HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2018-055 Authorization to award contract to Bermello Ajamil & Partners for Parks and Recreation Department Ten Year Master Plan (RFP NO. 18-003) RESOLUTION NO.2018-055
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY DANIA
BEACH, FLORIDA PERTAINING TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT TEN YEAR MASTER PLAN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
(RFP NO. 18-003) BID REVIEW COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND CITY
COMMISSION AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO
BERMELLO AJAMIL & PARTNERS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS;
FURTHER, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission authorized the advertisement for the Parks and
Recreation Ten Year Master Plan on January 9, 2018 per Resolution No. 2018-005; and
WHEREAS, the City issued Request for Proposal No. 18-003 on February 23, 2018; and
WHEREAS, on March 16, 2018 the City received two responses to the RFP, one was
submitted by Bermello Ajamil & Partners and the second response was submitted by Miller
Legg; and
WHEREAS; the Bid Review Committee, comprised by City staff from the Parks and
Recreation Department and the Finance Department met on March 23, 2018 and held a second
review meeting on March 28, 2018.; and
WHEREAS, the Bid Committee reviewed and ranked both responses, a copy of the
ranking sheets are attached as Exhibit "A", which is incorporated into this Resolution by this
reference; and
WHEREAS, the Committee determined that both submittals had met the minimum
requirements set forth in RFP No. 18-003 and scored the two submittals as follows:
Bermello Ajamil &Partners 277 Total Points; and
Miller Legg 328 Total Points; and
WHEREAS, it is recommended that the City Commission consider both proposals and
select the preferred firm;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DANIA BEACH, FLORIDA,AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above "Whereas" clauses are ratified and confirmed as being true
and correct, and they are made a part of and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.
Section 2. That the City Manager recommends that the City Commission select the
firm that is preferred to perform the services and the City Commission grants authorization to the
City to award a contract to Bermello Ajamil & Partners.
Section 3. That the proper City officials are authorized to execute an agreement with
the selected firm and the City Manager and the City Attorney are authorized to make minor
revisions to such documents as are deemed necessary and proper for the best interest of the City.
Section 4. That all resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict with this Resolution
are repealed to the extent of such conflict.
Section 5. That this Resolution shall be in full force and take effect immediately
upon its passage and adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED on April 10, 2018.
ATTEST: e�`o�p�s x
f LOUISE STILSON, CM C T ARA J ES
CITY CLERK . MAYOR
ATED 1`�'
APPROVED S TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
e
THO AS J. S O
CITY ATTO EY
2 RESOLUTION#2018-055
k
1
SUMMARY TABULATION SHEET
s
t
RFP NAME: Parks&Recreation Department Ten(10)Year Master Plan
RFP NO: 18-003
Date: 3/28/2018
1
s
Bermello Miller Legg
Committee Members Total Score Total Score 3
Mark Felicetty 98 100
Rafael Acosta 83 93
Mark Jensen 96 100
Hakeem Ismail 0 35
Combined Total Score 277 328
Y
1
G
C�
5y�
F
kj{
Y
IV
q$6
9
3
d
yE
3
9
i
i
I
t
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE SHEET i
RFP NAME: r rki ar-py y 7 wN j��q,1 l0 1 w /�t�C7rA Plan
RFP NO:
t
Date:
d
i
d
4
p
Bermello
Ajamil& Miller Legg
Selection Criteria
Partners
1.Resources and Capabilities Maximum 20 points 0
a.Qualifications and expertise related to municipal government
b.Organizational capacity to complete project on schedule and within budget
2.Staffing and Organization Maximum 20points) 41Q
a.Capability of key personnel '
b.Experience of key personnel(minimum 2 years)
c.Qualifications of key personnel
d.Understanding of overall needs of the city
3.Relevant Project Ex erience(Maximum 40points) Q L7
a. Experience with similar projects
I
4.References Maximum 20 points o Q fi
a.Past performance
Subtotall 1 19 1 100 1
E
F
{
Comments:
Evaluator:
Name: r
Signature:
Date: _jam_
OF
I
(
1
s
r
i
:
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE SHEET •�
RFP NAME: a
N
RFP NO: K& g
Date• ,
I3ermetlo
Ajamil& Miller Legg
Selection Criteria
Partners
1.Resources and Capabilities Maximum 24points)
a.Qualifications and expertise related to municipal government
b.Organizational capacity to complete project on schedule and within budget
2.Staffins and Organimlon Maximum 20points)
a.Capability of key personnel
b.Experience of key
y personnel(minimum 2 yearn
c.Qualifications of key personnel 5 .5
d.Understanding of overall needs of the city
3.Relevant Pro rlence Maximum 40 nts
a.Experience with similar projects
4.References Maximum 20 pointsl
a.Past performance O !
subtotal
c
Comments: l
i
4
6
Evaluator.
Name: "A
Signature: J
Date:
1
I
i
's
E
S
4
3
e
i
I
t
s
s
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE SHEET
RFP NAME: e,
4
RFP NO:
i
Hate:
I
t
Bermello
Ajamil& Miller Legg
Selection Criteria
Partners
(
1.Resources and Ca b 101i M6xit"11 it i
75ZT77J
a.Qualifications and expertise related to municipal government
b.Organizational capacity to complete project on schedule and within budget
2 Staffing a»dirganlza#oi iillaxnUrxi 2:f2 ants}
a.Capability of key personnel
b.Experience of key
y personnel(minimum 2 years)
c.Qualifications of key personnel
h
d. Understanding of overall needs of the city
3:Relevant;,�r+a e� ri�nci� Maximuuii:4Q :arts , � = 'i
a. Experience with similar projects
4.Rafirenc+e (Maximum 2D hits} . ,
a. Past performance
subtotal
o.
Comments:
a
Evaluator:
Name:
MAa�L 3-64 s6,A)
Signature: W ` J
Date: .3
(
r
I
i
4
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE SHEET
s
RFP NAME:
k
RFP NO:
Date:
Bermeilo
Ajamil>� Miller Legg
Selection Criteria
Partners
1.Resources and EWbilitles(Maximum 20 polnts 1 2 i
a.Qualifications and expertise related to municipal government
b.Organizational capacity to complete project on schedule and within budget
2.Staffing and Organization Maximum 20points)
a.Capability of key personnel
b. Experience of key personnel(minimum 2 years)
c.Qualifications of key personnel I
d.Understanding of overall needs of the city
3.Relevant Project E fence Maximum 40points)
a.Experience with similar projects
4.References Maximum 20points)
a. as performance
Subtotal
Comments:
i
i
Evaluator:
Name: W,,� k✓1+4 t E
Signature:
t
Date:
I
5
h