Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-07-01 Special City Commission Meeting Agendai 3 1 { i THE BEGINNING OF JULY L 1997 SPECIAL MEETING I I +ss MINUTES 1 DANIA CITY COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING JULY 11 1997 i ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor: Bob Mikes Commissioners: John Bertino John Etling Bill Hyde City Manager: Michael Smith City Clerk: Marie Jabalee City Attorney: Frank Adler Absent: Vice Mayor: Jim Cali l Mayor Mikes stated that Vice-Mayor Cali would be participating through a phone patch. 1.1 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES RATE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." i' The title of the resolution was ready by City Attorney Adler. A motion was made by Commissioner Hyde, seconded by Commissioner Bertino to approve the resolution. The motion passed on the following roll call vote: Commissioner Bertino - yes Commissioner Hyde -yes Commissioner Elting - yes Mayor Mikes - yes 1.2 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN &ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES IMPACT FEE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF DANIA; AND i PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." The title of the resolution was read by City Attorney Adler. A motion was made by Commissioner Hyde, seconded by Commissioner Etling to approve the resolution. i SPECIAL MEETING 1 JULY 1, 1997 I City Manager Smith stated he would come back to the Commission if he felt additional 1 services would be needed. The motion passed on the following roll call vote: Commissioner Bertino - yes Commissioner Hyde -yes Commissioner Etling - yes Mayor Mikes - yes 2. Discussion and possible action relating to City's position on Purchase Assurance Program and other matters in connection with expansion of Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. Victor Lohmann, Chairman of the Airport Advisory Board, presented a proposed Position Statement to the City Commission defining the position that the citizens of Dania want expressed to the County Commission and the Aviation Division which would include some priorities such as road expansion, job opportunity, job growth, preservation of tax base and preservation of the quality of life the residents currently enjoy. He also requested that the County Commission be asked to define the basic premise on how the Purchase Assurance Program would operate. Some of the issues the Board was concerned about were boundaries, time frame and guidelines for seeking public input. i City Manager Smith referred to options addressed in the inter-local agreement. Mayor Mikes read the contents of Resolution No. 67-97 wherein the City recommended the south runway remain a general aviation runway and one of the north runway alternatives be constructed, which would minimize the threat to the public health and safety of Dania residents by the proposed project. Commissioner Bertino was concerned that the property values were decreasing in the area because the owners don't want to put any money into their homes which they feel will eventually be taken by the airport expansion. It was suggested that the Mayor meet with the new County Commissioners individually and talk to them regarding the health, safety and welfare of the residents in the area. The Mayor mentioned that the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) was coming up soon for approval. Commissioner Hyde felt that the best opportunity to bring the health, safety and welfare issues up would be during the EIS process. Mayor Mikes stated that the DRI study was scheduled for the next County Commission agenda. Vice-Mayor Cali recommended that the City ask the County for a fully funded purchase assurance program by creating a trust fund which could be funded by a percentage of revenues generated through tenants, tickets and other sources of revenue at the airport. SPECIAL MEETING 2 JULY 1, 1997 I y Commissioner Hyde stated that he felt it was the County's responsibility to fund the Purchase assurance program. Mayor Mikes suggested that the City get a definitive statement from FAA regarding allowable uses of the runway. Jay Field, member of the Airport Advisory Board, suggested that a single event noise component be included for mitigation. Mayor Mikes suggested that an addendum or a side agreement be drafted regarding the mitigation portion of the inter-local agreement with language that would increase the viability of home ownership in the stressed areas. The Mayor was directed to draft a statement to the County to include: definition of the purchase assurance program, areas that would be impacted, establishment of a time frame for the implementation of the program, guarantee that it will be fully funded, and single event contour. The Mayor was also directed to address the County Commission regarding the possibility of an addendum to address specifics of the purchase assurance program. Vice-Mayor Cali suggested that the County be asked to give Dania the unincorporated parcels which lie within the Riverland Road area and/or to deed all the water and sewer ! utilities to Dania that lie within our city limits. Robin Coatsworth agreed that the City should take a hard stance like Hollywood and Fort Lauderdale. Gary Lichi mentioned that the City of Hollywood was concerned that they might be loosing the Oakridge neighborhood. Craig Leonard was concerned about air pollution and water quality. This special meeting adjourned. i j Mayor-Commissioner I l/6l�il�o�����O.c' City Clerk!Auditor t SPECIAL MEETING 3 JULY 1, 1997 Commissioner Hyde stated that he felt it was the County's responsibility to fund the Purchase assurance program. Mayor Mikes suggested that the City get a definitive statement from FAA regarding allowable uses of the runway. Jay Field, member of the Airport Advisory Board, suggested that a single event noise component be included for mitigation. Mayor Mikes suggested that an addendum or a side agreement be drafted regarding the mitigation portion of the inter-local agreement with language that would increase the viability of home ownership in the stressed areas. The Mayor was directed to draft a statement to the County to include: definition of the purchase assurance program, areas that would be impacted, establishment of a time frame for the implementation of the program, guarantee that it will be fully funded, and single event contour. The Mayor was also directed to address the County Commission regarding the possibility of an addendum to address specifics of the purchase assurance program. Vice-Mayor Cali suggested that the County be asked to give Dania the unincorporated parcels which lie within the Riverland Road area and/or to deed all the water and sewer utilities to Dania that lie within our city limits. Robin Coatsworth agreed that the City should take a hard stance like Hollywood and Fort Lauderdale. Gary Lichi mentioned that the City of Hollywood was concerned that they might be loosing the Oakridge neighborhood. Craig Leonard was concerned about air pollution and water quality. This special meeting adjourned. I Mayor-Commissioner City Clerk-Auditor SPECIAL MEETING g JULY 1, 1997 L AGENDA CITY OF DANIA SPECIAL MEETING JULY 1, 1997 TO FOLLOW WORKSHOP MEETING ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE 8Y THE CITY COMMISSION WITH REGARD TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING OR HEARING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. LOBBYIST REGISTRATION REQUIRED - REGISTRATION AS A LOBBYIST IN THE CITY OF DANIA IS REQUIRED IF ANY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION IS BEING PAID TO LOBBY THE COMMISSION ON ANY PETITION OR ISSUE PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 01-93. REGISTRATION FORMS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE IN THE ADMINISTRATION CENTER. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, PERSONS NEEDING ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY OF THESE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD CONTACT MARIE JABALEE, CITY CLERK, 100 W. DANIA BEACH BLVD, DANIA, FL 33004, (954) 921-8700 EXT. 202, AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO MEETING. ••.......•............••._...•- CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: J 1. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES RATE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES IMPACT FEE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. Discussion and possible action relating to City's position on Purchase Assurance Program and other matters in connection with expansion of Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. S RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES IMPACT FEE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the certain Proposal dated June 18, 1997, submitted by Hartman & Associates, Inc. to conduct a water and wastewater utilities impact fee study in the amount of $9,500.00 for the City of Dania, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", be and the same is hereby accepted and the appropriate city officials are hereby authorized to execute same. Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED on this 24 day of June 1997. ATTEST: ROBERT MIKES MAYOR- COMMISSIONER MARIE JABALEE CITY CLERK -AUDITOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS By: � FRANK C. ADLER, City Attorney 1 Resolution No. 4Y I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES RATE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the certain Proposal dated June 18, 1997, submitted by Hartman & Associates, Inc. to conduct a water and wastewater utilities rate study in the amount of $20,000.00 for the City of Dania, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", be and the same is hereby accepted and the appropriate city officials are hereby authorized to execute same. Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED on this 24 day of June 1997. ATTEST: ROBERT MIKES MAYOR- COMMISSIONER MARIE JABALEE CITY CLERK-AUDITOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS By: Y C .�-�— FRANK C. ADLER, City Attorney 1 Resolution No. I y � HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. =Ew unuuxu Clm, ,%EL engineers,hydrogeologists,surveyors&management consultants HIM ,I,,H. C,r C nlmnes • IIaaX Ceewvm l:2 1.Ilaiva l•.mMn.Ih ' XK I.la4x YSA4 n.rpa.Y uw....u.,rt. Xlnti"' E![nml.qJt IlF. June 18, 1997 HA1#97-237MR �t'�:,","CAO EL IdvW ., SMIOHAtOC1ATES: liwT 1.Xel'N' :I,PF w2rdm nMo ,,PP. kaco CQ-k*d .PX ''. TamIOA.ItotlrvliCE Ms. Marie J. Jabalee Finance Director City ofDania 100 W.Dania Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 1708 Dania,FL 33004 Subject: Engineer's Quotation for: 1. Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study 2. Water and Wastewater Utilities Impact Fee Study Dear Ms. Jabalee: Thus letter constitutes our budget quotation to you and confirms our conversation of June 18, 1997. 1, Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study - The lump sum amount for the water and wastewater rate study is$20,000. 2. Water and Wastewater Utilities ltnpact Fee Study - The lump sum amount for the water and wastewater impact fee study is$9,500. 3_ If the City desires, the lump sum amount for a combined water and wastewater rate study, as well as a water and wastewater impact he study in one report is S29,500. Our standard hourly rates are attached hereto. EXHIBIT «Alr 201 &1Sr MU STR= • stmTinor) • ORLAWO,R.32801 TFLFPHONF.(40n S:;9.4955• FAX(407)839-3790 • C-MAIL:112MG I a'�.Io I.cnm ;r I Ms. Marie J. Jabalee June 18, 1997 Page 2 Our firm stands committed to accomplish the above-referenced work for'the lump sum amounts delineated above. If any additional services are required, we are available to conduct the same utilizing our hourly rate schedule. Very truly Yom, Hartman �&&Associates,Inc. {ierald C. Hartman,P.E. President GCH/ch P25/Jabalee.gch Attachment cc: Mrke Rocca, C.M.C.,T3AJ JUN—W-1997 14:17 40^r 639 3790 P.02 Y \ LLART1lLA11r 8t ASSOCL470, LNG i HOORLPRATB SCHEDW i Geuld C. Harenan,P.B. $150.00 Partmeta/Principals(P.B./P.G.!P.L.S.)-(Schmidt,Christopher,Rynning, Duke,LW=) $115.00 Senior Manager/senior TE, $99.00 DivWon M9nagcr/C hief Engineer(P.B./P.LS./C.M.C.) $90,00 Bugi»em VI1T(P.R.) $80.00 Senior Ptojact Manager $72.00 Engineer VII(P-E.) $72.00 Engineer VI(P.B.)/Scientist W $66.00 Engmeer V (P.B.) $60.00 HIV $55.00 Engimm IH $50.00 EngineerLU $45.00 Senior Scientist $60.00 Scientist IM $40.00 Engineer Impector $50.00 Tutor $40.00 Senior FJmoer $50.00 Hydtogeoloo Vm(P.G.) $83.00 Hydrogeologist VII CP.G.) $72.00 Hydrogeologist VI(P-G.) $66.00 Hydrogeologist V $60.00 Hydropdogist IV $55.00 Hydrollalogist In $50.00 Hyfto6Kologist lm $45.00 Hydro Technician 11 $35.00 Hydro Technician I $25.00 Bugineerime Designer m $50.00 Engineering Dedpm H $45.00 Engineering Technician IV $45.00 Eogimmine Technician M $40.00 Engineering Technician B $35.00 Bngfirtdag Techmician l $30.00 Land Surveyor $45.00 Sarvey Crew Chief $40.00 Smvey Technician M $40.00 Smwy Tochntrlan H $35.00 Smvey Tedm ciao I ,$25.00 GmPhica Manger $45.00 Graphics Technician $35.00 Senior Rau Analyst(M.B.A.) $60.00 Senior Rate Arodyst $55.00 Ram AtWyn $45.00 Sccretzdai Supper $20.00 Repro&=ion/Comier S%Vod $25.00 Adtmmstzative Assib= $50.00 Senior word Processor $37.00 Woad Pt $30.00 Rod-man $20.00 Egeane Due; Aug=10, 1995 (flemdy ratty nre mviewcd mamaUy udmay be adimted to redm chavgea in the variim eWn mta dut emnpriso diem.) aVsdik6J3Hetyara8ea 8/10/95 j JUN-18-1997 14:18 407 839 3790 P.03 I i DRAFT June 20, 1997 HAI N97-2372%4K Ms.Marie Jabalee Finance Director City of Dania 100 West Dania Boulevard Dania. Florida 33004 Subject: Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study Dear Ms. Jabalee: We are pleased to submit the following proposal for professional services in connection with water and wastewater utilities rate study. Hartman&Associates,Inc. (HAI),bereinafter referred to as the"Consultant,"proposes to furnish professional services for the City of Dania,hereinafter referred to as the "City"for the scope outlined below for the fees stipulated herein. Scope of SX:dCzs The Consultant will perform the following: General: Pursuant to the request for services in the City's RFP, it is the Consultant's understanding that the City desires a review of the water and wastewater user rates and miscellaneous service charges, together with recommendations for modifications of the rate structure and adjustments to the rates as applicable. Task I: Water and Wastewater Utilities Study 1. Review Utility Customer Data The City will provide information as requested by the Consultant and the Consultant will review and evaluate historical and current records for the mrnber of customer accounts currently on Iine to the water system and wastewater system. Data to be provided by tl.e City will include, but not necessarily be limited to, the number of accounts belonging to each customer class,the number of water accounts by meter size by class, the number of dwelling units associated with each account and the breakdown of accounts between inside and outside service areas and the number of exclusive irrigation meters by meter size. JUN-20-1997 09:48 P.02 i Ms.Marie Jabalee June 20, 1997 ®RAFT Page 2 �[ 2. Review Water Use and Wastewater Flow Data The City will provide and the Consultant will compile historical flow data for the water and wastewater systems. The Consultant will review characteristics of utility customers in the City's service areas and identify any relationships to historical and current trends in water demand and consumption and wastewater generation data 3. Forecast Customer Growth, Water Consumption and Wastewater Generation. The number of accounts for each customer class of each utility will be forecast, inside and outside the City's limits, for the next 5 years. These projections will be reviewed with the City staff to ensure their compatibility with City plans. In addition, water consumption and wastewater generation will be projected for the same 5-year period and presented to the City for review. 4. Review Revenue Requirements. To estimate the revenue requirements, the City will provide and the Consultant will review and evaluate such information as historical and current finaucial records, operation and maintenance reports, and schedules of existing debt service as they pertain to the water and wastewater system. The Consultant will require assistance from the City's staff in estimating revenue requirements for each utility to ensure that cacti utility will operate on a financially self-sufficient basis. 5. Forecast Revenue Requirements. Based upon such information as historical operating records. system development plans, estimates of preventative maintenance costs and needs for renewal and replacement and contingencies, and relevant economic conditions and trends, the Consultant will forecast revenue requirements for the next 5 years for both the water and wastewater systems. Costs will be forecast by major cost line item. 6. Allocate Costs to Each Utility Cost allocations for both capital and O&M expenses of the water system will be made .o water system functions, customer classes, size of meter and volume of usage. Costs for the wastewater system will be allocated to wastewater system fimetions, the customer classes reflecting capital, and O&M and wholesale treatment costs. Cost allocations will be made to determine administrative charge back from the utility systems to the City's General Fund. The Consultant's rate study will also be conducted so as to recognize the JUN-20-1997 09:49 P.03 Y Ms.Marie Jabalee DRAFT � /dA�� June 20, 1997 Page 3 25% outside City surcharge on cartes to customers located outside the City limits, as Cowed by Florida Statute. 7. Evaluate Miscellaneous Service Charges. The level of various miscellaneous water and wastewater service charges will be reevaluated for general appropriateness and comparability with similar charges for other public utilities in this area. For the water utility, these charges include the following: meter turn-on, meter tum-off, meter calibration, monthly fire protection charges for private fire line and hydrant rates and security deposits. 8. Allocate Revenue Requirements for Each Utility. Maintaining the basic integrity of existing water and wastewater customer rate categories and structure, the Consultant will determine each customer class' proportionate share of total system revenue requirements for each utility. 9. Calculate Proposed Rates. For the 5 year time horizon of the study, the Consultant will forecast the annual revenues expected to be collected through water system rates and charges and through wastewater rates and charges. Proposed rates will be compared with the current rates for each utility and the differences will be identified, 10. Prepare Report. (Deliverable) The Consultant will prepare a single volume report of this project. The report will include: • An executive summary 0 A discussion of rate-malting concepts focusing on equity and cost of service • Assumptions,policies and date sources • Methods and procedures • Conclusions and recommendations + Figures and tabular displays of the analysis • A draft revised rate resolution Eight copies of the draft report will be provided for review by the City staff The City staff comments will be incorporated as appropriate. JUN-20-1997 09:49 P.04 I Ms.Marie Jabalee June 20, 1997 DRAFT Page 4 Ten copies of the final report will be provided to the City of Dania. 11. Presentation to the City Commission. The Consultant will present conclusions and recearmtendations to the City of Dania Commission at two public meetings on request. Task 11; Impact Fee Study The City may desire to engage the Consultant to perform a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study in addition to the Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study. This impact fee study would include an analysis of the City's existing water and wastewater system fixed assets, funding sources used to acquire/construct those assets and existing water and wastewater system design capacities. In addition, a review of the City's future 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) will also be conducted to determine the appropriate projects to be funded through the water and wastewater impact fees. The various assumptions, conclusions and recommendations will be provided to the City in an executive report format or combined in the Utility Rate Study Report and presented to the City Commission in one public meeting. In addition, this proposal assumes and relies on the availability of appropriate data to be provided by the City. in particular, data regarding the City's existing utility fixed assets and historical funding mechanisms. Task III: Additional Services The Consultant will provide other utility Management Consulting Services on an as requested/as needed basis. Such services may include, but not be limited to, bond feasibility reports, bond credit rating and insurance support, utility acquisition and valuation assistance, annual utility reports required by bond covenants, capital hording assistance, assessment programs, utility strategic planting, utility line extension policies, ordinance/resolution preparation, litigation support,expert witness testimony and assistance regarding utility privatization issues. Items To Be Furnished At No Expense to the Consultant Th, City will assist the Consultant by furnishing, at no cost to the Consultant, all available pertinent information including previous reports; financial statements, budgets, cost estimatt s, customer data; and any other data relative to performance of the above services for the project it is agreed and understood that the accuracy and veracity of said information and data may be retied upon by Consultant without independent verification of the same. JUN-20-1997 09:50 P.05 Ms.Marie Jabalee DRAFT June 20, ]997 U Page 5 Designate in writing a person to act as the City s representative with respect to the services to be performed under this Agreement. Such person shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to materials,equipment,elements and systems pertinent to the Consultant's services. Time of Performance Task 1,items I through 10 of the Scope of Services will be completed within ninety(90)calendar days after receipt of Notice to Proceed except for delays beyond the reasonable control of the Consultant. Said representation is not, however, a warranty or guarantee that said services will be completed within such time frame. Task I, item 11 of the Scope of Services will be completed as mutually agreed. Although the exact tinting of presentations of the final report to the City Commission is unknown at this time, it is believed that this schedule will allow the City to implement the adjusted rate schedule, if any,as of October 1, 1997. Tasks II and III of the Scope of Services will be completed as mutually agreed to by both the City and the Consultant. Fees to bq Paid For Task I of the Scope of Services (the Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study), the Consultant shall be paid a lump sum fee,including reimbursable expenses, of Twenty Thousand Dollars($20,000.00). For Task II of the Scope of Services (Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study), the Consultant shall be paid a lump sum fee, including reimbursable expenses, of Nine Thousand Five Hundred Dollars(S9,500.00). Should the City desire the Consultant to provide both the Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study as well as the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study, the Consultant shall be paid a lump sum fee, including reimbursable expenses, of Twenty-Nine Thousand Five Hundred DLIIars($29,500.00). For Task III of the Scope of Services (Additional Services), the Consultant shall be paid a fee Rased upon the attached Kate Schedule(See Exhibit A)plus reimbursable expenses. JUN-20-1997 09:50 P.06 Ms. Marie Jabalee DRAFT June 20, 1997 Page 6 As specified for Task III, the Consultant shall be reimbursed for direct nonsalary expenses, including,but not limited to, equipment rental, automobile travel at $0.30 per mile, commercial air travel at cost, subsistence,printing and reproduction,plus Florida sales taxes, if applicable. Invoices for services rendered are prepared monthly and the City agrees to pay such invoices within the time frame specified in Section 218.70, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the 'Florida Prompt Payment Act'. However, the City shall retain 20 percent of the lump sum fees to be paid to the Consultant until ten(10)days from final presentation to the City Commission. Payments which are not received within sixty(60)calendar days from the date of invoice will be considered sufficient cause for Consultant to discontinue performing and providing services until payment in full is received. If Consultant is required to take action to collect past due invoices, the City will pay all legal fees and costs. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida, and the appropriate venue for any actions arising out of the agreement would be Orlando,Florida. T,.�yAifi�ati.,�rn rhn Terms of S CrneIlt . In the event the City issues a Purchase Order or Memorandum or other Instrument covering the professional services described herein, it is hereby specifically agreed and understood that such Purchase Order, Memorandum or Instrument is for City internal control purposes only and any and all terms and conditions contained therein, whether printed Cr written,shall be of no force or effect. This contract is the entire contract between the patties and there is no modification or waiver of any of the terms and conditions herein unless signed by both parties. Termination This Agreement may be terminated by either party by giving thirty (30) days advance written notice. The Consultant shall be paid for services rendered to the date of termination on the basis of a reasonable estimate of the portion of services completed prior to termination and shall be paid for all reasonable expenses resulting from such termination and for any unpaid reimbursable expenses. Aunuu= Acceptance of this proposal may be indicated by the signature of a duly authorized official of the City in the space provided below. one signed copy of this proposal returned to the Consultant JUN-20-1997 09:51 P.07 Ms.Marie Jabalee June 20, 1997 Page 7 DRAFT r w111 serve as an Agreement between the two parties and as Notice to Proceed. This contract will be binding on the parties hereto and parties' successors and assigns. Should this proposal not be accepted within a period of sixty(60)days from the above date,it shall become null and void. Very truly yours, Hartman&Associates,Inc. Witness Witness Accepted by: City of Dania Witness Witness Authorized Signature Date RCGvgs/P2/j ahalee.rcc cc: Ada Terrero, HAI JJN-20-1997 09:51 P.08 Y \ HOURLYRATE SCHEDULE Gerald C.Hardman,P.H. $150.00 Parmecs/Priudpals(P.E./P.G./P.L.S.)-(ScLlaidt,Christopher,Ryne�, Doke,Luke) $115.00 Senior Manager/S=ar Engineer $99.00 Division Manager/Chlef Engineer(P.E.lP.L S./GM.C.) $90.00 &ngineer Vm(P.5.) $80.00 Senior Project Manager $72.00 Engineer VH(P.E.) $72.00 Engineer VI(P.R.)/Scientist IV $66.00 Engineer V (P.E.) $60.00 Engineer 1V $55.00 Engineer III $50.00 Engineer III $45.00 Senior Scientist $60.00 Scientist I/a $40.00 Engineer Inspector $50.00 Inspector $40.00 Senior Planner 550.00 Hydrogedogist VIH(P.G.) $83.00 Hydrogcologist VH(P.G.) $72.00 Hydrogeologist VI(P.G.) $66.00 Hydrogeologist V $60.00 Hydrogeologst IV $55.00 Hydrogeolosist M $50.00 Hydrogeologist III $45.00 Hydro Technidaa H $35.00 Hydm Technician I $25.00 Engineering Designer 11I $50.00 Engineedag Designer li $45.00 Engin=zing Todwieian IV $45.00 Engineming Technician III $40.00 Engineering Technician li $35.00 Engineering Technician I $30.00 Land Surveyor $45.00 Survey Crew Chief $40.00 Survey Technician M $40.00 Survey Technician II $35.00 Survey Technician I $25.00 C.npbits Manager 545.00 Graphics Teebnicim 535.00 Senior Rate Analyst(M.B.A.) $60.00 Senior Rate Analyst $55.00 Rate Amlyst 545.00 Secretarial Support $20.00 Reproduction/Courier Support $25.00 Administrative Asssmm $50.00 Seni rr Word Procamor $37.00 Word Processor $30.00 Rod-ana $20.L 0 Effecive Dal: Augurs 10,1995 (Houdy riots me reviewed==Uy and any be Adjusted to reflect changer insbe various ckments that ca mOse them.) aVM wwadyiumscb 8/10195 AN-m-1997 09:51 P.09 V CHAPTER2 HISTORY AND FORECAST OF OPERATIONS AT FORT LAUDERDALE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1985 TO 2005 2.0 Introduction Two important analyses are presented in this section. First,the input data from the 1992 and 1997 Noise Exposure Maps from the FAR Part 150 Study Program Update, dated December 1994, were checked for accuracy and reasonability. Second, Young Environmental Sciences, Inc. (YES) analyzed the 1995 estimated number of operations from FAA data and compared this most recent level of operations with the FAR Part 150 forecast data. YES then developed a forecast of operations for 2005. In Chapter 3,noise contour maps are plotted for 1985, 1992, 1995, 1997 and 2005,using actual and forecast data. The YES noise contour maps display the Ldn 60 contour to highlight the areas affected by a defined sound level less than Ldn 65. 2.1 History and Local Market Share In 1994 the Ft.Lauderdale/Hollywood International(FLL)airport ranked about 35th in the U.S.for air carrier operations. This airport is considered a part of the Miami hub because of its proximity to Miami airport. In 1989, FLL handled about 32 percent of the commercial operations of the Miami Hub as compared to Miami International(MIA)airport that handled 68 percent of the commercial aircraft operations. The FAA states that the FLL airport is expected to increase its share of the Miami Hub operations to 33 percent by 2005. As the second major airport in the Miami Hub,FLL is considered to be primarily a domestic airport as compared to MIA that serves a large international market. International passenger enplanements at FLL are about 15 percent of the total,while at Miami international enplanements account for a little over 40 percent of the passenger activity. Recent statistics list Delta,USAir,Continental and American as the top four air carvers serving Ft. Lauderdale.They accounted for about 77 percent of the enplaned passengers in 1994. Commuter and air taxi passengers accounted for four percent of enplaned passengers, while about 12 other airlines carried the remaining 19 percent of the total. Referring to the FAR Part 150 and Master Plan documents, the number of actual and forecast operations in a given year has changed as the various studies have evolved. Generally the greatest difference between actual and forecast operations has been a decline in total operations, attributed principally to adecline in general aviation(GA)operations. Another unanticipated occurrence is the shift in commercial traffic from the predominance of air carrier jets to the rapid increase in commuter or air taxi operations. The shortfall in GA activity at FLL is due to a general decline in numbers of operations for small private aircraft nationwide. According to the 1995 FAA Aviation forecast, general aviation operations decreased at a rate of 0.8 percent per year between 1985 and 1994. Some leading Page 2-1 Y indicators of GA activity, such as business jet aircraft sales, were improved for 1994. A slight recovery of GA activity,coupled with the 1994 General Aviation Revitalization Act,are expected to encourage general aviation activity in the forecast years between 1995 and 2005, particularly for corporate jet activity. An additional contributing factor to the decline in GA operations at Ft. Lauderdale airport is an increase in GA operations at the nearby Ft. Lauderdale Executive airport. For example, from 1985 through 1991,Executive airport increased its share of GA operations in the Miami hub by about two percent,while FLL decreased its share by more than three percent in the same time period. The FLL air taxi operations increased in number at a very rapid rate between 1985 and 1990 as many major airlines allowed their code-sharing airline partners to serve many intrastate Florida markets with smaller capacity turboprop aircraft. That trend appears to have been a one-time shift of commercial traffic and the current traffic growth seems to be similar for both air carrier and air taxi operations. The number of night-period (I OPM-7AM) operations is calculated to be 10 percent of air carrier operations,based upon actual flight schedules. Many night operations can be accounted for as cargo flights and night period flights for tourists. The percent of night operations is not expected to change significantly in the forecast period. 2.2 Annual Operations, Historic and Forecast Figure 2-1 shows actual and forecast operations for Ft.Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport FORT LAUDERDALE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ACTUAL AND FORECAST OPERATIONS AIR AIR GENERAL AVERAGE YEAR CARRIER TAXI AVIATION MILITARY TOTAL DAY SOURCE 1980 91,808 4,020 176,630 749 273,207 749 1 1985 75,300 46,400 103,000 1,100 225,800 619 I 1990 99,362 53,975 69,876 1,490 224,703 616 1 1992 82,920 46,052 78,613 1,480 209,065 573 1 1995 106,717 57,698 70,151 938 235,504 645 2 1997 110,700 60,800 75,000 2,000 248,500 681 1 2002 131,000 68,400 75,000 2,000 276,400 757 1 2005 129,021 64,737 78,289 891 272,938 748 2 2012 162,300 81,100 75,000 2,000 320,400 878 1 SOURCE: 1.FORT LAUDERDALE PART 150 STUDY, 1994; 2.YOUNG ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES,INC. Figure 2-1 History and Forecast of Aircraft Operations Page 2-2 Y' for select years 1980 through 2012 from various sources, as indicated in die Figure. The historical data for 1980 through 1992 was taken from die FAR Part 150 study and verified through other FAA information sources. For the 1995 actual(estimated)operations,Young Environmental Sciences(YES)acquired the actual number ofoperations through June 1995 for this study. Using monthly data from the previous year,an estimate of 1995 operations has been determined for this study. Note that the traffic increase from 1992 through 1995 represents an average annual increase of four percent. YES developed a forecast ofannual operations for2005 using the information in the Pan 150 Study, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)Annual and Hub Forecasts and Official Airline Guide Schedules. Looking at Figure 1-1, the YES forecast for 2005 is lower than the Pan 150 forecast for 2002 that was completed in December 1994. This is the result of the continuation of conservative forecasts for air transportation in the U.S. in general and for the Miami Hub in particular. Attention is focused on the 1997 forecast from the FAR Part 150 Study because that contour is expected to represent the"worst case"in terms ofresidential noise exposure. Between 1995 and 2000 die number of Stage 2 aircraft operations is expected to be systematically reduced to almost zero. Quieter Stage 3 aircraft are expected to replace the older Stage 2 aircraft. The Stage 3 aircraft will tend to decrease the area ofcritical noise exposure,although the number of noise events will increase. As calculated from Figure 1-1,actual air carrier and air taxi operations increased at an average rate of 3.5 percent per year between 1985 and 1995(estimated). During this 10 year time period, air taxi operations increased at an average rate of approximately 2 2 percent. Although the average growth rate for commercial operations from 1985 through 1995 was relatively low, the more significant factor is the unevenness of the change. Both air carrier and air taxi operations decreased in 1991 and 1992 due to the residual effect of slow economic conditions;and the termination of Eastern Airlines service in January 1991,due to the airline's bankruptcy. From 1992 through 1995 air carrier and air taxi operations increased at a hearty annual rate of 8.8 and 7.8 percent, respectively. A trend of slower growth in commercial airline operations is apparent in U.S. traffic statistics. This is due to an economic slowdown in the early 1990's and to the general maturation of the airline industry in recent years. The FAA and other commercial forecasts project annual gowth rates of between one to three percent over the next ten years. General aviation operations include all civil aircraft operations not classified as air carver or air taxi (commuter)operations. This category includes business jets and other smaller aircraft. Figure l-I shows that GA operations increased only slightly from 1990 to 1995. The large increase in operations in 1992 was due to the temporary closing of nearby Tamiami airport because of Hurricane Andrew in August 1992. The Ft.Lauderdale Airport supported those operations temporarily. General aviation operations are expected to increase at an overall rate of approximately 12 percent by 2005. Within the GA category, business jet traffic is projected to increase at a faster rate while smaller turbojet and reciprocal engine aircraft operations will increase only slightly in the next ten years. As discussed previously,nearby Ft.Lauderdale Executive airport has experienced substantial Page 2-3 I y increases in GA operations directly related to decreases in GA activity at FLL. Ft. Lauderdale Executive airport is expected to continue attracting GA activity because they are well suited to serve this specialized market. Military operations at Ft.Lauderdale have historically been less than two percent of total operations. Planned reductions in military budgets will decrease those operations to an even lower level in future years. Overall, moderate economic conditions coupled with an established tourism industry in the Ft. Lauderdale Hollywood area are expected to contribute to a moderate 1.7 percent annual growth rate in air carrier operations over the next ten years. Air taxi operations are expected to increase at a rate of approximately 1.8 percent in the same time period. Although commercial operations are expected to increase at a relatively slow rate,passenger enplanements are expected to increase more rapidly. In this ten year time frame,the average seating in commercial aircraft is expected to increase by more than 14 percent. As an example,many olderBoeing 727 and 737 aircraft are expected to be replaced by larger Boeing 757 and late model 737 aircraft. Another factor in the sluggish outlook for commercial airline traffic is the fact that many newer aircraft have increased space for belly cargo. Therefore,commercial cargo operations are expected to increase at a slower rate than cargo traffic because more cargo can be carried on fewer flights. The 1997 - 2012 forecast as established in the FAR Part 150 Study seems reasonable in terms of number of annual operations. The Study considers recent changes in rates of growth for the major classes ofaireraftoperations. The selection ofaircraft types reflects die schedules in place at the time of the Study. One noticeable change reflected in the YES forecast is the addition of DC-9's to the aircraft mix. The impact of this narrow body aircraft type is expected to have a minimal effect on the final area of noise impact. The number and distribution of turboprop aircraft types are similar in the FAR Part 150 and YES studies. Among general aviation aircraft the YES study contains a slightly higher percentage of business jet operations. The reason for this slight shift in aircraft 'nix is the lle tendency of business jet operators to choose the facilities of a larger airport. Operators of sma r aircraft such as single engine aircraft tend to prefer operating in an environment where they do no[have to be sequenced with faster jet aircraft. The methodology used by the FAA in determining the average day operations selects the total operations divided by 365. In reality there are peaks in numbers of operations that coincide with weekly and seasonal variations. In the case ofFt.Lauderdale the climate and thriving tourism industry cause seasonal peaks that are quite pronounced. The nature of the air transportation demand also causes greater peak demand in correlation with weekend days. Therefore,the average day operations as shown in Figure 2-1 represent a conservative forecast of operations that would as compared to actual peak day activity. To illustrate this point, if the established method of selecting a peak day as utilized in the Land Use Plan were used,the peak day operations as a share of the total would be.00323 (peak month of 9.7% divided by30)as compared to theaverage day operations of.00274(total operations divided by365). For the 2005 forecast of272,938 operations the average day is 748 as compared to a peak day of 882 operations. Page 2-4 Y In addition to peak traffic patterns, noise events during these periods tend to be more annoying to residents becausepleasant weathercauses residents to keep windows open and participate in outdoor activities. Warmer weather also has a negative effect on aircraft performance. Therefore, aircraft tend to take longer to climb to a given altitude. These factors mesh together to create a more negative noise environment than would be expected in an area that does not experience the exaggerated peak traffic situations as occur at Fort Lauderdale. Figure 2-2 shows a detailed look at the aircraft mix for average day operations for the years 1985, 1995, and 2005. These numbers of operations are used as inputs for the noise contours that will be generated for this study. The aircraft mix is determined from the FAR Part 150 Study and changed only slightly as discussed previously to reflect updated information taken from the current Official Airline Guide schedules. i i Page 2-5 ei s Figure 2-2 History and Forecast ofAircraft Operations by Type FORT LAUDERDALE INTERNATIONALAIRPORT HISTORYAND FORECAST OF OPERATIONS BYTYPE AIR CARRIER 1985 1995 2005 AIR TAXI 1985 1995 2005 B747-400 2 6 DHC7 3 is 18 MD11 3 10 DHC8 6 28 56 B767-200 5 4 12 EMB120 8 46 94 B767-300 11 22 DHC6 6 6 A300 10 4 EMB 110 45 6 A310 2 C402 11 44 10 1,1011 26 10 8 SD330 5 2 DC10 2 4 10 SWM 42 8 DC8-60* 4 4 AT TOTAL 126 158 178 DC8-73 4 6 2 B757 6 25 100 GENERALAVIATION A320 4 14 B737-300 20 44 LEAR25 12 6 2 B737400 14 82 CITATION 8 8 12 B737-500 4 24 SABRE 6 6 MD80 2 9 LEAR 35 8 8 38 MD88 20 4 G-III 4 6 12 17I00 4 LCTW 72 48 32 DC9-10* 2 SMTW 80 52 54 DC9-30 17 36 6 SEP 92 58 64 DC9-50* 5 GA TOTAL 282 192 214 B737-200* 26 20 B727-100* 11 MILITARY B727-200 78 90 6 BACI-11* 8 C130 2 ? 2 F28* 2 C9 2 2 2 AC TOTAL 208 292 354 MIL TOTAL 4 4 4 AVERAGE DAY TOTAL OPERATIONS 1985 620 1995 646 L Stage 2 a/c 2005 750 Page 2-6 I CHAPTER 3 NOISE CONTOUR MODELLING 3.0 Introduction In Chapter I the concepts involved in noise analysis and contour modelling were presented along with a discussion of land use compatibility and noise related annoyance. Chapter 2 provided a summary of aircraft traffic, historical and forecast for Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport. This Chapter presents the results of the development of noise contour plots for 1985, 1992, 1995, 1997 and 2005, all plotted to the Ldn 60 level. Single event noise contour are also shown for three representative Stage 3 aircraft types in order to show the relationship between the annual average contours for the various years analyzed and the audible or single event noise con- tour impacts. Both of these matters are central to decision making on land use compatibility. Fur- ther, statistical and summary information is presented to provide a further basis for understanding and applying the results reported below. The central purpose of showing this time series is to gain a better understanding of the changing nature of source noise and the implications this has for community protection. Heavy jet aircraft have undergone a major transformation over the last few decades as improvements in engine de- sign have substantially reduced source noise emission levels. This improvement is masked to some degree by the continuing presence of noisier aircraft in the fleet. Noise contours, by their nature, tend to move in response to the noisiest components of the fleet. This will change dramatically after the Year 2000 when, by federal law, all the noisiest (Stage 2) aircraft in the commercial fleet are grounded or converted to the quieter standards represented by Stage 3 emission levels. This type of transition occurred once before, in 1985, when all Stage l aircraft were grounded or con- verted. It is for this reason that the 1985 noise contours are presented. 3.1 Statistical Summary Table 3-1 presents a summary of the total areas included within the contour sets by year. Table 3- 2 shows the total traffic by category in percentage distribution of aircraft activity. Noise impacts in Table 3-1 Comparison of Noise Contour Areas COMPARISON OF TOTAL NOISE CONTOUR AREAS 1985-2005 Ldn 60 Ldn 65 Ldn 70 Ldn 75 YEAR Area Area Area Area 1985 19.44 9.36 4.11 1.79 1992 17.77 8.35 3.6 1.52 1995 19.67 9.51 4.16 1.78 1997 22.03 10.05 4.51 2.04 2005 7.95 3.28 1.31 0.62 • ALL AREAS IN SQUARE RULES Page 3-1 ACTUAL AND FORECAST OPERATIONS PER DAY BY TYPE OF ACTIVITY YEAR Air Air General Military TOTAL OPS PER DAY HISTORICAL Carrier Taxi Aviation 1985 33.50% 20.30% 45.50% 0.70% 100.00% 620 1992 39.70% 22.00% 37.60% 0.70% 100.00% 573 1995 45.20% 24.50% 29.70% 0.60% 100.00% 646 FORECAST 1997 44.60% 24.60% 30.10% 0.70% 100.00% 680 2005 47.20% 23.70% 28.50% 0.60% 100.00% 750 Table 3-2 Distribution of Activity by Category in Percent terms of the total area contained within the contours show a small reduction for 1992 in compari- son to 1985. 1985 and 1995 are almost precisely the same. The highwater mark in terms of total area is expected to be reached by 1997 followed by a drastic reduction by the Year 2005. At that time, total areas included within the contours are reduced to approximately one third the areas covered in 1997. Throughout this period,air carrier and air taxi traffic is increasing overall as can be seen in Table 3-2. General aviation activity is gradually reduced while military activity remains constant. Because of the expected drop in cumulative noise impacts that occurs with an all Stage 3 civil air carver fleet, there is growing recognition that the land use compatibility standards his- torically applied may need to be revised downward. This circumstance is seen most clearly in Table 3-3 which analyzes activity on Runway 9R. This runway is expected to be extended in the future to an air carrier capable 9,000 foot length. Activity Table 3-3 Sunvnary of Activity on Rurnvay 9R AIRCRAFT ARRIVALS ON RUNWAY 9R 1985-2005 TOTAL TOTAL GENERAL DAY PERIOD NIGHTPERIOD AIRCARRIER COMMUTER AVIATION AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT PEAR DAY NIGHT DAN' NIGHT DAY NIGIIT OPERATIONS OPERATIONS 1985 0 0 19 0 50.1 0 69.1 0.0 1992 0 0 11.75 0.05 21.75 0.22 33.5 0.27 1995 2.02 0 30.4 0 37.7 1 70.12 1.0 1997 0 0 10.03 0.97 59.72 4.37 69.75 5.34 2005 47 0 39 0 30.6 0 116.6 0.0 Page 3-2 } is restricted during the night period after the runway is lengthened. While this limits the size of the noise contour, the volume of air carrier activity goes from zero or nearly zero to 47 operations per day. General aviation activity is reduced while commuter(air taxi) volumes increase. Thus, while it is clear from the summary of areas enclosed that overall noise contour area decreases, the volume of operations increases dramatically with the addition of 47 large aircraft overflights by 2005,most at comparatively low altitudes. 3.3 Technical Procedure All noise contours in this report were prepared using the same program, the FAA Integrated Noise Model Version 4.11. A newer version of the INM has been available since last September. This program provides substantial changes and improvements over the earlier versions. These improve- ments are primarily confined to semiautomated input modules instead of the text based input file characteristic of all earlier versions. The calculation procedures for the noise contours themselves are unchanged between the two differing versions. Early in the study program, die two versions were compared and produced identical results. However, conversion of the data input files from INM 4.11 to INM 5.0 is not entirely straightforward due to the substantially revised method of inputting information and the expanded range of data required. More importantly, the output from INM 5.0 is not compatible with internal electronic transfer of the contours at the degree of accuracy desired. Thus,to retain consistency with other studies of Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport at the highest level of refinement, INM Version 4.11 was used throughout. A unique characteristic of the noise contours produced involves the display procedure. Generally, the noise contours produced by the INM are transferred manually, i.e., traced onto a basemap with pen and ink. In this study, the contours are transferred electronically as an overlay of the basemap. What is seen on the maps is the actual output of the noise contour modelling program and not a tracing of the original. All contours produced in this manner are run at the highest levels of accu- racy the model is capable of rendering. The contours were produced on an Acer 586 desktop computer running at 133 megahertz. Typical run times in excess of three days were encountered for each sequential contour set. 3.4 1985 Noise Contours Figure 3-1 shows the noise contours developed for 1985. Table 3-4 shows the aircraft assignments to runway. The boundaries of the City of Dania are shown with a heavy black lines, the noise contours themselves are in lighter black lines and labelled with the respective cumulative noise levels. The base map itself is drawn from a street map of the entire area around the Airport in order to ease identification of specific locations within the City. Ldn 60 covers major areas of the City of Dania including most of Lakewood Village, substantial portions of the Ravenswood section west of the general aviation Runway 9R/27L, and major areas in northeast Dania are effected. Ldn 65 effects much smaller areas but still include a major portion of Lakewood Village. Small portions of Ravenswood and NE Dania were also effected. Ldn 70 and 75 are generally confined to non residential areas in the City of Dania with the exception of the Lakewood area and portions of Ravenswood. Page 3-3 ss \ 1985 ACTIVITY BY RUNWAY ARRIVALS ARRIVALS DEPARTURES DEPARTURES TOTAL RUNWAY DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT 9R 11.10% 0.20% 13.30% 0.00% 24.60% 27L 2.60% 0.00% 2.20% 0.00% 4.80% 9L 24.60% 4.00% 25.50% 1.50% 55.60% 27R 5.00% 0.20% 4.70% 0.20% 10.10% 13 1.40% 0.00% 1.40% 0.30% 3.10% 31 0.90% 0.00% 1.00% 0.00% 1.90% TOTAL 45.60% 4.40% 48.10% 2.00% 100.00% Table 3-4 Distribution of A ircraft A ctivity by Runway for 1985 3.5 1992 Noise Contours Figure 3-2 shows the noise contours for 1992. The noise contours for 1992 were developed directly from information contained in the"Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport Pan 150 Up- date of 1994"and are largely consistent with the contours produced in the Part 150 Study. Details on fleet mix, runway and flight track assignments can be found there. The input data was received directly from the original analysts. There are some differences due to the differing plotting meth- ods used. The contours themselves are slightly smaller than those shown for 1985. Reductions are panicu- larly apparent in NE Dania with the remaining areas effected remaining similarly impacted. 3.6 1995 Noise Contours Figure 3-3 shows the noise contours calculated for 1995. They are a modest expansion of the areas calculated for 1992. The traffic volumes in percent split between the runways are shown in Table 3-5. Here again major areas impacted by Ldn 65 and above levels are confined to Lakewood Village, a small area in Ravenswood and a similar small area in NE Dania. Ldn 60, by contrast, expands substantially and takes in the majority of the area west of the Airport, all of the area to the east, and nearly reaches Dania Beach Boulevard in NE Dania. Page 3-5 1995 ACTIVITY BY RUNWAY ARRIVALS ARRIVALS DEPARTURES DEPARTURES TOTAL. RUNWAY DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT 9R 10.90% 0.20% 9.90% 0.00% 21.00% 27L 1.60% 0.00% 1.40% 0.20% 3.20% 9L 23.90% 4.60% 29.70% 1.30% 59.50% 27R 6.00% 0.30% 5.20% 0.20% 11.70% 13 1.40% 0.00% 1.40% 0.10% 2.90% 31 1.10% 0.00% 0.60% 0.00% 1.70% TOTAL 44.90% 5.10% 48.20% 1.80% 100.00% Table 3-5 Distribution of Aircraft Activity by Runway for 1995 3.7 1997 Noise Contours Figure 3-4 presents the contours calculated for 1997, the year of highest overall impact. Ldn 65 levels and above involve major areas in Lakewood Village. The contour on Runway 9R/27L combines with the larger area around Runway 9L/27R to envelope most of Ravenswood. All areas to the east of the Airport are enclosed. Ldn 60 level impacts extend south of Griffen Road to the west of the Airport and nearly to Dania Beach Boulevard in NE Dania. 3.8 2005 Noise Contours Figure 3-5 presents the Year 2005 forecast noise contours. Table 3-6 tallies the runway split data. The reduction in cumulative noise level is substantial. Total areas for all contours are approxi- mately one third as large as are expected for 1997. By that time,Ldn 65 and higher contours extend into small southern portions of Lakewood Village and encompass approximately one third of Ravenswood. Little or no area south of the Airport is involved. Ldn 60 levels involve the southern one quarter of Lakewood Village, the Avon Heights area out to nearly 28th Terrace. To the south of the Airport,the contour extends beyond the Airport boundary but does not encroach on residential areas. Page 3-8 r 2005 ACTIVITY BY RUNWAY ARRIVALS ARRIVALS DEPARTURES DEPARTURES TOTAL. RUNWAY DAY NIGHT DAY NIGHT 9R 15.50% 0.00% 19.10% 0.10% 34.70% 27L 3.70% 0.00% 2.10% 0.00% 5.80% 9L 17.20% 4.80% 21.20% 1.50% 44.70% 27R 5.20% 0.50% 4.00% 0.30% 10.00% 13 1.70% 0.10% 0.90% 0.10% 2.80% 31 1.20% 0.00% 0.70% 0.00% 1.90% TOTAL 44.50% 5.40% 48.00% 2.00% 100.00% Table 3-6 Distribution of Aircraft Activity by Runway for 2005 3.9 Single Event Noise Contours Figures 3-6, 3-7,and 3-8 present single event noise contours for three representative aircraft types, all Stage 3, i.e.,quiet aircraft. This is shown as a single landing from the west followed by a takeoff to the east, all on Runway 9R. These aircraft include the Boeing 747, one of the largest aircraft manufactured and used chiefly in long range international service; the Boeing 757, a narrow body medium range airliner; and the Boeing 737-400, a modem short range airliner. The Year 2005 cumulative noise contours lead to the conclusion that the noise impact will, by then, be reduced to such low cumulative levels that a significant problem with respect to residential areas no longer exists. However, Stage 3 aircraft are only comparatively quiet when measured against earlier models. These single event contours are provided to balance the apparent improve- ment against the reality that audible noise events will continue and remain objectionable in certain key community areas. Further, land use compatibility strategies such as noise insulation are best keyed to audible noise levels than to average daily noise levels. The lowest level plotted in these cases is 75 dBA. This is the generally accepted threshold for the onset of potential annoyance in outdoor areas. Long term observations of normal human reaction to aircraft sound tend to reinforce the conclusion that by the level of 85 dBA, serious objections occur and noise is spontaneously characterized as deafening. Although exposure must continue at this level for many hours before clinical effects, i.e., hearing loss can be documented, 85 dBA has long be recognized as a key threshold perception level. Note that even in the case of the Boeing 757,one of the quietest heavyjet aircraft in the fleet, levels at 95 dBA and above project westward into community areas. Page 3-11 1r 4 (, .4 i y 1 �. �Z • Il '7. ;I LLJ cc to '4� ' � :.. R' �M�.jj ...is-� �. • ' J."Wi LO TE3 •• • ell •�� � � . � � .� _ . . . Ir IN ME VIVA �ii +»e. Fri 1I���dxr'C� I m r •e• ���: � �p�� ..i4,ihfilS7i'F- .. '� 3.�g/;� Fop - • .:� ,g y. , 1 LU lf rr UJ .59; 4 rra v. 11YI l'f SW4d I � , it Is cc 1! Lo rY �! : ©d I �� �1��a ����I i•�rt •�L! � I I N `Yn L `Xb IIc�yy 1 �1 it .� � '��, ems.� } 1.✓'�i.Y»i.�. . �-.!�......,2'� _.' tu���i:LL �HMR':.-' uHe�ai.�,1141wAlW:L'S3Nbv..,:av:;i N ,��• � ..m t. � �_iae' \' � 7■■ ' C■ %WW1 ! M4y"Y i y� (� rr . , ,i,. ,' - ' FM Z w. L 11 �mco - Cc `. ,._ r am ONO 10 LLJ � 1��Wn+•"-'�� 'e 1 . ICY 1 Ins► -�ai� Y i • gis LL LLJ ! • f t. rr.w1F• I �� V _�3 I I o I 1 y_1— T 8 4 a 'O \ �LII t 'bb n p I \ N •---- - I Q p P 1 \ CC ox N NOV No L _ ___ __ \ H3MOHN313 > gea Y.H9�1 ■ Ae.0000 �. w nI. ry 3 I\ I \ �VY �`" Y 1 -,] u 1 IV.IA �J n%T N U AH 14>vA 1 uRl nr 9Ar tt tI�A1 foJ4 O I A r IN 4� Z t0 a O :i_ TEL LAID Zp I� ••tl L 3 �JE t+ Ri ev( v7 n w O 5 1 C / n Z I MN ��¢r W AV C n I C] ��r ��r U� LA J y AY - z cp =� v f'• v s L;, I rh 8 CL l L---- O r nv y M � G aIDU MN 93 AV L II( 1G LL G nr Cl V y w i a n [ Fa i 9Lrl F 1 r $ I pr ,c�y F II 1A J L a vL 1 L _ um WU MSN AV G r�r i 91 L : �• o �. w ENE F I n A M 1 r 7 Z71— AV IL MS AllA1f AV v-Tu r lu v' Y .wn 1z L tl • vNV -Yi < AA .V 9Z tl ,yf tl 1 LZ MS 1 1 1 ` LLI �xt L [ w A� N r W i Y- - S b s 4/ F LL Alf Yll n a eu i■ C7 J n + �Y =■ i■■ V A L AV __ u 1 0 - a. L tl3 1 O ° Do fr r FMn AruMf aAi L, O F tl31 J M OL MS; I g LYOd y AV fi Alv ru G gI MS AV cc ui o� IAS C c _Ntl31 It a g u z At a o u o � J U f �1 Lo LLJ LO s ' rIKEt r . GG v t�' I . • I I. 1 i'. s{ 9 TWcr z Cc CL LL !lLU � 4 � 1 RIM CL IOWA i t# ' �.:.1 I 11ASIwn. •. j t r•. —" 0 • 4 t ?ll r 1 a� n � _ i'N. , 1.1 • l; '��� +` ' � , r t. :i. H �n Q ' ' • 1 I I: 1 it I '.YF•�L���P+C ��fl,. �'a?�C'r 1• .�.Eu,.. S�. ty ------------- 'A' w?a. �:Y�f I �. �! � .R. `'!lAI• ij{'•il : f� xv'r t� NNNNNN it8 - ` ik ii rt i.� Llj LO HE RIM Ir a'at lyN " �����._. �.��r* ��ilU 1�. :� tJ'�i`�` K° r..•. Rl J 1 U r.�� I.. . „i'I i.iltl a Sty ntW-0Nrva 1 Y R ��}� t 3 v I i�?f .1 , pY.. �,; �y■ �. ..�'Tn!!R�" ' I g0 fL`F+ > .t. 4 w4v N ®� •; , YxEti vJliN � 'l��•{NA Yyl'f'f t+ My 4. �' ' � 11 n (i[Ilii9 IA u 1 N14Yy({• 1 • S Loa.xYn• �d 4Y:A F{1 � � f w.v.v ym i. .. i 1 � �t � 1 '�`• I I J'�• E. • �� �4 i1•r ly .,, �+1.��` r , +u...�W:,..,v� ^'...,� r. ,..u.,'+Y1►ei.,,.Y�Y.•r'Yw rv. ,.� Po!a\.yi 4Y4:�rilRfi.•el,_r' Pl n Myyyy Y FS j+S,t,J,.� � q}�� '• w� ��'� I�n�l 1, -�� � x J anM { 1kfhR. ,I F� ,1 � Yi •�NhwS^u n ' I J,SEQRET IybObs ll .� e. , rn _ 84 - SIN 271 C1 'aI " > 2151�+451 60�a SI NATURG C6'�lMt a ,`�' N<� 1 .. , .•Irt SW Qf 28¢ _ Sr T.129 _ MITI' }I` ■Ilull Jrr! . .. .28_ _$ > - - 5r+ . 29 ST Park I. I � 29 ST Wrr _ SW 21 30 1 ST _ `O ,I — � 31 ST i 30 ST 30 Pl. ]I CI f; m j37 i 22 31 Si U1126'- rl 4 __ 32 Si32 ST Nn- 1O " a sl a 32 CTlAk('u SK'_ �Id7 C I , I 1 37 _'_.1..�'l �411 I' 1 I 3 32 C -=W - 3i- l- 3i_ sr a SN DE -- - s\ 3 PARK 11 CI 3 G\� " --- - C, SW 33 c F 32 SW 34.' ST_ I'EIIIM w 3— 51 " -- —_ p qq e JLlL)-3d a_ I It IF I ST _ p COItINq 1 RD � J r > �ay �rI m � 1•`a I ITT 3 CT �4 tron c �J� V r Q95 COMMERCE 1PAR1� H I "N' 38S 3 o - 3s $T "� u: 4 , -��", FOR . LAU�DERDIALE HOLL (WOOD n 1 -- > W47 kSL "` i .: r•.• North j Q i w > a 2 / IIERNAf�A1A Terminal SW=14°0—PL'N y v F Q ,:T SW 40 fF,fl S 7 9'i 41St' n 41 Cl ,y rp N 1'1 n I i \ N w d I S w ¢ r•y '.- Weal N ^,- 2 '�' N N 'n • ^a •L` Terminal Sho •Tr RD ry Sw rn 42 STN W 41 CT Perking F2'9 0, a d g i Q ,I'` ' LEE WAC NER BWD' I- •:� �,,..,, Garage j m 43p v rn w 42 \ f n 18 27 5t-N 43 St Merin Brine SW 43 ST ,y °' w t ° ' 44 St Manna •. Village South F > a AQ t r atina .� �'L ® roty t Terminal St Cif � (n�. Y K+R,. w � a N W 45 � ry st�an d ; � 4 95o® zr o 00 > M � a11 � n a 45N C6 N N N Itly o 46 Gl 4 OQi N 47 St rn 2 N$W 47 St YF1, Marina. �_ "'c` a 6i N 16: 3Py a Q ° F Q a ¢ 49 v C r Barbadoti r A naut e-. �° NW 8 a Sta , a� ct m w CT I".+Ca „y >a7 ' t1 4 DeslgnDominiea t (F —8 Sy 2° rn m n m NW q ST N m n n n m ry MHP uk,u + a Center lOr. _) , 1 MaaWatar \ Dry dST Di �5f , 1 , of the Blvd" ).6tJ Mel 3 5 Si i° + t 'Industrial Amerim a lna S m 5 T 2 2 3 4B 1_C T i I I r t '¢,.'•� I Tn �i N m e C 1 1 a W 51 Pl. i 1 I Pl �f y k MHP •—St '"-y Tw"'1tiSW 2 ST a 57 N• ST 1 i e 3 St NI 3 TE .• Lake a x rea> ,. L NE 535 �¢ N> �K�K•'� $ 'Parki O a 7¢ r'J31 a > > > > > ' - N $ 5 32 ST ¢ NSLAKE OR_Q> :I j 9 ') —3�NW 2 ' ^ x` a S N Clu Hour ^ W J; ''j ' I I Bryan 0j], 5d PL >n ^m �/.Rgj7 l Busine , Park MARINA OR < 55ry • �TIGERTAII NW�_ T ? t z LAKE 55 n ST BLVD I lGrand Pr a E y w I I MHP 2 3 HORE� I W a Q Y +Yrc !c�0 z 2 Z 2 .: 'ARBOR A a Lake a STsi ao �;a Lake W DANIA BEACH W Dania each vdC m S KEDR ti BLVD > > C- AARINA DR ^' > rQQ 'Q Q i R Q ial e Ci a 3 W .4 Ian m m tl Park SF I \ F S a 57 H 3 3 ry 33 r� 5W 1ST Z s < 58 M ; SW 58'MANOR >. zN; F` n > ¢ A o _ Fna StirlingL N ny.0 U z Sorlin� 1C a ' n g N -- ommercial a x u d > sPLO 41 CTz 1�1 . Q1 �_ Par I � Sz z z MVANS ST I / Proposed i I SW 3.Sf. SE z m Id N 39 St Par I H Q w I �341: r-SNpj.•y dQ�SW 3 019� PI Oakwood DR M 38 St >++F`1 (S i m `�' tm"' Y Meade t 4 > ST Tara tl eW K CT a � Sy � M 1. AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY OF DANIA i Date: 06-17-97 Agenda Item#: i Title: 1 DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION I I Requested Action: { Report by Victor Lohmann, Chairman Airport Advisory Board i Summary Explanation& Background: Update from the June 12, 1997 Regular meeting Exhibits (List): I I I C Purchasing Approval: i Prepared By: LC i Source of Additional Information: (Name& Phone) i Recommended for Approval By: Commission Action: Passed ❑ Failed ❑ Continued ❑ Other ❑ Comment: City Manager City Clerk I I W Subject: Airport advisory board Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 19:49:50.0400(EDT) From: iddesigns@aol.com To: lulu@ci.dania.fl.us Please see attached amended and approved statement of position. Please Include this in the commission back up material for their next meeting. Thanks Vic Position Statement,Airport Advisory Board—June 12, 1997 Be it resolved the City of Dania,Airport Advisory Board hereby promulgates the position of the Board and as representatives of the Community as a whole. Whereas, The overwhelmingly most important issue in the proposed expansion of the Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport is Community protection. This being the stabilization and long term health and safety of the residential communities surrounding the Air Field. There is significant concern among many of the City's residents as to whether certain residential communities will remain viable and tenable as the airfield expands. The residents are also concerned about the lifetime economic investment in their homes. These investments must be protected. These concerns can be successfully addressed by immediately seeking public input and further defining a Purchase Assurance program as referred to in the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Dania and Broward County. Furthermore, if BCAD is unable or unwilling to further define a program and the proposed areas that would most likely be impacted and participate,then this is indicative of a runway expansion that is unnecessary. Whereas,The protection of the residential communities surrounding the Airfield benefits not only the local community,but also the County as a whole.As tourism increases, it is clearly not in the best interests of the County of blight this City. No one benefits from the conditions that have been created in the area surrounding Miami Intl.Airport. Left unattended this will start to happen here. Subordinate to the preservation of the Community and residents needs is preservation of the City's tax base and road improvements. u 1 {l I r I 1 M E M O R A N D U M i DATE: June 4, 1997 TO: Lou Anne Cunningham I M1 FROM: Victor Lohmann RE: agenda for 6/12197 CC: Please add item#5.2 Report from staff on notification of county P&Z Board meeting and proposed Development Order County Commission meeting. (Your findings). Under new business please add the following; item#00 Proposed position statement Be it resolved that the City of Dania Airport Advisory Board hereby promulgates -- the position of the Board and as representatives of the Community as a whole. Whereas, The overwhelmingly most Important issue in the proposed expansion of Fort Lauderdale Hollywood Intl.Airport Is Community protection. This being the stabilization and long term health and safety of the residential communities surrounding the Air Feld. There is significant concern among many of the City's residents as to whether certain residential communities will remain viable and tenable as the airfield expands. These concerns can be successfully addressed by immediately seeking public input and further defining a Purchase Assurance program as referred to in the Intrelocal Agreement between the City of Dania and Broward County. Furthermore, if BCAD is unable or unwilling to further define a program and the proposed areas that would most likely be impacted and participate, then this is indicative of a runway expansion that is unnecessary. Whereas,the preservation of the residential communities surrounding the Airfield, benefits not only the local community but the County as a whole.As tourism increases it is clearly not in the bast interests of the County to blight this City. No one benefits from the conditions that have been created in the area surrounding Miami Intl.Airport. Left unattended this will start to happen here. Subordinate to the preservation of the community are other needs, such as; preservation of the City's tax base and road improvements. i i i Item#�eed for speakers at the upcoming County Commission Meeting, where the proposed Development Order will be heard. Would you please see if You have a copy of the agreement signed between BCAD and the Ma Carrie put rs in the the 19Wards b n up U8. if not, mould you inquire at SCAD for a copy In any backup material related to the Engine Also, please see if you can obta that that Item is on the Noise agenda without any results or backup material. Runup Fadlity study referenced in the Noise Committee Agenda. I can't believe Otherwise the Agenda looks great as usual. Thanks,\11c i i 2 I i RESOLUTION NO. 67-97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, RECOMMENDING THE SOUTH RUNWAY REMAIN A GENERAL AVIATION RUNWAY AND ONE OF THE NORTH RUNWAY ALTERNATIVES BE CONSTRUCTED, WHICH WOULD MINIMIZE THE THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY OF DANIA RESIDENTS BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA; WHEREAS, an interlocal agreement was signed in September, 1995, between the City of Dania and Broward County regarding airport expansion; and WHEREAS, the City of Dania as the first local government of the ( area known as Broward County has contributed more land proportionately than any other city to airport expansion; and WHEREAS, each airport expansion disrupts and removes prime future tax base from the City and threatens both the economic stability as well as the public health of the residents of Dania; and WHEREAS, the protection of public health and safety is the primary responsibility of the Dania City Commission; and WHEREAS, the FAA has represented that it may not approve a .one way" runway which is the basis of the remaining community protections in the agreement; and WHEREAS, the City of Dania wishes to express its concern with the status of the "Trail's End" parcel and the county's failure to proceed with the buffer planning and construction; and WHEREAS, the county has represented that the City is fully supporting and not concerned regarding the proposed runway conversion and expansion. r i I NOW THEREFORE, let it be clearly known that the City of Dania jwould prefer the south runway remain a general aviation runway and one of the north runway alternatives be constructed, which would minimize the threat to the public health and safety of Dania residents by the proposed project which may require Dania to re-enter litigation. Section 1. A copy of this resolution will be supplied to Broward County Commission and all relevant planning agencies. Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. II PASSED AND ADOPTED on the 13 day of May 1997. MAYOR-CO ISSIONER ATTEST: CITY CLERK - AUDITOR i APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: CITY ATTORNEY 2 RESOLUTION NO. 67-97 I I r i CITY OF DANIA 100 W. DANIA BEACH BLVD.33004 phone: (305 921-8700 DANIA, FL P.O. BOX 08 Fax: (305) 921-2504 ® ® October 20, 1995 The Honorable Suzanne N. Gunzburger Chairperson Broward County Commission 115 South Andrews Avenue, Room 421 Fort Lauderdale, FI 33301 Re: Interlocal Agreement between Broward County and City of Dania pertaining to the Expansion and Jurisdiction of Fort Lauderdale - Hollywood International Airport Dear Commissioner Gunzburger: The City of Dania Commission adopted Resolution No. 144-95 approving the Interlocal Agreement regarding the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport on October 10, 1995. An original agreement has been enclosed with a copy of the County's signatures on Page 12 and original signatures for Dania on Page 13. As you know, this is an executory agreement which is conditioned on actions to be taken by the Florida Legislature during the upcoming 1996 regular legislative session with respect to annexation and deannexation. Between now and the legislative session, City staff will be compiling the necessary documents to finalize the financial transaction referenced in the agreement. Asiine ith ger MS/cs Enclosures cc: Jack Osterholt, County Administrator I RESOLUTION NO.144-95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, APPROVING INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROWARD COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DANIA PERTAINING TO EXPANSION AND JURISDICTION OF FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the City Commission of the City of Dania, Florida, hereby approves the Interlocal Agreement between Broward County and the City of Dania pertaining to expansion and jurisdiction of Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and the appropriate city officials are hereby directed to execute same. Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED this 10th day of October, 1995. MAYOR -tOMMISSIONER ATTEST; pp CITY CLERK -AUDITOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: By: 70&4...L LA. Frank C. Adler, City Attorney i Resolution No. 144-95 i INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT Between BROWARD COUNTY and CITY OF DANIA pertaining to Expansion and Jurisdiction of Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport This is an agreement between Broward County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ( "COUNTY" ) and the City of Dania, a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida ( "CITY" ) . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, COUNTY owns and operates the Fort Lauderdale- Hollywood International Airport (the "Airport" ) , which is presently located within the jurisdiction of the COUNTY, the CITY and the City of Fort Lauderdale; and WHEREAS, to ensure efficient operation and management of the Airport, in 1971 the Legislature enacted certain local bills to exclude the Airport, as it was then configured, from municipal jurisdiction, but subsequent land acquisition for Airport expansion in the early 1980' s resulted in portions of the Airport again falling within the jurisdiction of the CITY; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY have authority to enter into Interlocal Agreements pursuant to §163 . 01, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY desire by this Interlocal Agreement to provide for unified governmental services and regulatory control of the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, and to address the CITY's concerns regarding future expansion of the Airport ; and WHEREAS, COUNTY has approved the study entitled "Technical Report : Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, Master Plan Update" dated March 1994 , hereinafter referred to as the "Master Plan, " which study recommends the widening of runway 9R/27L at the Airport to 150 feet and its lengthening to 9, 000 feet to 09/12/95 -1- Y, accommodate the projected capacity needs of the Airport (the "runway expansion" ) ; and WHEREAS, previous Master Plans for the Airport in 1978 and 1987 depicted the extension of runway 9R/27L to 6 , 000 feet; and WHEREAS, the lands needed to complete the runway expansion are ` located within the CITY; and WHEREAS, COUNTY provides all necessary governmental services and oversight to the Airport , and, therefore , desires exclusive jurisdiction within the Airport ; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY recognize the benefit of the Airport to the economy of Broward County and the City of Dania; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY recognize the need for stability and commitment in planning; and WHEREAS, CITY desires the stabilization of its tax base in light of such planned acquisition of land for Airport purposes ; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY recognize and agree that any interim negative impact on the tax base of the CITY due to COUNTY' s acquisition of land within the CITY for the runway expansion will be addressed by the CITY' s annexation of certain land, as more fully described herein; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY recognize and agree that any potential impact of the runway expansion on the residents in the vicinity of the Airport will be addressed by the runway use and noise mitigation programs addressed herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions, promises, and covenants set forth herein, COUNTY and CITY hereby agree as follows : I . AIRPORT EXPANSION AND RUNWAY RESTRICTIONS 1 . COUNTY and CITY agree that the Airport expansion proposed in the Master Plan, and the mitigation of the impact of the runway expansion, as further addressed by this Interlocal Agreement, is in the best interest of the residents of Broward County. 2 . CITY agrees to cooperate with COUNTY in the preparation and approval of an amendment to the Airport DRI development order, land use plan amendments related to the Airport DRI, including the amendment to "transportation" of the land needed for the runway 09/12/95 -2- i expansion, and an Environmental Impact Statement based upon the Master Plan for the Airport . 3 . COUNTY agrees to: A. Amend the Broward County Land Use Plan and Compre- hensive Plan to become consistent with the Airport Master Plan, to the extent the Comprehensive and Broward County Land Use Plans address the matters addressed by the Airport Master Plan Update; B. Restrict the use of proposed runway 9R/27L as follows : (1) At all times during phases 1, 2 and 3 of opera- tion, proposed runway 9R/27L shall be used only during the hours of 7 : 00 a.m to 10 : 00 p .m. and only by Stage III aircraft . However, proposed runway 9R/27L may be used at any time in the event of an emergency or the closure of runway 9L/27R as hereinafter provided. (2) At the start-up of operation of the proposed runway 9R/27L, aircraft exceeding 58 , 000 lbs . will land only to the west and depart only to the east . However, proposed runway 9R/27L may be used unrestrained at any time in the event of an emergency or the closure of runway 9L/27R as hereinafter provided. This level of use shall be referred to herein as "Phase 1 . " (3 ) When the number of aircraft operations at the Airport require it, to avoid delay, aircraft exceeding 58 , 000 lbs . may land to the east or depart to the west using proposed runway 9R/27L only during IFR conditions during peak hours . However, proposed runway 9R/27L may be used unrestrained at any time in the event of an emergency or the closure of runway 9L/27R as hereinaf- ter provided. This level of use shall be referred to herein as "Phase 2 . " COUNTY may proceed to Phase 2 use of the proposed runway 9R/27L only if COUNTY has complied with the requirements of paragraph 4 , below, "Noise Mitigation. " (4 ) When the number of aircraft operations at the Airport require it , to avoid delay, aircraft exceeding 58, 000 lbs . may land to the east or depart to the west using proposed runway 9R/27L only during peak hours . However, proposed runway 9R/27L may be used unrestrained at any time in the event of an emergency or the closure of runway 9L/27R as hereinafter provided. This level of use shall be referred to herein as "Phase 3 . " COUNTY may proceed to Phase 3 use of the proposed runway 9R/27L only if COUNTY has complied with the requirements of paragraph 4, below, "Noise Mitigation. " (5) If COUNTY determines at any time that it is necessary or advisable to move to Phase 2, Phase 3 or unrestrained 09/12/95 -3- use of proposed runway 9L/27R, COUNTY may do so by notifying CITY in writing and preparing a projected 5 year 65 Ldn noise exposure map for the Airport and immediately commencing to comply with paragraph 4 , below, "Noise Mitigation. " (6) Unrestrained use of runway 9R/27L because of the closure of runway 9L/27R or due to the existence of an emergency condition at the Airport as declared by a pilot, Air Traffic Control personnel or the Airport operator shall be permitted at all times . (7) COUNTY agrees to supply CITY monthly reports of the Airport noise monitoring system. Such reports shall be provided in the form requested by the CITY, to the extent the form requested by the CITY is within the standard existing capabilities of the noise monitoring equipment and software . CITY has the right to independently verify the accuracy of the Airport noise monitor- ing system. C. Not proceed with the construction of the proposed runway expansion unless the restrictions described above are submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration ( "FAA" ) , and the FAA has responded indicating that it did not object to the restrictions. 4 . Noise Mitigation: A. Starting in the calendar year during which construc- tion of the proposed runway 9R/27L commences, COUNTY shall prepare annually a projected 5-year 65 Ldn noise exposure map' for the Airport and provide such map to the CITY immediately upon acceptance by the Broward County Aviation Department . The base year information shall be drawn from the best available data on actual aircraft operations at the Airport . Data from the COUNTY' s noise monitoring system shall be utilized to verify the accuracy of the computed base year contour. The projected 5-year noise exposure map shall utilize the best available data to project the number and type of aircraft operations . The forecasts and all supporting data shall be provided to the CITY at CITY' s request. At such time as a projected 5-year 65 Ldn noise exposure map shows that a portion of any residential area within the CITY will be exposed to 65 Ldn because of the operation of runway 9R/27L within such 5 years, COUNTY shall commence a noise ' Where the term "Ldn" is used herein, it shall mean an annual average Ldn contour. The term 1165 Ldn" shall mean the then- current applicable Federal Aviation Administration guideline for noise mitigation of residential areas . 09/12/95 -4- i mitigation program, as described below, in such area and shall substantially complete such mitigation, as described in paragraph 4 . C. below, prior to allowing the next phase of use of runway 9R/27L. CITY has the right to independently verify the accuracy of COUNTY' s projected noise contours . However, COUNTY may commence use of runway 9R/27L or move to a higher phase without having substantially completed the noise mitigation program if, because of natural disaster or other force majeure, there is a drastic reduction in commercial airport capacity in the South Florida area, such as the long-term closure of a commercial aircraft runway, which causes an increased commercial demand at the Airport beyond reasonable projections . In the event this occurs and is expected to last longer than six (6) months, COUNTY shall immediately prepare a revised noise contour reflecting the increased use of runway 9R/27L and immediately commence noise mitigation as defined below. B. The COUNTY shall prepare and implement, as required by paragraph 4 .A. above, a noise mitigation program based upon then-current and applicable . Federal Aviation Administration guidelines, which at the present time may include one or more of the following: purchase assurance or sales assistance programs2; acquisition of fee title to all property (and relocation of property owners) within a defined area; voluntary acquisition and relocation; or, acquisition of avigation easements . Depending upon the desires of the affected residents and the CITY, a variety of mitigation measures may be offered within the same area. The primary concern in the preparation of a noise mitigation program will be the desires of the affected residents . The exact terms of any avigation easements purchased will be subject to negotiation between the COUNTY and the property owner. Mitigation programs shall be developed in coordination with the CITY, and shall be based upon a consideration of the consistency of such measures with then-current and applicable Federal Aviation Administration guidelines . However, the mitigation programs selected shall not be dependent on the availability of federal or state funding. At this time, the parties recognize that a purchase assurance or sales assistance program will best achieve the goals of the parties where the affected residents desire to maintain the character of their neighborhood. C. Proposed noise mitigation programs prepared pursuant to this agreement shall be submitted to the Dania City Commission for review and comment . CITY shall review such programs and may submit to COUNTY a counter-proposal within forty-five (45) days . 2 Any mitigation program will base the determination of value on comparable properties selected from outside any airport affected area . 09/12/95 -5- r y \ Any counter-proposals made by CITY shall be based upon a consideration of the desires of the residents of the area and shall be consistent with then-current and applicable guidelines, including, at a minimum, federal regulations regarding grant eligibility and the expenditure of aviation funds . However, mitigation programs proposed by the CITY need not be dependent on the availability of federal or state funding. The CITY' s counter- proposals shall not address the subsequent use or disposition of any property acquired for noise mitigation purposes . COUNTY shall consider any such counter-proposals and respond in writing regarding each element of the counter-proposal . Should the COUNTY elect to pursue a mitigation program differing from that proposed by the CITY, the parties shall attempt to resolve their differences and, if necessary, utilize the services of a local, public-oriented organization to function as a mediator, such as the "FAU & FIU Joint Center for Environmental and Urban Problems . " If the COUNTY rejects the CITY' s proposal because COUNTY contends that such proposal is not consistent with FAA guidelines, or if the CITY contends that the mitigation is not consistent with the provisions of this agreement, the parties may elect to utilize the services of an arbitrator to generate a finding on those issues. The arbitrator' s finding and all supporting documentation shall be submitted for the FAA for a ruling. The purpose of this approach is to ensure that the submittal to the FAA is unbiased, complete and fully-documented. The arbitrator will be selected as follows : The COUNTY may request from the American Arbitration Association ( "AAA" ) a list of six (6) proposed arbitrators who have demonstrated knowledge and expertise in the interpretation and application of then-current FAA laws and regulations pertaining to grant eligibility and the expenditure of aviation funds by airport sponsors who have received federal aviation grant funds . Within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the proposed list of arbitrators, CITY and COUNTY shall attempt to agree on an arbitrator. If the parties are unable to agree on an arbitrator, they may request the Regional Director of the AAA to designate the arbitrator, and the parties agree to accept such designation. No individual who is, or has at any time been, an officer, employee or consultant of either party will be an arbitrator hereunder without the express written consent of both parties . The arbitrator may, with the unanimous consent of the parties, agree to such modifications to or exceptions from the Arbitration Rules as he or she deems appropriate. The arbitrator shall interpret then-current applicable FAA laws and regulations regarding grant eligibility in a reasonable manner. All arbitration proceedings will be held in Broward County, Florida . Each of the parties will produce all records requested by the arbitrator. The agreement to arbitrate the dispute as provided in this agreement is specifically 09/12/95 -6- i I enforceable in any court having jurisdiction. The determination of the arbitrator must be in writing and will include written findings of fact to the extent the arbitration required the resolution of factual disputes . The determination of the arbitrator must also include conclusions of law addressing the basis of the arbitrator' s interpretation of the applicable FAA laws and rules . The costs of arbitration shall be equally born by both parties . In the event of a dispute between the parties as to whether the arbitrator has jurisdiction over the subject matter of any dispute, the decision of the arbitrator as to that jurisdiction will be followed by the parties in the first instance, but will be subject to judicial review after the decision of the arbitrator on the merits of the dispute . The decision of the arbitrator as to jurisdiction will be reversible only if clearly erroneous . Each party submits to the jurisdiction of the arbitrator appointed in accordance herewith. COUNTY will not proceed to the next phase of runway use unless there is a fully-funded noise mitigation program in place and COUNTY has substantially completed such noise mitigation, as more particularly described in 4 .B. above. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the COUNTY may proceed with the next phase of runway use after a period of six (6) months has elapsed from the date the COUNTY funds and offers to initiate its program of noise mitigation. S . COUNTY agrees that any fee simple condemnation undertaken as a noise mitigation measure will be conducted pursuant to the Federal Relocation Assistance Act . II . ANNEXATION/DEANNEXATION 6 . COUNTY shall prepare all necessary documents for annexation into the CITY of the parcels of land more fully described on Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and sometimes referred to herein as the "Annexation Parcels . " 7 . CITY and COUNTY agree to support by all reasonable and legal means the annexation by CITY of the Annexation Parcels, which shall include supporting before the Broward County Legislative Delegation and the Legislature a local bill in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit 3 . The modification or elimination of "Dania Annexation Area 3" as described in Exhibit 1 and in the attachments to Exhibit 3 shall not be considered a substantial modification of the local bill . 8 . COUNTY shall prepare all necessary documents for the deannexation from the CITY of the parcels of land more fully described on Exhibit 2 , attached hereto and incorporated herein by 09/12/95 -7- !y I reference, and sometimes referred to herein as the "Deannexation Parcels . " 9 . CITY and COUNTY agree to support by all reasonable and legal means the deannexation of the Deannexation Parcels, which shall include supporting before the Broward County Legislative Delegation and the Legislature a local bill in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit 3 . If the COUNTY ever determines that the area commonly known as "Trails End, " or any portion thereof, is no longer needed or desired for airport purposes, COUNTY agrees that such land will be offered for sale or exchange in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statutes and the FAA, and that such lands may thereafter, at the discretion of the CITY, be annexed in accordance with law into the CITY. 10 . The COUNTY and the CITY agree that the annexation and deannexation of lands described herein, when considered together with the other provisions of this agreement, provide comparable benefits and obligations to each party. Therefore, if for any reason the Legislature does not enact a local bill in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit 3 , this Interlocal Agreement shall be null and void and of no further force and effect . Similarly, if for any reason any clause or paragraph of this Interlocal Agreement is not agreed to and approved by each commission, then both the COUNTY and the CITY shall withdraw support for a local bill . III . PLATTING; AIRPORT-COMPATIBLE USES 11 .A. CITY agrees to support by all reasonable and legal means the platting, rezoning, and other such actions necessary to prepare certain lands in the vicinity of the Airport for development or redevelopment for airport-related uses or airport compatible uses . The lands to which this paragraph applies are included in the following plats or proposed plats : "Runway Lakes FLL Airport Plat 3 ; " "Trails End FLL Airport Plat 5 ; " "S.W. 27th Avenue FLL Airport Plat 7; " "Ravenswood 32nd Street FLL Airport Plat 8; " and, "N.E. 7th Avenue FLL Airport Plat 9 . " B. Regarding "Trails End FLL Airport Plat 5 , " COUNTY agrees as soon as practicable after plat recordation to install within the area designated on the plat as "Open Space" an appropriate landscape buffer, similar to that proposed by Value- Rent-A-Car during CITY' s review of the plat . C. COUNTY agrees, following approval and recordation of Plats 3 , 7 and 8 , to offer Plats 3 , 7 and 8 for sale or exchange in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statutes and the FAA, so that such lands may be returned to the tax roles of the CITY. 09/12/95 -8- It is the parties' intent that such lands be offered for sale as soon as practicable after plat recordation, considering the prevailing market conditions . When used in this agreement , "airport-related uses" or "airport-compatible uses" shall mean uses and facilities that are related to the Airport or aviation, or that provide support services to the Airport, its tenants, users, concessionaires and employees, and which may, by the application of reasonable site- plan, zoning or similar regulations, be conducted on a proposed site in a manner that is compatible with existing, non-airport uses in the vicinity of the site. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, "airport-related uses" and "airport- compatible uses" include : rental car facilities and storage lots, long-term passenger parking facilities, employee parking facili- ties, airline in-flight services, air cargo services, specialized aircraft and ground transportation equipment repair and maintenance excluding aircraft engine testing, and aviation-oriented training facilities. IV. SETTLEMENT OF LITIGATION 12 . It is the intent and desire of the parties to resolve by this agreement all of their disputes regarding the proposed runway expansion as described in the Airport Master Plan. Therefore, based upon the mutual benefits and obligations set forth herein and the framework for cooperation provided by this agreement, the parties desire to resolve all pending litigation, as follows : A. CITY agrees to enter into a Stipulated Final Judgment in the case styled City of Dania v. Broward County, Case No. 93-18222 (05) , pending in the 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida, which Stipulated Final Judgment shall incorporate the terms of this agreement , and CITY agrees to dismiss the non- final appeal styled City of Dania v. Broward County, 4th DCA Case No. 95-01238 . B. CITY agrees that, by entering into and executing this agreement, Resolution No. 26-95 of the City Commission of the City of Dania is hereby rescinded. COUNTY agrees, therefore, to dismiss the case styled Broward County v. City of Dania, Case No. 95-04167 (05) , as soon as practicable after execution of this agreement . C. As soon as practicable after execution of this agreement, CITY agrees that it will withdraw any and all pending motions to intervene in eminent domain actions filed by COUNTY to acquire land for Airport purposes, and voluntarily dismiss any and all appeals and proceedings currently pending regarding the CITY' s intervention or participation in such eminent domain actions, 09/12/95 -9- including but not limited to the following cases : City of Dania v. Broward County and Powell , et al . , 4th DCA Case No. 95-01223 [L.T. Case No. 95-001848 (07) ] ; City of Dania v. Broward County and Powell , et al . , 4th DCA Case No. 95-01428 [L.T. Case No. 95-01847 (14) ] ; City of Dania v. Broward County and Lancaster Steel Co. Inc. , et al . , 4th DCA Case No. 95-01213 [L.T. Case No. 95- 01565 (07) 1 ; City of Dania v. Broward County and Kurz Associates, L.P. , et al . , 4th DCA Case No. 95-01748 [L.T. Case No. 95- 01562 (13) 1 ; City of Dania v. Broward County and Peerless Investment Co. , et al . , 4th DCA Case No. 95-01747 [L. T. Case NO. 95-01842 (05) ] . Thereafter, both parties agree to withdraw or dismiss any ancillary motions or proceedings, including any motions for attorney' s fees . V. OTHER PROVISIONS 13 . COUNTY agrees to acquire from CITY certain infrastructure improvements on the land being acquired for the runway expansion, for an amount equal to the costs expended by the CITY, excluding grants received or other amounts advanced or reimbursed by any other entity, for the installation of such infrastructure improvements, not to exceed One Million, Six-Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1, 600 , 000 . 00) , which costs the CITY shall demonstrate and document to the COUNTY' S satisfaction. The CITY shall provide the COUNTY with an itemized description of the locations, types and characteristics of the infrastructure for which costs are to be paid by the COUNTY. Simultaneous with the payment by the COUNTY to the CITY of the costs of such infrastructure improvements, the CITY shall provide the COUNTY with: (1) a Bill of Sale, in recordable form, transferring all rights, title and interest in said improvements to the COUNTY; and (2) a quit claim deed to all property rights in the Deannexation Parcels. The Bill of Sale transferring all rights, title and interest in said improvements to the COUNTY shall be in recordable form. COUNTY shall bear any expense of recording the Bill of Sale, and CITY shall be responsible for sales taxes, if any, that are payable in connection with this transaction. 14 . COUNTY agrees to protect the existing infrastructure, or provide appropriate replacement infrastructure, needed to ensure continued safe and adequate access and continuation of existing utility services to areas currently served by the infrastructure defined in paragraph 13 above . 15 . COUNTY agrees to initiate amendments to the Broward County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Plan to reflect this Interlocal Agreement, and diligently pursue such amendments . 09/12/95 -10- y. 16 . The parties agree, to the extent permitted by law, that, as between CITY and the COUNTY, COUNTY shall be the local government with exclusive jurisdiction over the Airport . "Exclusive jurisdiction" shall be construed to include, but shall not be limited to, power to issue any development order pursuant to Section 380 . 06, Florida Statutes, or any local program established to replace the DRI program, for lands within the planned Airport boundary. 17 . Any notice required hereunder shall be provided in writing by certified U. S . Mail , return receipt requested, addressed as follows : FOR THE COUNTY: County Administrator Broward County Governmental Center 115 South Andrews Avenue, Suite 490 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 FOR THE CITY: City Manager City of Dania 100 W. Dania Beach Blvd. Dania, FL 33004 18 . Except as otherwise specifically provided in paragraph 7 regarding "Dania Annexation Area 3 : " this agreement shall be construed in its entirety and no portion thereof is severable; each clause is dependent on the remaining clauses and common to the entire contract; and, the parties agree that the entire agreement is void should any clause or provision herein fail or be stricken. 19 . COUNTY agrees to approve, or support the granting by the appropriate agency of, an easement to allow the continuation and maintenance of CITY' s entry sign on the traffic island at U. S. 1 and Griffin Road (S . R. 818) , provided CITY agrees to maintain said entry sign. The COUNTY further agrees to install, or provide for the installation of, at no cost to the CITY, a landscaped gateway to the CITY on U.S. 1, south of Griffin Road. 20 . COUNTY agrees that at such time as COUNTY no longer provides fire and/or rescue services from Fire Station #32 (located on S .W. 31st Avenue) , CITY shall be given first consideration to purchase such fire station for the purpose of providing its fire rescue services. 21 . The parties hereto agree that all legal requirements or prerequisites pertaining to the execution of this Agreement have been performed. 22 . This Lnterlocal Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with Florida Law, supersedes all prior 09/12/95 -11- i i i written or oral agreements between the parties , and may not be modified or amended unless in writing following approval by both the Board of County Commissioners of Broward County and the Dania City Commission. 23 . COUNTY agrees , if necessary to facilitate the relocation of Value-Rent-A-Car from its present location at 1030 Taylor Road within the area needed for the runway expansion to another site within the CITY, to enter into one or more leases or other agreements in COUNTY' s standard form to allow the use of a portion of the runway protection zone for runway 13 for rental car storage, subject to the approval of the FAA and subject to any prior existing contract rights of other rental car companies . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have made and executed this Interlocal Agreement on the respective dates under each signature : BROWARD COUNTY through its Board of County Commissioners , signing by and through its Chair o Vice Chair, duly authorized to execute same by Board action on o its 2 1995, and the CITY OF DANIA, signing by and duly authorized to execute same. COUNTY ATTEST: BROWARD COUNTY, through its BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS o my4Admistrato nd By Ex-offo the Cha ' Board ommiss ers of Broward Coun�trll' day of �' �, 1995 . • Approved as to form by Office of ^ •�'` • % = the County Attorney, Broward �. CL".1.= . •f V County, Florida, 5Z JOHN J. COPELAN, JR. , County Attorney, Governmental Center, Suite 423 , 115 South Andrews Avenue •.FD C^,�. �d`" .riff � Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 �:4�"�'•aeo�"f���Or�P` Telephone : (305) 357-7600 Telecopier: (305) 357-7641 By �la Tracy &4. Lautenschlager Assistant County Attorne 09/12/95 -12- i a \ y I INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROWARD COUNTY AND CITY OF DANIA PERTAINING TO EXPANSION AND JURISDICTION OF FORT LAUDERDALE- HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CITY WITNESSES : CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA By � ' Name : Title : day of 1995 . EAL Approved as to form: ATTEST: lA City Attorney City C Ci a er THL/wp #93-890 09/12/95 dania.13 i i i -13- I I i EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit 1 Annexation Parcels Exhibit 2 Deannexation Parcels Exhibit 3 Proposed Local Bill I i i -14- I " N' TU]T YI:1 ]USI� ¢ N - `[ SIV ItlCI mul N Sf I' ,Iv ]u l'1 fl ]I fl 9Y1 9 ; IIS Y^ 11l LIr D I} SW � Iv21 4 1 I� !%cl flit J u T . ; E l /' � � w ]hShj ¢ a nsl- w •foal — S[ r^Ualrr ,rrrrrreunrnr 11 C1 r� N[ r U YSY ]l Sl Y � W f al sl ]1 ]1 j .Ur' /151 Cn IINN lI[ (nl nll /ICr Q E ° rrwn ° ylnw M1 •ticNl - yp' ASI r S ].ral [EFII lflry Y a %]51° SI ]]_�f_ i rrrrM_ MIEN MCC 1 ] LTw E jI IIU ¢ n IJ I I•���II I� �` ]1CI ° � ..Y ]J Cl � )lain 1 S r HO P J je ° IF 11 Il' d y _-. fICNkN NU YIFN]NIJ� _ (J._—_ I ' lvr wl sr]b S%u we•..1 Vu i agss SrarveuN u[vo PO PO _ —" EVERGLADES ell.1 DANIA ANNEXATION ARE ]`ar ]] t NoYJ I '� ury oM II NL I ✓'�sf - sw]usl �' 13G > Z > s[]6 sr] I uit ObMlu 1 IwP VI Ni .r NJ' M > ]u 5i MUY. LR •!.r 51 n —> an]tls a J1nv SE]C SI L••. Li4ul li ao y'." ¢r�m Svr r $t Q � J n LSI M1 N ]Y S•O I Uj SF]tlS1 1 U.I$ - - UADT ¢ '- SWw IIDaY S L' sv+ sr 5111U 51 , w „ q¢' sF,asl IUN1ugGi GCua1rN --SPAF d I DANIA ANNEXATION AREA wl]S! 22 '111 n Dasw 20 wl]cr Sv nsI S ]] z +a sFl]51 41 I 1151 QJ ° L1Yp UI1 Ya N\K ]]f.l ]] N L'I ¢ I I II s5 _ waw]] I` SW I]sT ^d51 Cr [^ m Sw IJ Sr S' 11 CI a Fi 1 1N r.r NJr 595-�1 ^_ Eu[N UN sw]! SI Q nm SF 15' 7 ' r �a ^ 11 I \VU[IlUglt IILl1 YY'iUUU bill , SW lvsl ]B Sr d $Iv lV1] O � g Q F 4 > e DANIA DE—ANNEXATION AREAS 1- 0 = yrlqul lF,l,,,glI . s ll2�M1�� 3�� 1� A�i° 28 i� / 27 25 a __,nr [ m „•...ern �� II" I S uY'AI —JN 3 i li _ VV lI "1 11 1 ° an4 � 1 I � Tn �� 1 • � / Illryr � 1 RA .s+ W.I Mu„Ir E9 uUM liv I I�I ° r.l ra ncl tAIIF��N IL Y r.. r i d L u l I :m •1 ` 1 aYsr sw}alll onto ((rrQ pp In ],1_y, ... II . . I bt L J I \ I I Y.. J J J fit I t I .rr'h.lU � !��1R^ _¢ % � i _WO•rr Irro5aY �w'!•aU' I� t,lr 21 aNQ°i m °], �_ J II Wb M DA My'., n r i ^33 n 6: n eIIC. � tl %i[e EfiiQ CCt i {f v nv]a_il'�e ° 34° i s r1 1 I.tile E:v a l_s�,a,rr/ iiC x f¢ nnJ^r iy�1a[$o ��W V-� a aG Z NE]51 Js -'Eob dun dd i S ^ 2 tl O• ' 5'+51 Ia1Y 1� 'n1 141b1aLL NW ISI 1 SI 4 V h11Y qy Isw av ---FLVD -7T_ a - i= - ]I IIVr Jn=_ n3 SJf J YY '` """ �a E..r DANIA ANNEXATION AREAS - PD LEGEND 1 •..I1 j I a GG ��f3 �� Y Nlry Y 1 r ' �J l L ,rs^nlNs' � . 1 u`; I 1J'� I yL°�J °v .rl• ae ��� —_—_ ST IRLINGIID'^ RD �'_ ";� ° r�IEXIT 25 �T` I._., ^ I" "s� „ '1 DANIA ANNEXTIUN AREA—SI J 41 1 1; I '1 ; —�� • ' Y Ila 5 II 1Y 3 Y Y 7! / vl ] 1 ff SW 51 j < 1 DANIA DE—ANN RATIONFiEAS�I 1rjlnio y THE END OF JULY 1 , 1997 SPECIAL MEETING i AM ace >•sa. KODAK �v. IMAGE The In formation Management Company GUAR /1\ 6954 N.W. I-) STREET, MIAMI. FLORIDA 33126 PROGRA A 305-477-9149 . 800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526 owury MONlranrrG PROGRAM s . E THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT AMERICAN MICRO-IMAGE, INC. PRESENTS THE FOLLOWING IMAGES AS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE MICROFILM COPY OF THE ORIGINAL BUSSINESS FILES AS EDITED BY THE INSTITUTION INSTRUCTIONS. 1 .0 I 2.9 2.I 2.2 W 2'2 Be lu IIIII I I `U L2.0 111111-25 jjj_ M MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART yNM1 NVION4 BUREAU D4 SI1hDA115 1,,A lll1 i I THE BEGINNING OF JULY I , 1997 WORKSHOP MEETING i _ i r MINUTES DANIA CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING JULY 1, 1997 I ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor: Bob Mikes Commissioners: John Bertino John Etling Bill Hyde City Manager: Michael Smith City Clerk: Marie Jabalee City Attorney: Frank Adler Absent: Vice Mayor: Jim Cali i 1. Presentation by Hartman & Associates relating to their proposals to conduct a Water and Wastewater Utilities rate study and an impact fee study. City Manager Smith informed the Commission that three RFP's had been received to conduct a Water and Wasterwater Utilities Rate Study, one of which was from Hartman & Associates, who staff is recommending that the City engage. Richard Copeland and Gerald Hartman were present representing Hartman & Associates. Gerald Hartman gave a brief background on their firm and advised the Commission that they had recently done rate studies for Coral Springs, Miami Springs, Tamarac, West Palm Beach and Royal Palm Beach. Water and Wastewater Utilites Rate Stud v - Commissioner Hyde was concerned about subsistence rates and conservation rates. Mr. Hartman stated that the City currently has a block structure which has conservation rates in it and stated that they would provide cost of services rates. He stated that they could bring various alternatives for life-line rates, if so / directed. He also stated that S.H.I.P. moneys were available to assist WORKSHOP MEETING 1 JULY 1, 1997 r y j economically depressed areas. He advised the Commission that the time frame for the study would be 90 days and an interim meeting would be held halfway through the study. Impact Fee Study - Mr Hartman advised the Commission that his firm would do complete, proper capital recovery for capital charges or impact fees. He stated that the five year C.I.P. could be integrated for engineering studies. He also stated that capitalized professional service costs would be recoverable as part of the expansion. This workshop meeting adjourned. Mayor-Commissioner !L- / City Clerk-Auditor WORKSHOP MEETING 2 JULY 1, 1997 I AGENDA CITY OF DANIA WORKSHOP MEETING JULY 1, 1997 7:30 P.M. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH REGARD TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING OR HEARING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. LOBBYIST REGISTRATION REQUIRED - REGISTRATION AS A LOBBYIST IN THE CITY OF DANIA IS REQUIRED IF ANY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION IS BEING PAID TO LOBBY THE COMMISSION ON ANY PETITION OR ISSUE PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 01-93. REGISTRATION FORMS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE IN THE ADMINISTRATION CENTER. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, PERSONS NEEDING ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY OF THESE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD CONTACT MARIE JABALEE, CITY CLERK, 100 W. DANIA BEACH BLVD, DANIA, FL 33004, (954) 921-8700 EXT. 202, AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO MEETING. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: 1. Presentation by Hartman &Associates relating to their proposals to conduct a Water and Wastewater Utilities rate study and an impact fee study, I y AGENDA CITY OF DANIA SPECIAL MEETING JULY 1, 1997 TO FOLLOW WORKSHOP MEETING 1. "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES RATE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES IMPACT FEE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 2. Discussion and possible action relating to City's position on Purchase Assurance Program and other matters in connection with expansion of Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. r CITY OF DANIA MEMORANDUM FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK TO: City Manager, Mayor and Commissioners FROM: Marie Jabalee, Finance Director/City Clerk _ RE: Utility Rate Study DATE: June 18, 1997 The following firms submitted a response to the RFP advertised for services of a water and wastewater utility rate consultant: HARTMAN& ASSOCIATES, INC. DAVID M. GRFFITH& ASSOCIATES RACHLIN, COHEN AND HOLTZ The selection committee, consisting of Mike Smith, City Manager, Marie Jabalee, Finance Director and Budd Palm, Utilities Director recommends awarding the engagement to the firm of: HARTMAN& ASSOCIATES, INC. $20,000 This amount is included in the 96/97 budget for this purpose. An analysis of the water and wastewater impact fees was not part of the RFP, but Hartman & Associates has agreed to do the study for an additional fee of$9,500. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES IMPACT FEE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the certain Proposal dated June 18, 1997, submitted by Hartman & Associates, Inc. to conduct a water and wastewater utilities impact fee study in the amount of $9,500.00 for the City of Dania, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", be and the same is hereby accepted and the appropriate city officials are hereby authorized to execute same. Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED on this 24 day of June 1997. ATTEST: ROBERT MIKES MAYOR -COMMISSIONER MARIE JABALEE CITY CLERK -AUDITOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS By: _ 4 le .z C. a(< i FRANK C. ADLER, City Attorney 1 Resolution No. w RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO CONDUCT A WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES RATE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF DANIA; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the certain Proposal dated June 18, 1997, submitted by Hartman & Associates, Inc. to conduct a water and wastewater utilities rate study in the amount of $20,000.00 for the City of Dania, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", be and the same is hereby accepted and the appropriate city officials are hereby authorized to execute same. Section 2. That this resolution shall be in force and take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED on this 24 day of June 1997. ATTEST: ROBERT MIKES MAYOR -COMMISSIONER MARIE JABALEE CITY CLERK -AUDITOR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS By: o C a-*' FRANKC. ADLER, City Attorney 1 Resolution No. AA11.[<11I1Lur (7 AJS®C.LL'1 ES, INC. P61NGiPAES�. M]UC:.111Y pme]E�wwPhc-P.E engineers,hy 1 drogeologists surveyors&management consultants HtHim.,H.R,u Cm RmM W.OnYe-Y.f1 MK I.1�MS.Xf. nIt'MIdC VIlw..-.wr. 4 XXIYA4;rb-,D.0 June18 1997 FIA1#97-237.W �cwr,.,�.�X.r.!ni 11XIWA L knrwX,Jl I!F. , IL(LTi 1�{IUXR ]nY1t7YnYgCJAIC]: fixiY 1.Xeliv:r.PE VRIPan rX XI ,DF- SXvO G Quinhn.RE TXavJVA ItWNIX CE Ms. Marie J. Jabalee Finance Director City ofDania 100 W. Dania Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 1708 Dania,FL 33004 Subject: Engineer's Quotation for: L Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study 2. Water and Wastewater Utilities Impact Fee Study Dear Ms. Jabalee: This letter constitutes our budget quotation to you and confirms our conversation of June 18, 1997. 1. Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study - The lump sum amount for the water and wastewater rate study is S20,000, 2. Water and Wastewater Utilities Impact Fee Study - The lump sum amount for the water and wastewater impact fee study is $9,500. 3. If the City desires, the lump sum amount for a combined water and wastewater rate study, as well as a water and wastewater impact fee study in one report is S29,500. Our standard hourly rates are attached hereto. EXHIBIT "A" zoiEj%srPwrSTREET • SUrrElnnn • OKANOO,Ff.3Z901 TF.I.FPHON6(407)6i9-i75i • FAX NO7, 8-,9.379f) • C-A ATL u�(1 q�,o Lrnm Y Ms. Marie L Jabalee June 18, 1997 Page 2 Our firm stands committed to accomplish the above-referenced work for the lump sum amounts delineated above. If any additional services are required, we are available to conduct the same utilizing our hourly rate schedule. very U'yam, Hartman&Associates, Inc. �d�Gerald C. Hartman,P E• v President GCSIch P25/Jabalee.gch Attachment cc: Mike Rocca, C.M.C.,HAJ JUN-18-1997 14: 17 407 839 V90 P.02 y ITAMUN ASSOCIATES, lNC. HOURLYRATE SCHEDULE 5150.00 Gerdd C. Aartman'P.B. R Drake,T nYy} S115.00 parMmwpAnrinats(P.E./P_ /P.L.S.)-(SdUloidl,Cmistop Yam• $99.00 Senior managet/Senior Begin= $90.00 Division Mwaga/Chief Engineer(P.S.IP.LS./C Iv C.) $80.00 &ginea V1II(P.E.) $72.00 Senior Project Manager $72.00 Bogie=VII(m.) $66.00 Engineer VI(P.B.)/Scientist IV $60.00 Engineer (P.E.) $35.00 Eogimcr IV $50.00 Engineer EI $45.00 Bngineetl/II S60.00 Senior Scientist S40.00 Scic List IlII S50.00 EnBincel Invector $40.00 Tnspec[m $50,00 Senior Flamer $83.00 Hydrogeolo&VIQ(P.G.) $72.00 Hydcogeelogiet VII(P.O.) $66.00 Hydmgeolo&t VI(P.G.) $60.00 Hydtogealogist V $55.00 Hydm_=Iogist IV $50.00 HydmgwloW M $45.00 Hydmgeologlst LM $35.00 Hydro Technician A $25.00 Hydro Technician I $50.00 Eggi=ming Deagner DI $45.00 Ru&e ring Designs II $45.00 Fjgincerino TeclmicimW $40.00 Engineering Techmnan III $35.00 Engineering T II $30.00 Eagbmering Technician I S45.00 Land Surveyor $40.00 Survey Crew Chief $40.00 Smvey Technician lD $35.00 Smvey Tt*dcian II $25.00 Sm "TechmcisnI $45.00 Graphics Manager $35.00 Graphics Tmbnician $60.00 Sao!=Rate Malys(MAA-) S55.00 Senior Ram Analyst $45.00 Rate Analyst $20.00 S=ctzoal Support W.00 Rgro&=ion(C=W SOPPott $50.00 Admmalrative As dsmm $37.00 Senior Word Proces= $30.00 Woad Processor $20.00 Rod-man Me&*Date: Amgen 10, 1995 (Hourly rater ne mAmod aiumadY w d=Y ba adjumd to r&em change'in the vniea5 el-th%eampriao dram.) all0/95 wUMmc6/3Hdytt LSCh . AN-18-1997 14:18 407 839 3790 P.03 y DRAFT June 20, 1997 HAI#97-237.MK Ms.Marie Jabalee Finance Director City of Dania 100 West Dania Boulevard Dania Florida 33004 Subject: Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study Dear Ms. Jabalee: We are pleased to submit the following proposal for professional services in cormecdcn with water and wastewater utilities rate study. Hartman& Associates, Inc. (HAI), hereinafter referred to as the"Consultant," proposes to furnish professional services for the City of Dania,hereinafter referred to as the "City"for the scope outlined below for the fees stipulated herein. Scope of Smdccs The Consultant will perform the following: General: Pursuant to the request for services in the City's RFP, it is the Consultant's understanding that the City desires a review of the water and wastewater user rates and miscellaneous service charges, together with recommendations for modifications of the rate structure and adjustments to the rates as applicable. Task 1: Water and Wastewater Utilities Study 1. Review Utility Customer Data The City will provide information as requested by the Consultant and the Consultant will review and evaluate historical and current records for the number of customer accounts currently on Iine to the water system and wastewater system. Data to be provided by tl.e City will include, but not necessarily be limited to, the number of accounts belonging to each customer class,the number of water accounts by meter size by class, the number of dwelling units associated with each account and the breakdown of accounts between inside and outside service areas and the number of exclusive irrigation meters by meter size. JUN-20-1997 09:46 P.0- Ms.Marie Jabalee June 20, 1997 DRAFT Page 2 u 2. Review Water Use and Wastewater Flow Data The City will provide and the Consultant will compile historical flow data for the water and wastewater systems. The Consultant will review characterisrics of utility customers in the City's service areas and identify any relationships to historical and current trends in water demand and consumption and wastewater generation data. I Forecast Customer Growth, Water Consumption and Wastewater Generation. The number of accounts for each customer class of each utility will be forecast, inside and outside the City's limits, for the next 5 years. These projections will be reviewed with the City staff to ensure their compatibility with City plans. in addition, water consumption and wastewater generation will be projected for the same 5-year period and presented to the City for review. 4. Review Revenue Requirements. To estimate the revenue requirements, the City will provide and the Consultant will review and evaluate such information as historical and current financial records, operation and maintenance reports, and schedules of existing debt service as they pertain to the water and wastewater system. The Consultant will require assistance from the City's stag'in estimating revenue requirements for each utility to ensure that each utility will operate on a financially self-sufficient basis. 5. Forecast Revenue Requirements. Based upon such information as historical operating records. system development plans, estimates of preventative maintenance costs and needs for renewal and replacement and contingencies, and relevant economic conditions and trends, the Consultant will forecast revenue requirements for the next 5 years for both the water and wastewater systems. Costs will be forecast by major cost line item. 6. Allocate Costs to Each Utility Cost allocations for both capital and O&M expenses of the water system will be made o water system functions, customer classes, size of meter and volume of usage. Costs for the wastewater system will be allocated to wastewater system functions, the customer classes reflecting capital, and 0&M and wholesale treatment costs- Cost allocations will be made to determine administrative charge back from the utility systems to the City's General Fund. The Consultant's rate study will also be conducted so as to recognize the JUN-20-1997 09:49 P.03 i Ms.Marie Jabalee DRAFT June 20, 1997 Page 3 23% outside City surcharge on rates to customers located outside the City limits, as allowed by Florida Statute. 7. Evaluate Miscellaneous Service Charges. The level of various miscellaneous water and wastewater service charges will be reevaluated for general appropriateness and comparability with similar charges for other public utilities in this area. For the water utility, these charges include the following: meter turn-on, meter tttm-off, meter calibration, monthly fire protection charges for private fire line and hydrant rates and security deposits. 8. Allocate Revenue Requirements for Each Utility_ Maintaining the basic integrity of existing water and wastewater customer rate categories and structure, the Consultant will determine each customer class' proportionate share of total system revenue requirements for each utility. 9. Calculate Proposed Rates. For the 5 year time horizon of the study, the Consultant will forecast the annual revenues expected to be collected through water system rates and charges and through wastewater rates and charges. Proposed rates will be compared with the current rates for each utility and the differences will be identified. 10. Prepare Report. (Deliverable) The Consultant will prepare a single volume report of this project. The report will include: • An executive summary A discussion of rate-making concepts focusing on equity and cost of service Assumptions,policies and date sources • Methods and procedures • Conclusions and recommendations • Figures and tabular displays of the analysis A draft revised rate resolution Eight copies of the draft report will be provided for review by the City staff. The City staff comments will be incorporated as appropriate. JUN-20-1997 09:49 P.04 I Ms.Marie Jabalee ®RAFT June 20, 1997 Page 4 Ten copies of the final report will be provided to the City of Dania. 11. Presentation to the City Commission. The Consultant will present conclusions and recormnendations to the City of Dania Commission at two public meetings on request. Task II: Impact Fee Study The City may desire to engage the Consultant to perform a Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study in addition to the Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study. This impact fee study would include an analysis of the City's existing water and wastewater system fixed assets, funding sources used to acquire/construct those assets and existing water and wastewater system design capacities. In addition, a review of the City's future 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) will also be conducted to determine the appropriate projects to be funded through the water and wastewater impact fees. The various assumptions, conclusions and recommendations will be provided to the City in an executive report format or combined in the Utility Rate Study Report and presented to the City Commission in one public meeting. In addition, this proposal assumes and relies on the availability of appropriate data to be provided by the City, in particular, data regarding the City's existing utility fixed assets and historical funding mechanisms. Task III: Additional Services The Consultant will provide other utility Management Consulting Services on an as requested/as needed basis. Such services may include, but not be limited to. bond feasibility reports, bond credit rating and insurance support, utility acquisition and valuation assistance, annual utility reports required by bond covenants, capital funding assistance, assessment programs, utility strategic planning, utility line extension policies, ordinance/resolution preparation, litigation support, expert witness testimony and assistance regarding utility privatization issues. Items Io Be Famished At No Expense to the Consultant Ths City will assist the Consultant by fumishing, at no cost to the Consultant, all available pertinent information including previous reports; financial statements, budgets, cost estimatt 3, customer data; and any other data relative to performance of the above services for the project It is agreed and understood that the accuracy and veracity of said information and data may be relied upon by Consultant without independent verification of the same. R4 -20-1997 09:50 P.05 I Y Ms.Marie Jabalee ®���� June 20, 1997 Page 5 Designate in writing a person to act as the City's representative with respect to the services to be performed under this Agreement. Such person shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to the Consultants services. Time of Performance Task 1, items 1 through 10 of the Scope of Services will be completed within ninety (90)calendar days after receipt of Notice to Froceed except for delays beyond the reasonable control of the Consultant. Said representation is not, however, a warranty or guarantee that said services will be completed within such time frame. Task I, item 11 of the Scope of Services will be completed as mutually agreed. Although the exact timing of presentations of the final report to the City Commission is unknown at this time, it is believed that this schedule will allow the City to implement the adjusted rate schedule, if any,as of October 1, 1997. Tasks 1I and III of the Scope of Services will be completed as mutually agreed to by both the City and the Consultant Fees to bg Paid For Task 1 of the Scope of Services (the Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study), the Consultant shall be paid a lump sum fee,including reimbursable expenses, of Twenty Thousand Dollars($20,000.00). For Task 11 of the Scope of Services (Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study), the Consultant shall be paid a lump sam fee, including reimbursable expenses, of Nine Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($9,500.00). Should the City desire the Consultant to provide both the Water and Wastewater Utilities Rate Study as well as the Water and Wastewater impact Fee Study, the Consultant shall be paid a lump sum fee, including reimbursable expenses, of Twenty-Nine Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($29,500.00). For Task III of the Scope of Services (Additional Services), the Consultant shall be paid a fuse based upon the attached Rate Schedule(See Exhibit A)plus reimbursable expenses. JUN-2e-1997 09:50 P.eb Ms.Marie Jabalee June 20, 1997 RAFT Page 6 As specified for Task III, the Consultant shall be reimbursed for direct nonsalary expenses, including,but not limited to, equipment rental, automobile travel at$0.30 per mile, commercial air travel at cost, subsistence,printing and reproduction,plus Florida sales taxes,if applicable. Invoices for services rendered are prepared monthly and the City agrees to pay such invoices within the time frame specified in Section 218.70, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the 'Florida Prompt Payment Act'. However, the City shall retain 20 percent of the lump sum fees to be paid to the Consultant until ten(10)days from final presentation to the City Commission. Payments which are not received within sixty(60)calendar days from the date of invoice will be considered sufficient cause for Consultant to discontinue performing and providing services until payment in full is received If Consultant is required to take action to collect past due invoices, the City will pay all legal fees and costs. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida, and the appropriate venue for any actions arising out of the agreement would be Orlando,Florida. Modification to he Terms of this Agreement In the event the City issues a Purchase Order or Memorandum or other Instrument covering the professional services described herein, it is hereby specifically agreed and understood that such Purchase Order, Memorandum or Instrument is for City internal control purposes only and any and all terms and conditions contained therein, whether printed or written, shall be of no force or effect. This contract is the entire contract between the parties and there is no modification or waiver of any of the terms and conditions herein unless signed by both parties. Termination This Agreement may be terminated by either parry by giving thirty (30) days advance written notice. The Consultant shall be paid for services rendered to the date of termination on the basis of a reasonable estimate of the portion of services completed prior to termination and shall be paid for all reasonable expenses resulting from such termination and for any unpaid reimbursable expenses. Acm=ce Acceptance of this proposal may be indicated by the signature of a duly authorized official of the City in the space provided below. One signed copy of this proposal returned to the Consultant JUN-20-1997 09:51 P.07 Ms. Marie Jabalee June 20, 1997 Page 7 RAFT will serve as an Agreement between the two parties and as Notice to Proceed. This contract will be binding on the parties hereto and parties' successors and assigns. Should this proposal not be accepted within a period of sixty(60)days from the above date, it shall become null and void. Very truly yours, Hartman&Associates,Inc Witness Witness Accepted by: City of Dania Witness Witness Authorized Signature Date RCCtvgs/P2/jabalee.rce cc: Ada Terrero, RL4I JUN-20-1997 09:51 p.08 HARTM"&ASSOt"WES, INC HOMrARATESC&'EDU E GeraldC.Hartman,P.E. $150.00 Parmers/Principals(P.E./P.G./P.LS.)-(Schmidt, Christopher,Ry""�, Drake, Luke) $115.00 Senior Mans a semorEngineer $99.00 Division,ManagedChidEogineer(P_H./P.LS./GM.C.) $90.00 Engioxr VM(P.E.) $80.00 Senior Project Manager $72.00 Engineer VU(P.E.) $72.00 Eogium VI(P.E.)/Scientist N $66.00 Engineer V (P.B.) S60.00 VnIdne fV $55.00 M $50.00 EngineerIM $45.00 Senior Scientist $60.00 Scientist I/D $40.00 Engineer Inspector $50.00 rnspeetor $ 0.00 Senior Planner S50.00 Hydrogeologisr VM(P.G.) $83.00 Hydrogeologbt VU(P.G.) $72.00 Hydrogeologist VI(P.G.) S66.00 Hydrogeologist V S60.00 Hydrogeolt9gist IV $55.00 Hydrogeola&III S50.00 Hydmgcologist IM $45.00 Hydro Txtmidan E $35.00 Hydro Technician I $25.00 Euginceritlg Designer M $50.00 Engineering Designer 11 $45.00 Engineering Techmcim IV $45.00 Engin5ering Technician III $40.00 Engineering Tedmician II $35.00 Engineerng Tectmician I S30.00 Land Surveyor $45.00 Survey Crew Chief $40.00 Survey TwAtlician M $40.00 Survey Te aboiciau II $35.00 Survey Techaician I $25.00 Graphics Manager S45.00 Graphics Technic= S35.00 Senior Rate Analyst(M-E.A.) $60.00 Senior Rate Andyst $55.00 Rate Analyst $45.00 Secrom ial Support $20.00 RepruductiordCouuerSupport $25.00 Administrative As=zd $50.00 Seat u Word Processor $37.00 Word Processor $30.00 Rod-m= $20.10 ElTeaive Data: August 10,1995 (ioudy rasa are reviewed annally and any be adjured to rellect d artgta is the various elements that eamprire them.) atlblia:6llEd7RtaSch 8110195 JLN-20-1997 09:SI P.09 i i j I i THE END OF JULY 1 , 1997 WORKSHOP MEETING w.AMP Aw = yO AKA K IMA E The Information Management Company GLAR 6954 N.W. 12 STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 305-477-9149 R800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526 A7UAu1Y M( MR04-PROWW THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT AMERICAN MICRO-IMAGE, INC. PRESENTS THE FOLLOWING IMAGES AS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE MICROFILM COPY OF THE ORIGINAL BUSSINESS FILES AS EDITED BY THE INSTITUTION INSTRUCTIONS. IIII� I .O W Y.8 2.5 W 2.2 All 7e I 1" 111.0 11.6 Il „I �IlII1.25 � I= MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NAIIDNAI BUREAU OF STANDARDS 1%1-A