HomeMy WebLinkAbout262855 - MINUTES - CRA MINUTES OF MEETING
CITY OF DANIA BEACH
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2011 6:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order/Roll Call
Chairman Flury called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Present:
Chairman: Patricia A. Flury
Vice-Chairman: Bobbie H. Grace
Board Members: Anne Castro
Walter Duke
C. K. "Mac" McElyea
CRA Executive Director: Jeremy Earle
City Attorney: Thomas Ansbro
CRA Secretary: Louise Stilson
2. CRA Updates
Jeremy Earle, CRA Executive Director, discussed the US 1 Landscaping project. He noted there
are issues and some of the business owners want some of the trees moved. Director Earle
requested feedback from the Board.
Board Member Castro commented that the business owners have been complaining about how
dilapidated this corridor is and we have been talking about this for a long time. She further noted
this project has been a challenge due to the infrastructure and we are finally spending millions of
dollars to enhance Federal Highway; therefore, we need to move forward with the plan.
Board Member Castro motioned to continue with the plan; seconded by Vice-Mayor
Grace. The motion carried on the following 4-1 Roll Call vote:
Board Member Castro Yes Vice-Chairman Grace Yes
Board Member Duke Yes Chairman Flury Yes
Board Member McElyea No
3. Presentations
There were no presentations at this meeting.
4. Consent Agenda
4.1 Minutes
Approve minutes of October 5, 2011 CRA Board Meeting
4.2 Revised Merchant Assistance Program Application
Board Member Castro motioned to approve the Consent Agenda; seconded by Vice-
Chairman Grace. The motion carried on the following 5-0 Roll Call vote:
Board Member Castro Yes Vice-Chairman Grace Yes
Board Member Duke Yes Chairman Flury Yes
Board Member McElyea Yes
5. Proposals and Bids
5.1 Sun Garden Isles Bid Acceptance
Director Earle confirmed that the bid amount of$452,714.20 will be funded by the CRA and the
City of Dania Beach.
Board Member Duke motioned to award the Bid for Sun Garden Isles to West
Construction; seconded by Vice-Chairman Grace. The motion carried on the following 5-0
Roll Call vote:
Board Member Castro Yes Vice-Chairman Grace Yes
Board Member Duke Yes Chairman Flury Yes
Board Member McElyea Yes
6. Discussion and Possible Action
6.1 Dania Beach Heights Traffic Circle
Director Earle noted Oscar Bello of Chen Moore and Associates is present, if needed. He asked
the Board for direction on how to proceed with the project.
Chairman Flury commented that she would like to get rid of this project. She added that
currently we do not have the funding and suggested revisiting the issue at a later date.
Board Member Castro commented that half a million dollars is a lot of money for a traffic circle.
She remarked that the original cost from 7-8 years ago was $45,000.00 - $65,000.00. Board
Member Castro stated she cannot support this project; however, she would like to try other
alternatives such as stop signs. She asked City Manager Baldwin to discuss this matter with
Broward County.
Minutes of Regular Meeting 2
Dania Beach Community Redevelopment Agency
Tuesday,November 8,2011 —6:00 p.m.
It was the consensus of the Board to take this project off the list.
6.2 US-1 Phase II Landscape Cost Estimate
Director Earle reviewed the revised cost proposal which is included as an attachment to these
minutes. He noted that the total base cost, with Alternates (1 & 2) is $2.4M. Director Earle
remarked that it is important to remember that these numbers represent a best estimate based on
all the issues that we have encountered during the current construction of Phase I. He indicated
that Public Services Director Orlando believes the City can realize additional savings of
$675 000.00. Director Earle advised that the cost estimate was prepared by the IBI Group.
Board Member Castro questioned some items that could be eliminated.
Jed Hall, IBI Group, advised the utility lines do not have to be done. He further explained the
process and said that the $2.4M amount is the worst case scenario.
Dominic Orlando, Director of Public Services, explained how they saved costs on Phase I of the
project. He noted there are a lot of contingencies in Phase II. Director Orlando indicated that the
Alternates are separate from the lump sum because if the work does not need to be done, the
contractor will not be paid for that specific item. He noted that his savings are in the Alternates;
however, it would still cost $1.7M.
Board Member Duke said we should focus on the landscaping and above ground improvements
at this time.
Director Orlando noted the utility realignment would only need to be done if there is a conflict.
He clarified that not all the utility companies may want to do things the way staff is proposing in
which case we would be responsible for the cost.
Board Member Castro cautioned that we need to contact all the utility companies before we vote
on this item.
Board Member Castro motioned to continue this item for 2 weeks; seconded by Vice-
Chairman Grace. The motion carried on the following 5-0 Roll Call vote:
Board Member Castro Yes Vice-Chairman Grace Yes
Board Member Duke Yes Chairman Flury Yes
Board Member McElyea Yes
Addendum
6.3 RESOLUTION #2011-CRA-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF DANIA BEACH COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ("CRA"), AUTHORIZING THE CRA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO
Minutes of Regular Meeting 3
Dania Beach Community Redevelopment Agency
Tuesday,November 8,2011 —6:00 p.m.
TERMINATE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH DOWNTOWN DANIA BEACH DEVELOPMENT,
LLC; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS;FURTHER, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Director Earle
City Attorney Ansbro read the title of Resolution#2011-CRA-007.
Director Earle read a statement regarding this project which is attached to and incorporated into
these minutes. He advised that to date $7M of public funds have been expended on the Parking
Garage and the new Cul-de-Sac. Director Earle noted that staff has witnessed many of the
unsuccessful attempts by the development team to find financing for the project. He stated that
the current economy is to blame for most of the problems. Director Earle suggested issuing a
new Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the City Center project, and explained the primary
requirements for the new RFQ.
Jamie Cole, Weiss Serota, noted under the agreement the City and the CRA have the right to
terminate the contract without cause,just for convenience, with not less than 7 days notice. He
clarified that there is no default to the agreement.
Michael Moskowitz, Special Counsel to the CRA, explained the consequences to terminating the
development agreement with respect to the $700,000.00 of Redevelopment Capital Program
(RCP) funds obtained through the 7th Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with
Broward County. He advised that the 7th Amendment states that the roadway must be
operational by May 1, 2012. Attorney Moskowitz noted that he has a meeting with the County
next Thursday to discuss the status of the $700,000.00 if the development agreement is
terminated.
Hank Thomas, Downtown Dania Beach Development, LLC, thanked the residents and the City
for the opportunity to work with them. He stated he is opposed to the dissolution of the
development agreement. Mr. Thomas explained: Point 41, he is prepared to develop the
roadway; the only issue is what will happen to his building. The concern is that there is no
parking for his building if the road is built. Point #2, he is in a position to team up with a new
partner who does substantial retail as well as multi-family residential development and has
financing available, for which he is prepared to present documents. He requested that the City
extend the dissolution of his development agreement for 30 days during which time he would
have more specific documentation showing he can bring this project to fruition.
Board Member McElyea agreed to a 30-45 day extension.
Board Member Duke commented we have given this developer a lot of time and he is doubtful
that Mr. Thomas will be successful in obtaining financing in 30 days. He confirmed with Mr.
Thomas that he would lose 50-60 parking spaces if the road is built. Board Member Duke stated
that we have the real estate and the location, we are not going anywhere; the reality is Mr.
Thomas has not been able to obtain financing for this project. He asked the attorneys what
documents we need to see in 30 days in order for the City to feel comfortable that this developer
was able to deliver.
Minutes of Regular Meeting 4
Dania Beach Community Redevelopment Agency
Tuesday,November 8,2011 —6:00 p.m.
Director Earle responded we have given the developer countless opportunities, and would never
recommend a 30 day extension; only to the next Commission meeting. He emphasized that we
have a time certain for when our ILA with the County expires. We need to find developers that
have financing and move the project forward. Director Earle stated he is willing to extend the
termination of the agreement for two weeks, provided it is still dissolved; they look for
financing; and if they do not find financing, something is left on the table for the City of Dania
Beach. He reiterated that we have delayed this project too many times.
Board Member Castro clarified with Mr. Thomas that his partner, Sam Jazayri, is the one who
wants the parking spaces in perpetuity.
Mr. Thomas confirmed for Board Member Castro that Sam Jazayri is prepared to sell his interest
in the property.
Board Member Castro suggested tying the 30 day extension to the $700,000.00 to build the
roadway.
Director Earle noted he could begin to discuss this suggestion with the attorneys.
Board Member Duke motioned to approve Resolution #2011-CRA-007, with 15 days
notice; seconded by Board Member Castro. The motion carried on the following 5-0 Roll
Call vote:
Board Member Castro Yes Vice-Chairman Grace Yes
Board Member Duke Yes Chairman Flury Yes
Board Member McElyea Yes
7. Adjournment
Chairman Flury adjourned the meeting at 6:57 p.m.
ATTEST: COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
LOUISE STILSON, CMC PATRICIA A. FLURY
CRA SECRETARY CHAIRMAN—CRA
Approved: December 7, 2011
DM M BEACH
cow"I"
Minutes of Regular Meeting 5
Dania Beach Community Redevelopment Agency
Tuesday,November 8,2011 —6:00 p.m.
Dissolution of City Center Project
Good evening CRA Board members,
As you are aware, the decision to place the addendum for the dissolution of the
Developers Agreement between Downtown Dania Beach Development LLC., and the
City of Dania Beach has not been taken lightly.
As you all will recall it was during the worst of the market crash in 2008-2009 that we
issued an RFQ for development of our new City Center, which at the time was to include,
residential,retail, commercial, a new city hall and a new parking garage. We received 7
respondents and the CRA Board chose The Greenhill Development Company as the
winner.
The Greenhill Development Companywent on to enter into an agreement with the City
g h'
of Dania Beach as Downtown Dania Beach Development LLC., for the project. The
Developers Agreement was executed exactly two years ago this month. During the two
years since award of the project the CRA with the assistance of the developer
accomplished all of the public sector improvements that were contemplated as a part of
the agreement with the exception of the roadway from Federal Highway to the City
Center. This means that almost $7 million of public funds have been spent so far on the
parking garage and the new cul du sac.
Over the past two years and, unlike many in the community you have all been privy to
countless unsuccessful attempts by the development team to find financing for even a
small non-public sector component of the project. I along with our attorneys have sat
down with numerous potential partners of the development team and their attorneys and
have been witness to such efforts as the mad dash to get Recovery Bond Financing and
the potential creation of an EB-5 area.
I hope that we all fully understand that we have been trying to do the seemingly
impossible during the worst economy since the Great Depression. And it is that economy
that we can blame for most of the financing issues that we have encountered. As you all
know, banks as rule for example were making it extremely difficult to get financing.
Again, this has been an extremely difficult decision to make, and it is by no means
personal towards any member of the development team. Our attempts to move our city
forward, improve the quality of life for our residents and increase the tax base by
encouraging business development are always at the forefront of my mind on a daily
basis.
In light of the many unsuccessful attempts by the development team and their partners to
get financing for the project, I believe that it is in our best interest to move forward and
issue a new RFQ for the City Center Project, minus the hotel component which we do not
control.
This RFQ would be issued in approximately a week and would have at a least a 30 day
period of time in which developers would be able to respond. The primary requirements
of the plan would be:
1. A demonstrated ability to write a check for$15 million dollars towards the
project
2. Extensive development experience and access to additional capital.
A selection committee led by Michael Cannon of Integra Realty Resources would fully
vet all of the respondents.
It is important to note here that this new RFQ would be open to anyone including the
current development team.
This issue of the dissolution of the developer's agreement and its ramifications are so
important that I have asked both of our CRA Special Counsels to be here.
I will first ask Jamie Cole to speak and then I will ask Mike Moskowitz to speak about
the $700,000.
-------------
100W.Dania Beach Wd.
Dania Reach,Fbrida 33004
DANIA.BEACH tel(954)924-Ml
Fax(9"921-2f64
www.D@niaReachCfVLa%
Memo
To: CRA Board
From: Jeremy Earle,Executive Director,Dania Beach CRA
CC:
Date: 11/8/2011
Re: US-1 Phase II Revised Opinion of Probably Cost
Greetings CRA Board members,
Attached is a revised Opinion of Probable Cost(OPC) for the US-1 Phase II Project. Below is the breakdown.
1. Base bid estimate-$1,050,063
2. Add Alternate 1 (Utility Realignment)-$599,787
3. Add Alternate 2(6"Water Main Replacement)-$769,876
4. Total including base cost and add alternates(1 &2)-$2,419,726
It is important to remember that these numbers represent a best estimate based on all of the issues that we have
encountered the field during the current construction of Phase I landscaping Improvements.
Mr. Orlando, the Public Services Director has reviewed the OPC and believes that the city should be able to realize
additional savings of at least $535,362 on the water and utilities and $140,000 on the landscaping (based on unit prices)
for a total of approximately$675,362
This item is on the agenda for your discussion and direction.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Best,
Jeremy Earle,ASLA,AICP
Executive Director
Dania Beach Community Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT NAME: Dania Beach US-] ROW Landscape Improvements
IBI IBI PROJECT NO.: 27133
GROUP DATE: November 3,2011
PROJECT PHASE: Phase 2(Sheridan St-Stirling Rd)-Bid Set
®pinion of Probable Cost
Item No. Item Quantity Unit Price Subtotal Description
A General Cop0j#06s =
1. Mobilization&Staging 2.0% lump sum $15,967 $15,967 Of construction sub-total
2. Maintanence of Traffic 5.0% lump sum $39,917 $39,917 Of construction sub-total;incl.design
3. As-built drawings 1.5% lump sum $11.975 $11,975 Of construction sub-total
4. Bonds&Insurance 1.5% lump sum $11,975 $11,975 Of construction sub-total
5. Video Documentation 0.5% lump sum $3,992 $3,992 Of construction sub-total
6. Locates,Testing&Quality Control 1.0% lump sum $7,983 $7,983 Of construction sub-total
7. Permits, Inspections,etc... 1.0% lump sum $20,939 $20,939 Of construction sub-total+ Impact Fee
8. Under round Survey Soft Digs) 1.5% lump sum $11,975 $11,975 Of construction sub-total
9. Erosion control 0.25% lump sum $1,996 $1,996 Curb inlet grotectiw get FDOT
General Conditions S • • . 1
1. Clearing&grubbing 12,590 s ft $0.50 $6,295 Per FDOT spec section 110
2. Concrete curb 51 1 If $5.00 $254 Sawcut,remove,&dispose
3. Concrete pavement&base 7,469 1 s ft 1 $2.001 $14,938 Sawcut,remove,&dispose
4. Lar a shade trees 0I each $500.00 $0 Demolish&remove;includin -stump
-
Demolition
AW
1. Fine grading 20,059 s ft $0.30 $6,018 All landscape verges
2. Type"F"concrete curb 51 If $18.00 $915 Per FDOT index 300
3. 4"Concrete Sidewalk 205 sgft $4.50 $921 4"Thick:per FDOT index 310
4. 6"Concrete pavement 0 s ft $5.00 $0 6"Thick;per FDOT index 310
4. Type B stabalization 205 s ft $1.50 $307 FDOT section 160 for sidewalk
6. Asphalt overlay restoration 1.4 tons $260.00 $367 FDOT spec section 300-337
7. Bituminous aggregate base 2 tons $260.00 $551 FDOT spec section 300-337
8. A29regate base 2 tons $50.00 $106 FDOT spec section 901-916
9. 12"Type B stabalization 76 s ft $2.00 $153 FDOT section 160&911 for roadway
10. Export of CUS(prepared soil layer) 371 cud $18.00 $6,686 FDOT sec. 162;excavate&di pose
11. Soil Amendment&Backfill 371 cud $28.00 $10,401 Inc.transit,material.till&grade
12. Ex ort of surplus soil tree pits 107 cud $18.00 $1,9311 Surplus from tree planting pit
13. Tree rate 3 each $800.001 $2,4001 Ironsmith model 4848 w/M480OF-2
1. Cocos nucifera'Ma an' 7 each $1,050.00 $7,350 18'OA;8.5'CT MIN.
2. Cocos nucifera'Ma pan' 20 each $1,125.00 $22,500 22'OA;8.5'CT MIN.
3. Dict os erma album 18 each $630.00 $11,340 12'OA,8.5'CT MIN.
4. Dict os erma album 33 each $720.00 $23,760 14'OA;8.5'CT MIN.
5. Dict os erma album 31 each $810.00 $25,110 16'OA;8.5'CT MIN.
6. Dict os erma album 13 each $900.00 $11,700 18'OA,8.5'CT MIN.
7. Dypsis lastelliana 19 each $472.50 $8,978 12'OA;8.5'CT MIN.
8. Dypsis lastelliana 33 each $540.00 $17,820 14'OA;8.5'CT MIN.
9. D psis lastelliana 32 each $810.00 $25,920 16'OA;8.5'CT MIN.
10. Dypsis lastelliana 13 each $900.00 $11,700 18'OA;8.5'CT MIN.
11. La erstroemia indica'Muskogee' 0 each $618.75 $0 17-18'OA;8.5'STANDARD
12. La erstroemia indica'Tuscarora' 5 each $637.50 $3,188 17-18'OA;8.5'STANDARD
13. Phoenix dact lifera'Med ool' 13 each $5,000.00 $65,000 13'CT;full head
14. Bulnesia arborea 2 each $480.00 $960 17-18'OA;8.5'STANDARD
15. Thrinax radiata 3 each $1,560.00 $4,680 12'OA; 10'CT MIN.
16. Thrinax radiata 10 each $1,820.00 $18,200 14'OA, 10'CT MIN.
17, Thrinax radiata 6 each $2,340.00 $14,040 16'OA;10'CT MIN.
18. Thrinax radiata 0 each $2,632.50 $0 18'OA; 10'CT MIN.
19. Tradescantia vi iniana 414 each $5.00 $2,070 1 al.; 12"tall;full
20. Mulch 63 cud $50.00 $3,128 3"of Florimulch
20.1 Turf rass 1 11972 1 s ft $0.601 $7,183 Solid Sod
PROJECT NAME: Dania Beach US-1 ROW Landscape Improvements
IBI IBI PROJECT NO.: 27133
cRouP DATE: November 3,2011
PROJECT PHASE: Phase 2(Sheridan St-Stirling Rd)-Bid Set
Opinion of Probable Cost
Item No. Item Quantity Unit Price Subtotal Description
1. 4"HDPE DR 11 HDD Mainline 5230 If $28.00 $146,440 PE 3608/3408 IPS-Reclaim
2. 3"HDPE DR 11 HDD Mainline 230 If $25.00 $5,750 PE 3608/3408 IPS-Reclaim
3. 1"HDPE DR 11 HDD Cable 2285 If $5.00 $11,425 PE 3608/3408 IPS
4. 3"HDPE DR 11 HDD Lateral 5950 If $25.00 $148,750 PE 3608/3408 IPS-Reclaim
5. 2"HDPE DR 11 HDD Lateral 2275 If $18.00 $40,950 PE 3608/3408 IPS-Reclaim
6. 6"HDPE DR 11 HDD Sleeve 290 If $25.00 $7,250 PE 3608/3408 IPS
7. 4"HDPE DR 11 HDD Sleeve 40 If $22.00 $880 PE 3608/3408 IPS
8. 2"HDPE DR 11 HDD Sleeve 360 If $15.00 $5,400 PE 3608/3408 IPS
9. 4"PVC CL 200 Mainline 30 If $4.00 $120 Pantone Purple 522C incl.fittings
10. 3"PVC CL 200 Mainline 105 If $3.50 $368 Pantone Purple 522C incl.fittings
11. 2 1/2"PVC CL 200 Mainline 335 If $3.25 $1,089 Pantone Purple 522C incl.fittings
12. 3"PVC CL 200 Lateral 40 If $2.50 $100 Pantone Purple 522C,solvent weld
13. 1 1/2"PVC CL 200 Lateral 15 If $2.25 $34 Pantone Purple 522C,solvent weld
14. 1 114"PVC CL 200 Lateral 80 If $2.25 $180 Pantone Purple 522C,solvent weld
15. 1"PVC CL 200 Lateral 620 If $1.75 $1,085 Pantone Purple 522C,solvent weld
16. 3/4"PVC CL 200 Lateral 4575 If $1.50 $6,863 Pantone Purple 522C,solvent weld
17. RainBird 1800 s ra head 509 each 1 $22.00 $11,198 Reclaim nozzle& 5' 1/2"Funny pipe
18. RainBird 1402 bubbler 510 each $16.00 $8,160 Reclaim nozzle& 5 112"Funny pipe
19. 200-PESB-R Control Valve&Box 7 each $325.00 $2,275 Reclaim nozzle& 5 1/2"Funny e
20. FD-101 Single Address Decoder 3 each $175.00 $525 Valve Box
21. FD-102 Two Address Decoder 4 each $250.00 $1,000 Valve Box
22. SP-201 Turf Sensor Decoder 3 each $200.00 $600
23. 4"Gate Valve&Pie Restriant 3 each 1 $600.00 $1,800 Valve Box
24. 3"Gate Valve&Pie Restriant 1 each $500.00 $500 Valve Box
25. 2 1/2"Gate Valve&Pipe Restriant 3 each $450.00 $1,350 Valve Box
26. Bermad 4415 Air Release Valve 3 each $350.00 $1,050 Valve Box
27. Rainbird FS200P 2"Flow Sensor 3 each $500.00 $1,500 Valve Box
28. Rainbird ESP-50 LXD w/IQ V2.0 1 each $8,000.00 $8,000 LXMMPED-cell comm&Rain Sensor
29. Rainbird Maxi-Cable 14-2 OF 2580 each 1 $2.00 $5,160 Double jacketed w/wire connectors
30. Rainbird LSP-1 Turf Sure Protect. 3 each $300.00 $900 Ground rod&Valve box
31. 4"Harco HDPE to PVC Transition 8 each $500.00 $4,000 Full assembly
32. 3"Harco HDPE to PVC Transition 11 each $475.00 $5,225 Full assembly
33. 4"x2"Saddle HDPE w/FIPT Outlet 2 each $300.00 $600 Harco 804801-14
34. 3"x1 1/2"Saddle HDPE w/FIPT Out 3 each $250.00 $750 Harco 803801-14
35. 3"x1 1/4"Saddle HDPE w/FIPT Out 4 each $250.00 $1,000 Harco 803801-14
36. 3"x1"Saddle HDPE w/FIPT Outlet 69 each $200.00 $13,800 Harco 803801-14
37. 2"x1"Saddle HDPE w/FIPT Outlet 28 each $200.00 $5,600 Harco 801801-12
38. 2"Water Meter,Tap&Restoration 1 each $3,000.00 $3,000 Per City of Dania Beach
39. 2"Backflow Preventer&Vault 1 each $2,000.00 $2,000 Per local code;Underground install
40. Electrical 120V Single Phase Drop 1 each $4,000.00 $4,000 Electrical supply and Breaker
41. 3"Mainline Connection 1 each $800.00 $800
Irrigation Subtotal $461,476
Construction Subtotal ••
,343
1. Construction Contingency 1 lump sum $100,000.001 $100,000
2. Concrete Sidewalk Conti enc 1 lum sum $25,000.00 $25,000
Allowances Subtotal •ti
Project • 1 • •.3 (gc, const,
2 of 3
T PROJECT NAME: Dania Beach US-1 ROW Landscape Improvements
IBl IBI PROJECT NO,: 27133
r6Mf�t'P DATE: November 3,201 1
PROJECT PHASE: Phase 2(Sheridan St-Stirling Rd)-Bid Set
®pinion of Probable Cost
Item No. Item Quantity Unit Price Subtotal Descri tion
1. 2"Electric&Conduit(120 Service) 5275 If $26.00 $137,150 Boring HDD &Pull wiring East
2. Street Light Connections 29 each $2,300.00 $66,700 Rewire&Connect Lights East
1Electric&Conduit(West side) 2556 If $26.00 $66,456 Borin HDD &Pull wirin West
4. 2"PE C901 Water Line 1425 If $30.00 $42,750 PE Pie Replace;Cut&Patch Method
5. Water Service Connection 13 each $2,000.00 $26,000 Tap,Connection,Meter&Box
6. Water Meter Impact fees 13 each $3,893.00 $50,609 1"Water Meter
7. 4"Steel Gas Line 2022 If $40.00 $80,880 Subcontract Teco;To install deeper
8. 1"Steel Gas Line 290 If $35.00 $10,150 Subcontract Teco;To install deeper
9. Maintanence of Traffic(MOT) 1 lump sum 4.00% $19,228 Additional MOT
10. As-built drawings 1 lump sum 2.00%1 $9,614
11.1 Permits,Inspections,etc... 1 I lump sum 2.50%1 $12,017
12.1 Construction Continqency 1 lum sum 15.00%1 $78,233
r.. Subtotal -:i n
1. Water Main Design 1 each $15,000.00 $15,000
2. Water Main CA Services 1 each $12,000.00 $12,000
3. Water Main Regulatory Permitting 1 each $20,000.00 $20,000 May not be necessary
4. Water Main Construction 1 each $487,468.00 $487,468 C900,service connections,hydrants
5. Water Meter Impact Fees 16 each $3,893.00 $62,288
9. Permits, Inspections,etc... 1 lump sum 2.50% $12,187
6. Mobilization 1 lump sum 2.50% $12,187 Tap,Connection,Meter&Box
7. Maintanence of Traffic(MOT) 1 lump sum 8.00% $38,997 Additional MOT
8. As-built drawings 1 lump sum 2.00% $9,749
10. Construction Contingency 1 lump sum 20.00% $100,000
Add-Alternates
Base-Bid & • •• Total
he IMI Gmup,Inc.has no control over the cost of labor,materials,or equipment,the Contractors method of dder nmang prices or competitive bidding or market conditions.Therefore,our opinions of probable mm uetion costs provided for herein are made on the
azis of experience and represent our best judgment as Landscape Architects familiar with the omanuction industry.The firm cannot and does not guarantee that proposals,bids or the comtruction cost will not vary from our opimom of probable costs.If the Owner
fishes greater assurances as to the commuct-cost,we recommend the employment of an independent cost estimator.
3of3
9 CN k 2 $ \
7 \ cy K $ %
�
E .
/
k. @ / �
q 2 7 / 2
§
�� £ § /
CX
t
/ k q § /
o
i 3 o / k
@ o E 2 Q.) §
2 o u t4
k CL
aj aj � / %
o % / / a
» E C \ o13
2 � C3 o ' @
q : w k B
% C rn q o
/ § / / § : � o . \
f 2 0 q R %
kc 0 m 'I / o o \
aj q / E k �
v % k § t4V). vl� kru t4 b k t4 t4 �
7 �
k k \
# � � co
m ui m m.� / 66
§ � f a CA CA
E 41 g \3 /
Q
66 § co s C \ / / O O
o § o C t aj t t \
g ° c 2 M M c
x k z c c c c
CfC : 3k / / / u
E o
k2 a / V) V)
r
�' N
N �
�`
� �
Vf
�f
C
O
H
a
+�
e
a,
a
.,,
c
��..
r`
�,