Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-08-19 Planning and Zoning Board Minutes MINUTES CITY OF DANIA PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD WEDNESDAY AUGUST 19, 1998 7:30 P.M. Roll Call — Present: Also Present: Bob Adams Terry Virta, AICP — Growth Management Director Pat Janowski Thomas Ansbro — City Attorney Victor Lohmann Special Counsel — Miriam Maer Jason Dubow Board Clerk— Lou Ann Cunningham Kevin Pierson 2. A motion was made by Bob Adams, seconded by Pat Janowski to approve the Minutes from the July 15, 1998, Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Approval of Agenda - It was agreed that item TX-23-98 (Sign Ordinance) be heard first on the agenda. A request from Ram Designs, Inc. was read for the continuance of items VA-35-98 and SP-36-98. Motion was made by Bob Adams to move item (11) TX-23-98 to the first item to be heard, and to continue items (4 & 5) VA-35-98 and SP- 36-98 until September 16, 1998, seconded by Jason Dubow. Motion passed unanimously. 11. TX-23-98 — An administrative ordinance making certain revisions to the City of Dania's Sign regulations. FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 28, ZONING, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DANIA, BY AMENDING ARTICLE 2, ENTITLED "DEFINITIONS" TO ADD CERTAIN DEFINITIONS RELATING TO SIGNS; BY AMENDING ARTICLE 6 TO ADD SECTION 6.65 ENTITLED "SIGN REGULATIONS" TO INCLUDE CERTAIN PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO SIGNS; PROHIBITING CERTAIN TYPES OF SIGNS; PROVIDING AMORTIZATION PERIODS FOR NONCONFORMING SIGNS; PROVIDING A VARIANCE PROCEDURE; PROVIDING INTENT, APPLICABILITY, GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Ter Virta AICP Growth Management Director gave a summation of the final draft of Terry 9 the ordinance, which included changes proposed by the board and the ad hoc sign committee. Mr. Virta indicated that he has included a "patch" amendment to the Planning and Zoning Board 1 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES S ordinance to provide for entrance way signs to developments. He further described the changes which were made since the last meeting. Mr. Virta reported a proposed change which came about as a result of the meeting with the ad hoc sign committee, which dealt with the appearance of bus benches throughout the city. He stated that while staff could not support a total ban of bus benches, he has added to page 8, item 30 of the ordinance which states, "Bus Bench Advertisement, except as specifically provided through contract with the City of Dania but in no event is such advertisement allowed in residentially zoned areas." At the bottom of page 8, as well as throughout the ordinance, the term "freestanding" [sign] has been replaced with "monument" [sign]. Item J, typographical/editorial changes were made. On page 10, there is an editorial change where the term "one" was struck through the word "single" was added. On page 11, the insertion of the word "monument" [sign], and consistency in the way the numbers are referred to in the document. Also on page 11 are changes, which came about as a result of meeting with the ad hoc sign committee. One change increases the height of monument signs to eight (8') feet along the major corridors and on page 12, item 4(i), references to the square footage of shopping centers has been changed to two part size limitations, and on page 13, item 4(ii)(a)(1), which changes the calculation for determining the maximum wall sign area to one (1) square foot per linear foot of building. In the same item 4(ii)(a)(2b), criteria was added for determining the maximum sign height for anchor businesses with specialized architectural facades. Mr. Virta concluded his presentation of the changes made to the draft sign ordinance, stating suggestions made by the ad hoc committee that were not supported by staff, one being the "Grand fathering" in of existing signs (greater than 10 years or more) to remain. Mr. Virta further noted that this ordinance in no way makes any changes to the existing Downtown Sign Regulations, except for the allowance of the nature of use on the sign, the "OPEN" sign and "credit card" signage. Questions by the board were then answered by Mr. Virta. The first dealt with clarification on page 24, item Q(3) "Nonconforming signs", which makes reference to 15(c). Mr. Virta stated that this reference ties into the amortization portion of the Downtown Sign Regulations, and that the amortization period for the businesses located in the Downtown Redevelopment district had ended in 1993. He further commented to say that the reference has remained due to the fact that it was not the intention of the City Commission, to extend the amortization period for Downtown Redevelopment District in the new ordinance. The next comment that was made related to the recommended change on page 21, item O, (2) which deals with the removal of political signs. Bob Adams stated that the recommended change was that the statement "General Election at which the applicant seeks office" be replaced with the statement "10 days after the time the applicant ceases to be a candidate" so that signs could be removed after a primary election. Planning and Zoning Board 2 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES At this time, Mr. Virta requested that Attorney Barbara Hall be allowed to speak regarding the proposed "patch" amendment to the ordinance. Attorney Hall addressed the board advocating support for the section to be placed in the sign ordinance dealing with placing signage in the right of way which would require special exception approval per each request. She specifically addressed a pending request for monument signage on SW 30" Avenue and Griffin Rd. At this time, the Chairman announced that anyone from the public wishing to speak for or against the proposed sign ordinance, rise, stating their name and be sworn in before the clerk. Members from the public wishing to speak were sworn in before the board. Mickie DiClemente, an employee at the Rustic Inn, questioned whether her sign could remain, and whether it was included in the "Grand father" provision. Mr. Virta responded stating that the amortization period for the sign would be 5 years, and that without knowledge of the size and type of sign, he could not give her anymore information. He further stated that assuming that the sign would be non-conforming, at the end of 5 years, the sign would either have to be removed and replaced or a variance would have to be applied for. Attorney Susan Delegal, representing AMO (MEBA) and the Airport Hilton, addressed the board questioning interpretations in the ordinance for both properties represented by her firm. She quoted text from page 11, titled "Individual Commercial Office or Industrial Uses", and asked for interpretation of the calculation used to determine the number of wall signs and square footage allowed. Attorney Delegal then briefly described the signs presently located at the Hilton, and questioned how the frontage of the building would be determined. She suggested that the ordinance be revised to exempt signs on buildings located along the 1-95 corridor from the provisions of the sign ordinance. Attorney Delegal then addressed the board concerning the signs at the AMO (MEBA) building(s). She stated that after review, it was found that virtually every sign on the property will become non- conforming. She further described for the board the sign variances which this board, as well as the City Commission, have approved in the past few years. She mentioned signs located on the property which were not addressed in the code, which she felt would then fall into a category of being prohibited. In concluding, Attorney Delegal asked for clarification of the provisions for wall signs on buildings and the future of the existing 2 pole signs at the site. Mr. Mike Abrams, of Captain Mikes Seafood, addressed the board in favor of concerns raised by the Rustic Inn. He then questioned the "Grand fathering" term, and mentioned that the pole sign at Lorenzos Restaurant should be considered "Grand fathered" because it has existed over 20 years. He further felt that the small businesses have a great need for identification. Peter Foley, representing Outdoor Systems Advertising, addressed the board with comments on the proposed ordinance. Mr. Foley started with item Q(1) Non Conforming Signs, on page 23, and stated that there are key issues relative to the outdoor advertising industry concerning the aesthetics of the signage which they feel were not properly or adequately addressed. Mr. Foley stated the property rights of the owners or the lessors who benefit from the billboard signage would be hampered and the impact of the ordinance on local property and business owners would provide a loss Planning and Zoning Board 3 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES of impact and exposure. He further questioned what the cost would be to the property owners to implement and enforce this ordinance, and that the right of the city government to declare all non-conforming signs to be removed may cause future law suits. He suggested they be allowed to be involved and work with staff on this issue prior to the adoption of the ordinance. Mr. Virta addressed the board with responses to the comments made during the public hearing. He clarified for Attorney Delegal that there is no limit to the number of wall signs as long as you do not exceed the total coverage permitted in the ordinance. In response to the measurements of the Hilton, it would be the width of the building. Mr. Virta responded to the reference of the signs on the duplexes at the AMO property, he felt that the signs in question were more than likely illegal under the current ordinance and that there has been no action regarding these signs due to the fact that there have been no complaints made by the public. Mr. Virta stated that in terms of existing signs and non-conformities, the regulations are more restrictive as drafted than in the past; and that a large number of signs would be non-conforming and would have to be either replaced or receive a variance to remain after the 5 year amortization period. Mr. Virta reminded the board that the criteria given to staff for the drafting of a sign ordinance was to model it after the current "Downtown Sign Regulations"; and that staff has broadened the ordinance by taking into consideration the various concerns and needs of businesses located away from the downtown area. He concluded by stating one final recommendation made by the Ad Hoc Committee, concerning the expansion of the Downtown District Regulations, south of Stirling Road further on to Sheridan Street. The board raised questions regarding current regulations for signs in the right-of-way the proposed "patch" which staff is recommending to be added to the draft ordinance. Mr. Virta stated that the board will have to vote separately to include the patch in the draft ordinance prior to making a recommendation on the sign ordinance. At this time Sandra Cimaglia addressed the board commenting on the sign ordinance, with comments on how the business people are discouraged by the proposed and existing sign ordinance. Rick Abrams was sworn in and addressed the board, he felt that there is a lot of confusion with the proposed ordinance and that it should be presented and translated so that the public can understand it. Hearing and seeing no one further, the Chairman closed the public hearing. The board further discussed the comments made by the public. It was felt by the board that the ordinance has been discussed thoroughly by the board, staff, special counsel as well as with the public at open and individual meetings. Board member Kevin Pierson suggested that an economic impact study be performed with the finalization of the ordinance. At this time the Chairman called Special Counsel Miriam Maer to the board to report on the Billboard issue. Planning and Zoning Board 4 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES Miriam Maer addressed the public and the board and confirmed that an economic impact study would be beneficial with the sign industry representatives, and felt that a way to look at economic impact factors would aide in future court decisions. City Attorney, Thomas Ansbro, address the public and the board confirming the efforts made by the board and staff to assure that full discussion was made in the drafting of the ordinance. The timetable for amortization for the billboards was discussed by special counsel, Maer, and she mentioned that input from the sign industry representatives should be reviewed before a decision is made. The Chairman questioned whether or not recommendation of the proposed ordinance can be made at this time prior to the amortization issue being fully reviewed. City Attorney Ansbro felt that further study needed to be done with staff and special counsel and that they should continue their research and meetings so that a proper presentation can be made to the Commission, assuring them that all of the legal concerns as well as the public's concerns are addressed. He further commented that it would be the boards decision whether to forward the proposed ordinance on to the Commission or not. He further stressed that any concerns the public may have should be addressed to staff either by phone or letter soon, and that they will also have opportunity to express their concerns to the Commission at public hearings. Terry Virta, AICP, Growth Management Director stated that consideration of including the "Patch" to the ordinance should be acted on tonight. Comments from other board members were heard at this time. Comment was made my board member Dubow on the number of times the ordinance has been brought before the board and that aside from representatives from the Hilton, AMO and representatives from the billboard industry, specific problems have not been addressed with the ordinance text. Bob Adams questioned how long the current draft of the ordinance has been available. City Attorney Ansbro, further stated that after counsel and staff have reworked it, the public will need to hear what has been revised. He stressed that the ordinance needs to be in the strongest legal defensible posture before it is adopted by the City Commission. The board confirmed that the next regular commission meeting is August 25, 1998, then following would be September 8, 1998 and September 22, 1998. Board clerk Lou Ann Cunningham verified that the ordinance could not be heard by the City Commission any sooner than September 22, 1998 due to the timeframe for advertising requirements of quarter page display ads, (required by State Statute.) She further clarified that the quarter page ad must contain the ordinance heading (title) as well as the Dania City Map. The board was concerned about delaying the ordinance any further, a special meeting was discussed. Bob Adams stated that he felt there is no major disagreement with the ordinance, and that once the ordinance reaches the City Commission, public comment can still be made and the ordinance can still be revised. It was the boards sentiment that the conceptuality of the ordinance has been reviewed and that the ordinance should be forwarded on. The "Patch" to the ordinance regarding monument signs in the right-of-way as a special exception was discussed. Comment made by Bob Adams against allowing monument Planning and Zoning Board 5 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES signs in the right-of-way. Staff clarified that currently there is no provision that even addresses this request and that the patch would provide a vehicle for the Commission to review requests and to make a determination on a case by case basis. City Attorney Ansbro backed up Terry Virta's comments stating that the issue of monument signs in the right of way will be petitioned by not only the City of Hollywood, but for the Sportsman's Park Development on Ravenswood Rd. also. He went on to explain the special exception test to the board. Hearing no further discussion from the board, staff or special counsel, motion was made by Kevin Pierson to recommend approval of the proposed sign ordinance TX-23- 98 and incorporating the "Patch" which would provide criteria for monument signs in the right-of-way, seconded by Pat Janowski. Motion passed on the following roll call: Bob Adams - no Jason Dubow - yes Pat Janowski - yes Victor Lohmann - yes Kevin Pierson - yes 6. VA-45-98 — Request by Steven V. Hoffman, for the firm of Mastriana & Christiansen, PA, representing Dania's Sportsman's Park ("Bass Pro Outdoor World") which is located along the 1-95 corridor to the east, Angler's Avenue to the West and Griffin Road to the North; for variances from the following code sections concerning sign area, roof signs and number of permitted signs per property. The code sections are as follows: Chapter 3: Advertising, Article 11 Signs, Section 3-33 and Chapter 28: Zoning: Article 6.64 Principal Arterial Commercial Design Standards Overlay. (6) Signage and Lighting. The petitioner is requesting the following signage package for the Outdoor World and IGFA developments: 1) 31 wall or roof mounted signs on the five separate elevations of the Bass Pro Outdoor World Building totaling 4,169 square feet. (These signs will not exceed 20%of the surface area of any wall.) 2) 4 monument, or ground mounted structures, featuring signs totaling 330 square feet. 3) 1 wall mounted sign on the IGFA Building totaling 24 square feet. 4) 3 monument, or ground mounted, IGFA identification signs totaling 301 square feet. Attorney Ron Mastriana, representing Bass Pro Shops, and Dave De Cou, Head of Development for Bass Pro Shops, addressed the board giving a brief history of the project, the relationship of this project with the City, County and Tri-Rail and commenting on the proposed sign ordinance. Mr. Dave De Cou gave a slide Planning and Zoning Board 6 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES presentation of the project for the board. Attorney Mastriana described the requested signs and discussed the proposed ordinance's reference to "Roof Top" signs and the issue of what is defined by Roof signs, stating that because the structure has a "Gables" type roof, it should be considered a wall sign. There was further discussion regarding identification of the "Joint Venture" entities listed on the proposed monument signs, (The City of Dania, the County, Broward Community College, Tri-Rail, IGFA and Bass Pro.) Attorney Mastriana went on to discuss the proposed "Sculptures" to the site. Terry Virta, AICP, Growth Management Director, addressed the board with staffs comments on the proposed sign variance(s). Mr. Virta stated that he felt the hardship criteria had not been met. He went on to state that there is no provision for roof signage in the current ordinance. He confirmed that the number of signs falls into compliance since the code only addresses total square footage. Attorney Mastriana stated that it is a determination of the location of the signs being roof or what appears to be roof but should be considered wall. Bob Adams questioned City Attorney Ansbro as to whether this situation would be not permitted or prohibited since it is not addressed in the ordinance. It was confirmed that it would become a variance issue in the proposed ordinance. It was discussed that the proposed ordinance should specifically address what is meant by a roof sign. At this time the Chairman opened the item for public comment. Hearing no one and seeing no one, the Chairman closed the public hearing. Motion made by Bob Adams to recommend approval of VA-45-98, Chairman Lohmann brought to the boards attention possible confusion for the Humane Society building. Attorney Mastriana brought the board up to speed on what is being worked on in conjunction with the Humane Society, and it was agreed that Bass Pro would work with the Humane Society so that they could also be identified. The motion on the floor was seconded by Jason Dubow. Motion passed on the following roll call: Bob Adams - yes Jason Dubow - yes Pat Janowski - yes Victor Lohmann - yes Kevin Pierson - yes SITE PLANS & PLATS 7. SP-02-98(R) — A request by Joseph Roles and Associates, Inc. for Marvin Mandel, President of Angler's Office Park; for approval of a site plan revision to the previously approved office building site plan located at 5555 Ravenswood Rd. Terry Virta, AICP, Growth Management Director addressed the board and explained that the proposed change would be to the size of the building in the amount of 1,820 sq. ft.. He further explained that city code states that any addition or change over 500 sq. ft. requires site plan review. Mr. Virta stated that increases to the vegetation and an Planning and Zoning Board 7 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES additional dumpster has also been added to the plan. At this time the Chairman opened the public hearing. Hearing no one and seeing no one, the petitioner David Garmizo, of Joseph Roles and Associates, addressed the board concurring with statements made by Terry Virta. Hearing no further comments the Chairman closed the public hearing. Motion made by Jason Dubow to recommend approval of SP-02- 98(R), revision to the site plan, seconded by Pat Janowski. Motion passed on the following roll: Jason Dubow - yes Pat Janowski - yes Victor Lohmann - yes Kevin Pierson - yes Bob Adams - absent from roll call 8. SP-26-98 - A request by Michael Ambrose, representing Airport America USA, Inc. for approval of Phase II of a site plan to construct a long term surface parking facility at SE 32"d Street, Port Everglades Terminal. The proposed area for the site is approximately 3.11 acres located along Eller Drive and the Broward County Port Authority Railway. Michael Ambrose, representing Airport America USA, Inc., was sworn in and addressed the board with Phase II of a proposed site plan to construct a long term surface parking facility. Mr. Ambrose gave a brief summary of what has transpired between meetings with Port Authority Planners regarding the project. He presented what had been worked out with the ingress and egress of the project and staffs recommendations as to the landscaping. He further described that a letter from the State regarding clearance on the use of the site (tank farm) should be received sometime in December. Terry Virta, Growth, AICP, Management Director addressed the board, commenting on the current proposed landscape plan. He has also stated that staff has supported the plan concerning the ingress and egress. The board commented on access to fire hydrants for Phases I and II of the project. 'Mr. Ambrose explained that he has met with the Fire Marshal, and the installation of (approximately 14) fire hydrants has been worked into the plan. He then went over the landscape plan with the board and stated that he will discuss changing the Buttonwoods to Live Oaks so that the landscaping on both plans match. At this time the Chairman opened the petition for public comment. Hearing no one and seeing no one the public hearing was closed. Motion was made by Jason Dubow to recommend approval of SP-26-98, seconded by Pat Janowski. Motion passed on the following roll call: Bob Adams - yes Jason Dubow - yes Pat Janowski - yes Victor Lohmann - yes Kevin Pierson - yes Planning and Zoning Board 8 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES 9. SP-39-98 — A request by Vincent F. Pyle, owner of Danian Corporation for site plan approval of a 2,160 sq. ft. addition to the existing shopping center located at 605 East Dania Beach Blvd. Vincent F. Pyle was sworn in and addressed the board presenting his request for site plan approval. Mr. Pyle described the proposed landscaping for the site and the existing landscaping that exists between his site and the Sea Oaks site. Mr. Pyle asked that the board give some leniency as to the buffering requirements with the Sea Oaks site, due to the fact that the chain link fence was just placed there 6 months ago. The board stressed that the code clearly states that a 6' masonry or wooden fence be placed between commercial and residential development. Terry Virta, AICP, Growth Management Director, addressed the board with staffs comments on the project. He stated that the applicant must bring the project up to current landscaping requirements. He further stated that the site has existing parking and that it will meet the needs of the expanded center. The applicant has also made efforts to enclose the dumpsters provided on the site. He further stated that additional square footage proposed will be accommodated within the footprint of the existing development and the proposed additions will be located at both ends of the east-west structure in the center. Mr. Virta addressed the current landscaping at the site. He stated that according to the code, on the north should consist of a ten (10) foot buffer, which includes a six (6) foot masonry wall or solid wood fence. There currently exists a ten-foot buffer but only five feet is on the applicant's property. Because of drainage considerations, it appears that additional landscaping is not practicable. He further stated that interior parking areas and the remaining property boundaries do not currently meet landscaping requirements. Landscape islands will have to be provided within the parking lot as per the Code. The three (3) remaining property boundaries will have to have trees at forty (40) foot intervals and have the necessary shrubs/hedges provided. The plans as submitted only partially include these provisions. The Chairman then opened the item for public comment. Hearing no one and seeing no one, the public hearing was closed. Further discussion with the petitioner, Board and Staff continued in regards to bringing the site up to current code. Motion was made by Jason Dubow to recommend approval of SP-39-98, provided that the petitioner works with staff to bring the landscaping up to code, seconded by Pat Janowski. Motion passed on the following roll call: Bob Adams - yes Jason Dubow - yes Pat Janowski - yes Victor Lohmann - yes Kevin Pierson - yes Planning and Zoning Board 9 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES 10. PL-44-98 — A request by Treasure Cove of Dania, Ltd., for preliminary plat approval for the remainder of a 7.13 acre of partially built residential development. The property is located on the North Side of SW 4tn Street between 27th Terrace and SW 27t" Avenue. The development is commonly known as "Treasure Cove Villas". Ed Ploski, of Craven and Thompson was sworn in and addressed the board concerning the request by Treasure Cove of Dania, for preliminary plat approval. He described the site to the board as well as the petitioners desire to build up to seventy (70) dwelling units at the site. Terry Virta, AICP, Growth Management Director addressed the board commenting on the problem of how to best protect the existing residences that were built as part of the original project. He gave a brief history of the site stating that it has been a problem from its origin in that it was not properly laid out or platted and that the existing owners have faced several problems related to their legal descriptions and access. Mr. Virta described that the preliminary plat indicates a twenty-four (24) foot access easement for the properties located on the Dania Cut-Off Canal, but unfortunately, there is no provision shown for access easements for those properties which are adjacent to SW 27' Terrace or SW 45' Street. He concluded, recommending that necessary provisions must be made to protect and enhance the access needs of the existing residences and that the Planning and Zoning Board should recommend that the City Commission approve this preliminary plat subject to access easements being provided to protect and enhance the right of all the residences existing at this location. The board opened the item for public comment, hearing none and seeing none the public hearing was closed. Discussion regarding staffs comments were held by the board, petitioner and Mr. Virta. Motion made by Jason Dubow to recommend approval of PL-44-98 subject to the required access easements being provided, seconded by Pat Janowski. Motion passed on the following roll call: Bob Adams - no Jason Dubow - yes Pat Janowski - yes Victor Lohmann - yes Kevin Pierson - yes 12. TX-42-98 —An administrative ordinance which adds the "IROM" zoning classification to schedule of use regulations. the Cityof Darna s g AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DANIA, FLORIDA, PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT OF ZONING; CREATING A NEW ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION TO BE KNOWN AS THE "I.R.O.M." DISTRICT (INDUSTRIAL, RESEARCH, OFFICE AND MARINE DISTRICT); ESTABLISHING USE REGULATIONS AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR SUCH DISTRICT; PROVIDING PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING DEVELOPMENT ORDER APPLICATIONS FOR LANDS LOCATED IN SUCH DISTRICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE THEREFOR. Planning and Zoning Board 10 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES 0 • Terry Virta, AICP, Growth Management Director, addressed the board regarding the proposed ordinance which will add a new zoning classification to the code. Mr. Virta reported that this ordinance has been adopted by the City Commission on first reading and that it is scheduled to be heard on second reading at the August 25, regular meeting. He further stated that the Marine Advisory Board had met and discussed this item, however, at the time that this memo is being prepared we do not have the benefit of their comments. He stated that the primary concern this board had at its last meeting had to do with the length of boats to be allowed and that the concern was that the length allowed might be to excessive. The board discussed the concerns over boat length, and it was decided to move forward with the proposed ordinance. The Chairman opened the item for public comment. Hearing no one and seeing no one the public hearing was closed. There was no representation at this meeting by the Marine Advisory Board. Motion was made by Bob Adams to recommend approval of Ordinance TX-42-98, seconded by Jason Dubow. Motion passed on the following roll call: Bob Adams - yes Jason Dubow - yes Pat Janowski - yes Victor Lohmann - yes Kevin Pierson - yes 13. Comprehensive Plan Update — Terry L. Virta, AICP, Growth Management Director, gave a brief status report of the project, and stated that consultants will make their next presentation at the September Planning and Zoning Board Meeting. The Chairman recognized David Reich from the audience. Mr. Reich made positive comments on the land use plan to date, and that the consultants have been very helpful in answering his concerns. 14. Administrative Ordinance amending the Design Guideline ordinance by adding 2 additional arterial roadways (Bryan Road and Anglers Avenue) to the overlay district. Terry Virta, AICP, Growth Management Director, addressed the board explaining that this ordinance would add two (2) roadways, Bryan Rd. and Anglers (Ravenswood Rd.), to the Design Guideline overlay district which were left out of the original ordinance which was adopted last September. The Chairman opened the item for public hearing, hearing no one and seeing no one, the public hearing was closed. Motion was made by Jason Dubow to recommend approval of the text ordinance, seconded by Kevin Pierson. Motion passed on the following roll call: Bob Adams - yes Jason Dubow - yes Pat Janowski - yes Victor Lohmann - yes Kevin Pierson - yes Planning and Zoning Board 11 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES Adjournment Planning and Zoning Board 12 AUGUST 19, 1998 MINUTES