the requisite special benefit to the assessed property. t
s es Determine the relative benefit anticipated to be derived by categories of
G ,
property use within the City from the projected delivery of fire rescue 4 I
services.
1.
Recommend the fair and reasonable apportionment of assessable
S costs among benefited parcels within each category of property use.
�� . Calculate assessment rates and parcel classifications for Fiscal Year
1996-97 through Fiscal Year2000-01. __�
r ,
Ascertain that the assessment rates and t � parcel classifications
recommended are capable of incorporation into an assessment roll �w
conforming to the statutory requirements of the Uniform Method.
The calculation of assessment rates for fire rescue services is
i APPORTIONMENT dependent on three separate, but interconnected pieces of
METHODOLOGY data. The first data element is the identification of the full
cost of providing fire rescue services through the
development of a five-year pro-forma budget and a determination of the assessable
costs within such pro-forma budget. The second data element is the analysis of
service delivery data segregated to property use categories (i.e., fire rescue call
data). The third and final data component is a comprehensive analysis of all
{M412 ' !r 1 1 ii1
4�rJi 4, property use categories within the City to determine which parcels receive a special
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. & DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIA TES LTD. li
x M1 Y v,
1
i 1 d! Si y '4ii
k,r
b'�� r �1� ✓ j'A� J` t{ ,' � ,.'M.1 y •- '^' '*, ti1`#y . , ; . , i+! ti.
-tryl ' 'Q1x vNgq Fi �� ekt } y
i s !
....«
y
41
!
benefit from the provision of fire rescue services and to identify a fair and reasonable
method of apportionment of assessable costs among all benefited parcels within
each property use category.
' The recommended fire rescue services apportionment methodology allocates fire
rescue services assessable costs on the basis of the anticipated demand for fire
rescue services by categories of real property uses as identified on the real property
assessment roll prepared for the levy of ad valorem taxes. The assessable costs to
provide fire rescue services are allocated among real property use categories based
upon the historical demand for these services as reflected by the fire rescue incident
data as reported to the State Fire Marshal. As discussed in detail in Issue 3 of this
Executive Summary and the "Incident Data" section of this Assessment Report, cost .�
allocation percentages utilized for the City of Dania are based on incident 1
percentages for the City of Hollywood extrapolated for the City of Dania's call
volume. ` -'
PRELIMINARY This section of the Executive Summary summarizes the i
ASSESSMENT RATES recommended preliminary assessment rates and parcel
AND CLASSIFICATIONS classifications as calculated within this Assessment
u Report. The five-year budget projection developed by a ,
_ DMG is designed to forecast a range of preliminary assessment rates within each
property use category for a five year period. n
The City Fire Rescue Department five-year budget projections are primarily based on
sy information supplied by the Fire Rescue Department and the Finance Department.
The City reviewed each budget line item to determine anticipated changes or trends
over the next five years given the existing conditions. The pro-forma budget
projections are based on these assumptions, as well as historical trends and
identified future needs.
It is important to note that the budget information in this Assessment Report is only to
Yes present preliminary assessment rates necessary to fully fund the projected budget ;
i with assessment proceeds. Each final Fire Rescue Department budget is dependent
on a final budgetary decision by the City Commission. Thus, the readers of this
Assessment Report should understand that the projected five-year budgets are not,
at this time, City Commission approved budgets.
Table 1 utilizes assessment cost allocation percentages (calls per property use) to
allocate the unfunded fire rescue assessable costs (100% of the full cost budget for
r r Fiscal Year 1996-97 net estimated revenues) to each property use category.
f
h .
r
t�
rYl i 4 GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. & DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD.
b '�i'txIl-un r 3 f
H 1 f
V
iYf�r,J"rv' tl .W L
di �u'a iM1 l"�tvbF.r . t ti':
e
V l!M1a
A7
TABLE 1
COST APPORTIONMENT
{. Number of Fire Percent of Total Portion of Budget
Property Category Rescue Incidents Incidents (100%)
Residential 1,078 72.14% $3,169,990
Commercial 188 12.59% $553.232
IndustrialNJarehouse 27 1.83% $80,414
Nursing Homes 114 7.63% $335,279
Institutional 87 5.81% $255,304 I " .
Total 1,495 100.00%
$4,394,220
fl ,
Tables 2 through 4 detail the aggregate dollar amounts of assessable costs allocated 1
i
°. to each property use category divided by the number of parcels within each
Y
classification (for the Non-Residential Categories) or by the number of dwelling units
`J (for the Residential Category). This calculation determines the preliminary fire 4� /
a rescue assessment rate on a per unit or per parcel basis for Fiscal Year 1996-97
through Fiscal Year 2000-01.
I � S
y
TABLE 2 ?°-
"` PRELIMINARY RATES - RESIDENTIAL CATEGORY ``';
". FY 96-97 FY 97-98 FY 98-99 FY 99-00 FY 00-01 p ,
Number of Rate Per Rate Per Rate Per Rate Per Rate Perk,
y' r Category Dwelling Units Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit
r f r
{_ Residential 7,000 $453 $468 $543 $485 $509
L _L
l '
r ,
etr � s
i
I
M.L.C.,
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP &DAVID M GRIFFITH 8 ASSOCIATES, LTD. IV
FY z
�t�ytt7Yl ,t`e r�{t t , yyx zC!
MWr x
(� � s lry rr ✓ rk {' ti
,F
I A,
N R _
9
TABLE 3
�A
PRELIMINARY RATES - COMMERCIAL CATEGORY
Parcel Classification FY 96.97 FY 97.98 FY, 8-99 FY 99-00 FY 00-01
(in square foot Number of Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per
ranges) Parcels Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel
< 1,999 88 $276 $285 $331 $295 $310
2,000-3,499 65 $551 $570 $661 $590 $619
3,500-4,999 27 $965 $998 $1.1571 $1,032 $1,084
5,000-9,999 57 $1,378 $1,425 $1,653 $1.4751 $1,549
F 10,000- 19,999 22 $2,756 $2.851 $3,307 $2,949 $3,097 k
20,000-29,999 10 $5,512 $5,701 $6,613 $5,899 $6,194 f
30,000-39,999 4 $8,267 $8,552 $9,920 $8,848 $9,292
40,000-49,999 3 $11,023 $11,402 $13,227 $11.798 $12,389 '
> 50,000 15 $13,779 $14,253 $16,533 $14,747 $15,486
Total 291
I
� I
v. TABLE 4 1 1
PRELIMINARY RATES - INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY d
Parcel Classification Number of FY 96.97 FY 97-98 FY 98-99 FY 99.00 FY 00-01
s (in square foot Parcels Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per
ranges) Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel
v ` < 1,999 8 $35 $36 $42 $37 $39
i '
2,000-3,499 14 $70 $72 $83 $74 $78 "
3,500-4,999
12 $122 F $126 $146 $130 $137
r 5,000-9,999 29 $174 $180 $209 $186 $195
10,000- 19,999 22 $391 ;s
t C' $348 $360 $417 $372 l�szw7
I { 20,000-29,999 18 $695 $719 $834 $744 $781 J
1 30,000-39,999 9 $1,043 $1.079 $1,251 $1,116 $1,172
f
%'. 40,000-49,999 6 $1,3911 $1,438 $1,669 $1,488 $1,563
> 50,000 20 $1,7381 $1,798 $2,086 $1,860 $1,954
Total 138
i
;5
,
tt
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. 8 DAV/D M. GRIFFITH8 ASSOCIATES, LTD.
w e v
ti .
xs�dtCC , ,• `' ;
y6
a �fi,
i
GSG and DMG have identified the following issues that
REMAINING ISSUES require further consideration with respect to the preliminary
assessment rates that have been developed and presented
within this Assessment Report.
Issue 1: Verification of Database on Real Property Assessment Roll
Data utilized to assign property use categories and the number of billing units per
category is based upon information maintained on the real property assessment roll
maintained by the Broward County Property Appraiser for the levy of ad valorem
(' taxes. A successful assessment program collected under the Uniform Method must
employ the information maintained by the property appraiser on the ad valorem tax " ?i
roll. However, county property appraisers are charged with the responsibility of
determining the value of all property within each county and maintaining certain ;
r records contained therewith, specifically the preparation of the ad valorem tax roll.
The ad valorem tax roll is designed solely to provide the data required by property t ?
appraisers to fulfill their charge of assessing the value of property. In contrast,
assessment programs focus upon property use, size of improvements and other
r s not related to value. Further verification of the assessment database
characteristic
is expected during the actual implementation phase, which may result in modification
to the preliminary assessment rates provided in this Assessment Report.
Issue 2: Verification of Square Footage of Structures Within Tax Exempt " }
Parcels '
As discussed in Issue 1, the ad valorem tax roll is designed to provide the data
t: r required to determine value. So long as properties remain in the name of owners
exempt from ad valorem taxation, the property appraiser may not consistently
maintain data related to such parcel's improvements on the tax roll. As a
consequence of such inadequate data, the square footage of the majority
(approximately 75%) of the parcels within the Institutional Property Use Category,
i t that are exempt, is not readily available for the purposes of calculating preliminary y`
Institutional Property Use Category assessment rates. Until further verification of the
r: square footage of structures within tax exempt properties is completed by the City,
the appropriate classification of each institutional category parcel assessed cannot
be determined. Accordingly, this Assessment Report provides information related to
the Institutional Property Use Category at the aggregate level. City staff has begun
the process of obtaining the data required to calculate the assessment rates, and
t upon completion, preliminary Institutional Property Use Category assessment rates
can be provided and considered.
't
� ` a
1y 1�
1 r^I
1
i 9i i
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. V1
539
rcy ,
y��y, �S G1, .r �,1 {5. A Q::h•.
55•' T� V
4� Vry! Vr N i+ i 1 t t�..jr
ty�,t
Issue 3: Utilization of the City of Hollywood's Fire Rescue Incident
Proportions to Determine Cost Allocation
The apportionment methodology recommended within this Assessment Report
allocates fire rescue services costs based on the historical demand for these
services as reflected by the fire rescue incident data reported to the State Fire
Marshal. However, the City of Dania only reports fire rescue incidents to the State
Fire Marshal when a fire engine responds to the incident. Incidents where a fire
engine does not respond are not reported to the Fire Marshal. As a result, a majority
of fire rescue incidents cannot be assigned to a fixed property use as required by the
recommended apportionment methodology. Therefore, it is necessary to utilize data
from a comparable municipality to develop cost allocation proportions. Based on the i7 1
City Fire Rescue Department's judgement that both the property use composition
and the proportion of incidents among property uses in the City of Dania is /I s
comparable to the property use composition and proportion of incidents among i
property uses in the City of Hollywood, we have extrapolated the City of Hollywood's
call proportions to the City of Dania's call volumes. '
_ 1
It is strongly recommended that the City of Dania immediately begin developing City
specific call data and be prepared to update the fire rescue assessment methodology
next year.
x l }
r Issue 4: Proportionately High Number of Fire Incidents to the Institutional
• Property Use Category r
Upon initial analysis of the fire rescue incidents utilized for the apportionment
methodology, the Institutional Property Use Category reflects an inordinate number J" '
yr of fire rescue calls, due in part, to calls to nursing home types of property uses which '
have been assigned to the Institutional Property Use Category. Additionally, the high $
number of calls to nursing home types of property may dictate separation of their
! uses in the cost apportionment to the Institutional Property Use Category. This
scategory also includes tax exempt properties such as government, educational and
,, religious property uses. As discussed in Issue 2, until the data regarding tax exempt
} , properties is completed, the appropriate classification of each institutional category
parcel assessed cannot be determined and assessment rates cannot be calculated.
However, once the data is complete, it may be necessary to address the high
number of fire rescue incidents to the Institutional Property Use Category and the
burden of funding fire rescue services from all the types ofproperty
within the
Institutional Property Use Category. Upon analysis of both the complete property
data and the fire rescue incident information, recommendations regarding
segregation or aggregation of property uses within this category and other categories
i will be provided. Other funding mechanisms or combinations of funding
mechanisms may also be recommended.
I Y
4 +� GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. vii
z^� r
e'R+��•J i dv F ' 3�° ry�1y7�•i
r.tkl lit � n# � i r; roS t
! dnt't•��T��4 ti.j� �k',hh Y��r•11e r �{wY Y��,
w' ) s
� AJ
lS
IL
Issue 8: Conditions Assumed in Legal Sufficiency Conclusion
GSG and DMG have completed the development of preliminary assessment rates
and parcel classifications to fund the cost of providing fire rescue services by
determining the full cost of the services to be provided and suggesting a preliminary
apportionment methodology designed to be consistent with the legal sufficiency tests
of special benefit to property and fair apportionment articulated in Florida case law
for a valid special assessment. Integral assumptions in the Legal Sufficiency
Conclusion provided in this Assessment Report are that (i) the assessment
„r ordinance and implementing resolutions adopted by the City contain specific
legislative findings supporting such a conclusion as prepared and directed by
" Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A., (ii) no exceptions are created that would
undermine the apportionment method described in this Assessment Report, and (iii) r;fe
the final assessment roll is prepared by the consulting team specified in the existing '
agreement with the City.
If
p 7
lzo
41
„ a
{ S
L { f
,
i
i r
t �
S
t
�y
Vy `
, 1
fI4'
r r
1
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. 8 DAVID M. GRIFFITH 8 ASSOCIATES,
LTD. ix
1.
3p V� rv„'f t Y qI
a
��wv'rr x r� ah i �' t t✓
y .M ks a h a i i hl at t��t,
y JlSti 1f. � 4 1 L�.
s y.
r � y
f
FIRE RESCUE SERVICES ASSESSMENT REPORT
Government Systems Group, L.C. ("GSG") is a firm that
INTRODUCTION provides management consulting services to local governments
utilizing computer based technology and process oriented
analysis. GSG is an affiliated company created and partially
owned by Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A. ("NG&N"), a law firm dedicated to the
representation of local governments on issues of finance and taxation. David M.
Griffith & Associates, Ltd. ("DMG") is a national consulting firm that works with public
sector agencies in the fields of cost accounting, budgeting, revenue enhancement and
service delivery analysis.
The City of Dania (the "City") has entered into an agreement with GSG and DMG to
provide specialized services in the development and implementation of a non-ad A
valorem assessment program to fund fire rescue services within the City. NG&N has
been engaged by GSG to review the proposed assessment apportionment methodology 1
and deliverables and provide an analysis relative to the legal tests required in Florida for s i
f a valid special assessment consistent with the legal requirements for collection under
the ad valorem collection process provided in section 197.3632, Florida Statutes (the t-
r. �
"Uniform Method"). i.'
The development of the methodology contained within this Assessment Report for
calculating the special assessments for fire rescue services to each property use
category included the following steps: f
The full costs to provide fire rescue services were functionalized and
identified.
f ` The full cost of the City's annual fire inspection program was calculated. A
t:x r The percentage of fire rescue calls was extrapolated from the City of
y 't Hollywood's incident data and allocated to property use categories that
.'r conform to the Broward County Property Appraiser's database utilized in
the real property assessment roll, where applicable.
9:t
• The percentage of specific fire calls by property use category extrapolated
x ' ` from the City of Hollywood's incident data was used to cost apportion each
pro-forma budget amount to the appropriate category.
r A parcel apportionment methodology was determined for each category
and assessment rates were calculated for each property use category.
ti
i
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. & DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD.
VS
• � � rpi, rti
; r
The goals of this study were as follows:
• To develop a five-year pro-forma operating budget for the City to provide
fire rescue services.
• To determine a consistent, feasible and legally sufficient special
.assessment methodology capable of collection as a non-ad valorem
assessment under the ad valorem collection process provided in the
Uniform Method.
r;
• To apply the assessment methodology and develop preliminary
assessment rates within the identified property use categories.
In order to achieve the study goals, a number of objectives were ! -r
OBJECTIVES accomplished as follows:
k ( V
• A
Develop an inventory of the City's proposed fire rescue services.
' F j sr�i tI
• Determine anticipated full costs of providing fire rescue services within the
y
City.
• Review such final cost determination with the City to confirm that all >" ,
elements provide the requisite special benefit to the identified77
:
classifications of assessed property. £ '
Determine the relative benefit derived by categories of property use within
the City anticipated from the projected delivery of fire rescue services. '' `
Recommend the fair and reasonable apportionment of assessable costs {Kr
T ' ,3 among benefited parcels within each property use category.
Calculate preliminary assessment rates and parcel classifications for
{ ,E Fiscal Year 1996-97 through Fiscal Year 2000-01.
{} Vy � • L IC
2 t�� 1 t � • :'Y i '
{ , , Ascertain that the preliminary assessment rates and parcel classifications
` r „ recommended are capable of incorporation into a non-ad valorem `
assessment roll conforming to the statutory requirements of the Uniform
Method.
F
u 3 1
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. 2
f
e
�a.�'$,,l'�tgf ��� lx) {{t �r j i r I .3,, v r ti'G`+""r"�'�w..:rm- �t11�' � � �kl����l ,�� 'hP.+;;•.�`� R't�t. +i� �
r.
> I
t.
I
i
. t
TABLE 5
FIRE RESCUE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Dania Fire Rescue '
Fire Chief
Deputy Chief
Fire Marshall Rescue Division Chief
Fire Inspector } ,
F� ,a Secretary
Battalion Chief Battalion Chief Battalion Chief
A Shift B Shift C Shift
�i
Y5191wn It SlaLon It Slalwn W Slalan t Slalwn 0.1
Engineer Lieutenant Engineer Lieutenant Engineer Lieutenant
Operator Operator Operator
Paramedic Engineer Paramedic Engineer Paramedic Engineer
a. Fire Fighter Operator Fire Fighter Operator Fire Fighter Operator l'I4tV���t i •
Paramedic Paramedic Paramedic Paramedic Paramedic Paramedic
Fire Fighter Fire Fighter Fire Fighter Fire Fighter Fire Fighter Fire Fighter 51
. " Fire Fighter Paramedic Fire Fighter Paramedic Fire Fighter Paramedic q_
Fire Fighter Fire Fighter Fire Fighter yKa
J�� _. •,rT��f .
1 s
Paramedic Paramedic Paramedic
a
Fire Fighter Fire Fighter Fire Fighter r
t U��
s ,
Y ' RESPONSE PROTOCOL
Dania's Fire Rescue Department responds with a minimum of 3 Firefighters to all
emergency situations using the following guidelines in Table 6.
nF `
j
IV
� ♦.M' .i`M`
L )
l
t� ♦i L („xZyne�4 .
5 .. 1a 1 ]yi Jlnl
'� 1• -� Y i f 3 C�.7i
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. 8 DAVID M. GRIFFITH 8 ASSOCIATES LTD. a
f>5Vf tt t A111 r 4
ira tI�ify .: It ali�i��pry,� la'^`�v 1'yYf
ITT
n ,e•. a� ya r �
a� a •,� ern'r v�q� 9 •T�da llr`.}$�\r'�
yy M�V'1' 1� •N tiTJAA4 .�,��
la 1IM a:„�"t 14 i9�A� M
aay'"n e 3U - s a yf t f
, s a
. f
l!
TABLE 7
DANIA FIRE RESCUE
FIVE-YEAR ASSESSMENT BUDGET (continued)
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Year Year1 Year Year Year4 YearS
Expenditures FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 2000 FY 2001
OPERATING EXPENSES
Professional Services $41,700 $42,951 $44,240 $45,567 $46,934 Fire Services Due to County 571,045 _ $48,342
` k u Travel&Training -
14,000 14,420 14,853 15,298 15,757 16,230
Telephone 6,400 6,592 6,790 6,993 7,203 7,419
Communication Services 53,000 54,590 56,228 57,915 59,652 61,442 ?
Water 1,060 1,092 1,125 1,158 1,193 1,229
Electricity 11,500 11,845 12,200 12,566 12,943 13,332
Natural Gas
s Lease of Equipment 250 258
pmen 265 273 281 290 �� 1
7,760 7,993 8,233 8,480 8,734 8,996
Lease of Automobiles 95,365 98,226 101,173 104.208 107,334 110,554
Lease of Buildings 18,000 18,540 19,096 19,669 20,259 20.867 I '
it MTNC of Office Machinery&Equipment 10,500 10,815 11,139 11,474 11,818 12.172 `
\ � MTNC of Machines&Equipment 10,800 11,124 11,458 11,801 12,155 12,520
MTNC of Communication Equipment 7,300 7,519 7,745 7,977 8,216 8,463 ,
"• MTNC of Vehicles 10,000 10,300 10.609 10,927 11,255
MTNC of Buildings&Grounds 11,593 �''
'Y MTNC of Uniforms 6,000 6,180 6,365 6,556 6,753 6,956
M 7,500 7,725 7,957 8,195 8,441 8,695
Printed Forms
750 773 796 820 844
1 Employee Physicals 8691,000 1,030 1,061 1,093 1.126 1,159
y� Office Supplies
Gas/Oil 5,050 5,202 5,358 5,518 5.684 5,854
Consumable Items 15,000 15,450 15,914 16,391 16,883 17,389
38
Wearing Apparel ,000 39,140 40,314 41,524 42,769 44,052
13,300
13,699 14,110 14,533 14,969 15,418Miscellaneous Supplies 20,400 21,012Janitorial Supplies 21,642 22,292 22.960 23,649 w'j
- \
i'. Vehicle Parts 2,000 2,060 2,122 2,185 2,251 2.319
y 13,500 13,905 14,322 14,752 15,194 15,650 Bldg&Grounds Maintenance Supplies 8,500 8,755
Educational/Reference Supplies 8,000 8,240 8,4887 8,742 288 9,004 9.274
Dues&Subscriptions 2,853 2,939
2,535 2,611 2,689 2,770 2,853 2,939
t TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $1,000,215 $442,045 $455,306 $468,966 S483,U35 $497,526
x'
+ -„ CAPITAL OUTLAY pySiC
1
Communication Equipment S0 S0 so $0 $0 gp
1 , Rescue Equipment
38,600 3,708 3,819 3,934 4,052 4,173
+ Machines&Equipment
Vehicles 84,500
> ,r•r, I TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY $123,100 $3,708 $3,819
$3,934 $4,052 $4,173
CAPITAL PROJECTS
Buildings&Improvements $0 $0 $337,460 $650,000 Rescue Equipment $0 $0
442,000
'I .• i Machines&Equipment _ 99,300 _
n, Vehicles 66,000
t Projected Operating Impact - - - '
z t - 122,500 158,625 242,156 254,264 266,977
I r TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
rf�, $0 5630,500 $496,085 $991,456 $254,264 $266,977
a� y t
I y I
�w"1,F , Y _b ay ♦ ti
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. a' DAV/D M. URIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. 6
'jp�S b� df' 4•SI S Y k y� 1j fi
dh 'k3+ Nsy ,l� 1. 9 � + r��•,
ti
4'Y'I,x i ti ,. •`, "' � _ �z r!t Ij � e � ° til'9
� r
5 fi T Y �1
A�
r
, r
5,
TABLE 7
DANIA FIRE RESCUE
FIVE-YEAR ASSESSMENT BUDGET (continued)
a
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed =2FrY
Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Expenditures FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99
DEBT SERVICE
Debt Service-Vehicles $0 $16,900 $16,900 $16,900 g16,900 516,900
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EO E16,900 §16,900 E16,900 §16,900 E16 900
ONE-TIME ASSESSMENT EXPENSEStz
s: r
One-Time Study Charges '+
Legal Advertising $10,,425 000 $O $0 $p $0 $0
cti Citizen's Notification Cost _
6,508
+,J TOTAL ONE-TIME ASSESSMENT EXPENSES §91,933 §0 EO EO EO
E0
ASSESSMENT EXPENSES +
General Fund Repayment $0 $18,387 $18,387 $18,387 $18,387., Property Database Updates - $18,387
> h 5 11,302 11,302 11,302 11,302 11,302
Legal Advertising(Years 1 throw r
9 ) - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 I 7
Citizen's Notification Cost(Years 1 through 5) - 508 508 6,508 6,508 6,508
v � 6,508
TOTALASSESSMENT EXPENSES $0
f i E46,796 §46,196 $46,196 E46,196 E46,196 �
TOTAL GROSS EXPENSES I
$4,284,493 E4,412,056 b4 554 649 55 240 611 §4 703 264 $4 925 531
FIREIRESCUE REVENUES
EMS Transport Fees '
250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 �N
Publie Safety-EMS(Minnet$) 209,000
r Fire Inspection Fees 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 r Fh 26,000
s TOTAL REVENUES 485,000 276,000 276,000 276,000 276,000 276,000
� 4iI • Nn
TOTAL NET EXPENSES
$3,799.493 E4,136,056 $4,278,649 $4,964,611 E4,427,264 E4,649,531
MISC ASSESSMENT EXPENSES
Property Appraiser Estimated Collection
' Charges - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Necessary Administrative and Actual
Collection Costs - 41,361 42,786 49,646 44,273 46,495
1 Uncollected Receipts - 206,803 213,932 248,231 221,363 232,477
I TOTAL MISC ASSESSMENT EXPENSES General Fund 258,163 266,719 307,877 275,636 288,972
ASSESSMENT FUNDING General Fund REQUIREMENT E4,394,220 §4,545,368 E5,272,488 E4,702,900 E4,938,503
+ ,
r 1
' '`•�.
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAV/D M. GR/FFITH 8 ASSOCIATES, LTD. 7 r>
�+ � 3nr41� � ftLir7afl' �„ a� i �aa
+r
r ,
4
i.
P .
7
The five-year budget contains assumptions for the purpose of this study. Those
assumptions are:
A 5.0% growth rate per year was assumed for the following line items in the "Personal
Services" section of the budget. These line items are:
• Salaries
• Overtime
• Longevity
• Rev Sharing Supplement
• State Incentive
?, • FICA Taxes
• Retirement Contributions
• Life & Health Insurance
• Workers' Compensation Pay r
Accrued Leave Buyback }
• Additional Personnel
., i.
Note: Line item "Additional Personnel, " is based on Finance Department projections ,
of $50,000 per new employee hired. The information provided to DMG by the City , 4
indicated hiring 1 additional person for Fiscal Year 1997 and 2 for Fiscal Year 1998.
A 3.0% growth rate was assumed for all line items in the "Operating Expenses" section
of the budget.
Within the "Capital" section of the budget, a 3.0% growth rate was assumed.
[.
t � The "Capital Projects" section of the budget is based on the following information: , r
r 7 a,
t TABLE 8
t ; CAPITAL PROJECTS
7
Item Projected Date Total Cost Annual Cost
New Station #93 January 1998 $650,000 $50,600
Refurb. Station #1 October 1997 337,460 30,000
i 65 ft. Ladder Truck October 1996 442,000 100,0 00
Rescue Vehicle October 1998 99,300 25,000
Command Vehicle October 1996 30,000 9,500
Four Door Sedan October 1996 18,000 6,500
Four Door Sedan October 1996 18,000 6,500
Within the "Debt Service" category, the following line item is based on EMS vehicle
purchases of$84,500 paid out over five (5) years.
ew
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. 8 DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. $ ;
ti
I k��3�D�N1'1}rPol y rc*' JYt�"r,�
M`
t'`s�
SS f < h R.i _
qTf d l3 �a
P„
A
Within the "One-Time Start-Up Assessment Expenses" category, the following line items
are included:
• The full cost of implementing the Fire rescue non-ad valorem assessment
` study ($75,425) is being paid by the General Fund in the current budget
(Fiscal Year 1995-96).
The "Legal Advertising" line item contains the estimated cost for legal
notifications to be published in the local newspaper. All legal advertisements
are being paid out of the City's Fiscal Year 1995-96 general fund budget.
y + . The "Citizen's Notification" line item contains the estimated expense to send
First Class notices to all property owners in the City of the proposed kk ,
assessment rates. These notices are being paid from the City's Fiscal Year
1995-96 budget. The cost is based on the Property Appraiser's count of
8,677 parcels multiplied by $0.75 per parcel totaling $6,508. t
0' i
Within the "Assessment Expenses' category, the following line items are included:
• "General Fund Repayment" includes the full cost of repaying the General
Fund for the Fire rescue non-ad valorem assessment study ($75,425), all
e legal advertisements ($10,000), and "Citizen's Notification" ($6,508). The City
t f Ir is budgeting the full reimbursement to the General Fund expenses incurred in I `:
Fiscal Year 1995-96, over the first five years of the assessment program.
In "Property Database Updates," $10,000 plus $0.15 per parcel per year, j
beginning in Fiscal Year 1996-97 has been included to cover any assessment li
I related expenses incurred updating the City's property database each year.
Also included are the ongoing expenses attributable to citizen's notification
and legal advertising expenses.
r}}} J
le') '. Within the "Fire Rescue Revenues" category, the following line items are included tox
i calculate the Net Assessment Funding Requirement. These line items are flat ratet
projections and are based on the City's Adopted Annual Operating Budget from Fiscal
a ,'€ Year 1995-96.
i
• EMS Transport Fees
Fire Inspection Fees
a,
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. 9
gg
f �
r
'd „etrc�gJ
r�r !��
c
....... I 1fMi t h
)
y v�
TABLE 9
USER FEE SUMMARY
Fee Units of Current current Full Cost Total Deficit Recom. Rev.@ Addl Rev
Area Service Fee Revenue Per Unit Cost (Surplus) Fee Rea Fee At Rec Fee
Plan Review Minimum 117 $25.00 $2,925 $24.15 $2,826 ($99) $25.00 $2,925 $0
Plan Review Per Sq.Ft 100 $63.25 $6,325 $54.81 $5,481 ($844) $54.81 $5,481 (5844)
Sprinkler Minimum 77 $50.00 $3,850 $47.91 $3,689 ($161) $50.00 S3,850 Annual Inspections 437 $38.58 $16,859 $39.70 $17,349 $489 $38.58 $16.859 $p$0
so
TOTALS $29,959 $29,345 ($615) $29,115 (5844)
't FEE AREA DETAIL
j
� 7 Plan Review Minimum Fee +`
k t ;
' Annually, the department is required to conduct approximately 117 inspections and plan
E reviews for projects less than 1,667 square feet. The current minimum fee collected is 1
$25. Each permit requires an average of 34 minutes of inspection and plan review time.
The full cost per permit is $24.15 or $2,826 per annum. DMG recommends no change
to the current fee as it is recovering the full cost of providing the service.
Plans Examination -Per Square Foot Fee "'t
� f - , r I
( The current fee schedule provides for a fee of $0.015 per square foot. The current
average fee collected is $63.25 that equates to a project size of 4,217 square feet.
Annually, approximately 100 projects are processed by the Fire Rescue Department.
Each project requires an average of 1.27 hours of plan review and inspection time. The
j full cost per project is $54.81 or $5,481 per annum. The full cost per projects equates to
,A , �; '� ; an approximate 13% decrease in comparison to the current fee. DMG recommends a ''}
fee of$0.013 per square foot that will equate to an average fee of$54.81 that will ,
recover the full cost of providing this service.
Fire Sprinkler System - Minimum Fee
r
An average of 77 applications are received by the department requesting fire sprinkler
tests. The current fee is $50.00. The full cost of providing the service is $47.91 or
$3,689 annually. DMG recommends no change to the current fee as it is
recovering the full cost of providing the service.
t
,t
rn
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. 8 DAVID M. GRIFFITH 8 ASSOCIATES, LTD. 11
" ulyj t
J
1 k t �fi a i
N
4 51�y l,l�k'teti� y It t � If'.
i
1jPA 4'r E}n x)
��
r
Annual Inspection Fees
The current fee schedule provides for approximately 35 different types of annual
inspection charges. Data was not available to delineate the number and type of each
inspection conducted annually. On an aggregate basis, the department was able to
provide information that approximately 437 annual inspections were conducted. The
average fee collected was $38.58. The full cost per inspection is $39.70 or $17,349
yearly. As the current schedule is recovering a majority of the full cost of
providing the service, DMG does not recommend a change to any of the current
annual inspection fees.
4' GSG obtained information identifying the number of fire rescue
INCIDENT calls made to property categories within the City over a one
DATA year period as reported to the State Fire Marshal for the j
calendar year 1994. The State Fire Marshal's office uses the National Fire Incident 1
Reporting System ("NFIRS") which is designed as a tool for fire departments to report
and maintain computerized records of fires and other department activities in a uniform
manner. A series of basic phrases with code numbers are used to describe incidents in { "
f this system. However, the City of Dania only reports fire rescue incidents to the State ;
Fire Marshal when a fire engine responds to the incident. Incidents where a fire engine } f
a does not respond are not reported to the Fire Marshal. As a result, a majority of fire }
rescue incidents cannot be assigned to a fixed property use as required by the
recommended apportionment methodology. Therefore, it is necessary to utilize data r, i
from a comparable municipality to develop cost allocation proportions. Based on the
r City Fire Rescue Department's judgement that both the property use composition and
the proportion of incidents among property uses in the City of Dania is comparable to
the property use composition and proportion of incidents among property uses in the
?t r. City of Hollywood, we have extrapolated the City of Hollywood's call proportions to the
,h4
City of Dania's call volumes. ?�
For the recommended methodology, fire rescue calls include all calls related to fire, ;f ;
if explosion, overpressure rupture, rescue calls, hazardous condition, standby, service
i calls, good intent calls, false calls and other situations not classified. Using the City of
Hollywood's call proportions, of 1,495 calls, 1,087 or 72.71% are emergency medical
calls, with a majority of the remaining calls comprised of fire calls, good intent calls,
service calls, system malfunction, smoke scare and malicious false calls.
Fire rescue incidents in the fire rescue incident reports are categorized on the basis of
the "Fixed Property Use" code included in each incident report. There are
approximately 625 fixed property use codes in the NFIRS.
�z
r �
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. 12
,
rlif ii 1,7,'y
t
aft r} f .._�•..� -
n
Y
Y"
k
I ,
3
y
r
the property data regarding tax exempt properties is completed, the appropriate
classification of each institutional category parcel assessed cannot be determined and
assessment rates cannot be calculated.
r However, once the property data is complete, it may be necessary to address the high
number of fire rescue incidents to the institutional category and the burden of funding
fire rescue services from all the types of property within the institutional category. Upon
analysis of both the complete property data and the fire rescue incident information,
recommendations regarding segregation or aggregation of property uses within this
category and other categories will be provided. Other funding mechanisms or
combinations of funding mechanism may also be recommended.
Table 10 illustrates the final assignment of fire rescue incidents and proportion of calls F
by property use category based on the extrapolation of fire rescue incident data fromFFFF
;
the City of Hollywood.
. r
TABLE 10
l FIRE RESCUE INCIDENTS ;
AND PROPORTION OF CALLS BY CATEGORY
Number of Fire Percent of Total
K Property Category Rescue Incidents Incidents
r<
2 Residential 1,078 72.14% !# s
Commercial 188 12.59% " 1
Industrial/Warehouse 27 1.83%
Nursing Homes 114 7.63%
s, Institutional 87 5.81%
y?, Total 1,495 100.00%
li Y:�c � d yy.g •-1?
I PROPERTY Using the data from the most recently certified real property
4dw' DATA assessment roll available, there are 8,646 parcels within the City `: 2
on the ad valorem tax roll. The number and property use of
parcels will change during the year and will be required to be updated during the
implementation stage.
All properties included on the City's ad valorem tax roll were assigned to one or more of
the categories (correlating to the Fixed Property Use Category in the fire rescue incident
reports) based upon their assignment of use by the Broward County Property Appraiser.
The 100 Florida Department of Revenue property use codes in the ad valorem tax roll
files reflected in Rule 12D-8.008, Florida Administrative Code, were used to categorize
' property with a single use. A listing of the Florida Department of Revenue property use
1
codes organized by property use category is attached as Appendix C.
}, GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. 8 DAVID M. GRIFFITH-8 ASSOC/A TES, LTD.
14 7+'
{ c v
i. Z -;, r , A1 dA
q� 3p7.{.y. {' \ .� i S � t•3
gM y r
f�. a
n
i"
>SI
Table 11 illustrates the Florida Department of Revenue property use code frequencies
in the ad valorem tax roll for the City of Dania.
TABLE 11
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE PROPERTY USE CODES
DOR Codes Description Parcels % of Total
00 Vacant Residential 669 7.74%
01 Single Family Improved 3,254 37.64%
+ 02 Mobile Home 12 0.14%
I, 03 Multi-family + 10 Units 33 0.38%
04 Condominium 1,903 22.01% 'j
570 6.59% '' ;3
05 Co-ops
08 Multi-family 2-9 Units 968 11.20%
10 Vacant Commercial 111 1.28% I
100 1.16% F
11 Stores 1 Story y
12 Mixed Use Store/Office 79 0.91% i
.` 14 Supermarkets 6 0.07% 1
17 Office Non-Prof 1 Story 4 0.05%
:'• ka 18 Office Non-Prof 2 + Story 33 0.38%
19 Professional Services 9 0.10%
c 30 0.35%
22 Drive-in Restaurant
23 Bank/S&L/Mortgage/Credit 6 0.07%
t y: 26 Service Stations 14 0.16%
x-
?4 27 Auto Sales/Service/Rental 31 0.36%
28 Mobile Home Parks/Parking Lots 17 0.20%
29 Wholesale/Produce Outlets 1 0.01%
32 Theater/Auditorium (encl.) 1 0.01%
"r
t 33 Nightclub/Bar/Lounge 5 0.06% ;
34 Bowling/SkatinglPool Hall 1 0.01%
h , P
I I ; • 37 Race Track; Horse/Dog/Auto 2 0.02%
.f 39 Hotels/Motels 24 0.28% r'r`
1. r" 40 Vacant Industrial 45 0.52%
' 41 Lt. Mfg./Sm. Mach. Shop/Print 28 0.32%
( 43 Lumber Yard/Sawmill 1 0.01%
a<
44 Pack Plant (Fruit/Meat)
1 0.01%
48 Warehousing 103 1.19%
49 Open Storage 1 0.01%
` 52 Bi-Annual Row Crops 1 0.01%
69 Ornamentals, Misc. Ag. 14 0.16%
h 70 Vacant Institutional 5 0.06%
71 Churches 29 0.34%
72 Private Schools & College 2 0.02%
73 Private Owned Hospitals 1 7 0.08%
15 '^
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAV/D M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD.
STIR
° .
"� �'�R'
M
��C'l' If A9 i� �•.
qq . .
1 i�xdj�d S Imo.. S :T' •:�' e _ �,
-
r
TABLE 11
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE PROPERTY USE CODES (continued)
DOR Codes Description Parcels % of Total
74 Homes for the Aged 1 0.01
76 Mortuaries/Cemeteries 2 0.020
77 Clubs, Lodges, Union Halls 6 0.07%
82 Govt. Forest/Parks/Recreational 1 0.01%
° 83 Public County Schools 11 0.13%
86 County 268 3.10%
87 State 137 1.58% y�.
t 89 Municipal not Parks 44 0.51% l
91 Utilities, Gas/Electric/Telephone 8 0.09%
95 Rivers & Lakes, Submerged 2 0 02%
_ 97 Outdoor Rec. or Park 1 0.01% 1
99 Acreage Nan-Agricultural 45 0.52%
Total 8,646 100.00%
1
•- Where a single parcel of property is used for more than one purpose, the Brow
and r
f „ County Property Appraiser's improvement code was also used to assign each building ?
{{ use to a category. There are 91 three digit improvement codes which distinguish
properties according to type of use. A listing of the Broward County Property Appraiser's
improvement codes organized by improved code classification is included as Appendix 4-D. .
The following table reflects the improvement code frequencies on the ad valorem tax roll
ti for the City.
J
x L ;cc
r
^t
TABLE 12 '
IMPROVEMENT CODES
Improvement Code Description °t^ 001 Improvements /oofTotal
Single family residence 3,546 58.90%
15 ; 002 Misc. values on separate folio(pool, slabs, utility, garage,fence,
t paving)
I 3 0.05%
003
Residential on Farm
100 Apartments 2 0.03%
+ 101 975 16.20%
Apartments or Res.(combined with stores, offices) 116 1.93%
102 Garage Apts.,Guest House on Residence, 2 res. Or more
r 103 Motels 276 4.58%
is 3+ 104 23 0.38%
Holels combined with stores,office,etc.
105 Co-op Apartments
�r� ati ppfl 1 , ,
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. 8 DAVID M. GRIFFITH 8 ASS
OCIA TES, LTD. 16
{ Fi
`Aj1f'ti X+!'ik f p r i.
k!
c� t
��k
L
ry
f y 11
;.Ff
I j
r {
—u � S _
al��v✓a-1 r4w1...
TABLE 12
IMPROVEMENT CODES (continued)
Improvement Code Description Improvements %of Total
704 Medical(private hospitals, nursing and convalescent homes) 81 0.13%
706 Schools-private, day nursery 41 0.07%
707 Religious 241 0.40%
708 Marinas 6T 0.10%
800 Power companies 3 0.05%
801 Telephone companies 11 0.020/io
/ Total 6,020 100.00%
For parcels assigned to the residential property use category, the total number of
dwelling units was determined.
I I
(3 j
For parcels within the non-residential property use categories of commercial and
industrial/warehouse, the amount of square footage of these non-residential structures ff
was determined from the building files on the ad valorem tax roll, where available.
Please note that the ad valorem tax roll is designed solely to provide the data required f ;
E to determine value. Properties that are exempt from taxes do not necessarily need their
value maintained on the tax roll. Accordingly, the Broward County Property Appraiser i
has chosen not to include information on the ad valorem tax roll relative to
improvements on certain tax-exempt parcels. As discussed under Issue 2 in the
rt Executive Summary, further verification of the ad valorem tax roll specifically related to
3s a„ exempt properties is expected during the implementation phase. The refined data may
result in modification to the preliminary assessment rates provided in this Assessment
Report.
is SPECIAL BENEFIT The following assumptions support a finding that the fire
t y: ASSUMPTIONS rescue services provided by the City provide a special benefit
., to the assessed parcels,
Fire rescue services possess a logical relationship to the use and
' enjoyment of improved property by: (i) protecting the value of the
improvements and structures by providing available fire control services;
(ii) protecting the life and safety of intended occupants in the use and
enjoyment of improvements and structures within improved parcels; (iii)
' lowering the cost of fire insurance by the presence of a professional and
comprehensive fire control program within the City; and (iv) containing the
r f' spread of fire incidents occurring on vacant property with the potential to
spread and endanger the structures and occupants of improved property.
ki
! o-
5 Lr h5�
n„" h GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. 8 DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. 18
R:
r
AllL'Or t ft '
+v s
��
p,yA ....SAC)
A
t 1 rt4 it ( yK t` f
g4
,�.w.�
l 1
t
I
I
• The combined fire control and emergency medical services of the City
under its existing consolidated fire rescue program enhances and
strengthens the relationship of such services to the use and enjoyment of
the structure and improvements within improved parcels of property within
the City.
The following section describes the recommended
APPORTIONMENT assessment apportionment methodology for fire rescue
` METHODOLOGY services based on (i) the five-year pro-forma fire rescue
budget, (ii) the real property tax roll maintained by the
property appraiser for property within the City and the
availability of data residing on the tax roll database, and (iii) the fire rescue incident data
specific to the City. Included are the underlying special benefit and fair apportionment
assumptions. .
i The assessable cost to provide fire rescue services for Fiscal Year 1996-97 was
apportioned among property use categories based upon the historical demand for fire
rescue services reflected by the fire rescue incident data reported to the State Fire
} 3 Marshal as illustrated in the following table.
t 'r ,
r TABLE 13
' COST APPORTIONMENT '
.4
r.
Number of Fire Percent of Total Portion of Budget
i
Property Category Rescue Incidents Incidents (100%)
i` Residential 1,078 72.14% $3,169,990 r '
Y Commercial 188 12.59% $553,232
IndustrialMarehouse 27 1.83% $80,414
Nursing Homes 114 7.63% $335,279
Institutional 87 5.81% $255,304 ;
Total 1,495 100.00% $4,394,220
The share of the fire rescue assessable costs apportioned to each property use
category was further apportioned among the individual parcels of property within each
property use category in the manner described in the Table 14.
I
1
s.
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. & DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. 19
r
r , •tii ��n �
t � �
VW d
'- i
J
,3 ;.
c
,. ♦F
f
r;
TABLE 14
PARCEL APPORTIONMENT WITHIN
PROPERTY USE CATEGORIES
Category Parcel Apportionment
Residential Dwelling Unit
Non-Residential Improvement Area Per Parcel
• Commercial Within Square Footage
h • Industrial/Warehouse Classifications
Institutional
Nursing Home <�
.t
COMPUTATION OF FIRE RESCUE ASSESSMENTS INN t
> >
r, I
Applying the foregoing parcel apportionment methodology, fire rescue assessment rates
were computed for each category of property use in the City. The specific methodology j and underlying assumptions for the parcel apportionment within each category of
property use is generally described below.
pp
The following assumptions support findings
RESIDENTIAL PARCEL ns that the g
p, APPORTIONMENT parcel apportionment applied in the Residential Property
ASSUMPTIONS Use Classification is fair and reasonable.
°tk� ` • The historical demand for fire rescue service availability for multi-family '
and single family residential parcels is substantially similar and any
difference in the percentage of documented fire rescue calls to such
specific property uses was statistically insignificant.
� r The size or the value of the residential parcel does not determine the
scope of the required fire rescue response. The potential demand for fire
rescue services is driven by the existence of a residential unit and the
anticipated average occupant population.
d
• Apportioning the assessed costs for fire rescue services attributable to the
r ; residential property use category on a per residential unit basis is required
to avoid cost inefficiency and unnecessary administration and is a fair and
reasonable method of parcel apportionment based upon historical call
„ data.
/
p F
fii +T /� C' b 1 ry41�1
s "at*i'tz 4 GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAV/D M. GRIFFITH 8 ASSOCIATES, LTD. 20
No
wb
x '
ti
�er.4
w+�'� N•r a r �� ,xo .
�✓ rr t h+ Y F 4 ra ly„t
ffi� ��<£e 1i Etta
i
Residential Property Parcel Apportionment Calculation
Based upon the historical demand for fire rescue services, the percentage of the City's
total fire rescue assessable costs attributable to property in the residential category was
calculated. The amount of the assessable costs allocable to property in the residential
property use category was divided by the number of dwelling units in the residential
lling units, multi-family units and mobile homes to
category including single family dwe
compute the fire rescue assessment to be imposed against each dwelling unit. For
each residential parcel, the actual number of dwelling units located on the parcel will be
multiplied by the per dwelling unit charge to compute the residential fire rescue
assessment for the parcel.
The following assumptions support findings that the ,
NON-RESIDENTIAL PARCEL parcel apportionment applied in the Non-Residential j
APPORTIONMENT Property Use Classification is fair and reasonable.
ASSUMPTIONS
F r
The risk of loss and demand for fire rescue service availability is r.
substantially the same for structures below a certain minimum size. i
Because the value and anticipated occupancy of structures below a
certain minimum size is less, it is fair, reasonable, and equitable to provide
a lesser assessment burden on such structures by the creation of specific ! i
property parcel classifications for those parcels. j
t .
The separation of non-residential parcels into square footage
t classifications is fair and reasonable for the purposes of parcel
' apportionment because: (i) the absence of a need for precise square
footage data within the ad valorem tax records maintained by the property
>S appraiser undermines the use of actual square footage of structures and
t4.
improvements within each improved parcel as a basis for parcel
j{ apportionment; (ii) the administrative expense and complexity created by ;
an on-site inspection to determine the actual square footage of structures
and improvements within each improved parcel assessed is impractical; sr'
�Ti and (iii) the demand for fire rescue availability is not precisely determined ��Kr
t
or measured by the actual square footage of structures and improvements
within benefited parcels; and (iv).the classification of parcels within square
;- footage ranges is a fair and reasonable method to classify benefited
parcels and to apportion costs among benefited parcels that create similar
demand for the availability of fire rescue services.
The demand for the availability of fire rescue services diminishes at the
r
outer limit of structure size since a fire occurring in a structure greater than
a certain size is not capable of being suppressed under expected
n conditions and the fire control activities under such circumstances are
directed to avoid the spread of the fire event to adjacent structures.
r 21
7
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. & DAVID M. GRIFFITH 8 ASSOCIATES, LTD.
,t ✓�ia� ., 1 r.r r
r I•a(f f t.
-
vy
�P9} r fi c
pppp¢¢yy�� s `Y
uyY4
t t y
�y}� r
Therefore, it is fair and reasonable to place a cap on the square footage
classification of benefited parcels within the non-residential property use
categories.
The parcel apportionment for each Non-Residential Property Use Classification shall
cations and an additional classification of all other
include both minimum parcel classifi
improved parcels based upon the assumed square footage of structures and
improvements within the improved parcel. The Non-residential Property Use
Classifications include Commercial, Industrial/Warehouse, and Institutional property
uses. The following describes the Non-Residential Property parcel apportionment
calculation and classification for Commercial and IndustrialMarehouse categories, and
proposed parcel apportionment and classification for the Institutional category.
( �
Non Residential Property Parcel Apportionment Calculation and Classification
V ,
Based upon the historical demand for fire rescue services, property in the Non-
Residential Property Use Classification will be responsible for funding a percentage of f
the City's total fire rescue assessable costs segregated by Commercial, (�
Ind ustrial/Warehouse, and Institutional categories. The amount of the assessable costs
f i
allocable to parcels within each of the Non-Residential Property Use Classification was Y I
calculated based upon the following classification.
Non-residential parcels with square footage of non-residential improvements less than
1,999 square feet were assigned an improvement area of 1,000 square feet per parcel
Parcels with square footage of non-residential improvements between 2,000 square feet
and 3,499 square feet were assigned an improvement area of 2,000 square feet per J
lk
parcel. Parcels with non-residential improvements be
3,500 square feet and
ff' 4,999 square feet were assigned an improvement area of 3,500 square feet per parcel.
Parcels with non-residential improvement areas between 5,000 square feet and 9,999
square feet were assigned an improvement area of 5,000 square feet per parcel. For
parcels containing non-residential improvements greater than 10,000 square feet, °s
made in 10,000 square foot increments.
assignments of improvement area were
For non residential property uses, parcels containing improvements greater than 50,000
I square feet were assigned a maximum improvement area of 50,000 square feet. The
following tables illustrate the assignment of improvement area under this apportionment
methodology for Commercial and Industrial/Warehouse.
y
Y,
„
ZZ
G GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. 8 DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD.
1
lit X), ilf o T7 .
f l {
gd Lfi 1
Y � `
u
Y
TABLE 15
PARCEL APPORTIONMENT
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY USE CATEGORY
Number of Total Assigned
Category Parcels Assigned Area Area/Category
< 1,999 88 1,000 88,000
2,000- 3,499 65 2,000 130,000
3,500-4,999 27 3,500 94,500
00-9,999 10, 57 5,000 285,000
10,000- 19,999 22 10.000 220,000
20,000-29,999 10 20,000 200,000
30,000-39,999 4 30,000 120,000 ° a
40,000-49,999 3 40,000 120,000 + 1
> 50,000 15 50,000 750,000
Total 291 2,007,500 i?
TABLE 16
PARCEL APPORTIONMENT f'
INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE PROPERTY USE CATEGORY '� a
t j Number of Assigned Area Total Assigned
Category Parcels Area/Category
A: < 1,999 8 1.000 8,000
2,000-3,499 14 <<
2,000
3,500-4,999 28,000
12 3,500
5,000-9,999 42,000 ,
29 5,000 145,000
10,000- 19,999
22 10,000 220,000
20,000-29,999 18 20,000
30,000-39,999 360,000
9 30,000 270,000
40,000-49,999 6 40,000 240,000 4 ,
r: > 50,000 20 50,000 1,000,000
t Total 138
• {. . 2,313,000
f s-'•
i
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. & DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. 23
$ ! 6f
f
f y t
�3SI,
`p��Qnp • li 4
yy;; .ryl r`•
L/
o'
TABLE 17
PRELIMINARY RATES -ALL CATEGORIES (excluding Institutional)
FISCAL YEARS 1996-97 THROUGH 2O00-01
100% OF ASSESSABLE COSTS
Assessment FY 96.97 FY 97.98 FY 98.99 FY 99.00 FY 00.01
Property Billing Unit Parcel Number Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per
Classification Type Classification of Units Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit
Residential Dwelling Units N/A 7,000 $453 $468 $543 $485 $509
Commercial Parcel <1.999 sq ft 88 S276 S285 $331 W95 $310
2.000-3,499 sq it 65 $551 5570 $661 $590 $619
3,500-4,999 sq It 27 $965 P 1. 5.000-9.999 sq it 57 , 54929 5$1,,157 , 5$11,,50484
, 653 $1,47510,000-19,999 sq ft 9 52,851 $3,307 11 $2.949 33,097
q 10
20,000-29,999 s ft 55,899 $6.194
r 55,512 55,701 $6,613 ++"k^^,{
30,000.39,999 sq ft 4 58,267 58,552 $9,920 $8,848 $9.292 E'
40,000•49,999 sq ft 3 $1 M 23 $11,402 513,227 $11,798 $12,389 1i' a •!
>50,000 sq k 15 $13,779 $14,253 $16,533 $15,486
$14,747
Industrial Parcel < 1,999 sq k 8 S35 S36 $42 S37 t J
2.000-3,499 s 539
q k 14 $70 $72 $83 $74 $78 {
" 3,500-4.999 sq It 12 $122 $126 $146 $130 $137
5,000-9,999 soft 29 $174 $180 $209 $186 $195 �-
10,000-19.999 sq ft 22 $348 $360 $417 $372 $391 ±
20,000-29,999 sq ft 18 $695 $719 $834 S744 $781
30,000-39,999 soft 9 $1.043 $1,079 $1,251 $1,116 $1,172 1
1 40,000-49,999 sq it 6 $1,391 $1,438 $1,669 $1,488 $1,563
r >50,000 20 $1.738 $1,798 $2,086 $1,860 $1.954
1 I 1 ,
�MY y
1�
1 e
F ` i
1 b"
1 f,
1
t
y1
.rtL i
,
1 , •
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAVID M. GRIFFITH 8 ASSOCIATES, LTD. 25
t
f f V i Y L
1
SY N � �x r �� ,1 y •^�
V
TABLE 18
PRELIMINARY RATES - ALL CATEGORIES (excluding Institutional)
FISCAL YEARS 1996-97 THROUGH 2.000-01
75% OF ASSESSABLE COSTS
Assessment FY 96-97 FY 97.98 FY 98.99 FY 99-00 FY 00.01
Property Billing Unit Parcel Number Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per
Classification Type Classification of Units Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit
Residential Dwelling Units NIA 7,000 $340 $351 $408 $364 S382
Commercial Parcel < 1,999 sqk 88 5207 $214 $248 $221 S232
w 2,000-3.499 sq ft 65 $413 $428 $496 $442 $465
3.500-4.999 sq k 27 $723 $748 $868 5774 $813
5.000-9,999 sqk 57 51,033 S1,069 S1,240 S1,106 $1,161
10,000- 19,999 sqk 22 $2.067 $2,480 $2,212 S2,323
52,138
20,000-29,999 sq it 10 54,134 $4,276 $4,960 $4,424 $4,646
,4 30,000-39,999 sq ft 4 $6,201 $6,414 $7,440 $6,636 $6,969 t
40,000-49,999 sq ft 3 $8,267 $8,552 $9,920 $8,848 $9,292 lY
>50.000 so it 15 $10,334 $10,690 $12,400 $11,060 $11,614 ' ,f
Industrial Parcel < 1,999 sq ft 8 $26 $27 $31 $28 S29 + ;-
2.00D-3.499 sq It 14 $52 $54 $63 $56 $59 i
`v 3,500-4,999 sq k 12 $91 $94 $110 $98 $103 7
5.000-9,999 sq It 29 $130 $135 $156 $740 $147 ;
10,000- 19,999 sq ft 22 $261 $270 $313 $279 $293
20,000-29,999 sq ft 18 $521 S539 $626 $558 5586 +
30,000-39,999 sq ft 9 $782 5809 $939 $837 $879 ;+ +
40,000.49,999 sq ft 6 $1,043 $1,079 $1,251 $1,116 57,172 i
>50,000 20 $1,304 $1,349 $1,564 $1,395 $1,46.
+
i
c-'
4 Jr,
+ i•
i +
i,
r '
v Ia+
t
;q
26
i f{1 GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. & DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD.
4:
F'1 a2 �4A;4{S c1 + J
r� 4v
T
k
SIC• `1 � 1 � j y'ki
Y2a Cr � � ,: •�' 4 i a?��•
I
e
.r+'4
A
I
j
TABLE 19
PRELIMINARY RATES -ALL CATEGORIES (excluding Institutional)
FISCAL YEARS 1996-97 THROUGH 2O00-01
50% OF ASSESSABLE COSTS
Assessment FY 96.97 1 FY 97-98 FY 98-99 FY 99.00 FY 00.Ot
Property Billing Unit Parcel Number Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per
Classification Type Classification of Units Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit
Residential I Dwelling Units I N/A 7,000 522E $234 S272 I S242 $254 i
Commercial Parcel <1,999 soft 88 S138 I S143 S165 1 S147 1 5155
2,000-3,499 sq ft 65 1 S276 I S285 S331 I S295 1 $310 °
1 3,500-4,999 sq ft 27 $482 1 $499 f S579 f $516 $542 `
1 5,000-9.999 sq ft 57 $689 1 $713 $827 1 $737 1 $774 �
! ry:• 1 10,000-19,999 sq ft 22 $1.378 $1,425 51,653 $1,475 51,549
' 1 20,000-29.999 soft 1 10 $2,756 1 $2,851 1 $3.307 1 S2.949 I S3,097 t'-`•+"��
30,000-39,999 soft 4 $4,134 1 $4,276 1 $4,960 1 $4,424 1 $4,646
40,000-49,999 so ft 1 3 $5,512 1 $5.701 1 S6,613 1 $5.899 1 $6,194 ft �.� t
>50,000 sq it 1 15 $6.890 1 $7,127 1 $8,267 17,374 $7,743 k
Industrial Parcel <1,999 soft 8 $17 $18 $21 $19
$20 h '
2,000.3,499 so ft 14 1 $35 1 $36 1 $42 1 $37 $39
3,500.4,999 sq ft 12 1 S61 $63 $73 1 $55 $68
1 5.000-9,999 so ft 29 1 S87 I S90
' 48 4 $93 $98
1000-19,999 q ft 0
$209 $186 S195
20.0 18 $53 $ 8 $417 $372 $391999 sq 9
430.000- 21 $539 $62 86$
0,000
-49,999 sq ft 6 $695 $719 $834 $744 $781 ,
>50,000 1 20 1 $869 $899 $1,043 $930 $977
!
1 +�
1 l
+t
A i
1 �
{ A
4 y4 ...
E k�
S
s}
V ,V'
r I ,
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. 8 DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. 27
e
Y� V Y I y4 Y Y
l ! vl y 1A
P
ttt f 1f, rly:; V I
di qqv
}}r
m
v
cl
c
r
TABLE 20
PRELIMINARY RATES -ALL CATEGORIES (excluding Institutional)
FISCAL YEARS 1996-97 THROUGH 2000-01
' 25% OF ASSESSABLE COSTS
Assessment FY 9697 FY
97-98 FY 98-99 FY 99.00 FY 00.01
Property Billing Unit Parcel Number Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per
Classification Type Classification of Units Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit
Residential Dwelling Units N/A 7,000 $113 $117 $136 5121 5127
Commercial Parcel < 1.999 sq ft 88 569 $71 $83 $74 S77
r 2,000-3,499 sqft 65 S138 $143 $165 $147 S155
3,500.4,999 sq ft 27 $241 $249 $289 $256 $271
5.000-9,999 sq ft 57 $344 $356 $413 $369 $387
r ' 10.000-19.999 sq ft 22 $689 $713 $827 $737 5774 -
' ; 20.000-29,999 sq ft 10 S1,378 $1,425 $1,653 $1,475 $1,549 A^-»•
30.000-39,999 soft 4 $2,067 $2,138 $2.480 $2,212 $2,323
40,000-49,999 soft 3 $2,756 $2,851 $3.307 $2,949 53,097
>50,000 sq ft 15 $3,445 $3,563 $4,133 $3,687 $3,871 r�i
<1,999s
Industrial Parcel q ft 8 $9 $9 $10 $9 $10 f�
2,000-3.499 sq k 14 $17 $18 521 $19 $20 s
' 3,500-4,999 sq ft 12 $30 $31 $37 1 $33 $34
5,000•9,999 sq ft 29 $43 $45 S52 $47 $49
10,000-19,999 so ft 22 $87 $90 $104 $93 $98
r 20,000-29,999 sq k 18 $174 $180 $209 $186 $195
30,000-39,999 sq k 9 5261 $270 $313 $279 $293 J '
40,000-49.999 sq k 6 $348 $360 $417 $372 $391
it >50,060 20 1 $435 $450 $521 S465 S488
a' �r
Z. aq
J1 �
$ l _
Its
i
i
f
t
r f `
F +, ` `° , GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. & DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD.
28
b i vt+ 5'g( t k _'G ai 6r
a,
I
y ,
j. x
Y Cl
r ,
t
4.r t
• 1
TABLE 22
PRELIMINARY RATES -ALL CATEGORIES (excluding Institutional)
FISCAL YEARS 1996-97 THROUGH 2O00-01
MINNET PLUS IMPLEMENTATION AND ANNUAL COSTS
Assessment FY 96-97 FY 97-98 FY 98.99 FY 99.00 FY 00.Ot
Property Billing Unit Parcel Number Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per Rates Per
Classification Type Classification of Units Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit Billing Unit
Residential Dwelling Units NIA 7.000 $36 $38 $40 $42 $44
Commercial Parcel <1,999 sq ft 88 $22 $23 1 $25 S27
2,000.3,499 sq ft 65 $44 546 548 $51 $53
3,500-4,999 sq ft 27 $77 $81 585 $89 $93
5,000-9.999 sole 57 Silo $115 $121 $127 $133
t'. 10,000-19,999 sq ft 22 $220 $230 5242 $254 $267
20,000-29,999 soft 10 $439 $461 5484 $508 $534 �' 1
30,000-39.999 sq ft 4 $659 $691 3726 $762
f .+ 40A00-49,999 sqk 3 $878 $922
f >50,000 sqk 15 $1.098 $1,152 $1,210 $1,271 1 $1,334 r, .
Industrial Parcel <1,999 sq It 8 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 f
' r�r 2.000-3,499 sq It 14 $6 $6 $6 $6 $7
l � 3,500.4,999 sq ft 12 $10 $to $11 $11
5000-9999 sq ft 29 $14 $15 $15 $16 $1$12
10,000-19,999 sq it 22 $28 $29 531 $32 $34
20 000-29,999 sq it 18 $55 $58 $61 $64
30,000.39.999 sq it 9 $83 $87 $92
40,000-49,9995gk 6 Sill
6 $122 28
$
153>50,000 20 $145 5160 SS168 ` �r
r
r
y r I�
G-, 1
`f
r'
i
t
r z
r
yt
1 �
v t
I
k i
t
r�
yr
r
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. B DAVID M. GRIFFITH&ASSOCIATES, LTD. 30
r
Ir���iY fJr r $ t rf �x
........ �
J
,
f IJM1
5
.. i
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY CONCLUSION
PREFACE Special assessments are "charges assessed against the
property of some particular locality because that property
derives some special benefit from the expenditure of the
money. . . ." Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. City of Gainesville, 91 So. 118, 121 (Fla.
1922). Municipalities have the authority to impose special assessments by
ordinance pursuant to their home rule power. City f Boca Raton v. State, 595 So.2d
25, 30 (Fla. 1992). As established by case law, two requirements exist for the
imposition of a valid special assessment: (1) the property assessed must derive a
y: special benefit from the improvement or service provided, and (2) the assessment
z must be fairly and reasonably apportioned among the properties which receive the
t' special benefit. Id. at 29. An assessment may provide funding for either capital ex- f `
penditures or the operational costs of services, provided that the property which is f �.
subject to the assessment derives a special benefit from the improvement or service. f:
Madison County v. Foxx, 636 So.2d 39 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), appeal after remand, 21
Fla. L. Weekly D587 (Fla, 1st DCA March 5, 1996); see also Sarasota County v.
Sarasota Church of Christ, 667 So.2d 180 (Fla. 1995). {
+ 2
4' The benefit required for a valid special assessment
SPECIAL BE
{
REQUIREMENT consists of more than simply an increase in market value, I
' and includes both potential increases in value and the ; ;+
1� ( added use and enjoyment of the property. Meyer v. City of
3 St Oakland Park, 219 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1969). Furthermore,
the benefit need not be determined in relation to the existing use of the property. ,s .
See City of Hallandale v. Meekins, 237 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970), aft'dd, 245
So.2d 253 (Fla. 1971). f
Assessments for fire protection and ambulance services were upheld in South Trail ix
' r Fire Control District, Sarasota County v. State, 273 So.2d 380 (Fla. 1973). The
Legislature, in Chapter 70-933, Laws of Florida, provided that, "The furnishing of tier'
protection against fire, and the furnishing of ambulance service are hereby}
declared to be benefits to all property." The Supreme Court refused to overturn the
i• .'. finding that the assessment provided a benefit to property. In Fire District No. 1 of
Polk County v. Jenkins, 221 So.2d 740 (Fla. 1969), the Supreme Court found that
necessary special and peculiar benefits resulted from the levy of an assessment for
t - fire protection against mobile home rental spaces. The court found the presence of
special and peculiar benefits from the resulting decrease in insurance, protection of
the public safety, enhancement of business property and better service to tenants.
The court also stated that the benefit need not be direct nor immediate, but must be
r substantial, certain, and capable of being realized within a reasonable time.
1,
t s
31
IA tk 4i
NABORS, GIBLIN&NICKERSON, P.A.
11ffnne u� l p v�.� H
19ik� 4 z yr i l_•f 1 rR 4L�17�
ilk'���ti�a�4�Hh+ j r •,YtY`',P� a�sf'�:'.
4' 4
f
A..
In Sarasota County v. Sarasota Church of Christ Inc., 641 So.2d 900 (Fla. 2d DCA
1994), rey'd on other grounds, 667 So.2d 180 (Fla. 1995), the Second District upheld
special assessments for fire and rescue services. The court specifically noted that
the rescue services in question were synonymous with ambulance services. The
court cited both the Polk Countv and South Trail decisions as recognizing fire and
related services as valid special assessments. However, the court upheld the
assessments based upon estoppel grounds because the churches challenging the
assessments had paid the fire and rescue assessments without protest for over 20
years.
AN
k l,• Generally, the governing authority levying the special assessment must make a
specific determination as to the special benefit received by the property to be
assessed. City of Ft. Myers v. State, 117 So. 97, 104 (Fla. 1928). Judicial reliance
upon legislative findings was buttressed in the recent case of Sarasota County v
Sarasota Church of Christ Inc., 667 So.2d 180 (Fla. 1995). On appeal, the Supreme
Court held that "the legislative determination as to the existence of special benefits r
and as to the apportionment of the costs of those benefits should be upheld unless /F i
the determination is arbitrary." Church of Christ, 667 So.2d at 184. Consequently,
legislative findings constitute a critical element in any assessment program imposed i
by local government.
It is also significant to note that in Church of Christ, the Supreme Court recognized ,
and declared that assessed properties may be specially benefited by a special J
( assessment program for services even when the assessment is imposed throughout
an entire community. The Supreme Court stated, "Although a special assessment is
typically imposed for a specific purpose designed to benefit a specific area or class
of property owners, this does not mean that the costs of services can never be levied
throughout a community as a whole." Church of Christ at 183. The Supreme Court
then amplified that
the validity of a special assessment turns on the benefits
� > r
received by the recipients of the services and the appropriate
apportionment of the cost thereof. This is true regardless of
Q.w
whether the recipients of the benefits are spread throughout an
' F entire community or are merely located in a limited, specified
area within the community. See, e.g. South Trail (special
assessment for fire services found to benefit all properties within
the district).
Id.
Notwithstanding this well established case law, on May 10, 1996, the Fifth District
f Court of Appeal rendered a decision in the case of Water Oak Management Corp. v•
Lake County, Florida, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D1128 (Fla. 5th DCA May 10, 1996), which
t
X ' invalidated the Lake County fire and rescue assessment on the grounds that such "
y ,
X , NABORS, GIBLIN&NICKERSON, P.A. 32 ;
a ,
1.-
<
A ,
A tf Y 1
r I
� r
t
' L^S
services did not provide special benefits to the assessed properties. The court did
uphold the County's solid waste assessments "in light of the Supreme Court of
Florida's recent decision in Sarasota County v. Sarasota Church of Christ Inc., 667
So.2d 180 (Fla. 1995)." Id. at D1128. Additionally, the court certified to the Supreme
Court the question of whether the funding by Lake County of solid waste disposal
and/or fire protection services by special assessments was valid under the Florida
Constitution.
Af The Fifth District Court attempted to distinguish the Water Oak Management Corp
case from the Supreme Court opinions in Polk County and South Trail. However, for
�., the Supreme Court to validate the distinctions made by the Fifth District Court, it
would have to reverse those two decisions as they upheld special assessments for ( `
fire and fire and rescue, respectively. While the Fifth District states that the Water
Oak Management Corp. case does not conflict with South Trail, the court never I !
f
expressly offers a distinction between the instant case and South Trail. This
oversight is significant because in South Trail, the Supreme Court upheld a special
assessment program which funded both fire and ambulance services. Further, while
the Fifth District recognized the benefits provided by fire protection enumerated in `.
the Polk County case, the court apparently concluded that they were insufficient to
uphold the special assessment program. Water Oak Management Corp., 21 Fla. L. `.
Weekly at D1130, n. 10.
The court in Water Oak Management Corp appeared to be concerned with the large
{ k' geographic area in which the fire and rescue assessment was imposed. The Fifth
District Court cited the Polk County case and suggested that a community-wide
special assessment program for fire and rescue services could not provide a special
t: benefit to property, but a special assessment for fire and rescue services imposed
only in a discrete geographic area may provide a special benefit. This position is
x completely contrary to the Supreme Court's opinion in Church of Christ. ,r
f The court in Water Oak Management Corp also appeared to be concerned that the
special assessments would "reduce costs of this service that would otherwise come
t from general revenue funded by ad valorem taxes." Water Oak Management Corp.,
F zr
21 Fla. L. Weekly at D1129. An acceptance by the Supreme Court of this reasoning
{ ! in Water Oak Management Corp. would require the Supreme Court to retreat from
language in Church of Christ, wherein the Court noted that services which were
previously funded by taxes and are now funded by special assessments are not
necessarily invalid. Church of Christ, 667 So.2d at 186.
While there is no guarantee of reversal, the likelihood of the Supreme Court "
reversing the Fifth District Court of Appeal's decision in Water Oak Management
{ Corp. is extremely high. If the Supreme Court does not reverse the Water Oak
Management Corp. decision, it will be required to reverse its Polk County and South "^
Trail decisions and to retreat from its recent decision in Church of Christ. 't
y NABORS, GIBLIN&NICKERSON, P.A. E
r , 33
V t{L d n l I r• 'fl b }r,::
g , r
y. r
A
a.
1
l
1._.._
Ct , .
1
r
i
I
FAIR AND REASONABLE
An improvement or service which specially
APPORTIONMENT benefits the assessed properties must also be
REQUIREMENT fairly and reasonably apportioned among the
properties that receive the special benefit." City
of Boca Raton v. State, 595 So.2d at 29. For
example, in South Trail, the Supreme Court
upheld an apportionment scheme which assessed business and commercial
property on an area basis while other property was assessed on a flat rate basis.
The Supreme Court held that the manner of the assessment's apportionment is
immaterial and may vary provided that the amount of the assessment for each
property does not exceed the proportional benefits it receives as compared to other "? 1
1properties,
1
However, improper apportionment will defeat a special assessment when a special
benefit is otherwise available. In St. Lucie County-Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention and II
Control Dist. v. Higgs, 141 So.2d 744 (Fla. 1962), the Supreme Court struck fire
assessments imposed against property where the method of apportionment was
based upon the ratio of the assessed value of each property to the total value of all
property in the district.
r In determining the reasonableness of the apportionment, the courts generally give =t
' deference to the legislative determination of a municipality. in Rosche v. City of
Hollywood, 55 So.2d 909, (Fla. 1952), the Supreme Court of Florida stated:
a The apportionment of assessments is a legislative function and if
reasonable men may differ as to whether land assessed was
y benefited by the local improvement the determination as to such
f ` benefits of the city officials must be sustained.
Id. at 913; see also Key Colony No. 1 Condominium Assoc. Inc v Village of Key "
Biscayne, 651 So.2d 779 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) and Church of Christ 667 So.2d 180
(Fla. 1995) (both courts recognized that the legislative determination as to the
apportionment of the cost of benefits should be upheld unless the determination is
arbitrary),
LEGAL In reliance on the above Florida case law analysis and on
SUFFICIENCY the decisions of the Supreme Court in the Polk County,
CONCLUSION South Trail and Church of Christ cases, it is our conclusion
that the fire rescue services described in this Assessment
Report projected to be provided by the City of Dania (the
"City") and the method of apportionment of the identified
assessable costs to provide such fire rescue services are consistent with the special
benefit and fair apportionment requirements for a valid special assessment. This
L
NABORS, G/BL/N 8 NICKERSON, P.A. 34
14
a
i 1
l '
,
4
t
r.
i
i
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
FRULE
TUTORY TIME The following section describes all of the steps required
ME AND HOME to use the Uniform Method of collecting the fire rescue
AUTHORIZATION assessment on the same bill as ad valorem taxes.
Following this section is a critical events schedule
identifying specific dates for all significant remaining events for the City to comply
with required statutory steps and those expected to be prescribed by the City's
proposed home rule ordinance authorizing the imposition of recurring annual fire
rescue assessments.
To use the tax bill collection process, a local government must follow the strict .
procedures provided in section 197.3632, Florida Statutes (the "Uniform Method"). A
local government must initiate the process almost a year before it intends to begin r'
using the Uniform Method to collect the assessments. The process begins with the
passage of a resolution of intent prior to January 1 or, if the property appraiser, tax
! collector, and local government agree, March 1. The adoption of a resolution of
intent does not obligate the local government to use the method or to impose a
lF special assessment, but it is a prerequisite to using the Uniform Method.
I i
! The local government must publish notice of its intent to consider a resolution to use
the Uniform Method weekly for four consecutive weeks prior to a public hearing on
" the matter. If the resolution is adopted, the governing board must send a copy of it to
' the property appraiser, the tax collector, and the Florida Department of Revenue by
,. January 10 or, if the property appraiser, tax collector, and local government agree, j
March 10. The City complied with this requirement by adopting Resolution No. 175- t
95 and timely notifying the Broward County Property Appraiser, the Broward County
Department of Finance and Administrative Services and the Florida Department of
Revenue.
A
Assuming the City decides to proceed, we will immediately cause the dissemination
of a draft home rule ordinance which will outline the procedural steps and
notifications required to impose a recurring annual fire rescue assessment. Upon !
adoption of the ordinance at a second reading, we will provide an initial assessment
resolution to be adopted by the City. Such initial assessment resolution will, among
other things, briefly describe the fire rescue assessment program, the method of
apportionment, set a public hearing date for final consideration, and direct and
authorize the mailed and published notifications to those property owners included
on an initial assessment roll.
Upon adoption of the initial assessment resolution, the City will have made the
tentative decision to move forward with the imposition of special assessments to fund
the fire rescue budget. Although the decision to move forward is not binding at this
point, the reality of statutory time frames for notification and certification, and the
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. & DAVID M. GRIFFITH, LTD. 36
i
i
if
i
i
f
i.
I
logistics of implementation leave the City few subsequent alternatives after the public
hearing but to go forward with the assessments or choose to fund the fire rescue
budget through the general fund.
i After adopting the necessary implementing documentation, the local government
must develop a computerized, non-ad valorem assessment roll which contains the
basis and rate of the assessment and electronically applies them to each parcel
subject to the assessment. The non-ad valorem assessment roll must utilize the
parcel identification number and property use code classifications maintained by the
property appraiser and be compatible with the ad valorem tax roll. A critical }
fj consideration in the implementation of an assessment rate is the verification of the
integrity of the property use data base utilized to develop the assessment rate E
3•= structure and ultimately, the development of the non-ad valorem assessment roll on
an annual basis.
The local government, not the property appraiser, must develop the non-ad valorem
assessment roll. County property appraisers are charged with the responsibility of
determining the value of all property within each county and maintaining certain i
jl records connected therewith, specifically the preparation of the ad valorem tax roll.
�xc t
The ad valorem tax roll is designed solely to provide the data required by property
appraisers to determine property values. Under section 197.3632, Florida Statutes, r
x property appraisers must annually provide certain information to local governments
° by June 1 to assist the local government in the preparation of special assessment
f^
i
rolls to be collected under the Uniform Method. The information must conform to that
{ contained on the ad valorem tax roll, but the property P p y appraiser need not submit
Ii information which is not on the ad valorem tax roll. If the local government
determines that the information supplied by the property appraiser is insufficient to
develop its non-ad valorem assessment roll, the local government must obtain
,f information from other sources. Obviously, the degree of cooperation received from t
the office of the property appraiser in including, updating and consistentlyf`�'.
maintaining data relevant to property uses will have a direct effect on the quality and
,F efficiency of the special assessment or non-ad valorem roll.
Accordingly, successful special assessment programs are those programs designed
t to employ to the maximum extent possible, the information maintained by the
property appraiser on the ad valorem tax roll. In addition, a special assessment
program should be designed to maximize the local government's ability to
electronically maintain the data base on an annual basis, which in turn minimizes the
amount of manual manipulation to the special assessment roll.
Statutory requirements provide that a service assessment roll must be adopted at a public hearing between June 1 and September 15 so the tax collector can merge it
I with the ad valorem tax roll and mail a single bill for the combined collection of
n. assessments and ad valorem taxes. At least 20 days prior to the public hearing, a
` I local government must publish notice of the hearing in a newspaper of general
Y� �5
ri GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAVID M. GRIFFITH, LTD. 37 ^• �C �i�a,�n,47� '
c
dlrz
t
!! rt ilk
�J
1 '
.1
'r
circulation within the government's boundaries and by individual first class United
i States mail to the owners of property subject to the assessment.
1 ' Although the Broward County Property Appraiser has in the past used the truth in
j millage notification process to notify affected property owners of non-ad valorem
assessments, there is no statutory authorization for such a procedure. In any event,
the time frame required by the Broward County Property Appraiser to include such
,1 notification does not allow adequate time for consideration and implementation of the
„} fire rescue assessment program by the City. Notice to all affected owners will be '
` accomplished by first class mail in conformance with the Uniform Method.
{ After the scheduled public hearing, the City will adopt a final assessment resolution 4
which, among other things, will confirm the initial assessment resolution, articulate
the rate of assessments, approve the assessment roll, and direct and authorize the
,,; ,, T method of collection. i
y: Once the final assessment resolution is adopted and the roll certified on September
` 15 to the tax collector to be collected along with ad valorem taxes, any minor
modifications, corrections or errors must be made in accordance with the procedure
applicable to the correction of errors on the tax roll, upon written direction from the ;
�ryy4 a City to the tax collector.
i
Collection of the special assessments and ad valorem taxes begins in November. tj bp
` r Failure to pay the assessments and taxes result in the issuance of a tax certificate ' `
x r and may result in the sale of a tax deed.
If the special assessment will be collected for a period of more than one year or is to & '
be amortized over a number of years, the local government must so specify in the
published and mailed notices and is not required to annually adopt the assessment r
f roll. However, for assessments whose rates vary among different types of property, fi
r ., the property owners must be notified annually if their assessment increases beyond ,
the noticed amount for the prior year. Essentially, the local government is faced with v
x z; annually adopting an assessment roll. Experience has taught us that annual
notification of all property owners is the most efficient and effective approach to deal
with renotification required by property use or classification changes and the
r procedural ordinance being developed to authorize imposition will provide for annual
` renotification.
� t
i f
i
' •I}tt4x�t4�"15a4�i '� �frypp✓4'
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAVID M. GRIFFITH LTD. 38
r
r•
�' a ifl and iydRr
' l " ` r vrfwr°Sx 1�yt
t !
t
yx'�`v
i
a . r
i
t .
i
1 i ,
, J
II
= I
CRITICAL EVENTS The following provides information related to the remaining
;,, •" ' ! SCHEDULE critical events schedule: 4
Event Date
Property Appraiser provides assessment
information June 1, 1996
Workshop with City Commission June 18, 1996
Draft Ordinance authorizing non-ad valorem
Y=; assessments June 19, 1996y
r
t Comments from City staff re: Ordinance a
authorizing non-ad valorem assessments June 20, 1996
wr=' First reading of Ordinance authorizing non-ad
valorem assessments June 25, 1996
q Agreement with Property Appraiser and s r u
as Department of Finance and Administrative
8 Services June 25, 1996
Draft Initial Assessment Resolution June 25, 1996
d
Draft First Class Notice package June 25 1996 �
h, ',. r City advertises Ordinance authorizing ,Pk'R„
non-ad valorem assessments _
June 28, 1996
-Z ;
�4 Development of Preliminary Assessment Roll July 2, 1996
L > 4
` Calculate Final Assessment Rates July 2 k r +1996
r+ t
et Ir r Second reading of Ordinance authorizing
1 � t
r''x* non-ad valorem assessments July 9, 1996
rF� City Commission adopts Initial Assessment
G
Resolution July 9 1996 ��^�"r �
Print and stuff First Class Notices July 10 - 22, 1996
c '
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. 8 DAVID M. GRIFFITH, LTD. 39 ;
i {>
71,TV
77
r
i
x
rNyy � zsa r M
l
i
f
I
L.
,
�L
1
, 1
i, Event Date
Publish Notice of Public Hearing to adopt
' 1 j Final Assessment Resolution By July 23, 1996
r
Mail First Class Notices to affected '
property owners By July 23, 1996
Draft Final Assessment Resolution August 6, 1996
Public Hearing to adopt Final Assessment
' s Resolution August 13, 1996 1 <
Test tape of Non-Ad Valorem Assessment ;,
Roll to Broward County Department of
g �1 Finance and Administrative Services September 1, 1996a
-
v
City certifies Non-Ad Valorem Assessment rl
Roll to Broward County Department
h - of Finance and Administrative Services By September 15, 1996
r+
� t YiVS
)�L '•
tiJ� �JI A
,v
r
ayro
xr
uy >
r
I'
L'
a ,
�`.
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS GROUP, L.C. &DAVID M. GRIFFITH, LTD. 40
Y.
i� pp1
f
1
sir T
I
w '
- r
V", r -
i IN
t I h
1 f
1
\a
i �
I r
4
"' Y It •� 1
) ll'
DETAILED EXPLANATION
Y i
is
OF FASTR *G
k
�t
...... '#' This sectior, of the report is provided as a detailed, step-
by-step explanation on how to read, analyze and
understand the FASTR computer printouts in connection ` f,r
with a DMG Service Cost Evaluation. The FASTR
p+k
documentation is the end product of DMG's fee analysis
for a particular department/division or set of
departments/divisions. DMG has found that the most
X " beneficial way to explain FASTR is to pick a particular fee< rt
;{ and follow its progression through the FASTR "
documentation. w . ,•
s is l
l �f HJ '•' I
=h 1r tVa
Introduction
na+
FASTR basically consists of 3 interconnected spreadsheets. Each spreadsheet
is utilized to capture different types of data as they relate to individual fees.
i, y rka3 The first spreadsheet (in a printed format, each individual "spreadsheet" will
e Y is
consist of numerous pages) is the "Direct Labor Cost Analysis."
This
spreadsheet is where all of the time and personnel data is captured as it relates
to the fee areas included in a study. This spreadsheet will always begin on r/f
Page 1 within the FASTR documentation. Its length in printed form (number of
w;i�{ �•t` ;ti, 4 pages) will be determined according to the number of fee areas to be reviewed. ;
i( The fallowing 3 pages contain an example of the "Direct Labor Cost Analysis."1�� ulyC3� iqt rN, '
.l"^4 F � � tpr�k�'i+y P{�si+3•e'ii+.;�
DAM M. OR7FFIIH b ASSOC4iTFS,LTD.—SERVICE COS('EVALUA270N
p,�a
'I
f
PK
IVJ✓•"�.'li°�y}N.A('t'Yt(�i ( ...:+K` ,.._.r. .� _ _ y t ". ' � {t5 '.f 4 9�{��t°f�{1, � A .
ryl, ~ ap'1,1ly 11�� f, r .. _ ..• P Y r Y� �hY�'Y^1 �� r44
•.• no-".i. . ._ ... .. ,• �1.,. ._...r ,.
t t
v
i
t
t
r �
1 � r
i
Detailed Explanation of FAM—Page 2
v i Ip 11 000Qoo - po 000a 000po0 eopeoo OooOoo oocQoo i{ oo p o 0 00 0 00 o po� � W o 00 0 00 0 00 0 0o p o0
�� _ o•o o Oo o po 0 oc o 00 0 00 o co
a � s
�/ ' + l{ 'i 6 opCQ00 Op OOc00 C00000 nPnOOP C000000 OOOOca J
t t O O 00 999 O 00 JO O 00 O OO 1
O 00 p p0 O <O O 00
W N Z
n yM� �Ow Y
S Y
00 O 00 Op O O O O O O O p p p O p O O O O O O O O O n O O O n O n p O O n J y
+ o pc o 00 o a'o 0 09
0o o cc o 00 o oc
P p
W: a
r1.
v �i J opooep oeopoo cogs" nP,1O OP 000.Ce oopoeo z o g a oo p co O oo N p
oc o 00 0 �o 0 oc p
n s r -
_ F�
{ ,1j 3 o0op00 coo 000 O.00 OOC gg•O Ou hNn OON OO O coOOn
t ax 4r� - a zu o 0o c ac oNao N pn�a n a o
1 1 �3 y - O 00 O 00 n �-O N n0 O JO O f
5 rr5},�1'(1° QOoaOO oOcc00 c=oo oOn on o0� NooOn popeoo
_a � .
O O C Y}.ryi
0 0o
v W coop
p o0 oeoo Go cacOee aJrv00� r.Noo oN
..a G oc c oo nx-a e O o
a No o cc
v 1
S .•: J � C O C C O O '..] O c C C O C c?O O O p0 C O O 00 O 00 00 O O NO P^o p P �a N f y i
Ll i �1' _ O 00 C _ O 00 O 00 y rv0
x tL.,. $ a=u p cG c cp 0 oc o po p
(n«}4` = Q000ce �oQQoc 000Qoo 000Qoo o e co po oo opc000c
o c o c o c o a,f n f�a • o -o a co c oc o oe c oc
��`�'}�x �'i'� �,: o °•o 0000 o�000c GJ�pov eGeo-_ oe000c caeeGe t .o, �`'+a >+�;
'ik1 < 060c p c 'o cc
o o..
i�",�na'gA TEA ». .'�.. c » = F " _ • = " _ » yi��.,✓' ' r r��-S
}ta fu+" "na°'i� 1 � ��v° o� � . �� \g . �- :� � ..0 512 : w y � e :.." t..i• t fl ,:
,af
0-2
a . i a a :e w . a s v•• � •• t ,
�o
a Ot
o._ : ° ` ` - {°. i`
y... t4k�1 =osadG - o- O �_ S-t o _
k�r a'.� N 1 �' F ry1„3 =oeac0 soeiPO =o-iao sc-ue`_o
M � ft 4 ! eecvn oconr. 90.10 ro ery a
rY�Mt�t `�` �� I i ". a `:vo�•O o oP o p o"ona pe olIo 4 v c e
t nTfi w i o ory ^.o.o"� NOJ Non o oo rvN
o
On o e.N.otiN Nw h
Ott x�a ,�.x Sf tl r:no ocn^ Wove- v^ti_ oa�vn� WOpo N.:� 1 •S,ia v�tr� .v
y t1.,tM�t +, ? 2 -o .-v e ..a ��•.:"�N � !)'1 fl ir9 L>L�
t v
4y�9 .`��ip�(�ai4�.
?i FL SaaY W <NSnO.»U `N'N S,O.NU o C O
O i
� 010 OW7lM . O . O I` . O Y.O�� . O h'L Y�`YI}R.1
<xs »u mNx »u mNC » u »N_ »u +�ytyy�dl aYfxr
t y DAVMACITHM&ASSOCIATES�LTD. —SERVICE COSI'EVALUATIO,v;
� L
"ry'k Y
'�ajaQ�Kvyl
ip 3' "• �5'8 :4
rya}".yS'l�yT'�7�rS3x�S�i�}�y��i� 1i
�� t rJ(��t�4LIIjT� x n � -____.- -' �...: ����� y t � t i� ka t+''F�'�`#.«'a S:v 4�,�5��tif`•
{5i: f r�T F,2 I t, 3 xa w7 u t
t
t P
t is j r'
i -
'+
t U:
r
t
r
I^,
I '
1 i Detailed Fxplanation of FASTR — Page 3
cc
' Qoo�Co oa0000 000000 oo oep oa po oaoo ea n.o�o ao
o cc ? oo a oa a ?? ? oo n na
1 W
oO o 0. O 00 O Co o PO
7 i t tit a° oo oa aooG 000po o0 00000o eoeeoo e00000 Oee.00
0 0o O Oa a o0 o co
00 o 00 e o e a co c ee `r _ y.
t W> N
C O O O O O 00 O OO o 0 C d A O O p A OO O O O O O 00.900 N J e O O J S'
O 00 C O O J n O O C O O O O N .0
O O p C O O O C O cc O cc O .0
�f
0 o eaaooa coavae eOeoco 00000 aoeaoo A-Noo-
t WtUi i rc o c c p o e c
oa c
r I W o00000 cc�9oo oeeceo oeoeeo 0000Oe Noecao
o c a e o c
l 'zr o 00 o ee o eo 0 op o co arc_ -„tfxvv2 r '
r •1 � YWi� N C �. Frc :J'.
t 1
f Y Irt ¢ oOO V OO cC a
S J r e op c cce'• eaoceo ea oeoa 000 Oae nN-on � (
s i t✓ G co c ao e Cog Roo oo c--a - �}.�'•1 I-'
t 4,, •N c o _ c e e o c o o e o 1: C;
o e o C O G a o p a o G A tie
L r _ � s Ne -e _ _ g9ac ocg _oe eG�000 ee000e A-_c_C
-
c a . o cc o co arc_
i4 r a= •O � � a _ c
1 � ^ o
tt r s Nrv0 ary = COj cC aCOOvO OOOOCC •� 0.c
c c co PIJ�O -jM _p
9 sPF •, = p <G o 0o rR {gNt
a aC C CO O 00 O 00 N Jv U�ry ytfl 1 F;
I li
�'ht >rl � z..ri _ 0000aG ecoaoo cceoac oeaoGG aooe eo ee-cCa
N o oe o `cc o oc a ao o ao o ao {r Ji
r'-
v ��naas O o0 o Oo 0 oa o Go o eo dH�
�u
yta9y V - C ooe coC cC oC __ t
k�^` -c
__ a
aacaac coaveo t
T[f] t"' ` .Y �� < a c a -c o c o c o a c c a
• q t Y � •
Af,
f�'♦♦♦�P ���t ' Y 2 ICY y
V �� �11 V w � w _ •"M _ .'M\ _ .r N \ _ n _ 5'.., 1'i i tj..
Yi �] jj •' ww_ \� w r \ NrN �� wr•. `� xrw � � wrN � ry A r
09 Z r�, r Far +nti.11
Oa CU ) Y •.
r t e.t w •• w_ = i p= ° p_ : o
V • C 6 w V w . w 6 \ r _ Y L M V w w .:
Pde � t'i ti oa ° O ` - � - `o ` .. � : ` a` . i � io ` . = " " . = � � `o ` e
I t ; - Lc o'G=sLc =o_iLo
Mrc °
t rr,
\4r bi`llrr{l' I f` a OOOOa NO COON\ NOe On OCOCJ OOOPO O00
X�SJ l JI 1i \ NOOJ MOVONO w0 ONN O OCq OWOO� 6�00�0. t ji?' Gtl r G'J �On d OOPOn NO
j 1 NOO�Or •� Co.GO A On O NOP OOV ••n t+!'„ i rJ y r G a n
�1KS{{J t4� 1(• �r1 r t V � ti rOn W_„JP, yoJ NP P.. ^ONON O_va J.N.
u
r�[ ��1lw�f��g•,,by 4C " a iE= wNN s� Z
: ::, ^_ems }:1
cx=`.nu° iN sa i o . o .. u� • a Na �` � o �c ` Uo� - o • KJ tt /t^0.0.tit�.��ryf,x
NV WM= NU 7N= NU LN= NU NM= N DAVID.NLGWFIIH&AZOCIATFS,LTD.—SERVICECOSCEVALUATiON
�f ii i.xn
Id=
i
F
ui'rc� 2v�b'�
>> r a t -
a
3 P rl k t ti 3"k".{ yyy
�'��a�1•iy`� �td i'� 7 r - '�•. t �v ;�1r ^1i"'t vy}�l�`a'� y�y
t ti .r,F to:'._:
+:. „ ..
t 3
,
,i
i
i �
/H
II N
Detailed Explanation of FAM—Page 4
I` o^NCO-
nONOnN
n WSW
} ! W o 0 0 a c S
n o �c� •O
`•i c
•. O O O O O O N-O O O- P O O^O O O p H
R 11�' ^a_ o 0o a >o nd •o '
Wc'
,
{' ' I = 000aoc .N. -ion •rcac-.P �i.3�'
r bb3
r"
h7 .c c0 o. 0
3 y:
=` s
^'� ��; fl Q og c000 _ccN nano nn i'rF 1 , .
a o :m:!
,
00 0
t p 11
fl � ^_ a-
c c
r
t F{ IN
yka
a ++✓a�C ' 3 rr+ r - ..o r r ° c _ o � +N �o 0 4 r`. ^r 4R' i
•.
5 0- o - ' O 0 t V- V� •.r � '�• i..i'
t r
,y 1}. Y *L 1 � O OP • O�C C_ CO^OVP �II r i � J
r�."[•e rlf'�')41 � � , � -• =riven - Qj eae^^ �j,, � ry :
t r{, y�.•i t ,t tiZ
a �w r� lR r`a"'t+ . o - �`- W- c �� . e� c` �r `, •flF �' , ',�.
DAVM A GMF9H&ASSOCLATE_ LTD. —SERVICE COST EVALUATION
UATION
M,r
ti�,y Yk4
yy4; g}a
R
_,�v�
_.------------
5 3
v
r
I
Detailed Explanation o/FASTR— Page 6
"Dir + Prorated $/Unit." In the case of "FEE #1," the 0's indicate that the
Administration personnel do not spend any time that can be directly attributable
to the Exam Processing fee. We now direct the reader down the "FEE 1 "
column to the "Secretary" row. Here a "0.750" figure appears in the
"Hours/Unit" row. This refers to the fact that a DMG consultant has
±! determined (through the on-site interview process) that an individual Exam will
require 45 minutes of the Secretary's time to process.
I' -
Continuing down this fee area column (to Pages 2 & 3) reveals that no other
' personnel performed any work that can be directly attributable to the Exam
E I Processing fee. The 45 minutes of the Secretary's time referred to in this
column is where the focus of staff's review of this document should be directed
r for each individual fee area. Upon further consideration by staff (the Secretary), `
r.
f is 45 minutes enough time to complete this task? Is it too much? Did the I
consultant key this data in, incorrectly? Maybe the correct figure should have i
{ been 7.5 hours or .075 hours.
} 1 f
Please also note that multiple categories of personnel could have time recorded
r to a single fee area. An example of this occurs in connection with "Fee n5
Comm, New - Struct". If you follow down the column directly under this fee t iti
area, you will see "3.000" hours recorded in the row for "Admin/Plan Review", !
` I "2.108" hours recorded in the row for "Bldg/Zoning Tech", "0.167" hours r '
r
recorded in the row for the second "Bldg/Zoning Tech", "9.250" hours recorded
} in the row for "Structural Inspectors" (Page 2), and "0.333" hours recorded for
the "Intake Unit" (Page 3
At the bottom of this column (for "Fee 45 Comm, New - Struct" (on Page 3)),
„'fitt the "Unit Demand" row, reveals that 87.0 Commercial, Structural permits for ,
New construction were issued or were expected to be issued over the course
! a of a full year. Up to this point in the explanation, the reader can now determine
that this building division issues 87 New Construction Commercial Structural "4F
' permits each year and that each one requires 3 hours of the Admin/Plan Review '
staff's time; 2.108 hours of the first Building/Zoning Technician's time; 0.167
�'I hours of the second Building/Zoning Technician's time; 9.25 hours of the
Structural Inspection staff's time; and, 0.333 hours of the Intake Unit staff's
time. The FASTR software utilizes this information to create a percentage w
' allocation basis to spread all of the benefits and operating expenses. The
software uses the combination of the number of units and the time for each fee
area, times the salary expense, to create a percentage of the total available
salary dollars.
' s In the case of the Exam Processing fee, this combination is, 108 units x 45
44. minutes x $8.57 (the Secretary "Cost/Hr V, the last.row located in the "box"
♦. t'i1 '!}''fl f e
D.tVJD SL GNFFIIH dASSOCLITcS LID.—SERVICE COSTEVALG770N
-
� 1 s�ljy p •'F �.. I.T i4' S 1`� i
y I
A sJ"2 rn f. fsiw`I�^may:
�tg u M1
;r,
r fl�R #, ohs rtY wJr'"i�'1�y,
, I
m
�
• a�a��M�ay _..,�a s _, +:,._.:,.-,.. r ..,,,. . . F u r,�cJa L~µaK���
''rrFFqq J ,
f
i
f
1
rt 1"
. 1 i
ii
I
Detailed Explanation of FASTR—Page 8
! 1I K P ^ d v AnO�� NONn , N O N J O . O AO , A n '
N n u J d n , ^ ^ O , O ^ � P P J,•
1 � N n „ � •o 0 0 0 o n r a ,e,
rv— a s r cN � ti n e r
o
J _ J
� i n n O �O.'.+��•O O N O n . d O O v O
nc.
W i N k.
�`- r
w
s � r S� >t�4f�7�•
1 M �J! J o • x _
l 1 « }:1 ? O n ^ 1 N C h O n N N.On
1 •4 + 1 1 n �� u O � !Yi�� �
I,V •'' ` N P N A „a, ^u , N d • • Y(x^ t Y� }}r•.
V} j-Y •� Stl P N n ^NJd JN��/Oi�l � O L a O n ^ O^ � P N < "r`'{~ / :
1 L y ` vY✓ �+.
4 - o
1 >1 i c Gi«Y4
15�� 1 v`� ; o � ,^� � _n�an P9 • n n � — •• nP . N _ �xp 1
E ,) `
i
Y11 P u J nJ'a PN�O/Oir ONTO C O .Pi CII NN . �• P 2p Y�.4� (.: � i Y U V A ^ G N Pn� C � O_ .P.
a �f
y �
_
+ N c c � N r
� �+ 't •._ ^ N P ov aNti oNN Jo . N x. JI 'taj
} tJ '� '3.p. o
`✓+ ;nJ y � d� i n o o ra co^ao^—oaoNJ PP 7 ti:"
c
T `ltP �� n y O NPryP NP n> . O � 1
� 1 n tl N O.O�• N , ^J . N
f i l�l
f nr (r�'f o� "v il� $ .. � �-zi:.,"c�nn s,uW � � • c g�i'< L ,111 vi y}v .
{�� tl' q{g���y{�I•�45yeY� u N _ u F i i u u o o�a Z i i i < a � �u u�� .u. : ;•l's+Y ii S rt+FT n�•c
DAVID AL CRffF1771&ASSOCLITES+LTD.—SERVICE COSC EVALUMION
i
F
y 4 ° J , •,
+A A ._.. ..-•1_. A� !1� + ✓ xf v cj`+�kte'(!<r5 1Sµ sy�
i
I
i
11
. t i
i,
Detailed Explanation of FASTR — Page 9
j; The far left column contains numerous row headers beginning with "Grand
Total" and ending with "Grand Totals." The "Grand Total" figure at the top of
the column is the sum of all the data (expenditures) presented in that column,
while the bottom "Grand Totals" is the sum of all of the individual fee area
�1 columns that appear to the right (beginning with $1,483, to include the column
! totals for all fee areas included in the study). These 2 sums serve as a cross
reference to assure that all costs have been allocated.
tl The second row header "Salary S Wages" is the sum of al! salaries as
tY
If
previously presented in the "Direct Labor Cost Analysis" spreadsheet. (This
number, $876,168, has been carried over from the previous "Direct Labor Cost k
yjt �j Analysis spreadsheet.) The rest of these row headers are self explanatory and ,. .
w" correlate to line items in the departmental budget. These line items are
distributed to each fee area based on the percentages presented in the 3rd row,
entitled "Distribution %." (Please note the .079% figure located under the "FEE
#1 Exam Processing column header. The derivation of this percentage was °a
<: discussed on the previous page of this section.) '
{ It is within this spreadsheet that the costs in connection with the General & rw, f
Administrative time, also previously discussed, are spread. These percentages
r, I are detailed in the "G&A Distribution %" row which are than used as the basis '
+ ' to spread all previously identified G&A salary expenses. Overhead, ' xWr
I administrative and other central service indirect expenses are spread on the 7�
t Ii rows below the "G&A Distribution" header. All of these percentages are "{ I
F �I slightly higher than the "Distribution %" figures referenced earlier, as 100% of Y
the expense within the "General & Admin" column has now been allocated to
these fee areas. This "shift" in costs results in an increase to each distribution N.
i Fn,�v
percentage. ( The one "Agency Admin" sub-header entitled "Intake Admin" hasXr
an to the left of it. This simply notes that this line item was manually #"
allocated directly to specific fee areas. Note that no costs were allocated to r" 's
' Fee #1 . � ;+
{'y The final set of spreadsheets is the "Detailed Revenue/Cost Comparison." The
following page contains an example of the single page that relates to the "Fee
#5 Comm, New- Struct" permit previously discussed. (Each individual page in
this section contains the detail for one fee area.) It is at this stage of the
FASTR process, that a comparison with the current fee is presented, both in a
narrative and a graphic format.
DAVm AL GALFFrrH&ASSOcLATE� LTD.-SERVICE COST EVAL L1TiON
tl A.
3
',i� kk YYL�2� t•���
nl t4u�5J• b�h
w
t"�1
M 1 Rlk 41 •S,y 7'�'�
{ ll
•r
a
., -• rl
f S%
}
I,
Detailed Explanation ofFASTR —Page 10
I� r I
� { u
Ic
I;
1
" d 5 Eyy I o
rr � w ' o n n ! b Z✓„� '
\ O g '" • i I a uJ : I
noon
n � _ n
�'d IJ3Y\R� � I O • ! rl
r +
Tin r� �9li f �r ! r a � •• � � lx+.
}',IJ
riv§r^ ttSu°yr n ' � � :. .`. � � �u°O � ! 1. a / M�; .•.
1},yt�� ' 11 — • O : O y O V O S 1 C41 A
d��i 'd 'r� yn 1 flu � S u : u �r�.u •li n°�c \ r'cAL�r
zt1
r lr,( 3+4r i5: " u o. o o u a
DAVIDALGRIMMC•ASSOCLATE-,LTD.—SERVICECOSTEVALVA77ON
"J4
t �
"-3' yY r '_ m 1(\ � r' > R "^3 r•X Lzk3�+Sjk
��qq,,eif"� d�lr � .. �.-.:_.�� —._.,'"� ' -- �.y+ W C' r •"vn: Y � � .TR�'�++7y i*ii�{�{''jj fKI�J FIA•l:` 1 C � ... - _._ .-_•_•-•. �l..v 11�.Y -• � ,}Y i �y.�YXd V}571'F'���yy �allss�1414,,��Ijj'�S�\.+. 1 r 'y y♦ Y}..t �r r<a p\:j'..
r
4 ,
c[•1 y 1
3
I
+ail. , ��.Rs� ti l lL .. ✓
7
I
• �' Detailed Explanation of F,9STR— Page 11
AdBitional information specific to this fee area ("Comm, New - Struct") is also
presented within this spreadsheet. The "Full Cost/Unit" figure of $524.91
j provides the reader with the total cost of providing inspection services for this
ji permit. This cost includes the direct salary expense plus benefits expense, line
l item operating expenses as well as G&A, administrative and indirect expense.
A breakdown of these various expenses is presented both at the individual
Unit and aggregate "total" levels. As was stressed earlier, this full cost per
unit fee consists of a variety of expenses; however, the primary variable that
influences its outcome is the total labor time previously identified in connection
with this permit in the "Direct Labor Cost Analysis" spreadsheet.
DMG has provided this more detailed explanation of the FASTR printouts based #k I
on the fact that in any Service Cost Evaluation, this set of documents is where
3s o the primary review should be conducted by departmental/divisional sta". As
previously discussed, the "Detailed Labor Cost Analysis" spreadsheets contain
" all of the information derived from interviews with staff as to the amount of
i time that is required to conduct a variety of tasks. There are numerous factors A j
in the gathering t{,
9 of this information that could have caused the wrong data to
be captured. It could also be the case, that after further review and �c r
\ " dl.���Cft
consideration by staff, they may feel that some of the time per task informations
should be modified. This analysis and resulting modifications, if necessary,
y t: should take place at the "draft" stage of the project presentation. This is the „, {
fi
rationale for first releasing a a "
"draft" of the study prior to the release of a "final"
s � copy.
,cT 4�t
�F p25
L
i
1
4 P ,
DAVID.1r.c?JFFrrH&AZOcuTES�LTD. —SERVICE COST iV' Ltarox '`,�•,.�r ,• +„ �
A 1Lrt
R '.
y� s
` ,s
'4jpyld is �' � • .._.._ \4 � :I .
Y •N N
i
I
. 1
�i
i
I
I
i
I '
1 , I
� i
a
i a �
Ij U
m
m
i e
I �
H
W
W e a
N
4
o0000o p000 000 0 000 000 oo .♦ 000 N o000 00 .ao .lo .y .♦ p
`�f. Nm O O Nm O O O N Nm ry N 1
O O O 0 O O O O O O O
/ M1p '� mR O O D O O O O O O Pm N mp p N O O O N Nm N N 9 1
S Mil W ,Lj P m L r }two- j ,
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 o m o 00 0 m o .a o 0 0 N
{5 r' � o 00 0 0 0 00 0 oNop Nm o0
m b O r N N N ry U Y
E m N m N m o m m b b m Or Or m p\ U {t,T S f Ig
7' � �� � �♦ N P P V P N P rl m m m t p�•l')Y�� 1� 1 I
ro ! 1 w � .♦ .v n m r r 40�1ai"�h( .rfyt i,4�
0 oD000O ooa o 0o ry ticoo .ri 0000p o 0 000 00 ,riDo o .rio 'w y�l/� �
o
0 0
7 d s k2 r ` t'
� 41 ❑C N P '�. 'f 41 b
O N O O O O p O O O O 00 O O O M O O O '1 O O O O O
pqp M O O O O 00 N r O N p O O O O ry rl ry .♦ / �l }x It }f
o 0 0
� 7
5 h�
A
t w m 0000DD o0000000 o Poo ooP o0000 0 000p000
0
O O P000 PP ' tx b it
o 0 0o
d O O O O O O N O O O O O O O P p �I ✓�
M U N 3 O O O O O O M r O O O O O O O ri N N M1'G U E •N fN
5 I C o 0 0 00 p o 0 o O Om o o o N o 00 O fl o O o o D o OO O O o 0 o rl o o O ri O i 1111T
` i• m p O O O O O O % O R L q m O O O O O M M ri ,3 y'JVO. �ly
m q > t tr 5x $
� '[.i i [mu a K 4cF x�•k .
ti4
7 /ail /
oI o 00 0 � o 0 00 o N .4 0 o a p o 0 0 0 0 00 0 o o o D oo oo 0 o m
R � � o bOo b o b oo b D o op m .i n m ii`�•�^ �
p! G Q m m m .♦ m c a c ti a o 1 . o 0 .1 0 0 .� m m m N ,. Y Y♦ N
'��•y� C) W r ti n ti m N m N % YI I(1 % u I F' �!'r4� 1 `
V'�1 Irl ri N M r-I .♦
a t It
m
J f" �4 �3i.. O G m U m g C N U m C 'O Y m m C 9 N m m G 'O U v♦ C E m 0 0
'J G N U g L N u b C N u q qU U 0
u E m O U u
E w E m o v u E m O u m 0 0 U E m O Y a T1 u w w r j i' A 7x YI r
N N U U L N W U Y U N W U Y U N N U U N ryryC O q ♦ { .}I 6
(OJ q 0 '0 M G U Q O 'O H C U q O 'O M C U q O 9 N k U Q 0 Rf N
I J .4 \ Y ® UYH \ U ® UU UH \ U ® UUM \ U ® LUH \ U % UUH Uq UwgQ �r� l NArJt r,.11
m U m N N
bF H y N H N M y H H H N W M H H N N M N N H y N H H ♦ N L N N g q 1 I
5 1 I F; O ti 0 H N '.a O n C O O H o H O O O N G N 0 0 0 H D N D O O H
O 0 N H O O N NH 0 o N M
p U PS+ '_ T g S w w q T g 2 w w Q S Q T w w 0 S O S w w q S g S w w p ❑ g q Q F F {�.[ f k 7 Ctf�i '
5 �i�� ^va 000mN o00o r % 000rm 0000No 0000mb m000lnn "'� 1x��i��u' sy� ,
C • mom Pp F^f k. "/
.47��1(5l rl�� �, T 'u O r m m 1.1 O P U 'I m P % "I O m m � •1 m �i N N
fY N N nl . 10 N r1 m 1'I •♦ m m r'1 ~ r P r1 N ~ m r �f t1l }•Y k
I Yp� /1 Jti Yt(�1J`•}, 'O �p m r .1 N m '1 11 l 1All 'S YIN
fd7 ��{'�,rr 1v47 7 E V Y {'r 1�w^rv�„yl�
'} "�I,m�iC,�` L M q 'O N •O N U U U q -llll 'S
b m y „ 'N N S H q 'N T H N H •1 T N L .1 S M M µ J
� b m\ >. M u >.S V •♦ u >.T U S % .+ S .H u S >.S m 0 q � S � u a :
j C m .i .•� u q q u H u q N u N u q q u v u q q u q q u q .N > ® q q U y 5. •2q m.♦ om WE •rpt r S F m U% Uy r.^Jr Tm FU N Um wH x:] SN U HN N N
M O m N O ' O g4 ON 0 Om Q N 0 mF / UwU el
1'
S
A! C
Jt P i Pr'
l f k`i ae,.��rvt 1 - Tt. - r -r "��, r{ YR2�da � •!"b _%
1 � t LI 's11vY 9 � ec i x 1 ♦^r t f 4 1 I
fr,�}�.i'�� � � Y __�'e q�Y1 ` —rH. _ � �`•, 5 r x"+^`7�31�'�` *m �•�43Ye a ai
f
ry v
+ h
r.l.
I �
i
I ' m
m
w
-+1
ti
W �
u
W
W
t
i
® YF Y
O N 1111111 IX m o " 1
.0
x i O
\ Yn "5 N vl , � Nxxeo � P 11111111 m � m us��w�� + : I:
C I IX vIXIX U ry ffl+frn � ;
y
Ip er I '1 O n o is
I
sr i
III I
i y N O N m O O, m VI
y}T}Y{ 1 N � fn 1 In � a p CC •�R , t, c
y �• w > o m .>k �
444 N
> v>>
0 0 u 1 fYq
0 N D W IX IX l a
u
it
a
r�� f��� yvitl � to ti IS �Y � �lI 4�jg
r o c
iiy�,Y�J19fly IY f { o ❑ .m+ m N v. ry !+ !�'�I e S f v
✓ 'f'yt !r' E N N N t II
Ps 1'�Ixk e ( £ a
'fG ,e ry k�i.f f
I 3 i yr b
m
„ .ri�'Y3, `y�' ?Y+ v .. v ❑ u mom
❑ 0 m u
m m L C U U 4N U y 'x-
m�
.t IX I(1 nl 4y1 MJ
yi rl 0 w U (L ❑ ❑ U O H 14 6
5..Jqr
r2,.
R
+
--- -- ;�? 4�. .
`$.K t.. . w ��I
T �
ti
,.t
J I
j { a
f!
N
pit
y ",� �`. � •n � � � N N o tft Y r J
0 0 u°
rr } v c vva ® kY '
o
! o
{ .0 p
ti- u u w N P m m N N r
41
, N u C , .1 yw✓r '��uu
X.3
t f y ; ; m m',•?µnf I
0
crti
> s r
N � j'Skj.h: O
tfu � It,: Aa',e t 'R�roY
�Zy4 5 yl�, It; .i N a o 6 �1 /r•'`,
M J lA o
..
(A
1,1
� F�r° , ' i p � r4 ,31 1 r Rr•
aI
. d+A�i I iG ti y �Po� '0 a u ' C nj v si h je'Agy .9
R c .� m
I P� nays 0 4 u m c u � m fix•! r�" a
uri
�acw 1Ja u a c o m \°SC
Y �,
fVut3� (I
0 00
m t, tt f
L
a N .. 'i +•
O V O
'
fit#gun 1 w
1 r
I( { t
fY `.t..yrn r.'^•_ •r{ �"i'::.:a �t P... •}`ti f+�Y.N'M%�
i
r' d
Ali
vt
Il
4'f 1 i m
w
r C
i
is
r 1i
YJ {i N r0 m > O
1 a m N N (•1 rp �
i g N N N N rl f
r o ry
� IL > x ITfi
xr0 � O � I1111 .Y
U ry K e y j
rh
I
c w > > o
u O W m 4xFY
I
5r 0. ::mar m m
h
I y�}
LLL p ii ..1 W w pr h {A
•,v!1 C C�y}r"!!I .°1i °i w v v v > Y, r{4an.
U U U
Ji4i47 r=� nY�, � u r a>i r v yy m o m f1} iy
as .y
Q 'Z rr h r
n x r ..rmoo r � rr
1 x-r' yS " r is m m mm 5 < BSI dr
y k r
w, e
x r�ku t r�i o t k voi i m m m i h a
i t m g r m
Cy
< .pig!Pr yf` " � ❑ d �.� � p �h a r
�r"f mar .ti C i U i U $m UN U •• ��d R.,
ILI
p ❑ .mio 4 U 4�. w 00 U O
ry
kk�Fri t
i p.
\ r Y,vd 1{ �� lr i , 4 a�,•, ,:.rt.... ny -,.,,,.... •.. ..I �w f L`;'S"'y�44"`FB.� (�Y
i• n�xt:^e• a ty� .�. r k � d r' ,
V', ft Y.LT �'.� l •'t t ua�ti Pi 4 t:y,ter�� ._ ," •r 1 5�!S�
,,7 r h .. _ r� •n_: u
� s
,� r �� 'L'Yni5 `�C�. w�'_, �. .,...�A.: .. ..:.. _l.,.s'., maa 'v`y'v fy✓.;.I
1 �
i
1i
1 u
i m
a
t
i
(�? x
rx o
r U O O U F M
i
d a r m p❑ o o a ❑❑
r
m N m:ol
ya m n ..r m Y>A ti
ma m � rN
rl N u
U V y
ib
�x
ir�i Y th/vto' vv I m rAs a`.� �a ii�t:�;
o o
a\ .N m i ro fi wry\il ,�Izi.^F�t
n�'�l 1 rtl I
I p u
.7s v
' � p ❑ 1 rl E yy •l1
tp, ^4 t"V !d• ,
D U u U u '-•+w`1 �fd, 13.Y�Y�+
o" r "o
ti C r U r U
A`V p' P 'I L r N 1 •-1 L L W ~ I
w IyyI
O U O p ,v
F I
Jj•1i4�. . ���
p y, hb
P
h
dxW� s t5 Jv � ! v. � I ra�tt :a t ter�a��}4�tfvS�ayi '6.v 1�4�Il
v+t¢� r'� A,A"i� ¢I �� ��'' ' ' "-w �_ xy Y: �• ' AytS'�`11YEu't'�'y�o-JJ�bdr'K.b,�S�rr r.
!y
,• a
I _ r
0 'tL.ta'l`'T �`i'w ..6e�f: N .o.. _ . .i..✓-. 4 ..,`ve.,-'r. -+h^'
TZ
011 1111
-Jr
..1
1
0
ti
n
r 1 .
pt
j
{ I
r
{ O O M p IA N
V •FZ N P Ilr
I,.y. j •1 .v N Z m `G4t'fYrn(r
r w
� a w
1
r 0 0 1
1
fJ
G 4• > > O
� ❑ i K w K C m U ® N H'c'F�g M�r � ,:
" Y t,T.ry N U i rI MM .MO O K � 4. �fk Nt inl
I a
on o� n wma w w v r w r
T .fir G U M v 0 0 0 o
Yt♦ '� N t C :', H a n �R
1' m m N ry m P \f• f I
v
SA} � ❑ rl .. N N m ❑ ���� Y Y ,
f`rc �� f�1+�' u N N O Yr�•A 5 L R11
r � y
Vim' ❑ � r U � u 0
�t IgM1{T f u� Y 40. N Y 4! lr N .t i ILIw" > > 0
0 0 uIT
U U Y
v 7 G C N Y C
J� aJ
.p -: v v v 2iem a a 4 tv r
7"F i t LFArw o '� 4 r k`
lt' H G O N P n m!n rn Y.P
tYv h
'•"Y'1+-���}'� r� R{` I o � r m ❑ o o ! i 1 7,ry, rL y}(
���Mj�'��'�'U •Y 1 4�,t G ? N � o ❑ m °t�V t n {N If Y°p_"�;
�S} o r4Li aR3£"r1� t(y' m m P m
r �ty X;f i Arl � r rn i m
rA 1 (A ik 4E4
tY r ��i�l wzlr�ir u C u H N bK era �•r`T}�Y'1
?`v,7rr iis°t v m r a I U w No N
SyY#4yp. W N W V u N M U
Bquy
61
777
V W m� O M r •y i .�i N C•C L .Ni i xr:'yR4�iq .y{
G mio ty � i tv i 4 p O UO H �
x u,r 6
yr.t
fF1P�`�a.
> + •
^`�'PKit A5 5A jr i .• ` ' yn f \ �}{{' v
-��'R t.
)I W.NY
♦ i
-
r) C ) �
Y
1Y 1 S '
y
y
! i
I r
1 q
6
1
>i
)
t •+. � p � o O m a m � � � � _
NIt!
ON
N p W
N N Ci N
o A FC�
�kl;Py, t _
5 W o o °u F �'y) t ,. vA +''•
i wrc
4 p tf v
t 1C 1-
K �`/ ✓`, N O
C� r m uNi
ti "lUfdl U a N 0 � 1 n,
J a
k �
M� #
try + y > Io
� fyr�'b R r U O O a
x�NM
1$ � r ttl; a a a ❑ oomo s � t tf(
t L� .�� N r'1 1.1 N O O � N '•
d`4�s41'a��il to x R p m v.In I N I s ' '
x 4
✓k{{�1' '��I /it �' o � r o c o Y � (r+at .�
31 p V1 N Y)
1
p 1 0
i{1�
m i
f
M m
to m L C U U �q V y
2mu\i L ❑❑ y n a aci u u ! i9a
•�`�'y�'k.Yv
�Y
r � p
1 r
A �?
t " r
I f,
„ 3 i
rt
r 11
m
iO1 u
n �,•,` " y, 7 u
i + K
�i� 111111jjj O m N N VI 0
N t
r J M4 I V1 N N 0 ; XIn
tt 9 .mimm � ao 0 3 vY �,
�" ✓'P�' -Yt �� o u " P: r � l C
"
o- f
tV�'�IYee " ItGt.F' N N N N N O rF�xyi
In o o
br�i'1R""�I�p�4nz�u
,r
5 a f
Ci u.0 tgY
� u mavwia � �
w
b
V T
r0 P\ N N N P YI r0
m \r
Ill N
� m\
Ol b
0 N O
' tJ.G1S T�fR SM�''y§J1rr '
rY'+'S'"R£¢q',�'�`'i s3M'Co�.J br✓ c9,� ^`'� r � r�.�".S" '. 1 , °,a�s '' �y ��sS
'$'+ ^u"M t,c �l''.�Yd '4'� fr�<•t� Oar+�,W"&'hw' H."iie°�w6,lJ fib' ,�5� a ^.����^e1
�r�,54' "��"'f t �f �'- P r <(�+ � ,Y r <, 1 K a ✓,l .-rti" "�A}.�.''4.� l�`w< �a r �.n.ri�'•'��,w - �y�l ..i X!' ,
".
"
x
Y
yY
j
i
t C y f
e L
1 , r , ul.•NA.� �. .
J hl t 1i{2r Ili ��� ————_——_———————' � �Tir<ye ' i� ma NmNm m •r-" m .ri ^i, F r�i;.
Il Y 4 C V'.. N P .O m N nl N N �, l V"•�
N x'
p 1. p�'LC frr d w. � m c vNi
,M+,vIG�s
1 n�" u �zA tliwdrr.
(� •�'L R-"- C Np §F m m N m m o m a
{°�xc rci !��•'' u N `� i B m .r b m a � m o u`fi o >�t{%��r:
IV f4� P� 3 ty n N n r b .a of .f of L,.: t� L 'rig
o uNi .rvo a ✓t-, t( °:f '•'f,..
t �1 pN
Z T kk
�l yL ap y
�p ,�j' 0 LO N N V N O O, O O• O � U G 44
n. ,,
�rv•r`f �
C'7rr 31} �?. a u L2" r !' ` gjrrri
pr 0 .e t mrn m m
-T � - m P m c m E .r t�71��!'p����}'e3 a YT f m N b b m w r Y?�Y%•:
y�Lt Y
rrh'�r '�PLr7L`L F{, 2 N o o o ' � i� {Ph J
�, y 44�,ir�4w '`e; {yrYer r L�] � � v •c u' �4 f�75tt,r�� °"('u +
T 1 rP U ar > U u RCS' 7.
4 � � S�j.. � m m y ✓�y v�r 3H ✓i
to 9
cD j'� .mTa.h;LyLr @ o o m H avi m .bi 4e 1'„r+� �i
^'Y �r
L o
i i,Fjj°�lynn b o m H �f
.y
U qH W
CL' 0 x W E L !
w PEA
b m
wm \ IY m
O O
. W
!
'S' Yt'4t �� ry t ^.....a: a�'6�_..-.- -�._•. r`YL r - '' �: I x"`ML � x♦1�'an T`• iti'
" � ��) � �As >rj n�� L .�_ '_.. .�.. +<P` •� r S .:y �r1 "�Kyy,� ��d.nCLC' y,
•y 3'{k YAd`.L51 {/ � 1 }y, � Jdh JZ�4'�a�Y f
r
t t r ."Ira' +nn"�5._�. _ r,.. _.. ,^.tw.,rr;_'c+:'H�:'r,"+'a;•` ` ,..> �-
�
9'
r ;>
1 ,
� t
� 11
j1
Appendix B:
Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
y J Category Name Property Use Code Description
AGRICULTURAL
^" 650 AGRICULTURE
651 POULTRY,EGG PRODUCTION
652 COW,CATTLE PRODUCTION
653 PIGGERY,HOG PRODUCTION
i
654 OTHER LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION
"N f �0 i 655 CROPS,ORCHARDS
659 AGRICULTURE
660 FOREST,HUNTING,FISHING
661 FOREST,TIMBER W/OUT LOGGING � " s
` e,
�ryti�tiM12 3" 1 "
662 FOREST,TIMBER WITH LOGGING
664 TREE
665 FISH HATCHERY
s �
686 WOOD CHIP PILE
Itf� 669 FOREST,HUNTING,FISHING
v
x t rr l ipi qt! Jr1�:
t
i r�lyt aS�k£'t r ,if:
}, r' � {
1 he
Moo
5y�t
k,a°A� 2L.,yfy,h'gn ., titY m fhn s
Cyr�^a��c�"';�^<>,tr I �s•,• `"' �?°1y�trk�YX�
rI�5d1A q Fla`✓�e,l .:'l 0 yi � �� ,� b 4,�y,
H.
City of Dania Page 1 of 16
r.
77,
j, �'f, yytlt
� ,f
p
d�� t`wz'l 3'; �y,Nc '2^�.\��•--.. iv 3':-`'ar.r.,', a s. � >'"i!
,
1
l
i
c
i
f, I '
a it
II
f I I
J Appendix B:
Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
Category Name Property Use Code Description
,
COMMERCIAL
110 AMUSEMENTIREC
111 BOWLING
112 BILLIARD
!� a 113 AMUSEMENT
+
+ I; 114 ICE RINK
115 ROLLER RINK
q
118 SWIMMING FACILITY a ,�
119 AMUSEMENT/REC
120 AMUSEMENT/REC
121 BALLROOM/GYMNASIUM tiq"7 r� •,;�"-
M
122 EXHIIEXPO HALL
q Yg3M
123 ARENA,STADIUM
z r + r# 129 AMUSEMENT/RECREATION
134 FUNERAL PARLOR,CHAPEL
140 CLUBS +'
` ,irrry ` +`. • 142 COUNTRY CLUB
143 YACHT CLUBCLUBS
149 CLUBS
160 EATING,DRINKING PLACES
161 RESTAURANT
162 NIGHTCLUB
163 TAVERN
164 LUNCHROOM,DRIVE-IN + '.
169 EATING, DRINKING PLACES
you � i. 170 PASSENGER TERMINALS
171 PASSENGER TERMINALS
172 HELIPORT,HELISTOP
�T" k1 rar f Sr'U si 'G s a'ril* .7
173 BUS PASSENGER TERMINAL
to r a a e',t'¢wv��rt�'Sti
174 STREET LEVEL RAIL TERMINAL
176 ELEVATED RAIL TERMINAL ,Y a�1b31
, e.°ajls���I�' e �• 177 MARINE PASSENGER TERMINAL
179 PASSENGER TERMINALS ��f���
180 THEATERS,STUDIOS
}h� itiS'�)I Yn3"t r^g.r illr s5+$ )a
181 LEGITIMATE THEATER e 4t{�`��<-yr�,�.���!•,,.
} h 182 AUDITORIUM,CONCERT HALL •M1 �>, � �,arw(
183 MOTION-PICTURE THEATER
'�w
gF Cityof Dana
i Page 2 of 18
Y)G
' + �*lti7 �.'�<trf F � '� y,._....`_. —•-Z ._._ _. .. �t'~k ': ` rr. ! �'�'�+, ���ti, s)y .'
1 qa'�b to , , ��^• ._.__... - -
f�
t
1 i
f 11
li
r J li
{ Appendix B:
„
1 j Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
* Category Name Property Use Code Description
COMMERCIAL
185 RADIO,TV STUDIO
.'1 i 186 MOTION-PICTURE STUDIO
Y' 189 THEATERS,STUDIOS
� i
321 DAY CHILD-CARE CENTER
i 440 HOTELS,MOTELS,INNS,LODGES
'.
441 LESS THAN 20 UNITS:YEAR-ROUND 33
442 LESS THAN 20 UNITS:SEASONAL I `Si
443 20 TO 99 UNITS: YEAR-ROUND
444 20 TO 99 UNITS,SEASONAL
a1 d i T i 1'.t5s+� q
r a ji 445 100 OR MORE UNITS:YEAR-ROUND ;, "kir
446 100 OR MORE UNITS: SEASONAL
.° + �., �r '•i. 449 HOTELS, MOTELS,INNS,LODGES '
,a \
500 MERCANTILE PROPERTIES,OFFICES
i $ s °✓ 509 MERCANTILE PROPERTIES,OFFICES
t 1 yt, 510 FOOD,BEVERAGE SALES : G a
rr F^ J! 511 SUPERMARKET
512 MARKET,GROCERY STORE
513 SPECIALTY FOOD STORE
514 LIQUOR,BEVERAGE STORE
D k ti FY )i° 5ktit Ur 7
, a n 515 CREAMERY, DAIRY STORE ' J'
Ott° ,.
516 DELICATESSEN +?�.
519 FOOD,BEVERAGE SALES r
520 TEXTILE,WEARING APPAREL SALES
521�9i2 1
,t°f;' CLOTHING STORE
p1
522 CLOTHING ACCESSORIES
523 SHOE REPAIR SHOP
J 41�11 YLSd}F tY ' f�-u, yP
524 TAILOR, DRESSMAKING SHOP
526 DRY GOODS STORE
529 TEXTILE,WEARING APPAREL SALES
z1l,p cnk 530 HOUSEHOLD GODDS,SALES, REPAIRS fY'ar'
531 FURNITURE STORE
532 APPLIANCE STORE
533 HARDWARE STORE
i o
Y 'n�v5i�y,,Ftkarl>N` ahi ti�f� ttHx,
534 MUSIC STORE
ds, 535 WALLPAPER,PAINT STOREr� y,hksf
y' '92p9v. 536 �r�yta .
r �k RUG,FLOOR COVERING STORE
t City of Dania Page 3 of 18x+"' j' 6
-14
01
p�yy�
1`1k a t kt.'
dl a
i -
r ,7
,
b � I
l
r I
a i
1.1117.1 rl
Appendix B:
{ Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
# Category Name Property Use Code Description
COMMERCIAL
537 FURNITURE REPAIR SHOP
538 APPLIANCE REPAIR SHOP
539 HOUSEHOLD GOODS SALES,REPAIRS
r 1 540 SPECIALTY SHOPS
541 BOOK, STATIONERY STORE
542 NEWSSTAND,TOBACCO SHOP s
543 DRUGSTORE
1 y L 2
' c} 544 JEWELRY STORE
" T4' 545 GIFT SHOP
546 LEATHER GOODS SHOP
547 FLORIST SHOP,GREENHOUSE
548 OPTICAL GOODS SALES
549 SPECIALTY SHOPS
550 RECREATION,HOBBY OR HOME REPAIR
551 HOBBY,TOY SHOP ° 7i,
552 SPORTING GOODS STORE
553 PHOTOGRAPHIC SALES,STUDIO
554 GARDEN SUPPLY STORE
555 RETAIL LUMBER SALES
556 PET STORE,ANIMAL HOSPITAL
557 BARBER,BEAUTY SHOP " �z
558 FIREWORKS SALES "• ,� ' ' r;'
559 RECREATION, HOBBY OR HOME REPAIR -.
560 PROFESSIONAL SUPPLIES,SERVICES r t
j3 p ;day o" 561 PROFESSIONAL SUPPLY SALES
562 TRADE SUPPLY BALES v °ir '�A~•",r{
n� 563 ART SUPPLY SALES
564 SELF-SERVICE LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING
•"cs � 585 LINEN SUPPLY HOUSE f`
566 LAUNDRY,DRY CLEANER PICK-UP SHOP
567 HOME MAINTENANCE SERVICES
568 RESTAURANT SUPPLIES, SERVICES 569 PROFESSIONAL SUPPLIES SERVICES
�� •jj,Nz';%°p'�y�� 570 MOTOR VEHICLE OR BOAT SALESS �;> r ort�' rz
571 PUBLIC SERVICE STATION 't r" tly/• P
572 PRIVATE SERVICE STATION
City of Dania
Page 4 of 18 1��52,��
n..
r r.�
�i s4eR::�s7 i
lilr
A'
I_
b
I
r ! i
Appendix B:
Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
lr t
Category Name Property Use Code Description
I ` INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE
600 BASIC INDUSTRY, UTILITY,DEFENSE
609 BASIC INDUSTRY,UTILITY,DEFENSE
, I
, i 610 NUCLEONICS
' ,qy 611 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL WORKING
612 NUCLEAR ORDINANCE PLANT
613 NUCLEAR ENERGY PLANT
614 STEAM,HEAT ENERGY PLANT
615 ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT
e +I J�i ^1'ny � ��^�t• a
s r 616 GAS MANUFACTURING PLANT
620 LABORATORIES
621 CHEMICAL,MEDICAL LABORATORY
622 PHYSICAL MATERIALS TESTING LAB
624 RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS LAB
625 ELECTRICAL,ELECTRONIC LAB �' r�`•
� Zt
626 AGRICULTURAL LAB ' �r
627 GENERAL RESEARCH LAB ;
629 LABORATORIES
✓` f �� ! 630 COMMUN.,DEFENSE,DOCUMENT FACILI. .+'
irri�e,Sll�i�,i 632 RADIO,RADAR SITE �. E
uT'�+ 633 FIRE,POLICE,INDUSTRIAL COMM.CNTR 'f t�
634 TELEPHONE EXCHANGE,CENTRAL OFF.
FP r 1 rf F�
635 COMPUTER DATA PROCESSING CNTR
636 DOCUMENT CNTR,RECORD REPOSITORY
639 COMMUN,DEFENSE DOCUMENT FACILI. rk
640 UTILITY,ENERGY DISTRIBUTION CNTR
i qrd+ 642 ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
rtRCM1i� + `ky'�j� r"rr'{ 644 GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM,PIPELINE
645 FLAMMABLE LIQUID SYSTEM,PIPELINE
Xr.} iy 4)5k
646 STEAM,HEAT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
647 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
648 SANITARY SERVICE ,,,
649 UTILITY,ENERGY DISTRIB.SYSTEM
! 4 a
@lit �Afs s1.+'9 ~�tK w�2'Y ur;jFb
656 TOBACCO CURING SHED
' aa '} xY�,rti 657 FRUIT,VEGETABLE PACKING
r !Ay +4 672 ORE MINE
674 PETROLEUM,NATURAL GAS WELL ,x� z
City of Dania Page 6 of 18 '
a
d
,I
.I
n t u �,Hi� ^y �-'+lu: ) r�. � ii � L• Vt�liP , � w5 J � 1q,�
TM
4 Y
t
l
I
Appendix B:
Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
Category Name Property Use Code Description
INDUSTRIALM/AREHOUSE
- `( 675 STONE,SLATE,CLAY,GRAVEL,SAND
' 677 CHEMICAL,FERTILIZER,MINERAL MINE _
" 679 MINING,NATURAL RAW MATERIALS
680 NONMETALLIC MINERAL,PRODUCTS
681 STRUCTURAL CLAY MANUFACTURE
,I
682 GLASS MANUFACTURE
It
Y
683 GLASS CONTAINER MANUFACTURE aly
" t. ' r F 684 POTTERY,CHINA,EARTHENWARE MANU. r
a '
685 CEMENT MANUFACTURE
686 CONCRETE BATCH PLANT
'fit" tY r 688 NONMETALLIC MINERAL PRODUCT t f C;
.FtSF,i.��
689 NONMETALLIC MINERAL PRODUCTS
r"tt,' p i��.�' 700 MANUFACTURING PROPERTY
708 GENERAL MAINTENANCE SHOP
G t k 709 MANUFACTURING PROPERTY
' 710 FOOD INDUSTRIES
711 SLAUGHTERING,PRESERVING MEAT
712 DAIRY PRODUCT MANUFACTURE
t}� 'Y� 713 CANNING,PRESERVING FRUITS,VEGET.IlY
714 CANNING,PRESERVING FISH, SEA FOOD ` ';
715 MANUFACTURE OF GRAIN MILL r t r 1
n r
"'t 716 BAKERY PRODUCT MANUFACTURE
5 P ,e
i�; ��S "' 717 SUGAR REFINING,CONFECTIONERY
4 a< �
718 SNACK FOODS MANUFACTURE
'.{f
719 FOOD INDUSTRIES
r yy sf 721 DISTILLING,RECTIFYING, BLENDING FS �nSn ., ' X 723 BREWERY,MANUFACTURE OF MALT
Or, P,
724 SOFT DRINK, CARBONATED WATER
725 TOBACCO PRODUCTS MANUFACTURE
726 VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL OIL FAT;SOAP
w��i�'r ern{i4£to b t 1 y1 ;ti rf p
Ycd
729 BEVERAGES,TOBACCO, ESSENTIAL OILS
730 TEXTILESS xtXr ,e
45Mt` i y isf 731 COTTON GIN
732 COTTON SPINNING,WEAVING
tr+;ygry y 733 WOOL OR WORSTED SPINNING,WEAVING 'r"5�'v"
�```"""ly,,Is
734 MIXED,BLENDED,OTHER FIBERS
City of Dania Page 7 of 18 �
ys '
16' kl�
4
i t1 tNI-C-
k w t r a' rr 1
tiS(LI r�iy e 1r I r , ',4 4 �v3ti°4YF M
,
x
l
r
r
cr ;
j, j
i
� r
Appendix B:
� pp
Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
' Category Name Property Use Code Description
INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE
kt
-1, 735 TEXTILE FINISHING PLANT
` 736 KNITTING MILLS FOR ALL FIBERS
s
737 CORDAGE,ROPE,TWINE, NET MANU.
, ! 738 FLOOR COVERING, COATED FABRIC MANU.
pax 'i
739 TEXTILES'.
5 741 FOOTWEAR MANUFACTURE
1 j ,{
a' 742 WEARING APPAREL EXCLUDING FOOTWEAR i
t a i
743 MADE-UP TEXTILE GOODS MANU.
745 FUR PRODUCTS MANUFACTURE
746 LEATHER PRODUCTS MANU. ",1�a '
i
747 RUBBER PRODUCTS MANU.
749 FOOTWEAR,WEARING APPAREL,LEATHER
{ `t 750 WOOD,FURNITURE,PAPER,PRINTING
751 SAWMILL,PLANING MILL,WOOD PRODUCTS
752 WOODEN OR CANE CONTAINERS
753 WOOD,CORK PRODUCTS MANU.
3
JF 1 ! + d wF fit; . 754 FURNITURE,FIXTURE,BEDDING MANU.
i
�'ry+ 755 PAPER,PULP, PAPERBOARD MANU.
F id a
756 PAPER,PULP, PAPERBOARD PROD.MANU.
�124 757 NEWSPAPER OR MAGAZINE PRINTING
t
` 758 PRINT,PUBLISHING,ALLIED INDUSTRY �' +
759 WOOD,FURNITURE, PAPER,PRINTING
760 CHEMICAL,PLASTIC,PETROLEUM
( •'� 761 INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL MANU.r�
4^ 762 HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL MANU,
j{�a b , 763 PLASTIC MANUFACTURE
pI• .yr 764 PLASTIC PRODUCT MANU.
l y \ 1 191 A
765 PAINT,VARNISH,LACOER, INK,WAX
+•.
766 DRUG,COSMETIC,PHARMACEUTICAL MANU.
t '{IC,
767 PETROLEUM REFINERY,NATURAL GAS PLNT
768 ASPHALT,COAL PRODUCT MANU.
i
769 CHEMICAL PLASTIC,PETROLEUM
rsyr �ti N y_.}7 770 METAL,METAL PRODUCTS `�v"55 t•�'' i3U4" �,''�
�i'� iftm' Yea° Ii,t' CaR',4.Sti �73.�
777 IRON,STEEL MANU.
A
772 NONFERROUS METAL MANU.
�•�vKny 'F �`
FK"�� •� 773 METAL PRODUCT MANU,
City of Dania Page 8 of 18
i
Iv
7,77
9 p
!sS.
b i " 4r
r� r-
F
y�. M`+ 2T J r r ..i '�` "t+. 7 5 +
!+' �t ��>'Y v y}+
_ _ `
•. ..r, 4 +�� �i *�.al.=?,4�, ;°"-] a-a.". I 5;✓�ke.
.. _... . .. . .. {. :'n. -. ....r.�, (.xt• .. is "
{r {
Appendix B:
Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
,
Category Name Property Use Code Description
INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE
774 MACHINERY MANUFACTURE
775 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT MANU.
' ! 776 ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE,ELECTRONICS
779 METAL,METAL PRODUCTS
781 SHIPBLDG,REPAIR VESSELS>65 FT
782 BOAT BUILDING,REPAIR VESSELS>65 FT
783 RAILWAY EQUIP.MANU., REPAIR
784 MOTOR VEHICLE MANU.t, {(
T, ,1 786 AIRCRAFT,ROCKET MANU., REPAIR ' k
A J y it
787 MANU,OF TRANSPORT EQUIP. ((�� p1.>v1j
788 VEHICLE ASSEMBLY,MANU.
°y 790 OTHER MANUFACTURING
T
791 INSTRUMENT MANU.
792 PHOTOGRAPHIC,OPTICAL GOODS MANU.
794 JEWELRY MANU.
796 LAUNDRY, DRY CLEANING PLANT
+ 797 PHOTOGRAPHIC FILM PROCESSING LAB
798 TOY,SPORTING GOOD MANU. ,w
,I,u-'i -1 799 OTHER MANUFACTURING
8 STORAGE PROPERTY
n 800 STORAGE PROPERTY
810 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS
5 ,Ej 811 SEEDS,BEANS, NUTS,SILAGE STORAGE
['O 812 BOXED,CRATED,AGRICU.STORAGE
813 LOOSE BAGGED AGRIC.PRODUCTS `
1 t
615 BARNS,STABLES
816 GRAIN ELEVATORS
817 LIVESTOCK STORAGE
818 AGRICULTURAL SUPPLY STORAGE
619 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS STORAGE
kt r A rx 820 TEXTILE STORAGE 7 ) r i,
-rr>7 %a+r 821 BALED COTTON STORAGE
824 BALED JUTE,HEMP,FLAX, SISAL STORAGE
g'bug !1
825 CLOTH YARN STORAGE + '" t�
I��`t�ir�55g{ ¢n ¢YU
t Y' 'rpcG'tf.ti" ' 826 WEARING APPAREL,GARMENTS,STORAGE
r
828 FUR,SKIN,HAIR PRODUCTS STORAGE
} City of Dania aYft
Page 9 of 18
&^�
t
yy i
y I i
y
r.
t '
l
1
.t.
� I
I .
r, t
Appendix B:
r � !
Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
c Category Name Property Use Code Description
I INDUSTRIALIWAREHOUSE
829 TEXTILE STORAGE
830 PROCESSED FOOD,TOBACCO STORAGE
n
831 PACKAGED FOOD STUFF STORAGE
+ a
832 CANNED, BOTTLED FOOD,DRINK STORAGE
y rfi1 833 LOOSE, BAGGED,PROCESSED FOOD STRGt
t i! 834 FOOD LOCKER PLANTS '" *I:
L >b�
°r u ti 835 COLD STORAGE
' 836 BULK SUGAR STORAGE 3
+_ 838 PACKAGED TOBACCO PRODUCT STORAGE yr2 F�
V �Yk
839 PROCESSED FOOD,TOBACCO STORAGE y + i
r 840 PETROLEUM PRODUCTS,ALCOHOLIC STRG
841 FLAMMABLE,COMBUST,LIQUID TANK STRG
' ` 19 •" 842 GASOMETER,CRYOGENIC GAS STORAGE 843 LP-GAS BULK PLANT
( kh ,yea x j r
844 MISSILE, ROCKET FUEL STORAGE
J "� RG Jn
845 PACKAGE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS STRG
h4r r 846 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE STORAGE
849 PETROLEUM PROD., ALCOHOLIC BEV, STRG "IVIg t`~
i r �i yet �y;�xsu
s`'`Si f irCS 850 WOOD PRODUCTS,FURNITURE STRG >p
r
w 851 LUMBER YARD,BLDG. MATERIALS STRG `,9y
852 WOOD PRODUCTS, FURNITURE STRG `,„
853 FIBER PRODUCT STORAGE
855 PAPER,PAPER PRODUCTS STORAGE
856 TIMBER, PULPWOOD,LOGS,WOOD FUEL
859 WOOD,PAPER PRODUCTS STORAGE
860 CHEMICAL OR PLASTIC PRODUCT STORAGE yr <
r !
861 INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL STORAGE
S vTrt r "
862 HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL STORAGE
t`
863 PLASTIC, PLASTIC PRODUCT STORAGE
4
864 FERTILIZER STORAGE
865 PAINT,VARNISH a STORAGE ,
d t—
`aS' ��• + 866 DRUG, COSMETIC, PHARMACEUTICAL STRG
867 i 31.
F � RUBBER PRODUCTS STORAGE
✓�i �Ar I 4
t C; � y wyAy
868 PHOTOGRAPHIC FILM STORAGE .yt "v - '��I?��'q�
ES+d h 1 {' fiS'
869 CHEMICAL OR PLASTIC PRODUCT STORAGE
870 METAL PRODUCTS STORAGE
31i r City of Dania
Page 10 of 18
r
.. y. x .n r''N ,... •.> ,r._. ,.: .,...-. ram::,.,,- i .-... � k ;�� ¢
e ask '>-.✓�'�" V i � ,...;,,„ emu r` : + < < 1 �! �'. �# ��4��
1:,nu3 + �'i,.n.` fl rt ♦,.: :jt,^ Lyt '��.:f E "rrti -
3 i�y �S �`� 14�... L n'b 2_.:.h,<SC .. . _ ,.:.. .�-. .}:. u.-.�r;4_r."N. �'•".�,�, '"���
rt
1
f
P I
i.
i
i
I
} I .
r 1 L
Appendix B:
Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
+ } , Category Name Property Use Code Description
INSTITUTIONAL
,i
130 CHURCHES/FUNERAL PARLORS
131 CHURCH,CHAPEL
132 RELIGIOUS EDUC, FACILITY
133 CHURCH HALL
r}W.
„�„ +. 139 CHURCHES/FUNERAL PARLORS
141 CITY CLUB
,Y
r
150 LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS,CRT RMS -' a.
X
151 LIBRARY
a y } 152 MUSEUM,ART GALLERY �rlw�"`�t •�v'rt 153 HISTORIC BLDG
154 MEMORIAL STRUCTURE/MONUMENT
rr
X r,ns 155 COURTROOM
;i 156 LEGISLATIVE HALL
i[
159 LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS,CRT RMS ' %^( ,
200 EDUCATIONAL PROPERTY
209 EDUCATIONAL PROPERTY
210 NON-RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS '��, +'� `
r
211 NURSERY SCHOOL
212 KINDERGARTEN
i 213 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Y'•'� 214 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
215 HIGH SCHOOL
219 NON-RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS
220 RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS
t>.
221 RES SCHOOL CLASSROOM BLDG
3 229 RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS ;, "r
Yr r ,r
«•, A � ,^"•` 230 TRADE, BUSINESS SCHOOLS ;
231 VOCATIONAL,TRADE SCHOOL
r,
� v
232 BUSINESS SCHOOL r o-ts
233 SPECIALTY SCHOOL
234 REHABILITATION CENTER/BY CHOICE
239 TRADE, BUSINESS SCHOOLS
240 COLLEGES,UNIVERSITIES
i � i TlS;.r5 J k n u� a
241 COLLEGE CLASSROOM BLDG
249 COLLEGES,UNIVERSITIES
300 INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY
"- City of Dania Page 12 of 18 ' ka
x SaTQ�i" ,
no"T11
.•y,.r st, _ .. - ''1:
u ,
11 �
1 „
1
1
i
a j
1
Appendix B:
Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
' + Category Name Property Use Code Description
.i INSTITUTIONAL
309 INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY
' 1 320 CARE OF THE YOUNG
1 322 CHILDREN'S HOME,ORPHANAGE
5 ' 11
323 FOSTER HOME
r
329 CARE OF THE YOUNG
it 330 CARE OF THE SICK,INJURED
1y 'fi. 331 HOSPITAL,HOSPITAL-TYPE INFIRMARY a3 e I 332 SANATORIUM,SANITARIUM h
334 CLINIC,CLINIC-TYPE INFIRMARY nry
339 CARE OF THE SICK,INJURED
340 CARE OF THE PHYSICALLY RESTRAINED -} x
.�
341 PRISON CELL,CELL BLOCK FOR MEN
342 PRISON CELL,CELL BLOCK FOR WOMEN
343 JUVENILE DETENTION HOME � '`'.Q.
344 MEN's DETENTION CAMP ,•� '�wRY'` �, ;'
345 POLICE STATION
6
346 VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER '-aa+ r '
349 CARE OF THE PHYSICALLY RESTRAINEDr'1`
350 CARE OF THE PHYSICALLY INCONVENIENCED 1� v1
t +•�p , '� 351 INSTITUTION FOR DEAF MUTE OR BLIND i'_ s•
352 INSTITUTION FOR PHYSICAL REHAB - xr
41 a 6f y a' 359 CARE OF PHYSICALLY INCONVENIENCED
{ 360 CARE OF MENTALLY HANDICAPPED `
361 MENTAL INSTITUTION
a r
y�4 362 INSTITUTION FOR MENTALLY RETARDED
369 CARE OF THE MENTALLY HANDICAPPED
a Y� � t �'" y •�: 465 CONVENT,MONASTERY, RELIGIOUS
rS1Y b 5 '1 Ir'` r°y�, 596 POST OFFICE ";
631 NATIONAL DEFENSE SITE
896 MILITARY,NATIONAL DEFENSE STRG
124 PLAYGROUND
44
u toy}� r vr:F 1 sf Y4�t _
r °
w� �}ws.yr� J <� a4lSR'���f rz"ijrsi��3
' m City of Dania iw3 'S
'dig, f Page 13 of 18
a.,
�eykvsr`iy'1 � _°
n ��y�,e'•��,¢
b � �. �,��„�i s u �'� : ¢•+.nm�;v rr ',,.'�"spy, . , t �,!ti,r+'��kjd'$le,�
��1���.r}'C�rfr� I v!F Sn Y f —+4."`'R��.,,;.,,,,•�� .A,-- -,,. ' -� 1 f Iv ti�-!C�i,l *.� t :,r�fi�£'`eKS f14l��r�3'3"fNd���
s. f3�/yf ��1 r rr � y�-•... ,,yF_ < S l y 1 � IA �,' 47,f �'l
a.ir`I�.Yf y� ,�• A�"rb �v° r , ."._",<.•+m�FF.�".�I','h,e} w .'V: �: \ � 7'e +sF !.� uC, 1 y�,�,� �J' 12 i!
(t
t r ,
1 �
1
JJ' Appendix B:
1 Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
Category Name Property Use Code Description
NOT USED
933 PUBLIC MAILBOX
t.
934 CEMETARY
935 CAMPSITE WITH UTILITIES
939 OUTDOOR PROPERTIES
940 WATERAREAS
941 IN OPEN SEA,TIDAL WATERS
942 WITHIN DESIGNATED PORT,CHANNEL
�+ "y 943 ALONGSIDE QUAY,PIER,PILINGS
Y}
944 AT FLAMMABLE LIQUID OR GAS LOADING
945 AGROUND 6` e`' r
° 946 INLAND WATER AREA �l '
949 WATER AREAS
'lle�yy t ,
960 RAILROAD PROPERTY
i
e ' 951 RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY
r diA
` { 952 SWITCH YARD,MARSHALLING YARD ?�i•1
1 „ 953 SIDING
I
954 RAILROAD SIGNALING,SWITCH CONTROL
959 RAILROAD PROPERTY ':r r r
960 ROAD,PARKING PROPERTY W,
961�76\ LIMITED ACCESS,DIVIDED HIGHWAY R'
962 PAVED PUBLIC STREET
w tr
963 PAVED PRIVATE, STREET,WAY
964 UNPAVED STREET,ROAD, PATH
965 UNCOVERED PARKING AREA
969
NOT CLASSIFIED
970 AIRCRAFTAREAS
971 IN FLIGHT
4
972 ON RUNWAY
973 ON TAXIWAY,UNCOVERED PARKING AREA
974 AT LOADING RAMP
r� x
t
979 AIRCRAFTAREAS
980 EQUIPMENT OPERATING
AREAS
N
981 CONSTRUCTION SITE rir 'r{all* �0.yy
982 OIL,GAS FIELD
r f � 983 PIPELINE, POWER LINE RIGHT OF WAY
899 EQUIPMENT OPERATING AREASw.A,d1
i t+
S�k Rv 1`ST5 �S .. n
t r�c
4 a
: �'y lrA � ,7i,✓� t v7 '' 1n.r.-•+-�....-.•--a.__^ "h n4 ri' C 4, 'w ' ,�. .k r a yr" •+`y gV
q-` v)f"[2", ��f�1 }[ s y '. � ti tt- '�• �.,'�- y 'w` � t ° �,,F`.i �1�°iaY ,Iw5 � }a�5+��" 1 �w �4+"�
$' 4
r '
Y` y
i
i
r
i
1
r
f
f
Appendix B:
Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
` a Category Name Property Use Code Description
NURSING HOME
310 CARE OF THE AGED
311 CARE OF THE AGED W/NURSING
t 312 CARE OF THE AGED W/OUT NURSING a
g y. 319 CARE OF THE AGED i
T r
i r
� a
rtr rj! � i Si i Y In,'
i
N
� v
F
y2� ti
µ�` r
in� i•
t !
+
,
a l
i t
4
$ 1{
'r3�
City of Dania
a" Page 16 of 18
1
K rY rrT4 'lJi�}
ry�ti}}''.+ >•�'�r r/<.a .w „t,�5 ?. _.� aa/ 4 Y ` .^e.'Yr�a ti ti7t,$r t V..�4[
1 "
z
n
a I;
y.
ff Appendix B:
1 Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
1 Category Name Property Use Code Description
RESIDENTIAL
400 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
409 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
1
d' 410 ONE-AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLING
411 ONE-FAMILY DWELLING' YEAR-ROUND
yy 412 ONE-FAMILY DWELLING:SEASONAL
414 TWO-FAMILY DWELLING:YEAR-ROUND
415 TWO-FAMILY DWELLING:SEASONAL
F a
419 ONE-AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLING
420 APARTMENTS,TENEMENTS, FLATS
421 1 OR 2 LIVING UNITS W/BUSINESS
�zr u
e 4l r
+^: 422 3 THROUGH 6 UNITS ri
s;;r 423 7 THROUGH 20 UNITS � +�4�
{ 424 OVER 20 UNITS
./fin°" ' r{ f�•.
429 APARTMENTS,TENEMENTS,FLATS t ptiy' ,�f r
�r
430 ROOMING, BOARDING,LODGING .-
I 431 3 TO 8 ROOMERS OR BOARDERS tj Nh i
^� 432 9 TO 15 ROOMERS OR BOARDERS
439 ROOMING, BOARDING, LODGING
460 DORMITORIES
A 'ti �N 461 SCHOOL,COLLEGE, UNIV.,DORMITORY t
3z9
r
<� t i ;' 462 FRATERNITY,SORORITY HOUSEjy'� c
)11+y 464 MILITARY BARRACKS
466 BUNK HOUSE,WORKER'S BARRACKS , `{
469 DORMITORIES : >
( Y-
x�} 480 HOME HOTELS „-
481 LESS THAN 20 UNITS:YEAR-ROUND
,
�;✓'"` 482 LESS THAN 20 UNITS:SEASONAL ` •_,.'._
aai y 4
4 , 483 20 TO 99 UNITS:YEAR-ROUND < ,
484 20 TO 99 UNITS:SEASONAL `
r
y� u -
't 485 100 OR MORE UNITS:YEAR-ROUND `
466 100 OR MORE UNITS: SEASONAL
rota " 489 HOME HOTELS
t 1 q Gisd( r; 490 OTH
ER RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES
499 OTHER RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES
i�a t} ?� � � �Yr6�'; eta� ` t✓° )ku.�,f
�a 1$ City of Dania w '
Y Page 17 of 18
C �
•e \yp��` .�,+�`j4Y'r�J -•u�: yt'' v', iY' ':� it � N <ti41i �0. �:3
_- - p tia
- .yY Y ..
v141.
,.�
f
y r
i
T'
I,
J Appendix B:
Categories and Associated Fixed Property Use Codes
Category Name Property Use Code Description
' VACANT
s: 915 VACANT PROPERTY
931 OPEN LAND,FIELD
936 VACANTLOT
s
i
Y Fkkk
4 � ,
5 � 111Y It
5 yy e
f r
M
YID b t Zk�."( '3 jt4T�ei
1 .
Y IV � .. 1Y EASY"1{N,
� yc
.1 f�Jll ir� ry��. 3F
r I �
_ tw
City of Dania
Page 18 of 18
a
s
i qe *Eh d+b s.i�', Pq a.=r ;� «,.•,,<,-_.. �, . . .,.. ���Sj�`��p,+.�'�'a.
:
r
' C
is .+
Appendix C: Categories and Associated DOR Codes
�j Category Name DOR Code Description
INSTITUTIONAL
�,. 71 CHURCHES
P. 72 PRIVATE SCHOOLS&COLLEGE
73 PRIVATE OWNED HOSPITALS
75 ORPHANAGES
76 MORTUARIES/CEMETERIES
i
77 CLUBS,LODGES,UNION HALLS
78 SANITARIUMS,CONVALES,REST
79 CULTURAL ORG FACIILITIES
F.
81 MILITARY
83 PUBLIC COUNTY SCHOOLS - F
84 COLLEGES
85 HOSPITALS � 't
86 COUNTY .
87 STATE
88 FEDERAL
89 MUNICIPAL NOT PARKS
II - 90 LEASEHOLD GOVT OWNED
e {
; F lw•7}JI 1
YYY �• $
�4
�fk iE
�}f
i a
h1{ � 11�• � �� r
/ 1
al`
I ) r
�E•
t
t i i A ity:
�p f7rK1av47
a
,r-
'�ti4
' rry r :ram+ vim t S�,R
1n � City of Dania Page 2 of 4 ,6
tc yryva�n, V `4
rwN�.)vi",1y of°G
s
aliti.�r�jr}ru �.
�Tiy jf r fy 5 '4 ii
rt Ct;i i i�—
5wd���• N,� r 1 t �, . 4 , F
K eq 1 Y n'
�.r. . . Z
�. _. 1. . .. ..
I
r.
i
i
i,
i
i
I
t
Appendix C: Categories and Associated DOR Codes
{ Category Name DOR Code Description
NOT USED
00 VACANT RESIDENTIAL
10 VACANT COMMERCIAL
28 MOBILE HOME PARKS/PK LOTS
40 VACANT INDUSTRIAL
i, 50 IMPROVED AGRICULTURAL
11 51 VEGETABLE CROPS
52 BI-ANNUAL ROW CROPS
I ,I
�-' 53 ROW CROPS
y.
54 TIMBERLAND SITE 90+
4' i 55 TIMBERLAND SITE 80.89
"A �) 56 TIMBERLAND SITE 70-79
AX` 57 TIMBERLAND SITE 60-69 ' J
58 TIMBERLAND SITE 50.59
Y
59 TIMBERLAND NOT CLASSIFIED
r 60 IMPROVED PASTURE LAND
61 SEMI-IMPROVED LAND
�1 62 NATIVE LAND
Fa e
tih � 63 WASTELAND
64 GRAZING LAND CLASS V rr N�K r
65 GRAZING LAND CLASS VI
i 4 66 CITRUS
67 POULTRY/BEES/FISH/RABBIT
68 DAIRY, HOG 8 CATTLE FEED l�rry
' 69 ORNAMENTALS,MISC AG
70 VACANT INSTITUTIONAL
,Ry 7 '
vL( `
80 UNDEFINED t '
rli a �
-z 82 GOVTFOREST/PARKS/RECREATIONAL
�`a fig 91 UTILITIES,GAS/ELEC/TELEP
4 �rr
92 MINING,PETROLEUM,GAS `
93 SUBSURFACE RIGHTS 1 '+
sf +
94 RIGHT-OF-WAY
f .
3 95 RIVERS 8.LAKES,SUBMERGED
y r
96 SEWAGE DISP,BORROW PITS j
' 97 OUTDOOR REC OR PARK
98 CENTRALLY ASSESSED =,
99 ACREAGE NON AGRICULTURAL
? F �
a 1 tt. rat
NURSING HOME
tltrf rr ,, t`7 . � v5 h �ty,A � ♦xa
air c , v 74 HOMES FOR THE AGED
City of Dania Page 3 of 4
�M a
fIF ��
Appendix C: Categories and Associated DOR Codes
Category Name DOR Code Description
RESIDENTIAL
01 SINGLE FAMILY IMPROVED
02 MOBILE HOME
03 MULTI FAMILY+10 UNITS
04 CONDOMINIUM
05 CO-OPS
06 RETIREMENT HOMES/NONEXPT
r
RIP,
07 MISC RESIDENTIAL
08 MULTI FAMILY 2-9 UNITS
c I ��,.. �•u �4 1` s
7�
r r.H ♦:� a +sY� ;
4 r " hA
t i "• s`
Y = o tf f S
ry
Li tl _
v�`ir�t A " $ r� tt i •�tJfri
lr
pNh"�v'sS Tri: '.H i
1�7 b lr. r rr. �Y � t r� vtilpr
c
��L � t)ygrit Jar Y �.� 'tP rit rv��Y
City Of Dania Page 4 of 4
f. ry
�tr,1�z
fir•
1
v47t`yM1 T�"I A v
i _ c c kt?r L rxt�ti
y4 r}"t'•xs L x` , .- s._.._ _ _.. '-_ 1 :. c it V tt ':n�n�t La vr�g.
l
4
Ay
�p
r
i ,
e
Z.
. r .
Appendix D: Categories and Associated Improvement Codes
Category Name Improvement Code Description
t'.
COMMERCIAL
i, 103 Motels
104 Hotels combined with stores,office,etc.
.t
200 Row Stores-2 or more units
201 Shopping Centers Regional
• 202 Department Stores
203 Restaurants
qt� 204 Bars
205 Sales Display Rooms
{ h 206 Single Bldg.(Mist.types not included in other codes)
In 207 Food Stores(Chain or large private)
208 Lumberyards
F x
209 Store+Office(1-2 stories) i?�,•,x
211 Shopping Centers Community `} y
-
v 212 Shopping Centers Neighborhood
213 Restaurants Franchise ' +.�',
t ' 1 299 Combination Uses
r 300 Office Building i,r sr r
301 Banks
302 Medical-Doctor or Dentist Office or small hospital clinic
303 Veterniarian Office or small animal hospital,clinic,kennels
r,� ) 304 PostOffice-NonEx.
305 Funeral Homes k*�'
I �� •'n Y K
310 Office Building HI-rise 5-story+
399 Combination Uses +., ' '� `
400 Service Stations
401 Car Agency,New or Used w
��3 402 Garages-repair,car wash,etc. '
kkk t • o
404 Bus Terminals ' r '�
r i'•s 407 Marinas(boats,storage,sales,yards,etc.) , t
AC}Y
408 The stare-new or recap
499 Combination Uses
�
600 Bowling Lanes,Skating
601 Theatres, including drive-ins 5
602 Racing-;1 horses,dogs,harness,Ja Alai,etc.
r r Y 604 Clubs-non-exempt(large,yacht,night clubs)R �
608 Amusement Park
699 Combination Uses
fir=s ��') a •. 902 Agriculture Buildings "� �{
r, r e: yP'4
4Y tP " jE 3t Cn
City of Dania Page 1 of 4 d
t
K.>SY�1IN.JF •,
k
t
e ,,5'j
i
I.
r Ii
i,
i
I Appendix D: Categories and Associated Improvement Codes
Category Name Improvement Code Description
NOT USED
t' 002 Misc.values on separate folio(pool,slabs,utility,garage,fence,paving
r ,.
♦ ' �' 099 Combination Uses
109 Misc.values on separate folio(pool,cabanas,rec.bldg.,tennis courts,
- 199 Combination Uses
403 Parking Garages '
405 Parking Lots(all paving,except residential on separate folio)
406 Airports-private i.
?,
r. , 409 Gasoline storage
503 Misc.val.on sep.folio,ie.,fence,slab(not paving)
603 Golf courses,miniature
T
p< 607 Fishing Piers
705 Cemeteries-private,crematory,mausoleums '} `
t �* 708 Marinas ' . :,7 ey�t 7-•
K� 715 R.R. Property(See 802)
�^ 716 Cemeteries,city owned ,.Y� Ft1 �� r
z 800 Power companies
801 Telephone companieslh
Y� ct r
r 802 Railroad Comptroller
803 Water&Sewer Plants .
+r ;
804 Airports(See 406 or 709)
805 Radio Stations
GS I'
806 Gas Companies
899 Combination Uses
900 Groves / Y
901 Sod
3 i "Yi�r
903 Small buildings not included in other codes '
ft 999 Combination Uses i,a.
Zx ''
r `r�
t
n
Y '
� Yip
r t ', �IT" 1,
e � F
s��r1)Y i�4/FM
City of Dania
Page 3of4
9 �
E 4`pq4`,.ryY r"-0
Q"�,$^�p}si t 4 t:a � - —— -�:".'� •Y ' S a i k Y rFfhjt, } "fit "I
F
r
<u
I.
�+ Appendix D: Categories and Associated Improvement Codes
Category Name Improvement Code Description
RESIDENTIAL
001 Single family residence
i
003 Residential on Farm -
i 100 Apartments
101 Apartments or Res.(combined with stores,offices)
1 102 Garage Apts.,Gutest House on Residence,2 res.or more
J
105 Co-op Apartments
106 Trailer Parks
107 Trailers on individually owned land
#, 106 Group buildings(Farm Labor Quarters, Daires,etc.) -
r 110 Hi-Rise 5 story+ J 'Y
r
F
Duplexes
x r
112 Condominiums
n' v" ' eI
`r 4` t r•'. �� ill %s 5 "1�� ` w
t
1
� t I ' t �r,)•t ,�,r, a.
t I4� kfcn .i:
+f<yb"i'-aTa F3 V..:
111c T.,
?!aM1 � a+ xy a ' ' ids,✓n-ia f:
1
r
vtr i i r
t �t , t
, `yt i i f i-F`<Lkyi
kv '` i` �J>E
RSe �'i1 f�If''h�°tad
7 ,J
' i6tRS`S�.t.CR' „nTs�iuity� y+
City of Dania Page 4 of 4 a
L o$.
a
A `
is
rya,
Ytr
a
r +�.,. ,�F d ✓n A.: •r I �a t .nrd,'SMy" ,4'�rJ, 1a
tY �✓�PY. ��fPJtlh :i t ° , _..r,:...i,} -- --s._,� - __. _ •w r
r
h
' 7
i
o '
DRAFT
CITY OF DANIA
STORMWATER UTILTIYIASSESSMENT
OUTLINE OF RATE STRUCTURE
�. A. COST APPORTIONMENT
I
i
UTILITY SERVICE AREA DISTRICT BOUNDARY - The utility service area Includes all
j parcels and portions of parcels within the City.
i'E �
2. IMPROVEMENT BENEFIT AREAS - There will be three Improvement Benefit Areas,
x ' one for each of the three basins in the City. Sub basin improvement areas might emerge
�a
^ I upon closer review of the capital program further into the project. ( i
3. O&M COST APPORTIONMENT - The first year assessment will include 100% of
O&M costs as determined by a simple cost allocation technique. Only direct stormwater ``
r costs will be recovered (no general, citywide overhead). The rate should be set to cover } i
y 1
operating costs such that it would not be expected to change for three years. s
f f
i
Proceeds from the assessment should be deposited into a Special Revenue Fund so that
assessment dollars are used solely for appropriated purposes and so fund balance does
not lapse into any other fund.
.t j.
I All operating costs (engineering, planning, data management, billing, property appraiser y;� t
5x ' fees, operations and maintenance, etc.) will be spread across the utility service area on y¢
kk�
an ESU basis. There will be no minimum ESU charge.
y "Road portion" costs will be financed from sources other than the assessment. (Road
1 IY'
runoff will be split into two components - "passed to" and "onto" - based on a
determination of co-mingling of road related runoff in the City; only the "onto" portion must
be financed from non assessment monies.)
r �
c ,
4. CAPITAL COST APPORTIONMENT - Various capital projects will be funded from
z assessments the first year, if possible. The intent is to spread project costs across the
'
Rate Structure.doc
'v° r v c�xu✓j� iir ° S 1 05/06/96
� e�i� '�➢ t':r �t nitiiyl
YdM,15Ve��:F
pr
I
I
4
I
I
r ) �
DRAFT
I
7 a I
e) Mixed-use condo - residential portion billed as residential condo, non-
residential as non-residential condo.
• f) Mobile home parks-treated as general parcels (not a class)
g) Mobile home condo parks- similar to residential condos: impervious area
1 divided by actual units in park. (not a class)
I r.,
h) Multi-family residential -three units and over-general parcel (not a class) ^x^�
-
"' { i) Governmental - general parcel (not a class); set up interagency fund
' transfers. f
Agricultural and vacant Properties - general parcels billed only for the
impervious area; (not a class) i
All other Parcels-general parcel
r
x i i
r
3. MITIGATION CREDIT CONCEPT - The City has not In the past and does not currently
' require the construction of stormwater facilities for new development; it appears that
neither does the SFWMD. However, several apartment and condo complexes use ponds
{f and small lakes for stormwater attenuation; other parcels may have invested in
stormwater facilities in order to use the property with some assurance of freedom from
+n :• flooding.
in Q7
'y Mitigation credit will apply only to parcels which are privately maintained and which meet
design standards in terms of performance.
f
Natural or man-made lakes which handle stormwater will be addressed through "drain-
to/DCIA"factor discussed below.
Berry and Calvin are generating list of all parcels with privately owned and maintained
t. '.
y stormwater facilities on site and all parcels with lakes or ponds which act as mitigating
facilities. We will default to a .65 reduction for those parcels on the lists for first cut
estimation purposes.
n I
{ 'r Rate Structure.doc 3 05/06/96 f e[-
t
xn "
+fzi^4T"Y
[ 1
'�nd' �f� 7`�' 'r ` !y t tT y`�3���+ •
tj
f;.
I
I
i'
�{ PA002 -BOB Code Frequencies
1
ji OUR UescMpUon Parcels %of Total
?, 00 VACANT RESIDENTIAL 669 7.74%
j 01 SINGLE FAMILY IMPROVED 3,254 37.64%
02 MOBILE HOME 12 0.14%
1 03 MULTI FAMILY+10 UNITS 33 0.38%
04 CONDOMINIUM
1,903 22.01%
05 CO-OPS 1 570 6.59%,
► 08 MULTI FAMILY 2-9 UNITS 968 11.20%
1
10 VACANT COMMERCIAL ill 128% 2 '
11 STORES 1 STORY 100 1.16% ° !
12 MIXED USE STORE/OFFICE 79 0 91%
14 SUPERMARKETS 6 0.07%
1
rr: I
17 OFFICE NON-PROF 1 STORY 4 0.05% j
18 OFFICE NON-PROF STORY a
, f
� 2+ 33 0.38/o
a
19 PROFFESIONAL SERVICES 9 0 10%
s'
` f 22 DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT
30 0.35%
t; 23 BANKS$L/MORTGAGE/CREDIT 6 0.07%
J Y f
' 26 SERVICE STATIONS 14 0.16%
27 AUTO SALES/SERVICE/RENTAL 31 0.36%
28 MOBILE HOME PARKS/PK LOTS 17 0.20% h
29 WHOLESALE/PRODUCE OUTLETS tia4 i
r ,4 1 0.01%U
d 32 THEATER/AUDITORIUM(ENCL o y s
1 0.01/o ya,
„.' 33 NIGHTCLUB/BAR/LOUNGE 5 0.06%
rr »
34 BOWLING/SKATING/POOL HALL 1 001% '
r
37 RACE TRACK;HORSE/DOG/AUTO 2 0.02%
' ;5; 39 HOTELS/MOTELS 24 0.28%
40 VACANT INDUSTRIAL o
45 0.52/°
i 41 LT MFG/SM MACH SHOP/PRINT 28 0.32%
j 43 LUMBER YARD/SAWMILL 1 0 01%
r
44 PACK PLANT(FRUITIMEAT) 1 0.01%
c
h 48 WAREHOUSING 103 1.19% '
49 OPENSTORAGE 1 0.01%
' City of Dania
Page 1 of 2
7,7
n
�4 1 t hvt
?�"'✓n�jgil+f
x
�xd J!'.1=i5 ✓ i,! _ ...c:: tit � t�.' sy .r � tkA � {t��
p f'f..f l e i - •_. �_.-, w �i. ' •, a .�.. +� d'``'
Y `
.q!
. P
BOB Bouriptmo Parcels %of Total
52 BI-ANNUAL ROW CROPS 1 0.01%
69 ORNAMENTALS, MISC AG 14 0.16%
70 VACANT INSTITUTIONAL 5 0.06%
71 CHURCHES 29 0.34%
72 PRIVATE SCHOOLS&COLLEGE 2 0.02%
73 PRIVATE OWNED HOSPITALS 7 0.08%
74 HOMES FOR THE AGED 1 0.01%
ANY\7` 76 MORTUARIES/CEMETERIES 2 0.02%
77 CLUBS, LODGES, UNION HALLS 6 0.07%
82 GOVTFOREST/PARKS/RECREATIONAL 1 0.01% � ' 4
F � °
83 PUBLIC COUNTY SCHOOLS 11 0.13%
Ri 86 COUNTY 268 3.10%
87 STATE 137 1.58%
Fty 89 MUNICIPAL NOT PARKS 44 0.51% "
.: 91 UTILITIES,GAS/ELEC/TELEP 8 0.09%
Y , 95 RIVERS &LAKES, SUBMERGED 2 0.02% x
*' 97 OUTDOOR REC OR PARK 1 0.01%
f� 99 ACREAGE NON AGRICULTURAL 45 0.52% ( ,
Tots P817 W&
e
! 411l. x1f
t
1 YV�'�
1 �,ati
a $ >
H
lI T
t� t�94
sTea Y.
51"
Y"'7
City of Dania Page 2of2wy��$,�h
fn 1'f t yt ts FF•a
ifrE�"" �y �
w� `ZS
l�
i 7 CAS X
�*
Qq}"� ly'
bw
at {r
i ..
r.
i
1
' }01
{ coco
r,
i
AMA
i r
i
U r .
Y
L
4 V
' > ..E..j CO .9
^c '
d �
v a
w
` ® t
lE
Y
U
Y
If�f 6 O,A p r p_1�
U zSiCR,l6� ... • F Y �:.
i;�Ya7 �+��•, � i`` t
Y � ,•� is
t 1 Y Y , .. . . ,n••a,.,. R,� , r, , `.
51 - s
err;r',
Y
i
i
1
■ ds
l�
C CL 1
I �
ip
LIJ �
f . !
I"'
co
,J co� — —
LU
• � Cn
U Cn
C
Cn Q
CL
■ EMNON r,
3
R
I
r
U
i
r' I'
r
� 1 j
r 1S
a
ix
x f
� b
}
9Y 1kip,
u
c�
0
�M14J
Y.
1
V �
I
co ,
s ,
r
` J
a
d
w
m
3
o
A
0
0
U
t
d
•
JLF 1
1
,
i
i
1
{
c
cn
O
■ J
W
to
5
,
4 I Y
� ® t
> o
Q ~ �
w
0 �R
w
0
A
� Y r
r
S
t£ fi.1x
z
r �a
i
y � ... `3a..wf.� •
.�4
w 4
r
J
r
II
i
(7
V/
O
L
06
fn /cam
4-1
O U) '
W
y L UJ
v { C
h
co
q
rycn
Co Z
A
c
a. U W Z U- U-
�S I
2 +ur `7�Y•`.���t��ri'F�: A�5 r„ x r�t4 5 k�'i•'.
t7+e SAL 3 $f_. v t _;� ♦ 4 ttr, ,
tTJj 1} t 11 1l I �44 V1 �[r
„rFa�r
a I�35W
f
w
N
0
I w w } N
i W Z W Q
aZp � pcn (
I Z ® Z a w W w
g 0 UJ
0 ZNjod
J 0 otS -- Q
z 0 Z
w � Q
°aF- U)
wzOW z
w
® LLI 0
Lw
1_
Ile
31,
:. W LL Qa
� m
4, ? w ° F 0 w
c
p� 0 J CO) ° !
W LL
, �• z
r a AWL
ow
Q og
W Q H `
w . r
z
® CL Opal 3
�+ W a � fn J Q fnH E
hw D � WW W Wwz
� 0q ® a =' Z - 00' NQ-' m
a O �LI- -� E- w � F' Fw- ~
o W W D W _i W a ? a o
? U) � � � o �
y, U
1
ire
£ } Y Y
�xt ,
+r
i
n
N U
G '
F
w � w
LU
L' Q Z
O
W Z W u
i
WU) Z
CO) 00a ®
a ce 1-- O
it
Oado
V) w � a
CO) W J
J r '
WIL
-�
W J2 O
�
f' W Q
00
W
'w
d) a L�. W V
ui
W
ED
ry
> Ni O m
' W
CO) z �-
® W
U
® 2 CO
Z
00
e
' t 21
r
r 3 ;
z s
n-
x
r aL ,r
yIP �'�r 1.t r. •_
bV l i' 1 i A
R r
4
t r
41tY
t CD
Cl)
U) U rr
.�1 h
1
1 �{
S irz�• x y� �
� W
v
� of waYf.�. •� `F� /V�J �� �� Sai� Q1;'1 f.�,tu
W
00
..
e �� rr rn
�F Mti r r kkt +., m
-10
U
: t
f
i � o
4 Q
pp�
i O
4
� 1
� f l
I� 47-
co
1
S r
U .O co
M C
ry ,
1
N 3
� > E
N
1
� co
O �o
+ o
r\ �
1I f
��;���Fit ��I e` i r ^• '
s1X�f�1f `1y rw ` i + n
ary�ta }f F lilf� -•
Y fC Ir 4 t
I
1
f(. p
J
{
_ 1 y
a
1
u
v � 1
■
L:
r
E '
i
J C
. . 1
cr
,
C r17
r r ■ � � r�i
' 3
E
1
bm S�A 1 rr v
1 ht�rdei f�fk+"F ! - N1 r°eK
t )
1.
V
L. 1
U -C_ a� °
co
U _
Jc
i
�- C)
co
as
1 . LLB 3:
�
� Q j
O O N
CY
U (DLLI O
/�o U U)
' (o — 1
I
5 N
t
o O CO— � O
i _/cn
cu
`
a
4-0cu (6 0
LU 4-0
O (L O N 0 ® Q ,�
4
0 0 O cu O O
0
} f Y
t1 '
ihF99v`If ll�f�YY f {P3. 4 ^ r Mr.:
ut.�� �y,F;r�it{fit qYa; a ¢ giirl ::
I3 u{a' yt.y 1 L i �, 2Y5
i
h)
g�, r 1w
r'tr_
E
� o
co
LL ZU Z3 N O i; i s
® LLIUO ' U
� ID
p
Uj Z
r
® U '
u
cu
c an N ® o
a. c
cn
• � +n E
cu an U
� s x .
h
+ "yet,.ji pT s f d t
r y
a
�'erxsFv� v 1' t;
l f
{
z
t
.t .�
. j
1
1
d ! �
j O
3 3
1
r Ji ,
{ i
v j
4 •.� �fj �.�1 rM(j)
1
• ++ A,; r
J J�
r
LL
r r .
r l / R
h *F CL ry ;r
� 1 V +�� � 1•�4St
t t a
r
, � e
, ' a
3
ra t r C
t G
ay y
\9{¢ 1
4 {tr d 11( l•
y � .
erEfv5l���
r �4ra'ri �y>b. it m
r.Fc ti
e � 4
{
t
� W
��`c/�
V+ C
p QU
v u
u
l W 1
LLJ
v ft , I � , W �' � •V � f
f r; LU 11 _ s� O ��✓✓ f
��q1 �C9
co L
uj
co w4)
' � p W
3
am 0
w f
O
r
t ,
r J
i
Itl. Js; ' t it 4 f
i
z +
f
k
k' y
{
c�
N
LL
...
ui
® uja e
s
St
um •� 1
ti o a�
p > O •_
P 9
uj� w
ly
VO
.�
co
�+ •o
_ a
R
cc
� � ® li. esI v+ ® �✓ U c
A
N th 4 ui 6 1` o®
1
x, 2:1
� U
4
i
WWM �
NMI, YZ
1 � V
C � i ry
d
j
x j
j
i
. t �
i
I �
N
Yz
_1
Q Q
Z
Z W® Q U� � w
I
y:
5 _ mow/ w Cl)
w CL
O '
w
0
co in
® 1
j�.. /�
W I 1® { I
cam• cnW ® wC* j
I - J � J ® 1
� wQ OQ O
4
Z00
CL W
' ' W O U � � Z c�•
� � � � IL
�
J CL Z <
' W
10006 0. W D W
= W 0 0. > F- �
Cn QZ LZ Z) w WWI
L! Cn � (n0� e
U
r>,
i
i r �
T
'rz
r
as \
F \ tS
� h� f
f d til,i
1F f �•
C
t
A\ a .' _ ... � � F• 'e.' � ,,.
i
C7
wP 4 W
� a y.Jt :. •
11
LU
Z
® f
t �uj
LU Cl)
uj Lca
L
um
ui
U w
z _�'�J Y
LU •� ^,
M W L
C
y� ca (�
U a
0
w
0
U
1
lq
V
< t
am
_ L
cn
cu
H
`4 coLLI
m �}
j D
Wo i
Q
LO� o
iIL
4
•_ •_
� � s
QU m � NME° co) {
s
t � �
uw
II p
{ W Q q iO r w
._
LM Fla 3
CL m
V L)
w
0
U
i .
vA :
i
ti ,
!
..44 r d,''n,. ,r
3r'tr 1>�f %.'�k' v
AMT
IN
u
x-� j � 7 !. •3 �r
'i In f'y i i •
!
!
k
t � 1
���� '. • fit, '.
;t 9 *w."Y ,t yq r{� tnF
�{yp x s " k A l !y_4Ak7ht >� 1 E 7• mi �9A n� 2t. t A!i{ F�F
IV II
,J
1 ♦ �, 4 1
I ..A4"AY+MiA43� kl 4"lnt :•
J
I
O
W
J�k'
1 I
LU
5 LL
a
LU
5 < Ir
Etn�1
r I1
a
1,
{
1
k,
C r
' r
� a
i C �>Ely~ly�
r ; 1
1
t
t � d
w
' 3
� c
I3 W
1 t N
1
�� Y'ltror��'!T` ) f FIB° ,r rtA 1mnN
i
z,
i
w
w
C
LM
i ` Q a) (D
® L
®
� h ,
t i
f � )
y® 4m ♦G .� `
"�F'+J K Pr Frf
3
M � y
m
0
{
r �
�ru 4
f
11 1 )
1 y9 i7
S
i
. 1
- p
-
MOON-
vi
o
O
Y
L � «
U
R r
k ,
1 , 1 1
� 4
t ,
s
r
r
,e {
h Y
l{
YYY �'
I
i
Q �
' � O
w
D z
Z U, O w �
� � W Q > � wLu
�
(� ® CO m '
{ W I jLLJ w Z LLI
® ® � wwC%• Q w f
BOO LL• o- = O
® � - Ott r•
Q p
C.7 = Jw w w 7
I � � C%. �
W � z gE O a W F_ -r
® � Q LLI c
�-- W
c) +-
' CO O
~ Q
CL
CD
CO
r 0° Q - D - CL z ® z J
m > O > JJ wCL
U
Q w w � O LJ
A A A A A
r F„
� t
V
w ,
a
.r+
,
_ 4
v .
F
f
f
a Lu
f
111W Lj I
f ; M N J_
t^ ® Z U e-
Q
`L V
LIJ
CL
1
w
] 3 cn c
rL O
f•
1 - U
V �]
4O
yr f
' l
1
w
�_ Ip
v
N
UJ N �p
� V
LL W
L L U.
Q. Q� W
w
®co V
4�CO w
i O i z p
I � � y 3 aLL
i (L ® VI
Fm
(, o �
} c
! U ® caU) i
y.. Q. cl)
1 L a
� ' 1 J 5 ca O > w c
w.- 211
LU
4. 0 E
O = z
O p (n
'O ZOO c
.� 0Ow
r ; � � Y VI 0
w
co o Ln o o u)
o, o ca U� ti o0
♦ ' > `' ° 0
rl ® U) o
a
B LQL J = w = 2Q Ow
W o. w QoW w JN - ® d =
(7 �` w Q J m Q: COa
Z U) � Q m
O Fn QfOU p aG. y (A y
Q r N rvi 14
¢ ¢
N p ¢ Q J
` I N
o Xa) p om co w O
E
ono p_ Wz z ¢ ¢
U � 2 w a0 WO 0) O
f ; '. a p IL 2 (.) o. U N w 0
Imo-- 0
U a' X j
} co co 0 0y N tL a W 3
NQ () V Q' 0' Q U- 2 lL — J
Q Q Q II a ¢ y
V W LL LL = > > W o
LU J IX o O — O rn W O r
QZ z > z .. w . .. w p � W c
L Q � w 0 W W C CCL ,C ,aci ,aci ►L W ¢
a9T= T= Ir= F= _ pm =) a J
(LI pt > U. 00000 + wQ Z z•
Z ® X x > ODUUUU aN II
L. IY QUv a 0
W O Q LL XXXXXX r � m
WC� w U) a w a E
® ® w ~ �
J_ O J O Q m S > m
V w U o: a = w w UV R
W W a a s a � i= . z QLL o
r
O (� U cV U W 13'
co coQ m v p 6
f
4I11
ttttt
►
CZ)LL0 0 0 C oo Lo in oo 0 o CD O
o O CDN coN
CD o r
OZ cn
i
U G
LL—
�1 1g1j1
0 o a
0 do
CD CD
0L o wgN i„>G L: 0
LL. j
CD
Q G 1x d -d o ' CCD
D CI CD
i Up X
L7 61 N 07 d i
i Qti ...� A of
LO
a a # vy c o v>'w o
'p U
aoi C O II O
7 m ,C �. a a>♦{✓s a'Y' f4� , ! ♦' ;4 �.
p�0, N o aoa o 0 0 ,
}I V J o N r o o h:4 .. C O I
O C k O D o c
cm
a
a+ Q tafw, > y a
oCD
I e a n:>, ♦ w J h::- a>✓�w n..:e' ,r. w
CD CO
o v o O ?
�Q aCD Q I N ~a
r 3
N E
w o cn o w
o
I u Q
41
v G7 41 _
LI_I — o
Q U w
_ t i
Cl) �■
z ■
u W
J ® J
1
�I v'
I W Q
LIJ F- LL ;
Q w Q f
z J
Lu
Q
i
<C ® Fm > ca
�j Z =
0
} . O
LL LLI a I
i ui 1LI
FM ♦ ' UJ CL 7
LLJJd
Fm
U)
m
0
U
7
' i •
a.
i
r• b.
x
i
v
i
00001,
nd Gr
/1
Ar J i i
1)(f J
J�
I I.
v{
1`
{•
{. 1
�l
1
I.
JL�
�i
r •� c
t
s �
y�; t
� 1 J
ti. l
ry� IA 7
C�LI R Y J { Yx
!K Y 1
i 1
I
L6 N EX T
These images were F® L L= ,f
produced in the normal
course of business by:
f
The Microfilm Depot/
Advanced Imaging Solutions
1213 South 30th Avenue
Hollywood Florida 33020
Brow: (954) 927-4404
{ Dade: (305) 625-0509
i.
I
i
,
1
r
i
t
7