HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-11-29 Airport Advisory Board Agenda AGENDA
DANIA BEACH AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
NOVEMBER 29, 2006, WEDNESDAY
7:00 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL AND SELF INTRODUCTION
2. EXCUSED ABSENCES
3. MINUTES
3.1 MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 MEETING
4. PRESENTATION OF SUB COMMITTEE REPORTS.
4.1 DISCUSSION OF RUNWAY PROJECT, MASTER PLAN UPDATE & PART 150 PROJECT,
EIS UPDATE, TASK FORCE UPDATE..
4.2 NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING DISCUSSION
4.3 PRESENTATION OF ANY MEMBER RUNUP LOGS
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
6, NEW BUSINESS
7. ADJOURN
A REMINDER FROM THE CHAIR: ALL COMMITTEE MEMBERS WHO ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD WRITE
A NOTE TO DANIA CLERK STATING YOU WILL BE ABSENT OR YOU WILL BE CHARGED WITH AN UNEXCUSED ABSENCE.
THANK YOU. SEE YOU AT THE MEETING.
City of Dania Beach
Airport Advisory Board Meeting
September 20,2006
The Airport Advisory Board met in the conference room at City Hall on Thursday,
September 28". The meeting was called to order by Chairman Field at 7:00 p.m.
Members present:
Jay Field Beulah Lair Rae Sandler
Don Hill Bud Witz Billy Phipps
Members absent:
Dick Sokol Betty Sokol Loretta Murray
Zack Adams Thomas Allen Clive Taylor
Others present: .
Suzanne Witz
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Field at 7:05 p.m.
Clive Taylor,Dick and Betty Sokol were out of town. Motion to grant excused
absence made by Billy Phipps,seconded by Beulah Lair. Motion carried.
Minutes and notes from three months were presented for approval. Motion to
approved as written was made by Rae Sandler,seconded by Beulah Lair. Motion
carried.
Chairman Field said April was the month new board officers were to be elected.The
board felt the present officers should continue. A motion to that effect was made by
Rae Sandler,seconded by Billy Phipps.Motion carried. The present officers will
continue until March,2007.
Chairman Field asked Rae Sandler to report on the Noise Abatement Meeting.
She said Eric from Leigh-Fisher was present. He was talking faster than an
auctioneer and was not answering any questions asked by the attendees. He said
they had been told to report on mitigation only to the 65 and they cannot show
anyone any noise contours until they show them to the County Commissioners.
Chairman Field reported statistics show the number of operations at the airport,
despite a booming economy,has been steadily declining since last November. He
questioned why they are talking about expanding a runway with a steady decline in
operations in a booming economy. He was ruled out of order. Rae Sandler said the
Part 150 was supposed to be ready in April but now they are saying it will be ready
in October.
1.
The backup material furnished the board was next discussed. Included in the
backup material was a list of the locations of the ten permanent noise monitors. The
monitors in Dania Beach are numbers 2,3,4 and 5. Number 3 and number 4 are
showing more noise since they are now allowing the jets on the south runway.
Rae Sandler mentioned they are discussing putting an additional noise monitor in
John U.Lloyd Park.
Chairman Field asked the board if they felt a presentation should be made to the
Commission in regard to the steady increase in the noise level because of jet traffic
now beingallowed on the south rune and also report the stew decrease of
Y P �'
operations since last November. A motion was made by Rae Sandler,seconded by
Don Hill that a presentation be made to the Commission regarding the decrease in
operations since last November and the increase in noise due to jet traffic now being
permitted on the south runway. Motion carried.
Chairman Field said he was going to notify the unexcused board members they will
no longer be a part of the board.
There being no additional business to bring before the board,the meeting was
adjourned at 7:34 p.m.
Jay Field,Chairman
Respectfully submitted,
Suzanne Witz
PREVIOUS ITEM BROWARD COUNTY NEXT ITEM
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BPOMeeting Date
cOU R AGENDA ITEM #3 10/10/06
Page 1 of 2
(Identify appropriate Action or Motion,Authority or Requirement for Item and identify the outcome
n
and/or purpose of item.)
2:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION TO CONSIDER the enactment of an Ordinance, the title of which is as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE
BROWARD COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES; AMENDING
SUBSECTION 5-182(a�(7)e) TO INSERT CORRECTED CITATION;
AMENDING SUBSECTT ON 5-182()(3) RELATING TO PROTECTION
OF AIR NAVIGATION AND NOTICE OF POTENTIAL AIRPORT NOISE
IMPACTS; CREATING SUBSECTION 5-182(v), PROTECTION OF THE
PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY; AMENDING SECTION 5-196,
PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(Sponsored by the Board of County Commissioners)
Why Action is Necessary: Resolution directing the County Administrator to publish notice of public
hearing to consider enactment of the Ordinance was adopted by the
Board of County Commissioners at its Commission meeting of
September 12, 2006.
What Action Accomplishes: Corrects citation under Development Review Requirements; provides
County will only provide noise mitigation for existing incompatible
development and not for new incompatible development; and provides
public health and safety considerations to be addressed in the issuance of
a development permit.
Is this Action Goal Related? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Signature: Date: Type:Name,Title,Agency,and Phone
Jeffrey J. Newton
County Attorney
954-357-7600
Source of additional information:Type Name,Agency,and Phone
Barbara M. Hill, Assistant County Attorney, 954-357-7600
Norm 107-1-A Revised 12/09/03
£
� t 33 Page 2 of 2
r Yjk � 'ry" �'l The first sentence includes the Agency recommendation.Provide an executive summaryof
the action that gives an overview of the relevant details for the item.Identify how item meets
Commission Challenge Goal.)
At Aviation Department's request, there were two changes made to the ordinance after it appeared
on the September 12, 2006, agenda: (1) on Page 3, Line 18, N' was changed to Y' in the
compatibility column entitled 65-70 sound level decibels; and (2) on page 5, line 9'/2, an additional
source material was added, i.e., the 1994 Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport FAR Part
150 Program Update, as same may be amended.
.:3 3� L 3 ek fi`tk FF t ¢x F projected PP 9e
<: (Include ro acted cost,approved budget amount and account number,source of funds,and
fMm any future funding requirements.)
Fiscal Impact Statement by Office of Management and Budget attached as Exhibit 2.
f 6':i 3 'v Db 3. Yea '�"rY £'' tYR!r✓s£>x n'
(Please number exhibits consecutively.)
Exhibit 1 - Copy of Proposed Ordinance
Exhibit 2 - Copy of Fiscal Impact Statement
Exhibit 3 - Copy of Memorandum from Development Management Division
101,
< %F. i?t1 )
Executed original(s)for permanent record ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED
(Number)
Executed copies return to: ❑ DEFERRED
(Number)
Other instructions(Include name,agency,and phone)
Original Ordinance From:
To:
PROPOSED EXHIBIT I
1 ORDINANCE NO. 2006-
2
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
3 COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,
4 AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE BROWARD COUNTY
CODE OF ORDINANCES; AMENDING SUBSECTION
5-182(a)(7)e) TO INSERT CORRECTED CITATION;
5 AMENDING SUBSECTION 5-182(n)(3) RELATING TO
PROTECTION OF AIR NAVIGATION AND NOTICE OF
6 POTENTIAL AIRPORT NOISE IMPACTS; CREATING
SUBSECTION 5-182(v}, PROTECTION OF THE PUBLIC
7 HEALTH AND SAFEETTY; AMENDING SECTION 5-196,
PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR
8 SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE
9 CODE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
10 (Sponsored by the Board of County Commissioners)
11
12 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
13 BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA:
14 Section 1. CHAPTER 5, ARTICLE IX, "BROWARD COUNTY LAND
15 DEVELOPMENT CODE," is hereby amended as set out below:
16 1.01 Section 5-182 is hereby amended as follows:
17 Sec. 5-182. Development review requirements.
18 An application for a development permit must comply with the requirements of
19 this section. To determine compliance with these requirements, within municipalities,
20 the County shall conduct an independent review; provided, however, that in conducting
21 such review the County shall utilize and consider whatever documentation and
22 recommendation is provided to it by the relevant municipality as a result of that
23 municipality's own review of such subject matters.
24 (a) Adequacy of Regional Transportation Network:
Coding: Words in s#Fb1sk-thFeu0 type are deletions from existing text. Words in
underscored type are additions.
The adequacy of the Regional Transportation Network, as defined
1 in Section 5-201 of this Article, shall be determined based upon
conditions at the time the final development permit application, or a
2 request for a Transportation Concurrency Satisfaction Certificate, is
submitted in accordaonce with the following provisions:
3
4 . . .
5 (7) Developments of Regional Impact
An application for a Development of Regional Impact, as
6 governed by Ghaptef Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, shall
satisfy the regional transportation concurrency requirements
7 of Broward County if the DRI Development Order complies
8 with the following:
10 e) Satisfaction of the County's regional transportation
concurrency requirements by a DRI Development
11 Order does not preclude the need to address
mitigation of transportation facility impacts for that
12 DRI, as required under Rule 9J-2.045, Florida
Administrative Code, entitled the Transportation
13 Uniform Standard Rule. For the purposes of
calculations under the Transportation Uniform
14 Standard Rule, the Level of Service Standards
contained in Policy
15 3.4.3 of the Transportation ement of the Broward
ounty Corrivehensive Plan shall apply.
16
17
(n) .Impacts.
of Air Navigation: and Notice of Potential Airport Noise
18
19
20 (3) If an application for a residential development permit
includes land lying within an area which extends five (5)
21 miles in a direct line along the centerline of an existing or
proposed runway of any County-owned airport and which
22 has a width measuring one-half ('/2) the length of such
runway, then approval of the application shall be conditioned
23 upon the applicant recording a separate document against
24
all the property within the development, as follows:
Coding: Words in str---sk-t-ireugb type are deletions from existing text. Words in
underscored type are additions.
2
This serves as notice of potential aircraft overflight and noise
1 impacts on this property, due to its close proximity to a
2 County-owned airport, which is being disclosed to all
prospective purchasers considering the use of this property
for residential purposes. Further Information regarding the
3 current and potential impacts of airport operations on the
4 subject property may be obtained from the Broward County
Aviation Department, Planning & Development Division. In
addition to the forecloing. consistent with the Federal
5 Aviation ministrations han a in s Noise iti ation
Policy.-I, effective October 1 1998, the County will onlv
6 Drovide noise mitigation for existin "incom ati le
evelo ment" and not for new incom ati a eve o ment.
7 The determination of "compatible" an "incom atl e
development" will be based on the un 's most current
8 noise COMM ity Qrograrn which as been reviewe and
naProvedthe a era viation ministration or the ort
9 uder ale- o ood International Airport it ort" . The
followina table o an se ComQatibilitv Guidelines"
10 represents comoatible and incom atib a land uses. The
determination of com ati a and incompatible uses is based
11 on the most current FAA approved Noise ExposureMap:
12 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES
13 ABLE 1.1
14 YEARLY DAY-NIGHT AVERAGE SOUND
LEVEL 113NQ IN DECIBELS
15
Below Over
16 LAND USE 65 66-70 70-75 75-80 80-85 85
17 RESIDENTIAL
18 Residential, other than mobile homes Y Y' N' N N N
and transient lodgin-as
19 Mobile home Darks Y N N N N N
Transient lodyincis Y N' N' N N
20 PUBLIC USE
Schools, hospitals, nursing homes Y Y2 Y3 N N N
21 Churches, auditoriums, and concert Y Y2 Y3 N N N
22 halls 2
Governmental services Y Y Y Y3 N N
23 Transportation Y Y Y2 Y3 Y4 N4
Parking Y Y Y2 Y3 Y4 N
24 COMMERCIAL USE
Offices, business and professional Y Y Y2 Y3 N N
Coding: Words in stFusk-thFeugh type are deletions from existing text. Words in
underscored type are additions.
3
i
1 Wholesale and retail, building Y Y Y2 Y3 Y4 N
materials, hardware and farm
equipment
2 Retail trade, -general Y Y Y2 Y3 N N
3 Utilities Y Y Y2 Y3 Y4 N
Communication Y Y Y2 Y3 N N
4 MANUFACTURING/PRODUCTION
Manufacturing, general Y Y Y2 Y3 Y4 N
5 Photographic and optical Y Y Y2 Y3 N N
6 Agriculture (except livestock) and Y Ys Y7 Y8 Y8 Y8
forest
7 Livestock farming and breading Y Ys Y7 N N N
Mining and fishing, resource Y Y Y Y Y Y
8 production and extraction
RECREATIONAL
9 Outdoor sports arenas and spectator Y Y Y5 Y5 N N
10 sports
Outdoor music shells, amphitheaters Y N N N N N
11 Nature exhibits and zoos Y Y N N N N
Amusements, parks, resorts and Y Y Y N N N
12 carnips
Golf courses, riding stables, and water Y Y Y2 Y3 N N
13 recreation
14 The designations contained in this table do not constitute a determination that any use of land covered by
the program is compatible under Federal State or kcal law. The responsibility for determining the
15
compatibility and permissible land uses and the relationship between specific properties and speck
noise contours rests with the local iurisdiction.
1b
17 Key to Table 1.1
18 Y(Yes) Land use and related structures are compatible.
N(No) Land use and related structures are not compatible.
19 Notes for Table 1.1
20 1. Where residential or school uses are allowed by the local iurisdiction measures to achieve
21 outdoor-to-indoor Noise Level Reduction (NLR)of at least 25 dB and 30 dB should be incorporated
into building codes and be considered in individual approvals Normal residential construction can
22 be expected to provide a NLR of 20 dB: thus the reduction requirements are often stated as 5, 10.
or 15 dB over standard construction and normally assume mechanical ventilation and closed
23
windows Year round However, the use of NLR criteria will not eliminate outdoor noise problems.
2. Compatible provided that measures to achieve NLR of 25 dB are incorporated into the design and
24 construction of portions of these buildings where the public is received, office areas, noise-sensitive
areas, or where the normal noise level is low.
Coding: Words in stfursk-thFOUgh type are deletions from existing text. Words in
underscored type are additions.
4
3. Compatible provided that measures to achieve NLR of 30 dB are incorporated into the design and
1 construction of portions of these buildings where the public is received,office areas, noise-sensitive
2 areas,or where the normal noise level is low.
4. Compatible provided that measures to achieve NLR of 35 dB are incoroorated into the desian and
3 construction of portions of these buildinas where the public is received,office areas, noise-sensitive
areas,or where the normal noise level is low.
4 5. Compatible provided special sound reinforcement systems are installed.
5 6. Residential buildings are compatible with a NLR of 25 dB.
6 7. Residential buildings are compatible with a NLR of 30 dB.
8. Residential buildings are not permitted.
7
NLR Noise Level Reduction(outdoor to indoor)to be achieved through incorporation of noise attenuation
8 in the design and construction of the structure.
9
Sources: FAR Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Planninc Appendix A Table 1 and the 1994 Fort
10 Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport FAR Part 150 Procram Update. as same may be amended.
11
12 •
13 Ly) Protection of the Public Health and Safety.
14 Ana lication for a develo ment pgrmit may be deferred denied or
approved with a ro riate conditions. en competent substantial
15 evidence is presented demo5stratingthat the proposed
development will a verse y affect public health or safety.
16
17 1.02 Section 5-196 is hereby amended as follows:
18 Sec. 5-196. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY.
19 The purpose of this Division is to establish procedures for the adoption,
20 enforcement and amendment of a Broward County Delineated Trafficways Plan
21 pursuant to Sestien the Broward County Charter and Chapter 71-561, Laws of
22 Florida, as amended.
23
24
Coding: Words in stFusk-thfeuo type are deletions from existing text. Words in
underscored type are additions.
5
1 Section 2. SEVERABILITY.
2 If any portion of this Ordinance is determined by any Court to be invalid, the
3 invalid portion shall be stricken, and such striking shall not affect the validity of the
4 remainder of this Ordinance. If any Court determines that this Ordinance, or any portion
5 hereof, cannot be legally applied to any individual(s), group(s), entity(ies), property(ies),
6 or circumstance(s), such determination shall not affect the applicability hereof to any
7 other individual, group, entity, property or circumstance.
8 Section 3. INCLUSION IN CODE.
9 It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners that the provisions of
10 this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Broward County Code; and that
11 the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or re-lettered and the word
12 "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or such other appropriate word or
13 phrase in order to accomplish such intentions.
14 Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.
15 The provisions of this Ordinance shall effective as provided by law.
-16 ENACTED
17 FILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE
18 EFFECTIVE
19
20
21
22
23 BMH/lt
#06-400
24 09/11/06
ldc-noise mitigationord-4.doc
Coding: Words in stFUGk-thFoU0 type are deletions from existing text. Words in
underscored type are additions.
6
EXHIBIT 2
Bpt' ' . RD
<;
COUNTY
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
115 S.Andrews Avenue,Room 404•Fort Lauderdale,Florida 33301 -954-357-6345•FAX 954-357-6364
MEMORANDUM
August 11, 2006
TO: Board of County Commission
FROM: Kayla Olsen, Director
Office of Management and Budget
SUBJECT: Fiscal Impact Statement Re: Proposed Ordinance Amending Chapter 5,Article IX, Broward County
Code of Ordinances, Relating to the Broward County Land Development Code
Sum
The proposed ordinance inserts a corrected citation included in one of the subsections relating to development review
and amends the subsection relating to the protection of air navigation and notice of potential airport noise impacts.
The current county ordinance requires a disclosure of potential aircraft noise to all prospective purchasers of
properties within designated boundaries surrounding the airport. The proposed ordinance provides that the county will
only provide noise mitigation for existing incompatible development and not for new incompatible development.
Compatible and incompatible development is defined in the most current noise compatibility program for FLL
approved by the FAA.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact anticipated on the County associated with this ordinance.
KO:Ib
Broward County Board of County Commissioners
Josephus Eggelletion,Jr.-Ben Graber-Sue Gunzburger•Kristin D.Jacobs-Ilene Lieberman•John E.Rodstrom,Jr.-Jim Scott-Diana Wasserman-Rubin•Lois Wexler
www.broward.or4
CADocuments and Settingslmshie4ds1ocal Selling0emporary Internet Files10LK1660welopment Review FIS.doc
EXHIBIT 3
B Pv
, RD,' � COUNTY
Urban Planning and Redevelopment Department
DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT DIVISION
115 S.Andrews Avenue,Room A-240-Fort Lauderdale,Florida 33301 -954-357-6666-FAX 954-357-6521
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County r4tommissioners
THRU: Al Simon, Director,
FROM: David M. Danovitz, Assistant Directorp�kj�r
DATE: August 17, 2006
RE: Proposed Amendments to the Broward County Land Development Code
Relating to Notice of Potential Airport Noise Impacts and Protection of
Public Health and Safety
On January 10, 2006, the County Commission directed the County Attorney to draft an
ordinance amending Chapter 5, Article IX ("Land Development Code") of the Code of
Ordinances to add language relating to the protection of air navigation and notice of
potential airport noise impacts, as well as to provide the Commission with the ability to
consider protection of the public health and safety when approving, denying or deferring
4evelopment permits.
'The proposed ordinance (attached) provides the following:
1. Pages 2-5, "Protection of Air Navigation and Notice of Potential Airport Noise
Impacts." This section provides that, consistent with the Federal Aviation
Administration's ("FAA") October 1, 1998 policy, the County will only provide noise
mitigation for existing incompatible development and will not provide noise
mitigation for new incompatible development. The determination of what is and is
not "compatible" or "incompatible" is based on the FAA's "Land Use Compatibility
Guidelines," which are adopted into the County's most current noise compatibility
program and the most current FAA approved Noise Exposure Map. A chart
depicting "Land Use Compatibility Guidelines" is incorporated into the ordinance on
pages 3-5.
2. Page 5, "Protection of the Public Health and Safety." This section allows the County
Commission to defer, deny or approve a development permit with appropriate
conditions when competent, substantial evidence is presented of possible adverse
public health and safety concerns.
Broward County Board of County Commissioners
Josephus Eggelletion,Jr.-Ben Graber-Sue Gunzburger-Kristin D.Jacobs-Nerm Lieberman•John E.Rodstrom,Jr.•Jim Scott•Diana Wasserman-Rubin•Las Wexler
www.broward.org
Page 2
3. Pages 2 and 5 contain housekeeping changes by deleting a reference to a section
of the Land Development Code, adding a reference to a policy of the Transportation
Element of the Comprehensive Plan, correcting a reference to the Florida Statutes,
and deleting a reference to a section of the Broward County Charter.
Attachment
cc: Cynthia Chambers, Director, Urban Planning & Redevelopment
Total Operations for the past 12 months
(August '05 — August 106)
Total Operations (Arrivals/Departures)
30000
r '�� ;�w .£, Yss• x 4t 'Ft 4 : s; 4 lzYs
Oki
sz. ��� v.x' is 3 £i ; � 3.{�w� �>� £�l F'"PE� .z ,�•
10000s .
0 Y..:
,Ah � ��° ADO
O 0 ��
J Q c'� a � a
P )
Month
Monthly DNL for Noise Monitors 2,3,4,5:
September, 2005 — September, 2006
Noise Monitor#2 (Sep'05 -Sep'06)
60
�:.��
�}cF�£FF x.>Rk< a E�'E`
58 �" x ���� � x� � ��£���
N
'�.. P' ;3 A<��a•t, � �>`<<sY. F?'� S
56
ITT 4
Y
52h
50
48
Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep-
05 05 05 05 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06
Month
Noise Monitor#3 (Sep'05 -Sep '06)
H
�
70
60 €�s�t y��£�xE �£ii�`�Ir�,'�'r�<; i• _ �f � �S��i ��3??��A #`�J''F r��s S r
r
30
20
10 E..
Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep-
05 05 05 05 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06
Month
Noise Monitor#4 (Sep'05 -Sep'06)
54
52
s
50
7 s YE ki #3
� 48a of
Z
Q 46
44
SEE a"
42
40
Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep-
05 05 05 05 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06
Month
Noise Monitor#5 (Sep'05 -Sep'06)
60 ...is n a s£a qs
50
40
z 30 E
20
10 M
Sep- Oct- Now Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep-
05 05 05 05 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06 06
Month
Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 210/Tuesday, October 31, 2006/Notices 63829
data concerning potential new hires for This Noise Analysis is being provided comment.The FAA is also announcing
the FAA.The information will be used for public comment as part of a the availability of the Noise Analysis in
to evaluate the qualifications of settlement agreement between the FAA major local newspapers in the vicinity
applicants for a variety of positions. and Broward County related to runway of FLL.
Without this information there would be utilization at FLL. Background
no reliable means to accurately evaluate DATES:The public is invited to comment Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood
applicants'skills knowledge and on this Noise Analysis on or before yw
abilities to perform the duties of these November 30,2006. International Airport(FLL)is owned
positions. ADDRESSES:Address your comments to and operated by,and lies within,
ADDRESSES:Interested persons are the Docket Management System,U.S. Broward County,Florida.The cities of
invited to submit written comments on Department of Transportation,Room Dania Beach,Hollywood,Davie,and
the proposed information collection to Plaza 401,400 Seventh Street,SW., Fort Lauderdale and adjacent,or in
the Office of Information and Regulatory Washington,DC 20590-0001.You must close proximity,to the airport.The
Affairs,Office of Management and identify the docket number FAA-2006— airport is bordered by Interstate 595 to
Budget.Comments should be addressed 25553 at the beginning of your the north,Griffin Road to the south,U.S.
to Nathan Lesser,Desk Officer, comments and you should submit two Route 1 to the east and Interstate 95 to
Department of Transportation/FAA,and copies of your comments.If you wish to the west.
sent via electronic mail to receive confirmation that FAA received In 1989,FAA accepted Noise
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or faxed your comments,include a self- Exposure Maps(NEMs)submitted by
to(202)395-6974. addressed.,stamped postcard. Broward County for FLL.FAA also
Comments are invited on:Whether You may also submit comments received and approved a Noise
the proposed collection of information through the Internet to http://d`ms.gov. Compatibility Program(NCP)for FLL
is necessary for the proper performance You may review the public docket pursuant to 49 U.S.C.47501 et seq.,as
of the functions of the Department, containing comments to this notice in implemented by 14 CFR part 150(part
including whether the information will person in the Dockets Office between 9 150).The FAA reviews airport noise
have practical utility;the accuracy of a.m.and 5 p.m.Monday through Friday, compatibility programs for consistency
the Department's estimates of the except Federal holidays.The Dockets with statutory and regulatory criteria.65
burden of the proposed information Office is on the plaza level of the FR 43802,43809(July 14,2000).To
collection;ways to enhance the quality, NASSIF building at the Department of qualify for approval,program measures,
utility,and clarity of the information to Transportation at the above address. among other things,(1)Must be
be collected;and ways to minimize the Also,you may review public dockets on reasonably consistent with the goals of
burden of the collection of information the Internet at http://d`ms.dot.gov.FAA reducing existing noncompatible land
on respondents,including the use of will respond in writing to all uses around the airport and of
automated collection techniques or substantive,properly submitted preventing the introduction of
other forms of information technology. comments. additional noncompatible land uses; (2)
must not derogate safety or adversely
Issued in Washington,DC,on October 24, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: affect the safe and efficient use of
2006. Questions cor.cerning the public airspace;(3)must not impose an undue
Carla Mauney, comment process should be directed to burden on interstate or foreign
FAA Information Collection Clearance the FAA contact person,Mr.Miles T. commerce;(4)must not be unjustly
Officer,Information Systems and Technology Bennett,Office of Airport Planning and discriminatory or violate other airport
Services Staff,ABA-20. Programming,Planning and grant agreement assurances;and(5)
[FR Doc.06-8972 Filed 10-30-06;8:45 am] Environmental Division,APP-400.Mr. must be consistent with the powers and
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M Bennett can be contacted in writing at responsibilities of the FAA
Federal Aviation Administration,800 Administrator.The FAA must approve
Independence Avenue,SW., NCPs that meet the specified criteria.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Washington,DC 20591,Attn:APP-400; FLL's approved 1989 NCP included an
Federal Aviation Administration or by e-mail at Tom.Bennett®faa.gov;or informal runway use program.Under
via telephone at(202)267-3263.The this runway use program the
[Docket No.FAA-2006-25553] Integrated Noise Model(INM)input northernmost parallel runway at FLL,
data used in preparing the noise Runway 9L/27R,was designated as the
Request for Public Comment on Noise contours is available upon request from "preferred runway"for turbojet
Analysis for Fort Lauderdale- the point of contact. departures and arrivals.FLL has three
Hollywood International Airport, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:This Noise runways,two parallel east-west
Broward County,FL Analysis is separate and independent runways and a crosswind runway
AGENCY:Federal Aviation from the Environmental Impact (generally running from the northwest
Administration(FAA),DOT. Statement(EIS)process initiated by the to the southeast).The northernmost
ACTION:Request for public comments. FAA for a proposed runway project on parallel runway is as noted above;the
January 19,2005. 70 FR 3095 (January southernmost parallel runway is 9R/
SUMMARY:The Federal Aviation 19,2005).The 2004 Map was previously 27L;the crosswind runway is 13/31.
Administration(FAA)is requesting provided for public review during the Pursuant to FAA Order 8400.9,
public comments on a Noise Analysis scoping process for the above EIS.The National Safety and Operational Criteria
that was prepared for the Fort 2005 Map derives from noise analysis for Runway Use Programs,and FAA
Lauderdale-Hollywood International conducted for the above EIS. order 7110.65M,"Air Traffic Control",
Airport(FLL).This Analysis identifies The purpose of this Noise is to notify Pilot/Controller Glossary,a runway use
noise impacts in the areas surrounding Federal,State,local government program is a runway selection plan
FLL during a 12-month period from July agencies,and the public about the designed to enhance noise abatement
2003 to June 2004 and a 12-month availability of the Noise Analysis and efforts.The Air Traffic Service(now
period from April 2005 to March 2006. the opportunity for review and "Air Traffic Operations")administers
63830 Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 210/Tuesday, October 31, 2006/Notices
runway use programs as"Formal"or consists of arrivals,with relatively few day operations.The second map
"Informal."Formal programs are departures.The capacity of the represents the noise conditions at FLL
defined and acknowledged in a Letter of preferred runway is typically not for a 12-month period between April
Understanding between the Office of exceeded during this period.As the day 2005 and March 2006(the 2005 map:
Flight Operations,Air Traffic Service, progresses,the number of air carrier and See http://www.faa.govl
the airport proprietor,and the users. turbojet arrivals progressively increases airports airtraffic/airports/
Once established,participation in a while air carrier and turbojet departures regionalguidance/southern/
formal program is mandatory for aircraft significantly increases and the capacity environmental/media/
operators and pilots as provided for in of 9R/27L may be exceeded.It is at this fll exhib2 2005_baseline.pdfl.Between
14 CFR 91.129(h).An informal runway point that runway 9R/27L is utilized to April 2005 and March 2006,320,400
use program does not require a Letter of alleviate departure and/or arrival annual operations occurred at FLL,
Understanding,and participation in the backlog that runway 9L/27R cannot which constitutes 878 average-annual
program is voluntary for aircraft accommodate.Occasionally,the day operations.A comparison of the two
operators/pilots. crosswind runway must be tactically maps reflects how noise impacts
In 1995,Broward County submitted used to alleviate departure and/or changed between 2004 and 2005,
revised NEMs and a revised NCP for arrival baggage.This permits ATO to including any effect of increasing use of
FLL.The NCP included a reduce the departure/arrival backlog the non-preferred runways during
recommendation to continue the more quickly and allows the airport to periods when demand exceeds the
informal runway use program.FAA return to operating on the parallel capacity of the north parallel runway
approved continuation of the informal runways.Typically,in the latter part of (See http://www.faa.govl
runway use program as a voluntary the day/evening,the air carrier and airports airtraffic/airports/
measure.About 10 years later,by letter turbojet traffic levels off and the regional-guidance/southern/
dated June 23,2005,FAA advised preferred runway is eventually able to environmental/media/
Broward County that air traffic had handle the air carrier and turbojet traffic fll exhib3_2004_2005_baseline.pdfl.
recently increased to levels that demand.As shown in the runway and Each map was generated using FAA's
periodically exceeded the capacity of utilization data described in this Integrated Noise Model(INM)Version
the noise abatement runway,9L/27R, Request for Public Comment,the change 6.1.Inputs to the INM include the
resulting in delays affecting the national in use of runway 13/31 following June runway length and direction,number of
airspace system.FAA announced that 23,2005,has been minor and did not aircraft operations(the landing or take-
the non-preferred runways would change the noise contour.Setting aside off of an aircraft is considered one
experience an increase in use when the the proposed runway development that <,operation")during the period
capacity of the preferred runway was is the subject of the current EIS,FAA evaluated,the types of aircraft flown,
exceeded in the future.The June 23, does not anticipate any major changes the time of day when they were flown,
2005,letter expressly noted that FAA in future runway utilization unless there how frequently each runway was used
was not proposing to change the is a major change at the airport(i.e., for arriving and departing aircraft,the
informal runway use program;however, number of operations,runway routes of flight used to and from the
when demand for the preferred runway characteristics,etc.). runways(flight tracks),and ground
exceeded its capacity,FAA would make This Noise Analysis discloses the runupactivity.The INM calculates
use of all available runways.Prior to noise impacts at FLL during a 12-month y
noise exposure for the area around the
June 23,2005,occasionally Runway-A/ period from July 2003 to June 2004 and
31,and more frequently Runway 9L/ a 12-month period from April 2005 to airport and outputs contours of equal
noise exposure.The same flight tracks
27R,were made available for use by March 2006.The Noise Analysis
turbojet aircraft in some situations.The includes two maps that identify land were used in preparing both maps
because no change in the flight tracks
County specifically agreed to allow use uses in areas surrounding FLL that
of Runway 13/31 when Runway 9L/27R experience noise levels of 65,70 and 75 occurred during the relevant period.
was being resurfaced and to allow use DNL dB or greater.The noise contours Aircraft types and times of operations
of both Runway 13/31 and 9R/27L are superimposed over the land uses. were determined using Official Airline
between three and four hours per year The 2004 and 2005 maps are available Guide(OAG)data,landing fee reports
during air-shows.In addition,Runway on FAA's Web site,as noted below. for the relevant periods,and the
13/31 was used by turbojet aircraft The first map represents the noise Airports Noise and Operations
during aircraft emergencies,crosswind conditions at FLL for the 12-month Management System(ANOMS)data.
conditions,and severe weather period from July 2003 through June The ANOMS data was provided by
conditions.In recent years Runway 9R/ 2004(the 2004 map:See http:// Broward County.
27L has been used for turbojet aircraft www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/ The number of housing units,number
on a limited basis,during peak demand airports/regional-guidance/southern/ of people,and area within each noise
hours. environmental/media/ exposure contour for 2004 is illustrated
Runway use at FLL since June 23, fll exhib1_2004_baseline.pdfl.Between below.This data compiled using parcel
2005,can generally be described as July 2003 and June 2004,304,430 records from the Broward County
follows:In the early part of the day,air annual operations occurred at FLL, property appraiser's office and through
carrier and turbojet traffic primarily which equates to 834 average-annual a review of aerial photography.
Summary units 2004 Multi family Single family Mobile home Total units
65 DNL ............................................................................................................. 11 10 36 57
70 DNL ............................................................................................................. 0 3 0 3
75 DNL ............................................................................................................. 0 0 0 0
65+ ............................................................................................................ 11 13 36 60
Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 210/Tuesday, October 31, 2006/Notices 63831
Summary Population 2004 Multi family Single family Mobile home Total pop
65 DNL............................................................................................................. 29 24 60 113
70 DNL............................................................................................................. 0 9 0 9
75 DNL............................................................................................................. 0 0 0 0
65+ ............................................................................................................ 29 33 60 122
AREA EXPOSED TO VARIOUS NOISE LEVELS (IN SQUARE MILES)
2004 map
Noise level Area on 2004 Area over air- Area over
map port property Atlantic Ocean
65 DNL ......................................................................................................................................... 3.0 0.5 0.4
70-75 DNL................................................................................................................................... 1.3 0.4 0.0
75+DNL....................................................................................................................................... 0.9 0.8 0.0
Total65+DNL ...................................................................................................................... 5.2 1.7 0.4
Source:Landrum&Brown,2004.
Approximately 5.2 square miles are that is over either the airport or the exposure contour for 2005 is illustrated
within the 2004 Maps'65+DNL noise Atlantic Ocean. below.
contour.However,2.1 square miles of The number of housing units,number
of people,and area within each noise
Summary units 2005 Multi family Single family Mobile home Total units
65 DNL ............................................................................................................. 2 2 0 4
70 DNL............................................................................................................. 0 3 0 3
75 DNL ............................................................................................................. 0 0 0 0
65+ ............................................................................................................ 2 5 0 7
Summary Population 2005 Multi family Single family Mobile home Total pop
65 DNL ............................................................................................................. 4 5 0 9
70 DNL ............................................................................................................. 0 9 0 9
75 DNL ............................................................................................................. 0 0 0 0
65+ ............................................................................................................ 4 14 j 0 18
[2005 Map's Noise Contours]
Noise level Area on 2005 Area over air- Area over
map port property Atlantic Ocean
65-70 DNL................................................................................................................................... 2.8 0.6 0.3
70-75 DNL................................................................................................................................... 1.3 0.6 0.0
75+DNL....................................................................................................................................... 0.8 0.7 0.0
Total65+DNL ...................................................................................................................... 4.9 1.9 0.3
Source:Landrum&Brown,2006.
Approximately 4.9 square miles are general aviation category experienced a the 2004 Map to the 2005 Map.The
within the 2005 Map's 65+DNL noise decrease.In addition to the increase in percent of nighttime operations for the
contour.However,2.2 square miles of operations,there was also a change in 2004 Map was approximately 11 percent
that area is over either airport property the fleet mix of the air carrier and while the percentage of nighttime
or the Atlantic Ocean. commute/air taxi categories.The air operations for the 2005 Map decreased
Comparison of 2004 and 2005 Noise carrier fleet experienced a reduction in to approximately 10 percent.
Contours: the older noisier aircraft,such as the Runway Utilization:The runway
727-200(Hushkitted),737-200 utilization at FLL is comparable
Number of Operations and Fleet Mix: (Hushkitted)and the MD90 aircraft,and between the period covered by the 2004
Annual operations increased by 15,970 an increase in newer quieter aircraft, Map and the 2005 Map.The minor
between July 2003 and March 2006, such as Airbus 319,320 and 321 difference in runway utilization
which results in an increase of 44 aircraft.The commute/air taxi agency percentages is within a normal variance
average-annual day operations.This experienced an increase in regional jets for a large airport when comparing data
increase occurred in the air carrier and and turboprop aircraft.The percentage from different time periods.The 2005
commuter/air tai categories,while the of nighttime operations decreased from map reflects increase use of Runway 9R
63832 Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 210/Tuesday, October 31, 2006/Notices
by general aviation jets and commuter utilization percentages reflect an
propeller aircraft.Runway end average annual day.
RUNWAY END UTILIZATION 2004 MAP
[Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport]
Percentage
Runway user group
09L 09R 13 27R 27L 31 Total
Air Carrier/Cargo
Takeoff.
Heavy Jet.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 77.1 0.0 0.5 21.8 0.0 0.6 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 78.4 0.0 0.5 20.4 0.0 0.7 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 74.9 0.0 1.3 23.3 0.0 0.5 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 79.6 0.0 1.0 19.2 0.0 0.2 100
Air Carrier/Cargo
Takeoff.
Large Jet.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 77.6 0.0 0.5 21.4 0.0 0.5 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 78.1 0.0 0.4 20.9 0.0 0.6 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 76.1 0.0 1.6 22.1 0.0 0.2 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 79.3 0.1 0.1 19.3 0.0 0.4 100
Commuter/Air Taxi
Takeoff.
Commuter Jet.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 76.7 0.9 0.6 20.7 0.3 0.8 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 78.5 0.0 0.6 18.4 0.0 2.5 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 73.5 1.9 1.9 21.6 0.5 0.6 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 74.3 0.4 1.5 22.8 0.1 0.9 100
Takeoff.
Commuter Prop.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 57.2 20.0 1.4 12.8 7.0 1.7 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 71.4 1.8 2.5 19.5 0.9 3.9 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 40.2 33.6 3.7 12.7 8.8 1.0 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 70.0 1.7 2.3 25.2 0.8 0.0 100
General Aviation/Military
Takeoff.
General Aviation.
Jet Daytime .............................................................................................. 74.9 1.6 0.6 20.2 1.0 1.7 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 77.8 0.3 0.8 17.5 0.1 3.5 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 71.4 3.2 2.0 22.2 0.9 0.3 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 76.5 0.3 3.2 18.1 0.1 1.8 100
Takeoff.
General Aviation.
PropDaytime ............................................................................................ 52.1 23.0 2.6 10.5 9.1 2.7 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 75.1 0.5 2.7 17.8 0.0 3.9 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 32.1 41.4 2.6 11.0 11.3 1.6 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 1 74.21 0.61 2.1 1 22.1 1 0.3 1 0.7 1 100
Daytime=7:00 a.m.-9:59 p.m.
Nighttime=10:00 p.m.-6:59 a.m.
Source:2003,2004 Airports Noise and Operations Management System(ANOMS)data, Broward County Aviation Department.
RUNWAY END UTILIZATION 2005 MAP
[Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport]
Percentage
Runway user group
09L 09R 13 27R 27L 31 Total
Air Carrier/Cargo
Takeoff.
Heavy Jet.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 77.0 0.0 0.3 23.0 0.0 0.2 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 76.8 0.0 0.1 23.0 0.0 0.1 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 77.5 0.0 0.5 21.9 0.0 0.1 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 77.8 0.0 1.5 20.6 0.0 0.1 100
Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 210/Tuesday, October 31, 2006/Notices 63833
RUNWAY END UTILIZATION 2005 MAP-Continued
[Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport]
Percentage
Runway user group
09L 09R 13 27R 27L 31 Total
Air Carrier/Cargo
Takeoff.
Large Jet.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 78.1 0.0 0.1 21.7 0.0 0.1 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 77.4 0.0 0.2 22.2 0.0 0.2 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 77.5 0.0 0.5 21.9 0.0 0.1 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 77.8 0.0 1.8 20.3 0.0 0.1 100
Commuter/Air Taxi
Takeoff.
Commuter Jet.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 78.1 0.0 0.1 21.7 0.0 0.1 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 77.4 0.0 0.2 22.2 0.0 0.2 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 77.5 0.0 0.5 21.9 0.0 0.1 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 77.8 0.0 1.8 20.3 0.0 0.1 100
Takeoff.
Commuter Prop.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 43.2 34.2 1.6 12.0 8.2 0.8 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 70.9 3.2 2.4 19.6 1.5 2.4 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 25.4 53.3 0.5 19.2 1.5 0.1 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 81.6 0.1 1.5 16.6 0.1 0.1 100
General Aviation/Military
Takeoff.
General Aviation. 66.5 10.4 0.8 16.8 4.7 0.8 100
JetDaytime ............................................................................................... 66.5 10.4 0.8 16.8 4.7 0.8 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 77.7 0.2 1.3 20.1 0.1 0.6 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 58.3 19.9 0.4 14.9 6.4 0.1 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 75.9 0.2 2.8 20.5 0.5 0.1 100
Takeoff.
General Aviation.
PropDaytime ............................................................................................ 47.0 28.5 3.0 9.7 10.0 1.8 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 74.5 4.5 2.0 13.1 0.5 5.4 100
Landing.
Daytime ..................................................................................................... 22.7 56.4 0.4 5.7 14.7 0.1 100
Nighttime ................................................................................................... 79.7 0.3 1.9 17.4 0.6 0.1 100
Daytime_-7:00 a.m.-9:59 p.m.
Nighttime=10:00 p.m.-6:59 a.m.
Source:2005,2006 Airports Noise and Operations Management System(ANOMS)data, Broward County Aviation Department.
Flight Tracks:No change in the flight contours off all runway ends remains area west of the airport,off Runway 9L/
tracks occurred between July 2003 and the same,which is reflective of no 27R,a total of nine(9)mobile homes are
March 2006. significant changes in runway end no longer in the 2005 65 DNL noise
Ground Runup Noise:There was a utilization or flight tracks.The minor contour when compared to the 2004 65
small increase in the number of engine change in the utilization of Runway 13/ DNL dB noise contour.For the area
runups that is reflected in the 2005 31 did not change the noise contour. northwest of the airport,off Runway 13/
Map.This change was in proportion to The two areas where differences in 31,a total of thirty-seven(37)homes
the increase or decrease in the overall the noise contours occur are to the west (consisting twenty-seven(27)mobile
operations of the types of aircraft of the airport,off Runway 9L/27R and homes,two(2)multi-family homes with
performing the runups. to the northwest of the airport,off a total of nine(9)units,and eight(8)
Noise Contours:The 2005 noise Runway 13/31 (See single-family homes)are no longer in
contour is smaller than the 2004 contour http://www.faa.govlairports_ailtrafficl the 2005 65 DNL dB noise contour when
due to the changes in fleet mix and the airports/regional-guidance/southern/
decrease in the percentage of nighttime environmental/media/fll exhibx compared to the 2004 65 DNL dB noise
operations.The shape of the noise _housing-diff 2004_2005.pdf).For the contour.
Summary units difference 2004 and 2005 Multi family Single family Mobile home Total units
65 DNL............................................................................................................. -9 -8 -36 -53
70 DNL............................................................................................................. 0 0 0 0
75 DNL............................................................................................................. 0 0 0 0
65.F. ............................................................................................................ -9 -8 . -36 -53
63834 Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 210/Tuesday, October 31, 2006/Notices
Summary population difference 2004 and 2005 Multi family Single family Mobile home Total pop
65 DNL ............................................................................................................. -25 -19 -60 -104
70 DNL ............................................................................................................. 0 0 0 0
75 DNL............................................................................................................. 0 0 0 0
65. ............................................................................................................ -25 -19 -60 -104
Issued in Washington,DC on October 24, accounts for less than 1 percent of the Commercial ramp expansion(design).
2006. total annual enplanements at Abraham Taxiway A rehabilitation(design).
Steve Kelley, Lincoln Capital Airport. Groove runway 17/35 extension
Manager,Airspace and Procedures,Eastern Brief Description of Projects Approved (design).
Terminal Services,Federal Aviation for Collection and Use: Update airport master plan.
Administration. Fire alarm upgrade terminal building. Decision Date:September 1,2006.
[FR Doc.06-8975 Filed 10-30-06;8:45 am] Replace roof 1 terminal building(freight FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M area). Parks Preston,Atlanta Airports District
Terminal study update. Office,(404)305-7149.
Widen taxiways G and F and construct Public Agency:Metropolitan
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION perimeter road. Nashville Airport Authority,Nashville,
Storm sewer rehabilitation study. Tennessee.
Federal Aviation Administration Storm sewer rehabilitation phase 1. Application Number:06-12—C-00—
Replace perimeter fence,phases 1 and 2. BNA.
Notice of Passenger Facility Charge Decision Date:August 25,2006. Application Type:Impose and use a
(PFC)Approvals and Disapprovals FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PFC.
AGENCY:Federal Aviation Chad Oliver,Chicago Airports District PFC Level:$3.00.
Administration(FAA),DOT. Office,(847)294-7199. Total PFC Revenue Approved in This
Public Agency.City of Eugene, Decision:$21,671,262.
ACTION:Monthly Notice of PFC Oregon. Earliest Charge Effective Date:
Approvals and ,therer were
In Application Number:06-08—C-00— December 1,2009.
September 2006,there were six EUG. Estimated Charge Expiration Date:
applications approved.This notice also Application Type:Impose and use a June 1,2011.
includes information on two PFC. Class of Air Carriers Not Required to
applications,approved in August 2006, PFC Level:$4.50. Collect PFC's:Air taxi/commercial
inadvertently left off the August 2006 Total PFC Revenue Approved in This operators filing FAA Form 1800-31.
notice.Additionally,nine approved Decision:$2,645,000. Determination:Approved.Based on
amendments to previously approved Earliest Charge Effective Date: information contained in the public
applications are listed. March 1,200;. agency's application,the FAA has
Estimated Charge Expiration Date: determined that the approved class
SUMMARY:The FAA publishes a monthly May 1,2009. accounts for less than 1 percent of the
notice,as appropriate,of PFC approvals Classes of Air Carriers Not Required total annual enplanements at Nashville
and disapprovals under the provisions to Collect PFC's:None. International Airport.
of the Aviation Safety and Capacity Brief Description of Projects Approved Brief Description of Projects Approved
Expansion Act of 1990(Title IX of the for Collection and Use: for Collection and Use:
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of Taxiway Echo and A5 reconstruction. Runway 13/31 reconstruction.
1990)(Pub.L. 101-508)and Part 158 of Taxiway Alpha overlay(from A3 to Al). Multi-user flight information display
the Federal Aviation Regulations(14 Jet bridge replacement. system upgrade.
CFR Part 158).This notice is published Snow removal equipment replacement Design of 2L/20R and 2R/20L runway
pursuant to paragraph d of§158.29. vehicle. safety areas.
PFC Applications Approved Decision Date:August 29,2006. Aircraft rescue and firefighting building
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: expansion.
Public Agency:Springfield Airport Wade Bryant,Seattle Airports District Ticketing level canopy extension.
Authority,Springfield,Illinois. Office,(425)227-2659. Retaining wall on taxiways Juliet and
Application Number:06-10—C-00— Public Agency:City of Valdosta, Lima.
SPI. Georgia. Hangar lane access improvements.
Application Type:Impose and use a Application Number:06-08—C-00— General aviation master plan.
PFC. VLD. Loading bridges(four).
PFC Level:$4.50. Application Type:Impose and use a Snow broom.
Total PFC Revenue Approved in This PFC, Master drainage plan/deicing runoff
Decision:$233,000. PFC Level:$3.00. plan.
Earliest Charge Effective Date: Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Lighting upgrade on runways 2L and
November 1,2006. Decision:$12,140. 13/31.
Estimated Charge Expiration Date: Earliest Charge Effective Date: Surface sweeper.
July 1,2007. November 1,2006. Exhibit A property map.
Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Estimated Charge Expiration Date: Airport rotating beacon.
Collect PFC's:On-demand air taxis. January 1,2007. Lightning protection for apron lights.
Determination:Approved.Based on Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Decision Date:September 5,2006.
information contained in the public Collect PFC's:None. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
agency's application,the FAA has Brief Description of Projects Approved Peggy Kelley,Memphis Airports District
determined that the approved class for Collection and Use: Office,(901)322-8186.
W
Ul
.„n t
N g W �
f §
,_... 1`J ' r'' g• m _art
:
V Z a1
s
IA
i #
x
w W
F
P
Z
LOE
s � N
,
' 1
i
a
4 �
44 11 :.Na
s_